Slashdot Mirror


Man Pays $200,000 To Save Fake Online Girlfriend

An anonymous reader writes "A 48-year-old Illinois man has experienced an online scam that was particularly devastating, both financially and emotionally. A woman he believed to be his online girlfriend turned out to be a fake, and his money has disappeared with her. The scam was recently revealed because he went to the police asking for help to rescue the woman, insisting that she had been kidnapped in London. The online 'relationship' between the two began over two years ago, during which he wired about $200,000 to several different bank accounts in Nigeria, Malaysia, England, and the US."

464 comments

  1. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dumbass

    1. Re:Dumbass by ZosX · · Score: 1

      +4 insightful? It took insight to come to this conclusion? :P

    2. Re:Dumbass by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 1

      without a doubt.
      but it still made me feel a little sad. he was trying to help someone he thought was in trouble.

    3. Re:Dumbass by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      In this case, it's not pronounced: doo-mahs.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:Dumbass by bernywork · · Score: 1

      I take it this is a Shawshank Redemption reference?

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    5. Re:Dumbass by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Don't know about that; never saw that movie.

      I got this from some advertisement for something or other (not good advertising if I don't remember the product).

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    6. Re:Dumbass by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      I need more money, and I want to be in a relationship.

      Problem solved!

    7. Re:Dumbass by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I guess, but it's a mere pittance compared to what (the estate of) Hugh Hefner will end up paying for fake companionship. Loneliness is apparently a very powerful force.

    8. Re:Dumbass by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I can't mod you up any more than you already are, so allow me to applaud you. I clicked the story intending to post the very same message.

    9. Re:Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just can't fix stupid

    10. Re:Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded, that guy deserved to lose that money. Stupid, stupid man. Maybe he'll get a clue for next time eh?

    11. Re:Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know man it happened to me too.

    12. Re:Dumbass by meglon · · Score: 1

      Obviously way off topic, but The Shawshank Redemption is an incredibly good movie I highly recommend seeing. I'm not much of a Tim Robbins fan normally, but watch the movie sometime, it's well worth the time spent.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    13. Re:Dumbass by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Hey, some AC's get mod points, other people lose $200,000.

      The former is no more unbelievable than the latter :-)

    14. Re:Dumbass by kyrio · · Score: 1

      If he really thought any of it was real, he was truly a dumbass.

  2. Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Afforess · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why didn't he check that she was a real person. Would have cost less than 200k.

    Darwinism at work folks. Move along, nothing to see here.

    --
    If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    1. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no enought 4chan memes to explain how alone this guy is right now.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    2. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tits or GTFO would have saved him from all this, you know...

    3. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, because there is just NO way someone could find a random picture of tits online...

    4. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Upaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some people get to wrapped up in the fantasy. The hope of love, easy riches, these both speak to a deep need in many of us.

      A friend of mine once got engaged and moved the Scotland (from Massachusetts in the USA) for her Everquest sweetheart. Never having communicated with him in any way but online.

      Now they didn't last more than a couple years, but it shows there are quite a few that never really alive in their own skin, and the prospect of making new friends in person causes stress and panic. But the need to connect is still there.

      Personally, I feel for him even greater sympathy than those that lose their savings in a 419 scam; one has a core of inherent dishonesty -playing off ones greed for a quick payoff. This played off his need for companionship, and as he invested years, and thousands, into it, it wasn't for any form of payoff. Just to connect.

      --
      3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    5. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webcam.

    6. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gee lucky time stamps can't be easily edited...oh wait.

    7. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Trails · · Score: 2

      Sounds painful for the lady.

    8. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      And he didn't get a lap dance out of it!

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    9. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Seumas · · Score: 2

      I don't get the "online girlfriend" part. In other words, "an online acquaintance".

      Anyway, "online" has little to do with it. I knew a girl who had a couple relationships which were entirely founded around her bilking somewhat older guys out of money and eventually breaking up and disappearing. The simple answer is not suspect everyone and don't fall for every fucking snatch that crosses your path and you'll have a lot more time, money, and sanity to enjoy your life with. (Not that I don't still feel some sympathy for guys like that, since they're ultimately the victim, regardless).

    10. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by DerKlempner · · Score: 0

      Evidently, there's also not enough spellcheck programs to help you, either.

      --
      UNIX: Find it, fsck it, forget it.
    11. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine how trippy it would be to lick time stamps!

      And can you use them to send postcards back in time?

    12. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      maybe the scammer actually was a woman?

    13. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your friend, she's single now? Is she hawt?

    14. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by grub · · Score: 1


      Why didn't he check that she was a real person. Would have cost less than 200k.

      Indeed. One "Sharpie in pooper" request would have caused their scam to fall apart.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    15. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      My dog ate it.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    16. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people get to wrapped up in the fantasy

      Which is why cartoon porn is a special category. No matter how much you may like a cartoon character, you know it's still fantasy and that nothing in this universe* will ever make it so that you can be with her.

      * if you have any information to prove otherwise, please say so!

    17. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Tits or GTFO would have saved him from all this, you know...

      What about fake tits, or fake fake tits!

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    18. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, a simple Skype call with webcam, MSN, Yahoo, anything, would have been better than this.

      I know from personal experience, i certainly found out the girl i was dating online was real before i let anything continue.
      Lasted a few years before she eventually gave up on it and life in general, at which point i gave up caring period.

      Online dating, it is hit or miss. In this case for our good friend, it was just outright-failed.

    19. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by atrain728 · · Score: 2

      Russia.

    20. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tits or GTFO would have saved him from all this, you know..."

      A catalog pic of a Real Doll would probably suffice :)

    21. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Darwinism unless he dies before managing to reproduce.

    22. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Gilmoure · · Score: 2

      And this is where being poor, ugly, and having a small schwartz comes in handy?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    23. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      There is no enought 4chan memes to explain how alone this guy is right now.

      Personally, I'd use this Homestuck meme for that

    24. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the fall of EverQuest what else did they have. WOW? Yeah right! Hold on PS2 version of EverQuest can't find a server.

    25. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Alyred · · Score: 1

      It's not Darwinism unless he dies before managing to reproduce.

      I'd say there's likely a good chance of that now, being (likely) penniless and without a girlfriend...

    26. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just a flavor of 419; at least the perps are the same people. I work against that stuff for a living; most of these "girlfriends" are actually Nigerian males, I think he's gonna feel even worse.

      I do feel sorry for him, but...

    27. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by $0.02 · · Score: 2

      A real woman may cost you well over 200k.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    28. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless this somehow prevents him from fathering any more children, this isn't remotely close to Darwinism.

    29. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's not Darwinism unless he dies before managing to reproduce.

      I'd say there's likely a good chance of that now, being (likely) penniless and without a girlfriend...

      Brian Griffin combs his hair in front of the mirror, then unexpectedly messes it up.. "Yeah, that's a bed head, yeah. Hey, look at you, you just got out of bed. You're the underachiever every woman wants to sleep with."

    30. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Why didn't he check that she was a real person. Would have cost less than 200k.

      Darwinism at work folks. Move along, nothing to see here.

      This is why I fully blame the victims of serial murderers. If you are stupid enough to get killed by a serial killer, it is Darwinism at work.

    31. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You can become a cartoon yourself?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    32. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "Some"? It's pretty much the rule for our species - look at the plethora of belief systems (and countless more which didn't survive), for just one example; large group of cognitive biases, for another - ...and one which was certainly quite adaptive. Most likely still is.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    33. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... is that a cry for help?

    34. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      One may assume the older guys at least got some nookie and generic intimacy out of it; whereas this "online girlfriend" might not even be female for all the sap knows.

      Some people are way too much into the whole "our love is pure" crap that hollywood and the religious shovel around wholesale. Nothing wrong with nookie, it's a wholesome, not to mention necessary part of a good relationship and of life in general.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    35. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this different from real porn?

    36. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by stub667 · · Score: 1

      Same result if she was real, although the online angle is relatively new. People who have had bad relationships (or no relationships) commonly cling to the first person they find who they think wants to be with them, and are commonly fleeced, often legally. I'm pretty sure when you hear the term 'golddigger' you don't think of some dude down a mine shaft. People have been marrying Vegas strippers and Thai bargirls and Russian mail order brides for decades and will continue to do so. People have been marrying elderly widows for centuries.

      It all comes down to trust being an essential component to a serious relationship. Once a con has gained that trust, the victim has lost.

    37. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by lxs · · Score: 1

      Granddad get off the computer.

    38. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was a real person.

      like you never met a gold digger...

    39. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you are joking or not but assuming you aren't, your example is Darwinism at work.

      The ones that survive are the ones who meet a person or get into an environment, realise something is wrong with either the person or the situation, if only at a gut level, and turn back, either in terms of a relationship or more physically moving out of the environment, away from that place where the nutter has a chance to kill them.

      Admittedly, if the nutter is anywhere close to being good, the chance of realising something is wrong in time to be able to do something about it is probably very small but there is a chance. In fact I would guess the survivers never even know they are in danger because they never got to that point where the nutter was able to carry out any actions.

      The alternative is that a serial killer is the absolute perfect hunter, killing 100% of their intended targets.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    40. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee lucky I know about TinEye, how to check for EXIF and I've seen a few shoops in my day. Pixels, etc...

    41. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You are merely saying in a long winded way that the victim is always to blame. Perhaps you would change your mind if you had been the subject of a vicious random rape/mugging/beating.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    42. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by darjen · · Score: 1

      Good point. This guy could have lost a lot more had he gotten a traditional marriage and divorce in the USA.

    43. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      No I'm not, the attacker is always to blame, without his actions that critical moment would never happen at all regardless of the victims actions or lack of actions.

      What I'm saying is that victims are subject to the same rules of evolution as every other living creature which have to face competition. Whether they are affected an encounter is down to physical and psychological traits and often just plain old luck. How is that blaming the victim?

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    44. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that nothing in this universe* will ever make it so that you can be with her.

      *any information to prove otherwise ... You can become a cartoon yourself?

      That's actually pretty darn close to the only thing left for some people.

      I recall hearing of some author who became so obsessed with the main character of her novel that she wrote herself into the story and married him.

      I have no idea who it was and don't really even know how I'd attempt to find her name on Google.

    45. Re:Can't Feel Pity For Him. by garompeta · · Score: 1

      If this is Darwinism at work, if you do mean that a motherf*cker is the most apt to survive, we have a very dark future ahead.

  3. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How sad

    1. Re:Sad by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      How sad

      Yeah, as a Slashdotter, I don't get many opportunities to call somebody else's love-life sad.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  4. Thinking saves money!!! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    There is no reason to wire that much money to several bank account for an online girl friend, if she's worth $200 000 why didn't she move to him and then he would know she's safe. Move Before she was kidnapped of course.

    1. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      why didn't she move to him and then he would know she's safe.

      Um, because she doesn't exist....

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and he didn't insist she move before continuing this relationship.

    3. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How do people that naive get all that money in the first place? If I had a girlfriend who needed $200,000 to save her own ass she'd be S.O.L. if she came to me for it.

    4. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      How do people that naive get all that money in the first place?

      credit cards?

    5. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Evidently money is not distributed fairly in our society.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    6. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 0

      According to my republican acquaintances, money actually is fairly distributed (everyone who is well off deserves it through their hard work and skilled investing, and the poor are either stupid or lazy and deserve to be poor), provided government stops heavily taxing the wealthy, as that is unfair.

    7. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by scot4875 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well according to my democratic acquaintances, money is not fairly distributed and needs to be taken from those who have too much regardless of how hard they work for it and given to those who have none regardless of how little they work for it.

      Bull. Fucking. Shit. You haven't heard that. Ever. That's just your absolutely pathetic understanding of the "progressive" agenda.

      It's probably not your fault though -- smart people with a lot of money have been painting progressives with that brush for a long time, and a lot of dupes have fallen for it.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    8. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by LordNacho · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well according to my democratic acquaintances, money is not fairly distributed and needs to be taken from those who have too much regardless of how hard they work for it and given to those who have none regardless of how little they work for it.

      Bull. Fucking. Shit. You haven't heard that. Ever. That's just your absolutely pathetic understanding of the "progressive" agenda.

      It's probably not your fault though -- smart people with a lot of money have been painting progressives with that brush for a long time, and a lot of dupes have fallen for it.

      --Jeremy

      And of course it only goes one way...

    9. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't like feeding trolls, but I'll bite it just this time....

      Have you heard about inheritances.... I mean, the thing that allows Paris Hilton being, well, Paris Hilton, instead being employed in a 7-11?

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    10. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to my republican acquaintances, money actually is fairly distributed (everyone who is well off deserves it through their hard work and skilled investing, and the poor are either stupid or lazy and deserve to be poor), provided government stops heavily taxing the wealthy, as that is unfair.

      Well according to my democratic acquaintances, money is not fairly distributed and needs to be taken from those who have too much regardless of how hard they work for it and given to those who have none regardless of how little they work for it.

      The antidote to dishonesty is not more dishonesty.

    11. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Mr+44 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Insightful? Really???

      The GP's post was actually a decent paraphrase of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need".

      And yes, some modern progressives may not be marxists, but I sure wouldn't say its that far off base...

    12. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      How do people that naive get all that money in the first place?

      Because the world is far from a meritocracy. Or an any-thing-most-people-in-their-right-minds-would-consider-worth-measuring-ocracy. Power, riches, and related trappings are not distributed by fairness or intelligence, nor does the gullibility required to lose this sort of money preclude the chance to obtain it by some means deserved or not.

      And before anyone points it out: I'm well aware that I'm comfortable compared to many in the world by luck of birth rather than personal worth. Yes it is working out OK for me, thanks for asking (though I don't have $200,000 to my name, never mind $200,000 to blow!).

    13. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Even 7/11s have some kind of requirements. Like, say, being able to read, write or be on time.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The fun part is that this would exactly be what fixes our economy. Our economy flounders because the lower classes simply have no money to spend on bling anymore, and the upper classes don't do it. Simple as that. Money in the hands of someone with no skill and no knowledge quickly changes hands. He will have to buy everything he wants and pay for every service he wants because he cannot do it himself. Everyone with skill and knowledge will avoid spending money on something he can do himself, from creating his own ringtone to changing his own oil.

      The core fact of why our economy is going down the drain is simply that the lower classes get no jobs (because they're being shipped to China) and now they can't even refinance their homes (read: Get some more mortgage on top of the existing one).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see, the ONLY class that can afford to buy bling is the lower classes.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    16. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean, in the alley behind a 7-11?

    17. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Luck of birth and comfort is pretty much guaranteed in some Western countries.
      If you are 16 or over, unemployed and looking for a job you will receive around $760AU per fortnight to help you meet the costs of living. If you can show rent receipts then you will receive an increase in your fortnightly payment to help cover your rent. If just want to party your arse off for the weekend you can apply online to receive up to $1027 of this money in advance(paid back out of your next 13 cheques) and it will be paid into your account usually within 48 hours.
      If you are a wife-beater you can apply for a special payment of $200 paid pretty much immediately(debit card) so you have the funds to relocate.
      I am always surprised when I hear some one ask why refugees try so hard to get to Australia. Bloody hell I know people from the USA that would love those sort of financial guarantees.

      PS: If you go on the dole when you are 18 you can only stay on it for around 48 years because that's when the old age pension kicks in. Surf is up, dudes.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    18. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      If you go on the dole when you are 18 you can only stay on it for around 48 years because that's when the old age pension kicks in. Surf is up, dudes.

      I was on the dole for a while and it isn't a party. It's humiliating and degrading for a subsistence lifestyle. The contempt with which the DSS clerks treat you, not to mention people like you, will drive you to either become an alcoholic or worse after a few months, let alone 48 years.

    19. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      How do people that naive get all that money in the first place?

      credit cards?

      200K USD on credit cards?? Surely you can't get 20 cards with 10K limits on them without the banks noticing and cutting you off?

      I'm in Europe, 200K would need a morgage here unless you have rich relatives you can rob.

    20. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      If you go on the dole when you are 18 you can only stay on it for around 48 years because that's when the old age pension kicks in. Surf is up, dudes.

      I was on the dole for a while and it isn't a party. It's humiliating and degrading for a subsistence lifestyle. The contempt with which the DSS clerks treat you, not to mention people like you, will drive you to either become an alcoholic or worse after a few months, let alone 48 years.

      I was on the Dole in the UK for about 6 months, it was an easy way to live and could very easily get to become a way of life. In the UK they really don't care and almost go out of their way to prevent you looking for work. I remember telling the clerk I could not sign on at my allotted time in a few days because I had an interview, he told me they would cut my benefit and I'd have to reapply if I went. I went anyway because it was the only sensible thing to do.

    21. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      I was on the Dole in the UK for about 6 months, it was an easy way to live and could very easily get to become a way of life.

      I know people on the dole here and it is only an "easy" way of live if you set your standards that low and so do the people around you.

      I remember telling the clerk I could not sign on at my allotted time in a few days because I had an interview, he told me they would cut my benefit and I'd have to reapply if I went.

      When was this? There were times, when things were not as bad economically as they are now, when the service seemed entirely populated with that sort of jobsworth, but I don't get the impression it is the case now (though I can't speak from personal experience in either case). They will as for proof (a letter confirming your interview or doctor's appointment or such) of why you are not planning to turn up to the appointment where you "sign on" for the period as there are some people who will make up any excuse not to go in when they can't be bothered, but one of my close friends has had no trouble what so ever skipping such appointments when there is good reason (including an interview). Not that this has helped him find permenant work, of course...

    22. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by lxs · · Score: 1

      If your entire economy depends on selling bling to rubes then I see that as fundamental problem.

    23. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Afford? You kidding? They can't "afford" it. At least not for traditional meanings of afford, meaning "having spare money after essentials are covered". They have maxed out credit cards, more mortgages than shingles on their house, a car on installments, no healthcare, no 401k, no insurance other than uncle Sammy (and I mean both, fed gov and some more or less reliable relative who might give them a buck when they're totally in the gutter). They can't afford it.

      But they would buy it if they had a fistful of cash! Instead of getting their finances back in order, they'd go out and buy some crap or spend a day at the mall. And, like it or not, that's what kept the economy afloat for at least a decade now. Overspending of the middle-lower class. Sometimes I wonder whether these people have been running the national budget too, looking at the federal spending policy, it sure looks like it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well? Then please tell me what else our economy should rely on? Agriculture? Industry? Want me to laugh now or later?

      The US economy, like most highly developed economy systems, is highly service and IP dependent. What do we produce that isn't dependent on government subsidies? I can't think of any agricultural product that isn't subsidized to make producing it viable. And with the competition from China, what can you manufacture here anymore? What's left is something you can't easily import and export: Services.

      Selling a service, otoh, depends on two things: First, someone who needs it and second, the same person has to be able and willing to afford it. Who needs a service? Someone who either cannot or is unwilling to do the duty himself. To do that, he has to be lazy and/or uneducated. You won't buy a ringtone, will you? You'll create it yourself. You might pay someone to change the oil in your car because, let's face it, if you're not 100% certain what you do, it's a VERY messy experience.

      But you also have to be able and willing to hand over the cash for it. And services is about the first thing people cut back when money gets tight. Getting a haircut is not as important as having food tomorrow. And it needn't be a fashionable haircut, does it? Hell, the nice girl next door can do it well and she'll be happy to provide that service for a fiver, or didn't she ask you for help last week when her computer failed and you fixed it? She kinda owes you something.

      Of course, this ain't true if you're someone who defines himself through his "style". And while common during teenage years where it counts what clothes you wear and what style you follow, I do not know any "class" but the lowest where this kind of self definition carries over into adulthood. Their status symbols, from cellphones to haircuts to clothing, are the only ones that are highly service dependent and easily defined through the media. It's trivial to tell them that they HAVE to have US made fabrics to be 'cool', and they are the only ones you will be able to convince that they should buy items that nobody would buy, given their price tag (because they're US made, they can't compete on price with Chinacrap).

      THIS is why the economy is dependent on the spending ability of the lower classes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by garwain · · Score: 1

      I figure I've probably spent that much on my girlfriend... but over a period of years, not in a one shot payment...

    26. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that was Jesus.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    27. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Thanks but he wasn't on the ballet on '08...

    28. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      money is not fairly distributed and needs to be taken from those who have too much regardless of how hard they work for it and given to those who have none regardless of how little they work for it

      ...I'm pretty sure that was Jesus.

      I think you misremembered that parable... the master took all the money away from the guy who had the least and gave it to the guy who had already received the most.

      Mt. 25:24-30

      So take the bag of gold from him and give it to the one who has ten bags. For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.

      So the principle is somewhat more like "money needs to be taken from those who are lazy regardless of how little they have and given to the people who work hard for it regardless of how much money they have already."

    29. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No points? lol, I think u made some publicans butt hurt

      -@|

    30. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      My God that's what's wrong with people from the West (and I am from the West). they think that $400 per week (with extras) is degrading and subsistence. I guess if subsistence is driving a 5 year old BMW and living in Neutral Bay it may be. I guarantee that there are a lot of people out there who don't want to work, have never worked, and will never have a job vefore they hit retirement age that are living very non-subsistence lives.
      You are a little too sensitive(are you a Beta). I I wasn't attacking the unemployed, disabled, or others. I was making a simple statement. When I did my tertiary studies I lived in what a lot of people would have called a shithole of disadvantage. I moved to the shithole from a very upmarket area in Sydney and I made a discovery that has shaped my life. The people from the shithole are actual real mostly nice and kind people while those who seem to have it all are a bunch of pretentious wankers.
      I suspect you wouldn't know what humiliation, degradation, and especially not what a subsistence lifestyle really is. Maybe try living in Somalia then talk about subsistence. Suffering is not having to chose the Coles brand Corn Flakes over the Kelloggs or was your personal sufferring that Mum kept yelling at you to get a job?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    31. Re:Thinking saves money!!! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      My God that's what's wrong with people from the West (and I am from the West). they think that $400 per week (with extras) is degrading and subsistence.

      The "degrading" part is being treated with contempt by the bureaucrats you're forced to kowtow to. And it's "subsistence" by design.

      But I do have a job now, fuck you very much. So I don't have to jump through hoops for civil servants or take shit from arseholes like you.

  5. The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where men are men, women are men, and children are federal agents.

    1. Re:The Internets by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      But who are small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:The Internets by KhabaLox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously those are small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    3. Re:The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But who are small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri?

      The large scaly things from Sirius.

    4. Re:The Internets by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The children of the small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri, obviously.

    5. Re:The Internets by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      If I hadn't commented already, you'd get mod points for that.
      So you two will have to settle for high fives.
      Congratulations, you win one Internet.

    6. Re:The Internets by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Damn... I don't have my copy here, but you're right, it's "small furry creatures", not "small fuzzy things".

      Hit me with a cluebat.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    7. Re:The Internets by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, when is Steam going to get Alpha Centauri? Wait, where did the topic go again?

    8. Re:The Internets by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      But who are small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri?

      Ravenous Bugblatter Beasts from Traal

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    9. Re:The Internets by initialE · · Score: 1

      We don't talk about the furries here damn you

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    10. Re:The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that "small fairy creatures form Alpha Centauri?"

    11. Re:The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a joke, but not too far from the truth, considering the gender ratio in many places.

    12. Re:The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tribbles?

    13. Re:The Internets by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you win one Internet

      Well said, sir! And you win $200,000 from me.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    14. Re:The Internets by mlush · · Score: 1

      But who are small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri?

      Furries

    15. Re:The Internets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the internet? Small fuzzy things from Alpha Centauri are probably still men.

  6. There's an old saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There, but for the grace of God, go I.

    1. Re:There's an old saying by fish+waffle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, the one you're looking for is "A fool and his money are soon parted."

    2. Re:There's an old saying by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Funny

      There, but for having more than 2 brain cells, go I.

    3. Re:There's an old saying by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      --This way to the Egress-->

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:There's an old saying by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      That's what she said. And he paid $200,000 for it.

    5. Re:There's an old saying by t2t10 · · Score: 1

      "Not soon enough."

  7. Can this be real? by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

    I've worked hard for many years, and while my lifestyle isn't excessive, I still don't have anywhere near that kind of money to throw around even if I was getting laid by a real girlfriend.

    This guy gave "her" $200k and never even got a blow?

    Wow, where do I find suckers like this? I need the cash.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Can this be real? by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of credit cards?

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Wow, where do I find suckers like this? I need the cash."

      Apparently on the Internet.

    3. Re:Can this be real? by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably the majority of it was in the last few months, and may have been for what he thought was a ransom. I don't have $200,000 laying about but if I truly believed that my girlfriend was being kidnapped I could get it within a couple of weeks by loans and remortgaging.

    4. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well you see, an obsessive devotion to a single pursuit tends to lead to two things:

      1. Expertise in that area.
      2. A corresponding lack in other areas.

      When you take that devotion to extremes, you can make a lot of money and not have the time or desire to spend it on anything. And unless you work hard to avoid it, the "lack in other areas" is likely to include your love life.

      How do you not know this?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:Can this be real? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Informative

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      I guess you've never been to northern Canada.

      Any smart person would refuse to work: outdoors in -30C weather, in the middle of nowhere, where you can lose an arm because someone forgot to properly chain a pipe down, and the only thing to do during your time off is drink and do drugs in an all male labor camp.

      If you're willing to endure all that, then you can make $120k+ per year all while still being just smart enough not to wet yourself.

      (All the guys dumb enough to wet themselves in -30C weather died of hypothermia)

    6. Re:Can this be real? by Nialin · · Score: 1

      Someone please mod parent up. I already knew the aforementioned details, but dammit, that was a clear and concise explanation.

    7. Re:Can this be real? by EdIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you take that devotion to extremes, you can make a lot of money and not have the time or desire to spend it on anything. And unless you work hard to avoid it, the "lack in other areas" is likely to include your love life.

      How do you not know this?

      Uhhhhhhhh........

      2. A corresponding lack in other areas.

    8. Re:Can this be real? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      "This guy gave "her" $200k and never even got a blow?"

      Love is a many-splendored thing...

    9. Re:Can this be real? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Most of those guys end up blowing 99% of that on women, drugs, and vehicles. I knew a few guys who worked the rigs - 3 years after getting there, they all had brand new pickup trucks and a coke habit, and were just as broke as when they got there.

    10. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait, do you think we live in some kind of meritocracy where intelligence and hard work are rewarded, while stupidity is punished? No, we live in a kleptocracy where connections and favors are rewarded and being born poor is punished. If you have money and/or connections, you can make more money with very little risk or effort by stealing the labors of honest working people, who are so desperate that they will do nearly anything for you. So, you shouldn't have to look to hard to find suckers like this, if you aren't already rich, try looking in a mirror. If you are halfway intelligent and working at a salaried job, you've more than likely given away at least that much value.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I was a small child I did wet myself at -30C in Northern Canada. It is surviveable if someone else can carry you home (pants immediately became too stiff to walk).

    12. Re:Can this be real? by Chuckles08 · · Score: 2

      No. It is "reel". As in fishing.

      --
      Twenda Learning: Educational Apps that Engage.
    13. Re:Can this be real? by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Home equity loans. Those are usually used for cars, bling, and cosmetic surgery, and on very rare occasion are used for home improvement. I got a roof and air conditioner with one in the early 00s.

      Usually these "moralizing human interest stories" have a much more complicated and detailed real story behind them.

      When it comes to he said / "she" said like this, if he was dumb enough to be out $20K, but smart enough to report it as $200K and theres no paperwork to prove it either way, he may as well go for the gold and strike back at "her". Worst case he's busted for filing a false report, although how they'd pin it on him is a mystery. Best case is he makes a nice profit. He's probably pissed off and looking for revenge....

      Another possible situation is someone turned 200K into coke, snorted it, doesn't want to admit it, and weirdly enough this utterly pitiful story sounds "better", or at least doesn't violate someones parole terms, divorce settlement, custody requirement, etc.

      Then there's the money laundering mule whom got burned. His handler got him used to sloppy handling procedures (yeah I know I told you to keep the last $20K for yourself, but I'm in a hurry and you can just keep $40K of the next shipment). Next thing you know "his" share of the money is gone and he's left holding the bag for laundering, errrr, I mean now he's a unfortunate victim going to the police, how sad.

      Sometimes these stories are people whom did NOT get burned, if you know what I mean. Sure, they withdrew $200K of their money and wired it to Mr Kingpin in another country whom now has $200K with a valid receipt proving it is his. The untold story is Mr Kingpin handed him a bag of $300K cash as the first step. Sometimes the IRS catches these guys if they're dumb enough at cash handling (buys a Ferrari, in cash, the week after reporting his "loss", etc). Generally the less the guy helps the cops the more likely this is the situation. He's probably not making that much on a risk free carefully choreographed transaction like that. Probably more like 10% or maybe he's having a favor taken care of for him or being forgiven of a certain mistake toward a powerful person.

      The IRS situation is very complicated. If you withdraw the cash, stash it, or wire it to your brother in another state, suddenly you have quite a capital loss there to report. Of course you can only do this about once per lifetime, but, maybe he had a windfall inheritance and this is how he, uh, "lost" it...

      Sometimes you see this "behavior" when a genuine, although illegal, deal goes bad and at least you'd like to deduct it from your taxes. So, your "co worker" promised you a 25% rate of return, and he just needs a little cash to get him thru a tight time, but he skipped town instead... Well, at least you can write it off, and/or explain where the money disappeared to, even if thats not exactly where it went. Look thru the local papers for a grow up that got busted a couple weeks ago that had about $200K of expenses, etc.

      Shockingly enough, it might be true as reported. Historically unlikely, sure, but possibly true. Maybe. Its a heck of a story anyway.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    14. Re:Can this be real? by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A new girlfriend would be way cheaper.

    15. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This person was from an excessively affluent suburb of Chicago (I happen to work in that suburb). Almost everyone that lives here is relatively wealthy compared to the surrounding suburbs.

    16. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah that would roughly be the joke. Man, subtlety is dead.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    17. Re:Can this be real? by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you can read.

      $200 000.

      Not $200.

    18. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      halfway intelligent and working a salaried job is an oxymoron. How is it intelligent to work 60hours a week and make the same as if you are working 40 hours but to get reprimanded and possibly lose your job if you by chance work 39hours? This is why I stay as an incredibly skilled contractor. I'm a big fish in a medium pond where I'm at and average 250k/year working hourly. Everyone needs there project done _now_.

    19. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the plot of Fubar 2.

    20. Re:Can this be real? by Seumas · · Score: 2

      I am confounded on a regular basis by how desperate people are, in general. Guys who cling on to the first thing that fucks them, even in highschool (and of course, realize twenty years later that they wasted their youth). Girls who can't stand belong alone for five seconds and go from one stupid/bad/pathetic/abusive relationship to another. Nobody seems to be able to just hold the fuck up and be with themselves for awhile. It's like the idea of not having someone to cling to or fight with or have drama with is foreign to them all. All this pathetic desperation across the board results in a lot of stupid people doing stupid shit. Period.

    21. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, he is 48. By that time if you don't have a $200K nest egg you are in big trouble, esp here in the US where you are basically on your own once you get old.

      Judging by how he was scammed, I would hazard a guess that he was not the type to go out and spend money on stuff (or even go out at all).

    22. Re:Can this be real? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Man, subtlety is dead.

      LOL. I was thinking the same thing.

    23. Re:Can this be real? by cvtan · · Score: 1

      Watching This Old House I saw a project involving a California house built on the side of a hill in an area with mudslides, earthquakes and wildfires. My first reaction was: How could anyone dumb enough to buy this home earn enough money to pay for it? It did have a nice view though...

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    24. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macintosh user groups.

    25. Re:Can this be real? by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most of those guys end up blowing 99% of that on women, drugs, and vehicles..

      And the rest just waste it.

    26. Re:Can this be real? by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      I've worked hard for many years, and while my lifestyle isn't excessive, I still don't have anywhere near that kind of money to throw around

      You're doing it wrong.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    27. Re:Can this be real? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily, depending on what state/country you live in and how long you've been together. For most places, living together 6 months is the same as if you were married, and that means she gets a chunk of your income.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    28. Re:Can this be real? by FileNotFound · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually it's not as absurd as you may think.

      I could pull about 75k out of my credit cards. I could also get a HELO backed "creditcard", I keep getting offers for HELOs for anywhere from 100k to 250k.

      So really it'd not be that hard for me to pull out 200k from a "credit card".

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    29. Re:Can this be real? by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a lot of places around the western world nowdays.

      This is a natural result of our "civilisation" frowning on and outright prohibiting parents allowing children to meet Ms Danger and get acquainted with it. It is better to get swindled out of your pocket money a couple of times instead of being swindled out of your salary and life savings a few decades down the road.

      I know that I am going to be modded into oblivion, but it is a statement of the fact - there were much less nerds and social misfits in the days when I went to school. Despite the fact that I went to a high school that specializes in sciences and math, the number of nerds we had was nothing out of the ordinary. Today that would have been (and actually is) nerd central. 20 years ago it was a school like any other with the usual 1-2 slightly nerdier kids per each class of 25. However even they boozed, did silly things, partied and made their fair share of social mistakes on par with everyone else.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    30. Re:Can this be real? by psithurism · · Score: 1

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      I've worked hard for many years, and while my lifestyle isn't excessive, I still don't have anywhere near that kind of money to throw around even if I was getting laid by a real girlfriend.

      This guy gave "her" $200k and never even got a blow?

      Wow, where do I find suckers like this? I need the cash.

      Although the short article did not say so, when I have read about these scams before, the victim goes to their friends and family and tearfully begs them to help. Even if he couldn't quite make 200K appear, a few of his friends and family might have been able to get some loans and remortgages to help him reach the sum.

    31. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly I'd never considered the devious fraudulent side of things. Thanks for your post.

    32. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Contractors are just as fucked, though. The point being: most of the value you produce is going into another man's pockets. You are, at a measly quarter million a year, barely upper middle class. You are still playing the chump's game, working for a living, rather than having other people work for you. Basically, you can either be a sucker or a con artist, letting yourself be taken advantage of, or taking advantage of others. If you are working for a living, as opposed to making other people work for you, you are a sucker. In the eyes of the elite, you aren't even a real person.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    33. Re:Can this be real? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Guys who cling on to the first thing that fucks them

      A puppy is for life and not just for Christmas.

      Nobody seems to be able to just hold the fuck up and be with themselves for awhile.

      Except for you, apparently? It's an instinct, hard-wired into people's brains to ensure the survival of the species. Most people follow their instincts. Congratulations on being so intellectual that you managed to over-ride this programming. Now let's talk about how your highly evolved genes are going to be passed on. Oh wait...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    34. Re:Can this be real? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not necessarily, depending on what state/country you live in and how long you've been together. For most places, living together 6 months is the same as if you were married, and that means she gets a chunk of your income.

      Not if the kidnappers kill her, she doesn't!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    35. Re:Can this be real? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Ok, now can you please explain to me how I can use my excessive devotion to porn taken to extremes to make a lot of money???

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    36. Re:Can this be real? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      And high chance that he is a minority as well. More than half of the Naperville's population is Asian.

      This proves another point.... Asian men hard to find any girls even if they show the ca$h. How said..... who said racism is gone from America.....

    37. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I have read about these scams before, the victim goes to their friends and family and tearfully begs them to help.

      And the fact that none of them had the sense to get the cops involved proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that stupidity of such an extraordinary magnitude has to be genetic.

    38. Re:Can this be real? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that there is somewhere in CA not prone to mudslides (the state is made of mud—it's the "Golden" State), earthquakes, wildfires, floods and drought. We don't get hurricanes and only a small tornado or two though.

      Do bad drivers count as a natural disaster?

    39. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another slashdot commie Slashdot = idiot. I America even poor can become rich its what used to set us apart until the reds took over.

    40. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also...

      Some of us on slashdot are not quite nearly as broke as the others...

      It comes down to my income has been far greater then my needs for several years and I try to save a little bit at least.

    41. Re:Can this be real? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      hahaha

    42. Re:Can this be real? by tverbeek · · Score: 0

      And you're a homophobic asshole, too socially retarded to have the sense to post that kind of neanderfuck insult anonymously. :P

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    43. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming your an average American you will make an estimated $1,000,000.00 during your life time. You could easily dish out $200,000.00 over the course of a couple years especially considering that money isn't anything more than debt. Debt can be aquired from a lot of different sources besides paid labor.

    44. Re:Can this be real? by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Your mistake is assuming that rich people are rich because they work hard. The majority of the time, rich people are rich because their parents were rich.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    45. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      120k per year ain't that much. You only get to keep lets say 75 after taxes. Add up all the usual items (rent or mortgage, electricity, food, heat, car payment, school loan payment, etc) and you won't be left with that much. So hopefully the "+" part of 120k+ is pretty big.

    46. Re:Can this be real? by antdude · · Score: 1

      No girlfriend will be even cheaper!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    47. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2

      Clearly I meant "faggot" as "gay". I could tell by his lack of parens that his lisp is terrible.

      Also if you're going to make judgements about a person's value system (based on a reply to an obviously trolling AC no less) and find it so opposed to your own as to be contemptible, just for future reference the emoticon kind of kills the gravitas.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    48. Re:Can this be real? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a cousin who decided to try his hand at crab fishing back in the days before Deadliest Catch. He heard you could make a ton of money really fast and then coast the rest of the year. What he didn't grasp is that you don't get a year's wages for two or three months of work. You compact a year's worth of work into two or three months. I knew nothing of crab fishing at the time but it took me about 5 seconds to reason that out. And you get paid shit because you're the new guy. If you can do that reliably for a few seasons, you might get a shot at making decent money. I don't think he even made it through one run, let alone an entire season.

    49. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you're an asshole who doesn't care about those close to you. Then you're not getting another one.

    50. Re:Can this be real? by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Says the person with an excellent grasp of capitalization and punctuation.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    51. Re:Can this be real? by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      Despite the fact that I went to a high school that specializes in sciences and math,

      Did you ever read about selection bias? If so please think about it and how it applies to your situation.

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    52. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't allow them to purchase anything for the home, and treat them like a renter (including paying you monthly "rent" checks).

    53. Re:Can this be real? by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      If you're willing to endure all that, then you can make $120k+ per year all while still being just smart enough not to wet yourself.

      I'll go there. Where I live, I earn about $16k per year, and I'm paid well above the national average.

    54. Re:Can this be real? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      People often do stupid things, and young people tend to do them more. The trick is to not do stupid things that are terribly permanent while you're younger, so you don't have to live with them when you're older, and perhaps wiser.

      This is confounded by the fact that this generation (as stated by anyone from the previous generation) is that they are raised in an environment where instant gratification is the norm. This leads to a tendency to not put off, say, that need for intimacy until they have made the foundation on which the rest of their life will be built.

      Of course, this applies to me when I was younger, too.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    55. Re:Can this be real? by kckman · · Score: 1

      I know mine would certainly be cheaper. Something just north of a paypal minimum commitment would more than suffice.

    56. Re:Can this be real? by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      America was a better place back when they used to teach English in the schools.

    57. Re:Can this be real? by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      1. Get rejected
      2. Bitch about everyone else jumping blindly into a relationship
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

    58. Re:Can this be real? by craash420 · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, I'll feed the troll. Are you such a mouth-breathing knuckle-dragging animal that you can't defy your instincts? "I'm sorry honey, I didn't mean to bang the babysitter but my instincts took over! It's not my fault; she's half your age with supple skin and firm breasts. The survival of the human race depended on me and I did not falter!"

      --
      Extra medication for all!
    59. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone has stairs in his house.

    60. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an available credit line of darn near $200K
      Not sure how in the world I could afford to pay that off if I racked it up, but sure I could put it on credit cards...
      Still doesn't cover the "Stupid Git" part of the story though.
      -nB

    61. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Considering that a household income of "a measly quarter million a year" puts your household in the 2nd-highest percentile of households in America, I'd say calling that "barely upper middle class" is a bit of a stretch. If you earn more than 98.3% of the rest of the population, there is no way that you can claim that you're "barely" middle class.

      Somebody's got an awfully skewed vision of how much it costs to maintain a middle-class lifestyle, and an awfully skewed vision of how much people actually earn.

    62. Re:Can this be real? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      At my 10 year reunion, found out my 'friends' in band and physics club were not inviting me to parties because I was too weird. Man, the 80's sucked!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    63. Re:Can this be real? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's always racism when someone can't get a girlfriend. No other option, really.

      Couldn't possibly be your implication that women are whores who won't put out to asian men despite being "show the ca$h" and the whole underlying thought process that goes along with such comments.

      Nope. Gotta be racism.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    64. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      My point being, if you aren't in the first percentile, you aren't making any real money. Did you know the top 400 earners in America make as much as the bottom fifty percent combined? Second percentile? Pfft, you might as well be on welfare. You aren't even playing the same game as the fat cats on Wall Street.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    65. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Somewhere around age 28, I took a year off chasing tail and hearts and yeah, just spent some time hanging loose. After awhile, I started seeing patterns in the kind of women I'd been dating/pursuing (more emotionally stunted than myself; therefore safe to date and self destruct) and realized that was getting me nowhere. Once I figured out what kind of woman would be good for me (self assured/creative/down-to-earth/technical/funny), I took a look at myself and realized that a well grounded woman who was living life like I desired would not want to have anything to do with me. I then spent another year getting my shit together and then went out trying to meet my new kind of woman. Lucked out and met her right off, we decided to get married at end of first date and have been together for 12 years now. We now work together at a really cool place (Linux/Google admins), have the house on 10 acres in the country and a daughter who's breaking hearts at the school robotics club.

      Sometimes, taking a step back from the dance can be good.

    66. Re:Can this be real? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      a lot of stupid people doing stupid shit.

      This is my working definition of life. It's best to take an anthropological view and just marvel at the amazing naked ape or you'll drive yourself bananas.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    67. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Again: if you consider "250k / year" to be "not real money," it's clear that you are tremendously out of touch with what the average person lives on, and earns, in a year.

    68. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up your own business, start photographing/managing your own models and generally live like a leach off of them?

    69. Re:Can this be real? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But just think; if he puts this story in his dating profile, all the women will realize just how romantic he is and will be flocking after him.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    70. Re:Can this be real? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Farkin' red bankers and financiers!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    71. Re:Can this be real? by maxume · · Score: 1

      By what legal mechanism does that happen?

      (In the U.S., common law marriage is largely abolished, and even where it isn't abolished, it often requires mutual intent)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    72. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you didn't really mean to offend homosexuals, this kind of language is simply ingrained in most of us, especially men. But there is nothing wrong with being homosexual, and to use the word faggot as an insult suggests there is. So, are you claiming there is something wrong with homosexuals, or were you just using the word without thinking it through?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    73. Re:Can this be real? by maxume · · Score: 1

      http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html

      (I'm not claiming anything about the fairness of the U.S. economy, just pointing to an argument that suggests it shouldn't be real surprising)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    74. Re:Can this be real? by maxume · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the house they were remodeling had already stood for like 60 years.

      So if they can buy insurance for it, it might not be that stupid a house to purchase.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    75. Re:Can this be real? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      No, you're not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States#Median_income and the chart here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States#Household_income_in_the_U.S.

      Median household income is $44k in the US. At the $44k income level there are about 1.4 wage earners per household. That equates to ~$31,400/earner on the median. You're making about 51% of the median income per earner.

    76. Re:Can this be real? by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Spun generally isn't someone who I'd classify as "tremendously out of touch" with reality.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    77. Re:Can this be real? by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 1

      win

    78. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you really not understand the point I am trying to make, or are you being dense for rhetorical purposes? To the elite who control our country and take in ninety percent of the income, $250k/year is a joke, a sign that you aren't any sort of real player, but just a peon no different from the guy making $20k/year. If you are making $250k/year, some wealthier fellow is still eating most of your lunch.

      Back to my original point, plenty of stupid people make more than enough money to blow $200,000 on a fake girlfriend and not even feel it. It does not take brains to make money, it takes connections and money to make money. Real money, that is. Brains and a whole lot of luck might get you into the $250k/year "Adorable Junior Capitalist Club" but without connections and a certain amount of sociopathic lack of empathy and remorse, you won't be making much more than that.

      Simply put, there is no upward social mobility in America anymore. The children of the middle class are just as likely to make less than their parents as they are to make more, and things are even worse for the poor. We do not live in a meritocracy, that is my point. My point is not "$250k/year isn't that much to the average guy," of course it is! My point is that $250k/year isn't going to buy you a Senator, or even a Congressman, and therefore, is not real money to the people who can and do buy Senators and Congressmen.

      And, more importantly, neither you nor anyone you know will never be one of those people, no matter how hard you try. If you want upward mobility, go to France. Or Sweden. Or, heck, almost anywhere but here: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/04/b1579981.html

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    79. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Normal countries, ones that are not run by kleptocrats, manage to defuse the power law problem. In America, we have far less social mobility than in any other first world country except the UK. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/04/b1579981.html And we should defuse the power law, it hampers innovation and excellence. If everyone just tends to go with what other people are doing or using, better alternatives get overlooked.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    80. Re:Can this be real? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most states go with splitting everything acquired since marriage.

      So as long as you both earn similar it ain't much money.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    81. Re:Can this be real? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      It can easily take $100k/year to be 'middle class' in much of the US, but in a place like NYC or LA $250k/year probably is 'middle class'... It takes A minimum of a $60-70k/year job where I live to be able to afford a moderate house.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    82. Re:Can this be real? by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      He didn't say he's in the US.

    83. Re:Can this be real? by ian_from_brisbane · · Score: 1

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      I've worked hard for many years...

      People this stupid get money by working smart, not hard.

    84. Re:Can this be real? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure, things could be a lot better for the bottom whatever percent.

      Personally, I think your rant about $250,000 is misplaced, GDP is only about $100,000-110,000 per worker in the U.S., so it isn't as if that top 1% is slurping up so much that the people making $250,000 can't get their 'fair' share.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    85. Re:Can this be real? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      The story is about a guy in the US, the thread was about comparisons to people in the US - by context it's pretty clear that this is about US incomes.

    86. Re:Can this be real? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Did you know the top 400 earners in America make as much as the bottom fifty percent combined?

      Did you know that you are completely wrong? For your statement to be true, your 400 top earners would need to AVERAGE over 2.5 BILLION dollars in income. (22k average income * 50 million wage earners / 400 earners)

    87. Re:Can this be real? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Supply and demand, my friend. I have an acquaintance (John Rickman) who is a brilliant photographer and has done some very classy erotic photos. Where does he make the vast majority of his money? Off of family portraits...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    88. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I, like most people who use the word, have used the word since before I knew what it "really" meant. You say it means homosexual, I say it's blindingly clear through context when it does and when it doesn't. You're sick of it being used, I'm sick of people pretending not to know what I mean so they can make a statement. If you were personally hurt by it, I'm sorry, I truly am, but I know what it's like to be hurt by words about something you can't change, and the best advice I can offer is to grow a thicker skin. If you weren't personally hurt by it, then fuck off and mind your own business.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    89. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      I've worked hard for many years, and while my lifestyle isn't excessive, I still don't have anywhere near that kind of money to throw around even if I was getting laid by a real girlfriend.

      This guy gave "her" $200k and never even got a blow?

      Wow, where do I find suckers like this? I need the cash.

      If you hit the age of 48 and don't have $200K in a tax-deferred investment account, get used to the idea of eating cat food when you retire.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    90. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proud of ya!

    91. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) Cohabiting for six months = marriage? That's insane.
      (2) "Life Insurance Plan". "Asset Protection". Google.
      (3) Good luck.

    92. Re:Can this be real? by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      Darwin again.

    93. Re:Can this be real? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Meh, the troll doesn't like straw men.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    94. Re:Can this be real? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, there are well over 7 billion people living OUTSIDE the US. Which is why I said "most countries".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    95. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point is that $250k/year isn't going to buy you a Senator, or even a Congressman, and therefore, is not real money to the people who can and do buy Senators and Congressmen.

      This may be true but it in no way supports your idea that "there is no upward social mobility in America anymore".

    96. Re:Can this be real? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      I don't know if he's wrong or right, but the bottom 50% of earners don't on average earn the average income - if you see what I mean.

    97. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an accountant? Will you be my accountant? :)

    98. Re:Can this be real? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I could tell by his lack of parens that his lisp is terrible.

      The comments about queerdom were lame, but this line is a bit of genius.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    99. Re:Can this be real? by maxume · · Score: 1

      So what's the legal mechanism?

      I mentioned the U.S. not out of some desire to enforce my parochial views on the world, but because it happens to be the place I am the most familiar with and I mentioned common law marriage because that's the only mechanism I could think of that would explain your assertion.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    100. Re:Can this be real? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he meant he is paid more for his vocation than the national average for that job.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    101. Re:Can this be real? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      They'll recognize him as an omega and try to pry loose his wallet ASAP.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    102. Re:Can this be real? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Working in remote fly in-fly-out conditions not only has a considerable income, but generally your expenses are a lot less. Your company pays for food, utilities and accomodation half the time, and often there are tax breaks.

      For what only seems like 30% - 50% more income, you can potentially put away 5 times as much in savings in a year.

    103. Re:Can this be real? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      He lives in Naperville, Illinois. The average home there is over 329,000 ( and that's after the bubble burst). Most people that live there are not actually all that wealthy, but are definitely pretty well over-extended.
      I guess I didn't answer your question.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    104. Re:Can this be real? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Common law marriage is also voluntary. The state can't tell you you are married and neither can your partner unless you agree.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    105. Re:Can this be real? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      He's 48 years old, and being lonely at that age is probably the rather obsessive, picky type who doesn't spend much and saves a hell of a lot of money. Plus he no doubt got a few loans to boost the amount of cash he's got access to as well.

    106. Re:Can this be real? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Wait. Some people actually PAY for pornography? I'm pretty sure new free porn comes onto the internet faster than one could view it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    107. Re:Can this be real? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd argue that $200K isn't a lot of savings at all for a man of his age (48 years old). He certainly isn't wealthy. And I bet he would've really had to stretch things (running on empty) to get all $200K out and available to use. So no, I don't think he would be the entrepreneurial or business type.

      The developed world has become so obsessed with insane credit and spending that we think it's unusual to have some decent savings in middle age.

    108. Re:Can this be real? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      The miners in Australia are earning craploads of money, but the problem is that the cost of living in their mining towns is correspondingly incredibly high, so it's still hard to put away large amounts of savings. That, and there's nothing to do out in the sticks.

    109. Re:Can this be real? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Nope. "Show the ca$h" is only a desperate measure, and usually involves drawing out every single credit line that you have.

      Caucasians and black woman want big dicks.

      Asian women want to marry to someone with big $.

      Asian men usually have neither.

    110. Re:Can this be real? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      or when they won the lottery, or found oil under their basement.

    111. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      A household income of 100k/year or more in "much" of the US would generally fall into the upper middle class, or upper class, depending on how much greater than 100k your income is.

      I know that we like to stretch definitions and imagine ourselves to be much worse off than we are here, but you can live a comfortable middle class lifestyle, even in NYC or LA, on 100k/year. Middle class doesn't mean "caviar only 3 nights a week." Take a look at the various definitions of classes given here.

      By just about any definition that's not solely based in "soak the rich" populist rhetoric, a household with 100k yearly income is firmly in the middle class, and would generally be considered "upper middle class," or even higher on the social scale. I'm not disputing that there is a vast difference between the top income earners and the bottom earners. But to suggest that 250k, or even 100k, per year makes you more or less one of the working poor is just so divorced from any reality that it's ludicrous.

    112. Re:Can this be real? by t2t10 · · Score: 1

      It's an instinct, hard-wired into people's brains to ensure the survival of the species. Most people follow their instincts. Congratulations on being so intellectual that you managed to over-ride this programming. Now let's talk about how your highly evolved genes are going to be passed on. Oh wait...

      Strangely enough, evolution doesn't necessarily favor those who spread their genes around the most. Some species have entire societies in which most individuals are physically incapable of reproducing, yet they all contribute. And cheating on your wife is not necessarily a good way of spreading your genes around either.

    113. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      I'll refer you again to this chart.

      Assuming that everybody in the bottom ~53% of that chart (households making less than $47500/yr) makes the very lowest amount allowed for their bracket, the "bottom 50%" of earners makes about $1,353,870,000,000/yr - that's 1.35 trillion. The "top 400 earners" who you assert make more than the entire lower 50% would then need to have average salaries and income of 3.375 billion dollars per year.

      If you look at the Forbes 400 - the list of the richest people in America - there are people who do not even have a NET WORTH of 3.375 billion dollars, much less a yearly income of 3+ billion dollars. According to this, the "average income" of the top 400 households in 2007 was roughly 345 million per year. That falls far short of 3.375 billion dollars.

      I am not disputing that there's a vast differential between the earnings of Bill Gates or Warren Buffet, and a disabled mechanic or an unemployed daycare worker. But pretending that people making 250k per year are somehow "the working poor" is just deluded. If you want to argue that the super-rich have a disproportionate amount of power, I'll agree with that. But let's keep our numbers grounded in reality.

      It's also worth noting that in that bottom quintile, "Educational attainment, alongside the amount of work done by individuals are among the main determinants of income. The vast majority of Americans derive their income from occupational tasks and the utilization of their expertise. The notable exception is the lower class, where the most common source of income was not occupational status, but government welfare." (Cannot find link to primary source, but name & info is available from footnote 50.) -- this suggests that the people at the bottom are already primarily supported by tax revenues, which raises the question of exactly how high a standard of living everybody has a "right" to, and what sort of terms & conditions that standard of living comes with.

    114. Re:Can this be real? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      Three possibilities come to mind...

      1) He borrowed the majority of it from friends/family. I've heard such stories many times before.

      2) He's 43, there's a decent chance his parents have passed away, and he just blew his entire inheritance, possibly plus his own money, possibly plus taking out a mortage...

      3) You don't have to be bright to save money (though failing to do so is pretty stupid). At 43, he could have been earning a salary for 25 years. That's an average savings of $8,000/yr. Without a wife or kids to take care of, that's doable even on a working class wage, assuming you don't live in a massively high priced area.

      Besides, what you call "not excessive" is probably massively expensive and wasteful, you just justify it to yourself because you see others who are worse. Consider that there are plenty of people living on minimum wage, and compare your lifestyle to theirs...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    115. Re:Can this be real? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If someone is older and lives in a property they own (with some form of mortgage) it is quite likely that through appreciation in the property market (unless they live in an area where it has collapsed recently) and the gradual repayment of the loan they will have built up a substantial chunk of equity which they can draw against. They probably don't consider it "money to throw around" but if they believe a loved one needs it badly enough they are likely to release it.

      Afaict the trick is being able to convince someone you are a loved one even though you consider them as a mere victim to be exploited.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    116. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.
      If you're making 250k a year you could work for like 5 years and retire. The assertion that you need to be in the top 400 to be considered to be making real money is ridiculous. Who cares if some else out there is making 100 million a year? Sure he may be richer then I am, but at 250k you're still making more then something like 99.999% of the world's population.
      Oh no feeling inadequate compared to bill gates and warren buffet? Go on vacation to any 'third world' country and feel like a king.

      There are other things in life besides money; if the only way you have to judge your own self worth is income you'll never be happy.

    117. Re:Can this be real? by joebagodonuts · · Score: 1

      Found my wife in a very similar manner. Experience is such a great teacher - if it doesn't kill you :).

      Figuring out what you don't want is the best lesson.

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
    118. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the USA. There are only 11 states that allow a couple to form a common law marriage - and even then, I believe all of those states require the couple to represent themselves as married and have an intention to be married. Just living together doesn't cut it if you're not calling yourself married, filing joint income tax returns, etc.

    119. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who is part of the "kleptocracy," i.e. what you refer to as the general network of power brokers in the world both political and economic, and as somebody who came from the outside, I often wonder why people like you stand around bitching all the time instead of joining the party.

      You, with your extreme anger and blame issues, do far more to hurt yourselves than people like us could ever do to you on purpose. It's funny in a sad sort of way. I refer you to HHGTTG:

      "The President is very much a figurehead - he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it."

      Anger and outrage really do quite a bit to help us out. First, people don't think terribly clearly when they're pissed. Second, if you can create two groups of people and get them pissed off for different reasons, they will take care of stoking the fire for you. The way the liberal and conservative segments of the USA attack each other is one of the better examples of this. You can blame the President, Congress, the Supreme Court all you want -- that's okay, that's what they're there for. In the meantime those with real influence are in complete agreement on almost everything, and work toward the actual and only goal: increasing power and control.

      Apart from fanning the flames of your pointless rage, we also play into your victim mentality. Believing yourself to be a hapless victim puts you in a mental place where you subconsciously believe yourself to be inferior and a failure. Once victimized you tend to abandon most hope of ever recovering what you've lost. Of course, outwardly you shake your fist in anger. Inwardly you feel like a tiny rodent who's just been stomped by a big boot. After being fleeced once there's no much hope for you unless you can resist this self-destructive tendency. As long as you look at the corporation/government/whatever as something that's enormously bigger and more powerful than you, the prophecy will continue fulfilling itself.

      Well shit. Had too many glasses of wine and I should probably stop telling secrets before I start giving away the good stuff.

    120. Re:Can this be real? by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      A 401k or IRA? You should have at least that much by your mid-thirties if you are on track to retire. And no one really notices when you take it out with the right forms until the IRS sends you a huge bill.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    121. Re:Can this be real? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      He is wrong. the 22k/year isn't the overall average income, it is the average income of the bottom 50% he was referring to. Hell, even if I bumped it up to the overall average of the US (around 45k, I think), he's still waaaaaay off by a couple orders of magnitude.

    122. Re:Can this be real? by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Simply put, there is no upward social mobility in America anymore. The children of the middle class are just as likely to make less than their parents as they are to make more,...

      Wow, you managed to contradict yourself within one sentence. If half of the children are doing better than their parents, doesn't that indicate 'upward social mobility' for them???

      My point being, if you aren't in the first percentile, you aren't making any real money.

      My point is that $250k/year isn't going to buy you a Senator, or even a Congressman, and therefore, is not real money to the people who can and do buy Senators and Congressmen.

      Well, which one is your point? That 250k isn't 'real money' (whatever the hell that means) or that I can't buy my own senator? Either way, who cares about this 'point'???

    123. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Canada isn't part of the US, yet.

      http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2015768&cid=35341108

    124. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so nice to see another U.S. citizen here on /. who still has his mind! But your honesty is risky, such daring!

    125. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22/k a year would be an improvement for me. F'ng Somalia is starting to look good compared to THIS place.

    126. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg don't use 'whom' if you don't know how

    127. Re:Can this be real? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Monetarily.

      If you care more about your money than your girlfriend, you should probably break up with her. She's not the one for you.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    128. Re:Can this be real? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      How do people this stupid have $200,000 to begin with?

      I've worked hard for many years, and while my lifestyle isn't excessive, I still don't have anywhere near that kind of money to throw around even if I was getting laid by a real girlfriend.

      This guy gave "her" $200k and never even got a blow?

      Wow, where do I find suckers like this? I need the cash.

      probably inherited money. I have known a couple of idiots inherit money. One didn't keep it for long either - but at least he is happy that his "donations" to the televangelist brought him a place in heaven! The other idiot takes things the other way, won't spend any of it.

    129. Re:Can this be real? by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Oh, he got a blow alright. Right in da NUTS!

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    130. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars - the rest I just squandered."
      - George Best

    131. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly true. (if a bit over-dramatic)

    132. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't have $200,000 laying about

      Indeed, because money is inanimate and cannot lay anything. But do you have $200,000 lying about?

      Hint: lay and lie are different words with different meanings. Learn them.

    133. Re:Can this be real? by A+Friendly+Troll · · Score: 1

      The story is about a guy in the US, the thread was about comparisons to people in the US - by context it's pretty clear that this is about US incomes.

      But I'm not from the US or the Americas.

      I'd go over there and freeze my balls off, because I'd earn in a year what I earn here in a decade. Stay there for two years, and come back as an incredibly rich man - I'd have the rest of my entire life sorted out.

    134. Re:Can this be real? by garwain · · Score: 1

      or assume his wallet is now empty, and move on to the next sucker...

    135. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please go die. You really are a turd of a human being, and you make it all the more obvious every time you start typing.

    136. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      tl;dr;

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    137. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, the AC isn't me.

      I'm saying, people who make $250,000 per year have more in common, and more shared goals, with people who make $25,000 than with people who make $5,000,000. People who make a quarter million a year should be supporting government policies that help their interests, which are the same as the average persons;s, not the interests of the ultra rich.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    138. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      When people use words that are by definition insulting to a large number of my good friends, it is my business. You were using "faggot" as an insult. What definition of faggot carries insulting connotations? Obviously not the bundle of sticks definition, so what DID you mean by "faggot?"

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    139. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      What does "fuck" mean? It means nothing. It's just a curse. Calm down.

      As for it being by definition insulting to your friends, I strongly disagree with that. Not only is it generally known that people don't generally mean "gay", I made it explicitly clear that I didn't mean it in that way. If you still continue to choose to be offended, I have no further apologies or explanations for you, and only hope that in the future I figure out a way to offend you so badly that your head explodes.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    140. Re:Can this be real? by cskrat · · Score: 1

      And we're currently talking about wages in Canada.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    141. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, the AC isn't me.

      I wouldn't ever suspect it of you anyway - I've seen your posts around here, and often disagreed with them, but I wouldn't lump you in as a troll. Though I must say that I'm delighted to have inspired such a passionate and memorable follower - he's been following me around posting the same nonsense for about a week in response to anything I post here.

      People who make a quarter million a year should be supporting government policies that help their interests, which are the same as the average persons;s, not the interests of the ultra rich.

      This, I can agree with, to the extent that it doesn't require the top 0.5% of the "ultra rich" to become beasts of burden supporting the lower 99.5% of the socioeconomic scale. As I said, I'm not disputing that there's a vast difference between the incomes of the ultra rich and a street sweeper - there absolutely is. My issue was specifically with the (percevied) suggestion that someone making 250k/year is barely scraping by as a member of the lower middle class. By any sane measure, a household pulling down 250k/yr is well off, and living quite comfortably. They're not sharing a private airport with Warren Buffet, but they're also not living in a 5th floor studio walk-up in Queens.

    142. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Fuck is just a curse, it has never had negative connotations. And I am calm, you can tell that because I am not insulting you. I am not offended, because, like I mentioned, I don't think you said it on purpose. In fact, I am trying to help you. You seem to think that "faggot" has some other commonly accepted meaning besides "homosexual." It doesn't. When you use the word, you will alienate large segments of your audience, and your message will not be heard. It is no longer socially acceptable to call people "faggots," sorry. Try finding another word or phrase to use as an insult, perhaps "Fuckstained cuntflap" which I find fun to use because it is so graphic.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    143. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Agreed, my only point being that, IMHO, people making a quarter million have the same or similar economic interests as those making $20,000. In general, people making a quarter million make most of it from labor, not interest. They are not "capitalists" in that they do not make most of their money by lending capital, they are "labor" in that they make most of their money through, well, working for it. It was badly put, an awful sidetrack to my original point, and I'm sorry I even brought it up at this point.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    144. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Try finding another word or phrase to use as an insult, perhaps "Fuckstained cuntflap" which I find fun to use because it is so graphic.

      Implying there's something wrong with fuckstained cuntflaps?

    145. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      No, they are wonderful things, just like the poop that came out of me this morning was a wonderful thing (to me anyway.) I wouldn't want to be one, though.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    146. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      "Homosexuals are wonderful things. I wouldn't want to be one though."

      So what's the difference?

    147. Re:Can this be real? by Americano · · Score: 1

      I did find the item I cited earlier to be interesting, however, that the lower end of the scale was primarily supported by government welfare. To me, this really seems to set up three sets of competing interests:
      -- The capitalists - the very rich who lend to businesses & employ others as their primary means of making income;
      -- The labor - the working & middle classes, who make an income off their physical or mental labor;
      -- The entitlement recipients - bottom quintile-or-so - whose primary source of income is government welfare;

      If the goal is social mobility, we really need to focus on making it possible for people on the bottom rung to move up into the middle & upper rungs, and to do that we need to drastically reduce the number of people who are relying on government handouts to survive. Now, before anybody calls me heartless, I'm not suggesting that this be accomplished through welfare cuts - food, shelter, and basic healthcare are all absolute necessities... hard to learn much when you're worried about where you're going to be sleeping tonight, or where your next meal is coming from. But, moving beyond that - education & vocational programs are a huge component of encouraging mobility, and things like day care for single parents, easily available (and affordable) birth control, and sensible (fair) minimum wage laws will also help.

      Now, with all of that said, I think that it's also important to keep in mind that, as Thomas Paine said, "what we obtain too cheaply, we esteem too lightly." There need to be some responsibilities & requirements placed on the people receiving these benefits. For example, want government healthcare? Great, you show up for regular checkups, don't smoke, exercise regularly, and are subject to random drug tests - if someone else is footing the bill for your healthcare, it's awfully impolite to abuse that charity and deliberately make yourself sick. Collecting a welfare check? Great, 20 hours of your week will be spent doing some work (even if it's sweeping sidewalks & picking up trash) for the government. The other 20 hours of your 'work week' can be spent in vocational training, job searching, or doing other things aimed at moving you out of the entitlement class, and into the middle class.

      I also have to question the statistic you cited earlier suggesting that "50% of children make less than their parents." I have to wonder if this is also an indicator of the wide latitude of career options available. For instance: maybe dad's a teacher, and I become a mechanical engineer - I make more than him; Or, maybe mom's a nurse, and I become a teacher - I make less than her. It seems that social mobility doesn't necessarily require every child to make more money in absolute terms than their parents - perhaps I would be miserable as a nurse, but thrive as a carpenter. This doesn't necessarily mean my life is "worse," it just means that I'm happy doing a different type of work than my parents did, and that my career is one which by definition earns less than theirs did. I'd be interested to see a more in-depth review of the numbers you cited, to see if they've accounted for these sorts of things, because the ability to pursue the career you want seems to me as if it should also count in any measure of social mobility.

    148. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Remember the part about minding your own business? The only message I'm trying to get out there, to you, is "fuck off", and despite my restraint from calling you a nonsense word that people attach way too much meaning to you still haven't heard it. Go offer your help to someone who either wants or needs the preachings of a self-righteous douche and leave me out of your stupid crusade.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    149. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, you said you were done responding, and yet, here you are, desperately trying to communicate with me. What are you hoping to accomplish? Personally, I feel good about the work I've done here. I'm willing to bet that, whatever your protests to the contrary, you will probably be less inclined to call people faggots. From here on out, you will find that you will be called on using that word more and more often, and eventually, you will stop.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    150. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      "Fuckstained cuntflap" is not a phrase that applies to a specific group of people. It does not connote a history of violence and oppression. It does not bring up memories of young men being tied to fences and beaten to death. Are you clear on the difference now, or do you need more of an explanation?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    151. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I'm carefully dropping hints that I may be worth saving. Eventually, I plan to lead you to the conclusion that perhaps, by meeting with me in person, you might be able to change my wicked ways. Once that happens it should be a simple matter to seduce you (given your close association with the homosexual community you almost certainly harbor a latent desire that you placate by playing white knight to your secret brethren, I merely have to make you not so ashamed to admit it, if only to yourself) and then we can both be faggots together, forever and ever.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    152. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      (by the way I meant the gay kind of faggots that last time)

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    153. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Ah, so I am a secret homosexual? Anyone who defends gays must be one? Well, it's hardly a secret, I've tried it and found it isn't really for me. I like curves, and men don't have them. Sorry to dash your hopes. If you were a nicer person, I might be persuaded to have sex with you even though I'm not so into it, but given that you're kind of a jerk, that's not going to happen.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    154. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get it, you had problems getting laid, let yourself get talked into fooling around with a dude due to your crippling loneliness, it made you sick so you rationalized it as honest experimentation, and now you've reinvented yourself as an enlightened male who exclusively fucks fat girls out of choice instead of necessity. Well, your secret's safe with me, doctor.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    155. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      "Fuckstained cuntflap" is not a phrase that applies to a specific group of people. It does not connote a history of violence and oppression.

      It applies to promiscuous women. It brings up memories of adulteresses being stoned to death. I'm afraid I'm still not clear on the difference.

    156. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      One dude? No, I've been with about ten or so, all good friends who wanted to fool around, so I Iet 'em. As for women, I've been with about thirty or so. I guess that makes me three quarters straight? I'm married eleven years now, but I don't fuck anyone exclusively. The wife and I have an open relationship. I can't wait to see what you try to make of all that, but please keep up the commentary, it's pretty funny! Especially considering your earlier protestations of innocence...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    157. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Then I shan't use it anymore, if it offends you. But I am curious where you have heard the phrase before. I thought I made it up. And I never thought it applied to loose women, because I rather like loose women and wouldn't choose to insult them. It's just that sperm is messy, you know? Maybe I should just call people wetspots. Anyway, it's a conundrum, isn't it? How to insult the right person without insulting the wrong people. Perhaps I should just stick to the old tried and true, "Asshole" or "prick" but then people will complain that there is nothing wrong with assholes and pricks, they give us lots of pleasure.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    158. Re:Can this be real? by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Ok - sorry about that. Context about the American job and the original $200k being in US dollars made me interpret wrongly. Getting the permit to work in the US might be the hardest part then..

    159. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for the genital resume, now I totally don't doubt that you're a huge winner and I should definitely take your advice about what is and is not appropriate, given all your success at being a fuckdoll for who or whatever decides to crook their finger. Although I always thought I'd prefer to be the one who abuses the friendship of an emotionally crippled friend for a cheap thrill, after seeing how much smug self-satisfaction it's given you, maybe I should take a masochistic glee in abdicating my own sexual preferences in deference to ... well, apparently anyone other than myself ... until I don't even know what those preferences are anymore without referring to my own historical statistics!

      Hey, just between you, me, and the rest of the internet, have you ever noticed how dudes tend to have an open relationship with a particular girl, when they're with that girl, but girls who are "open" tend to be that way outside the context of any particular relationship? What's that all about?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    160. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Well as I may have mentioned, that was in my youth. I have gone through dry spells of over a month, and after a month, any orgasm with another human being is a good orgasm. And I never said I wasn't into it, just not AS into it as with women. I used to identify as bisexual, but years of experience have shown me that I don't get nearly as excited for guys as for women, so now I identify as (mostly) straight. But I can still say, there are guys that I am in love with, and it is that fact, being in love with someone, that makes me want to have sex with them even if their body is, for whatever reason, not a big turn on for me.

      As for open relationships, it took me seven years to convince my wife to give it a try. She did, with all of two guys. The first one turned out to be kind of a douche, the second one is still with us, three years later. Not that there is anything wrong with being a slut, as long as you are honest about it, but that's not really what we are about, thus "polyamory" rather than "swinging." In a way, sex is just a shortcut to emotional intimacy for me, which I guess makes me some kind of pansy-ass girly-man, except that chicks really seem to dig it, you know?

      Anyway, I certainly hope this is keeping you as amused as it is me. Cheers!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    161. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      It doesn't offend me. I'm just intending to point out that it's terribly easy to find something to be offended at, if you're trying. Conversely, as you said it: nearly impossible to offend the right people without offending anyone else, to which I'd add, particularly hard if anyone else was actively seeking to be offended.

      And really, worrying about offending the wrong people is a rather childish reason not to use an insult that otherwise seemed like a perfectly good insult to direct at a person you wanted to offend.

    162. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. Not buying it. Would you call someone a kyke? Would you call someone a nigger, a spick, or a pollack? I doubt it, because you don't want to open up those cans of worms. Well, welcome to the twenty first century, "faggot" is rapidly becoming one of those words you don't want to use because people will give you hell for it. Get used to it, ignorance is no longer an excuse. Thoughtless oppression is not acceptable just because it is thoughtless.

      Just to be clear, equating a recent murder by homophobes to a practice like stoning, which hasn't happened here in hundreds of years, is specious reasoning. You know full well they aren't the same.

      We live in a country with freedom of speech. Some people think that means "I can say whatever I like without consequences," but that is just not true, because I have freedom of speech as well, and your freedom to say what you like does not remove my freedom to call you out on it. So, I (and a growing majority of people) will continue to say that people who use the word "faggot" as an insult are childish, bigoted, small minded assholes. Sorry if that offends, but that is my position and I am sticking to it.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    163. Re:Can this be real? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Not really, to be honest I just wanted to see if I could take you from being a condescending tool to defending your sexual history to a complete stranger using nothing but insults--now that we're here, I'm running out of interest.

      Anyway, even though I think you're an annoying twat, I wish you all the happiness you can find (as long as I don't have to deal with your whiny complaints). Later fag!

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    164. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Sorry, no. Not buying it. Would you call someone a kyke? Would you call someone a nigger, a spick, or a pollack?

      Not in real life. But online?

      Well, still probably not, but that's more because I just don't think calling somebody something they aren't is a particularly effective way of insulting them. Neither is calling them something that there's nothing wrong with them being.

      Anyway, getting offended over being called something you're not is silly, and getting offended over someone else getting called something you are is likewise silly. And getting offended over somebody being called something that neither of you are is downright pointless and a waste of time.

      Also, while your trolling abilities are extraordinary, I'm afraid 19thNervousBreakdown had beaten you in that respect. You ought feel no shame there, however. I mean it as a complement in every way possible.

    165. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of an exhibitionist, I'll take any excuse I can get to go into my sexual history, so don't get too proud of yourself. For now, I guess I will just assume you are one of us, and are "reclaiming the word" for cocksuckers everywhere. Solidarity, brother!

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    166. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      Being a good troll is no guarantee of being troll-resistant. However, it is not a successful troll unless you get the other party angry. Just engaging in a conversation where the other party does not rise to the bait is a troll fail.

      Finally, I have to point out that only someone who has never suffered any sort of real oppression could possibly hold the attitude you do. If you had any awareness of what it was like to be a part of a subjugated minority, you would understand why your attitude is redolent of subconscious racism and classism.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    167. Re:Can this be real? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      However, it is not a successful troll unless you get the other party angry.

      Anger is not the only measure of troll success. Nor even the greatest, I'd say.

      I have to point out that only someone who has never suffered any sort of real oppression could possibly hold the attitude you do.

      Personally? Nope, I can't say that I have. But if I wanted I'm sure I could find half a dozen or so fragile identities that needed coddling based on some weird or bad stuff that happened a long time ago somewhere else to people who I'm related to or similar to. Frankly the mere idea of it sounds tiresome.

    168. Re:Can this be real? by spun · · Score: 1

      It's easy enough to tell other people to get over it when you've never had to.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    169. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, my sentiments EXACTLY . . . for 200K I can nail me a different hot 19 year old EVERY DAY for the REST OF MY LIFE (I live in Colombia)

      Very well said indeed sir

    170. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you see, an obsessive devotion to a single pursuit tends to lead to two things:

      1. Expertise in that area.
      2. A corresponding lack in other areas.

      I was thinking Facebook and Microsoft.

    171. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, where do I find suckers like this?

      Blowers surely?

    172. Re:Can this be real? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can somebody be modded "insigtful" when they are using "cheap" and "girlfriend" in the same sentence?

  8. Strange... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People with common sense don't get so far into such a scam without smelling a rat... But people who don't have at least some common sense don't have $200K just sitting around. This poor guy must have been terribly lonely, and the perps played him like a harp. Very sad.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:Strange... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1

      I really hope her name wasn't "Francesa A. Sample"...

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    2. Re:Strange... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You're assuming he had $200k. He probably borrowed the money against his house or something. Not only did it probably crush him, it's likely to ruin his life as he'll think everything is a scam.

    3. Re:Strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm on to your scam to convince me that not everything is a scam. Scammer!

    4. Re:Strange... by Seumas · · Score: 1

      What's baffling is how you have $200k to spend, but no girlfriend -- if you really *want* one. Even moderate wealth will score you your choice of 8/10 to 10/10 girls eager to find a man with more money than looks or fame. This guy didn't need to be some desperate internet patsy to do that.

    5. Re:Strange... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      People without common sense don't have $200k? I beg to differ.

      Running a Ponzi scheme doesn't seem like something you'd do if you had common sense, does it? Sooner or later it'll catch up with you, right? Well...

      OK, a less extreme example? Buying a McMansion with a NINJA loan. Total nonsense. Yet, there were probably some people who actually, through total dumb luck, got out at the right time. Same deal with dot-coms or any other bubble.

      The lottery. Suckers game, and yet people win $200k all the time.

      And, if that isn't enough to convince you; I actually saw a report on 419 scams where one of the victims was a doctor. A doctor!!!

      And yes, my first thought was "I don't want him operating on me".

      In short, a fool and his money are soon parted, and you'd be surprised how many rich fools there are, waiting to be parted from their money.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    6. Re:Strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong - people who don't have at least some common sense don't have $200K just sitting around...for long!

    7. Re:Strange... by vlm · · Score: 1

      A doctor!!!

      Doctors are legendary for not being able to handle money. Right up there with dentists, pro sports athletes, and lottery winners.

      And yes, my first thought was "I don't want him operating on me".

      An accountant or a cop, yeah be scared. Docs get a free pass on money handling. It doesn't really have much to do with their job.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Strange... by tukang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You left out the most common one: inheritance.

    9. Re:Strange... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1

      He probably borrowed the money against his house or something.

      Good point.

      To make matters even uglier, he's probably going to have some problems if he ever tries to borrow a significant amount of money again...

      --
      Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    10. Re:Strange... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      At least I know my online girlfriend is real. She sent pictures.

    11. Re:Strange... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I know plenty of people without that kind of common sense who have large amounts of money available, if not readily, readily enough, and almost all of them actually worked for it.
      Heck, this website probably has had thousands of members who had plenty of money, no ability to understand people what-so-ever, and a desperate desire to find SOMEONE, ANYONE who much get into a relationship with them, however shallow.

      Over the years, I've been on dates with geeky guys who were flat out fucking RICH (you wouldn't know it to look at them) who offered to take me on trips to Europe, bought me expensive (and ridiculously inappropriate) things, or just basically made it clear that if I stayed with them I was set for life, often by the 3rd or 4th date. It wasn't even flattering, just kind of fucked up and sad - they really thought that money could solve that whole "interpersonal" thing not working out deal.

      Anyway, tl;dr version: Totally seems feasible someone with $200,000 and not a lick of people-based common sense would fall for this.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    12. Re:Strange... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Is that why dentists were the only ones to buy Acura NSX's?

      I thought maybe there was a rule restricting ownership or something.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  9. Hard to believe Blogoviovich fell for this. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    This is not the end of the road Blogoviovich, you will rebound from there. Don't give up. Continue the fight.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  10. howly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a freaking horrible scam. I mean imagine. The poor man falled in love wth someone that only wanted his money. That is an everyda issue, but that the guy really believed that scam was true: that is modern day dynamics.
    We should have to create something to avoid that people like this guy get rob by playing with his feelings... Is a risky business, and maybe too good to be true. What do you think?

    1. Re:howly by Seumas · · Score: 2

      To be fair, if you weeded out everyone that wants you for your money, you'd have to turn gay.

    2. Re:howly by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking more "self love", but I also want my money, so even that's not safe...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:howly by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      So you're basically in for Newtonic love?

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  11. It happens more often than not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    My previous landlord was sucked into this. He has sent over 20k to online scammers who are from the U.S. We even google mapped where they were in Florida yet he still sent money. He was sent various cheques, would cash them and western union the money, then charged with fraud from the cheques. He sent his rent money to "save her" to the point where he was 10k in debt on the house on back payments.

  12. Wow by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a good way to pay off my student loans faster!

  13. Don't Assume by b4upoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People don't think these classic scams could ever suck them in but if they are done in an artful way they actually can sucker people in. Most of these con artists lack the ability but there are a few out there with serious skills that really can sink a strong man's boat.

    1. Re: Don't Assume by goodmanj · · Score: 2

      Agree. Also, there is no fool so foolish as a fool in love.

      Falling for Nigerian fraud scams isn't normal. But on Love it is.
      Love. Not even once.

    2. Re: Don't Assume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure buddy. I'm sure your average "strong man" would be stupid enough to "[wire] about $200,000 to several different bank accounts in Nigeria, Malaysia, England, and the US" to someone they've *never seen in person*.

      That isn't just naive. That isn't just being tricked. That's fucking stupid.

    3. Re: Don't Assume by Seumas · · Score: 1

      No, you have to be a HUGE sucker to fall for this.

      I mean, I don't know about you, but if I spend my whole nice listening to someone's life story and buying them dinner and yadda yadda yadda, I'd be pissed if there wasn't at least a little action at the end of the night. If I spent $199,960.00 more on top of that and found out that all I got was scammed . . . holy shit...

    4. Re: Don't Assume by jmak · · Score: 1

      Actually, If the cons really worked the guy for two years, that's a pretty impressive feat. Probably on par with three-letter agencies.

    5. Re: Don't Assume by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

      Hell guys get scammed by real women all the time...This is just funny because he never even got laid.

    6. Re: Don't Assume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laughed so hard when I read this. Thank you.

  14. EPIC FAIL by kheldan · · Score: 1

    In reality, the man in TFA has been participating in a covert intelligence test using a new innovative testing method. The cost for this testing is $200,000. I don't think I need to go into what the results of the testing.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  15. Stupid person. News at 11 by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Is this a relevant story because the fraud happened online, or because of some other reason that is not in TFA?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  16. What amazes me... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    ...is how people so profoundly stupid can nevertheless be intelligent enough to make enough money to have $200,000 in discretionary income. That must require a remarkably narrow set of capabilities.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:What amazes me... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Or the possibility that the $200,000 was not, in fact, what you or I would consider "discretionary income".

      The person he thought was the love of his life was in trouble. $200,000 is pretty easy to get for anyone in any kind of a decent financial position. How much mortgage capacity is in your house? How about cashing in your 401K and IRA?

      Plus, skill at detecting scams is not, last I checked, a job skill that most people had to demonstrate in order to earn decent money. I have a relative who's a doctor, and he's an incredibly smart and very kind and generous soul, but it's a good thing he's married and his wife is a practical and reasonably skeptical person, because I suspect he'd fall for any number of scams that play to his generosity and kindness.

      Love's a lot more powerful a "hook", and they played him for two years setting him up.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:What amazes me... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Oh, there's plenty of ways a stupid person can make a good amount of cash, if they're willing to risk their life. Just look at the crew of Deadliest Catch.

    3. Re:What amazes me... by gutnor · · Score: 1
      You can be born with a lot more than $200,000. Or you can have close relatives that dies. You can win the lottery.

      He could have been tricked by his greedy banker to put all his money in Apple stock just before Jobs came back.

      You can also -become- a sucker after for example depression, excess of stress, an accident (car crash, stroke, ...) He could have been a dotcom millionaire in a downward spiral.

    4. Re:What amazes me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians?

    5. Re:What amazes me... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Plus, skill at detecting scams is not, last I checked, a job skill that most people had to demonstrate in order to earn decent money

      I agree, but c'mon. These scams have been around for decades. Anyone who has had an email account for more than six months has already seen hundreds of similar scams, and anyone with the faculty of reason should be able to see through them.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:What amazes me... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Ok, you have me there. A politician who, for instance, is so lacking in reason that he thinks Guam might tip over if too many soldiers are deployed there, may nevertheless make six figures.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:What amazes me... by RussellSHarris · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has had an email account for more than six months has already seen hundreds of similar scams

      See, that's what's actually quite scary about Gmail. It's so stinking good at detecting spam and phishing that I feel like I'm going to literally begin to lose some of the mental faculties I had developed back in the days of AOL and Hotmail.

      I still have a Hotmail account; every once in a while I sign in to it to peruse my inbox and click a few of the spam/scam/phishing sorts of e-mails just to keep in touch with what the sleazebags are up to. And maybe partly for nostalgia's sake too...

    8. Re:What amazes me... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      You may have a point. I got my first commercial email account years before hotmail existed, and my first work-related presence on the net dates long before AlGore invented it. I still pay for my personal email account (NOT AOL) rather than use a free one, mostly as a hold over from the old days when free email account had an almost one to one correspondence to spammer. I regularly check my "junk" folder because even the spam detector screws up sometimes, and I have been known to read (with a text-only mail tool) the more interesting of the 419 missives. I'm continually surprised at how badly most of them are written. You'd think that an industry that nets millions of dollars could afford a decent scriptwriter.

      Anyway. So it's possible that I'm expecting too much of the rank and file. I can understand that intellectually without appreciating it emotionally. I mean, you just have to READ them with clear eyes to see the scam.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  17. 200K? by boxxa · · Score: 1

    I wish I had 200k to wire period.

    --
    Bryan
  18. A fool and his money... by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the story that came out not too long ago about the composer who lost millions, believing an even more elaborate hoax than this guy.

  19. How come this fool had 200K? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0

    Cant believe someone this naive would have amassed 200K by his own work. Either it is a lottery or it is inheritance. Wish the Koch brothers also would be this stupid and blow some 20 billion in saving fake Republicans and fake libertarians.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:How come this fool had 200K? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Maybe he borrowed the money, so now he might owe $200k plus interest.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:How come this fool had 200K? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Maybe he borrowed the money, so now he might owe $200k plus interest.

      Those kind of amounts are discharged in bankruptcy every day, no big deal. Can anyone prove he was not planning on declaring all along? Makes you wonder if he REALLY doesn't know where the cash is. In fact sometimes the rules on chap 7 vs chap 11 mean you "save money by losing money" if you can get your net worth negative or low enough... Even better if you don't actually lose the money but its just stashed somewhere.

      Now someone whom is stupid, would wire it across the country, then buy a plane ticket using their own credit card to the destination to collect it and fly back, but they would have to be really dumb to get caught like that.

      Yes, I did have friends whom were cops. I have no idea if their stories are true or not, but they are certainly pretty interesting.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:How come this fool had 200K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason everyone here seems to think a person has to be smart to make a lot of money, despite there being ample evidence to the contrary.

      The first thing I did out of the military was join a logging crew in Alaska. Most of those guys were dumb as a post, even the guys running the companies, but for someone who wasn't afraid of cheating death and willing to work himself to physical exhaustion, $200k/year was within reach. Even the dumb guys running the logging outfits made 5 times that.

      AK is a very expensive place to live, but if you just sit at home on your off time the bankroll builds pretty quickly.

  20. My online profile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My online profile presents me as a multi-millionaire, ex-athlete, slim, caring and educated individual that would make a perfect employee. In reality I'm a nine to fiver, athletically inept, overweight, gadget-loving and video game playing dork. I've seen other profiles... Some buddies are umm.. gravityphilic.. (you know, symmetrical height and width.. i.e., round), and their profiles invariably show them much slimmer than they are. My friend, who hasn't worked in twenty years, pretends to be a pilot.

    I'm just surprised that *anyone* thinks that any online profile is real..

  21. Sigh... by koan · · Score: 5, Funny

    See the difference between "screwed" and "laid".

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  22. Big head... by TimHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...meet little head.

    From my soon-to-be-published book "Dick: An Owner's Manual"

    Rule #1: Your dick will lie to you.

    1. Re:Big head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule #1: Your dick will lie to you.

      Rule #2: Always refer to rule #1, even if you believe what your dick is telling you.

    2. Re:Big head... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Rule #3: Now, to really find out the secret of getting laid, send me $100.

      Rule #4: What did I tell you???

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Big head... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      From my soon-to-be-published book "Dick: An Owner's Manual"

      About time there was a Dick manual, we've had Jane's guides for years (and before anyone says they've got nothing to do with women, my last girlfriend was ocean-going and had a gross displacement of around 10,000 tons).

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    4. Re:Big head... by stms · · Score: 0

      Rule #2: Your dick will lie to you.

    5. Re:Big head... by Tolkien · · Score: 2

      So you like to open portholes eh?

    6. Re:Big head... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      After all that, I'd think you would have read the one by Melville....

    7. Re:Big head... by TimHunter · · Score: 1

      The first rule is always free.

  23. For $200k he could have by joeytmann · · Score: 1

    bought himself a pretty high-classed hooker. Not sure for how long though......

    --
    Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    1. Re:For $200k he could have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bought himself a pretty high-classed hooker. Not sure for how long though......

      Going by the only information I have on such things (the amount Richard Gere's character paid Julia Roberts' character for a week of 'service' in the 1990 film Pretty Woman, and the government's inflation calculator at http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm), I'd say, 39.6 weeks.

    2. Re:For $200k he could have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reckon if you found one and said, look here's $200K for two years full time, that would be a pretty attractive deal. Especially in these uncertain economic times.

  24. He saved money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If it was a real woman, she would have cost him more than that in marriage

    1. Re:He saved money by Seumas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Marriage is different. You're renting pussy. Of course, after the divorce, you're stuck paying for that pussy for the rest of your life even though you don't get to enjoy it anymore. But yeah, for $200k, he should have been able to attract a choice of decent chicks that he could have settled down with. Why you'd waste your time on some fantasy half a world away is bizarre.

    2. Re:He saved money by makubesu · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Sometimes it takes an Anonymous Coward to deliver to the cold hard truth.

    3. Re:He saved money by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your pathetic attempt at humor makes me sad. Stories like this should never appear on Slashdot, because while readers here manage to say interesting things about tech issues, they are basically stuck in retarded, rude and simple stereotypes about gender relations. For other readers who are similarly retarded about this issue: Please wise up before you make comments like this, here and everywhere else.

    4. Re:He saved money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some say the benefits are worth it though. Seriously, do you really really want to live in your mom's basement well after mom is dead?

    5. Re:He saved money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was a real woman, she would have cost him more than that in marriage

      Finally, someone understands......... that man is lucky.

  25. what a tard by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    On the positive side he probably hasn't bred.

  26. Anyone here divorced? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Admit it--You're all jealous over how easy this guy got off.

    1. Re:Anyone here divorced? by poundbang · · Score: 1

      It took me a minute to read "got off" the way I believe you intended.

    2. Re:Anyone here divorced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant we're jealous how EASILY he got off.

    3. Re:Anyone here divorced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best comment ever. :)

  27. what's the penalty for bigamy? by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    hey, he's only out $200,000 and doesn't have an ex-wife!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:what's the penalty for bigamy? by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      2 mother in laws?

      --
      No brain, no pain.
  28. Re:Stupid person. News at 11 by dziban303 · · Score: 1

    Is this a relevant story because the fraud happened online, or because of some other reason that is not in TFA?

    Teh lulz are always relevant.

  29. The really sad part, ... by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

    athough it should come as no surprise, is that this guy's Slashdot member number is 101.

    --
    One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
  30. Ironically... by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    Prostitutes would have been cheaper, and he might have ACTUALLY gotten laid.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  31. Well well well by scarface71795 · · Score: 0

    Internet connection $30. Computer $600. Wiring your internet girlfriend money $200,000. Finding out she's fake Priceless. For everything else there are hookers.

  32. I don't know if I should laugh or cry. by ctwx · · Score: 1

    I don't know if I should laugh or cry. On the one hand, it's really funny to that that really someone fell in such a trap. On the other hand I have to say it's really sad that there are really many people who don't know how to deal with it. I mean, it starts with the spam in the mailbox. I know many people who probably fall into a trap like this too. But this case is really extreme... I mean, $200,000 is a lot of money.

  33. The economy's getting worse... by ChristianMc · · Score: 0

    It's hard to believe stupid tax is getting as high as $200,000 these days.

  34. Lack of empathy by hahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a little saddened to see all the negative comments aimed at the *victim*. What did he do wrong? He trusted someone. Apparently, that's so idiotic and inconceivable that it makes him the one who's at fault. What's next? Blaming rape victims for not bringing pepper spray on a blind date? What happened to blaming the perpetrator? The lesson here appears to be, if you're capable of scamming people online, then you deserve the money and your victims are morons. I guess the study that was written about in NY Times last year wasn't far off the mark.

    --
    "The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well."
    1. Re:Lack of empathy by ChristianMc · · Score: 0

      The lesson here appears to be, if you're capable of scamming people online, then you deserve the money and your victims are morons.

      I don't think the issue here is whether or not the person doing the scamming deserves to have the money, but whether or not the person being scammed deserves to have that money. If you're stupid enough to *ever* wire money to Nigeria nowadays (Nigerian royalty, anyone?), you give that money up right away.

    2. Re:Lack of empathy by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 0

      Finally, a thoughtful comment in this discussion. Thank you!

    3. Re:Lack of empathy by SockPuppetOfTheWeek · · Score: 1

      What did he do wrong? He trusted someone. Apparently, that's so idiotic and inconceivable that it makes him the one who's at fault. ... The lesson here appears to be, if you're capable of scamming people online, then you deserve the money and your victims are morons.

      I pretty much agree with all of that. Even the bit about you deserving the money - at least more than the people you scammed. You also deserve to get caught, but that's beside the point.

      What's next? Blaming rape victims for not bringing pepper spray on a blind date?

      To be fair the analogy should be more like "blaming rape victims for going on blind dates in deserted parks at 11 PM and not at least bringing pepper spray".

      I guess the study that was written about in NY Times last year wasn't far off the mark.

      I especially like their last bit:

      "The implications are hardly superficial. Low empathy is associated with criminal behavior, violence, sexual offenses, aggression when drunk and other antisocial behaviors."

      No, correlation is not causation. Not even when the New York Times says so.

    4. Re:Lack of empathy by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      First of all - what the fuck is wrong with you that you compare this to rape?

      Second, in general all online scams involve something that is too good to be true. They require the victim to cooperate by suspending all logic. Nobody forced the man to send money.

      Chances are that this "victim" fell for a woman who was stunning in every way imaginable - a woman who he must have been able to realize was out of his league. (If she was not, he'd pursue such a woman offline.)

      He is no more a "victim" than someone who buys an overpriced set of brittle dull steak knives from a late night infomercial because they showed them cutting through bricks and he fell for it.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    5. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all - what the fuck is wrong with you that you compare this to rape?

      Protip: You can make an analogy between two events of different levels of severity, and doing so does NOT imply any kind of moral equivalency between them.

    6. Re:Lack of empathy by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      He is no more a "victim" than someone who buys an overpriced set of brittle dull steak knives from a late night infomercial because they showed them cutting through bricks and he fell for it.

      I'd say he's a bit more of a victim than that... unless when he complained about the knives, they offered to exchange them for a $200,000 restocking fee.

      The one that came to my mind had more to do with Monster cables.... an area where people routinely get bilked out of $200,000 with one exception... they never realize they've been duped!

    7. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with trust. There's also nothing wrong with verifying the situation before trusting.

      This isn't a question of empathy, it's a question of what the hell was the person thinking? For $200000 you could fricking afford a few percent of that to travel to the location and discreetly verify the story, or hire someone to do the same.

      I'm sympathetic, but I'm also perplexed.

    8. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Empathy in the modern world is a huge liability. I lost mine a while ago when I realized that every person in the western world has three slaves working for them somewhere in the third world so we can have flat screen TV's and cheap shoes. Empathy would destroy the modern human who was aware of how the world actually is. He or she would be reduced to a crying shivering mass on the floor for all of the suffering their very existence caused other human beings. This is not a good state to be in if you intend to pass on your genes (which I don't BTW). I'm not saying it's "right" (whatever that means), I'm just saying that it's the way it is.

        We all have wished at some point or another that stupidity was painful. We get joy when we see that sometimes it is. Most stupidity isn't painful in a short enough time frame for the stupid person to learn a lesson and perhaps teach others. In this case it was. YAY!

    9. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of this thread applies to you perfectly.

    10. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck empathy. He's a dumbass who deserves what he got.

    11. Re:Lack of empathy by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

      I just want to say thank you for this comment. I also want to note that there was an element to this story that seems hidden, but nevertheless present. It said that he reported her kidnapped. Almost all of this $200,000 could have been in ransom money to try and save her life. Is it a foolish thing to do to spend money trying to save someone you have an intellectual relationship with? I'd really like to see more of the story here, because my first reaction to this was empathy at the man taken advantage of, not "Well, he deserved it." He could be perfectly intelligent, he was taken advantage of because of a sense of caring and trust. Is caring a bad thing to have nowadays? That's kind of sad.

    12. Re:Lack of empathy by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      First of all - what the fuck is wrong with you that you compare this to rape?

      Agreed. In some ways it is worse than rape. Emotionally pains from getting scammed or raped are both huge. However, rape doesn't leave monetary hurts behind.

    13. Re:Lack of empathy by izomiac · · Score: 1

      The emotional part of the brain overrides the logical parts, ergo too much empathy is bad. This guy was empathic when he should have been logical. As this wasn't an unavoidable tragedy, one should learn from it rather than just feel sad for the victim, and it's doubtful anyone even has the emotional capacity to sincerely feel sad at every little public tragedy that happens. Plus, this guy isn't even that bad off; he's got his life, all four limbs, an expensive education, and lives in a country where debt isn't life-ending.

    14. Re:Lack of empathy by Geminii · · Score: 1

      "Trust, but verify."

      I might trust someone I'd met half an hour ago with five bucks. If they'd been a good friend for years, I might trust them with a couple hundred or a few thousand dollars, depending on how rich I was. I wouldn't trust _anyone_ with ten grand (let alone 200) without some damn good paperwork in advance. Particularly if I'd never laid eyes on them.

    15. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? Blaming rape victims for not bringing pepper spray on a blind date? .

      Personally, I prefer a wrench, a handkerchief, sleeping pills, and an LED flashlight.

    16. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do I love thee? Let me count the ways.
      -click-
      -click-
      -click-

    17. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck empathy. He's a dumbass who deserves what he got.

      He may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but saying some random guy deserves to lose that much money just because he's a little slow makes no sense. If it did, it should be against the law to be stupid.

    18. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be as dumb as the guy in the story. Read this line carefully: The rape victim *never* consented to being raped (unless under fear of severe physical abuse or drugged). This dumb guy willingly gave the money while being in his senses. When you make stupid decisions, you pay the price. No one is saying the scammer(s) is a good person and he deserved the cash, but this guy deserved to lose it, if not to the scammer, some where else.

      How dumb you have to be to be sending money in several different bank accounts in different countries for your 'girlfriend'?

    19. Re:Lack of empathy by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      First of all - what the fuck is wrong with you that you compare this to rape?

      Agreed. In some ways it is worse than rape. Emotionally pains from getting scammed or raped are both huge. However, rape doesn't leave monetary hurts behind.

      Yes, because the worst pain you can feel is in your wallet, you drooling fuckwad.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    20. Re:Lack of empathy by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      Unless you count babies, medical bills from particularly violent rapes, or psychiatric bills from the trauma of rape...

    21. Re:Lack of empathy by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Unless you count babies,

      Abortion

      medical bills from particularly violent rapes

      Any sane country don't have rape victims paying medical bills.

      or psychiatric bills from the trauma of rape...

      And you think there isn't trauma from being swindled out of a large sum of money?

    22. Re:Lack of empathy by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the worst pain you can feel is in your wallet, you drooling fuckwad.

      If you think that I was talking about the loss of money, then you are a drooling fuckwad.

      Being deceived, about love no less, is what causes pain. It is just as huge a violation as rape.

      So when it comes down to it, and you deduce the similar emotional pains from each side of the equation, you are left with the physical part of the rape vs the money part of the scam. Unless you are extremely severely raped, I doubt the physical part of the rape is worth $200,000.

  35. Re:The power of desire by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    I can't speak on behalf of this guy's intelligence, but I am reluctant to conclude he's an idiot. My guess is that this guy is not so gullible in general, but that he let down his guard here because he really wanted to believe it was true.

    Well said. I think if the commenters here would get past their 'smarter-than-everyone' mentality, they'd have a bit more sympathy for the dude. We all act dumb for love, that's why it's such a common topic on sitcoms.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  36. Wired money to banks... by yt8znu35 · · Score: 1

    LMFAO

  37. Not the same, but close enough. by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

    Wait for it. It'll happen.

  38. Re:The power of desire by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    Con artists can be REALLY good. If she was in contact with him for a long time, he probably really believed her, really loved her. When he found out that this person he trusted was in trouble, he did what he could to help.

    People have lost millions over love. The have murdered, committed espionage, and started wars over love.

    Need to remember that he was probably not very internet savvy or the scam would not have gotten past the first email.

    As far as a dumb move by a person in love, this isn't at all out there.

  39. Home Equity Line of Credit by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    A HELOC can have that kind of credit line.

  40. Nigeria by b0bby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As soon as you see Nigeria and bank in the same context, always run away. In fact, just Nigeria should be enough...

    1. Re:Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Nigerian Banker whose farther, the President, just died, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you see Nigeria and bank in the same context, always run away. In fact, just Nigeria should be enough...

      The future when one will do the same when only seeing "bank" doesn't seem too remote as well.

    3. Re:Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^THIS

    4. Re:Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just 'bank' should be enough also.

    5. Re:Nigeria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its too bad, because Nigerian women are fine!

    6. Re:Nigeria by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      As soon as you see Nigeria and bank in the same context, always run away. In fact, just Nigeria should be enough...

      Similarly, you should have nothing to do with the USA as it is the centre of the majority of spam.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  41. Hire her by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    It's sad they had to steal from him. He would gladly have paid 200K just to continue the fake relationship for more years. It seems to me that 200K compensation for being a fake online girl ought to be plenty for a Nigerian Scammer, so why not just continue the relationship for a 200K fee instead.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Hire her by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      What's sad is that so many people in our society are lonely -- lonely enough to go to great lengths to find a mate or companionship, or even just sex. Even with all the supposedly amazing wonderful technology we create, all the vast knowledge and wisdom we've accumulated over the past 100,000 years, we still have a society where people are unhappy and lacking the basic companionship that our species needs.

    2. Re:Hire her by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People are less interested in getting married, settling down and having kids now. Where once they would have settled for someone less than ideal due to the need for a partner in life (didn't used to have maternity leave and usually only one parent worked remember). Therefore there are a lot more people unable to form lasting relationships.

      Advertising and TV are also to blame. They give people unrealistic expectations about partners. At the most basic level a person is at once made insecure by being unable to live up to the perfection they see on TV and told that they should aspire to a beautiful/successful partner. Fortunately switching to Diet Coke and a 5-blade razor will bring you all that, or so they claim.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Hire her by jemenake · · Score: 1

      What's sad is that so many people in our society are lonely -- lonely enough to go to great lengths to find a mate or companionship, or even just sex.

      I agree. At first, I was just going to toss in a snide comment about this whole scam being a tax on the stupid... evolution at work, but it's true. It's tragic that someone can be that lonely and have no idea how to fix it. If this person were in chronic physical pain, there are thousands of ways that modern science can help. But, for this chronic emotional pain... what solutions are there for him? "Buy a Russian bride", "Just be happy with yourself", "Just hang in there. You'll meet someone, someday...". Platitudes.

      And to think that there are millions like this person. Not necessarily so desperate as to get bilked out for $200k, but forlorn and lonely, nonetheless.

  42. Most expensive Tamagotchi ever. by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    Ouch.

  43. HELO-what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could also get a HELO backed "creditcard", I keep getting offers for HELOs for anywhere from 100k to 250k.

    So really it'd not be that hard for me to pull out 200k from a "credit card".

    Home equity line of backed "creditcard"? Does not parse.

    1. Re:HELO-what? by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      It's a credit card, has a VISA/Mastercard logo, and pulls money straight out of a HELO as opposed to a dedicated credit card account.
      I don't have one. Their only advantage over a regular CC is the lower interest rate.

      By the very definition it IS a credit card as it is NOT a debit card. Any purchases you put on the card, or money withdrawn using the card are borrowed and subject to an interest rate which may or may not rise depending on the terms of your HELO.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    2. Re:HELO-what? by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      I could also get a HELO backed "creditcard", I keep getting offers for HELOs for anywhere from 100k to 250k.

      Home equity line of backed "creditcard"? Does not parse.

      Yeah, I'm in RE, we abbreviate the hell outta things
      but HELOC is about as abbreviated as we've ever
      said it. The 'C' is the important part there.

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  44. Scant on the details but dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, so Love is a blinding force. This woman must have been what your level 60+ paladin becomes to you after two years of WoW grinding.

    That said, it seems the victim knows the bank accounts spread into FOUR different CONTINENTS. Did he really think these "kidnappers" can have the worldwide footprint of a major Fortune 500 company? We know he was a total fool, but still can relate: level 60+ paladin

  45. I know there's by teeloo · · Score: 1

    a funny Mastercard commercial in this somewhere....

  46. marriage by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    and you thought getting married was expensive...

  47. You are doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked hard for many years

    There's your problem right there. Hard work doesn't pay. To make real money you need to climb the corporate ladder and get a nice executive position. Then you get to cash in on the hard work of others.

    Connections, nepotism, and political intelligence are the real keys to wealth in the modern world.

  48. Less upward mobility here than in France by spun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is no social mobility in America anymore.

    http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2005/01/the_economist_o.html

    and, from here: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/04/b1579981.html

    The key findings relating to intergenerational mobility include the following:

    *Children from low-income families have only a 1 percent chance of reaching the top 5 percent of the income distribution, versus children of the rich who have about a 22 percent chance.
    *Children born to the middle quintile of parental family income ($42,000 to $54,300) had about the same chance of ending up in a lower quintile than their parents (39.5 percent) as they did of moving to a higher quintile (36.5 percent). Their chances of attaining the top five percentiles of the income distribution were just 1.8 percent.
    *Education, race, health and state of residence are four key channels by which economic status is transmitted from parent to child.
    *African American children who are born in the bottom quartile are nearly twice as likely to remain there as adults than are white children whose parents had identical incomes, and are four times less likely to attain the top quartile.
    *The difference in mobility for blacks and whites persists even after controlling for a host of parental background factors, children’s education and health, as well as whether the household was female-headed or receiving public assistance.
    *After controlling for a host of parental background variables, upward mobility varied by region of origin, and is highest (in percentage terms) for those who grew up in the South Atlantic and East South Central regions, and lowest for those raised in the West South Central and Mountain regions.
    *By international standards, the United States has an unusually low level of intergenerational mobility: our parents’ income is highly predictive of our incomes as adults. Intergenerational mobility in the United States is lower than in France, Germany, Sweden, Canada, Finland, Norway and Denmark. Among high-income countries for which comparable estimates are available, only the United Kingdom had a lower rate of mobility than the United States.

    Key findings relating to short-run, year-to-year income movements include the following:

    *The overall volatility of household income increased significantly between 1990-91 and 1997-98 and again in 2003-04.
    *Since 1990-91, there has been an increase in the share of households who experienced significant downward short-term mobility. The share that saw their incomes decline by $20,000 or more (in real terms) rose from 13.0 percent in 1990-91 to 14.8 percent in 1997-98 to 16.6 percent in 2003-04.
    *The middle class is experiencing more insecurity of income, while the top decile is experiencing less. From 1997-98 to 2003-04, the increase in downward short-term mobility was driven by the experiences of middle-class households (those earning between $34,510 and $89,300 in 2004 dollars). Households in the top quintile saw no increase in downward short-term mobility, and households in the top decile ($122,880 and up) saw a reduction in the frequency of large negative income shocks.
    *For the middle class, an increase in income volatility has led to an increase in the frequency of large negative income shocks, which may be expected to translate to an increase in financial distress.
    *The median household was no more upwardly mobile in 2003-04, a year when GDP grew strongly, than it was it was during the recession of 1990-91.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Less upward mobility here than in France by jaymzter · · Score: 1

      Just quoting this part as the rest was nonsense as well...

      African American children who are born in the bottom quartile are nearly twice as likely to remain there as adults than are white children whose parents had identical incomes, and are four times less likely to attain the top quartile.

      And yet here I am, the son of a janitor and cafeteria worker with no college degree making six figures. Why not drop your victim mentality?

      --
      If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    2. Re:Less upward mobility here than in France by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you never took statistics, there are such thing as statistical anomalies and you are one of them. Um, congrats?

    3. Re:Less upward mobility here than in France by spun · · Score: 1

      I'm not a victim, I make good money, have a house that is mostly paid off, and have a good life. But even though my life is good, I won't just sit back and say "anyone can do it," because that is demonstrably untrue. We have an unfair system, and I will continue to fight to make it more fair, because I want the chance of a good life for everyone.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  49. Obligatory by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    Forever alone

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  50. Just "Africa" will do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shortly after my divorce, I gave the ol' internets a whirl for dating. Didn't take long before I found myself in a chat with a nice woman telling me about her life, and how she was going out of town the next day.

    "Oh, where to?"

    "West Africa. I'm an art dealer..."

    NEXT!

    Finally wised up and found someone NOT on the tubes.

  51. The Real Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop groping our genitals in airports and go after the 419 and v14g4ra spammers and their botnets.

  52. Its stupid even if the girl was actually "real" by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Either way, whether or not the girl is "real" he is a total idiot. $200k (or even $2) to a cyber-real relationships is totally stupid and unjustifiable.

  53. Re:subtlety is dead. by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

    All we know is that one person who didn't understand posted. It's entirely possible some 10,000 other readers completely understood the original comment.

  54. Re:120k per year ain't that much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha. Try making 30k/year and then talk about how 120k isn't much.

  55. 200k for a word, my word is poontang! by slash76 · · Score: 0

    I guess he thought he was giving it for that, and in the end I'm sure someone got some out of the whole deal somewhere in either Nigeria, Malaysia, England, or the US. I know of a guy (cough), that goes onto these "adult dating" sites and has gotten several hits from "women" trying to get him to vote for them on their cam site. Oh, yeah baby... I'm only a few miles away and will meet you after you give you credit card number (for five dollars, yeah right) to this website. It will help me with my modeling career... So, basically if guys think there is any chance of getting some they will fork over money.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
  56. I am! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    There can be only one!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  57. This guy . . . . . by bogidu · · Score: 1

    is why we have so damn much SPAM!!!!!

  58. Actually most people by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to think Oprah is real. Well it is, for a segment of the population. Don't let the tv stereo-types fool you into believing this is how most people are. TV shows the extremes because normality doesn't make for intresting TV.

    There won't be a program Deadliest code, gripping the nation season after season. O.C. Support Desk is NOT a sure fire hit. BugBusters will not be challenged by the president of the US of A.

    Most teenagers? Never rebel and get along with their parents and siblings. Most women are not complete sluts in college crying they can't find a good guy while banging the soccer team. Most men do not in fact follow their cock, either that or the navy has a LOT more gay people in it then a republican can stand.

    Most people lead simple sensible lives, they might screw up a little by accident but recover and move on. The real idiots are rare. Same as with criminals. Most people will NOT in fact kill to gain a fortune even if they could get away with it.

    Humanity is a lot more normal. TV reality is about showing the extremes on the edges but you would be a fool to believe it. Do you believe everyone can run really fast because you just saw the olympics? Then why do you believe all people behave like the freaks on talkshows.

    Ancient statistic. 50% of people loose their virginity before 18. Means over half the population does NOT.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  59. Wouldn't happen to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live my life by the motto "it's not real till I put my dick in it."

  60. Ah foohey by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    This guy can blow $200K on a fake person while I feel bad for blowing money on buying my (real life) wife flowers? I have about as much pity as I do change in my pocket, which is.... 78 cents.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  61. That's awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd of pretended to be his online girlfriend for much less than that.

  62. how? by Scotty+L · · Score: 1

    How does someone that foolish get to have that much available money in the first place?

  63. Also, by nastro · · Score: 1

    That stripper is not really into you. She just wants you to buy her a few beers and then pay for a lap dance. No touching.

  64. Robin Williams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "God gave man a brain and a penis and only enough blood to run one at a time..."

  65. What victim? by raehl · · Score: 1

    What did he do wrong? He trusted someone.

    Well, actually, no, he didn't trust SOMEONE. He trusted ANYONE. SOMEONE is an identifiable person. Text on your computer screen is not SOMEONE.

    What's next? Blaming rape victims for not bringing pepper spray on a blind date?

    No, because forcing someone to have sex is not comparable to convincing someone to send you money. This guy is about as much of a victim as the girl who decides to sleep with a convenience store clerk because he convinced her he's a talent scout.

    1. Re:What victim? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      In Sweden lying to get sex is rape, so in you example the clerk would be convicted of rape.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  66. Identified as nonexistant by her fake ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTFA: "An identification card the woman provided to the man was a sample driver’s license from Florida, the report said. According to the report, when the officer stated the female did not exist, the man "was in disbelief." The case is under investigation."

    Who's to say she isn't real, and gave him a fake ID at the beginning of their relationship because she didn't want some creep from the internet to see her real ID? Just saying, if that's all that they're going on, then there's a real possibility that his girlfriend really could be in trouble. And it's her own damn fault. Chicks lie ya know. Just sayin.

    But yeah, he definitely got scammed.

  67. Hmm by Kuruk · · Score: 1

    How someone can get $200,000 available cash and then be so stupid to send it a virtual girlfriend is beyond me.

  68. jawdropper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy Fucking Shit. Foreign people must really be starting to believe they could topple us with this kind of stuff going on. This must obviously mean he never actually met her yet spent $200,000 on her. What a horrible existence followed by the most tragic of all endings. USA!USA!USA!

  69. I'm stumped. by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

    There are no words to describe that level of stupidity... I can't believe people can actually be that dumb... Wow... I...I... I'm lost for words.

  70. wouldn't pay for a real GF either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't pay $200,000 for a real GF let alone someone on the Internet. Not paying a ransom that leads to untimely results is not a criminal offense. There are plenty of fish in the sea.

  71. By any definition, you're a liar Americano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... and you lied about it here, trying to "pass it off" as a DUAL/DOUBLE MAJOR, liar?? Give us a break!

  72. Americano the liar exposes his lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... and you had to lie about it here too?? PItiful. You're forgetting that the rest of us know that there is a difference in credit hours/courses taken between majors and minors in collegiate academia, liar.

    1. Re:Americano the liar exposes his lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alexander Peter Kowalski is a fraud and a malware author.

  73. Mentally handicapped by elkstoy · · Score: 0

    She must have been quite a scam artist to get someone to invest that kind of money and send it to other countries without ever seeing her. Not being mean or insensitive, but anyone that could be taken for such a ride has to be mentally handicapped in some fashion. I don't believe it is pure lonliness or the need to connect. The guy could get conversation from a $20 hooker, and she would be there in person. This is why criminals that prey on handicapped people are the worst slime. The guy is probably a great friend to anyone that will have him...

  74. One word... by Chili-71 · · Score: 1

    MORON!

  75. no online dating by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    this is why i do not get involved with online dating, even texting for me is not cool when i am talking with my gf, if I know i can see here in person, i do so, otherwise use the phone...

  76. Americano caught red handed lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2001036&cid=35247076

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... and you LIED about it here, saying your MINOR was a DOUBLE-MAJOR? Pitiful. You're a lying scumbag.

  77. Americano appears to be the fraud here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2001036&cid=35247076

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... and you LIED about it saying it was a DOUBLE MAJOR, quoted above? Pitiful.

  78. Americano LIES about having a DOUBLE MAJOR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2001036&cid=35247076

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... AND THEN YOU LIED HERE SAYING IT WAS A DOUBLE-MAJOR? Bullshit! There is a large difference in the credits/course hours needed between them!

    1. Re:Americano LIES about having a DOUBLE MAJOR? by spun · · Score: 1

      Dude, give it a rest. All you have done here is make me more sympathetic to Americano, which is no small feat.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Americano LIES about having a DOUBLE MAJOR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It's actually pretty funny that he (APK) is following Americano around and basically posting proof that the guy's more of a success than he's ever been. I mean, hell... a respectable degree and jobs that I wouldn't mind having on my own résumé. And all that APK can dig up on him is that he implied he had a "dual degree", which isn't the same thing as a "degree with a minor in CS", which I actually had to look up to remember whether or not they were different things at all, or whether it's different from a "double major" which is what APK is now claiming that he said he had.

  79. Your own words quoted are nonsense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's been following me around posting the same nonsense by Americano (920576) on Tuesday March 01, @12:26PM (#35348766)

    Doesn't appear to be nonsense Americano. It appeared to be your own words quoted here http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2015768&cid=35349250 literally stating you had a double major, but when your linkln is checked, it says Computer Science MINOR, not major. You appear to lie and you are willing to keep on lying to try to cover up the fact you are a liar.

  80. I feel sorry for Americano too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has been exposed as a liar and with his own words quoted no less http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2015768&cid=35349250

  81. Americano your own words show you are lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me: 1) Degree in Biotechnology and Computer Science. (Did your troll factory offer dual majors, or just the standard "how to be an obnoxious twat on the internet" syllabus?)" - by Americano (920576) on Friday February 18, @02:27PM (#35247076)

    FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2001036&cid=35247076

    First of all, Kevin B. Pease = AMERICANO from Merrimack New Hampshire - kbpease@hotmail.com - YOU DID NOT GET A DOUBLE MAJOR!

    http://www.linkedin.com/in/kbpease

    PERTINENT EXCERPT:

    Kevin Pease's Education
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute
    B.S., Biotechnology

    1993 Ã" 1998

    Minor: Computer Science

    ---

    LMAO - it took you 6 YEARS to get a CSC MINOR? Rotflmao... and you even LIED about it here saying it was a DOUBLE MAJOR but you only have a MINOR and there is a big difference in the credit hours/coursework needed for a MAJOR, vs. a minor. You're a liar, and you're caught red-handed, scumbag.

  82. Someone tried a similar scam on a friend of mine by Theovon · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine was on a dating site and started chatting with someone who seemed interesting. At first, just on the site. Then via emails. Even then, he was concerned that she might not be a real person, because, you know, that happens. So he checked the email headers. They appeared to be legit.

    She claimed to have an undergraduate degree in medicine. Since I have some knowledge in that area, I helped him converse with her on that topic. She became subtly evasive, in that she never had anything intelligent to say about it and avoided the topic in discussions she initiated. But we persisted, kept linking to articles, talking about recent developments, stuff in JAMA, etc. It was kinda funny, because it was obvious that either she had lied about her medical background.

    Eventually, she sent him a picture. First thing he did, of course, was to do a reverse image search. That immediately lead him to a porn site for someone with an entirely different name. Likely: this is a scam. Unlikely but plausible: those really are her pics, and she'd done porn to pay for school or something. The thing is this wasn't just a pic of the same person. It was the exact same picture. He decided to play along anyhow. What harm could it do to not jump to (obvious) conclusions when you don't have absolute proof? No need to make accusations or anything.

    It wasn't long before 'she' asked for money. Her boss had demanded sex, and when she refused left her stranded in a foreign country. She needed money for a plane ticket home. He knew this was coming and had his own sob story prepared. His car was in the shop, and his boss hadn't paid him the last two pay periods, so he wasn't going to be able to make his credit card and rent payments.

    That was the last email exchanged.

    This friend of mine is actually a really great guy, and I felt bad for him that someone had tried to scam him. Of course, he was also smart enough to not get emotionally involved. But what's interesting is that the checking he did wasn't all that hard. Maybe interpreting an email header is hard. But a reverse image search engine? Upload an image, see matches. Maybe the hard part is knowing that it exists. Either way, he was smart enough to have just the right level of paranoia (or discrimination, more like it). The problem with other people is that they never learn basic critical thinking. Are they just stupid? Or did their parents and schools never bother to teach it? My parents taught me to be wary of strangers, without being rude about it. Not everyone is out to get you, but you will frequently encounter people who have no qualms about cheating you. Size people up before trusting them.

    This guy who was cheated out of $200k... how gullible was he? Who just sends money to a stranger? I don't care how convincing a person seems. I'm not sending them money. Even if I DO meet them, I'm not writing a check for $200k. A well-meaning person wouldn't ask for it in the first place.

    In about 1997, I met a girl on the internet. She was a medical student in London. (Sound familiar?) But actually, she knew TONS about medicine, as well as a lot about our shared interest in psychology. This one seemed legit. I had some other friends in the UK, so I decided to visit. At Gatwick, I was greeted by a very attractive girl of Indian descent. She was exactly what she claimed to be. Today, she's a research cardiologist at a major London hospital. Weird, huh? Of course... she never asked me for money.