Slashdot Mirror


Is Daylight Saving Time Bad For You?

Hugh Pickens writes "According to experts on circadian rhythms, the hour shift in sleep schedule from Daylight Saving Time can have serious effects on some people's health, particularly in people with certain pre-existing health problems. One study found that men were more likely to commit suicide during the first few weeks of Daylight Saving Time (DST) than at any other time during the year, and another study showed that the number of serious heart attacks jumps 6% to 10% on the first three workdays after DST begins. Dr. Xiaoyong Yang, an assistant professor of comparative medicine and cellular and molecular physiology at Yale University, theorizes that shifts in biologic rhythms could trigger harmful inflammatory or metabolic changes at the cellular level, to which these individuals may be more susceptible."

333 comments

  1. I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets.

    1. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by omarius · · Score: 2

      I was going to say, FINE! Fix it: keep DST all year round!

    2. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I enjoy flexi-time.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      The winter is terrible whatever we do with the clocks so I vote for keeping summer time all year round - because the summer is better for the extra hour of outdoor time in the evening. When you have slaved away for decades in an office you come to realize that this evening time is very valuable, I would even go so far as to say that double summer time GMT+2 would suit us in the UK with so called summer time GMT+1 for the winter. As for suicides and health problems - well stuff em I say, the gene pool could do without wimps who cant cope with the clock shift. I worked 4 on, 4 off, 12 hour shifts in my younger days and it does mess with your health but earning money doesn't always come for free. Fix the rest of capitalism before you get excited about trivial things like DST.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    4. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Cowclops · · Score: 2

      Yes - the problem is that we have to change it at all, not that the sun goes down an hour later (and comes up an hour later). I prefer the light at the end of the day myself, so, indeed, make it DST year round. Problem solved.

    5. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by daodao · · Score: 1

      The problem are the earlier sunsets -- oh I miss you Sun!

    6. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Znork · · Score: 1

      the summer is better for the extra hour of outdoor time in the evening.

      Hate to break it to you; it's a number on a display. You're not getting an extra hour, you're getting a different number.

      fix the rest of capitalism before you get excited about trivial things like DST.

      As long as people actually appear to think that they magically get extra time because the numbers on the display say one thing I'm afraid fixing capitalism is out of reach. After all, if the boss turned the clock back eight hours I'd assume that people would just keep working at the end of the day...

    7. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Light at the end of the day is nice and all, but I find it much more difficult to make myself get up when it's dark..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or, better yet... keep standard time year 'round so that on the equinox, the sun will rise at approximately 6AM and set at approximately 6PM.

    9. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "outdoor time" implies "time outdoors after work but before the sun goes down" So DST does in fact affect "outdoor time" if you're on a fixed work schedule.

    10. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone actually thinks they get more free time.

      What you do get though is light that lasts longer into the evening which is great for those of us who don't live near the equator (and by Scandinavian standards Italy and the continental US are pretty damn close to the equator).

      Where I live the sunrise in mid-december is generally around 9:30-10:00 in the morning with sunset just after 14:00. In fact, with standard office hours we basically have sunset before 17:00 betweeen late october and early february with sunrise during this period occurring at the earliest at about the same time as you're on your way to work in the morning.

      If we used summertime all year round the period during which sunset occurred before the time that most people get off from work would be shortened to mid-november to mid-january which means more sunlight overall. That's the difference most people would be interested in.

      This is counting dusk and dawn as time when the sun is up. If you count it as time when the sun is down then we don't actually get to experience sunlight after work until the end of february (and considering that this isn't summer dusk and dawn but rather the sun lazily dragging itself over the horizon just enough that it's no longer pitch black I don't really want to count dusk and dawn in the winter as time when the sun is up).

      I know I'm not alone in preferring more light in afternoons and evenings even if it means that the sun won't be up until after the morning coffee break rather than before...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    11. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by HairyNevus · · Score: 1

      Time is a human invented concept to explain movement in the fourth dimension. It doesn't necessarily have to exist, but our concept of hours and calenders help us explain the phenomenon of why right now the state of the world is different from where it was in the perceived past. With that said, a different number is the same as an extra hour; its all relative and made up anyways.

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
    12. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by omarius · · Score: 1

      I'd be fine with that...if I got off at 4!

    13. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by gay358 · · Score: 1

      And I know that I am not alone in preferring more light during mornings instead of afternoons and evenings. If mornings would be darker than they currently are, it would be even more difficult to get up, especially if you are night owl.

    14. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, for a large part of the year mornings here in Sweden are pitch black with normal time so from our point of view having DST all year round wouldn't make much of a difference there, we'd still be getting to work while it was pitch black for quite some time but at least when we got off from work in the afternoon there'd be a few less weeks when it would already be pitch black again.

      As I stated, with normal time we have "sunrise" (beginning of dawn) around 9:30-10:00 in december with sunset (end of dusk and beginning of actual darkness) around 14:00, in practice we have a couple of hours of sunlight in the middle of the day. Saying you want "more" sunlight in the morning implies you're lucky enough to live somewhere where the sun is actually up in the morning all year round...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    15. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      Given that the whole basis of our calendrical system is that at "noon", or "midday", the sun is supposed to be at the meridian point of its path across the sky, that is the most logical way to do it. Especially since nowadays, a significantly greater portion of the year, including most of when there IS sunny weather, is spent off of that kilter.

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    16. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by TheABomb · · Score: 1

      So the rest of us should suffer because you want to get up earlier? This is precisely why I don't have kids. That, and no women will have sex with me, but the sleeping in is part of it too.

      --
      MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    17. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      A different number is not the same as the sun moving 15 deg in it's arc in the sky.

    18. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Why not just do everything an hour earlier?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      At least in the developed countries, we should move to constantly adjusting time, anchored either at sunrise (always fixed amount of daylight in the morning) or at sunset (fixed amount of daylight after work). So probably, to stay in familiar time ranges, either sunrise would be at 06:00 every morning, or sunset would be at 18:00 every evening. Of course then we'd need time areas instead of time zones, for example each state being it's own time area in the US, and time in that zone set by some suitable point in each area.

      Or it wouldn't have to be anchored exatly at sunrise or sunset either, but that could drift too. The point is, there would not be a large change two times a year, which both maximizes the damage and reduces the advantages as it still isn't optimal for large part of the year and for different locations at different latitudes.

      So each clock would be set to UTC, and would calculate the correct local time to show for it's set time area. Clocks would probably show time both in local time and in UTC, as for example TV schedules would need be in UTC except for very local channels. Technology is approaching point where there is no real need to have synchronized clocks accross large areas: businesses are largely inter-time zone already so exact local time in any give time zone doesn't mean much, and we're moving from broadcast media to time-shifted and on-demand delivery of media content.

      And then there would be extra coolness to mechanical clocks able to show correct local time for any given time zone, as I believe the mechanism would need to be quite complex, possibly out of scope of building such a thing out of Legos, even :-)

    20. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Ciggy · · Score: 1

      If you want light at the end of the day, try moving further North...you'll get light long into the night - far enough north and you'll get 24 hours of the stuff (in the summer when the DST is in effect).

      Problem solved: instead of changing clocks, make school/work/pub closing times all run one hour earlier.

      Same effect, just it also makes the sun correct so that the middle of the day (and daylight hours) is (approx) 12 noon not 1pm every day (or 2pm on double summer time).

      Going to sub-Sahara Africa is an interesting experience - dawn is (approx) 6am +/- 30 mins, dusk is (approx) 6pm +/- 30 mins all year round - none of this day light saving clock changing.

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    21. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      what's 4? with DST there is no 4.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    22. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by mirix · · Score: 1

      Kinda pointless up north. My city has 8h of daylight for most of December and part of January, for example. If you split it around noon, it would come up at 8:15am and be down by 3:45pm on the 21st, and we're only 300mi north of Seattle.

      Most of Canada has DST, but my region doesn't. Well. Sort of. We're ahead of the sun by 1h year round. (So in the above case, sun is up at 9:15 and down at 4:45).

      Never saw much use for DST myself, seems like something you'd trick kindergarteners with.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    23. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by gay358 · · Score: 1

      I live in Finland which is even somewhat darker during wintertime than Sweden. But I know that the darker the morning (not necessarily only at the exact time I wake up) is, the harder it is for a night owl like me, to wake up early.

      In my opinion people should wake up even later during wintertime. It is quite unnatural to wake up in darkness.

    24. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      You are able to enjoy a sunset more because an arbitrary device now has a higher number displayed on it?

      The sunset doesn't occur any later, it occurs at the exact same time, they only difference is what that time is called. What's to stop you just getting up earlier?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    25. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Well, I wouldn't complain about shortening the workday in winter, good luck getting employers to go along with that one (and if they did they'd demand we work around the clock during the summer months.

      Also, unless you live north of Vaasa then I still live further north than you do. :P

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    26. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. I'm a semi-pro cyclist and I'd prefer more daylight in the late afternoon/early evening for training.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    27. Re:I don't care I enjoy the later sunsets. by plover · · Score: 1

      I live in Minnesota, which is in the northern continental U.S at 45 degrees north. When I was younger I had a factory job that ran from 7:00 to 17:00 Monday through Friday, and 7:00 to 12:00 on Saturdays. The shop had no windows or natural light except for a few small, north-facing windows in the truck dock and office areas. It was not a great neighborhood, and windows invited burglars and vandals. The interior lighting was provided by lines of bare fluorescent bulbs that were significantly dimmed by layers of grime sprayed continually by the machinery. One of the occasional tasks to do when it was slow was to mop the light bulbs with a rag on a stick. The lunchroom was interior and also had no windows. There was enough light to work by, but not much more.

      In December and January, we would arrive at work before dawn, and leave after dusk. On Saturdays, we would leave the cave-like darkness at high noon, and on those clear winter days I often felt like a vampire being exposed to the sunlight.

      It seems that daylight savings time was geared expressly towards making a job like mine slightly more tolerable. The only problem is it never helped me when I could have used it. I didn't need "more daylight" in the summer hours, I needed to have more daylight opportunities in the winter!

      All in all, Daylight Savings Time means almost nothing to me except inconvenience.

      --
      John
  2. would have happened anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the heart attacks (at least) would have happened anyway at a later point, if someone is that vulnerable to small changes.

    1. Re:would have happened anyway by undecim · · Score: 1

      A change to your sleep pattern is hardly a small change biologically. We may not understand everything about sleep just yet, but we do know one thing: It's damn important.

      A change in your sleep schedule changes your biological clock, which helps control many complex biological processes. Even small changes like that can confuse the body and cause it to do things wrong.

      --
      The Internet has given stupid people the resources of intelligent people.
    2. Re:would have happened anyway by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Yes but it may simply be that their "time" is up, excuse the pun. For example talk to any nurse that works critical care and they'll say 'its always darkest before the dawn' because you are much more likely to die right before dawn than at any other time. my mom used to work ICU and said they'd make sure to have all the crash carts nicely set up and restocked by 2AM because between 3AM and 5AM you were much more likely to code.

      Sadly we are still in our infancy in understanding how the complex changes to our environment effect all the chemicals and processes in our bodies, so maybe there is something here we just haven't figured out yet. Humans are such complicated creatures biochemically it really doesn't surprise me that a simple one hour change to our biological clocks could play havoc on those with existing conditions whether diagnosed or not.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  3. Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As someone who suffers from SAD, depression, etc. I can attest to the fact that a strict sleep schedule is incredibly important to keeping me healthy and functional. DST rudely smashes all my carefully laid schedules and plans.

    It may not seem like much, but even shifting things by a single hour and put me (and people like me) a very difficult spot. Light boxes and sunrise simulator alarm clocks help, but what helps the most is strict consistency in sleep/wake times. This is especially harmful to people with bipolar disorder because it can trigger a manic or depressive episode.
    DST sucks!

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suffer from S.A.D also (I hate the fucking acronym!) I actually do better on DST - yeah, part of it is because it's the Spring and Summer but there's also more Daylight in the day; which is what we need.

      My doc tried a bunch of different solutions for me but the best thing for me is any type of physical activity during the day: running, walking, yard work, etc....

      Oh yeah, stay away from booze and caffeine.

    2. Re:Yep by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it's really a health issue, why adjust your sleep schedule to match the changing clock? Can't you simply get up an hour earlier during winter?

    3. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm already waking up before the crack of noon. I don't know how much earlier you expect me to get up.

    4. Re:Yep by wulfmans · · Score: 1

      Move to Arizona if your in the USA and don't like silly time shifts.

    5. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a condition for this actually. It's called "You're A Pussy".

    6. Re:Yep by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      Can't you simply get up a hour earlier in the summer, without changing the clocks to regulate everyone else into doing so?

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    7. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm already waking up before the crack of noon. I don't know how much earlier you expect me to get up.

      There's your problem, if you don't wake up until noon then you're not going to have the energy to actually get out of bed until about 3ish, by which time you're going to be damned hungry. Better to wake up at 9, then contemplate getting out of bed until 12 by which time you'll be ready for breakfast.

    8. Re:Yep by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're saying. I do get up an hour earlier in the summer, I certainly could do so without changing my clocks (though that would seem like a silly and pointless exercise, since the everyone around me changes their clocks), and I'm not regulating anyone! Perhaps you mistook my practical suggestion for pro-DST advocacy?

    9. Re:Yep by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I suppose it would just be a "waaaah" issue if the guy had narcolepsy or something along those lines? Surely we can cure all our mental problems just my manning up, after all it's just in our head! Surely chemical differences in our brain can't make that much difference to the way our mind works? If they did, then everyone would be drinking caffeine and alcohol, eating sugary foods and taking drugs all the time to make themselves temporarily feel better about their shitty little lives! Oh, wait..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Yep by kinuso+kid · · Score: 1

      Or to Saskatchewan if you live in Canada

    11. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that your mother may have shit you out prematurely. If it weren't for an incubator, you probably wouldn't have lasted a week. But fuck medical technology, right? Get better or die trying.

    12. Re:Yep by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're saying. I do get up an hour earlier in the summer, I certainly could do so without changing my clocks (though that would seem like a silly and pointless exercise, since the everyone around me changes their clocks), and I'm not regulating anyone! Perhaps you mistook my practical suggestion for pro-DST advocacy?

      Yes, I did. Good day to you, sir. :)

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    13. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it's really a health issue, why adjust your sleep schedule to match the changing clock?

      Because neither work nor school will adjust their schedules for him?

      Frankly, DST should be abandoned entirely. It doesn't appear to have any benefits and changing our clocks only causes problems.

    14. Re:Yep by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 2

      Your suggestion of moving to AZ may be problematic for non-white people.

    15. Re:Yep by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      > If it's really a health issue, why adjust your sleep schedule to match the changing clock?

      Because neither work nor school will adjust their schedules for him?

      Yes, that's why I suggested getting up an hour earlier in winter rather than the otherwise-equivalent change of getting up an hour later in summer, which would make him late.

      Frankly, DST should be abandoned entirely

      But it hasn't been, and unless and until it is, this guy has to live with it. Are you suggesting that he should continue to risk his health and mental well-being just to try to prove your point? I gotta say, I'm not very comfortable with demanding that someone else martyr themselves for my cause, no matter how much I think they may agree with it. But maybe that's just me. :)

    16. Re:Yep by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      I'd guess you've never been to Arizona.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    17. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it's really a health issue, why adjust your sleep schedule to match the changing clock? Can't you simply get up an hour earlier during winter?

      This is only insightful on /. -- it is about waking one hour earlier! What do you use for brains? Bunch of morons...

    18. Re:Yep by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      The rest of us, the majority... we live in perpetual Twilight.

      Could be worse...could be living in the Twilight Realm...

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    19. Re:Yep by wulfmans · · Score: 1

      Hey fool. Only if your an illegal immigrant.

    20. Re:Yep by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Saskatchewan is a little odd in this respect. Physically, the line between mountain time and central time goes through the province or the province is entirely in mountain time, depending on who's drawing the lines (as you can see here). The government decided back in the 60s to have the entire province on Central time. This has the result of having most/all of the province on DST all year.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    21. Re:Yep by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Wow. Just wow! Do you simply not know which direction the clock is adjusted at which time of year, or do you honestly think that I might have been suggesting that you deprive yourself of an hour of sleep when everyone else is sleeping for an extra hour, putting yourself two hours out of sync with the world?

      I kinda hope its the second one, just because that's a cool thing to have believed someone meant long enough to try to insult them for having said it. :)

    22. Re:Yep by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. You need to educate yourself - you sound like an ignorant bigot. We have a few less asians and a lot less blacks than the national average, but we are way above the national average in hispanics and native americans, and actually below the national average in white people. Contrary to your ignorant, bigoted attitude that great majority of people in this state fully support legal immigrants, a significant percentage of the residents being just that. What we do not support is illegal aliens coming here, driving cars with fake licenses and using other people's social security numbers, nor do we like the Mexican drug traffickers.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    23. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an insomniac, you insensitive clod!

    24. Re:Yep by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      actually the majority have sleeping problems, while not as bad;
      but why should we cause issues for ourselves because of laws written a 100 years ago, to help out farmers, when most people airnt farmers

      --
      warning pointless sig
    25. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's really a health issue, why adjust your sleep schedule to match the changing clock? Can't you simply get up an hour earlier during winter?

      Huh? How do I get up an hour earlier without adjusting my sleep schedule?

    26. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last night I fell asleep at 10pm which was amazing and woke up at 11 PM today. I don't know how that happened but I had to check slashdot for some answers and low and behold there's a conspiracy theory on the front page! Obviously I slept for 25hrs straight because of the government and aliens and such... derp!

    27. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you simply get up a hour earlier in the summer, without changing the clocks to regulate everyone else into doing so?

      Dude, DST doesn't change time, it only changes what people call the current time. If moving your sleep schedule around causes that many issues for you, then stop moving it around.

      And just for the record, I hate DST and think it needs to be done away with. Simply because it does nothing except fool people like the parent into thinking that we're actually moving time around.

    28. Re:Yep by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      As someone who suffers from SAD, depression, etc.

      Some sympathy, as my wife appears to have a number of symptoms for these syndromes too. It's not fun. And yes, she needs consistency in her wake-sleep cycle too.

      But as someone who has to work irregular and unpredictable 24x7 cover, and often to get by on 3-4 hours of sleep per day in several sessions, my sympathy is limited. Your condition is going to put you at an economic disadvantage unless you find some way to manage it.

      If you're that sensitive to the DST shift, then move yourself to whatever cycle you like and stick there. And if that means doing 2 hours of (paying) work at home some times of the year before going to external work, and at other times of the year doing 1 hour of home work before going out to do external work, then just do it.

      The cost of SAD lamps with a full spectrum is falling rapidly, and their electrical consumption is negligible. So if it's that much of a problem for you to adhere to the DST system, don't participate in the DST system.

      Alternatively, move to a tropical country (if you can stand the heat ; I'll take 50degC+ for pay, but won't pretend it's a pleasure), where seasonal day-length variations are minimal. Or is your condition not bad enough to prompt you to move?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    29. Re:Yep by Ciggy · · Score: 1

      It is get up an hour earlier in Winter, so that when you've been getting up at 5am in DST, when DST ends, you then get up at 4am instead, which is what 5am in DST equates to in non-DST - ie you have not changed your sleep schedule with respect to the sun (and the slowly changing daylight), only the clock (which has changed with respect to the sun).

      Thus when DST ends, you will then have an hour less in the evening as you'll also go to bed an hour earlier (with respect to the clock, not the sun) when it's dark anyway, along with going to work an hour later (giving you an extra hour in the morning).

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    30. Re:Yep by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      And a big fuck you to the mods that down ranked me. Suck my low hanging balls motherfuckers.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    31. Re:Yep by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I'd guess he's never been outside his village. Which is just as well.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    32. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because that means I would have to go to bed an hour earlier in the summer. You don't want to waste daylight time in the summer. People need the light for their summer activities. Considering everything else would be at the same time, simply waking up an hour earlier in the summer doesn't help anything. The point of moving the clocks ahead is to give people more after work sunlight, not before work sunlight.

    33. Re:Yep by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      As someone who suffers from SAD, depression, etc. I can attest to the fact that a strict sleep schedule is incredibly important to keeping me healthy and functional. DST rudely smashes all my carefully laid schedules and plans.

      I keep a very irregular schedule, and I still feel crappy while DST is in effect. Presumably it's psychological, but who knows.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    34. Re:Yep by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Why do you feel that way about the people that modded you down?

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  4. People who travel? by ramk13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does this compare to people who travel one time zone over, let alone multiple time zones? Aren't these people (millions) in worse shape?

    1. Re:People who travel? by hedwards · · Score: 2

      This is a related problem. But unlike travel which can be mitigated by either avoiding it or traveling by car/train, DST is something that's imposed by the government and cannot easily be avoided if you're in an area that observes it. Few employers are going to let you come in late to avoid having your circadian rhythm disrupted.

    2. Re:People who travel? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This is a related problem. But unlike travel which can be mitigated by either avoiding it or traveling by car/train

      How? If one hour is a problem, you'll have a problem crossing any timezone. And if you're travelling multiple time zones, it's not likely your boss will pay for days of travel each way either. To be honest this might be triggering on the statistics, but those people must be pretty fragile to begin with. It's like how they say the flu kills thousands each year - the weak and elderly that can't take it, but it's only the last straw and something would have did them in.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:People who travel? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DST is something that's imposed by the government and cannot easily be avoided if you're in an area that observes it.

      You could always move. Arizona doesn't observe DST.

      Some people move to dry or warm climates for reasons related to health. This isn't really that much different.

    4. Re:People who travel? by kanweg · · Score: 1

      It is impossible for an individual to slowly change his own sleep schedule over the course of a couple of weeks, by say 5 minutes per day without consent from the government.

      Bert

    5. Re:People who travel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest this might be triggering on the statistics, but those people must be pretty fragile to begin with. It's like how they say the flu kills thousands each year - the weak and elderly that can't take it, but it's only the last straw and something would have did them in.

      Exactly. Weak, fragile people can got to hell. As you rightly say, if it wasn't this then something else would get them so let's give them a good kicking.

    6. Re:People who travel? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Few employers are going to let you come in late to avoid having your circadian rhythm disrupted.

      If you can prove you have this problem... for example, you can prove you will have a heart attack if you have to come in an hour earlier, then by law (the ADA) the employer would have no choice, they have to make reasonable accomadations.

      The problem is... well.. how are you going to prove it?

      A healthy person won't have a heart attack because they had to get up an hour earlier. And in the wild.... predators/violent animals/other threats won't respect your circadium rythm.

    7. Re:People who travel? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      How does this compare to people who travel one time zone over, let alone multiple time zones? Aren't these people (millions) in worse shape?

      Assuming they move twice a year, yes. Otherwise, no. But, yes, moving is a time of great stress that does indeed have negative health impacts.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:People who travel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the wild.... predators/violent animals/other threats won't respect your circadium rythm.

      That's one of the reasons I don't live in the wild, but as DST would be completely irrelevant in the wild, it's hard to imagine what your point might be. Do you have one?

    9. Re:People who travel? by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So get up an hour earlier during winter rather than an hour later during summer, and you won't have to come in late or have your circadian rhythms disrupted.

    10. Re:People who travel? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      Try working on the border between Illinois and Indiana, not only is there a timezone changeover, Illinois uses DST while Indiana does not. If I'm not mistaken part of the year their clocks match, and part of the year they're three hours different.

    11. Re:People who travel? by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

      Which Indiana and Illinois are you talking about?

      --
      All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
    12. Re:People who travel? by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      This is especially popular with mental health disabilities since the symptoms of the disability often cannot be seen. A lot of homeless people are that way because their brains simply cannot conform to the constraints of a given cultural reality tunnel. Either through biological abnormalities, trauma, or as in most cases, some combination of the two, the ability to cope with the 'day-to-day' is often unattainable to them. The fact that I can means I'm pretty lucky. But certainly not any better.

    13. Re:People who travel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Few employers are going to let you come in late to avoid having your circadian rhythm disrupted.

      Get a better employer. Unless you're doing shift work, it shouldn't matter much when you're present as long as you're doing the amount of work your contract specifies. If your employer is stupid enough to insist that you do that work between the hours of 0800 and 1630, and will fire you if you show up at 0900 instead, then get your resume together and start looking for one that isn't.

    14. Re:People who travel? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Indiana Jones has his own timezone? Oh, wait, that was Chuck Norris. ;-)

    15. Re:People who travel? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Hmm? I always thought Indiana was split between many time zones (with neighboring states' major cities). Are these articles wrong?
      http://www.infoplease.com/spot/daylight1.html
      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Time_in_Indiana

    16. Re:People who travel? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Time change is irrelevant to me. I sleep when I'm tired and wake up when I'm not. That means that in a single week, I might sleep twice in a day. Or not at all. And I may sleep during the day and be awake all night and in the same week, be awake all day and sleep all night. The idea of sleeping at a specific time -- no matter what -- seems a lot to me like eating at a certain time every day. If you're not hungry, why eat just because it's noon? If you're not tired, why sleep, just because it's 10pm?

    17. Re:People who travel? by swalve · · Score: 1

      The government does not tell you when to wake up.

    18. Re:People who travel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then I'd live in Arizona.

    19. Re:People who travel? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      >>Try working on the border between Illinois and Indiana, not only is there a timezone changeover, Illinois uses DST while Indiana does not. If I'm not mistaken part of the year their clocks match, and part of the year they're three hours different.

      I do work in central Indiana, and it's really really annoying. Not only do they not use DST, but their time zone splits the state in half, so an airport 20 miles away might be an hour ahead or behind your time at the hotel.

      I would have missed a flight once because of this, but fortunately(?) it worked the other way and I showed up at the airport at 4AM, before anyone was even there.

    20. Re:People who travel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. But then, on the plus side, you'd live in Arizona.

    21. Re:People who travel? by mea_culpa · · Score: 2

      Hawaii then?

    22. Re:People who travel? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      yes, don't. We already have far too many assholes here, we don't need another one.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    23. Re:People who travel? by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I do work in central Indiana, and it's really really annoying. Not only do they not use DST, but their time zone splits the state in half

      Not in the last few years you haven't. Indiana switched to DST in 2005. Arizona and Hawaii are the last holdouts of sanity.

    24. Re:People who travel? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>Not in the last few years you haven't. Indiana switched to DST in 2005.

      Heh, I've been going out to Indiana once or twice a year for a while now. Looking up the changelog for their time zone insanity, it looks like it was 2006, not 2005. And they shuffle counties around, too:

      Effective April 2, 2006 - all of Indiana observes daylight saving time.
      Effective April 2, 2006 - the eight Indiana counties of Daviess, Dubois, Knox, Martin, Perry, Pike, Pulaski and Starke moved from the Eastern to Central Time Zones.
      Effective March 11, 2007 - Pulaski County moved back to the Eastern Time Zone. Previously Pulaski County had moved from Eastern to Central Time effective
      Effective November 4, 2007 - The five counties of Daviess, Dubois, Knox, Martin, and Pike moved from Central to Eastern Time effective when Daylight Saving Time ended.

      So... yeah. It's been a total PITA whenever I go out to Jasper (in Dubois County). Evansville Airport is on the other side of the line... and they keep moving the line.

    25. Re:People who travel? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      You know, if even a one-hour change is so disruptive, "traveling by car/train" is certainly going to be no help to those who frequently travel between two adjacent time zones. It's not like you can move gradually across the line to avoid the shock of a one-hour jump.

      I call BS on this whole thing. I'll grant that there may be a very few individuals who just can't deal with time changes, but it's no more than a slight inconvenience for 99.9999% of the population at large.

      Of course, DST itself is BS for other reasons, but "health concerns" makes no more sense than the "extra hour of sun will fade my drapes" argument.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  5. Natural Selection! by notommy · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is the weak getting picked off. If you can't handle an hour change twice a year, you probably shouldn't be getting up (to work) anyways.

    1. Re:Natural Selection! by Aphex+Junkie · · Score: 2

      How about this modest proposal: let's grind up the "weak" and turn them into cat food! In fact, let's have sweeps on a yearly basis. This will finally solve our problems and allow humanity to advance to the next level. One may even go so far as calling it a.... final solution.

    2. Re:Natural Selection! by cognoscentus · · Score: 1

      Godwin in 1! (You have a point, though)

    3. Re:Natural Selection! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Do I smell Soylent Green here?

    4. Re:Natural Selection! by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      But, what do you do with all the extra, fat cats wandering the streets?

      Do we start culling the weak and grinding them up into dog food?

  6. Lengthening the Blanket... by kenwd0elq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw an editorial cartoon perhaps 30 years ago. In the cartoon, Richard Nixon is depicted sitting in a rocking chair saying "I need to make this blanket longer, so that we can stay warm in the winter. So I'll cut one foot of the blanket off at one end, and sew it onto the other end." That's everything you need to know about Daylight Savings Time.

    1. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by peragrin · · Score: 2

      While your analogy is correct, it misses the point.

          I stopped and looked at it one day. in NY the sun sets on Sept.1st at about 8:30pm. without daylight that means it sets at 7:30pm The northern states would literally lose the ability to do many things they can now simply because it will get dark out in August and September, instead of October.

      Evening sports, afterwork hobbies, anything that one does after 5pm(when most people stop working) will lose time to do things like mow the yard afterwork. How many things do you do in the summer after work, and how many of them require daylight to be made easier. That is daylight savings time working for you.

      I would love it if we used daylight savings all year round. it would solve both problems.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Plunky · · Score: 1

      No wait.. what you seem to want is to stop work at 4pm instead of 5pm but you still want to call it 5pm? Then, you want to start work at 8am instead of 9am but you want to call it 9am? I think I'm getting this now.. so you want to have lunch at 12noon but call it 1pm!?

      Of course, some people don't have friendly employers and require that the government mandate the hours that they work.. but it sounds like a pretty hackish solution..

    3. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You know, those of us who want the extra daylight could just get up an hour earlier and go into work earlier.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by MatthiasF · · Score: 2

      I think the benefits of the system are being curtailed by the fact it's being applied by longitude instead of latitude.

      As most know, the differences in sun rise and sun set align along the latitude (local solar time), yet the daylight savings adjustments are currently aligned against the averaged time zones by longitude. This was the easiest way to do it and it seems to be holding back the system (based off studies).

      If instead they setup latitude DST to run perpendicular to the date lines, we'd definitely see the efficiencies gained. But this would mean countries like the USA would have 2-3 DST areas (northern one from New England west to Washington state, southern one from Georgia/Florida to Southern California, and a middle one from North Carolina-Maryland over to Northern California), applied on top of the normal time zones.

      Could get confusing when two people who were in the same time zone now have to deal with an hour difference as well, but would be an hour closer to someone in a time zone behind them.

      It's really the only way DST would work but adoption would be difficult. Maybe less so nowadays that computers and phones can do the adjustments for you, but to explain to the broader public why the system had to become more complicated would probably be a disaster in itself.

      (copy pasta from a previous comment on DST)

    5. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by kenwd0elq · · Score: 5, Interesting
      When I was in the Navy, I spent a couple of years on Bermuda. (I know; a TOUGH assignment!) Bermuda doesn't (did not?) do DST. Instead, many businesses did "summer working hours"; come to work at 7 AM, no lunch break, and then close at 2 PM. If many employers offered flextime, or people could break out of the clock-watching habit, then they could have the benefits of DST all year long.

      The only thing "daylight savings time" does is force, by government decree, that EVERYBODY must do this at the SAME time, in lockstep.

    6. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      It is... but if it seems silly to you, you treat the entirely arbitrary way we label periods of time entirely too seriously. Among other things, you seem to think that a particular point of time is really 4pm rather than 5pm, which is patently absurd. It's either 4pm or 5pm because we decide to call it that. Neither answer is more "real" than the other.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people feel the need to cite stupid quotes? In one scenario there are tangible benefits, while in the other scenario you're just keeping exactly the same blanket with no benefits at all.

    8. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      You know, those of us who want the extra daylight could just get up an hour earlier and go into work earlier.

      I can do that. However, I was under the impression the majority of people actually work for someone else, often at companies or organizations that have a set schedule. "You know, those of you who want this can just quit your jobs." Uh huh...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fuck it. Too complicated.

      Stick everybody on GMT / UTC / Zulu (whatever you want to call it) and just deal with it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Instead of making everybody change their clocks, Congress could require companies to allow people to make those changes.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an editorial cartoon perhaps 30 years ago. In the cartoon, Richard Nixon is depicted sitting in a rocking chair saying "I need to make this blanket longer, so that we can stay warm in the winter. So I'll cut one foot of the blanket off at one end, and sew it onto the other end."

      That's everything you need to know about Daylight Savings Time.

      The sad thing is, Nixon really was one very smart President. Imagine how the world would be today if the US still had the same adversarial relationship with China that existed before Nixon. No, that relationship isn't great today, but it's probably the most economically-important relationship on the Earth and before Nixon the relationship was downright war-like.

      But IMO he was brought down by thinking he was TOO smart - HIS second-rate burglary operation was better than everyone else's and didn't need to get cut off and disowned when it was caught. Because it's not like Nixon's contemporaries - Johnson and Kennedy - were above using any and all underhanded tactics to "win" elections. Hell, Nixon was probably using equipment installed by Kennedy and Johnson to make those tapes - that he was too stubbornly prideful to burn. "Tapes? What tapes?"

    12. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Evidently you're not old enough to remember Eastern War Time (when daylight was extended two hours).

      Extending daylight means that activities that occur in the early evening are performed with the sun still out, which has various advantages, the primary being related to energy consumption-- less heat is needed, less electricity for lights, etc. There are various secondary arguments, such as fewer accidents.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time .

      Please google the topic before opening your mouth, next time.

    13. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Znork · · Score: 1

      The number of seconds since 1/1 1970 is, however, not arbitrary. Which makes it a whole lot more useful as a measure of actual time and for determining a particular point of time, than labels randomly calling a specific moment 4pm, 5pm, lunch or teatime. The labels are a utility. Changing them several times per year reduce the utility of those labels, as well as causing the multitude of other problems, just because some people apparently can't get over their desire for calling the start of work a particular label while changing the actual time around.

    14. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      The assignment of hour labels to particular times of the day is as arbitrary as assigning labels like "cat" and "dog" to particular animals. I'm not sure whether it means anything to ask whether a particular time is really 4pm or whether a particular animal is really a cat, but I'm sceptical of the advantages to be gained by moving the labels around.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    15. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work for people in say retail who don't get those hours. or for people at restaurants, who work regular shifts.

      by forcing everyone to do it lockstep the government makes sure it actually gets done.

      Because 99% of business will say you still have to work 8am to 5pm look at all the problems of doing things like telecommute.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    16. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1
      99%? Not even close. Retail businesses ALREADY have evening and weekend shift workers; the big resistance to flextime and telecommuting comes from office drones, especially GOVERNMENT office drones.

      I live near Sacramento, CA, a big state government town. On State holidays, the rush hour commute is a breeze. If the state office drones could telecommute even one day a week, it would cut a critical 10% of commuters, save bazillions of gallons of gas every year, and probably eliminate the phony AGW fears. For 10% of the cost of high-speed rail, every person in California could get HD broadband telepresence connections. Of course, it would kill the inner-city office building market....

    17. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      actually, the real 12:00 is when the sun is at its highest point in the sky. this whole time measuring business started with the sun, so the middle of the day was "placed" when the sun was in the middle of its jurney.
      it seems kind of stupid to me to change the labels on the sun dials every six months, when you could simply decide to change the work schedule. honestly, I don't understand why it was ever considered a good idea.

      --
      new sig
    18. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      or, you know, companies could change their schedule instead. I mean, the trains get messed up anyway when the clock changes, why not simply shift their schedule? with today's technology, it's very cheap to change the big letters that tell people which train goes where and when.

      --
      new sig
    19. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      look, we all know it makes sense to have sunlight in the evening. but why not simply start work earlier? get up at 5 instead of 6, go to bed at 22 instead of 23, problem solved.

      --
      new sig
    20. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Because not everyone's going to do that, without a law. You can get up at five, maybe you can convince your boss to open the business at 8 instead of 9... the school board is another issue...

      this is a simple way to do it, without having to get anyone on board, without co-ordination, without having to reprint schdules. Hello guys-- 9am is now 8am.

    21. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in the dead of winter, it sets at 5pm or even earlier.

      If shifting the clock an hour to get more daylight in the hour is such a great idea, why don't we do it year round.

    22. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Of course, some people don't have friendly employers and require that the government mandate the hours that they work.. but it sounds like a pretty hackish solution..

      It's funny that people are opposed to the "government imposed" daylight savings time, but don't seem to mind the government imposed timezones them self. You would think that timezones would follow straight lines, but they don' t they follow the border of states. Darn government interfering with everything.

      Personally, I think it's a good idea not having a bunch of kids standing in the dark waiting for a school bus during the winter. It's also nice to still have some light to get things done around the house after work. But what do I know?

    23. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      You know, those of us who want the extra daylight could just get up an hour earlier and go into work earlier.

      And if you work are in management in an office building that might work. But if you work in a factory or a retail venue, that isn't an option. And, what about sending the kids to school?

      A better solution would be that people just get up when they need to. If the switch over is a problem, then start a week early adjusting your alarm 10 minutes a day so by the time the clocks do change, you're in synch with them.

    24. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Simply? Not everyone will do it, and you'll have a mishmash of people going to work earlier and some going to work later.

      In late June, NYC would wind up with a 4:20 am sunrise and 7:30pm sunset. Yet events will still have to happen at their regular time, due to the mix of people with Summer and Winter hours. So you'll see no benefit reducing electrical use for large venues. (Baseball, for example, the lights will be on for more of the game).

      Sorry, this is one of those things where the government should be making a change.

    25. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work for people in say retail who don't get those hours. or for people at restaurants, who work regular shifts.

      by forcing everyone to do it lockstep the government makes sure it actually gets done.

      Because 99% of business will say you still have to work 8am to 5pm look at all the problems of doing things like telecommute.

      Doesn't work very well for school students, either.

    26. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      look, we all know it makes sense to have sunlight in the evening. but why not simply start work earlier? get up at 5 instead of 6, go to bed at 22 instead of 23, problem solved.

      Well, DST effectively does that, doesn't it?

    27. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Who goes to work at 9 am except retail workers prepping for a 10 am open? Honest question, I've never known anyone who worked an office job that started at 9.

    28. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The supposed energy benefits of DST are not as cut and dry as you assume. You might want to do a bit more research than just looking at a wikipedia article.

    29. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      And that's how, kids, Nixon ended up with two left feet.

    30. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice theory, but the evidence from Indiana when they switched from partial compliance with DST to full compliance is that the areas that had previously been on "slow time" and now were on "fast time" showed a marked increase in energy usage that the areas that had always been on "fast time" did not.

      Daylight Saving Time is an energy waster, not saver.

      Get up early and do stuff in the morning. Then go to work. When your workday is done, go do some more stuff.

    31. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by swalve · · Score: 1

      Its even cheaper to send a guy up a ladder and move the little hand one notch forward.

    32. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by swalve · · Score: 1

      The edge cases are tough. Twilight doesn't end until 10:30 around the summer solstice in the western areas of EDT. So lots of Indiana folk are getting home at the peak of afternoon heat and cranking the AC. All the folks on the East Coast balance them out for a net gain in energy reduction.

    33. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Except if you have a cat and you want a dog you dont start calling the cat dog. You just go get a dog.

    34. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      How would that not work for students?

    35. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      If shifting the clock an hour to get more daylight in the hour is such a great idea, why don't we do it year round.

      Well, when this topic comes up every year about this time, I always wonder why we don't just shift the clocks by 6 or 8 hours, and thus get 6 or 8 hours more sunlight per day.

      And we should do it in winter, when we could really use all those extra hours of sunshine. What's the point of doing it only in the part of the year that already has 12 or more hours of sunlight?

      Oh yeah: ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    36. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Flextime is the best option. Or just being flexible about individual employee's starting times. You get the benefit of DST all year long, as you say, AND you spread out the commutes so that the peak travel time isn't so bad, letting roads designed for average volume actually work...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    37. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Grade school students wouldn't have the option the OP suggested. Plus there are safety issues if they are all going to school in the dark.

    38. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me. I wander in sometime between 9 and 9.30, and leave about 8.5 hours later, including a 1 hour lunchbreak.

    39. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by JasperHW · · Score: 1

      In NYC (and as far as I know most, if not all, of the Northeast Corridor) everything starts at 9.

    40. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Ciggy · · Score: 1

      ...it seems kind of stupid to me to change the labels on the sun dials every six months...

      Actually it's about every 7/5 months - DST starts about 1 week after the vernal equinox, but ends about 5 weeks after the autumnal equinox, meaning DST lasts about 7 months, non-DST (sun-time) lasts about 5 months.

      --

      A rose by any other name would smell as sweet;
      A chrysanthemum by any other name would be easier to spell
    41. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aye. Lazy HR causes so many problems for us; everyone knows having every damn peson start and end work at the same hours just shuts down the roads for the rush hours each day.

    42. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      If you go far enough north, like in Canada, it's dark when the kids leave for school and when they come home, even with the daylight savings time. We seem to do alright with it. Some places like Finland have it even worse.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    43. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      If you go far enough north, like in Canada, it's dark when the kids leave for school and when they come home, even with the daylight savings time. We seem to do alright with it. Some places like Finland have it even worse.

      If you go far enough north, like Canada, it won't make a difference with DST, kids will still be going to school and coming home in the dark. Just because there is no difference there, does not mean it is desirable below Canada where it does make a difference.

    44. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Where I work, they are somewhat flexible with what hours you want to work. We have some people who choose to come in at 9. Problem with that is generally then you would be expected to stay until 6.

    45. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      By that logic, we should do away with time zones, too. Because at the same time on the clock, someone standing on the eastern edge of the time zone sees the sun in a different part of the sky than someone standing on the western edge. This "real" noon you speak of happens somewhere new every minute of the day. Obviously we construct our time for matters of convenience rather than accuracy.

    46. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think it's a good idea not having a bunch of kids standing in the dark waiting for a school bus during the winter.

      I just wanted to point out that there are two things wrong with this view.
      1. Winter is Standard Time, thus there is no need to change the clocks for the kids.

      2. Kids are waiting for the bus in the dark anyway. Therefore, changing the clocks (in this manner) is ineffective at protecting the children.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    47. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of also dependent on other people too. What good is shifting your work day up if everyone else is still working, and then you're exhausted at 9 PM (tried working 6 AM - 3 PM for a time)?

    48. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cousin was in the Air Force, stationed in Greenland for a couple years, and got transferred from there to Bermuda.

    49. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      the primary being related to energy consumption-- less heat is needed

      In summer? We cool our homes in North America while on DST, so the result of Daylight "Saving" Time is that people that use automatic thermostats are cooling their homes at a hotter time of the day. Businesses are generally unaffected due to multiple working shifts or cleaning crews usually in the building to sunset regardless of DST.

      less electricity for lights

      Which do you think uses more, air conditioning or lighting (now that CFLs are so much more common)?

      Please google the topic before opening your mouth, next time.

      Same to you: http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120406767043794825.html
      http://www.physorg.com/news187946326.html

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    50. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      All the folks on the East Coast balance them out for a net gain in energy reduction

      Got any data to back that up? 1 hour more sunlight, in Indiana, Texas or New York, is still 1 hour more heat that you have in the afternoon.
      Is there something that makes it less expensive to cool on the East Coast?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    51. Re:Lengthening the Blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be an ass. The OP lacked basic knowledge of the arguments. The Indiana case presents one instance in which DST may have negative effects, but the arguments for DST and underlying phenomena go far beyond heating and cooling. And what holds true in Indiana farm country, may not hold true in the population centers of Detroit or New York, much less Denmark or provinces of China.

  7. In other news by starfishsystems · · Score: 2

    In other news, I believe that waking up to an alarm clock is hazardous to my health.

    --
    Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not alone. My optician told me exactly this: alarm clock -> too quick opening of my eyes in the morning -> erosion of cornea -> pain in the eyes.

    2. Re:In other news by sjames · · Score: 1

      It *IS*.

      If you need the alarm most of the time, you're not getting enough sleep. That, in turn leads to depression and possibly other disorders.

    3. Re:In other news by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      In other news, I believe that waking up to an alarm clock is hazardous to my health.

      At any rate, its hazardous to the alarm clock.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    4. Re:In other news by starfishsystems · · Score: 1

      Slashdot needs a like button.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you are correct. Look at almost all sleeping "disorders". In your brain, light enters your eyes and is processed by rods, cones, and melanopsin. The latter takes certain spectrums of light to the SCN where it regulates sleep hormones. The sleep wake cycle is designed to be regulated by the rising and setting of the sun, not by some arbitrary (irrelevant) number on a clock.

    6. Re:In other news by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      You can say that like it's entirely fact, but when I try to go without an alarm clock I keep 27-hour days and go round the clock roughly once per week. That's not a terribly convenient way to live.

    7. Re:In other news by sjames · · Score: 1

      You are probably either not getting adequate light cues or are staying up too late. The average human cycle when deprived of all cues is around 26 hours. Exposure to sunlight in the AM and dark in the evening synchronizes it with the day.

  8. Jetlag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA:

    In other words, people who are already vulnerable to certain health problems may experience more severe effects of their body-clock disruption.

    In other words, people who are already in trouble feel compound effects with other changes in their lives.

    Can an hour or two really have such a severe effect? If that was the case, shouldn't there be a massive effect when travelling and crossing time zones? A quick PubMed search didn't throw up any studies with jetlag and suicide or heart attack.

    1. Re:Jetlag? by osu-neko · · Score: 2

      In other words, people who are already in trouble feel compound effects with other changes in their lives.

      Can an hour or two really have such a severe effect? If that was the case, shouldn't there be a massive effect when travelling and crossing time zones? A quick PubMed search didn't throw up any studies with jetlag and suicide or heart attack.

      You're talking about results of a self-selected study, essentially. Most people who travel have a choice about when to do it, and don't do it when they're not up for it. Start involuntarily loading millions of people into airplanes with no regard whatsoever for their current health status and moving them to new time zones, then see what effect jetlag has on their health.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  9. Time to solve the problem by Wowsers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To solve the problem is VERY simple, but the politicians don't like it. When you move to summer time, move the clocks 1/2 hour forward instead of 1 hour... and then LEAVE them there. No more going forwards and backwards wasting time changing countless clocks and gadgets, and no more bickering about moving the timezone multiple hours forward like the UK had recently just to please some European fascists.

    Recent campaign for UK to be on Berlin Time
    Portugal wants to move back to GMT

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on the 1/2. I leave the other rants for you.

    2. Re:Time to solve the problem by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I agree about DST, though I don't see the point in being a half-hour out of synch with GMT. It just makes the mental math harder.

      I'd say just do away with daylight savings time the next time it comes around. You'd need to give everybody at least a year's notice anyway, so that devices can be updated and gotten into the retail channels.

    3. Re:Time to solve the problem by magpie · · Score: 0

      Sorry your using the daily mail as a reference...can't believe anything you say. BTW how did they link it to immigrants and mortgage rates?

    4. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1
      You have no idea what you are talking about:

      "What that means is that if every one of 110 million American households bought just one ice-cream-cone bulb, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads."

      http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/108/open_lightbulbs.html

    5. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already produce enough power to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island.

    6. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your example only serves to illustrate that savings in minuscule scale require enormous implementation to see appreciable results. If 300 million people each put a dollar into a jar labeled, "NATIONAL DEBT" then we'll have $300 million to apply to the debt, but we'll still be $14 trillion in the hole-- with no appreciable difference to where we were before.

      Just the same, if we burn 500,000 tons of coal to power 110 million households, and those households in turn, save 0.1% on their power usage, then we've still burned 499,500 tons of coal. Or, more likely, since coal consumption does not respond directly to power usage, we've probably still burned 500,000 tons of coal, and some of the resulting electricity went largely unallocated.

      It's all horse shit. It's one thing to be responsible with what we do with our resources, but the line has to be drawn somewhere. Why stop at changing out a lightbulb? Why not just remove all of the lightbulbs? We can return to using candles, can't we? I hear we've gotten awfully good at making those. Progress is in improving efficiency, not in making meaningless trade-offs.

    7. Re:Time to solve the problem by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I agree about DST, though I don't see the point in being a half-hour out of synch with GMT. It just makes the mental math harder.

      So adjust GMT as well, by having 30 leap-minutes one year.

    8. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was rebutted in a recent thread; I won't spend the time to search for it, but the conclusion after factoring in said shipping costs was that it will pay for those costs after approximately 20 hours of use (over an incandescent.)

    9. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they factor in the energy loss when people end up spending more to heat their homes?

    10. Re:Time to solve the problem by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what you are talking about:

      "What that means is that if every one of 110 million American households bought just one ice-cream-cone bulb, took it home, and screwed it in the place of an ordinary 60-watt bulb, the energy saved would be enough to power a city of 1.5 million people. One bulb swapped out, enough electricity saved to power all the homes in Delaware and Rhode Island. In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads."

      http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/108/open_lightbulbs.html

      I assume by "ice-cream-cone bulb" you mean compact fluorescent. The numbers show (at least in Canada) that they save electricity for the consumer but use significantly more electricity to produce and dispose of than incandescents (it takes 1.7kw/hour to produce a CFL vs .11kw/hour). Canada, New Zealand, and others are now rethinking their ban on incandescent bulbs as CFLs actually have a heavier carbon footprint than 60 watt incandescents.

    11. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To solve the problem is VERY simple, but the politicians don't like it. When you move to summer time, move the clocks 1/2 hour forward instead of 1 hour... and then LEAVE them there. No more going forwards and backwards wasting time changing countless clocks and gadgets, and no more bickering about moving the timezone multiple hours forward like the UK had recently just to please some European fascists.

      Not sure if you're trying to be funny here, but there's no European fascists involved. The movement to change the UK's timezone was born in the UK and stayed in the UK. I don't recall anyone outside the UK commenting or caring about it. Some people would like to shift the sunshine hours to a later wall-clock time -- that's all there is to it.

    12. Re:Time to solve the problem by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 0

      >>>(it takes 1.7kw/hour to produce a CFL vs .11kw/hour).

      Careful. People will give you a -1 Troll moderation for daring to post facts contrary to accepted "rightthought" (as happened to me).

      --
      FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    13. Re:Time to solve the problem by Vegemeister · · Score: 2

      No. People will mod him -1 Troll for fucking up his derivatives, which you so courteously quoted.

    14. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an even simpler solution to your problem, simply redefine the standard workday to be 8:30am to 4:30pm. Everyone else will follow and no need to change any clocks.

      The standard basis for clocks is that 12:00 (noon) is the point in the day when the sun is directly overhead. Changing clocks amounts to attempting to change physics for some gain. Now, as energy savings are the primary supposed gain, I must point out the 2008 study in Indiana, which showed the real world difference in energy usage was a 1-4% increase. As such, we should be getting rid of DST, now.

    15. Re:Time to solve the problem by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Your math needs work.

      A 60W incandesent replaced with a 16W CFL will make up that 1.6KW extra power used to make it in the first 36 hours of use.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    16. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and gotten into the retail channels.

      Back in the days before "GOTTEN" took-over, we used to have a gamut of verbs for such usage.

      For example, we would have said "inserted into the retail channels" or "delivered to the retail channels".

      How I miss those quaint old verbs.

    17. Re:Time to solve the problem by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Your math needs work.

      A 60W incandesent replaced with a 16W CFL will make up that 1.6KW extra power used to make it in the first 36 hours of use.

      It's not my math, it is the governments of Canada and New Zealand math.

    18. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Er, moving the UK's clocks forward by an extra hour has nothing to do with 'European fascists' (a term which I suppose is interchangeable with 'European socialists' in your mind) and everything to do with it potentially saving lives through reducing road accidents and potentially reducing energy consumption.

      Please don't cite The Daily Madeup as a source.

    19. Re:Time to solve the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math needs work.

      A 60W incandesent replaced with a 16W CFL will make up that 1.6KW extra power used to make it in the first 36 hours of use.

      It's not my math, it is the governments of Canada and New Zealand math.

      And you quoted their ignorance exactly when it suited your biases. Fuck you, you intentionally stupid lying piece of shit.

    20. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Direct electrical heating is one of the worst ways to heat your home. Plus, people also COOL their homes during half the year, so they no longer have to waste power getting rid of the excess heat generated by their old light bulbs.

    21. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      ...and you need about 10 incandescent bulbs for every one CFL bulb, so you really need 1.1kW-h (it's not kw/hour, BTW) of energy for the incandescent. And at 60 watts vs. 15 watts, you will make back that .6 kW-h after less than 15 hours of use. Hell, even if I go by your completely wrong 1.7 vs. .11 comparison, it will only take about 40 hours to break even. Any more mathematically challenged bullshit you'd like to throw this way?

    22. Re:Time to solve the problem by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      ...and you need about 10 incandescent bulbs for every one CFL bulb, so you really need 1.1kW-h (it's not kw/hour, BTW) of energy for the incandescent. And at 60 watts vs. 15 watts, you will make back that .6 kW-h after less than 15 hours of use. Hell, even if I go by your completely wrong 1.7 vs. .11 comparison, it will only take about 40 hours to break even. Any more mathematically challenged bullshit you'd like to throw this way?

      Actually, the 1.7 kw is only the direct manufacturing energy. The full Canadian study included production energy, including the obtaining the raw materials for the bulbs, shipping energy (CFLs weigh more than incandescents), increased energy used in producing the packaging (with and without using recycled paper in the packaging), actual energy usage of the bulbs, disposal
      energy, particularly reclaiming the mercury.

      The study also found that the wattage claimed by the bulbs and useful life are grossly misstated. Most Chinese made, bargain priced bulbs last twice as long as an incandescent, but actually use 40 watts and not the 13 watts advertised. Their (Canada's) explanation has to do with the certification process for CFLs. Like other electronic devices, actual devices must be tested. However, unlike, for instance with RF testing, where a change in internal components means the entire device must be retested, lighting products can swap components regularly. So, what is originally tested, is not the same thing on the shelf at Walmart. Very often, to keep costs down, lower quality capacitors are substituted. This leads to shorter bulb life and higher wattage. So, it is still true that they last longer and they use less power to light, but not at the levels listed on the packaging. (You can get bulbs that meet the packaging statements, but they cost significantly more than the $1.25/bulb price of most CFLs).

      Again, the study done by Canada and confirmed by New Zealand shows that CFLs have a higher carbon footprint than incandescents when the figures used start with obtaining of raw materials and ends with disposal of the bulb. Not bullshit, as you claim, but just actual data.

        But, maybe the scientists in those two countries don't know what they're talking about. You are free to spend tons of money to come up with your own data.

    23. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      The full Canadian study included production energy, ...[snip]...disposal energy, particularly reclaiming the mercury.

      Then why didn't you post THAT number, instead of the useless 1.7 number?

      ...but actually use 40 watts and not the 13 watts advertised.

      I'm having a hard time buying the idea that a device suddenly draws triple the power of it's original design, and still functions. Who made this claim?

      But, maybe the scientists in those two countries don't know what they're talking about. You are free to spend tons of money to come up with your own data.

      You have made a couple of posts now about these alleged 'studies' by Canada and New Zealand. Is it really that difficult to give us a link to it?

    24. Re:Time to solve the problem by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Google is your friend. I figure that people who are smart enough to comment on slashdot know how to do a search on Google.

    25. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1
      I tried searching before my previous post. I searched for 'canada cfl study'... and got a bunch of studies related to Canadian football league injuries. I'm not going to spend all day trying to figure out where these 'studies' are located. You took the time to post again to say 'Google it', but couldn't take the time to actually post a link. Since you have refused to tell anyone where these 'studies' are, I'm going to assume that they don't exist, and most of what you said is complete made up crap.

      Links are your friends. I figure that people who are smart enough to comment on slashdot know how to link to their sources that they cite.

    26. Re:Time to solve the problem by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Since their are hundreds of links because there are hundreds of studies it would be hard to post a single link. Try searching on: cfl energy consumption canada study as a starting point for your research.

    27. Re:Time to solve the problem by kobaz · · Score: 1

      I agree about DST, though I don't see the point in being a half-hour out of synch with GMT. It just makes the mental math harder.

      I'd say just do away with daylight savings time the next time it comes around. You'd need to give everybody at least a year's notice anyway, so that devices can be updated and gotten into the retail channels.

      One year? That's it? I think we would need at least 5, maybe even 10. Have you seen how long it's taking to roll out ipv6? :P

      --

      The goal of computer science is to build something that will last at least until we've finished building it.
    28. Re:Time to solve the problem by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      Christ, you are lazy. Fine, I'll do a search on the key words you posted. Oops, it looks like there are no studies listed that support your claims. In fact, the Canadian government supports my position that they use 1/3 less energy and last 10 times longer:

      http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/residential/business/manufacturers/questions-answers.cfm#save-money

      ENERGY STAR qualified CFLs use only about one-third as much electricity as a conventional bulb to produce the same amount of light. Although they cost a bit more, ENERGY STAR qualified CFLs are rated to last up to 10 times longer than incandescent bulbs.

      Or were you referring to this unsupported rant from some random guy:

      http://www.greenmuze.com/blogs/guest-bloggers/1031-the-dark-side-of-cfls.html

      He is so stupid, that he thinks it is bad that CFLs don't waste enough heat:

      Because they burn cooler, they cause home heating costs to rise.

      ...and so stupid that he doesn't even realize that we are exposed to UV rays all day from... Duh dun DUUUN.. THE SUN!

      CFLs emit electromagnetic radiation, a type of energy that can make people very sick. Many people have reported skin rashes and irritation due to ultra-violet (UV) radiation.

      Yes, they are called sunburns. Quick, everybody inside! The sun is coming out!

      And did I mention that he cites ONE source for his claims? It's the infamous "1.8 kwh vs. .11 kwh" energy needed for production. But... that same study actually takes into account the lifetime of the two bulb types, and it comes to the opposite conclusion of what he stated:

      http://www.iaeel.org/IAEEL/Archive/Right_Light_Proceedings/Proceedings_Body/BOK1/200/1411.PDF

      To produce 10^6 lumen hours, 0.14 CFL, or 1.37 incandescent lamp is necessary. The energy consuption to produce 0.14 DFL is 0.19 kWh and to prodcue 1.37 incandescent lamps 0.21 kWh is needed. In other words the production of CFLs does not require more energy than producing incandescent lamps...

      Guess he never go around to reading the whole study.

      Have I done enough research for you? I could refute your bullshit all day long if you like.

    29. Re:Time to solve the problem by jfengel · · Score: 1

      They actually gave everybody a bit less than two years notice for the last time change in 2007. The law was signed in August 2005; the first effect was in March 2007.

      I thought it was pretty stupid at the time, and still do. DST is an idea whose time is past, if it ever had one. The only reason to keep it is that we're already used to it and devices are already programmed with it. Changing it without eliminating it seemed like worst of both worlds, especially when changing it in such a way that we now spend more time on "daylight time" than off.

  10. I dont need that to hate DST by Fusselwurm · · Score: 1

    Concerning TFA: I guess it pushes only those people over the edge that were close to it anyway.

    Apart from that: I hate DST.

    If they dont want to waste daylight in summer, people should fix their timetables instead of fiddling with everybody's clocks.

    1. Re:I dont need that to hate DST by maxume · · Score: 1

      At this point it is the other way 'round, we have about 20 weeks of 'normal' time.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  11. The problem is psychological, not physiological by grizdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with DST is the free lunch mentality that goes with it. It was the first response of Congress to the "energy crisis" of the early 70's, and has remained the solution of choice for similar problems ever since. People genuinely believe they are getting "an extra hour of daylight", and expect other little bonuses to be handed to them just as painlessly. Sorry for the rant, but it's long been a pet peeve of mine.

    1. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      >>People genuinely believe they are getting "an extra hour of daylight"

      They are. People that aren't farmers don't care about daylight in the morning time, but they do care about it when they get off work. So it's exactly like getting a free hour of daylight from a utility point of view.

      DST should be made permanent.

    2. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Of course they're getting an extra hour of daylight. I can't believe your post was marked insightful. Way to miss the point.

      Sure it's trivial that the number of physical hours of daylight in a 24 hour period doesn't change by changing the clocks, but that's never been the reason to do so. The reason is that people's lives are regulated by clocks. They get to work at 9, and leave at 5, or whatever the hours are. That also means they sleep during the "night" that's defined by those clocks.

      The point of daylight savings is that the work hours and night hours are shifted, so that during the period when they are awake and working and living, the amount of daylight is, actually, truly, increased. Also, during the period when the clocks say it's time to sleep, the amount of darkness is increased.

      Daylight savings is a great idea, and will continue to be a great idea for as long as human societies are using clocks to synchronize economic activity.

      It didn't used to be like that. In medieval or ancient times, people's days started at dawn and ended at sunset, and that was the economic regulator. They didn't have appointments at ten, meetings at two, eight working hours etc. Instead they had longer work days in summer, shorter work days in winter, and meetings around midday, plus or minus a few hours.

      I can't believe I have to spell this out on slashdot.

    3. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      It IS a savings. If we didn't have it, sunrise in the summer, would be around 5am. I'd rather sunrise were at 6am, and so I can enjoy the daylight in the evenings for longer.

    4. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      The last time DST was adjusted there were congressmen arguing it would be good for farmers...because the plants would get more sunlight...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      Actually, the primary point of the "extra hour of daylight" is that (in the eyes of Congress at least) it encourages people to go out and shop during the summer evenings. That's why the latest changes to when DST started and stopped were billed as a measure to revive the economy.

      Practicality, or the free time available to us peons, had nothing to do with it.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    6. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by Velex · · Score: 1

      DST should be made permanent.

      Or people should just start working the shift I wish I could work again: 7:00 till 15:00. You get off work at 3 PM and have like a whole EXTRA TWO HOURS OF SUNLIGHT. It's like Oh MA GAWD! I onced worked 6:00 till 14:00 and had an extra three hours of sunlight, but I found that was a bit too early for a social life.

      Feh, fuck those magic numbers nine and five. I don't even have a job I need to be there regular hours for except that new customers always need their accounts set up YESTERDAY because we live in a society that can't plan five minutes into the future. Never mind if they planned the decision to have undereducated females answering their phones after hours (I work at a call center) even 48 hours in advance, I could work literally whenever I wanted to. I digress.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    7. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by Velex · · Score: 1

      I hate to reply to my own post, but I forgot to add that I think redefining noon to be anything other than when the sun is at its highest point in the sky is tantamount to redefining pi to be 4 just because 4 is an easier number to work with. The fact that cities don't all have their own local time with regards to the sun's position in the sky any more is a compromise like working with 22/7 when calculating numbers that involve pi.

      9 and 5 are just numbers for christ's sake! It gives you 3 hours before noon and 5 after! Already the arrangement is lopsided. Yet for some reason people find it easier to redefine an astronomical fact to mean something else than challenge the superstition of 9 and 5.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    8. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except that it's all backwards.

      In the spring, we should be moving the clocks *back* an hour. That way, it would actually be dark outside before midnight in the summer, allowing us to actually sleep in *darkness*.

      Then, in the fall, we should be moving the clocks *ahead* an hour, so that it's actually light outside when we wake up, and it's *still* light outside when we are done work, giving us more "after work daylight".

      The current "daylight savings rules" are completely bass-ackwards!

    9. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by plover · · Score: 1

      The last time DST was adjusted there were congressmen arguing it would be good for farmers...because the plants would get more sunlight...

      [Hilarious citation desperately wanted!]

      --
      John
    10. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by nprz · · Score: 1

      I hate to reply to my own post, but I forgot to add that I think redefining noon to be anything other than when the sun is at its highest point in the sky is tantamount to redefining pi to be 4 just because 4 is an easier number to work with.

      Well, in that case noon shouldn't be 12:00pm, because where timezones are located doesn't guarantee that every place in that timezone would have the sun at its highest point at 12:00pm.

    11. Re:The problem is psychological, not physiological by garwain · · Score: 2

      Yes, it's a great idea. Now, it's still near dark when I get up at 6:00, I have to use lights in my barn to see what I'm doing with my animals. Then just light when I drive to work, and wow, it's light for an extra hour at night after i'm home, and taken care of the animals for the evening. Thanks, but I like it to be light when I get up in the morning!

  12. Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Goddamn right, Daylight Savings Time is bad for me.

    It fucks with my sleep cycle -- messes it up for a week or more -- every six months, like fucking clockwork.

    Repeal it, stop it, get rid of it forever.

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      If it affects you that strongly, why not try getting up 15 minutes earlier every few days for the couple of weeks preceding it so you'll be eased into it instead of shifting entirely at once?

    2. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by jrminter · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. The change is a royal pain for all affected and does very little if any good for energy savings. I agree with the others who say pick one and stick with it. Arizona has it right. The rest of the states in the USA should join AZ.

    3. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are part of the majority that do not have problems going to sleep and getting up in the morning, this seems like a very obvious solution. Unfortunately, for those of us with a bizarre sleep cycle or other sleep issues that can be nearly impossible. I absolutely cannot go to sleep and wake up at a set time every day. I've tried a lot of different things over the years and the only thing that can put me down at night is seriously drugging myself....at which point I feel like hell in the morning.

      I personally got incredibly lucky with my employer. I explained to them that I have some issues getting up early and getting to work at a set time every day. I had contracted with them for some time prior to being hired and they really liked my work so they pretty much let me come in at random times. Of course, I also told them that I'm willing to be on call at ALL times. So...when that phone rings at 10 on a Saturday night and some sales person desperately needs some type of report I'll drop everything and help them. Luckily that doesn't happen that much. The situation works out pretty well for both the company and myself.

    4. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by sandytaru · · Score: 1

      I invested in a sunrise clock to ease the transition. It lights up 30 minutes before the alarm goes off, and starts playing birdsong 15 minutes beforehand. Only if you haven't gotten up and shut the birds off at the appointed time does it actually sound the final alarm. As it stands, I'm wide awake and ready to strangle birds 5 minutes after the birdsong starts, and because of the light, I'm less cranky about the whole thing.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    5. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by swalve · · Score: 1

      If you are such a genius, why don't you just adjust your wake time backwards for the 20 weeks of standard time? Wake up at 5am during standard time, 6am during DST. Problem solved, and you don't have to waste the internet any more.

    6. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pah, I have it worse every weekend, when I stay out past my bed-time and "go out" for the evening. Going to bed after the sun has come up is not so fun on the body. The effects are getting worse as I get older :-( I guess shift workers must have it bad.

    7. Re:Mandatory National Twice-Yearly Jet Lag by bstender · · Score: 1

      By subtracting an hour, in your head, from whatever the clock says, (during the Daylight Savings period), you can both mitigate the effect of numerical disconnect and improve your overall sharpness and focus due to the additional mental gymnastics.

      --
      look sig is kool
  13. They should have one time zone with dst always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No more moving forward and back. Make dst the standard time. And with a single timezone you would always know when it was a decent time to call someone or start drinking alcohol. And you would always know when you could expect a business to be open no matter where in the world you are.

    1. Re:They should have one time zone with dst always by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Fine, as long as the regular business hours occur while it's light outside where I live...

      Right, do you begin to see a problem with this now? Not to mention that some people simply can't handle a nocturnal lifestyle...

    2. Re:They should have one time zone with dst always by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Fine, as long as the regular business hours occur while it's light outside where I live...

      Right, do you begin to see a problem with this now?

      Yes. Regular business hours should be 24/7.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    3. Re:They should have one time zone with dst always by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Regular business hours aren't 24/7 because some businesses don't get enough customers at night to make it profitable for them to remain staffed and open for business. What you propose doesn't fix that.

  14. I've got another theory... by Superdarion · · Score: 1

    theorizes that shifts in biologic rhythms could trigger harmful inflammatory or metabolic changes at the cellular level, to which these individuals may be more susceptible."

    ...OR "Shit shit shit shit I'm late for work I'm gonna be fired again!" gets to you ...

    Everytime I read one of these "studies" that "shows" stuff, I can't help but think that the researcher is a press whore or is just trying to get more funding by throwing out a ridiculously convoluted "theory" to explain a simple observation. After all, the "people get stressed out when they're late for work" hypothesis doesn't get you as many grants.

    1. Re:I've got another theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always go read the research yourself.

    2. Re:I've got another theory... by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      theorizes that shifts in biologic rhythms could trigger harmful inflammatory or metabolic changes at the cellular level, to which these individuals may be more susceptible."

      ...OR "Shit shit shit shit I'm late for work I'm gonna be fired again!" gets to you ... Everytime I read one of these "studies" that "shows" stuff, I can't help but think that the researcher is a press whore or is just trying to get more funding by throwing out a ridiculously convoluted "theory" to explain a simple observation. After all, the "people get stressed out when they're late for work" hypothesis doesn't get you as many grants.

      One fall Saturday night, I jokingly "reminded" my friend to turn his clock forward because of the time change - I said "Remember, fall forward, spring back". I figured his wife would catch the joke and correct him, and move the clock back an hour. Instead, he showed up for the 6AM restaurant opening time at 4 in the morning - which meant he must have gotten up at 2:30 AM ...

      So he's sitting in the mall parking lot all by himself, wondering where everyone is, when the police pull up to find out why some black guy is just sitting there in his car in the middle of the night.

      Maybe I can apply for a grant for stress caused by being early for work? I could get an ig-nobel.

    3. Re:I've got another theory... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Everytime I read one of these "studies" that "shows" stuff, I can't help but think that the researcher is a press whore or is just trying to get more funding by throwing out a ridiculously convoluted "theory" to explain a simple observation. After all, the "people get stressed out when they're late for work" hypothesis doesn't get you as many grants.

      Every time I read the "opinion" of some "poster" on a web "forum" who "abuses" quotation marks "extensively", I naturally expect to see some crazy conspiracy "theory" about the "motives" of researchers.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  15. I agree by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    One more hour of having your wife in bed with you, that would but a strain on my heart.

  16. Re:Socialism/Communism/Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just curious....What year do you think it is?

    And, what thread do you think you're replying to?

    Just asking.

  17. Turn the clock back 23 hours, instead of one ahead by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    Turing the clock one hour ahead is bound to screw people up. So why not just turn the clock back 23 hours? The time will be the same, and we all can take that extra "Daylight Savings Day" as an opportunity to lounge around, doing nothing productive.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  18. genetically altered nazi mutants fear the LIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so that's good. they can still be defeated. the lights are coming up all over now. darkness, & it's 'shadowy' minions, will be leaving. it would be better if we helped them do LESS damage, as we'll be tasked wit cleaning up the mess. looks daunting so far? see you there, at one of the million babys+ play-dates, georgia done editing(s) etc.... be there or be scared (left in the dark?).

  19. microscopic political motivation by smoothnorman · · Score: 1
    [states-centric ..apologies] So what political will, or interest, is there in ending DST? Over my too many decades I've heard only "we really don't need this thing anymore" with only very faint and feeble "it's good because...". But since there's no money in getting rid of it (or is there...?) then our politicians get distracted by fighting to stay in power and it never gets addressed ( http://www.boingboing.net/2008/11/21/obama-might-get-rid.html )

    "People are out of work!" "People are starving!" "We're at WAR!" "The economy sucks!" "Corruption via lobbyists!" "Corruption via Koch brothers" "Tea-party!" "R(o|an)d Paul!" ....all true; and too distracting to worry about a tiny little really annoying slightly costly thing like daylight saving time shifting. -sigh-

    Next up: shifting to the metric system.

    1. Re:microscopic political motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [states-centric ..apologies]
      So what political will, or interest, is there in ending DST? Over my too many decades I've heard only "we really don't need this thing anymore" with only very faint and feeble "it's good because...". But since there's no money in getting rid of it (or is there...?) then our politicians get distracted by fighting to stay in power and it never gets addressed ( http://www.boingboing.net/2008/11/21/obama-might-get-rid.html )

      "People are out of work!" "People are starving!" "We're at WAR!" "The economy sucks!" "Corruption via lobbyists!" "Corruption via Koch brothers" "Tea-party!" "R(o|an)d Paul!" ....all true; and too distracting to worry about a tiny little really annoying slightly costly thing like daylight saving time shifting. -sigh-

      Next up: shifting to the metric system.

      The problem is, there's money in keeping it. Most people will go shopping after work, but not before. So having more daylight hours after working hours benefits retailers, and retailers lobby in favor if it. The disruption actually costs a good bit of money, all told, but the retailers and manufacturers/importers see a benefit.

    2. Re:microscopic political motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, there's money in keeping it. Most people will go shopping after work, but not before. So having more daylight hours after working hours benefits retailers, and retailers lobby in favor if it. The disruption actually costs a good bit of money, all told, but the retailers and manufacturers/importers see a benefit.

      So keep it on summer time all year round. Anecdotally, nobody I know does anything with the morning light we get in winter, and it'd be great to be able to have daylight after work for longer in the year.

    3. Re:microscopic political motivation by arkenian · · Score: 1

      The problem is, there's money in keeping it. Most people will go shopping after work, but not before. So having more daylight hours after working hours benefits retailers, and retailers lobby in favor if it. The disruption actually costs a good bit of money, all told, but the retailers and manufacturers/importers see a benefit.

      So keep it on summer time all year round. Anecdotally, nobody I know does anything with the morning light we get in winter, and it'd be great to be able to have daylight after work for longer in the year.

      Yeah, but dawn has to happen too. Especially on the western ends of time zones, if you don't switch back, dawn gets very very late indeed. I remember in ohio the last week before the DST switch dawn was awfully close to 0800....

  20. Average? by MrQuacker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why don't they average it out to half an hour and just leave it there? Instead of swapping an hour twice a year, swap half an hour one time and don't bother doing it again.

    1. Re:Average? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Why change it at all?

      Really, if you shift your schedule... What to you miss? TV. TV is the problem here. The fact that shows are broadcast at a certain time. I predict (and hope) one day soon we'll be able to get The Daily Show and Colbert Report, when it is done production, and available on-demand. That way, you can watch them at any time. Without favorite TV shows to control our bed time, we can get as much sleep as we need. If you're willing to be a day behind that reality can be now. But it makes for hard water cooler talk. "Did you see XXXX last night?" There is a lot of idle time in my evening when I am not watching anything, If I could move the later shows to that time slot, by sleep and wake schedules and over0all health would be positively impacted.

      Then you have to look at wake-up time which is set by work hours for most people. Most places these days have flex time. But By getting to bed at a good time, you can compensate.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    2. Re:Average? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they average it out to half an hour and just leave it there? Instead of swapping an hour twice a year, swap half an hour one time and don't bother doing it again.

      Maybe because moving just half an hour will have the US half an hour off the time zones from the rest of the world.

    3. Re:Average? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even want to imagine the IT headache that would cause. Just stop fucking with it and leave it alone. Stop immediately and never do it again.

    4. Re:Average? by swalve · · Score: 1

      Move the time zones. Duh.

    5. Re:Average? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Even if that happened, the US wouldn't be the only place with a half hour offset from the rest of the world's timezones. There are several places already that have offsets that are not whole hours from GMT, including India (with over a billion people), some parts of Australia, some parts of Canada, Venezula. Hell there are even some oddball places with 15 minute offsets.

  21. Semi Annual DST rant by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the best part of DST is the opportunity to have this semi-annual anti-DST rant-fest. It's better than sunlight!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Semi Annual DST rant by Alsee · · Score: 1

      It's better than sunlight!

      We're computer geeks. Getting poked with a pointy stick is better than sunlight.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  22. Let's keep DST all year round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having an extra hour of daylight in the evening is an even better idea in the winter.

  23. Healthy Stressless Society? by SumterLiving · · Score: 2

    If the government gets rid of DST for the health benefits of a few then they should be required to make new laws for other causes of stress too: How about doing federal taxes, job interviews, coming home to the wife after a sneak trip to a strip club, traffic jams, law suits, the bogyman, XMAS shopping, public speaking, jock itch, earthquakes, tornadoes, ice storms and the list could go on forever. More so for some and less for others. Maybe our government should not try to protect us from all stresses in life?

    1. Re:Healthy Stressless Society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot. We need the EU government to protect us from cookies, because we are paranoid.

      Slashdot is fearful or vaccines, fluorescent flicker, EM radiation, DNA analysis. Seriously, this site is full of more luddites and neurotics than the first-time mother's branch of Greenpeace.

    2. Re:Healthy Stressless Society? by hawkfish · · Score: 1

      If the government gets rid of DST for the health benefits of a few then they should be required to make new laws for other causes of stress too: How about doing federal taxes, job interviews, coming home to the wife after a sneak trip to a strip club, traffic jams, law suits, the bogyman, XMAS shopping, public speaking, jock itch, earthquakes, tornadoes, ice storms and the list could go on forever. More so for some and less for others. Maybe our government should not try to protect us from all stresses in life?

      I think the problem here is that the government is causing the stress and it is being suggested that they just stop.

      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  24. Pointless by pgpalmer · · Score: 1

    When DST is active, they "gain" an extra hour of sunlight in the evening. An hour that is likely used in household stuff as people come home from work (read: lights are probably on, anyway).

    Why can't we just have it at 1/2 hour and leave it at that?

    1. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone needs the lights on in their house when it's broad fucking daylight, you know.

  25. Get rid of it and adjust schedules... by zoid.com · · Score: 2

    As someone that has to deal with DST and timezones in the IT world I say we go with straight GMT and get rid of all of the rest. Then let local areas adjust accordingly. So in central time zone areas we go to work @ 14:00 GMT and get off at @ 23:00...

    1. Re:Get rid of it and adjust schedules... by swalve · · Score: 1

      That's what you are supposed to do. Set the computers to UTC and let the OS decide what number to display.

  26. Stopped changing my sleep schedule last year... by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 2

    ...and it's been working out fine thus far.

    Back during the last time change (autumn of 2010), I decided to not change my alarm clock's time. My computer and laptop would auto-adjust, and I'd still have to change the times on my DSLR camera, e-reader, and Nintendo DS. But the alarm clock time remains the same. When the alarm clock shows "9:30 PM", I go to bed (even though it's actually 8:30 PM). When the alarm clock shows "4:00 AM" (even though it's actually 3:00 AM), it sounds and I wake up.

    The effect is that my day shifts by an hour twice yearly, but I do not. It was strange for the first week or two, having everything around me shifted by an hour (giving me an extra hour in the dark morning, and an hour less after work), but that's much better than the two weeks it would have taken me to even begin to adjust to an altered sleeping schedule.

    Soon I'll find if shifting my day back (moving an hour from my morning to my afternoon) will feel as strange as it did in the autumn. One thing I do know for sure, I won't lose an hour of sleep in the transition.

    1. Re:Stopped changing my sleep schedule last year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the alarm clock shows "4:00 AM", it sounds and I wake up

      That's all I need to know. You're insane.

  27. It's bad for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's bad for me. Twice a year it causes me severe depression as I'm reminded that I'm living in a country where the people that pass the laws think they can "gain" an hour of daylight by changing the clocks. For fucks sake, just wake up sooner and leave the clocks alone.

    In other news, I'm kind of tired of time zones as well. I should disagree with some one on the phone about what time it is. it's the same time every where. What difference does it make if the sun rises at 06:00 or 18:00?

  28. It's logic. It's not bad for you at all by fluor2 · · Score: 1

    We have daylight savings to *save daylight*. Because in winter-time, we have less sun.
    The human mind is closely connected to the sun. Less sun means less happines. Your health might also be connected to this. E.g. you move less when there is less sun, and you get less excercise.

    I also have to point that there seem to be no study that proves that removing DST means less suicides or heart attacks.

    1. Re:It's logic. It's not bad for you at all by fatphil · · Score: 1

      "We have daylight savings to *save daylight*. Because in winter-time, we have less sun."

      Have you never noticed that the time of year that you're "saving daylight" is *summer time*?

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  29. What about not having daylight savings time? by louic · · Score: 1

    Be that as it may, not having daylight savings time makes people spend more time in the dark, which may also cause depression.

    1. Re:What about not having daylight savings time? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The further you get from the equator, the more hours of daylight you get simply due to the tilt of the earth during the summertime anyways, and DST thus becomes increasingly redundant at higher latitudes at best.

    2. Re:What about not having daylight savings time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Arizona, we do NOT have daylight savings time.

      (Except the Navajo reservation which extends into New Mexico, so it somehow makes sense to keep the whole reservation in sync.)

      Most people in Arizona live in either the Phoenix or Tucson metro areas (southern part of state.)
      This is part of the great Sonoran Desert extending out of Mexico. Our summers have at least
      one hundred days where the temperatures reach 100 degrees, and a couple of dozen of those days
      reach above 110.

      People here do not want to go out until AFTER THE SUN SETS and the temperatures fall to something tolerable.
      We had daylight savings time back in the 1960's (?) and was an economic hardship on drive-in theaters and
      restaurants/bars and, to some degree, almost everyone that does some business in the evening.

      It was a simple legislative process to opt out. We are doing fine without it.

    3. Re:What about not having daylight savings time? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      And the closer you get to the equator the less difference there is between winter and summer daylight hours, so there's no sense in artificially selecting half of the months to shift. So, were DST to make any sense at all, it would only make sense in two bands.

      However, I don't believe it makes any sense at all. If you want more light after work, start and end work earlier. If so many people are in favour of getting up earlier, then these earlier work hours can be the societal norm. And if they aren't, then we've been lied to all along (by our governments - no way!?). Calling 7am "8am" doesn't change anything apart from an abstract label.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  30. Hi by bmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My name is BMO and I live in Rhode Island. We here in the Northeast US are far enough east that during the winter, we go to work in the dark and we come home in the dark. Unless you have windows in your office or stock room or machine shop, or whatever, you never see the sun except on weekends. It's like being divorced and having partial custody - of sunlight.

    The Eastern time zone is so wide that it stretches all the way to the Eastern border of Illinois. This is just nuts. When DST finally shows up in March, suddenly the sun sets at a reasonable hour.

    New England and NY should secede from the Union and join the Maritime Provinces simply to get a sane time zone.

    I'm sorry for ranting, but I'm tired of my Seasonal Affective Disorder and I can't wait for DST to get here. See? My SAD is showing!

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. As long-time eastern EST-er, I've always wished I could remain on DST permanently so at least one of my (bicycle) commutes could be in the daylight.

    2. Re:Hi by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      That's your latitude, not your longitude. The number of hours of daylight is essentially the same at all points at a given latitude on a given day. If you're doing double dark commutes, you're actually just about properly situated in terms of standard time matching solar time. If you were farther east, you'd get morning light; farther west, it would be evening.

      Actually, I can't imagine the summers up there -- I live in the South, and find the idea of sunlight at 9 pm somewhat disturbing. Then again, I like the dark...

    3. Re:Hi by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      My name is BMO and I live in Rhode Island. We here in the Northeast US are far enough east that during the winter, we go to work in the dark and we come home in the dark.

      How far east or west you live is irrelevant to the length of your day - it's your position north or south that determines the length of your day.

    4. Re:Hi by bmo · · Score: 1

      And you fail at spherical geometry.

      Sunset *is* dependent on how far east or west you are in the time zone. That is if you believe the earth is a sphere and rotates.

      Derp.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Hi by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      My name is BMO ...

      I tried pronouncing that and had to give up.

      We here in the Northeast US are far enough east that during the winter, we go to work in the dark and we come home in the dark.

      Think a bit harder and you'll find out that north is the cardinal direction that plays that nasty trick on you. I mean, you're on /. at the end of the day. (Pun got in but lucky coincidence.)

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    6. Re:Hi by Velex · · Score: 1

      You had implied that your day itself was shorter referencing both sunrise and sunset. Perhaps it was bad phrasing. The sun rises earlier for you than it does over here in Michigan on the western end of EST/EDT. I do share the same depressing experience, though, of going to work in the dark and going home in the dark. It's why I wish the world would get over this whole 9 to 5 mentality so I could work 7 to 3. 7 to 3 makes the winter so much more bearable.

      Alas, allowing people to work different hours would require allowing people to know what they're doing when they get in the office ahead of time, you know, forcing clients to plan more than 5 minutes in the future. Won't ever happen in an ever increasingly increasing 2.0 world.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    7. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid centrally planned policies fucking over tons of people for reasons those planning would never imagine. Who would guess! Next, DST is gonna turn out to cause migraines!

    8. Re:Hi by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      In your first message you were not discussing sunrise or sunset times, you were discussing length of the day ("we go to work in the dark and come home in the dark"). The length of day is determined by your position north or south because of the Earth's axial tilt.

    9. Re:Hi by bmo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I said that we go to work in the dark and come back in the dark. I want to come back in the daylight.

      Moving to the Maritime Provinces time zone would do exactly that. Daylight Savings Time also does that. But not enough, in my opinion. If anything, DST should be extended year-round for New England an New York.

      Because as it stands, we would go to work in the dark anyway. It would make no difference for the morning drive but a big difference coming back.

      Thank you for ignoring everything I said and being a pedantic putz and *still* getting it wrong.
      --
      BMO

    10. Re:Hi by bmo · · Score: 1

      What part about "we come home in the dark" does not mean sunset time?

      The further east you are in the time zone the sooner the sun sets.

      I couldn't give two shits about sunrise time because in the winter it's dark outside on the commute and in the summer all that sunlight before the commute is wasted.

      Why people in this thread don't understand this boggles my mind.

      --
      BMO

  31. DST has nothing to do with daylight by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1

    DST starts roughly 80 days after the solstice and ends roughly 50 before the soltice. Changing clocks based onthe season rather than the actual amount of daylight or the time of sunrise is wasteful.

  32. Educated stupid?! The solution to DS is simple!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FREE SPEECH in AMERICA is

    "BULL SHIT",

    EVIL EDUCATORS

    block and suppress

    www.timecube.com.

    You are educated evil,

    and might have to kill

    the evil ONE teaching

    educators before you

    can learn that 4 corner

    days actually exist -but

    all Cube Truth denied.

    time cube

  33. Why not adujst our clocks gradually ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 1-hour shift is certainly painful when you wake up on the Monday after DST starts. But how about 4x15 or 2x30 minutes ? Where I live, DSTstarts on March 27th this year. so I think I'll try adjusting to it in 20-minute increments (or decrements, rather) on Monday 14th, Monday 21th and Monday 28th. I'm not gonna change my office hours, but I guess I'll use the extra time in the morning to do other stuff, like practicing my piano for a bit.

    As long as the law doesn't change, it seems to me like a sensible thing we can do to fend off the jet lag. Takes just a bit of preparation and discipline (no cheating with the snooze button ! ;) )

  34. Something is wrong there. by khasim · · Score: 1

    In terms of oil not burned, or greenhouse gases not exhausted into the atmosphere, one bulb is equivalent to taking 1.3 million cars off the roads.

    Since there are only around 300 million people in the USofA ... and none of them can drive more than 1 car at a time ...

    All we'd need to do to completely eliminate the carbon footprint of our cars is to ...

    Replace 300 bulbs.

    Or 100 people replace 3 bulbs each.

    I think your time scales are out of sync.

    1. Re:Something is wrong there. by kopo · · Score: 1

      One bulb per household.

      I don't think many households have 300 light fixtures in which they could replace bulbs.

    2. Re:Something is wrong there. by superdave80 · · Score: 1

      What are, some kind of moron? The article I am referencing is talking about each household replacing one bulb each. Reading is your friend, try it some time.

  35. Q;what's with all the spelling etc... mistakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the time to waste (nitpicking) is gone. that's why. there's plenty of evidence that history is 'creeping' up on us, & the future may be backing up to fetch us up to date? no black hole for us? see you there. can't avoid it.

    wit=with done=stone. ok? thanks

  36. Re:Write your Congress critters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Letter to Congressional representatives:

    Please get rid of Daylight Savings Time. It is a farce. It does not really help save energy or stimulate the economy. Instead it causes an increase in accidents, suicides, heart attacks and other health problems in addition to the simple inconvenience of the change.

    http://healthland.time.com/2011/03/12/is-daylight-saving-time-bad-for-your-health/

    "According to experts on circadian rhythms, the hour shift in sleep schedule from Daylight Saving Time can have serious effects on some people's health, particularly in people with certain pre-existing health problems. One study found that men were more likely to commit suicide during the first few weeks of Daylight Saving Time (DST) than at any other time during the year, and another study showed that the number of serious heart attacks jumps 6% to 10% on the first three workdays after DST begins. Dr. Xiaoyong Yang, an assistant professor of comparative medicine and cellular and molecular physiology at Yale University, theorizes that shifts in biologic rhythms could trigger harmful inflammatory or metabolic changes at the cellular level, to which these individuals may be more susceptible."

    Phew... I'm glad you told them. They'll be sure to read through Slashdot looking for comments like yours to base their policies on.

  37. Simple way to END Daylight Savings Time by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    For those areas affected, for the next DST, just go 30 minutes in the appropriate direction and then STOP CHANGING THE CLOCKS FOREVER AFTER.

    Tada, Simple cure and one final gig for the Y2K / DST programmers.

    1. Re:Simple way to END Daylight Savings Time by paul248 · · Score: 1

      Brilliant, then you need to deal with half hours every time you convert to/from UTC.

    2. Re:Simple way to END Daylight Savings Time by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Math is hard.

      "Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to type like a retarded tree sloth."

    3. Re:Simple way to END Daylight Savings Time by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      This isn't really hard. Many people already have to do this, including the >1 billion that live in India which is on a half hour offset timezone. As are certain areas of Canada, Australia and several other nations.

  38. Good for many, bad for some. by Teun · · Score: 1
    DST is good for all those enjoying that extra hour of daylight after work and, like me, don't get up early enough to notice the sun seems to rise an hour later.

    Having DST in winter is useless because of that later rise of the sun, around my place it'd mean the sun would only rise around 10 o'clock.

    When I hear about the health issues of some it makes me wonder how they cope with a night out in town...

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Good for many, bad for some. by icebrain · · Score: 2

      I'm at work before dawn, DST or not. I'd rather have that extra hour of sunlight year-round, so I can actually try and do something productive when I get home.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:Good for many, bad for some. by fatphil · · Score: 1

      "DST is good for all those [who] don't get up early enough to notice the sun seems to rise an hour later."

      Then you're *wasting daylight* - you're part of the problem!

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  39. Re:Socialism/Communism/Fascism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hahahahahahaha

  40. PITA too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's a PITA to develop applications around it too. I wonder how many billions of dollars are wasted working around this clunky idea.

  41. And non-Soviet Russia by saikou · · Score: 2

    has already decided to end daylight-saving time.
    Because "power savings" from this back-and-forth are 0.2%. And hassles from switch time are simply not worth it :) Heck, Arizona lived without DST without problems...

    1. Re:And non-Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been shown to use more power.

  42. Obvious solution by Kosi · · Score: 1

    Changing the clock is idiotic. If anything, working times should be shifted, not "time" itself.

    For the last years, since I don't watch broadcasted TV anymore, I only became aware of the DST day because my computers showed a different time than the clock in my microwave.

  43. Traffic accidents by Tridus · · Score: 1

    DST is also known to significantly boost traffic accidents after the switch, as people are tired and make more mistakes while driving.

    It's time to abandon this archaic switch.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  44. DST or time of year? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    The question I have is how much does DST have to do with it and how much is simply the time of year? It is possible that people are simply trying to stay awake longer than the available light. I have read elsewhere that being up after dark is not good for you, though like every other study I have to ask myself how much is this based in the factor being studied and how much is this simply a life-style factor?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  45. I feel hounded for several weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's terrible, I have to live 24 hours in 23 hours and slowly I get my 24 hours back.

    cb

  46. This is why I don't celebrate DST by makubesu · · Score: 1

    Can we have an alternative holiday like Kwanza?

  47. Blame Benjamin Franklin! by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Blame Benjamin Franklin!

    It was actually he who suggested it!

    http://www.webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/franklin3.html

    It is very witty!

  48. Aha...an argument against evolution... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2

    What with all that darkness you guys deal with, I can't figure out why Scandinavian women evolved into such exquisite creatures. What does it matter, in the dark?

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    1. Re:Aha...an argument against evolution... by Urkki · · Score: 1

      What with all that darkness you guys deal with, I can't figure out why Scandinavian women evolved into such exquisite creatures. What does it matter, in the dark?

      Now you forget the other half of the year. Imagine watching a woman in perpetual light for months, not a moment of darkness to spare your eyes... And the other half of the year doesn't give less attractive looking people any advantage, it just makes thing equal for half of the time.

    2. Re:Aha...an argument against evolution... by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      What with all that darkness you guys deal with, I can't figure out why Scandinavian women evolved into such exquisite creatures. What does it matter, in the dark?

      Now you forget the other half of the year. Imagine watching a woman in perpetual light for months, not a moment of darkness to spare your eyes... And the other half of the year doesn't give less attractive looking people any advantage, it just makes thing equal for half of the time.

      lolll...now you've made an argument for "intelligent design".

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    3. Re:Aha...an argument against evolution... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      No. This is one for evolution: The vikings would have killed the ugly ones in the summer, giving them a serious disadvantage for procreating.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  49. Re:Turn the clock back 23 hours, instead of one ah by calzones · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think that if the switch to Standard Time occurred at 2am on a Monday, and then the switch to DST occurred at 4pm on a Friday, everyone would be happy.

    It basically gives you an hour longer to sleep in on a Monday in the fall, and lets you off work an hour early on a Friday in the spring, giving you the weekend to start re-adjusting. Everyone gets what they want with the least amount of stress.

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
  50. One size does not fit all by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2

    Here in Canada, most of us are far enough north that our summers are bright, DST or not. Here in Vancouver at "only" 49 degrees north, the latest sunset (if we stayed on standard time) is about 2025 PST, with twilight until nearly 2200 PST in June and July. Further north it's brighter, later. I've been in Yukon (63 degrees north) in May when it was like a bright overcast day at 0100. How much more do people want?

    By the same token, our winters are dark, no matter what we do. The earliest sunset in Vancouver is about 1600 PST, and the latest sunrise is about 0800 PST.

    I think messing with the clocks is pointless. There may be a sweet spot, say, around 40 degrees north, but Canada is well north of that.

    ...laura

    1. Re:One size does not fit all by hoytt · · Score: 1

      It's the same here in the Netherlands. Around June 21 twilight lasts past 22:45 and around 04:30 you'll see the eastern sky turn red again.
      Not to mention the fact that the Central European Timezone runs from the Poland - Belarus border (~23 degrees east) to the western most tip of Spain (~9 degrees west), which is further west than Great Britain.

      We had it somewhat solved prior to world war two. The Netherlands had its own GMT +00:20 timezone which went quite well with the fact that Amsterdam is about five degrees east of Greenwich.

    2. Re:One size does not fit all by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I think messing with the clocks is pointless.

      It might be pointless to you, but that's you. I live not so far from you (near Seattle), and when the sun starts setting at 1900 next week (rather than 1800 as it has this past week) and that extra hour of daylight is going to be very useful.

    3. Re:One size does not fit all by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      If we Canadians reversed daylight savings time, it would make more sense.

      Move the clocks back an hour in the summer. Thus, it would be dark before midnight, and we'd be able to sleep.

      Move the clocks ahead an hour in the fall. Thus, it's light outside when we wake, and it's still light outside when we leave work.

      If we were really concerned with "saving daylight" and "reducing power usage", we'd even move the clocks ahead 2 hours in the fall.

  51. Wasting Daylight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    daylight shifting time, saving time vs savings time, hilarious

    Wasting Daylight

    if you can find the full movie, its hilarious

  52. Leave the god damn clock the fuck alone already! G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave the god damn clock the fuck alone already! Geeze!

  53. Golfers love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not for attorneys who like to play golf after work. It still puts farmers and farm children to work and school in the
    dark; but it did kill a lot of unnecessary sex in cars as DST ended the "drive- in" theatre movie business and, if
    still in existence today, would probably be just another spot for Home Land Security to use body scanners.
    Did it save electricity, which was its claimed purpose? Only your congressman's hair dresser knows.for sure.
    .

  54. Think about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The acronym 'DST' in Portuguese stands for 'sexual transmitted disease'

  55. Better Yet by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    We could go to 10 minute time zones! Or just have everyone set their clock to GMT and just have some people getting up and going to work at 2am...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Better Yet by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Or we could all use Swatch time.

  56. Don't be SAD, be SADD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you're SADD -- Seasonal Affective Depressive Disorder

  57. Keep it at daylight saving forever. by antdude · · Score: 1

    I hate standard time. I like later daylight hours! :P

    It seems like more people like standard time in my old poll: http://aqfl.net/node/5466 ... :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  58. DST == Get Your Ass Out Of Bed Earlier by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Daylight Savings Time is just getting your ass out of bed earlier while pretending you're not. If you like to have light in the afternoon after you get out of work, go to work earlier and leave earlier. You're probably a techie like most of us, so you can probably work flexible hours like most of us. It's different if you're a factory assembly line worker and everybody has to be there at once for the line to roll, or a schoolteacher who's got to be there when class starts. (It's also different if you're a farmer and your cows are going to get up at dawn whatever time the clock says, but since most small farmers tend to also have town jobs, having dawn be later is a real pain.)

    So stop messing with everybody else's clocks and get your ass out of bed earlier if that's what you want to do. Real morning people do it anyway (as do people with little kids.) Non-morning people don't want to get up anyway, and often don't. It's only you half-assed morning people who insist on adjusting the clocks to pretend you're not getting up as early as you are.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:DST == Get Your Ass Out Of Bed Earlier by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2

      Yet another reason I'm glad I live in Arizona. We stay on Standard Time all year. None of this whacky time changing nonsense.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    2. Re:DST == Get Your Ass Out Of Bed Earlier by Nocuous · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm jealous that you live in Arizona, with its perpetual Standard Time all year.

      And no downsides to Arizona, none at all.

      --
      Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
    3. Re:DST == Get Your Ass Out Of Bed Earlier by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      If only I could still say this too...

      lives in Indiana...

  59. DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to end the time change. We should have daylight saving time observance be year round, then those states that don't want to observe it can opt out like Arizona and Hawaii.
    Join our cause on Facebook:http://www.causes.com/causes/465264-stop-the-daylight-savings-time-time-change-support-modern-standard-daylight-time

  60. The flipside by hydrofix · · Score: 1

    Well, DST might causes depression and stress to some particularly sensitive individuals, but what about the 400% increase in fatal traffic accidents involving pedestrians when coming out from DST?

  61. Nothing changes but a mechanical device... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Someone might want to explain that it isn't time that changes... just the hands on a watch (or clock). The "circadian" stuff stays exactly the same.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  62. Japanese quake helped by bobdevine · · Score: 2

    An early estimate of the 8.9 magnitude quake's effect on the planet shows it sped up rotation by about 1 microsecond.

    So all we need is enough huge earthquakes to change the day by an hour -- ergo, no more need for daylight saving time! Okay, there might be a few undesirable side-effects...

  63. Re:Socialism/Communism/Fascism by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    I guess you didn't get it. Isn't the question "Is Daylight Saving Time Bad For You" ?

    How about going further and ask yourself "what's the point of DST" ?

    What grand socialist/communist/fascist design is it to herd a nation of people to wake up earlier when the "market" of businesses itself can just as easily define an earlier starting time for business? They've easily defined varying closing times depending on the needs of their business already.

    There's no meaningful, proven savings, so why bother messing with everybody's clock? Everybody means every nation gets dragged in because it's costly to have mismatched starting times between countries.

    It's a useless anachronism that gets worse when Presidents like Bush come along and push tweaks to it that again don't help or fix anything except make it more "fun" to have more darkness in the winter. We have GMT -- we should just stick to that.

  64. Re:Educated stupid?! The solution to DS is simple! by monkyyy · · Score: 1

    sadly i run out of mod points, other wise u`d get +1 troll

    --
    warning pointless sig
  65. Re:Turn the clock back 23 hours, instead of one ah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nevermind the fact that your logs would magically have overlapping entries for a 23-hour period.

  66. DST is cruel by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Some people are morning people. Such people struggle to stay awake at night and spontaneously wake up in the morning.

    Some people are night owls. Such people struggle to get up in the morning and aren't sleepy in the evenings (even with only 5 hours sleep the night before).

    And you want to make it even more difficult?!? Why? If you want to get up earlier, then do so, but don't force us night owls to struggle even more than we already do.

    At least morning people only need to keep their engines running in the evenings (hard enough), whereas night people must actually get them started in the mornings (even harder). And if a morning person really wants to, he/she can actually go to bed earlier, much earlier, and many do. Night people don't have the option of getting up any later.

    And it's not just a matter of "going to bed earlier". Do you think I haven't tried that? What about all the years I went to school and work? Do you think I didn't try? (Uni doesn't count. Fewer contact hours. ;) I've solved it for the time being by becoming a freelancer.

    For some people, going to bed earlier simply doesn't seem to work. I don't know why. And I would not be surprised if this is the cause of many health issues, but because it's the norm, these issues would fall below the radar.

  67. Yes, it is bad for me. by dswensen · · Score: 1

    Well, the twice-yearly whining about it sometimes raises my blood pressure, if that's what you mean.

  68. Dying frm DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously we have gotten far too soft. Now we are listening to DOCTORS who are telling us we might die because of a slight shift in sleep hours.Humans are not so F***ing delicate. If we are, we should be darwined out. Looks like another excuse for 1) a lawsuit, or 2) getting some more mind-numbing meds. And paying a doctor, a pharmacist, and putting more money in the insurance company pocket. After all, they are stockholders in the doctor office, the med manufacturer, and the major pharmacies.

  69. Is Daylight Saving Time Bad For You? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Yes. It irritates me twice a year, raising my blood pressure.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  70. DST = Load Of Crap by artao · · Score: 1

    Seriously. If we really wanted to "save daylight" we'd be IN DST during the winter, NOT during the summer WHEN WE HAVE THE MOST DAYLIGHT!!! Besides, you can't "make more daylight" or even "save" it. The amount of daylight is set by the orbit of the Earth around the sun and the Earth's axial tilt, NOT by some arbitrary clock setting. All DST does is de-tune people from the natural rhythms of nature. It's illusory and false. That is all. .... by the way, how the heck does one get a carriage return to actually work in these comments. my paragraphs always get run together ...... :D

    1. Re:DST = Load Of Crap by Quirkz · · Score: 1
      You can get paragraphs using the html p tag -- obviously can't show you because it'd just put in a break.

      As for saving, as many others have noted, we realize the number of sun hours have not changed, but that they're shifted to a more convenient location -- in the evening, when people are often out of the house and doing things, as opposed to mornings, where more people stay inside until it's time for work.

      As for DST in winter, while I'd support it, I think the reason it's cut short is because of sunrise time. There's a balance between more light in the evenings and having no light until well into the workday. I'd gladly accept sunrise at 8:30 in exchange for being able to get home before dark, but apparently that's not a common opinion.

      As for natural rhythms of nature ... pretty sure that the 8-5 workday isn't really part of it, no matter your time zone or DST status.

    2. Re:DST = Load Of Crap by artao · · Score: 1
      "p" tag, thanks. D'OH :D

      testing.

  71. Blame the bogeyman by lpq · · Score: 1

    Naw...can't do that... It's gotta be someone or something else's fault!

    In jobs where they have shift-rotation (monitoring something 24hours/day), shift-rotation plays all sorts of havoc with people's biological clocks -- much more severely than DST...

    I wonder if there is a reciprocal effect on the shift to 'Standard' -- i.e. do health problems rise, or do they fall? I.e. is it the change in time or the 1 hour less sleep we have over a weekend?

    To the person with health probs "caused" by DST -- seriously, just think about planning the shift over 10 days. I.e. change the time you go to bed/get up by 6 minutes a day starting 5 days before the change. It should be gradual enough to not disrupt your body clock.

    Also you might find melatonin or tryptophan to help shift your body clock. I found it useful to "pre-shift" my body-clock to 'European-time" when I went on vacation, so I had no jet-lag when I got there (I wanted to enjoy the short time I had there, so I did the time-adaptation before the trip).

    Personally, I'd prefer we stay on DST all the time, as I'm usually a late riser, and if I want to do anything outdoors, the extra time in the evening helps -- but a true-computer geek wouldn't really care -- "what's daylight"?... :-)