Slashdot Mirror


One-Way Sound Walls Proven Possible

disco_tracy writes "Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it. The concept — a kind of one-way mirror for sound — seems imaginary, but two Italian scientists recently pushed this kind of sound manipulating technology closer to reality (abstract)."

117 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Uses by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 2

    Sounds like a good use for interrogation rooms...

    1. Re:Uses by nschubach · · Score: 2

      Automotive as well... being able to hear sirens outside the car without broadcasting your Justin Bieber sirens to the rest of us. Nobody needs to hear that.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Uses by egranlund · · Score: 1

      From a user of a 1980's convertible - road noise gets old. This has limited use in automotive.

    3. Re:Uses by wiedzmin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also submarines.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    4. Re:Uses by drb226 · · Score: 1

      Because democrat policemen never interrogate?

    5. Re:Uses by sconeu · · Score: 1

      This is NEEDED for automotive applications.

      The rest of us do NOT want to hear your 1200 watt bass line on whatever it is you're playing.

      If we wanted to hear it, we'd be listening to the same CD or station.

      And when you drive through my neighborhood and cause the windows in house to rattle.... don't get me started (I know.. .too late).

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Uses by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's a pride thing. You may not want to hear it, but they *want* you to hear it. A way off announcing their cultural identity.

    7. Re:Uses by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's pretty insightful! Sound gets in, but can't get out. Submarine is almost invisible to sonar.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    8. Re:Uses by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Fuck their "Cultural Identity". I don't need my fucking house to shake when they drive by.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Uses by jshackney · · Score: 1

      I always wondered if it would be possible to build a huge parabolic acoustic "mirror" that could focus the energy of those 1200 watt bass systems back either to the glass or the eardrums of the driver causing aural devastation. How big would this parabola have to be to get the kind of energy that could do some real damage?

    10. Re:Uses by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't want a parabola - to reflect back to the point of origin, you'd want a sphere. It'd be impractical though, due to the impossibility of tracking a moving car. Remember they are at ground zero for every note, so the car is built for it and the driver willing to sacrifice his hearing.

    11. Re:Uses by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Pa pa l'americano.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:Uses by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of using science to deal with this, but I think the xkcd approach might be more practical -- and more fun.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    13. Re:Uses by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's much too cheap to use a Microphone, a Wire and a Speaker.

      We need this special one-way sound wall retrofitted into the interrogation room, right next to the one-way glass, ASAP. Don't forget to include some kind of damping system, to act as a volume control mechanism.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    14. Re:Uses by crtreece · · Score: 1

      A way of announcing the size of their penis.

      FTFY

      --
      file: .signature not found
    15. Re:Uses by WorBlux · · Score: 1

      No, what is needed for those people is a mobile EMP blaster.

    16. Re:Uses by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Dammit! There's an XKCD for EVERYTHING!!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  2. Really necessary? by jspenguin1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with an ordinary soundproof wall with a microphone on one side and a speaker on the other?

    1. Re:Really necessary? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Where would we be if people were happy with what they had? There's probably all kinds of situations, and even new inventions, that could use this that we can't even think of at the moment.

    2. Re:Really necessary? by mirshafie · · Score: 2

      I don't expect that the scientists in question longed to solve the problem of the band that needs to play loud music but still hear the people outside. They probably did it for the science itself, which seems fascinating.

    3. Re:Really necessary? by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      Easily found with a bug detector?

    4. Re:Really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with an ordinary soundproof wall with a microphone on one side and a speaker on the other?

      That's like saying why do we need one way mirror when we can just build a wall and put a video camera on one side and a monitor on the other? I'm sure there will be cases when something like this would be useful.

    5. Re:Really necessary? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They missed the obvious use case. Think of the Children!

      Parents can hear kiddie outside when he wants a cookie, but kiddie can't hear the grownup sounds inside the bedroom.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    6. Re:Really necessary? by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This would be material based and not require additional power?

      It would be great for those baby-rooms they used to have in movie theaters. The people inside could hear the movie without the audience hearing the screaming kid.

    7. Re:Really necessary? by Creepy · · Score: 2

      That is done in studios currently, but I think the main downside it requires electricity and someone usually has to push a button to turn it on (in my experience). Not really sure how effective it would be in a studio, though, unless you want a lot of natural reverb. Incidentally, I used to have a room set up with sound absorbing tile for that exact reason, but that all got torn out in a remodel a few years ago (it was in really crappy condition, or in my wife's words, was "fuggly and has to go"). I actually play a lot more acoustic guitar these days, anyway, and the 12 string sounds unbelievable in that small room (my wife also won't let me turn my electric guitars and basses up to 11 [she complains if it's over 1...], either, so they aren't as much fun).

    8. Re:Really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or flip it around. Parents don't have to listen to kids. Kids can be scarred for life. It's a win/win! Somehow...

    9. Re:Really necessary? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with an ordinary soundproof wall with a microphone on one side and a speaker on the other?

      Yeah, we wouldn't want any improvements in sound-dampening technology.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:Really necessary? by ElMiguel · · Score: 1

      ... or they could just install speakers inside the baby rooms.

    11. Re:Really necessary? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's controllable it would be nice having it on car windows, or if it isolates certain frequencies, you could use those frequencies for emergency vehicles so some @$^!#$% people won't block their way.

    12. Re:Really necessary? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      That you still need a soundproof wall? So instead of paying for the soundproof wall AND the electronics (and subsequent batteries/electricity). You just pay for the wall?

    13. Re:Really necessary? by Irontail · · Score: 1

      So many killjoys. With this kind of material, you would presumably get the full surround-sound effect of the theater without having to replicate the system in each baby room.

    14. Re:Really necessary? by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Or alternatively, not take a young baby with you to watch a movie!

    15. Re:Really necessary? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to tell your wife to STFU and let you have your hobbies. Unless hers are fair game for your shooting-down as well, that is.

      (of course, find a nicer way to say it)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:Really necessary? by AtomicOrange · · Score: 1

      Personally I think the racking of a 12 ga shotgun to be a great deterrant. I want the robber to hear that, because if he doesn't leave then the slug/buckshot mix will ensue.

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    17. Re:Really necessary? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this would be of any use in a recording studio. Typically they use monitors, and it's not because of the wall. The reason for the sound proofing is because the audio engineer is more interested in what they've got on tape than what's actually being produced. Because ultimately that's what they're going to have available when they go to master the CDs, not the actual sound that's being produced.

      You really wouldn't want to turn it around either, because you don't want to have to find completely silent equipment just so that you can talk to the band without using an intercom.

      I suppose if you wanted to give the execs a way of ducking in to listen to a bit of production without disturbing things this would be helpful, but otherwise I'm not seeing a use here.

    18. Re:Really necessary? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Another poster already mentioned it, but it truly bears repeating. Having that car blasting out their music completely silenced but still able to hear a police siren.

      From the article, this is not limited to glass at all. In fact, the article does not even indicate that the material is translucent at any point either.

      Something else to consider. Take two of these and slap them together in a sandwich and you know have sound proofing to a fairly extraordinary level in something that is likely to be only a percentage of the thickness of the material that would be needed now.

      What does the NSA or CIA think about this too? Law enforcement? If this material can be made translucent, my biggest question from how it makes it sound in the article is with lasers could you still measure vibration on the surface on the outside to reconstruct audio waves on the inside? A.K.A, laser microphones?

      There is nothing wrong with a standard sound proof wall. However, this kind of technology sounds as good as what the NSA/CIA use on their buildings to prevent them from being spied on. In other words, military/national security level technology being applied to normal civilian applications.

    19. Re:Really necessary? by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      We would only be a few microbes swimming around an empty ocean planet because, hey, just surviving is good enough.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    20. Re:Really necessary? by lxs · · Score: 1

      Awesome! Then I wouldn't have to work on a saturday!

    21. Re:Really necessary? by bug1 · · Score: 1

      Yea, for example, what would you do during an extended power outage, with no batteries, solar, or handcrank ?

      That silly microphone/speaker idea wouldnt be any use then !

      I heard of a new invention too, a movable two way sound resistance wall, with optional visual transparency.

      They call them windows.

    22. Re:Really necessary? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Snoring?

  3. Band... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it.

    They can't be a very good band if they can hear somebody talking in the next room while they're playing...

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Band... by parlancex · · Score: 2
    2. Re:Band... by irishPete · · Score: 1

      I am not sure quality and volume are necessarily equivalent. Actually, I can attest that I have heard quite a few very loud, yet horrendous bands on any given Monday night at the Rat. (if you recognize the club, you're probably old too...)

      --
      disk? hmmm... I know I saw it somewhere...
    3. Re:Band... by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but they've got the use case backwards. The proper way to set it up is so that everyone else hears the band, but the band can't hear any of the complaints from the neighbors banging on the walls and yelling at them.

    4. Re:Band... by Abstrackt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it.

      They can't be a very good band if they can hear somebody talking in the next room while they're playing...

      Do you have any idea how hard it is to find an amp for an air guitar?

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    5. Re:Band... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      Pff, they're everywhere... you just have to know one when you see it.

    6. Re:Band... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      In your personal space, nobody can hear you scream.

    7. Re:Band... by FauxReal · · Score: 1



      <quote><p>Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it.</p></quote>

      <p>They can't be a very good band if they can hear somebody talking in the next room while they're playing...</p></quote>

      Maybe the drawback is it amplifies sounds on the other site... or you can only hear someone if they speak vuvuzela.

  4. Re:Try the.. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Looks like they finally got around to fixing the fortune database...

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Joke Variant Unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    - "You have a banana in your ear!"

    - "I'm sorry, what?"

    - "YOU HAVE A BANANA IN YOUR EAR!"

    - "I'm sorry, I can't hear you, you're on the wrong side of the wall!"

    1. Re:Joke Variant Unlocked by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      "...please call the Bananaphone."

  6. Try to... by marcansoft · · Score: 1, Insightful

    not very obviously break the production site by dumping the entire fortune file out with every page.

    World to Slashdot calling, it would like you to know about little tiny things called "testing environments". You should learn about them.

    1. Re:Try to... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      World to Slashdot calling, it would like you to know about little tiny things called "testing environments". You should learn about them.

      And exactly where do you think you are now? The best testing environments look exactly like the production environments. Taco is such a smart dude!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Try to... by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      Nice try. I hear that in the test environment they still haven't ironed out the occasional post trunca

    3. Re:Try to... by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      World to Slashdot calling, it would like you to know about little tiny things called "testing environments". You should learn about them.

      I hear Aperture Science is pretty experienced with these things. I recommend contacting them with any questions you have about testing.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  7. Huh? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3

    "Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it."

    How does this wall mean the musicians will hear the talking over their own music? Is there one-way sound air coming soon too?

    1. Re:Huh? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Time division multiplexing.

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      "Imagine a room where a band is playing. Neighbors can't hear the music, but if someone outside the room is talking, the musicians can hear it."

      How does this wall mean the musicians will hear the talking over their own music? Is there one-way sound air coming soon too?

      They're just trying to explain the concept in very simple terms. Read the abstract instead if you're going to be pedantic.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    3. Re:Huh? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      There's that, but there's also the question of why that would be desirable anyways. I assumed that meant between sets, but even that doesn't seem particularly useful. If you've genuinely blocked the sound from penetrating in that direction the people on the other side of the wall shouldn't have anything relevant to say.

  8. Wave diode applicable to light? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article describes the proposed theoretical mechanism as a "wave diode" - I wonder if the same principle is applicable to light? I don't know if "light diodes" already exist in some sense, but that seems like a possibly useful component for optical computing...?

    1. Re:Wave diode applicable to light? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Wave diode applicable to light? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe one-way mirrors are completely dependent on highly disparate levels of light between the two regions. This paper describes a totally different physical mechanism.

    3. Re:Wave diode applicable to light? by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      That post mentions the exact same paper... I wonder why the blog post focuses on light, and the discovery article focuses on sound, when the actual paper is just about general wave phenomena?

    4. Re:Wave diode applicable to light? by kmac06 · · Score: 2

      There is such a thing for light, an optical (or Faraday) isolator, which uses the Faraday effect. It relies on the fact that light is a transverse wave, not longitudinal, so it wouldn't work for sound. Note that because of the large magnetic field required, most optical isolators only have an aperture of a few millimeters (or less), so it would be impractical to build a "one-way" mirror of appreciable size out of it.

    5. Re:Wave diode applicable to light? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 2

      No... a one-way mirror doesn't allow light to pass in only one direction. It passes, and reflects, light equally in either direction. The trick is to make it dark enough on one side that you can't see your own reflection, and bright enough on the other side that they can't see you because their reflection is too bright.

  9. Get Smart by KDN · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the Cone of Silence from Get Smart. Lets just hope it works better :-)

    1. Re:Get Smart by amanicdroid · · Score: 1

      WHAT?

  10. Let's build... by wolfsdaughter · · Score: 1
    --
    "Are they made from real Girl Scouts?" ~Wednesday Addams
  11. Great idea by slackzilly · · Score: 1

    Until every recording gets polluted by sounds from the outside.
    Laughter from the next room, babies crying, fire trucks passing by etc.

    --
    - "If one man can create that much hate, you can only imagine how much love we as a togetherness can create."
  12. Lots of reasons by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 3

    The same reason why a 1 way mirror is better in some applications than a video camera on one side of a wall with a monitor on the other.

    On possible use is in security. People can avoid cameras, and small unseen microphones are not directional. Airports, casinos, police stations, and other security heavy areas will certainly have a use.

    Imagine the CIA setting up a room for foreign dignitaries. The dignitaries sweep the room for bugs. But unknown to them, the floor of their room is a 1 way sound barrier, with agents sitting below with directional microphones pointed at the ceiling underneath each room.

    Imagine a submarine with a section of the vessel being a 1 way sound room where large microphones reside. All other walls are sound deadened except 1 outside wall. More equipment could sit there than any outside array of microphones, listening for enemy ships... but without an outside sonar signature, and without worrying about hearing internal noises.

    Even naturalists would love it. Imagine a retreat in a forrest where every outside wall was 1 way, making it sound like you weren't even in a building, but the animals were not disturbed by the sounds you make snapping pictures and talking.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:Lots of reasons by klui · · Score: 1

      That's where the Cone of Silence is useful in situations like what you've described.

    2. Re:Lots of reasons by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the sound would remain directional, which may not be the case. Indeed, I would expect the sound to be projected perpendicular to the surface. ... and it will probably not be as general as you expect. It will be a long way (if at all) until it would look like anything other than what it was.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  13. Not like a one-way mirror. by Timmmm · · Score: 1

    This isn't really like a one-way mirror. With a one-way mirror light travels through it and reflects from it the same in both directions. It's just that the amount of light reflecting from the bright side is much much greater than the 'signal' which comes through from the dark side.

    This is apparently a true 'one-way' material.

  14. Re:I can all ready do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I all ready dislike your title.

  15. Re:This doesn't sound (pardon the pun) that diffic by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

    That's active noise cancellation. This is a proposed mechanism that uses materials with nonlinear acoustic properties to accomplish a similar effect passively. Both methods might be suitable for different situations.

  16. Re:I hope it works. by adonoman · · Score: 2

    You just need a really tiny man to sift through the molecules and sort them by energy level.

  17. How would this be useful to a band? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    I can imagine it might have many perfectly good uses, but how could it possibly be useful to a band? In a recording situation it would be disastrous! It is difficult enough keeping sirens etc. out of the recording area without actually unviting the sounds into the session.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:How would this be useful to a band? by mlts · · Score: 1

      I can think of a lot of uses for it, mainly in the research/testing fields:

      1: Observing wild animals without worry about noise spilling over.

      2: Outer walls of a building to keep sound in (so the neighbor doesn't call 911 because of that awesome drum solo at 11:00 PM), while being able to hear what is going on outside.

      3: As stated above, keep the obnoxious music inside the car, while still being able to hear the motorcycle in the blind spot.

    2. Re:How would this be useful to a band? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's not how that works. If you've got the obnoxious music inside the car, there is no way that you could direct this technology where you'd be able to hear the motorcycle. You could however direct it so that they could hear you're obnoxious music, but you couldn't hear them.

  18. Can we make this mandatory? by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    Can we wrap children up in this new material? It would make my trips outside of the basement a lot more bearable.

  19. Re:I hope it works. by jank1887 · · Score: 1

    he wants a passive device. What he's talking about is a thermal diode. thermal and acoustic diodes would be very similar (audible vs phonon frequency matching being the primary issue). if they didn't violate the 2nd law, that is.

  20. Re:I hope it works. by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure what this had to do with sound, but what you're thinking of already exists and it's called a peltier.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  21. Its here! by keithltaylor · · Score: 1

    The "Cone of Silence"!

  22. Re:I hope it works. by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    t would probably need a special holding case otherwise your backpack would catch on fire while carrying it.

    No, just fold it in half so that the cold sides were facing out.

    --
    That is all.
  23. Re:Perfect... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    Perfect for porn consumption! Just don't accidentally install the wall the wrong way around.

    I would take it one step further and shape the wall into a parabolic dish pointed at my neighbor's house!

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  24. Better use: recording studio by Zinho · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for the neighbors, the band is more likely to install the walls the other way around. Making a room that can be monitored from the outside (by a sound engineer/producer) while rejecting outside sounds would be ideal for a recording studio.

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    1. Re:Better use: recording studio by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that still doesn't answer the question of "Why would you want the sound to pass through a wall prior to recording it?"

    2. Re:Better use: recording studio by Zinho · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't; the pickups would be inside the sound chamber, not outside. That's the whole point of rejecting outside sound from the space, get a clean recording of what happens inside.

      That being said, though, I think the right question for a skeptic would be "wouldn't a completely soundproof room and earphones for the producers/engineers be a better solution than this?", to which the answer is, "yeah, maybe". After all, that's what we're doing now in good studios, and the job's getting done. I'm sure if the unobtanium wallboards hypothesized in this article get made, though, that someone will try them out just for novelty's sake (or to prove how much money they have to spend on bleeding edge tech for their sound rooms). And maybe all the producer needs is a way to tell when the song's over, and the audio diode walls would give some value there.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  25. Nothing extraordinary; happens all the time. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    It's called: the irreversibility of impedance! This is why, for instance, a loudspeaker isn't a great microphone, and vice versa.

    1. Re:Nothing extraordinary; happens all the time. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      A good loudspeaker, in fact, makes a good microphone. That voice coil works both ways. It's just a very bulky solution, and you have to basically put your face in it to get the same sound pressure in that you can get out.

      Most microphones, though, aren't based on voice coils, and their transduction of sound into variation in an electric current doesn't work the other way nearly as well. Like pushing on a rope.

  26. Re:I hope it works. by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    No, fold it in half with the hot sides facing out. That way there's a limited amount of heat trapped inside it for it to move out; when the middle reaches absolute zero it simply can't continue moving heat across (actually, it'd undoubtedly be an asymptotic approach, but that's beside the point).

    What you suggested would cause the inside to get hotter and hotter, making your backpack colder in the process. And even whatever magical material you used to make the hotpad has to have a melting point somewhere...

  27. Here is a simple DIY way to do it. by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Put the band in a tightly soundproofed room. Put some microphones outside of the room, and amplify the sound from the outside into loudspeakers in the room.

    See? Microphone --> amp --> speaker. One way signal with off-the-shelf stuff.

  28. Washington DC's been surrounded by this for years. by bareman · · Score: 5, Funny

    We can hear the idiots inside but they don't seem to be able to hear us.

  29. Re:I hope it works. by vux984 · · Score: 2

    oblig...

    In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics.

  30. Re:I hope it works. by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    That's right. And if you could have a cut off temperature like certain diodes with voltage then you could use it as a temperature regulator and build it into walls.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  31. This makes for by twentynine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a better masturbation chamber...

  32. Re:I hope it works. by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    Thank you, I have now added a one-way hinge to my imaginary pad.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  33. What about military uses? by AJH16 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like it would be brilliant for the military. Contain the sound of a craft inside but allow the occupants to be aware of what is going on around them. That is pretty much a priceless advantage.

    --
    AJ Henderson
  34. Re:I hope it works. by djdanlib · · Score: 1

    Peltier cooling devices need power, though, and tend to amplify the heat output quite a bit more than you'd expect.

    Example: Something like this product: http://www.frozencpu.com/products/2408/exp-01/245W_Potted_Peltier.html

    Disclaimer: I like FrozenCPU, but I'm not affiliated with them. Just using it as an example of a real-world, purchasable Peltier device, with comments that explain it in a bit more detail.

  35. lobbying booths by erdraug · · Score: 1

    There was a scene like that in Dune.

  36. I dunno by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    A material that allows evergy to only pass one way seems like it would defy some sort of law of physics. Imagine a cube made of this stuff that only lets sound in... Would the energy inside the cube continue to build until it erupted in a sonic boom?

    1. Re:I dunno by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      You mean kind of like what a laser does with photons?

    2. Re:I dunno by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Almost all materials have differing levels of transmission and reflection of waves. It has to do with impedance difference at the interface.

      The trick here is there are two interfaces. Air-to-wall on either side. What they've done is to make the impedance differences dfferent on the two sides (low-to-high on one side and balanced on the other side, I would guess), and make it work for a broad spectrum of frequencies.

      The question is how much attentuation you get in the transmissive direction. If they're claiming almost none, I'm claiming bollocks.

  37. This should be easy with 19th century technology by BetterSense · · Score: 1

    Just make a soundproof wall; put some microphones on one side and speakers on the other.

    (you'd have to use some basic amplification, otherwise it would work both ways and the speakers would work like mics and vice versa).

  38. Obligatory. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Sony's headquarters must be built out of this stuff.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  39. We already got one. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    "Talk to the hand."

  40. It could make a fun gag item... by EvilSpudBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make a small cube with each wall made of this material so that sound can enter the cube but it can't get out. Next, let it fill up with sound. Take it to the airport, construction sites, concerts, etc...

    Then you leave it somewhere with a sign on it that says, "Open Me."

    1. Re:It could make a fun gag item... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The reason it won't work is stated a bit above: The soundwaves change to heat (slowly, but they do) in the air and at each bounce. The box would start heating up as you "fill" it and this heat would leak away.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  41. So Al Borland... by thwack328 · · Score: 2

    ...was a time traveler!

    AL: *singing away inside booth*
    TIM: Al! Can you hear me?
    AL: I can hear you...
    TIM: Think about that.

  42. Re:Washington DC's been surrounded by this for yea by timeOday · · Score: 1
    No, the root problem there is all the contradictory input they get from competing interests.

    If you're waiting for everybody to agree with each other (or even be consistent with themselves over time) it ain't gonna happen.

  43. Re:Washington DC's been surrounded by this for yea by cosm · · Score: 1

    Best political-geek satire of the year.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  44. How long do you suppose it will be... by Roduku · · Score: 1

    before this is made mandatory in new housing construction. The police will be able to just walk up to your house and hear what's going on inside without you even knowing they're there.

    1. Re:How long do you suppose it will be... by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Anyone can do that now if they can walk up next to your house reasonably quietly. No, it's far to impractical for even the black helicopter crews to want to mess with.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  45. We already have this by brillow · · Score: 1

    microphone on one side, speaker on the other.

  46. Is this so hard to belive when... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Buckaroo Banzai can hear the sound of someone crying within the same room while guitar amps and drums are going full blast?

    Quote: Is anybody out there not having a good time?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  47. Perfect for loudspeakers by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    With material like that loudspeakers could be build that won't reflect the sound inside the box back outside through the cone.
    One layer of one-way material on the inside, then one sound absorbing layer on the outside.

    --
    home
  48. Re:How about noise cancellation? by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    We don't use it because of the unacceptable price, due to high fuel costs.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.