Slashdot Mirror


Treasure Hunter Wants To Find Bin Laden's Body With ROV

Kittenman writes "Slate is carrying some details of how eccentric treasure hunter Bill Warren is proposing looking for the body of Osama Bin Laden in the Arabian sea. He plans on using sonar, and a remotely operated submersible. If he finds the remains, he'll photograph them to confirm Bin Laden's death to the world. Warren says, 'There is still a $25 million reward that no one has collected, and the reward says dead or alive, well, if -- in fact -- he is dead, then I could collect the $25 million reward. Why not?'"

257 comments

  1. Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titanic by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good luck finding a target slightly smaller, that the fish have been chewing on.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That is if they in fact threw him into the ocean, maybe they just said that and have him somewhere else.

  3. Just gonna take a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Recover that body! Think about it... Weekend at Osama's!

    1. Re:Just gonna take a picture? by alienzed · · Score: 1

      If Osama's dead body is used for a suicide bombing... does that still count?

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    2. Re:Just gonna take a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A man is taking a walk in Central park in New York. Suddenly he sees a little girl being attacked by a pit bull dog. He runs over and starts fighting with the dog. He succeeds in killing the dog and saving the girl's life. A policeman who was watching the scene walks over and says: "You are a hero," tomorrow you can read it in all the newspapers: "Brave New Yorker saves the life of little girl." The man says: "But I am not a New Yorker!" "Oh, then it will say in newspapers in the morning: Brave American saves life of little girl" - the policeman answers. "But I am not an American!" - says the man. "Oh, what are you then?" The man says: "I am a Saudi!" Then next day the newspapers say: "Islamic extremist kills innocent American dog."

    3. Re:Just gonna take a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahah that movie was awesome

  4. He's got a point, though futile by mcvos · · Score: 1

    'There is still a $25 million reward that no one has collected, and the reward says dead or alive, well, if -- in fact -- he is dead, then I could collect the $25 million reward. Why not?'

    He's got a point there. But the sea is pretty big. Finding a single body there is much like catching one very specific fish. Not to mention that I'm sure there are lots of critters down there that love to eat dead bodies.

    1. Re:He's got a point, though futile by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you ignore the fact that the reward is no loger on offer.

    2. Re:He's got a point, though futile by uncanny · · Score: 2

      i bet that if he manages to get pictures of BinLaden i'm sure he'll make quite a bit of money from the tabloids alone anyways.

    3. Re:He's got a point, though futile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's able to find a single body in the Indian Ocean, it's $25M well-spent. Cheap, even.

      And $25M will be a drop in the bucket when he starts selling his technology to navies and oil production companies.

    4. Re:He's got a point, though futile by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the offer was so that the US could capture or kill Bin Laden. Since they already killed him, the US no longer needs to offer a bounty.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:He's got a point, though futile by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that I'm sure there are lots of critters down there that love to eat dead bodies.

      According to wikipedia,
      soft tissue of whale fall is consumed at 40-60 kg PER DAY. the guy has been "down there" for just over three months. I doubt there's much of anything left of him.

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    6. Re:He's got a point, though futile by ryantmer · · Score: 1

      While I agree that there's probably not much left of him, he was killed May 2nd, so he's barely been down 6 weeks...

      --
      Whatever it is, it's notablog.
    7. Re:He's got a point, though futile by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Finding a single body there is much like catching one very specific fish. Not to mention that I'm sure there are lots of critters down there that love to eat dead bodies.

      The government should give hime a better chance of finding a body. They can take the thousands of bodies they've collected at area 51, and dump them all around the area where they dumped Ben. Every body they found would quickly restrict them to the covers of the Weekly World News, and if they actually found the body, it would be given the same respectability as the alien autopsy video.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    8. Re:He's got a point, though futile by frozentier · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Plus, what would he get the money for doing? Capturing him? He's already been captured. Killing him? He's already dead.

  5. Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by Skarecrow77 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Like a cell deep in Guantanamo or the like?

    I'm just saying what everybody else is thinking...

    1. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like a cell deep in Guantanamo or the like?

      I'm just saying what everybody else is thinking...

      No you're not. What I'm thinking is... he either A) died years ago, yet the US kept parading those videos because they needed that big villain image to justify [insert every national "security" policy since 9/11] or B) he's nowhere near the bottom of that ocean, dead or alive. But hey, go ahead and try it, I'm sure that 25 million reward is still on offer!

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    2. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by dccase · · Score: 2

      Did anyone check his office in Langley?

    3. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      Seriously, how do you choose which hare-brained conspiracy theory you want to believe in? Since there is absolutely no evidence that he was killed years ago, is in a Guantanamo cell or is back at his office at he CIA, then how can you say that one theory is wrong and another right.

      And why is any of those bizarre ideas more plausible than the official line. The idea that he died years ago requires both the co-operation of Al-Qaeda and President Bush to agree to defer the glory to his successor. Yeah, right.

    4. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If he died years ago, they wouldn't have 'staged' his death in Pakistan.

      Pakistan and US relation are really important for strategic reasons.

      A cane in Afghanistan would make much more sense. It's what people expected, it's easier to do, and it could have been used for even greater political gain.

      Of course, the whole idea makes no real sense.

      1) The previous administration would have staged as an aid for the political campaign.
      2) The shear number of people involved in keeping it quite.
      3) The fact that if the pubs did it, the dems would of destroyed all the current pubs gain by exposing it.
      4) IF he is still alive, all he would need to do is show his face and the US would be in a shit of trouble. Something he loved to do.

      5) He is dead and at the bottom of the sea, being consumed by the locals.

      I wonder if he will show up in a spongebob episode~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by gtall · · Score: 1

      And you base this thinking on what evidence? Or is running off at the mouth over your latest "insights" part of your therapy?

    6. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by Raumkraut · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, there is also absolutely no evidence that he was killed in Pakistan this year, either. All we have is the word of politicians.

      And the supposition that he died years ago needs only the cooperation of Al Qaeda, to distribute some pre-canned or impersonated audio at appropriate intervals. The US government need not to have known anything about such a deceit.

    7. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, there is also absolutely no evidence that he was killed in Pakistan this year, either. All we have is the word of politicians.

      I'd love to see you say that straight to the face of one of the SEALs involved in the operation.

    8. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, there is also absolutely no evidence that he was killed in Pakistan this year, either. All we have is the word of politicians.

      I'd love to see you say that straight to the face of one of the SEALs involved in the operation.

      You're assuming SEALs went there in the first place.

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    9. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Say it to their face.

    10. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      Who's face? The mythical team who's name is paraded in the media?

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    11. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Something obviously happened in Abbottabad. There's video and and independent verification. The US lost a chopper. Say it to the face of the guys who were there on May 2nd.

    12. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      Key words: "something happened".

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    13. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Whatever.

    14. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      Say that to my face!

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    15. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 0

      If you want to come to Oregon I'd be happy to.

    16. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by creat3d · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't set foot in your forsaken country even if I was paid to. Come up north!

      --
      Grammar nazis are to this community what excrements are to gold.
    17. Re:Shouldn't he be looking elsewhere? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      LOL, I've been to BC & Alberta before. Beautiful country. I'd have to go get a passport now to go though.

  6. Shoddy reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the article begins by saying that the treasurehunter will not find the body because sonar doesn't reflect well off of a body... This is true, however if the US military is to be trusted, the lead weights inside the bag will be more than 'visible' on a sonar display. Further, the body was in a bag that is probably air-tight... so decomp will likely be pretty early.
    Personally I think that it is still a futile attempt, in order to take pictures, Bill will have to essentially bring the body to the surface in order to do the tests he is planning.

    1. Re:Shoddy reporting by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it isn't theoretically possible but practically difficult. Remember at most the body is 2m (6ft) and the size of the lead weights will be smaller than the body. I'm sure the Arabian Sea is full of all sorts of things that will be far more visible on sonar like shipwrecks, dumped garbage, etc. Finding bodies will be hard enough; then it may not be his body. They have many people buried at sea.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  7. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    They put him in the secret freezer next to Walt Disney and the real Mikhail Gorbachev.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. Wow by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    And you thought someone keeping $500,000 in bitcoins on their windows machine was an idiot...

    1. Re:Wow by Phreakiture · · Score: 2

      This guy isn't an idiot. He is someone with an expensive hobby who has found a way to get someone else to pay for it. Regardless what you think of the project, that's pretty shrewd.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    2. Re:Wow by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Except there is no getting someone else to pay for it part.

    3. Re:Wow by blair1q · · Score: 1

      He should have been a DARPA-funded scientist.

    4. Re:Wow by kryliss · · Score: 1

      He should get the History channel to fund it and call it Arabian Pickers!!

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a "bitcoin" ?

  9. Too late to be useful by Millennium · · Score: 1

    IIRC, don't bodies buried at sea decay very quickly? At this point he may be able to find the shroud and weights, but the body itself must be past the point of recognizability by now, if there's anything left of it at all.

    1. Re:Too late to be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      k csi

    2. Re:Too late to be useful by lennier1 · · Score: 2

      Needs more sunglasses!

    3. Re:Too late to be useful by Millennium · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that he won't ever be able to prove that the body he found was bin Laden's, and thus will never be able to collect the reward. He won't be able to pacify the deathers either.

      Note that I am not a conspiracy theorist. I believe that bin Laden was in fact killed and buried at sea, either just as the US government claims or close enough to it as makes no real difference. But lots of people get buried at sea, and bin Laden cannot possibly be the only person to have been buried at around that time and place. All it takes to keep him from getting the reward is a simple claim that he's pulled somebody else's body, and he will have no way to refute that.

    4. Re:Too late to be useful by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not if they are deep enough. The water is pretty cold down there. Look up the state of the bodies for Air France 447 after 2 years in the water...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Too late to be useful by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this guy might find himself...

      *sunglasses*

      ...in over his head

      YEEEAAAAH!

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    6. Re:Too late to be useful by rednip · · Score: 1

      It took them two years of active well funded searching to find the big aluminum container which marked the location of those bodies. Perhaps Bin Laden is too deep to be crab food (as I kinda like to think that he is), but I really doubt if they'll find him by himself on the seabed.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    7. Re:Too late to be useful by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      If he is in a rubberized plastic body bag, no, he wouldn't decay quickly.

    8. Re:Too late to be useful by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Oh I doubt it too - I was merely addressing the decomposition aspect of the argument. But I guess technology marches on, and like another poster said, I'm sure some sort of weights were attached to his body (apart from the lead/brass it already contained) to prevent him washing up on a beach somewhere.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:Too late to be useful by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Actually considering what I just wrote, his washing up on a beach would be his last act of terrorism, no? :)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Too late to be useful by Millennium · · Score: 2

      IIRC, shrouds intended for burial at sea aren't watertight. The material is made to be durable in undersea conditions so that the body won't escape, but holes are cut into the fabric to let water in and escaping gases out. This speeds up decomposition and reduces the bag's buoyancy.

  10. Good freaking luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a big place with lots of hungry critters. Maybe they left you something.

  11. Reward? by Adkins1984 · · Score: 1

    I thought they removed the bounty on his head once the Seals got him? I am not 100% sure this guy is working with a full deck of cards...

  12. Why not? by b0bby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'There is still a $25 million reward that no one has collected, and the reward says dead or alive, well, if -- in fact -- he is dead, then I could collect the $25 million reward. Why not?'

    "Why not?" is that the reward is given at the discretion of the US government, and they're not going to give it to you.

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that he was ALREADY captured and killed by seal team 6.

      Who, by the way, being agents of the US government, are ineligible to collect. Their "reward" is already included in their military pay.

    2. Re:Why not? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you offered a reward for someone to find your wallet. And then you found your wallet. Would you pay the reward to someone who later picked it out of your trash?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Why not? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Their "reward" is the fact that they are now the top superheroes in a community of superheroes. That and you know everyone involved in that operation now has a "if you need anything, call me" card from every General and Admiral in the Pentagon with three or four stars.

      I'm sure there are Navy Crosses for the SEALs and Distinguished Service Crosses for the Army aviators going around.

    4. Re:Why not? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0, Troll

      There should be a quick firing squad for murder of a foreign national on sovereign grounds for those thugs you are all fapping off about these days. I am only half-trolling here. This sets an unappetizing precedent. What is the most scary, is that even the most die-hard GUBMINT IS EVIL guys on /. seem to fully approve of shooting people without a trial and dumping them into the sea to leave no tangible evidence.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me just get this straight. You are so concerned about rights, that you disapprove of the killing of even Osama Bin Laden.

      And...you think the punishment for his killing should be "a quick firing squad". "Quick" meaning, without a messy trial. The kind of messy trial you think Osama Bin Laden deserves.

      Gotcha. IHBT.

    6. Re:Why not? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0

      You have. My apologies. As I said, only half-trolling here, though.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:Why not? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      If that's only half trolling, what's the other half? Doubletrolling, for a total composition of 150% trolling? :P

    8. Re:Why not? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      The other half is the serious question why a nation that likes to put itself up as the paragon of freedom sends out assassination squads that after their deed dump all evidence into the sea. Quickly.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    9. Re:Why not? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Sort of an eye-for-an-eye problem there, since Seal Team 6 was our firing squad. See, Bin Laden planned the murder of a couple thousand foreign nationals on sovereign grounds. Granted, our firing squad wasn't exactly *quick*...

    10. Re:Why not? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Did he? Proof? Trial? Presumption of innocence? Guess we don't need that any more. All I see is a turf war between two bands of street thugs...

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    11. Re:Why not? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      You didn't seem to suggest any of that initially. Why demand it now?

      Or does "quick firing squad" silently include the slow process of a trial?

    12. Re:Why not? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Why give a trial, he admitted to it?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    13. Re:Why not? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      You skip trials in your country in case someone confesses, for whatever reason? Or just if "the facts are clear"? Nice rule of law you got there, mate.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    14. Re:Why not? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Please make it a car analogy. Wallet analogies are not accepted here.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    15. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you offered a reward for your missing car, and then later one of your kids says he crashed it down the street, would you give that reward to the schmuck who takes a photo of it wrapped around a telephone pole?

  13. Scuba bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "if - in fact - he is dead"... yes, yes, maybe we will find him alive and well at the bottom of the sea.

    1. Re:Scuba bin Laden by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      well, he better not be feeding any haram sea creatures down there with his body

    2. Re:Scuba bin Laden by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Ah, so 72 virgin fish (not mermaids you Ariel pervs). Man, you got to read those contracts and close up the loopholes. At least people that deal with devils and demons know that!

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    3. Re:Scuba bin Laden by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yes, living in a pineapple no less!

      I have to wonder, did this loon consider the consequences if he does disturb OBL's "grave"? I'm pretty sure there's a lot of muslims who wouldn't like kindly on that, avoidance of such being of the reasons the US claimed to have buried him that way in the first place. He'll wind up with a Fatwa on his ass so fast it'll make his head spin.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    4. Re:Scuba bin Laden by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      Yes, living in a pineapple no less!
       

      Pfft, common misconception. We all know now that Spongebob lives in the rainforest, under a tree.

      http://www.livescience.com/14626-spongebob-mushroom-species-fungus.html

    5. Re:Scuba bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then he should paint Muhammad deep throating a dog on the side, Fuck extremists.

    6. Re:Scuba bin Laden by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I thought the Muslims were already pissed that he was dumped at sea and not given a proper Islamic burial (which, to my knowledge, burial at sea is not eligible for).

      He could probably make a killing handing the body over to some interested group of Muslims who'd want to rebury him with his head pointed towards Mecca.

    7. Re:Scuba bin Laden by arisvega · · Score: 1

      I thought the Muslims were already pissed that he was dumped at sea

      You thought wrong. And you are confusing "thems Muslims" with Bin Laden's followers. Unless of course you genuinely think that all Muslims are Bin Laden's followers, in which case there is probably not much hope left for you.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    8. Re:Scuba bin Laden by gtall · · Score: 1

      If it were me, I'd have fed him to a crazed school of sharks with their appetites whetted with a bit of blood in the water. It would have prevented nutjobs like this....oh, nevermind, what was I thinking. Given the tinfoil hat theories on this slashdot story, there's no stopping people like the treasure hunter thinking they'll strike it big providing evidence for their whacked out theory...or more likely, a well-placed documentary;

          THE SEARCH FOR BIN LADEN

      Follow along as our fearless group of intrepid bounty hunters search the oceans deep for the BODY OF BIN LADEN. Watch as sharks (possibly with lasers on the heads) defend this suspicious lump on the ocean floor. Feel the excitement as the diving bell gets as close as humanly possible to solve THE MYSTERY OF BIN LADEN.
          Advert during show: now for 5 easy payments of $19.95, get your very own collectible bin Laden figurine. Notice the index finger of the right hand pointed upward in true authentic Muslim practice for any holy man being photographed for the world's press. It comes with a body bag and an assortment of lead weights. Conduct your own BIN LADEN DEATH CEREMONIES right in your own bathtub. Even the kids can join in with playing bin Ladin's wives and children scattering as your contingent of Navy Seals (for another $19.95 in 5 easy money payments) blows a hole in the Holy's One's head (figurine comes with removable scrap of skull plate). Invite the neighbors for bin Ladin night at your place. We will also include, at no charge to you, an authentic list of Halal recipes for hors 'd voeuvre to entertain your guests during the magic moment when with a press of our remote control button, bin Ladin's head explodes and you can commence playing our CD of Victory Music for a mere $16.99. Do it today; supplies limited; one per customer.

  14. Can he find Jimmy Hoffa? by bkmoore · · Score: 1

    If this guy does find a body at the bottom of the Indian Ocean, maybe he can find Jimmy Hoffa's remains too.

    1. Re:Can he find Jimmy Hoffa? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If this guy does find a body at the bottom of the Indian Ocean, maybe he can find Jimmy Hoffa's remains too.

      We didn't leave any remains.

      Guido

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Can he find Jimmy Hoffa? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Sonar doesn't work though asphalt.

  15. Kind of reminds me of this guy by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bo_Gritz Back in the 80s, US special forces were going to rescue POWs that were still being held in Vietnam. They tried twice, and both times as soon as they were getting close to launching the raids, Bo Gritz popped up, did a little boasting and ego stroking, and got the missions cancelled. This guy is directly responsible for the deaths of those prisoners. Anyway, whenever I see Slate stroking his own ego, I can't help but think of Gritz. At least Slate isn't getting anyone killed though.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Kind of reminds me of this guy by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      And sorry, when I say Slate, I of course mean Warren. Fail on my part

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Kind of reminds me of this guy by geekoid · · Score: 1

      sigh.
      There where no POW in Vietnam in the 80s, and the "inside delta force" book is full of shit.

      Both Gritz and Haney are opportunists.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Kind of reminds me of this guy by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      There where no POW in Vietnam in the 80s,

      Technically, you are right. They were being held in Laos.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Kind of reminds me of this guy by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Lots and lots of articles that get posted to Slashdot are opportunistic self-aggrandizers or just trolling for hits. This isn't any different, is it?

  16. not this again by waddgodd · · Score: 1

    If ever in my life I rooted for the Somali Pirates to take a ship, it'd be this guy's. I'm not saying that stupidity should be a capital offense, but if it becomes one via external influences, I'll LMAO.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
  17. Was he in a hard coffin, or just wrapped? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    People are speculating at the body being eaten by creatures of the sea, but I don't recall hearing if he was buried at sea in a coffin or not. That would change the search parameters fairly significantly.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Was he in a hard coffin, or just wrapped? by waddgodd · · Score: 1

      For military burials at sea, there is never a coffin

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    2. Re:Was he in a hard coffin, or just wrapped? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      From what I heard, he was wrapped in a shroud tied to weights (to keep the body from floating). Given currents and organisms determined to get a meal from a sinking corpse, I doubt that shroud protected the body for long. As someone else said, you might be able to find the shroud and weights but the body'll be beyond recognizable by now.

      Of course, even if we somehow assume that every creature found Bin Laden's corpse so detestable that they left it alone, you're talking about a sea with a surface area of 1,491,130 square miles with depths of over 15,000 feet (Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabian_sea ). That's a LOT of volume to search to find one body, even the body of someone who was 6 1/2 feet tall. The phrase "needle in a haystack" comes to mind, but I don't think it does it justice. It'd probably be easier to find the needle than Bin Laden's corpse.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Was he in a hard coffin, or just wrapped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a LOT of volume to search to find one body, even the body of someone who was 6 1/2 feet tall. The phrase "needle in a haystack" comes to mind, but I don't think it does it justice. It'd probably be easier to find the needle than Bin Laden's corpse.

      The body will be at the bottom.

    4. Re:Was he in a hard coffin, or just wrapped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the needle is easier. You can just use a big f***ing magnet.

  18. U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    bounty was not to be paid, since no single tip given. But that era of the bounty is over anyway, once U.S. government knew where he was and acted on it. That's as silly as if Osama had been put in gitmo and this treasure hunter walked up to the fence and said "he he is! where's my money??" What a moron.

    http://www.nodeju.com/9119/osama-bounty-not-paid-out.html

    1. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps The Hague might pay a bounty for providing evidence of a rogue state conducting unlawful assassinations on foreign territory?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    2. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 0

      nothing unlawful about killing the head of an organization that is waging war on the U.S. Pakistan is an economic dependent of the USA, we pay to among other things wage war on certain groups within their borders (which we've done again and again). As long as they continue to suck on our tit, but harbor enemy combatants, they can and will take it up the ass each and every time we choose, with no recourse. That's the real world.

    3. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al'quaeda isn't a state.

    4. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't change a bit about the fact that you guys watered down the definition of "combatant" to the point where it could mean anyone. Obviously a state doesn't need to be involved, obviously a formal declaration of war doesn't need to be involved. In that framework, an "enemy combatant" is just code for "anyone the US does not like and will disappear without any trial or evidence." Excuse me if my trust is limited.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    5. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I agree the U.S. has been involved in wars without proper adherence to constitutional procedure and abusing rights of people without due process, but in this case Al Qaeda is not a nation, though they wage war on the U.S. the Constitutional process for war declaration does not apply. Only the Executive branch with its mandate to protect the U.S. from enemies applies in that particular case. The detaining and abuse of peoples, and the declaration of intent to do the same even to U.S. citizens, is a separate matter to the handling of bin Laden and Al Qaeda leadership.

    6. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      I don't want to play the apologist for Al Quaida here. What seriously troubles me, though, is the question where the line is drawn. Precedent has been set that the US military can apprehend a foreign national, on the territory of a nation that did not approve it, shoot him and dump him into the sea, thereby destroying all relevant evidence of what actually happened there. This seems a tad unhealthy for a democratic nation to me.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    7. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      but they (pakistan) did make the deal with the devil, they mollify their populace with condemnations but still have accepted (and often aided) our acting in their territories for a decade. Slippery slope for them, now the sliding has accelerated and they are getting frightened. The alternative is to accuse them of outright harboring our enemies, making Congress to formally declare war on them, and then we can level the place while they try to get one of their tiny fission devices into our territory. This way (pay, play and take some grief) seems a bit better.

    8. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Fascinating. The alternative to an unlawful execution on foreign territory would be "leveling the place" in your words, then? I leave it to the reader to determine where the "axis of evil" has its origin.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    9. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Fascinating you are ignorant of the role many in the Pakistani government and military have in aided and harboring those who attacked us. We could in fact justify war if cooperation does not continue to be forthcoming.

    10. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Thanks for proving my point. Preponderance of guilt. it really does hurt to get hit at home as someone who spends more than the rest of the world combined on the military, does it? Well, at least you can cry your eyes out now over an isolated incident that vanishes in the death statistics, even a decade after the fact, while simultaneously fapping off over your military prowess, yes?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    11. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. Doesn't have anything to do with killing a mass murderer and head of a terrorist organization, though.

    12. Re:U.S. Government Already Said NO BOUNTY FOR YOU by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      sometimes I shake the trees here to see what falls out. This anti-pakistan meme is something I've been seeing much of in the news lately.

  19. It's come full circle... by bmo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We've had the birthers.

    And now we have the deathers.

    I am not a psychologist or psychiatrist, but there has to be a pathology in the DSM IV for this.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:It's come full circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are buckets of pathology in this whole affair.

      I believe the president was born in the good old USA and bully on the administration for killing the dude, but the burial at sea stuff would turn me into a conspiracy theorist. Putting him on ice and sending him on a US tour would have been a better plan than the burial with the initial story that they were honoring muslim law.

      We should at least get some pictures.

    2. Re:It's come full circle... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      I think it's called "the government lies to us all the time, so now we don't know what's true and what's not". I'll call up the APA and see if we can get it into the next revision.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    3. Re:It's come full circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we have two-syllable political buzzwords coined and propagated by the media to simplify and polarize complex issues to keep us divided, stupid, and focused on the meaningless.

      Maybe there's an entry in the DSM IV for that.

    4. Re:It's come full circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad told me he was there shooting his documentary, right at the time Bin Laden house got raided, in the same street, and saw it with his own eyes. He has physical video material and plane tickets etc. to prove it. He even got raided by the government for talking to an ex-agent about it, who was under surveillance.
      The US government, who did [1], tells me something different. They got nothing to back it up.
      And the conspiracy theorists, who have mental problems [2], tell me something else. They also got nothing.

      I haven't seen any of it with my own eyes. (And even those can be deceived.)
      So all I can do, is calculate the best hypothesis from how trustworthy things are, and accept that I will probably never know what really happened. (This is what differentiates it from blind belief. I know it's just a theory.)
      And who of those above do you think I will trust most?

      The "pathology" is called delusional belief and blind trust. Not differentiating between own observations and what somebody just told you he observed. Somebody who is notorious at lying, on top of that.

      Birthers & Co. trust the conspiracy theorists blindly. Because it's what they wish were true.
      You trust the government blindly. Because you wish that was true.
      You both know nothing. Even worse: You actively avoid knowing reality.
      You both are idiots because of it.

      ___
      [1] http://www.zpub.com/un/chomsky.html
      [2] I researched the psychology behind this. Yes, you can call it that. But that only means those people need someone to help them, accept the real world again. Similar to religious schizophrenia.

    5. Re:It's come full circle... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's exactly right. How many people still believe there were WMD in Iraq? Anyone? Anyone?

      So why were people so quick to make fun of those who didn't believe the government's claim that Osama was killed? The claim may or may not have been correct, but with the track record the USG has with the truth, there's no way to know. You can't believe anything they say without overwhelming evidence.

    6. Re:It's come full circle... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I think it's called "the government lies to us all the time, so now we don't know what's true and what's not". I'll call up the APA and see if we can get it into the next revision.

      In the DSM-5 (the new one), the closest I get is Unspecified Psychotic Disorder (B18). The criteria are open, which means no one has a clue how to define it. Send in your ideas today!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:It's come full circle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did the birthers do, try to find Osama's mom's placenta to prove that he was born?

    8. Re:It's come full circle... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >the government lies to us all the time,

      It's mutual.

    9. Re:It's come full circle... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      So why were people so quick to make fun of those who didn't believe the government's claim that Osama was killed?

      I don't know for sure, but I would guess evidence.

    10. Re:It's come full circle... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Where's the evidence that he was killed? It's just as believable as the evidence that Saddam had WMD; after all, it's coming from the same source.

    11. Re:It's come full circle... by bmo · · Score: 1

      >Where's the evidence that he was killed?

      The butthurt Taliban announcing on Al Jazeera that he's dead.

      It's like you conspiracy guys can't even do international news. Ever.

      inb4 "Al Jazeera is just another face of VOA"

      --
      BMO

    12. Re:It's come full circle... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should put some of those who don't believe bin Laden was killed in the same room with Seal Team 6 for some personal convincing.

    13. Re:It's come full circle... by bmo · · Score: 1

      Except, you know, that Osama's been declared dead by third parties that don't like the US.

      Like the Taliban.

      If he's not dead, Why is Zawahiri now in charge?

      Yeah, just disregard international news like Al Jazeera.

      Twit.

      --
      BMO

    14. Re:It's come full circle... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Use what lies between your ears. Al Queda has said he's dead. I think they would know.

    15. Re:It's come full circle... by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Duh... hasn't said he ISN'T dead... late at night.

    16. Re:It's come full circle... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a possibility that they're going along with it for their own purposes, like to drum up renewed support for their cause.

      However, yes, it's probably true that not only is he dead, but was recently killed (rather than having died 10 years ago, as the President of Pakistan said).

      The thing that bothers me so much, however, is that people are so willing to take the government at its word when it's presented absolutely zero evidence, and just says "trust me". This is more true before Al Queda popped up and said he was just killed too; there was a period there when AQ hadn't said anything yet, and all we had was Obama saying "we got him. trust me", and everyone just believed him. You think they'd be at least a little skeptical after all the lies our government has told us for the past, what, 50 years? Viet nam, Gulf of Tonkin, Iran/Contra, supporting AQ in the 80s, backing Saddam in the 80s and supplying equipment so he could gas the Kurds, claiming Saddam had WMD, I could go on and on. There's a word for taking a known liar at his word: gullibility.

  20. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by drolli · · Score: 2

    I prefer his head futurama-style in a cabinet.

  21. Modest proposal by return+42 · · Score: 1

    Or, wow, how about the US military takes his photos next to something that could only be recent, to prove that he was dead and when he died *before* dumping him in the ocean. DUH.

    1. Re:Modest proposal by dave420 · · Score: 1

      How on earth do photos prove anything shown in them?

    2. Re:Modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, they should have taken pix of Benny Ladins dead head next to a laptop displaying an irrelevant /. post like this one. It would make this place famous.

      And for good measure, the captcha on this post was "Osmosis" ( bet they buried him in a semipermeable plastic body bag )

    3. Re:Modest proposal by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      Or, wow, how about the US military takes his photos next to something that could only be recent, to prove that he was dead and when he died *before* dumping him in the ocean. DUH.

      Short answer: those photos would simply be claimed to be Photoshopped.

      Longer answer:
      The problem is there is no such thing as sufficient proof for someone who refuses to accept any evidence that contradicts their belief. No matter what the government does, it will be accused by a small number of people of lying and fabricating evidence.

      Within the US government and the military specifically you don't need to satisfy the impossible demand for proof that characterizes conspiracy theorists. If a team of highly decorated SEALs who devoted their lives to serving the nation confirm the report, it's the truth. While that doesn't make for a great Hollywood flick, neither does most of real life. Random crazies who have done nothing to deserve our trust are unworthy of such credibility and are not worth the hassle.

    4. Re:Modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is there is no such thing as sufficient proof for someone who refuses to accept any evidence that contradicts their belief. No matter what the government does, it will be accused by a small number of people of lying and fabricating evidence.

      Fair enough but the corollary is not "Therefore, no proof will be offered or should be demanded for anything." To date, has the U.S. government actually offered any proof at all regarding the getting of Bin Laden other than its own assurances?

    5. Re:Modest proposal by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      First and foremost: I don't believe there's any conspiracy here. I believe OBL is dead at the bottom of the ocean.

      That said, your point about highly decorated SEALs only stands up if no superior tells them to lie. Veteran fighters I know would have no problem lying about an event because a superior told them it was the right thing to do.

      Unfortunately, that leaves the "you can't ever prove it" issue for conspiracy nuts, I know, but I'm not gullible enough to believe every good soldier is also morally responsible enough to tell the truth all the time.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Modest proposal by return+42 · · Score: 1

      Precisely. Of course there are crazy people who will accept no possible combination of evidence. And then there are many more reasonable people who would like to see some evidence. Beyond just the say-so of a group of government employees, highly decorated SEALs or otherwise. "Why aren't there any photos" is a perfectly reasonable question.

    7. Re:Modest proposal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So do you still believe Saddam had WMD? After all, a bunch of CIA agents who devoted their lives to serving the nation say it's true.

    8. Re:Modest proposal by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      You're certainly correct in that they're capable. 'No, I don't know where we slid the bastard off the deck' is a core value they are trained to uphold. But that value conflicts with 'no, I haven't participated in a government conspiracy in which we pretended to kill a terrorist so the president could net a few points in the polls'.

      There's a world of difference between the two and in the balance lies a smart soldier's morale.

    9. Re:Modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First and foremost: I don't believe there's any conspiracy here. I believe OBL is dead at the bottom of the ocean.

      Seriously? What was he doing there?

    10. Re:Modest proposal by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Like a note saying "Hi /b/! 6/16/11"? Something like that?

      --
      Dan
    11. Re:Modest proposal by return+42 · · Score: 1

      Feeding the fish?

    12. Re:Modest proposal by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      Go away, troll. No food for you here.

    13. Re:Modest proposal by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They took his photo next to the dudes who killed him. They also likely have helmet-cam video of the killing (they lost the feed back to the WH during the operation, but that doesn't mean the cameras weren't recording internally).

      The President refused to release the pictures to the public, but the NSC and Intelligence Committee have seen them.

      Now, if you don't trust your Intelligence Committee, NSC, and President, then you should probably remove them out of principle. Otherwise, there's really no cogent reason to believe they're all lying about this.

    14. Re:Modest proposal by return+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, Monchanger, you said: "If a team of highly decorated SEALs who devoted their lives to serving the nation confirm the report, it's the truth." Implying, you trust what government employees say, at least if they're SEALs. So Grishnakh drew the obvious corollary: The CIA said Saddam had WMDs. We have since seen that he did not. Government employees don't always tell the truth. This isn't trolling, it's making a good argument.

    15. Re:Modest proposal by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      No, that's not a good argument for many reasons, one being that it (and you) confused the concept "work for" with "devote" and "serve" which are key to my point. Another being I didn't say government and its employees never lie, which is the suggested strawman. Following these, I was not talking about absolute truth, but of a standard sufficient to the government itself, regardless of the opinions of biased outside observers. It's also a single, oversimplified counter-example, which further does very little to undermine my point, other than demonstrate that the world isn't as simple as I suggested conspiracy theorists think.

      Now, did you have anything useful to contribute, or are you just here to be argumentative like the troll?

  22. Reward?!? by Aeros · · Score: 1

    well, if -- in fact -- he is dead, then I could collect the $25 million reward. Why not?'

    Well that's nice and all but if you look at the FBI site the reward is no longed there for him.

  23. And just how do you know they havent paid out by h2okies · · Score: 1

    to anonymous people a hefty reward for information....or they will NEVER pay out as they managed to find him without the public's help... I see this more as a self serving promotion by someone about to go belly up and needing the publicity to score someones funding.

    --
    Beware the Lollipop of Mediocrity, Lick it once and you suck forever.
  24. Chester Copperpot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reclusive treasure hunter claims, "I have the key to one eyed Laden!"

  25. Air France flight by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They were able to find, recover and identify roughly 70 bodies 2 years after the plane went down. So, it would be possible if he found it fairly quickly. However, I think this guy is an idiot and nothing more than a publicity seeker. Of course the $25million reward no longer stands. The government found him and killed him. And they know where the body was dumped as well. Those coordinates are just highly classified. You can't find what isn't lost or missing.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Air France flight by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yes, they found 70 bodies, but they first found the plane, then noticed that there were still bodies in it. On top of that, we don't know that bin Laden's body is as deep in the ocean as that plane was, and at any rate locating the bag is going to be nigh impossible.

    2. Re:Air France flight by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Did they really identify the bodies, or did 70 Thai corpses with fake ids get loaded into a second hand plane?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Air France flight by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      The northern Arabian Sea, where the US Navy said it dumped bin Laden, can be up to 3,300 meters deep

    4. Re:Air France flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I find stuff that isn't lost or missing all the time. Look I just found my keyboard, where's my parade damnit!

  26. An Effort in Vain by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I am willing to bet that Osama Bin Laden is fish food by now. This treasure hunter is either supid or crazy, perhaps maybe both. With the amount of sea life the ocean sustains, bits of Osama Bin Laden have nourished many species of fish and perhaps some bottom dwellers.

    1. Re:An Effort in Vain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      treasure hunter are always looking for investors. This is probably a stunt to attract investors.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:An Effort in Vain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 a day to look for him ? Sign me up !

    3. Re:An Effort in Vain by gtall · · Score: 1

      Hell, by now, the fish that ate have already themselves been eaten.

  27. ROV? by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have expected Clear Channel to go along with it.

  28. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll probably show up in a small boarding house in Minehead, Somerset.
    "Planning a little excursion are we, Mr Nadel?"

  29. Use the long range sensors... by master_p · · Score: 1

    ...for scanning human life signs.

    Well, that is, if you have 24th century technology :-).

    1. Re:Use the long range sensors... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt that corpses have much in the way of life signs.

    2. Re:Use the long range sensors... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Um... A corpse wouldn't be "emitting" life signs.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:Use the long range sensors... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Of course, neither you nor c6gunner seem to have any problem with the '24th Century technology' part.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Use the long range sensors... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Of course, neither you nor c6gunner seem to have any problem with the '24th Century technology' part.

      You're right. Long range sensors would be absolutely silly. You'd be using short range sensors. Long range sensors are for detecting planets around neighbouring stars, spacecraft that are too far away to get a phaser lock; that sort of thing.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Use the long range sensors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase "if you have 24th century technology" sets up a hypothetical situation. In this context their replies make perfect sense.

    6. Re:Use the long range sensors... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If 24th century technology can find signs of life in a dead guy, it needs a requirements revision.

    7. Re:Use the long range sensors... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Or for detecting positronic signals from a powered-down, disassembled android on the surface of a desert planet tens of light years away.

      Ye gawds what a stupid movie Nemesis was...

    8. Re:Use the long range sensors... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I would have had tensions between the Federation and the Klingon Empire once again mounting as factions within the Klingon Empire fight each other. Then, a release of a radiation/virus kills off the Romulan Senate. When news of the Romulan power vacuum reaches the Klingon High Council, factions there urge the Empire to take over Romulan Space.

      Ambassador Spock summons Commodore Picard (who should have been made Commodore for organizing the blockade that prevented Romulus from aiding the Duras sisters, or for organizing the fleet against the Borg). Commodore Picard organizes a defence of Romulus from the Klingons, bringing tensions to the breaking point.

      Meanwhile the source of the radiation/virus/whatever is traced back to the factions that urged the war, who also turn out to be officers who loyal to the House of Duras and who were seeking revenge against the Romulans. The Klingon High Council angered at being used (and realizing that Picard has organized a combined Federation/Romulan fleet) mutters some Klingon platitude about Honour, Revenge, and Wielding your own Bat'leth, kills the Duras faction and withdraws.

      Picard is summoned to the Romulan Senate Chamber where he is thanked by the new Senate, and is told that, while it is possible that previous Romulan governments may have judged the Federation too harshly, it is noted that once again the Romulan Star Empire sits between the Federation and the newly aggressive Klingon Empire.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  30. Interview of Bill Warren being owned by Cobalt+Jacket · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is an interview with Bill Warren on The Roe & Roeper radio show on Chicago's WLS-AM station. http://www.wlsam.com/article.asp?id=2213142&spid=37724 If you want to skip past the B.S., just listen to to the last four minutes where a professional salvage operator completely shows him up.

    1. Re:Interview of Bill Warren being owned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He claims the sonar is full color, so he just has to look for the white sheet. He also claims he's found a beer can at 1200 feet, so finding small things at depth isn't an issue.

      I call BS!

    2. Re:Interview of Bill Warren being owned by toxonix · · Score: 1

      "I hope I don't get my ass shot off, but yes, that's the plan" Have you done this before? "Oh yeah, ah 35 years I've looked for that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. I've written 2 books about it!" bullshit muncher. "I've got some Navy friends who are down there trying to get these guys drunk and give up the location." ... "I have Muslim friends out here that own gas stations and convenience stores .. " ... Jack-hole. Mauritius is not a 3rd world country. And of course they won't let you grab diamonds from a shipwreck.

  31. No by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You won't get the money. The reward is for turning him in, and that was already done, this is just the disposal.

    You can't go to some graveyard, dig up a guy who was wanted dead or alive and collect the reward if he had already been turned in once.

    This will be a huge mess. Quite frankly, I understand why they killed him and buried him as sea. I don't know if I agree with it.

    BUT, finding him will turn into a nightmare. Al quida will want to use the image as a martyr, People will wan to bury him else where and create a shrine, and who knows if this violated Muslim doctrine. Normally I could care less about that last issue, but the practicality of the matter is that this could be an excuse for more attacks.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly! And the Seal team can't get the reward because military personal performing their duties are not allowed to accept rewards and bounties. (Apparently the rules are either a bit vague or bent for gifts from admirers, but no rewards.)

    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole point of dumping the body within 24 hours of killing him was to not violate Muslim law. Meanwhile, grave robbing is a violation of every religion's law, not to mention creepy.

  32. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Obyron · · Score: 2

    Fish can't get to the body. It'd be in a regulation US Navy body bag specifically made for burials at sea, and loaded down with lead weights. It'd definitely be hard to find though.

    --
    --Obyron
  33. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Svippy · · Score: 1

    Or in a cabinet meeting.

    --
    Clicked pie.
  34. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by hedwards · · Score: 2

    Assuming that he's successful in locating the body and is successful in verifying that it's the right body and manages to get the US government to pay up anyways, the likelihood is that this would still be a losing venture as he could very easily blow through $25m searching. Ships for that sort of operation are not cheap, and neither are the rest of the resources needed. And if the body isn't located quickly, chances are that it will just blend in to the bottom as flora start to grow over it.

    At this point, I'd put the odds at being indistinguishable from zero. Even with the knowledge of where the ship was, one has no idea how far a body would drift as it sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

  35. A note for Mr. Warren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A quick note for Mr. Warren: "air pressure" and "nitrogen narcosis" are actually a libral plot to keep Real Americans from finding Osama. All you really need is a snorkel and faith in Jeebus to dive to the bottom of the ocean...

    1. Re:A note for Mr. Warren by brusk · · Score: 1

      Translation: Get bent.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
  36. Sorry Charly! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Ain't no body to find, the whole thing in a charade to make Obama look good, just go through the whole thing, logically, scientifically!

    And I imagine the reason GWB didn't show up for the little by-by Bin Ladin show at ground 0 was that he was pissed at Obama for taking credit for somthing that happened on his watch.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    1. Re:Sorry Charly! by jjohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Logic tells us that there's no way that the U.S. government would announce bin Laden's death without being 100% sure that he was dead, because it would be too easy for bin Laden to release a video reading the headlines from today's newspaper.

      Maybe they know he died a year ago from kidney failure and the U.S. government wants to take credit, but you can bet that bin Laden is dead right now.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and I'm sure al-Qaeda issued an announcement that al-Zawahiri is the official leader now because they're a part of a massive CIA conspiracy.

      Bin Laden of course being hired by GWB and the CIA to fly a bunch of zealots into a building to take our freedom and rob us of our money. The plane, of course, was empty and the buildings were already rigged to explosives. Later, he sold the US defense stocks he bought in the crash of 2000 and bought a house with big walls to hide his women. He then got paid a little bit more by Obama (who is actually a cloned Reptilian ancestor of GWB with skin mutations) to pretend like he was dead so the New World Order could take over. The end game is when the time-traveling anarcho-Christians come back (who now strangely worship Allah? maybe a mistranslation) and murder us all for defying the Lord.

      My story makes total sense. You just need to go through it scientifically, or logically, if you prefer.

    3. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, if Obama was just trying to make himself look good he would have done it at a more opportune time.

    4. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obvious troll is obvious (or completely fucking retarded)

    5. Re:Sorry Charly! by u38cg · · Score: 2

      I don't have a lot of time for Dubya, but you can't deny that he's shown pretty good grace by keeping the hell out of the limelight since stepping down. He knows perfectly well what kind of attention he attracts, and he's sensible enough not to want to draw that on such an occasion.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    6. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that Osama died back in 2004 or 2005. Proving was the problem. Videos would pop up showing that he was alive. It was impossible to prove or disprove. How do you prove or disprove ghosts.

      With the majority of the population believing that the ghost is alive, you have to kill the ghost. Kill the ghost, don't take any pictures and say you buried the ghost in an inaccessible place to everyone, that would either be the deep oceans or space. The general population is not going to believe space, so it had to be the deep oceans.

      Now when a video pops up that Osama is alive, the person responsible for the video will have to show proof that he is alive, instead of the other way around before, that the US would have to prove that he is dead.

    7. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ain't no body to find, the whole thing in a charade to make Obama look good, just go through the whole thing, logically, scientifically!

      And I imagine the reason GWB didn't show up for the little by-by Bin Ladin show at ground 0 was that he was pissed at Obama for taking credit for somthing that happened on his watch.

      And your theory is that even al Qaeda was taking part in this conspiracy? Since they have acknowledged that he was killed now.

    8. Re:Sorry Charly! by Rinnon · · Score: 1

      Logic tells us that there's no way that the U.S. government would announce bin Laden's death without being 100% sure that he was dead, because it would be too easy for bin Laden to release a video reading the headlines from today's newspaper.

      Maybe they know he died a year ago from kidney failure and the U.S. government wants to take credit, but you can bet that bin Laden is dead right now.

      You make an interesting point. But by that same logic, if he is NOT in the hands of the Americans, isn't it possible for Al qaeda to do the same thing with todays headlines, next to his body? I mean, obviously not as good as if he was alive, but at the very least, it would certainly shame America greatly if it was found out they were lying about having killed him.

    9. Re:Sorry Charly! by guspasho · · Score: 1

      If Bush killed bin Laden, why didn't he tell us about it? And why did Obama announce it at the worst possible time electorally?

    10. Re:Sorry Charly! by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and this is precisely why the moon landing conspiracy nuts are morons too. Forget all the scientific evidence, moon rocks, etc... did the Soviet Union, the mortal enemy of the United States of America, ever claim that Americans didn't land on the moon, that the Americans were lying through their teeth and made everything up?

      No? Then they should STFU, case closed, and they shouldn't humiliate themselves further by suggesting the US and Soviet governments made a secret pact to tell the big lie to the world.

    11. Re:Sorry Charly! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      You only "know" that which is told to you by well known liars.
      Believing anything the government says is just plain stupid.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    12. Re:Sorry Charly! by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You're trying to apply logic, this is Slashdot. If it's not an X-Files conspiracy involving the CIA, the FBI, and the Trilateral Commission people aren't interested.

    13. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only "know" that which is told to you by well known liars. Believing anything the government says is just plain stupid.

      I know that Al Jazeera have reported that al Qaeda have acknowledged that he was killed in this raid. Are they too in on the conspiracy in your world? (btw. when you refer to 'the government' I'm quite sure mine is not the same as yours)

    14. Re:Sorry Charly! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      And you wonder how many of the sources used by "well known" news outlets are either well vetted or even known.

      Let's review..

      Let's see, the raid a house in a middle class suburb (true)
      Somebody gets killed (maybe)
      An experimental carbon fiber helicopter catches fire (true)
      An old, male dead body with a gunshot to the head is shown to a "facial recognition" device and pronounced as Bin Ladin (Ha!)
      Within minutes a positive DNA identification is made (Absurd!!!)
      A burial at sea takes place (of whom or what?)

      Add to that substantial, circumstantial and credible anecdotal evidence that the Bin Ladin (Kidney failure, diabetes, late 50's) was killed in the Tora Bora mountains in 2001.

      Keeping the myth alive of the ultimate boogieman greatly helped to expand executive powers and make billions for generous defence contractors!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    15. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you wonder how many of the sources used by "well known" news outlets are either well vetted or even known.

      Let's review..

      Let's see, the raid a house in a middle class suburb (true) Somebody gets killed (maybe) An experimental carbon fiber helicopter catches fire (true) An old, male dead body with a gunshot to the head is shown to a "facial recognition" device and pronounced as Bin Ladin (Ha!) Within minutes a positive DNA identification is made (Absurd!!!) A burial at sea takes place (of whom or what?)

      Add to that substantial, circumstantial and credible anecdotal evidence that the Bin Ladin (Kidney failure, diabetes, late 50's) was killed in the Tora Bora mountains in 2001.

      Keeping the myth alive of the ultimate boogieman greatly helped to expand executive powers and make billions for generous defence contractors!

      But your whole theory still is based on al Qaeda being part of and supporting this conspiracy. They have confirmed this through channels that have nothing to do with US government. Unless you believe that also Al Jazeera and their direct al Qaeda sources are in on the same conspiracy.

    16. Re:Sorry Charly! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      And your information comes from where?
      I hope not from Al Q !

      I can tell you that little green men told me that Elvis is alive and living in Longview Texas!

      How do you know whose sources are from where!

      Be skeptical, never believe known liars, always expect the worse and you'll never be disappointed!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    17. Re:Sorry Charly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your information comes from where?

      Al Jazeera's al Qaeda sources for one. I live very far from the country you seem to think is distorting everything you hear. And why would they suddenly appoint a new leader now?

    18. Re:Sorry Charly! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      And from who did you hear about "it" and from who was the attribution to Al-Q?
      This BS passes for the truth when nobody can really say where "it" originated.

      We live in in the "rabbit hole" where nothing is as it appears, the only truth is that everything said by a government (any) government can be reasonably suspected of being a self-serving lie!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  37. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by dunezone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, it only took them 75 years to find the Titanic.

    No, the majority of the time was waiting for the technology to catch up so they could verify where it sank. They always knew the general location of where it was from the last coordinates sent from the Titanic as well as the rescue ships documenting where they picked up the passengers. The 75 year wait was waiting for correct technology to be developed so they could send something down 2 miles to say, "yep there it is".

  38. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    "Gee,

    I searched the whole ocean, down to the square centimetre.

    But? Nothing!

    Do you think they cooked the whole story up?"

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  39. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by AngryNick · · Score: 1

    Good luck finding a target slightly smaller, that the fish have been chewing on.

    HA! The fish can't get to him on land. A recent taxi driver I talked with assures me that he is still alive and well and playing CoD to keep his skilz up-to-date. He just wasn't sure where.

  40. What a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the reward says dead or alive, well, if -- in fact -- he is dead, then I could collect the $25 million reward. Why not?

    So let me get this straight. This schmuck thinks that if he finds the body and returns it he should be entitled to collect on a reward for a person who was already found?
    Okaaay there smart guy.

  41. the reward by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Should be given as college scholarships for the kids of Seal Team 6 as well as a nice cunk of tax free cash to each of the members. IT's the right thing to do.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:the reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be given as college scholarships for the kids of Seal Team 6 as well as a nice cunk of tax free cash to each of the members. IT's the right thing to do.

      and if done right, we would never hear about it. So, there you go. Maybe it's already done...

    2. Re:the reward by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      This would make it quite obvious, to their friends and family if no one else, who the members of Seal Team 6 are. That information is classified Top Secret, presumably in this case for good reason, there are good reasons why we know next to nothing about the actual people who performed the raid. These people went home to their wives and when asked how their day was, said "pretty good" and changed the subject because that's part of the job they signed up for.

      Engineers working for defense contractors get approached commonly enough that most defense contractors have explicit instructions given to their employees on how to handle the situation. These guys know enough about the intelligence agencies and black ops technologies that just having their identities known is a bad idea. Maybe they'll get a reward of some kind, but it'll be buried with a deep cover story or more likely just be a promotion to a higher pay grade (but spread out over several years).

    3. Re:the reward by blair1q · · Score: 1

      The reward is for information leading to his capture or killing. It goes to the people who dropped the dime on him. The people who received the call and served the warrant are already paid to do that.

      If the government hasn't paid the money, it's possible it's because the person who found him was in their employ already.

    4. Re:the reward by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      The wont. Further more they cant as it is specifically prohibited by law.

      The sailors who were in the raid did what they are paid and specifically trained to do, nothing more nothing less.

      We can argue about their compensation ( an E-5 "petty officer second class - the middle of the enlisted ranks ( E1 thru E9 ) with 6 years of active service" makes 2620.00 per month plus around 225.00 per month "Hostile Fire and Imminent Danger Pay" ) being way low for risking their lives but that is what they signed up for and the SEAL's are completely voluntary and in fact very difficult to get into since the washout rate for training is about 95%.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    5. Re:the reward by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Should be given as college scholarships for the kids of Seal Team 6 as well as a nice cunk of tax free cash to each of the members. IT's the right thing to do.

      No, it's insulting. Those of us who served didn't so for the money. We're sailors and soldiers and airmen - not mercenaries.

    6. Re:the reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military has statutes making the receivership of large monetary rewards illegal. It helps prevent our armed forces from becoming mercs on-the-job with new ties to the-highest-bidder.

    7. Re:the reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. With a decent education their kids might not be lulled by propaganda and lies and will hopefully chose a respectable career, unlike their dads.

  42. Good luck with that by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    All he'll find is shark poop.

  43. other US mavericks sought Bin Laden by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The combination of playing a real-life Rambo and $25M reward tempted others like this Colorado man. The State Department rescued him after he was arrested.

  44. Barbarism by GodInHell · · Score: 1

    Except.. you know... that's not what the U.S. Government does.

    It's one thing when our reporters or paparazzi run and get a picture of a cooling corpse. The U.S. Government (usually) stays out of the buisness of putting heads on pikes so everyone can see the body. I get really creeped out every time someone suggests this. Ignoring the anger it would stoke, the loss of the moral high-ground we require to win the long war, we're talking about putting a dead dude on display so folks can exhault in the holes we put through it.

    Dude's dead. He belongs in the dustbin of history, not center aisle at madison square garden.

    -GiH

    1. Re:Barbarism by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Except for when the dead person is "public enemy number one".

      http://www.lostindiana.net/Lost_Indiana/Lost_Indiana__In_Grave_Condition__John_Dillinger.html

      Then the US government is all in favor of showing off the body.

    2. Re:Barbarism by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Yup. Indeed. The government seems to be in the business of getting rid of evidence as fast as possible in this case. Putting heads on pikes would be counter- productive. Might allow third parties to prove anything.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  45. Maybe they'll find Jimmy Hoffa, Santa Clause... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    ...elves, the loch ness monster, the holy grail too, Zeus, the starship "Enterprise" and my youthful enthusiasm too.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Maybe they'll find Jimmy Hoffa, Santa Clause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...elves, the loch ness monster, the holy grail too, Zeus, the starship "Enterprise" and my youthful enthusiasm too.

      Santa Claus, not "Clause".

  46. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    so search for large deposits of lead on the sea floor!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  47. Get ready for a major plot twist by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    The shroud will be filled with the body of...ELVIS!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  48. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, I thought it was body-laden bin instead of a bag.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  49. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by arisvega · · Score: 1

    it will just blend in to the bottom as flora start to grow over it

    Flora? In the bottom of the ocean? I think not.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  50. Shark Sh*t by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

    He should be snorkeling with his hands cupped behind local sharks asses, or trying to put on little shark diapers.

  51. Islam and burial at sea by brokeninside · · Score: 3, Informative

    Burial at sea is fine for Muslims. In this particular context the important bit is most likely this bit: " if an enemy may dig up the grave to mutilate the body, it is also allowed to bury the deceased at sea to avoid mutilation." (And if you don't trust Wikipedia on the matter, go to their source: Rules About Burial of the Dead Body.)

    Given all the comments I've seen that he ought to have been buried in a box of pork chops, I think it's fair to say that this was a real concern.

  52. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a shift in military markets away from the U.S. right now. If this guy can deploy an interesting enough plan, or optimize the application of existing technologies, he can probably get underwriting from most any solvent nation on earth that controls coastal waters.

    The corpse is a convenient PR piece to attract suitors.

  53. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by jc42 · · Score: 1

    Nah; the reason they've been so secretive and even refuse to release photos is that just as the Navy SEALs broke into his bedroom, he was taken away by a host of angels who were singing in Arabic. His body isn't in the ocean; it's in heaven, being taken care of by his 72 virgins.

    (Hey, it's as credible as those other similar stories from other religions.)

    (And I'm sorta glad that I don't have to worry about a Disney lawsuit for posting the above.)

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  54. Preventing the current recovery madness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll bet you a buck that halfway to the bottom of the sea, a submarine snared it and took it to Bethesda, MD for further analysis and then to secret storage. I will win that bet.

  55. Insider information by danhaas · · Score: 1

    If Bill has any tip of where the body was dropped, this mission is certainly doable. All he needs is some sailor that got the GPS coordinates of the drop point and is willing to take a share of the reward (of course USA won't pay him, but Iran or some sheik could certainly pay so that they can prove that Osama was executed).
    The GPS coordinates of the path of the ship might be enough too, if the reward is big enough to pay for months of search.

    If all info he has is that he was dropped in the Arabian Sea, this will be a shot in the dark.

  56. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK negative nancy.

    "Assuming that he's successful in locating the body"... well then he's a happy bloke, ya? Not everything is about money.

  57. Sewage dump site ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just gonna take a picture? Recover that body!

    No, just record the GPS coordinates so we can establish a dump site for ship's sewage tanks.

  58. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Alright - what technology is needed to find a decomposing body in water? Note, that burials at sea do NOT involve sealed caskets. Normal clothing, or a uniform if appropriate. A shroud - basically a sheet sewed up into a sleeping bag. Some rocks in the bottom of the shroud, at the feet of the corpse. Dump overboard, and the body is water soaked immediately. In THEORY, the shrouded body goes directly to the bottom. Whether it does or not, a sheet won't last very long in salt water, with various animal life exploring it. Bacteria, at the small end, on up to sharks and whales on the big end.

    Somehow, I really don't believe that anyone has a snowball's chance in hell of finding a body in deep water. And, the more time that passes, the smaller that snowball gets.

    Oh yeah - as far as I know, Muslim funerals don't include any kind of embalming. I think they verified Osama's identity, and dumped his ass. No preservatives added. Au Natural!!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  59. I Think I Know What Osama's Wives Were Screaming! by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    "The $25 million, it's mine, there he is!" It is regrettable that SEAL Team 6 were frightened by the female crazed shoppers and the SEAL's had to defend themselves. What wasn't written the SIT-REP about the mission is that the women in the compound had jumped into one of the Helo's and were heading to the local Norstrom's. It's chilling to think of being in front of a running shopper with that much money to spend.

  60. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by mjpaci · · Score: 1

    "Don't you know old chap that I was head of Al Qaeda for 10 years. Five year! No, no, I was not head of Al Qaeda at all...I make joke."

  61. Eh, recovered not yet identified by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They recovered the bodies, identification will be a slow process. Even the bodies found at the time of the disaster took two months to identify.

    And identification won't be done by lifting the sheet and having a grieving relative say "yes that is him" unless the french police is very nasty indeed.

    It will be done through DNA and records of things like healed bone fractures, dental work, surgery after effects etc.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  62. what I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what I want to know is where his pr0n stash is.

  63. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're naive buddy ..
    he will certainly have been 'deposited' in such a way that the fish & scavengers will get easy access .. Obama has no intention of letting anyone finding even a single bone ..

  64. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by hedwards · · Score: 1

    No, not everything is about money, but few of us have millions of dollars sitting around for such a frivolous waste of time.

  65. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Not everything is about money.

    Sure, if you ignore the fact that he is specifically doing this to get money. In this case, he believes he can get the dead or alive reward.

  66. Compeltely unnecessary by jandrese · · Score: 2

    For me, the fact that Bin Laden hasn't released any new videos or other media since the raid is proof enough that he's dead for me.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  67. loooooolz by treywilliams · · Score: 1

    I haven't laughed this hard in weeks. Good luck buddy! I say start your search in the south pacific.

  68. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by ryantmer · · Score: 1

    Michael Palin, is that you?

    --
    Whatever it is, it's notablog.
  69. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by blair1q · · Score: 1

    1. I have no doubt that modern lookaside sonar equipment can something the size of bin Laden's body in a body bag, if it's not stuck in a reef that looks like a pile of such things.

    2. Ships are cheaper than you think, and all this one needs to do is cruise back and forth towing the sonar rig and recording to a flash drive.

    3. Not sure anything can grow on a navy body bag. Not sure there's much growing in that body of water. It could be flat, sandy bottom for hundreds of miles.

    4. How does he even have a clue where to start? That's the big question, as it means he's breached the security of the US Armed Forces Special Operations Group, and they will want to know how.

    5. How does he collect a reward that's cancelled because the government caught the guy themselves? That's the small question, as it's just going to surprise him if he doesn't ask it before he shows up with a mangled corpse. (Yes, mangled. The body is in a bag from which most of the air is removed. The bag is sunk hundreds if not thousands of meters into the ocean. the soft tissue in the bag will be squeezed into pudding, and if there's any imbalance in the shape of the bag, it will all be squeezed into that corner, and if one of the bones breaches the bag, it will all be extruded through the hole.)

    6. Why is imagining bin Laden in that state so much fun?

  70. There is no body to be found... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    I am guessing after they did the whole song and dance of bathing and wrapping the body (in accordance with the Islamic tradition), they ran the body through the Woodchipper Fargo-style (in accordance with the Intelligence Commitee tradition) and chummed the ocean.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  71. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    He could fund his efforts with the recovery of cargo containers! It's gotta be easier to stumble over some of those than a body dumped at some mostly-unknown location.

  72. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by kiwix · · Score: 1

    They still took almost two years to find the remains of Air France Flight 447.

    And the part about confirming that Osama Bin Laden is indeed dead is just ridiculous. It's quite certain that they did dump a body in the sea, the relevant question is whether that body was Osama's or not. And he's not going to answer that.

  73. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    The bottom of the ocean is now well understood to be rather abundant with life, even at tremendous depths. Not all plants require sunlight. Maybe you should read the link you posted, eh?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  74. Check your facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden

    it's still listed on the fbi top ten list.

    it does specify for information leading to the arrest or apprehension of

  75. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    He wouldn't need to give them the whole body to receive his $25 million. He can always sell off the rest of it in pieces, like the Cristians did with anything Jesus related. Except that I doubt Bin would be able to supply barrels full of finger bones and tons of pieces of the true cross (probably related to the Bread and Fish dinner). Those relics can bring in huge sums of cash, maybe enough to fund a Democrat re-election comittee.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  76. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Fish can't get to the body. It'd be in a regulation US Navy body bag specifically made for burials at sea, and loaded down with lead weights.

    Well, not if this is accurate.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  77. Isn't this... by frozentier · · Score: 1

    Isn't this like a family putting up a reward for a lost dog, THEY find the dog, and then you go in their back yard and say "hey, here's your dog, I want the money"?

  78. Enough with the Seal Team 6! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, these guys did a great job, a job they were thoroughly trained to do. They were chosen, they got the privilege of executing that mission. It's an insult to the rest of the military to say Seal Team 6 was uniquely capable of completing that task. Let's also mention that they still managed to crash a helicopter and not take him alive. I have no desire to diminish what these guys did, but just put it in perspective. What about the Pakistanis that let us know about him and now are under arrest for their help? I'll bet dollars to pesos that we just let them burn without another mention. They, more than our Seal Team, deserve our gratitude and our help.

    1. Re:Enough with the Seal Team 6! by Albinoman · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, does Seal Team 6 or their children (scholarship, really? let them earn one for themselves like anyone else) deserve any more compensation than the soldiers that have done far more (unsung) deeds than taking down a figurehead?

      Also, I figure if I'm gonna say that stuff I'd better log in and claim it.

    2. Re:Enough with the Seal Team 6! by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Navy SEALs do not fly helicopters. But maybe that was part of the problem..

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
  79. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Nikker · · Score: 1

    The bounty really has not that much to do with it. Publicity, books, day time TV shows, etc, can be very profitable. If he does find the remains also many other wealthy 'explorers' might hire him to look for various other things at amazing markup. So even if he fails he still gets to sell to the skeptics his findings as well as more books than if he did find the remains.

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
  80. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

    A tiger? In Africa?

  81. I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think Tim Osmand aka Osama Bin Laden died in 2011 then I've got a great deal on some bridges in Los Angels you might want to look into before you spend the money on the treasure hunt.
     

  82. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is doing it to try and expose the 'conspiracy' over why the US Government refuses to release the photos of Bin laden.

    He's a nutjob.

  83. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Even with the knowledge of where the ship was, one has no idea how far a body would drift as it sunk to the bottom of the ocean.

    That question is eminently amenable to expermient.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  84. You don't know for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US government has proven over and over again that they are not to be trusted. Government in general is the most untrustworthy of institutions that has ever existed. I certainly wouldn't be surprised to find out 50 years from now that the entire thing was fabricated.

  85. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, if you ignore the fact that he is specifically doing this to get money. In this case, he believes he can get the dead or alive reward.

    TFA specifically states that the reward is no longer being offered, and also that he is aware of this. He's doing it because he wants to.

  86. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by arisvega · · Score: 1

    Flora = plants = photosynthesis = requires light. Maybe you should read the link I posted. Cite otherwise, or shut up.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  87. Re:Well, it only took them 75 years to find Titani by v1 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one is tinfoil-hatting the possibility that they hauled him off to a basement cell in gitmo for some round-the-clock torture revenge whilst telling the world he was dumped in the ocean? I mean really, why dump the body in the ocean? There's no logical explanation for it other than to cover for where he really is.

    I'm sure they'd absolutely love to patch him up (from getting shot) and then spend several months drugging him up trying to squeeze information out of him. It would really surprise me if this isn't what they're doing. Naturally "the world" wouldn't approve of such treatment, so they'll just cover for it by claiming he's dead and dumped in a place that nobody can verify the body.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.