Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Windows Phone Revealed

DMiax writes "Nokia's controversial CEO Stephen Elop just revealed the prototype of the next WP7 handset. The CEO asked the journalists present to turn off the cameras because the new phone was 'super confidential.' Did he really expect them to comply? After all he must know that this has the potential to hurt the sales of the recently released N9, the last non-Windows Nokia smartphone. He would never want to do that, right?"

211 comments

  1. It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This phone is super secret, don't say a word!" actually means "Please, please, please, please give us some press for this. Even bad press. Just anything you can say that isn't another iPhone or Android story is great."

    1. Re:It's reverse psychology! by kmckinlay · · Score: 1

      And those that don't comply with Elop's request are now on "double secret probation". If he really meant it he wouldn't have let cameras and smartphones into announcement.

    2. Re:It's reverse psychology! by wintersdark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This.

      Color me uninterested. Windows Phone is too little, too late. To an entrant in the mobile OS market this late, they need to come to the table with something that can generate enough wow on it's own accord to get the press it needs.

      WP7 doesn't do this. It's arguably more or less on par with the existing OS's (though I'd certainly debate that) but it definitely doesn't have anything making it particularly appealing in comparison. Why give up the huge support base and massive app availability of Android or iOS for.. well, Something Else.

      As it stands, WP7's only feature is that it isn't iOS or Android.

      --
      Meh.
    3. Re:It's reverse psychology! by c0lo · · Score: 1

      "This phone is super secret, don't say a word!" actually means "Please, please, please, please give us some press for this. Even bad press. Just anything you can say that isn't another iPhone or Android story is great."

      With the continuation: "What? You have no camera on you? Did the guy at the entrance asked you to drop it? Here... have this WP7 phone, 't has a great camera"

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    4. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why give up the huge support base and massive app availability of Android or iOS for.. well, Something Else.

      on that note we should probably give up on OSX and desktop linux.

    5. Re:It's reverse psychology! by c0lo · · Score: 1

      This.

      Color me uninterested.

      Let me color you: this (link from TFA)
      (looks like a blue shit).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:It's reverse psychology! by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They have to show they have /something/ that takes away the impression that the next "real Nokia phone" is going to be released sometime Q2 2012.

      But to everyone else with two brain cell to rub together knows that a mock-up is not a product.

      Elop is an idiot. Not only did he piss everyone off including the developers and every single customer, but he /also/ did an Osborne.

      Where is the outrage? Where are the shareholder lawsuits?

      --
      BMO

    7. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if you want not android and not ios there is already blackberry, which supports actual background multitasking at least back to OS 5 and i think OS4 did too, also RIM does not trust itself, if you install a RIM first party app from blackberry app world (RIM marketplace) it asks the same permissions requests that any other app does.

      with a blackberry RIM recognizes that it is MY phone not theirs, i can install apps from the internet via blackberry browser and i can install apps via the BB desktop manager from my PC

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:It's reverse psychology! by SpryGuy · · Score: 2

      The version of WP7 that will ship with Nokia phones supports multitasking, at the same level as iOS. WP7 runs circles around RIM in most areas. And MS has embraced unlocking/jail-breaking as well, which will enable side-loading apps.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    9. Re:It's reverse psychology! by sigipickl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If he really meant it, he wouldn't have shown the phone...

      marketing fluff, nothing to see here.

      --
      Never trust anyone who takes pride in being called a 'geek'....
    10. Re:It's reverse psychology! by jcr · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for desktop linux, but OS X is showing steady market share growth for quite a few years now.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:It's reverse psychology! by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      but it definitely doesn't have anything making it particularly appealing in comparison.

      It runs Microsoft office. Believe it or not, that might be enough, if they get all the other kinks worked out. Not that I want them to, I like seeing Microsoft fail (ooooh I'm bitter).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:It's reverse psychology! by cheeks5965 · · Score: 1

      woosh!

      --
      -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
    13. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Microlith · · Score: 0

      at the same level as iOS

      That's a tricky statement, since iOS both does and does not support it. Most applications will simply continue to be killed outright. Anything that supports "multitasking" will be working through GCD, which requires Apple approval to use.

      Does it actually support it at that level, or does it (as I've heard) do the Android thing and just halt the application while in the background?

      And MS has embraced unlocking/jail-breaking as well, which will enable side-loading apps.

      They have not. They are "rekindling" ChevronWP7, though how it will differ from before is up in the air. Certainly, it will not be like Android where you can freely sideload apps. First, it'll cost money. Then I imagine you will have to manually sign and upload software, possibly even compile and package them, as this is supposed to be a tool for developers. A hair better than Apple, still behind default Android and MeeGo.

    14. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Did an Osborne"? You mean sabotaging N9 sales with this? That's deliberate -- see, if the N9 sells like hotcakes, then his whole burning-platform bullshit is exposed as rubbish, Meego* is shown as the sane option, and WinPhone was a mistake -- which means he's a mistake.

      If the N9 doesn't sell, and then the WinPhones don't sell either, he can just blame his predecessor for screwing the whole company into an unrecoverable mess, and stay at the helm until MS buys the collapsing company.

      * Yeah, I know the N9's Harmattan is really an oddball Meego-compatible Maemo OS, not true Meego. But what I mean is the pre-existing Nokia strategy for moving from Maemo for semi-experimental niche devices (N8x0, N900) and Symbian for other phones to Meego for all high-end phones -- if the N9 sells, it validates that, and there's no reason to suppose things would have failed when they brought out a whole range of true Meego devices next year.

    15. Re:It's reverse psychology! by terjeber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously, go to a store and try a WP7 device

      Take that advice. As a mobile developer I obviously have an iPhone, I have an Android device (actually more than one) and I got a WP7 device as soon as I could. My iPhone has always been my primary personal device. When I get a new phone, I always make my self use it as my primary device for a week to get to know it. I did that with my WP7 device too. Back in the beginning of this year. It's still my primary device, and I cringe every time I have to use the iPhone. Honestly, the UX is significantly better with WP7.

      Are there things missing. Absolutely, but not enough to make me want to go back to the iPhone, and from what I gather, the missing will no longer be missing come Mango.

    16. Re:It's reverse psychology! by terjeber · · Score: 0

      Elop is an idiot

      Compared to who, at Nokia specifically. Nokia has been scrambling for years to get something going. It hasn't happened. Everything out of Nokia since the release of the iPhone has been a sad joke, and it continues to be a sad joke. The Nokia SW Engineering team proved beyond any possible doubt that they simply did not have what it takes to build smart-phone software. Meeh-Too is a joke.

      I would like to see a suggestion about what Nokia should have done. Symbian was in a coma, Meeh-Too was rotting on the vine. Nobody at Nokia was taking it seriously. Elop's gamble is not huge.

    17. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the same level as IOS, so it won't support it then?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    18. Re:It's reverse psychology! by xnpu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Really? Because I can't do jack with my Blackberry without signing up for a BIS or installing a BES. It seems to be MY phone only as long as I pay my RIM taxes.

    19. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Recent quotes from terjeber.

      See if you can spot a trend...

      "Honestly, the UX is significantly better with WP7."

      "Windows 7 as an operating system is significantly better protected than Linux"

      "Windows is out ahead though. With a bit of a margin actually."

      "Linux is a really bad fit for the desktop."

      "Windows hasn't been that unstable since Windows 98."

      "My personal workstation is a Windows XP thing"

      "NET MVC beats both Play! and Spring hands down."

      "you'll be significantly more productive with .NET than Java"

      "compared to DirectX, OpenGL sucks."

    20. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Seumas · · Score: 2

      It's sad that Slashdot put this story up. What more do they need to make this obviously not a leaked video? If it was "leaked" by someone with a camera phone, how did they get feed from the overhead camera? And how would the guy not see the people in the back with their cameras over their heads recording it? *sigh*

      The sad thing is, this isn't a slashvertisement. It's just stupidity. :/

    21. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      If he really meant it he wouldn't have let cameras and smartphones into announcement.

      If he really meant it he wouldn't have let journalists into announcement.

    22. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Meumeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And MS has embraced unlocking/jail-breaking as well, which will enable side-loading apps.

      If they actually embraced it, it wouldn't be called jailbreaking, it would be called sudo.

    23. Re:It's reverse psychology! by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 1

      In Canada at least the data plans for BIS and "SmartPhone" are the same cost with most carriers. RIM Data (well, email and IM only) is actually cheaper ($15/ month) than a 500MB data plan ($$25/ month)

      --
      I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
    24. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Nokia dies well with their phone so that it drives the cost of WP7 phones down overall. In my opinion, WP7's interface absolutely destroys iOS and Android.

    25. Re:It's reverse psychology! by SickLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Parent AC is a troll, in case readers/mods don't spot it.

      Some of those quotes are taken totally out of context. Some of them are true! Carmack also says Direct3D > OpenGL.

      How about I choose some quotes from terjeber:
      "I also have to do cross-platform stuff. In such cases I am on Linux primarily. Some times I wander into Solaris territory."
      "Ruby/Rails". (His preferred web dev platform, ahead of .NET MVC, Play! and Spring.)
      "Being religious about what platform you use is a sure sign that as an IT professional you are ready for replacement."

      --
      main() {1;} // zen app
    26. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adopt Android.

      SE did it, so did Motorola and HTC.

      They are doing fine.

    27. Re:It's reverse psychology! by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Why do you call it a mock-up? The phone appeared to be fully functional in the video, running the OS and various apps.

      Prototype, perhaps. There's always a cycle of development hardware to get the kinks out before the first actual retail devices are manufactured. Calling what was shown in the video a "mock-up" is just flat-out lying, though.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    28. Re:It's reverse psychology! by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Also it can run Xbox Live games, earning achievements and gamerscore. For some reason, that's a hugely valuable capability to some people.
      Also it can use Zune Pass, streaming and downloading all-you-can-eat music on a subscription service. That one is actually pretty cool.
      There are a few other interesting features (the live tiles thing has some potential) but those two are clear differentiators that will be a big deal to at least some portions of the market.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    29. Re:It's reverse psychology! by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      That's not quite true. In theory, you can use a standard APN for data instead of a BES or BIS.

      The problem is that there's no global setting that dictates which communications method should be used. The app developer has to manually detect whether a BES, BIS, APN or WiFi should be used, and switch between them. What you'll probably find is that most won't support all four, especially as data over an APN tends not to be included in bundled data allowances on 'BlackBerry' tariffs.

      Contrast this with Android and iOS, where switching between APN and WiFi is handled globally by the OS, and is completely transparent to individual applications.

    30. Re:It's reverse psychology! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually if you look at the pic I think they have a shot. A small shot mind you, but still a shot, for one little thing in the right hand corner....Xbox Live.

      Now if they put out a phone with a decent GPU and something other than an iSliver battery, so you could take some sort of Xbox mini games that will level up your characters or earn achievements? Then I could see it selling. There are a hell of a lot of people that own Xbox, there are a hell of a lot of developers making games for XBL, get those developers on board making games that'll run on WinPhone? Then yes I could see it becoming a hit.

      Because lets face it folks, what has MSFT really got going for it right now but gaming and Office? Most of what people do with PCs other than gaming and Office can be done over the web, which can be just as easily done in Linux or Mac. No what keeps people buying MSFT is backwards compatibility and gaming, with the backwards compatibility used for...dum dum dum...their games! From those cheesy things they pick up at the Wally World to the latest Xbox chestie mcWallhigh cover based shooter MSFT is about gaming and if Nokia puts out some decent hardware that lets folks play something other than Angry Birds and ties it all together, Xbox,Windows,Office, and mobile? Then and ONLY then can I see them having a real shot at the title.

      Otherwise they are gonna be slaughtered by the 50 bazillion Android phones the carriers are practically giving away and the latest iCool, because one thing MSFT most assuredly does NOT do is cool and slick. But as long as their games work people will ignore the lack of cool and slick. After all look at all the shit folks got with RRoD yet they still buy the hell out of X360s.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    31. Re:It's reverse psychology! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It isn't just phone development.

      I've interviewed at Nokia for a job in a team that was doing services; one of the questions was "how do you feel working in a company where projects get chopped and changed and people moved around very regularly?".

      Reading between the lines, I suspect what was meant was "This huge company used to have a dominant position. They've been losing dominance for years, which is a bit of a problem if you're trying to keep shareholders happy , and as a result management have been panicking - they'll come up with an idea, get a team on it then drop it like a hot potato 6 months later in order to chase the Next Big Thing.

    32. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Why give up the huge support base and massive app availability of Android or iOS for.. well, Something Else.

      Why give up the massive app availability of Windows Mobile 6.5 for ... well Something Else.

      According to Gartner

      http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/19/gartner-1-6-million-windows-phone-7-devices-sold-in-q1-consume/

      There were 36 million Android handsets sold last quarter. There were 3.6 million Microsoft ones. Unfortunately for Microsoft only 1.6 million of those were Windows Phone 7, i.e. 2 million were Windows Mobile 6.x.

      When my Sony Ericsson X1 was being repaired I bought another Windows Mobile device to run the applications I use every day. So I got an HTC HD2 rather than a HD7. Right now if I lost the HD2 I'd probably just buy another one. There's no reason for me to move to WP7. I suspect a lot of WM6.x users feel the same way. And the HD2 is a pretty good handset that can run WM6.x, WP7 or Android. The HD7 can only run WP7 and right now WP7 is a disaster for applications - all of the WM6.x ISVs have announced that they won't port to WP7 and have stopped new builds on WM6.x. But on WM6.x you can still use the old builds. For things I use everyday like Pleco, that's good enough for me while Pleco finish their port to Android. iGo's GPS software works on WM6.x and Android. It won't ever run on WP7. Opera works on WM6.x and Android. It won't ever run on WP7. Basically all the WM6.x software vendors will never support WP7 but either have already ported to Android or are committed to doing so. So in the short term I'll stay on WM6.x but in the long term I'll move to Android.

      And if you're already using Android or iPhone you're not going to switch to WP7 for much the same reason.

      So I can't really imagine how WP7 can ever succeed. Especially not with adverts like this

      Hot Apps: Burn It All, Lunchbox, Urban Dictionary, Simon, Apict

      Maybe they should rename it WP7 something like Yo! or HipStah! Or something impossible to search for on Google like "C#" or ".Net".

      Or Neegro to capitalize on some of the buzz Nokia created with their Meego commercial whilst still aiming for an young urban market. I.e. the sort of gangster wannabe white middle class suburban kids that listen to rap music steal pairs of Nikes from each other at gun point.

      No. Whilst many people regard the mere suggestion as being outrageous I still strongly suspect that WP7 is not going to be a great success.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    33. Re:It's reverse psychology! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You're getting a lot of people calling you an astroturfer, and here's why: You spend a lot of time saying that Windows Phone 7 is better than iOS, but you don't give a single concrete example of where it's better. I've used iOS for about 10 minutes, and not used WP7 at all, so I can't say whether you're right or not, but you don't give one single objective reason why anyone should believe you.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    34. Re:It's reverse psychology! by terjeber · · Score: 1

      I've interviewed at Nokia for a job in a team that was doing services

      Ah, yes, services. I know those guys from when I worked in Telco. Honestly, Elop can do no wrong. A semi-trained monkey could do no wrong with Nokia. Nokia was doing all wrong all on their own. No matter what Elop does, except doing nothing, is going to make things better for Nokia.

    35. Re:It's reverse psychology! by klapaucjusz · · Score: 2

      Does it actually support it at that level, or does it (as I've heard) do the Android thing and just halt the application while in the background?

      Er, no. Android does honest-to-god multitasking, with background applications running normally unless they choose to suspend themselves.

      What's unusual about Android (for us desktop programmers) is that the OS goes into sleep as soon as nothing is running, so if your idle application needs the handset to remain awake (say, in order to receive network packets or to ring an alarm), it must program it to do so (using wake-locks or alarms). But as long as the handset is awake, it's real multitasking that's going on.

      -- jch

    36. Re:It's reverse psychology! by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1
      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    37. Re:It's reverse psychology! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Doesn't surprise me.

      I still think the reason I lost that interview is I embarrassed my interviewer. They were migrating a Windows-based platform to Linux, yet I couldn't for the life of me see why. It can't have been to save licensing costs, those had already been paid for. Unlikely to be because the platform was obsolete, it was only about 18 months old. Unlikely to be security, this was long after Microsoft had audited IIS and made it substantially more secure; if there were any issues it'd be with the application rather than the web server.

      So - coming from a background where having a rough idea of business purpose is generally considered a Good Thing - I asked what the business reason for this was. You could see him thinking "shit.. that's a damn good question, I don't know the answer and I'm in charge of the team that's setting up the servers to make it happen!"

    38. Re:It's reverse psychology! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You'll see straight away that it's a spectacularly pointless and boring device.

      Then it should be huge.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    39. Re:It's reverse psychology! by tbf · · Score: 1

      The WP7 clearly was mocked up. They put the phone on the overhead projector and pretended to do a life demo. I that was a life demo via overhead projector, then tell me: Where was that guy's finger when he tapped the UI?

    40. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plz turn off cameras => sounds like a job for...

      "Gotta share", the musical.

    41. Re:It's reverse psychology! by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      It supports it to the level required by phones and their users, which means extremely fast app switching combined with the ability to do background music playing, downloads and network access, etc. It will appear as multitasking without consuming the CPU or battery like "real" multitasking will. The effect is certainly good enough, if not better. So yes, it supports it just fine, as far as any user will be able to tell... just with better battery life.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    42. Re:It's reverse psychology! by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      They DON'T call it "jailbreaking". I have no idea what they will call it. I just used an available analogous word from the iOS world.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    43. Re:It's reverse psychology! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      They were migrating a Windows-based platform to Linux, yet I couldn't for the life of me see why. It can't have been to save licensing costs, those had already been paid for.

      I don't disagree with the notion that you shouldn't migrate to a new OS for the sake of migrating but licensing is complex. Migrating to save on licensing and maintenance fees is a legitimate cost savings measure especially if you reduce the number of CALs required.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    44. Re:It's reverse psychology! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with the notion that you shouldn't migrate to a new OS for the sake of migrating but licensing is complex. Migrating to save on licensing and maintenance fees is a legitimate cost savings measure especially if you reduce the number of CALs required.

      Indeed, but it was a web application so with the right version of Windows Server there would be no need for CALs.

    45. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      XBox Live games? Seriously? It may have some appeal to certain over-the-top addicts who live and breathe by their rankings, but for the casual gamer? The only thing that would make it stand out from other smartphones would be that you get to pay monthly for access to other games... sort of like the gaming equivalent of Rhapsody. There's also the thing where you can hook up with other players in fora and rankings. Now, if they're doing true remote multi-player gaming on the phone, *that* would be a compelling feature, but other phones and app publishers could do that too.

      Zune Pass... well, if you had a Zune setup already. Or you could just use Rhapsody, or Napster, or pay into Pandora if you like somewhat random, or...

      Sorry, but I'm just not seeing the pull - at least not enough of one to blow cash and contract on a phone that still lacks many apps, and has a bunch of promises that it may someday catch up to the other guys. *shrug*.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    46. Re:It's reverse psychology! by ch0knuti · · Score: 1

      I agree. Here is the full version of the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6oidCTUw4s

    47. Re:It's reverse psychology! by terjeber · · Score: 2

      You're getting a lot of people calling you an astroturfer

      I am? I see one person. You. I have given an opinion, and that opinion is mine alone. Is the opinion at odds with some perceived majority opinion that you have sniffed out? Usually, when people are accused of lying about having an opinion, it is because the opinion seems to go against reason or common perception. From what I can gather, WP7 has received nothing but praise from people who have actually tried it. Given that, what would indicate I am an astroturfer?

      If you base the "You spend a lot of time saying..." on something else I have said on /., you should also have found me explaining why I prefer WP7 over iOS. I can do it again for you though. Some of the things I like is the UI consistency. Microsoft included some rather nifty UI controls with the Phone, and that means that you get a very consistent UX. Speed and smoothness. iOS bogs down on me after a while, WP7 never does, it is always responsive and smooth. Integration - honestly, Microsoft got this right, and everybody else got it wrong. I don't care about applications on my phone. I care about data. Contacts. Pictures. Books. I care about communication. Phone, SMS, Email, Messaging. The WP7 integration is heads and shoulders above anything else in the mobile market. Apple will do a little catch-up in iOS 5 as I understand it, but it is still catch-up. WP7 also has some areas where it need to basically catch up with its own idea of how things should be, most notably messaging. In Mango they will leap forward quite a bit (from the demos shown) though, and still be significantly ahead of Apple and Google in this regard.

      If the data on my phone changes, in other words, I change info on a contact, it should be reflected everywhere I have that contact stored. On my iPhone, data is stored locally, and updates are not propagated to (for example) Google. On WP7 all changes are automatically reflected at Google. If I take a picture on my phone it would be nice to have that on my PC as well, just in case I lose the phone. No problem, automatic and easy.

      Oh, and Apple still can't do hardware right. Not totally on topic but still. My iPhone 3GS gets zero wi-fi coverage in several of the rooms in my house. My latop, the wife's Nokia and my LG (universally agreed - the worst WP7 phone) gets full coverage everywhere.

      Multitasking is not terribly important to me on my phone, in many ways what MS did originally with the Tombstoning concept - an application needs to be able to get back to the exact state it was when it was interrupted - works really well. For one of my own apps I would like to have multitasking though, so I will welcome it.

      A clean, consistent, responsive UX with focus on what I want to do (talk, send messages, take pictures etc) on my phone is important, and nobody does it like WP7 at this point in time. Not even close. They are all too focused on apps.

    48. Re:It's reverse psychology! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0

      I am? I see one person. You.

      Before I posted, there were at least three comments calling you a Microsoft shill.

      If you base the "You spend a lot of time saying..." on something else I have said on /.

      Nope, just on the post I replied to. Two entire paragraphs to say 'I think WP7 is better than iOS'.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    49. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Sene · · Score: 1

      This video was professionally made and edited for Nokia internal use, for management around the world.

      Clearly not taken with a smartphone.

      The leak was probably intentional nevertheless.

    50. Re:It's reverse psychology! by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Wow, so here we are, disagreeing on something, and the only thing you can do is to take quotes out of context. You are a sad and pathetic individual.

      "Linux is a really bad fit for the desktop."

      I also explained why. No reason to include why right? But hey, show me an app on Linux that can replace Vegas and Lightroom, and I will change that opinion instantly.

      Windows 7 as an operating system is significantly better protected than Linux

      That isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of technical fact. You might not like that fact, but it is still so.

      you'll be significantly more productive with .NET than Java

      Again, context would be nice. Also, if you had searched a little more, you'd have found that I have developed software commercially in Java since the late 1990s. I have done .NET only for two years. Wonder why I have such an opinion. Perhaps I have the experience to know. You will get that too once you finish Middle School, High School and University.

      compared to DirectX, OpenGL sucks

      Again, this is not at all controversial. The fact that it hurts your religious feelings is in that regard completely irrelevant.

      NET MVC beats both Play! and Spring hands down

      My personal experience, I have developed commercial software in two, MVC and Spring. I have done personal stuff in Play! How much experience do you have in either? How about Ruby? Ruby as a language beats C#, but the tooling is nowhere near as sophisticated. Also, Ruby is still difficult to introduce into the enterprise. Again, if you had chosen to read what I actually wrote and keep context, you would have known that. The sad part for you is that to you computers is a religious thing, and in your view I am a Satan Worshipper every time I say something positive about Microsoft. It just shows how amazingly pathetic you are. Get a girlfriend. Get some sex. Relax. Computers are not important. Not important enough for you to accuse someone of being dishonest just because they do not share your religion. I'm an atheist, in both a spiritual and a computer sense.

    51. Re:It's reverse psychology! by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      WP7 has enterprise level integration for major companies? Encrypted personal communications? Secured remote phone shutdowns and application limitation options?

      Last I checked it didn't.

      Maybe you should brush up on WHY Blackberries are popular.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    52. Re:It's reverse psychology! by antv · · Score: 1

      What WP7 brings to the table is perfect compatibility with MS Exchange servers and MS Office file formats.
      By "WP has perfect compatibility with Exchange" I of course mean "MS would make sure every other phone out there would have less than perfect compatibility with Exchange".
      So that's really the selling point of WP7, except of course MS can't say that out loud.

      --
      Obama 2012: our incompetent asshole is slightly less of an incompetent asshole than the other incompetent asshole !
    53. Re:It's reverse psychology! by engele · · Score: 1

      The biggest impact WP7 has had on my life is that all of the annoying ads have made me hope it dies a quick and painless death. I don't see what Nokia gets out of WP7 except that the former Microsoft guy gets to prove his loyalty to his ex bosses. I just ignore this stuff.

    54. Re:It's reverse psychology! by a-yz · · Score: 1

      The smartphone market is a tiny fraction of what it will be eventually. To say an entrant now is too late is like 10 years ago saying that an entrant to the regular cell phone market was too late.

    55. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't just say it was too late. I said it was too little for how late it was. The market is booming, but there is an immense installed base of the existing OS's.

      For a new entrant to have any chance of competing now, it has to offer something sufficiently beyond the current offerings to overcome the utter lack of community support (friends with similar phones, third party app selection, etc.)

      WP7 offers no real reason to switch, beyond Just Being Different. It will really struggle to get that critical mass to pull in lots of developers and build comparable word of mouth. While it struggles to get to first base, iOS and android continue to grow at an astounding rate.

      It's much like Linux vs Windows and OSX in the desktop environment. Linux is great. It's a fully capable OS. But it lacks enough to really overcome the advantages OSX and windows have by their massive communities. As a result, good as Linux is, you still don't see a lot of hardware developed for it, or high end commercial software.

    56. Re:It's reverse psychology! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      IIRC from the development docs an app can use "auto" for it's network connectivity, many do not because people want to tell their app what connection to use, for example I like to use pandora on my phone, but i sure don't want to run it for an hour or two over 3G

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  2. Somehow... by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it hard to believe that something being announced to the press is "super confidential." One more subtraction from Nokia's credibility score.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Somehow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The gadget blogger sites missed an opportunity here to cut off Elop's spiel after ten seconds and interjecting, "Well, the CEO of Nokia said very emphatically that he didn't want his demo of their new phone to be shown. So instead, we'll show you a few things their competitors have been working on..."

    2. Re:Somehow... by dwater · · Score: 1

      Clearly it was an internal meeting ("all hands") which are usually recorded professionally and put on the intranet for people who couldn't be there to watch.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Somehow... by hydrofix · · Score: 1

      It was not announced to the press. You can clearly see on the video that this is an internal, employees-only event. Whether the video recording of the event was leaked on purpose is a whole another question, though. But the submitter and parent did obviously not WTFV, and the ./ summary is again wrong.

  3. "To hurt the N9?" by the+linux+geek · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nokia has been pretty upfront ever since the announcement of the move to WP7 that it was their primary smartphone OS, and MeeGo was mainly an experiment. I really doubt that Nokia gives much of a fuck if this WP7 device hurts the N9 at all, especially since they appear to be almost identical in hardware.

    1. Re:"To hurt the N9?" by kakarote · · Score: 0

      yup i am agree with you Dear becoz maybe anytime in future i need it.

    2. Re:"To hurt the N9?" by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Dude! Nokia is old people.

  4. N9? by js3 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Isn't this the phone everyone raves about but nobody wants to buy?

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:N9? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's one of them. I can't tell you about the other one, because it's super confidential, so no one even raves about it.

    2. Re:N9? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Well... No matter how good it is, Nokia has said "it is over and we are dumping it as soon as we can. We didn't even really want to do this one, but we had to." Knowing that, does it matter how good it is? Why buy a phone that you KNOW will not be supported well, or long?

    3. Re:N9? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Almighty Tallest 1It's a planet so secret that no one knows its name!

      Almighty Tallest 2And those who do dare not speak it!

      ZimWhat's its name?

      Almighty Tallest 2Oh, I dare not speak it!

    4. Re:N9? by Microlith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it's the only commonly available follow up to the N900. After that it's only devices running WP7 from Nokia, at which point I will cease ever being a customer.

      At least now we know the exact terms of the deal.

    5. Re:N9? by DemonGenius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why buy a phone that you KNOW will not be supported well, or long?

      Given the open source nature of Meego, I'm guessing Nokia is expecting the community to pick up the slack here. The Nokia Qt SDK is readily available and from what I've seen in the few hours playing with it, seems like a decent framework for developing "apps" for Meego. While that's all fine and dandy, it would be nice if there was a little official support so that developers can concentrate on writing "apps" and less time fixing bugs and implementing features Nokia should be handling themselves.

    6. Re:N9? by Microlith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it would be nice if there was a little official support so that developers can concentrate on writing "apps" and less time fixing bugs and implementing features Nokia should be handling themselves.

      The stock software on the device is a mix of the old Maemo understructure and a proprietary upper layer (the part that integrates all the social media services) that the community can't do anything with themselves.

      Before long I expect MeeGo (as in, MeeGo Community Edition) to be up and running with full functionality on the device, which should be nice and fully functional by the time Nokia decides to give up the ghost completely.

    7. Re:N9? by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And then? Open source is great and so - but software is nothing without hardware it can be installed on.

      Mobile phones are devices, not exactly what I see as a platform to install a different OS on.

      Also while it may have a nice framework for app development, with a user base of 2 there will not be many app developers interested in working on the platform. Some hobbyists maybe, but nothing to take serious.

      Really without at least one major phone maker behind it, MeeGo is going to die. Open source or not, it's going to die. Sad but true. Android is the future, iOS a good second (will be second due to it's restriction to Apple devices), WP7 may survive thanks to the deep pockets of Microsoft, but for the rest... well... what rest?

    8. Re:N9? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      It will run on rooted Android phones. Or will even dual-boot on them.
      I am sure, there will be plenty of unlockable Android phones.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    9. Re:N9? by exomondo · · Score: 2

      It will run on rooted Android phones. Or will even dual-boot on them. I am sure, there will be plenty of unlockable Android phones.

      You still need drivers for all the hardware, it's not just a case of loading the OS onto a different phone.

    10. Re:N9? by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Now, honest question: why in the world would someone want to dual-boot their PHONE?

      For a PC I can somewhat imagine it: key applications available only on the other platform (dual booting into Windows to play games, for example, if it can't be solved by running Windows in VirtualBox like I have to do for e-banking).

      Android is running on iPhones too (and I wouldn't be surprised if someone got it working on an iPad). There are plenty of rooted iPhones. But are there really people buying an iPhone to run Android on it? Or is anyone dual-booting their iPhone?

      Sorry but except for a very small group of hard-core enthusiasts I don't see this idea take off, at all.

    11. Re:N9? by Microlith · · Score: 2

      I think you mean "runs on" as it is already booting on most ARM platforms to some degree.

      The biggest hindrance to complete operation these days seems to be limited to graphics drivers.

    12. Re:N9? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      And thankfully all hardware in Android phones has Linux drivers.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    13. Re:N9? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Now, honest question: why in the world would someone want to dual-boot their PHONE?

      For development, or to import-export data in some asshole format that is only accessible through a library that runs under some particular system.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    14. Re:N9? by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To some degree. The drivers tend to be messes that don't ever end up in the upstream kernel so they rot as the kernel moves on. Then you have the problem of graphics drivers existing in userspace, which leaves you in a lurch with things like MeeGo that use glibc and your only graphics library is compiled against Android's Bionic.

    15. Re:N9? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Mobile phones are devices, not exactly what I see as a platform to install a different OS on.

      But nonetheless they are. Not everyone will do it, but then, few people install different OSes on the computers they have.

      Android is the future, iOS a good second (will be second due to it's restriction to Apple devices), WP7 may survive thanks to the deep pockets of Microsoft, but for the rest... well... what rest?

      Well, since two out of three would be happy to see Free Software, open systems, and open source in general die, it looks bad. And Android is a weak form of open source that isn't really all that helpful except to Google.

    16. Re:N9? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It's a reason, though it definitely falls within the "group of hard-core enthusiasts" category...

    17. Re:N9? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I'll buy it, unless the N950 materialises.

      I 3 my N900 as it's basically a pocket sized computer with added phone function. The N9 is pretty and has better hardware than the N900 (though the processor is still something of a disappointment compared to the rest of the market), but it lacks the physical keyboard I like.

      And yes, I know, you can get some tiny bluetooth keyboards these days, but it's still an extra thing to carry.

      The N950 is supposed to be the same hardware as the N9, plus keyboard but minus teh pretty. I'll end up with one or the other most likely.

    18. Re:N9? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Well, since two out of three would be happy to see Free Software, open systems, and open source in general die, it looks bad. And Android is a weak form of open source that isn't really all that helpful except to Google.

      True. And I also find it sad to see a promising platform like MeeGo die. Not just because it's open source, also because we're not exactly spoilt for choice in the smartphone/tablet world. Sure there are dozens of handsets, a great choice of hardware, but just two serious software platforms running on it.

      And when looking at choice, there is only one platform with a lot of choice, and that's a contradiction in terms really.

      We have Apple with their iPhone (with just a few slightly different versions on the market) and iOS.

      We have BlackBerry with their line of phones, and their own OS. They're not doing so well recently.

      Microsoft with it's WP7 platform. It's available on a handful of phones, and Nokia is trying to make it work on their phones (they haven't released a single product yet).

      Nokia with remnants of their Symbian and MeeGo offerings - as long as stocks last.

      And then there is the plethora of offerings running Android. The hardware is different, the OS is the same (save some minor branding in the UI).

      So much for choice... you only have a reasonable choice if you choose Android. One choice if you like iOS (a good choice if you like iOS for sure - but also an expensive one).

    19. Re:N9? by djowatts · · Score: 1

      I'll Tell you why I did it. I have a HTC HD2, and that came as default with WinMo 6.5, which, although steady, is a pile of waste IMO. So I rooted it and installed android as a second on my SD card. I have to boot into WinMo to run the bootable android, but my phone is hardly ever off, so that is rare.

    20. Re:N9? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even before canning it, Nokia showed that they wouldn't be supporting the Maemo / Meego line. I got a 770 on the open source developers' programme. It is quite nice, but a bit underpowered. As soon as the N800 was released, they ditched support for it. There's a 'community edition' of the firmware, but last time I tried it it was slow and buggy. If I'm paying that much for a device, I expect it to be supported for at least 3 years.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:N9? by operator_error · · Score: 1

      As a developer, I saw the N9 GUI and got totally psyched. Disclaimer: I like Linux and open-source. That said, the single-handed swipe mobile GUI is The Future and I can already see Apple, HP, Google, etc. photocopy machines switching ON. (I already got a feel for it first-hand using FireFox 5 Mobile on my recently purchased, low-price N900; ...but the price shot up nearly 175% after May 23rd when no N9 was announced at the San Francisco Meego conference and I digress).

      More disclaimers + My Point: I am a Drupal developer and have yet to write a mobile client-app. I develop a lot using Drupal & www.openatrium.com which is a custom Distribution of Drupal. OpenAtrium is an intranet-in-a-box. The person I want to win over is the Crackberry CEO and I see the Nokia N9 swipe GUI as The Future, so I want to develop a single-handed mobile client for my customer. I want a Nokia N9/N950 BAD to get started, get it done, and then move on to Maemo-open-source ...iOS/Android/WebOS once they get the single-handed GUI-thang goin' for them too.

    22. Re:N9? by dwater · · Score: 1

      The N950 isn't quite the same h/w as the N9 - close though. You can apply for it - I don't think it costs anything, if you are chosen.

      --
      Max.
    23. Re:N9? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget HTC is NOT locking there boot loaders as a few other to. Letting the community write drivers for these devices. also you KDE mobile as well. So life in Open source mobile OS does not die with Mamo/Meego. Also everyone so far forget Intel said they are still working Meego.

    24. Re:N9? by exomondo · · Score: 1

      And thankfully all hardware in Android phones has Linux drivers.

      Except it's not quite so black and white, the Android kernel is not the same as the Meego kernel, it would be fine if all of those drivers were open source so you could build them for any system and build against Bionic or glibc depending on which system you are using but at the moment very few are open source.

  5. Nokia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is Nokia still around?

    1. Re:Nokia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah, they're only the biggest vendor of smartphones in the market. Life does exist outside the US....

    2. Re:Nokia? by alci63 · · Score: 1

      Well, they probably are, but here in France, they are doomed to provide low end phone (the ones you get for 1 € if you really don't care). Every exciting phone has been Samsung, Apple or even LG for at least 3 years...

    3. Re:Nokia? by IICV · · Score: 1

      In a manner of speaking - what happened is that, much like the liver fluke parasite preying on an ant, Microsoft has taken control of Nokia's brain. Now, dazed and confused, Nokia is wandering up the stalk of Windows 7, where it will latch on in a vulnerable position and wait to be consumed.

      The analogy kinda breaks down here, because they're probably gonna get eaten by Microsoft instead of a cow or a bird or something, but still - mind control is pretty much the only way to explain this move. Windows Mobile has such a shitty track record and the failure of the Microsoft Kin shows that the politics behind Microsoft's mobile strategy are seriously fucked up. I just don't see how Stephen Elop has managed to convince anyone that pinning Nokia's future on Windows Phone 7 is a good idea.

  6. What a retard by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 1, Insightful

    how can he expect anyone to take him literally and not see the real plea for publicity cloaked in a poorly executed attempt at reverse psychology?

    oh wait, this is for windows users who enjoy the Microsoft experience, makes perfect sense, carry on.

    1. Re:What a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh wait, this is for windows users who enjoy the Microsoft experience, makes perfect sense, carry on.

      haha unlike us mac users amirite? Driving our Priuses to the Genius Bar. Thank Steve we can get an applause and hi-fives from the staff when we buy something at an Apple Store to really make us feel good, sure it might seem gay to everyone else but we know the truth, it really bolsters your self-worth to be a part of that. Peace :)

    2. Re:What a retard by dwater · · Score: 1

      It was an internal Nokia all-hands, not some publicity stunt.

      --
      Max.
  7. Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's too bad it's not running Android, since with WP7 nobody will buy it and stores (like with current WP7 phones) will just hide it in the back.

    There's a reason Android is selling 400,000 phones every day and WP7 is selling 400.

    1. Re:Unfortunate by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the bright side for MS, they can hardly do any worse than they did with the Kin.

    2. Re:Unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad it's not running Android, since with WP7 nobody will buy it and stores (like with current WP7 phones) will just hide it in the back.

      There's a reason Android is selling 400,000 phones every day and WP7 is selling 400.

      [citation] --- ?

  8. Can't really hurt the N9... by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least, not any more than Elop has hurt it already. If anything, this mad scramble and poor demo was his immediate reaction to interfere with and disrupt the positive press that built around the N9 and Harmattan. It had such a good immediate demo and favorable reviews that people were quickly looking at Elop as a complete fool, instead of the mere tool that he is.

    1. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by wvmarle · · Score: 2

      Being a mere tool, doesn't that imply he's a fool? Except that he'll get a nice salary for being a fool. And a tool. So maybe he's not that big of a fool after all.

    2. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 0

      The N9 hurt itself by being Nokia's typically unusable mess. I mean let's be honest here - nerds who think UI peaked in the 70s loved it, and while I know there are dozens of you, that's not gonna sustain a technology market.

    3. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when having money makes someone smarter?

      I thought it was the opposite... i.e. not having money makes one smarter.

    4. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      let's be honest here - nerds who think UI peaked in the 70s loved it, and while I know there are dozens of you, that's not gonna sustain a technology market.

      And people who insist that the WP7 UI is somehow superior (despite the fact that you'll constantly be scrolling to read text that hangs off the screen) aren't either. There's nothing SPECIAL about the WP7 UI, similar things could be implemented on other platforms.

      Or perhaps you can show me how exactly what we've seen falls apart?

    5. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My point is that he's a tool. He isn't supposed to think for himself, or do what 's best for his company. He's doing what's best to drive his company into a weak position so that they are dependent on Microsoft. His reaction here is to undermine the notion that Nokia could actually exist without the Microsoft dependency.

      He is a tool, wielded by Microsoft.

    6. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      It's a pity that this can't be used by Nokia sharholders as more proof that he's trying to damage the company to reduce it's sale price.

    7. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      What you say may or may not be true but it was the Nokia before him that got themselves in a position where they could be run by a "tool".

      Self-determination always belongs to the clever and successful, Nokia has shown to be neither in the last few years.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by BrokenBeta · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else misread his name as "Stephen Flop"?

    9. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      There's nothing SPECIAL about the WP7 UI, similar things could be implemented on other platforms.

      Could be, but the fact is that they won't be, certainly not on a consistent systemwide basis.

    10. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by Hellasboy · · Score: 1

      No, I think OPK did that with years of mismanagement.

      --

      "Tread softly because you tread on my dreams"
    11. Re:Can't really hurt the N9... by operator_error · · Score: 1

      I could not agree with you more, especially when one considers Elop clearly had access to something pretty close to the released N9 waaay back in February when he wrote the burning oil platform memo, as justification to sleep with Microsoft and kill off All Direction and Resources up to that point in time.

      How would Steve Jobs have made the world know the N9 was The Latest and Greatest Nokia phone (until the next one of course)? He'd Sell it! Yet the very next day Elop hacks together something so lame, it certainly speaks for itself, actions being louder than words and all; with that hindsight clarity.

      What grieves me is it is so clear the team that delivered the very fine N9 is not being praised to the highest for what they managed to do, and the day after the announcement the CEO does everything he can to belittle their most-solid straight-on-target deliverable. This lame public presentation and its timing must not look good to the board. (And that video was shot with 2, sync'd tripod'd cameras, anyone can see that it isn't a cameraphone video that 'leaked')

      How could the N9 team have done any better? I hope the market answers in a most solid way, without Elop's further interference. Elop's tenure is a matter of time, and I hope it is short because I can't wait for whatever happens in the post-Elop era. Who would want to work for this guy?

      I don't really need a new phone, both my N95 & N900 are still perfect machines, with SIP, etc. But now I want an N9 bad, and I want to develop apps for the swipe single-handed GUI. I can envision web-clients to my OpenAtrium development that crackberry CEO-types might like; and the single-handed interface development seems like a good investment once iOS and Droid adopt it too.

      I've been telling my friends about the N9 Linux phone, and I'm gonna buy Mom her first smartphone, N9. And I don't see why not, I mean really? Why do people say it is like buying a dead technology? If I like the phone and it works and it lasts, it isn't dead at all. It isn't like someone will make it stop working because something else is coming later. As far as apps go, my N900 does very well with the free open-source apps available at repo http://maemo.org/ and when Apple talks about 'over the air sync' I gotta laugh, since linux does this like a normal thing. I trust the ongoing linux community for support, and I want to support the effort that went into this particular, open, product.

  9. Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That metro calendar reminds me of really shitty websites from the 90's. Calendars should be on a light background and you should use a high contrast colour for the text to stand out from the background instead of blending into it.

    The entire metro "experience" reminds me of many flash websites from the late 90's to early 2000's and it will not scale well to other latin character set languages let alone non-latin ones like Chinese and Japanese.

    Nokia made a huge mistake hiring Stephen Elop and going with WIndows Phone 7. They should have chosen either Maemo or Meego, ported the Symbian UI framework for backwards compatibility and developed a modern competitive UI to compete with iOS and Android.

    I'll never buy a Nokia device regardless of OS.

    Before you label me as a blind Nokia hater, my second cellphone was a Nokia (first being a Motorola "Brick" flip phone). I am also a Finnish citizen so I would like to see Nokia find a way to survive. I just don't see Windows Phone 7 as the right way forward.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    1. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If color is all you're on about, you can choose the light theme and the background (system-wide) is white. The dark theme is on by default, partly for style and partly because it's more energy efficient on the AMOLED screens.

    2. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If color is all you're on about, you can choose the light theme and the background (system-wide) is white. The dark theme is on by default, partly for style and partly because it's more energy efficient on the AMOLED screens.

      So then everything is they the opposite might not be what someone wants either. You also don't address the fact that Metro is typography heavy which means it is English centric effectively.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, specifically, does typography-heavy design make it so bad for east asian languages? Seems to me like it would make things better.

    5. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by terjeber · · Score: 2

      Sigh.

      If the color is not to your liking, you change it. That was what he was trying to explain to you. Now that you realize color can be changed, that is no good either?

      Metro isn't any more typography heavy than any other mobile OS. English centric? In what way specifically? You are desperately making up stuff as you go, are you not?

    6. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      Sigh.

      If the color is not to your liking, you change it. That was what he was trying to explain to you. Now that you realize color can be changed, that is no good either?

      Metro isn't any more typography heavy than any other mobile OS. English centric? In what way specifically? You are desperately making up stuff as you go, are you not?

      It has "hubs" with Textual heading which might or might not make sense in non-Latin1 languages especially if some of the glyphs are cut off.

      Hubs are a bad idea.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    7. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a trollish post and you even got a +5 "Interesting" for it.... If there's something flashy that reminds the 90's is Android and don't let me start with the icon grid that both Android and iOS shares. Metro is actually a great interface, much more relevant that the other two. But you have to use it, of course, instead of pursuing your bashing agenda...

    8. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      It has "hubs" with Textual heading which might or might not make sense in non-Latin1 languages especially if some of the glyphs are cut off.

      This assumes that Windows Phone l10n developers are hopeless dumbasses who don't check how their translated texts look on the screen. Have you actually seen a truncated label in WP7, or are you indeed making shit up?

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    9. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      It has "hubs" with Textual heading which might or might not make sense in non-Latin1 languages especially if some of the glyphs are cut off.

      This assumes that Windows Phone l10n developers are hopeless dumbasses who don't check how their translated texts look on the screen. Have you actually seen a truncated label in WP7, or are you indeed making shit up?

      Have you actually seen a windows phone 7 screenshot or video of it in action? The last letter of heading title is almost always off the screen. Ok, Mr. Pedantic, it is not technically truncated but it is cut off from the view port which to me looks stupid and unfinished but I guess the hipsters at MSFT think it is "cool" or "ironic".

      The point is that it looks too much like a website and the text takes up way too much space not to mention that it does not even fit on the screen.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      What a trollish post and you even got a +5 "Interesting" for it....
      If there's something flashy that reminds the 90's is Android and don't let me start with the icon grid that both Android and iOS shares.

      Metro is actually a great interface, much more relevant that the other two. But you have to use it, of course, instead of pursuing your bashing agenda...

      How is it a great interface? Do you really think a widgets based UI is better? Is the square superior to the arbitrary shape? Do you really think a tiny square is going to give anyone enough information about their "facebook" friends? Do you really think people asked for "hubs"?

      I think MSFT should have concentrated on touch controls, copy and paste and other basic functionality while keeping the icon grid for the launcher. Are you one of those people who insist of changing something even if it is not broken? Unix has been chugging along for decades just fine without a need for "refactoring" just to the lulz. WIndows Phone 7 should have stayed in the MSFT research lab. Much like the Star Trek LCARS UI in the movies and TV, it was interesting to look at but completely impractical as an actual interface and the same can be said for Metro on a small screen device like a phone.

      Metro places too much focus on the hubs with the big title and the busy background. The user should be free to create their own groupings instead.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    11. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      clueless.

      You might want to read links that you google more carefully. That story was posted on the 21st of this money which is 3 days ago from today or 2 day from the date you posted the link. The implication is that support was coming. What that means is that while the new build may support additional languages, there is no way of knowing if existing WP7 applications will be localized. Since MSFT did not have localization built in from the start, developers will probably have to rewrite their applications now to support other markets whereas I have applications from Japanese and German developer on my iPhone and iPad which work in english out of the box and it is easy enough to localize in any language supported by iOS if you have the resource files translated into that language. iOS had localization support from the very beginning. For all we know, MSFT might have an "ASIAN" edition with different layouts with or without hubs.

      Another problem I just thought of with the hub strategy and specifically with their Xbox centric strategy is that it might not function in some countries at all.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    12. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by lilfields · · Score: 1

      You can change the color scheme to have a white background. I quite enjoy the Metro interface, and I've come to notice a lot of designers are taking notice and copying it in advertising, etc. I actually think iOS home looks sort of Tonka, toy like. Not a big fan. The Metro interface has its flaws in that because it is so simple, it can sometimes appear empty...but when it's at its best, it is probably the most visually appealing interface on the mobile market. I think each interface has its benefits design wise, but to say Metro is "ugly as sin" is a bit skewed, and had it not come from Microsoft I have a feeling your opinion might be different. I wonder how many anti-Microsoft-at-all-times people moderated you to "insightful." They do good, and they do bad...Apple and Google don't have monopolies on good design or ideas.

    13. Re:Metro is ugly as sin. by lilfields · · Score: 1

      The text only overlaps on screens that side scroll.

  10. Just a little bit of history repeating by paiute · · Score: 1
    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Just a little bit of history repeating by Dracos · · Score: 2

      ...term referring to the unintended consequence...

      Emphasis added. This almost certainly was intentional, so I hereby coin the term Elop Effect.

    2. Re:Just a little bit of history repeating by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The reason it doesn't matter (and why Microsoft is different than Osborne): people actually wanted to buy Osbornes. :)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Just a little bit of history repeating by dwater · · Score: 1

      I heard it called the Elopocolipse.

      --
      Max.
  11. Oh come ON by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CEO asked the journalists present to turn off the cameras because the new phone was 'super confidential.'

    Seriously - the guy gives a presentation to a bunch of journalists - who I assume weren't just randomly milling around on the street before the Nokia folks brought out a podium and a microphone - and says "Hey!! Here's our super-secret WINDOWS PHONE! Ssh! Don't tell anyone!" Is there anyone in the world with a greater than room temperature IQ that'd actually fall for that? (and yes, that's room temperature in Celsius)

    I see the former Microsoftie has brought along those mad Microsoft advertizing skillz for which the company is renowned...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Oh come ON by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You underestimate how easily reporters are led by the nose and manipulated. These are journalists, after all. If they were smart they wouldn't have been RTF majors.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  12. Irrelevant by Weezul · · Score: 1

    There won't be many Symbian, Android, iOS, etc. users buying WP7 phones. WP7 purchasers will mostly be existing Windows phone users and unlucky smartphone n00bs. M$ bought Nokia's industry connections, not Nokia's (ex)users.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Irrelevant by lilfields · · Score: 1

      You used dollar signs, as if Microsoft is trying to make money and that's bad. Even though of course Apple and Google also operate to make money and do questionable business acts that rival Microsoft's questionable business acts. Thanks for the insight, as I'm sure you have had an in-depth experience with all the mobile operating systems.

  13. Success is their worst enemy by FranTaylor · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is copying Apple again and getting into the retail market with their own products.

    If Nokia's phone is successful, they are simply doing the heavy lifting for Microsoft's own product entry.

    They'll be just another in the long list of companies that Microsoft has trampled in their mad rush for supremacy.

    1. Re:Success is their worst enemy by terjeber · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      They'll be just another in the long list of companies that Microsoft has trampled in their mad rush for supremacy.

      Yeah, you are right. All companies that are involved with Microsoft get trampled. Companies like Dell, Asus and all the other PC makers that Microsoft trampled in their mad rush for supremacy. They were simply doing the heavy lifting for Microsoft's own product entry. As I said, stop doing drugs and stop washing them down with that kool-aid.

    2. Re:Success is their worst enemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft is copying Apple again and getting into the retail market with their own products.

      Are you on drugs? Exactly how is Microsoft copying Apple here? Seriously. Stop doing drugs.

      Apple invented mobile phones, you ignorant unbeliever.

    3. Re:Success is their worst enemy by dwater · · Score: 1

      He didn't say 'all', just that there is a long list. You haven't shown the list to be any shorter...

      --
      Max.
    4. Re:Success is their worst enemy by terjeber · · Score: 1

      You haven't shown the list to be any shorter

      I have to wonder if you are more than a little slow. It seems so. The vendors I listed have something in common, and they have something in common with Nokia. Stop reading now and let that sink in for a little bit. Think about it. Don't read further. Stop! OK, now you can continue. They are hardware vendors who run Microsoft Operating Systems on their hardware. What chances are there that Microsoft will try to produce WP7 hardware? Do they have a lot of positive experience in doing such stuff? Believe me, if they were even contemplating exploring the avenue, the rumor would be out.

      Microsoft is essentially a software company. They are not going to "trample" the people who deliver the hardware on which their software can run. Not even Ballmer is that stupid. Thinking that they might means one is even dumber than Ballmer, which probably puts one in Chimp territory.

    5. Re:Success is their worst enemy by dwater · · Score: 1

      slow,perhaps. just trying to get you to spell it out.
      although, if you think there aren't hardware vendors that have sufferred at the hands of Mircosoft, then think again. it isn't as simple as that. almost no company is simply hardware (or software).
      anyway, Nokia *was* a software vendor too....but not any more...well, to some extent it is and will be, but not like it was. already huge chunks of Nokia have sufferred, if you consider Nokia to be a group of people rather than a bunch of shares.

      --
      Max.
    6. Re:Success is their worst enemy by terjeber · · Score: 1

      OK, so here's the challenge. Show me one, just a single one, hardware vendor who is/was a Microsoft OS customer and who Microsoft "trampled in their quest for supremacy". Shouldn't be too hard if there is lots of them.

    7. Re:Success is their worst enemy by dwater · · Score: 1

      well, it wasn't *my* assertion, and Imm sure it is debatable, but SGI comes immediately to mind.

      --
      Max.
    8. Re:Success is their worst enemy by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      yeah! nokia is just another copy-cat phone company trying to cash in on apple innovation!

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  14. Give them some credit. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I realize people love to dump on Microsoft, so they're going to be dismissive of Windows Phone 7 without even having tried it. It's the total opposite of how people respond to the iPhone. Anytime someone asks for suggestions for a smartphone people default to the iPhone like mindless drones.

    I have an Android phone which I'm extremely happy with. However, a friend recently got a WP7 phone which finally gave me an opportunity to give it a try. I was extremely impressed. I felt like Microsoft, moreso than either Google or Apple actually put thought into usability, into how people will interact with the phone. Menus and settings are clear and better organized and the interface seems more consistent. I can navigate more efficiently and there seems to a good amount of customization. And I'll give them credit for not just going and cloning Android and iOS's look. Blackberries might offer some great functionality, but in terms of usability they aren't even in the same galaxy as their competitors.

    Of course, not having to actually live with the phone I can't speak to how I'd feel about WP7 over the long run, if I'd find it as satisfying an experience as Android. My point is that Microsoft deserves quite a bit more credit than they're getting for this OS. I've found that friends of mine who've actually used a WP7 phone have been quite impressed.

    1. Re:Give them some credit. by sturle · · Score: 1

      My point is that Microsoft deserves quite a bit more credit than they're getting for this OS. I've found that friends of mine who've actually used a WP7 phone have been quite impressed.

      Impressed as in "Wow, in spite of being from Microsoft, it is actually usable" or "This is better than Android or iPhone"?

      A couple of months ago I tried to find sales numbers for WP7. I could only find thousands of descriptions of how to replace WP7 with Android. If there are as many WP7 phones sold as there are descriptions of how to install Android on them, the phones must sell very well. When the number of howtos on converting Android phones to WP7 outnumber the howtos in the other direction, I'll start believing in WP7.

      Microsoft Vacuum Cleaner didn't suck either, but it wasn't a great product that users wanted.

    2. Re:Give them some credit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey everybody! this guy knows someone that owns a wp7 phone!

    3. Re:Give them some credit. by Error27 · · Score: 1

      People default to the iPhone because it is the best phone available.

      Before the iPhone came out Nokia used to sell the best phone available and it cost twice as much as the iPhone. When the iPhone came out, Nokia freaked out and killed their high end products. Now their best phone costs the same as an iPhone and has roughly the same hardware as the iPhone, although Symbian sucks so it's not as good over all.

    4. Re:Give them some credit. by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      I tried a WP7 phone in a store for a few minutes, and I was taken completely by surprise how smooth and sleek it was. But then I immediately lost interest and focused my attention back to the iPhone and Android phones. I'm sure I'm not alone here... This will be a tough battle for MS.

  15. Things missing by symbolset · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Like customers for your apps, for example.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Things missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No point trying to reply.

      The Redmond Mod Squad is onto this discussion already.

    2. Re:Things missing by williamhb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like customers for your apps, for example.

      Didn't spot the transparent strategy then? Hmm, Windows 8 apps look a lot like Windows Phone apps, and something similar is moving onto the XBox too...

      The implication is that they intend Windows Phone apps will be the same apps you use on Windows 8 which will be the same apps you can access on XBox. The famous "three screens". And if you're not coding specifically for Windows, well standard HTML5 and Javascript apps will run just dandy on Windows 8 and the future version of Windows Phone too. I don't see there being a problem with getting apps, or with getting customers for your apps.

      It's plain and simple leveraging from the PC market into the phone market. And my goodness there are a lot of Windows PC customers, and neither Google nor Apple have that advantage.

    3. Re:Things missing by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2

      Just for reference, I'm no Microsoft fan (Linux guy) and Android is my current choice of mobile OS.

      But the above statement strikes me as rather pathetic trolling - in the history of new computing devices, has there ever been a wealth of software sat there waiting for its release day ready to install on it?

      If you are talking about, say, a new games console platform, then at £50 a game a developer with millions in the bank can maybe afford to take a risk and have a game or two ready to buy and run on a console on release day.

      But for mobile apps that average £2-£3 in price where you are more than likely a small or independent developer, are you really going to want to take the risk of having stuff ready on release day if you end up only selling a few hundred copies of your app?

      I too believe Microsoft have an uphill struggle with WP7 but, like Apple, they are exceedingly good at marketing and pulling rabbits out of hats, so now is not the time to start shouting "FAIL".

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Things missing by ultranova · · Score: 0

      The implication is that they intend Windows Phone apps will be the same apps you use on Windows 8 which will be the same apps you can access on XBox. The famous "three screens". And if you're not coding specifically for Windows, well standard HTML5 and Javascript apps will run just dandy on Windows 8 and the future version of Windows Phone too. I don't see there being a problem with getting apps, or with getting customers for your apps.

      Unless Windows Phone is going to have gigabytes of memory and a multi-cored processor, then no, they're not going to be. If you code for a PC, you take advantages of the resources there, or your competitors will. If your app is so simple it doesn't need much resources, the chances are that people can get better alternatives for free, so why would they pay for yours? And XBox "apps" are games, which tend to be designed for the XBox controller.

      This is simply a stupid move, and the market knows it too. The lesson here is to never put anyone who's worked at Microsoft to any position where they could possibly make any decisions where anything Microsoft makes might be an option.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Things missing by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      And my goodness there are a lot of Windows PC customers, and neither Google nor Apple have that advantage.

      Actually Apple have a good market penetration among people who actually buy smartphones like college students and people with the disposable income to actually buy these things. That's confirmed by studies like this : "74 percent of iPad owners surveyed currently own a Mac, while just 26 percent own a PC." and "iPhone users twice as likely to own a mac"

      Most of the PC's out there are corporate desktops or owned by people who aren't interested in the latest in computing, these are not potential smartphone customers.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    6. Re:Things missing by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      In what way are they good at marketing? Windows 7 is a good OS in its own right, but the best marketing line you get is that it isn't Vista.

    7. Re:Things missing by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Very good point. I was just talking to a friend of mine who is fairly computer savvy. He was out looking to buy a mobile computing device (laptop, netbook, tablet) for his son for school this fall. He has NO interest in an Apple device and little interest in an Android device. He wants something that can sync up with his MS Office applications on his desktop (including Outlook). He does not believe that an Android device can do that. He won't buy an Apple device. He is very interested in the HP Windows 7 tablet and may wait for that to come to his local store before buying.
      I was surprised by how strongly he felt against Android devices, but I was unable to convince him to reconsider. I suspect he represents a significant market. He has a spotty record on predicting future technology trends. When we have agreed on the way a new technology trend would play out, we have never been wrong. When we have disagreed, he has almost always been wrong (although that does not mean that I was correct, often we were both wrong). When, like now, we have disagreed but he has made an argument I find somewhat convincing (although I think it is missing some things), he has been right about as often as he has been wrong.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    8. Re:Things missing by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I too believe Microsoft have an uphill struggle with WP7 but, like Apple, they are exceedingly good at marketing and pulling rabbits out of hats, so now is not the time to start shouting "FAIL".

      There are enough examples of recent MS failures that counter your argument. MS can spend alot of money on marketing and still come up short because it may not be "good" marketing. Did you even see the Jerry Seinfeld ads?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    9. Re:Things missing by jbengt · · Score: 1

      In what way are they good at marketing?

      MS just about owns the desktop market. They did not get there by being bad at marketing.
      Marketing != Advertising Slogans.

    10. Re:Things missing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Any app designed for a large screen will need redesign for a small screen. The windows 8 + phone strategy is not going to help any more than Android phone apps work just fine on 10" tablets (they don't).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    11. Re:Things missing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      But the above statement strikes me as rather pathetic trolling - in the history of new computing devices, has there ever been a wealth of software sat there waiting for its release day ready to install on it?

      I recall people whining about only having three games to play when the 360 was released.

      A year later people whined that there were no games to play on the PS3.

      People aren't good at recognizing patterns and deconstructing them into data it seems.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    12. Re:Things missing by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      But the above statement strikes me as rather pathetic trolling - in the history of new computing devices, has there ever been a wealth of software sat there waiting for its release day ready to install on it?

      If they'd allowed Windows Phone 7 to run Windows Mobile 6 applications (and both of them are based on Windows CE) they would have had a wealth of software. If they'd allowed people with C/C++ legacy code to run it on WP7 they'd have had people who have iPhone/Android portable applications supporting them.

      The fatal flaw in WP7 is that they've told those people they need to either rewrite everything in C# or pay Microsoft for a permit to use native code. Most developers aren't going to do either of those for a platform with the market share of WM6 (~10%). Actually WP7 looks like it will have even less market share that that.

      http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1689814

      Microsoft's total market share has dropped from 6.8% in 1Q10 to 3.3% in 1Q11. Of that only 1.6% is WP7, the rest is WM6. Right now you can write in C/C++ and target Android and iPhone. Rewriting in C# or paying for native code is just not going to happen to get 1.6% of the market. In fact all the companies that make software I use on WM6 have dropped WM6 and announced they won't support WP7 but will move to Android and/or iPhone.

      At that point it's hard to see the people who've bought WM6 in the past are going to move to WP7 instead of Android.

      Look at it this way. Imagine if Vista had been launched with no support for XP applications at a point where OSX had a much larger market share. All the people that made software on XP have already ported to OSX and announced they'd drop support for XP and not support Vista. Basically it would have been game over for Microsoft on the desktop. That's what they've done on phones.

      What's funny is that I remember loads of excited articles on how Vista's crappiness would cause a move to Linux. That was never going to happen. On the other hand I can see WP7 causing all the WM6 users moving to Android.

      Android right now is literally a better Windows Mobile than WP7.

      It's actually amazing that a company obsessed with back compatibility and cosseting developers like Microsoft has done something so dumb.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:Things missing by symbolset · · Score: 1

      This isn't Windows Phone 1. This is Windows Phone 7. As in: they've been at this a long while - 15 years at least. If they ditched their legacy it's because it wasn't worth carrying forward but let's not pretend that didn't happen.

      Microsoft is good at marketing when they can tell their OEMs to shut up and take it. If they could tell HP and Dell to shut up and take it, HP would not have bought Palm and Dell would not be giving forth Android tablets. That's not the current mobile market. There's a lot of evidence available that points of sale are shifting WP7 product to the back shelf due to lack of demand, or removing it from the shelves entirely. That's not an uphill struggle - it's whistling in the dark.

      Microsoft doesn't have any leverage here so they have to bring world shaking product. And they haven't got that in 'em

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  16. Journalists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like it was an internal meeting, not journos.

    Also the fact that the camera switches/pans/etc suggests that this was professionally recorded, this wasn't some dude recording on his iPhone.

  17. Say what? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Most applications will simply continue to be killed outright.

    Most applications will NOT be killed, they will be suspended until the memory is needed by something else, then they will be pushed out of memory, gracefully, after getting a last chance to clean up.

    MOST applications do not need multitasking to begin with. Of the ones that do, 99% of them can run in the background just fine in iOS.

    Anything that supports "multitasking" will be working through GCD, which requires Apple approval to use.

    Whoa. WTF? That's a really weird statement. It's not like Jobs is sitting in the background of GCD approving blocks that get onto queues.... Any IOS developer can use GCD, there is no need for special "Apple Approval" beyond the normal app review process.

    They are "rekindling" ChevronWP7, though how it will differ from before is up in the air. Certainly, it will not be like Android where you can freely sideload apps.

    I am assuming it will be exactly like that, possibly more secure though.

    Then I imagine you will have to manually sign and upload software, possibly even compile and package them, as this is supposed to be a tool for developers.

    WP7 developers can ALREADY deploy what they want onto phones, so obviously the effort to support the WP7 of "jail breaking" is for non-developers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Say what? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Don't you just love the bs spread about Apple and this GCD just takes the cake in absurdity.

  18. Wanting what you cannot have by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They should have chosen either Maemo or Meego, ported the Symbian UI framework for backwards compatibility and developed a modern competitive UI to compete with iOS and Android.

    That is pretty much what they tried to do though, and the thing is they simply could not do it. I do not understand the reasons why exactly, but it's not like Nokia did not see this same fact and try. It's sad they could not succeed at all, but WP7 really was the best path forward for Nokia - with Android they would have been a vendor very late to the game, tied to Microsoft they at least have the chance to affect development and direction of the platform as a preferred hardware vendor.

    Microsoft seems like they are coming into this late but do not count them out. They have a LOT of money and they have to make something hit, and WP7 is actually a pretty decent base to build on once they catch up the internals.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by phishtahko · · Score: 1

      That is pretty much what they tried to do though, and the thing is they simply could not do it. I do not understand the reasons why exactly, but it's not like Nokia did not see this same fact and try.

      Too many managers managing away at too many units each doing their own thing. As Apple have shown, the best way to get anywhere is to have one man who has veto power and a sense of where he wants to take the product. I think this is what Elop - love him or hate him - is bringing to the table. He's taking Nokia down the WP path, and while it might not be the Meego path we'd like at least they're no longer a company developing 2 operating systems with neither going anywhere.

    2. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What nonsense that WP7 was a better pick than Android. Which would you rather be: one of the leading manufacturers of the leading phone OS, or one of the leading manufacturers of the late-to-the-party also-ran phone OS?

    3. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Which would you rather be: one of the leading manufacturers of the leading phone OS, or one of the leading manufacturers of the late-to-the-party also-ran phone OS?

      Since at this point Nokia cannot be "a leading manufacturer" of an Android device, you present a false choice.

      They would have no say in the direction of Android. But with WP7 they can to some degree help drive the platform and attempt to leverage the strong brand and device construction ability they have to create something that might catch on in the market.

      Android may look like it is dominating now but we are going to go through at least a decade of gyrations before things settle. We are only at the start of the post-PC era, a term I'm sure you despise simply because Apple has used it but which fits the situation well.

      People who count Microsoft out have no memory of the past.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anybody of you is in a position that makes a mobile phone developer listen to you, tell him how MS made Nokia drop their best chance to win the market, and since it's free, you can just pick it up, put in on your phones, and roar upwards becoming a major player! (Provided you play your cards right, nothing can beat Linux. Ever. If you aren't confident about that, you're not the right person to do it, and should now hand in your geek card. ;) (OK, BSD, we love you too. *hug* ;)

      There is already QT which 100% blends in on Symbian and on Maemo/Meego.
      Actually, we can just find any phone open enough to allow replacing the OS (any Nokia S60 phone can do that, and any other one who allows flashing a unencrypted the firmware), and install Meego on it.

    5. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by ploxiln · · Score: 1

      The developers could never quite get far enough before management mandated a strategic rewrite of some sort. First it was a rewrite to use qt which nokia had just purchased, hoping to save symbian by having a fat application library that would run on both low-end symbian and high-end maemo. (previously maemo was based on gtk). Then it was the merge with intel's moblin to form meego, with new packaging formats and new networking later and new gui stuff... and then it was the total switch to WP7. Finishing and polishing the project before the next mood swing from management proved impossible it seems

    6. Re:Wanting what you cannot have by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The thought of MeeGo having any chance against iOS *and* Android *and* WP7 (and even Blackberry!) is just insane. There was a window to be able to make it happen, Nokia started in time but couldn't get far enough along, and MeeGo is nowhere close to competing with the big players now.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Employees not Journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems some of you did not watch the video presentation. It was more like a product update for Nokia employees, rather than for journalists. The posted video was probably for internal circulation, leaked either intentionally or by a disgruntled/overly excited employee.

  20. How appropriate by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 1

    I've just realized - Stephen Elop is only one letter away from 'flop'...

    1. Re:How appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez. I didn't see that. You're so smart!

  21. Nokia should have went Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nokia has always produced decent phones hardware-wise (I've owned phones from Nokia, Siemens, Samsung, LG... and Nokia phones have always been most durable and had least defects. With few exceptions, their battery life has also been at the top). They have also always embraced openness (linux-based OS:es, large support for many open source projects, etc...). When they decided "Okay, we can't deliver with any of our in-house OS:es..." it really boggles the mind that they chose MS over Android. With Android, Nokia would have boosted the adoption of the OS by a massive amount which would have led to more apps, etc... I don't see how that could have failed, really. Instead they are gambling by trying to enter a mature market with a new software from a company that has a tradition of making horrible software for phones... Elop isn't an idiot but he certainly is favoring the interests of his former employer over the interests of his current one.

    1. Re:Nokia should have went Android by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      Elop is an idiot because he certainly is favoring the interests of his former employer over the interests of his current one.

      there you go, fixed that :)

      The idea that going Android would have made Nokia into a 'me-too' re-branding phone company, but going with WP7 somehow makes them unique is an interesting concept. Unless Microsoft gives Nokia special privileges, whereupon they kill all the their other existing phone partners. Not that those partners will care too much, having sold so pathetically few WP7 phones.

  22. And it's a big secret indeed by DrXym · · Score: 2

    So Nokia have produced yet another generic smart phone indistinguishable from virtually every other smart phone running android or Windows Phone 7 in the last few years. Big screen, a button, camera on the back, smart phone shaped. Frontpage news.

    1. Re:And it's a big secret indeed by dwater · · Score: 1

      no button....at least, not on the front.

      --
      Max.
  23. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it run meego^w linux?

  24. Sea Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch out Steve!

    1. Re:Sea Ray by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Is a Sea Ray like a C-Beam? They're so glittery.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  25. Internal presentation by ecki · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was a company internal presentation, not for journalists. If you watch the whole video, it becomes clear that this was not a controlled leak, there are other references to ongoing work which I seriously doubt Elop wants to have out in public.

    1. Re:Internal presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does this leaked video have

      * perfect sound and perfect camera positions
      * professional camera zooms and position changes?

      Honestly, this doesn't look like something a random guy recorded from the audience.

  26. What everyone seems to overlook by MemoryDragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nokia has been struggling, new ex Microsoft CEO was brought in, makes 100% turn by axing the entire software division and handing it over to Microsoft. The platform Nokia has been working on for three years finally is released (probabyl also due to contractual obligations) and gets raving reviews.
    Ceo who killed literally every other road for Microsoft by telling upfront, forget about Symbian forget about Maemo stands upfront a crowd one day after the N9 is released and almost 100% raving reviews come in and he has nothing better to do after day one of the raving reviews to show his Windows 7 version of the same phone "accidentally". Ooops a leak, oh well never mind.
    If this guy is not a Microsoft juggernaut than what. He damages his own divisions by using the old dont buy that we have something else in the line tactics, Microsoft used successfully in the 90s to kill off competition. But he is applying the tactics internally probably to kill of the Maemo division which if the N9 would have become successful could cause his pro Microsoft course to be questioned again and in the end his job.

    The Microsoft Vaporware tactic used to be following:
    Usually if a product had mediocre success, they instantly launched a press release usually showing some images of vaporware with the message dont buy from them we have something in the line. If the other product was killed then often nothing came from Microsoft if the product stayed on the market then Microsoft usually shoved a half working clone out in the wild with that and the back then we buy only from Microsoft crowd this was enough most times to kill the product. The prime example for that tactics was Borland C++ and their excellent Windows UI classlib and also the Star Division C++ UI Classlib, which went down the gutters when Microsoft forced anyone to the absymality MFC.
    Another prime example was the famouse Cairo operating system which they instantly announced when Next showed off NextStep. They never could pull it off basically thanks to their broken COM component model which they shoved literally upon poor developers. The same they tried with Corba which they positioned their back then not even working DCom against. When they sold DCom as Corba competitior even their own examples they delivered with it did not work.

    So to sum this up, accidentally leaked. Definitely not. This seems like a last stroke against the Maemo division to me so that they cannot gain control by releasing a successful (qualitywise they seem to have gotten their act right) product. If anything else did not show it this, action clearly showed that Nokia is fucked as long as this guy is at the helm, this is a juggernaut Microsoft sellout nothing more nothing less. Every sane CEO simply would have tried to keep multiple platforms, probably putting symbian on the roast releasing a Windows Mobile product and Android and given the state of the N9 also Maemo as successor to Symbian. Just as basically HTC and Samsung do it.

  27. Time for Nokia to quit with the confidential crap by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 2

    I used to work with Nokia. I was with a company that would work towards delivering software for 5-15 Nokia devices at a time. They were so secretive about each of their products that the developers working on these different projects were not allowed to communicate with one another. We had to have separate bug databases even though bugs for one were bugs for all. We had to have separate code repositories even though the code should have been common to all. The reason was... they wanted to make sure that no person had enough information available to them to leak information about more than one product.

    Let's be realistic here. The handset market is very simple these days. You make a device, you choose an OS, you differentiate yourself with a new skin, maybe add some value adds, you ship.

    1) You make a device.
    You can either buy a reference design from a hundred different companies and add to it, or you can develop it in house... or you can combine the two. With a reference design, you really only need to put a logo on the case. If you design it in house, you're spending tons of time and money on something that will make your device not that much more interesting than the other guys. You better have an awesome idea to differentiate yourselves from the other guy if you design your own, otherwise you're spend a few million bucks that was just a waste of time because "We're special, we design all our stuff inhouse".

    2) You choose and OS.
    Android, Windows Phone, Palm... whatever. Any company who wants it can put Android or Windows Phone on their device. Palm, BlackBerry, iOS are developed in house by the phone makers, but really, Nokia has already proven they can't make their own OS, so it's better off they simply use someone elses.

    3) You differentiate yourself
    "Special Nokia Apps" are just plain stupid anymore. Use the ones built into the store or give away some of your inhouse developed ones, but sell them on the store to people with other phones. Don't waste your time making ones that only run on your phones... it's stupid and nearly impossible to maintain long term.

    Make a skin. Well, you always have the default skins on the phone, but the user will want to install their own. So, if you're trying to have some fun while you make your phone... sure make a skin.. but don't interfere with the user's ability to change it. It's like when you buy a computer.. the default wallpaper might say Toshiba, Sony or HP on it. But you can change the desktop picture of your brother's computer to a picture of your bare hairy butt if you want.

    4) Ship the thing
    This is probably the hardest job in the business these days... managing the manufacturing and supply chain effectively.

    But let's get to the point... Nokia will probably manufacture a slew of low cost, nifty little Windows Phone telephones and get them into the pockets and purses of millions of grandmothers across the world. But as far as being an innovator.... they should know by now... that's not their role in the tech world.

  28. The Elop Conspiracy by gman99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, the conspiracy theories are getting ridiculous now. Full disclaimer: I'm an (ex)Nokia employee and was caught up in the great purge of developers following the feb11 announcement. So I'll very soon be out of a job (but as the redundancy package for all the employees at my site is extremely sweet, I'm very happy to bail -- plus this is not the company I joined all those years ago) Even as an employee, I could see that there is no consumer device they have released in the last 4years (since the N95) that I actually cared about (except the N900; which is not really a consumer device, but it's certainly the best mobile computer on the planet! :) Anyway, back to the article; that video was available on the Nokia intranet for employees worldwide to watch. The event was not filled with journalists/bloggers but employees (inside a Nokia site). This is not a vast conspiracy to hurt the N9 (as there are tons of similar videos released internally every week whenever an exec speaks "publicly" at a nokia site; that obviously no one bothered to leak) -- the difference this time is that there are a massive number of disgruntled employees worldwide who have been told their role is terminating/moved to Accenture/projects canceled etc. I assume a random employee leaked this. You could still say that it's stupid to have confidential videos available to employees worldwide, but that's just how Nokia operates. There is a large amount of trust towards the employees (which is regularly broken), and they've resisted from turning into a massively secret organisation in full lockdown mode (& this is one of the things that makes it a wonderful place to work) The above is not meant to be taken as me standing up for Elop. I disagree vehemently with his strategy; but there are parts of it that are yet to be made public (well, it is public now, but no one has joined the dots yet :). It'll make more sense in the next 12 months. It's extremely high risk and not guaranteed to succeed). But there is one thing most employees agreed with before he took centre stage; and that is Nokia's strategy before Feb11 was fucked. Of course, it's still possible Elop's an MS stooge trying to run the company to the ground. If so, he's doing an amazingly good job of hiding it (internally; where the strategy is known). The only really stupid (public) mistake he's done so far is to EOL Symbian before the successor was in place. I have no idea why, but I assume MS gave Nokia a billion reasons to force him to make that statement. Anyway, I think Nokia's finished. I'm glad the N9 is out. Full linux distro, root access with a shell out of the box (OK, you need to enable dev mode which is just a UI toggle) -- I have a phone for the next 3 years and a large payout & couldn't care less about what happens to the company But do keep the conspiracy theories reasonable, guys :)

    1. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by gman99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry about the earlier comment eating all the breaks! That'll teach me not to preview before I post :)
      Reposting:

      OK, the conspiracy theories are getting ridiculous now.
      Full disclaimer: I'm an (ex)Nokia employee and was caught up in the great purge of developers following the feb11 announcement. So I'll very soon be out of a job (but as the redundancy package for all the employees at my site is extremely sweet, I'm very happy to bail -- plus this is not the company I joined all those years ago)

      Even as an employee, I could see that there is no consumer device they have released in the last 4years (since the N95) that I actually cared about (except the N900; which is not really a consumer device, but it's certainly the best mobile computer on the planet! :)

      Anyway, back to the article; that video was available on the Nokia intranet for employees worldwide to watch. The event was not filled with journalists/bloggers but employees (inside a Nokia site). This is not a vast conspiracy to hurt the N9 (as there are tons of similar videos released internally every week whenever an exec speaks "publicly" at a nokia site; that obviously no one bothered to leak) -- the difference this time is that there are a massive number of disgruntled employees worldwide who have been told their role is terminating/moved to Accenture/projects canceled etc. I assume a random employee leaked this.
      You could still say that it's stupid to have confidential videos available to employees worldwide, but that's just how Nokia operates. There is a large amount of trust towards the employees (which is regularly broken), and they've resisted from turning into a massively secret organisation in full lockdown mode (& this is one of the things that makes it a wonderful place to work)

      The above is not meant to be taken as me standing up for Elop. I disagree vehemently with his strategy; but there are parts of it that are yet to be made public (well, it is public now, but no one has joined the dots yet :). It'll make more sense in the next 12 months. It's extremely high risk and not guaranteed to succeed). But there is one thing most employees agreed with before he took centre stage; and that is Nokia's strategy before Feb11 was fucked.

      Of course, it's still possible Elop's an MS stooge trying to run the company to the ground. If so, he's doing an amazingly good job of hiding it (internally; where the strategy is known). The only really stupid (public) mistake he's done so far is to EOL Symbian before the successor was in place. I have no idea why, but I assume MS gave Nokia a billion reasons to force him to make that statement.

      Anyway, I think Nokia's finished. I'm glad the N9 is out. Full linux distro, root access with a shell out of the box (OK, you need to enable dev mode which is just a UI toggle) -- I have a phone for the next 3 years and a large payout & couldn't care less about what happens to the company

      But do keep the conspiracy theories reasonable, guys :)

    2. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by bball99 · · Score: 1

      gotta agree... and thanks for the N9 info - i was kinda wondering about the underlayment, and there was no way of knowing by reading the glossy info on the unit (i guess 'Linux' is not something the suits in Marketing think is good for brochures)... i will take a closer look at the N9 (still want an N900, but darn, my N800 just won't die and still suits me just fine)...

    3. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A congruent disclaimer: I'm a longtime Microsoft employee, and I think WinPhone7 is a thoroughly mediocre product. (And given the current trajectory of msft & nokia, my next phone will be WebOS.

      I thoroughly agree the n900 is "certainly the best mobile computer on the planet" and Maemo/MeeGo has a 4+year technology jump on WP7. Aside from some clever screen transitions, WP7 is typical Microsoft: Ask for a planet and you get an asteroid belt. UI design by a committee of a thousand PR people who mindlessly yammer about "delightful" inconsistent use cases; years late to market because we have 8-12 layers of management between SteveB and people who do actual work; slow from bloat because anything innovative is perceived as a threat to Windows, Office or IE and they have ultimate fire-everyone-and-bury-it veto power; missing core technologies and essential features because we've got Fort Knox in our back pocket and we can make pigs fly just fine. Of course Elop's trying to run the company almost to the ground, and of course Microsoft wants to buy Nokia -- we kinda already have, but lower stock value would be handy if they want to cross that last bridge. When Nokia's HQ moves to Vancouver, maybe people will get it. We just bought Skype and already have Lync, isn't the big picture strategy obvious?

      But I don't get why Nokia employees keep saying the company strategy /could/ not succeed, could not even change to a successful direction under internal power, even with a top-notch modern OS like Maemo/Meego, and top-notch hardware like the N97,N900, E7,N9 etc etc. Sure, the company has put out some crap, but why throw out the baby with the bathwater? Is Nokia really as bad as we are, where you just can't lift the gold out of the muddy river? I can see a pure leadership failure and lack of strength prior to Elop, but there was enough strength to make major /bad/ decisions. I can see midmanagement failures with parallel product lines but you'll face that anyway (and alliances with msft won't help). Certainly there were political problems from the Symbian alliance and user base, and the drag of old OS's still under support (we feel your pain). But the one thing I don't see was a lack of a viable technology at the bottom of the hierarchy. Where the rubber hit the road, Nokia was sitting on excellent tech in multiple product lines, and is walking away from it in favor of lesser tech and a biz partner that eats its partners after mating. Does /anyone/ at Nokia aside from Elop think this is going to turn out well for Nokia?

       

    4. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by gman99 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I never said the current strategy could not succeed. Just said it was high risk. Also note that WP7 is only one part of the strategy (well, it's the only public part)

      At the end of the day, Elop is right. Nokia cannot create a viable ecosystem by putting out one phone every 12-18 months (yes, it works for Apple, but Nokia will never be Apple; and even Apple has iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad to drive the ecosystem) Nokia either required the volume of Symbian, or a number of other manufacturers to join them in Club Meego. And no one did (ironically, LG joined just as Nokia left)

      This might change in 2-3 years, but by that time it's too late -- you're looking at total domination by iOS & Android with everyone else having under 5% market share.

      A new plan was required, and that plan is to use WP7 to slow the Android juggernaut. (I guess the hope in feb11 was that MS will still have HTC & Samsung on board so it's not just Nokia trying to win market share for WP7)
      All the above is public knowledge, so I guess I've not said anything new. What isn't public knowledge is what plans Nokia has in 3-4yrs time when hopefully it's a three way split between iOS/WP7-8/Android. Throw in QT, Mobile Phones, "the next billion" for ecosystem building (part of the N9 announcement) and you have your answer (this is also the reason Elop *needs* N9 to be picked up by devs -- and everything he's ever said both internally & externally shows that he's committed to Qt)

      Like I said, high risk. Most likely outcome is that WP7 bombs, taking Nokia down with it. But there is a plan in there.

      Oh and I don't think MS will ever buy Nokia. Why would you? MS effectively owns Nokia as it is. Nokia takes all the risk. Plus the second MS buys Nokia; HTC, Samsung, all other vendors will bail and MS is in a worse position than before.

      Well, unless MS has a secret reason to own a lot of phone factories around the world :)
      (well there also is loads of IP, I guess *shrug*)

    5. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh and I don't think MS will ever buy Nokia. Why would you? MS effectively owns Nokia as it is. Nokia takes all the risk. Plus the second MS buys Nokia; HTC, Samsung, all other vendors will bail and MS is in a worse position than before"

      So what ? MS doesn't need HTC and Samsung if they effectively follow the Apple strategy, by finally making both the hardware and software. While I don't like WP7 much, I think they would be far more successful in controlling both than trying to use the commodity hardware strategy that has only worked well for windows because home computers had a bigger need for "fat client" software than mobile phones which made a "one os rule them all" a necessity for the mass market. Most of the popular mobile app are quick, 3 to 6 months at most projets to develop and the cloud is getting stronger with better 3G and 4G networks, not like the absolutely insane development cycles of software like Office or Photoshop. Anyone can get into the mobile market as long as they make a good OS, it is a lot more competitive than the desktop OS market and Microsoft should make not a clone of the iPhone but something that finally feels and looks like a well thought product from the inside to the outside.

    6. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, paragraphs.

    7. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      What isn't public knowledge is what plans Nokia has in 3-4yrs time when hopefully it's a three way split between iOS/WP7-8/Android.

      It will probably always be a two way split of Android/iOS, with Android taking a larger share. WebOS/Maemo will likely take a distance third and fourth (don't know which will be which), and WinPhone7/8 will be a far distance fifth or lower behind that. MS just doesn't get that no one wants WP7/8.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    8. Re:The Elop Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about the earlier comment eating all the breaks!

      Yeah. You ate my entire coffee break. Now back to work....

  29. Please stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Osborne didn't do a bloody Osborne. Kaypros were better and cheaper, and by 83 anyone who wasn't building DOS for business users was building a coffin.

    The Ossy 1 had a minor claim to fame for being a hair-breadth first portable, but it wasn't a great machine, and honestly the keyboard /really/ sucks; you wouldn't be keen on getting a second Osborne, or recommend it to a friend.

    And things were moving so fast that by 1983 that the two-year-old Ossy 1 might as well have been ten years old - it was obsolete crap.

    The 'Osborne Effect' would be a useful spin to cover a lot of incompetent decisions by the company at that time, but the more likely source was just lazy column-filler by the pundits. Seriously, we've got to stop spreading that old myth on /., it's as stupid as the misuse of "bricked".

  30. That's not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea posited in the parent post is a good one and highlights the failure of journalists to report the truth to their readers. Instead we get collusion with the corporation in presenting public relations and marketing as news. Most journalists are scum.

  31. You forgot HTC ! by alex67500 · · Score: 1

    HTC is the object of all my desires!

  32. Do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Execute Order 66

  33. phone announcement schedules? by v1 · · Score: 2

    I just noticed an interesting difference between Apple and the rest of the cell phone market. When Apple announced the iPhone, or announces a new iPhone, it's available the minute the announcement leaves Steve's lips, or at least pre-orders are available for delivery in a few weeks etc. None of this "coming soon" or six months from now or "coming real soon" crap.

    People watching the demo know that what they see is exactly what they will get, can get, right now. No vaporware, no feature cuts before launch, no failure to deliver, no cancellations. I wonder why more companies haven't found themselves forced to take on that sort of schedule?

    Is it not that important? Are people just willing to take whatever they can get when it actually shows up, and treat announcements like this as teasers? And if a company can keep development under wraps anywhere near as well as Apple usually does, there's none of this sillyness of "no pictures please!"

    No pictures? Ya, right. new product press conference and you really don't expect anyone to take pictures? that's a laugh, that was said for show purposes, nobody with two brain cells to rub together actually expected no pictures to be taken, they expected it and just said that to try to stir up hype. Anyone that didn't actually "sneak" a picture or two there was an idiot, that's part of what you were there for.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  34. I'm so happy! by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 1

    Windows is finally returning to a boring square box! I'm waiting for the Beige color before I get mine! Ha, iPhone white? Beige Windows box shaped phone, biatch!

    --
    I8-D
  35. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by terjeber · · Score: 1

    It's sad when the only thing you have to offer is calling someone you disagree with a liar. One day, when you reach fifteen or so, you'll realize people actually can have different opinions about things.

  36. Tomorrow by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The sun'll come out

    Tomorrow

    Bet your bottom dollar

    That tomorrow

    There'll be sun!

    Just thinkin' about

    Tomorrow

    Clears away the cobwebs,

    And the sorrow

    'Til there's none!

    When I'm stuck a day

    That's gray,

    And lonely,

    I just stick out my chin

    And Grin,

    And Say,

    Oh!

    The sun'll come out

    Tomorrow

    So ya gotta hang on

    'Til tomorrow

    Come what may

    Tomorrow! Tomorrow!

    I love ya Tomorrow!

    You're always

    A day

    A way!

    Annie

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  37. Doesn't matter. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Executive decision (i.e., It's my money and I decide) : after a decade of using multiple Nokia phones, the next one will be a non-Windows one. If Nokia wish to include themselves out, that's Nokia's choice. Goodbye Nokia, and don't let the door slap you on the arse as you leave.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"