Slashdot Mirror


Climate Scientists Ask For Help Fighting Somali Pirates

thebchuckster writes "Scientists are seeking the help of the Australian and US navies to repel Somali pirates who are threatening one of the world's key climate monitoring programs. They hope to deploy about 20 robotic instruments in a no-go area north of Mauritius. The instruments, which record ocean heat and salinity patterns, are programmed to submerge and eventually resurface to upload their data to satellites."

300 comments

  1. Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't the govt give Somalis money for acting morally? If we have to print money to reward virtue, isn't it a good thing and won't society benefit more than if we spend money on punishment, which ends up creating endless cycles of violence and repression?

    1. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they learned a long time ago they could take the money ... then act immorally anyway and win on both sides.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by russotto · · Score: 2

      Because they learned a long time ago they could take the money ... then act immorally anyway and win on both sides.

      Well, until the Vikings sue them over the patent violation on their business method. It's Danegeld, after all, not Somaligeld.

    3. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative

      Give it to whom precisely? Somalia has been in a civil war for the last 20 years, there isn't anybody that can take the money and make it happen. Most folks there are more concerned with starving or being killed to do anything about this.

    4. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why doesn't the govt give Somalis money for acting morally?

      Which government? The Somali government? It sounds like calling that a government is being charitable. Warlords might even be charitable. They just started allowing aid into the country for the worst drought in 60 years with 11 million people starving.

      The US? We're not really big on spending money overseas except if it's Israel or bombing someone. And, truth be told, we have a terrible record of giving money and aid to bad people only to have to kill them later on after they've killed a lot of innocent people. Though again, the situation is pretty bad already. If there were a way to make the situation worse, the US would be hard-pressed to find it.

      Anyone else? Not interested in Somalia or incapable of doing anything. Somalia has been a failed state for a while now.

    5. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by SpongeBob+Hitler · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't the govt give Somalis money for acting morally? If we have to print money to reward virtue, isn't it a good thing and won't society benefit more than if we spend money on punishment, which ends up creating endless cycles of violence and repression?

      You know, if you look at some of my other posts, I'm a fairly liberal live-and-let-live kind of guy. But, considering what the Somali pirates are doing, the only solution is to kill the bastards!

      --
      Wollt ihr den totalen Krieg?
    6. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      So now we can get paid for acting nicely? And here I've been doing it for free!

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    7. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, if you look at some of my other posts, I'm a fairly liberal live-and-let-live kind of guy. But, considering what the Somali pirates are doing, the only solution is to kill the bastards!

      So "SpongeBob" is the "liberal live-and-let-live" part and "Hitler" is the "kill the bastards" part of your split-personality?

    8. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US? We're not really big on spending money overseas except if it's Israel or bombing someone.

      I'm guessing you're young. The US (under President Clinton) sent its military into Somalia in the early 1990s with the goal of stabilizing the situation enough to allow aid (both goverment-sponsored and that of private relief agencies) to help ameliorate an ongoing famine. Given the way it ended, I doubt the US government has much motivation to attempt helping Somalia again.

      If you don't trust the slant of a military-published document, dig up some old newspaper archives. I think you'll learn why so many governments appear to be ignoring Somalia.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "civil war" is largely a creation of foreign and now AFRICOM interference.

      http://webarchive.ssrc.org/Somalia_Hoehne_v10.pdf

      "Thanks to half a century of pouring US arms stockpiles into Africa, the price of an assault rifle in Africa has for some time been cheaper than anyplace else on the planet."

      http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/africom-americas-military-foot-africas-doorway

      Somali "piracy" is the outcome of the illegal, exhaustive, industrialised over-fishing of Somali waters, by foreign fleets - leaving the coastal towns without any livelihood.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/you-are-being-lied-to-abo_b_155147.html

      http://www.democracynow.org/2009/4/14/analysis_somalia_piracy_began_in_response

      http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1892376,00.html

      The US manufactures foreign wars and "terrorists" the same way it used to lead in the creation of Automobiles and heavy manufacturing. But remember your Gibbon: The decline of Rome was seeded from its very rise on world's stage.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it was Bush I who sent the military to Somalia to provide security so aid could be distributed. It was Clinton who decided to try "regime change"...........and that resulted in Black Hawk Down.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mogadishu_(1993)

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    12. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "Somalia has been a failed state for a while now."

      By your definition of government, maybe.

      Just because Somalia has a different government structure then most countries (I consider no government "different", and nothing more) does not mean we should preclude them from discussion venues such as the United Nations or even more personal dialogs with individual nations.

      Most of these "pirates" are regular people forced into this role by outside influences. Most coastal communities in Somalia have been devastated economically and environmentally by the continued dumping of wastes by foreign governments and corporations, up to and including nuclear waste. More easily put, the ocean they once relied on for food and commerce is no longer viable for either.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somalian_pirates#Sovereignty_and_environmental_protection

      The 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami made matters far worse--destroying the remaining fishing boats while leaving the pirate-craft out at sea unharmed. This was the "push" that forced a lot of legitimate fishermen into piracy. A little diplomacy and some aid in the form of fat, slow fishing boats might have gone a long way in preventing piracy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_the_2004_Indian_Ocean_earthquake_on_Somalia

      The Media is partly to blame for ignoring the root cause of the situation and instead focusing on the result--desperate people doing what they can to survive.

      What these people need is someone to speak for them (it shouldn't really matter who), and more importantly, someone to listen.

    13. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by hedwards · · Score: 1

      And your point is? Regardless of how the nation came to be in the state that it's in, there isn't any functioning government there at the moment.

    14. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1, Informative

      That was then, in a relatively stable post-USSR world. This is now, in the age of instant digital fearmongering, rampant invisible terrorist threats, and overwhelming governmental corruption and outright bribery. Expecting anything to get done even 1/10th as efficiently as a 1990s government is just pointless.

      Can we have Bill back, please?

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    15. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      It's being kept that way.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    16. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh. And the whole "climate science" angle is just there to recruit the liberal/progressive sentiment into supporting more neo-colonial imperial adventure.

      "Hey, no time or money to create jobs, you guys. We have to invade AFRICA and save THE PLANET!"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    17. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Nah, with their pockets full of money they'd be too permanently drunk to bother with hard work like piracy.

      OTOH there's a lot of Somalians, paying all of them might cost a lot of money.

      OTOH ... it's only bits of paper. Give them enough and the inflation it causes will ruin the Somalian economy. Maybe their own government will shoot them for us if we do that.

      --
      No sig today...
    18. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The countries capable of helping Somalia have given up because ultimately it is up to it's own citizens to want peace and be willing to do something about it and there has been no sign of that occurring. The only organized efforts in that part of the world are targeted at piracy, constant tribal conflicts, and of course the ole reliable Jihad and any outside assistance gets denounced as interference so as along as they are contained in their territorial boundaries let them destroy themselves in peace.

    19. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      We did. We have, however, gone to Iraq twice. And we've stayed there for 8 years. And they had a government that was more stable than Somalia. It's NOT because Somalia is too much for us to do anything about. It's about apathy.

    20. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      That's why they are pirates, there is no Somalian economy.

    21. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      I was wondering how long until this sentiment was expressed. I whole heartedly agree with this statement though. Within 6 months the powers that be will decide that a 20 year civil war was too long, and it's time to end it.

    22. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tick-tock-atona · · Score: 1

      I doubt the US government has much motivation to attempt helping Somalia again... I think you'll learn why so many governments appear to be ignoring Somalia.

      On the contrary, the US is very interested in Somalia for the very same reasons the pirates are - it's lack of government and infrastructure means whoever has the most money/guns in their own patch is the law. This makes it an ideal location for the CIA to set up secret prisons, as well as pirates to set up their base of operations.

    23. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by catchblue22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And your point is? Regardless of how the nation came to be in the state that it's in, there isn't any functioning government there at the moment.

      It makes me laugh when I hear neo-cons say "government isn't the solution, it IS the problem". If you want to see what not having a functioning government looks like, go to Somalia. It even has religious extremism.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    24. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by manwargi · · Score: 1

      AC you nearly made me spit out my drink.

    25. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Uhhh...been there done that. Didn't you ever see "Black Hawk Down"? That was the USA trying to keep enough order that famine relief could be brought in to help the starving. Instead every warlord and jihadist snatched everything that wasn't nailed down for their troops and for good measure used the US soldiers as target practice.

      If the EU wants to go in there fine, but we kinda have our hands full with trying to keep the reps from tossing our credit rating in the hopes of stomping on the poor and elderly some more by making sure they don't get their checks next month (I swear they need to change their logo from an elephant to the monopoly guy lighting a $100 bill while standing on the poor) not to mention the THIRD war the president now has us involved in, showing us that "Hope & Change (TM)" had fine print that read "I Hope nobody notices the only Change was from a R to a D on the door".

      Finally, and I'm sure I'll get hate for pointing it out but I don't give a fuck, the truth is the truth, everything I've seen proposed with regards to "climate change" (I love how they switched it from global warming, so no matter what happens the name fits) has been a GIANT SCAM like carbon credits, led by Rev Al Gore who has set himself up to be a carbon billionaire and just to show his balls are REALLY big has the nerve to claim farting around on his Lear jet and having a home so large it has its own basketball court indoors is "carbon neutral" since he pays himself credits from his own company which would be like moving money from your left to right pocket and claiming its "wealth redistribution" and demanding a tax break for it!

      Oh and it might interest some here to know one of the chief architects of credit default swaps, you know the thing that helped slaughter the economy? Well guess who is writing the rules on cap & trade? Yep from the very same people who brought you "lets treat the market like Las Vegas baby!". And I would also point out that NEVER, not even once, have you seen Rev Al Gore come out for increased tariffs on China or India, two of the biggest growing polluters on the planet and who have already said they won't play the carbon swap game. Why? Because he and his friends MAKE MONIES off of them silly!

      So I'm sorry but until we see a plan that doesn't consist of "hey you should give large chunks of money to me and my friends, while helping China and India to completely bury your economy!" then I say they can all fuck right off. We have three wars, an economy that has lost more than 20,000 FACTORIES to outsourcing not jobs mind you, whole factories, and a shamefully porous border that is killing Americans daily. So frankly we have bigger things to worry about that guarding some probes. Let the EU do it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      The Vikings didn't invent that business practice, the Mayans did it 500 years before the Vikings and the Aegean and Sardinian pirates predate them

    27. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats great and everything, but the US, French, British, South Africans aren't the only destabilizing influence, following decolonization in Africa the Soviets dumped thousands of tanks, thousands of aircraft, tens of thousands of large caliber weapons and millions of guns into Africa from 1960 through 1989.

      For the region
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etheopia#Mengistu_Era
      "In 1977, there was the Ogaden War, when Somalia captured the part of the Ogaden region, but Ethiopia was able to recapture the Ogaden after receiving military aid from the USSR, Cuba, South Yemen, East Germany and North Korea, including around 15,000 Cuban combat troops."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somalia#Communist_rule
      "By 1978, the Somali troops were ultimately pushed out of the Ogaden. This shift in support by the Soviet Union motivated the Barre government to seek allies elsewhere. It eventually settled on Russia's Cold War arch-rival, the United States, which had been courting the Somali government for some time. All in all, Somalia's initial friendship with the Soviet Union and later partnership with the United States enabled it to build the largest army in Africa."

      So the Soviets backed Somalia and loaded them with weapons, then Somalia starts to lose, the Soviets dump weapons into Ethiopia and the US back the Somalis, but all you care to cite are sources blaming it on the US.

    28. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      It's being kept that way? That is completely wrong, the US, France, Pakistan, Italy and others intervened under a NATO resolution, tried to negotiate, tried to decapitate the forces destroying Somalia. Somalia, like Afghanistan is a place so fundamentally ruined right now there doesn't have to be anything keeping the status quo and there is no way to simply fix it.

    29. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yummm. Tasty coolaid.

      Let's look at the wonderful compromise plans that the Savior Lord Obama came up with. Raise the debt ceiling, increase taxes, and increase spending like a drunken sailor. Or, as an alternative plan, they are willing to raise the debt ceiling, increase taxes, and increase spending like a drunken sailor. Choose whichever of these two wonderous plans that Great Lord Obama created for you to compromise on. And don't call his bluff, or he will run away crying!

    30. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by riverat1 · · Score: 1, Informative

      As opposed to Bush II raising the debt ceiling (7 times in 8 years), lowering taxes, and increasing spending like a drunken sailor. Choose your poison.

      (Most) Republicans only care about the debt ceiling when there's a Democrat in the White House.

    31. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Obama already offered the Reps a deal: Raise the debt ceiling and taxes, cut spendings drastically. Instead the Reps don't want to hear anything about tax raises.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    32. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Thanks to half a century of pouring US arms stockpiles into Africa, the price of an assault rifle in Africa has for some time been cheaper than anyplace else on the planet." http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/africom-americas-military-foot-africas-doorway [blackagendareport.com]

      Uh, no. The primary rifle used by militias in Africa is going to be the Kalashnikov because it's cheap, rugged, any idiot can use it, and it's light enough for a child to carry. Which is useful, of course, if you want to arm children. As you might guess from the name, the Kalashnikov is a Russian assault rifle that was sold off in vast quantities by Warsaw Pact countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    33. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest.. when you look at Africa and Rome 2000 years ago, now look at Africa and Rome today, the only change in Africa is that now they have guns.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    34. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Indeed, a few pirate organizations are actually militias that want to drive away commercial fishermen from their waters. There's definitely some that are solely in the "steal ships for fun and profit" business, but there's quite a few that are in the "shoot at people so we can start sustaining ourselves again" business.

    35. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by oobayly · · Score: 2

      We know that, but the USPTO accepted the Viking patent for piracy - in fact the Vikings did very little piracy, most of their earning came from royalties.

    36. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by rbrausse · · Score: 1

      according to an interview with an kidnapping negotiator one of the main reasons for the Somalis becoming pirates is overfishing - most of the economy crashed because they cannot compete with the sophisticated trawler fleet. A FAO paper claims that illegal foreign ships are one of the main reasons for the depletion of maritime resources.

      Without a government and while illegal fishing is profitable (pirating started with selling bogus fishing licenses to foreign ships, see here) the problems cannot solved; one proposal was an export embargo but this wasn't successful in the UN security council.

    37. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by gangien · · Score: 1

      and Most democrats only care about killing poor foreigners when it's a Republican in office.

      partisan bullshit is.. partisan bullshit. TOo bad so much of it goes around.

    38. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Vaphell · · Score: 1

      nice false dichotomy you got there. I don't think that people claiming that the government is the problem have the base functions like judicial system and law enforcement in mind. More like erosion of basic rights and violation of privacy by omnipotent 3-letter agencies, pork barrels, subsidies and whole industries built around them, excessive regulations to justify the existence of bureaucrats, hand picking the winners in markets, ever increasing tax burden, giant waste of taxpayer's aka nobody's money (wars, pet projects of the day, ...). None of these things would exist with a barebone government that doesn't micromanage everything.

    39. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      And railroads. Don't forget the railroads.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    40. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Vast doesn't even begin to describe it. Even as far away as NZ, a entire container load cost little more than the shipping--or less than 1 dollar a rifle. Ammo was also stupid cheap. If that is what we got 25000km away, i can only imagine how much got to Africa, about 1 week of shipping away (guessing).

      I don't know about the rifles, but i know that disposing of the tons of ammo was expensive, so if you wanted it, it was free. You just paid the shipping.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    41. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB63/doc10.pdf

      One of the first major decisions regarding equipment came prior to the establishment of TFR and involved the use of airpower. Upon initiating his secret manhunt for Aidid, Admiral Howe, through General Montgomery, requested and received four AC-130H Spectre Gunships. Upon arrival, the AC-130H's were used to surgically strike and destroy key SNA targets, and also flew support for the QRF while they conducted raids to disarm the SNA militia. However, within less than a month of their arrival, operational control of the AC-130H's was relinquished by Montgomery in order to incite Aidid to give himself up. At the time, this was probably a good idea, however, when Aidid only increased the ferociousness and number of his attacks, Howe and Montgomery never recalled the aircraft. Had the AC-130H's been in Mogadishu at the time of the 3 October raid, they could have flown an offensive air mission to support the tactical withdrawal of TFR. As such, the only air support TFR received during the raid was from the MH-60's and AH-6J's, and they were not enough.

      Another important decision relating to equipment that might have saved many lives during the raid was that of armor. Following the September shoot down of an MH-53 by RPG's, General Montgomery requested help in the form of armor. Montgomery's superiors, CINC CENTCOM, General Hoar, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Powell, relayed the request but did not support it strongly enough to keep Secretary of Defense Les Aspin from stopping it. The reason Aspin gave was that sending armor could result in a military escalation which would hamper any chance of a political settlement with Aidid. Little did Aspin know that this decision would turn out to be a costly error. But what about the military leadership in Somalia? Why did they simply take no for an answer? The military leadership should have shown enough nerve to hammer the point home with General Powell, and if this still did not produce results, then they should have terminated the hunt for Aidid until they were able to receive the armor they so desperately needed. If TFR would have had tanks, even with the ambush, they would have gone in, knocked over the mud huts, put a steel cable around the tail of Super 61, and pulled the thing out. Instead, political and military leadership decisions needlessly put their troops in harms way without the proper equipment to successfully complete the mission.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    42. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And the sad part? For over 30 years all we have heard from the Rs is "Give teh rich more MONIES" nom nom nom when the data clearly shows that higher taxes on the wealthy leads to lower unemployment and higher growth but all they can do is say "Its da poor with teh entitlements! You should give teh rich more MONIES nom nom, nom" because surprise, they are rich.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    43. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      What spending did Obama offer to cut? Please be specific. Oh, yeah, which taxes did Obama want to increase and how much revenue would be generated by those increases? Once more, please be specific. On the tax increases, the only specific I have seen was enough to cover 8 hours of current deficit spending each year. Oh yeah, it was a tax deduction that Obama asked for back in the beginning of 2009 as part of his "stimulus" package.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    44. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      And the Wine!

    45. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Why would they try to decapitate their own forces?

      The military would do well to learn and understand local customs before trying to invade, even for "humanitarian" reasons. Somalis outside of the "capital" follow Xeer, and as such are literally ungovernable. If they would stop trying to fund strongmen, then would see that the violence would abate, and Somalia would return to the state it was in for the 1100 odd years prior to the start of colonialism, which is to say, the freest, most peaceful society on Earth.

      For some reason, whites don't like thinking about that, and love to point out the failures of their system of near-anarchy, but totally ignore their long history of success under the exact same system prior to the arrival of occupying forces from the west, occupying forces who were NEVER able to control the countryside, just like today.

    46. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      That's excellent racism there. I guess you missed the part where these are the decentness of the very same people who, along with the Yemenites, stopped the Roman advance into the Horn of Africa.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axum

    47. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Somalia is a great example of functional anarchy much the same way that Serbia was a great example of functional democracy.

      Why do racists whites always ignore the thousands of years of history prior to their arrival in a given area? "Native Americans were always nomadic." BS--They had a series of large, sedentary nations, now known as the MIssissippian culture, which collapsed a hundred years prior to the arrival of whites. "Southeast Asia has always been a series of primitive villages". BS again--They had the Khmer Empire, which built the marvelous Angkor Wat, and NUMEROUS other temple complexes.

      Fact is, the Somalis (formerly Ethiopians), are among the very very few non-coddled native societies to survive colonialism more or less intact, the others being India and China. Somalia is STILL under assault, however. African crackpots and UN forces have pumped so many guns and supported so many strongmen in the region that they can claim that Somalia's system of civil order leads directly to civil war. Mission accomplished. They know westerners don't study history. At least, not the history of any non-white culture. Should the foreigners ever leave, or give up on their imperialistic desires, you will quickly see Somalia emerge as an African powerhouse of production. Already, they have the best telecommunications infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa. But again, the imperialists don't want you to know that.

    48. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      I think the preponderance of evidence shows that those two sides are actually the same.

      Hmmm, we fish their seas to sterility, and then the locals get pissed and start seizing foreign vessels trespassing in their territorial waters. Solution? KILL EM ALL.

    49. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yes, Bush II was also a liberal (or Obama is a conservative, as he has carried on or "enhanced" every one of Bush II's policies). Just like every republican going back to Reagan. They were traitors.

      Maybe someday, people will learn that "both" parties long ago become ONE party with two wings, so that they could eternally blame everything on one side or the other, while the fascists remain in firm control.

      And now we finger fuck 96 year old wheelchair bound ladies in the name of "safety". As long as we stand for this crap, we don't deserve either liberty or safety.

    50. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yes, cut taxes while simultaneously increasing regulations and then blame the negative effects of one on the other in a method that makes zero sense. The partisan doublethinkers will then prevent any realistic debate from happening forever, and we can continue to steal all the monies forever!

    51. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      "Thanks to half a century of pouring US arms stockpiles into Africa, the price of an assault rifle in Africa has for some time been cheaper than anyplace else on the planet."

      Odd that the "US arms stockpiles" consist mostly of Soviet weapons (AK-47s and such)....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    52. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      decentness

      Decentness? I'm guessing you mean descendents, but this one is so bizarre I can't be sure....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    53. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with you. I was just trying to provide some balance for the GP.

      Divide and conquer is the fascist/corporate mantra.

    54. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      The US supply and a "foreign" rifle are not mutually exclusive.

      The US is the WORLD'S BIGGEST supplier of AK-47 (Kalashnikov):

      In returning to the Kalashnikov market, the Pentagon has shunned purchases from Russia, opting instead for AK-47 knockoffs available for sale or donation from other countriesâ(TM) stockpiles. (The true AK-47 was short lived and swiftly modified; its many variants, almost all of which the Soviet Union helped create via foreign aid, are often inaccurately called AK-47s, by now universal shorthand.)

      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/weekinreview/15chivers.html

      In Afghanistan, the United States has selected the AMD-65, a short-barreled Hungarian Kalashnikov copy with a forward hand grip and futuristic muzzle, as the standard weapon of the Afghan police. It has received most of its projected 55,600 AMD-65s via its foreign military sales programs, according to data provided by Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan. ...
      Another 10,000 Kalashnikov knockoffs were transferred in 2006 to Afghanistan from Slovenia. At least some weapons being handed out, based on an examination of the shipping containers and rifles this spring in Afghanistan, are inexpensive Chinese clones.

      Similarly, in Iraq (which once had its own Kalashnikov plant, built with Communist help) the United States scrounged or purchased more than 185,000 Kalashnikov-style rifles and light machine guns for Iraqi security forces from 2003 and 2006, according to the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

      http://www.mouseguns.com/ak47info/ak47info.htm

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    55. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't think that people claiming that the government is the problem have the base functions like judicial system and law enforcement in mind.

      You must not be paying much attention. With the exception of Ron Paul, the "government is the problem" neo-con demagogues, from Reagan to W. to Scott Walker, have always been in favor of dismantling anything that threatens corporate privilege, so they are wholeheartedly against law enforcement and judicial due process - at least at the corporate level.

      More like erosion of basic rights and violation of privacy by omnipotent 3-letter agencies, pork barrels, subsidies and whole industries built around them, excessive regulations to justify the existence of bureaucrats, hand picking the winners in markets, ever increasing tax burden, giant waste of taxpayer's aka nobody's money (wars, pet projects of the day, ...).

      Nice rundown of the priorities of Reaganism. Big Government based on the Big Lie of small government - you've described modern "conservatives" perfectly!

      None of these things would exist with a barebone government that doesn't micromanage everything.

      That's a nice glittering generality there - everything would be perfect if everything was perfect. That's the "limited government" soft-soap that every neo-con is always talking about, but once they get elected they increase the size and costs of government at nearly every opportunity.

      People like yourself really need to find a candidate who is willing to state up front what those "bones" are, and who has a record of acting with consistency and honor (that rules out nearly everyone in my own political party unfortunately). Rand Paul ain't it, and neither is Sarah Palin; stupidity and blind worship of wealth is not a recipe for good government.

    56. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      The CIA is actively engaged in ongoing operations in Somalia - with collusion by "legitimate" government (CIA-backed thugs), to ensure a plan that extends US power dominance over the Horn of Africa and the strategic passage of the Arabian Sea. With several live conflicts at once, the US profits through maintaining and exploiting chaos and disorder, as an effective way to achieve goals without full-blown miltary dominance.

      Jeremy Scahill exposed many details of the latest specific CIA activities - including secret prisons and torture - in The Nation, last week.

      In Salon.com, Glen Greenwald deconstructs much of the US noise about Somali "terrorism" in light of Scahill. He continues exposing the "coverage" of Somalia's political turmoil by NYT and LAT as CIA and State Dept stenography.:

      Independently, note this amazing passage from that LA Times article, regarding how these anonymous officials learned of what they are claiming concerning an AQAP/Shabab grand alliance:

      The CIA gained other information when Somali authorities allowed them to interview Shabab militants imprisoned in Mogadishu, the Somali capital, U.S. officials said. The CIA asked about the militants' ability to launch attacks outside Somalia as well as the group's command structure.

      That claim presumably refers to the secret Mogadishu prison Scahill revealed, the one the CIA pays Somali agents to guard and at which they're constantly present. The notion that Somali authorities generously "allowed" the CIA to "interview" prisoners there mindlessly disseminates CIA propaganda and ignores the facts Scahill revealed: that this is effectively a U.S.-maintained-and-engineered prison. And, of course, there is no discussion of the legal and human rights repercussions of interrogating prisoners in secret facilities beyond the reach of human rights monitoring agencies, nor any discussion of the role such practices play in further spawning anti-American sentiment.

      Ultimately, the exacerbating cause of conflict and turmoil throughout the region which includes Somalia and Yemen is the same as that in Central Asia - the imperial subversion and aggression by the United States, inheritor of the mantle "Evil Empire".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    57. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      And the aqueduct.

    58. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by mhelander · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure what the hell you're trying to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

    59. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Trade actually. Largely the slave trade, but that was legal at the time, so that was OK then.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    60. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave it up to a bunch of pencil pushing politicians to fuck up a military operation. RLTW.

    61. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Ohhhh, you got so close and then WHOOSH ya missed it. The problem isn't "its da regulationz!" although I would argue that some of the regs are dumbshit. The problem is a lie that has been pushed for 20+ years, starting with a Dem by the name of Clinton. Ready for the revelation? here goes...THERE IS NO FREE TRADE!

      To call treating as equals a country that literally lets corps use their storm drains as toxic waste dumps, where the air and water are so bad that 9 out of 10 highest cancer rates are all in a single area, and where children need masks to go outside to play as "free trade" is as asinine as saying a football game between your local HS and the Denver Broncos is a "fair test of athletic skill".

      The hilarious part? It does NOT work both ways. India is sinking billions into Aerospace rather than buy from us, China buys one or two then reverse engineers or just steals, like digging up the F117 that crashed in Kosovo to steal our stealth tech.

      But you see our "give us more MONIES nom nom nom" party (which is quickly becoming the ONLY party) just gets a sly grin and says "Oh they're nationalists" like that is just cute for them, but then go on to rail about how being nationalist or isolationist is "ZOMFG EVIL!" when it comes to us.

      Well fuck them and fuck their bullshit. THERE IS NO FREE TRADE and the quicker we lock down the borders and tariff the living hell out of those that pollute the planet the better! Oh and those companies that move to China? Should have to take their headquarters with them. No more house in the Hamptons for you, hope you like the air in China. don't let the door hit you on the way out!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    62. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by lul_wat · · Score: 1

      Stopped the roman advance then.. continued building mud huts for 2000 years.

      Compare Africa to anywhere, The Middle East, Asia, Europe, South America. You will see others have moved forward.

      --
      Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
    63. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Leave it up to a bunch of pencil pushing DEMOCRATS to fuck up a military operation. RLTW.

      FTFY.

      The sad thing is at least Clinton seemed to do ok with the economy. Obama can't even get that right.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    64. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by cusco · · Score: 1

      "That was the USA trying to keep enough order that famine relief could be brought in"

      No, that was the US military blasting the living shit out of everything that moved, armed or unarmed, on either side of what was formerly a rather vicious but very local conflict, and being shocked that people shot back. "Our" military has that habit, and "our" soldiers are continually surprised when people attempt to defend their homes and families. I've never been clear why that might be, something in the brainwashing they go through in Basic Training, I suppose.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    65. Re:Why don't we give the pirates a choice by KDR_11k · · Score: 2

      Cutting taxes will only boost the economy if the economy is being choked by the taxes. That's not even close to what's happening in the western world so tax cuts won't boost the economy, only empty the govt's coffers. Maybe in an extreme case it can turn you into a tax haven but that's not a terribly good idea either as Ireland's troubles show.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  2. Correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But global warming is caused by a lack of pirates!

    1. Re:Correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No - global warming is caused by an oversupply of ninjas.

    2. Re:Correlation by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm... when looking at the governments around the world, I'd say it's due to an overpopulation of zombies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Correlation by capnkr · · Score: 0

      For which we should *all* say a big "Thank You!" to Chuck Norris...

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    4. Re:Correlation by mjwx · · Score: 2

      But global warming is caused by a lack of pirates!

      Ergo we need to deploy sensors near an area of high pirate activity.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:Correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrrrggg!

    6. Re:Correlation by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      I think its caused by Mobile Phones.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    7. Re:Correlation by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      for some reason the html link on mobile phones didn't work! Raw link: http://xkcd.com/925/

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    8. Re:Correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But global warming is caused by a lack of pirates!

      Ergo we need to deploy sensors near an area of high pirate activity.

      This will only require us to threaten the endangered pirate population that prevents us from burning to a crisp.

  3. no-go area? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 1

    sounds like a challenge.

  4. But Pirates! Global warming! Skewed Data! by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warming

    Everyone knows that pirates have an inverse effect on global temperature! If there are pirates in the area, then the data will be skewed. No wonder those scientists want those pirates gone.

    1. Re:But Pirates! Global warming! Skewed Data! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracism!

    2. Re:But Pirates! Global warming! Skewed Data! by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      Religious persecution!!!!

  5. Pastafarians by jorrizza · · Score: 1

    Que the Pastafarian jokes in 3..2..1..

    1. Re:Pastafarians by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Missed it by that much.

    2. Re:Pastafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *checks the time stamps*

      Sorry, you were one minute late. Those damned dirty Pastafarians apparently have invented time travel. Does his noodliness's gifts know any bounds?

    3. Re:Pastafarians by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      *checks the time stamps*

      Sorry, you were one minute late. Those damned dirty Pastafarians apparently have invented time travel. Does his noodliness's gifts know any bounds?

      FAITH

    4. Re:Pastafarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Cue" the jokes! "CUE"! NOT "que"! That's not even an English word! ARGGHHHHH!

    5. Re:Pastafarians by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Que?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Pastafarians by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he meant queue?

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
  6. I see. For research! no Joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Aircraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How big are these things and how long does it take to deploy them? Can't they just drop them from an aircraft like a sonar buoy? If the things can't take an airdropping perhaps a flying boat is an option?

  8. no pirates, higher temps by rzitex · · Score: 1

    Despite the fact they threaten climate monitoring equipment, anyone else go straight to "the lack of pirates is the reason for global warming argument". haha

  9. Easy solution by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    House the probes in old WW2 mines - armed of course...

    Then just give the big shipping boats GPS coordinates, and let the pirates "find" them if they wish.

    Seems to solve multiple problems as the pirates find more and more of them...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Easy solution by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2

      Or issue letters of mark so any old person who can go hunt em down for fun!

    2. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'Letter of Marque and Reprisal'.

      Given that the pirates are using any old junk to mount their attacks, I'm guessing that there would be no economic incentive to hunt them down under the historical mechanism of condemnation and sale. Some sort of bounty-based alternative, in addition to the cost, would amount to offering to pay anybody who can come up with a few rusty Kalashnikovs and a boat full of dead Somalis. What could possibly go wrong?

    3. Re:Easy solution by arisvega · · Score: 1

      Given that the pirates are using any old junk to mount their attacks

      This assumption is wrong; under their current business model, they (the warlords) reinvest the ransom into better hardware and manpower- what they lack in style they make up with fast boats, many hands, and *lots* of ammo.

      This piracy thing is in no way a one-time-only gig; look how it goes on and on.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    4. Re:Easy solution by swb · · Score: 0

      Some sort of bounty-based alternative, in addition to the cost, would amount to offering to pay anybody who can come up with a few rusty Kalashnikovs and a boat full of dead Somalis. What could possibly go wrong?

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

    5. Re:Easy solution by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Letters of Mark are what you issue to create pirates. The recipient then goes and harasses the shipping of your enemies, and you hope(*) that they'll be treated as prisoners of war if captured, rather than summarily executed or whatever your enemy does to criminals and spies.

      (*) you probably don't care, but you pretend to, to bolster the number of ships willing to take the deal.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      They have made some upgrades; but not nearly to the point where condemning and selling off their used gear would make up for the cost of capturing it in the first place... Worse, from the perspective of powers interested in trade security and stability(rather than just getting some blood in the water and reveling in the righteous vengeance), history suggests that low-budget privateers are often little better than pirates themselves and 'respectable' mercenaries get really expensive.

    7. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Even if you have a sociopathic disregard for civilian casualties(after all, pirates are a pain to find and sometimes fight back, while you can obtain villagers by the villageful...) you'd be an idiot to make such a bounty offer: anything high enough to motivate sufficiently competent people to take on the risk and time commitment of doing some actual pirate hunting would be well above the cost to an unscrupulous operator of securing a few corpses, some cheap small arms, and a dinghy of some description. Heck, even the pirates might get into the game of bundling casualties and/or enemies with junked hardware and bounty-ing the package off for a tidy profit!

    8. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what i was thinking, make them into mines. whoever approches them goes boom. they might lose a couple but the rest won't be touched.

    9. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note what he said:

      Or issue letters of mark so any old person who can go hunt em down for fun!

      If the U.S. Government were to issue Letters of Marque entitling the bearers to hunt Somali pirates I bet there's more than a few bored rich guys who'd jump at the chance. They could load up several boats full of booze and food and a god-awful shitload of heavy duty firepower. Have a couple of bait ships draw out the pirates and then show the pirates what happens when they fuck with people who have superior firepower.

    10. Re:Easy solution by modecx · · Score: 5, Funny

      You've got the wrong idea entirely, frankly. Mercenaries are expensive. Tourism, however, is profitable. So, you make it like a safari. You know, for the chance to go send some pirates to Davy Jones' locker. The 'fishing license' just absolves prospective pirate hunters from prosecution.

      So, you restore and or build a few PT style boats, strap a few twin-fifties, miniguns and grenade launchers on pintle mounts, and let any sociopath with ten thousand bucks to spare have some fun. You'd have a waiting list a mile long.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    11. Re:Easy solution by camperdave · · Score: 1

      No. Letters of Marque are what you need to create privateers. Pirates don't need no stinking letters. It's take what you can, give nothing back.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I hadn't considered the idea; but I suspect you are correct. On the other hand, with those selection criteria for pirate hunters, I think that I might want the pirates to win. The people at the intersection of "sociopathic thrill-killers" and "substantial disposable income" are not exactly the ones you want making it back from vacation alive.

    13. Re:Easy solution by modecx · · Score: 1

      Hmm..the government it pretty good at attracting and making thrill-killers, is that the reason we keep them below the poverty line?

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    14. Re:Easy solution by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      You can always sell the pirates as slaves.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    15. Re:Easy solution by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, with those selection criteria for pirate hunters, I think that I might want the pirates to win. The people at the intersection of "sociopathic thrill-killers" and "substantial disposable income" are not exactly the ones you want making it back from vacation alive.

      Dead pirates, dead rich sociopaths, win-win.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    16. Re:Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the defense of privateers, capturing enemy trade ships, auctioning the hull and cargo and ransoming the crew would be behavior quite in keeping with their official post as an auxiliary to the Royal Navy. The difference is that privateers have a state behind them that is willing to risk its own valuable interests through being at a state of war. Pirates on the other hand have nothing to lose apart from the trivial amount a yardarm can take, and thus are much more troublesome.

    17. Re:Easy solution by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the torpedoes. Tune them to follow the arrrrrgh's!

    18. Re:Easy solution by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Pirates will just spot the things and stay away, going after easier targets. Meanwhile anybody who's not a pirate gets murdered by your safari freaks, turning the freaks into the actual pirates.

      Besides, massive human rights violations aren't going to make you popular with developed nations, they might just use their military escort troops in the area to kill your freaks.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    19. Re:Easy solution by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, you just invented the concept of Tourist Pyschos. I'm fairly certain that I first read about the idea in a book called Kaleidoscope Century.

    20. Re:Easy solution by xkuehn · · Score: 1

      Given that the pirates are using any old junk to mount their attacks, I'm guessing that there would be no economic incentive to hunt them down under the historical mechanism of condemnation and sale.

      Selling the pirate vessel is not the only financial incentive. Piracy costs a lot of money.

    21. Re:Easy solution by stdarg · · Score: 1

      So pirates vs "safari freaks" -- that's a bit biased isn't it? Why are the safari freaks any different from pirates, even in your rather twisted view? Do you have some romantic idea of pirates as noble, honorable, brave men who turned to piracy out of the most severe desperation? In reality they are freaks as well.

    22. Re:Easy solution by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Another option should be remote-piloting a predator drone. More expensive but entirely safe (for the operator).

    23. Re:Easy solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      True; but very, very little of that cost is borne by the hypothetical pirate-hunter. All consumers of goods shipped through that area pay slightly higher prices because of increased insurance costs and occasional losses; but, per person, those are pretty tiny.

      In the classic 'letter of marque' days, the loot obtained by the privateer operating under one was sufficient to provide an incentive for people to outfit ships and get their loot on, that is what made the system self-sustaining. In absence of such motivation, there would necessarily be some sort of mercenary/bounty system, which comes with its own set of issues.

    24. Re:Easy solution by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Of the stuff you listed, only the ammo has any real resale value. The fast boats are probably zodiacs/etc, but if they have anything more sturdy there might be a market. The better manpower is worthless to a privateer unless you legalize slavery. (Impressment on the high seas again?)

      The bounty is the obvious market solution, but I'm leary of that one. "Fast ship at 175 degrees, aye, must be a pirate. Great, fire a missile at it, mark it as a kill, and send a bill to the Navy." Suffice it to say I won't be yachting in that area.

      I think that patrolling the ocean is a job rightly suited to the Navy, but it should be treated as a military endeavor. Require merchants in the area to be part of convoys or they will receive no protection, and charge ships in the convoy for the cost of the operation. If local nations want to retain the services of the US Navy/etc for general security to promote commerce that is also fine, but they'll have to pay for it. If the US Navy wants to use pirates for target practice/etc they are of course welcome to do that as well - we pay them to exercise whether they're shooting at decoys or pirates.

    25. Re:Easy solution by moortak · · Score: 1

      Even an uncharitable view of pirates as bloodthirsty mercenaries is more positive than the best spin you could put on murder tourists. I'd rather trust a guy who kills for money than someone who is willing to pay money to kill. Their reward structure is slightly more healthy.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    26. Re:Easy solution by arisvega · · Score: 1

      If local nations want to retain the services [..]

      'Local' nations? Try 'all naval nations'. Piracy is at an international choke point, very busy with traffic. Every large vessel that does international trading will pass near there at some point or another- this elevates it into an international issue, certainly not local.

      [..] but they'll have to pay for it.

      I do not think that people keen enough to make a fortune out of trade (I am talking about the legitimate ones here) are not aware of this option; a plausible explanation is that it is cheaper to just pay the ransom every now and then- depending on cargo etc. And who knows what arrangements they have with their insurance companies.

      On the other hand, keeping the military sharp is a reward in itsself- with the added bonus of making them appear as heroes to the public.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    27. Re:Easy solution by xkuehn · · Score: 1

      That's partly but not entirely correct. Goods shipped past the Horn of Africa must compete in the marketplace with goods produced elsewhere or shipped along alternate routes. While an increase in the shipping cost for that route would lead to an increase in prices in the relevant markets, the increase would not be sufficient to cover losses entirely due to this substitution effect. Shipping companies could collaborate to fund pirate-hunting.

      Nevertheless, I think that hanging pirates is one of the fundamental responsibilities of every government and would prefer to be without mercenaries.

    28. Re:Easy solution by modecx · · Score: 1

      Pirates will just spot the things and stay away, going after easier targets

      And so the PT boat shadows the more attractive target, be it a merchant ship, ten million dollar yacht, or whatever... Hell, maybe they have an inflatable facade to hide behind. Whatever. If you wait for the pursuant boat to go aggro, no innocent parties harmed.

      If I had some sort of a problem and with a little creativity, I could get someone who was even mildly competent to pay me for the honor of helping to fix it, that would be a pretty attractive alternative to paying for someone do to it myself. Hell, I'd even make 'em feel right at home, with a cool adult beverage and selection of delicious finger sandwiches.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    29. Re:Easy solution by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      If local nations want to retain the services [..]

      'Local' nations? Try 'all naval nations'. Piracy is at an international choke point, very busy with traffic. Every large vessel that does international trading will pass near there at some point or another- this elevates it into an international issue, certainly not local.

      Yes and no. Patrolling the waters in general shouldn't really be a matter of US concern. Whether specific ships of interest to the US get through might be. However, simply taxing those ships and putting them in convoys is a simple solution.

      [..] but they'll have to pay for it.

      I do not think that people keen enough to make a fortune out of trade (I am talking about the legitimate ones here) are not aware of this option; a plausible explanation is that it is cheaper to just pay the ransom every now and then- depending on cargo etc. And who knows what arrangements they have with their insurance companies.

      Certainly no objections if they want to do it this way, but they should receive no support at all from US warships if they don't pay for the service in some way. I suspect that paying ransoms will become prohibitively expensive once pirates figure out that as long as they keep away from organized convoys that nobody will bother them.

      On the other hand, keeping the military sharp is a reward in itsself- with the added bonus of making them appear as heroes to the public.

      I suspect the USN can get plenty of practice limiting its activities to supporting ships that pay for their services (one way or another). However, if it has a good return-on-investment I have no objection to getting more involved. I suspect that this is often not the case.

      There are lots of other options beyond tarriffs/etc. You could charge a registration tax on US ships, and then not assist anybody not flying a US flag, or the flag of a nation that provides effective reciprocal services/etc.

      My problem with what is going on off the coast of Somolia is that merchants operate in a way that shifts a lot of cost to the USN, while not sharing in those costs. This is an economic externality and like all externalities it creates large expenses for those who bear the cost.

    30. Re:Easy solution by cusco · · Score: 1

      This is already being done. There was a ad in (IIRC) Soldier of Fortune magazine about a year ago looking for personnel to provide competent security for the rich idiots.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    31. Re:Easy solution by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They're using military ships to screen freighters against pirates, that's still not enough to stop piracy.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  10. Pirates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ah ha, so there _is_ a correlation between pirates and global warming!

    1. Re:Pirates! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Ah ha, so there _is_ a correlation between pirates and global warming!

      Hockey stick indeed; its scimitar shaped.

      Avast, you'll no be needing that gold now.

  11. No Problem- by gearloos · · Score: 0

    I know this guy, he goes by Capt. Jack Sparrow. He'd be happy to help, I'm sure. I heard he is out of work now a days.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  12. How about these techies use tech to save the day? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Seriously, throw an active sonar pinger on it, before it surfaces to send radio data, have it do a few active pings and make sure no one else is around before surfacing, sending the data, and re-submerging.

    You'd probably want to put a little effort into having multiple sensor units pinging at the same time to make it hard for them (the pirates without a lot of tech) to triangulate based on the pulse source.

    You're talking a 5 pound sonar module and a few lines of code, a few thousand dollars, far far less that putting a bunch of fully crewed ships burning fuel and food in the area. Hell, do they not already have sonar modules on them for sensing water speed and temp at depth, or looking for thermoclines?

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  13. The real issue by gearloos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The real issue is in how the global security is executed. When these pirates are caught, it is up to the country of the vessel's home port to pay for extradition and prosecution. You may be surprised but in the majotrity of cases, the pirates are arrested and then days later released as the government of the vessels home country decides not to extradite as they don't want the expense of shipping tham, then housing them in prison. A solution? Well, go back to how we used to deal with pirates. Tried by a captain on ship and walk the plank into the water 300 miles off shore. Done. Problem solved.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:The real issue by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      They didn't generally make pirates walk the plank...

      What they used to do is hang them in a public place off the shore (or just their head). So other pirates will see a bunch of bodies and get scared.

    2. Re:The real issue by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I think you might be a little confused there: plank-walking was a highly irregular practice, only indulged in by pirates and similar types on rare occasion. State-sanctioned naval executions were usually hangings.

    3. Re:The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or have privateers that get paid to deal with them.

      Or just buy them off -- probably the cheapest solution.

    4. Re:The real issue by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Royal Navy used to sail back into port with the pirates still swinging from the yardarm. Icky.

      But seriously, given that we're talking about a handful of people, the expense is trifling for any Western government - the problem is jurisdictional issues. Essentially, many of the European countries doubt that their constitutions would allow them to exercise jurisdiction; others doubt that a case could be proven beyond reasonable doubt; Kenya is fed up of being a dumping ground for sufficient numbers of pirates as actually do make them a financial burden and Somalia has no functioning government to do anything.

      --
      FGD 135
    5. Re:The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its not a matter of expenses, its a simple matter of avoiding a political shitstorm.

      Its gotten the point where politicians simply "pass the buck" but instead of actually "passing the buck" onto someone else, they simply throw it out the window and pretend its gone... even though the shitpile has stacked up so high its flowing back through the window.

    6. Re:The real issue by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      It's also a rather large area of ocean that needs to be covered which requires quite a few ships. Maybe one aircraft carrier could do it but that's still a big commitment. Something like a modernized PT boat would be pretty effective I imagine.

    7. Re:The real issue by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      The proper way to deal with pirates is to kill them on the spot. No other method works. Jurisdictional issues are a nightmare, so criminal trial is out of the question. No need for needless brutality by sending home their body parts or anything like that; just shoot them and feed them to the sharks. If there are any legal inquiries after the fact, just remember they fired first and the victim ship was doing what was necessary to save the lives of the crew. Nobody needs to hear any differently.

    8. Re:The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Merchant ships are unarmed. Armed ships are not permitted to dock in any respectable port. Try again.

    9. Re:The real issue by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That never worked either you realize, right? Pirates still did their work, even after the hanging of Captain Kidd.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:The real issue by asparagus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The real issue is that once upon a time people in Somali could make a living fishing off their shores. Boats passing through the Suez canal dump their waste in international waters, which is roughly defined as "not the red sea or the mediterranean", which the end result of most of the ships dumping their pollutants into the Somali waters. The country has complained to the UN, who won't do anything about the issue unless oil rights are transferred from the Chinese to America as protection money. This has little chance of happening, and so when the people in the middle eventually take up arms against the international ships dumping in their waters they are labeled pirates and shot out of the water to satisfy the moralistic urges of people who like simple good versus bad qualifiers.

    11. Re:The real issue by RussR42 · · Score: 1

      Sort of. They can (and many do) carry small arms to shoot up pirates. It's up to the captain. Oh, and all bloody hell breaks loose if some port tries to take your guns.

    12. Re:The real issue by cavreader · · Score: 1

      Why not save the rope expense and just chuck them overboard?

    13. Re:The real issue by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Stop "catching" them.

      We don't "catch" the enemies we hit with airstrikes or artillery nor is there an expectation that we should.

      Blow them out of the water, don't strafe them with small arms.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:The real issue by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      The Russians have a fine solution -- just release them immediately, in the middle of the sea, with no fuel. After all, you certainly don't need a trial not to hold someone.

      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/piracy/7713375/Somali-pirates-captured-and-released-by-Russian-navy-have-died.html

    15. Re:The real issue by PPH · · Score: 1

      And as they are walking the plank, they remind you of the fact that their compatriots have several hundred other hostages. Some of whom will be killed if they aren't returned in one piece. I don't know about you, but if I were some little third world country, I wouldn't want the Russians blaming me for getting one of their freighter crews killed in retribution.

      If you can't blow the pirates out of the water right there, before they radio their situation back to their base, you risk hostage deaths. If they just disappear, it could be poor seamanship, a freak storm, or the will of Allah.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    16. Re:The real issue by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Because then you can't LEAVE them hanging there at the entrance to the port as a warning to all the other pirates.

    17. Re:The real issue by camperdave · · Score: 1

      There's also the added complication that the pirates are scaring away foreign fishing trawlers, so now the fish stocks are returning. The pirates may soon turn back to their fishing careers. The problem may be correcting itself without expensive naval intervention.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    18. Re:The real issue by Paradigma11 · · Score: 1

      nah, just do it like the russians.
      set them free in international water to find their way home ... without supplies or compass.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piracy_in_Somalia
      "In early May 2011, Russian special forces retook a Russian oil tanker that had been hijacked by 11 pirates. One died in the assault, and a week later Russian military official reported that the remainder were freed due to weaknesses in international law but died before reaching the Somali coast. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev had announced the day the ship was retaken that "We'll have to do what our forefathers did when they met the pirates" until a suitable way of prosecuting them was available."

    19. Re:The real issue by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1
    20. Re:The real issue by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes it did. When the Royal Navy dominated the seas they pretty much eliminated piracy except in a few corners of the world (and even there only on a small scale).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:The real issue by cavreader · · Score: 1

      You are totally correct I forgot all about this option.

    22. Re:The real issue by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup - a few yards of rope in a public place will save you a lot of planks.

      While I don't consider this necessary in the modern era, there is a reason that the old Soviet Bloc was rarely the target of terrorism.

    23. Re:The real issue by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, loss of hostages has never really been something to deter Russian action. They certainly try to minimize loss of life, but not at the cost of not resolving the situation quickly. The main concern is punishing the guilty and deterring future crime. When people realize the Russians aren't deterred by hostage-taking, they stop taking hostages.

      While nobody really likes having the Russians in town as a result, that applies to the pirates even more than the civilians.

    24. Re:The real issue by proind · · Score: 1
      --
      When Geiger counters are outlawed, only mutants will have Geiger counters
    25. Re:The real issue by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      The original Pirates of the Caribbean got that both right and wrong. At the beginning you see Sparrow paying his respects to a couple of skeletons still hanging from their nooses just off shore. Later, he is forced to walk the plank.

      A little history and a little bit of TV make-believe. I guess I'm ok with that.

  14. Ocean already gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but the oceans are already gone, they won't take the acidity and heat. All this research won't convince anybody. Better fight the oil and coal companies, but they be protectud by thems criminal bankers.

  15. But these are bots! How do you threaten them? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    "Oooh, a Somali pirate! I'm scared now! Oh sure, the scientists will pay whatever you ask them! Here, take my leg! Please! So I can be a peg leg like you! Let's see what your Mom has to say about that!"

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  16. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just need help to get there, deploy them, and leave.

  17. What is, flypaper? by vlm · · Score: 0

    Scientists are seeking the help of the Australian and US navies to repel Somali pirates who are threatening one of the world's key climate monitoring programs. ... The instruments, ... are programmed to submerge

    Not seeing the problem here. Make them big, really F-ing big, like mil-surp naval submarine big. Wrap with flypaper. Any pirate who wants to touch a submerging sub covered with flypaper is welcome to try it. In fact I double dog dare them, just like kids licking a flagpole in the winter...

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:What is, flypaper? by belthize · · Score: 2

      Having a tough life ?

      The problem isn't the instruments, the problem is pirates attacking the scientists as they go to place them. The area of interest is a no-go area of the Indian Ocean.

      But with piracy in the western Indian Ocean making it too dangerous for commercial or research vessels to deploy the robotic devices, Australia's government research department, the CSIRO, hope naval forces will help them out.

    2. Re:What is, flypaper? by PPH · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the instruments, the problem is pirates attacking the scientists as they go to place them.

      Deploy them with parachutes from a C-17 or something similar. Armed with a couple of electric Gatling guns, they could have some fun with the pirates while doing noble science.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:What is, flypaper? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The instruments are probably not designed to be deployed from an aircraft. I imagine a couple of destroyers accompanying the research vessel would be pretty effective though.

  18. Re:Awesome work Pirates! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Pirates don't care about socialism. They vaguely care about globalism inasmuch as it affects the number/type of ships that go by. Mainly they just want to get rich, like 90% of the rest of the world.

    The point is, the scientists need to drop the sensors into the pirate infested waters, and no commercial ship dares to go there. So they are hoping a military ship will take them to drop the sensors. Hope it works out.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  19. Re:Awesome work Pirates! by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

    US and other naval warships patrol the area. All you have to do is ask to tag along behind one and drop the sensors.

    No extra cost, no big deal.

  20. Does this relate to... by commandermonkey · · Score: 0

    The Nation's article on CIA black sites? I may have been in a bubble, but I don't recall many articles mentioning Somalia until The Nation ran their article about the US Torture camps in Somalia.

    Now I see article, after article, about how there is a humanitarian crisis in that country is caused by people the US want to torture/murder and now an article about how climate change research is being hampered by evil people in the area. It all seems a little much.

    I really want to stay away from tinfoil hat material but, when a story about torture camps run by the US gov seems to be ignored and then humanization problems seems to appear at the same time, I can't help but wonder if a counter information campaign, like what the hack on HBGary help to expose may be responsible.

    1. Re:Does this relate to... by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously saying that you never heard of Somalia before a few days ago? You never heard about the brutality of the warlords, the civil war, the pirates, the international naval effort to patrol the piracy-infested waters, and the kidnappings that the pirates have engaged in? I'm kind of hoping that's not what you meant, but it's difficult to construe it in any other way. Even Slashdot has reported off-and-on about the situation, though nowhere near as much as the constant barrage of Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Apple stories.

      I'm honestly surprised that you'd be completely ignorant about what's going on over there. If I weren't so lazy, I'd pull up some slashdot stories about Somalia, to point out that this has been big news for several years now.

    2. Re:Does this relate to... by commandermonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am aware of the issues with starvation in poverty in most of Africa and other parts of the non-industrialized world. Somalia also covers the Horn of Africa and is a prime staging ground for pirates attacking ships heading through the Suez. I also have seen sporadic coverage throughout the years that tends to peak when some sexy news story hits about pirates or something else, black hawk downs incident was what, 2 decades ago?

      Point taken though, this was probably the wrong story to comment on this about. I think I am just confused that a non-story about the relaties of maritime activity in the region, that probably would have been ignored a few weeks ago, happens to rise to a point of note.

    3. Re:Does this relate to... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      It's a story for slashdot because it directly relates pirates and global warming.

  21. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, be PROUD of your stupidity! Why not?

  22. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're taking the ships not the buoys. The buoys are expendable, they drift till they die. They can be scuttled if needed. The ones we use are capable of being air dropped.

  23. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep on trolling for the oil industry, there's a good lad. They need real-world observations because they have two things you don't have - intellectual curiosity and honesty.

  24. M2 Browning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:M2 Browning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would a .50 MG help? Besides small arms they also have rocket propelled grenades like the RPG-7. Somali skiffs and motherships have been known to mount recoilless rifles and the pirates' shore establishments have these, plus mortars (light mortars have also been present on their attack boats), heavy machine guns, and even autocannons.

    2. Re:M2 Browning by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Too small. Don't approach with a ship because that creates an expectation of taking prisoners.

      Use drones and kill the target with a missile.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  25. Re:Awesome work Pirates! by belthize · · Score: 1

    That's kind of the whole point. They need to place them in specific locations, so they're asking to tag along behind one after it goes where they need it to.

  26. Pirates by hackus · · Score: 0

    Science is a great endeavor, but when hundreds of millions can't eat, something is wrong and it has nothing to do with global warming.

    It is called global-ISM and it has to be eliminated. If it is not stopped with its policies of artificial scarcity of oil, and natural resources to jack up prices for the super wealthy and destroy everyone else through the ruthless MBA programs that teach it is OK to use slave labor to produce things, we are going to have a third world war.

    The amount of destruction has to be seen to be believed from these policies. Whole cities in the USA look like they have been bombed out like Dresden in Germany in WW II. Michigan, California, Ohio...the number of states look awful..almost third world like.

    What this amounts to is too much is owned by too few. You can't even grow your own food in many states in the US because Monsanto is on every local county board paying people off to arrest and fine people who threaten any revenue stream from the local grocery store.

    They don't want people able to feed themselves.

    You know most of these pirates simply want to have food medical care and a way to support their families. People who have food, and a means to support themselves and their families are usually very enthusiastic about science and learning.

    I think if I was in their position I would probably do the same thing....only I would be much more, creative about it and sink every ship I get my hands on. They could make huge changes in world order if they were to do that.

    That way you could steal any of the commodities on the vessel then sink it and get out before anyone gets there. You also then have a much higher rate of survival.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Pirates by microbox · · Score: 1

      You know most of these pirates simply want to have food medical care and a way to support their families. People who have food, and a means to support themselves and their families are usually very enthusiastic about science and learning.

      This is true, but their behaviour is caused by systemic violence and corruption in their society. Either you go into their country and tame the savages (we all know how that turns out), or you let them sort out their own problems. If you choose the later, then shooting pirates is just applying the golden rule. If I engaged in piracy myself, I would expect violence to be a natural consequence of my actions. They have to learn how to take care of themselves without leeching off of others.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    2. Re:Pirates by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      Oh please. Globalization has been around for a couple of centuries, the only thing that has changed is the scope of operations. By encompassing more of the globe, more people have better lives than they ever had before. (btw how's that computer you're using working out for you?)
      You should apologize to the people in Dresden who went through that - to compare inner cities in the US to that is ridiculous hyperbole.
      I'm very grateful that if things ever became as bad here in North America as they are in Somalia that you aren't my neighbour - if they want to feed themselves and have proper medical care then perhaps they should stop shooting at each other in a bloody civil war and try and work together to build their society. They could start by asking for help (re)building ports, as they have a large coastline to work with, which would provide jobs and money to fund other activities.

    3. Re:Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No ones stopping the pirates from growing food. They could even grow enough that they could sell some to pay for medical care.

    4. Re:Pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you go into their country and tame the savages (we all know how that turns out), or you let them sort out their own problems. If you choose the later, then shooting pirates is just applying the golden rule. If I engaged in piracy myself, I would expect violence to be a natural consequence of my actions.

      It seems you profoundly misunderstand the golden rule, it is not "an eye for an eye" or "do to others as they do to you.".

    5. Re:Pirates by hackus · · Score: 1

      It is a fact.

      As societies become more mature and are education and technology based, people tremendously reduce their population and growth and consumption rates for food, energy housing etc.

      From Europe, to Japan, to USA populations are contracting.

      As for the idea of globalism being around forever, in some aspects that is true if we are talking about Imperialism.

      But Globalism in the context I am speaking of is far far worse than imperialism and is quite new.

      This Globalism seeks to destroy the concept of sovereign nations and reduce the globe to simple labor and production blocks. They do this primarily through banking by insuring loans and markets are rigged or planned through crisis, to draw nations into debt and then buy back the land and infrastructure of a country through a process called "privatization".

      Let me explain how this works.

      Essentially a group of private investors become owners of your countries power utilities, land and resources such as crops, water resources etc. These owners are the unseen hands behind the Federal Reserve and IMF. Which, act through their proxies such as Ben Bernanke...George Soros..etc.

      They do this because they can rig Investment Banking markets now, world wide. For example, CDS traders don't allow American companies to invest in local manufacturing for example and demand loans obtained be used and factories built only in countries with slave labour like China. They do this because they know, that once those jobs move the labour force in that area and the communities who have pensions bonds and other stuff in Wall Street banks will go insolvent. They then collect huge on the shorts and as a bonus they get real physical assets such a real estate from foreclosures, so they make a much bigger profit if they can collapse a market than if the market goes up.

      Finally, because the local political establishments invested those pensions, municipal bonds etc with the Investment Banks the bankers know they can simply suggest that if they political estasblishment doesn't do what they want, the Investment Banking organizations such as the Federal Reserve and IMF will crash the whole thing on their watch.

      That is why Congress for example gave 27 Trillion dollars to these people so far with overwhelming opposition from the public, and will continue to grant any amount of money to these people. The alternative is a currency collapse and nobody in the political system wants that too happen while on their watch.

      Hardly anyone really knows this truth, except maybe the Icelanders who caught on real fast to what these criminals where doing and threw the into jail, and kicked the out of their country.

      It would seem though, they are the only ones who have awakened. The rest of the world continues to get "Austerity" measures from these IMF/Federal Reserve banks. (i.e. I wouldn't surprised for example if the IMF commuity ends up owning all of the USA's public parks and lands, power grid companies even the very buildings Congress and the President use.)

      People have not awoke yet. Which, the longer this continues the greater the unrest will be when people finally wake up. If it isn't soon, the USA will burn from city to city coast to coast.

      So Globalism and its centralization of power is far more dangerous than Nuclear War, or Global Warming because it removes the industrial and technological infrastructures of the 1st world, strips them really...and prevents science and technology from addressing these issues.

      Globalists only want one thing, absolute power, and enforcement of that power so that nobody can ever change it. These ruling elite use corporations so that people can't fight back or identify a single target like they did in the old days.

      (i.e. If you had a bad Queen, you cut her head off along with the rest of the corropt royalty. Kings and Queens are easy targets. Transnational globalist corporations and systems are much harder to single out and identify the ruling power.)

      Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    6. Re:Pirates by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      I dare you to try to get food to the poor in Somalia. If the warlords don't kill you and take all your stuff, then the pirates will. There is no viable method of getting supplies to the poor without it being taken by the various political "parties", like the warlords, for their armies, who will then be well fed so they can go out and kill those poor people for whatever they might have. If you want to get food to the poor people of Somalia, you will first need to kill all the warlords and their supporters.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:Pirates by genner · · Score: 1

      On the bright side the private corps and then fed will burn with us when the US can no longer pay the interest on the national debt.
      All the money they've made will be worthless.

    8. Re:Pirates by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Science is a great endeavor, but when hundreds of millions can't eat, something is wrong and it has nothing to do with global warming.

      You are apparently unaware that a smaller percentage of the world population is underfed today than at any time in human history (well, ok, it may have been somewhat better 2-3 years ago, but that is not long enough back to support the point you are trying to make). The average daily caloric intake in deveolping countries is significantly higher today than it was in the 1960s.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Pirates by stdarg · · Score: 1

      Which really casts doubt onto the simplistic narrative of "evil corporations" that want to destroy the country and enslave everybody.

    10. Re:Pirates by genner · · Score: 1

      Which really casts doubt onto the simplistic narrative of "evil corporations" that want to destroy the country and enslave everybody.

      Nah they just want to make money with no eye for the long term consequences. This narrative is also simplistic but it's mostly true.

    11. Re:Pirates by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Corporations (for the most part) aren't evil, they're amoral. Their eye is on the bottom line and the next quarterly report. They don't spend a lot of time considering the long term effects of their actions. From a (natural) human point of view some of the effects are evil.

  27. Dependence by microbox · · Score: 1

    You just create dependence doing that.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  28. Head in sand. by microbox · · Score: 1

    What we know about climate change. Of course, he who doesn't listen cannot hear.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  29. Super intelligent by microbox · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter to you whether scientists collect data or not. You will just assume you know better -- right? The beliefs come first, and then the "evidence" is lawyered by your "super" intelligence. There is indeed an inverse relationship between someone's competence, and their own belief in their competence.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    1. Re:Super intelligent by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      There is indeed an inverse relationship between someone's competence, and their own belief in their competence.

      <pedant>Wait.. so what does that say about your competence?</pedant>

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Super intelligent by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      It is a waste of time arguing yesterdays argument with those of such limited intelligence as you. Ironicall they same losers who doubt the honesty of climate scientists, usually are pro nuke, and in an astonishing display of cognitive dissonance are happy to believe known employees of the nuclear industry as unbiased sources.

      The sceptics are living in the past ignore them and move on to action.

      Not worth wasting any more time on these idiots.

  30. death penalty for vadnalism? by decora · · Score: 4, Insightful

    any pirates who would attack scientific intstruments are committing property crime. the death penalty seems a little harsh.

    as for the pirates that attack people, well, somalia doesn't really have a government to speak of.

    and if you think you can 'solve the problem' by intimidating a few of them, you might want to read about what motivates them in the first place. i.e. there is a massive drought in the region right now, millions of people are starving... as i write this.

    if i were in their shoes, and you asked me if i wanted to be a pirate, and maybe eat, i dont know what i would say. you see, i've never been starving to death and watched my whole family die.

    in my humble opinion, instead of starting a nother never ending 'war on piracy', we could instead try to stop the corruption and malfeasance that prevent the somalis from engaging in ordinary business activity. i.e. start enforcing international laws regarding the fisheries off of their coasts.

    1. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would seem to me that the real problem here is FOOD then. It amazes me how stupid society is. People don't commit crime out of desire to commit crime. They do so out of need. It may be they need to eat. The need to be safe (shelter). It may be they need to have sex (be it intercourse or otherwise sexually stimulating to the particular individual). They need to live (experience other pleasures- ups/downs)! Solve these and you solve all crime. The first is easy. It is a cost. The second is a bit harder although probably doable. Fantasies are not reality and probably already solve 99.98% of societies deviant sexual desires which begs the question of why there are any crimes for possession materials (consensual or otherwise) or consensual sexual activity. Then you have shelter issue. Seems easy to solve too. People really don't need that much space. They manage to fit people into very small cells in prison. Lets do this OUT of prison x 2 the space per person and you could even charge them for it- because after all someone making money can pay SOMETHING compared to the person in jail making nothing. Then you have the living issue. This is probably the most difficult one of all. Society has allowed the wealth gap to occur which means people are not able to survive on a minimal income. Guarantee a minimal level of income that meets the needs for the essentials based on what 75% of the population posses. If 75% of the population posses a phone a phone becomes an essential. If 75% of have televisions then a TV becomes an essential. If 75% have cars then a car becomes an essential. If 75% of the population have water then water is an essential. Then provide for cost of such items based on the average of those items within the middle class.

    2. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      So I guess boarding a boat and pillaging it is simply the 'confiscation of non-legal goods in their territory', and as such people shouldn't be put to death for it. Yeah the Russians have a good idea to deal with pirates, kill them at sea. Of course the rest of the western world has a 'catch and release' program. Where the pirates are caught, and dumped back ashore. There's a real reason why that trade land became safer when the Russians got there.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you really are an ignorant jerk. Decora is exactly right. These people don't go pirating just for the fun of it. While you probably sit in the luxury of a western country with public infrastructure, commercial infrastructure, some level of govt healthcare, a strong military, a roof over your head and a large supermarket nearby that carries 30,000+ stock lines, these people don't enjoy any of that. No government, no supermarkets, no internet, no roof. They go pirating because it's the only way to make a bit of money so they can compete for the scarce resources available. Before you start talking about killing anyone, try living in Mogadishu for 3 months. Head there with only the clothes on your back and see how long before you resort to barbarism.

    4. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well why don't you volunteer to improve things over there? Or maybe give a little donation of your precious hard earned money to an aid agency? Or perhaps just get out of your mom's basement?

    5. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the law went bankrupt going to Iraq and Afghanistan....

    6. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by gearloos · · Score: 0

      another tree hugging asshat.. shove then all into the pile...

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    7. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      International law states that pirates can be arrested, tried and executed under the law of the ship that subdues/captures them. "Enforcing international law" means hanging them on desk and then sailing back home with the pirates still swaying in the air like hunting trophies.

    8. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you think it's stupid to try and solve the problem at it's source instead of just killing the people forced to do these things by economic circumstance?

      I put it to you that it's people like you who are the problem... your solution doesn't work. Exhibit A - Iraq, exhibit B Afghanistan.

      Call it tree hugging if you like, but it sounded like a fairly sensible suggestion to me.

    9. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh im sorry here, I have a tree for you to hug.. Asshats like you are the problem today. i wish there was a law to kill stupidity.

      He's got a good point though.

      Solving problems reasonably may sound like tree-hugging (I don't quite get the correlation, but whatever) to you, but generally it just works better. You could beat someone's head with a stick all day, but that's not likely to make them less angry. Desperate people do desperate things. Solve the desperation = solve the problem. What you propose may sound like justice to you, but it's not a solution, it's an exasperation.

    10. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      some of the pirates are millionares. this is big business, it's not only a matter of poverty

    11. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by gearloos · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, please introduce yourself. and please state what planet you are from.

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    12. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the picture you're painting of a typical Somali pirate has anything to do with reality...

      According to the article, they are more like thugs with lots of cash and material items, not unlike what you would see in the US, rather than a bunch of starving people trying to feed their families.

    13. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      It was an idiotic suggestion. There is no good solution. Killing them is not really going to help a lot but it cuts down on repeat offenders. There is no other solution at all. Somalia is broken beyond any fixing. You'd have to kill everyone there to save them, it's that screwed up. If you go in and try to feed people you wind up fighting for your life because the warlords will be all over you. It's their territory and you are encroaching. You give the food to them and they distribute it...it's been tried and millions starved while the warlords sold the food to people with money. The poor just keep dying. The only solution is to take over the country and run it for a generation or two with an iron fist and teach the children how to be human. Nobody has that kind of determination, it's never going to happen. Too bad, where's Alexander the Great when you need him.

    14. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in my humble opinion, instead of starting a nother never ending 'war on piracy', we could instead try to stop the corruption and malfeasance that prevent the somalis from engaging in ordinary business activity. i.e. start enforcing international laws regarding the fisheries off of their coasts.

      And what model government would you suggest? The U S government, a true pack of liars and theives that make corruption and malfeasance look good?

    15. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to stop corruption and enforce laws would require spilling blood which no one is willing to do. If you make piracy unattractive and unsuccessful, that will stop it just as well as trying to fix corrupt internal strife and at far less cost to any outside nations

    16. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      level Somalia and make it bare as a baby's ass!

    17. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      instead of starting a nother never ending 'war on piracy',

      O, and here I thought that the MAFIAA had that one started long ago already...

    18. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by cbope · · Score: 1

      100% correct. The pirate situation off the Somalian coast is not going to improve until the local people can earn a living and provide for their family. The current situation there is complete and utter disaster, and until it improves the attacks will continue. I'm not saying it is right and legal to attack passing ships as they have been doing, but until the economic and social issues are dealt with in their own country, it's just not going to change.

      The fisheries issue is key, the local fish population is being totally devastated by foreign corporations that have no legal right to fish there. What would you do if a foreign entity just dropped in and started harvesting your primary food source then gave you nothing in return? This is precisely what is happening there.

    19. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO, you guess wrong.
      He is not saying that nothing should be done to pirates. He is saying that solely fighting pirates is traiting the symptoms, not the illness.
      The best and probably only way to put a stop to piratery is to deal with the issues that pushed people to become pirates in the first place which are poverty, starvation, political instability, lack of education and stagnating economies.
      Believe me, if people had an honest way to live decently and cater for their families, the vast majority of them wouldn't be pirates, it's far too dangerous.

    20. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Property crimes are punishable by the death penalty in any sane country. The reason being is that property is a means of survival. Hell, food is survival and property. Also, someone has given a part of their life to obtain that property. If pirates were truly about food and not enriching themselves and their masters; they would simply steel all the food they could. There is usually plenty of frozen and canned food on container vessels being shipped. I don't know about water but there maybe canned juices. Some ships have desalination for drinking water but the small cargo crews probably only use a storage tank. If the pirates did this people would probably be inclined to help them-out. Hell shipping companies and/or their insures might even send food in-order to avoid being boarded.

    21. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the first Facebook photo of a captain standing next to his tallest hanging pirate with the tagline "6 foot 1 inch!"

    22. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      any pirates who would attack scientific intstruments are committing property crime. the death penalty seems a little harsh.

      They're not just committing property crime, they're engaging in piracy. If they happened to stumble across a ship with people on it, they would attack that as well. It's not like a graffiti artist who goes out spray painting -- if he runs across a group of people he's not going to take out an axe and kill them; pirates will. So killing them for property crime is a legitimate preventive measure.

      as for the pirates that attack people, well, somalia doesn't really have a government to speak of.

      Yes, that's why ships need to enforce their own security as GP said.

      you might want to read about what motivates them in the first place. i.e. there is a massive drought in the region right now, millions of people are starving... as i write this.

      Funny enough, the reason they're starving is that aid is cut off to them because they are under the control of a terrorist group, al shabab. People have a choice, they can turn to terrorism and piracy to get what they want, or they can work with others in a civilized manner. They're never going to terrorize their way into saving millions of lives.

      if i were in their shoes, and you asked me if i wanted to be a pirate, and maybe eat, i dont know what i would say. you see, i've never been starving to death and watched my whole family die.

      Sure, on the ground level things may be confusing, but surely you, sitting here at your computer, have a bit more clarity than that, no? You see that supporting terrorism and piracy won't make things end well for your country, right? Your choices put millions of lives at risk, including your own family's lives, just so that you can "earn" your booty by the sword rather than swallow your pride and beg.

      Okay forget the effects on the country, let's talk about your morality. Let's say your desperate situation is right. So just how far would you go to save your own hide and that of your family? Would you sell your daughter to a pedophile to save your other children? Would you join a militia and rape and kill hundreds of innocent villagers to earn some food for yourself and your family? If you see piracy differently than those situations then you're just valuing the lives of "decadent Westerners" lower than the lives of "poor innocent Somalis" -- just like the pirates.

    23. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Complete, apologist bullshit.

      There are LOTS of people in the world that are in difficult circumstances, and don't then resort to violence, crime, and intimidation.

      The fact is that not everything bad in the world reduces to "it's the white man's fault", as convenient as that might be for self-loathing westerners.

      Somalia's a shithole for lots of reasons - most of them domestic. Far, far down the list is the 'exploitation' of its fisheries.

      In fact, this is precisely the sort of patronizing racism the world doesn't need.

      --
      -Styopa
    24. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think it's all about drought and starving? How many of the starving do you think the pirates are giving aide to? I suspect the pirates are in it for themselves and do this regardless of the economic conditions.

      I don't think we should spend our navy to enforce anybody's laws around there. I don't have a problem with blowing them out of the water should the opportunity arise though. (Same goes for the "not normally considered pirates" in any activity disrupting things like military exercises, fishing, whaling, etc. Terrorism is terrorism, and is not appropriate regardless of the cause. I'm sure the Somali pirates have valid reasons for what they do in their view to.)

    25. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Believe me, if people had an honest way to live decently and cater for their families, the vast majority of them wouldn't be pirates, it's far too dangerous.

      They have an honest way to live. Being a pirate is easier and more lucrative then fixing their own country.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    26. Re:death penalty for vadnalism? by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      So... what you are saying is that the whole pirate / somalia coast problem can solved by western countries contracting the russians to police the area?

      Good plan!

      My back-of-the-envelope calculations show that in less than 2 years there will be less than 2 pirate attackes in any six month period (the rest of them won't be willing to go near the water when they know that their boat will be sunk.. and them along with it... possibly from up to a kilometre away...)

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  31. Re:Huh? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 2

    (same AC as GP) Everyone knows the "bury the researchers in millions of bogus, frivolous FOIA requests" is simply a tactic of the oil-industry shills - about as intellectually honest as "teach the controversy" from the anti-evolution tards - or, more to the point, about the same as the tobacco industry's decades of stonewalling that no evidence existed for a link between smoking and cancer.

  32. Here's the thing about that.. by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

    The submersibles have already been programmed with the data they will transmit...

  33. Re:Huh? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    Name me one Presidential candidate recently who hasn't exaggerated to make a point. Maybe Ron Paul but I doubt it.

    It's damn near impossible to find an "anti-AGW" statement that has not been proven false or at least ridiculously exaggerated.

  34. Re:There is no 'global warming' by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    Facts are not something I associate with climatedepot.

  35. IRONY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How ironic, the reason they are forced into piracy to live is because europe has been dumping their chemical and radioactive waste off their coast... which is pretty much where 100% of their food source resides.

  36. Bad pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    More than 30 nations are involved in the multi-million pound Argo project, in which 3,000 robotic instruments provide data on the heat and saltiness of the world's oceans. The information is of great value to scientists who are able to forecast weather patterns and advise farmers of the likelihood of rainfall and floods.

    Well what have done those 30 nations when overfishing and nuclear waste dumping was done in somalian coasts for decades, taking advance from the absence of somalia costguard? That is not a major enviromental isue, or what? What is the scientific advise to somalia people they face right now a _major_ drought crisis? Justice for all...

  37. Leftist moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know most of these pirates simply want to have food medical care and a way to support their families. People who have food, and a means to support themselves and their families are usually very enthusiastic about science and learning."

    Sure. Unless they're black.

  38. The Aussies can throw didgeridoos at the pirates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, they can sing such timeless classics of Aussie "culture" such as 'Tie Me Kangaroo Down, Sport' and 'The Jolly Swagman' (or whatever the fuck they're actually called), which will have the pirates cutting their own throats in no time.

    A DEEEEN GO STOLE MOY BAI BE!

  39. Why not pay off the pirates. by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    Not just pay them not to attack, but pay them to go and place the bouys for you. Why? Because it gives them money from a non-piracy endeavour, their primary intention being financial gain. It's money they would have otherwise sought through ransom etc, and ulimtately keeps good people out of harms way. Would they hold the bouys to ransom? Well maybe, but you could make sure they are expendable, after all it's the data you want.

    Or just get a Navy vessel to drop off the gear. Get in some target practice on anything that approaches. Only way to be sure.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:Why not pay off the pirates. by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      Why? Because it gives them money from a non-piracy endeavour...

      Such as what? It would certainly give them more money to fun piracy-based endeavors, though.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Why not pay off the pirates. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just pay them not to attack, but pay them to go and place the bouys for you.

      They'd capture the gear and ask for more money. Never pay the Danegeld.

    3. Re:Why not pay off the pirates. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Not just pay them not to attack, but pay them to go and place the bouys for you.

      Why does the word "Danegeld" come to mind when I read this?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  40. For me, this is the only valid solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for a vastly expensive mission of friendship and understanding that carries vast amount of cash and bling with the aim of getting a MoU with the pirates and a mutually agreeable but non-binding protocol where they get to pillage etc as much as they want, but they should try and avoid enlarging their carbon footprint or damaging etc the sensors that are so critical. Repeat this every six months and everyone's happy.

  41. Replace buoys with trained sharks by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Two problems solved.

    (Three if the sharks have lasers.)

    1. Re:Replace buoys with trained sharks by jmac880n · · Score: 1

      Two problems solved.

      (Three if the sharks have lasers.)

      What could possibly go wrong?

  42. Excuses excuses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's the U.S., who created this civil war.

    No, it's the media. No it's...

    Maybe it's just base tribalism rearing its ugly head. Oops, did I just blame the Somalis for being responsible for their own behavior? How very callous and imperialistic of me. Root causes, root causes: smart Western people will dig it out.

    1. Re:Excuses excuses... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Yes, because those "tribes" summoned all those weapons from the sky. With negroid majicks.

      Somalia is literally being invaded CONSTANTLY. Their non-government controlled society is the only type that could every hold up to such an invasion. But then, I guess you'd prefer they just had a strongman in charge stepping on baby skulls like the rest of Africa.

  43. Cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article discusses many of the benefits of what those guys are asking for, but none of the costs.

    1. Re:Cost? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      The costs are already covered if they can sail their research vessel in those waters. Because it's too dangerous for them to go in there on their own they're asking for some help getting the buoys distributed. I guess someone will have to step up and eat the additional costs but I imagine it could be considered training time for some naval vessel.

  44. Political Correctness by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 2

    Asshats like you are the problem today. i wish there was a law to kill stupidity.

    So you would like a law to silence people whose ideas you find offensive?

    Wow, talk about loving big huge government. Where do you nutcases come from?

    1. Re:Political Correctness by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 2

      Good job changing the subject.

      When you said, "I wish there was a law to kill stupidity," you were talking about the parent poster. He said something that offended you and you wanted a law to silence him.

      Why do you feel such a sense of entitlement? Why do you want big daddy government to solve all your problems?

    2. Re:Political Correctness by gearloos · · Score: 1

      Has nothing to do with big government.. It is just dun asshats like you. sympathetic till the end.

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    3. Re:Political Correctness by gearloos · · Score: 0

      Who let this dum shit post? It's only obvious he is flamebait. Read his past posts. he does absolutly nothing but try and instigate. He has nothing to contribute and actually just waits for someone to fall so he has something to suck on.

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  45. Re:Huh? by riverat1 · · Score: 2

    You need to look into things a bit more deeply than you apparently do. Please give me a quote from Phil Jones where he admits manipulating data for other than valid scientific reasons. Does one mistake (Himalayan glaciers) in the IPCC AR4 report invalidate the thousands of other points in the report? That's like getting a F on a final exam because you missed one question out of 100. The IPCC had nothing to do with the climate refugees statement. That was a think tank associated with the UN. And I believe their statement was "up to 50 million climate refugees". Did they put a minimum value on it? The sulfur in coal does cause a cooling effect as SO2 in the atmosphere but it doesn't last nearly as long as the CO2 does so in the long run coal burning unequivocally causes warming.

    Please show me the science that shows increasing the levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere does not cause a warming effect. If you can give me some good science showing that then I'll join you. Until then you're just someone who puts economics and politics over reality.

  46. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by gearloos · · Score: 1

    And you probably love directv

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
  47. Haha, you gross little manchild. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Getting all pissy when someone points out how clueless and reactionary your murder fantasy is.

    It was nice of you to end your last post by saying, "i wish there was a law to kill stupidity." It lets everyone know what a wretched little maggot you are.

  48. kill them by gearloos · · Score: 0

    Is this concept to difficult to understand? Pirate takes boat by force using guns- kill Pirate- feed to shark... What the hell is the discussion?: Seriously? WTF Pirate= death walk the plank, get hanged, shot in the head, who gives a rats ass. Rob a bank with a gun and jail for life. Why are these fucking bleeding heart liberals actually having a retort to this? saying things like well Food, they ar starving... too fucking bad. You put a gun to my head and steal my boat, your a criminal and you fucking die. NUF SAID.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:kill them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I question your intent to sound "irrational" and "grammatically retarded" all while putting down the "liberal agenda". In the end its clear to many here that you provided zero insight into this issue and only chose to display an obvious political slant instead of content. Your're asking why I replied? That answer is because you shouldn't have.

    2. Re:kill them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar has a well-known liberal bias.

  49. OK enough by gearloos · · Score: 0

    Ive had enough. pirates = taking a boat by force with lethal weapons. I don't give a fucking rats ass what your argument is. they need to be executed. would you like a home invasion robbery? WTF is wrong with you people ? Shoot them. Done. feed them to the sharks. give a good deterrant. Tree huggers protected by the US laws need not apply.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:OK enough by Falconhell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asshole poster is asshole, what a surprise. What part of the US are you from? (The attitude of use violence first is most typically a US approach).

      As Churchill said the Americans always do the right thing eventually. Your crap is an example of trying everything else first.

      Grow the fuck up.

    2. Re:OK enough by stdarg · · Score: 1

      What... did you even read his post? He's not using violence first, he's responding to violence with violence.

      Using violence first, which is a great idea by the way, is seeking out the pirate bases and destroying them. Don't bother waiting for an attack. It makes a lot of sense and would solve the problem a lot faster.

    3. Re:OK enough by nycguy · · Score: 1

      Violence is a tool. You're just a pussy.

    4. Re:OK enough by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Violence is the last resort of a fool, thats why its so popular in the US.....

    5. Re:OK enough by cusco · · Score: 1

      You do realize that what the Pentagon would refer to as a 'pirate base' a more rational individual would refer to as a 'coastal fishing village', don't you? Those tend to be full of non-combatants, women, children, and the like.

      Oh, that's right, they're brown people so it doesn't matter. Never mind.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  50. Wintertime in Austrialia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the CSIRO have anything better to do in wintertime than this?

    After all, they are paid by the Government, that's tax payers money.

    So they come up with ... THIS SHIT?

    Some heads need off.

    --//

  51. I'm sorry, since when is "tree-hugger" an insult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some Teabagger Newspeak I don't grok?

  52. Do not pay that randsom... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there are any roving spy blimps that could be tasked to spend some time tracking all boats in the area around somalia. Its a big ocean but if you can watch the coast , catch them leaving and track it might work?

    The information could be used to warn others where the pirates are or for the more hawkish amoung us allow nations who have had enough to intercept them.

  53. Mines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mine the entire coast of Somalia. Pay the "government" in lost fishing returns until they can independently and effectively patrol their own border or are willing to persecute the pirates via prison or death.

  54. Re:Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least the pirates are honest about their profit motivation. Maybe, the climate "scientists" should offer to cut the pirates in on the scam!

    An honest comment gets modded down... Slashdot... the home of censorship!!

    SlashUSSRdot.

  55. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, throw an active sonar pinger on it, before it surfaces to send radio data, have it do a few active pings and make sure no one else is around before surfacing, sending the data, and re-submerging.

    You'd probably want to put a little effort into having multiple sensor units pinging at the same time to make it hard for them (the pirates without a lot of tech) to triangulate based on the pulse source.

    You're talking a 5 pound sonar module and a few lines of code, a few thousand dollars, far far less that putting a bunch of fully crewed ships burning fuel and food in the area. Hell, do they not already have sonar modules on them for sensing water speed and temp at depth, or looking for thermoclines?

    The issue is NOT about collecting the devices afterwards - it's about the ships going in to plant the devices in the first place. You are addressing the wrong problem. Don't tell me you didn't RTFA?

  56. Toxic waste, fishery destruction, and piracy by Animal+Farm+Pig · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The fisheries off the coast of Somalia were destroyed by years of European countries dumping toxic waste and over fishing off the coast. What the fuck else are they supposed to do?

    Support the Somali volunteer coast guard

    1. Re:Toxic waste, fishery destruction, and piracy by Suomi-Poika · · Score: 2

      There is not a single source that I have seen which would verify that someone from Europe would have dumped toxic waste near or to the coast of Somalia.

      Lets think this rationally for a moment:

      Multiple sources confirm that Italian mafia buys ships, fills them with toxic waste and sinks them in the middle of Mediterranean sea

      Why would anyone who gets their toxic waste from Europe and are good at "losing" ships at Mediterranean sail through Suez? That and the sea voyage through Red Sea and the return would cause a lot of extra cost.

      We are talking 200km vs 4000km here. It is much easier to dispose a junk ship at Mediterranean and come back with speed boats which have enough range for that. This "they poisoned our land, we have RIGHT to pirate" is another lie from greens and other similar people who want to "understand" Somalias plight by placing guilt to Europeans, or anybody else than Somalis themselves.

    2. Re:Toxic waste, fishery destruction, and piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      School funding in various neighborhoods was slashed, so we should just accept drug dealers and criminals out of these places?

      We may have pushed the problem on it's way, first by keeping the blind eye when our industries "sold" toxic waste for arms to the local at-the-time people in power and not reacted when the first ships were boarded and kept for ransom, because it was not "our" ships (The majority of capered ships are Arab origin) and ransoms were paid. That does not mean we should accept the situation.

      A multi-step solution is needed. On one side we need to help stabilize the area. without a stable government and relative peace, no projects to get people to do something constructive will succeed. And on the other side, piracy must be punished so much as to keep people from considering this as a way of living.

      The second part is easy to implement. The first part is really hard, too many different interest (Not least the neighboring countries who have a two fold interest in Somalia being so troubled, 1) Point to them and say, "See we are a better government, even if we do oppress you, we keep order!" and 2) Sell them arms and earn money.) The local Al'queda who don't want stability, because that would dry up recruitment and probably kick them from their training camps. The local warlords who would no longer be needed...

  57. Read all of the -1 posts... Someone at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone at Slashdot clearly has an agenda and it ISN'T the free flow of information. Clearly censorship is being actively enforced here at Slash_Any_Opposing_Views_dot

  58. What if you don't like climate scientists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dono... climate scientists are starting to join the ranks of lawyers, politicians and insurances agents. Is there a "tipoff a somali" option somewhere?






    (and of course I'm kidding, if you really don't have a sense of humor)

  59. .. best solution to Indian Sea piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that the USA is winding down ops in Iraq and Afghanistan there'll be available drone operators who'll need to keep their skills sharp. What better use for Global Hawk and Predator drones and a few Hellfire missiles? Instead of blowing up wedding parties and funerals they could be doing something useful and take out Somali pirates. The unmanned drone optics are more than adequate quality to easily avoid mis-identifying their targets.

    1. Re:.. best solution to Indian Sea piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No good. The pirates are too far away from the civilians.

  60. Re:Huh? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    Climate scientists have moved beyond whether CO2 in the atmosphere causes warming. You can read the signature of CO2 capturing radiant energy in the spectrum of the planet. I have read the IPCC AR4 Working Group I Summary for Policy Makers. What's your point? You don't like the way they're simplifying the uncertainty for non-scientists? If they can't be virtually certain about something but only consider it very likely we can ignore the risk? Science doesn't work in absolutes (except zero).

    The WG1 report is all about the science and doesn't get into danger, it's Working Group II where that part comes in. That's where they examine the probable effects of global warming.

  61. Pirates are a real problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirates are a real problem and they must be elinimated with all cost. The international community of countries should pool together all their resources and firepowers to get rid of pirates. Pirates causes delays in shipping goods to desired country and in many cases huge loss of money.

    1. Re:Pirates are a real problem. by grahamm · · Score: 1

      So why not just tackle the pirate situation rather than action, political or military, on land? Send in the NATO navies, plus maybe also invite the Russian, Japanese and Chinese navies for good measure and take action to protect the international shipping. Do as used to happen in the days of sail, arrest the pirates, confiscate their vessels and maybe even pay prize money to the navy crews who capture a pirate vessel.

    2. Re:Pirates are a real problem. by cusco · · Score: 1

      Why should "our" governments have to foot the bill for what is in all honesty a multinational corporation's problem? I'm sick and tired of spending hundreds of millions of tax dollars protecting the pipelines of Occidental Petroleum and drilling platforms of Shell, the fleets of Maersk and Hyundai, or Anaconda's mines. If they want protection then let the bastards pay for it, it's not like any of them are actually shelling out a penny to pay taxes here. If they want the 7th Fleet to accompany them through the Indian Ocean let them cough up a few million out of their truly grotesque profits and pay for it. If "our" military is already essentially a mercenary force protecting the multinationals, let's be honest and have the multinationals foot the bill.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  62. They did ask for help by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They asked the UN for help in stopping the dumping of toxic waste in their waters, they asked the UN for help in stopping Asian fishing vessels from emptying their sea of the food Somalia has always used to sustain itself.

    Guess what the answer was since Somalia has nothing anybody wants. That is right, get stuffed.

    The world is not as simple as you think it is.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:They did ask for help by stdarg · · Score: 1

      But they didn't ask for aid, they asked for intervention. They want other people to use their guns and planes and ships to fight other people who are, like the pirates, just trying to make a living. So why should we do that? Why are the Somalis more entitled than anybody else?

      What they did not do is ask for aid and work to build an environment that can receive that aid. When you have terrorist groups running the country and your major industry is piracy, who is able to help?

      Their problems are self-created.

  63. De-criminalize self defense. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Then just give the big shipping boats GPS coordinates, and let the pirates "find" them if they wish.

    And what do the private yachts do, just go ker-splat so the oil can get through?

    The only reason any of this is a problem is that certain governments have outlawed self-defense on the high sees. Having several 50mm guns on the deck would be all that is necessary and sufficient to get rid of the entire Somali pirate problem. When pulling into port, the harbormaster can ensure that the guns have the requisite safeties on them - he can use his locks if it really matters.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:De-criminalize self defense. by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 1

      This problem can be solved with escort ships. Provide armed escort through pirate infested waters, and don't dock armed ships at ports that disallow armament. While you are at it, the escort ships can also keep the illegal fishing vessels out of their waters as well.

  64. Problem solved before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 17th. century piracy was a major problem for international commerce. Solution: Shoot pirates on sight.
    Today piracy is a major problem to international commerce. Solution: ...

    I am still amazed that the international community does not act appropriate and hunt these people. Go for the "mother ships" they are large, slow and easily identifiable. Find a fishing ship with no fishing gear and loads of guns, and sink the ship! Use a deck gun or even a rocket... Warn them in advance over the radio

    "Dear pirates, we will sink your ship in aprox. 30sec. if you want to live, jump over board, you might prefer to use a life boat or at least a life west. Mind the sharks"

    Boom!

    The problem would be solved in quite a short time... Recruitment would be alot harder... Actually making money from the business would be harder...

  65. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the issue is with taking a boat out there to install these things, not the worry that pirates will try and steal the things themselves.

  66. What about a balanced optimum? by mangu · · Score: 1

    It makes me laugh when I hear neo-cons say "government isn't the solution, it IS the problem"

    To someone lost in the middle of the desert lack of water is a problem. To a drowning person excess of water is a problem. Why is it so hard to understand that most western countries are drowning in a massive excess of government?

    It makes me laugh when the same people who believe governmental health care is the solution to all problems complain so hard about TSA pat-downs.

  67. Re:Awesome work Pirates! by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 1

    They have done exactly that

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-14/scientists-call-in-the-navy/2795700?section=world
    asking the Royal Australian Navy to take nine of our floats up into that area on the next rotation to the gulf.

  68. wow, preventative execution for vandalism by decora · · Score: 1

    interesting concept. i have never heard of a 'preventative death penalty' before.
    only preventative wars.

  69. Free Market by Myopic · · Score: 0

    It occurs to me that Somalia would be a utopian paradise for "free market" types of people. Do you think taxes should be ultra-low? Do you want "small government" because you think government always screws things up? Want unfettered access to all varieties of weapons? Believe that two private individuals should be able to enter into *any* contract whatsoever?

    Somalia is the place for you! (Link actually jokes about Darfur and Minnesota.)

    Only people who want big government supported by high taxes should stay in HELLHOLES like the completely backward United States of America.

    1. Re:Free Market by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Taxes can be ultra-low without lawlessness, and piracy and looting are not "free market". We have have in the U.S. a bloated federal government that acts for a very small wealthy elite, more than four times the size necessary to carry out the duties outlined in the Constitution.

    2. Re:Free Market by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Of course piracy and looting are "free market". You should enter into a private contract with pirates if you don't want them to loot your stuff. Alternately, as a private citizen you can hire a private police force to enforce your property claims. Having a state-run police force is socialism -- yes, literally: as government employees that is socialized police work.

      If you want to claim that taxes can be ultra-low without lawlessness, then provide examples. I can't think of a place which has both small government and prevailing peace and prosperity. Because I am a man of evidence, I have come through experience to reject the claims of libertarians/free marketers/tea partiers. I just don't think the claims reflect reality, but I'm ready for the slew of examples you're going to bury me in.

      Or, we could do it backwards. Name all the best places in the world, and then let's talk about the taxes in those places. Bonus points if you have actually put your money where your mouth is, and moved to one of those places. Extra bonus points if you can prove how awesome low taxes are by showing mass human migration to those places.

  70. Re:How about these techies use tech to save the da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very hard to spot a small surface craft with sonar. They just get lost in the clutter when there's any kind of significant waves running. Even the big-budget navies don't always get it right; there have been several cases of innocent surface craft getting accidentally rammed and sunk by surfacing submarines.

  71. Why don't they make up the data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the rest of their global warming data.

  72. Re:I'm sorry, since when is "tree-hugger" an insul by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    I think it's got naught to do with the teabaggers. It's entirely possible to be a treehugger and a teabagger.

  73. join the pirates? take over! by relaxinparadise · · Score: 1

    why not pull a hostile takeover on the somali pirates and make a real enterprise out of it? startup costs are not prohibitive assuming you can find some willing participants to join you in the endeavor. insurance and legal costs are minimal. the world is awash in small arms and un/underemployed. there is a lot of profit there for someone.

  74. Re:Huh? by cusco · · Score: 1

    It's up to the Climate "Scientists" (i use that term very loosely) to prove that CO2 causes dangerous warming.

    Venus.

    For that matter, high school physics classes do the experiment all the time, measuring heat retained with a concentration of X-percent of CO2 and heat retained by Y-percent concentration. It ain't rocket science, it's just basic physics that have been well-established for over a century.

    Oh, that's right, physics works differently in the labs of petro-conglomerates, so there's nothing to worry about.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  75. Re:Huh? by riverat1 · · Score: 1

    Well, if you don't understand how uncertainty is quantified in science then I would say you don't know what real science is. It's a key concept in science.

    How can you make a prediction when it's impossible to know ahead of time how much CO2 will be added to the atmosphere or what the Sun is going to do in its cycles and a number of other things? Instead you create various scenarios for reasonable possibilities and base your expectations on those.

    If you find 100 other errors like the Himalayan Glacier typo in the IPCC AR4 then maybe I'll start wondering about it. In a report with literally thousands of predictions from hundreds of authors 4 or 5 mistakes isn't enough to take it down.