What happens when you stick the iPhone up your ass? How many bars then?
And iPhone owners can't say they haven't tried, cuz how else would they have put the phone next to their ears!
I hate what Muslims have done to the airport/airplane experience. So much so that I am on personal boycott of all Muslims (unless forced to for work). I know it won't do anything but I do it on principle.
I would just put each set of experimental data in a separate subdirectory. Within each subdirectory I'd put a file with specific name (e.g., "description.txt") in which you briefly write up exactly what the experimental data is, how it was generated (e.g., if generated by a program, give the arguments and/or pointers to input data), and some keywords to allow it to be indexed/searched. Then I'd use your standard OS search tools to find the description file(s) you're looking for, thereby allowing you to locate your data based on its description rather than some brittle directory hierarchy.
I have a pretty standard setup for generating experimental data in my work. Whenever I run an experiment (which are usually simulations), I have a wrapper script that generates a random (meaningless) subdirectory name, copies my simulation binary and configuration to that directory (so I can reproduce the results later in case either my simulator code or its configuration changes), and prompts me to enter a description of what it is I'm simulating, and asks me to provide some keyword tags. The only way I can find the data afterward is to search the description files from the last step, because the data is otherwise just in a randomly-named directory.
Of course, this scheme depends on you doing a decent job of describing your data and providing keywords, but I don't think you can get around that with any technique. At some point you have to inject some human labeling/categorization. Directories and symlinks are just a pretty restrictive way of organizing things.
The main goal of humanity should be finding a sustainable source of energy (e.g., fusion). Our entire economy, lifestyle, etc., is driven by cheap, abundant energy. Getting out of the gravity well, building and running orbital stations, transporting people to other planets, constructioning and maintaining habital environments and colonies are all going to require even more massive amounts of energy. Moreover, the source of that energy must be transportable and work in a variety of environments to accomplish those aims. Until we have such a source of energy, our future is in doubt, regardless of whether we stay here on Earth or not.
Let's see: There have been successful terrorist attacks around the world since 9/11. These attacks imply that terrorists are still active. Terrorists groups have re-asserted their ongoing desire to conduct similar attacks with in the US. Moreover, some such attempts have been made in the US but largely prevented. I'd say those might imply causation, douchebag.
I take it someone will start a Pedo Party and claim that sex with minors is part of their political platform.
"I know she's only 13, but this is a matter of political philosophy!"
If this governor had let his pansy religion get in the way of pulling the trigger on this murderer, he should have been impeached and perhaps executed himself. Whatever nonsense he chooses to think about non-existent gods and their "mercy" is his business. It's not hypocrisy; it's blind stupidity.
You've apparently never written a trading system. Any such mechanism that is sufficiently stringent to catch the majority of such errors is by definition going to generate a number false positives--legitimately oversized trades that do need to be executed. Pretty soon the traders start clicking "allow" by reflex, and then the check becomes useless. Humans being visual creatures, the one mechanism I've seen work is to show the trader a graph of the stock price with the estimated market impact of the trade they're about to execute. When the image of that squiggly line suddenly going up or down 50% or more hits the trader's brain, it causes a reflexive "uh-oh" that makes them question what they're about to do.
Why not get Sanrio Corp to fund the mission and have it draw a Hello Kitty? Why not have the android look like Hello Kitty? If you've ever been to Japan and seen the Hello Kitty dildos, toilet seat covers, etc., you'll understand why this isn't entirely unlikely.
Slashdot Mirror
A million reasons why: http://miljons.com/en
Violence is a tool. You're just a pussy.
WSJ is a socialist rag, even after Rupert bought it. It's still not as bad as the commentary on Bloomberg, which tends to run to the left of Pol Pot.
What happens when you stick the iPhone up your ass? How many bars then? And iPhone owners can't say they haven't tried, cuz how else would they have put the phone next to their ears!
your argument is null and void.
Anyone who makes this kind of assertion is, at heart, a fascist. So, zeig heil and welcome to the club!
Is the US government out of control and operating outside the bounds of the Constitution?
Thankfully, our President was formerly a professor who lectured on Constitutional law. I'm sure he's going to sort this one out for us ASAP.
Obama is an appeaser in the Neville Chamberlain mold.
There's an important distinction: Chamberlain loved his country. Obama loves the world.
Bush will hold King Abdullah's hand while Obama bows to him, and everything will be OK.
...Microsoft really would buy Adobe, they could show them how to really make something exploitable!
I hate what Muslims have done to the airport/airplane experience. So much so that I am on personal boycott of all Muslims (unless forced to for work). I know it won't do anything but I do it on principle.
I agree.
I put Facebook on my shitlist.
I would just put each set of experimental data in a separate subdirectory. Within each subdirectory I'd put a file with specific name (e.g., "description.txt") in which you briefly write up exactly what the experimental data is, how it was generated (e.g., if generated by a program, give the arguments and/or pointers to input data), and some keywords to allow it to be indexed/searched. Then I'd use your standard OS search tools to find the description file(s) you're looking for, thereby allowing you to locate your data based on its description rather than some brittle directory hierarchy.
I have a pretty standard setup for generating experimental data in my work. Whenever I run an experiment (which are usually simulations), I have a wrapper script that generates a random (meaningless) subdirectory name, copies my simulation binary and configuration to that directory (so I can reproduce the results later in case either my simulator code or its configuration changes), and prompts me to enter a description of what it is I'm simulating, and asks me to provide some keyword tags. The only way I can find the data afterward is to search the description files from the last step, because the data is otherwise just in a randomly-named directory.
Of course, this scheme depends on you doing a decent job of describing your data and providing keywords, but I don't think you can get around that with any technique. At some point you have to inject some human labeling/categorization. Directories and symlinks are just a pretty restrictive way of organizing things.
The main goal of humanity should be finding a sustainable source of energy (e.g., fusion). Our entire economy, lifestyle, etc., is driven by cheap, abundant energy. Getting out of the gravity well, building and running orbital stations, transporting people to other planets, constructioning and maintaining habital environments and colonies are all going to require even more massive amounts of energy. Moreover, the source of that energy must be transportable and work in a variety of environments to accomplish those aims. Until we have such a source of energy, our future is in doubt, regardless of whether we stay here on Earth or not.
I can guarantee the vast majority of OSX users have no idea that it is based on unix
And that, friends, is also why "desktop Linux" has yet to make any serious inroads.
Let's see: There have been successful terrorist attacks around the world since 9/11. These attacks imply that terrorists are still active. Terrorists groups have re-asserted their ongoing desire to conduct similar attacks with in the US. Moreover, some such attempts have been made in the US but largely prevented. I'd say those might imply causation, douchebag.
My name is Cao Ni Ma.
I take it someone will start a Pedo Party and claim that sex with minors is part of their political platform.
"I know she's only 13, but this is a matter of political philosophy!"
Simple rename it D-ETOILE, and the real problem will be solved.
If this governor had let his pansy religion get in the way of pulling the trigger on this murderer, he should have been impeached and perhaps executed himself. Whatever nonsense he chooses to think about non-existent gods and their "mercy" is his business. It's not hypocrisy; it's blind stupidity.
Considering that the current occupant paid $740.6 million for a 4-year lease....
I just don't trust the guy. Sleaze-ball comes to mind.
And if you're a Facebook user, sleaze-ball comes behind.
"Normal" kids piss in toilets; autistic kids piss in their pants or on the floor. Next.
If we start enumerating, I'm sure we'll have the 613 mitzvot soon!
You've apparently never written a trading system. Any such mechanism that is sufficiently stringent to catch the majority of such errors is by definition going to generate a number false positives--legitimately oversized trades that do need to be executed. Pretty soon the traders start clicking "allow" by reflex, and then the check becomes useless. Humans being visual creatures, the one mechanism I've seen work is to show the trader a graph of the stock price with the estimated market impact of the trade they're about to execute. When the image of that squiggly line suddenly going up or down 50% or more hits the trader's brain, it causes a reflexive "uh-oh" that makes them question what they're about to do.
Why not get Sanrio Corp to fund the mission and have it draw a Hello Kitty? Why not have the android look like Hello Kitty? If you've ever been to Japan and seen the Hello Kitty dildos, toilet seat covers, etc., you'll understand why this isn't entirely unlikely.