Slashdot Mirror


Review: Cowboys & Aliens

The name pretty much sums it up: There are cowboys. There are aliens. And Iron Man Director Jon Favreau has blown a pretty penny trying to make the whole thing work, getting the sexiest woman alive from Maxim a few years back, as well as a James Bond and a Han Solo to convince you to come to the theater and watch 6-shooters take on the little green men. Spoilers may exist below, but I promise to keep the review mostly lacking substance: just like the movie.

So let me be clear up front: I didn't hate it. The only movie this summer that I walked out of the theater thinking FAIL in capital letters was Green Lantern. So far everything else has had some sort of redeeming value. And this does too: solid production values, occasionally funny dialog, cool looking aliens, and a really awesome bad guy base/rocket ship is good fun.

The plot: Daniel Craig is a cowboy who wakes up with amnesia and a strange metal wrist band. He runs afoul of a punk kid with a rich daddy (Ford) in a town where blinking lights in the sky show up and lasso people away at night. So Craig and Ford and a ragtag assortment of town folk go looking for their kin, learning about the aliens, and growing beyond their cheesy racism with the local indians, and shooting pistols at alien space ships.

The sci-fi western is tough sod to trod. The winners (Firefly, Cowboy Bebop) have typically placed Cowboys into Outter Space, and not Aliens into the Old West. For me, this is because the whole old west/cowboy thing is kinda campy. Hollywood dried up that well over the years, leaving behind a legacy of great and terrible movies. But the Western has a visual vocabulary we all know. The Bar Hall Brawl. The standoff in main street between two gun-slingers. The Boozing and the Prostitutes. And of course the dialog conventions... that 1800s slang which is very fun to play with for a moment, and pretty annoying after awhile. Unless you are Malcolm Reynolds.

I think they did an ok job with their world. They never really break out of The Old West. With the exception of the super weapon that Craig has attached to his wrist, the good guys weapons are pistols, rifles, dynamite sticks which makes it all the more awesome fighting highly maneuverable alien fighter jets, as well as the more melee battles on the ground.

The aliens and their technology are a mixed bag. Their design is sort of like a turtle with a quatto to inside. We see 2 ships: one which is kinda a fighter that looks like a firefly, and one giant rocket base that is mostly underground and used to mine gold (which is explained, but really is done just for cool golden visuals scattered all around the film, and to justify alien presence and overall badness).

Should you see it? I enjoyed Captain America, Harry Potter, and Thor more. But this was better than Transformers 3 and Green Lantern. It's visually stylized. Sometimes charming. My wife thought Daniel Craig was just ok, where I found him to be pretty cool. I thought Harrison Ford to once again proves that he is just to old for this sort of work: Same problem with Indiana Jones the action just isn't believable any more- he looks and moves like an old man, and they edit it this stuff to make him look like he is doing more than he is instead of embracing the fact that he's an old guy shuffling around. He just doesn't pull it off. But he looks good in a hat.

But when I look at the producer credits, I can't help but feel like this just should have been better. There are 8 writers, including several of the Bad Robot regulars. The producers include the Ron Howard/Brian Grazer team, Steven Spielburg and those Lost guys again. I can't help but feel like when the dust settled, this was a film by committee. From the design to the script to the casting and somewhere through 8 writers and all these producers a bit of sparkle got sanded off.

But hey, next summer Pirates & Aliens? Ninjas & Aliens? I spent all night trying to decide what genre should encounter aliens next, and i have the answer: Alien & Aliens. Now THAT would be a movie.

39 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. There are 8 writers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The true sign of any picture I would avoid.

  2. Alien vs Ninja by nhat11 · · Score: 3, Informative

    They already have an alien vs ninja =) : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_vs_Ninja

  3. Re:Steven Spielburg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty sure that's the guy who directed Shaving Ryan's Privates.

  4. Crappy, crappy film by heptapod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's nothing like the comic and as AC posted there are eight writers which is a warning sign.

    I was hoping there would be a high noon shootout, a crazy old prospector sidekick, the whore with a heart of gold and a six shooter between her boobs, saving an alien from being hung by the sheriff who's more crooked than the branch on the executioner's tree. Instead "Aliens are greedy like us. Supposedly killing off humans means they can get all our gold." Aliens who can travel interstellar distances have the need to exterminate humanity when 16-17th century tradesmen traded realty for shiny beads of glass then have the unmitigated gall to gift those natives with blankets full of cooties. Crappy films are good when they're crowdpleasers but there weren't any joyful moments where humanity got their comeuppance against the aliens.

    I expected Blazing Saddles with anal probes. Instead I got JJ Abrams without lens flare.

    1. Re:Crappy, crappy film by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sometimes an action flick is just that...
      Action flicks rarely if ever really have a good plot... We just think they do when we were kids, or teenagers. If you never saw any of the Star Wars movies then watched them (Even excluding the new ones) they would probably joke at the lame plot that they use to show off all the cool special effects.

      Why did they need the force? Well as a plot device to show people doing super human things, so they can make these cool special effects with it, did the force really add to the plot much... Lets see...
      Boy Find messagers who direct them to a an old general.
      General befriends boy and asks him to join him,
      Boy rejects then finds guardians dead from bad guy.
      Boy goes with general as has nothing else to do.
      General finds Rogues to do work No Questions Asked.
      General, Boy and Rogues go on quest get caught by Bad Guys.
      General, Boy and Rogues try to escape and rescue the Dame.
      General works on the escape, while Boy and Rogues find dame.
      Dame helps Boy and Rogues escape.
      General Finds Bad Guy fights to the death and dies.
      Boy takes Generals place.
      Boy kills Bad Guys...
      Boy becomes Hero.

      Now you can take that story plot, and change things around many ways to create hundreds of movies. After such movies we do not gain much insight into anything. They are just fun to watch the special effects, and its easy plot allows our imagination to make us feel like we can be the hero too.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Crappy, crappy film by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      I love your story idea. But I can't let the beads-for-realty thing go without making the comment that the Natives didn't pretend to own any land, so if anybody got taken for a ride in such a deal it was the one who purchased from a non-owner.

      But I think the realty reality was more about violent force (and cooties) than swindling.

    3. Re:Crappy, crappy film by KarrdeSW · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's also worth noting that the land was actually traded for several thousand dollars (in that time, not today's) worth of beads, firearms, cookware, and other manufactured goods (the bulk of which was NOT the beads).

      It's especially worth noting that the natives who sold the land didn't live there. They actually sold a neighboring tribe's land. The rest is violent force and cooties.

    4. Re:Crappy, crappy film by genner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sometimes an action flick is just that... Action flicks rarely if ever really have a good plot... We just think they do when we were kids, or teenagers. If you never saw any of the Star Wars movies then watched them (Even excluding the new ones) they would probably joke at the lame plot that they use to show off all the cool special effects.

      Why did they need the force? Well as a plot device to show people doing super human things, so they can make these cool special effects with it, did the force really add to the plot much... Lets see... Boy Find messagers who direct them to a an old general. General befriends boy and asks him to join him, Boy rejects then finds guardians dead from bad guy. Boy goes with general as has nothing else to do. General finds Rogues to do work No Questions Asked. General, Boy and Rogues go on quest get caught by Bad Guys. General, Boy and Rogues try to escape and rescue the Dame. General works on the escape, while Boy and Rogues find dame. Dame helps Boy and Rogues escape. General Finds Bad Guy fights to the death and dies. Boy takes Generals place. Boy kills Bad Guys... Boy becomes Hero.

      Now you can take that story plot, and change things around many ways to create hundreds of movies. After such movies we do not gain much insight into anything. They are just fun to watch the special effects, and its easy plot allows our imagination to make us feel like we can be the hero too.

      Boy finds out the bad guy was his father NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

    5. Re:Crappy, crappy film by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2

      Crappy films are good when they're crowdpleasers but there weren't any joyful moments where humanity got their comeuppance against the aliens.

            Huh? You pull for aliens because humans deserve their comeuppance? This is a bizarre little corner of the world we have here...

            Brett

    6. Re:Crappy, crappy film by cusco · · Score: 2

      Knowledge of the germ theory is immaterial. Even the most primitive of peoples know that giving a sick person's goods to a healthy person can make the recipient sick, they don't have to know WHY they get sick to recognize that simple fact. That's why so many cultures burn a deceased relative's clothing and bedding, so that whatever killed them doesn't come back for the survivors. The Brits didn't give away cast-off blankets from the royal family or from people killed in the frequent mine disasters, they specifically handed out blankets from a smallpox infirmary (probably leaving sick residents without blankets in the process) centuries after they had instituted quarantines for people with serious infectious diseases like pneumonic (sp?) plague.

      I've come the the conclusion that one of the reasons that conservatives repeat the same disastrous policies time after time is that they're mostly ignorant of history and cultures other than their own.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  5. Putin is not James Bond by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Daniel Craig aka Vladimir Putin should be a Bond villain not James Bond. How do they explain him being a cowboy in this? The KGB sent him to spy on our cattle?

    1. Re:Putin is not James Bond by operagost · · Score: 2

      Dude, Craig is half Welsh, half English.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Putin is not James Bond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why would the KGB send an English actor to spy on American cattle.

      Because no one would suspect him?

    3. Re:Putin is not James Bond by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, Craig is half Welsh, half English.

      God, keep him out of the kitchen, whatever you do.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  6. Re:Steven Spielburg? by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He changed name after doing that horrendous piece of shit called "War of the Worlds". To wash the shame away.
    Turns out that wasn't enough!

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  7. Re:Steven Spielburg? by uberjack · · Score: 2

    Steven Spielberg's non-union Mexican equivalent.

  8. Come on.... by wjousts · · Score: 2

    Pirates & Aliens? Ninjas & Aliens?

    Pirates & Ninjas, obviously!

    1. Re:Come on.... by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      I think you're forgetting about Harper Lee's timeless classic "How to Kill a Mockingbird". I think that pretty much says all that needs, nay, can be said in the pirates vs ninjas genre.

      But you still have monkey vs robot vs pirate vs ninja (vs alien vs predator vs terminator (wait, robot...)) which is wide open.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Come on.... by mdf356 · · Score: 4, Funny

      90 minute film, 85 minutes of action.

      So, a porno without the sex? :-)

      --
      Terrorist, bomb, al Qaeda, nuclear, yellowcake, kill, assassinate. Carnivore is dead... long live Echelon.
  9. Think I'll be skipping this one by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The producers include the Ron Howard/Brian Grazer team, Steven Spielburg and those Lost guys again.

    Wow, that just screams mediocre crap before the first scene even plays.

    Same problem with Indiana Jones the action just isn't believable any more- he looks and moves like an old man

    Ford seems to be one of those actors who just can't accept his age. And for some reason, everyone is still indulging him (maybe they're still starstruck from his younger days). Personally, he's one of the actors I would least want to ever have to work with. He comes off as an arrogant prick in just about every interview and the people who've worked with him don't ever seem to have many kind words for him (except Lucas and Spielburg, who both started working with him before he became so big). Basically, he's an old-school movie star who does everything HIS way and isn't going to listen to any direction at all, especially someone telling him "You're an old man now, and you look stupid as shit in a fight scene." And this is not the kind of movie he should be in anymore (not sure what in the hell Favreau was thinking).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Think I'll be skipping this one by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

      Hollywood is a bottom-line industry. When they see "Harrison" they think of all the money his movies have generated. If they have to wheel him out on stage they'll do it.

      Same thing with a lot of other aging actors. Sylvester Stallone is still squeezing blood from that stone and they're talking about a Die Hard 5!!! I really just don't get why Hollywood doesn't trust the new generation of leading men to carry films. Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, et. al. are proven assets.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Think I'll be skipping this one by TimHunter · · Score: 2

      He was thinking he wants to sell tickets to people over 40. Especially women over 40. Nothing wrong with that. Rosie Huntington-Whitely isn't in Transformers 3 for her acting skills.

  10. A vs A? Done that. by pupitetris · · Score: 2

    Remember Aliens VS Predator, which was another OK movie.

  11. This movie was AWESOME. by PatTheGreat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously. I don't care what the critics say, it had cowboys, aliens, Olivia Wilde, Daniel Craig, and Harrison Ford. If you don't like it, then you, my friend, just don't know art.

    --
    Google: "All your data are belong to us."
    1. Re:This movie was AWESOME. by ImprovOmega · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Though I wouldn't say they don't know art as much as they don't know how to have fun at the movies!

  12. Re:Steven Spielburg? by Heed00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    C'mon, you know that's Señor Spielbergo.

    --
    Thought thinks itself.
  13. Air Force One by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one that was hoping for a scene on a train, so that Harrison Ford could tell an alien to "Get off my train"?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  14. Zeppelin vs Pterodactyls - dammit! by smoothnorman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is the one and only most critical RandomA-vs-RandomB film that cries out to be made!: http://boingboing.net/2007/07/31/zeppelin-vs-pterodac.html

    Jürgen Prochnow as the prussian sabre scarred Zeppelin captain with a vast history and one last battle to prove! ...and i dunno...uh, John Malkovich as the psionically mentally linked Pterodactyl master - who, unlikely enough, has a past that overlaps Prochnow's ...yeah.

  15. You Know... by jimmerz28 · · Score: 2

    It might be worth seeing if it had Vin Diesel.

    And I was really drunk.

  16. Re:It was like a Linux conf near WWDC by ginbot462 · · Score: 2

    It got you to want to shave. Come on, that's something! Sort of like how Michael Bay films give me dysentery.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  17. Re:My short review. by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I always enjoy when someone comes along and says a movie isn't original, not noting the fact that there are no previous big release movies with Cowboys and Aliens that I can recall. I'm sure there may be some hidden in some B-Movie treasure trove, but the fact that a main line studio did this is refreshing rather than re-rehashing some remake done 4 times already.

    The movie itself has familiar 'themes' but that's about it. If you go to that extreme, every movie and story told today has similar themes (boy meets girl, good vs bad, yada yada). The movie was better than usual summer fare, with an interesting plot and an unusual story idea. That is to be encouraged, especially when they managed to pull it off as well as they did.

    No regrets seeing this one.

  18. Re:what? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are at least two different Han Solos. One of them shot first, the other shot in self defense. It's all very quantum.

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  19. I enjoyed it by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

    To me it was a fun, marginally campy movie. Daniel Craig does a pretty good job playing the tough guy. I didn't go in looking for a life-changing experience, and I came of the theater having enjoyed myself.

    I guess each has his own opinion, but I still don't understanding the hating some people have for this movie, given its limited ambitions in the first place.

    1. Re:I enjoyed it by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also agree.. :)

      Well put. Sometimes movies are just supposed to be fun. I mean, seriously? We're praising movies on the one hand that have just as silly a premise as this one, but because someone has a boner against Daniel Craig as James Bond, this movie lacks "substance"? WTF? Didn't the title clue everyone in? (As for Craig, I enjoyed his Bond movies... more than I can say for the last 4 Bonds...)

      Now for the rest of you neckbeard Comic Book Guys:

      Sometimes movies are just that... fun rides. Who gives a shit if Harrison Ford is arrogant? The man's been in film franchises that grossed a bazillion dollars... and he's a good actor. He's wiping his ass with $100 bills and that sparks jealousy. He doesn't "Burt Reynolds" his way through a part... he's believable.

      As for high art in this movie... is everyone missing the fun? All critical folk should look at this movie the way they SHOULD have looked at the Star Wars prequels... through 11-year-old eyes. Stop trying to turn simple action space operas into hard science fiction all the time. You'll live longer. :)

      This movie has all the elements:

      Cowboys? Check.
      Aliens? Check.
      Explosions? Check.
      Action thrills? Check.

      Pretty much pass me the popcorn. If I wanted to watch Shakespeare, I wouldn't go to a movie with the title "Cowboys and Aliens"...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  20. Popcorn Movies by IonOtter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Y'know, people need to just learn to turn off their brains once in a while. If you really wanna use your brains when you see a movie, don't go to the cinema at the mall, go to the art-house cinema in the college district.

    This is where the genre of "popcorn movies" comes into play. It's not great, it's not bad, it's a movie you can enjoy so long as you've got a bit of popcorn to stuff in your face while you watch it. Quite frankly, the last "Steak and Potatoes" movie I saw was "Moon", and I left the theater incredibly happy. The last "Dinner and Nightcap" movie I saw was "Avatar", and I left THAT one a bit dizzy and giggly, wanting a cigarette.

    But most of the summer offerings so far have been either Popcorn, or flat out Pepto-Bismol. "Percy Jackson and the Olympians" from last year is a perfect example of a Peptol-Bismol movie, and I'm glad I didn't see it in the theater, but got it from "a friend".

    "Cowboys and Aliens"? I'd call this one a "Popcorn, Soda and Hot Dog" movie. It's not a "Steak and Potatoes" movie, but it's got more brains than just a popcorn. You don't need a brain, per se, but if you care to use it, you won't be terribly disappointed. You'll still be a bit peckish when you leave, but not sick over spending 10 bux.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  21. Sequel? by rishistar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So when is Cowboys vs Predators coming out?

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  22. Re:Reviews... by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    Why would you look at a movie review article then? Let alone comment on one?

  23. And her name is...? by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And Iron Man Director Jon Favreau has blown a pretty penny trying to make the whole thing work, getting the sexiest woman alive from Maxim a few years back, as well as a James Bond and a Han Solo to convince you to come to the theater and watch 6-shooters take on the little green men.

    Huh... Sexy woman, Bond, and Solo? Perhaps we'll get the names of these three shortly...

    The plot: Daniel Craig is a cowboy who wakes up with amnesia and a strange metal wrist band. He runs afoul of a punk kid with a rich daddy (Ford) in a town where blinking lights in the sky show up and lasso people away at night. So Craig and Ford and a ragtag assortment of town folk go looking for their kin, learning about the aliens, and growing beyond their cheesy racism with the local indians, and shooting pistols at alien space ships.

    Well, that's two. What about her name?
    She's the lead actress, the love interest, and, in your words, the "sexiest woman alive"? Come on, Taco... Surely she has a name, or were you too busy spanking it to her tits to bother looking it up? She even shares top billing on the goddamn poster.

    Frankly, Olivia Wilde deserves better than this shiat review.

  24. Re:Steven Spielburg? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

    Steven Spielburgh. He makes all the movies filmed in Pittsburgh.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust