Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What To Do With Spammers You Know?

courteaudotbiz writes "For years, a business named Compu-Finder has been sending spam all around the province of Quebec, Canada. In their emails, there is a phone number where we can reach them, and an unsubscribe link that you can click and seems to work, but even after asking them on the phone, by email or with their unsubscribe link, to unsubscribe me, I still receive 10 — 15 spams a week coming from this company. Many bloggers, journalists and radio chroniclers talked about them, but they seem to be untouchable. Still, it is easy to find the names, addresses and phone numbers of the shareholders and administrators of the company. How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?"

333 comments

  1. Aren't there laws against that? by NixieBunny · · Score: 3

    Document it thoroughly and submit a report to the authorities. If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

    --
    The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    1. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I was just going to recommend this. The behavior they're displaying borders on harassment, and should definitely be viewed as unfavorable by police and (hopefully) the shareholders.

    2. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      I lock them in my basement, then Christopher Walken and I prank them.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    3. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

      Also helps against neighbours who play loud music in the middle of the night...

    4. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by mcavic · · Score: 2

      I live in an apartment building where all of the master breakers are accessible, and I've often wanted to do that, but never had the balls.

    5. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Document it thoroughly and submit a report to the authorities. If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

      I was thinking more along the lines of thermite bomb on top of the main building transformer. Problem is that their servers are probably virtualized on some offshore blade farm.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    6. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      ...If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

      Uhhh...yeah...speaking of "laws against that"...

    7. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by TheCarp · · Score: 0

      So don't get caught. You didn't break the law if you didn't get convicted.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    8. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      No, their host is theplanet.com in texas. (do an nslookup on their latest site name theutraining.com - 174.123.135.180 - they keep changing it, for obvious reasons).

      Report it to abuse@theplanet.com

    9. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Well, they are from Quebec, so they are just playfully harassing the English-speaking world...

      As least they aren't coming to your shop and breaking your windows for not having the French version of your company name at least twice as big as the English version.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    10. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Canada have something like CAN-SPAM? It doesn't work in the US for most unsolicited email, but I haven't had any problems with a US company in years. Our authorities do act against domestic spammers, and when they do it isn't pretty.

    11. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works pretty much for anything. However, who the fuck in their right mind has the power panel outside? The only way to disconnect my house from the outside is cut the actual cables or mess up the board on a pole.

    12. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by jittles · · Score: 1

      Just remember that if you do grow the balls to do this, you may be prosecuted if someone is seriously injured or killed due to the power outage! :P

    13. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by yuldude · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like every Irish are member of the IRA. All Germans use to be Nazi. All Quebecers are intolerant towards English-speaking.

    14. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by mcavic · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know. But I already have my escape route from the breaker room planned. Actually, though, the loud neighbors have moved out.

    15. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by davester666 · · Score: 0

      Um, yes?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    16. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by yuldude · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see, so in your case it's just pure ignorance...not foolishness, that's reassuring.

    17. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Yank the power meter. Plus the next time the meter reader comes by they'll notice that the tamper clip has been broken and they'll get harassed by the power company.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    18. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      So don't get caught. You didn't break the law if you didn't get convicted.

      So, when a murderer doesn't get caught, there's magically no victim?

      As you can see, that whole "tree falls in the woods" analogy doesn't exactly apply everywhere...

    19. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Where I worked once, our whole office complex's main breaker was not only unlocked, but open to and visible from the street and unguarded/unwatched. You could shut the WHOLE THING down. Hilariously, the individual breakers for tenants were locked.

      Now, I know you might thing that might not actually be the master - maybe only for this part of the building... but we did look at the plans and talk to facilities, because it made us nervous, and they did confirm it.

      I could understand this kind of thing at a residence, but in an office building?! Yikes.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    20. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about stereotypes is there is always some grain of truth to them.

      (CAPTCHA: mislead)

    21. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by en4bz · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right.

    22. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I lock them in my basement, then Christopher Walken and I prank them.

      Oh, like he 'pranked' Dennis Hopper?

    23. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      That's because it's a stupid analogy which ties reality to a human being there to observe it.

      If a bear shits in the woods ... Well, there is still bear shit in the woods.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    24. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      Actually, my suggestion looks a bit like this: http://xkcd.com/538/

    25. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are laws against that. The government has a website with more information about it:

      http://fightspam.gc.ca/

      And the raw law (it was bill C-28) if you're interested:

      http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocID=4547728

    26. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      Oh, like he 'pranked' Dennis Hopper?

      No, like the SNL skit "Pranksters" http://www.kewego.com/video/iLyROoaft1UI.html

      I jumped out and pranked him to death with a tire iron. ... I hate Stiffley Stiffersons; I wanna prank them for hours in my basement.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    27. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! that way you?
      Enjoy this night then, i've just got a power generator!!! hahahahah

    28. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Not all, but the Majority are, yes. Its less prevalent in some areas, but quebecois often do things differently just because they don't want to do it the same as their english-speaking counterparts.

      This causes all kinds of problems.

    29. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by ulricr · · Score: 1

      your just trolling with the cliché prejudice, but btw the article linked in the post is in French and the poster here is probably french speaking as well.

    30. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. They appear to be in violation of principle 4.3 of schedule 1 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act 2000:

      http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Bill&Doc=C-6&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=36&Ses=2&File=163

      Note that 4.3.8 clearly states that consent may be withdrawn given reasonable notice. Complaints should be sent to the Privacy Commission of Canada. http://www.priv.gc.ca/

    31. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      If that doesn't work, go to their offices and switch off the main power panel a few times until they get the hint.

      No, buy a strong (rare earth) magnet and use it to stop their meter. (Or some other tampering device, depending on the age of the meter.)

      Then when the meter reader comes out and reports power-theft, they'll be trying to explain to the power-company (or courts) how a vandal broke into their meterbox in order to help them lower their power bills.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    32. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      We have an outside breaker. It's build into our electrical meter. Part of our billing rate is determined by what size breaker we have. I recently got a $40/month bill decrease by getting them to replace the 50A breaker with a 35A breaker.

      If we call in a power outage, the first thing they ask, "Have you checked the meter breaker?"

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    33. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      There was a point, and you took a wide berth around it.

      I never said there was no victim when that specific law is broken. To recap, the question of legality came up with a specific action which was, not murder.

      The observation that the law only matters if you get caught is hardly revolutionary or new. It hardly constitutes an endorsement of all lawbreaking, simply a consideration in this instance, or any instance, where legality must be considered.

      If you need the law, or the threat of being caught by the law to stop you from considering murder. If you feel the law should always be inviolate, then I hope to never be stuck behind you in traffic.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    34. Re:Aren't there laws against that? by yuldude · · Score: 1

      Quoting wikipedia as an Anonymous Coward...FAIL.

      Oxford Dictionary
      Stereotype: a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing

  2. Getting your point across by jdavidb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

    Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?

    1. Re:Getting your point across by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Informative

      How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

      Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?

      I just hope that doesn't mean you are one of the mindless masses who believes that spam is sent out purely to make people angry or waste their time. People of even moderate intellect realize that spam is all about money, and the only way to stop the spam is to stop the flow of money to the spammers - or at least make it more difficult for them to get so much money so easily.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:Getting your point across by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Correct. It continues because they think it is effective.

      Contact the group being advertised for.
      Tell them you will not use their services, explain why (including the firm).
      Don't use their services.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:Getting your point across by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      It continues because they think it is effective. I'm sure they can see if it's making them money and therefore effective. Until something happens that causes them to lose money it is effective for them.

    4. Re:Getting your point across by lcarnevale · · Score: 2

      Set up a filter that forwards all the messages to the shareholders and administrators.

    5. Re:Getting your point across by wisty · · Score: 1

      1) Start a business.
      2) Send spam, ostensibly advertising your competitors.
      3) ... ?
      4) Profit!

    6. Re:Getting your point across by LordNacho · · Score: 1

      I always wondered who would even read a spam message, let alone respond to it. Has anyone here ever met someone who bought something off a spam email? Someone must be doing it, I just can't imagine who.

    7. Re:Getting your point across by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      True. The thing with spam, like much advertising, is that it's based on wishful thinking and something almost like superstition. They spend money on advertising, and unless they're a huge megacorporation doing serious market research, they just sort of hope that it pays off. Unless there is a big dive in profits that correlates with a marketing campaign, ideally with many angry letters to give the marketroids a hint at what's going on, they'll assume it's all hunky-dory.

      They spam, profits are roughly the same or increase, it works! Spam more! And it repeats like that until they get hit with a clue bat.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Getting your point across by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2

      The issue with spam is that it is so cheap that even incredibly low rates of return can still be profitable. Like one in a million rates of return, or even the prospect of one day getting a single hit.

    9. Re:Getting your point across by pugugly · · Score: 2

      Thus the issue is being handled at the wrong end. Create a spam system yourself, and spam Quebec. Some small number of people will respond positively to your campaign. Use the profits from the campaign to hire assassins and have those people killed.

      When you can no longer afford to hire killers to eliminate people that respond positively to spam, the problem will have been defacto resolved.

      In order to eliminate ethical concerns, this process should probably be automated - otherwise the profits might actually tempt you and you might forget that we're doing this for a greater good. And that would be wrong.

      Pug

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    10. Re:Getting your point across by geekmux · · Score: 1

      How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

      Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?

      Are you under the impression that spam continues for the fun of it, just to annoy people?

      Root cause analysis my friend. There would be no spam if there were not plenty of idiots still generating click revenue behind it.

    11. Re:Getting your point across by Anrego · · Score: 1

      People fall for those Nigerian prince scams a few times per year.. reasonable to expect if someone can fall for that, someone can fall for anything. More importantly, the cost per spam is so cheap that even if you only get a few people per million emails, you probably make money.

    12. Re:Getting your point across by Anrego · · Score: 1

      You can even take the "think" out of there..

      Spam is effective because it's ultra cheap and there are just enough people who will go for it.

    13. Re:Getting your point across by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I have done this once or twice. Its amazing how much people don't get it when you call up complaining about their advertising practices.

      Generally the people willing to advertise with spam are of the opinion that, if you don't want their service, you should just hit delete, and not call them.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    14. Re:Getting your point across by sjames · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, make their expenses exceed the income or make the degradation to their quality of life exceed the value they derive (tell their kids "your daddy is a dirty spammer and the whole world hates him").

      One must be careful not to cross any legal boundaries, but that leaves plenty of room for a bit of personal feedback when you know their physical location.

    15. Re:Getting your point across by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rather, his request is a thinly-veiled plea for vigilante/mass action from the Slashdot community. That kind of making them understand.

      Like calling 1.800.861.6618 or emailing them at conseil@theumanage.com (ooh, that's the first time I've made a mailto link in a /. discussion — wonder if it'll work) or at conseil@www.cfcible.com, or just visiting their website a bunch.

      Which could actually happen, I wouldn't be surprised. I stand by, curiously awaiting report of the results.

    16. Re:Getting your point across by gmack · · Score: 2

      Report them to their ISP.

    17. Re:Getting your point across by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      "Correct. It continues because they it is effective."

      Hmm. No. I don't like that correction. <sarcasm>I English better than that</sarcasm>

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    18. Re:Getting your point across by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this where I say 'not your personal army', or am I in the wrong place again?

    19. Re:Getting your point across by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spammers don't need every recepient of the email to click the link. Here it works the same way...

    20. Re:Getting your point across by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

      Are you under the impression that spam continues because people think we like it? That if they only understood how much we don't like it, they would stop?

      What parent poster is implying is the only effective solution is correct. Wear a cap to contain your hair and latex gloves to reduce the chance of leaving DNA when you do it.

    21. Re:Getting your point across by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How can we, collectively, take action to make them understand that we do not like their mass mailing practice?

      Burn down their building and rape their wives and daughters? That might give them a clue. However, even that probably wouldn't work -- sociopaths don't care about ANYBODY, even their wives and daughters.

    22. Re:Getting your point across by Uhyve · · Score: 2

      And all of their public email addresses...

    23. Re:Getting your point across by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      A parable:

      A child on their way home from the market is attacked by a leering brigand, only narrowly managing to escape. The child wails piteously for help as they race into the village square, and with dozens finally gathered reports, "I was attacked!" To which town drunk contemptuously spits, "Not your personal army!" The crowd hits him with their hats.

      This is my hat off to you.

    24. Re:Getting your point across by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Sort of a manual Blue Frog.

    25. Re:Getting your point across by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Has anyone here ever met someone who bought something off a spam email?
      Once, out of sheer morbid curiosity about a product that was spammed to me, I decided to respond to the spam. I did not get any kind of response to my attempt to inquire about the product.
      Apparently, spam is just like every other advertising technique. The only people who benefit are the spammers themselves. The people who utilize spam to sell their products don't even get notified of the leads their spam generates.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    26. Re:Getting your point across by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase a post from the Ralsky thread: I am writing this article to request something for a terminaly ill boy. Theu Training is a seven year old boy who has terminal cancer. His ambition before he dies is to be included in the Guinness Book of Records as having the largest collection of post cards. My request is that EVERYONE who reads this posting send at least one post card to him at: 707, rue du Village suite 202 Morin-Heights, (Québec) J0R 1H0 Phone: 450.226.2238 Fax: 450.226.1917 Toll free number : 1.800.861.6618 E-mail: conseil@theumanage.com Please pass this information on to as many people as possible. Let's make a child's dream come true before its too late. Best wishes. A hopeful person.

    27. Re:Getting your point across by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Commerce isn't the majority of spam these days... most of it (that I've ever seen that is) is worm chatter. Bots trying to spread the infection.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:Getting your point across by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You forget botnets, worms, viruses, etc. They don't care if you buy anything, and even worse a good chunk of those work just from accidentally (or intentionally) viewing the email (if you are still vulnerable to their payload).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    29. Re:Getting your point across by metamatic · · Score: 1

      One must be careful not to cross any legal boundaries

      Why? They don't care about breaking the law.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    30. Re:Getting your point across by sjames · · Score: 1

      Mostly so there's nothing for them to hang a reprisal on.

    31. Re:Getting your point across by happylight · · Score: 1

      Bargain shoppers and coupon clippers like my mom. She always signs up for all kinds of spam and she reads them and buys stuff from them.

      And she signs me up for them too.

    32. Re:Getting your point across by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Yes, that was exactly my point. Spam is sent out to make money. They don't care if we like it or not. They do not need to be "made to understand that we really don't like it." They already know this and don't give a rip, so I thought this wording in the original article sounded extremely wimpy and ineffective.

    33. Re:Getting your point across by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Are you under the impression that spam continues for the fun of it, just to annoy people?

      Did you read what I wrote correctly? Spam goes out to make money, and it does make money, so the original article's weak suggestion of letting them know in no uncertain terms that we really don't like what they are doing and could they please stop now sounds pretty ludicrous to me.

  3. Don't call or unsubscribe by gearloos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Usually having a phone number is great!... for the spammers. It now gives them another reference for you and more info to sell and abuse. as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.

    --
    "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    1. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setup Tor and start signing them up for everything you can.
      Request callbacks for services in the name S Pammer.

    2. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by bzipitidoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why was this modded down? It's all too true. Don't unsubscribe, don't call. All that does is confirm that you look at their spam. Mark the offending messages as spam, and filter them out, that's all.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    3. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.

      If they use the unsubscribe link in order to actively maintain you on their list, that smells like fraud to me.

      Remember that something doesn't have to be in direct contravention of your country's Data Protection Act (or equivalent) to be spam -- contract law still holds, and if they offer a way to unsubscribe, you take it and they don't unsubscribe you, that's a breach of agreed terms.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    4. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      molitov cocktail Score:666, Insightful

    5. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but here's my $0.02:

      To be a contract, at least in the US, as far as I know there has to be something of value given by each side (for example, if it's a contract to buy oranges, you are giving the seller money and the seller is giving you oranges.) There are exceptions like detrimental reliance but I don't think they're relevant here.

      In this case, they are unsubscribing you, but you aren't giving them anything of value in return. So it's not a binding contract because you aren't giving them anything of value in exchange for the service of unsubscribing.

      I'm only saying that contract law doesn't help you; I'm not saying you have no legal recourse. They might still be liable for fraud/misrepresentation, or violating truth-in-advertising, consumer protection, the CAN-SPAM act, or unauthorized access to computer systems. (The last one makes me nervous and it should make you nervous. I've heard there are a few court cases out there where the prosecution has argued that violating a website or online service's ToS constitutes "unauthorized access" -- being jailed for a ToS violation is ridiculous and probably doesn't mesh with the constitution / legal system in most countries, since usually the power to decide what sort of behavior can result in criminal penalties belongs exclusively to the government.)

    6. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Yes, and considering the value of the relationship you can sue to collect your $0. The "agreed terms" are certainly being abrogated but you do not have anything of value happening here.

      A court is more likely to fine you for wasting their time.

    7. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by richlv · · Score: 1

      actually, they somehow seem not to like when people call them. i usually look up some number, cal it. i start with "hi, do you receive spam ?" - "um... yes" (who doesn't ?) - "do you like it ?" - "...no" (some get suspicious here, some don't) - "then why do you send spam ?"

      and here i take some time to rant about spam. sometimes they are very like "sorry" and such, then i just rant for a while. sometimes they are aggressive and go like "what's your problem, just delete it" - then i become slightly more rude, suggest spamming/adding to spamlists them or stuffing their mailboxes with paper spam.

      also, once i became really annoyed at my phone company for sending me some sms advertisement (i had complained to their hotline about that before, and they sort of claimed they have no technical means of excluding some numbers from spam - uhuh). i didn't receive messages for a while after that, so i hoped they actually had me blacklisted, then i got 2 in one week. i called their hotline and just read back the sms. the girl on the other end was surprised at first, but was trying not to laugh by the end of it. i think i got one more spam sms after that still. will have to see whether i get more & read them back again...

      --
      Rich
    8. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't think there is any sort of contract created by clicking/following an unsubscribe link. No exchange of goods or services or money, etc (consideration).
            Mind you I'm not a lawyer or any sort of professional legal person and am going on my limited knowledge of US law, maybe Canada is different or there is something I'm not aware of.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    9. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this modded down? It's all too true. Don't unsubscribe, don't call. All that does is confirm that you look at their spam. Mark the offending messages as spam, and filter them out, that's all.

      On the contrary, when an actual business sends spam, I LOVE calling them to complain.

      Call, bitch, moan and express your displeasure. I find it very effective & satisfying. You get bonus points by calling, pretending to be a sales lead, then reaming out the sales rep.

      You get extra bonus points for getting an executive, VP or higher on the phone.

    10. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXACTLY! every time you click 'unsubscribe' you get off one list and make it to the more expensive 'confirmed addresses' list.

    11. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was this marked Insightful. This person has obviously never used or heard of a "pay-phone".

    12. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for unsubscribing, well, that just shows them that a live human actually is at that address and reading email from spammers.. Goldstrike if you called and unsubscribed.

      If they use the unsubscribe link in order to actively maintain you on their list, that smells like fraud to me.

      Remember that something doesn't have to be in direct contravention of your country's Data Protection Act (or equivalent) to be spam -- contract law still holds, and if they offer a way to unsubscribe, you take it and they don't unsubscribe you, that's a breach of agreed terms.

      But what if they unsubcribe you from list A at company X, and then "sell" your address to company Y to add to list B?, Doesn't matter that Company A & B are owned by the same person(s), your breach arguement just collapsed all the way to the bank...

    13. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      You are right about all of that. Trouble is why that may be satisfying in nerd world, it holds little water in practical world.

      Its well known that many spammers do abuse the unsubscribe links. They either just use it to verify your address is real continue to send the same crap, or they use it verify the address is real, "unsubscribe" from their Homeopathic Viagraaaa mailing list and add you to their Homeopathic Cialisss mailing list, along with 15 others and to their database of validated address they sell to other spammers. That is what happens.

      With that in mind yes, you might be able to sue them breech, the latter senerio being a little more difficult to prove if you do; coupled with the problem that it does nothing about the other 96% of the SMTP traffic you got which is also SPAM.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    14. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by dbug78 · · Score: 2

      This isn't the first time I've heard the "don't unsubscribe" wisdom. It's logical but doesn't reflect reality.

      At my last job, I was asked frequently about the volume of spam. I got less than almost anyone else in the office despite having one of the most widely publicized email addresses. Why? Because I unsubscribed whenever I got something. When I was able to convince others to unsubscribe, they saw drastic decreases in spam.

      This theory relies on the idea that spammers stop spamming people they don't get a reply from, and that's lunacy. The only time they give up on an address is if the email is rejected or if they cease operations. That being the case, there's no harm in trying to unsubscribe.

      To address the initial question, if this company is so notorious why aren't they blocked at the SMTP server? Your IT people ought to be able to blacklist them with very little effort.

    15. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by hazah · · Score: 1

      What does this actually get you? Sure, you'll piss someone off in the moment. This does nothing to deter the COMPANY.

    16. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was probably modded down because it's just not true. You can not maintain ip reputation or make any money by sending to unsubscribe data. If someone is a complainer you want them out of your list, they lower your ip reputation by sending you to their junk box, making it difficult to deliver to people who will actually buy something. They most likely don't know that their unsubscribe feature doesn't work properly, or they regularly reimport their data without any regard for reimporting unsubscribers. Complaining louder is a good idea, call them or snail mail them something explaining the situation. Getting you out of their list is something they should want to do, it's in their best interest if they're not using a botnet.

    17. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you're a spammer.

    18. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you can go through the motions of buying a product (make sure you reference their email as the source), use up a salesperson's time, ask for a demo etc etc. Then cancel it all at the last second.

    19. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Roogna · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but would it be possible to use the various EULA protections to turn it into a contract. Like sending the company themselves a letter along the lines of "Use of email server constitutes acceptance of the following terms and conditions. $500.00 US per email sent will be paid to ." type thing? After all, that's what companies like to hide in tiny little fine print on all their websites. Why can't we do it? Perhaps in the e-mail server welcome message.

      Plus once you've declared a cost to continue e-mailing you, then if they agree by sending you additional email, then you -do- have a value on both sides.

    20. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a contract to be valid I believe you usually need money to exchange hands. A dollar will do. Given a lack of money when they don't unsubscribe you will probably mean they are free to do as they please.

    21. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no money changing hands. It's not fraud, nor is there any contract. They're just simply lying to you.

    22. Re:Don't call or unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What (sometimes) happens is, they unsubscribe you from their list, and then sell their list of "unsubscribers" as "verified to reach human eyes" email addresses.....

      Now, here in Holland we have a chain of drugstores. At one point in time I ordered a set of photo-prints. They want your EMail address when you order. Fine. Then (probably just crossing the legal line) they put you on their general mailing list. If I would unsubscribe there, and then find out that they sold my EMail address they would be in big trouble.

      (the law here in the Netherlands states that they can email-market things similar to what I purchased from them. So they could contact me about "poster prints" for the digital photos, but not for "shampoo" or other stuff that drugstores sell. That's why I think they are crossing the legal line when they put me on their general mailing list and try to sell shampoo. But then again, I'm not a lawyer, and I don't think this has been tested in court. So.... who knows where this may go).

      I sometimes create an EMail address just for one company. So if I get spam from another company on that EMail address I know they sold the EMail address. On the other hand.... this doesn't happen often. Most people on the internet are just repeating others who say that companies sell their lists....

      Most companies in Europe have a "privacy policy" which states that they won't sell your info to others, and they would be in trouble if they didn't follow their own policy.

  4. show up at their door by james_van · · Score: 2

    with pitchforks and torches

    1. Re:show up at their door by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      this. Occupy their main office. Bill them for their services of delivering you junk mail. Submit to collection agencies. Show up at their houses. The usual stuff.

    2. Re:show up at their door by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Seriously.

      Nothing else seems to work.

    3. Re:show up at their door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or show up at their cyberdoor with cyberforks and cybertorches (i.e. DoS) -- in either case, you'll want a mob with you for maximum effectiveness, so get thee to 4chan and ask Anonymous if they'll be your personal army. (Never hurts to ask, amirite.)

    4. Re:show up at their door by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I suppose "high explosives" wasn't the answer the guy was looking for.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:show up at their door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      organize a cross burning in their front-yard, does wonders for real-estate value.

  5. Arson is your friend. by Surt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really, it's the only way to get through to some people.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Arson is your friend. by Spectre · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It works for nearly any non-hardened military target ...

      "Kill it with fire!"

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    2. Re:Arson is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that this is Quebec, I'm inclined to agree. Montreal has become such a mob run city that firebombing of small businesses is pretty common place. These guys would certainly deserve it.

    3. Re:Arson is your friend. by wintercolby · · Score: 2

      Light a fire for a man and he's warm for a day, light him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life. --Terry Pratchett

      --
      Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:Arson is your friend. by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

      Hey! My cat says that when she is made aware of the existence of any other cat...

      Well, not in those exact words, but she can't actually speak. The intent is clear though.

      I wonder if I could train her to go into these homicidal rages at spammers?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    5. Re:Arson is your friend. by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Yes, set your cat on fire and toss through their front door.

      That ought to do it.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    6. Re:Arson is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded?

    7. Re:Arson is your friend. by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Are you a dumbfuck?

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    8. Re:Arson is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pfft. I'm thinking more along the lines of something deorbited on top of their site. Something preferably containing the terms "nuclear" and "warhead" in its description, just to be sure.

      Okay, in seriousness, I'll relate a relevant story. Way back in the days when usenet was relatively young, around of the time of the great, initial spamming (Cantor and Seigel), I discovered that not only was a newsgroup I frequented receiving spam, but it was advertising spam tools. Programs for composing mailing lists and firing off messages en masse to usenet or e-mail or wherever. Spam to make spam. I then discovered that the person responsible lived in my own city. This was kind of like discovering that someone committing the usenet equivalent of war crimes was manufacturing weapons in your home town. I was incensed. Young and naive as I was, I decided to do something. The person in question didn't make it easy to find them and did all their business through a post office box, but they did make one foolish mistake. They also sold (dubious) financial services and software in other newsgroups. That ad listed a business, that business was linked through a website to another business, and the other business was in the official business registry in the region where I live. That business registry had what turned out to be the home address for this person, confirmed via the same address and their name in the local phone book. It all matched up. I had tracked the spammer to their home lair.

      There's no big final confrontation here. I'm not the vigilante type and would never consider or advocate anything criminal. But I did phone them up at home, asked them if they were the person running the business in question and if they sent an ad across usenet, confirmed that they were, and then politely berated them for adopting such a horrible business approach (spamming usenet). I also told them that while I had no ill intentions myself: A) if I could find all that information then probably anybody could, and B) if they spammed usenet again, I'd simply reply in the newsgroup with all their business and home address contact details including their phone number, and that I couldn't be held responsible for whatever happened once people had access to the information.

      They never did spam that group again.

      "What to do with spammers you know?" Answer: out them. Make them findable and accountable to the fullest degree possible by anyone looking. You know the address of the business and the people who run it? Post it. Any and everywhere so that anyone searching can find it. You don't need to do or suggest anything criminal, just give people the ability to contact them however they want. If they've been greatly damaged by the company, then they'll sue. If they've just been annoyed, then they'll annoy them back. But being contactable and getting feedback from the thousands of people they spam to is the LAST thing spammers want because they know what the response will be: overwhelmingly negative, and people will use both the legal system and a variety of creative and legal ideas to register that feedback. Make them findable and the more they spam the more feedback they'll get.

    9. Re:Arson is your friend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given that this is Quebec, I'm inclined to agree. Montreal has become such a mob run city that firebombing of small businesses is pretty common place. These guys would certainly deserve it.

      Stats regularly show Montreal as one the least crime-ridden city in North America, with crime rates across all categories continuing to go down. You are safer in Montreal than in any other city on this continent, and we have a truly multi-cultural population where everyone, whether Asian, African, Arabic, etc. feel truly welcome. Don't believe the lies and propaganda from Harper, he is out to invest in prisons, or what he sees as Canada's future (for him and his rightist friends).

      And yes, there is corruption here, as everywhere else. If you see it in the media, it is because the Quebec citizens are keeping it there, and dealing with it.

      Deal with yours and also with your half of the population who might as well qualify as insane.

    10. Re:Arson is your friend. by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Hence why I believe in the John Kramer school of thought. Make them decide between spamming or their lives and see which one wins out!

  6. DNS block by charnov · · Score: 1

    Add a entry in your mail server to drop everything from their netblock. Better yet, block them at your DNS, too.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
    1. Re:DNS block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or better yet, re-direct there spam traffic from there netblock back to there own email servers, if enough of there spam gets re-directed back to them they may end up slowing or crashing there own systems.

    2. Re:DNS block by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is botnets and amazon cloud instances. I see a lot of spam coming from all over the place now. In the old days, blocking the bastards in sendmail or the firewall was enough. Now, they just come at you from a new IP address within hours.

    3. Re:DNS block by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      Now, they just come at you from a new IP address within hours.

      Greylisting is your friend. Your mail server gives them a service temporarily unavailable error. If their mail server follows the SMTP standard, it comes back a few hours later from the same IP address and gets let through. Most spammers are interested in volume, and don't waste resources following up like that. And if they do, and it happens to be a new IP address, then they get delayed again for having a new IP address.

      It doesn't take long for Greylisting filters to learn legitimate hosts, especially if you receive a fair amount of mail from said hosts, and within a day or two you won't notice any delays at all with legitimate mail.

  7. Fire back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Subscribe their phone and their email to another very spammy website. The more goastier, the better.

    1. Re:Fire back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some years back i collected real emails from spammers and people that hire them, and sent messages to each in the name of each other, so each one will have all the rest in their to spam databases. Wasnt a spam singularity, but at least they could had a chance to feel how annoying they were.

    2. Re:Fire back by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

      Any suggestion on this? Which very spammy website do you suggest?

    3. Re:Fire back by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      MycleanPC.com

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. I know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just click report spam

    1. Re:I know what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL user, huh?

  9. As a start... by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Publicise the names and personal details of their CEO and board of directors.
    Subscribe their email addresses to every spam product and service you can find.

    1. Re:As a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then unsubscribe their email address from those same spam products / services.

    2. Re:As a start... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:As a start... by psyque · · Score: 1

      Sign them up for their own mailing list. See if they can get themselves off it.

    4. Re:As a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post gay sex invites on craigslist and write out their phone number and add "ring me" and use their CEOs name

    5. Re:As a start... by NReitzel · · Score: 1

      Get together a list of people who are willing to take action. Get board member and managment phone numbers.

      Start calling them, 24/7. No person call more than once a day. Coordinate times, so that they receive calls every ten minutes, 24 hours a day. It is important that no one person call more than once per day. If you have 140 people, you can call every ten minutes for an entire day with no duplicates. If the phone answers, provide a polite, succinct message such as, "Please stop sending me email". It is important that no one be abusive or hostile.

      Just keep calling. Every ten minutes.

      --

      Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    6. Re:As a start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just what do you stand to gain by giving their secretaries even more work?

    7. Re:As a start... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that might just be "up" their "alley" - you can't use something quite so vanilla.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  10. Give him a wedgie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take no prisoners!

  11. Give it back to them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could a script be written that whenever it receives a spam email from them, it sends a copy to Compu-Finder's email addresses with a tag saying "I received this from you. Please take me off of your list." ?

    And/or have a robo caller that calls the company and tells them that you received an email from them and please take you off of their list?

    They contacted you. And if they keep contacting you, I don't see what you can't return the favor.

  12. Contact your ISP by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

    Have you considered contacting your ISP and asking them to filter that sender domain?

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  13. First Hand Experience... by what2123 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can speak on this company from a first hand account. I work for an ESP, I actually manage all our mail servers and work closely with ISPs and mail vendors to help out GOOD CLIENTS. I say this because Compu-Finder (although they have an official name that is different) was a client of ours. They were a BAD-CLIENT. We have many tools that are in place to help our clients ensure that best practices are followed as well as easily available to contacts of the client, e.g opt-outs and suppressing those contacts from future emails. Compu-Finder did everything they could to get around built in mechanisms to keep "contacts" subscribed. Well Finally after battling with them on changing their practices we finally fired them. They are the kind of company that makes me cringe because I know there are real, legitimate, marketers out there that do use email to engage clients and keep them up-to-date but they are the ones that make it bad for any sender.

    1. Re:First Hand Experience... by fifedrum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      and I work on the other end, supporting a few million email accounts. I like ESPs like you, because you work diligently to keep your senders on the up and up, but this scumbag will just move on to some other ESP, or worse, start connecting with hosted email providers like us, and spam from there.

      There is no way to defend against it EXCEPT to put their phone numbers and domains in black lists from the start. That, and as per a suggestion above, kill it with fire.

    2. Re:First Hand Experience... by what2123 · · Score: 2

      You should be familiar with MAAWG then. I am a committee member and one major point that comes up with is Vetting. For the most part, we are attempting to have ESPs have an open network of communication regarding business that are known as bad or corrupt in some form and literally BAN them from sending from a MAAWG member. This of course isn't live or current yet but eventually it could work to promote much better sending via known, good ESPs, not the fly-by-sender ESPs that exist everywhere.

    3. Re:First Hand Experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]there are real, legitimate, marketers out there that do use email to engage clients[/quote]

      No there aren't. Any marketer that assumes that customers want to receive bulk emails immediately qualifies themselves as a spammer. Yes, it is possible to find a human being that says "I want to receive helpful bulk emails from a company that I've purchased from in the past" but those are one in ten thousand, and they're the kind of people that are home watching QVC on Saturday night wishing their grandchildren would call. If you manage mail servers for anyone sending bulk emails, then you're the enemy, and if you can't see it, it's because the kool-aid has already pithed the part of your brain that is aware of ethics.

    4. Re:First Hand Experience... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Baloney. I get mass mailings from Axis and Pelco (among others) to keep up on their products. I don't have time to go to their web site every few days to see if they have anything new.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:First Hand Experience... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I agree. There are several that I want. What annoys me is they keep getting flagged as spam by all the other dipshits who ignore 'unsubscribe' functionality (from actual companies they've done business with - this is the important part) and flag it as spam instead.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:First Hand Experience... by tconnors · · Score: 1

      > They are the kind of company that makes me cringe because I know there are real, legitimate, marketers out there that do use email to engage clients and keep them up-to-date

      There are actually clients out there that want to be "engaged"? All the marketing bullcrap I get from Oracle, Sun, Veritas, VMWare etc is because we have a "relationship" with them. Do I want to be engaged? Hell no. Marketers are all just a waste of time. Pity they think they're being useful. All they're doing is clogging up my procmail rules.

    7. Re:First Hand Experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same work at an ESP and I recognize it ;-). Some corporations are not just stupid and unknowing but EVIL (that's you, Trust.com).

  14. Court? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Have you considered taking them to court?

    Or you could just filter or even tarpit their mail servers and forget about it. If you use free webmail just click the spam button on each mail and sooner or later they will get blocked.

    I think there are a few companies like that. I get constant spam from a bunch of jokers calling themselves clubline football.

  15. Re:not your personal army by Xacid · · Score: 1

    Wrong "we'.

  16. How to fight spam by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Naturally, you want to use the CAN-SPAM act, and send it to spam@uce.gov.

    Oh, wait, you wanted something effective, didn't you?

    If you want to fight spam effectively you need to focus on the prime motivation behind spam - money. Spam is sent out because people make money sending it out. Ordinarily spam is sent out by a company other than the spamvertised company, which gives you a few more avenues to explore. There are, however, a few things you can still look into.

    First, who is the registrar behind the domain? Most registrars have AUP's that prohibit spamming from domains they sell. You can try to report the spam to that registrar and if they are truly vigilant about spam they could essentially de-register the domain from its address, which would prevent all return traffic to it. No email, no web, no anything else going to their domain. The registrar would still have the rights to the domain, hence the customer (your spammer) wouldn't be able to do anything with their established domain until they clear up the situation with the registrar.

    Of course, most registrars are in on the take and won't take such action. Your next option is the hosting company (or ISP if they are hosting their own website). Contact them about it as well, most hosting providers and ISPs frown heavily on their traffic being used for spamming or for spamvertised sites. Same thing could happen here; their domain could become unreachable. Only downside of this avenue versus getting the registrar to do it is it wouldn't take nearly as long for the spammer to get their domain back up afterwards.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:How to fight spam by Phreakiture · · Score: 2

      The CAN-SPAM act loses what little punch it has as soon as you cross the state line from New York into Quebec . . .

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    2. Re:How to fight spam by Sancho · · Score: 1

      The first sentence of the summary says

      For years, a business named Compu-Finder has been sending spam all around the province of Quebec, Canada

      Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?

    3. Re:How to fight spam by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?

      CAN-SPAM. Canadian-SPAM Act. Makes perfect sense to me.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    4. Re:How to fight spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Man, it sure took you a lot of words to say "I didn't read the question".

    5. Re:How to fight spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?

      Well I assumed the CAN was an abbreviation for Canada

    6. Re:How to fight spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally, you want to use the CAN-SPAM act, and send it to spam@uce.gov.

      And what would you propose he use a US law for in Canada?

    7. Re:How to fight spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not matter, since the sender probably doesn't know whether he is in the US or not threatening with it may still be effective.

    8. Re:How to fight spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is CAN-SPAM Canadian?

      As you suspected, no, it's not Canadian.

      Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography And Marketing Act of 2003.

      The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (15 U.S.C. 7701, et seq. , Public Law No. 108-187, was S.877 of the 108th United States Congress) was signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 16, 2003.

    9. Re:How to fight spam by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

      The CAN-SPAM act loses what little punch it has as soon as you cross the state line from New York into Quebec . . .

      Correction - CAN-SPAM is just as worthless outside the US as it is inside. That was my first point. Strange how pretty well nobody (at least who replied to me) bothered to read past that - or even all the way through it.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. This is Canada by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    cosumer rights here are shit. Get some signs, friends and park your ass at their door. Piitch forks could be used if not enough sings are available.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:This is Canada by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah, but it's Quebec.

      Make sure they follow the language laws, if not, report them to the language police. They're apparently quite vicious.

      Also, Quebec has very special status in Canada since they basically want to do everything themselves and only give token attention to Ottawa (they have their own sales tax - QST, that the Harper Government (tm) is paying $4B or so for them to change it to an "H" to implement the HST which would do the same thing). Quebec can easily make it very hard for a business that's not obeying its laws to do business inside Quebec, even if they're not in Quebec.

      It's why in Canada there's lots of things that are "excluding Quebec" - not just sweepstakes/lottos/etc, but also products that basically are unavailable to be shipped to Quebec. They have the requisite French, but they don't meet some other part of Quebec law and are therefore disallowed.

    2. Re:This is Canada by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      cosumer rights here are shit. Get some signs, friends and park your ass at their door. Piitch forks could be used if not enough sings are available.

      Well, the holiday season is fast upon us, so it wouldn't be hard to convince some Carolers to take up the cause. Tell them you'll have free hot chocolate, and you're bound to get a few to sign and hold your signs.

    3. Re:This is Canada by CCurzon · · Score: 2

      Toss the spammers on their asses,
      Fa la la la la, la la la la

    4. Re:This is Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should be modded troll: poster has obviously a grudge about Quebec language law (or sweepstakes for some reason) which has no link at all the to current subject. SPAM laws are the same all across Canada, even in Quebec. Compu-Finder just dodge the law by sending SPAM from an IP address that can be traced to Florida.

    5. Re:This is Canada by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Deck the halls with heads of spammers!...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:This is Canada by openfrog · · Score: 2

      Quebec has a special legal status in Canada because Canada is still, last I checked, a federation.

      That being said, Francophones are welcoming, friendly people. Some people live here without ever uttering a French word and Quebecois go out of their way to accommodate them. Those who want to learn French are actually annoyed by it.

      Montreal is a truly multicultural city, and every small culture is free to express itself, in all manners, restaurants, soccer team fans, and they are and do feel appreciated.

      Look at the crime rates, those don't lie: Montreal is one of the safest and coolest city in North-America. But don't tell, we don't want to get over-crowded.

      Don't believe Haper's propaganda. He is out to spend public money on prisons, so his new friends will finance his re-election.

      And come visit us, before talking nonsense.

    7. Re:This is Canada by epine · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse Montreal with Quebec. And don't count on smiles and beneficence in the far east end: that's where the Quebecoise live who wish Montreal was more like the rest of the province.

      Here's my idea: figure out who the politicians are in the neighbourhoods where these people keep their homes and families, then organize to get those politicians kicked out of office at the next election. Make these seats incumbent dead zones until the laws are strong enough to deter this kind of behaviour without calling in the space drones.

      You have to apply pressure where the power lives.

    8. Re:This is Canada by phorm · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that he was saying that if the spammer isn't following language laws (perhaps sending SPAM to Canadians in dual-language, or having a french operator) they could be shut down for non-compliance...

    9. Re:This is Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this sort of quebecoisie is why I sold everything, quit my job, moved back to Australia, tabernaque and don't look back!

    10. Re:This is Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re. the misleading and silly "... lots of things that are "excluding Quebec" - not just sweepstakes/lottos/etc, " fails to take into the account that, like a state in the USA, provinces can pass their own laws on issues besides language. In particular, Quebec has exceptionally strong consumer-protection laws and regulate lotteries and sweepstakes, and require them to disclose the actual return rate, probabilities of winning, etc. This is really great anti-spam legislation, but it a hassle to even totally legitimate sweepstakes often are not willing to fully disclose (plus it generally exposes lotteries as the bad idea they are). Oddly, it doesn't stop people in Quebec from gambling as much as anyplace.

  18. Small Claims by vlm · · Score: 1

    Small claims courts are easier if you're a local. There's no way I could sue them, but you could.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Small Claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small claims won't do jack. It's not winning the case that matters, it's collecting, and I guarantee you these people are not going to just hand over any money owed from whatever judgment you get.

  19. Fighting SPAM... by generikz · · Score: 1

    ... shutting down all domains that have a non-responsive/non-working abuse@ handler in their whois?

    I'm tired of Korean/Chinese/Pakistanese/South America spam sources these days. Is there a way to get a rather complete list of IP blocks per country?

    I do not have business with these countries, the net impact on my activities would be close to 0.

    1. Re:Fighting SPAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.countryipblocks.net/, for the next couple of days anyway. Looks like they're closing up since nobody donates.

    2. Re:Fighting SPAM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a way to get a rather complete list of IP blocks per country?

      No, isn't possible.

      Only kidding! Here:

      IP block list by country

    3. Re:Fighting SPAM... by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong focus. While at first pass it may seem that blocking email based on country affiliation makes sense because of the ratio of spam/ham you get from them, you need to look at the meaning of the criterion you're using. Yes, there will be some correlation between governance and spam, but that correlation is loose, and the collateral damage is (theoretically) oppression by geography. These people already have screwed up governments, why make it harder for them to be global citizens?

      There are other ways to block, based more directly on the spamminess of the systems. Even "... shutting down all domains that have a non-responsive/non-working abuse@ handler" is a better idea.

  20. Spamcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wind up sending all my spam to SpamCop.net which is owned by Cisco. They in turn send email to abuse departments at the company and ISP level. It's a free service.
    http://spamcop.net/anonsignup.shtml

    1. Re:Spamcop by LostOne · · Score: 1

      And those reports are promptly ignored by almost everyone that receives them, and here's why: of the 1000 or so I've recevied at $dayjob over the past decade, exactly zero have had anything to do with me, my customers, or my servers. All it takes is some lowlife to mention a bunch of random sites in their spam to deluge abuse contacts with irrelevant reports.

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    2. Re:Spamcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What about operations like Blue Wolf Consulting, who spams through Salesforce.com? (I'm sure this guy isn't the only guy seeing their spam.)

      Salesforce itself is a legitimate company with a market cap of $18B. They're not even in the spam business per se; their main line of business is selling CRM software to large companies. Although their abuse department is reportedly responsive, they're apparently not responsive enough.

    3. Re:Spamcop by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I wondered about the efficacy of SpamCop's facilitated reporting to abuse operators.

      The other side of this coin, however, is that SpamCop themselves learn more about the reported emails/systems, and they run a DNSBL which could pick up those systems.

      Analogous to large ESPs offering "delete spam" actions that teach their systems what's spam.

  21. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    this is /., no one on here has ever had sex, much less more than once, unless your partners were your hands

  22. Block it and move on by Lev13than · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:Block it and move on by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ironically, getting nothing is exactly what he wants. It's funny how much time we spend trying to get people to stop wasting our time.

    2. Re:Block it and move on by Nanoda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      After all the spam I've gotten in the past ~15 years? If I found out there was a spammer in my own city, I'd be willing to spend at least a couple of evenings trying to shut them down.

    3. Re:Block it and move on by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If all you are interested in is money, then indeed the best thing is to do nothing. If however you value other things, then the return might be worth it.

      Not everything can be easily calculated in an amount of dollars.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Block it and move on by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Try to think of SPAM like farts on the subway.

      They have the whiff of shit. You simply can't avoid them.

      Just try to wince and ignore them as best you can, as complaining doesn't help at all.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    5. Re:Block it and move on by Lev13than · · Score: 1

      Sure, but idealism only goes so far. If you're camping in the summer you can try to destroy the source of all the mosquitos, or you can apply bug spray. Only one will give you the desired result.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    6. Re:Block it and move on by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      you just crushed the spirit of 1000 would-be heroes.

    7. Re:Block it and move on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you value your time at $20/hr, go to one of the many freelance marketplaces and hire someone in the third world to sign up their phone number for every phone list they can for $2/hr.

      See how they like nonstop phone spam every day, for about $40.

    8. Re:Block it and move on by Tom · · Score: 2

      Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?

      The satisfaction of seing a spammer ruined would be worth several hours of my time for me. Sure it is pure and evil revenge. However, doing to them the only thing that makes them stop is... well, the only road you can take to eventually make them stop.

      Blocking their domain seems like the low-cost solution. Until you realize that you need to block not only their domain, but hundreds of others as well. Increasing the risk of spamming by making them pay, on the other hand, has effects beyond the one you sued or took out of business.

      I still wish we'd all band together and simply get a dozen or so of the highest profile spammers killed. Everyone who's annoyed by spam paying just 10 cents would get us more than enough money to hire a couple top-notch hitmen. I'm quite sure that after this, the only spammers who'd still dare doing that business are the organized criminals. That's not a good thing, but then at least the grey area would have been clearly removed and we might finally get some actual government action on the problem.
      Plus we'd have eliminated at least half of the spam.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:Block it and move on by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Just block their domain and get on with your life. If you value your time at, say, $20/hr, how much are you willing to spend in order to get nothing in return?

      And this is known as the tragedy of the commons. Your 'do nothing' approach would be better called the 'let them continue to mess up the commons until it's unusable for everyone' (where in this case the commons is the email system).

      This is the same reason why we don't just let people get away with arson although putting them in jail won't unburn the building, murder (again no benefit to the dead victim), etc. Stopping people who break society's rules is worth it, even at a cost higher than the initial damage, because that's the only thing preventing it from devolving into anarchy. Of course this all needs some leeway and some common sense thrown in, and it does not mean that everyone (or possibly anyone) should turn into a vigilante. But apathy is not the solution either: as Edmond Burke said, "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing".

  23. Baseball bat to the knees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a baseball bat. You gotta hit him in the knees, before you hit him in the head.

  24. Pirated software by vlm · · Score: 1

    I heard on IRC that they use pirated software to spam, although I have no first hand knowledge or documentation. Are there not paramilitary heavily armed SWAT team like organizations that break down doors, like we have in the land-of-the-unfree to your south?

    Also CP is sold by spammers, and they are spammers, so they probably traffic in CP, correct? The legal system loves to bust CP distributors.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Pirated software by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The BSA works on behalf of their member organizations and ONLY their member organizations. This means that Microsoft, Adobe and a few others have their services but anyone else does not. So unless they are using a Microsoft Spamming tool or one from Adobe it doesn't matter if they are pirating it or not. Essentally, nobody cares unless you are one of the select few belonging to the BSA.

      As to distributing CP, all that is needed is some kind of hint - "Daddy, I saw pictures of naked kids on Uncle Fred's computer" and local law enforcement has enough probable cause to sieze computers. Now don't say I didn't warn you but turning in false accusations to harrass and intimidate someone is frowned upon rather severely.

  25. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had 30 hands? O.o

  26. Re:not your personal army by tepples · · Score: 1

    So which "something" should one "do[...] in real life rather than whinging on slashdot" in order to shut down an identified spammer?

  27. Share the joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign them up for their own list
        And as many other lists as you can, let them enjoy the fruit of their "Labors"
    Especially include the Sales department, the CEO / CFO, accounting staff
        Leave out the Sysadmin staff, after all, they may slow down the tide

    Let them start paying the human cost of so much junk
        After all, "it only takes a second to remove it"
        Times 50-60 different addresses, and 50-60 different "opt-in"

    While you are at it, fill in some of the drop cards out of magazines
        The weirder the better
        Again, figure what, 2-3 out of every magazine? How many do you get? Get from Doctor's offices, any other waiting room, and send em all to the company / staff

    Not sure which law(s), if any, would be broken by this in the US. But if you have a buddy outside the US, they aren't likely to get em
    Even in the US, the "victimless crime" unit doesn't care. After all, look at how aggressively Identity theft is pursued

  28. Do Nothing, let Spamgourmet take care of it. by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

    I've had the issues as the original poster. So, about 6 years ago, when I was about to change email addresses anyway, I signed up for an account at Spamgourmet.com. I hoped that I would never need to worry about unsubscribing again.

    It works perfectly. I place unique characters in every address that I give out online. The first 'n' messages to a particular address get forwarded to my main address. After that, they get eaten by spamgourmet. I have to manually increase the limit or designate an exclusive sender if I want more than the first 'n' messages to go through.

    You can set 'n' to be anything from 1 to 20. I use 5 typically.

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
    1. Re:Do Nothing, let Spamgourmet take care of it. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Another Thumbs up for SPAMGOURMET, every vendor gets their own, count limited, email address. (alternatively, an unlimited exclusive sender so discship@netflix always comes through and I don't have to keep resetting the count) This lets me know when and to whom they sell the address. Good Stuff. You can even download the code and set up your own relay if you are a corporation and want to provide a similar server for your users under your own control.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Do Nothing, let Spamgourmet take care of it. by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Thats a pretty cool idea, but from looking over their site, It seems a little flawed. This only works so long as everybody else is ignorant to the existence of spamgourmet. If somebody was to realize what was up, they could take your frombigcorp.3.spacecowboy@spamgourmet and instead just send it to frombigcorp.20.spacecowboy@spamgourmet, you don't really have much control over that part. It only works if the person treats the email as a normal verbatim email. I can pretty easily write a script that takes anything that matches *@spamgourmet.com and then mangles the front part of it. As long as you keep changing the front part, you could keep spamming the person.

      In order for this to be truly robust and defend against spam, they'd have to ONLY allow emails through to disposable addresses that are pre-defined. You login, choose a new keyword, and then tell it how many emails to let through on that keyword. Only the keywords you would set up would work, so it would take an in-feasible amount of brute forcing to get a spam email through without knowing a keyword.

      The current implementation is more convenient, but easily exploitable.

      This is my first time looking at spamgourmet, if I'm missing something I'd appreciate somebody letting me know.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  29. Fight spam with real mail by cronos1013 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a simple and SUPER fun way to combat this. Get the google toolbar with auto fill for forms, and sign up for every free thing on the market you can with their address. This was done to a spammer a couple years back in the US and I guess once your postal mail volume reaches a certain ammount they stop delivering it, and bill you if you dont pick it up. If 10000 people sign them up for 1000 deliveries of junk real mail, they might get the picture. Maybe....

  30. Think for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Can't you think for yourself?

  31. Anonymous... sounds like a job for .... by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    dun dun duh.....

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  32. You can get a instruction manual on this subject.. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    Right here.

  33. Like a telemarketer by wintercolby · · Score: 2

    I got a call from a telemarketer on my cell phone at 3AM one day. I called the number back and found that it was a standard voice/prompt setup. I randomly dialed buttons until I got to a dial by extension choice. I then dialed every extension I could think of, leaving voicemails on every line, stating that the next time I get called on my cell phone at 3AM I would sue the company out of existence. Where I live the law is on my side on this, it is illegal to call before 9AM or after 7PM here. It must have gotten through to one of the people I left a voicemail for, because they never called again. Harass them more than they harassed you by wasting their time, and they'll find a way to stay out of contact with you.

    And never, ever, ever click unsubscribe from anyone but the most reputable companies. It lets the spammers know that someone at that address actually reads those emails, and they don't mind sharing it with their sister companies.

    --
    Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. --Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Like a telemarketer by antido · · Score: 1

      And never, ever, ever click unsubscribe from anyone but the most reputable companies. It lets the spammers know that someone at that address actually reads those emails, and they don't mind sharing it with their sister companies.

      Same goes with loading images from the email. Always have image loading turned off by default if you don't want the sender to get any information back from you.

  34. The Star Trek way...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the approach of Lieutenant Worf, on an edition of Deep Space Nine:

    "FIND HIM AND KILL HIM!"

  35. Anti-Spam Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realize that this is probably naive but... Since spammers rely on the very few percent of people who respond, couldn't people just set up a special SpamFolder that responded to these emails 100 times with random text? If enough people did this, the spammers inboxes would be so clogged with mail that they wouldn't be able to find the few valid responses thereby making it financially infeasible.

    1. Re:Anti-Spam Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like it. Similar to a "re-share" on Google+ or what I assume they mean when they say "re-tweet" on that twit thing. We should call this "re-SPAM" and, unfortunately, credit it to "Anonymous Coward" as the inventor.

    2. Re:Anti-Spam Tool by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Won't work... Read up on Joe Job. My father has been Joe Jobbed when he retired and had too much time on his hands and started fighting SPAM. It wasn't pretty.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:Anti-Spam Tool by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Although that does sound like an effective way to fight spammers you'll have to do it anonymously since they could charge you with spamming.

      That does actually sounds like it would be very effective. Just be sure not to trip any anti-spam filters with your randomized text, perhaps instead of random you'll want to do some combination of words that they would not want to filter such as "Where do you want me to send my credit card information?" or "I will gladly help you smuggle your money out of your country.", stuff that if they filtered it, it would also filter out any one stupid enough to legitimately respond.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:Anti-Spam Tool by Jeng · · Score: 1

      What percentage of spam do you think is Joe Job spam? A percent? Less than one percent?

      Also as I said in my reply to the parent you want to do this as anonymously as possible. One reason is so that the spammer can't report you for spamming, the other reason is so it is harder to filter out the anti-spam spam. I didn't know about Joe Job'ing but that just adds one more reason to make sure you do this anonymously.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Anti-Spam Tool by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The Joe Job article linked to backscatter, that was the actual term I was looking for.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  36. (Yes, I'm serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give their address to the wonderful people at 4chan.

  37. If Fire Doesn't Work by El+Torico · · Score: 1

    Nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    1. Re:If Fire Doesn't Work by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  38. Start leaving the CEO voicemail by gotfork · · Score: 1

    I had a similar issue with a company that makes industrial plasma etching equipment. After eight months of trying to get off their mailing list I was able to find the CEO's personal phone extension, and started left him a choice voicemail. I got a phone apology each from their PR and marketing heads within the hour, and haven't heard from them since. This may not work if the whole company is in on it though.

  39. There's no "Stopping" Just "Annoying back" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give a list of their IP's and contact information to Spamhaus http://www.spamhaus.org/.
    If it's bad enough they will hold the ISP's IP's hostage until they get rid of the customer. If they decide not to stop, they could contend for a spot on their "ROKSO".
    It still won't stop them, but it will at least cost them time and money to get new servers and ips.
    Also send samples of the emails you receive to their ISP's abuse department. If nothing else you'll make them unhappy for awhile.

    Instead of using their personal email addresses to sign up for spam, just use spam-trap emails to sign up for their own crap. If that doesn't put them on the radar, you could always resort to weeping in a dark corner somewhere.

    1. Re:There's no "Stopping" Just "Annoying back" by bardyc · · Score: 1

      Give a list of their IP's and contact information to Spamhaus http://www.spamhaus.org/. If it's bad enough they will hold the ISP's IP's hostage until they get rid of the customer. If they decide not to stop, they could contend for a spot on their "ROKSO". It still won't stop them, but it will at least cost them time and money to get new servers and ips. Also send samples of the emails you receive to their ISP's abuse department. If nothing else you'll make them unhappy for awhile.

      Instead of using their personal email addresses to sign up for spam, just use spam-trap emails to sign up for their own crap. If that doesn't put them on the radar, you could always resort to weeping in a dark corner somewhere.

      They will always find some new way to send junk, and spamhaus doesn't usually affect the "big" email providers, they just scare ISP's into kicking people off their network.

  40. Spamhaus by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Has Spamhaus never heard of these people? How about other spam blockers? If you ISP isn't subscribing to blocklists then maybe your issue is with them.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. Re:not your personal army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But doing something in real life rather than whinging on slashdot is a good stay.

    How about if the OP posted the details on 4chan?

  42. File a lawsuit! Or many! by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Informative
    There are some people or companies that will clean up their act when they have been sued. Sometimes it takes more.

    Within a week after I had been contacted by one drug spammer that I sued, my spam load went down by 50%.

    Another Spammer I sued, put in place a strong anti-spam policy and apparently quite effective.

    When I went after Avtech Direct (Arlene Sediqzad and Gary Hunziker ) for spamming, I also helped arrange 21 lawsuits against them. After this was over, Sediqzad told me she wish she never heard of e-mail, and had not heard of it until Gary Hunziker got her into using it. Another spammer, Robert Smoley, stopped, only because he was charged, pled guilty, and sentenced to 40 months. They also seized over $40M of money and property from him. I think that is one of my most productive 45 minute phone calls with an IRS agent ever.

    But this company you talk to is like Smoley, or Ralsky who needs to be sued multiple times or imprisoned for a while before they stop spamming.

    1. Re:File a lawsuit! Or many! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some people or companies that will clean up their act when they have been sued. Sometimes it takes more.

      Within a week after I had been contacted by one drug spammer that I sued, my spam load went down by 50%.

      Another Spammer I sued, put in place a strong anti-spam policy and apparently quite effective.

      When I went after Avtech Direct (Arlene Sediqzad and Gary Hunziker ) for spamming, I also helped arrange 21 lawsuits against them. After this was over, Sediqzad told me she wish she never heard of e-mail, and had not heard of it until Gary Hunziker got her into using it.
      Another spammer, Robert Smoley, stopped, only because he was charged, pled guilty, and sentenced to 40 months. They also seized over $40M of money and property from him. I think that is one of my most productive 45 minute phone calls with an IRS agent ever.

      But this company you talk to is like Smoley, or Ralsky who needs to be sued multiple times or imprisoned for a while before they stop spamming.

      I love you so much right now. Please, Please don't stop.

    2. Re:File a lawsuit! Or many! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some people or companies that will clean up their act when they have been sued. Sometimes it takes more.

      Within a week after I had been contacted by one drug spammer that I sued, my spam load went down by 50%.

      Another Spammer I sued, put in place a strong anti-spam policy and apparently quite effective.

      When I went after Avtech Direct (Arlene Sediqzad and Gary Hunziker ) for spamming, I also helped arrange 21 lawsuits against them. After this was over, Sediqzad told me she wish she never heard of e-mail, and had not heard of it until Gary Hunziker got her into using it.
      Another spammer, Robert Smoley, stopped, only because he was charged, pled guilty, and sentenced to 40 months. They also seized over $40M of money and property from him. I think that is one of my most productive 45 minute phone calls with an IRS agent ever.

      But this company you talk to is like Smoley, or Ralsky who needs to be sued multiple times or imprisoned for a while before they stop spamming.

      Dude, RTFA. Smoley wasn't taken down of spam charges, he was taken down because he was trafficking controlled substances.

  43. Four Letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DDOS

    1. Re:Four Letters by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No!

      Do not break the law to end this. Stay within the law, there's plenty of legal options at your disposal to make their business truly miserable.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. Laws to be used against spammers in Canada by dayton967 · · Score: 1

    These are the laws that can be used currently in Canada.

    Theft of a Telecommunication Service (Section 326)
        (1) Every one commits theft who fraudulently, maliciously, or without colour of right,
            (a) abstracts, consumes or uses electricity or gas or causes it to be wasted or diverted; or
            (b) uses any telecommunication facility or obtains any telecommunication service.
        Definition of “telecommunication”
        (2) In this section and section 327, “telecommunication” means any transmission, emission or reception of signs, signals, writing, images or sounds or intelligence
                  of any nature by wire, radio, visual or other electromagnetic system.

    Mischief (Section 430 (1)(c) and Section 430(1)(d))
        (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully
            (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or
            (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property.

    Mischief in relation to data (Section 430 (1.1)(c))
        (1.1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully
            (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use of data; or
            (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use of data or denies access to data to any person who is entitled to access thereto.

    1. Re:Laws to be used against spammers in Canada by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the AtPtEaAotCEbRCAtDRoEMoCOCAatAtCRTaTCAtCAtPIPaEDAatTA Act. Rolls right off the tongue.

      Or is "Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act" actually the acronym?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Laws to be used against spammers in Canada by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Would repeated spam qualify as harassment in Canada? If so, would that volume of spam be sufficient to warrant a restraining order against the company?

  45. call them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally have started a site called callspamout.com. I find the worse offenders of my spambox and I put their toll free number into the system. A cronjob then creates a .call file for my asterisk box every hour to call them and plays a recording stating I just want removed and then the phone calls will stop.

    There are stats and estimates of hour much just *I* myself have cost these people already.

  46. Anonymous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put in a ticket to Anonymous...?

  47. Fight fire with fire by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Make sure every Spammer and their dog knows their business email address. And keep an eye open for changes to follow suit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  48. Automated Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I have a GMail filter setup to handle this. I mean, besides that GMail's SPAM filtering seems to catch 99% off it in the first place (so I guess the best answer is just "use GMail"). I have a canned response email saved with a 10MB attachment (I'd do 25MB but often the spammers themselves have a 10Mb limit). It's actually a PDF scanned at incredibly high resolution telling them to take me off their list. Any time I get a SPAM email, GMail automatically sends them the 10MB automatic response. If enough people did this, their servers would simply run out of room and we wouldn't have this problem.

    Sadly they often use hijacked proxies so this has the downside of hitting a lot of innocent people. Sorry for anyone who ends up collateral damage, but in that case, you should have secured your system better to begin with.

    1. Re:Automated Solution by ledow · · Score: 1

      This relies on them even caring, the return address being even vaguely valid and them actually bothering to do more than just redirect incoming mail to /dev/null, let alone bothering to have someone on the payroll who will read emails from people they've spammed.

  49. Re:not your personal army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GTFO my /./

    err... uhmm.... yeah.

  50. Try getting them to change your saved email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See if they have a way to *change* your email address. If so, sign up for a service that offers temporary emails, like sneakemail. Replace your real email with the temporary one. Respond to any email you get verifying it. Then delete the email address.

  51. FIrebomb them and their datacenter by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Then the harassment will stop.

    We need a few examples made.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:FIrebomb them and their datacenter by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Nah, firebombs are too impersonal, and then you need a message sent out of band...messy.

      Far better to do it up Cartel style...find them... leave them hanging from bridges, with the word "Spammer" cut crudely into their flesh.

      It may be tempting to scrap "OPT OUT" followed by your email address... but this is not recommended for reasons that are left as an exercise for the reader.

      Which is not to say the former action is recommended, mind you. However, I am pretty sure that I wouldn't cry over the brutal loss of a few spammers....and such action would amuse me greatly.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:FIrebomb them and their datacenter by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Nuke it from space. It's the onl---ah, fuck it.

    3. Re:FIrebomb them and their datacenter by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      While i am angry at them like the next guy, i don;t suggest physical harm to anyone. ( except for life in prison ). in my suggestion ( that i would not take action on, for the obvious reason that its illegal, tho im not sure immoral ) it was just the data center ( and presumed empty at the time, or can made empty ) that would be destroyed.

      losing all their computing ability in such a manner would make people think twice before they do it again.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  52. If you're willing to spend money on a stamp... by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

    Or, even better, if you can get their fax number how about full-color Goatse in the mail or by fax? By email too, but Goatse coming out of a fax machine seems like it would be a nice gift to send them.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    1. Re:If you're willing to spend money on a stamp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and loop the fax, so it just continuously transmits (print it 2 or 3 times and tape it back to itself so it keeps reloading itself).
      Think of the money they'll spend on paper printing the Goatse image over-and-over!

    2. Re:If you're willing to spend money on a stamp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is against the Geneva convention, and arguably a lot worse than any amount of non-goatse spam anyone could send. You'd likely be sentenced to death (unofficially, if need be) if you do that.

      Stick to conventional blunt weaponry and torture, a spammer is not worth a death sentence.

  53. Spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can get their e-mail addresses, why not sign them up with those doing the spamming? This way they can gain a first hand understanding.

  54. Complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do a complaint.

    CAUCE http://www.cauce.org has done exceptional work in Canada in order to fight spam and to pave the way for proper legislation.

    So if you have already made clear to the sender that you do not want to receive any further bulk mail ( you used the unsubscribe link, you have sent an email to their support) the sender is accountable by law to stop sending you emails.
    Canada is building a Spam Reporting Centre. However it is not in action yest: See here http://fightspam.gc.ca/eic/site/030.nsf/eng/home

    The best way is to contact the following people:

    1. Your own ISP. Either contact their support desk or see if there is a http://postmaster.ISPNAME.CA or http://abuse.ISPNAME.ca an email to abuse@ISPNAME.ca should also do the trick
    2. If applicable the owner of the sending mailserver (most of the senders use third party services which will send the emails on their behalf) These Senders are dependant on the reputation they have at the end use (you and your ISP). They usually act fast. Look in the email headers of the spammail and check the domain name of the IP address. A decent sender will kick out their customers (content providers) if they see that their reputation is in danger.
    3. The ISP of the sender. Do a whois lookup on the sending IP address. This should be the hoster of the sender and they should either relay your message to the sender or shut him off
    4. The content provider. In this case compu-finder
    5. Post on Slashdot

    If you have trouble finding the proper abuse contact address for an IP you can use The Abuse Contact DB from Abusix: http://abusix.org/service/abuse-contact-db-beta.

  55. My favorite response by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I read about someone who responded to them with a carefully written contract, saying that they have the email address for business purposes, and by emailing him at that address, they were entering into a business relationship with him. In doing so, they were liable for his billing purposes, and that every email would be billed at his normal billing, in hour increments.

    And that continuing to email him was considered an agreement of terms. And ask them to kindly provide their billing address.... and legal service address.

    So, 15 of those spam - surely you value yourself at $60 or $100US/hr, if it's consulting on your own time - should be worth a pleasant $900 or $1500US/week for you.

                        mark

    1. Re:My favorite response by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      There are companies out there that will handle sending the invoices for you. I've heard Leo Laporte (TWiT Network) uses FreshBooks.com.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:My favorite response by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      One should go one step further. The problem with your proposal is that a free speech argument would be made. You are not offering a service to the individual, and there is no way that receiving any kind of mail is going to be counted as a service by any court. You need to supply a service to the spammer.

      Ad to your letter that one of the services that your business provides is "marketing consulting", and that the address they are sending the spam to is the evaluation request address. Thus, by submitting their work to that address they are requesting your "marketing consulting" services. Then when you send them your bill, make sure that you give them a fair assessment of their marketing strategy. E.G. "After careful consideration, we have determined that your marketing method is a poor choice." You have then had services requested, and you have services supplied. Personally, my marketing consulting is really good, and due to the nature of the work is not an billed at an hourly rate. My rates are $1500 as a promotional price for the first analysis, further analysis are $10,000 for standard email evaluation, and $20,000 for drug, dating, or sex industries email evaluation.

      The promotional price would work out well because it falls within the values covered by small claims court, so you don't need a lawyer. If you get a judgement in the first case, it seems unlikely that a court would not recognize that the spammer was in a preexisting business relationship with you, give that he has previously been order by the court to pay his bill for those exact same services. This should make it much easier to find a lawyer who would be willing to take the subsequent, higher value cases on contingency.

      I don't know Quebec law well enough to know if this would apply to them.

    3. Re:My favorite response by TheGreatDuwanee · · Score: 1

      When I have been able to get a specific mailing address I have been successful in getting this method to work before, it does take persistence and the correct wording (I've found the phrase "any further emails means you accept my billing rates and practices" or something similar works pretty good).

      I've used this practice to get unwanted 'free' local newspapers discontinued as well.

      --
      Save early, Save often ... no telling when the fickle finger of Gate's is gonna point at YOU!
  56. Automate your own response? by Pliny · · Score: 1

    The reasonable thing to do is just block everything from their domain or that includes their name.

    However that's no fun. What is fun is whipping up a python script and using a service like Tropo to respond to every single message with a phone call to tell them that the email is unwanted. Of course, to ensure that they can effectively identify the offending mail, the script should read it to them in it's entirety and ask them to press a button to acknowledge that they've understood and will stop. If the call gets... disconnected for any reason, it should call back and start over until it gets it's acknowledgement.

    --
    What does this button d$#%* NO CARRIER
  57. 2 things by Digital+G · · Score: 1

    1. Get them reported on spamhaus.
    2. Find out their ISP, find their spam policy and file a complaint. Getting their internet service shut off due to spam will get their attention much quicker than an email, phone call, letter, or firebomb.

    --

    End Transmission....
  58. Its simple... by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    It rhymes with "shmashmit shmurder".

  59. In the U.S. by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    You can report them to the state attorney general. I've heard of auto-dialer companies that were shut down recently by the attorney general's office.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  60. The Canadian Government is working on it... by msobkow · · Score: 1
    FightSpam.gc.ca

    The legislation hasn't been passed yet, but it's on the table.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:The Canadian Government is working on it... by rgviza · · Score: 1

      I thought Canada had an opt-in rule. I used to work for a major bank and we weren't allowed to send email to Canadians until they opted in. In the US you can send spam until they opt-out. I have no idea whether or not the rules are enforced or violators get fined up there, but that's the law as it was explained to me by the legal department at the bank when the opt-in law in Canada was passed.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  61. Arson may be a bit extreme.... by mynis01 · · Score: 1

    ....but I've never been above some good ole DDoS.

  62. Mailing lists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One spammer kept getting signed up for more and more catalogs. The semi-pornographic ones work particularly well. Amazingly, somebody actually talked to him about this and he said:

            "I don't understand why people keep sending me all this junk mail when I've made it clear I don't want it!"
              "So, isn't that what you are doing sending people spam when they've said they didn't want it?"
              "...."
              He just didn't get it, but it did royally piss him off. That is what I would do.

  63. Sounds like a job for by proici · · Score: 1

    /b/ not /.

  64. Forwarding Rule by rootnl · · Score: 1

    I had the same problem with some of those "product news" type emails. What I do is go to their website and get their sales email, send a test email to it, just to check for auto responders. Then, create a forwarding rule to forward all their email they send me, to their sales department email (making sure to exclude any auto responders) and delete the original email. Gives you a warm feeling.

    --

    We are the people our parents warned us about.
  65. occupy a spammer` by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone ?

  66. cut off their cuff-links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Axe or a power-saw (all well insulated), go to their building's (shack's) rear road and disable all cables incoming to meter boxes of their premises. It may not take out their internet lines, but will certainly take out their power to dissubscribe. Be prepared to run away fast, as such premises are usually well lit. Unless... you do it at night (now is the good time of the year), and do your ninja disable of the back street lightning (if any) as well. Usually, there's a flimsy box/pole nearby with a central fuse inside, unscrewing it out will prove sufficient and decidedly non-leathal. PS: Do not cut off your fingers in the up brought darkness afterdards doing... ;-)

  67. Government of Canada link by Champion3 · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to an informational website about the Government of Canada's new anti-spam legislation.

    --
    I'm going to the casino. Don't gamble.
  68. In (North) America you ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Sue them! That's the American way! Or do Le Québécois not think they are in North America?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:In (North) America you ... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Sue them! That's the American way! Or do Le Québécois not think they are in North America?

      In Montreal you just hire an ex-Sicilian or the Hells Angels to break their legs while the cops look the other way.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  69. I do not recommend... by egamma · · Score: 1

    I do not recommend posting their mailbox address on Slashdot. And if someone were to do so, I do not recommend subscribing their office to all sorts of catalogs and junk mail subscriptions. That would be irresponsible!

  70. How do they SPAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use mailchimp, but after adding all of our customers to it and sending them an email apparently 5 out of 1,000 unsubscribed (0.5% according to the email they sent us) and mailchimp got mad and blocked us. I don't want to SPAM anyone, but I would like to send emails out to customers, any suggestions for a mailing list company that won't freak out every time someone unsubscribes?

  71. Start the attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their profile from Industry Canada, complete with contact info: http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?sbPrtl=&prtl=1&estblmntNo=234567104828&profile=cmpltPrfl&profileId=501&app=sold&lang=eng

    You can rate them as an employer: http://www.ratemyemployer.ca/employer/employer.aspx?l=en&empID=3231

    Or just let people know how you feel on Google: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&complete=0&q=707%2C%20rue%20du%20Village%20suite%20202%20Morin-Heights&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&biw=1280&bih=898&wrapid=tljp132077464029230&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl

  72. why not help others? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At first glance we see this is the personally efficient way to handle the situation. Block their mail and move on. But then we might wonder if we're being a little selfish, not engaging our computer skills to help out others, the many others who are negatively affected by this spam. A little altruism is generally recognized as a noble thing...

    This could lead us to thinking about the systems that have been developed for reporting spam, how individuals have been empowered to spend little effort in reporting, and how, when summed, that individually trivial effort, of thousands and thousands of people, collectively makes powerful anti-spam effect.

    Then maybe we complete the circle, realizing that we are the beneficiaries of these powerful anti-spam systems, that our time is greatly saved by these systems, and that we are not just being altruistic in our contributions, we are helping ourselves.

    The personally efficient way to handle many things is this way, being helpful to the larger community that you are by nature a member of, and personally capitalizing on the beneficial effects of the economies of scale and other mass dynamics/synergistic effects.

    This is where selfishness meets altruism. So, why not help others, when you are really helping yourself?

  73. You're a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complete dumbass if you actually think spam doesn't work (as in pay for itself many times over). Ok, maybe you're not a dumbass, so much as you're divorced from reality; totally out of connect with the type of persons who are the majority users of the internet and email.

    1. Re:You're a... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the latter. I know that computer-illiterate grannies and total morons buy stuff from spam ads (basically the 419 victim crowd), but I can't imagine the number of them is great enough to make any significant profit for the businesses that advertise through spamming. The act of spamming itself I know is profitable, no question about that...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:You're a... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not I actually got spamming spam once (spam advertising a spam-generating company). Their offer was something like 200,000 e-mails for $10-$20. That means if you only have a $1 profit from each sale, you only need 1 response out of every ten to twenty THOUSAND messages. Definitely profitable.

  74. CC the Attorney General by booch · · Score: 1

    Next time you send them an email or letter, be sure to CC your Attorney General.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:CC the Attorney General by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll work. The attorney general will certainly read an unsolicited email that he's been CCed onto.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:CC the Attorney General by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, as long as the spammer is that sure of it.

  75. Does the BSA operate in Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An anonymous tip that their licenses aren't up to date while not stopping the flow of spam, could at least serve a little justice.

  76. the words by nimbius · · Score: 1

    precision orbital strike come to mind... but in all seriousness, as i work at a hosting company, just give theirs a call and detail the problem.

    heres a little snip from the mx for the domain...
    220-crescent.web-dns1.com ESMTP Exim 4.69 #1 Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:15:43 -0500
    220-We do not authorize the use of this system to transport unsolicited,
    220 and/or bulk e-mail.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  77. horse head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy a horse head from a slaughter, send it as a package to their snail mail address. Append a letter asking them to delete you from the mail-list...

  78. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an AC I can admit I've had less :\

  79. Spam them back by next_ghost · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest spamming their office, this time with paper ads (a few metric tons of them). Contact as many affected people as possible and tell them to gather paper ads for a few months. Wait until you have a few thousand people each with a few kilos of paper spam and then do a coordinated drop-and-run delivery on their front yard.

  80. Auto-reply and forward... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    to all of the contact emails you have for the company. When they call you to complain, tell them it's their own system.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  81. Hit them where it hurts by ravenbytes · · Score: 1

    Maybe they don't understand. But their clients will. Known Spammer like compu.finder prides themselves with a "our clients'" page. Just don't do business with companies on this page and let them know why.

  82. Easy as 1, 2, by RPGillespie · · Score: 1

    Flag as spam? Seriously, it's not like I bother looking through my spam folder, and gmail has a pretty good filter.

  83. Subscribe all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    subscribe all their known email addresses to their own mailing list and any other mailing list you can find.

    create as many free public email accounts as you can and have them all forward their email to the company.

    post their email info on every forum you can find so that other spammers add it to their own spam list.

    Or create a bot that will auto-reply to any email from them with a "Yes, I'd love to know more about your products". For bonus points, hook it up to cleverbot and have their sales people waste time emailing a bot.

  84. DOS attack by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Nuke them from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  85. Tell the Oakland PD that they're hippies. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Tell the Oakland PD that they're hippies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made me lol
      --an Oakland resident

  86. PIPEDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada, arguably, has an opt-in regime, pursuant to the requirements of PIPEDA, which requires commercial bulk emailers who establish or acquire lists of email addresses to ensure that their recipients have given some form of consent to receive commercial solicitation. Email addresses can only be used for the purpose for which they are collected, and can only be put to secondary uses if the owners of these email addresses consent. While PIPEDA was not designed to address spam, it has, this way, effectively established an opt-in regime in Canada. Furthermore, PIPEDA requires that unsubscribe functions be operative and respected in such emails.

    Source: http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/ecic-ceac.nsf/eng/gv00342.html

  87. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always maintained there is nothing like the taste of a twenty year old girl's asshole.

  88. Block them by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    If you know who they are, block them and be done with it. Also, don't shop there.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  89. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's secretly Vishnu, Preserver of the Universe, but off-duty he secretly pretends to be Tom Cruise, a secret homosexual. You should get a gander at his threesomes with Brahman and Shiva. Hubba hubba!

  90. Spoofed bounce messages? by kheldan · · Score: 1

    What I think would be nice, is if you could blacklist specific senders at the level of your mail server such that when any message arrives from that address or domain, it automatically sends back a bounce message, as if the intended recipient doesn't exist. The spammer wouldn't have any way of knowing if the bounce message was legitimate or not, and would have to choose between continuing to send spam to addresses that may or may not actually exist, or remove that address from their list.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  91. Pay them with the same coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://shitsenders.com/

  92. Hate to say it by IronOxen · · Score: 1

    In order to keep the spam out of my in box I would be willing to have to pay for each email I send and also have the spammers do the same; say 4 or 5 cents each to: address. It seems to me that spam would no longer be as profitable and would be greatly reduced by stopping those that are getting one hit per million. The problem is who should get the money? Not the ISPs, definitely not governments. Maybe set up some sort of corporation that would fund the set up of mail relays that check for some sort of prepaid encrypted "reciept" attached to every email and just drop any without it, Have the corporation go after the few spammers left that were willing to pay by refusing to sell them any more email. Then maybe the corporation could use the money to give grants for open source project development or maybe inovation awards kind of like a techie nobel prize. Whatever we can come up with that would contribute to the common good within the computing / networking world.

  93. This approach works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Report them via Spam Cop. Spamming may be a TOS violation with their provider.

    2. If their Whois records are inaccurate (most spammers register their domain with fake or incomplete contact information), report it to ICANN using their on-line form. The domain will be terminated if the inaccuracies are not corrected.

    3. Report them to their domain registrar. Many domain registrars prohibit spamming on domains that they register. If this is the case, the spammer's TOS violation will get his domain terminated.

    Take these actions against the spammer and their spamvertised domains. I have been very successful using this approach. Hundreds of spam domains have been terminated because of me (usually 1 or 2 spammers with hundreds of domains). They may still be in business, but I'm no longer on their lists.

  94. Taste their own medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do what some hackers did to a spam king, put them on every junk mailing list you can find.

  95. Forward and delete by Mike_EE_U_of_I · · Score: 1

    I once had a "reputable" company doing that to me (unsubscribe did not work, phone calls, etc.). So, I found e-mail address for about fifteen higher ups in the company, and set up a filter that would auto-forward anything I got from their domain them to all fifteen of them (with "Please unsubscribe me" added). Their e-mail was then automatically deleted. It must have worked, because a couple of years later I changed e-mail systems, and I've never had to recreate that filter.

  96. Contact the Hosting Company! by stillevande · · Score: 1

    Blacklist 69.61.81.116 stille@dns-lamp:~$ dig mx compufc.com ;; ANSWER SECTION: compufc.com. 14400 IN MX 0 compufc.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: compufc.com. 14400 IN A 69.61.81.116 Though their mailserver isn't located in Quebec: stille@dns-lamp:~$ whois 69.61.81.116 Cyber Wurx LLC NET-GLOBAL-COMPASS (NET-69-61-0-0-1) 69.61.0.0 - 69.61.127.255 TIP Networks Inc TRUSTED-IP-NETWORKS-69-61-81-0-24 (NET-69-61-81-0-1) 69.61.81.0 - 69.61.81.255 Well, looks as though yellowpages.com has this address for them: http://www.yellowpages.com/beaverton-or/mip/tip-networks-inc-464616168 14525 SW Millikan #56056 Beaverton, OR 97005 (866) 365-6442 Yellow pages links us to this URL, which has the same address as TIP Networks: http://www.idologic.com/ Looking thru their page, there is a link for abuse: http://www.idologic.com/contact.php abuse@idologic.com How about if Everyone here sends them an email about it? All this is public information.... using dig, whois, standard net searches etc. Enjoy :)

  97. I got on spam lists from my college advisers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both at my old school and my new one when I emailed my advisers suddenly my spam amount went way up. The first one was computer science so I thought maybe she was knowingly selling students emails but my new adviser is for graphic design and i got spammed there too. I don't mean like "legal spam" either, i mean russian viagra and philipino hooker spam. Pisses me off man.

  98. fax your unsubscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On 2 pieces of black construction paper taped in a loop.

  99. Charge them money by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Send them back a certified letter to the mailing address of the company containing a contract offering to read their e-mails for $50 per e-mail. In your letter indicate that in order to agree to the services, they need do nothing more than send you an e-mail to be read. once you receive the e-mail, start sending invoices. if they don't pay, take them to court and file a bad debt report with the credit agencies.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  100. forward their spam to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once I was unable to unsubscribe for ads from a company who annoyed me with their bad product support. Requests to be removed from the distribution list were unsuccessful. So I googled for email addresses of this company. Every time I got junk mail from them I forwarded it to all the about 40 email addresses I had found with the request to be unsubscribed. After two times, I received no further junk mail.

  101. Say wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " In their emails, there is a phone number where we can reach them, and an unsubscribe link that you can click and seems to work, but even after asking them on the phone, by email or with their unsubscribe link, to unsubscribe me, I still receive 10 â" 15 spams a week coming from this company." ... How do you imagine an unsubscribe link "seems to work" if after using it you still receive 10-15 spams every week from them?

    I'd describe that as "definitely doesn't work." Just sayin'.

  102. Is it even still happening? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    TFA is from Feb 2010.

  103. Re:not your personal army by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Now, I can understand whining, but why people like to go around whinging their genitals online I just do not get. ... see the difference? Also, get your ass back to 4chan, that speak isn't welcome here.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  104. Re:not your personal army by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd say whining would be a much better start than whinging, but that's just me.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  105. Fax Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Setup your fax machine to dial their voice phone number(s) with automatic redial and endless retries; add *67 to the beginning of the number to block your caller id. Although it may not stop the spam, it will make you feel better everytime your hear the fax tone and someone screaming "STOP IT!" in response.

  106. Obviously by kikito · · Score: 1

    Call the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

  107. Package of Expanding Poo by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    I am working on a patent for a special product just for this purpose. It is a blend of Polyurethane and feces packaged tightly into your typical courier parcel. When the receiver cuts through the thick outer packaging tape it will be virtually impossible to avoid perforating the interior bag of contents. With only the slightest nick the contents begin to expand as it makes contact with air, forcing the rest of the bag to open further, which exposes more air to the contents, thus forcing almost all of the contents to expand rapidly to a size several times larger than the parcel it arrived in.

    Even if the person opening the package drops the box and jumps back quickly, in all likelihood the area where the box lands will be a complete mess. And if we're lucky this will include their mouse and keyboard.

    If you have a moral conviction against sending poo in the mail then maybe you could ship them a boxed hive of Africanized bees.

  108. Re:Is Analingus the new Cunnilingus? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    Good question. Nowadays, there isn't a tv show in prime time that doesn't imply (if not show, obscured by blanket) a man eating pussy. And to think that in 1990, Uncle Buck (the tv show) was controversial for the line "Miles, you suck!". And now with Glee showing man-on-man kissing, it's only a matter of time until anilingus, shrimping, playing the rusty trombone, etc are a staple of the Thursday night boob tube schedule. [Side note - Oz showed surprise butt-sex in the late 90s, but that was on HBO which is a few years ahead of the curve].

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  109. I bet their spam would stop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet their spam would stop if their board members and top level execs were to start dying, say, one every other day for a couple of weeks.

    Worth a try. :)

  110. instigate a boycott... by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Get everyone (including these media guys saying bad things about them) to write letters/emails to the company saying "unless you stop sending the SPAM, we will boycott your company"

    Of course that assumes the company is the kind of company where a boycott would actually work.

  111. Bill them for email processing by GiantRobotMonster · · Score: 2

    I once had a similar problem; endless spam coming from a trying-to-be-legitimate business despite numerous requests for them to stop it.
    Ultimately I emailed every administrative contact I could find for the company with something along the lines of:

    "Thank you for trying the Robot Monster Unsolicited Email Processing Service.
    While your first email is processed for free, any additional emails are processed at a fee of $1000.
    A 10% discount is available if payment is received prior to the email.
    Any additional emails sent to this email address will be interpretted as an acceptance of these charges."

    I was kinda disappointed I never heard from them again -- was looking forward to sending them invoices.

  112. Cut their throats and burn their bodies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That ought to take care of it.

    Unless they are vampires :-)

  113. Common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they weren't alive they couldn't spam.

  114. Welll........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Spam them - ring them every half an hour. A good trick is mapping a PABX, working out the numeric range that covers their company, after a few calls its not hard and there are online hints you can look up. Then call random numbers in their office. This wont stop them but man its FUN!

    2. Authorities, like the other guy said. They HAVE to be violating some statutes somewhere, its a matter of making the beauroids put down their coffee mugs and do some work.

    3. Firebomb their offices. Seriously. Firebomb their offices. Death threats dont work, minor inconveniences dont work. Making them fear for their very lives actually seems to work.

  115. The answer is obvious by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Whenever someone is doing something you don't like, the most effective method of getting them to stop is usually the same...lawyer up. This is especially true when whatever they are doing is illegal or legally questionable. People tend to do what they think they can get away with. If you suddenly make them think they're about to get sued and incur a lot of costs, they will probably take you off their lists.

  116. Auto-Forward rule by yotto · · Score: 2

    Send them an email, carboned to every email address for everybody in the company you can find. That email says something along the lines of:

    I am getting a large amount of spam emails from your company. I have tried normal channels to get them to stop, but they have actually gotten worse. I am appealing to you to put a halt to these emails. I will forward you examples of the emails I have received.

    Then set up an auto-forward rule that forwards every single spam to that same list, with the text:

    Here is an example of the spam I am receiving from your company. As I acquire more examples, I will forward them on as well.

    I bet they'll stop in a few days.

    1. Re:Auto-Forward rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're bright they'll just block your emails ... but if they aren't, something between 1 and 1000 recipients at the company will reply (or better yet, 'reply all') which of course your auto forward rule should catch and forward back them to which someone else at the company will reply "don't reply to these" ... wash, rinse, repeat .. and boom goes the mail server. For added enjoyment include your email sig as a moderately large image file attachment.

  117. Block, don't filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever try MIPSPACE? Known for some time that several operators from Quebec, (and the new Canadian Anti-spam legislation, you can drive a truck through) have been very active.. the idea of opt-in is very loose, and not what end users would consider opting in for

  118. Baseball Bat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose one, go there, smash shit up. That is the ONLY thing that will get your point across. If their life isn't in danger, they don't give a shit about what you want. Thankfully in america we aren't disarmed. If I found a local spammer here in portland, I would arrive there with a rifle and begin shooting people.

  119. Having the same problem....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the moment I am getting very little spam, except a from a "Lousie McGlashan", ostensibly from some outfit in Plainsboro Illinois, sending me chirpy personalised emails as frequently as 3 times a day urging me to sign up for TOGAF training (whatever that is). At first I thought they were legit and I tried to unsubscribe. Strangely, they just keep sending me the same email, for the same product, over and over.

    Sometimes I just wish I had a battlefield nuke..........

  120. so... by villain222 · · Score: 1

    ...I'm going to cut the chase here. KILLS ZEM ALL!!!!!! man, this is a tough room.

    1. Re:so... by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

      WHO IS THIS?!

  121. Viacom also does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I signed up for a gametrailers.com account because I had a product video to upload. Viacom proceeded to spread my e-mail to every single company in their control. MTV, CMT, etc. (I know because I give every place I give an e-mail address to a different e-mail account. The joy of running one's own mail server...) Unsubscribe links were ineffective. I forwarded a couple to spam@uce.gov, but I don't know that they had any effect. I think I just ended up blocking all incoming mail to that address. It amazes me that a giant company like Viacom can get away with flagrant violations of the law like that. Shows just how toothless "CAN-SPAM" is...

  122. Mexico... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell the guys in Mexico, they're Anoymous!

  123. SEAL Team 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In many cases its time to raise the bar.

  124. Meow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kill them and Eat them. There can only be one.

  125. rent-a-killer! by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Check your spam folder for the services of professional killers, and have one of them take care of that company's management.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  126. Yep, you are right. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and Al Capone was not a gangster, he just cheated on his taxes.

  127. 3 things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Add the domain to your spam fillter!
    2. if you have a return email address that works , sign it up to every porn site, pill ad site and forum you can. if all the people that hate the spam did this it may over load there email server and kill it for a few hrs, or at least give their admin's a fun time adding all the email to their own spam fillters.
    3. just ignore it like everyone else.

  128. Commission d'accès à l'information (CAI) by shtrom · · Score: 1

    Not sure it is relevant, but shouldn't it go through the Commission d'accès à l'information [0]? They seem to be in a position to be dealing with these types of repeat spam-offenders.

    [0] http://www.cai.gouv.qc.ca/

  129. i fear by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    the thievesguild manual of citizen survival clearly states you can only rat on paedophiles, rapists and sociopaths who kill for personal pleasure or cos they cant get it up otherwise, any other case it's done at own risk (its been a while since i read the manual tho might have been adapted but i guess not)

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?