Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: To Hack Or Not To Hack?

seeread writes "I discovered how to hack into and secure user accounts of a rising mobile payment start-up. Account info includes credit card details and usage. The company has big name financial backing and an IRL presence, but very few in-house developers, and they don't seem terribly concerned about security. Good samaritan that I am for now, I sent them an e-mail explaining the lapse on their part, but the responses I have received thus far are confused, aloof and unconvinced. So, I am wondering: what is the appropriate next step? Should I do a proof of concept? Should I go to the investors, or should I post about it somewhere? The representatives haven't been too receptive, despite the fact that their brand seems to be at risk, not to mention all of those users' credit cards. I almost feel like it's my responsibility to blow them out of the water if they have made it this far while compromising such trusted data. And although I would love to be in the paper, this hack is just too easy for it to be respectable, though I am sure the FBI could still be interested in all those credit card numbers."

517 comments

  1. First thing first by CmdrPony · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't talk about it much publicly. You never know what kind of people there are on the internet and what they could do once they figure out what company you're talking about. Now Slashdot, what are your suggestions to him?

    1. Re:First thing first by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blow it up. People's privacy is at risk.

    2. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone left their front door open, lets go torch the house before someone steals something of value.

    3. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

    4. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA's author's hand is covered in honey from the pot he just stuck it in.

      Party Van inbound.

    5. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 5, Informative

      He is clearly miles and miles in over his head. My advice: STOP. NOW. Don't touch anything and don't say anything. Go read books on ethical hacking and wiretapping / unauthorized access law. He's likely already in violation of several laws, possibly several federal laws. And now he's admitted to them publicly on the internet. -__-

      He's already violated several conditions of the Computer Fraud and Abuse act: conspiracy to access a computer without permission, accessing a computer without permission, including financial records
      Computer Fraud and Abuse Act State laws on Computer Hacking and Unauthorized Access

      I suppose I'm getting ahead of myself by assuming he is in the United States. Regardless though, I ask:
      To go to jail, or not to go to jail?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    6. Re:First thing first by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Who was that poor bastard that I read a slasdot article about that was having legal weight put against him for pointing out a companies security flaws to them? It was offshore (USA) possibly Australian in nature?

      Based off that experience, you have two perfectly viable options.

      1. Tell them without risk to your identity
      2. Sell the information to someone who is setup to exploit it

      The increase in technology has done nothing for hacking, you are still either a white hat or a black hat, I guess sometimes a greyfag.

    7. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More like, some business has a bunch of peoples addresses. Go destroy the addresses so that they don't fall into the wrong hands.

    8. Re:First thing first by S73rM4n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would second this opinion (also, as above, assuming USA as OP's location). Though your intentions are noble it is highly illegal to breach a computer system without permission/ownership, regardless of intent. Similar to other crimes - you would still be arrested for breaking and entering a property even if your intent was to show the owner that their security system was flawed, unless they asked you to test it out for them.

      My advice - do nothing further. You discovered the flaw and told them about it, the onus is on them to make sure that their systems are secure. Just make sure that you don't leave a trail for other, less scrupulous people to follow...you certainly wouldn't want a future breach and malicious use of this flaw to point to you as the one who discovered it!

    9. Re:First thing first by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a 3rd option. Give out the info anonymously, and see how quickly it gets resolved.

    10. Re:First thing first by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

      An anonymous tip to US-CERT might not be a bad idea. But, yes, he is in over his head and opening himself up for nasty reprisals when the company looks for someone to blame.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    11. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      yes! not only has he already committed numerous offenses, he's already found the company is unethical and probably does not care about its clients. Legally, however, they are not breaking any laws for doing so and you are. While they where surely too stupid to notice you yesterday, they will notice you today. Being they are making money, if they are doing something wrong they have more money to spend on lawyers than you, and since cyber-crime laws are ridiculously harsh byzantine, and written to protect the sort of idiots who run the sort of company you mention, it'd be a very easy tool for them to shut you up with to prevent a scare that might destroy their company.

      Being they've already proven to not to have ethics, I don't see what the question is? I hope you where smart enough to inform them in some way that doesn't leave any personal information. Since you've posted this already, I am thinking you should research if they're in violation of laws, then use TOR and a throw away email to contact the FTC/FBI and see if they'll give you immunity for testifying.

      If not to to wikileaks, or some other whistleblower site, blow the whistle as hard as you can, start raising money for your legal defense, and create enough of a public stir that they cannot get rid of you quietly. Or just find some other means of getting yourself whistleblower protections.

    12. Re:First thing first by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He's already violated several conditions of the Computer Fraud and Abuse act: conspiracy to access a computer without permission, accessing a computer without permission, including financial records

      Maybe. He didn't say he *had* accessed the secure user accounts, just that he had discovered how. Granted that it's usually hard to know if your attack works without testing it, but it is possible to recognize an easily-exploited weakness.

      Building a proof of concept doesn't necessarily require accessing the data, either. He could build the proof of concept, test it against his own system, and then send it to them (or perhaps even publish it) without having broken any laws.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Love your signature. :)

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    14. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like everyone has basically said thus far; STOP, you're probably already looking at serious criminal charges. How do you know you haven't uncovered a honey pot? Seems pretty stupid to do prison time for a honey pot.

    15. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was Canadian, iirc. Wasn't it the dude who got caught during the G20 thingie?

    16. Re:First thing first by tripleevenfall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are being reckless with people's personal information. Painfully reckless it sounds like, since they are ignoring clear warnings that they have vulnerabilities.

      Look at what happened to Sony re: Playstation Network - and they didn't even lose anyone's billing information.

      The negligence is already occurring, the damage is just waiting to happen.

    17. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I get the sense that he has, from what he said, but I agree with you... it could be he's fine.

      What scares me more is that, by his own admission, it sounds like one of those Citibank kind of situations where someone could just change an URL parameter and access someone elses account, or really basic sql injection that returns cardholder data.

      And that's a bogus thing, because you haven't "hacked" anything, though you may have just discovered that you broke in. And if you understand what happened, as simple and stupid as the process is, you probably just broke in as far as anyone else is concerned.

      So now you're looking at someones account on, let's guess here, Square*... and you KNOW this has to be fixed, it's way too dangerous, but pushing the issue with the company (or elsewhere) could land you in prison.

      That's shitty. I hope someone at that company pays attention, fixes the problem and recognizes that something stupid like this doesn't constitute malicious intent.

      * I have no idea if it's them... I am not the OP

    18. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Maaaaaybe. Thats a big stretch though, it sure doesn't sound like he discovered some 0-day in proprietary software that he can test a custom hack software against. It sounds more like he discovered an easily guessable password, or an SQL injection opening or something like that. Where there is a known solution, but this particular company hasn't been very careful. Maybe I'm just getting that out of nowhere, but if that is the case, then there really isn't a "proof of concept" to be made at all. I'd like to hear what he was thinking of doing for that proof of concept. Hacking somebody's financial records isn't a just a concept ;p

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    19. Re:First thing first by RandomAvatar · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with you up to a point. It is entirely possible that he has figured this out without breaking any laws. Possible I say, probable, perhaps not, I do not know the laws of the unknown country he is in so I can't make a guess at how probable it is. I would agree to look up the laws and make sure you have not broken any. However, if you find that you have not broken any laws, try to play your hand carefully and make the biggest profit you legally can off of this (paid interviews and such would be my idea).

    20. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Or there's the guy who stole the Half-Life 2 source code, and then when Valve said "come to America and we can talk about it and offer you a job for your sweet hax0ring skillz" and he fell for it. FBI was waiting for him. Smooth.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    21. Re:First thing first by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      He is clearly miles and miles in over his head. My advice: STOP. NOW. Don't touch anything and don't say anything. Go read books on ethical hacking and wiretapping / unauthorized access law. He's likely already in violation of several laws, possibly several federal laws. And now he's admitted to them publicly on the internet. -__-

      Better yet, hire a lawyer (EFF, maybe?). "I read it in a library" won't help a lot in court.

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    22. Re:First thing first by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you "blow it up" you WILL risk very SEVERE consequences. There's no room for the good Samaritan outsider esp. where it concerns security. I'm not sure if there's a reasonable answer that will put a stop to their negligence but I would most definitely tread lightly.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    23. Re:First thing first by zlives · · Score: 0

      Tip "daily show" the only news, i watch

    24. Re:First thing first by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Someone built and extra door into all of the houses in the neighborhood. Let's keep it quiet and hope no one notices.

    25. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I guess IANAL, but it seems to be (again, at least in the US) that even whistle-blower protections wouldn't cover this. That is more meant for someone on the inside, aware of some detail, sharing the detail that they aren't supposed to share because it needs to be shared ethically. It does not AFAIK, give protections to proactively LOOKING for details to share. And hell, whistle-blower protections aren't even that strong to begin with. If it did protect this sort of action, it would create an awkward double-standard where if you thought there was a vulnerability, and so you hacked it to test it, you would be covered if you were right, but you would be in violation of a law if you were wrong. It seems wonky.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    26. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      there are plenty of insecure servers out there, we don't need heroes to come along and save us from them.

      Seriously.
      So if I build a computer at home, and I install an old, unpatched OS for fun, somebody is legally allowed to hack me? The implications of this would be devastating. Even if they aren't vulnerable, businesses could be DDoS'd without recourse on the grounds "we're testing you for vulnerabilities". People simply do not think things through fully.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    27. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The hell they didn't lose billing info. My bank caught some fraud on my account shortly after the breach and told me several other people had mentioned the breach in their fraud cases too.

    28. Re:First thing first by tripleevenfall · · Score: 2

      Your personal information could have been used to open fraudulent accounts, as with any other data breach, but they did not lose billing information. In this case, TFQ says billing information is right there for the taking.

      I hope that legislatively we will one day regard damaging someone's privacy closer up the chain to damaging their person.

    29. Re:First thing first by tripleevenfall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right - I didn't mean "do something nefarious". I meant, go to the media or some authority agency under a white flag, anonymously, whatever, and get some exposure for it.

      By "blow it up" I was thinking, if this company has had a few chances to act and has chosen to ignore the problem, take the next step in generating publicity.

    30. Re:First thing first by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He never got on the plane, get your facts straight, sounds like he almost did though, cause German kids are the #1 security threat to this country.

      Source:
      http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-02-21-the-boy-who-stole-half-life-2-article

      It's a pretty good read.

      I can't help thinking how a real criminal would have proxied, and sold the code rather than published it, but to the FBI it's all the same.

    31. Re:First thing first by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Don't talk about it much publicly.

      Look for another job. You don't want to be working for a company that is so sketchy.

      Once you've found another job, send a detailed letter (on paper) to someone in a position of authority at the company with the security problems. CC the letter to the company's attorney and to Human Resources, explaining (among other things) that you could not continue working for a company that did not take security seriously.

      Then go on with your life. But seriously, first make sure you've got another job.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:First thing first by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know what you meant. Believe me businesses will do anything and everything to protect their image with the shareholders. If someone were to leak this to the media, VISA, etc. and the company found out who it was, they'd have their lawyers, and the FBI pounding down that person's door. Go direct to jail, do not pass "go," do not collect $200.

      The only way you could possibly approach this from a legal "high-ground" would be to have jurisdiction and sue for negligence.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    33. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only ethical thing to do is to contact VISA and whatever data protection authority exists in his jurisdiction. Unfortunately he cannot do so anonymously any more since he was stupid enough to contact the company first. Big mistake. His choice is between a) being a criminal in the legal sense (report, company gets slap on the wrist, he goes to jail) and b) being a criminal in the ethical sense (don't report).
      Note that even if he is a psychopath and goes for option b) that won't mean he's necessarily safe either. Suppose a customer who's had his credit card data exposed sues the company. In some jurisdictions the customer could exercise discovery rights to figure out if third parties knew about the situation. Congratulations mister hacker, you've become an accessory.
      The first thing you need to learn about programming is that society on the whole hates programmers. Not in the Bin Laden sense, but in the loathsome bully target sense. All applicable laws are understandably infused with prevailing attitudes, and once you understand that everything else follows.

    34. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never know what kind of people there are on the internet and what they could do once they figure out what company you're talking about.

      What's to figure out. He broadcast the company name on Twitter. At this point he should just go open his front door, as that will save him money fixing it.

    35. Re:First thing first by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    36. Re:First thing first by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why does the hacker have to be a "he"?

    37. Re:First thing first by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 4, Informative

      Detail it to Brian Krebs. He would be a very good source of information on what to do.

      http://krebsonsecurity.com/

    38. Re:First thing first by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Morally he is obligated to take action since people's personal data is at risk. If someone saw some damage to an aircraft but decided not to report it for fear of being accused of something that would be immoral and could result in them being responsible (in the moral if not legal sense) if there was an accident. This is no different.

      Since the law is apparently stupid and companies often react to this kind of bad news by trying to silence or sue the person who discovered the problem the best course of action is anonymous disclosure. Unfortunately the questioner has already revealed himself but ideally he should have sent an anonymous email to the company and then an anonymous description of the problem to one of the full disclosure mailing lists and some relevant news sites a day or two later. That gives the company enough time to either fix the problem or take their system offline until they do, and ensures that innocent people are warned.

      The only exception is with companies that are known to have a good attitude towards people who discover bugs.

      To the questioner I would say sit on it for a week or two and then use a Tor based email site to send the anonymous emails I mentioned. I recommend the Tails live CD which includes Tor. There is no way it can be traced back to you if you are careful. There may be suspicion but if you found the flaw then it is highly likely that others have too, so as long as you are willing to defend yourself there is little they can do. Unfortunately that can be costly, especially in the US, but you have to ask yourself if you can live with the consequences of staying quiet.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re:First thing first by swillden · · Score: 2

      So now you're looking at someones account on, let's guess here, Square*... and you KNOW this has to be fixed, it's way too dangerous, but pushing the issue with the company (or elsewhere) could land you in prison.

      Agreed. That is a real problem with the way our legal system approaches these issues. Malicious intent really should be a required component of the crime.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    40. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more like, someone went and opened the front door to all the houses in the neighborhood. Also we told them and they ignored us. Lets torch their house so we can close the doors. Yeah not a great metaphor but yours didn't really apply to the situation.

    41. Re:First thing first by reiisi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If his own account is secure and he has noticed that he could have accessed it without credentials?

      Actually accessing his own account without credentials could also be breaking himself against the law.

      Building a proof of concept legally is probably not possible, even if he builds it on his own network, on his own machine.

      The laws are screwed until we can figure out how to get people to understand that computer memory is just fancy paper and CPUs are just fancy pens with fancy erasers.

      I need to change my sig. Apple is now only a co-conspirator.

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    42. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would add "call a lawyer immediately" to your list of suggestions. I've gotta say, I've seen some crazy "Ask Slashdot" entries, but this one takes the cake.

    43. Re:First thing first by Silentknyght · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That is a real problem with the way our legal system approaches these issues. Malicious intent really should be a required component of the crime.

      I hope this is a whoosh moment, but mens rea does exist.

    44. Re:First thing first by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      If this company is in the USA, then yes, they are breaking laws by leaving the proverbial front-door wide open to credit card information.

      Many states require at the minimum, under law, that if they've been notified of this very type of thing, that they have to publicly report the incident and rectify the situation. Hawaii has had such a law since 2007. Washington State has something similar since July of 2010, and even goes so far as to say that the vendor, business, or processor in question, must also reissue new cards, pay expenses including attorney's fees, etc. resulting from any such "breach".

      If it really comes down to it, report it to US-CERT, the BBB, etc in the USA. Check your local laws and any other applicable federal laws as well.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    45. Re:First thing first by swillden · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That is a real problem with the way our legal system approaches these issues. Malicious intent really should be a required component of the crime.

      I hope this is a whoosh moment, but mens rea does exist.

      As I understand it, for this crime the prosecutor has to prove that you intended to access the system. But that's different from proving that you had malicious intent in doing so.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    46. Re:First thing first by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Seems like it only exists where the officers of the court are capable of understanding the crime in question.

    47. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I can't help thinking how a real criminal would have proxied, and sold the code rather than published it, but to the FBI it's all the same.

      Yeah, he clearly wasn't of a criminal mindset as much as a curious and possibly playful attitude. But sealing HL2 source is stealing HL2 source :P

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    48. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I am a he so I use he. He/she are interchangeable. Use whichever you want. English does not really have an acceptable gender-neutral way of speaking about a person, "it" is wrong even if the sex of the person is in doubt. I do not feel like typing he/she went down to his/her computer to type up his/her thoughts
      Every single time a pronoun is used. Are you trolling? Making sexist issues where there are none doesn't help anybody. Going around making sure that everything that talks about computers includes girls because girls aren't usually involved is practically reverse-discrimination; you're making women look bad by trying so hard to include them, where I just figure everybody is already included.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    49. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Morally he is obligated to take action since people's personal data is at risk. If someone saw some damage to an aircraft but decided not to report it for fear of being accused of something that would be immoral and could result in them being responsible (in the moral if not legal sense) if there was an accident. This is no different.

      Agreed, if by your job or by being a customer riding on an aircraft, you see something but don't report it, then that is bad.

      But actively going around breaking into airports without permission so you can perform your own security checks on their airplanes isn't whistleblowing, it doesn't matter if in the end you find a plane that needed a check or not, you're trespassing and whistleblowing shouldn't protect that behavior. If we allow that, if we encourage it, people will be breaking into computers and airports and corporate offices every day looking for some dirt so they can get rich and famous and get away with it. So, you break in, and if you find something, you're okay, but if you don't, then you're guilty?

      I absolutely agree that people need to feel confident coming forward to whistleblow, they need to be protected. But we can't encourage vigilantism. There is a significant difference between the issues.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    50. Re:First thing first by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      But actively going around breaking into airports without permission so you can perform your own security checks on their airplanes isn't whistleblowing,

      Right, but there is no suggestion that he did that. It sounds like the vulnerabilities are fairly simple and common ones, so a better analogy might be someone who goes into a bank's safety deposit box vault and notices that the locks look like ones with known security flaws. The person tests their own box's lock, or perhaps one other if the exploit demands it, and then reports the problem to the bank without stealing anything.

      Similarly if you can access other people's accounts by slightly changing a URL you do it once to test if it works and then report it. A jury is unlikely to convict someone of hacking if that is all they did, and the burden of proof to prove otherwise is on the prosecution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because women don't know much about computers. Ugly women pretend to, but they're usually less clever than the autistic men who have nothing better to do.

    52. Re:First thing first by rtfa-troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not having broken any laws is very unlikely; worse still it may be true locally, but likely he's broken US law and may be extradited or tricked into a situation where they can get him. Later, when he's had a clear statement from the company that he did the right thing, then that's the time to go to the press. Right now, when he's pretty clearly screwed up, he should be in damage limitation mode.

      The fact that the company is giving "confused" and "aloof" answers may be just stupidity, but to paranoid me it suggests a trap. They are trying to get him to do something so that they can accuse him of doing something clearly illegal and have the FBI/CIA get rid of him. The fact he's sent an email suggests he's completely screwed unless he's done that through TOR + an anonymizer service.

      What to do

      • Get lawyered up. Lawyers are expensive; not lawyers are much more expensive. Make sure you have one who has actually succeeded in protecting people in your exact situation.
      • See if the EFF will support you as a security researcher. Freedom of speech issues may help protect you. They may be able to recommend a lawyer. Unless you see martyrdom as your future, be careful not to become a public case until you know that that would be a benefit for you.
      • Try to find out for sure if you have broken any laws and the consequences. When doing this ensure you only talk to a lawyer (no internet searches!!) so that all discussions remain legally privileged and can't be used against you to show you knew what you were doing / had done
      • Find a CERT that would be interested in this. Do not communicate further with the company directly, only through the CERT. The EFF might do to. Any body which has real experience in doing disclosure and will isolate you from the risk of direct communication.
      • Pretending you don't know about the hole would probably have been best, but assume it's too late for that. You need to now go through the notification; until this is fixed you are at risk of lawsuit or prison.
      • Do not accept any offer of anything; no free travel; no free developer account; no "chance to help us clean up". This is likely an attempt to set you up for an extortion charge.
      • Anything further you do with this case, you do on your own isolated computer.
      • Do not do anything which could be interpreted as destruction of evidence. Your lawyer may be able to help you with advice about any data destruction you could do to minimise risk in a lawsuit.
      • Without legal advice otherwise, do not use any services from the company and don't visit the web site of the company. Beware of anything which might bind you into a contract with the company.
      • Prepare to be raided. All of your computers will be taken from you and any disks you have on site. Your close family and computer friends may also be raided. Make backups of everything and store them in a locked box somewhere which can't be related back to you. E.g. a trusted but distant friend from school times. Alternatively a vault in a private bank (e.g. in Switzerland).
      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    53. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..but then again you probably wouldn't ask for other people's cc nums and claim they are safe on your unpatched server now would you?

    54. Re:First thing first by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hacking somebody's financial records isn't a just a concept

      A few months ago, I, in the course of my job duties, discovered a massive, glaring, easily exploitable security flaw at a financial transaction processing company that a great many people (as in, somewhere around a third of Americans who pay their bills online) likely use without knowing it. And no, you probably haven't heard of them unless you work in the banking industry.

      I didn't write an SQL injection. I didn't guess passwords. I didn't even probe for hidden options in a CGI... I merely mis-typed a path in a web-scraping script intended to retrieve information I legally had the right to get, and ended up with entirely someone else's information. Yes, literally as simple as "tweak the URL", and you could see anyone's info you want.

      I informed them of this flaw, as an official "you have to fix this now or consider yourself in violation of our contract" communication, and they have made it a bit better - In that you would now at least need to intend to attack them, rather than just anyone having the ability to do so accidentally. Good to know that no more pesky whitehats will bother them about their insecurities.

      But put bluntly, companies don't give two shakes of a rat's ass about us. The very fact that such a trivial weakness existed in the first place demonstrates that they don't pay attention to security in the least; and their fix demonstrates that they don't really care even when they have known flaws. They care about how much it will cost them to fix vs the cost and probability of someone malicious discovering the problem, end of story.

    55. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I believe I finally understand how to proceed in these types of things. This may be an extreme
      example (and I'm not offering legal advice) -

      Say you're walking down the street, and you witness a mugging taking place. If you interfere, even though
      you _may_ be successful, you'll be in jail for assault. Likewise if you don't do anything, you'll be in jail for
      aiding the criminal. That's has and how the U.S legal system works (I'm not being cynical); very un-Biblical.

      The correct answer (in the above example) is to call 911 and ask them what you should do - the onus is on them
      to provide instructions and removes the liability from you. Provide as much info as you can safely acquire to them.

      Likewise, report your findings to the police with the assumption that the company is already aware of their issue
      and are negligent in providing the remedy in a timely fashion. Get a copy of the report or a receipt from the police.
      Be careful to present your position as that of an observer - the police cannot reveal you identity to the company
      if they choose to investigate. The observer part is important; you can neither interfere or assist - consider my
      example, above. If the police fail to do anything, and someone dies as a result - you are legally protected because
      you have a receipt.

    56. Re:First thing first by drwj01 · · Score: 2

      Well, the first thing I would do is play Robin Hood. Give every one of their customers a credit. It is the season for giving. This will prove that you where in there and they will not have to send any letters to their customers about the breach, it will be apparent. Top it off by sending everyone a letter from Saint Nick.

    57. Re:First thing first by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      How about, instead of just a tip, he collect a small amount of incriminating information? He sends that data, along with the emails and such that he has already exchanged with the company.

      The fact that he has already exchanged mails with the company says that he is no longer anonymous, and has zero hope of staying clear of the fallout. To late for anonymity!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    58. Re:First thing first by JMJimmy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blow it up sounds fun but it'll get you sued or worse.

      http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/

      I had to threaten to expose a security flaw which exposed hundreds of thousands of peoples info (luckily no financial info) - within an hour of threatening full disclosure they'd closed my "tech ticket" and an administrator was emailing me for more details and a timeline for a fix.

    59. Re:First thing first by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Make popcorn.

      Post the pertinent details on talk.masked

      Eat popcorn while you watch the show.

    60. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      there are plenty of insecure servers out there, we don't need heroes to come along and save us from them.

      Seriously.

      So if I build a computer at home, and I install an old, unpatched OS for fun, somebody is legally allowed to hack me? The implications of this would be devastating. Even if they aren't vulnerable, businesses could be DDoS'd without recourse on the grounds "we're testing you for vulnerabilities". People simply do not think things through fully.

      You assholes and everyone else that respond that way...
      do know how to make the distinction between a private
      individual having a potentially hackable computer exposed
      to the internet...

      vs

      A FUCKING COMPANY THAT IS IN CONTROL OF OTHER
      PEOPLE'S MONEY AND IS ACTING LIKE THEY DON'T CARE,
      NOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN INFORMED... THAT THEY
      ARE NOT SECURE!

      So... you do know how to make that distinction... right?

      -@|

    61. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean there WAS a 3rd option; now that he posted about it on /., anonymity is out the window. ANY info regarding security flaws at ANY "mobile payment start-up" that surfaces over the next six months or so will be assumed to have come from "seareed".

    62. Re:First thing first by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I disagree completely. Since presumably the hack itself is a process, not a piece of data, he can "leak" this information to other sources who will notify the authorities or make it public... I dare say based on the response that is received.

      While I agree that he may have placed himself in jeopardy, there are ways he can get this information out without divulging his identity. And that would be the ethical thing to do, despite the laws.

    63. Re:First thing first by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      By "other sources" I meant like Wikileaks, etc. But hey... if the "authorities" hassle him over something that is clearly an act that benefits society as a whole, then give the damned thing to Anonymous. Who cares?

      Some years ago I was in a similar position, having discovered accidentally that there was a severe security hole in a bank's online banking system. I mean to the extent that I could get anybody's information, bank, personal, and otherwise off of any computer they had used to access it. Really bad.

      The first thing I did was call the bank, and explain what the problem was, and that I would like to talk to their programmers about this. They connected me to the programmers, and I told them all about it. They agreed, "Yes, that is a pretty bad problem. We'll fix it right away."

      Months go by, and nothing had changed. I contacted the bank again, and talked to one of the many "Vice Presidents", who assured me that it was being taken care of. Etc.

      This went on and on. I finally threatened to go to the press with my story if they didn't get their act together. If I recall correctly, it was a year and a half before they actually fixed it. Totally unethical. I can think of about 3 or 4 ways, if I had been a dishonest person, that I could have cleaned out hundreds of people's accounts in the meantime. Not only that, but I would also have their names, addresses, telephone numbers, and more.

    64. Re:First thing first by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "He's already violated several conditions of the Computer Fraud and Abuse act ..."

      Probably not.

      If I am not mistaken, actually being guilty of CFAA requires intent. He says he discovered the hack accidentally. Since I discovered a similar thing some years ago, I see how that can happen.

      Also, chatting about something does not constitute "conspiracy". Contrary to popular belief, conspiracy requires you to commit actual physical acts intended to carry out your plan. You can talk with your poker buddies about robbing some bank for 10 years, draw up floor plans, and more... but until somebody saws off a shotgun or gets in a car to go do it, you haven't committed any crimes; you've only been playing a child's game.

    65. Re:First thing first by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      That's only for big businesses. The FBI doesn't give a shit about small un-clouted businesses. Be sure you know which one this company is before you expose them.

    66. Re:First thing first by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Why does the hacker have to be a "he"?

      Do you know of any female hackers? (The girl with the dragon tattoo doesn't count!)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    67. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you "blow it up" you WILL risk very SEVERE consequences.

      Bah. The risk of being hit by a falling satellite is greater. There's no guarantee you'll actually get any attention from anybody anyway, no matter how hard you try. When I realized that ADP was failing to protect my, and a million other 401K accounts by using nothing but a 4-digit PIN with a browser cookie to count the number of attempts and providing no other means to secure it and no abillity to disable online access to it, I yelled my head off at them. They did nothing. I sent them a demonstration of hacking into my own 401K account and explained how they could just change the login to hack into any one of their lord-knows-how-many accounts in a few minutes. Crickets. I called them and emailed them again and told them I was going public with it. Not even a virtual shrug of shoulders.

      Fearing for my anonymity, I submitted the info to cryptome. Nothing. Not a peep, no mention of what seemed like a gaping hole to my naive self showed up there. I submitted it to Slashdot. Editors were asleep, I thought. It scrolled into oblivion. Slowly, I understood: The reality is that there are gaping security holes and giant lists of SSNs and Credit Card numbers EVERYWHERE. Nobody fucking cares. You could post the root login to Chase Manhattan Bank's Safety Deposit Box Database ten thousand times on ten thousand different security-oriented web sites and forums and nobody would notice. Finally, the ten-thousandth-and-one time, something that you think is a big deal will get noticed by some critical mass and it'll "blow up". Until then, just move your own stuff off their crappy systems and make a minor effort to tell people what's up and don't waste more energy than that on it.

      10 months later, ADP finally got around to improving their logins. I went through the exact same thing with Alaska Federal Credit Union too with their 8-digit numeric-only passwords. Anybody who wants to can find a major institution with pisspoor passwords and SQL injections in about 5 minutes online. The overall amount of lameness is just too high to get all that worked up about.

    68. Re:First thing first by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      Except he has already told them about it, so if there was anything in that e-mail that could be used to identify him and then "all of the sudden" they get a breach, guess who's getting a door pounding?

    69. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Short the stock before you make it public. Then have hookers feed you the popcorn.

      Second thoughts, forget the popcorn.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    70. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie in the film, 'Hackers'. ;-)

    71. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In theory. These days, possession of the tools -ven potential tools - is enough to brand you as a taihrst. Remember the slashdot story about the guy who got busted for having a few jars of chemicals in his garage?

      Or how about this: http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/RegulatoryServices/narcotics/narcprecursor.htm
      I'd suspect most cooks or homebrew enthusiasts would have something from that list - as indeed would most schools.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    72. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a software security professional and I disclose software security vulnerabilities to development teams and chief information security officers all the time. But this is always contracted work specifically for this and I have permission.

      I think better than an external org or tech support, he should look up the CIO, ciso etc on LinkedIn and notify them.

    73. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Funny

      In this case it probably is a she. Who else would tell everybody about it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    74. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      You can talk with your poker buddies about robbing some bank for 10 years, draw up floor plans, and more... but until somebody saws off a shotgun or gets in a car to go do it, you haven't committed any crimes

      If that was the case there'd be no need for a specific offense of conspiracy, since you'd be committing the main offense.

      The Supreme Court appear to agree - see United States v. Shabani.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    75. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I missed it, but where does it say he works for the company in question?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    76. Re:First thing first by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I think he did all he could ethically do, by accident he found a flaw, he reported it to the content owners... Anything past that he will just big digging his own grave. I think the only other thing he could do is report it to the authorities. But he better be able to explain "the accident" that caused him to find this information.

      Who knows perhaps he just hit a honey pot. Setup to help find and track hackers who steal the information and use it for nefarious purposes.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    77. Re:First thing first by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He's already violated several conditions of the Computer Fraud and Abuse act

      Not to mention the first and second rules of hacker club.

      Shit. So did I.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    78. Re:First thing first by PaladinAlpha · · Score: 1

      NO. Seeread (original asker): STOP. You are within a hairsbreadth of getting yourself in very serious (federal prison) trouble. You need to drop this NOW. Further, do NOT try to destroy evidence, or do anything fancy to "cover your tracks" -- just let it drop.

      It doesn't matter how easy it is. If the lock on my door can be deactivated from outside, you're still breaking into my house if you do so without my permission.

      Be firm and final in your dealings with the institution -- describe to them a method that, in your opinion, could fix a problem that you are theorizing they have. Do not tell them details of their internals. Do not tell them what to do. When their lawyers get stuff like that you'll be on the bench for extortion, theft, and trespassing. Make no mistake -- you are guilty now. You simply want to maintain a goodwill relationship with the institution so that it's not worth their time to prosecute.

      There is a riskier option, which is to go public. But you are betting big on which outcome is better PR for the company -- if they think they can spin it as your fault for introducing a vulnerability or "cracking" a system, you'll be in jail for the next decade, and your life as a professional will be effectively over. On the other hand, you stand to gain some notoriety, peace of mind, good karma, and possibly a job. The risk can only be judged by you based on the actions you have taken and the correspondence you have had with the company.

      Think it through. If you knew a bank with poor physical security, and you wanted to demonstrate it to them, what would you do? Discuss it with them? What if they didn't listen -- would you break in at night and maybe grab a few things, and then come back later saying "ha ha I told you so"? You're no less a criminal. You can tell them, and you can tell other people (at non-zero risk to yourself). You have no further rights in this issue -- it's their problem, albeit one that affects their customers.

      (I am not your lawyer. If you have some spare cash lying around you may actually want to consider counsel on this matter.)

    79. Re:First thing first by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I missed it, but where does it say he works for the company in question?

      Oh hell, you're right! I don't know why I made that assumption.

      That changes everything. Thank you for the correction.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    80. Re:First thing first by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      I can't help thinking how a real criminal would have proxied, and sold the code rather than published it, but to the FBI it's all the same.

      The real issue most of the time in cases like this seems to be that someone is just trying something which "no way it works" and then all of sudden you're in and oh shit I'm not running Tor or anything.

    81. Re:First thing first by Lakitu · · Score: 1

      if it's so easy, I'd like to see you do it. I'd especially like to hear you ascertain the difference between "a fucking company that is in control of other people's money" and, say, the owner of, or an employee of "a fucking company ...", or, say, the home computer of one of these people, or maybe their smartphone with address books of "personal information".

      The fact is "that distinction" which you think is so blaringly obvious is actually not at all obvious or easy to differentiate, so I'll be waiting a long time for your response!

      thanks in advance,

    82. Re:First thing first by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      While we're on the subject of Brians, I'd like to also know what would Brian Boitano do? (And, 'ello, Bruce.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    83. Re:First thing first by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Right, intending to violate the law IS mens rea. Criminal intent != malicious intent and vice versa. There's plenty of malicious things I can do that are perfectly legal, and plenty of illegal things someone could do that may be benevolent. The public, the media, and especially law enforcement often fail to make a distinction, but there is one.

    84. Re:First thing first by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      geohot

    85. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess we need to know more details about what happened before we can judge. As discussed elsewhere in comments, the word "hack" has gotten watered down, when I saw it and the other things he said, my interpretation was that he had done some multi-step interactive exploit on their system, which would be going way too far. If he did actually just typo a URL and fall into somebody else's recoreds, that is entirely different. The law needs to be crystal clear here, unfortunately our techno-illiterate congress doesn't make that any better.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    86. Re:First thing first by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said completely. I just didn't get that impression reading it. I guess it really comes down to the details of how much he did to find it, and what else he did once he found it. In the scenario where he just typo'd a URL and is now asking if he should do anything further, then yeah, totally. I just saw "hack" and figured he'd either done some multi-step interactive exploit, or at LEAST he was password guessing or something, which is still going a little too far into checking others' business. (as discussed elsewhere, the word 'hack' has a lot more meanings now). If he just noticed it while doing normal business, then by all means he should be protected and free to inform company and others.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    87. Re:First thing first by swillden · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why in this case I think there needs to be a requirement of an intent to commit fraud, misuse obtained data, etc. Or, perhaps better, there should be an exemption for individuals who demonstrably have no intent to act in bad faith, and who expeditiously report any weaknesses they find. This would probably be more of an affirmative defense, requiring the actor to be able to demonstrate good faith, so there would still be a risk of prosecution, but it would provide some protection for researchers and those who accidentally stumble onto something, and would facilitate reporting.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    88. Re:First thing first by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      You are already guilty by hacking and will probably be imprisoned.
      If I were you, I would immediately wipe all traces of your existence on the net, quit your job and go live in Mongolia or North Korea.
      Hopefully they won't catch you there.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    89. Re:First thing first by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I've discovered through personal experience than the media is all to happy to hand over contact details of people who contact them in relation to a story. I once contacted the reporter on a story about a vulnerability in a pizza company's web site which allowed uncontrolled data download from their databases (billing not included) and I received a phone call later in the day - not from the police, but from the director of the company whose database was compromised. Way to protect sources.

      So yeah, don't bother with the media, they'll hand you over on a silver platter. Unless you send it from a throwaway email while using Tor from a VPN in France or something.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    90. Re:First thing first by Transaction7 · · Score: 1

      "Not having broken any laws is very unlikely." How universally true. I'm a retired lawyer and if you ever figure out how to go through a typical week, do anything, and not break one or more state and federl criminal laws in the process, it would be a rare occurrence. You can also get, as I did, into terroristic death threats from the authorities, all kinds of legal trouble, by reporting or otherwise trying to get protection and help for a sexually abused child, while the laws requiring reporting such things are filled with rat-holes only a child molester would have written. The State Bar told me I must not report something the statute said I was required to report in one instance, while nobody would investigate the solid evidence in others. If our politicians, of either party, gave a Continental hoot about us, our privacy would be protected by strong, and enforced, federal and state laws, and you would be required to go public with what you know and somebody would be required to notify the victims and deal with this mess. Do you really believe that all these lost, strayed, or stolen computers loaded with the personal, academic, and medical records of 70,000 university students or card holders were not actually instead bought and paid for by the data miners and aggregators who sell such personal information? Mine, loaded with privileged and confidential data about molested children I represented and their molesters, and my file cabinets, were searched twice, and my law office destroyed at what was at least the third burglary by what the Fire Marshal told and showed me was clearly arson but wouldn't list that way for the record, and hte police never even opened a file. I couldn't advise anyone else what to do but, in the situation described, I'd turn the whole mess over to not one but several investigative jo9urnalists anonymously with enough evidence to authenticate it, send a copy to the SEC, FTC, etc.--of course you might have to flee the country, change your name, etc.

    91. Re:First thing first by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "If that was the case there'd be no need for a specific offense of conspiracy, since you'd be committing the main offense."

      Not even remotely. You haven't robbed any bank! You only engaged in an act that proved conspiracy to rob a bank. They are not even close to the same things.

      "The Supreme Court appear to agree - see United States v. Shabani."

      Perhaps they did, but they used completely circular reasoning in order to do so.

      If one is not guilty of "conspiracy" unless one commits an overt act, then the statute is not violated. But if one need not commit an overt act in order to commit "conspiracy", then the statute would hold in the case of Shabani.

      This is a matter of changing the definition of "conspiracy", not of interpreting the law. And frankly, it is a bad decision, because it runs smack up against the First Amendment.

    92. Re:First thing first by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... even more interesting.

      In the general case, I was right. Conspiracy does require an overt act. See the general law (as referenced by Shabani: U.S.C. Â 371.

      It is only matters of conspiracy to distribute illegal drugs that this explicit exception (i.e., U.S.C. Â 846) applies to.

      Why Congress saw fit to make this explicit exception, I do not know. But it does not apply to the general case, as the court itself said in Shabani, as you can see if you read just a bit more carefully.

    93. Re:First thing first by Shienarier · · Score: 1

      This is more of a "Someone left their front door open and they keep mine and others sensitive information in there, lets go torch all this sensitive information up before
      someone steals it." situation.

    94. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a he so I use he. He/she are interchangeable. Use whichever you want. English does not really have an acceptable gender-neutral way of speaking about a person, "it" is wrong even if the sex of the person is in doubt. I do not feel like typing he/she went down to his/her computer to type up his/her thoughts Every single time a pronoun is used. Are you trolling? Making sexist issues where there are none doesn't help anybody. Going around making sure that everything that talks about computers includes girls because girls aren't usually involved is practically reverse-discrimination; you're making women look bad by trying so hard to include them, where I just figure everybody is already included.

      I would probably type "they went down to their computer to type up their thoughts" in that case.

      I do agree that pointing out minor (and trivial) things in the name of reverse-discrimination (not heard that term before, I've heard "positive discrimination" though) is a bit pointless (posting anon as have moderated)

    95. Re:First thing first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit. Yodlee?

    96. Re:First thing first by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      ^ This. If you read any replies. Read this one above mine.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    97. Re:First thing first by leroburton21 · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. You have already had hundreds of people read what you have written here. By posting about it you have increased the urgency for you to do something about it before someone else does. I would highly recommend that you refrain from any illegal activity. Once this is investigated it will be known that you had access and to be able to prove that you never used that access will protect you from potential false allocations. If officers of the company will not listen to you then you will need a government agency that oversees these things to intervene. Do they have a credit card processor that you could consult first? Is there anyone in the IT department that would be willing to speak with you? Your posting here shows that you want to do the right thing. If no one inside the company will respond to you then you have a responsibility to be sure this breach in security is resolved before the wrong people find out about it.

      --
      Accessories Kitchen Storage Organization
  2. NSA? by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe you could get the NSA to hack them?
    Just brainstorming here...

  3. Language matters by colinrichardday · · Score: 1, Informative

    Please don't call such activity "hacking". It is cracking. Learn the difference.

    1. Re:Language matters by pmgarvey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're fighting a battle that was lost long ago. In the minds of most, what was once called cracking is now hacking.

    2. Re:Language matters by BagOBones · · Score: 2

      You're such a geek no I mean nerd no wait.... what where we talking about?

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    3. Re:Language matters by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *sigh* man, I feel you. The word "hack" is just gone, lost from our culture. The mainstream has twisted it far too much.

      Reading Aaron Barr from HBGary talk to anonymous and then talk to his "programmer" about all his sweet "hacks" nearly killed me.
      The 95 Hackers film has become reality. I can't shake em, he's right behind me! Crash overdrive! Acid Burn!

      Ooh, plus there's Swordfish "dropped a logic bomb through the trapdoor" and the wonderful CSI "programmed a GUI interface in Visual Basic to track the IP".

      We really need to start educating the non-technical public on some technical things. Treating computers and technology as a whole as a black box ends up in all KINDS of misunderstandings and misinterpretations.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    4. Re:Language matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cracking a webserver sounds lame. 15 mebibytes level of lame.

      Don't defend lame language, let it fix itself.

    5. Re:Language matters by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      Hacking is hacking into remote targets. Cracking is cracking software on your local computer by reverse engineering and debugging it.

      You're probably right about cracking, but hacking has many different meanings. I tend to use it as "to do a quick-and-dirty bit of programming" and in context people seem to understand what I mean.

    6. Re:Language matters by msauve · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "Hacking is hacking into remote targets. Cracking is cracking software on your local computer by reverse engineering and debugging it."

      Absolutely wrong. "Hacker" is defined, and differentiated from "cracker," in RFC 1392:

      cracker
      A cracker is an individual who attempts to access computer systems without authorization. These individuals are often malicious, as opposed to hackers, and have many means at their disposal for breaking into a system...

      hacker
      A person who delights in having an intimate understanding of the internal workings of a system, computers and computer networks in particular. The term is often misused in a pejorative context, where "cracker" would be the correct term.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:Language matters by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Complain!

      --
      Here be signatures
    8. Re:Language matters by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I hear it used all the time. In phrases like 'password cracking' or 'WEP cracking'. It doesn't sound right to say hacking WEP or password hacking. For something like a website the term 'hacking' just sounds better than cracking. Maybe its an association of the word cracking with safe cracking. So it sounds more natural when referring to some kind of code that is being broken.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    9. Re:Language matters by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Well this is /. we're not 'the minds of most'.

      There are lots of specific jargon only ict geeks understand. This could be one of them.

    10. Re:Language matters by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Cracking a safe sounds lame. 15 sticks of dynamite level of lame.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    11. Re:Language matters by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Cracking is when he damages the system by making changes or stealing the information, hacking is when he is researching the security hole that company has exposed. But, as mentioned in response to your post, the battle has been lost, and everybody is a hacker that knows a bit of networking and isn't employed as a corporate tool, then the term becomes security expert.

    12. Re:Language matters by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Oh, well that counts in the real world at all...

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    13. Re:Language matters by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please use the appropriate term. It's "GNU cracking".

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    14. Re:Language matters by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Cool, wanna go hack the Gibson?

    15. Re:Language matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cracker

      Noun. Slang word used to refer to those of European ancestry. The word is thought to have either derived from the sound of a whip being cracked by slave owners, or because crackers are generally white in color.

      I'm still waiting for the word "Cracker" to be referred to as the "C-word" the way the word "Nigger" is constantly referred to as the "N-word".

    16. Re:Language matters by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Are you implying that security related research is not legitimate? Or that this guy's attempts to warn the company about their problems are a black-hat thing? Because it sure sounds like you just called this guy a "cracker" for analyzing and then disclosing a security vulnerability. Is that really what you meant?

    17. Re:Language matters by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      You and me, Zero Cool!
      Found a link to the original script, although reading scenes with both BLADE and DADE gets pretty annoying: Hackers

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    18. Re:Language matters by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, Hacking was originally used to mean tinkering with an electronic device and getting it to do something unintended by the creator

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    19. Re:Language matters by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      It may be legitimate, but is it hacking?

    20. Re:Language matters by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      If you break into a safe to get the antidote to save a poisoned baby, is it still not safecracking? Feynman did stuff like this at Los Alamos, and he called it safecracking.

    21. Re:Language matters by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Psh, semantics! You're just a dork !

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    22. Re:Language matters by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Jargon file:

      Hacker: "A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and stretching their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary."

      You tell me. To me it sounds like he explored some details and stretched some capabilities, and is unlike most users. Any speculation as to the legality of his actions is just that -- speculation.

      For all we know he figured out how to log into his own account without using the password. Innocent until proven guilty people.

    23. Re:Language matters by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      A lot of things discussed on /. have very little relevance in the real world. Doesn't make it any less useful to get the correct definition of things.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    24. Re:Language matters by pclminion · · Score: 1

      If you break into a safe to get the antidote to save a poisoned baby, is it still not safecracking?

      What definition of "hacker" are you using that this guy's activities do not fall under?

    25. Re:Language matters by Knave75 · · Score: 1

      You're such a geek no I mean nerd no wait.... what where we talking about?

      http://xkcd.com/747/

    26. Re:Language matters by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I termed it "cracking" because it isn't his system. That might not be enough to rule it out as hacking as well. The two terms may have some overlap.

    27. Re:Language matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a previous connotation for hacking: someone good with a hatchet, who used it to transform a unit of "firewood" into "something else".

      "Tinker" is a perfectly usable word to indicate someone who is "tinkering", whether with an electronic device or otherwise.

    28. Re:Language matters by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      And in some parts of the country "cracking" means having sexual intercourse! Gives a whole new meaning to cracking the books.

    29. Re:Language matters by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Bingo!

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    30. Re:Language matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let's not forget that infamous scene from NCIS...... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qgehH3kEQ [youtube.com]

    31. Re:Language matters by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      well yeah there is that, same thing with "hybrid" years ago a "hybrid" car was a car made up of 2 or more different cars, now its a car with a bat, and an ICE

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    32. Re:Language matters by euroq · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. But de facto, that's the historic definition. Hacker now means something different. (The same way it would be interesting to know what the term gay used to mean, but in reality it doesn't mean that anymore). Hell, it's now being used in contexts beyond software, such as life hacking.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    33. Re:Language matters by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But there's already a C-word. The proof is in the pudenda.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Language matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be fair. He called it "securing".

    35. Re:Language matters by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Hacking was originally using an ax to remove someone's limbs...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    36. Re:Language matters by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      Crash overdrive

      That'd be Crash Override.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  4. PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they don't want to listen, go to Visa and MasterCard. They won't sit on their asses about exposed credit card data.

    1. Re:PCI by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you hadn't already exposed yourself to the owner, I'd write a how-to and send it to them anonymously, and later send the credit cards an ANONYMOUS tip.

      Why anonymous? Hacking, even for white-hat reasons, is illegal in most jurisdictions. Even accidental hacking.

      Now that you've exposed yourself to them it would be too easy for them to piece it together who turned them in for a nice PCI audit. It would be all too easy of them to send your emails to a computer crime division and get you busted, especially if they have any friends with influence there. Just avoid using their product and quietly tell your friends not to do the same.

      The only time I have ever even considered informing a company of a security hole is on an occasion when I'd previously worked for them, personally knew the owner, and knew that the owner respected my ability.

    2. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assuming that they won't detect the hack and trace it to his ip address.

    3. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they already suck cock at security, you think they're going to be able to do that?

      lols x pi

    4. Re:PCI by hellkyng · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While you make a good point that Visa and MC won't sit on their asses about data, that is only from a PCI perspective. And realistically its trivially easy to maintain PCI compliance and have an insecure product.

      What I would recommend however is work through a professional service like Secunia: https://secunia.com/company/blog_news/news/271. They can lend credibility to your claim and they provide what I personally would describe as an ethical approach to remediation. I would strongly not recommend any further testing on your part unless you are prepared to deal with legal consequences. Not that I agree with companies going after researchers, but it does happen.

      Good luck.

    5. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just maybe it'd be a good idea to link to the organization and define what the Payment Card Industry security standards are. This sounds like an issue with non-compliance. If it's a large enough scope, offer to lead a team to correct the problem before it becomes a liability. If not, mention it to those responsible for operations and legal. Both will appreciate not being fined.

    6. Re:PCI by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Tell the company that you can *delete* all of those credit card details, and completely put a halt to their revenue stream. Then they might pay attention.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    7. Re:PCI by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      When the feds come he can just say the security hole was too big and he tripped and fell in it.

      P.S. if he didn't take the credit card numbers, they probably won't convict him or press charges, won't stop overzealous fags from raiding his house and taking his toys though.

    8. Re:PCI by Jeng · · Score: 1

      No, I think that the company would hire someone who could, and then charge the hacker for the expense of them having to hire someone competent and then probably charge them everything it takes to secure the system on top of that.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    9. Re:PCI by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That will be considered a threat no matter how you word it. Expect to go to jail.

    10. Re:PCI by swillden · · Score: 1

      if they already suck at security, you think they're going to be able to do that?

      lols x pi

      Tracking down an IP address is much, much easier than implementing good security. Yes, it's entirely possible that they could track him down from their logs, even if they suck at security.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:PCI by V!NCENT · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How can I help you?"
      -"Well, I noticed that your bank safe is wide open! You might want to cl-"
      "You asshole! I'm calling the FBI!"
      -"But people their money might get sto-"
      "Son, you are under arrest for looking at something and then notifying the owner about it"

      Why is the world ruled by morons?

      --
      Here be signatures
    12. Re:PCI by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If they don't want to listen, go to Visa and MasterCard. They won't sit on their asses about exposed credit card data.

      I guess I don't understand the correlation here. If someone steals your Ford Mustang, you don't contact Ford. You go to your insurance company, for they are the one who owns or insures the product.

      Visa and MasterCard are companies that sell/lease/rent a brand. The bank more owns the actual "product". You're right in that they won't sit on their ass, and would like to be notified, but I'm failing to understand exactly why. If they're concerned about public image, I seriously doubt that anyone who has had their CC info compromised held it against Visa or MasterCard directly.

    13. Re:PCI by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Tell the company that you can *delete* all of those credit card details, and completely put a halt to their revenue stream. Then they might pay attention.

      C'mon...You seriously don't think they have a response for that?

      "Due to a security measure within our systems to protect your data, your archived credit card information has been removed. For security purposes, please re-enter your credit card information so that we may have your latest information on file, and can continue your service with us uninterrupted. Thank you."

      That was just off the top of my head. Pretty sure someone could polish that turd up even more with about 5 minutes of real Marketing effort and spin.

    14. Re:PCI by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Having creditcard information stored in the clear in a database, without a VERY clear need to do so, can lead to pretty severe repercussions for the company. Like being unable to do business anymore. If they are doing that they are clueless to start with, IMO. You might want to report them anonymously to both Visa and Mastercard.

      But whatever you do: I would not press this matter too much. And most certainly, do NOT attempt further checks or intrusions, they will get you jailed if something goes wrong. You really don't want to share lawyers with some guys that *also* found the flaw and tried to sell the creditcard numbers. Getting cleared of that might take a looooooong time.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    15. Re:PCI by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Best argument I have ever heard for what this man did and shows how messed up the laws are. Arent there good Samaritan protections for things like this?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    16. Re:PCI by cavreader · · Score: 2

      For those who are truly interested in testing the boundaries of computer security there are dozens of legitimate companies that do nothing but this type of work. If you know your shit it is also very high paying. If you are truly exceptional any government security or military agency will search out your services under the strategy of "fighting fire with fire". They even accept people who have skirted ot flat out broken the boundaries of law in the past. And the best part is that these type of jobs do not fall under the governments pay pay scale system.

    17. Re:PCI by Tree131 · · Score: 1

      If the company is in the business of processing or clearing credit card transactions, then Visa and MC would be very much involved if there were any security breaches. Then again, there aren't much details about what the company actually does. :/

    18. Re:PCI by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The difference is that Ford doesn't head up a cabal of auto makers that hand out outragious fines to those who handle said cars insecurely.

      Here, since you obviously don't realize what PCI means in this context.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:PCI by Y.A.A.P. · · Score: 2

      I wish that it was possible to mod something up further than 5 in special cases, because the post from hellkyng really is giving the best advice for what you want to do, namely making sure that the people whose data is being stored insecurely becomes stored securely. None of the other 5's in the comments are doing that, they're just "Cover your ass" advice.

      Now I'm going to mod up the other post that I've seen which gives advice in line with your goals - contact some famous security professionals and see what they have to say.

    20. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:PCI by qzjul · · Score: 1

      This is why you go to a library or university or other public terminal, create a new hotmail | gmail | whatever address and send it from there.

    22. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The unfortunate thing is that not everyone that stumbles on something like this necessarily wants to work in security. Sometimes it just presents itself to you.

      On occasions where things like this (though never this severe) presented themselves to me, I just kept my mouth shut and went on with my day. It's not normally in my nature to do so, and I feel bad, but I'm not risking prison because some goof I don't know screwed up somewhere.

    23. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This a thousand times. Where I work I was supposed to do security work however my coworkers seemed to doubt and distrust to the point where the work was simply impossible, regardless of who offered the promotion.

    24. Re:PCI by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but if Visa knows that a company has poor security for handing credit cards they will probably revoke that companies license to their billing API. Credit card companies take security protocol very seriously.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    25. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lets say you have a company. Lets say you have some servers. Lets say the world works the way YOU say it should.

      Now, every day, you're going to get every script kiddie in the internet trying to poke holes in your network. In fact, if they get in, thats fine. They're allowed to look at everything your'e doing (trade secrets) and they can copy user data, since this is legal. You're going to be in hot water with your customers, fast.

      Also, you're getting DDoS'd now because of all these people hitting your computer at random times for fun, to "test" against that "vulnerability". Good luck dealing with that too.

      Yes, in a perfect world everybody would always have iron-clad security. But if you think that is remotely how this world works, you're missing so many details which are fundamental. Not everybody needs to be like that.

      What about a mom & pop store that has a small website for a few customers? Now, EVERYBODY EVERYWHERE has to ALWAYS have 100% perfect security. Its that or just DO NOT offer computer services. There is no inbetween allowed.

      That is the world you are advocating. Instead of, let people be free, let people do what they want. If a company wants to spend X money on X level of security, they can do that. If you find them to be not concerned enough about security for your tastes, go to company Y which spends Y to get Y security. Thats how it goes, its a money balancing game. The more you spend on advertising, the less you spend on products. The more you spend on development, the less you spend on something else. If more people like a certain company's policy, they'll make more profit, and then they can afford more security.

      But to just say that you ALWAYS, ALWAYS have to be up-to-date with 100% security or you can't own a computer is laughable. If that was the standard, there would be, what, a handful of websites on the internet? Google and a few banks? Comeon. Think it through.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    26. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Why is the internet ruled by morons?
      Maybe you're the moron, and you're concluding others are morons on a false assumption. Hm...

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    27. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      They'll pay attention long enough to tell your name to the FBI and smile while you're cop-walked off your front porch in handcuffs.
      Great advice.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    28. Re:PCI by V!NCENT · · Score: 2

      If they poke holes in my network all day and report where the holes are then that's fine, because if a malicious hacker gets it first; I'm fscked.

      Is that so hard? I'd rather have friendlies poke my network before unfriendlies poke my network.

      And I shouldn't be doing bad things that I can get charged with in the first place. And when I say bad I do not necessarily mean against the law, because the law isn't always The Right Thing To Do.

      --
      Here be signatures
    29. Re:PCI by swillden · · Score: 1

      The question was actually about whether they could track his IP from when he tested his hack, not when he sent his e-mail. But, sure... public internet access, open Wifi, Tor network, whatever, there are tons of ways to avoid connecting from an IP that's tied to you, if you think about it ahead of time.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:PCI by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Depending on the obviousness of the hack it may not be illegal to have discovered it, but unfortunately anyone can sue anyone else for any reason and no matter how stupid it is the victim has to offer some legal defence at their own cost. When someone fucks up security the usual response is to claim to be a victim of an uber-hacker and sue in the hope of management buying it and not firing the incompetent moron who is to blame.

      Baseless lawsuits to cover up incompetence should be made illegal with anyone abusing the system getting fines and a record.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:PCI by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      So your alternative is pretend it doesn't exist? He has discovered a serious problem.

      If I put my money in a bank you better believe that I feel entitled to get some binoculars and scope out their grounds to see if their vault has a gaping, truck-sized hole leading to the parking lot.

      If he found this then so will someone else. And someone else may not have a problem with taking advantage of it. Protip: If someone is okay with breaking the law and stealing your identity then they really don't mind that obtaining that information is also illegal.
      I'll never understand the mindset of "People are breaking the law, how do we fix it?! I know! let's make it more illegal!"

    32. Re:PCI by cavreader · · Score: 1

      I can totally understand people not wanting to work for a computer security company or government agency but it is always up to the individual to decide what they want to do without sacrificing any of their principles. I shocked myself 2 weeks ago when a company offered me a job that involved working with the tech platform I was most interested in, agreed to a 30% salary increase on top of a 6 figure salary I am currently making, and cutting my commute time by half. However, I chose to pass on the offer because this company relied solely on the misfortune of others to make a profit. The more people who defaulted on their mortgages the more money this company made and that was their sole revenue source for a 3 Billion a year company. I just couldn't get behind anything like that. 20 years ago I would have been asking how soon I could start but I guess a persons perspective can change quite a bit over 20 years although that doesn't mean all the changes are good.

    33. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      But having 10,000,000 friendlies that aren't working together and are completely un-coordinated attacking you from completely different regions of the internet isn't going to last very long. See the difference? YOU, the OWNER of the computer should be allowed to decide WHEN it gets tested, WHO does the testing, etc. What if you're in the middle of a computationally complex task and suddenly a bunch of people in say finland decide to test your computer "for you" to be "friendly". Oh no, there goes your service, oh no, there goes your task, oh no, there goes your productivity. Annoying they didn't ask first! And you can't even ask them to stop, because its legal for them to do this!

      Think about it.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    34. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      So he has every right not to use that bank, and every right to tell other people not to use that bank. But he isn't allowed to break in at night to inspect their locks personally. The key thing here is you said, "scope out with binoculars". Thats fine. If all he did was scope it out, then he's okay. But it sounds to me like he's gone way past that, if he's trying to find exploits and running against their servers, he can cause all kinds of mayhem that isn't fair. For all he knows, the company is in the middle of a security audit of their own; with a company they trust and that THEY selected, not him.

      Also, if financial records are held in a bank, and the bank is hacked because it is insecure, obviously people are going to suffer for that. But isn't the bank going to be held responsible? Doesn't the bank have obligations, nay contracts, to fulfill problems like that? I don't think it would be legal for the bank to just go "sorry guys!". If so, THAT is the law that needs to be changed. Then everything works fine, you can use whatever bank you want, and if they have shitty security and refuse to upgrade, you can change banks to somebody else that does. Then the banks with good security will get all the customers, yay capitalism in action! Freedom is good, isn't it? The only problem is if the bank is allowed to screw up, and yet somehow the individual people who trusted that bank have to suffer instead of the bank itself, which is wrong. The bank should be liable, and then everything is fine.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    35. Re:PCI by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      How can I choose not to do business with someone if it is forbidden to look? It doesn't sound like he's performing "exploits" to me. They talk about the hack being too easy to be respectable. To go back to the bank analogy if I discover their vault is actually a tent in the yard I should still be able to tell people that even though they have a "No Trespassing" sign by the sidewalk. If I ignored that sign, walked up to that tent and peered in to discover all the bank's money who do you think should be in trouble? Me or the bank?

      You don't understand! The bank needs to be held responsible before there's a breach. People can suffer irreparable harm in these circumstances. If no one is allowed to even look at this banks security how do they know to go somewhere else? All they have is the bank's word.

    36. Re:PCI by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      It's not a mon and pop website we are talking about but one that uses and store credit card informations. And users of the website don't know the CC and personal info s are not secure because there's not a big sign on the website saying "Hey, we got a dumbass sending us a mail about security flaws but we don't care about them ; just so you know!"
      Also, if a mom and pop store wants to let their customers pay with credit cards and not have to follow every contraint of PCI then there are lots of companies and bank who'll gladly sell them their secure online service.

    37. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, isn't THAT ironic, Simon.

    38. Re:PCI by PwnzerDragoon · · Score: 1

      Now, every day, you're going to get every script kiddie in the internet trying to poke holes in your network.

      Uh, how is this different from our current reality? Do you think nobody probes Google's or PayPal's servers, because they might get in trouble? And I don't recall parent saying it should be legal to steal the information, just that people behave unreasonably when you point out a gaping security hole.

    39. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is pretty stupid, because all the hacker did was say it was there. He didn't create it.

    40. Re:PCI by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Hacking, even for white-hat reasons, is illegal in most jurisdictions.

      Maybe I learned it differently, but I've always drawn the line between white and grey at permission, and hacking a site with permission is legal, and generally just called a penetration test.

    41. Re:PCI by dissy · · Score: 2

      I thought about it, and while neither situation is pleasant or nice, I think the GPs idea is still an improvement, and yes should be required by law.

      The world you are arguing for is that a company can choose to spend X on security, and when it turns out X=0 and so the chances of them being hacked are 100%, that company then does not have to deal with the consequences of their choice, but instead get to sue the person warning them that X=0 is a bad idea.

      V!NCENT's idea of forcing a company to suffer the consequences of their poor choices is much better.

      P.S. No one here but you mentioned taking that choice away from anyone, and enforcing security. The only topic at hand was who has to deal with the choices a company makes, the company, or some random person explaining the end result of those decisions.

    42. Re:PCI by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      The world is ruled by moderately intelligent people who have figured out a neat trick: They set up structures that the ordinary person cannot avoid having to interact with, and then make sure that those structures are ruled by morons. That keeps the rest of us jumping around trying to survive instead of seeing through their tricks and removing their power.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    43. Re:PCI by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      "Why is the world ruled by morons?"

      Because a stupid answer that appeals to emotion will get you a hell of a lot farther than a smart answer that appeals to reason.

      --
      ~X~
    44. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      ... Not that I agree with companies going after researchers, but it does happen.

      Good luck.

      I agree - stay away. One problem with the response is that many claim to be "researchers" once they get themselves into a legally sticky position due to their own actions. if one already has a track record of doing actual security research, taking such a position (... I'm performing security research ...) is likely to be *much* easier to defend.

    45. Re:PCI by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

      See, that's assuming one hell of a slippery slope. Even then, we don't need to make all white-hat hacks legal- all we need to do is open up a way for someone to blow the whistle anonymously.

      --
      Sent from my CR-48
    46. Re:PCI by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it suck that that's possible with your network? Having a 10.000.000 hackers staff at your disposal for free is kind of... you know... freaking great?

      You're either working at CERN, where no-one wants to actually crash your system, that's not really connected to the internet directly anyway, or your service isn't worth doing computations. Let's say you're behind Azure. Nobody will cry if iCloud goes down.

      Let me tell you what people will cry about; their credit cards getting stolen.

      --
      Here be signatures
    47. Re:PCI by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That would be a good plan if it was done anonymously, but he's already made traceable contact with them on the issue.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    48. Re:PCI by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Also, if a mom and pop store wants to let their customers pay with credit cards and not have to follow every contraint of PCI then there are lots of companies and bank who'll gladly sell them their secure online service.

      There definitely are. But are you saying you want to de facto make it ILLEGAL to not buy that software? And who decides which software is good enough?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    49. Re:PCI by robsku · · Score: 1

      Considering the message you are replying, you are not explaining why,, but how people are morons ;) I'm inclined to think that you actually meant this as reply to message other than parent of your msg though.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    50. Re:PCI by Anguirel · · Score: 1

      No, they want to make it legal to point out "Hey, what you're using isn't good enough." In particular, accidental access due to poor security should be protected. That is, you're still welcome to use whatever software you'd like, but now it's not illegal to tell you when you've chosen poorly, and not illegal for me to make a typo in a URL and see someone else's personal information (the company that allows that access may still be in violation of various laws, such as HIPAA or whatever similar legislation might exist for financial information).

      There might be a corollary, I suppose, that once notified, you should fix said flaws to the best of your ability within some fixed appropriate time frame (which I believe already exists for other types of infrastructure and in other sectors).

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
  5. You're just asking by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a 5 year tour of the federal penitentiary system, aren't you?

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:You're just asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - this all comes down to how much you like jail.

    2. Re:You're just asking by seniorcoder · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least if you are going to do this, simply as a proof of concept of course, steal all their customers money. Then the risk/reward ratio is looking better.

    3. Re:You're just asking by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      And submitting using the same name as your twitter?
      Definitely asking for "five years in Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    4. Re:You're just asking by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Complete with Bubba's Colonoscopy.

      Don't ask how or what he uses to perform these "checks".

  6. there is a saying, in my language by gTsiros · · Score: 3, Insightful

    translated:

    do you know how to steal? (implied yes as an answer)

    do you know how to *hide*?

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  7. Go to the investors by james_van · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe the company doesn't care, but the people with money on the line will. And when they start to care, the company will start to care. Don't go hacking to try and prove a point, that's just gonna cause you more trouble than it's worth. And if, at the end of the day, no one cares or does anything about it, no sweat off your back.

    1. Re:Go to the investors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. The investors won't believe him and

      2. If they do believe him they'll consider him to be the criminal. And they'll go to the IT department in question who will then say, "It's just some nut trying to make a name for himself, or to black mail us, or looking for a job, or ...... regardless, he's talking out of his ass because we know what we're doing."

      Lastly, no one here has considered that the submitter is making all of this up? Because right now, there are folks are looking at "seeread"'s account information, IPs, email for account, ....

      You're going to be having some real fun seeread in the next few weeks!

      Dumbass.

    2. Re:Go to the investors by Amouth · · Score: 4, Informative

      If it was me - after the company doesn't bother to recognize it - i'd contact the Credit Card clearing house (Visa/MC/AMex) that they use.. Anyone who is processing and storing CC info has to comply with PCI DSS. If you can get access to card info then they are out of compliance, and are subject to have their merchant account deactivated, charges seized, and pay fines.

      The CC companies don't (Normally) play around with it. Contact them and inform them of the situation, IF (AND ONLY IF) they need it provide them a proof of concept CODE/Method only, DO NOT grab card numbers and send them to them as an example, let the CC company evaluate your proof of concept and see if they can access CC numbers.

      This method seems to work (has in the past) to get people to fix their holes.. As for them actually becoming a more responsible company after this, well hell never has been a cold place..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  8. Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Walk away. You notified the appropriate people. After that, it no longer has anything to do with you, and can only go pear-shaped from here.

    1. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded. No matter what your motives are, there is nothing but trouble for you here. In fact, you may have already done too much.

    2. Re:Oh boy... by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Informative

      This, times a million. Source: Many previous stories of people who notified organizations about security issues and were rewarded with a lawsuit.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:Oh boy... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Whistleblowers are not kindly regarded in these times.
      Otherwise you'd have real news "a-la-deep-throat"

      Keep you head down and don't deal with the company.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    4. Re:Oh boy... by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, since poster did try to do the right thing, now this person could be accused if there is a compromise at the target. By making themselves known, they may have to go even farther.

      Seriously, I'd take the advice of other posters and bring it up with the credit card vendors. They will certainly be interested parties since they'd be directly affected by a breach. If the card companies aren't interested, maybe the Better Business Bureau would be?

    5. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This, times a million. Source: Many previous stories of people who notified organizations about security issues and were rewarded with a lawsuit.

      And in those cases once those people discovered a hole they continued to exploit it. He's already violated the law, but might claim he didn't expect it to work or some other lame excuse. If he does it again, it's clear he has no respect for that law and will be taught some. This is somebody else's problem, don't make it your own!

    6. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. Really only recourse here is to walk away.

      If you don't, you're likely to be the fall-guy if things go south, even though you brought it to everyones attention.

      From one 'fall guy' to a likely candidate, GTFO now!

    7. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use there service as a normal user, complain you data was been compromised by someone, press charges agains them for negligence wtih you info, profit!! and the hole gets closed.

    8. Re:Oh boy... by cusco · · Score: 1

      BBB doesn't give a shit. My dad was approached several times to join the BBB, and it quickly became apparent to him that it's nothing more than a public relations gimmick. Anyone can join the BBB just by paying the membership fee, and the only way to really get dropped is to stop paying. Exxon and Goldman Sachs could be members, even criminal fraud convictions don't trigger automatic expulsion. They told him as much, and said essentially, "For the low annual membership fee you can claim membership in the BBB in your advertising." Since in 20+ years he never once took out an advertisement he told them to take a hike.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    9. Re:Oh boy... by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      This, times a million. Source: Many previous stories of people who notified organizations about security issues and were rewarded with a lawsuit.

      And in those cases once those people discovered a hole they continued to exploit it.

      Actually, not all of those arrested for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act were selling the information for profit or repeatedly broke in. Especially during the early days of the internet, there were plenty of curious hackers who didn't actually do anything malicious, and they still got jailtime.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    10. Re:Oh boy... by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      A hacker is not a whistleblower. A whistleblower is someone who has access to something but is not supposed to share it, who chooses to violate that policy / contract because of ethical needs to inform. But that does not cover people who go out LOOKING for things to whistleblow. You couldn't use whistle-blower protections to protect yourself picking locks and breaking into a company's headquarters, EVEN if you found all sorts of atrocities. (AFAIK) Thats the difference here, the proactive searching instead of having already come across something as part of your day or your job. If this is acceptable, then it will create all sorts of hacking vigilantes / bounty hunters who will spam every corporate server they can get their hands on in the hopes that they'll find something.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm ALL FOR whistleblower protections. I just don't think this counts at all, different issue.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    11. Re:Oh boy... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't notify the appropriate people. If he had notified the appropriate people, the vulnerability would be closed right now. The right thing to do, if you find a vulnerability in non-open source software is disclose it fully, publicly, anonymously, and immediately. That will force them to secure their systems.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Oh boy... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      Translation: we're cowards, you should be, too. No wonder the world is so messed up. There was a time when Americans would die to right trivial wrongs, but now they hide from even threat of a lawsuit and shrug moral and social responsibility.

    13. Re:Oh boy... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Translation: we're cowards, you should be, too. No wonder the world is so messed up. There was a time when Americans would die to right trivial wrongs, but now they hide from even threat of a lawsuit and shrug moral and social responsibility.

      It may be cowardice to give in to overwhelming force, but the other way doesn't work so well.

    14. Re:Oh boy... by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      BBB doesn't give a shit. My dad was approached several times to join the BBB, and it quickly became apparent to him that it's nothing more than a public relations gimmick. Anyone can join the BBB just by paying the membership fee, and the only way to really get dropped is to stop paying. Exxon and Goldman Sachs could be members, even criminal fraud convictions don't trigger automatic expulsion. They told him as much, and said essentially, "For the low annual membership fee you can claim membership in the BBB in your advertising." Since in 20+ years he never once took out an advertisement he told them to take a hike.

      And as demonstrated by 20/20, the amount you contribute affects your BBB rating making it totally useless.

    15. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so full of shit on so many levels I don't know where to begin. Before labeling everyone here a coward, why don't you tell us how you have sacrificed life, limb and/or your own financial well-being to "right trivial wrongs"?

    16. Re:Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe Pa is that you?

    17. Re:Oh boy... by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      Walk away. You notified the appropriate people. After that, it no longer has anything to do with you, and can only go pear-shaped from here.

      The thing is, now he's effectively published that he knows of a flaw. A trivial google search will tell which particular company this regards, and give abundant information to identify him. Although he hasn't published the particulars of his "trivial way to hack user accounts" AFAICT, he's indicated that it's - well, trivial. Malignant people are probably all over this case as we speak.

      seeread: Your best course of action might be to protect yourself by formally notifying the proper authorities (CC companies?), document and secure any communications and actions you have already done, and consult a lawyer. As you've pretty much dropped the ball on this one, I would say that a lawyer is a must at this point no matter how you choose to proceed. Call one ASAP.

      Good luck!

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    18. Re:Oh boy... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      Whistleblower or white-hat hacker. It doesn't matter they will prosecute you the same.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  9. Who have you emailed and from what email address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you emailed the IT manager, the CTO, the CEO, some random guy? And what are your credentials? Are you emailing from superhacker123@hotmail.com?

  10. notify visa by banbeans · · Score: 5, Informative

    U.S. – (650) 432-2978 or usfraudcontrol@visa.com

    1. Re:notify visa by James+Renken · · Score: 5, Informative

      This! If you're able to see credit card information, then they are not storing it in a PCI DSS compliant manner, and Visa/MasterCard should be extremely interested.

    2. Re:notify visa by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Informative

      should be -> are :)

      (spoken as someone in the industry)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:notify visa by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      should be -> are :)

      But are they interested enough to give this guy a written offer of legal protection for disclosing the vulnerability?

      His smallest downside seems to be just going away and never mentioning it again. If the Industry is smart enough to not allow that to be the outcome, kudos to them (but color me pleasantly surprised).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:notify visa by EvilIdler · · Score: 2

      Visa? Quite possibly. From what I've dealt with that side of things they seem fairly clued in on things, and always interested in not losing money. Imagine that :P

    5. Re:notify visa by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Visa? Quite possibly. From what I've dealt with that side of things they seem fairly clued in on things, and always interested in not losing money. Imagine that :P

      I hope things have gotten better recently. In the past I've seen their auditors insist I switch systems from using md5 password hashes to using crypt (I refused).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:notify visa by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Auditor is correct that md5 probably isn't as good as many people think it is (** for certain ways it's used)
      Auditor is incorrect in that crypt is not really a good alternative either.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    7. Re:notify visa by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      But the auditor didn't really have a choice as the Visa requirements specified that all passwords had to be encrypted. Hashing isn't encrypted.

      This all predated glibc-2.7 anyhow.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Report Them by AdamJS · · Score: 1

    Report them to a newspaper and tech sites or something. Business papers, even.

  12. write 2600 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    write 2600 mag they'll post it.

    1. Re:write 2600 by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      No they won't.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  13. More important by tqft · · Score: 2

    How do I make my amazon wishlist available to you?

    Drop everything, wipe the files you have, reformat and reinstall your computer, create a plausible deniability claim to any account you used of this that can be tied to you.

    Then go to an internet cafe and post somewhere.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:More important by networkzombie · · Score: 1

      When at the cafe, have on a disguise, wear gloves, and pay in cash.

    2. Re:More important by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Also the cafe should be in a non-english speaking country with poor diplomatic relations with the US. And the more obscure the language the better. And the cafe should be busy and probably not even be known as an internet cafe. You should also try to use a portable Tor browser from a USB stick and then use an anonymous proxy in addition. Instead of gloves you might be able to coat your fingers with glue.

      Another option is to crack someone's WEP key from a laptop, preferably in a different state and then use Tor + anon proxy from their connection. Using a 'protected' wireless router is better for obvious reasons.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    3. Re:More important by I+Read+Good · · Score: 2

      and leave your cell phone at home

  14. Retain a lawyer. by chemicaldave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You should probably hire a lawyer. It doesn't matter how good you're trying to be. Anything you did to come to your conclusions that was illegal is going to be frowned upon... severely. And if you do go public, you'll likely be hit with a C&D letter.

    1. Re:Retain a lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, get a lawyer, and take it one step further. You do have one thing of value that might save your ass: you know how it was done, and they may not. Have your lawyer go to their lawyer and say this: "If you agree not to sue or pursue my client in any way, my client will tell you how it was done so you can avoid a disaster." One thing that your lawyer *must not* do is threaten to go public or do anything negative, because you're edging close to extortion, even though you're not asking for anything.

    2. Re:Retain a lawyer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't hire a lawyer without telling the lawyer why and once he does the lawyer has to turn him in or face charges himself. Attorney client privilege does not cover a conspiracy to hide a crime

    3. Re:Retain a lawyer. by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      The poster here is correct. Find yourself a criminal lawyer, because undoubtedly once this reaches a corporate level employee, you're going to be arrested. It doesn't matter whether you've done anything illegal or not. If they accuse you of violating the CFAA you're going to jail. Maybe only for a few nights or months if your lawyer can get you bail. It may be a few years before you can prove your innocence or not. Expect to spend whatever money you have fighting this. Get used to the idea of using Food Stamps and living in a rat-infested apartment, after you get out of jail.

      You don't have to be guilty of anything to become a victim of the New Improved American Justice system.
      Nor do you have to have committed any wrongdoing to be sued. Just ask IBM about SCO, and they'll be able to enlighten you as to our wonderful legal system.
      Or ask B&N about Microsoft.

      But, it's also possible the poster of the question is really an RIAA covert agent and this whole question has been a sting operation of the FBI, paid for by Microsoft and the RIAA, to take down all those terrible hackers on /.

      On the bright side the poster may be a juvenile and will only wind up in Juvie PMITA detention as opposed to PMITA prison.
      Best of luck to you son. You're going to need it if you are in the US or any country where the US will get you extradited.
      Although, this must be a really simple hack, since the poster was dumb enough to blast the news of his hack publicly on /., even if he withheld the details. But the good news is we here on /. will get to follow the story as it gets posted and reposted over the next 10 years. ;')

  15. You already made the wrong first step by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now just forget about it and hope no one hacks them before they forget about you.

    1. Re:You already made the wrong first step by Hentes · · Score: 2

      Exactly. By contacting them, presumably through a non-anonymous email account, you already made a wrong decision. Companies will never admit they were wrong, and if anyone would hack them in the future you will be the first one to blame. Even professional security researchers can be silenced by legal threats, you won't be an exception. Just leave it alone, it's far too risky to rely on a companies goodwill.
      And if you ever want to do something similar again, the most important part is to remain anonymous the whole time: send them an anonymous email detailing the vulnerability, possible ways to fix it, and give them some time (e.g. a month) to do so. After said time, if the vulnerability still exists, hack them, and publish the proof of concept, also anonymously.

  16. Depends on if you want fast or right... by trunicated · · Score: 0

    What's the right thing to do? Keep email bombing them until someone takes you seriously.

    What's the fastest thing to do? Leak info and POC to various news sites that cover start ups - like TechCrunch

    --
    There's a reason there is no "Disagree" mod...
    1. Re:Depends on if you want fast or right... by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Email bombs can, and will, in this case be dealt with by calling the police about a stalker who has threatened to hack the database. Only a small twist of the truth and off he goes.

      Don't annoy them. Just call the Visa/Mastercard fraud hotlines and explain the issue. They are MUCH more qualified to solve this (as opposed to: publish this) than most people here.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  17. Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by pngwen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most ethical thing you can do is fully disclose the hack to the media, and to as many websites as possible. This will force the developers to either fix the problem or let the company go down in flames. If you keep it secret, innocent pepole will be harmed when their information is leaked by the faulty code. If you could hack it, others can too. They may be less altruistic about what they find.

    Write to 2600, call your local media, write to your newspaper, post the info here, go to the forums, and take the word to the street!

    --
    I am the penguin that codes in the night.
    1. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not only the most ethical, it's the only way this company will actually do anything. I'd also suggest to do this anonymously. Corporations have a habit of striking back blindly in random directions whenever they feel threatened, and this will most certainly threaten them. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they tried to smack you down with restraining orders, defamation suits, or whatever the lawyers think will hurt you the most. If you release the information anonymously (and be very careful how you go about this), then there's nobody to slap down with restraining orders.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      This may the only way he can save his ass in the future. He emailed them, so they know who he is. If he blasts it everywhere, all at once, the company will get the shit storm if they try to crack him. But definitely get a lawyer first.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Darn I also meant to say get a lawyer first, consult, and go from there. Me and my twitchy fingers.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    4. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Temporarily benefit/protect the innocents but send your a** straight to jail. You'll be fortunate if they don't try pasting the cyber-terrorist label on you and come at you with the full force of the Patriot Act.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by Bucky24 · · Score: 1

      post the info here

      Yes. Tell us everything. I'm sure some helpful slashdot reader will "take care of" this company's security problems for you.

      --
      All the world's a CPU, and all the men and women merely AI agents
    6. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      If he blasts it everywhere, all at once, the company will get the shit storm if they try to crack him. But definitely get a lawyer first.

      The trouble with shit storms is it's hard to avoid getting any on you.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    7. Re:Full disclosure is the most ethical path. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      That's why I followed up- get a lawyer first, then see what happens. I had the twitchy fingers on my first post. Then realized what you said.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  18. Send them here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send them a link to this website: http://ask.slashdot.org/story/11/12/02/2124215/ask-slashdot-to-hack-or-not-to-hack

  19. NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the DUMBEST THING EVER. I cannot believe people actually think this way. Are you familiar with the LAW SYSTEM? People can't just go around doing things without permission like that. If your internet connection crosses a state line, (and due to packet routing it probably is and you might not even know) then you are committing a FEDERAL CRIME. That means that not just the police, but the FBI will come knock on your door. History is just FULL of people who though, hey, I'm pretty clever, I'll hack these people and get a job. NOBODY WILL HIRE A CRIMINAL I PROMISE YOU.

    Cannot stress this enough. Jeeze.

    Here are your options: Call them, email them. Thats it. Move on with your life if they ignore you. There's nothing that says they can't be incompetent if they want to, but there is something that says you can't break into their systems. (yes, even if they're not secured).

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    1. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how did this get on the front page?!?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    2. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really - listen to this guy. What you have done violates several US laws and you are now subject to being visited by the FBI and the US Secret Service. Regardless of your motives, what you have done is illegal and you should not be broadcasting it in public. I would not even call or email them.

    3. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by syousef · · Score: 1

      This is the DUMBEST THING EVER. I cannot believe people actually think this way. Are you familiar with the LAW SYSTEM?

      No, but I'm familiar with the concept of a LEGAL system. ;-)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Law is a system by definition. So you have a system, that is Law. Yes, it is "legal", but you're arguing semantics when you understood exactly what I meant and it wasn't even technically grammatically wrong. I'm not upset or anything (appreciate the ;-) to help pass joking inflection).

      But that said, people being sticklers for exact wording is one of the things wrong with the internet. Enough, grammar nazis, enough. :P

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    5. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the DUMBEST THING EVER.

      That was my initial reaction, and it seems to be the clear consensus on this board. Thinking about it, though, I don't blame the submitter for being confused - we generally see exactly the opposite reaction on /. when the story is about illegal piracy or DRM hacking.

    6. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by cusco · · Score: 1

      Because they're not the only person who has been in this position and been unsure how to proceed. I wandered into a similar situation a number of years ago, and fortunately while I was still debating how to proceed the company fixed the giant gaping security hole. It was quite literally the same issue that Bank of America had earlier this year, where if you changed the account number in the URL you were in someone else's account details. (Since SeaFirst Bank was gobbled up in the 1990s that particular issue has been around for a LONG time.) I had taken screen shots of a couple of accounts that I had entered and was wondering who to notify and how. Sounds like the poster has tried to do the right thing, and is authentically puzzled as to the response he's received. If he just shuts up hundreds/thousands of people can be victimized, and I know that in his shoes I would feel bad if that happened. Wouldn't you?

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the dumbest thing ever is the legal system which punishes whistleblowers. Wait, no, that's the 2nd dumbest thing ever. The absolute dumbest thing ever are the people who support a legal system that punishes whistleblowers.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Thats because we reject DRM, defective by design only hurts legitimate owners who have paid and legally own it, the pirates, the criminals who should be punished, are not, and those who shouldn't be punished are. It is entirely pointless, backwards, and annoying. Similarly piracy, when you really analyze it, is usually a response to a product being sold only at a price point that is above the perceived value of that product. We in America do not haggle, you buy it at the advertised price or you get nothing. There's no telling the manager "hey, I can't pay that, but if you'll sell it to me for 15% less then you can still make a profit and I'll be happy", so your options are pay too much, or pirate. Piracy is often equated to lost sales, and this has been shown time and again to be absolutely incorrect. Most pirates will either buy a product later after testing it (not wanting to buy products that have been marketed to look better than they are) or cannot afford the product at any point. So it does not effect economics and criminally suing these people for hundreds of thousands of dollars is beyond insane.

      But this is one that SHOULD be. You SHOULDN'T be able to just access and tinker with any computer that is on the internet, just because you can. Not every mom & pop store can afford iron-clad security; that doesn't give you a *right* to break their system just because you can. If a bank didn't lock its money up, it would still be QUITE ILLEGAL to steal it. It is still very ILLEGAL to walk into somebody's house and watch their television while they are gone, moving their things around or breaking them. It doesn't matter if the front door is locked or not, or how bad the lock is, or how good you are at lockpicking. It is a non-issue, the fact is you just can't do that. We can't keep peace otherwise, everything would be chaotic. There are no possessions, so I can take things right out of your hand, even while you're in the middle of using them? Production would grind to a halt.

      I don't blame the submitter for being ignorant, we are all born ignorant. But you need to be aware of your ignorance, and stop yourself and do research before you go an break laws. This is how people get hurt, when you don't think things through, when you don't consider the implications and the consequences.

      As much as I may feel that people should get a few mistakes before they're judged too harshly, in the United States Legal System, ignorance of the law is not and has never been an excuse.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    9. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      If he just shuts up hundreds/thousands of people can be victimized, and I know that in his shoes I would feel bad if that happened. Wouldn't you?

      For all he knows, the system he was looking at wasn't as important as he thought, maybe its a testing sever.
      Or maybe the company is in the middle of a security audit, and they are paying someone right now to fix things, it just takes time.
      We don't know. But the point is, you're not the watchdog of the internet. It isn't your place to go snooping around everybody else's computers. If everybody is allowed to freely trespass on anything, if we abandon the idea of ownership, then there are going to be LOTS of big problems. I've discussed it on other comments, so I won't bother copypasta, but this simply is not the way to get things done.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    10. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Someone who goes out looking for problems is not a whistleblower, they are a vigilante or a bounty hunter. Whistleblowers, who I am all in favor of, are people ALREADY aware of some knowledge, who then break an agreement or contract not to disclose that information, which they are protected against because of the ethical need.

      This does not mean you are allowed to break into banks and try to break their safes every day, so long as you don't steal anything and are only there to tell them how good their safe is. That is not acceptable. The bank could not conduct its business. Similarly, a computer cannot conduct its business if people all over the internet are trying to crack your computer and are legally free to do so, free of ramifications. It would be chaos.

      You're not allowed to pick the locks to the front of a corporate headquarters, go inside, mess the place up, and then find some file that proves they were doing something illegal and then get whistleblower status. THINK ABOUT THAT. IF THAT WAS OKAY, PEOPLE WOULD BE BREAKING INTO EVERY OFFICE IN AMERICA ON A DAILY BASIS. That CANNOT be allowed. That is COMPLETELY different from whistle-blowing.

      The absolute dumbest people ever are the people who condemn others without understanding the complexities of an issue or bothering to think someone else's point out half way.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    11. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by cusco · · Score: 2

      Yes, you've been pretty emphatic in other posts, but the whole "watch your own ass and screw everyone else" mindset so common throughout this thread bothers me. I'm probably older than you, and certainly grew up in a different cultural environment, and I would have trouble leaving other people hanging in the wind the way that you and a lot of other commenters recommend. Maybe I'm just weird nowdays, but I still tell people when their tail lights are burned out, help kids catch their runaway dog, report a stolen bicycle dumped in the park to the police, hold the door for people with their hands full, and stop to help people who appear sick or hurt. I'm eternally bewildered when I see the venom being dumped on someone who was trying to do what he thought was the right thing. Maybe preventing people from getting robbed is no longer considered a good thing to do in America. Makes me kind of glad that I'll be moving to Peru in a few years.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    12. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      'cmon. This is like watching a car crash in slow motion. We all know the guy is gonna end up in jail, but now we get the pleasure of being able to say "I told you so" when he ends up doing it because he ignored our wise advice (it doesn't matter what he does, he will have ignored somebody's advice). I see this as giving us not one but tens of front page stories. This is 100% news for nerds and Slasdot is creating it in front of your eyes.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    13. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you're familiar with the US Governments recently updated position on whistle blowers.

      Glad I'm not the only one paying attention...

    14. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      No, the dumbest thing ever is the legal system which punishes whistleblowers. Wait, no, that's the 2nd dumbest thing ever. The absolute dumbest thing ever are the people who support a legal system that punishes whistleblowers.

      The dumbest thing ever is at the beginning of this sentence.

      --
      ~X~
    15. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      This is stupid.

      The whole point here is that if one guy who's not planning to commit crimes can get at financial information, then anyone who is can too. The difference being, if they find it first, then they sure aren't going to tell anyone.

      This isn't "defacing a web site" pain-in-the-ass stuff. This is real people's real finances being left, it would seem, trivially exposed for the world to take.

    16. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Similarly, a computer cannot conduct its business if people all over the internet are trying to crack your computer and are legally free to do so, free of ramifications. It would be chaos.

      You're obviously not a sysadmin, you might be a lawyer. All servers are assaulted with break-in attempts all day long, from connections that effectively free the attacker from ramifications. There is no chaos. If the system is kept reasonably secure so that the attempts don't succeed, it works fine.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    17. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is entirely different. If the guy just accidentally fell into the exploit, then fine. Yes, he should be able to annouce this, to help people with their decision about using the business in question. As discussed elsewhere on this thread, a big problem might be the watering down of the word "hack", when I saw "should I hack this company" and so on, I figured that he had already done some interactive process with their servers, which would be going too far. Thats not checking out your neighbor's break lights, thats opening up his hood to look as how his engine is doing because you think he could use a tune up; maybe he doesn't want you messing with his ride that much, maybe there's an extenuating circumstance. You're free to offer him your services, but that is where it ends. If he'd rather have a shop do it then you, and he thinks he can get by for 2 more days, then that is his right, his freedom to decide. Going around poking into everybody's backyards and checking up on them is not doing the right thing, its the sort of big brother behavior we DO NOT want. Absolutely if he just stumbled backwards into a URL exploit, go post that shit, and he should be covered by whistleblower protections. I guess we need more information about how much he did.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    18. Re:NONONO RED FLAGS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The examples you give of Good Samaritan-ing aren't at all like this case:

      (1) Your examples are all about ordinary people who probably don't have the money or inclination to sue you. None of them have a presumably giant, compassionless, deep-pocketed corporation involved anywhere in the situation.

      (2) None of your examples involve the computer industry. Computers and the Internet are still really new, socially speaking; our laws, norms & society are still struggling to decide how to deal with them. The end result is, the legal definitions of what's right and wrong are probably strange and defy what Slashdotters would call common sense, cops / judge / jury won't be technologically literate enough to have any kind of common sense either, and the forces of history haven't had time to bring us to a stable equilibrium where effective social patterns become universal and dysfunctional ones die out.

      So even though you're trying to do the right thing, the legal system will just lump you in with black hats trying to steal CC#'s to make a quick buck.

      (3) The entire USA legal system is completely out of whack. If you've never seen the video "Don't Talk To Police" on Youtube, I highly recommend it. We have so many laws in the United States, not even the government itself knows how many there are! The bottom line is, everybody in the USA probably violates some law just about every day, and the only way you don't get screwed is if you know and exercise your Constitutional rights (particularly rights against self-incrimination and unreasonable search and seizure), or you pay lawyers whose advice will be to exercise your Constitutional rights.

      Sadly, this involves not cooperating with the authorities any more than the law says you absolutely have to, volunteering information without getting some kind of immunity agreement first, or in general sticking your neck out, ESPECIALLY if (a) you're innocent and you've done nothing wrong, or (b) you think you're innocent and you tried to do the right thing, but since you didn't have highly paid, highly skilled lawyers in this particular legal specialty helping you plot your every move from t=0, even though you did your best you actually had approximately a 0% chance of avoiding doing something illegal.

      I'm not saying that you shouldn't help people, I'm saying -- and I think others are saying -- that, in this situation, the original poster might pay a heavy price to do so.

      The obvious conclusion is that a set of laws that punishes people who are trying to do what intuition and common sense say is the Right Thing, is somehow flawed or broken and needs patching.

      And the saddest part of all this? You'd never know it from the above analysis but I'm actually politically conservative, I just believe that government which governs least, governs best (within reason of course, I'm no anarchist)...too bad I'm too young to really remember Ronald Reagan :(

  20. Escalate in another direction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about notifying the local police department, better business bureau, or city council member? How about the newspaper? That's likely to get a lot more attention from the powers-that-be at the company.

    1. Re:Escalate in another direction? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      You want then to notify the police about having broken federal laws? That's even dumber than what this person had already done.

  21. CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Contact CEO or their board of directors.

  22. For the love of Christ... by trims · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First off, QUIT FUCKING TRESSPASSING.

    I don't care if you're not doing it for money (though, you sound like you might do it for fame). It's wrong.

    The company didn't ask you to do a security audit. It's not a public organization where you can claim some sort of "ownership" or such. It's a Private Place. They're responsible for their own security, not some random passerby. You have no business doing what you did, and that's it. If they blow security, they're on the hook for the consequences. We have very well established methods for doing that kind of reinforcement.

    Dress it up how you want to, you're still a criminal - legally, morally, and ethically, it's none of your business, you shouldn't have done it in the first place, and quit doing it in general. Grow the Fuck Up.

    Just drop it, period, and go find something else do spend your energies on. And, find another crowd of people to hang out with - those ones you're in with now aren't a good influence (obviously).

    -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
    1. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nail on the head

    2. Re:For the love of Christ... by iceaxe · · Score: 2

      IF the poster actually used the discovered methods of intrusion (which is likely) then you are absolutely right.

      If on the other hand the poster simply noticed a problem but did not test it actively, then notifying the company is the decent thing to do.

      In either case, it's now time to walk away.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    3. Re:For the love of Christ... by dave562 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're being a bit harsh on the guy. A lot of people started their IT careers in the computer underground, myself included. If it were not for LA 2600 meetings and the first few Defcons, I would not have developed the skills and background that landed me my first job as a sysadmin fifteen years ago. More recently (within the last year), the head auditor for my company told me that my background reassured him because he knew that I had a better perspective on computer security and the threat landscape than most "professionals" who picked up all of their knowledge in a classroom.

      WRT the OP, it was dumb for him to go to the company. As everyone else stated, he exposed himself to some liability. Any information that he provides to the company could be used to build a case against him for computer trespass, unauthorized access, etc.

      To call the OP morally and ethically criminal is overboard. He did not do any damage to them and did not profit from his activities. It was a real world learning exercise. It was not the brightest move in the world, but doing a security audit on a random computer system does not make someone morally bankrupt. If he had taken the data and sold it for profit, or even just posted it for fame and notoriety, that would be a different story. Instead he naively did "the right thing" without fully understanding the liability it exposed him to.

    4. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, QUIT FUCKING TRESSPASSING.

      I don't care if you're not doing it for money (though, you sound like you might do it for fame). It's wrong.

      The company didn't ask you to do a security audit. It's not a public organization where you can claim some sort of "ownership" or such. It's a Private Place. They're responsible for their own security, not some random passerby. You have no business doing what you did, and that's it. If they blow security, they're on the hook for the consequences. We have very well established methods for doing that kind of reinforcement.

      Dress it up how you want to, you're still a criminal - legally, morally, and ethically, it's none of your business, you shouldn't have done it in the first place, and quit doing it in general. Grow the Fuck Up.

      Just drop it, period, and go find something else do spend your energies on. And, find another crowd of people to hang out with - those ones you're in with now aren't a good influence (obviously).

      -Erik

      Wow, to many people see something and ignore it. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass.

    5. Re:For the love of Christ... by jgrahn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First off, QUIT FUCKING TRESSPASSING.

      I don't care if you're not doing it for money (though, you sound like you might do it for fame). It's wrong.

      As he explained it, it sounds as if he's concerned about the outfit's customers. It's not unheard of -- that people care about the wellbeing of other people. (That Christ guy you mention in the subject line did, for example)

    6. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he didn't "use the methods" how does he know it exposes CC information?

    7. Re:For the love of Christ... by sootman · · Score: 1

      You should go a little easier on him until you have all the facts. For all you know, his "hacking" amounts to "I changed the URL from ``...?mode=show-account&userid=1'' to ``...?mode=show-account&userid=2'' "

      That said, people freak out about "hacks" as minor as this, and anyone who's been on Slashdot long enough (sorry, I don't feel like doing the searches right now myself) knows that lots of people in exactly his position have been royally screwed over (up to and including fines and jail time) for trying to do exactly what he's doing, so my advice to him is the same as yours, though for different reasons: walk the fuck away and say no more.

      > They're responsible for their own security, not some random
      > passerby... If they blow security, they're on the hook for the
      > consequences. We have very well established methods
      > for doing that kind of reinforcement.

      Yeah. It's called "all the customers get fucked in the ass and have to spend months repairing their credit and nothing bad happens to the company."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:For the love of Christ... by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

      The company didn't ask you to do a security audit.

      Not sure if you've been missing out on the past year+ of news, but companies don't really do this.

      I'm sorry they may pay for a security audit, but the au gratis one they just received was far more effective.

      And are you my dad?

    9. Re:For the love of Christ... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      That's the biggest pile of horseshit I've ever heard. If the laws make it such that helping to protect your fellow citizens from negligence is a criminal affair, then you guys need to re-examine your laws.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    10. Re:For the love of Christ... by pdxer · · Score: 2

      fifteen years ago

      It isn't 1996 anymore. The days when people hacked into systems and where then hired into computer security consulting jobs are long since gone.

      --
      Looking for a job in Portland, Oregon?
    11. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dress it up how you want to, you're still a criminal - legally, morally, and ethically, it's none of your business

      Legally, you're correct. Morally and ethically, I would argue he's in the right. He's violating the letter of the law but not the spirit. There's no mens rea (criminal intent) in him. He's a criminal because of the law, not because what he's doing is wrong.

    12. Re:For the love of Christ... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Exactly! If you see that your neighbour accidentally left his door open, don't do anything. IT'S NON OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS.

    13. Re:For the love of Christ... by dave562 · · Score: 1

      The metapoint was that I am good at my job because I enjoy it. When I was younger, it was a hobby that I could turn into a career. That aspect of it, the hobby to career transition opportunity is not realistic today. But enjoying what you do is so rare in adults who have to earn a paycheck that it seems criminal to suggest that the OP needs to find a whole new group of friends. What he should be doing is going to a college with a digital forensics and/or computer security program. His natural curiosity and talents will put him head and shoulders above everyone else in the class who is there on a whim, or because they think it will get them a "good job".

    14. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between 'Hey, your door's open.' and 'This lock looks flimsy, I bet my 4 pound sledge could knock that deadbolt clear through the frame. You really need to fix that.'

    15. Re:For the love of Christ... by taskiss · · Score: 1

      Google "seeread" hack

      This troll is all over the net spewing this same exact crap

      --
      - real hackers don't have sigs -
    16. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty harsh. OP never said how he came about this discovery -- it could have been by accident. "Grow the fuck up" isn't really useful advice here. He may have made a mistake in how he made the discovery or how he disclosed it, but that doesn't make him a criminal or immature.

      I'd also like to point out that even though it's private, he may be a user of that service and so he has an interest in protecting his own data. There's a big difference between pointing out a danger and telling some one/corporation how to do things. I think that a "good Samaritan" is a fitting label for this guy and that you're jumping to a lot of conclusions.

      "Just look the other way" is how a lot of shit gets left un-checked for long periods of time. I'm not sure if I have enough information to agree or disagree with OP's actions, but it sounds like they're trying to do the "right thing."

    17. Re:For the love of Christ... by trims · · Score: 1

      My point about his friends was that he's clearly with a bunch of folks who think it's OK to hack. And, give him positive reinforcement to hack. It's unlikely that he's going to be able to change the group dynamic, so his own best interests are to find another group that isn't a bad influence.

      This is no different than getting a kid out of any other bad circle of peers; people seldom recognize the damage their peer group is doing to them, and abandoning that peer group, while drastic, is usually the only way to stop the behavior. There's too much pressure to relapse, otherwise.

      He's still free to explore his talent, but he needs to find another group that will encourage him to do it in a more constructive manner.

      -Erik

      --
      There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
    18. Re:For the love of Christ... by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      Jesus Christ got crucified too, and that's a serious risk for this guy as well. In the metaphorical sense, true, but it could still get pretty unpleasant. He really should quit tresspassing because it does not improve the disclosure, is no longer needed and finally, provides anyone who knows about it with a pretty big lever against him to shut him up. Don't give them more ammo than they already have.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    19. Re:For the love of Christ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      There's "underground" and there's "underground". I've read the 2600 mag quite a bit. I've set up servers and tried techniques described in 2600. As you correctly noted, that's a great way to learn computer security and how to be an effective system administrator. I personally would have absolutely no problem working with, hiring, etc. someone who made computer security a hobby, including someone who was part of an underground group that had LAN parties to try cracking EACH OTHER (in fact, I've frequently wanted to do exactly that, although I've never found like-minded people to hook up with).

      The moment you step outside of a sandbox like that, however, all bets are off, ESPECIALLY if you are trying to gain unauthorized access to credit card information. If you don't own the system, or at least have permission to look for security flaws, then yes, you are on the other side of an ethical line. You may not be "morally bankrupt" but I would question your judgment at the very least. More likely, prospective employers are going to be concerned about how much they can trust you. Breaking into someone else's property, whether it's virtual or physical, is a breach of trust, and that's something that is exceedingly hard to get back once it's been lost. YMMV.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    20. Re:For the love of Christ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      That Christ guy you mention in the subject line did, for example

      Yeah, but did you read the rest of the story? It didn't end so well for Him. Just sayin'

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    21. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it was probably more like he thought his neighbor might have forgotten to lock his door, so he went over there, swiped a card through the slit to open the door and toured through the house before telling his neighbor to lock his door.

    22. Re:For the love of Christ... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Some of the very best "computer people" have no formal education, and are labeled criminals by their governments.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    23. Re:For the love of Christ... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      isnt one of the governments big pushes these day "if you see something say something" ??

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    24. Re:For the love of Christ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      The company didn't ask you to do a security audit.

      Not sure if you've been missing out on the past year+ of news, but companies don't really do this.

      Wrong, but thanks for playing. The company I work for does, in fact, have a third party run a security audit once a quarter. How do I know this? I'm the guy who submits the request and receives the results. In all fairness, the audit we request is basically a glorified OpenVAS scan, so it's pretty basic; we aren't actually hiring someone to break into our systems, so maybe that's not entirely a fair rebuttal.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    25. Re:For the love of Christ... by Lord_Alex · · Score: 1

      Sometimes data just falls into your hands too. Are you trespassing when a back-end process causes a database to barf itself all over some user's browser? It is not hard for a small/inexperienced team to create an interface that does not handle all the legitimate crap the world will throw at it.

      --
      How much work could a network work if a network could net work?
    26. Re:For the love of Christ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in principle, but in practice you are dangerously wrong.

      If I crack someone else's computer system as a proof-of-concept and get caught, I will go to jail. Just like if I see some dude beating up on a lady and I assault him to protect her, I will go to jail. Vigilantism is frowned upon in most modern cultures. You might think you are doing the right thing, but I guarantee you that the authorities will have a rather different point of view.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    27. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given every result I've checked in that google search links back to this slashdot article, it doesn't look like there's been any "spewing the exact same crap". It merely indicates that lots of people link to slashdot's homepage.

    28. Re:For the love of Christ... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      How can it be immoral to look at something exposed to public view?

      Are you insane?

    29. Re:For the love of Christ... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Yes, you become a criminal as soon as you click the link that some incompetent developer created and dumps credit card numbers to your browser.

    30. Re:For the love of Christ... by cusco · · Score: 1

      If he's used this payment system **HIS** credit card info is one of those unprotected accounts. So he should just wander away and let some dirtbag victimize him and hundreds of other innocent customers of these idiots?

      Really now, tell me that you don't at least test to make sure that the companies that you give your credit card info to are doing at least the bare minimum of security checks. You really don't? My, you're a trusting fellow, believing that everyone in the industry is as competent as you are. Seriously, you need to be more careful.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    31. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's why anonymous is mopping the floor with the InfoSec industry?

    32. Re:For the love of Christ... by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      Well it got dark for a while there, what with the beatings, show trial, torture, and execution.

      But the end is a bit more upbeat than that. A few days later, he was hanging out with his best friends and saying "Hey guys, come checkout my new piercings!"

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    33. Re:For the love of Christ... by stewartjm · · Score: 1

      If I crack someone else's computer system as a proof-of-concept and get caught, I will go to jail.

      It ENTIRELY depends on who you target.

      If you crack, or even are ever so slightly suspected of having cracked some Fortune 500 or gov computer, and the admins/management of such don't like you, then you might go to jail.

      But if you put a key logger onto some grandma's computer, and max all her credit cards, and drain her bank account, the police and FBI will just about completely ignore her if she files a report.

      Small business owner? Probably the same as the grandma, medium sized business owner? Maybe you can get someone to pay attention if you inflate your "losses" enough.

      And that is one of the big huge glaring problems with all of these computer security laws. What happened to equal protection under the law?

    34. Re:For the love of Christ... by WhatAreYouDoingHere · · Score: 1
      Well, actually, if you read to the end of the story, it did end up well for Him. :)

      (I know this is off-topic but don't really care).

      --
      "What are you doing here, Elijah?"
    35. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm biased for being in the midwest, but how very un-neighborly of you.
      You wait a while, go give a knock, and if no one is there, you close their door and walk away.
      (Well, unless it's summer and they don't have a screen. As always, use your best judgement.) Mr. Rogers is up there just shaking his head, looking slightly disappointed in you. But not too disappointed, I mean, it's Mr. Rogers after all.

    36. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's wonderful and all, but that's the wrong analogy. Try this:

      If you see that your neighbour accidentally left his door open opening to a room full of other people's money and credit cards...

      Better perspective now, huh?

    37. Re:For the love of Christ... by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

      So I was right.

    38. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man now you're the hero! Fly off into the sunset Mr. Morales.

    39. Re:For the love of Christ... by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly valid for the GP to feel it's immoral and say so publicly. His stance is not falsifiable, and neither is yours. This isn't science, it's humanity.

      A great example is France's ban on women wearing Islamic clothing that covers her body, head, etc: Some view it as immoral to force/encourage/allow a woman to submit herself to such degradation, others view it as immoral because it takes away both the woman's freedom to wear whatever she wants, and the freedom to practice her faith as she sees fit.

      Similarly, many (especially the older generations) consider it wrong to eavesdrop on a conversation two people are having in a public place. Others take the view that you can't help what sounds hit your ears.

      Just because you don't agree with (or hold) to said moralities doesn't make them any less valid for those that do.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    40. Re:For the love of Christ... by reiisi · · Score: 1

      It's time to re-examine your laws. (And mine.)

      --
      Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
    41. Re:For the love of Christ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I stand corrected ;)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    42. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      First off, QUIT FUCKING TRESSPASSING.

      I don't care if you're not doing it for money (though, you sound like you might do it for fame). It's wrong.

      Fuck you, pussy. Nothing is going to change if people just sit on their hands and accept the world the way it is. There is such a thing as common good that goes beyond the letter of the law. I'm sure what the Egyptians protesters did was illegal as well, but they didn't let the laws stop them. Civil disobedience has a place in this world, and if you have to break some minor little laws to do it, then so be it.

      If everyone behaved as you suggest, we'd have a hell of a lot more oppression by authority.

    43. Re:For the love of Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. Lack of mens rea only applies when you could not reasonably forsee the outcome of your actions. There's no way to argue that he didn't know that breaking into a computer wasn't illegal.

      He's morally and ethically wrong on the breaking in (hacking) portion - that took a conscious act on his part. Unless it was the result of the computer equivalent of having it drop right in his lap involuntarily (which, a mis-typed URL would be, but not feeding a deliberately-constructed URL to the system). He chose to hack.

    44. Re:For the love of Christ... by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      You should go a little easier on him until you have all the facts. For all you know, his "hacking" amounts to "I changed the URL from ``...?mode=show-account&userid=1'' to ``...?mode=show-account&userid=2'' "

      That's the whole point. That is what almost all of us understand. This is precisely what is most dangerous thing for im. If it's true:

      • He deliberately accessed someone else's account
      • He did it in a way which can't be covered as "accidental"
      • He left logs of doing this on the web server

      If he stops exactly after doing that, he might, just might, get away with this on grounds of "was just curious" and "immediately realised I had done something wrong and set out to fix that". However, any further action on his part can point towards this being a crime and get him into deep deep problems. Most likely if he did it once, he did it again. At that point it's almost unarguable computer crime and he may be in deep trouble.

      He really needs to get the company to fix the problem, agree he was careful and then he needs to shut up completely. If the company won't fix the problem he needs to minimise any possibility of extending the crime by never having anything to do with them ever again.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    45. Re:For the love of Christ... by Peristaltic · · Score: 1

      What he's doing is advising this child regarding the point of view held by the people that will probably kick in his door at 3am. While I have a low opinion of the company in question... regardless of how negligent they are, and regardless of how correctly or incorrectly the applicable laws are interpreted and enforced, the bottom line is that those laws are squarely on the company's side- the company DIDN'T ask for a security audit from him, and LE now considers him a criminal. While he could have made something good of this without much risk to himself by dumping it anonymously in some security firm's lap (such as Secunia, mentioned above), he chose to identify himself to the company before asking for help here. It feels to me like he has ethical intentions, regardless of the "trespassing"- This situation could have had an ethically pleasing outcome and he could have walked away feeling good about it without worrying about consequences. He didn't have the years of small & medium-sized mistakes under his belt that your father probably has, so he made a massive mistake, and unfortunately someone's probably going to do really bad things to him because of it.

    46. Re:For the love of Christ... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      First off, QUIT FUCKING TRESSPASSING.

      How do you know he is?

      He didn't specify what the issue is. Granted, he did say "hack into", so maybe he was using it and noticed that his user account page was

      http://example.com/user.html?ID=123456789&loggedin=true

      If he then enters that URL into a clean browser and accesses his own user information, how is that trespassing? It's the exact address he was given to access his own account.

      Now, even without testing another ID, I can be pretty sure that it will work. Only "downside" is that the ID might be random and not sequential, but that's barely an improvement.

      Essentially something like this would be the equivalent of me walking into a bank, asking to withdraw 200 dollars, telling them my name is "Martin Schou" (which it is), and them simply giving me 200 dollars without any kinds of checks.

      It's not in any way, shape or form trespassing, fraud, identity theft or similar. What it is is a huge security issue.

      However - since the original poster didn't specify what the issue was and with whom (with good reasons), you can't make a factual statement as to whether or not he's trespassing.

    47. Re:For the love of Christ... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      Turn on your sarcasm detector.

    48. Re:For the love of Christ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you doing on Slashdot?

      Your permanent geek card revocation hearing will be held at the end of next week's meeting.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  23. Journalism works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to get the word out anonymously, approach a journalist. Journalists have a vested interest in breaking the next scandalous new story, especially those who are new and making a name for themselves. They also have a vested interest in protecting their sources, though you might still want to report it through an anonymous email account.

    1. Re:Journalism works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would highly recommend ensuring that you remain anonymous when dealing with journalists.

      I have a close friend who disclosed information and was not happy about how 'anonymous' the journalist kept him.

      If it's important you remain anonymous - take precautions.

      ==
      Keep on the grid

  24. Soo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To prevent someone from stealing a bunch of people's personal information, you plan on, stealing a bunch of people's information. Unless you are Batman, you are not legally allowed "to blow them out of the water" and your initial entry into their system is also illegal.

  25. Don't ask Slashdot, Ask Ed Felten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ed Felten himself may not be the best person to contact, actually, since he's currently working for the FTC, but then again he may be worth sending an email to.

    My point is this: ask someone who is respected in the security field and has years of experience. If not Felten, try and contact Moxie Marlinspike, perhaps.

    It sounds like you are young and have very little experience with this kind of stuff. Do not make the mistake of thinking that anyone is going to thank you for your efforts. The company with the bad security may be run by a bunch of technological idiots who will see you as the threat. When the FBI comes calling, they will be more interested in seeing what criminal charges they can bring against you.

    But don't be scared into inaction. Instead seek advice from experts who have been in the same position as you. They may have contacts and could help you present the exploit information in a way that is

    1) legal
    2) professionally done
    3) likely to get taken seriously by the developers at the affected company.

    Good luck! As long as you keep certain cautions in mind, you may have just stumbled onto a career in security!

    1. Re:Don't ask Slashdot, Ask Ed Felten by hardwarejunkie9 · · Score: 2

      Bruce Sterling is also an excellent choice to contact, as he strongly supports the view of fixing broken systems. Also: for shame all of you who immediately move to the illegality argument itself. It's also been illegal before to make copies of your own music, but I don't think that stopped any of you. The case here is that OP got him/herself into a problem where they're no longer in legal territory and are wondering how to remain in ethical territory. The response to "do nothing" runs counter to everything I know about true hacker ethic. If you find a problem, fix it. To go back and hide in your hole and hope noone comes after you may be the most legally advisable (I am not a lawyer) but it's certainly not the most ethical. Don't ask OP to compromise themselves in favor of supporting a poorly written law.

      --
      I like losing arguments, it just means that I can take your point and make it my own.
    2. Re:Don't ask Slashdot, Ask Ed Felten by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "But don't be scared into inaction."

      Bullshit. You have no possibility of reward and every possibility of punishment.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Don't ask Slashdot, Ask Ed Felten by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and if the FBI does come calling, KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. Google for videos on what to say to cops - answer: nothing ever. "This sounds serious. I want to talk to a lawyer." and then shut up.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
  26. this is not news by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is not news. This is not a story. There isn't even a fucking article to tell someone to go RTFA. This is some idiot asking for advice on an absolutely terrible scheme which has been explained before (with actual news mind you, of people getting locked up or tried for crimes instead of just theorizing).
    This is not something for /. This is something that should go on a programming forum, or a law forum. (Or better yet, kept to oneself as a hair-brained scheme that would fail).

    Usually when somebody goes "THIS, on /. ?" I go "hey, news for nerds means a lot of topics."
    But this is just ridiculous.

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    1. Re:this is not news by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is some idiot asking for advice on an absolutely terrible scheme which has been explained before

      Isn't that what Ask Slashdot is all about?

    2. Re:this is not news by bmsleight · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is wrong. Where else in the 'net could Programmers, White Hats, Black Hats, Lawyers and Engineers all debate an important ethical question, that soemone has got themselves in to ?

    3. Re:this is not news by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Next you're going to tell me "why isn't my hello world program working?" or "what does this syntax error mean?" are legitimate /. stories.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  27. Haven't played nethack in years... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Probably good time for another session...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  28. Give them one more notice with full details.... by bpeikes · · Score: 1

    I would send them one more email explaining how to crack a user account. If they still don't believe you, then I would send a complaint to the FTC with all of the relevant information on how it is insecure. The investors in this company don't want to hear about it. If the name of the company gets out, they'll have issues. If you really believe that their systems are insecure, post the name of the company here. People post security flaws all of the time: http://mashable.com/2011/10/03/htc-security-flaw/ I think you actually have a responsibility to tell people about the issue after you have done what you can to help the company.

  29. Well... by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You could consider contacting one of the major credit card companies like Visa. That's assuming you haven't done anything which could be construed as actually testing or exploiting the hole. If you have, it's a pretty sure bet the FBI will be on you like white on rice. They might anyway, but that would be a one way ticket to Club Fed.

    1. Re:Well... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      That's assuming you haven't done anything which could be construed as actually testing or exploiting the hole.

      He has, otherwise he wouldn't know it existed. That's what people using the "looking vs. touching" argument don't get: With computers looking and touching are one and the same. To put it another way, imagine a world where everyone sees using sonar, like bats. To look requires active probing, there's no way to passively take in the information.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  30. Bugtraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been years since I cared about security, since I just firewall, VPN, and use virtual account numbers where I can.

    Why don't you screw them indirectly, by posting the information on bugtraq or whatever the equivalent was/is these days. Let them get hosed by some other dumb fool willing to take the risk and publicly shamed. Not that it matters, public shame, people go the supermarket in pajamas and blow out in tuners at major intersections for all to see, but what the hell, try it, maybe then you'll get the point.

    Wash your hands of the matter afterwards. Not worth your time, effort, legal fees, and potential jail time cleaning up some else's ass. History has shown that the bearer of bad news, even if they do nothing wrong, gets axed and is deemed complicit by knowledge. A company that incompetent already doesn't deserve to grow, and investors that don't do their due diligence, deserve to get hosed for investing in a company with such purported bad security.

  31. i like hacking too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats really cool! I like hacking too and do a lot of it but nothing that complex. I just recently hacked my computer apart with a bigger hard drive but when i turned it back on nothing happened. when i put the old hard drive back in it worked again so i was confused. doesnt the hard drive just have my files and music on it? so yeah i tried hackign my hard drive and that didn't work well, i guess im wondering how you hacked somenoe elses hard drive? do you just go to their house and plug it out and hope they don't notice their data is changed or missing?!?

  32. Black market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell it to the second-highest bidder. The highest-bidder is always a trap.

    1. Re:Black market! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 good point!

  33. Let them rot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck em, you can't help people who can't help themselves. Let them suffer due to their negligence and inability to do risk analysis and management. I've been in a similar position so many times and tried various things, the best one is to just ignore it and advise your friends and family to avoid them like the plague. If you're still not convinced take the game theory normal form approach and gain an insight into how hopeless the situation is.

  34. Watch out for your self. by crakbone · · Score: 1

    Most people don't like when people tell them they made a mistake. They will try to find a scapegoat and it will be you. But if you wanted to push it. I have had the most success when pressed with problems similar to this to go to a high up person. If the normal channels just don't work find the email of the highest person there and send it to them. A vice president, ceo, cio, who ever you can find and send it. They will take notice. Just make sure you protect yourself first.

  35. Oh shut up... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Language evolves. You can fight the tide or swim with it. I know which way gets you drowned first.

    --
    That is all.
  36. Morons will sue you. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    As can be concluded from earlier cases like this. Dont tell them anything, dont do anything, but let them have what's coming to them. However, you contacted them. When hacked, they may attempt to sue you. So, you may need to go to a notar or something to have it written that you warned these people, but they didnt take heed or something. You need to have solid documents to show blame may not be laid on you, in courts.

  37. Mistakes by whereissue · · Score: 0

    1) emailing the vendor... if something goes wrong before this problem is corrected, you are the first suspect, and they already know how to contact you. 2) asking, publicly, if you should "hack" something. 3) asking slashdot instead of 4chan.* my advice would be to contact the EFF and install a keylogger on your computer. *humor!

    --
    where is sue? sue is idle.
  38. Screw Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell the exploit to the Russians. Corps don't give a shit about humans.

  39. no you grow the fuck up by unity100 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dress it up how you want to, you're still a criminal - legally, morally, and ethically, it's none of your business, you shouldn't have done it in the first place, and quit doing it in general.

    its maybe none of his business, but its MY business AS A USER that some company that i give my credit card to is this irresponsible. Those who would hack it, would hack it, and just use the cards and deduce hard to notice amounts every month and fuck me over.

    if it wasnt for people like the article submitter, THOSE COMPANIES WOULDNT LIFT THEIR ASSES for security. so YOU shut the fuck up. its MY wallet.

    1. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I think you should go to the White House and try breaking in. And the Capitol. Shoot, how about every public building you can locate. After all, you have an interest in them. Surely it's the right thing to do. Bust a window and see if you can climb in. I mean, after all, if you can so could someone else and that someone else might not be as noble and well intentioned as you are. It's for your own good, and the good of all of your fellow taxpayers.

    2. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It your $50 bucks - but it is his life and career you crazy selfish ass.

      How in hell can you be so freaking ignorant - even after watching hacker get hauled up and jailed ? Trespassing is a federal offence - and yes, you may wanna sacrifice his life and career for your $10,000 limit credit card... but no one else does.

      F*cking dumb fool.

    3. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      You're wrong and you're indignant about it; yay America!

      As a user of this business, you're allowed to hack into their systems and make all the changes you want, you can inspect everything they do, because you paid for their service! EXCEPT THAT ISN'T HOW IT WORKS ANYWHERE, OR HOW IT HAS EVER WORKED. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    4. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unity100 is a known idiot...his wife is hot tho...I banged her when he was in Atlanta...and San Antonio

    5. Re:no you grow the fuck up by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      Fine. Are you going to bail the submitter out of jail when the Feds come looking for him? Are you going to finance his legal defense fund? Are you going to hire him once he's finally released from jail?

      I completely agree with you that in an ideal world, filled with unicorns and rainbows and ponies and warm, happy, fuzzy thoughts that the right, ethical thing to do would be to do whatever you can to alert people to security holes so that users' don't get screwed over by the real black hats (of course, in that world, there wouldn't BE any black hats, so it wouldn't be an issue in the first place). Unfortunately, we never have -- and never WILL -- live in that world. There are plenty of stories of people who have done exactly what the submitter did (or at least what he claims he did, anyway) and are now paying the price for trying to do the right thing. In our society, no good deed goes unpunished.

      If this dude has even half a brain, and from what he says he has done so far, I'm not sure he does, he will RUN, not walk, away from this incident as fast as he possibly can. There is pretty much no way it will end well for him, especially if he keeps pushing the issue.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    6. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its MY business AS A USER that some company that i give my credit card to is this irresponsible.

      No, it's your business to find another company to to business with.

    7. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Hentes · · Score: 1

      How on Earth got these 3 consecutive trolls get modded up?

    8. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, dangerous for him, but beneficial to society on the whole. In three parts really:
      1) It makes people's money secure.
      2) It punishes an incompetent company.
      3) If enough people go about doing this sort of thing then lawmakers will see the value in "crowdsourced security testing" (yeah, that's some quality spin right there) and will have less stringent rules for this sort of infraction. You know, like it used to be.

      So... it's a stupid path to take, but it's the right one. Ethically.

    9. Re:no you grow the fuck up by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "if it wasnt for people like the article submitter, THOSE COMPANIES WOULDNT LIFT THEIR ASSES for security."

      No, if it weren't for massive breaches by criminals, those companies wouldn't lift their asses for security.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:no you grow the fuck up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So... it's a stupid path to take, but it's the right one (for someone other than me). Ethically." FTFY

  40. Walk Away and Forget About It by StormReaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot has had many stories of well-meaning hackers trying to save companies from themselves, only to wind up being the target of federal and/or state prosecutors rather than being considered a good Samaritan.

    Here's my advice:

    1) Stop violating federal and state laws. You've just confessed to the world that you are committing federal and state felonies. Stop being a criminal.

    2) Walk away while you still can, and maybe you'll still have a life to live free of federal and/or state prosecution.

    1. Re:Walk Away and Forget About It by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop violating federal and state laws. You've just confessed to the world that you are committing federal and state felonies. Stop being a criminal.

      At what point do you become a criminal? By looking at the URL bar and seeing an SQL statement, which can be used for SQL injection attacks? For changing a few characters in the URL bar and seeing that they're sending you other people's credit card numbers? I agree that he should just fuck em and ignore it.

    2. Re:Walk Away and Forget About It by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      At what point do you become a criminal? By looking at the URL bar and seeing an SQL statement, which can be used for SQL injection attacks? For changing a few characters in the URL bar and seeing that they're sending you other people's credit card numbers? I agree that he should just fuck em and ignore it.

      At the exact point you press enter having changed the URL. That's the point at which you intentionally attempted to exceed your authorized use of the other sides computer. That's the point where you must have written permission to do exactly what you are doing to their computer. Most importantly that's the point at which you leave an indelible mark in their webserver's log file.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    3. Re:Walk Away and Forget About It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really check the "user agreement" or whatever on every website you visit to make sure you have written permission for your every action online? If not, how do you know you aren't guilty of unauthorized computer use?

    4. Re:Walk Away and Forget About It by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      a) This doesn't have anything to do with the end user agreement. The court will look at what you could reasonably expect in the way of rights. When you change to access another person's information there will be no question you don't have authorization b) people actually have been prosecuted for this type of thing; this isn't a question it's settled case law.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    5. Re:Walk Away and Forget About It by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep the moment he put a custom SQL statement into that URL bar to confirm his suspicions he became a criminal. This is how much legal experts understand about computers. The same guys who put Kevin Mitnick in solitary because some moron lawyer said he'd start nuclear armageddon if given access to a phone.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  41. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You should never have notified them and used your own moral judgement to answer your "ask slashdot" question. What a dumbass... No one should have ever known regardless of what you planned to do.

    We all know that pointing out a security vulnerability will get you in big trouble. Hell, back in high school, we had Win 98 machines running Novell. I found a way to launch solitare, minesweeper, etc. by creating a macro in Word and editing the VB code to call an executable. Very simple to figure out, but I was the only one in my hick ass school (Home of the Mustangs in the southwest corner of MO) that would know such a thing. I lost my computer privileges for the rest of the year when I immediately brought it to the IT guys attention. I did it after class with no one else present. Thought I was doing the right thing.

    Fuck you, Mr. Jay. And fuck the idiots at that school. Enough info in this post for the pertinent parties to know who they are.

    1. Re:Dumbass by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      If we had problems that could be solved by shooting the messenger, we'd be out of messengers by now. Not withstanding that, people still try it every day. I mean, it's even a saying "to shoot the messenger", it's so common.

      But people still think that someday the messenger will be appreciated for his bad tidings. This will never happen.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    2. Re:Dumbass by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      You should never have notified them and used your own moral judgement to answer your "ask slashdot" question. What a dumbass... No one should have ever known regardless of what you planned to do.

      We all know that pointing out a security vulnerability will get you in big trouble. Hell, back in high school, we had Win 98 machines running Novell. I found a way to launch solitare, minesweeper, etc. by creating a macro in Word and editing the VB code to call an executable. Very simple to figure out, but I was the only one in my hick ass school (Home of the Mustangs in the southwest corner of MO) that would know such a thing. I lost my computer privileges for the rest of the year when I immediately brought it to the IT guys attention. I did it after class with no one else present. Thought I was doing the right thing.

      Fuck you, Mr. Jay. And fuck the idiots at that school. Enough info in this post for the pertinent parties to know who they are.

      You were looking for a pat on the back and to feel morally superior but it back fired, eh? Yup, sometimes the safest (I didn't say right) thing to do is to just shut up and back away.

  42. Testing 1 2 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

          Soulshill

  43. Consider doing nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Consider not doing anything. You've probably already accessed the system in ways you are not authorized to, and publicizing that in ways that causes "harm" to their reputation ("blowing them up"), even if it's based in truth, is possibly going to draw the kind of attention to you that you don't want. If it was me and I had "stumbled upon" something and _already_ informed them, then I would keep a record of that fact, as they already have a record on their side, and then stop getting yourself deeper into a hole, e.g. by providing further evidence that you're intentionally violating their TOS or actual laws. This problem is not your responsibility to force them to fix and you only take further risk upon yourself by pursuing it. Once they're suitably notified I'd guess they have higher liability by failing to address it.

    If you are actually their customer and you feel that there has been a threat to your own information, then you probably have recourse that could cause them to fix this, e.g. by disclosing findings to them as their affected customer, and perhaps to payment processors like Visa and Mastercard, who in turn will have rules around investigations, findings, risks and assessed disclosures to other customers. Again, depending on what's happened so far, you potentially dig yourself into a hole.

    Vigilantism is dangerous. How much is protecting everyone else worth vs. protecting yourself?

    IANAL, and none of this is advice of any kind, legal or otherwise.

  44. You've sent the email by camperdave · · Score: 2

    You've sent the email, now send your concerns in writing - hard copy. Set up a meeting with those in charge and explain it in person, nicely. If they do not respond, then let them know that you have no choice but to report the lapse to the appropriate authorities. Under no circumstances, crack your employers service unless they ask for a demonstration.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:You've sent the email by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      So he can have blackmailing added to his list of felonies committed? Brilliant!

    2. Re:You've sent the email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he can have blackmailing added to his list of felonies committed? Brilliant!

      What part of "Fix your (dangerous and illegal) broken shit or I will notify the appropriate authorites" is blackmail?

      I could see a blackmail charge if it went down something like "Give me a bunch of money or I blow the whistle," but I can't see any form of blackmail without a reward indicated by the blackmailer's "demands".

    3. Re:You've sent the email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to revisit the concept of blackmail.

      "Hey, I found your security problem. If y'all don't give me a big bag of money, I'm going to tell the whole world" = blackmail.

      "Hey, I found your security problem. If y'all don't address it, I'll report it to the authorities." != blackmail.

      See the difference?

    4. Re:You've sent the email by gknoy · · Score: 1

      While you're likely to meet some badge-carrying officers of the law in such a meeting, the one advantage this has is that you have the potential for a polite forum with the company where they can ask you questions, and you can get PERMISSION to demonstrate the flaw to them. As Kevin Mitnick said, everything changes when you get permission.

    5. Re:You've sent the email by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Set up a meeting with those in charge and explain it in person, nicely.

      This is where the feds will be waiting to arrest him. If this moron company has smart lawyers there's no reason it can't happen.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  45. Two Faced by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    You know "good samaritan" was an oxymoron in it's original use.

    I think you should keep its original context alive.

  46. Go Up the Ladder by pebbles061679 · · Score: 2

    I'd say there has to be a proper chain of command which you can go through. I'd start with the IT department. A random email from an unknown address may be filtered or just ignored so if you don't hear back in a day or two, make a phone call. Tell whomever answers the phone you are calling regarding a potential online security breach and you need to speak with the head of the IT Dept. Heck, even speaking with regular security may get you started. In your email, and potential phone call, you need to sound professional, non-threatening, but insistent. As previously stated, credentials and jargon matter. Hacking has a malicious connotation. Also, "I'm sorry, but I need to speak with your supervisor" can do wonders. As each person answers the phone or email take down their name.

    If you've gotten to the head of the IT Dept or the head of the company and the issue still hasn't been resolved then you definitely need to go to the investors and shareholders. They are definitely going to listen because this impacts their bottom line. If for some reason they don't, then contact local media.

    As with anything it's not necessarily what you are saying but how you are saying it and to whom. I can't help but think you just haven't gotten through to the right person yet.

  47. Ask yourself a question by phorm · · Score: 1

    If a company you were using for services had crap security, and some cracker abused it to plaster *YOUR* CC number all over the internet, how would you feel?
    Add to that, how would law-enforcement feel.
    Add to that, how do you like prison, because the above two are not likely to have *ANY* sympathy towards you when your trial-date comes.

    Seriously, "this hack is too easy to be respectable" makes you sound like the candidate for a news article, but it won't be able some great hacker who revealed a terrible breach, it will be about some jerk who caused a breach which caused a lot of people grief.

  48. CERT by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Report it to CERT. (Or other corresponding security organization if you are outside the US.)

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  49. It's Been Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, pretty much everything thing is crackable. Pretty much every program ever has been cracked. Everything is defeated at some point. Let me say that again, EVERYTHING is defeated at some point.

    Don't act so surprised. Really, it's not surprising, at all.

    Anyway, here we all are, looking at you.

    Mission Accomplished.

    Now go away.

  50. Should I do a proof of concept? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No. unless you wnt to go to jail.

    You reported your findings. If they don't fix the problem, discontinue your business with them and move on.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  51. Spill the beans... by Readycharged · · Score: 0

    ...can we see some excerpts of these "confused, aloof and unconvinced" responses? Censored enough to protect your identity of course....

  52. let the card companies know by camusflage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If you discover a vulnerable payment application and have specific information as to the payment application vendor, application version, where sensitive cardholder data is stored and vendor contact information, please notify Visa via email at cisp@visa.com."

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    1. Re:let the card companies know by sl3xd · · Score: 2

      Source URL? I don't know about you, but I'd be reluctant to essentially send a confession (anonymous or not) to an email address that was posted on a non-official website.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  53. Step 1: You have a right to remain silent by jduhls · · Score: 2

    Don't publicly admit in a large forum like slashdot to committing a crime unless you're ready to be jailbait. Oops, looks like you failed the first step.

  54. You didn't given them your real name, right? by tylersoze · · Score: 1

    I can only hope you contacted them anonymously and covered your e-mail tracks (and/or are far outside--presumably--US jurisdiction) otherwise you just opened yourself up to a huge world of trouble. I'm going to assume you're a young person and haven't yet realized you are surrounded by a world of idiots and can't fix everything, you just need to keep your head down and pick your battles, this isn't one of them.

  55. If you're set on publishing... by bradorsomething · · Score: 1

    Hey, has Defcon put out its call for 2012 speakers yet?

    It sounds like you're looking for someone who at least feels an ethical responsibility to help. Call the EFF; it's not their bailiwick, but they may be able to find the right tree to shake for you. Link to their webpage

    Plus they're lawyers, it's always nice to have lawyers on your side.

  56. Steal the customers money, obviously by Whatsisname · · Score: 2

    I would recommend stealing as much money as you can, because you are going to need it to hire your lawyers when the FBI comes looking for you, now that you've identified yourself to them.

    1. Re:Steal the customers money, obviously by cruff · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up! Unless the discovery was incidental to using that company's product, the poster probably made a mistake even attempting the cracking in the first place, and may face retribution from the company.

    2. Re:Steal the customers money, obviously by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Inciting the commission of a crime is also a crime.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  57. You should... by sapgau · · Score: 1

    Not post it on /.
    Oh.. crap

    1. Re:You should... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Or your twitter feed

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    2. Re:You should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which leads to his personal website, which leads to his Linked-In profile; so much for being security/privacy aware. Just for that purpose, sending information that could get you arrested, I would get extra E-mail handles, never use them from my home connection and ideally have sent such an E-mail from a public WiFi hotspot (of course, don't always use the same one for continued correspondence) using an OS from a suitable GNU/Linux live-bootable medium (CD, USB).

      But I guess, now it's too late ...

      Good luck!

      Just let it die down and never mention it again, anywhere, ever.

  58. What if they get hacked now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if they get hacked now. Could they blame (send the feds after) you? Feels like by asking you put yourself in the spotlight.

    I guess at minimum you now need to contact Visa (or MC) fraud. Maybe send a registered letter? So that in case they do get hacked you can show you did the honest thing.

    Sad if you think about it, but that's how fucked up we are...

  59. The FBI wants you, not numbers. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    "...this hack is just too easy for it to be respectable, though I am sure the FBI could still be interested in all those credit card numbers."

    At the risk of addressing a troll here, I should clarify that the FBI could give a rats ass about credit card numbers. But I can promise you that they will be interested in YOU if you proceed here with some sort of proof of concept.

    Just thought I would clarify your felonious future for you before you become too disillusioned that you're doing the FBI some sort of "favor" here...

  60. 4chan, 7proxies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get 7 proxies, post details all over 4chan DO IT MAGGOT

    1. Re:4chan, 7proxies by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      get 7 proxies, post details all over 4chan DO IT MAGGOT

      4chan autobans proxies from posting, why are you giving bad advice?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  61. the legitimate thing to do by superwiz · · Score: 1

    seems to be to go to the investors. contacting the authorities doesn't seem warranted since the company is being irresponsible rather than criminal. if you hack yourself, you'll end up at risk of getting a large sentence and being on probation for most of your life even if you do get release early. the only "good samaritan" thing to do is to go to let the investors know that their investment is being mismanaged.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:the legitimate thing to do by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The reason for contacting the "authorities" is not in the hope that they will act. It is to go on record as having contacted them if the company files a compaint against you (assuming that you have made the error of identifiying yourself to the company). Notifying the credit card coompanies might be a good idea too: they might actually act. Send your notices on paper.

      If you have not identified yourself to the company stop now. Do nothing else and destroy all record of your activities.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  62. Fucking awesome, dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You now have a tie to the company. They know how to get ahold of you. They know you hacked into them. Who the hell do you think they are going to go to when funny shit starts to happen regarding those accounts. Wrong answer, not you. The FBI. Now who do you think is going to show up at your door. Right answer. I would slow down and really think about this. I would also walk downstairs and tell your your parents what you have done when they get home.

    1. Re:Fucking awesome, dude by alphacharliezero · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't it be 'walk upstairs'? We know he lives in his parents' basement. (All IT people eventually end up working/living in a basement. We feel more comfortable there for some reason...)

  63. Not walk RUN by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    at this point your only out is to maybe find a LEO buddy that can cover you just in case SomeBody does hack the place and they decide to come after you. They may not care about you now but when things go to that little town in georgia (and dig from there) you will need some sort of GOOJF card. This is the time to DOD erase any evidence of what was done that you can get to (your computer(s)).

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  64. How about your house? by MarkvW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would you mind if I broke into your house? Not to take anything, mind you, but just to check your security?

    1. Re:How about your house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends. Do I have the credit card details of a million people stored in that house? If there's a way for people to walk in and out I should know, shouldn't I?

    2. Re:How about your house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if I left my door or window open by accident I would appreciate a neighbor telling me!

    3. Re:How about your house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes I would mind when I got a letter in the mail saying "Hey your door was unlocked when I tried it, you really should lock up"

      I'd be pissed but I'd also lock the door

  65. Why? by pdxer · · Score: 1

    I almost feel like it's my responsibility to blow them out of the water if they have made it this far while compromising such trusted data.

    Why?

    --
    Looking for a job in Portland, Oregon?
    1. Re:Why? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Note: I'm not the grand parent poster.

      I almost feel like it's my responsibility to blow them out of the water if they have made it this far while compromising such trusted data.

      Why?

      If you have to ask why, it's clear you wouldn't get angry/mad/irritated about people disclosing your financial and account information on a service.

      To explain in another way, this sort of stuff makes people angry.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  66. This just in by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 0

    sixteen year old boy playing with computers was arrested today by the FBI...

    --
    GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  67. A few options. by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Personally, I favor the Full Public Diclosure route. You have them a chance, you even told them how to fix it. The shareholders, yes they should know, but its the customers whose accounts are exposed, and the public who may become customers. Don't they really deserve to know what they are signing up for or trusting?

    So, you can do a full disclosure.... but they know who you are...its a risk.

    Another possibility.... wait a week or a month or so, and then anonymously release it to the public, swear up and down it wasn't you (use tor, etc etc)

    Or, you could just leak it into some IRC channels where you can be sure it will be abused.... then come out later with a public disclosure after its found that they had a major breech, include your conversations with them.

    Sure you could just walk away but.... don't the customers really deserve to know? They are paying for the service afterall.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    1. Re:A few options. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > don't the customers really deserve to know?

      There is abundant evidence that they don't care.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  68. Only Morons will sue you. by bmimatt · · Score: 1

    By filing a lawsuit they would be admitting to wrongdoing/negligence.  Since it's a startup, they probably want to avoid negative publicity.  Your best option: STFU and carry on.

  69. Don't Do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is little difference between doing the proof of concept, proving that your idea works and taking credit card numbers to commit fraud. I would stay totally clear of both and not risk a legal problem. Do not publish or disclose the exploit to anybody who might try to commit fraud with it or communicate the information to others who might. Remember, you will initially be the prime suspect in the investigation should the worst happen and this exploit gets used and somebody loses money because they can document that you knew about the exploit.

    All you can do is make sure you have exhausted all avenues to notify *somebody* at the company who will care and is in a position to address the issue and then let it go. Unless you work for this company or use their services there is not much else you can do.

  70. Might help if you owned some preferred stock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way you could address your concerns directly to the share holders.

  71. SoulSHILL +5, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soulskill story submissions 100% from Ycombinator.

    Dear Soulshill:

    You have seriously misappropriated the use of the word "hack".

    Burn in hell.

    Yours In Moscow,
    K. Trout

  72. what we're all thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's square, right?

  73. What are you aiming for here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be very clear about what you want the outcome to be;
    1. Profit for yourself
    2. Better security for their customer data
    3. Awareness of security within the company

    Depending on your answer, I suggest going for a highly paid Security Consulting gig after working out the long term solution.

  74. How did you contact them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    first off "how" did you contact them??
    By email? --- probably went straight to spam or trash or ignored.
    By post? see above.
    Registered / Signed for letter? - companies tend to take notice of a letter that requires a signature, Also it gives to proof that the company did receive your letter. (helps with any legal problems you may face as a result)

    Next step:

    DO NOT ACCESS THE DATA AGAIN UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!!! AND I MEAN NOT IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCE!!!! is that clear!
    by asking here you clearly are out of your depth and probably a short ride away from being "Bubba's bitch in cell block b"

    Next:
    In the typed letter detail the issue you found with their site/database/system.
    In the letter politely explain the problem, how you came across it and let then know of a possible fix if you know of a sure way to do so (don't guess!)

    BUT this is the important bits:
    DO NOT offer to fix it for them (may be misconstrued as an extortion attempt)
    DO NOT force them to fix it in a specified time (see above)

    DO inform them that you may have to contact relevant authorities (i.e. local business guild/association or professional bodies they are a member of,) if they have not responded to receiving your letter within 14 days. Stress that you just want conformation that they have read the letter (Again you are informing them not extorting them!) and not forcing them to a time table for a fix.

    Lastly

    GET A FUCKING LAWYER!! BEFORE A "Flowers By Iris" VAN Parks across the street!
    Remember you may have just committed a FEDERAL OFFENCE by accessing the data without permission (does not matter if they left it wide open! you're still not allowed to access it!).

    1. Re:How did you contact them? by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      first off "how" did you contact them??
      By email? --- probably went straight to spam or trash or ignored.
      By post? see above.

      By twitter?
      http://twitter.com/#!/seereadnow

  75. Nope, this isn't the Wild West anymore... by trims · · Score: 1

    I see no compelling ethical, moral, or legal defense for what he did. He's a criminal, and not in the kind of "causal" criminal sense of someone jaywalking. Nope, he explicitly went out and hacked someone else's system.

    Now, I'm willing to maybe (and, that's a very big maybe) accept that it might have been discovered by a malformed URL typed in. If so, that's a different story, as there that's accidental, with no intent. But the OP's statement sounds exactly like he was doing something with intent to hack (even if that hack was URL manipulation), in which case, he's back on the hook for being a criminal. Period.

    I'm old enough to have started out in the 80s, with the heyday of Phreaking. So I know all about "misbehaving". However, those times are long, long gone. The Internet has grown up, and the behavior we expect of people must also. This kind of behavior simply isn't acceptable anymore, and has been clearly criminalized. I can't see any compelling moral or ethical argument that outweighs the counters in terms of social good (that is, any moral or ethical argument in favor of this kind of behavior is outweighed by better moral and ethical arguments against it).

    As a community, we have a social responsibility to educate the new (potential) members, and that includes social pressure to conform to basic standards of ethics. What was possibly acceptable 20 years ago isn't acceptable anymore, and people need to recognize that. Times change, and hacking/cracking has very strict boundaries if it is to be ethical. This guy has crossed all those, and need to be told in a very strong way that he's wrong, since he clearly doesn't recognize that is was wrong.

    -Erik

    --
    There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
    1. Re:Nope, this isn't the Wild West anymore... by dave562 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're just getting old. ;)

      What the OP did is no different than what you or I did. The environment is different due to the criminal statues on the books and the willingness of the authorities to prosecute them. Other than that, it is just a kid / young adult pushing the boundries and seeing what they can get away with.

      Given that the OP had the good sense to post here and ask for guidance shows that they have their head on mostly straight. The phone phreaking that you did was more objectionable than what the OP did. You stole services. The OP just found a flaw, reported it and then realized that the vendor had no interest in taking the problem seriously. By doing that, they are exposing their customers to fraud.

      I agree with you about needing to emphasize ethics. I think the OP has shown ethics and a conscious awareness of responsible disclosure. Back in the day, the exploit would have been all over various underground forums, and everyone and their mom would be poking around the site.

    2. Re:Nope, this isn't the Wild West anymore... by trims · · Score: 1

      And, you just made my case for me.

      I never claimed Phreaking was legal, moral, or ethical. It wasn't (certain Hollywood films notwithstanding).

      The major difference is that now, the community as a whole should know better - that is, our community has the ethical standards to say it's bad, and not encourage people to do that kind of behavior. That's exactly what I'm doing. If it's a bit harsh, then so be it. Kids seldom change their behavior in response gentle admonishment for things they don't see as wrong - that is, for behavior they know to be wrong, being gentle is very effective, while for behavior that they perceive as OK (but isn't), the "tisk-tisk" approach is completely ineffective.

      We also only have the OP's side of things - how do we know they aren't doing something internally to resolve the problem? We also don't know exactly what he did as far as the hack itself goes, so there's no basis for assuming that it didn't cause any damage. That whole unknown is why the event should never have happened in the first place, which is why I'm being harsh. The hack itself shouldn't have happened. Period. End of discussion. This is not "back in the day" - this is now, and the comparison isn't valid anymore. Times have changed, and I'm holding the OP to current standards, not two-decade-plus old ones. That's not hypocritical, as I can easily recognize the 80s behavior was no better. He doesn't get a pass just because other people used to do it.

      -Erik

      --
      There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
    3. Re:Nope, this isn't the Wild West anymore... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      His intention was not to steal, but probably just curiosity. He didn't cause any damage, and judging from his description, it was probably some simple URL manipulation. Is it illegal? Probably. Immoral? My moral compass says no. Law != morality. Just look at history, and this is obvious.

    4. Re:Nope, this isn't the Wild West anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see no compelling ethical, moral, or legal defense for what he did. He's a criminal
      *snip*
      I'm old enough to have started out in the 80s, with the heyday of Phreaking. So I know all about "misbehaving".

      so you too are a criminal. Once done it's done, and like you said, intent doesn't matter.

      I find it hilarious that one criminal is trying to judge the ethics and morality of someone else! Why should anyone believe you that the poster is a criminal? You've already shown to have poor ethical standards and no morals by participating in criminal activities with the phone and computer networks. You judging another persons character will of course be jaded and biased accordingly.

      What was possibly acceptable 20 years ago isn't acceptable anymore, and people need to recognize that.

      Yes, it is only OK when you do it, and not OK when someone else "gets away with" it. It's different!

      No morals or ethics... Different rules apply to you than others... I think you are suffering from a tiny case of being a psychopath.

  76. DONT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody likes a whistleblower. Trust me on this. I've done this several times, trying to "help" some group that had weak security. They never beleive you, they don't understand your explanations, and if they had a lawyer they'd go after YOU. After all, they think they're all swell and capable folks. You're the troublemaker.

  77. You could go this route... by RLU486983 · · Score: 1

    Type (vice write!) several letters, tape (vice lick!) the envelopes closed, use stick-on stamps and send them out to the company, the FBI, the investors and several different news agencies. Include what the problem is and how it is accomplished. No handwriting analysis evidence nor any DNA evidence... job accomplished. Preferably, mail from a different city as well to throw the scent off.

  78. The Golden Rule Applies Here by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

    Don't fuck with what ain't yours.

    --
    "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  79. bad ecosystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad the kind of environment that exists in terms of privacy and security issues. When things that are clearly left vulnerable to savvy users, short-sighted laws are put in place to try and "stop" hacking, when all it does is pull the wool over people's eyes and fools the public into thinking that just because you don't hear about security related events, means you're actually secure.

    The problem with reporting the issue is that (if it's a publicly traded company) there's the fear that that would drop the value of stock since shareholders would want to pull out. That's probably why these laws to prevent vigilante "vulnerability testing" were put into place, just in case someone DOES find something wrong, they can't (or are at least HIGHLY discouraged from) tell anyone because it would hurt the corporation's bottom line.

    There needs to be a paradigm shift with hacking laws, and those that do find vulnerabilities shouldn't be found culpable unless they somehow profit from it (be it monetarily or not). It would probably be a generation before these old farts in Congress wake up to this kind of stuff.

  80. EFF by bmuon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shouldn't he contact the Electronic Frontier Foundation? Isn't its purpose to provide advice in this cases?

  81. Go to Jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OPand people like him/her need to go to jail. This person obviously has no moral concerns about what they have done. There isn't an ounce of remorse in their post. I hope something funny starts happening with those accounts. The FBI will know where to look first. I would say good luck, but I won't. Good Riddance.

  82. Give the guy a break already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm frankly amazed that so many slashdotters are so dead set against this guy and what he's done. Yes, I agree that he needs to be very careful because of the legal ramifications, but I'd also be very concerned about the potential for misuse if he doesn't find someone to take him seriously. I say: GOOD FOR YOU SIR. I'm no lawyer and have no experience with this, but I wish you the best of luck.

  83. Enough... publish it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When did /. get filled with egocentric *AND* incompetent pricks? The egos I expect...

    Let's review what op said for all the idiots out there...

    "I discovered how to hack into and secure user accounts of"
    "Account info includes..."

    At no point did they indicate they have done so, that they have personally verified, that they have watched or colluded with. "They discovered"

    That sure suggests a lot of things, but it doesn't guarantee it. For all I know they stumbled onto a video on a forum.

    Now, let's take all of you using the word felony. And...please go kill yourself. I'll wait. The computer fraud and abuse act may or may not apply at all here. Period.

    It not only might not be a financial institution, but the command might not have caused loss of above a certain amount. We all know that the laywers and companies exaggerate losses, but bottom line is... they have to show it. If it was for example, a command sent in an HTTP GET, they're going to have a hard time showing that loss. Especially given the apparent attempt to notify them of a problem -- after which any further damages may have occurred as a failure of theirs to exercise reasonably prudent behavior.

    So quit throwing the word felony around like you know your ass from the hole in your face.

    He may be miles above his head. But frankly, I'm sick to death of watching programmers as incompetent as the laywers you're all pretending to be literally getting away with murder. Or at least negligent manslaughter. Incompetent programmers. Incompetent and wasteful management. Incompetent UI designers making confusing...everything. Incompetent sales leads.

    I say the guy posts it all over the place from behind the proverbial 7 proxies (and one full disk encrypted platform), and blames it on someone else discovering the same problem.

    That way you children can stop threatening him with the law and get on with acting like ethical responsible adults. Where we hold people accountable not just for creating dangerous things, but for making them readily available in a manner a reasonable person would have anticipated would cause harm. Instead you're blaming the guy yelling "Hey, that fertilizer is chemically equivalent to blackpowder...." for endangering who exactly?

    I for one would like to see 'attractive nuisance' legislation applied to incompetent development.

    And most of the comments I've read so far.

  84. Or do this... by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

    In the past *someone i may/may not know would detect port scans or breach attempts and do a dns lookup, email the admins from the compromised IP address and let them know they were cracked/hacked. Very rarely would it solicit even a reply, and the IP address would still show up in the logs. So this person would then either remotely shut down the box at said IP address or do some other next tricks (kiddie scripts work great sometimes for this). Which would get emails/phone calls/cease and desist/etc sent to them. At this point they would respond that the IP address had been compromised already, and they should fix it so it would stop bugging *my friends box. No response and no more attacks from the said IP address. Dont know if it would work in this case, but if the server was shut down no one else could exploit the hack and see/obtain credit card info. *my friend would probably tell you to do this from a IP address that may or may not be traceable to your friend.

    -KI

    --
    #include bier;
  85. No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And not just in the tech world. You can be sued if you do CPR and crack someone's ribs if you're not certified. You can be prosecuted for going on someone's property if you hear screaming coming from the house. You can be prosecuted if you shoot an invader in your house (at least in the UK).

    There's no use in being a "good guy" anymore. Just trying to help someone will get you in trouble anymore. If you're a guy and talk to a kid you don't know, everyone gives you strange looks. A while back a kid was trying to put books into one of those big metal boxes libraries have for returns, but couldn't quite reach the handle to open it. I opened it for him, and his mom, who was sitting in the car at the curb gets out and starts trotting at us. Books go in, he starts walking back, and she is giving me the evil eye while she grabs the kid and nearly drags him back to the car. All the while I'm holding my own books.

    So why the fuck would I try and help anyone I don't know?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by Pooua · · Score: 1

      And not just in the tech world. You can be sued if you do CPR and crack someone's ribs if you're not certified.

      "there has never been a successful suit brought against someone performing CPR."

      http://depts.washington.edu/learncpr/askdoctor.html#Can I get sued

      also

      "if you give assistance, including CPR, for a medical emergency Good Samaritan laws cover you."

      http://depts.washington.edu/learncpr/askdoctor.html#Does the Good

      You can be prosecuted if you shoot an invader in your house (at least in the UK).

      That's why I live in Texas.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    2. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by unkiereamus · · Score: 1

      You can be sued if you do CPR and crack someone's ribs if you're not certified.

      Actually, no you can't. AFAIK, every state have so-called good samaritan laws which basically leapfrog the whole issue of liability in emergencies, as long as you're acting with good intentions, you're safe. Interestingly, I, as a paramedic, am not covered by some of those laws, even if I'm off duty, I'm presumed to have a higher level of knowledge, and if I screw up, it's just the same as if I screwed up while I'm on the clock. You're actually probably safer from liability performing CPR if you don't have a card.

      And, as a side note, if you're performing CPR and don't break the ribs, you aren't doing it properly, you need to push harder, the whole point of ribs is to protect the heart and lungs [and a few other things] from pretty much exactly what you're trying to do with CPR. Ribs heal, the brain doesn't. (The exception to this is kids, their bones are more flexible, so they only may or may not break.)

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    3. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      If you do it by the book, place your hands correctly, and the bones are healthy, and you use the appropriate amount of force, you won't break any bones. If the person is elderly and has osteoporosis or something (which is obviously really common), or your hands slip a little off the sternum, or they're fat and you're not sure how hard you need to push, or you get a little overzealous, you'll break bones or separate the sternum.

      It's not "supposed" to happen, if you do it by the book, but it's really common. I always go by, if they can bitch you out about how you did CPR on them, you've won. I've broken bones in only about a third of my CPRs, including about a third of my saves, so it's not like I'm just not pushing hard enough.

      (EMT-B, AHA CPR instructor)

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm, interesting, I wonder if the "Good Samaritan Laws" could provide the OP any protection?

    5. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to say the CPR thing isn't true the way the parent means. You can get sued... for anything but as long as you stayed with in what is considered normal procedures, you are fine. I have training in CPR; that doesn't mean I can't do it once my cert expires. It's one thing to be punching the guys chest than pumping it. And if you are doing CPR correctly, that chest is going to become mush by the time EMS arrives.

      But I agree with the rest of the posters point. It's just not worth the risk to be the good Samaritan; just do things as anonymously as you can... Without tights and a mask.

    6. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      At least in east Asian cultures this type of BS won't happen.

      They believe in community identity over individualism.

      Over here, let the church do it. Because people who help other people for no reason is considered having ulterior motive.

    7. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by unkiereamus · · Score: 1

      Ho many codes do you run on 30 yo pts? I've only run one on a pt less than 50 yo (Admittedly, I'm a great big walking white cloud. A source of no end of annoyance to me...some days I swear if I run one more little old lady with a cold, I'll scream.).

      At any rate, I'd put my breakage rate up much higher than that, somewhere around 90%. I've never run a survey on the matter, so I've no idea if my co-workers run similar rates to me or to you.

      Not knowing anything about how you do compressions, I'm left to wonder how it is that I break so many more than you do. I can come up with really about 1.5 possible reasons. The big one is that I do compressions to the monitor, I assume adequate depth when I see a robust deflection on a "CPR rhythm" (peaking at the clip size on the default view of a LP12, what mV that is, I don't know, off hand). Unfortunately, my current circumstances don't really permit me to run a research study on it, but doing it my way, I have, atm, a 44% save rate when I'm doing the compressions (As noted though, I'm a white cloud, I don't have a decent sized sample pool on that.) (Second note, I'm talking about "Dead when I pick them up, alive when I drop them off", not "...alive at discharge.").

      The other possibility is that I'm just a big guy, I'm 6'8, and while not obese, carry with me the weight that is inherit in being that tall (plus the fat that comes from living my life in a E-350), not to mention the advantages of leverage. Perhaps I do just put more force into it than most, but a corollary of that is that I can keep up effective compressions for much longer than most people can, when I work as an ER tech on a code, I commonly do 10-15 minutes, 2 minute spell by someone else, then resume for another 10-15.

      At any rate, this is something that I really hope to run a decent study on when I (hopefully) move back to the states in early 2012. I've seen studies that examine the outcome vs the strip, but never one that also factors in the physical size of the compressor, I think it could be interesting. Do you have any input?

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    8. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not just in the tech world. You can be sued if you do CPR and crack someone's ribs if you're not certified. You can be prosecuted if you shoot an invader in your house (at least in the UK).

      Granted, you said in the UK. In the U.S., in the state of Washington (not D.C., but the state) we have sane samaritan laws and castle doctrine, both of which have been tested and successfully proven as shields from liability. As long as I am not recklessly negligent and am trying to help you, I am protected (moot since I actually am certified in CPR, but still). If you enter my home, I can use force to make you leave. If you threaten me I can use deadly force.

      Your final statement is one of the reasons I enjoy this state, because in sillier states like Jersey which have duty to flee doctrine and don't protect samaritans in the same way, gun violence runs rampant and people let each other die in the street without a second glance.

    9. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a small guy, but I'm certainly not 6'8". We don't have monitors, being BLS, so I go by the 2" mark. That does tend to break bones, but again in the ones with osteoporosis (which is many of them). It's possible you're looking for a greater depth than I am, and I don't have enough to go by for whether that's an improvement or unimportant past a certain depth. Could also just be luck of the draw.

      The frail little old folks, their ribs break if you do a sternal rub. I wasn't really including them, since I take it as given that doing CPR is going to break bones. They break hips if they turn suddenly, some of them, so it seems like cheating to count them. But of the healthy-ish (40-60yo) people I've seen who've had an AMI, their bones don't typically break. The exceptions are those who are so fat that you're not sure when you're even compressing the chest cavity, since it's like pushing on a pillow. Their bones break because I don't want to under-compress.

      I agree that rib breakage is really common. I was more concerned with the characterization of it as an indicator that compressions were being done correctly. It's something that is likely to happen, but if you're doing compressions to an adequate depth, and you don't cave in a rib, the answer isn't "push harder".

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    10. Re:No such thing as being a "good guy" anymore by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      In the US we have the Castle Doctrine, so yes, it is legal to shoot an invader in your home. I have been told by those that would know, that should the need arise, "no witness is a good witness."

  86. You have done WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you have done is ethically, morally, and most importantly LEGALLY wrong. Drive (or have your parents drive you) to the local police department ASAP and tell them what you have done.

    1. Re:You have done WRONG by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      No! That would be a formal admission of guilt. As the poster said above, just stop now and protect your identity. Severe criminal penalties will be dropped on the poor guy if he is caught. If he actually got into the system, he is very definitely guilty of computer crime(s). If the box was in a state other than his, he has a pile more charges on top of that. Just drop it and run away.

    2. Re:You have done WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT IS MY POINT. He needs to go through the legal system! He has committed a crime! Did your parents not teach you anything?? Jesus H Christ I don't believe what I am reading.

    3. Re:You have done WRONG by Pooua · · Score: 1

      "The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects witnesses from being forced to incriminate themselves."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-incrimination

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  87. Go shopping... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    ...and get everything sent to the company/the CEO or whoever blew you off/that guy you don't like. lol all the way to the bank.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  88. Here. by Nethead · · Score: 2

    Give me the info and I'll take care of it.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  89. Is your name Kevin? by slapout · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hack their system, go to jail for a few (many?) years. Then become a security consultant and go on a book tour.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  90. ha by unity100 · · Score: 1

    that 'atlanta' guy again. ATLANTA, eh ? why the fuck, ATLANTA ?

  91. Point of no return by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask yourself: Have you passed it or not? Given that they are not getting what you are telling them, the best course of action would be to cover yourself. Wipe all evidence before somebody comes to you. Try to act cool.

    But, if you feel that you have exposed yourself too much (you posted on /. after all), there's not much point to hide anymore. If you think you'll going to jail anyway, exploit your advantage while you can. For example - cash in, buy gold, bury it somewhere in the woods. You're a criminal now, don't be shy.

    ---
    Just some guy from Eastern Europe.

  92. This is a general problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moreso in banking and other financial services where you have less and less choice not to use any.

    I say, notify, and if they're not properly responsive, drop the entire thing into the public pool. "Properly responsive" would be answering within a week, within two weeks I'd expect an "alright we're fixing it" notice and an ETA. I'd tell them this expectation in the email. Disclosure withheld at their request extensible to two months, after that you go public anyway so they'd better have fixed it by then, and if they're smart, announced the whole thing so you won't.

    Endangering customers? Weren't they covered by the company's guarantees in the first place? This is the company failing due diligence when it came a'knocking at their door. The only thing I'd worry about is them trying to retalliate and trying to shoot the messenger. So use a throwaway account to contact them, and go public anonymously. That is all.

  93. Simple by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    First off, don't do anything more. Realistically, you could already probably be found guilty of criminal acts (accessing computer systems without authorization, etc). If you piss them off, they are likely to respond in the only they know how (with a lawsuit). What I would do is tell explain to them where their failures have been, advise them that they need to take security seriously.

    With that being said, if you threaten to expose their issues, you will probably have crossed some legal lines that you don't want to cross. As of now, you are probably on questionable ground if they decided to take legal action against you (assuming they know who you are).

    If they don't know who you are, and you are reasonably sure they can't find out, then I say tell them have 30 days to convince you that they are actively working to fix the problems, or else you'll announce their ineptitude to the world and let their company fall apart.

  94. honeypot by vagn · · Score: 1

    Assume you are in a honey pot. The FBI already knows about it, it is their system. They are waiting for you to do something that they can lock you up for, and that makes them look good in the papers. Alternatively, they want enough on you that you can be turned to inform on your hacking friends. So, your move. Do you "Blow them up?"

    For that matter, why do you even care? Are you a customer? What is your standing? Don't you have something else to do?

  95. Be slient lest ye be punished. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Fuck 'em. Shooting the messenger is well established and you should never have said anything to anyone.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  96. Timeout by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

    It's been two hours since the OP. LEOs read /. too, so if he's still not heard from the locals, he should now be more concerned about less scrupulous visitors. He should hide, find a lawyer, and explain only that he has a tip to be passed along anonymously. At this point the truth is already going to come out, he just needs to survive until it does without digging his hole any deeper.

    --
    Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
  97. Forget about it! by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    And not in that charming NY/Jersey kind of way. Seriously, just drop it and don't ever mention it again. Regardless of your good intentions, these assholes WILL come after you legally. It's best just to let them find out the hard way and let them pin it on somebody else (who hopefully isn't you).

  98. nuke it from orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Stop now. Do not access their data ever again. Don't even visit their web page.
    2) Document everything you do from here on out. Take notes, record audio and/or video, remain in the presence of other people as much as possible. You are going to need an alibi.
    3) Back up your machines and then wipe them. Place the backups on physical media stored in a safety deposit box. Do not ever access your backups unless compelled by court order or under the advice of your lawyer.
    4) Contact the EFF, explain your situation and ask them to render aid. They will at least be able to recommend a good lawyer.
    5) From now on you must operate as if everything you write, say, or do will be scrutinized by a team of psychopaths who want to fuck you as hard they can. You must behave as a model citizen in every aspect of your life until this is resolved. When they come after you they will use anything they can to portray you as the villain. Stay sober, be nice to your wife, don't speed, ignore any wallets you see laying on the ground. Keep your head down and your hands where everyone can see them.
    6) Never do anything like this again without explicit prior consent from the other party or under the direction of a legally recognized chain of command.

  99. One suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use your real name, your real email, your real internet connection. They won't care that you tried to do a good thing, there's been too many precedents of white hats being convicted for pointing out a flaw. Even responsible disclosure is a very risky way to make a name for yourself.

  100. Anonymously Publish the Vulnerability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just floating an idea here for people to discuss:

    What about anonymously publishing the vulnerability, including the name of the company and their product? E.g. through WikiLeaks or similar.

    You've reported the vuln so that they can fix it. Apparently, they aren't interested and would rather push a payment system that they know to be vulnerable on their big customers and an unsuspecting public. So publicly shame them and hope they learn their lesson - as well as other people who may have similarly ill-conceived business ideas.

  101. ... left whose door open? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    That's not just the neighbors' doors.

    Companies who do this are the ones who should be hauled into court, and their CEOs, CIOs, and anyone responsible for making the decisions should be the ones put in jail.

    Unfortunately, right now, that's not what would happen.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  102. conspiracies? by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Practically, that may be the path of expedience.

    Ethically, you're telling him to become a co-conspirator with a company that is operating illegally.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  103. expediency by reiisi · · Score: 1

    bites you from behind every time.

    Hobson's choice: get screwed now or get screwed later, and it seems like the whole world these days thinks that getting screwed is fun.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  104. Wow. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    You've now Become The Man.

    What a drag.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:Wow. by trims · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not a child anymore. I learned that taking things from others is wrong. That much of the crap people do in their younger days is naive, misplaced, stupid, or dangerous. I don't scream at authority just because my friends say it's cool. Growing up is learning why the rules exist, and figuring out how to fix the rules that are broken, not flaunting the rules just because they're the rules.

      Oh, and by the way - notice how I never said the current laws are correct in all respects. They're not perfect. But, I still haven't seen a coherent argument that what the OP did was ethical or moral to begin with. And I'm tired of people saying "but I didn't mean to be bad". Sure. And how am I, the victim, to sort out the people who didn't mean to be bad from those who did? Innocent intent is only a defense if you can't reasonably foresee the consequences of your actions.

      There's a world of difference between helping people who either (a) ask for the help, or (b) drop in your lap by no volition of your own, and "helping" people by sticking your nose in their business - whether or not that "help" is useful is immaterial, you stuck you nose in where it had no right to be.

      Bottom line: even white hat hacking without permission of the target is the same as vigilante-ism. You're taking the law into your own hands, and it doesn't matter if you sometimes help society. The practice itself is a bad idea.

      -Erik

      --
      There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened.
  105. Mark AC parent up! by reiisi · · Score: 1

    Bad grammar, good idea.

    Although, in this case, he has to be very very careful to use only the published legal access methods as a customer.

    Better, really, to contact the credit card companies. Not about insecure web sites, about improper use of credit card numbers.

    Several people have posted phone numbers or on-line links below, with quotes relative to the credit card companies wanting to be informed about improper use of credit card numbers.

    Probably don't want to admit to illegal access, even to the credit card companies, just to having noticed the vulnerability. If you can leave some sort of record of your attempt to contact the credit card company, that will help if it does blow up in your face.

    --
    Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens with fancy erasers; the 'net is just a fancy backyard fence.
  106. You can't go back by jkyrlach · · Score: 1

    You've crossed a line that can't be uncrossed. Now that you have notified them, you will be the first suspect when they do get hacked. And you will then have to prove that you didn't hack them. Soooo, short of just hacking them, you HAVE to get them to take action. Contacting a local journalist is a good idea. You might also trying to reach out to one the app developers directly. Until then, you are on guard duty.You were really stupid man. Sorry.

  107. Back Away; You Were Never Here by Pooua · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm inclined to agree with those who state this was a honey pot. Maybe it was and maybe it wasn't, but standard security procedure is to have a honey pot open and available for naive, young hackers to fall into. You probably aren't the first person in it, either, if this is a big name institution. I read that an unsecured computer left open to the Internet will have hundreds of attacks compromise it a day, within seconds of going online. So, I would guess those credit card numbers are also fake.

    Your best bet is to leave it alone. If this isn't a trap, that's for the company and the customers to deal with it, and the repercussions that follow. The fact that you need to ask here what to do about it leads me to suspect that you are in over your head.

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  108. Publish and be damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Publish and be damned

  109. Sell it on the blackmarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell it to the highest bidder on the black market and profit. Seriously.

    If they don't take their security seriously even after trying to help them. Sell it and profit. Make it impossible to trace back to you. By being a good Samaritan the best thing that will happen is they fix it and move on (and probably sue you because they can). Worst case, you release a proof of exploit and they get their lawyer to throw the book at you. Fuck them all. Sell it on the black market and get something out of your work and their idiocy for ignoring you.

  110. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How long do you think it will be now before the blackhats start looking at the payment handling processes of 'a rising mobile payment start-up' with 'big-name financial backing' ?
    I don't think there are too many companies that match your description...
    Here's how I see things panning out if you do nothing after getting this far:

    -> Blackhat reads this article
    -> Blackhat sees opportunity
    -> All companies matching description are scanned for vulnerabilities that are 'just too easy for it to be respectable'
    -> One or more companies matching the description (the actual one you were referring to almost certainly among them) will be breached, and have data stolen/leaked.
    -> Companies start looking at their logs and/or correspondence to find the kind of traffic that was generated by the attack
    -> You show up quite prominently
    -> You plead innocence.
    ->Cops find your /. article, and see that you ' almost feel like it's my responsibility to blow them out of the water if they have made it this far while compromising such trusted data'
    -> Jail time.

    As I see it the only course of action to head off jail time is to ensure the breach never happens in the first place (Notify Visa/MC in a hurry, so that the company is forced into compliance before they get breached.)
    Good luck,

  111. Contact someone for legal advice by gregfortune · · Score: 1

    Yep, I found it rather quickly myself. I'm not about to touch it myself with a 70 foot pole, but I wasn't looking to rip off any account info either.

    As far as advice goes, you're in pretty deep already. Given the discussion here and the information that is already available, I don't think you're going to be able to back out now. You've already reported it to the company, but now it's publicly available and I worry that they might implicate you in damages. IMHO, get a lawyer. Now. They should be able to tell you what kind of liability you're facing. They should also be able to give you good advice on how to mitigate your own risk.

    Frankly, I think it's stupid that someone pointing out a security flaw could be liable in any way, but that's the way our screwed up system works. Best of luck.

  112. Step 1. Short the stock by bartoku · · Score: 2

    Step 2. Reveal the security vulnerability anonymously.
    Step 3. Profit!

    1. Re:Step 1. Short the stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Take advantage of this stupid financial system we have.

  113. Think about it by koan · · Score: 1

    No good deed goes unpunished.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  114. This concludes the USAPATRIOT LOYALTY test. by forkfail · · Score: 1

    Your answers have been duly recorded. Some participants may be included in a followup survey. Thank you for your time.

    --
    Check your premises.
  115. 4chan by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

    Go to the local library, load up 4chan, and let the /b/tards know about the vulnerability. Anonymous will do it for you, and your hands are clean.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    1. Re:4chan by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Go to the local library, load up 4chan, and let the /b/tards know about the vulnerability. Anonymous will do it for you, and your hands are clean.

      You've either got some twisted morals or you don't know Anonymous well.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:4chan by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      That would definitely be option A. And at least the stolen data will be used to donate to charity instead of buying electronics to sell in Russia and China.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    3. Re:4chan by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      And at least the stolen data will be used to donate to charity

      I don't see that as a good thing, the charities will lose their credit card processing abilities with all the excessive charge backs, as part of signed agreements (said violations aren't reversed usually for any merchant even under the best of the situations, companies that violate said agreement end up waiting the penalty months to be reinstated access) and automated systems.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  116. Nuke em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuke their ass!

  117. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have no moral obligation to tell anyone about anything.

  118. Talk to the canadian Privacy Commision by raceface · · Score: 2

    If the clients affected by this include Canadians, the privacy office can legitimately look into your concern about the company. The privacy commissioner has teeth in Canada and can reach out of country. Remember facebook??? http://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2010/nr-c_100922_e.cfm She can and does similar things with companies that process payments.

    --
    Ride recklessly only when safe to do so.
  119. The site is www.thelevelup.com by fluffy99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long do you think it will be now before the blackhats start looking at the payment handling processes of 'a rising mobile payment start-up' with 'big-name financial backing' ?
    I don't think there are too many companies that match your description..

    No need to search to hard for the company. Our illustrious OP, aka Mr. Christopher Reed (http://seeread.info/) was naive enough to post this on twitter (http://twitter.com/#!/seereadnow).
    "@TheLevelUp I think I found a trivial way to hack user accounts. Please get in touch to resolve."

    At least he can point to the twitter feed as evidence that he was trying to contact them. This /. article where he considers "blowing them out of the water" would undoubtedly work against him though.

    1. Re:The site is www.thelevelup.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't know for certain they were actually the same person TBH.

    2. Re:The site is www.thelevelup.com by c_jonescc · · Score: 2

      the whois for seeread.info shows an address in Austin. The Level Up seems to only exist in Boston, NYC, Philly, and SF. Why's he snooping things so far outside his geographic purview?

      I can't believe this question wasn't posed AC. Someone thinks their cleverness is going to equal fame. Instead it might equal jail.

      --
      Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    3. Re:The site is www.thelevelup.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whois for seeread.info shows an address in Austin. The Level Up seems to only exist in Boston, NYC, Philly, and SF. Why's he snooping things so far outside his geographic purview?

      The 646 area code on the contact info is New York City.

  120. Nothing more effective than an irate customer by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    There's nothing more effective than an irate customer. Get into as many accounts as you can, grab an email address and the first and last 4 digits of their credit card info (or some other disambiguating information), then send emails to the customers from an email anonymizer, sharing whatever disambiguating information you obtained from their account, and stating the fact that the company won't fix their security. Step back and watch the customers make the company fix the problem.

  121. Show them this post! by stastuffis · · Score: 1

    I'd do it as one last effort. And then vanish and say nothing more about it.

  122. try harder by anotherone · · Score: 1

    try harder to get in touch with them. It's extremely obvious that you're talking about Square, so try tweeting at everyone on this list: https://twitter.com/#!/Square/team

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  123. What to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make large jewelery purchases and I will be glad to pick it up for you.

    Dont be a willy willy lump lump your whole life.

  124. publish. by mevets · · Score: 1

    As a good samaritan you are already past your point. If you want to pursue it further, find a reputable media outlet - I've heard Rolling Stone is pretty good - hand the info to them. They have the appropriate legal expertise to ensure a proper procedure is followed. If there is a "your real important" press thing, you'll get credit; if not, the job is done.

    If you want to try a lone wolf approach, create an account with them, then hack it in such a way as you only damage yourself. Once done, sue them in a local small claims court for $1. That establishes the base for a class action suit once they fuck-up big time. Your exposure is minimal because you only, ahem, abused yourself. Even the US (in)?justice system would have trouble going after you.

  125. No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that you are aware of the situation you have no choice but to make it known to the general population. If not, you will be complicit in the consequences to the company's clients' losses. The only question is how to do this without risking retaliation.

  126. Why does everyone assume he did something illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From what I read he hasnt done anything illegal. He said he found a hack. If he has a proper login and that login is not secure enough that the account leaks other peoples account info he has done nothing wrong. There is due diligence laws in a lot of states and that includes admins doing their job.

  127. The law is an ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some asses have hooves and like to kick

  128. Coming from a position of mistrust by neurosine · · Score: 1

    I've done this in the past for ISP's and organizations. I explained that I didn't modify or download any information I thought might have been confidential, but could have. The security holes were patched, but I never recieved any sort of recognition or response from the organizations. This was probably 13 years ago. I could now be prosecuted for this...so...be careful. Even if you're cool and trustworthy, some people are jerks and take this as a slight to their ability. I don't know exactly why, but some people are jerks. If I were to do this in todays climate, I would remain anonymous but report the issue only to them. Don't expect kudos or a job offer though.

  129. Go to the developer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mention that this company doesn't have many in-house developers, but I would go to one in the small development team (prefereably anonymously) with a detailed report on the flaws, what they can expose and what types of attacks could be used.

    Surely a fellow hacker must realise the severity of this and take it to the right places

    Or am I dreaming ?

  130. "Secure" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I discovered how to hack into and secure user accounts of a rising mobile payment start-up.

    Euphemism of the year.

    "What are you doing with these bags full of jewelry, sir?"
    "I have to secure this stuff, it's too easily accessible for thieves"

  131. Paranoia anyone??? by alphacharliezero · · Score: 1

    I can't help notice how many posts on this thread have encouraged the poster to 'run and hide' since he's OBVIOUSLY broken the law.
    I'm not so sure that's the case. Many vulnerabilities such as this (especially SQL injections) can be discovered using nothing more than Google dorks. In that scenario, It is Google that has (unintentionally) breached the company's security. The poster is simply accessing information that has been indexed by a search engine. Even if he found it directly, that doesn't mean he broke the law. I've found SQL injections on accident before simply by typing "O'Donnell" into a text box. (That single quote is a Bit**!)
    I'm not saying that is what happened here. But don't assume that one has to break the law in order to discover a vulnerability. Google has indexed credit card numbers and other sensitive data in the past. And it's not Google's fault either. If their web spiders are able to scrape it, some web developer screwed up BIG-TIME...

    As for advice, I'd say-
    1. Document all communications with the company in question. It'll be harder for them to accuse you of wrongdoing if your first action was to inform them of the problem.
    2. DO NOT EXPLOIT THIS VULNERABILITY! Or you actually are breaking the law.
    3. Report the company in question to VISA, MC, AMEX, etc. You might have broken the law. But they are in violation of PCI-DSS. The company might not listen to you, but once they've got the card companies breathing down their neck they'll correct the issue. (Or they'll get shut down by their payment processor.)
    4. Consult an attorney. You are in jeopardy of being blamed if the company does lose data, regardless of the facts. Regardless of legality, it doesn't sound like you have done anything immoral. Don't be their scapegoat.
    5. If they do come after you, BE LOUD! The company in question has through their incompetence, screwed their customers. At some point they will have to weigh their options. The person who said 'There's no such thing as bad publicity.' did so before there was such a thing as the Internet. If coming after you means losing customers?

    In any case, Good Luck! I've been where you are and it's not a comfortable position...
     

  132. Not your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Release the hack if you want. If you have given them a month to fix it you have done your part in my opinion. If they have shown no interest in fixing it then just publish the details and they will be forced to fix it.

  133. Contact authorities. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are breaking federal laws when it comes to handling financial and credit data.

  134. Don't hack... by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    Go to the big name financial backers and the media.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  135. Most importantly by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    You say you have had correspondence with them. Do they know who you are or can you be traced? If the answer is NO then get the fsck out of dodge. If they list you might want to option their stock price tanking at some stage soon.

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    1. Re:Most importantly by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I just read some ore comments and realised what you have done. You did this in the US to a US company and let your name get out there? You need to speak to a lawyer.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  136. it is essential you get this right by frog51 · · Score: 1

    Some discussion on responsible disclosure over in the Security Stack Exchange site: htt p://security.stackexchange.com/q/52/485

  137. to do list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make sure you have an anonymous connection. Neighbours' wifi or freespot works. Spoof you mac.

    2. Not go back into the machines and erase any goddamn trace that you were there before. even though you didn't do nothing by your book, when shit will happen, the company will deal with it by simply sueing everyone in the logs and going after every ip. So be smart.

    3. Make yourself a copy of that nice data. If there is any decision to be made which actually holds any relevance to YOU this is it.

    4. Get the fuck out of there. Again, don't forget shell histories, lastlogs, tripwires etc etc etc.

    my 0.02 eurocents

  138. It's a sad day when a person who is sometimes accidentally caught up in viewing a method to breach a website (or DB) or accidentally breaches a website due to faulty programming/security will get years in a federal prison, yet the CxO's of that same company who theoretically are responsible for the integrity of that data, won't even see the inside of a courtroom.

    --
    "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  139. Uh.. Hello?? They're already DOING that. Re:PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, every day, you're going to get every script kiddie in the internet trying to poke holes in your network. In fact, if they get in, thats fine. They're allowed to look at everything your'e doing (trade secrets) and they can copy user data, since this is legal. You're going to be in hot water with your customers, fast.

    The s.k.'s are already doing that. This is similar to the argument about outlawing guns. If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.

    If you outlaw hacking, only outlaws will be hackers. Do you really want the BAD GUYS to be the only elite hackers?

  140. Do nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will not be rewarded for your help and may be prosecuted or otherwise legally bullied. Do nothing, fuck them. Until there is some sort of protection for good samaritans in the digital world the real world can do without digital good samaritans.

    Since they probably know who you are now, in the event they have issues with this in the future you may be targeted in the ensuing witch hunt. I would encrypt all of my computers (full disk) and simply never leave them up. If they are seized you do not know (no matter how smart you think you are) what completely unrelated stuff they may be able to use against you. Everyone's a criminal, they just don't want to prosecute everyone. Now they may want to prosecute you, though.

  141. Report it to the right place - Visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this has to do with credit card processing, the application vendor has to abide by PCI / PA-DSS regulations whether they like it or not. My suggestion is reach out to Visa at cisp@visa.com and let them know what you have discovered. They will look into it and likely will alert them of the issue. If they still refuse to fix the hole, they will be placed on the "vulnerable application" list which basically says you are not allowed to process any Visa/MC transactions with that software.