Slashdot Mirror


IBM Tracks Pork Chops From Pig To Plate

dcblogs writes "IBM is deploying technology in China that allows meat suppliers to track a single pig all the way from farm animal to pork chop. Pigs are initially identified with a barcoded ear tag. This identification is then put on bins used to track the various pig parts as they pass through the slaughterhouse, processing plant, distribution center and finally to the clear plastic-wrapped package in a grocer's case. If a consumer buys three pork chops in a package, 'you know that these three pieces of pork chop came from pig number 123,' said Paul Chang, who leads global strategy for emerging technologies at IBM. The goal is to control disease outbreaks, but theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating."

216 comments

  1. The real goal by Intron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like a more stylish ear tag when you start doing this on humans, please.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    1. Re:The real goal by Third+Position · · Score: 2

      Maybe this is how they're planning to keep track of their global work force.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    2. Re:The real goal by Mistlefoot · · Score: 1

      It will happen to humans before it happens to livestock.

      In North America we can't even track which country the meat comes from, let alone which animal.

      http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Regulation/WTO-sides-with-Canada-on-US-meat-country-of-origin-labeling

      Basically, it is so much of a challenge keeping meat from different countries separate so processing plants simply resort to only buying meat from one country where rules to maintain a "country of origin" are implemented. How can we expect there to be an "animal of origin"?

    3. Re:The real goal by bhcompy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's why you should eat racehorses. Parentage on racehorses is highly documented.

    4. Re:The real goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the unwanted swine in 1930s Germany.
       
      You have to learn from history. IBM is still IBM. Just wait till this bounces back to the Americans and the DHS gets its grubby hands on the tech and awards IBM a trillion dollar contract. Wait for it.

    5. Re:The real goal by TheLink · · Score: 2

      In North America we can't even track which country the meat comes from, let alone which animal.

      I heard in Japan it's not uncommon for a farmer's produce to be labelled/displayed with his photo in a supermarket (e.g. vegetables, and stuff like ginger). Read it somewhere[1] and recently asked a friend who is working there.

      Anyone in/from Japan would like to confirm/deny or provide more details?

      [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/business/worldbusiness/11safety.html
      By the way, I had to find this using Bing. Google produced tons of unrelated crap for: japanese farmers photos vegetables china "quality control" supermarket.

      I might have to switch to trying Bing first, if Google continues being so crap. Yes I know you're supposed to put double quotes around every mandatory keyword in Google nowadays. Fuck that.

      --
    6. Re:The real goal by durrr · · Score: 1

      Facebook timeline good enough?

    7. Re:The real goal by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> stylish ear tag... on humans

      IBM should apply this technology to keeping track of America's fine constabulary.

    8. Re:The real goal by foobsr · · Score: 1

      I would like a more stylish ear tag when you start doing this on humans, please.

      The whole thing was already perceived as animal farm, so why care about the human aspects.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    9. Re:The real goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    10. Re:The real goal by Calos · · Score: 1

      It's an obscure thing to search for, so good on Bing for helping you find it... but I'm impressed you found anything with that query.

      japanese farmers photos vegetables china "quality control" supermarket

      I had no idea what you were searching for with that, so I'm impressed either made any sense of it. You were searching for an article based on one attribute tangentially related to the topic, which comprised like two sentences. I wish I could see in aggregate what kinds of searches people make on Bing and Google, it certainly seems like they expect different kinds of queries. That said, I tried your query on Bing, and it didn't find your article until the third page.

      For what it's worth, japan food quality control farmer picture on Google gives your article as the third link on the first page. japanese produce packaging picture of farmer gives multiple results that indicate this is indeed fairly common.

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    11. Re:The real goal by utuk99 · · Score: 1

      Mmmm...long pig. Or were you thinking of labeling humans for some other purpose?

    12. Re:The real goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're tough and stringy, though.

    13. Re:The real goal by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had no idea what you were searching for with that

      I was searching for the specific article I remembered reading that contained all those keywords.

      The article dealt with China, Japanese supermarkets, vegetables and photos of japanese farmers. The article contains all my keywords. Your query does not mention China, supermarkets. My query does.

      I'm a nerd. I don't need a search engine or person to "second guess" what I really want. I give the keywords, give me non-link-spam/non-spam articles with all those keywords. If the results are not what I want, I can adjust it for myself. I don't want to try to read Google's "mind" that's trying to read my mind. I don't want to have to put double quotes around every frigging keyword.

      With this sort of results, it's no surprise it's getting harder to search for work related stuff. When I search for something, there's often a chance that the answer does NOT exist on any webpage out there. When that happens, I'm fine if there are zero pages returned. Because I can stop searching and try to figure it out the answers myself. What is useless is 300000 pages that don't contain all my search terms. Then I have to figure out whether the answer isn't published or it's because the search engines all suck and I need to try different sorts of queries...

      --
    14. Re:The real goal by Stebalien · · Score: 1

      That's why you should eat lab rats.

      --
      Steven
    15. Re:The real goal by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      They should tag the meat with femtotags that saturate the meat or just force a DNA test of all death row inmates.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    16. Re:The real goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Google, click "More search tools" then click "Verbatim".

    17. Re:The real goal by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Don't see that option. Do I have to sign in?

      --
    18. Re:The real goal by evalhalla · · Score: 1

      Not really. Horse is one of the few animals whose meat becomes softer with age and exercise; in the countries where horse is eaten the best cuts tended to come from racehorses who had to be killed because of injuries. I don't know if it is still possibile to eat them, however, because of the different regulation on medicinal use.

    19. Re:The real goal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 6 months ago I talked to a guy who delivered an antique vehicle to me. He is a rancher by trade and was talking to me about his business. He mentioned that there were a number of very rich politicians buying cattle ranches in South America and were trying to get import regulations relaxed or removed. This would in turn make them billions as the labor is cheap, lax environmental laws and safety regulations. He went on to saying that the laws/regulations they were trying to kill would not only make it difficult to track the source of meat but also lower the quality and safety of the meat. All in the name of making a buck, meanwhile domestic ranchers will face the reality of cheap import meat which will drive them out of business.

      I know it sounds like an alarmist conspiracy but I don't doubt that that something like that could happen.

    20. Re:The real goal by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      You mean, when they put the human's picture on the store package?

      Soylent Green is PEOPLE!

  2. First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See Porky, eat Porky

    1. Re:First Yea!!! by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      The deliciousness comes from the fact that it had a mother, you can almost taste the innocence!

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    2. Re:First Yea!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'd be a bit more excited about this technology, if it would track where ALL my food I'm purchasing comes from.

      First thing I'd do...I'd avoid ALL food coming from China...and just buy US foods, preferably as locally raised as possible.

      I do appreciate that the labeling on fish now allows me to do this, I'd be happy if I could do this with most all foods I buy in the store, that I don't now know its source of origin.

      I'm trying to learn (again) what seasons things naturally grow...that should help somewhat trying to keep food purchases local.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:First Yea!!! by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Many grocery stores now label where produce comes from. (Many produce companies do, too.) Usually state of origin within the US and country of origin otherwise. As long as you're okay with produce from California and Mexico, it's pretty easy to avoid produce from distant lands.

    4. Re:First Yea!!! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dear Cayenne8,

      We in the agriculture and food processing industry take customer satisfaction extremely seriously. For a small additional packaging fee, we would be delighted to ensure that your food has been locally produced in the location of your choice and certified to whatever standard you desire by whatever certification bodies you trust most. Our graphics department may require 8-10 additional business days for certification logos not already in our library, and 4-colour printing is extra.

      To suit the requirements of today's environmentally sensitive customer, we are proud to label all our products as being sustainably derived from non-endangered species, or endangered species whose tissues are indistinguishable by any test likely to be employed by the customs agents of your jurisdiction.

      Sincerely Yours,
      The Supply Chain.

    5. Re:First Yea!!! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I can tell you how to do this right now.

      Go find a farm and buy from them. you can even pick out the chicken that is running around for them to kill for you.

      Honestly, it has been easy to buy local for centuries, most people dont want to bother because it also involves experiencing the process. several times a year I buy a cow with 3 other families. we end up with 1/4 of it in processed meat that tastes better than anything from a supermarket.

      It's more expensive, but it can easily be done.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is supposed to be a joke, right?

    7. Re:First Yea!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Go find a farm and buy from them. you can even pick out the chicken that is running around for them to kill for you.

      Trouble is, I wouldn't know exactly where to even start looking for a farm anywhere near me.

      I live in New Orleans....I can quite easily find fresh seafood...but I don't think there is any farmland within reasonable driving distance to me.

      That and it would make my weekly grocery shopping trip take 1 or two days longer....?

      :)

      During the summer, I do try to garden what I can for myself, but just isn't practical to hit the farms on grocery day. Heck, it is a PITA to hit 2-4 different stores that day...to get the different specials at each store.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even easier than that. You can do this at a supermarket.

      For example, if strawberries are more than $2.50/lb., then they are not in season.

    9. Re:First Yea!!! by adonoman · · Score: 1

      It's more expensive, but it can easily be done.

      For significant amounts of meat it's often cheaper. I split a cow with my brother every so often. We go to a nearby farm and pick a cow, he slaughters, packs, freezes, and delivers the meat. It comes to about $3.00 - $4.00 / lb. If you only ever buy ground beef, it's a bit on the pricey side, but when you look at the price of the nicer cuts of meat, it averages out to be similar or cheaper than supermarket prices. You just need to find the freezer storage space.

      Poultry is more expensive, but that's largely because you're getting free-range chickens and also the extra costs of inspection.

    10. Re:First Yea!!! by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who grew up in the farm... I don't have issues with that. We have gotten so squeamish about food, we should know where you food comes from. Edible Mushrooms you get at the store are grown in manure. Our Tomato Sauce from a jar or a can come from storage containers that have stored the tomatoes for up to 3 years. The FDA allows a particular percentage that is greater then 0% of bugs dead bugs to be found and processed in food...

      If you get grossed out because of your food, then most likely you don't know much about it. If you grow up on a farm and see how your food is produces and made from what and how... You have respect for it, you know to clean it before hand, and how to properly prepare it.

      I eat meat, I know it comes from animals, and most of these animals have a distinct personality and if they weren't going to be food I could be friends with it, and have it as a loving pet. When I eat meat I don't joy over the fact that I am eating a dead animal, I take into consideration that this animal has died for my sustenance (and hence why I don't often wast meet).

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:First Yea!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      What about small butchers shops? I'm vegetarian, so I haven't actually tried, but I'm pretty sure that there are four butchers near me that will sell parts of animals from local farms. This also solves the problem of 'WTF do I do with a dead cow?' - someone else has already chopped out the bits that you don't want to eat and cut the bits you do into sensible-size portions. For vegetables, the local market sells things from several local farms.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:First Yea!!! by Forbman · · Score: 1

      but it's not easy to guarantee that the animal you bought actually went into the animal bits you have in the packages you got back for the most part. Most animals, once the hide/skin/feathers have been removed, look amazingly like all the other animals of that type in the same condition. Not too many slaughterers will guarantee that, either.

      Funny thing, that. If I had a bunch of lottery winnings money, I'd give good money to someone who could identify by taste (in a good, double-blind test) whether the beef they were actually eating was from "Angus", "Hereford", "Charolais", or whatever cows...

      Those marketing folks are pretty good at what they do. And we (the collective "we") sure are good at buying into their bullshit.

    13. Re:First Yea!!! by turtledawn · · Score: 2

      You may be interested in CSA programs. Here's a good place to start: http://www.localharvest.org/

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    14. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you missed the bit where he has a quarter of a cow in his deep-freeze. You don't buy that much beef every week -- it'll last a typical family 3-4 months. The only thing that does to your weekly shopping trip is remove beef from it.

    15. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Restaurants are starting to do DNA testing on the food they sale.
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/27/restaurants-dna-seafood-mislabeling_n_1114937.html

    16. Re:First Yea!!! by Zeroedout · · Score: 0

      Why would you eat something you can be friends with when you can sustain yourself perfectly well on insentient foods? I wouldn't eat my friends just because I'm hungry and they taste good. Not wasting their flesh doesn't make things better; you're attempting to rationalize something you know isn't right.

    17. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here you have the real reason, all the way at the bottom of the page:

      Endangered species are also sold as more common fish varieties.

      Guess what happens if the health inspector shows up and takes a DNA sample and it turns out your restaurant was selling an endangered species?

      Yeah, you don't wanna know. They won't just shut you down... they could very well lock you up.

      And hence the "self-regulating movement" by the food industry to make sure that they're selling what you think they're selling - and what they think they're selling.

      Okay, it's probably not the only reason they're doing it, but it's definitely a factor.

    18. Re:First Yea!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      What about small butchers shops? I'm vegetarian, so I haven't actually tried, but I'm pretty sure that there are four butchers near me that will sell parts of animals from local farms.

      I'm afraid such shops are few and far between, at least in any city I've lived in recently. I really wish I could find a quality butcher shop of this type...I'd pay a bit extra just for the good service, and ability to get quality meats, etc.

      Nothing much turns up on google for my area for this....you're pretty much stuck with grocery stores (a couple of local ones have decent butcher depts) and whole foods is good, but VERY $$$.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:First Yea!!! by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The FDA allows a particular percentage that is greater then 0% of bugs dead bugs to be found and processed in food.

      More to this point, for example, "The food colorants cochineal and carmine are made from ground bugs." - True.
      For more: Google food dye bug|beetle

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    20. Re:First Yea!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Very interesting..thanks for the link.

      For my area...seems to mostly only show restaurants, and the farmers mkt, while fun..is suprisingly SMALL for such a food town as NOLA.

      The Hollygrove thing looks promising tho...I'll check in on that!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:First Yea!!! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Enjoy! I'm not a hippie or anything, but my wife and I try to eat mostly a vegetarian diet with only a bit of beef, chicken, and fish (for health reasons; fish is excellent for you, but not so much the beef and chicken). We frequent farmer's markets for vegetables, some meats, honey, and so forth. Hope the site is helpful, its been extremely useful for us!

    22. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's not trying to rationalize anything. The behavior of people who eat meat is downright psychopathic, but because it's such a common behavior it's just one more in a big list of incongruences that is held as normal in a near-dogma-like style.

    23. Re:First Yea!!! by silanea · · Score: 1

      God, how I long for the day when scientists prove that plants feel pain, and how I will relish the sound of a million goody two shoes' simultaneously shutting up.

      (Yes, I have got karma to burn. Bring it on.)

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    24. Re:First Yea!!! by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      The problem being that the actual local farmers won't be able to afford to implement this kind of tracking system...

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    25. Re:First Yea!!! by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      these animals have a distinct personality and if they weren't going to be food I could be friends with it

      animals are people too!! http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=bsitu_speciesism

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    26. Re:First Yea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really - I am in Reading in the UK which is a large town not quite a city (it is trying to become one) home to MS UK Oracle UK Verizon UK etc etc and I have 2 dedicated butchers within 100yards of my office - 1 is a specialist Game butcher that I can walk past and see deer carcass hanging in and I know there chopping room is under the road and I see the Aberdeen Angus lorry pull up regulalry and the sides being carried in individually over the butchers shoulders. Around the outskirts of the town centre are several ethnic supermarkets with halal meat counters and butcheries in them as well for the muslims and at least 1 kosher butcher as well. There is also a weekly farmers market in the town centres old cattle market .And that is not counting the suypermarkets that actually have butchery depts (Morrisons being the best)

      Do US cities/towns not have things like that ?

    27. Re:First Yea!!! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Do US cities/towns not have things like that ?

      I can only speak for the ones where I've spent a reasonable amount of time, which basically means New York City, Salt Lake City, and Pittsburgh, but all of those did. Pittsburgh had a long street entirely filled with interesting food shops, but it was a little bit out of the centre so it's easy to miss. The main problem with US cities is that they tend to sprawl and they tend to put all similar shops together, so there can be a dozen of them within a mile of you but you won't notice unless you've gone through that part of the city for another reason. In the UK, small shops like this tend to be scattered through residential and commerical areas.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    28. Re:First Yea!!! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In the UK and I assume the rest of the EU all food is labelled with its contry of origin. It's political correctness health and safety socialism gone mad!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:First Yea!!! by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      Explain why it's ok to kill living non sentient beings but not sentient ones? Vegetarians are idiots, they still eat living beings and somehow think they are better because of it. Life is life, if you eat a plant you should have no problem eating a cow logically. Whether its sentient or not should be irrelevant. Your killing a living being either way, that is just how nature works.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    30. Re:First Yea!!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Do US cities/towns not have things like that ?

      Sadly...no not from the experience of most cities I've ever lived in...especially in today's world.

      There are virtually NO privately owned mom & pop type food stores. You're pretty much left with the big box chain supermarket. You will likely find 2-3 different chain stores in the city, but that's about it.

      Small, privately owned specialty stores for food just don't hardly exist anymore over here in most cities (except for extreme old urban ones like I guess NYC has). They've all been run out of business.

      You might find some niche ones here and there....but they will be incredibly expensive.

      I've only seen real specialty butcher stores a couple times in my life...when visiting friends in the NE of the US (New Hampshire, Boston)....but no where where I've lived have I found such a beast....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:First Yea!!! by Zeroedout · · Score: 1

      If that were the case, I would shut up. However, considering the fact that plants don't have a central nervous system, it's pretty damn unlikely that they can feel pain - or at least not how we feel it.

    32. Re:First Yea!!! by Zeroedout · · Score: 1

      Explain why it's ok to kill living non sentient beings but not sentient ones?

      So according to your logical chain of thought, I should be able to eat a human? It's just another life being killed either way, right? It also logically follows then, that if killing a human life for sustenance is acceptable, there's no moral issue with farming humans and selling chunks in grocery stores. Sure some might resist come slaughter time, but hey, so do cows and chickens.

      that is just how nature works

      You'll be hard pressed to find in nature, chickens living and barely moving in tiny tiny cages. Also note, that unless you live in a very cold climate, freezing isn't natural either. "Natural" killing consists of an animal following it's eating instinct and killing for food - it has no consideration of another being's will, wants, needs, or personality. I'm not advocating for stopping bears from killing deer, I am advocating for humans who realize how horrible killing something that doesn't want to die is, to stop doing so. Though I have to admit that if your stance is that all life is edible including human babies - you are being consistent and logical. You just have zero empathy for other life :(

    33. Re:First Yea!!! by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1

      Yes I see no problems with eating humans, meat is meat. Lots of tribes are cannibals. If you bred and raised them and killed them with them barely being aware of it yes.

      I never said anything about raising stuff in cages, most meat I'd eat at home would be free range. Im just saying there's nothing wrong with eating meat, we evolved to process it, hence it's totally natural for us. If they have good lives I see no problems. I don't see how this is any different from a bear hunting, we just do it in a more advanced fashion. I do have a problem with factory style farming, but that's a totally unrelated issue to whether killing animals is ok or not.

      Still didn't explain why it's ok to kill plants and not animals, I see both types of killing as just as bad. Plants sure don't want to die either, if you try kill a plant on a timescale where it can react it will move out of the way. So why is it ok to kill them?

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    34. Re:First Yea!!! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      But would you have eaten people who could be your friend but aren't.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    35. Re:First Yea!!! by Zeroedout · · Score: 1

      Yes I see no problems with eating humans, meat is meat... If you bred and raised them and killed them with them barely being aware of it yes.

      You expect me to believe you have no problem with me eating my children? Or perhaps I can capture you and a woman, get you two to breed and then eat your offspring. If it's not okay for me to do this to you, then you can't expect it being okay for anyone else. Thus we can't eat humans.

      we evolved to process it, hence it's totally natural for us

      Fair enough that factory farming is not at issue, however just because we evolved a natural process doesn't mean we succumb to it. We also evolved processes for sex and forcing it upon others - that's not acceptable in any fashion. It's different from bear hunting because the bear isn't capable of taking things into account other than it's own hunger and instincts how to quench it.

      Still didn't explain why it's ok to kill plants and not animals..

      Plants don't resist me when I pick them from the ground. Ever seen chickens go to slaughter? They do everything in their power to get out of there, and every other chicken in the vicinity is very well aware of what's going on. In contrast to plant, I can take off leaves, take a nib while it's growing, and no reaction. There are physiological reactions, but nothing that shows pain, resistance, or even awareness. Just a reaction to matter being removed. If you need me to cite this I will, but there are many studies out there observing plan behavior.
      Please explain what you mean by:

      kill a plant on a timescale where it can react

      Also, plants have no CNS, therefor cannot feel pain/suffer, thus okay to kill. With meat that can do this, I eat it. For example oysters which are closer to a moving plant than to a cow.

  3. if pig dens are over there like here.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    then no way in hell they'd implement a picture.

    anyhow, this isn't really news is it? except that they're bothering with this in china(to have a meat supply track where the meat isn't binned to a single big bin at some point in the process).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:if pig dens are over there like here.. by Millennium · · Score: 4, Interesting

      then no way in hell they'd implement a picture.

      You can bet PETA will lobby for legislation mandating it, though. Not that I think they'll succeed, but they'll certainly try.

    2. Re:if pig dens are over there like here.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      then no way in hell they'd implement a picture.

      anyhow, this isn't really news is it? except that they're bothering with this in china(to have a meat supply track where the meat isn't binned to a single big bin at some point in the process).

      Consider this country had the Milk scandal and you can imagine how necessary something like this tracking can be. However... if the Beijing government really doesn't know how so many hackers can be attacking USA sites and servers and they're handling these land grabs very poorly, the grip of the Central Government could certainly be called into question (I really don't think it's as strong as many believe.) Where there's corruption there's going to be will and means to game this system - "Recognise this pig? It's amazingly like the past 100 other pigs, with a little photoshopping" sorta thing.

      Then there's sausage .. the great mystery is what goes in and how hard that could be to track.

      Interesting idea and the fact they are even looking in this direction suggests there something going on, which is well known at high levels and you're not hearing much about.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:if pig dens are over there like here.. by Forbman · · Score: 1

      The cute picture of the critter out in the pasture, or the reality of it hanging on the hooks?

    4. Re:if pig dens are over there like here.. by Millennium · · Score: 2

      Both, I'd guess. The claimed reasoning will be to force people to make the connection between the living animal and the meat being eaten.

    5. Re:if pig dens are over there like here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A whole life video diary. Both of an external perspective the tasty bacon and also a video inlay from the pigs perspective. From conception to your mouth.

  4. Oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So THAT'S what IBM is doing now.

    1. Re:Oh. by AdamJS · · Score: 1

      Doubling its revenue every few years as well.

    2. Re:Oh. by CaptSlaq · · Score: 1

      There's a pork joke in here somewhere...

  5. No thanks by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2
    From the summary:

    "...theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating."

    No thanks. I like to feel a personal disconnection with the animal I'm about to eat. Lobsters aren't so bad because they're like bugs, but many people keep furry animals like pigs as pets. The idea's like a local radio commercial that advertises lambskin boots and then plays a cute "Baaaaa" noise, which is quizzical and bizzarre.

    Everytime that commercial comes on at work I say, "That is the sound of the lamb being slaughtered to make those boots."

    1. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why is denial more comforting than acceptance? I'm a carnivore myself, but I don't try and block out knowledge of where my food comes from.

    2. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You sound like a joy to work with. I'm sure your coworkers enjoy watching TV with you.

    3. Re:No thanks by dbc · · Score: 1

      Hi there, city boy. What a hoot you folks are, hypocrites one and all. You should be a vegan.

      I remember sitting around the family dinner table, commenting on the flavor and tenderness of particular steaks. "Pretty good. Very tender. But remember Wilfred? He was amazingly tender and flavorful.' To which someone might reply: "Wilfred was good, buy I preferred Roscoe."

      Our citified cousins tended not to join the conversation...

      If you aren't willing to kill it, don't eat it. I hear Mark Zuckerburg has been doing that this past year -- butchering his own meat because he decided not to eat anything he hadn't killed himself. You might want to try that. Or try being a vegan. Either way, you need a big dose of reality rays.

    4. Re:No thanks by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I remember sitting around the family dinner table, commenting on the flavor and tenderness of particular steaks. "Pretty good. Very tender. But remember Wilfred? He was amazingly tender and flavorful.' To which someone might reply: "Wilfred was good, buy I preferred Roscoe."

      Our citified cousins tended not to join the conversation...

      Could the reason for that be that Wilfred and Roscoe were your cousins?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  6. Meet the meat by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does Douglas Adam's estate get to sue if we get an introduction of our pork by our pork?

    1. Re:Meet the meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Meet the meat" was the first thing I thought when I saw this. Now we just need a time-traveling restaurant and a galactic hyper-hearse, and we'll be all set.

    2. Re:Meet the meat by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      ... or the same Douglas Adams, when he finishes his fiscal holidays...

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  7. Right by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    The goal is to control disease outbreaks, but theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating.

    As if a grocer would actually do this (unless forced by a pack of wild PETA activists).

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Right by Forbman · · Score: 1

      ...but it could become the thing to do at the Farmer's Markets...

  8. More people turning vegetarian? by kheldan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating

    Considering how disconnected the average person is from where their food comes from, I think putting a face on the meat you're buying would turn many people's stomachs -- and maybe turn them off eating meat. Oh well, more bacon for the rest of us!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a kid, I used to live close to a place where pigs were slaughtered. Never seen or smelt what happened inside, but I could hear them scream. Yes, it did turn me into a vegetarian, I have not been eating meat for over 18 years.

    2. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've been doing this in canada for at least a year now, particularly regarding fisheries and lobsters.

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/story/2011/07/01/ns-thisfish-tracks-diner-to-water.html

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's pretty well exactly what I was thinking.

      The goal is to control disease outbreaks, but theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating.

      So... psycho vegan grocers would be able to run themselves out of business by making people not want to buy from them after yet another round of painfully smug and condescendingly ham-fisted* evangelizing, while the SANE grocer next door would let them buy their goddamned meat in PEACE without disturbing imagery? Why on earth would any grocer want to actually DO that?

      *: Aha, yeah? Yeah? See what I did there? Yeah. Man, I just don't get the chance to use puns that bad AND contextual very often, but when I do get that chance, aw yeah, I'm going to make the most of it.

    4. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in China it wouldn't. When you go out to buy chicken it still goes cluck. Its not uncommon to see pigs being taken to slaughter as well. There are of course live fish, eels, snails, frogs, etc. for sale as well.

    5. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Our pork will now come with a photo of the animal that died along with a little biography ("He liked sunny days spent wallowing."). It'll be like one of those "support a child overseas" charities.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one would think it would make it more delicious

    7. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, last night pork chops were some of the most succulent I've ever eaten and I will happily pay extra for the meat of this fine beast's siblings.

    8. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're used to seeing fish and lobsters in the grocery when we buy our food and it doesn't bother us. People will be a little squeamish at first, then they'll just desensitize and care even less about the original animal. Food animal is food. As others have mentioned, it's a "used to" thing, and just as most other cultures don't give a shit, we won't either.

    9. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the first post, having a picture isn't quite the same as hearing its death-scream. Now if opening its package let out a recording of its death-squeal, that might turn some people off from pork... ...or just attract dogs.

    10. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Almandine · · Score: 1

      I think there are still places in New York City where one can get live chicken and rabbits for slaughter. I know they're still around but I'm not sure where. Live fish, eels, frogs, and other sea creatures are pretty common in the city too. Meat from a freshly killed animal taste different from one that was previously frozen or sitting in a case or hours.

    11. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      This post made me laugh. DISCLAIMER: I'm a vegetarian.

    12. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by bamwham · · Score: 1

      You far underestimate the ability of people to justify things which feel or taste good. A good portion of my family (from the previous generation) was involved in farming animals either as a business or as a way to supplement the family food budget, and branch of family tree have been small town butchers. All of these people intimately knew the animals they ate and milked from birth to death and continued to eat and profit off of them.

    13. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by whargoul · · Score: 1

      You can get live rabbit anywhere, rabbit breeders are all over.

    14. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      And don't a lot of countries already do something similar to this for cattle after the whole prion/mad cow thing? The US only tracks a small percentage of our animals due to some protest or other involving big agribusiness. At least that's what i vaguely remember, i'd welcome anyone who could supply specific facts for or against that.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    15. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Now if opening its package let out a recording of its death-squeal, that might turn some people off from pork...

      Canned tuna would still sound the same.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    16. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it's great marketing. There are food companies that market this kind of service already. Steak houses and their customers seem to absolutely love knowing where their meat is coming from.

    17. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      And don't a lot of countries already do something similar to this for cattle after the whole prion/mad cow thing? The US only tracks a small percentage of our animals due to some protest or other involving big agribusiness.

      Australia has been doing this for years with cattle. America is years behind Australia and probably other places.

      I suspect their reticence is all about cost

    18. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes in the UK (and I think all the EU) cows have unique eartags that are attached just after birth and must be replaced if they come off or you get a huge fine - all beef has been tracable from field to plate since the BSE outbreak and the ban on eating animals over 30 mths of age.

    19. Re:More people turning vegetarian? by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Fish and other seafood don't really have a "face"; they may as well be aliens to this world. Mammals, on the other hand, do have an identifiable face.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  9. Bad Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generally speaking, it's probably a bad idea to put a face to the meat, unless you're with PETA.

  10. Ugh.... by Third+Position · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The goal is to control disease outbreaks, but theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating.

    Sometimes, the idea of becoming a vegan is really appealing.....

    --
    American Third Position
    Finally, a real choice!
    1. Re:Ugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eww veganism is for tools. Vegetarianism is not so bad, you can have milk and cheese (and perhaps eggs if you're progressive) without feeling as bad. Dairy cows are still pretty poorly kept but they have to be a bit healthier.

    2. Re:Ugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a great idea. Then you can look at the package of pork and verify visually that the pig at least looked healthy. Some pigs 'look' more delicious than others.

      Of course you squeemish moderns don't like the idea of where your food comes from. So it'll never happen.

    3. Re:Ugh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you just call us modems?

    4. Re:Ugh.... by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 0

      Go for it, but you can kiss your positive Karma points here good-bye. ;)

  11. Wilbur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's some pig!

    Yeah, I don't think seeing the face that used to carry that porkchop around seems like a very appetizing idea.

  12. Nazi hollerith punch cards to track walking dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds incredibly like hollerith punch card technology that was used to track death camp and labor camp prisoners from abduction to death.

    Did IBM make those as well?

  13. I'd be more impressed by technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that tracked pig parts from the country clubs and corporate jets to the PAC offices to the K-street lobbyists and think tanks to the Washington Nationals sky boxes and Capitol Hill lunch spots to the Congressional cloak rooms.

  14. His name was Wilbur by dethndrek · · Score: 5, Funny

    "He liked spiders, and was a pretty stupendous pig."

    --
    -JWR
  15. More Proof that... by sethmeisterg · · Score: 1

    IBM has WAAAAAAAAY too much time on its hands.

    1. Re:More Proof that... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      No, if IBM is deploying this, it means that they have found customers who had WAAAAAAAAY too much money in their hands. And that IBM convinced them that they needed to pay for this technology.

      FTFA:

      Chang said the company has a similar tracking project with a large U.S. retailer that is focused on produce, but IBM can't disclose the customer's name. IBM is deploying similar systems in Vietnam, Thailand, Norway and elsewhere.

      C'mom Slashdot readers in the countries listed above . . . are your pigs tagged? And do you buy pork with pictures . . . ?

      "Hey . . . what's that thing on my ear . . . ?"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:More Proof that... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It's not THAT IBM. It is the local abattoir, I Butcher Meats.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:More Proof that... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      why would someone do this?? this whole 'picture of your food before it was food' thing is utterly pointless. diseases can be effectively tracked if you can tell the source farm of the meat, but there is simply no need to go all the way to individual animals.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  16. This is going to get complex(and long)... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For discrete cuts of meat, the labeling should be simple enough; but some of the more, er, 'waste minimizing' meat products are going to get seriously complex.

    The composition of a given hamburger would probably have to be given as a joint probability density function across a set of hundreds or thousands of animals or something similarly messy. That would give label-readers something to ponder...

    1. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Joehonkie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your hot dog was composed of the pigs, earthworms, and insects pictured below:

    2. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Something like chicken nuggets would be a challenge, but there's nothing stopping processors from making single-animal ground meat and sausage.

    3. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      only low grade hamburger. I usually pick out a roast or set of large steaks and ask the butcher to grind it for me. Tastes far better than the prepackaged garbage "ground beef" or "hamburger"

      If you go to a real butcher, you end up with better meat for the same price.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something like chicken nuggets would be a challenge, but there's nothing stopping processors from making single-animal ground meat and sausage.

      Nothing but competition and economics, that is. Until the market differentiates and demands single-animal composite meats products, economies of scale will benefit operations that don't take the effort.

    5. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Surely they could just tap one of the statistics professors at hamburger university. I imagine that describing the origin of a given nugget in the n-dimensional probability space encompassing all the possible distributions of the various animals on the line at production time would be rather like describing the position of an electron in space: You couldn't actually say where an individual nugget falls; but with knowledge of the production process and the input animals you could model the statistical distribution of where each nugget is more or less likely to fall...

    6. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      "May also contain one of the following: Wilbur Babe Bessy Betsy Gerty ..."

    7. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by khr · · Score: 1

      Something like chicken nuggets would be a challenge, but there's nothing stopping processors from making single-animal ground meat and sausage.

      Then they can probably charge more, sort of like single barrel whisky and things like that...

    8. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I can't even imagine the complexity of graphing the content of a mystery-meat style hotdog: multiple cuts, animals, processing plants, species, segments of time.... perhaps forcing this to be labeled would shift our eating habits back towards higher-quality, more expensive cuts of meat, lowering our overall consumption and reducing the environmental impact of heavy meat consumption.

      It might even make super market meat taste decent over time!

      Therefore, I'm not at all worried about this getting implemented inside the US.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    9. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      single barrel whiskey tastes better, single animal nuggets would taste the same.

    10. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Pope · · Score: 1

      Sorta OT, but there was an interesting article recently on the price of hogs and when McDonalds brings back the McRib, the price has to be within a certain range or they won't do it: http://www.theawl.com/2011/11/a-conspiracy-of-hogs-the-mcrib-as-arbitrage

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      This: http://home.hamelin.us/IMG253.jpg

      Business Costco (the one in Lynnwood, WA) and take home to cut into strips (and a nice little chuck steak for Joe), divide into 1.5lb baggies and freeze. When we want some good burger we just pull a baggie and run it through the KitchenAid grinder (works better frozen.)

      Top grade low-fat burger for the cost of 80/20 on sale. And we know what is in it.

      As you know, you can't go back to the mystery pack after you've tasted this.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    12. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by swb · · Score: 1

      I haven't done that for hamburger as we don't eat enough of it, but I do buy the whole prime NY strips and slice them myself and then vacuum seal into bags of two.

      Its amazing how much cheaper it is, like $6/lb cheaper for Costco prime than luxury grocery store choice.

    13. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the content of a mystery-meat style hotdog: multiple cats ...

      FTFY

    14. Re:This is going to get complex(and long)... by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      across a set of hundreds or thousands of animals

      As a die-hard carnivore, this little quote gave even *me* pause.

      Did you know: one hamburger can contain up to 100 different cows?

      source

      Of course it comes from a vegetarian blog so take it for what it's worth. But if you pause to reflect, it does make sense. Somehow, I just never really thought about it as I bit down into juicy medium-rare burger.

      This hasn't made me a vegetarian by any means, but I do find myself asking where a restaurant's meats are sourced from much more often now. That, and avoiding ground meats more often than not.

  17. Re:Nazi hollerith punch cards to track walking dea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more things change, the more they stay the same...

  18. Don't be surprised if IBM has a patent on this by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    "...you know that these three pieces of pork chop came from pig number 123,' said Paul Chang, who leads global strategy for emerging technologies at IBM. The goal is to control disease outbreaks, but theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating..."

    Would anyone be surprised if IBM has a patent on this? Remember, I am talking about the USPTO here. We've seen that in the past.

    1. Re:Don't be surprised if IBM has a patent on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not... in the European Union this kind of system is very old and is a cornerstone of food safety, quality control and animal disease prevention.

      So in the European Union not all animals are created equal for a very long time....

    2. Re:Don't be surprised if IBM has a patent on this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      How'd you like to be the patent examiner who has to strike down that application because IBM's own work in tracking people from ghetto to oven constituted prior art?

  19. Will it make bacon tastier? by BLToday · · Score: 2

    It would be a waste of technology if it didn't make bacon taste even better.

  20. hotdogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the "came from" list would look like on a package of htodogs.

    1. Re:hotdogs? by Third+Position · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the "came from" list would look like on a package of htodogs.

      Do you really want to see the pictures of the rats and cockroaches you're eating?

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    2. Re:hotdogs? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a can of Spam....

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    3. Re:hotdogs? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a can of Spam....

      Wouldn't be difficult, just take a picture of the floor of the slaughterhouse.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  21. Makes sense by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    They did the same thing in 1930's/40's Germany. I guess the more that things change, the more that they stay the same.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some of those "pigs" were my relatives, you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:Makes sense by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      As somebody that grew up north of Chicago, I can tell you honestly that some of those 'pigs' were relatives of a NUMBER of ppl that I KNEW. I knew a number of ppl with those numbers. Some talked. Some did not. But those that did not had the most ... 'haunted' or 'haunting' eyes that I have ever seen.

      And from German's POV, they treated pigs better than what they treated POWs, jews, etc. The same was true of IBM.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Makes sense by kencurry · · Score: 1

      They were pieces of flair...

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    4. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! You jews never let anything go, do you?

  22. IBM already did this by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But IBM's tech worked with numbers burned on forearms.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:IBM already did this by Johann+Lau · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would like a more stylish ear tag when you start doing this on humans, please.

      oh, not to worry! your concerns have long since been recognized.

      United States Patent 5,878,155

      There have been other methods to permanently identify humans. During the holocaust, the Nazis tattooed the arms of Jews with a unique identifying number. On an episode of the "X-FILES," a fictional television program on the FOX television network, a human was abducted by aliens who conducted experiments on the abductee. In order to permanently tag the abductee, the aliens etched a unique bar code onto one of the abductee's teeth. Neither of these methods is practical for marking humans for electronic sale transaction purposes. First, social conscience dictates that any permanent marking of humans not be conspicuous, such as a visible numbering on an arm like the holocaust victims. Second, the bar code must be long enough, large enough, and accessible enough to make the transaction efficient. Thus bar codes on teeth would not be practical because of the limited size of the teeth and the embarrassment caused by sales personnel placing scanning equipment in a customer's mouth.

      There is, therefore, a need in the art for verifying the identity of humans by electronic means that facilitates the transaction of sales, particularly e-money, through computer networks. It is an object of the present invention to overcome problems in the prior art.

      the problem of the prior art being those permanent markings being conspicuous, and that's it. meditate on that for a second.. and then check out the patent no. 4,597,495 which this one cites as reference. merry christmas!

    2. Re:IBM already did this by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      oh, I replied to the wrong post, sorry ^^

    3. Re:IBM already did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but so far, your mom and your friends have been unable to get you to do that. SO, I have considered how to pursuade you to do it, but I really think that you are not bright enough to realize that you are just a worthless human centipede. Continue eating shit.

    4. Re:IBM already did this by Intron · · Score: 2

      You probably didn't. There's a known bug in the code on this site where replies are mis-parented.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  23. Wont work in the USA. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Americans don't want to see the face of the pig they are eating, In fact most don't want to hear how you kill and process and animal. Putting a photo of the pig on the package will guarantee a drop in sales.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Wont work in the USA. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      Unless of course it says "Rail Gun - HEAD SHOT!"~~~~~~~~>

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    2. Re:Wont work in the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole pig bbq roasts are pretty popular actually and that one ups the idea of a mere photo of the pig's face.

    3. Re:Wont work in the USA. by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      "In fact most don't want to hear how you kill and process and animal"

      Personally, I always get my meat at a know butcher. That's about the only way I can make sure the animal was slaughtered in a civilized way. (meaning not Halal)

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    4. Re:Wont work in the USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preempting the "but, the Jews! Kosher!" reply, just in case.

  24. For Goverment, not for public. by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    The FDA is trying to do something similar here in the U.S. Cost / Benefit and regulating small farmers is the problem.
    They want the data for public health reasons. When there is an outbreak to disease (tuberculosis, salmonella) or contaminated meat the FDA would like to track the outbreak to the source. So, while it is kind of pointless to know where your hamburger came from (the packages in the local supermarket come from 1 or 2), not so much for the public health people.

  25. obligatory by prgrmr · · Score: 1

    Time to meet the meat!

    1. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also obligatory:

      Pig Brother is watching you

  26. and track it back to its facebook page by milindss · · Score: 2

    Track it back to its facebook page and post a message - "You were delicious"

  27. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've been doing this in Europe for quite a few years now...

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Similarly for well over a decade in New Zealand:

      http://foodsafety.govt.nz/industry/exporting/e-cert/

  28. Government Pork.... by kryliss · · Score: 1

    Now that's what they really need to be tracking...

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  29. Prior Art: IBM and Nazi Germany +3, Sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    collaboration.

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year !

    Yours In Osh,
    K. Trou t

  30. You know it's you Babe by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Styx quote: You know it's you Babe!

    'Cause you know it's you babe
    Whenever I get weary
    And I've had enough
    Feel like giving up
    You know it's you Babe
    Givin' me the courage
    And the strength I need
    Please believe that it's true
    Babe, I love you!
    Squeal...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  31. A whole new meaning to the game... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    "This little piggy went to market"

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  32. Re:Nazi hollerith punch cards to track walking dea by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    PETA would have us believe animal farms and nazi death camps are morally equivalent.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  33. Picture and Bio by TheUglyAmerican · · Score: 1

    I think we should do more to honor the creatures we eat. There is no greater sacrifice than for a creature to give its life to sustain the life of another. Instead of the nihilism vegetarians would desire for our fellow creatures, I say we give these creatures life, a good life, then celebrate that life as we dine on their flesh. So yes, give us a picture and bio of our creatures.

    --
    "Written on the pages is the answer to the never ending story..."
    1. Re:Picture and Bio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animals are gross, and stupid - I hate them. I'm vegetarian because I don't want anything to do with filthy, dumb, beasts. Veggies are cute and adorable, so I want to eat them.

    2. Re:Picture and Bio by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that, easier to get Americans to stop shopping at Walmart and spend couple hundred on a DVD player built in the US than something for $50 built in China

  34. Ben & Jerry's did this long ago by AlienSexist · · Score: 2

    Many years ago there was a similar article about Ben & Jerry's ice cream doing the same kind of ingredient-to-finished-product tracking. It described how say, complaints in Cherry Garcia ice cream can be traced by batch # to the source of the cherries, cream, etc to help pinpoint the problem in quality. For a long time people had been wanting things like this for food safety. Past steps to get the ball rolling in the livestock industry are stalled on practical matters such as tagging things like yes.. Individual chickens. The obvious complaint is that it costs too much money for farmers/ranchers to tag all of these animals. Humorously the farmers joke that the politicians want them to tag the chickens in their ears... which chickens do not have.

  35. Gets old... by Junta · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone know that the part of IBM operating in Germany worked with the government of the time helping with some of the most heinous institutionalized in human history. However, there is a good chance you can't find a single person currently in IBM's employ who was even *born* when that was happening. Implying that IBM continues to be a company worthy of scorn even now due to this is not that far off from calling Germany a despicable country. We must never forget and specific examples of how organizations were complicit in the whole thing helps to keep perspective, but in any way implying the IBM of *today* has any blame for what was done by people who have no invlovlement in IBM at all anymore is not productive.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Gets old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The assets held by IBM today can be traced to the profits it made from collaboration with the Nazis.
      It's not like the corporation somehow stopped benefitting from it.
      Sure, most of the people involved are dead now, but a "corporate person" has a much longer lifetime.

    2. Re:Gets old... by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      As somebody that HAS worked for IBM Watson labs, I have no issue with pointing out how bad they are. They were gutted badly and continue down that path.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Gets old... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      gets old, people like you yawning at our outrage over IBM's automation of genocide. How about this, we'll stop when IBM is dead.

    4. Re:Gets old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of today, IBM is still denying it was inovlved, saying "the German government was in control, not us". Details there. Wouldn't it be "smarter" to acknowledge what happened, maybe apologize for it, and then move on?

    5. Re:Gets old... by Junta · · Score: 1

      You'll have to cite specific examples to specific WWII assets they continue to hold onto relevant to the act and profit from, unless you are referring to the fact they had some assets then and therefore the assets they have now are all suspect. One, only part of 'IBM' at the time was under the control of the German government, therefore saying 'the assets' is disingenuous. Two, that sort of argument can be used for pretty much any 'organization' that existed anywhere in the world and even some that were not. For example, US military because they took in German scientists after the war to do things like advance our rocketry technology. Volkswagen's very *existence* happened specifically because Hitler explicitly made it happen, and yet you don't see any discussion referencing VW/Audi break out into 'but but they helped nazis!' You don't see people calling for the German rail system to be dismantled because once upon a time the same organization directly ran the trains responsible. Whatever advances/'wealth'/knowledge gained by Germany during WWII permeate all of society in all sorts of capacities, and I don't quite get the *specific* fascination with IBM.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  36. British Prior Art? by Mendy · · Score: 1

    This sounds very similar to the cattle passport system that was setup in the UK after the BSE outbreak, if taken a stage further. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Cattle_Movement_Service/

  37. Talk about a bad idea... by wfolta · · Score: 1

    "... theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating."

    Yeah, that would sell so many more packages. Reminds me of the friends who decided to raise their own Thanksgiving Turkey. (Who did not get eaten at Thanksgiving, and is now spending its retirement years in the country, at the friends' expense.)

  38. Already done in Australia for custom beef by wdef · · Score: 1

    I believe chefs in Japan can select a cow on the web with details of its history etc. It is then killed, butchered and the meat is shipped to them direct. The beef is specifically bred for Japanese tastes, marbled with fat etc.

  39. Not new. by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just plain old lot tracking?

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Not new. by Existential+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, and this is something practically every industry has been doing for years. It's called MES (Manufacturing Execution System) and is part of any modern automation plant. News I guess because it's China and typically MES has been implemented (if at all) with Humans rather than computers until now.

      MES on a meat plant is interesting BTW. usually a product is built of a number of raw materials, which are tracked into the produced lots. With an animal, you have a single raw material being used as a source of several finished goods. Kind of a reverse process.

  40. ROI by opusbuddy · · Score: 1

    Wow! IBM finally figured out how to make money out of pig painting!

    --
    If this were easy, they wouldn't need us to do it!
  41. Should I Be Worried by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    If the package says "Pork"? With with the quote marks, I mean...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Should I Be Worried by dbc · · Score: 1

      You should be more worried if the package says "food". Really. There are what are called "standards of identity" for various foods, and the labeling rules are very strict (USA-centric comment, obviously). (My wife used to work in the package foods industry, and had frequent conversations with company attorneys about getting package labels approved.) A couple of examples:

      "pasteurized cheese food product" -- Well, it is a product. It isn't cheese at all, it is "cheese food product". It isn't clear to me that it really is food.

      "potted meat food product" -- Read the ingredient list. As I recall, tripe and lips are the first two in some order, followed by other various organ meats.

      So... if it says "food" in the label -- beware. I think it's there just because a normal person might not recognize it as edible.

  42. 1024 by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Dibs on pig 1024.

  43. Delusional "knowledge" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know that these three pieces of pork chop came from pig number 123

    Yeah riiiight...
    You trust about two dozen people, handling all those pigs/pork, labeling them, etc, on saying that they came from pig number 123.
    People in horrible work conditions, who naturally will do trickery if it means they can make some extra money and eat something better than rice with rice tomorrow.
    People who might sell you fake rice made from plastic and cellulose, fake eggs made from the same stuff as flubber, and fake USB drives. (And given their situation, you can't even blame them.)

    Exactly. That's how stupid this sounds It's the "reliable sources" syndrome from Wikipedia all over again.
    Total ignorance of the only guaranteed fact: That you have not observed it for yourself, but rely on "sources", whose trustworthiness is different for different people, and who themselves has an inherent, inevitable filter bias in their senses, their brains, and their communication media.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid!

  44. Re:Nazi hollerith punch cards to track walking dea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had an ad campaign a while back where they equated eating a chicken sandwich to killing someone in the Holocaust.

    When PETA does that, they are actually endorsing the Holocaust. Since there is nothing morally wrong with eating a chicken sandwich, there must be nothing morally wrong with the Holocaust, since they equate the two.

  45. I, an IT worker, also own a pig farm. by hideouspenguinboy · · Score: 2

    We are a small family farm - we raise our pigs outdoors without locking them up. We feed them grain, but also hay, whey from a nearby dairy, and windfall apples from a local orchard. My customers know exactly where their meat comes from, I get more for my product than most farmers do, and they get a savings by buying a far superior product directly from me without having to pay for all the transportation and advertising costs in the supermarket. It's awesome. Seriously - go find a farmer who will let you meet the meat and only by from them forever. You won't regret it.

  46. Big deal by robi5 · · Score: 1

    SAP has been doing it as a matter of course. I don't even see how IBM got into this ERP like task, but I didn't RTFA.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR2ydWY3YNM&feature=youtube_gdata_player

  47. Spoiler alert! by PARENA · · Score: 1

    'you know that these three pieces of pork chop came from pig number 123.' Oh great, they tell you how it ends, in the summary already. Where's the fun in that? :(

    --
    Here's the secret to immortality: ...oh dang, I forgot.
  48. Remeber to remove the tag before cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just waiting for the first lawsuits file by people who don't remove the RFID tags...

  49. Fast food problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you eat at mcdonalds, then they need to post pictures of the 953 animals that you are eating, since they are all mashed together.

  50. Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Style!

    This has been obligatory for all meat exported from Argentina to abroad for very, very long. I think since the early ninetees.

    I'm pretty sure brazil does the same, only with more colorful tags.

  51. Is It Kosher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM already has a heritage of tracking Jews from home to incinerator, so why not track pig flesh from farm to plate?

  52. Best ever patent! by olau · · Score: 1

    Somebody's got a patent on tatooing people with invisible ink. :D

  53. Good by AdamJS · · Score: 2

    I would have to start mailing PETA pictures of my lovely steaks.

  54. IBM used punch cards on humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A recently published book details IBM's role in supplying Nazi's with technology to track humans through their final stage of their lives.

    Hollerith punch cards, hmmm????

    Seriously wtf????

  55. Sure you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't trust your brokerage firm to segregate your money from theirs, and you can't trust the regulators to make sure they do, how can you trust factories and farms in China and the Chinese regulators that those three pork chops really come from pig 123 ( and not from melamine batch 456 ) ???

  56. This by AdamJS · · Score: 1

    This kills the crab/pig.

  57. Can they track the pork in government? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can they track the pork in government?

  58. China food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to eat a single thing from there.
    I have seen it with my own eye.

    I wont even feed dog food to my dog from china.

    Much less my family.
    You better arsenic test every thing.
    The shit is in your rice now.

  59. Pig Defragmentation! by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Keep buying parts, match them on part number and recover the full "frame".

  60. Don't put a picture of the pig on the package! by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    What would you write by the picture?
    Have you seen me? No, and now it's too late! You're never going to see me. Well, not all of me, not in one place.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  61. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in china for a while now and pork aswell as beef are often cause for concern here. The Pigs get fed antibiotics en mass. They sometimes have a fatlayer of 2-3" which is compared to the pigs in germany (1" at MOST) monstrous. I dont know about yankee pigs but i heard they use antibiotics too.

    The good thing is that the farmers wont be able to remain anonym and they maybe start shifting their opinions on AB`s

    Another good thing is that i can finally see the animal while eating it....good times.

  62. Let me know when .... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 2

    Let me know when they start tracking the pork chop from plate to the city sewage treatment plant.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  63. Show me the conditions by mutherhacker · · Score: 1

    Rather than the pig's mugshot, I'm more interested in the conditions the pig lived in it's entire life.

  64. may not work, bad assumption by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    Three words, well know to vietnamese, some other asians, and also some soul food connoisseurs: "picked pigs ear". The body may go one way, and the tagged ears another.

  65. Plastic wrapped meat in China ? Where ? by DV · · Score: 1

    Well that story is all good and nice but except for one place in town here (I'm in China) *nowhere* is meat
    wrapped in plastic. you pick pieces on the stand, handle it, get it cut, but the customer is never gonna see
    any wrapping or label for his meat. And any cooking will be done thoroughly to avoid getting sick !
    Yet another piece of "IT news" absolutely disconnected from reality, don't get to excited !

  66. Noah's Ark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A picture of the pig at the butcher's is fine... but I don't want to see the animal at a (stereotype) Chinese restaurant! :-)

  67. Already being used in Japan by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

    Meat packages have QR codes which link to a complete record any nationally raised "meat" when it was still alive, including the farm it was raised in and medical records. Restaurants started displaying the QR codes prominently when the American BSE scare occurred, and the reception was so good many places display information on all the vegetables as well... though granted the information is not nearly as thorough as the meat.

  68. they should specify that... by Carlo+Castillo · · Score: 1

    ..you can only follow the ear down to the plate.

  69. Everything old is new again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So they finally fond a use for all that Jew tracking software they developed back in the 30s.

    This is a company I can't bring myself in good conscience to invest in. First there's the "billable hours" business model of selling catastrophic, but expensive, IT deployments 700 million here : http://www.govtech.com/health/IBM-and-Indiana-Suing-Each-Other.html 800 million here: http://offthekuff.com/wp/?p=29689

    Then there's the sad recycling of 60s-era AI techniques to a gullible public in the form of first the chess playing Big Blue and more recently the Jeopardy computer, neither of which was as it appeared. The Big Blue had a preternatural advantage over Gary Kasporov in that it could look at Gary's previous games and study his game play while Gary could not do likewise.

    Jeopardy appears to be a computer thinking about just any subject in the world when in fact it's a pile of loose associations in a database with a front end which can parse the highly stereotyped, and therefore highly predictable, style of "speech" Alex Trebeck asks Jeopardy questions in well enough to get at what the what the question is, some form of Find an X with properties (or associations with strength greater than 7 to ) A B and C.

    It is easy to design the questions so they are virtually the same questions to the humans but throw the computer off completely. We had computers doing accurate medical diagnosis (MYCIN) in the 70s with 70s hardware. Puh-lease.

    Then there's that little issue of the Holocaust and Hitler which some people just haven't forgotten. If there was ever a case where a corporate charter should have been revoked on account of moral depravity and a depraved indifference to society's values, this was it. http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/ Long story short: Watson had full knowledge of what was happening and the American headquarters signed off on everything.

    This is what IT becomes when amoral business majors are at the helm and seek profit however they can, through false and misleading representations, through the IT equivalent of cheap parlor tricks, and through mass murder. This is a company whose long term culture is fundamentally irredeemable both morally and technically.

     

  70. All your meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are belong to us.

  71. At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They really will be putting lipstick on a pig.

  72. EU vs. US by DrYak · · Score: 1

    On this side of the pond, we're busy tracking where the things on our dinning plate came from.
    On the other side, you're busy tracking worker/civilians/people.

    To each his priorities.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  73. Re-use by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, in the USA, the same technology will be recycled to help the government track people instead.

    You still won't know what mystery meat went into the burger you're eating, but the government will precisely know all the people who handled it before you, and with whom they were all interacting during the past 2 years.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  74. Take It to the Next Level by hutsell · · Score: 1
    "Ghawth is best when eaten alive."

    FTS ... theoretically this technology could allow a grocer to put a picture on the store package of the pig you are eating.

    --
    Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  75. ThisFish.info tracks seafood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The website, http://www.thisfish.info tracks seafood from ocean to plate. With ThisFish, a consumer can bring home a wild salmon from the supermarket and look up where and when it was caught and by whom. Traceable, transparent food sources.