Slashdot Mirror
Apple Increases Dominance of Mobile Shopping
bdking writes "If you purchased something online from a mobile device in December, there's a 92% chance you used an iPad or iPhone. And if so, you probably spent more money than someone making an online purchase with an Android or a desktop computer."
this statistic seems unlikely.
Apple iPad and iPhone users are found to have had their personal sense of values warped by the Jobs reality distortion field. Retailers are said to be intrigued.
Deleted
I just checked, and I have found that I have a 0% chance of making a purchase using and iPad or iPhone.
With average orders being over $100 what are people buying that they would use a tablet or phone for instead of a desktop?
I have tried ordering a few things uses a smart phone it kind of sucks unless it is a known item.
Android phones are obviously money-saving devices!
FTFA: "iPad and iPhone shoppers account for 90% of all mobile purchases; " Quite a bit different than the summary, eh?
All this means, dear summarizer, is that 90% of all mobile purchases are done by people with iphones. It's no indication that the iphone is dominating anything, except maybe people with money to burn.
[0] - http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-11-15/tech/30400455_1_ios-iphone-smartphone-market
Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
tweeted from my iPad
If you can afford an iPhone 4Gs 64GB (€898.99 in my country, no contract) or an iPad 2 Wi-Fi 64GB ( €719.00), it's evident you have plenty more to spend online.
The amount of money one spends and the amount of money one has aren't inherently linked. I seem to remember reading once that Apple users were more likely to have their accounts overdrawn than others. I'm far too lazy to try and dig that up again, so please feel free to consider it unsourced speculation.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
But if you're an Apple fanboi you've already proven that you like spending lots more money, so why is this news?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
I'd imagine that with the iPad being seen as more of a luxury item and most iPhone users having a bit more disposable income than the 1 cent Android phone owners, it's only natural that this would occur. In other news, Volkswagen owners are 3 times more likely to wear beanies or recycle.
Who would guess that owners of expensive devices marketed for style rather that practicality would be less careful with their money?
"Please connect to our online store using a preferred device" or "To take advantage of our special discount please use the appropriate device"
Not sure if this is it...
http://www.neowin.net/news/one-in-five-iphone-users-constantly-overdrawn
AccountKiller
All merchandisers know that iUsers have more money than sense and price accordingly.
Note: this is not to say that they have a lot of money, but rather that they don't have much sense.
There is a myth that goes something like "Macs are expensive, therefore only the wealthy can afford them.". Not the case - in fact it is the opposite - these people simply do not know how to manage their money.
http://www.neowin.net/news/one-in-five-iphone-users-constantly-overdrawn>
AccountKiller
Apple fans love spending unnecessarily large amounts of money on pointless crap. Film at 11.
Dude, it's the same sites that you shop through... just a different device.
-- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
I like that much better than being the 99%.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
"The majority out there consists of idiots who'll pay more than necessary."
Seems about right.
The amount of money one spends and the amount of money one has aren't inherently linked.
Very true. Read "The Millionaire Next Door".
Use it up
Wear it out.
Make it do.
Or do without
Apple device owners are spendthrifts, Android owners are frugal. And the news is?
Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
Boy, just reading through the comments shows that this article really hit a nerve with the Android "fanbois".
If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
I just bought a cheap 4 gig Philips MP3 player at Radio Shack..cost me $100 and came with an arm band and headphones. The interface sucks, the ergonomics suck, and the colour is boring black...but it was 1/3 of the equivalent ipod (atleast here in Egypt). Anyhow, the only reason why I bought it was because I was having a cheap day and it was a present. Otherwise it would have been Apple premium all the way.
I develop for Android and own a Samsung 10.1" Galaxy (Android) tablet. I know someone who owns an iPad.
Several months ago, I wanted to give them SSH access to a server. So I looked at what iPad had to offer. I could find no free SSH client (as of a few months ago). Not even an ad-supported one. The best I could come up with was a nagware one - it allowed you 500 or so SSH keystrokes and then logged out and asked you to buy the client.
Meanwhile on my Android tablet, I have a free SSH client. It doesn't even have ads, it's open source! ConnectBot. There are other free Android ssh clients as well, but ConnectBot works for me so that's what I know.
Admittedly, I know more about Android than iPad. But the one thing I ever needed from iPad, I couldn't get for free. On Android I could. So which would I want to own more?
And as I said, I develop Android apps. If there was no good free SSH app for Android, I could have developed one. But there was one - ConnectBot. ConnectBot has no ads, but I would have been perfectly happy to have used a free SSH app with ads.
There are many revenue models for applications. Most of the top free apps have various alternative methods of getting revenue - and not just the apps like Facebook or ESPN Sportscenter. Ads are just one method, there's also upselling, and other revenue models.
At the end of the day, the real question is not what's good for the developer, but what's good for the customer? We have a platform that is developer-friendly but not user-friendly, it's called the Linux desktop. I like platforms that are good to developers, but there are many ways Android is good to developers that Apple is not. It costs me $25 for life to publish and Android app, without any application approval process (not $99 to $299 a year like Apple). I can publish the app anywhere, not just Apple's walled garden App Store. I can write and compile my app on Linux, Windows, Mac or whatever - I don't have to buy a Mac and then get Xcode. And it's not no one ever buys Android apps - some apps have made millions of dollars in sales (that we can see - in-app sales, ad revenue etc. is less visible). The revenue model just depends on the particular app.
Amazon is know for quoting different prices for different people. It's also rather easy to identify what platform/browser is being used, unless they are spoofing their info. (But who does that with mobile devices?)
It is possible that Amazon doesn't give iphone/ipad browsers the same price/discount they give to others. Note, this is not an accusation. I have no idea if they are doing that, but it is rather easy to do.
If you want to test this, use a computer (not a mac), to check the prices on some things on Amazon. Don't use an account, you don't want it linked to you personally, just the machine being used. If possible, a machine that has never been to Amazon before would be best, since it wouldn't have any other user data for them to use to mess with the pricing.
(Note, Amazon has been caught giving different prices to new visitors vs returning visitors.)
Then look up the same stuff on and iphone. Again, don't log into an account or anything, just browse to the item.
Are the prices different?
Please tell us your results.
If you can afford an iPhone 4Gs 64GB (€898.99 in my country, no contract) or an iPad 2 Wi-Fi 64GB ( €719.00), it's evident you have plenty more to spend online.
That the average iPhone/iPad owner probably has more money than the average smartphone owner is not news.
That the (relatively small) number of iPhone and iPad owners collectively spend much, much more than the (relatively large) number of other smartphone owners collectively spend is big news.
And in many countries, the iPhone 3GS is free, or available for the price of a Coke, with contract.
Statistics prove it! Also, I've read that Apple users have poor personal hygiene, poor grammar, and they tend to be poorer than Android users at sports involving any kinds of mittens or gloves. They have poor depth perception and have less tolerance to squeaky chalkboard noises. They are congenitally incapable of playing trombones, and as a class of people have flatter arches and more brittle cuticles than their non-walled-garden counterparts. SUCK IT apple-heads, revenge is suh-weeeeeee-et!
They are congenitally incapable of playing trombones
Not anymore! There's an app for that!
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/ibone-the-pocket-trombone/id306629300?mt=8
AccountKiller
You have been iScrewed.
See, this information that Carrier IQ collects is very useful to the folks where it ends up. It is good for retailers to know if you are ordering something from an iPhone/iPad, so they can adjust the price accordingly.
In this case, up. And they know that you will probably buy more expensive stuff, so they can direct more advertising to you.
All this makes the markets and economy more efficient, so this is good for everybody.
Probably.
I think.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
$123 for Apple mobile devices, $101 for Android devices, but $87 for desktop PCs?
Sounds very unlikely, to me, that mobile devices would average more expensive purchases than the desktop, even on average. I guess they don't count all the small apps for Apple devices, and ignore larger purchases typically done from your home PC, like used (an new) cars and hi-fi equipment etc.
Very strange numbers.
If IOS slogan is "There's An App For That" (it really should be "There's An Expensive App For That") Android slogan must be "There's An Free App For That"
And she does all the shopping.
So there.
I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
given that I don't HAVE an iPad, iPod, or iPhone, the chances are closer to 100% (I DO have an Android phone).
Oh, you meant "you" as in everybody averaged? Then use proper grammar.
Get off the couch and go shopping you lazy jerks.
var agent=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();
var is_iphone = ((agent.indexOf('iphone')!=-1);
if (is_iphone) {
price *= 10;
}
FYI, google maps and navigation is hardly illegitimate.
That's all network based though. TomTom, and various other nav apps carry the maps with you on-device - so when service gets spotty you still have navigation.
Network based maps are fine for city use but for longer road trips (especially in less populated states or along lots of side roads) it's a must to have a real navigation application. On any device.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Still, sometimes a special-purpose device is a better match. ("works" and "works well" are often worlds apart.)
The thing is almost no devices fall into the "works well" category. Applications on a phone can however reach that status, because software can become excellent in a way a dedicated device fails to reach.
I have GPS in the car, because it's better suited than a phone for long trips.
I REALLY prefer Navigon or TomTom iPhone software to a few different dedicated GPS devices I have had.
I have an MP3 player because it's easier to use without looking at the display.
If you have inline controls with an iPhone/Touch you don't need to look at it either - just click to advance/pause/go back. Or even better, use one of the many car integration solutions.
I'm not worried about conserving my phone battery on long trips where I may not have access to an outlet for a long time
That made no sense to me. A USB adaptor for a lighter plug is what, $5? Then the phone just stays charged. I have a dashboard cradle for the iPhone (really universal, not tailored to any device) and it works great at holding maps up for display and also having someplace I can run a charging cable to for ease of use.
I have a kindle because the eink display is much nicer for reading
That is one area where I think a dedicated device is truly an improvement because eInk is hardware you cannot replicate with software.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
probably spent more money than the equivalent purchase on Android / computer?
I'd believe it. If you purchase through an app, the prices displayed are at the mercy of the provider. I once tried to price match Amazon's prices on its iOS app vs amazon.com .. you'd be surprised. I'd swear they were manipulating their prices based on what device you were viewing it from.
A lot of people here in Germany use debit cards, not credit cards: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debit_card#Germany
And since I can't pay with my debit card -- that I can use in the whole EU --, I don't buy anything.
PC users are probably more likely to use multiple stores for their needs. So an iOS user or Android user files a single purchase for $400, a PC user files 4 for $100 each (or more likely, $95 average each, saving $20).
Does this study take into account the number of people buying ebooks from their e-ink devices? There are an awful lot of Kindles, Nooks, and Kobos out there (Sonys too, but I don't think they let you buy books directly off the device).