Slashdot Mirror


Raspberry Pi Has Gone To Manufacturing

alecclews writes "After weeks of waiting, the Raspberry Pi foundation, who are creating a $25 computer to bootstrap computing education, has flipped the switch on manufacturing. They had wanted to build the board in the UK but it turns out to be uneconomic."

374 comments

  1. Not vapourware! by isCreeper($('Ssss')) · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After all of the accusations of vapourware, it's nice that they're actually making these.

    1. Re:Not vapourware! by thelonesun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want you to try to make a 25$ x86 computer. No pressure. Go ahead.

    2. Re:Not vapourware! by tomarq · · Score: 2

      Oh wow... such obvious flamebait. I dub the... troll.

    3. Re:Not vapourware! by sirsnork · · Score: 0

      It's not x86, it's ARMv6

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    4. Re:Not vapourware! by thelonesun · · Score: 2

      He's complaining about it not having windows support, I'm saying that he should make one if he wants one with windows support.

    5. Re:Not vapourware! by hawguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if you did create a $25 x86 computer that could run Windows, you'd have to add $100 for the Windows License.

    6. Re:Not vapourware! by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Well, everything is vaporware, until it isn't.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Not vapourware! by thelonesun · · Score: 2

      Spend double and you've got a crappy prebuilt from an OEM that will satisfy most needs without going through the "trouble" of installing windows. So even if it's possible, it's not profitable or even useful.

    8. Re:Not vapourware! by PRMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      1. Install DOSBox on your Raspberry Pi.

      2. Install Windows 95/98 in DOSBox. Windows 95 on DosBox guide.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    9. Re:Not vapourware! by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Except the Optimus Maximus keyboard. It was vaporware even AFTER it was released.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    10. Re:Not vapourware! by weirdo557 · · Score: 5, Informative

      about $54 dollars http://www.bifferos.co.uk/ but proof that x86 can be done. i for one still root for the raspberry pi though, can't wait to order one.

    11. Re:Not vapourware! by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      sure.. if you like a slideshow.

    12. Re:Not vapourware! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      how is it crappier than NT or osx?

    13. Re:Not vapourware! by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whether it is "vapor" or not, if they are still going to ship with only Lin-sux and no proper OS (Windows or OS X) support, then the project is going to nose dive anyway.

      Of all the computers that handled your message between your own computer and the slashdot servers, how many were running what you call a "proper OS"?

      I bet that even the router in your own house doesn't run Windows.

    14. Re:Not vapourware! by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      They have already sold and shipped 8 units on ebay, for charity. Yes, for more than $25.

      For the next 20 hours or so you can bid on one yourself.

    15. Re:Not vapourware! by hawguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      but can you run any supported version of Windows with 150Mhz CPU, 32MB of RAM and 8MB of Flash? (even ignoring the fact that it has no display)

      Aside from Windows CE or Mobile (which I don't think is what the OP was asking for), I think Windows XP embedded has the lowest system requirements of any supported version of Windows, and its got the same base requirements as XP Pro:

      Pentium 233-megahertz (MHz) processor or faster (300 MHz is recommended)
      At least 64 megabytes (MB) of RAM (128 MB is recommended)
      At least 1.5 gigabytes (GB) of available space on the hard disk
      CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive
      Keyboard and a Microsoft Mouse or some other compatible pointing device
      Video adapter and monitor with Super VGA (800 x 600) or higher resolution

    16. Re:Not vapourware! by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know, seriously. We need Windows on this. What will I do without 5 minute start-up times and without having to restart the thing twice per day??? My crochet work will seriously suffer. Also I am going to be pissed if I get one of these and I do not have 25 pieces of crap-ware I have to remove before the computer becomes usable. Those crap-ware cleanings are an integral part of my budhist training.

      And wait. What happens after I own it for a while? Will it slowly slow down and degrade until I have to buy a new one after a year? Or will it run just fine like I hear those "Lin-sux" computers do. Are you telling me I might be using the same computer for many years? What are we, savages?

    17. Re:Not vapourware! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0, Troll

      They have already sold and shipped 8 units on ebay, for charity. Yes, for more than $25.

      The current bid is £3,500.00, and it's a bit disingenuous to say it's for "charity", it's to support the Raspberry Pi Foundation, i.e. themselves. Though the proceeds obviously *do* go to a good cause.

      As well, these are clearly *NOT* from a production run.

      This sort of thing does not really qualify as "shipped".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    18. Re:Not vapourware! by oztiks · · Score: 3, Funny

      Err.... isn't the standard /. pun "yes but does it run linux?" now what? "yes but does it run windows?"

      For $25 and Linux focused I'm sure Android and Chrome will work just fine. As for OSX, are you talking about making a Hackintosh? please, Apple only supports its own handful of devices/vendors so much to infer your comment must be nothing more than a joke! If you said (f/o/n)BSD then perhaps you'd get my vote.

    19. Re:Not vapourware! by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 2

      You're assuming that Microsoft are the only people who provide an OS for x86. Don't do that.

    20. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe the word you're looking for is "thee".
      As in : "I dub thee...unread".

    21. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...and no proper OS (Windows ...

      Did you just claim an OS that can't even eject a USB drive, a proper OS???
      Bahahaha!

      I think you misspelled 4chan and accidentally ended up on this website. You should reboot your computer to fix your bookmarks and try again.

    22. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The Raspberry Pi Foundation is a UK registered charity (Registration Number 1129409)"
        - http://www.raspberrypi.org/sample-page

    23. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, I can't believe you just said Windows Phone. Is that even still alive?

    24. Re:Not vapourware! by froggymana · · Score: 3, Funny

      1. Install DOSBox on your Raspberry Pi.

      2. Install Windows 95/98 in DOSBox. Windows 95 on DosBox guide.

      3. ?????

      4. PROFIT!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    25. Re:Not vapourware! by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      I only like slideshows if they feature random PowerPoint transitions (with sound effects).

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    26. Re:Not vapourware! by Nethead · · Score: 0

      IOS is a proper operating system.

      (So is JunOS.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    27. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi Foundation is a charity. The proceeds are benefitting the Raspberry Pi Foundation. It's not disingenuous to say the proceeds are benefitting a charity.

      I agree that this sort of thing does not qualify as shipped.

    28. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that 1995 and 1998 are 17 and 14 years ago, respectively, yes? That the platform has advanced somewhat since the (quite deserved) death of the 9x kernel and re-basing everything on the NT kernel?

    29. Re:Not vapourware! by swalve · · Score: 1

      It might work good, but it is unintuitive as hell.

    30. Re:Not vapourware! by swalve · · Score: 1

      Huh?

    31. Re:Not vapourware! by Nethead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just what I need, Clippy asking if I need help setting up a BGP peer. :)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    32. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi Foundation is a registered UK charity.

      If the Charity sells some boards from a pre-production run, then by definition, the sale is for charity. There's no disingenuity about it. And the high bids are explained by the allotted serial numbers. Just suppose the Raspberry Pi does take off. How much do you think a single digit serial number board will be worth then? Speculation may be driving the eBay bidding but in the end, the benefit goes back to the Foundation.

      Which is a charity.

    33. Re:Not vapourware! by vinehair · · Score: 1

      ...and no proper OS (Windows ...

      Did you just claim an OS that can't even eject a USB drive, a proper OS??? Bahahaha!

      ...sure Windows can. It's called 'Safely Remove Hardware'.

    34. Re:Not vapourware! by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Windows XP had a lot of issues with removable drives. I have a couple of dozen of them assigned to specific drive letters, and nine times out of ten when I went to remove them I'd get the 'busy' message and I'd have to restart the PC to get them out safely. (These were critical backups, and the idea of pulling them out without a safe removal wasn't really an option.)

      Each time it happened I discovered XP had automagically ticked 'enable system restore' on these removable drives. I'd untick it, again, and back it would come next time. It's bad enough waiting for a backup to complete so I can leave the house, but having to do a complete restart of the system each time was too much.

      Would you believe this was the ONLY reason I upgraded to Windows 7?

    35. Re:Not vapourware! by fatphil · · Score: 1

      If they were counting down from 10 to 1, and only 2 and 1 are still on sale, then it looks like they've shipped 8, at least.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    36. Re:Not vapourware! by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I want you to try to make a 25$ x86 computer. No pressure. Go ahead.

      There are numerous off-the-shelf ARM / MIPS based SoCs for under $15 and I assume the Broadcom BCM2835 would be under that price too especially given Broadcom's prominent involvement with the project. So it's not hard to see how the bill of materials for the model A device could be $25 and the model B $35.

      It is an attractive price to be sure and the project deserves to attract enormous community interest.

    37. Re:Not vapourware! by shitzu · · Score: 1

      Maybe its worth mentioning that Pi is not x86. It is ARM

    38. Re:Not vapourware! by lucidlyTwisted · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, oft to get the error message:
      "Something is using the drive but I'm not going to tell you what and I am not going to even let you force the matter. You'll have to close all applications, then I may deign to let you have the device back. Maybe not. You'll have to reboot me, sucker. Bu-wa-ha-ha-ha-ha!"

      Windows holding on to USB devices is a bloody PITA. Sure, I can find the lock after a bit of process inspection but I'd hardly call that intuitive.

    39. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty dumb to have posted something that incredibly dumb, troll or not. But, rejoice! There are many books and Internet sites available that can help cure people like you of your terrible condition through a process called "learning".

    40. Re:Not vapourware! by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      No, I can't believe it. The other thing that is hard to believe is that after you had already been burned once by that brand that you went back and bought it again. You'd think that some people would learn from their experiences but that is not always the case. " Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    41. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      iOS is based on Mac OSX, OSX is based on Darwin, Darwin is based on Unix. Do your research before you start spouting out utter shit.

    42. Re:Not vapourware! by Sparrow1492 · · Score: 1

      . . .without having to restart the thing twice per day???

      While I generally agree with you here, can we please finally stop perpertuating this problem from 10 years ago? My windows box runs just fine for weeks on end with no problems.

    43. Re:Not vapourware! by vinehair · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, oft to get the error message: "Something is using the drive but I'm not going to tell you what and I am not going to even let you force the matter. You'll have to close all applications, then I may deign to let you have the device back. Maybe not. You'll have to reboot me, sucker. Bu-wa-ha-ha-ha-ha!"

      Windows holding on to USB devices is a bloody PITA. Sure, I can find the lock after a bit of process inspection but I'd hardly call that intuitive.

      If you don't know what your computer is doing and why it would be writing to a removable device then that's your own failing. Linux does that just the same too - ever seen 'Device or resource busy'? No help there. Allowing you to force unmount is not a safe thing to do for casual users - you need to know what you're doing and be prepared to accept the consequences of a mistake.

      Windows is perfectly fine here if you use and maintain it correctly, and part of that is not installing random background running applications that keep hitting the filesystem and not leaving programs open with files on the device you're trying to eject(!) Explorer windows count as a program in this case. Thumbnail services etc.

      If you still have a problem with it and your current solution is a more manual method, just go with something like Lockhunter. Works fine for this situation. Installing a separate utility for this task is another (valid) complaint entirely, in that Windows really never comes with an easy toolchain out of the box. Lockhunter just provides the same functionality as Linux's lsof, so it's worth having.

    44. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but can you run any supported version of Windows...

      I hope not. There'd be no room left for anti-malware software...let alone storage space for all of the malware.

    45. Re:Not vapourware! by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm cynical about charities. It seems that whenever you put people in charge of a pile of money, they find a way to use it for themselves.

    46. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linux and mac osx are both based on unix... they work (in many cases, not all) identical from my perspective (the bash window, command window, whatever you want to call it)

      windoze from microshaft is the only one that doesn't fit that mold... and fails horribly at it

    47. Re:Not vapourware! by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Even if you did create a $25 x86 computer that could run Windows, you'd have to add $100 for the Windows License.

      No shit, Sherlock.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every one box that runs microshaft properly(err without problems plaguing the system) there are 10+ that don't, both of mine run properly for weeks on end, but I know around 20 more that crash every 5 or so minutes...

      As a side note, I did have to install both my machines from an OEM disk before I even thought about configuration.

    49. Re:Not vapourware! by daid303 · · Score: 1

      Half those stats and I'm still running linux without problems. 48Mhz PowerPC, 16MB ram, 4MB flash. It's tight on flash space (new boards have 16MB) but other then that it runs pretty good.

    50. Re:Not vapourware! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      . . .without having to restart the thing twice per day???

      While I generally agree with you here, can we please finally stop perpertuating this problem from 10 years ago? My windows box runs just fine for weeks on end with no problems.

      I need to restart mywife's Windows 7 laptop at home at least once a week for various updates to take effect. Not the same thing as it crashing, I know, but still annoying.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    51. Re:Not vapourware! by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he is adding audio tracks over the original sounds from the troll.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    52. Re:Not vapourware! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Windows on an ARM device... wtf.. I'm tired of these fucking Microsoft employees posting on slashdot.

      You think you're cool because you surf tech sites and know everything about windows server 2008, but in reality you know jack shit.

    53. Re:Not vapourware! by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of the thread.

      The AC troll said that the product only runs Linsux (His words). The troll feeders pointed out that Windows doesn't run on an Arm. Then the thread moved on to an x86 board, now you are saying that other os's run on an x86 which is irrelevant because there isn't one.

      At the end of the day, Windows will never be in a space where a complete onboard puter system costs $25 because it's less than the OS license.

      It does raise an interesting issue. When SOC's cost next to nothing, where will Microsoft be?

    54. Re:Not vapourware! by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Ahh. OK, no grammar Nazi here, I really did not understand what he said.

    55. Re:Not vapourware! by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Sometimes people need Windows.

      Sad but true.

      I have Windoze 7 installed because I need to use AutoCAD occasionally and I need big memory.

      Were it not for that I wouldn't use it at all.

    56. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so they're like IKEA?

    57. Re:Not vapourware! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what your computer is doing and why it would be writing to a removable device then that's your own failing.

      I'm not the original poster and i've never had issues with removable media that I couldn't find an application to blame for (some apps seem to keep files open even after the user has "closed" the visible representation of the file in the program). I'd bet very few users really know what is running in the background on their computer and what it is doing. Windows is worse because apps tend to be closed source and not filtered by a distro but even on linux do you really know the exact details of how every program you have installed behaves?

      And afaict a file open for read is more than enough to prevent unmouning a partition on both windows and linux. It doesn't need to be writing it.

      Linux does that just the same too - ever seen 'Device or resource busy'? No help there. Allowing you to force unmount is not a safe thing to do for casual users - you need to know what you're doing and be prepared to accept the consequences of a mistake.

      If the OS lets the user force unmount then at least the FS gets the opertunity to shut down cleanly even if the app doesn't. If the OS doesn't let the user force unmount and the user pulls the plug anyway then neither the FS or the app gets to shut down cleanly.

      Though as you say linux isn't really much better No OS i'm aware of has proper handling for notifying users and their applications of WHY their unmounts are failing.

      And I found out the hard way that lsof won't tell you if the kernel itself has the file open. I spent ages trying to figure out why I couldn't unmount a partition before finally realising it was because I had an iso image on the partition loopback mounted.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    58. Re:Not vapourware! by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure of the version you are using but some seem to work under WINE http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=86

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    59. Re:Not vapourware! by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure of the version you are using but some seem to work under WINE http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=86

      I use the latest version, whatever that may be. I need to sort out mapping data that comes in from customers all over the world. And some of it is pretty crappy.

      Fortunately I don't need to do this often, a few times a year. It isn't worth the effort to spend more time than I already do fussing about with WINE.

      But thanks for the suggestion.

    60. Re:Not vapourware! by Saintwolf · · Score: 0

      UNIX and Linux are basically the same thing! UNIX is just a set of standards for an operating system. Linux is a kernel implemented using the UNIX standards. So unless Darwin is based on the original System V (Which is isn't FYI), you can fuck right off.

    61. Re:Not vapourware! by makomk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure 486-class hardware is even supported by most Linux distros these days, especially no-FPU chips like the Bifferboard.

    62. Re:Not vapourware! by makomk · · Score: 1

      Though as you say linux isn't really much better No OS i'm aware of has proper handling for notifying users and their applications of WHY their unmounts are failing.

      I think KDE 3.5 used to use fuser internally to tell you which applications were holding the device open in the error message. Unfortunately that feature got lost in one of the many internal changes; probably one of the one's caused by Gnome's NIH syndrome actually.

    63. Re:Not vapourware! by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      Obviously Linux is no proper OS as evidenced by the dozens of desktops, laptops and other little projects like Android phones and TiVo.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    64. Re:Not vapourware! by harrkev · · Score: 1

      You mentioned "Does it run Linux?" Does it? Really?

      I know that it CAN run Linux. However, looking on their home page, I do not see any sort of link to download an ISO image, or any sort of software to make a properly-formatted SD card.

      As it seems now, this device is great for people who know how to cross-compile to ARM, and make their own distros. For somebody who just wants to write a SD card and boot into a desktop, it looks like there is still some work to be done.

      If I am wrong, please post a link to the download page.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    65. Re:Not vapourware! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Last I heard the tools for preparing the SD card image had not been released because they were still in discussions with broadcom about the details of distribution licensing for the GPU blob needed to boot the thing (it's a somewhat strange setup, the GPU boots first and then loads the kernel for the CPU). As with most arm SOCs the build of the kernel will probablly be pi specific but the rest of the distro should be pretty standard.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    66. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you get a crappy prebuilt for 25 bucks let me know.

    67. Re:Not vapourware! by vinehair · · Score: 1

      I'm not the original poster and i've never had issues with removable media that I couldn't find an application to blame for (some apps seem to keep files open even after the user has "closed" the visible representation of the file in the program). I'd bet very few users really know what is running in the background on their computer and what it is doing. Windows is worse because apps tend to be closed source and not filtered by a distro but even on linux do you really know the exact details of how every program you have installed behaves?

      And afaict a file open for read is more than enough to prevent unmouning a partition on both windows and linux. It doesn't need to be writing it.

      It is pretty interesting how Microsoft neglected to make it more intuitive since its introduction in XP (or was it 2000? I do not recall.) As another poster noted there's partly some of the functionality there in Linux but it's not hooked up to any current GUI properly. A real pity. And you are correct, just holding a file open for reading is a blocker in both cases, which is what actually catches most people out.

      If the OS lets the user force unmount then at least the FS gets the opertunity to shut down cleanly even if the app doesn't. If the OS doesn't let the user force unmount and the user pulls the plug anyway then neither the FS or the app gets to shut down cleanly.

      Though as you say linux isn't really much better No OS i'm aware of has proper handling for notifying users and their applications of WHY their unmounts are failing.

      And I found out the hard way that lsof won't tell you if the kernel itself has the file open. I spent ages trying to figure out why I couldn't unmount a partition before finally realising it was because I had an iso image on the partition loopback mounted.

      Didn't realise that about lsof, that's good to know.

    68. Re:Not vapourware! by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      You can add me to the list of people anxiously awaiting release of Raspberry Pi. What a brilliant concept.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    69. Re:Not vapourware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't project. Lots of charities are run by selfless people.

    70. Re:Not vapourware! by xilefone1 · · Score: 1

      I hope it comes pre-loaded with AOL.

    71. Re:Not vapourware! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant, I say! You can still run the majority of Windows applications on Windows 98.

      Of course, the OP was joking, anyway. I'm surprised you didn't pick up on the blatantly obvious subtleties.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    72. Re:Not vapourware! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      You have to keep in mind that Linux *does* break the UNIX mould here and there, though. I forget where because my memory sucks. I believe "everything is a file" was one rule that's bended a bit.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    73. Re:Not vapourware! by CoolBru · · Score: 1

      OS X has BSD roots and is an officially certified UNIX. Linux is not.

  2. Excellent news! by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To Eben, Liz and crew: Congratulations! Looking forward to watching you revolutionize computer education!

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    1. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Douchebag troll alert.

      They don't have to "revolutionize" education. If they don't go broke and any number of people can afford to play with this computer where before they couldn't afford one, it's a win.

      Now kindly fuck-off with your bullshit attitude.

    2. Re:Excellent news! by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      ||since tens of you askig...
      |tens of people! Wow, that's like... the whole world!

      Could not tens of people be a typo for tons,
      Also he could mean tens. What's so bad about that. we speak of dozens of people but dozens are not really that good of a number in the geeks mind it should be metric, thus tens.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    3. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The geek version:

      "We've had 2^10s of people asking!"

    4. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, they certainly don't have to. The point is that the people claiming they will are full of shit since this will never been heard of outside of basement dwellers.

    5. Re:Excellent news! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's not the same people every day which would suggest that it would be between 1k and 2k people.

    6. Re:Excellent news! by Anrego · · Score: 2

      While I honestly don't see the whole revolutionizing computer education thing .. I still think this is going to be an awesome board with all kinds of uses. I can't wait to get my hands on one (or inevitably many) of these.

    7. Re:Excellent news! by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      and of course 'professionals' like yourself would never stoop to such unprofessional fallacies like ad hominems...

    8. Re:Excellent news! by h00manist · · Score: 2

      They don't have to "revolutionize" education.

      Seems established that revolutionizing education with computer hardware access, in developed countries where pretty much everyone has access to computers, didn't revolutionize education.

      Maybe the real education system has to be software. Maybe revolutionizing education really is just resolving to actually do it, hard work, and discipline. Maybe good tools just help teachers - and we will always need good teachers to get good students.

      --
      Build your own energy sources from scratch. http://otherpower.com/
    9. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this will never been heard of outside of basement dwellers.

      Well you've heard of it. Try not to project.

    10. Re:Excellent news! by swalve · · Score: 1

      That's hundreds. 2 ^ 7 is tens.

    11. Re:Excellent news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gonna revolutionise computer education in my house.

    12. Re:Excellent news! by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 2

      News just in: School ICT to be replaced by computer science programme

      *albeit, it's a Government announcement without, it seems, any thought to how to implement it practically. But never-the-less, things might be looking up!

    13. Re:Excellent news! by neiljt · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Maybe the timing is good for kids in the UK too.

    14. Re:Excellent news! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Douchebag troll alert. They don't have to "revolutionize" education. If they don't go broke and any number of people can afford to play with this computer where before they couldn't afford one, it's a win. Now kindly fuck-off with your bullshit attitude.

      The GGP used the word "revolutionize" first. Criticizing a ridiculously hyperbolic statement is neither douchebaggery nor trolling.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  3. Can't wait to buy one of these... by s0litaire · · Score: 1

    Bit annoyed that it's not made in the UK.

    But at least it's not VapourWare,

    Wonder how many of the other "USB PC's" will actually get into production...

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      direct your annoyance at the uk government which taxes components being imported, but not completed devices.

      chances are they would tax completed devices as well thou..

    2. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      looks like they tax both, it is just that the cumulative tax on the components is far higher than the tax on the completed device.

    3. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wonder how many of the other "USB PC's" will actually get into production...

      What are the other "USB PCs" you are referring to?

    4. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by kerohazel · · Score: 2

      Could be talking about the CuBox (http://www.solid-run.com/products/cubox) which wikipedia tells us has begun shipment.

      Actually, yeah, which USB PCs?

      --
      Skype is too convoluted... Now I'm reverse-engineering the Kyoto Protocol.
    5. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      fuck are you talking about?

      a broken tax system is no use to business or "leftists".

      i'm sorry the $25 computer people haven't saved the world yet.

    6. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by bingbangboom · · Score: 1

      Bit annoyed that it's not made in the UK.

      But at least it's not VapourWare,

      Who cares? Have China pump out volumes for version 1, while the UK makes version 2 prototypes; China then makes V2 while the UK can start on V3.

      Still vaporware until it's in your hands.

    7. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How does that work? If you import two items at $10 each and assemble them, is the tax greater on the two $10 items greater than the tax on the final item at $25? I've looked at some similar rules for countries that have VAT//GST and they tax the $10 items at exactly the same rate as the $25 item, so the cumulative tax would be the same.

    8. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by qxcv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bit annoyed that it's not made in the UK.

      Why? Manufacturing them overseas lowers the price and makes them more accessible to students. IIRC the Raspberry Pi Foundation's stated goal is to teach children programming, not to bolster a failing industry at the expense of educators and hobbyists.

      --
      "The most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough." -- Eric S. Raymond
    9. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      differnet import taxes for different goods. say import tax on "electronic device" type of goods is 2%, but for "electronic component" it's 10% - so you import - say - one (completed) device worth 20$ for 2% taxes (=0,4$) or dozens of components worth combined 10$ for 10% (=1,0$)....

    10. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not VAT. VAT, as you point out is just a percentage of the price (so importing assembled goods you'd pay more VAT).

      It's Customs duty:

      Customs duty is a tax charged on importation of goods produced outside the European Union (EU). [...]

      Customs Duty is charged as a percentage of the total value of the goods - that is the sterling equivalent of the price paid abroad.

      To work out the percentage, each type of product is given a 'commodity code'. This tells you what the Customs Duty rate percentage is for that particular product, based on whether it's being imported or exported.

      There are around 14,000 different classifications. The duty rate percentage for each may vary according to the country the goods come from. The average percentage is between 5 and 9 per cent, but it can be as low as 0 per cent or as high as 85 per cent.

      To find out the Customs Duty rate for a product you can contact HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) VAT Helpline or the Customs, International Trade & Excise enquiries.

      The UK customs duty appears to be based on the EU TARIC, so the choice of rates on particular goods may not be up to the UK (alone) to decide.

      The TARIC database is online at http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/dds2/taric/taric_consultation.jsp?Lang=en#

      An assembled Rasberry Pi is probaly an "8471":

      SECTION XVI MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL APPLIANCES; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; PARTS THEREOF; SOUND RECORDERS AND REPRODUCERS, TELEVISION IMAGE AND SOUND RECORDERS AND REPRODUCERS, AND PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF SUCH ARTICLES

      CHAPTER 84 NUCLEAR REACTORS, BOILERS, MACHINERY AND MECHANICAL APPLIANCES; PARTS THEREOF

      8471 Automatic data-processing machines and units thereof; magnetic or optical readers, machines for transcribing data onto data media in coded form and machines for processing such data, not elsewhere specified or included

      I'm not sure where components are - it's a real mish-mash.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    11. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      (Instructions for using TARIC can be found at http://www.sloanefox.freeserve.co.uk/taric.htm, some of the links seem out of date and it's got a bit of UK Europhobe editorialising, but it gives an idea of how to use it),

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    12. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Dan+Dankleton · · Score: 1

      They want to help bring Britain back to the forefront of computer technology again (they have mentioned this on their website, but it's not the Foundations main goal.)

      The main way they are planning to do this is by being an enabling technology for teaching children programming, but bolstering the manufacturing industry was a part of what they wanted to do. Manufacturing as an industry isn't failing as can be seen by the Far East, but in the UK it is in trouble and the Foundation was hoping to help.

    13. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      How does that work? If you import two items at $10 each and assemble them, is the tax greater on the two $10 items greater than the tax on the final item at $25? I've looked at some similar rules for countries that have VAT//GST and they tax the $10 items at exactly the same rate as the $25 item, so the cumulative tax would be the same.

      You're looking at the wrong tax. Raspberry Pi are talking about import duty, which varies depending on what sort of thing you're importing. My guess is that if you write "electronic components" on the import duty form, you get charged rather more than if you write "computers". And until they're assembled, they're components, not computers.

    14. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by lordholm · · Score: 1

      One of the fundamental parts of the Union is the customs union. Essentially, import tariffs are set centrally by Brussels (they are levied by the states, who pay parts of it to the EU).

      So it is not that the UKs levies appears to be based on the TARIC database, they are actually identical, without changes.

      The article was not clear on whether or not it was an import tariff or some tax deduction, but in the first case, the competence to change the rules lie exclusively in Brussels.

      This would be a perfect, probably very cheap way for the Commission to stimulate the economy, that is by making local manufacturing cheaper. I would guess that they are aware of this and are discussing this, the article seems to suggest that at least.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    15. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      But, as some AC points out lower down, reading the TARIC database, or the UK customs copy at http://tariff.businesslink.gov.uk/tariff-bl/export/heading.html?export=false&simulationDate=11/01/12&id=8542000000&additionalCode1=&additionalCode2=&additionalCode3=&countryCode= seems to show that the duty on imported electronic components is 0%.

      So what exactly is the problem?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    16. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by lordholm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just saw that, however, it seems that materials to produce PCBs are levied 6.5% tariffs, I cannot find data for just a bare PCB, but I would not be surprised that the issues are the PCBs.

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    17. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Bit annoyed that it's not made in the UK.

      Manufacturers are The Rich, and the Rich are 1% and the 1% must be crushed.

      Thus, in the Leftists' mad desire to destroy capitalism, they destroy the working man's job and the tax revenue stream that transfers money to council housing dolers.

      I think someone's been giving you the wrong dosage of your medications again.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The main way they are planning to do this is by being an enabling technology for teaching children programming

      Access to computer hardware is not what is stopping UK kids learning programming. Most families have some sort of computer nowadays, and anyway you can get one secondhand for less than a hundred quid that would be fine to learn on. Schools all have lots of computers to use too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    19. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Well, that sounds wierd enough to be true.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    20. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Highly unlikely. I know what they look like and dose them out myself weekly into a dispenser, and the side effects of improper dosage are pretty apparent.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    21. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Simple. Like the poster says, they tax components at a higher rate than complete items. Taxes and import/export tariffs are generally a hodge-podge of protectionist legislations: The government wants to bolster local chip fabrication, so they slap a tariff on imported components. Or they enter a trade negotiation with another country, and lower taxes on items from that country. Sometimes these tariffs and taxes survive long after the situation or industry they are set up to protect have dissipated.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    22. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but $25 PC boards enables a lot of experimentation beyond using MS Word or whatever, which is really a gateway to REAL computer science / engineering.

      Experimentation is really the key to building enthusiasm and really developing skills. When I started becoming excited about computers it wasn't because somebody gave me a copy of a word processor. It was more stuff like this:
      10 PRINT "HI! ";
      20 GOTO 20

      And the amusing thing is I wonder what percentage of kids with CS degrees today could correctly predict the output of that... :)

    23. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syntax error at line 10 because of the semicolon, right?

    24. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by bmsleight · · Score: 1

      Look very nice, about $50 too much for me, but very nice.

    25. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by CrazyBusError · · Score: 1

      I think you just proved his point.

      (No, it's not a syntax error, by the way)

      --
      -Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience-
    26. Re:Can't wait to buy one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for one of the UK companies bidding on the manufacturing. It was the labour cost, not the material, that was too high.

  4. Here's hoping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I'll luck out and get one of the first 10,000. There's going to be a mad dash on their sales page when they finally start selling them.

    1. Re:Here's hoping by CodeReign · · Score: 0

      I saw this on kick starter the day it was first announced. kinda kicking myself now. Also the Bluetooth sniffer :(

  5. Ding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world has just changed.

  6. Geek solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is a geek solution to a perceived problem. Cheap computers won't revolutionise anything, because we have an entrenched culture of anti-intellectualism. With the US and UK being about as bad as each other.

    1. Re:Geek solution by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Depends on the root problem. The anti-intellectualism could simply be a defense mechanism adopted by people who perceive that things like computing and higher education are not available to them, and so adopt an attitude that what they cannot have is undesirable anyway. If you change this perception, they might begin to abandon the attitude.

    2. Re:Geek solution by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      so how would you go about un-entrenching it?

      this is as good a move as any. it's probably more geared toward people that want to geek out but can't afford to. not exactly the USA and UK, though it certainly doesn't exclude them.

    3. Re:Geek solution by symbolset · · Score: 2

      There's a good chance the motivation is financial. As in IT people threatened by their charges becoming disposable. Or software developers well aware their software is incompatible. Moderation on Rpi threads has gotten brutal, and so now most everybody posts AC.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:Geek solution by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Honestly, wrap something like this up in a cheap case and sell it like they sell Rokus and you should be able to do something about that. For the things that people actually do like surf the web and do email this would probably be sufficient.

    5. Re:Geek solution by Anrego · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree, but I still think it will be a great product for many geeks (including myself).

      It'll be interesting to see how long the market lasts however. Once everyone who wants one has gotten one (or in my case, probably many) I have to wonder where they will get their continued sales from. Although I guess you can say the same about most markets.

    6. Re:Geek solution by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      This is how I feel about sex. You read my mind.

    7. Re:Geek solution by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      For what it is worth, generational change does improve the attitudes in society over time. For example, 20 years ago you would not have seen major governments even pay lip service to the problem of global climate change. In another 20 years that may actually take it seriously. I believe change happens as reactionary people die.

    8. Re:Geek solution by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      For what it is worth, generational change does improve the attitudes in society over time. For example, 20 years ago you would not have seen major governments even pay lip service to the problem of global climate change

      In 1988 (24 years ago) Margret Thatcher made speaches on climate change, championed the IPCC and personaly opened the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    9. Re:Geek solution by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      And now most leaders make speaches on climate change. Thatcher was a scientist of course.

    10. Re:Geek solution by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      it's probably more geared toward people that want to geek out but can't afford to.

      Computers in schools have been taken over by IT departments and many parents would not want their kids "geeking out" on their main computer. Most kids can't afford to buy their own regular computers even in first world countries. Furthermore regular computers do not come set up to encourage programming. Programming environments are an optional extra (admittedly often a free one now but still you have to find and install them) and modern PCs make interfacing with your own hardware a PITA on both a hardware (paralell ports are fast dissapearing) and software (the NT line doesn't like you doing low level port access, there are hacks but....) perspective.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Geek solution by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2

      Well said.

      Thatcher can be criticized for a lot of things (Poll Tax, etc). But people forget that she was a Chemist (Scientist) before she entered politics, and has always loved a good bit of tech.

      http://philosophyofscienceportal.blogspot.com/2008/07/margaret-thatcher-chemistpolitician.html

      http://alicerosebell.wordpress.com/2011/05/27/thatcher-scientist/

      --
      Have a nice day!
    12. Re:Geek solution by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This is a geek solution to a perceived problem. Cheap computers won't revolutionise anything, because we have an entrenched culture of anti-intellectualism. With the US and UK being about as bad as each other.

      I think to be fair, the US child is stupider on average, but the UK is lazier. So, yes, it probably evens out.

      What amuses me is adults thinking that because most kids can use mobile phones to text "LOL" and download porn on their parents' laptops, that they are somehow "good with technology" and so therefore should all be computer programmers. It's bollocks, as using a computer is about as difficult as using a TV nowadays, and no one thinks that anyone under a hundred should be able to repair their own TV.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Geek solution by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      Well said.

      Thatcher can be criticized for a lot of things (Poll Tax, etc). But people forget that she was a Chemist (Scientist) before she entered politics, and has always loved a good bit of tech.

      So? A lot of Nazis were cultured men in their home life who enjoyed listening to Mozart and playing board games with their children. Didn't stop them being monsters.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Geek solution by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Comparing Thatcher to Hitler/Stalin (which is exactly what you are implying) makes you loose credibility in your response.

      She had her faults, and she had her pros. She was hardly a monster.

      At least one was able to protest against her without fear for their lives, and in the end she lost power because the people did not like a particular policy (Poll Tax).

      --
      Have a nice day!
  7. Worrying state of affairs by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading the post (I really suggest everyone does so, it's an enlightening read), I have to say this sounds particularly worrying. The government and local manufacturers almost seemed intent on stopping them from doing the work locally. Does that even make sense?

    I can understand higher costs; the West won't accept salaries below a certain threshold, there's unions, and I entirely respect that. However, the schedule problem is ridiculous. A plant thousands of kilometers away from your main sales point can be faster to ramp up production than the shop down the street? We're not speaking about a small-scale project, either! I find this utterly unbelieveable. No wonder so much of the manufacturing goes overseas.

    And then the taxing part is plain and simply dumb. You can't control corporations, but that the government actively deters local production? That's like shooting yourself in the foot and wondering why it hurts.

    The UK and the West as a whole (I'm entirely sure that the UK is not a special case here) should be ashamed.

    1. Re:Worrying state of affairs by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forcing the manufacturing out of the country allows, among other things, the externalization of pollution.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK and the West as a whole (I'm entirely sure that the UK is not a special case here) should be ashamed.

      I agreed with everything you said but this. You should actually know what you're talking about before you make such broad generalizations. Just because the UK does something stupid doesn't mean it has to happen everywhere else, and vise versa.

    3. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Individuals importing items as 'gifts' posted from China bypassing taxes has been a sore point for years. In Australia we have the $1000 threshold which major retailers have been complaining about for years. cost of collections arguements etc.

      Companies (unfortunately) order volumes over this barriers and traceability, accounting issues etc make it impossible to bypass taxation liabilities.

      different to shooting yourself in the foot but still stupid nonetheless. I'd prefer to see tax incentives.

    4. Re:Worrying state of affairs by taylorjonl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Forcing the manufacturing out of the country allows, among other things, the externalization of pollution.

      Wow, really? Forcing manufacturing out of the country because of pollution sounds retarded to me, I would think the jobs would be better for the country.

    5. Re:Worrying state of affairs by c0lo · · Score: 5, Informative

      And then the taxing part is plain and simply dumb. You can't control corporations, but that the government actively deters local production? That's like shooting yourself in the foot and wondering why it hurts.

      The UK and the West as a whole (I'm entirely sure that the UK is not a special case here) should be ashamed.

      For those too lazy to RTFA, UK is shooting in the foot using a big cannon then crying big of unemployment:

      I’d like to draw attention to one cost in particular that really created problems for us in Britain. Simply put, if we build the Raspberry Pi in Britain, we have to pay a lot more tax. If a British company imports components, it has to pay tax on those (and most components are not made in the UK). If, however, a completed device is made abroad and imported into the UK – with all of those components soldered onto it – it does not attract any import duty at all.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, because we're not all on the same planet.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't take a stand on the taxes, but I'm fairly sure UK corporations are not special as far as schedules and costs go. If they are, then I'd be curious to know why exactly. I most certainly hope no other country ends up taxing locally manufactured products more than externally manufactured ones.

    8. Re:Worrying state of affairs by artor3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Government taxes have little to do with it. When most of the manufacturing was moved to Asia, skill sets started to atrophy. It is very hard to find skilled manufacturing managers, engineers, or even operators in the West because there are few places to build up those skills. Likewise, when volumes are low, it's hard to justify the cutting edge machinery that allows for faster turn times and lower costs.

      When the corporate CEOs decided to line their pockets by offshoring, they didn't just screw over the people they fired. They made it damn near impossible to ever bring those jobs back. Things will continue to get worse until the Asian factories realize that they can just take the schematics and make and sell the latest iPad as their own, and there won't be a damn thing we can do about it, since we will be completely unable to manufacture it (or anything else) in the West. Even if we were to eliminate all minimum wage and pollution laws, we wouldn't be able to compete, because we've been training them and buying their high tech tools for decades. But the CEOs who made that choice for us will have already retired with their hundreds of millions of dollars, so what do they care?

    9. Re:Worrying state of affairs by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The UK and the West as a whole (I'm entirely sure that the UK is not a special case here) should be ashamed."

      No, they should be justly punished by market forces.

      Oh, wait.....

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just from reading varying post's on Slashdot, I can assure you we cannot be on the same planet.
      welcome to MY reality.

    11. Re:Worrying state of affairs by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Customs rules are harmonised across the EU so if what the pi guys say is true for the UK it's probably true for the EU as a whole.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Forcing the manufacturing out of the country allows, among other things, the externalization of pollution.

      Wow, really? Forcing manufacturing out of the country because of pollution sounds retarded to me, I would think the jobs would be better for the country.

      Since when do environmentalists care about jobs? Or, for that matter, since when do they care about "the country"?

    13. Re:Worrying state of affairs by fermion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When I read the post, I find it an example of a firm that is either extremely uninformed or extremely idealistic about the work the are trying to do.

      First when one is creating a product to be mass manufactured, that fact must be designed in at the beginning, not tacked on at the end. It would be unrealistic to expect any product to be successful without working closely with the people who are going to manufacture it.

      Second, profitable competent manufacturers in the west is not going to have excess capacity and skilled labour just twiddling their thumbs waiting for customers. These firms are going to have as close to maximum production as possible, and, as new customers come in, they will adjust schedules or add capacity as needed. In places where standards are not high, and people can be taken off the street to run machines, or it acceptable to have machinery idle just waiting for orders, this is different. In any case the pricing structure for manufacturing is not surprising. China has a lot of excess capacity right now, and they are likely just trying to cover costs. Any firm that keeps excess capacity for quick order in the west is going to have to charge a premium.

      And the tax just seems like a red herring. Again, how does one enter into a venture without understanding the tax liabilities. I understand that firms do this all the time, and that is why so many go bankrupt, but really. One has a BOM, and one has access to people who know about this things. Getting to the end game and just then realizing that taxes, schedules, and shipping exists seems really lame.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    14. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I don't get the tax point. As I understand VAT the total tax on the product when sold should be the same where ever it is manufactured. Lets say your widget sells for $100 plus 20% VAT. You charge $120 and pay the $20 to the government but you get to deduct any VAT charged to you in previous steps. So if you bought the widget from China for $50 and they didn't charge you any VAT then you need to pay the full $20 VAT. If you bought the widget in the UK and they charged you $50 + $10 VAT then you get to deduct the $10 you already payed and just pay $10 VAT.

    15. Re:Worrying state of affairs by crossword.bob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And then the taxing part is plain and simply dumb. You can't control corporations, but that the government actively deters local production? That's like shooting yourself in the foot and wondering why it hurts.

      It's likely a throwback to a (failed) attempt to bolster UK component manufacture that's now backfiring on us.

    16. Re:Worrying state of affairs by adolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True. However, I'd imagine that the pollution generated by printing, stuffing, and soldering components to PCBs to be far less than the crap that arose out of the manufacture of those components to begin with (which was long-ago outsourced to the Far East).

      "Manufacturing" a Raspberry Pi isn't really manufacturing in the dirty sense of the word -- it's basically just an assembly process. AFAICT the only real pollutants which might be released in such a process might be some VOCs from the printing processes involved, as much of the rest of the waste can be profitably reclaimed (copper-saturated etchant, for example).

    17. Re:Worrying state of affairs by taylorjonl · · Score: 1

      Since when does the environment beat out the economy? Only in Nevereverland is that the case.

    18. Re:Worrying state of affairs by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      So if your boss reduced your wages to $0.50 an hour tomorrow, you wouldn't object?

    19. Re:Worrying state of affairs by sjames · · Score: 1

      Why not, do you figure it's fair to work full time and still have to live on the street? Or in the case of the U.K., for the public to end up subsidizing a substandard income so the employee can actually live long enough to report back to work?

    20. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm and engineer and have worked with various CM's in the US and Asia and I have to say you have things exactly backwards. Western manufacturers have given up on the low end since they can not compete with Asia on cost. They focus on the more profitable high end boards and/or doing very quick turns in small and medium numbers. First, lead times are long because factories are already at capacity with more profitable work. Secondly prices are high because you are competing with higher end boards with more profit margin. Why sell you time when they can make twice the profit selling it to someone else? For the places that quote lower prices they are using you to fill dead space between other boards. The volume is low because they only have so much expected down time. Making larger quantities would delay their more profitable business.

    21. Re:Worrying state of affairs by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but you didn't pay VAT on the import. An import duty isn't VAT. Also, assuming they build in China and ship individual units from China, even to the UK, then there is no VAT, as the price would be small enough to be under the level the shipper pays, and the recipient should write the govt the VAT cheque. It's confusing and silly, and hence the complaints.

    22. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tjbp · · Score: 1

      Since when were environmentalists in charge?

    23. Re:Worrying state of affairs by artor3 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like you're saying the exact same thing as me, but with a positive spin. Western manufacturers only make small orders. Margin doesn't matter. You can't feed your family on percentage points. Volume is what matters, and all the volume is going overseas. Places like TSMC own the electronics industry.

      If western manufacturers are capacity limited, then why aren't they expanding?

    24. Re:Worrying state of affairs by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      And the tax just seems like a red herring. Again, how does one enter into a venture without understanding the tax liabilities. I understand that firms do this all the time, and that is why so many go bankrupt, but really. One has a BOM, and one has access to people who know about this things.

      There are ways around many tax issues. To that, perhaps they thought they could get some concession in place between when design started and manufacturing started, they didn't, so they went to the fall-back plan of "make it in China". Maybe they thought that when making millions of dollars of products and pointing out penalties to manufacturing it in the UK, that the government might step in and encourage local business. You are the only one expressing that it somehow surprised them, and not that it was just a hurdle they looked at removing while simultaneously planing on jumping it.

    25. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo don't pay VAT on the import is correct. You pay VAT when you sell the end product. They aren't an end user so they don't need to pay VAT on imports regardless of the quantity. If something is made within the UK each step of the process incurs VAT but the buyer deducts the VAT once they sell. So TI sells chips to the CM and charges the CM VAT. The CM then sells boards to Raspberry Pi and charges raspberry Pi VAT. The CM keeps a portion of the VAT to cover the VAT that was already payed on the chips and pays a portion for the work they did. Raspberry Pi then sells the boards to consumers. The consumer pays VAT to Raspberry PI and Raspberry pi keeps a portion to cover the VAT they payed to the CM and pays the rest of the VAT to the Government. So TI, the CM and Raspberry PI all end up paying VAT but no one pays the full amount.

      For imported boards the CM pays no VAT. When raspberry PI sells the boards they pay the full VAT since they can not deduct for VAT already payed. The total amount of VAT should be the same regardless.

    26. Re:Worrying state of affairs by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      So if your boss reduced your wages to $0.50 an hour tomorrow, you wouldn't object?

      I've never belonged to a union, and every boss I've had has paid me more each year. Market forces take care of that.

    27. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      My company reduced my wages by a heck of a lot more than that two years ago, and I didn't object. Because the alternative was getting laid off in a down economy. In the bigger picture, the alternative was the company going under, as others have recently in this industry. As it was, I'm one of the 12 or so they kept out of over 200. So... yeah, I just fussed and fumed about it, wouldn't you?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    28. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So if your boss reduced your wages to $0.50 an hour tomorrow, you wouldn't object?

      Not only that, but every employer in every company in your line of work reduced wages to $0.50 an hour at the same time, so leaving for a different job is out of the question. Then, as the businesses floundered, they started upping wages, but moving you into corporate owned housing which you rented out of your salary, preventing you from having enough free money to move to a different city and find a new job. Then the employers all started cutting corners in safety and working conditions, but you can't move elsewhere because you are too poor, and you can't complain because there is no union.

      Anti-union types who are also middle class, mostly the religiously right-wingers, are so naive its pathetic. They so easily forget our recent history. That's not to forget the mob influence on unions, if people genuinely care about their livelyhoods, and the communities based on the jobs they all have, then they need a healthy union, free from the influence of corruption.

    29. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Socialism+is+win! · · Score: 0

      When the revolution has been prosecuted, $0.50 an hour will be The People's Wage, and it will be enough for everyone to be equally wealthy.

      --
      You say potato, I say produce of The People's Collective Farm
    30. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > Why not, do you figure it's fair to work full time and still have to live on the street?

      You're talking to the wrong person; I lost everything in dot com bust, was out of work for years, would have given a lot to work full time, even if I had to sleep in what was laughingly called my car. One can fuss about it and carry signs and ultimately sleep on garbage bags, or one can understand the realities of the economy. I'm sure there are other choices, but they're not coming to mind right now.

      Fair? It's not fair that my dad died on Christmas Eve and every holiday season I have to remember that. If you're looking for fairness, you're going to spend the rest of your life being profoundly disappointed.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    31. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, because it's so much better to pull a nice union wage right up to the point where the company shuts its doors.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    32. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unions certainly served a purpose when that historical time was the present. Now, having been in several unions... they are pointless. Their time has passed, and no, they don't deserve any fealty because they were meaningful a century ago. Believing so is basically retarded. Unions are now the nerd way of whining that they want "MORE MORE MORE" without appearing personally greedy. It's transparently laughable.

    33. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the alternative is living of literally starvation wages then yes. Your parent post is a literal description of the behavior of some American companies dung the "gilded age" the same happed in the UK. For all their many many many flaws and downsides the alternative to unions was at the time or slow starvation and mass deaths form workplace related injuries. The unions act as a counterbalance to the power of the corporations and employers protecting the workers lives, you do not need unions but you must have some form of counterbalance, if you do not want this to happen again. In the developed world the alternative is usually the government. The less strong your unions the more you need state regulation, one or the other.

    34. Re:Worrying state of affairs by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, yes. If I'm being paid well until the company folds, I propose that I should have been intelligent enough to have put some money away for just such an event. Whereas if my wages slowly dwindle, chances are my savings will be eaten up in the day-to-day cost of living, so that if/when my employer "shuts its doors," I have no reserves.

      I'd also like to point out that wages are not necessarily the main expense of a company. Also that a better way for a company to cut costs is not to reduce wages, but to reduce management bonuses, and golden parachutes for incompetent CxOs.

    35. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California it does. It's the main driver why we don't have local oil here, and why almost all of our new power production comes from out of state. People didn't like SMOG, so, we exported it.

    36. Re:Worrying state of affairs by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      Monty Python's "Four Yorkshiremen" sketch:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo

    37. Re:Worrying state of affairs by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, you had it bad and figure that means nobody ever deserves better till the end of time?

      I'm sorry about your dad, but what in the world does that have to do with statecraft or labor relations?

      The reality of the economy is that when the unions win the standard of living rises and everyone across the board does better in the long run.

      The other is that the short term schemers at the top want to take it all for themselves and to hell with the society that helped them get where they are. You can stand firm with your peers and say no or you can hand over your wallet and apologize profusely that you can't give them more.

    38. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Formalin · · Score: 2

      I think it's more likely that they are just outright lying, and never intended to build it in the UK. Throw on a little BS to make it sound like they gave it an effort.

      They can't possibly be that daft, can they? To just realise now that it is cheaper to do things in China?

    39. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem with leaving the low end to the Chinese is the very same thing happened with steel mills in the US. They figured, let the Chinese make the crappy rebar, they'll stick to the profitable mind and high grade stuff and rush jobs.

      Then the Chinese got better at the mid grade stuff, so we thanked them for taking the unprofitable jobs off our hands and stuck to the high grade stuff and rush jobs.

      Then the Chinese got faster and we let them take the hassle and risk of rushing things.

      China still doesn't do high grade steel reliably, but it won't be long now. There are only 2 major steel producers left in the US and they make less than 2 percent of the tonnage that China does.

    40. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've never belonged to a union, and every boss I've had has paid me more each year. Market forces take care of that.

      Unions have nothing to do with the fact that companies cannot compete. Simple fact is you can bet if the corporation could off shore your job you would just be out of work like the millions who have already been displaced by cheap labour and the ability to outsource without intervention. We in the west live in a Walmart nation where you play the game or you are replaced,,,and any who think otherwise are fools or dreamchasers.

      To paraphrase Steve Ballmer "goods and the price of producing them is becoming worthless therefore the real future in the north american (read USA) economy is in ``intellectual propery`` (read software)

      The problem is once the imaginary intellectual property bubble bursts there will be no manufacturing economy left is the west to employ anyone...except perhaps funeral directors as more people reach their debt ceiling and find that getting down to earth without the parachute of a real job producing things is dicy at best.

      So I say bring on this device and let the kids hack away with OSS software and learn machine logic at its core. That is how the information age revolution started including the wizards of silcon valley who now have grown too fat and stupid to realize that closing down fundamental computer learning with a closed computing environment like Windows has done little more than stiffle creativity and real learning.

      I remember only too well my first cd of Visual Basic when it came out and how hard the ``programing guru`` teacher stressed why it was important to not have to know anything about how the computer actually worked...I just wish I could find it and post the stupid AVI file to show you how damaging the attitude expressed withing this $300 dollar mandatory learning tool for the college course I was taking really was...

      Sure it contained the compiler and all the software necessary to quickly learn how to do basic GUI hacks. But as far as actually teaching me anything useful for core chip programming and machine logic it was useless. And this course was advertised as an advanced computer programming course along with the mandatory MS access SQL software and books that cost $500.

      Essentially the first year of my learning was wasted by these jerks and I have spent the last 15 re-learning what I should have been taught in the first place and un learning how not to think about core processes!

    41. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because capital is so known for its patriotism. Right?

      .

    42. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because it's so much better to pull a nice union wage right up to the point where the company shuts its doors.

      So you pull wage until the company shuts its doors, then you go and find another job, and the free market will take care of the rest? Right? Isn't that what the right wing hypocrites are always talking about, letting the free market do its thing? If the company cannot sustain a union, it had larger problems and wasn't fit to survive.

    43. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend who used that argument, verbatim.

      He is also one of the few grown men I have seen ever cry hysterically. It was right after his position was outsourced, oddly.

    44. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > So, you had it bad and figure that means nobody ever deserves better till the end of time?

      Absolutely not. I'm saying you can't expect iPads and gourmet pizza to be handed to you. That at some point you have to actually have some worth in the marketplace besides what your union boss can negotiate for you. And that when costs exceed profits for long enough, your job will go away despite all the striking and tire flattening and bottle hurling you care to do.

      If you think you deserve more, work for it, have a little luck, and maybe you'll get more. If you think it's not "fair" that you get paid less, then try being worth more.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    45. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, profitable competent manufacturers in the west is not going to have excess capacity and skilled labour just twiddling their thumbs waiting for customers.

      You're trying to sound as if you know what you're talking about, but unfortunately, you ain't.

      Let's analyse :

      profitable competent manufacturers in the west is not going to have excess capacity and skilled labour just twiddling their thumbs waiting for customers

      Are you trying to imply that the manufacturers in the east who happen to have excess capacity and skilled labor are either not competent or not profitable??

      Come back with a better argument next time, kiddo !

    46. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy wins the thread. Either the market will take care of it all (unions or not), or it won't.

    47. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      "Can't sustain a union?" We're doomed.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    48. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you'd be preaching this bullshit out of the gutter too (and have no doubt, that's where you'd have a fair coins chance, or more, ending up in your imaginary world with current production capacities). Your salary? That's not your market worth, that's part of what your boss negotiated in the market from a superior position of a company. If group negotiation is not possible in a market then unions aren't even an issue, since they only arise with employment, i.e. being part of a group dealing in the market. Run an industrial production as a sole proprietorship or lay of the hypocrite pipe.

    49. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A plant thousands of kilometers away from your main sales point can be faster to ramp up production than the shop down the street?

      The plant overseas already manufactures large amount of similar boards. They can simply work in these new boards into their process. They don't have to come up with new stuff. Look up how they do rapid prototyping - they don't care what they do as long as it keep running. Kind of like a chip fab - it matters if it runs, not what it produces. Small scale manufacturers cannot compete with this setup.

      That being said, I would expect that there would be some large scale PCB production/assembly places in UK? There certainly are in the US.

      And then the taxing part is plain and simply dumb

      Yes, duties on components but not on final product is stupid. In electronics, all components tend to be highly specialized with one supplier.

    50. Re:Worrying state of affairs by swalve · · Score: 1, Troll

      This basic programming language didn't teach me advanced topics! Waaaah!

    51. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Best response so far.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    52. Re:Worrying state of affairs by swalve · · Score: 2

      Clearly, you've never looked at a company's budget. CxO pay is miniscule compared to the whole payroll.

    53. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      What has to happen to people, I wonder, that makes them so lose confidence in themselves that they have to have a union boss tell them how much they are worth.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    54. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 1

      "Can't sustain a union?" We're doomed.

      If a business can't sustain itself in bargaining with a labor union...

      Again, not to minimize a the problems collective bargaining can cause. Especially what happened in the UK in the 70's, it isn't pretty.

      But like the other anonymous guy said, you need some kind of balance. If you want competition and the free market to thrive, then let workers organize and compete with the companies that put them to work for fair working conditions and wages, and the free market will take care of the rest. Without that balance, what workers are left with is legalized indentured servitude.

    55. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > So you pull wage until the company shuts its doors, then you go and find another job, and the free market will take care of the rest? Right?

      Um, no, the workforce demands more than the business will bear, and the company will either outsource (Entire department -- boom -- gone. [1]) or the company will fold (as has happened to some of our competitors). Whether things go good or ill, whether the market works or it doesn't, you can't conjure money out of thin air. However bad you think the free market is, there are even worse things.

      [1] Try to hold a picket line when the scabs are 13 time zones away. Hope you can swim.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    56. Re:Worrying state of affairs by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Why bother bargaining when you can outsource?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    57. Re:Worrying state of affairs by sjames · · Score: 1

      You say that like employers will just automatically pay what people are worth rather than what they are forced to accept because eating has to happen today and the rent is due. History suggests otherwise.

      Beyond that, your plan takes the utopian dream of a day when machines render human labor unnecessary and turn it into a dystopian nightmare where most of the population toils in near slave labor because they don't happen to own those machines and will never be able to afford one since jobs within the 1st class economy don't exist.

      Demand what you're worth or you'll never get it. Employers take advantage of anything they can to increase their bargaining power. If potential employees don't do likewise, they're fools.

    58. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can understand higher costs; the West won't accept salaries below a certain threshold, there's unions, and I entirely respect that. However, the schedule problem is ridiculous.

      Yet not unusual. Last year I had some specialized paper rolls made for an obsolete printer. I talked to about 10 US firms. Some didn't want to make up 500 rolls, several didn't return phone calls and emails, one produced a low-quality sample, and one produced a good sample but quoted $10 a roll. That's in an industry, paper converting, which is in a severe recession.

      Then I tried looking on Alibaba, the search engine for offshort manufacturing. I found a company in Fujian, China, which asked for a $100 deposit to make two sample rolls. The samples were promptly delivered and worked. Then I ordered 500 rolls, at $1 each, which were again delivered promptly, although the shipping cost more than the paper.

      The firm in Fujian answered E-mails consistently and with useful answers within 24 hours, something few US companies seem to be able to do any more.

    59. Re:Worrying state of affairs by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      And then the taxing part is plain and simply dumb. You can't control corporations, but that the government actively deters local production? That's like shooting yourself in the foot and wondering why it hurts.

      The UK and the West as a whole (I'm entirely sure that the UK is not a special case here) should be ashamed.

      I'm don't know much about taxes, so please someone correct me I'm saying something completely stupid, but I always thought that the VAT (Value Added Tax) that many European countries have would disfavor small businesses in favor of very large businesses.

      After all the VAT is a compounding tax, and if a large business owns a big chunk of its own supply chain, that means it can probably avoid paying that tax dozens of times (if not hundreds of times) for every step it can refine its product without having to go through a third party.

      Doesn't anyone know if my hunch is correct? or if I'm missing something?

    60. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Ramin_HAL9001 · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's a good point. So you favor more regulation and tariffs, and less free trade? I agree with that, but this can be done without union busting.

      Suppose one allowed workers to collectively bargain and also allowed them to own enough stock in the company so that they have a say in outsourcing decisions when such choices must be made. This would prevent outsourcing (unless the workers wanted to give away their jobs) and also gives them incentive make the company successful, and could affect their bargaining strategies to be more favorable to the company.

      But this cannot happen unless there are sensible tax laws that favor production at home rather than abroad, which is what TFA was on about.

    61. Re:Worrying state of affairs by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Maybe the answer is to import a "device" consisting of thousands of chips soldered to it. Superficially the "device" might even do something such as light an led at the end of the tray. And then desolder & reuse them.

    62. Re:Worrying state of affairs by buglista · · Score: 1
      Always. For example, Caroline Lucas is the leader of the Green Party in the UK. Do a google search for "Caroline Lucas jobs" and you will see quite a lot of stuff.

      Sorry if we don't conform to your ill-informed stereotype.

    63. Re:Worrying state of affairs by ReeceTarbert · · Score: 2

      Government taxes have little to do with it. When most of the manufacturing was moved to Asia, skill sets started to atrophy. It is very hard to find skilled manufacturing managers, engineers, or even operators in the West because there are few places to build up those skills.

      You are spot on. Last August Forbes published an article explaining that Amazon couldn’t make a Kindle in the US even if it wanted to citing, among other things:

      • The flex circuit connectors are made in China because the US supplier base migrated to Asia.
      • The electrophoretic display is made in Taiwan because the expertise developed from producting flat-panel LCDs migrated to Asia with semiconductor manufacturing.
      • The highly polished injection-molded case is made in China because the U.S. supplier base eroded as the manufacture of toys, consumer electronics and computers migrated to China.
      • The wireless card is made in South Korea because that country became a center for making mobile phone components and handsets.
      • The controller board is made in China because U.S. companies long ago transferred manufacture of printed circuit boards to Asia.
      • The Lithium polymer battery is made in China because battery development and manufacturing migrated to China along with the development and manufacture of consumer electronics and notebook computers.

      In other words, outsourcing screws a lot more people than those being fired.

      RT.

    64. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Beyond that, your plan takes the utopian dream of a day when machines render human labor unnecessary and turn it into a dystopian nightmare

      Obligatory short story.

      It's unfortunately all too believable. There are not technical obstacles currently preventing the 1.0 versions of the management software in this story, except the general unwillingness of middle management to contemplate being replaced with a computer system. I even find myself not disagreeing too much with the ubiquitous surveillance built into his utopian alternative - while I'm sure it would make me feel uncomfortable at first, I'm forced to concede that it might be necessary, and at least his system has adequate checks and balances.

    65. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Your post is very insightful, and I'm sure you'd do a much better job of it if you ever bothered. Where do I sign up?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    66. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this article is accurate. As far as I can see, integrated circuits don't currently incur any import duty either per gov.uk.

      Import VAT would still be payable (import VAT is not the same as duty), but would be reclaimable against VAT charged when they sell the finished product - this is no different from paying so-called 'input' VAT to UK subcontractors and reclaiming it against 'output' VAT charged to customers. Note that low-value consignment relief (LVCR - a de minimis exception from VAT) does not apply here - a container holding 1000x£15 Raspberry Pi will not be treated as 1000 imports of a low-value £15 item. That only applies if they were sent in genuinely separate consignments.

    67. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Government taxes have little to do with it.

      Thanks for your input. Now why don't you RTFA?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    68. Re:Worrying state of affairs by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Import duty != VAT.

      When you import something from outside the EU you pay both import duty and VAT (and VAT on the customs duty, and usually a handling charge to the carrier who cleared the package through customs). If you are a VAT registered buisness you claim the import VAT back and charge VAT on what you sell. Import duty however can't be claimed back under most circumstances (IIRC there are a few situations arround re-export where you can but I don't know the details).

      Import duty varies depending on both the type of goods in question and country of origin with a huge number of confusing codes for different types of goods. Thankfully i've never imported enough stuff myself to have to deal with it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    69. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      VAT is only charged on Value Added, not on the full value of sales. A business reclaims 'input VAT' that it pays on its inputs and pays 'output VAT' on its sales, therefore experiencing a net charge only on the mark-up it achieves. It therefore doesn't matter if the total mark-up is applied by a single integrated business or by several small businesses.

      VAT are considered more efficient than sales taxes if you are collecting more than a few % of the value. This is because it is harder for a corrupt business along the supply chain to evade - if they keep false accounting books for the taxman they can only evade the tax on their profit margin.

    70. Re:Worrying state of affairs by at0mjack · · Score: 1

      You're missing something - VAT is only charged on the final sale, to the consumer. All businesses (above a certain size: ~$100K turnover) are VAT registered. This means that they pay no VAT on things that they buy, but have to collect VAT on things that they sell, unless they are selling to another VAT-registered company. It's basically the same as the state sales taxes that you have in the US - business-to-business transactions don't have to include state sales tax.

    71. Re:Worrying state of affairs by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The way the EU vat system works is that as a VAT registered buisness you charge VAT on what you sell but you claim back VAT on what you buy. So the total VAT charged doesn't depend on the number of companies the product past through. There are slight complications around B2B sales between different countries in the EU but the basic principal holds.

      This particular story though is not about VAT it's about import duty which depends on what customs category the goods fall into when they pass through customs into the EU. Performing manufacturing before importing will change the customs category and hence change the ammount of customs duty payable.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    72. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I'm don't know much about taxes, so please someone correct me I'm saying something completely stupid, but I always thought that the VAT (Value Added Tax) that many European countries have would disfavor small businesses in favor of very large businesses.

      After all the VAT is a compounding tax, and if a large business owns a big chunk of its own supply chain, that means it can probably avoid paying that tax dozens of times (if not hundreds of times) for every step it can refine its product without having to go through a third party.

      Doesn't anyone know if my hunch is correct? or if I'm missing something?

      No business pays VAT, or to be more exact, the VAT you pay on your raw materials is subtracted from the VAT you bill your clients.

      I buy wood at 100EUR (+20%VAT), I pay my supplier 120 EUR. I make goods from that and sell them for 200 EUR (+ 20%VAT), my client gives me 240EUR, I give 20 EUR to the government.

      If you do more of the refining steps in house you're adding more value, so you're paying less VAT on your raw materials and so you get to offset less of the VAT you have to bill for the final product.

      It all evens out.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    73. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Stoopiduk · · Score: 1

      Interesting seeing views on a subject that is gathering some attention in my industry and seeing those opinions play out in the real world.

      http://www.cruise-community.com/News/News-Headlines/Government-backing-for-Fincantieris-strategic-plan-sparks-more-demonstrations.html

      Fincantieri are in a very difficult place at the moment, I don't see how the actions of the members of one of the unions is going to help anyone. If you threaten to disrupt the process of building the product you rely on building, you are a fool. In a competitive market with falling orders, this union is causing uncertainty and eroding the trust current and potential customers have in the company.

    74. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded insightful by knee-jerk right-wing retards.

      Manufacturing moved out so big-boss can have an extra yacht by using slave labour for assembly.

      I exaggerate, but not much.

    75. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reality, strong unions create stronger local markets (people have more money to spend, and job security means they'll actually spend it), which, in turn, create stronger local companies. Look at the statistics. States with unions have lower unemployment.

    76. Re:Worrying state of affairs by necro81 · · Score: 2

      A plant thousands of kilometers away from your main sales point can be faster to ramp up production than the shop down the street? We're not speaking about a small-scale project, either! I find this utterly unbelieveable

      Because it is not a small project, it is difficult to ramp up production at the place down the street. In order to survive, those kinds of "turnkey" board-fab-and-populating houses have to run very close to full capacity all the time. They can squeeze in a prototype run of a few hundred units if you need it fast, but a larger run requires you get to the back of the queue. As they themselves said, there aren't a whole lot of these places in the UK (chicken and egg, who knows?).

      Contrast this to China, where it seems every city with access to a shipping port has a factory with the capacity for a million units a day. There's huge capacity available, and so jobs get done sooner, the queues are shallower, and a 10,000-unit run is peanuts.

    77. Re:Worrying state of affairs by chill · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, supply and demand actually works.

      If my boss reduced my wages to $0.50 per hour tomorrow I'd quit. And he would NOT be able to find anyone capable of replacing me at those rates.

      He would have to either do without the services I rendered entirely, do them himself, or raise the wage to a level where a person competent in the field would accept them.

      He WILL NOT do without, because I produce value which he combines with the labor and services of others to produce a larger profit.

      He CAN NOT do it himself. He is not qualified and there is more work than he has resources.

      He will RAISE the wage paid to a level where he will attract someone competent in performing the needed services.

      Since he knows from experience that I am capable of doing the job, he is ASSUMING RISK in attempting to bring on someone else who may or may not be qualified. That risk has a cost.

      Bringing him back to where we began -- not cutting my wage because that is what the market dictates for the services I provide.

      I should point out that my position is not a commodity. I cannot be easily replaced because I have specialize skills. I also put a great deal of effort into keeping my skills current and acquiring new skills as I anticipate need.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    78. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That's the benefit of having cheap labor, low regulations, and low standards of living. What firm in the US can afford to stay in business while doing custom manufacturing jobs for around $1,000?

      How well would you compete if you were trying to sell such custom services against people overseas? Can you imagine trying to pay things like rent or health insurance while doing so?

    79. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I don't think this article is accurate. As far as I can see, integrated circuits don't currently incur any import duty either per gov.uk.

      Yeah, that's what I thought the TARIC database was saying (but it's such a miss-mash I couldn't be sure).

      So what the fuck are they talking about?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    80. Re:Worrying state of affairs by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the free market will take care of the situation.

      Just don't complain after you learn that the free market solution is to stop investing in corporations that would employ you, and move overseas to places where they can get some profit.

      I don't understand why people keep discussing that stuf. Yeah, unions are important, so are the companies. You just can't make one of them hostage to the other. You know, we should put that principle in a kind of legal document that would be ard to change... I sugest the name "constitution" for it.

    81. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what side you are arguing.. So just in case I would argue no one side can get too powerful
      If the businesses have all the power (let's say coal mining as an example) then you decrease/don't increase the wage you pay. As long as that is the going rate for the industry you are free to screw over people one at a time and fire your high paid ones for any infraction (and you can make up infractions) thus bringing the average pay ever down. You can ignore health issues, you can employ anyone who is desperate for a job particularly if you can start them young without much education/training. As long as there are enough people available who can do the job then you can drive the pay towards zero and make sure they never leave the industry.
      If the unions have all the power (lets say the single coal mining union covers the whole country) then you can strike over anything at all. People working who aren't union, pay, company unions subsidies insufficient etc. This can drive the industry into unprofitably and kill it off (look at coal mining in the uk for a great example of this).
      The problem is how do you balance the industry having too much power with unions having too much power? The free market doesn't help you here, only regulation, i.e. politics, i.e. favouritism and influence, i.e. corruption and emotion.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    82. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      then let workers organize and compete with the companies that put them to work for fair working conditions and wages, and the free market will take care of the rest.

      So if you have a couple of unions, dozens of companies (the UK in the 70s that you mentioned is a great example of this) how do you stop the unions reversing the situation and meaning that the business can't sustain itself against the union?

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    83. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, you've never looked at a company's budget. CxO pay is miniscule compared to the whole payroll.

      Clearly you've only looked at a company's budget where CxO pay is miniscule compared to the whole payroll.

    84. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 2

      If my boss reduced my wages to $0.50 per hour tomorrow I'd quit.

      This only works if everyone in the industry drops the wage at once. So Let's assume the evil 1% meet up in their club and decide that the new hourly rate for widget makers is now $0.50. So you decide to no be a widget maker anymore but become a doohickey maker, how are you going to re-train? How are you going to survive until you get trained in that field, I know: whilst you are retraining you find someone else who is hiring in a job that requires no training or provides training in that job.

      And he would NOT be able to find anyone capable of replacing me at those rates.

      Depends, if he provides training for that job then he just waits for someone who has quit/been fired from his previous job to become desperate enough.

      He will not do without because "there's plenty of people who need a job in these tough times"
      He has no need to do it himself because he makes it a requirement of the job to train others less skilled than you.
      He will raise or lower the wage to the breaking point where people go "stuff this". In a job with minimal training required or where there has been a country wide downsize this can be very low.

      I should point out that my position is not a commodity. I cannot be easily replaced because I have specialize skills

      Well that's not what this discussion is about, manufacturing often can be done with relatively little training. However don't be mistaken in any talent pool there is exactly the same tradeoff: for example if there was a new government initiative to train up (at the cost of the state) millions to your skill level or at least to a state perceived to be equivalent or at the most junior level then you can bet your wage would feel the impact.
      That said I am not arguing against this type of government training, because often a critical mass is needed to get and keep a particular job feasible, but you get my point...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    85. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This situation sounds very familiar. US firms that had the ability, quoted some small laser cut metal pieces at about $70 apiece (for about $0.03 worth of stainless, and about 20 seconds of machine time). They took 2 weeks to get back to me and offered 2 week lead times. Comparably in China I could get parts for $0.23, free samples, and they responded right away. I think the US firms are adjusted to the corruption involved in Defense procurement, and so just max out their prices as though they're always making tanks and missiles for defense contractors.

    86. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      The reality of the economy is that when the unions win the standard of living rises and everyone across the board does better in the long run.

      Even if the unions expect a 5% pay raise each year in a world with 4% inflation?
      Even if they stop you bringing in the latest technology because it would make someone redundant?
      Even if they are lead by sexist politicians?

      I'm not saying unions don't have a place, but they're made up of real people and that will always cause problems. They also have a history that cannot be ignored.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    87. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because right wing corporate whores care so much about country and jobs that they move them all to China. You right wingers are really good with logic.

    88. Re:Worrying state of affairs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was a good idea. I am aware that "there is no away." But even if the people calling the shots are, they don't care. They'll be dead soon anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    89. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Xest · · Score: 1

      "It is very hard to find skilled manufacturing managers, engineers, or even operators in the West because there are few places to build up those skills."

      This is such utter bollocks and it's so tiresome to hear.

      Whilst there's no doubt the proportion of Western economies consisting of manufacturing has decreased, it's to nowhere near the extent naysayers like you suggest where we hear proclaimations about how manufacturing is dead in the West, we don't have the skills anymore. Here's news for you, the countries with the largest manufacturing output in the world are:

      1. China
      2. US
      3. Japan
      4. Germany
      5. Italy
      6. Brazil
      7. Korea
      8. France
      9. UK
      10. India

      As you can see the West has an extremely strong showing still, and the UK even still having a larger manufacturing output than India. If you're talking about manufacturing for export you can likely drop Brazil a good few notches too as it's massively disproportionately focussed on it's own internal market.

      Even at 9th place for the UK, to have the 9th largest manufacturing output in the world means we have a massive amount of competent people in the manufacturing field to be able to do that.

      But let's look at it in context, if countries like France and the UK with their populations of ~60million, and Germany with it's population of ~80million are displacing countries like Brazil (pop. 195million), India (pop. 1.1billion), Russia (pop. 171million) Mexico (pop. 113million), Indonesia (pop. 140million) in terms of manufacturing, then doesn't that actually imply that as things are in the world, we've got proportionaly more people skilled in manufacturing in countries like the UK, Germany, and France relative to our population than almost every other country in the world?

      We can't even complain about how manufacturing as an industry is on a downward path in countries like the UK:

      http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2011/12/28/chart-of-manufacturing-output-from-2000-to-2010-by-country/

      This seems to imply it's only the 2008 recession to blame for any decrease, and that up until 2008 it was still showing very healthy growth, just not as fast as industries like services such that it's only declining as a percentage of total industry, not declining in itself.

      When people say the West, particularly countries like the UK are seeing a decline in manufacturing they're wrong beyond the current obvious effects of the global recession. When people say we don't have any people skilled in manufacturing anymore, they're even more wrong, as things go, we've got more than nearly every other country in the world relative to our population size - you'll find more people skilled in manufacturing amongst every hundred people or whatever here, than you will almost anywhere else.

      The whole manufacturing whine is little more than a fantasy made up by the likes of right wing nationalists and such to stir up hatred for other countries and things they export.

    90. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 2

      But does that matter? Take a situation i know a little about, farming in the UK.
      Once of a day over 90% of the population farmed, now less than 2% farm; yet more food is produced now. a huge amount of food is imported but is that a bad thing if we can (through better education system and critical mass in certain fields of design and finance) per person do a better job in some fields than other cultres might manage. Are you better off growing your food in better climates and using the land in worse climates for the things that work better when you invest in people to a higher standard. (I ask theoretically here because i know the education system in the UK is comparatively poor)
      As another example more steel is currently made in Sheffield than at the height of the industrial revolution yet it is no longer the steel centre of the world. Why? In both cases machines do the work of man better and cheaper. You can fight that or you can embrace it. In the case of farming there is nothing you would want to do in the UK to get 90% of the population farming, so what do/did you do with the people that technology improvements freed up - simple you move them to manufacturing. What about when you have too many people in manufacturing? Move them into services. What happens then when most of your population isn't suited for that type of work - I'll have to get back to you on that one.
      I find it interesting that it used to be thought (early industrial revolution) that true wealth came from the land, farming and mining were where wealth came from, new things like manufacturing it was said didn't add value to an economy. Now we see many saying it is only through building things of value that you add wealth to an economy, things like banking and other services are just moving wealth around. That may be true but...
      I honestly don't know where the economy goes from here, with rising energy costs does local manufacturing become more attractive or do we get a population shift and mass movement of population centres. I just don't know but it'll be interesting to watch.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    91. Re:Worrying state of affairs by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      What firm in the US can afford to stay in business while doing custom manufacturing jobs for around $1,000?

      That depends, if all it required you to do was have the latest machine and punch numbers into a database and let the scripts sort out the rest then I see no reason why by being clever you couldn't do the job cheaper.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    92. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of sight, out of mind.

      As long as its not in "My" back yard, I don't care how many small children died making my fancy shoes.

      Or, more importantly, I never think of it.....

    93. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the UK has secretly voted in an extreme enviromentalist party, which just happens to look like a collection of the normal money-grabbing right wing fucktards. David Cameron is an eco-communist who would prefer animals to be running the country, but he's got to pretend that he's a posh conservative twat.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    94. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that these aren't locally manufactured products. They're imported from China/wherever and intended to be assembled in the UK. Not manufactured in the UK at all. Import taxes if anything help to put local UK manufacturers on a fairer footing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    95. Re:Worrying state of affairs by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      VAT is Value Added Tax, not Sales Tax like what you have in the US. You charge 20% VAT on your sales, claim back the VAT charged on purchases and pay the difference to HMRC.

    96. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Funny, most people I know (who aren't in unions) haven't had a pay rise for a couple of years in the UK. The labour market is not a fair and free market, you utter imbecile. The majority of people can't walk away from their job and get another one straight away, so the employer always has the stronger bargaining position.

      It's why unions were created in the first place. "Market forces" don't work in the majority of employees' favour.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    97. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My company reduced my wages by a heck of a lot more than that two years ago, and I didn't object. Because the alternative was getting laid off in a down economy. In the bigger picture, the alternative was the company going under, as others have recently in this industry. As it was, I'm one of the 12 or so they kept out of over 200. So... yeah, I just fussed and fumed about it, wouldn't you?

      GP said "if your boss reduced your wages to $0.50 an hour tomorrow" not "by $0.50 an hour".

      I seriously doubt that if you live in the US (or other developed country) you were working for less than $0.50 an hour.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    98. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Unions certainly served a purpose when that historical time was the present. Now, having been in several unions... they are pointless. Their time has passed, and no, they don't deserve any fealty because they were meaningful a century ago. Believing so is basically retarded. Unions are now the nerd way of whining that they want "MORE MORE MORE" without appearing personally greedy. It's transparently laughable.

      You seem to forget that the power elite would love things to go back to the way they were a hundred or more years ago, and unions are one of the ways of stopping that movement backwards (along with things like universal suffrage).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    99. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you've never looked at a company's budget. CxO pay is miniscule compared to the whole payroll.

      There are a lot of higher management people being paid too much money below CEO level.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    100. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      the workforce demands more than the business will bear

      That's why you need discussion and negotiation, plus full transparency in revealing the true state of the company's finances. Except that those with control of the capital never like to tell the truth, as it would be too obvious how much profit is being made and where that profit is going.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    101. Re:Worrying state of affairs by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Since when do environmentalists care about jobs? Or, for that matter, since when do they care about "the country"?

      Jobs, you've got a point. Country, you fail. The nation is made up of the people, and the land, and the government. They care about the land, which the country rests upon. If the land goes away (which happens literally in cases of misused agriculture) then the country does too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    102. Re:Worrying state of affairs by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What has to happen to people, I wonder, that makes them so lose confidence in themselves that they have to have a union boss tell them how much they are worth.

      Anyone who thinks you measure someone's worth by their salary is either jus tplaying with words, or is an egregiously shallow waste of air.

      The majority of people are not rich capitalists who measure their value to humanity in terms of the size of their bank balance. Most of us who aren't in unions are totally screwed as soon as the economy worsens to the point where there ar significant numbers of unemployed in our field, and our bosses can just say "accept no pay rises or hold the door open on your way out for the hungry, younger person I've just employed instead".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    103. Re:Worrying state of affairs by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The problem comes when the import duty for the constituent parts/materials works out more expensive than the import duty for what is being manufactured. Then you have a disincentive to manufacture locally.

      IMO a sane import duty system would have relatively high import duties for finished goods and lower import duties the further back along the production chain you moved so the incentive was to do as much of the manufacturing as possible in-country but afaict duties are set to pander to specific interests so they often don't end up sane.

      Another problem is that many countries have exemptions for small imports. Even if they don't it's much easier to get away with dodgy declarations on small imports. This make sense from the point of view of saving paperwork (often the charge for collecting import duty/VAT is more than the duty/VAT itself) but it also creates an incentive for customers to buy directly from abroad.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    104. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because it's so much better to pull a nice union wage right up to the point where the company shuts its doors.

      So you pull wage until the company shuts its doors, then you go and find another job, and the free market will take care of the rest? Right? Isn't that what the right wing hypocrites are always talking about, letting the free market do its thing?

      Free market required FREEDOM. As in, no union influence. I agree that unions used to serve a valuable purpose, for safety and workers' rights, but in modern times the unions are more about self-service and political ambitions than the fair treatment of it's members.
      If you want to test my theory, make union dues voluntary for 5 years, and see if unions still exist.

    105. Re:Worrying state of affairs by sjames · · Score: 1

      There are bad unions and downsides, pretty much like everything in the world. Their history that cannot be ignored also includes bringing us the 8 hour day, the weekend, overtime pay, safety in the workplace (and compensation laws to protect disabled workers when they get hurt anyway), and child labor laws.

    106. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Let no one question their feelings for the dirt.

    107. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Most people aren't anti-union in principle; they're anti unions as unions currently are. Unions were an important factor in fixing some terrible practices, but those practices don't exist anymore. Unions, for the most part, have outlived their purpose, and now exist to perpetuate their own existence. Judge them as they are now, not by their accomplishments eighty years ago.

    108. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      My company reduced my wages by a heck of a lot more than that two years ago, and I didn't object. Because the alternative was getting laid off in a down economy. In the bigger picture, the alternative was the company going under, as others have recently in this industry. As it was, I'm one of the 12 or so they kept out of over 200. So... yeah, I just fussed and fumed about it, wouldn't you?

      And you now work at an employee owned company?

    109. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Agreed 100%, but if anything that should encourage tariffs on the finished goods that are at least as high as on the components. If you care about the planet then you should penalize sending work to countries that don't have reasonable environmental controls. Otherwise your own environmental controls do zilch for the planet but they still destroy your economy. If first world countries want to have clean air they should do what they can to keep work at home or at other countries that have similar goals.

    110. Re:Worrying state of affairs by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Cool. Thank you, and thanks to everyone else who also answered my question. That cleared it up for me.

    111. Re:Worrying state of affairs by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

      It's not that they forget recent history; they never bothered learning it in the first place. Too busy reading their bibles and handing over what little cash they have to their preachers...

      --

      --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    112. Re:Worrying state of affairs by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 1

      Visual Basic 1, 2, 3, and 4 all came out on floppies. Anecdote fail?

      --

      --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    113. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Forcing manufacturing out of the country because of pollution sounds retarded to me, I would think the jobs would be better for the country.

      I'm sure the residents of Bhopal would agree.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    114. Re:Worrying state of affairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as in actual reality -

      You can work on your shitty farm for nothing, earning 800rmb a year vs going to work at a factory earning double that a month.
      Nobody forces people into things, they do it because its a better option.

    115. Re:Worrying state of affairs by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

      I'm using my last gallon of real alkyd paint to do the kitchen walls. Next time if I don't want to use latex paint, I will have to smuggle my product in from Nevada. Haven't been able to get napthalene for a year or so, fifteen dollar brushes must now be thrown away rather than cleaned after use. I don't know about local oil, it looks an awful lot like a refinery that I drive by in Martinez.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  8. Cool! by scubamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was checking this out last night and I'm actually quite excited for one to come out. I've been in the industry for years now but more on the superuser side. It'll be a really fun chance to actually have a computer where I have to learn some electronics and programming to really get the most use out of it... kind of like jumping into the deep end of the pond. It'll be my main home computer.

    1. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for using Slashdot. Please leave your geek card at the lobby.

  9. UK and China were the only choices? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:UK and China were the only choices? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Where else would you make it and why?

    2. Re:UK and China were the only choices? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Some of the better run Asian countries (Japan, South Korea, etc), India, some democratic African country. There are always plenty of options.
       
      Why, because many of us are not fans of the Chinese govt, and their labor and environmental laws are pretty weak too.

    3. Re:UK and China were the only choices? by randomlogin · · Score: 1

      I'd have thought that Eastern Europe would also have been a viable option. For example, Olimex are already a big player in the 'cheap dev board' space and they do their manufacturing in Bulgaria.

    4. Re:UK and China were the only choices? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Where else would you make it and why?

      Eastern Europe, the USA, Mexico, Brazil, Italy, India... Many possibilites for contract manufacturing other than China.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  10. but it turns out that communism is awesome by decora · · Score: 2

    as long as you keep all the 'prison labor' and 'no environmental groups, no labor unions' stuff, and get rid of all the 'social safety net stuff'.

    1. Re:but it turns out that communism is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      the us has the highest number of prisoners per capita in the world. go capitalism?

    2. Re:but it turns out that communism is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as you keep all the 'prison labor' and 'no environmental groups, no labor unions' stuff, and get rid of all the 'social safety net stuff'.

      Keep telling yourself that. Truth is that we are taxing the people to death here. Both Republicans and Democrats have no solutions. Look at what Ron Paul is saying if you want to know how to fix our economy (including manufacturing).

    3. Re:but it turns out that communism is awesome by colesw · · Score: 2

      but they don't use them (mostly) for labor, they just pay to house, feed, entertain, and if they (inmates) want educate them.

  11. Sounds like a great learning opportunity by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I usually recommend a USB flash drive for my students in my Unix course (taught on Macs at the school), and leave it up to them which Linux distro to run at home from the Flash drive. With prices this low, I could almost make it a requirement for the course. I'll hold off to see how they fare though.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Sounds like a great learning opportunity by kcbnac · · Score: 1

      If you're going to do it, I would contact them about educational/bulk pricing - might be able to shave a few dollars off if you order them in a set of 20. Definitely save on shipping. Keep a few spares on hand, or require run-up time ahead of the class starting to order in a set.

    2. Re:Sounds like a great learning opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing they do mention in the FAQ is that they can't discount for bulk purchases, because their margins are too low. He'll only save on shipping, which isn't terrible.

  12. Is this really a big deal? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    While it looks like fun for a hobbyist to play with, is there really some greater purpose to this device? It seems that most people that can afford an HDMI capable (or even RCA/composite) TV or monitor to plug this into can probably also afford a 'real' computer.

    That said, I'll probably buy one just to play around with it, but I don't think it will change my life.

    1. Re:Is this really a big deal? by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Most people already have a composite TV, making the total cost of this device + keyboard + mouse + power supply under $50, as opposed to a real computer which is about $200.

    2. Re:Is this really a big deal? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      General purpose I/O pins normally only show up on expensive prototyping boards, not on "real" computers. I think the idea is that this will allow folks who couldn't otherwise afford such prototyping hardware to experiment with such things. I could easily see this being used for school science projects like BattleBots, those computer maze projects, and so on.

      Similarly, real computers aren't small enough to trivially embed them into random crap around your house. I can think of lots of really fun pranks to pull with one of these and a small speaker.... :-D But then again, that's hobbyist stuff.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Is this really a big deal? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      General purpose I/O pins normally only show up on expensive prototyping boards, not on "real" computers. I think the idea is that this will allow folks who couldn't otherwise afford such prototyping hardware to experiment with such things. I could easily see this being used for school science projects like BattleBots, those computer maze projects, and so on.

      I thought this was what the Arduino series computers were good at. The Arduino Uno costs $29 and includes:

      a microcontroller board based on the ATmega328 (datasheet). It has 14 digital input/output pins (of which 6 can be used as PWM outputs), 6 analog inputs, a 16 MHz crystal oscillator, a USB connection, a power jack, an ICSP header, and a reset button. It contains everything needed to support the microcontroller; simply connect it to a computer with a USB cable or power it with a AC-to-DC adapter or battery to get started.

      I mean, I think the Rasberry is cool and all, and is certainly much more powerful than an Arduino, but I don't understand the hype around it - like the posters here who said "Looking forward to watching you revolutionize computer education!" or "The world has just changed". Do people really think the world has been waiting for a $25 computer they can plug into their TV?

    4. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this may sound weird, but there are a huge number of people out there using Arduino for art and community projects. I even teach it to art majors at a major university. Arduinos are great, but I come across the limitations of AVRs in my own work all the time: slow A/D converters, major RAM limitations, limited PWM resolution, etc. Raspberry Pi might be a major leap forward because I'll be able to stuff it in a sculpture or a small box, power it with an (affordable!) photovoltaic array, synthesize realtime graphics / sound, do significant signal processing on sensor data and so on. In nearly the same form-factor as an Arduino -- and at nearly the same cost. Life changing, maybe not, but hugely empowering.

    5. Re:Is this really a big deal? by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could say the same thing about the Arduino vs. one of thousands of sub-$2 microcontrollers.

    6. Re:Is this really a big deal? by fotbr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For quick hack-it-together devices, I'd rather have a cheap linux computer with some gpio pins that I can access via something like /dev/port0 than an arduino. I'm not sure that this Raspberry Pi is the perfect solution to that, but it's closer to what I want than a arduino is, and it's a hell of a lot cheaper and easier to deal with than hacking something together out of an old laptop or mini-itx board.

      If I'm going to go back to playing with microcontrollers, I'm going to be working from a bare chip, custom boards, and assembly language, because to me, that was fun.

      Arduinos have their place. This thing has its place. There might be some overlap, but there's a lot of situations where you'd pick one over the other. Choice is good, right?

    7. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which the arduino is based on, in case people are confused by the references to an "arduino computer"

    8. Re:Is this really a big deal? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      You could say the same thing about the Arduino vs. one of thousands of sub-$2 microcontrollers.

      You could say the same thing, but I don't think that comparing the Rasberry PI to an Aduino is the same as comparing an Arduino to a raw microcontroller.

      I recognize the difference between a raw microcontroller and a finished circuit board that contains standard I/O connectors. Even if the microcontroller that powers the Arduino only costs $4, I can understand that many hobbyists don't want to procure their own I/O controllers, connectors, etc and wirewrap a board themselves at home. Many people want a board that's ready to plug into their computer and start programming.

    9. Re:Is this really a big deal? by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have kids, I'll bet you'd be more willing to let them take a soldering iron to a $25 machine than a $250 machine.

    10. Re:Is this really a big deal? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't own a composite TV. I was wondering what would be done if someone donated 10 of these to a school. USB hubs, USB keyboards and mice, power suplies, "monitors" that took composite, what would it take to get them working if 10 of them just showed up on someone's doorstep.

    11. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Arduino description sounds to me identical to the prototyping board Freescale sells for their 6808 microcontroller.

    12. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      You just gave me an idea for a new doorbell, which could be a fun project. (The old one sits in a box five times bigger than the RasPi - plenty of room for the board & batteries.)

    13. Re:Is this really a big deal? by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      Your description of the Arduino makes it sound identical to a prototyping board for any raw microcontroller. Freescale has been selling one for their 68HC08 micocontroller for years and years and year, with even more PWM inputs and outputs. With the rasberry pi you only get the same functionality of the Arduino or any other microcontroller for that matter if you add in the gert board. The rasberry pi by itself is more like a prototyping board for a set-top box or a smart phone or a smart TV. Microcontrollers serve a very different purpose than a microcomputer.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    14. Re:Is this really a big deal? by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      The Raspberry Pi is probably powerful enough that its GPIO connectors could be broken out and made compatible with Arduino shields...

    15. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school district would hire some consulting company at $150/hour to get everything set up, what do you think?

    16. Re:Is this really a big deal? by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      I thought this was what the Arduino series computers were good at.

      Only if your project requires no CPU. Consider an autonomous bot learning a path through a maze. With an Arduino, you might be able to do a passable job using a series of stepper motors with counters, but with this, you could connect a webcam and do computer vision analysis.

      Also, with an Arduino, you're limited in your ability to interact with it. Although it might be possible to cram a TCP/IP stack into the thing, it would be pretty tight. With this thing, you could ssh into it over a Wi-Fi connection (with an external adapter), update the software remotely, and keep on going.

      And you're memory-constrained with an Arduino. I realize that back in the day of assembly language über-hackers, it wasn't a big deal to cram amazing programs into tiny little chunks of RAM, but it's not a programming skill that's particularly useful in this day and age, and it makes more sense to teach people programming skills that more accurately map onto what they will see in the real world. This means having more than just a few kilobytes of RAM. Why would anyone want to squeeze their code down enough to work in such a resource-constrained environment if they don't have to?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      50 cent goodwill keyboard, network connection and a ssh client

    18. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'd have a hell of a job running anything resembling a 'real' OS on an Arduino - it's basically a single function microcontroller - which is O.K. if that's what you want, but not very flexible.

    19. Re:Is this really a big deal? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Personally I think Arduino and RasPi will be complementary more often than they will compete. There is a lot of code I would not be willing to handle on a general purpose linux microcomputer, that I would rather trust to a dedicated microcontroller. On the flip side there is plenty of code you just cant run on a microcontroller, it just doesnt have the grunt. The two could team together quite well.

    20. Re:Is this really a big deal? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So you have to buy a computer to SSH from to run these things?

    21. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      no

      jesus your just being impossible, what happens if you donate 10 of these things to a school? they look at them, shrug and stick them in the av room with the 10 tv's and the pile of computer junk that they never use

      schools are pits of retardation, teachers couldn't wipe their ass if it wasn't outlined for them, what the fuck do you expect?

      here is the deal... it has composite TV and HDMI, if you own neither go to the thrift store if you want video out, otherwise use it as an network attached device, or are you going to complain your piss poor school doesnt own a computer as well?

      seriously if your too damn dumb to hook a usb + TV / HDMI out computer up then you don't need to be here

    22. Re:Is this really a big deal? by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      Sweet, so you are saying they are completely useless for education, despite all the people here claiming they will revolutionize education and all that.

    23. Re:Is this really a big deal? by White+Flame · · Score: 2

      You've already found its greater purpose: To entice kids to become computer hobbyists at the programmer level, not just as websurfers & gamers.

      Think about it, there really isn't anything inexpensive and capable enough in the current market to hit that niche.

    24. Re:Is this really a big deal? by jimicus · · Score: 2

      The Arduino has only a serial output. In order to do any work on it from more than a few feet away, you'd need to plug it into a networked computer of some sort. With the raspberry pi, that networking is already built in.

    25. Re:Is this really a big deal? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately the Pi has very little GPIO. It's one of the compromises they made to keep the cost down (AIUI the chip has lots more GPIO but bringing it out would have required more layers). You may be able to hook up some specific shields that don't require much IO but afaict the only way you are going to make a generic "pi to ardunio shield adaptor" is to include either IO expanders or a microcontroller in it.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    26. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the world can't afford any computer. This can put a general purpose computer in many more hands. Has your high power computer filled world within eyesight changed? Perhaps not right away. Has the world changed for many who now will have something which allows them to learn to develop modern applications on a modern OS where before they had nothing? A computer no less they can carry in their pocket to a location which has video & keyboard & mouse (school, say) which can be shared by many other students/users? A computer that doesn't need to be eating hundreds of watts just to idle but with enough CPU horsepower to really matter?

      This includes most of the world, so I'd say yes, the world has changed.

    27. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, saying it should work with some of the equipment a school already has. If your school has none of these, then they may need to get some (cheap, possibly 2nd hand) bits. This is still cheaper than kitting out a school with a lab of computers instead of the Raspberry Pi. Please also remember that this is being driven by a UK charity, and UK schools tend to either have a nice, fairly modern IT lab, so these can be connected to the existing computers etc, or they have a variety of older equipment, which these WILL ALSO connect to. If you have none, then no matter what you plan to use YOU WILL HAVE TO BUY THEM.

    28. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At $25, and the rumor that it can run XBMC, I can sit and wait.

      Once XBMC is known to run on it, I can but a few of these, some cheap thumb drives and IR receivers, and give them to family members as home media centers for well under $100.

      Then I show them how to rip their DVDs to an external hard drive (don't think they're able to manage an SMB share) with Handbrake.

    29. Re:Is this really a big deal? by mikechant · · Score: 1

      I don't own a composite TV.

      I don't know about in the US, but here in the UK you should be able to get an analogue-tuner CRT TV with composite input for next to nothing. I've got two such 28" TVs sitting idle awaiting disposal - although the power consumption's probably not good, and they are very bulky and heavy. Even though you can still use them with a digital converter box most people have (or will soon have) disposed of them in favour of digital tuner LCD TVs.

    30. Re:Is this really a big deal? by 3dr · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've been working with different microcontrollers for a few years now, with the goal of creating an autonomous vehicle. In the context of autonomous vehicles, microcontrollers such as Arduino are capable of doing basic navigation to waypoints, and basic obstacle avoidance. That's largely the easy stuff. The hard stuff includes path determination, mapping, and more intelligent, higher-level reasoning about navigation. And for this, you need more memory.

      That's where a device like the R-Pi will be valuable. You'll have the processing headroom for complex algorithms, enough memory to represent and manipulate the world, and of course sensor access. I see combining R-Pi and Arduino: Arduino would drive the sensors, and provide the data to R-Pi over I2C, for instance.

      I look forward to getting one.

    31. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      if your too damn dumb that "plug box into tv" is a difficult concept then you dont need to be involved with education in any way shape or form

      ps your spam signature is a real classy touch, I am sure the state of Alaska is embarrassed to have you represent them

    32. Re:Is this really a big deal? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      Ah, the problem, is you are too damn dumb to read. What if you give them 10 and they don't have 10 spare TVs running around? It's stupidity that they don't just have tens of thousands of TVs laying around in case that happens?

      ps your spam signature is a real classy touch, I am sure the state of Alaska is embarrassed to have you represent them

      Given your idiocy demonstrated, you think Palin is a better ambassador, right? If you don't like it, turn of sigs. OR is that too hard for a confirmed die hard moron such as yourself?

    33. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What if you give them 10 and they don't have 10 spare TVs running around?

      But they probably do, so now they have 10 TVs that can also be used as computers.

      True, they can't use them as TVs and computers at the same time. But it's considerably cheaper than buying ten full spec computers, even if they had the space to put them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Is this really a big deal? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, it'll work only if they have 10 spare TVs running around? I'd think that if so many unused and unwanted TVs were showing up on the doorstep of schools, they'd be selling them at the regular fund raisers, so I don't have the same faith that they "probably" have 10+ TVs in storage.

      I can't buy a CRT anymore, not monitor, not TV. The cheapest TVs here are about $400 (19" to 32" all cost about the same), but a monitor with VGA-only input can be had for under $100. So if I wanted to donate something the school could use, I'd have to buy the computer, then spend $100 on a monitor that won't even connect to the computer (plus power supply, keyboard, SD card, mouse, probably a USB hub so they could plug in more than just the keyboard and mouse if they wanted). So the computer is $25 of $35, and it takes another few hundred dollars to get it working, unless they happen to have a pile of old TVs collecting dust. And when I point this out (from the perspective of asking for help, as I would be interested in donating some to a school, not trying to poke fun at the project), I get told I'm too stupid to donate a computer to a school. And they wonder why Linux will never have the year of the desktop when that's the level of support someone gets from the "community" when trying to get Linux into the schools.

    35. Re:Is this really a big deal? by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I'm a hobbyist who never could commit to micro-controllers because of a lack of EE experience. Arduinos are an improvement, but not fast enough for computer-like logic, for example the Raspberry Pi can do sound from any GPIO port due to it's speed. With USB, visual processing is possible. I work with Linux and can bring-in tons of libraries that do this stuff for me. For example, Reprap could run exclusively off one of these (with no computer attached).
      This potentially could begin the next era of computing: affordable, widespread custom automation

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    36. Re:Is this really a big deal? by snadrus · · Score: 1

      They make that, it's called an Arduino!
      Have a single GPIO pin go to an Arduino instructing it to use its drivers (already written) to operate its shields.

      Easier to code, less knowledge required for custom wiring. Sounds like the way to go.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    37. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't own a composite TV

      I haven't seen a TV in the last ten years that didn't either have a composite input or a scart - adapters for this are dirt cheap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    38. Re:Is this really a big deal? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I'd think that if so many unused and unwanted TVs were showing up on the doorstep of schools, they'd be selling them at the regular fund raisers,

      Not really. One, they aren't really worth much, especially since the digital switchover. Two, selling anything electrical is a liability nightmare; most charities don't bother.

      so I don't have the same faith that they "probably" have 10+ TVs in storage.

      Who said anything about storage, you fat narcoleptic moron? They actually use them for, shock, watching TV programmes. The BBC produce tons of quality educational material, it's part of their remit. Perhaps watching that when I was a kid is the reason I'm not as dumb as you.

      The cheapest TVs here are about $400 (19" to 32" all cost about the same),

      That's a lot. Are new ones even more expensive?

      So if I wanted to donate something the school could use, I'd have to buy the computer, then spend $100 on a monitor

      If you don't have a TV.

      a monitor with VGA-only input can be had for under $100. So if I wanted to donate something the school could use, I'd have to buy the computer, then spend $100 on a monitor that won't even connect to the computer

      Why do you think (and I use that word in its broadest sense) it won't connect? You're just making shit up now.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. tax is dumb, however unions... by decora · · Score: 2

    heh. without unions you would see a lot of work return to the UK ... like children working in coal mines and toxic garbage dumps.... just like children do in asia.

    1. Re:tax is dumb, however unions... by hawguy · · Score: 2

      heh. without unions you would see a lot of work return to the UK ... like children working in coal mines and toxic garbage dumps.... just like children do in asia.

      Unless the UK labor laws are lot weaker than in the USA, loss of labor unions won't result in a return to uncontrolled child labor or unreasonably hazardous working conditions (coal miners will still work underground, but risks will be mitigated when possible). Both are illegal and regulated by the government. In the USA, labor union actions seem to be centered more around issues of pay and benefits rather than working conditions. Employees with concerns about workplace safety have government channels to take their complaints to, they don't have to rely on a union to represent them.

  14. thats funny, straight out of Mao by decora · · Score: 2

    there is no need for democracy in communist China, because the people are already represented in government by the Communist Party.

    funny corollary: There is no need for independent labor unions in China, because the government controlled labor union inherently represents the people's interests - after all, it too is controlled by the Communist Party.

    as for the basic facts of history about unions and working conditions, well, you are just 100%, flat out wrong. i mean, its like you have tried to lecture me on mathematics by starting out with "the volume of a sphere is r cubed". no, its not r cubed. its not, its not even close, and any 3rd grader knows it from basic examination of the universe that is plain to their god given eyeballs.

    1. Re:thats funny, straight out of Mao by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there is no need for democracy in communist China, because the people are already represented in government by the Communist Party.

      funny corollary: There is no need for independent labor unions in China, because the government controlled labor union inherently represents the people's interests - after all, it too is controlled by the Communist Party.

      as for the basic facts of history about unions and working conditions, well, you are just 100%, flat out wrong. i mean, its like you have tried to lecture me on mathematics by starting out with "the volume of a sphere is r cubed". no, its not r cubed. its not, its not even close, and any 3rd grader knows it from basic examination of the universe that is plain to their god given eyeballs.

      I'm not talking about China, I'm talking about the UK and USA. And I'm not talking about the history of Labor unions, they've obviously been a powerful force in shaping worker's rights in the past. I'm talking about the present day.

      I don't know what you saw in my post that made you think I was talking about historical working conditions or conditions in China.

      All I'm saying is even if labor unions disappeared overnight, modern government regulations would prevent a return to the poor working conditions of the past. Perhaps worker's wages would drop, which could be a good thing (if you're an employer and want to compete internationally), or a bad thing (if you're an employee and your skills aren't in high demand).

    2. Re:thats funny, straight out of Mao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that such idiocy shows up on Slashdot nowadays. I miss the intelligent Slashdot commenters of 1999 or so.

    3. Re:thats funny, straight out of Mao by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Germans have shorter hours strong unions high salaries and a stronger currency and more rights than Americans, more vacation, hospitalization, a national healthcare system and compete fine against Chinese and overworked underproductive Americans under poor American management and poor American government and high us unemployment

    4. Re:thats funny, straight out of Mao by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is even if labor unions disappeared overnight, modern government regulations would prevent a return to the poor working conditions of the past.

      Don't think that with the correct lobbying you could get some of those laws to be relaxed?

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    5. Re:thats funny, straight out of Mao by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Old thread, so it's likely this will never be read....but..

      "All I'm saying is even if labor unions disappeared overnight, modern government regulations would prevent a return to the poor working conditions of the past."

      I've seen this sentiment before, but I don't understand how anyone could believe it. The only effective force for worker conditions are unions. There is no market force or government motivation that has workers' interests in mind. You can see how slanted government is towards big business now. I don't very few politicians fear the uncollected mass of voters. It is only when unions step in and lobby, with real tangible amounts of campaign financing, that laws get passed on behalf of the workers. America is only around 12% union now, but that 12% helps to set, and more importantly maintain what is considered 'normal' in terms of pay, rights, benefits, etc..

      Without any force pushing for labor, slowly but surely working conditions and pay would regress to match the lowest common denominator in the global economy.

  15. Blackberry Kush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm holding out for the Blackberry Kush.

  16. wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0

    They had wanted to build the board in the UK but it turns out to be uneconomic.

    Translation: while they were trying to nuzzle the UK government and NGOs for money their pitch was "ummm...sure, we'll build it here - how 'bout in that eyesore warehouse over there?" However, that was never the plan.

    1. Re:wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had wanted to build the board in the UK but it turns out to be uneconomic.

      Translation: while they were trying to nuzzle the UK government and NGOs for money their pitch was "ummm...sure, we'll build it here - how 'bout in that eyesore warehouse over there?" However, that was never the plan.

      Take it you didn't read the article properly and do your own research, there is a reason most countries outsource manufacturing and this is it.

    2. Re:wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After VATS the real price would have been $30 from the customers perspective or their pre-tax price would have had to have been $22.

      With the low profit margins on electronics, you would have to be business retarded to throw away 20% so you can manufacture domestically.

    3. Re:wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been in this business.

      That's unlikely what happened, I'd guess they are telling the truth. They rang around a few places in the UK for estimates early on, got O.K. numbers.

      When it came to the crunch though, the big boys aren't that interested in a one-off high volume job, so they quote high. The small guys would like the work, but can't do the throughput.

      The difference in China is that a lot of jobs coming in look like one-off high volume - and they want the work (reason below). Their setup costs for the production run are lower as well, but that's the only area they really save on labour costs, most of the assembly will be automated.

      I suspect the problem is more the slash-and-burn of low level electronics companies in the U.K. i.e. very few startups - which means the assemblers aren't set up for this type of job where in China it's all on.

    4. Re:wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the plan was to import the device package it and claim it was made in UK, now that they have the publicity they don't care anymore. They had no intentions of producing it here.

    5. Re:wanted to build the board in the UK but FAIL by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      No, you'd have to be business retarded to add an extra S on the end of VAT.

      In any case, it makes no difference to the reseller - VAT is effectively paid by the final consumer, as any VAT collected from sales is netted off against the VAT paid out to suppliers. That's what "VA" stands for.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Wrong information about all these assumptions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi

    To clear a few things up..

    Model " A " = 25GBP - Model " B " = 35GBP

    MdelB is ARM11, not 6, ModelB is the one you want to be able to get your hands on.

    Raspberry-Pi Foundation IS the charity, it didn't donate all the money from the auctions to a charity, they are the charity themselves.

    All the money earnt from the auctions which people wilfully gave up thousands of pounds for one of the first batch boards is all going to producing the 10K batch their after.

    If you follow the site and read the forums instead of just assuming, then you would see people have already gotten their hands on both models, and there are already several distributions of linux running off them, and even XBMC.

    There is proof that these boards are going into production, just read the site instead of assuming.

    1. Re:Wrong information about all these assumptions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Er, lots of what you've said is wrong too.

      A is $25, not £25. Likewise B is $35, not £35.

      Both are ARM11. Both have a ARMv6 architecture. (I don't blame you for getting that wrong, ARM aren't great at naming).

      And the people who already have models have either alpha or beta boards, which were produced in small batches, which means that of itself it doesn't guarantee the actual production. They aren't either model A or B, being preproduction (though they are closer to model B).

  18. so, where's the apps? by fikx · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is an app market for these :) I'd love to have a website I could go to to see what people have put on these and try them out....of course in a lot of cases you would only want to have one app on there at a time, but it'd be fun to swap out just using a download. Want it to be a file server? download the app. need a simple web database? download the app., need it to do X? see if there's already an app for it...

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
    1. Re:so, where's the apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The app store is called apt-get.

    2. Re:so, where's the apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My one worry is this version they're making sans ethernet. You just know if a school decides to get them en masse for all the kids, then they'll choose the cheaper version. It just seems pointless and limiting to make a version without networking, just to get a headline on the price point. :/

    3. Re:so, where's the apps? by VVrath · · Score: 2

      I don't think the removal of Ethernet from the Model A is just about building down to a price.

      I know that if I approached the network manager at my school and said "I want to buy 30 linux computers that pupils can use to write and execute their own code. Oh and by the way they all need network access", he'd have a blue fit!

      I could see us buying a few model B's to teach the sixth-formers about networking, but for general use in my school the model A would be a much easier sell to the powers that be.

    4. Re:so, where's the apps? by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      It supports USB ethernet adapters, and those are cheap, like about 12 bucks.

    5. Re:so, where's the apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Slightly brainwashed by Apple, are we?

      $25 portable Linux box. I'm thinking, maybe put Debian and a light X configuration on that. Your reaction is "ooh ooh! it needs an app store!"

  19. taxes and duty by Formalin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If a British company imports components, it has to pay tax on those (and most components are not made in the UK). If, however, a completed device is made abroad and imported into the UK – with all of those components soldered onto it – it does not attract any import duty at all.

    Tax and duty are two different things. Anyone care to explain the actual situation there? Sounds like they're confused, at least.

    Is there a specific semiconductor duty that doesn't apply to finished goods? (not sure that a board like this would count as 'finished' anyway, for duty purpose)
    If they're bitching about VAT, I don't see how that would be any different, completed unit or not.

    The only difference I can see is more margin on Chinese produced version, barring there is no duty on semis, as mentioned above... Which any idiot would well know, by walking into a wal-mart.

    1. Re:taxes and duty by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It is Customs Duty they are on about, also known as Import Duty. Duty is a type of tax, so it is not wrong to refer to it as such.

    2. Re:taxes and duty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading their blog, there is a specific import duty that only applies to electronic components. The purpose of the special duty was to punish manufacturers that used components not produced on shore. Now the untended consequences have hit big time since there is really no choice but to buy off shore components. A completed assembly like a populated circuit board is not subject to the tax.

  20. Why can't they make it in UK ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not economical?

    Why can't UK make themselves economical?

    1. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not economical?

      They explain this at the end of the article. One of the major factors is that there tax reductions for importing manufactured systems but not for components!!! Write to your MP today.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Actually, write to your MEP, as customs duties are set by the EU.

    3. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Did I miss the UK joining the EU?

    4. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Petition at http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/27158

    5. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by CnlPepper · · Score: 1

      Have you been in a coma for the last 30 years?

    6. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Nope. I always thought it wasn't based on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_the_euro

    7. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The EU is NOT the same thing as the eurozone.

      The UK is a member of the EU and has been since long before the euro existed. The UK and denmark negotiated opt-outs when the treaty that formed the euro was drawn up and have no immediate plans to enter. Sweden are technically required to join the EU but are trying to stay out on a technicality and several of the new EU countries haven't met the criteria for joining the euro yet (they are technically required to join eventually but afaict no timescale was ever set).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It happened in 1973. I missed it because It was before I was born.

    9. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Sweden are technically required to join the EU

      Again? Did somebody lose the paperwork last time or something?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Why can't they make it in UK ? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Yeah It should have said "Sweeden are technically required to join the eurozone" sorry.

      That's a somewhat embarrasing mistake, writing a post about the difference between the EU and the Eurozone and then mixing them up myself :(

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  21. I imagine... by abednegoyulo · · Score: 1

    a beowulf cluster out of this.

    I haven't created one so I ask the /. community, for 35USD what is your take with this device making up a beowulf cluster?

    1. Re:I imagine... by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      The ethernet is 100MBps, and is driven as a USB device behind an onboard-hub. The CPU isn't really that beefy.

      However, it's cheap and easy to set up a network to play around with actually implementing the tech, if not for performance.

    2. Re:I imagine... by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      what is your take with this device making up a beowulf cluster?

      If you want to learn about running a cluster and go for it.

      If you want to get computing done just buy a bloody i5 2500 and stick it on a cheap H61 mobo. The i5 has 4 cores at over four times the clockspeeds. So assuming the two architectures give similar performance per clock (i'd expect sandy bridge is faster but I dunno for sure) the i5 should be equivilent to over 16 pis. Further the Pi is limited by a USB based network connection.

      I'd expect the real cost of a Pi model B to be over £30 once you add in VAT, shipping, SD card, network cable and USB cable (to cut up and connect to your PSU).

      You can get an i5 2500 with mobo, 8GB ram and 8GB SSD for under £300 including VAT and delivery and as above i'd expect it to thrash a cluster of 10 Pis.

      You will need a PSU either way. You may or may not want some form of case. If you do I'd expect a case for a standard PC would work out cheaper than a case for a cluser of Pis. You may or may not need additional storage (on top of the boot drives I included above) either way.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  22. Re:Official complaint !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is racist about stating facts? Just curious.

  23. Won't be $25, but it could be close by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're looking for x86 SOC, Intel's new Medfield might be your best bet. Medfield article

    If you were to give these the Raspberry Pi treatment...let's say a Pi board's cost is 1/2 cpu, 1/2 everything else. So the everything else is about...rounding up....let's say about 15 bucks. So add about $15 to whatever Intel charges for Medfield and you'd have your x86 Raspberry Pi.

    It will be more expensive than $25 total, because...well...Intel is involved. No way a Medfield chipset will sell for ten bucks. But it would still be cheap and let you run Wine or other groovy stuff on a dinky cheap board.

    It might be close though. I found this atom board for $57, and that's a full motherboard with a lot of expensive slots and heat sinks and the like. The actual Atom chip probably isn't more than $15-20 bucks. If Medfield is in this ballpark you could still be pretty cheap.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Won't be $25, but it could be close by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      well $57 from a supplier who has no rating listed on the google product search, that i've never heard of an whose website looks rather dodgy. At best i'd say that is surpless stock at worst i'd say it's an outright scam. All the other sellers listed are FAR more expensive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Won't be $25, but it could be close by makomk · · Score: 1

      $15-20 bucks more than Intel's pricing would probably be too much?

    3. Re:Won't be $25, but it could be close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like "if you're looking for an x86 tiny computer, tell Intel you want to use it to bring computers to children in third world countries"

      Intel will then focus research there and use their connections to kill the market you were about to enter. Worked for OLPC.

    4. Re:Won't be $25, but it could be close by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Ok fair enough, it might be a fluke. I was just looking for a cheap Atom board to get some ballpark idea of what Intel might sell the Medfeld for. So I searched for someone actually selling Atom chips. Found them at Newark.com.

      Now it looks like you can buy at Atom Z510 in bulk for about $27, so I'm off by about 7 bucks. But that's my first find and if I were to put more effort into it I might find a better deal somewhere. If Medfield tracks about the same, I'll bet you can get the chipset for...a guess....$25. That's doing some shopping and after the price comes down - I wouldn't buy these for a Raspberry Pi type project the same quarter Intel releases them in. Wait for the price to come down.

      Add that to the "other half" of the Raspberry Pi board for about $15, and you'd have an x86 Raspberry Pi for $40. Maybe a little more depending on how much memory you bundle. Seeing as how the B model of the Pi is $35, it's in the ballpark. Maybe. If my guesses are close to the mark.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
  24. China has *interesting* safety net, actually by F69631 · · Score: 2

    China is an agrarian society, so most of the poor people are farmers. The land ownership is a very controlled system but the short version is that those poor farmers can't actually sell their land (as it technically belongs to the government) but they can lease it away for a few years. When a poor farmer decides that he wants to leave to a city to seek better wages, he leases his farm to someone, thus gains a bit of money to start the new life with and might or might not find a better paying job. If he does find factory work, he can make some more permanent arrangement about the farm and if he doesn't... he can return to continue his old life!

    The system is a bit unusual but it actually works pretty well. It's the main reason why Chinese cities don't have shantytowns, etc. similar to those of most developing countries.

  25. UK? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    "They had wanted to build the board in the UK but it turns out to be uneconomic."

    No, really?

  26. couchdouche got beaten by APK & ran? LMAO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  27. Well said...Bravo! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    You wonderfully expressed what I was struggling to put into words. :-)

    I believe change happens as reactionary people die.

    I never thought about like that, but I think that is true.

     

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  28. TOR exit nodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Install, leave it someplace and forget it. Do Anonymous a favor and place random stealth TOR exit nodes the world over with bifferboard and the like.

  29. Re:Official complaint !!! by fatphil · · Score: 1

    That's not an official complaint - you've not complained to anyone official. You've just gone "wah-wah-wah I don't like this guy's stereotypes wah wah wah" to the masses.

    If you want to make an official complaint, the feedback link is down
    |
    |
    |
    V there

    And, if you wish the authorities to curb his freedom of expression, then you are, by definition, for censorship.

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863