Slashdot Mirror


Plantronics Helps Make Remote Workers' Lives Easier (Video)

If you're working at home or from a coffee shop or, really, anyplace outside your company's offices, they need to hear you when you talk, and you need to hear them. The same goes for dealing with clients via VOIP or video, the two communications techologies that seem to be driving POTS into obsolescence faster than we thought possible just a few years ago. In this video, Plantronics PR person Karen Auby -- who works remotely most of the time herself -- explains how Plantronics products help make work easier in a world of "unified communications."

164 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Bloody really?!?! Another one? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... half the "stories" today are just bloody slashvertisements?!?

    --
    I was raised on the command line, bitch

    "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    1. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      These are plainly so.

      In the past there were attempts to pitch them as 'stories'. See the long run that Ruby on Rails had, or possibly the first ones: the They Might be Giants series.

      Slashdot has to make money somehow...

    2. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 2

      So... half the "stories" today are just bloody slashvertisements?!?

      Half? That's damn optimistic.

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    3. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by terpri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just wasted three minutes and forty-one seconds of my life that I will never get back

    4. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just did. I've always had Slashdot Adblock whitelisted with The Box unchecked, but now I give up. Too bad that box doesn't get rid of this "story".

      Though, I sort of appreciated the subversiveness of

      whatever-you-just-said-made-no-sense

    5. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by atriusofbricia · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have you checked the "Disable Advertisement" box yet? (Have you even gotten one yet?)

      Had one for as long as I can remember. It doesn't block "stories" as they aren't "Advertisements". Thus, entirely useless in this case.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    6. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by sir_montag · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I haven't logged in for months, and seeing this blatant of an advertisement is sadly the first thing I've been pissed off about enough to comment. This is ridiculous. Crappy articles, ok, whatever. What makes Slashdot worth coming to is the comments. Put up enough crappy advertising and the people who make those comments will go elsewhere.

    7. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by spyder-implee · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if we are witnessing the beginning of the end of Slashdot?

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    8. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      They're "Idle" articles. You can block them from Options > Exclusions.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    9. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Rebelgecko · · Score: 1

      This is just a delayed April Fools' Day thing, right?

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    10. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. The last advertisement (notice the "interviews" are always PR or CEO?) was catwgorized as IT and SECURITY.

    11. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't mind slashvertisements so much... as long as they're submitted as look-at-what-we-just-did stories by the company, are subject to pre-release rating like any other submission, and can be approved or rejected by the editor on duty at the time. It's the "here's some money, put this crap in your news feed" transactions, bypassing editorial review, that disgust me.

      Legitimate news sources clearly differentiate paid advertising from editorial content. This practise renders Slashdot illegitimate. "Slashdot: News and ads for nerds, stuff that might matter."

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    12. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Desler · · Score: 1

      No, because in retaliation samzenpus just started posting idle stories outside of idle.

    13. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So... half the "stories" today are just bloody slashvertisements?!?

      We gave up April Fool's for this? Slashdot TV: Every bit as (+5, Informative) of April Fool's Day, but without the (+5, Pony)

    14. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      This is why CmdrTaco left.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Simple! Just block those categories too! This plan is perfectly sustainable.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    16. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that 7UP commercial... Plantronics helps *cha-ching!* ...Plantronics PR *cha-ching!* ... Plantronics products *cha-ching!* Plantronics! *cha-ching!* I used to use Plantronics headset for telework, and the quality was great, but I've since switched to a Logitech that can switch between my smartphone and my computer with a push of a button, and is foldable so it fits into my laptop bag... so this story just makes me resent Plantronics now >:(

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    17. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't stop the ads 'cunningly disguised' as stories. Besides, Plantronics stuff is way overpriced. You can scam up cheaper gear that's just as effective at your friendly office supply chain store.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    18. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by ergowa · · Score: 1

      Count me in the same boat. I had to read the comments just to see if there was any value to this advertisement and completely information-free posting. I really don't mind advertising that much if it's clearly labeled as such (even though I find BoingBoing's long-format ads that look like posts to be annoying, they're clearly labeled as such). As a long-time reader, this pretty much marks the last straw in terms of irrelevant content and lack of editorial relevance. I mean, I can put up with inane content-free posts and badly-edited posts full of grammar errors that would embarrass any half-literate high school student, but this post is just one too many.

    19. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by zlives · · Score: 1

      i wasted 27 seconds ( plus what this comment takes to read the comments as it was playing....)

    20. Re:Bloody really?!?! Another one? by SeanNi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I haven't bothered logging in with my account for a good 7 or 8 years. But I dragged it out to stand with you in solidarity. (In the meantime, I have continued to visit the site to read the comments, and still comment myself, but anonymously, as I never felt that anything I had to say was important enough to attach my name to. However this is.) Please don't kill the community, Slashdot.

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean
  2. This is getting worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We had one ad yesterday, two today, three tomorrow?
    Also the first one for instance was much better disguised, this is glaring obvious, is the obvious version cheaper?
    I wouldn’t expect that form slashdot 5 years ago, now I'm surprised it took so long...

  3. WTF? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WTF? This isn't even a thinly veiled slashvertisement, it's a full-on ad. I can't wait for the "Watch this 30 second advertisement before Slashdot will load" ads to come.

    1. Re:WTF? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Funny

      If things get worse the 30 second ads might end up being more informative than Slashdot ;).

      --
    2. Re:WTF? by CaptainLard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree this is pretty blatant. But what can we do about it? Slashdot is owned by thinkgeek which trades on nasdaq. That means they eventually have to answer to shareholders who care about one thing. Like it or not, advertising makes the internet go round (although how this is economically sustainable, I have absolutely no idea). Is there some way we can avoid it? There are several million UIDs now. If everyone bought a few shares, slashdot users could dominate think geek's $95mil market capital. Would that even do anything? Is that better than a subscription model? In the end the guys running the servers gotta get their hot pockets from somewhere...

    3. Re:WTF? by hawguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree this is pretty blatant. But what can we do about it? Slashdot is owned by thinkgeek which trades on nasdaq. That means they eventually have to answer to shareholders who care about one thing. Like it or not, advertising makes the internet go round (although how this is economically sustainable, I have absolutely no idea). Is there some way we can avoid it? There are several million UIDs now. If everyone bought a few shares, slashdot users could dominate think geek's $95mil market capital. Would that even do anything? Is that better than a subscription model? In the end the guys running the servers gotta get their hot pockets from somewhere...

      Well I suppose that trying to buy up a controlling interest in Slashdot's parent company and then pressuring the board to stop hiding blatant ads as stories on is one option, the option I'll take is to just stop reading Slashdot if these ads keep up.

      It's not like I can't find many many other ways to waste time online.

    4. Re:WTF? by CaptainLard · · Score: 2

      It's not like I can't find many many other ways to waste time online.

      Forget string theory, that should be the fundamental law of the universe.

    5. Re:WTF? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What can we do? Nothing. Nothing except watch Slashdot die. And given this kind of bullshit, I'm going to be chuckling and nodded my head in satisfaction.

      It is exactly this kind of idiocy that has fucked up the US economy beyond repair: Let's never look beyond next quarter's financial statements. That seems like an awesome strategy to people who can't be bothered to give two shits about whether the property exists the quarter after; who only care if their wallet is slightly fatter and they can justify moving on to destroying the next property.

      Tell me, oh great Slashdot editors: How do those financial statements look when nobody is left to consume your bullshit?

      My search for a replacement begins today.

    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Plantronics USB headsets are crap under Linux.

    7. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am a huge fan of Plantronics, I recommend them to anyone I work with. Seeing this advertisement disguised as a story leaves me vaguely disgusted with them.

    8. Re:WTF? by GammaMatrix · · Score: 1

      Today's Slashdot quote seemed relevant: "There's always free cheese in a mousetrap."

    9. Re:WTF? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Or we could just take the slashcode to somewhere like slash.org where we could setup our own version without the slashvertisements. Eventually we'd probably have to pay for the servers and bandwidth so we could put up some unobtrusive ads, maybe even with a disablement since slashdotters are so picky about ads. If that doesn't bring in enough revenue we could always get companies to submit advertising directly and ... oh wait.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    10. Re:WTF? by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      WTF? This isn't even a thinly veiled slashvertisement, it's a full-on ad. I can't wait for the "Watch this 30 second advertisement before Slashdot will load" ads to come.

      It'll end up being 60 seconds because the crap Slashcode takes 30 seconds to start working anyway. d=

    11. Re:WTF? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      That means they eventually have to answer to shareholders

      Now what happens if the advertising revenues go down, because - despite the more frequent placement of slashvertisements - fewer people see ads since they don't visit Slashdot so often anymore? Pissing off your users is frequently not a good way to increase your revenue.

    12. Re:WTF? by Leebert · · Score: 2

      ell me, oh great Slashdot editors: How do those financial statements look when nobody is left to consume your bullshit?

      The slashdot staff DOES know better. If you think this doesn't bother them, you're dead wrong.

      Like many of us, they're sitting around on corporate telecons hearing about how they're going to "monetize blah blah corporatespeak". About their only choice is to quit and take another job. I certainly don't think we want that, because eventually those who fill their shoes will be selected as ones who are much more in-line with corporate philosophy, and NO ONE will be left to at least voice concerns.

      This "story" is repugnant, and I'm all about the anger, but aim it somewhere other than the editors.

    13. Re:WTF? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      This ad didn't go through Slashdot's editorial staff. That's the problem. It's a paid advertisement posted as if it were editorial content. Kind of like newspapers do with those ads typeset in columns, or TV stations do with those half-hour hostess-and-pitchman ads. But without the "This is a paid advertisement" notice attached to protect what's left of their integrity.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    14. Re:WTF? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I wondered if the 'this is a paid advertisement' notice was legally required for for reason. I don't think they'd put it up if they had a choice - integrity or no, the people who chose to run it wouldn't be giving a fig about the rest of the paper's professionalism.

      And if it is a legal requirement not to mislead the readers, why doesn't /. have to follow the same requirements?

  4. What. The. Fuck. by hairyfish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? Are we this blatant about advertising now? Pull your fucking head in Slashdot editors...

  5. Sad by JNSiQwa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, never, ever buy a Plantronics product. Check.

    1. Re:Sad by FSWKU · · Score: 5, Informative

      So, never, ever buy a Plantronics product. Check.

      I've had Plantronics on my "Do Not Buy" list for many a year now. I used to have SEVERAL of their headsets back when I was into LAN parties and online gaming. Every single one of them broke after only a couple months of normal use. The inline volume control would go out, the microphone would stop working, or one audio channel would give out. One set even had the earpiece completely fall off! Once I disassembled one of the broken units and discovered how cheap and thin the wires were, my decision to never give them anymore money was solidified.

      Went and bought a set of MDR-V600 studio monitors back when Sony didn't equate with evil. That was probably about 9 years ago and they've held up through everything I've thrown at them and sound great (if a bit bassy at times, but that's what EQ is for). Would I buy from Sony now? Not a chance.

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    2. Re:Sad by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      their professional products are shit as well, It used to be a serious company back in the 60's or something, they pretty much vanished for decades and started advertising on TV for their shitty 40+$ chico garbage

    3. Re:Sad by tapspace · · Score: 1

      > back when Sony didn't equate with evil

      So, never? Seriously, Sony has always been bad. Maybe we didn't see it as "evil" in the US because they were Japanese and we were afraid to call another culture's style of business evil for fear of being bigots. Sony is evil, and it didn't start 5 years ago or 10 years ago, they always were. Regardless, they make damn fine electronics. In every other market, their name is mud to me, but, God, I've had some great Sony electronics in my life (including, the essentially same V6's).

    4. Re:Sad by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      I've a very vengeful consumer. I used Sony for all my home electronics, since the root-kit debacle I haven't bought anything from them - they've lost a LOT of sales from me. Tektronix started spamming me at work, now they are the last company I check for hardware, not the first (and I buy a LOT of test and measurement equipment at my lab). One of the nice things about modern world is that there is almost always another company that makes a similar product. This add irritated me - so I won't buy any Plantronics products for the next decade or two.

      If slashdot needs more operating money, this wasn't the way to do it.

    5. Re:Sad by laron · · Score: 1

      IT at my workplace actuall recomends Platntronics USB headsets for VoIP communications, though I never could quite fathom why. For a recording that I had to do one, I did a quick comparison between a simple analogue headset and Plantronics USB device. I'm not exactly an audiophile, but the analogue headset provided a much clearer recording.
      Is there actually a technical advantage in using a USB audio device, if your computer has an internal sound card anyway?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    6. Re:Sad by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Hold on there, you're making a big mistake in judgement - it's Sony America that's causing all the problems and suing people, NOT Sony Japan. As a Japanese in Japan doing worldwide business I'm telling you the stunts Sony America is pulling would never fly in Japan; they'd be torn apart. Here in Japan companies live and die by customer service, and companies that disrespect their customers don't last so long.

      Of course if you are referring to the removal of the Other OS feature on the PS3 I can understand if you were actually using it for it's inended purpose - but the reality is most people used it to play pirated games so from a corporate standpoint I understand Sony removing it. It is unfortunate though, and it's removal gives me one less reason to care about the PS3.

      Of course I say this but I must admit I rarely purchase Sony products. In fact other than a first generation PS2 I can't think of anything Sony made in my possesion. It is a shame they don't embrace the hacker/maker communities like say Sharp or Casio... which is probably why I own a bunch of Sharp and Casio gear.

    7. Re:Sad by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      That would be entirely dependent on the quality of the USB device vs the quality of the internal sound card. But I have no idea why IT at your workplace recomends Plantronics - as you already know they make crap devices.

    8. Re:Sad by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      They do it to simplify their installation instructions. It makes it easer to tell everyone how to select the audio devices in the VoIP clients.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    9. Re:Sad by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Ok, wait, so they spend money on crappy hardware so they don't have to write a few extra lines in a manual? That's awful.

    10. Re:Sad by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      That's bullshit. The game piracy thing didn't come along until the firmware was jailbroken several revisions AFTER Sony removed OtherOS.

      In fact it looks like people broke the console open to piracy when they were trying to find a way to put OtherOS back. You have bad information there. And it's far from the only crappy move they've pulled over the years. Furthermore, the parent company are responsible for the actions of the US company at the end of the day.

  6. So... they believe in collaborative work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, I work from home and thought, "Hey, this might have information that will help me be more effective at working remotely." Instead, it was almost 4 minutes of a woman telling us how much time her company thinks about remote collaboration, unified communication and how important it is being able to speak with each other. Oh, and their product might have something to do with voice quality.

    If you're going to give us an ad like this, at least let it be something useful. Give us technical details and provide information about how the product or service works. Instead, I just lost 4 minutes of my life that I'll never get back.

    1. Re:So... they believe in collaborative work? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The lady seems to have no clue what she's talking about anyway :(

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:So... they believe in collaborative work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are right. That sucked. I'm glad I didn't watch it.

    3. Re:So... they believe in collaborative work? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Ok, I work from home and thought, "Hey, this might have information that will help me be more effective at working remotely." Instead, it was almost 4 minutes of a woman telling us how much time her company thinks about remote collaboration, unified communication and how important it is being able to speak with each other. Oh, and their product might have something to do with voice quality.

      If you're going to give us an ad like this, at least let it be something useful. Give us technical details and provide information about how the product or service works. Instead, I just lost 4 minutes of my life that I'll never get back.

      Couldn't agree with you more. I only made it about 3.5 minutes through. If you're going to post that kind of shit here (video adverts), at least make it appealing to the audience with some samples/specs/photos, etc.

      Plantronics? Thinks that voice communications is critical? Gee, no shit. They're a company who has bilked business out of millions over the years selling WAY overpriced telco headsets, but I needed four minutes of voice and video to tell me what they sell...like the average business hasn't been pimped their products a dozen times in the last year.

  7. Can't believe it, ads posted as stories? by BurkeTheEldar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never would have thought that slashdot would sink to this. Geez, disappointing. If you keep this up, sayonara. No wonder taco boogied.

    1. Re:Can't believe it, ads posted as stories? by some1somewhere · · Score: 1

      Bump up for "boogied" lol.

      --
      **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  8. it's official... by neight108 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    it's official...I have removed slashdot from my rss feed.

    1. Re:it's official... by shish · · Score: 2

      I'm planning to too, when I find somewhere else with tech news and at least semi-clueful discussions -- any suggestions?

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    2. Re:it's official... by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      news.ycominator.com

      Also known as hacker news.

    3. Re:it's official... by kvvbassboy · · Score: 1

      Oops.. typo. It should be news.ycombinator.com

    4. Re:it's official... by mutube · · Score: 1

      It's off my iGoogle homepage - replaced by tech reddit as suggested elsewhere. I guess I'll check back in a few years if it's even still here, but it's just irritating me these days.

  9. Plantronics? by xtal · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can't say I've ever had an enjoyable conference with their gear. I remember some epic fails.

    Google and others have better FREE alternatives. Use them!

    --
    ..don't panic
  10. Transcript by QuasiSteve · · Score: 2, Informative

    Title: Plantronics Helps Make Remote Workers' Lives Easier
    Description: Better sound = better communications

    [00:00] <TITLE>
    "Plantronics is Working to Help Collaboration with Far-Flung Workers, Suppliers, and Clients" appears along with the SlashdotTV logo bar reading "Chris Yeich, Geeknet" over a view of Chris sitting in front of a a white (p)leather surface.

    [00:03] Chris>
    With today's increasingly distributed workforce where a worker can work from an office, from home, on the road and even at a coffee shop, collaboration is the name of the game.
    For IT decision makers it means that they've gotta find new ways to use new technology to help facilitate that collaboration.
    Unified communications is one way to get there.
    I had the chance recently to speak with Plantronics about collaboration and unified communications, and here's what they had to say.

    [00:30] <TITLE>
    The SlashdotTV logo bar with "Karen Auby, Senior Manager, Public Relations, Plantronics" fades in and out of view.

    [00:30] Karen>
    Plantronics has really been focused on understanding how businesses are working today, because the idea of going to a place to work and clocking in at 9 and leaving at 5 - it's sort of an outdated method.
    Now, people are working wherever they are, whenever they can, and just really producing results that are meaningful for a company.
    So I can understand it's a big challenge for IT to be able to keep everyone connected as they become more distributed.
    Plantronics has really been looking at how to help our own employees collaborate, because we have people who work in Europe.. we are a global company, we have offices in Asia, and in Europe.. and keeping them all connected is extremely important for product development, for marketing, for business development, for finance - regardless of the area within the organization, collaboration is really important, and it's something that Plantronics is very, very focused on.

    [01:25] Chris>
    So when it comes to unified communications you [...] bunch of different types of technologies.
    Where do you see some of the biggest hurdles for IT managers in being able to effectively implement a broad-based unified communication strategy?
    What is some of the stumbling blocks that you see based on your experience working with IT orgs?

    [01:44] Karen>
    Well, to be honest, I think a lot of it is end user adoption and getting end users excited and interested and feeling like IT isn't pushing down another thing they need to learn, but actually understand - as an end user - understanding "Hey, this is actually gonna make my job easier - this is gonna make life better for me, and less frustrating."
    So I think the importance of simplicity and training and ease of use really can't be overstated.
    If you want unified communications or any collaboration tools to really affect ROI, affect the bottom line, affect innovation within a company.

    [02:20] Chris>
    One last question for you:
    So Plantronics - a lot of focus on audio quality.
    Tell me a little about how that component, that specific component of audio, fits into the overarching - again, the umbrella theme of - unified communications, knowing that we've got tools like Skype chat, instant messaging.
    Where does audio fit in?

    [02:39] Karen>
    There's so much emotion that comes out in voice that you don't get in text.
    There's a difference between "Hey, great job" and "Hey! Great job!", and so we really believe in the power of voice.
    So you can get business done so much quicker sometimes just by picking up the phone, rather than back-and-forth e-mails.
    I, personally, think that - and Plantronics definitely, the company, we believe that - voice is a natural way to communicate and that you see tools that embrace voice as the easiest, most synchronous, communication method is really one-on-one voice calls, and/or conference calls as well.
    As f

  11. Has it really come to this? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot has been an enormous factor in making me the nerd I am. That sounds cheesy, but I seriously started reading when I was 14. It was a big deal to me to find a huge community of other people who really saw the world like I did, unlike anyone else in my (small) high school.

    But I really can't justify sticking around if the "stories" are just "Isn't Plantronics great?" videos. This is nonsense. I understand that Slashdot needs to make money, but if you guys can't keep doing that off of (normal) ads, then just shut it down. It's not worth this painful death.

    I put up with trolls. I put up with Idle. I put up with the shitty Ajax. I didn't much mind the "itwbenett" stuff, where people were just submitting their online articles, as long as they were interesting. I even put up with the sponsored "ask slashdot", since it was clearly marked and had the potential to be somewhat interesting. I wasn't that guy bitching about every little thing- things change, but it's not a big deal.

    We all know about Plantronics. They even make a decent product. But I don't go to Slashdot to read paid-for content posted by companies about what companies say about their products.

    This is too much. If you're seriously going to have a half-dozen "stories" a day that are just ads for some gadget or service or so on, then I won't be here.

    In case this wasn't clear enough, you known that line that companies cross that pisses their users off and sends them into a death spiral, a la Digg? You just crossed it. Step back very quickly or you'll have big problems.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Has it really come to this? by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In case this wasn't clear enough, you known that line that companies cross that pisses their users off and sends them into a death spiral, a la Digg? You just crossed it. Step back very quickly or you'll have big problems.

      This.

      Seriously, did y'all have to kick Taco out before you could pull this crap? I've been reading /. daily, no, more than daily, for nearly 10 years, and this post made me seriously think about quitting.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    2. Re:Has it really come to this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the first time that I'm considering finding alternatives to Slashdot. There is no excuse for this. Slashdot staff should know better. I'll have to look around, what do you all suggest as alternative?

      (Even the captcha is on my side, the word is "LISTEN". LISTEN /.)

    3. Re:Has it really come to this? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      He's been at it for a few weeks. Check out his comments. I can't quite figure it out either.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Has it really come to this? by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is the first time that I'm considering finding alternatives to Slashdot. There is no excuse for this. Slashdot staff should know better. I'll have to look around, what do you all suggest as alternative?

      (Even the captcha is on my side, the word is "LISTEN". LISTEN /.)

      I haven't had to look for alternatives before, either. Maybe Boing Boing?

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
    5. Re:Has it really come to this? by Scott+McGuire · · Score: 1

      Nailed it.

    6. Re:Has it really come to this? by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 1

      That's good (if depressing) to know, thanks.

      --

      Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
  12. But, is there a science thing? by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean, I get the slashvertisment, but.. most of the time, there's at least something newish. Plantronics sells flimsy microphones in even flimsier plastic packaging at outrageous prices that may or may not connect to the audio jack on your device-that-has-a-standard-audio-jack.

    If they don't at least have some kind of wonder gadget that revolutionizes the headset industry in some not necessarily meaningful, but at least interesting way, I fail to see the point of their presence on slashdot.

    What's next? A zinc bolt manufacturer advertising their not particularly unique or inventive bog standard zinc bolts, without ever actually using the word "bolt" or mentioning or displaying an any of their actual products?

    Also, I had to watch an ad before watching the ad.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:But, is there a science thing? by tibit · · Score: 2

      You can't really trust a company that has the following somewhere in their product catalog: "UC Enablers are products that strategically build the bridge from desktop reliance to PC Voice and all the liberating possibilities of Unified Communications". I pity the fools who fall for this verbal abomination.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  13. My Karma is Excellent, Please Disable Advertising by Trip6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please?

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  14. Video won't play for me - by linatux · · Score: 1

    not good PR

  15. Most news stories originate with a PR source by QuincyDurant · · Score: 1

    Case in point:

    They were more like the fuzzy down of a modern baby chick than the stiff plumes of an adult bird,” Xing Xu, a researcher at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology in Beijing, said in a news release

    http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/china/120404/t-rex-cousin-sported-downy-feathers

    1. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by atriusofbricia · · Score: 2

      Yeah.. but the difference is that is a story with information and this is just an advertisement trying to look like a story.

      They're the same in that they both contain words. Much like a Boeing 777 is the same as a piper cub. They both have wings, right?

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    2. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by QuincyDurant · · Score: 2

      It's not trying to "look like" a story; the submission is clearly identified as coming from Plantronics PR. Product information is not intrinsically different from scientific information, and few would hear about Boeing or Piper without PR people.

      My point is that 80% of /. as well as 80% of the New York Times or 80% of the Wall St. Journal began as a news releases or story pitches.

      I'm happy to concede that the vulgar definition of "PR" as "BS" is usually correct--about 80% of the time, I'd say.

    3. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by tibit · · Score: 2

      Never mind that their PR lady is horrible at her job. Her voice sucks, and her appearance and body language sucks too.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    4. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There isn't even a story here, though. If Boeing had a press release for a new airplane and Slashdot posted that, that's kind of interesting, impactful, topically relevant, and it likely wouldn't bother many people. This, however, is substance-free garbage.

    5. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So we should all be happy because blatant advertising is the same as informational content, as they often come from teh same sort of source, bad is good, good is bad, cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria...

      No, this is blatantly advertising by and for one firm, not even 'here look at this breakthrough we made' that might be technologically interesting, just 'buy our stuff'.

      If that's the slashdot you want to read, good for you. To me this represents a new low on a site that had already driven away most of the interesting technical discussion of a few years ago.

    6. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      The key word there is "originate". Most news stories that begin as PR material are reworked into stories before they are published. And if they can't be (such as this nonsense; there is no story – no news – in this ad), they aren't published.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:Most news stories originate with a PR source by Hatta · · Score: 1

      This is not actually the case. The right way to state this is that most of what is passed off as news is not actually news at all. Repeating a press release is not reporting.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  16. This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by seifried · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously. I'm not one to reminisce about the "good old days" (see my UID) but this is serious ridiculous. This really reminds me of when Digg cratered out, just checked Digg, 15 stories on the front page and 77 comments, in total. I remember when they had hundreds of comments, per story. So I'm guessing if this continues Slashdot will crater out by the end of the year. Well it was nice while it lasted.

    1. Re:This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Slashdot's moderation system isn't patented. We need a community fork (definitely not a code fork. Let Slashcode die)

    2. Re:This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's what the kuro5hin folks figured too. Don't even look, it's a post-apocolyptic wasteland today.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by billysara · · Score: 1

      I'm a fairly long-time reader and I have to agree - this really, really has made me think about removing /. from my 'sites to read a couple of times of day' bookmarks. Digg was zapped a while ago along with a few others who went down the "we're ipad apps in a browser!" ajax-laden route.

      I really never thought I'd see slashdot stoop this low. It's a shame - it really is.

    4. Re:This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by backtick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sad to say I'm agreeing with this post, and seeing my UID will also provide some frame of reference. I don't even mind story/ads as long as they're disclosed as such but this is just pathetic.

    5. Re:This will crater out just like Digg (see stats) by seifried · · Score: 1

      The thing I still enjoy about Slashdot is not the number of comments, but reading them at 4+ or 5, and there are some real gems/informative things/etc. Unfortunately as people leave these great (not merely good) comments will leave as well leading to a downward spiral. Ala Digg. The system Reddit uses makes it much more difficult to simply say "show me all the good comments", although Reddit definitely wins the timeliness game.

  17. RED BORDER. by David+Muir+Sharnoff · · Score: 1

    If you're going to post ads, they cannot look like stories.

    If you're going to post ads, make sure they're good or nobody will click on more than one.

  18. Aaaand it's gone. All gone. by mgemmons · · Score: 1

    The slashdot I knew is gone. After years of reading and moderating, this will be my last visit to the site.

  19. Please turn off advertising by dbc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My karma here has been excellent for well over 10 years. I'd like to turn off advertising, please.

    Or, maybe let's change the moderation system to allow moderation of stories, not just comments, and add '-1 slashvertisement" mod option.

    Or maybe, it's simply time for a slahdot clone -- just the same only having editors with both integrity and a brain.

    1. Re:Please turn off advertising by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      You realize editors with integrity and a brain was dropped long ago when we got kdawson right?

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    2. Re:Please turn off advertising by Desler · · Score: 1

      Since when did Katz have either integrity or a brain?

  20. Re:My Karma is Excellent, Please Disable Advertisi by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    I never checked the box in the first place(thanks, AdBlock Plus!) but I may just have to now.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  21. If you are going to put ads in the news feed... by morphage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot editors: I understand you need ads. I understand you need sponsors, but if you are going to post them, please mark them as paid content. Seriously. If you don't you will loose your core readership, and maybe you already are, but this isn't going to help things. Was Rob Malda the only person keeping this from happening? Yes, Slashdot readers have valuable eyeballs, but treat us with respect, otherwise you will loose us. One of the key reasons geeks still defend Google and Gmail is that they set a precedent for tasteful and obvious ads with Adwords. Please hold yourselves to the same standards.

  22. Stop the tripe by dbc · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are looking for a way to make long time, loyal, readers revolt, then you have found it.

  23. Re:My Karma is Excellent, Please Disable Advertisi by reason · · Score: 2

    I've checked the box. It didn't help.

  24. Can someone recommend the new slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The signal:crap ratio is getting a bit high and this just blew it off the charts, are there some recommendations on alternatives sites that are currently what Slashdot (unfortunately) was?

    1. Re:Can someone recommend the new slashdot by burningcpu · · Score: 1

      Not to be pedantic, but you mean the signal to crap ratio is getting smaller. And I totally agree.

  25. Is this an experiment? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

    To see how many readers dislike? Add one more for me, please.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  26. my email to roblimo: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To: robin@dont-be-lazy-its-in-the-summary
    Subject: Plantronics Helps Make Remote Workers' Lives Easier (Video)

    So, how much did they pay you?

    Fucking sellout.

    Goodbye, slashdot.

  27. I'd block ALL Roblimo stories, except... by Maow · · Score: 1

    I'd block ALL Roblimo stories, except... watching the comments is irresistible, like a slow motion car crash.

    One has to wonder how Roblimo feels about being an anchor around the neck of /. - does she hate having the slashvertisement beat, does she hate /., does she perceive some value to these slashvertisements?

    Yep, even if I block her "stories", they still are ruinous to our beloved Slashdot's prestige and reputation. I don't think the brain trust behind these abominations realize how quickly a downward spiral can initiate, and how irreversible they are.

    Gotta wonder also what Rob Malda (C. Taco) thinks of this trend?

    I just hope someone realizes the errors of their ways, and soon.

    1. Re:I'd block ALL Roblimo stories, except... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      He. Robin "Roblimo" Miller.

      ... and yes. Fuck that sellout bastard.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:I'd block ALL Roblimo stories, except... by Maow · · Score: 1

      He. Robin "Roblimo" Miller.

      ... and yes. Fuck that sellout bastard.

      Thanks for the correction!

      I thought I'd read somewhere that "Robin" was a she. Oops, apologies to Roblimo.

      But I still think he's doing harm to /.

  28. yeah by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 2

    Advertisers - seriously, when you sucker slurp for being posted here like this, a crapload of us cross you off the list of being purchasable.

    And that sucks because I used to like plantronics.

    No more wallet for you..

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  29. WTF? by pesho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Roblimo, how stupid do you think the slashdot audience is? If you can't keep your ads apart from your stories, you probably need to find yourself a new audience. I would suggest moving to day time TV.

  30. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What a great video! Very unbiased. I really want a Plantronics headset now.

    Seriously though, this is the last straw for this Anonymous Coward.

    Bye!

  31. Last Post by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

    What a shame. Like many others, my IDs are high through lethargy; I started reading in 1998, and the desire to accrue karma eventually became too great. I've hit the site almost daily since then, and have collected my fair share of +5, Flamebait mods.

    No more. If you're this beholden to your corporate sponsors, please let them know they can advertise with impunity, since your remaining readers are obviously ok with it. I'm done. Thank you for the good times and the bad. From OMG Ponies to the 9/11 post, GNAA to klerck's page-widening posts, it's been a treat.

    Farewell.

    1. Re:Last Post by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

      Later dudes. If this site isn't good enough for Taco, it isn't good enough for me. It's been a fun ten years, and I've learned a lot and met some interesting people.

      But this sucks. See you over at ycombinator.com and maybe osnews.com Too bad, I used to love linuxtoday.com as well and they bit the dust ages ago, and for the same reason: "We need more ads!"

      Me, I'd rather build a site that fits a niche perfectly and makes just enough money to get by. You guys are obviously going for the big bucks instead. But to do so you're alienating your readers. You spend more in bandwidth to send us video, to catch the attention of fewer interested readers. Meanwhile you're the last site on the web that doesn't have a good mobile version.

      I've got two words for you: Death. Spiral.

      Adios!

      --
      If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  32. Here's how to fix slashvertizements by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's simple really... pan the product!

    Everyone post their negative experiences with the company, in gory detail.

    Even if you've never used the product, some well-placed negative innuendo or skeptical comparison (use this open source alternative instead!) will serve to disadvertize the product.

    After awhile, a short while (I'm hoping), the editors will realize that the readers don't want this, the sponsors will realize that they don't want this, and the practice will stop.

    People keep moaning about apathy in the face of an unlikeable situation, well here's our chance. Let's change the system.

    All together now, one... two... three...

    1. Re:Here's how to fix slashvertizements by yahyamf · · Score: 1

      ok, so seriously, what are good or better alternatives to Plantronics?

  33. Not my last post, but getting closer by SIGBUS · · Score: 1

    Well, NoScript put a big yellow box at the top of this article, so at least I didn't have to watch it. Did the video auto-play, too? There are few things on the web that I hate more than auto-playing commercials.

    NoScript makes the web bearable these days, but it's a crying shame that it's necessary.

    But, back to Slashdot, it seems to me like there's been an awful lot of shark-jumping since Taco left. I'm not going to completely bail just yet, but I'm finding myself spending less and less time here. It was great while it lasted!

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
  34. i heard by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    plantronics actually causes cancer, and that only sex offenders and violent drug addled criminals would ever use it.

    plantronics can also be scientifically linked to global warming.
    but they shouldnt worry. comments on message boards never get indexed into, say, the reviews of a product as illicited by a google search ;)

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  35. Ok Plantronics by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I wont watch your ad, but is this the same overpriced Chinese garbage you have been vomiting out for the last decade? If so I would rather spend my money on something that's not going to fall apart or break in a month. K THX

    PS: stop with the ass slashdot

  36. I'm sorry. by n3v · · Score: 1

    This is terrible.

  37. FOADIAF by The+Man · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well guys, I guess it's been, what, 15 years, give or take? I can't say I was the first or second slashdot reader, but I might have been the thousandth. A lot has changed in that time, and there are a lot of tech news aggregators with comments these days. Many have advertising-driven business models, a brave few try other models from time to time. But virtually all of them are far less offensive than this crap, in that they have ads at the top of the page which are obviously paid content separate from the editorial function of posting, well, tech news of one sort or another. Each of us has a certain threshold, be it qualitative or quantitative, beyond which we clearly recognise that something has become intolerable. Often it's difficult to articulate that threshold's location until it's been crossed, or at least to imagine each and every possible fashion in which it could be crossed. But here we are, way the fuck on the wrong side of that threshold, and you've lost another reader. I'm not sure how you plan to make up for the inevitable loss of other readers like me; maybe you're not even planning to or thinking that far ahead. Maybe you figure advertisers are so stupid that they'll gladly pay vastly higher sums for these sore thumbs that they think your apparently even more retarded readers won't know are ads. Maybe they're right. Maybe you're right. I hope not, but I'm certainly a lot wiser than I was 15 years ago, and I wouldn't be surprised by anything at this point. So, please, take it to its logical conclusion. More ads. Less pretense of editorial independence. I'd suggest you do what the bottom-feeding Chinese link vendors do and just fill your entire page with paid links, graphics, and videos. Maybe throw in some real American know-how like real-time auctions, and tie it into Facebook so that you already know everything you could ever want to about people who like to be products. After all, many of our country's best and brightest now spend most of their time and energy finding more ways to sell other people as advertising viewers. I'm sure you'll think of something, and I hope for irony's sake that you make a mint. But you'll be doing it without me. Given the choices you're making, I don't think you'll miss me, as I'm no longer part of your target audience.

    1. Re:FOADIAF by shri · · Score: 1

      Well said. Wish I had the mod points to give you some "Me too" points.

    2. Re:FOADIAF by Filgy · · Score: 3

      Another very low /. UID person agreeing with what you said.

      --

      -- filgy
    3. Re:FOADIAF by Gerafix · · Score: 2

      Can I have your account?

    4. Re:FOADIAF by merkin · · Score: 1

      Well said.
      Digg redux - truly a sad day.

    5. Re:FOADIAF by adavidw · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite as low of an ID, but I'm right there with you. I'm out.

      Goodbye, everyone. Last one out of here, shut off the lights.

    6. Re:FOADIAF by YuppieScum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Concur...

      I wonder if Taco had to sign a non-compete clause when he left, and how long it might have left to run...

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    7. Re:FOADIAF by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Doubt he'd want to compete with the crap in this toilet anyhow.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    8. Re:FOADIAF by johnwfran · · Score: 1

      I read slashdot daily only because of the commenting community. For posts regarding healthcare you can expect doctors and other medical professionals to chime in. For posts about computer science, you'll hear from both long-time veteran engineers as well as cutting edge researchers. Combine that with an excellent community moderation system (I've rarely seen agenda driven moderation--it always seems to sort itself out), and you've got one of the only sites I keep coming back to, day after day, year after year. Unfortunately, when you start to drive away the only thing that makes Slashdot worthwhile--educated commentors and moderators--well I guess Ash from Army of Darkness sums it up pretty succinctly: "...I've got news for you pal, you ain't leadin' but two things, right now: Jack and shit... and Jack left town."

  38. JTDC! by acoustix · · Score: 2

    Now we know why Cmdrtaco left. This is terrible.

    Note to editors: you are killing a once great site. Please stop before it's too late.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  39. Spam Spam SPam by wesharris6 · · Score: 1

    What's up with the Spam-Dot postings today? One would HOPE the ads posted would be useful, but instead we get this trash. Disappointed mate, disappointed.

  40. What a shame.... by i-like-burritos · · Score: 1

    This might be it for me too.

    To be honest though, I don't come to slashdot for the stories; I don't even RTFA most of the time. I come here for the discussions.
    As long as the Slashdot community sticks around, I will stick around as well -- no matter what the editors do. Unfortunately I think this article marks the beginning of the end for the community.

  41. got to disagree by Chirs · · Score: 2

    I'm using a Plantronics earpiece for a regular desk phone (the kind that fits over the ear and has a long hollow voice tube). It's getting close to 10 years old, still works fine.

    1. Re:got to disagree by jimicus · · Score: 1

      You're using one of their office products, which are priced rather highly compared with the cheap & cheerful headsets you get for £15 and are therefore, I imagine, somewhat less subject to "let's see exactly how cheap we can make this before it falls apart as part of the unboxing process"

  42. Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by humanrev · · Score: 1

    According to Rob's personal site: http://www.roblimo.com/

    "Now mostly retired, but doing a little video work for Slashdot"
    A little eh? I have nothing against you Rob, you can make these videos as often as you like, but since you're now affiliated with Slashdot could you please request on behalf of its (remaining) users to have these videos put in the Slashdot TV section, where they belong? Virtually everyone hates them here because they're basically ads, and so any redeeming qualities go out the window.

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    1. Re:Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by Roblimo · · Score: 2

      I have asked the people who run Slashdot these days to handle videos differently, and I am refusing to have my name anywhere near the more blatantly promotional ones.

      Realize that I am doing this in spite of the nasty cursers and insulters, not because of them.

      FYI - there have been some decent/informative videos, and there will be more of them in the future. Some will like them, some won't.

      - Robin

    2. Re:Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by adavidw · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have asked the people who run Slashdot these days to handle videos differently, and I am refusing to have my name anywhere near the more blatantly promotional ones.

      From above:
      "Posted by Roblimo on 07:26 PM April 4th, 2012 "

    3. Re:Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by backtick · · Score: 1

      ^This. *sigh*

    4. Re:Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by guanxi · · Score: 2

      Robin -

      First, one story shouldn't be taken out of context. Thank you for many valuable and enjoyable hours Slashdot has filled in my life over the years. Personally, it's been my favorite site in the history of the web, no exaggeration.

      I have asked the people who run Slashdot these days to handle videos differently, and I am refusing to have my name anywhere near the more blatantly promotional ones.

      The problem is not the ads, but the coverup. Ads are fine. I know it's not your intent, but you're effectively deceiving people by presenting an ad as editorial content. If you lose that trust, we don't know what to believe -- maybe other stories are really ads, maybe submissions and comments are moderated by/for advertisers, etc. Also, people get angry when they are deceived, and rightfully so. Again, I know you don't intend that.

      Just be transparent and open about it. Publish a policy on what Slashdot will or won't do for advertisers, and clearly mark ads and editorial. If the story was marked 'paid advertisement', nobody would object. If it's well-targeted, people might even enjoy it and find it valuable. How about presentations by 3-D printer manufacturers, Facebook or Mozilla engineers, physicists, with some Q&A?

      I have asked the people who run Slashdot these days to handle videos differently, and I am refusing to have my name anywhere near the more blatantly promotional ones.

      Be transparent about everything. You posted the story and now you are suggesting that someone else made the editorial decision to post it. Are they just using your name now?

    5. Re:Robin 'Roblimo' Miller by Desler · · Score: 1

      So you asked to not have your name near them yet you are pretty much the main source of posting these ad videos? I'd love to believe you but your public actions speak more loudly...

  43. 100% Marketing 0% Content by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    The subject says it all.

  44. A Few Suggested Tags by FSWKU · · Score: 1
    • boughtlikeawhore
    • businesspeak
    • buzzwords
    • crap
    • downwardspiral
    • fourchanhasbetterethics
    • idiocracy
    • jargon
    • junk
    • lackofethics
    • marketingtroll
    • nojournalisticintegrity
    • prwhore
    • sellout
    • shameful
    • thecancerthatiskillingslashdot
    • worthless
    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  45. Boring by malkman · · Score: 1

    What if I already like/prefer Plantronics products and don't want to see this same damn ad over and over again? Can we at least have dynamic preference-based stuff?

    --

    Robort knows all.
  46. This is a joke, right? by mpbrede · · Score: 1

    Zero-content, non-technical marketing buzzword jargon generated drivel. It's funny, but nothing informational. Propaganda. Why is it even on /.?

  47. Inception by 1MC · · Score: 2

    Obviously I'm inside a dream inside a dream inside a dream. Normally I read about invasive advertising on other sites ON slashdot, not experience it on slashdot. What just happened? Waiting for the spinning top to drop. In the meantime, I will post on Gizmodo about this. The king is dead, long live the new king!

  48. Hah! I'm Hijacking This Story! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I experimented with the WFH thing a while back. Got a Linksys SIP gateway and hooked it up to an asterisk server downstairs. Could have gone all voip, of course, but the landline was clearer for local and 800 calls and I needed it for the DSL line anyway. This let me route calls (via the asterisk server) to free numbers on the landline and through VOIP for anything else. It also me receive calls on the landline and, based on the caller ID, decide if I wanted to route the caller through voip to my cell phone. Furthermore, an iphone headset and a SIP client on the laptop was all I needed for working from home. I could just kick back on the couch, work on my code, and take and place calls effortlessly. It was awesome! You don't need Plantronics gear to set this up! Hell you don't even really need an asterisk server, if you can find a VOIP provider who's already running a SIP or IAX gateway.

    I was trying to figure out if I could hook my asterisk box into the corporate exchange but left before I got too far on that. They were running some proprietary shit and it looked like it'd be difficult. Probably could have forwarded the number to my home phone, but where's the fun in that?

    Asterisk is pretty neat. If you have a cell phone that does SIP, you can have it register to the server whenever you're in range of your WLAN. Or really any WLAN that allows it. If asterisk sees your handset, it'll ring it. Otherwise you can drop it straight to voicemail. Not much point in having two handsets when one will do, if you have to deal with multiple lines.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  49. Blacklisted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hilarious, time to put where my money is and go against this sort of advertising. Coincidentally, I need to purchase around 160 headsets for language education in our computer labs, some of which as excess inventory for breakages. Guess which brand I'm going to tell my vendors to not bother offering? May only be $5,000 or so but that's $5,000 Plantronics won't be seeing.

  50. I don't always read slashvertisements... by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

    ... but when I do, it's because I stopped blocking all submissions by Roblimo.

  51. Big Mistake by anti-pop-frustration · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you see that by mixing advertisement with content you are casting doubt on *every single* story posted? You had a great thing but you're killing it.

    Who thought this would a good idea? How dumb are the corporate owners?

    If this goes on, I'm going to start using those threads to list as many slashdot alternatives as possible. There many good sites out there looking for active commenters.

    Watch how mods are going to help your audience leave your site.

    1. Re:Big Mistake by oregonjohn · · Score: 1

      Please, list them now ... I'm just as disgusted as everyone else

  52. How much for a front-page ad? by jopet · · Score: 1

    Is there a list anywhere? I have that natural v1a9ra pill shop and want to place an ad on the front page too.

    1. Re:How much for a front-page ad? by DamageLabs · · Score: 1

      I am also looking for a pricelist. Since shark jumping is so obvious lets transform /. into a premium video advertisement site on the Internet.

      No point crying about past good times, lets innovate!

  53. another key downturn event? by jdogalt · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting to see some sort of apology or april fools cover for this story, but maybe it is a continued significant downturn in advertising standards at slashdot, along the lines of my recent complaint/submission about the 'sugar daddy dating' advertising - http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=30347589 - that I got flooded with (~50%, cookieless, fresh profile front page view coverage). That seemed to only last a week or two, either because of a one-off ad-buy coincidence, or slashdot(or parent) exerting some better advertising discretion. Dunno. I'd love to bash this article, but I'm really too stunned to believe it wasn't an accident or late april fools thing. Although I did find this thread educational, if in fact the statements about digg having massive reduction in readership is true. Never having gotten on that bandwagon, I'm nonetheless surprised to hear it taking a serious kuro5hin like turn. Certainly if this video isn't just a freak one time thing, it is what could finally do slashdot in. I just can't believe they'd be so stupid as to just walk that obvious road. Maybe it's a secret ploy to run away all the cookieless viewers who aren't trackable and therefore worth as much as advertisees. I.e. if you browse logged in typically, you filter the editor, otherwise, you are driven away by advertisements. Culling the herd to focus on those valuable trackable advertisees. Bwa ha ha ha..... (sorry, just had to give into the advertising paranoia there for a bit...)

  54. even Reader's Digest has "this is an advert" blurb by decora · · Score: 1

    at the top of the ad page.

  55. Here was me looking at my inbox... by simplypeachy · · Score: 1

    ...and my bank balance and wondering if I should renew my /. subscription. At least I don't have to wonder any more.

    Shame on you, slashdot, for going down this route. You are no longer stuff that matters.

  56. Vapidity! by mbullock · · Score: 1

    Following standard operating procedure I didn't initially RTFA and just dived into comments. Every single comment was about how horrible this story is and how this may be the beginning of the end for Slashdot. I didn't want to believe it. I couldn't believe it. I broke down. I clicked the link. I watched the video. I know, I know- this is crazy. But, now I've seen for myself. I've given up 4 minutes of my own life. I figured I owed Slashdot that much after all these years.

    All I can say is:

    What absolute trash. That video is the most vapid thing I've seen online anywhere lately. I never expected to see this here of all places. Sad, sad, sad. . .

  57. How to fix your mistake (free advice!) by Carpal+Tunnel · · Score: 1

    WTF /. !?!

    I almost never comment. I happily read slashdot daily. I enjoy all the community comments, and even find them useful (seriously). The all-to-common badly written articles get dissected by people who know more about an issue than some reporter. The random tangent discussions and fanboy vs fanboy banter entertain. The comments are what make Slashdot BETTER than some other random tech blog.

    Do you hear me slashdot? Your users generate half the content that I come here for. DON"T PISS THEM OFF!

    It is deceitful, offensive, and downright stupid for you to post advertisements as articles. At the very least, they should be clearly marked. Maybe moved into their own category. We are not idiots. We do not like people trying to trick us.

    The community (your bread and fucking butter) WILL move elsewhere! Get some cheap intern working on a marketing degree to tell you where you went wrong, and fix it! Quickly!

    On second thought, don't even bother with the intern, i'll do the work for them. You need a 3 step program: -Clearly mark all advertisements -Apologise profusely to your community (the free content generators who make the money for you) -Promise to never do it again. Make a policy to show you mean it. Perhaps remove all advertisements from the website for a week to show just how sorry you are.

    You can keep the $8/hour this information is worth. I'm just THAT generous. You're welcome.

    1. Re:How to fix your mistake (free advice!) by Carpal+Tunnel · · Score: 1

      shit, sorry. That list was supposed to look like this: You need a 3 step program:
      -Clearly mark all advertisements
      -Apologize profusely to your community (the free content generators who make the money for you)
      -Promise to never do it again. Make a policy to show you mean it. Perhaps remove all advertisements from the website for a week to show just how sorry you are. I guess that's what you get for free labor.

  58. LOGINS SUC@slashdot $ /.DiggDotCom by LOGINS+SUC · · Score: 1

    I see, /. executes... ARG! I swear, my address bar says "slashdot.org" but my eyes read "digg.com". What should I believe, the address bar or my lying eyes???

  59. Just popped in to say hi by opteek · · Score: 1

    Hello there, Veteran Lurker here!

    I too share the sentiments of many users itt.

    I wanted to say "Hi" before heading for the exit and make my first post my last. So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  60. What a disgrace... by begleysm · · Score: 1

    I read slashdot a couple times a day. This is embarrassing. Ads along a sidebar: no problem. Disguising ads as "news stories" on your "news site": reprehensible. Disguising them so poorly as this?: Now I'm questioning the intelligence & sanity of everyone who works behind the scenes at slashdot. I wonder how much longer I'll get to read slashdot before it turns into a big pile of crap :'(

  61. Good job... by Desler · · Score: 1

    So you guys couldn't even go a full 4 months before backing down on the fact that you were going to explicitly mark when you were going to be posting company paid-for slashvertisements...err "sponsored stories"? Wow, fucking disgraceful.

  62. Did Not RTFA by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    Come to comment that POTS isn't dead. Know why? Telcos that have terrible internet and cell service.

    I have a cell and skype, and in an affluent neighborhood north of downtown chicago my skype drops regularly and my cell service is abominable. I can't stay in touch with clients reliably and it is INFURIATING. This is 2012! Argh!

    POTS is not dead and won't be until infrastructure can reliably replace it (with power outages, it never will imo), and wtf is it with the advert?

    --
    -
  63. replacement by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recommend ArsTechnica, it seems a lot of /. posts are coming from them anyway, so you might as well go direct.

    Their comments section needs threading though, but if you're after articles rather than discussion, it's way better then here.

  64. Re:My Karma is Excellent, Please Disable Advertisi by Anvil+the+Ninja · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to honor the checkbox to disable advertising, could you at least add a checkbox to disable video? Slashdot has been an "idle moments at work" pastime for me for years, and as such, I don't watch video -- slashvertisement or otherwise.

  65. Huh? by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

    And I thought I checked the "Disable Advertising" box on the front page.

  66. Well, I'm out by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1

    I'll be over at reddit.com/r/technology and boingboing.net if anyone needs me.

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
  67. Where can I find similar communities on the web? by guanxi · · Score: 1

    The value of Slashdot has been its community, its shared interests and relatively high level of discussion. Can anyone suggest similar communities elsewhere?

    Reddit is a different community, less scientifically oriented in its interests and thinking. Maybe Quora? Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    I hope Slashdot turns things around, but if not, where else can we go?

  68. Slashdot needs a journalistic ethics policy by guanxi · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't the ads, but the coverup.

    I doubt it's their intent, but the editors should realize that it's deceitful to pretend an ad is editorial content. And from the readers' perspective it's worse, because we don't know what is an ad and what isn't. Readers can spot the obvious ads, but who knows what else on the site is also an ad. Other stories? Comments? Are comments moderated to suite advertisers?

    Slashdot needs to publish a policy on journalistic ethics (and follow it, of course). There is nothing wrong with ads or paid content, but just be open and transparent about them.

  69. You know what you did was wrong. by evn · · Score: 1

    I'm sure somebody will parse these comments to see how well this advertising move worked out. I have no new issue with Plantronics, somebody probably sold them that Slashdot is a great way to reach tech nerds and IT guys that can influence buying decisions. I can't blame them for targeted advertising, and though I won't be buying or recommending their kit that has nothing to do with this advertisement. Slashdot however has screwed up. You guys aren't dumb, you know why commenters would object to this. You knew in advance it wouldn't go over welI because you can't sit in nerd-stew this long without picking up the flavour of the community. We had a good run but you've tossed in the towel. Shame on you.