Slashdot Mirror
US Unhappy With Australians Storing Data On Australian Shores
Fluffeh writes "The United States' global trade representative has strongly criticized a perceived preference on the part of large Australian organizations for hosting their data on-shore in Australia, claiming it created a significant trade barrier for U.S. technology firms. A number of U.S. companies had expressed concerns that various departments in the Australian Government, namely the Department of Defence had been sending negative messages about cloud providers based outside the country, implying that 'hosting data overseas, including in the United States, by definition entails greater risk and unduly exposes consumers to their data being scrutinized by foreign governments.' Recently, Acting Victorian Privacy Commissioner Anthony Bendall highlighted some of the privacy concerns with cloud computing, particularly in its use by the local government. He said the main problems were the lack of control over stored data and privacy, in overseas cloud service providers."
The irony-meter is off the charts. Or is this a late April-fools-article?
The hell you say! Saving data in your own country, so that foreign governments can't judge your citizens by their laws? That's crazy talk, I think you should have a serious conversation with my sponsor, the MPAA.
Why would this be a problem? The farther away their "cloud" is, the worse the performance. There's enough of a performance hit just trying to cram all that data through a company's entartube without stretching that tube many thousands of miles for no good reason.
Is that really them throwing their toys out of the pram?!
"How dare the Aussies deny us from intercepting data and shutting down sites by Australian companies and citizens"
My other Sig is very funny.
Whoever is in charge of Australia's defence department is an asshole and I happen to agree with him. WHY is it even close to being a good idea to send data out like that and especially in the US? Sorry, but I don't trust the US government.
I wish I was surprised that the US has the nerve to be angry after the megaupload arrests. I don't engage in any of this but even I'm worried about having a VPS hosted on US soil.
Australia and New Zealand are notorious for having "pipe problems" due to the long-haul links they have to use, and the US expects them to have all their critical business data travelling those overloaded pipes for the convenience of US agencies and companies??!?!!?!
So the convenience of American firms is now justification for slagging the sound and reasonable business practices of foreign nations?
Navel gazing US again. If they navel gaze any closer they're going to find themselves eyeballing their own stomachs from the inside... :P
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
I live in the US. With the recent mega upload fiasco and some of the other craziness, I think it's a smart move for foreigners to avoid hosting in the US.
US courts are trying to reach into other countries now. We've got way to much craziness here to trust us. The government should have known their actions will have consequences.
The biggest and simplest question when deploying a "Cloud Solution" is very simple
WHAT HAPPENS IF IT RAINS??
In this case it makes sense for a company based in %Nation% to have the primary servers in %Nation% or if thats not possible in %AlliedNearbyNation%.
heck if a US (based) company wants to do "Cloud" things in and for say Australia then it stands to reason that a nonzero number of DCs should actually BE IN AUSTRALIA. (don't they have a bit of a bandwidth problem??)
Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
One of the reasons we don't like hosting stuff on American servers is due to one of their laws that the FBI (and similar agencies) can obtain data with a warrant that tells the service (cloud) provider not to tell the customer us. We have our own private cloud infrastructure here in Perth and spread to Adelaide and Sydney with talks of having some in Singapore. We do not want our data on cloud infrastructure we don't manage in another country.
Just raise an eyebrow, look the trade representative in the eye for a long, quiet moment, and then get back to work.
on suspected members of Men-At-Work will soon follow.
As someone who regularly solutions cloud services for customers, I can assure you, the exact location of the cloud is very important to our big customers. Being able to say it's based out of entirely Canadian datacenters on an entirely Canadian network is a huge advantage over our competitors south of the border. It's not like any of them have been bitten yet, but the perception is that their data is much less safe in another country.
Is that the person responsible for safeguarding Victoria's secret?
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Fuck You.
Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
The U.S. trade representative, whose sole job is to promote U.S. companies overseas, is complaining because the Australian government is telling Australian companies not to use American companies for a certain service? In other word, a guy whose job it is to complain about trade barriers is complaining about trade barriers? HOW DARE HE?
Just because the US blindly trusts China and India with their data, doesn't mean the rest of the world wants to trust anyone but their own country.
What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
As a US citizen, I can't help but think WTF. Let them (and the rest of the world, for that matter) do whatever the fuck they want.
Did the clown sprouting this crap listen to himself? God forbid a country that isn't the USA look after it's own industries and interests! To be honest I and many Aussies can't trust the Yanks as far as we could throw them, let alone let them store our data. Typical self centred 2 year old tantrum by some Yank dickwad who thinks the world should revolve around the USA. Yet another reason to build a 100ft wall around the USA until their idiot government/corporations (same thing?) learn to play with the grown ups.
The point of a trade representative to another country is to shill, without principle, for the interests of their country's economy. If the US Trade Representative gets too pushy, just remind him that if the US ever has any intention of "containing China," Australia is one of those "do not piss off, under any circumstances" regional bases. It's especially important to have on our good side in the event China ever goes batshit crazy by seizing Taiwan, then says "since we've already risked WWIII, let's just go ahead and invade South Korea and Japan as well since their armies aren't worth shit."
Would you store your beer collection in a country where it's legal to piss in it?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
As long as America makes the rules. What do you think the US government would do if we started storing all of our data on Australian servers? We would tell Americans that it is safer and more productive to keep that data here. This country is so full of itself; It is amazing.
No sigs in BETA. Beta SUCKS.
Next thing you know, they'll want to drink their own beer, too.
First of all, he is supposed to point out *real* trade barriers. When Australian government provides information about the numerous problems of using USA based cloud services from Australia (connection problems, lag, ability of USA government to snoop on it, etc.), he's not obligated to complain...
That said, if it was coming from any other country, I could go "Just some government official overstepping a bit. It happens. Nobody will listen. Why is this newsworthy?" but USA has *very* strong track-record about massive behind-the-scenes lobbying in issues similar to this one (see: USA influence on other countries' copyright legislation, etc.) and whenever something actually gets out, it's probably just the tip of the iceberg.
I work for an American cloud service provider, and even we do not want to store our(customers') data in the U.S. The patriot act is a huge obstacle when selling to foreign customers. Hence why we have a major data center in Canada, and are looking at putting one in the U.K.
(see http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/12/patriot-act-and-privacy-laws-take-a-bite-out-of-us-cloud-business.ars)
AccountKiller
Dear Australia,
I, an American Citizen and veteran of the Marine Corps where I served an an infantry machine gunner, and filling billets including intelligence analyst and company clerk, sincerely apologize for this.
Although this isn't my fault (for I was not allowed to vote while I was in the service. This is my opinion, I found it too much of a coincidence that my ballot and that of a friend from the same state arrived exactly 1 month to the day after it was supposed to be postmarked for return. Twice.), you can bet I will vote this round, and will not be voting for anyone that is currently in office, for they all allow these things to happen, which is an embarrassment to us all.
I'm E-mailing my senators and congressman now. I have other concerns to raise with them anyway, like why my state charges sales tax on private sales of vehicles (double taxation) and why they want to charge tax on the Real Market Value of said vehicle even though it was sold for 1/3 that price (taxing money not spent).
Sincerely,
Troubled American Citizen
P.S. Are you guys still open for citizenship? At times it's more prudent to abandon a sinking vessel rather than continue trying to fix what is so severely broken.
Because of the US Patriot Act the province in which I live has made it illegal for me, a government employee, to store personal information (including email addresses, age, views about things, etc.) about citizens on US servers. If I do I could be fined $2,000 and my municipal office could be fined $500,000. Sooo Mr. US, repeal your Patriot Act and then come back to us about using your servers.
I wonder if the US department of defense would allow its contractors to ever host their data in Australia?
Even if the USA had sane laws & law enforcement, the fact that your data is sitting on the other side of the planet adds a lot of latency.
The speed of light is the limiting factor, and we haven't figured out how to beat that one yet.
Further, the high cost of fat pipes in Australia strongly discourages cloud providers.
I cannot get into specifics to protect my identity but this is why you want to have at least a cache of your data in australia if you are a multi-national. It makes no sense whatsoever for Australian entities to store their data in the US.
Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
"Alligators complain that birds will not nest in their jaws. Cites discriminatory nesting practices." Damn near makes me ashamed to be American that officials AND COMPANIES here are that stupid and absolutely clueless. The irony of this almost requires no further comment.
Trust no one. Encrypt everything.
Fact: The NSA has shown itself, historically, to have knowledge and technology 20-30 years ahead of that available to the rest of the human race (case in point, their suggestion to modify DES' S-boxes to strengthen it against differential cryptanalysis, an attack using math no one had even heard of until almost 30 years later).
Fact: A general purpose quantum computer makes all commonly used encryption algorithms worthless (though a number of quantum-resistant algorithms have started to appear, such as http://tbuktu.github.com/ntru/).
Fact: Countless research programs have demonstrated the viability of quantum computing, and you can even buy a 128 bit quantum computer today.
Likely: The NSA already has the quantum equivalent of a Beowulf cluster of these, if not something much, much better.
Conclusion: Using encryption trusts the single least-trustable entity on the planet not to already have the ability to turn it into Swiss cheese. That said, the NSA doesn't give two damns about the "little" things like copyright infringement, kiddy porn, or terrorist plots, so most of us have no reason to care about this. The local doughnut-eaters still have no ability to read your encrypted emails.
I work for a financial institution and the main reason for the paranoia around storing data in the cloud is that no cloud company would allow one of the companies internal experts to inspect their environments to the level that is required by governance.
as it is eaten so it shall pass
That wall will be built by the Americans themselves if it ever comes about. It is not so likely now that either Obama or Romney will end up as President.
However the United States has always had periods of voluntary and ideologically founded Isolationism. If you give them another shock to the system like 9/11 or internal forces such as the Tea Party pushes them in that direction they could very well decide to shut their doors to the greater world.
I don't think the world will be better off without the US, we might not like everythng the US does, but it has probably been more beneficial than bad. I'm not disregarding the wars, mistakes and indirect suffering, but whatever power leads the world in the future will have to make the same tough decisions. You can't have stability without the threat/use of force.
The capture by the Royal Navy of not one but two Enigmas at sea in the course of the war was very important to the Battle of the Atlantic, and hence to the survival of the UK, but it surely had little effect on the outcome for the USA. I suggest that radar and rdf were actually as, if not more important, and that in those cases honours are even - the magnetron in the UK, and the work of the Rad Lab at MIT. In fact, in a bad attack of historical revisionism, the work of the Rad Lab may well have been far more important than the Manhattan Project. With complete air and sea superiority, an invasion of Japan was never necessary - the entire country could have been contained until it had no fighting assets left. The Bomb was just cheaper. But without radar, control of the Pacific and the Atlantic would have taken much, much longer.
From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
Locality rules the universe. Networked storage and communications are subject to the same laws of physics as everything else.
In Canada, it is illegal for public agencies or IT companies serving them to store customer/member data on US-operated servers because the Patriot Act contravenes Canadian privacy laws. Many other Canadian associations and businesses have similar policies, because Patriot Act searches would violate their infomration privacy policy.
Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
They should offer data restores from the NSA for a price...
* Accidentally delete an email? Just call the NSA and we'll send you a copy of it.
This sig contains a manual self-destruct. Kindly please put your foot through your monitor in 8 seconds.
I'm Australian and our company uses cloud models for some of our business - as per my other post - it would be crazy for an Australian company to host in USA. It isn't the latency ... that just sets an initial response delay. A lot of ppls in the "outback" have broadband via satellite ... database access assured but don't try and play quake :)
,given current US policy (we own EVERYTHING attitude), I don't think I can justify a business case that allows the hosting to be there.
Megauploads serves as a perfect example.
Data retention, security, availability and backup are what we need. My ideal then is an Australian hosting company with exemplary credentials. We have that!.
The USA has introduced laws and policies that withhold legitimate data from its owners. Even if costs were 50%