Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do I Stay Employable?

illcar writes "Hi, I am a 40-year-old working as a senior developer for one of the biggest investment banks. I have always worked as a full time employee in my career; however the last 5-6 years have been very tough for me because of office politics, outsourcing, and economic conditions. The financial industry is not doing well, and we may be at the brink of another round of layoffs. My family is growing, my spouse does not work, and I still don't own a house. I am worried regarding my job security & career growth. Considering Medicare does not kick in till 65, I am still looking at 25 long years of career. I am wondering what the best way would be for me to stay employable in the coming years?" illcar continues: "1. Should I stay technical, and be ready to work as consultant/contractor? How does medical insurance work in that case?
2. Should I capitalize on the domain knowledge, and move onto business/managerial side?
3. Will the MBA degree or alternate career help?
4. Any other suggestions?

Thanks."

708 comments

  1. Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why is your family growing if you are looking at possible layoff?

    1. Re:Question: by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because bank corporation people don't have wives who are probably also around 40, and don't have a life expectancy of 80 or so, and thus aren't the same as people people who eventually run out of the choice to have a family if they don't act on it.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:Question: by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2

      Because he's 40. How much longer should he wait? If you wait for the right moment, you'll never do it. Haven't you seen Idiocracy?

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:Question: by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why is your family growing if you are looking at possible layoff?

      Because maybe they decided to have another kid before he knew his job was in danger?

      Don't be a dick. If all you can come up with to say to someone who's in a bad situation is, "Well, if you'd done this, that, and the other thing differently, you wouldn't be in this situation right now" then you should probably just keep your mouth shut. Really, it says a lot more about you than it does about the person you're talking to -- and none of what it says is good.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Question: by PIBM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your parents should have used either of birth control of abortion from what I can see..

    5. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I completely agree. Your parents didn't get an abortion, and now I have to read your crap.

    6. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Why have kids at all? I know it's the social norm and there's some nagging instinct to procreate (Darwin practically insures it) but there are some serious draw backs.

      * It's environmentally irresponsible at this point to have kids.
      * Kids are expensive.
      * Kids make things complicated when you finally wise up and dump the bitch.
      * You can love a dog or cat just as much and spend next to nothing on them. (ok not a draw back.. draw sideways?)
      * If you're not going to get Social Security what chance to your kids have of getting it?
      * Kids are destructive. No really, you'll work 18 years to house break them and they'll still not be house broken by the time they move out.
      * The status symbol of having a baby really only last about a month. After that you're just the average asshole again. Not learning your lesson, a few years later you'll be the junky after another hit. It's really hard to just have one.

    7. Re:Question: by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Funny

      or make sure that they can afford goddamn babysitters before they go out, so their frazzled nagging asses and undisciplined shithead spawn don't ruin my otherwise peaceful dinner date

      I seriously have trouble believing that you've ever had a 'peaceful' dinner date

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Question: by neonmonk · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you count someone being bound & gagged as peaceful then that's the only type of dinner date he's had.

    9. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, I have to agree with him. I see lots of people having kids like it was deciding to buy a Diet Coke. They don't get that is a *huge* responsibility that lasts at least 18 years, costs tons of money, time, etc. to properly raise kids. Having kids is easy, raising them properly is not. I'm not going to sit here and say "people shouldn't have kids", but it shouldn't be an automatic thing where everyone decides to pump out three kids "just because".

      Of course the problem is that people who are smart enough to think about it might avoid having kids, and those who aren't "accidentally" have 3 or 4.

    10. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Instead they named him Skyler!

    11. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adults are basically grown up kids. Do us a favor an "no be".

      That's a good start so that we can learn from you.

    12. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *citation needed
      *Yes. Yes they are.
      *Yes, they do. Of course, he's 40. Statistically speaking, he's not likely to "dump the bitch".
      *No. No you cannot.
      *Arf?
      *Repeating that they are expensive.
      *Status symbol? Pshaw. Unless you are a widower because the mother died in a fire in which you rescued the baby and were held back by firemen from trying to rescue the mother... as a dude, the baby does you NO GOOD as a status symbol. I only had one. It wasn't difficult at all.

    13. Re:Question: by krray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because maybe his job sucks and his wife is a little hottie and banging her is, well, FUN. It's called life... :)

    14. Re:Question: by Genda · · Score: 0

      He takes his hand out to dinner... its the least he can do...

    15. Re:Question: by Genda · · Score: 3, Informative

      Idiocracy may have been a comedy, but it called the shallow end of the gene pool straight up.

    16. Re:Question: by wmac1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am 40 years old right now. I used to be a senior developer, software architect, network admin of a bank and finally manager of "networks and hardware" department in that bank. I finally got fed up of the work pressure and office politics. I remember that at one point in time I became sure that I will 99% have a heart attack in the next 6 months. Then every day I would worry whether today is the day (just imagine a retail bank with hundreds of branches, thousands of users, shitty communications infrastructure of my country, many disconnected branches at any time and hundreds of angry customers waiting to do their job).

      In order to save my life I resigned and returned to Academia and did a PhD hoping that teaching and working in Academia will be more peaceful. During the study my financial situation became weak, my wife of 10 years cheated and left with a very rich man (15 years older than me and 20 years older than her).

      Now I am almost finished with the PhD, have no life and no job. I have a teaching job offer (pending PhD graduation). The pay for a PhD lecturer is around $2000 in the current country I stay and $1500 in my own country.

      By your standard, I have no right to marry again (let alone have a kid) and you would perhaps suggest me to do software development (presumably open source for free). Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

    17. Re:Question: by ffflala · · Score: 2

      If all you can come up with to say to someone who's in a bad situation is, "Well, if you'd done this, that, and the other thing differently, you wouldn't be in this situation right now" then you should probably just keep your mouth shut.

      Well to be fair, while the guy who asked can't undo those things, it might be helpful info for people who have yet to make those sorts of decisions.

      Insensitive perhaps, but it can be a very useful skill to be able to learn from other people's mistakes, or even from their less-than-perfect choices. It seems like a perfectly good waste of our our own various imperfections, screwups, and failures to predict the future if we don't allow other people to benefit from the lessons they teach us.

    18. Re:Question: by onepoint · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      out of everything you said, you screwed up on
      >> " Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?"

      where/when and why would you even have that right? so let's see, you could not hack your job, you went to education.
      can't manage your money correctly, you went towards broke.
      of course your wife left you, you jumped a risk that was not within your skill level. at east she's got Darwinism skills

      that type of right is if only you are a dictator, that's when you get to pick whom you want without the other parties consent.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    19. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want kids, that is clear. If you want to make a change, Rise up, oppose the Catholic church, the Indian and Chinese governments and help eliminate the Gates foundation, UNICEF,and the Peace Corp. They have done more to promote overpopulation then any nerds bumping uglies in the first world. Get some balls and sense of perspective.

    20. Re:Question: by jimmydevice · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please WILL me your worldly possessions instead of your bitchy sister and her snotty brats.
      Thank you.

    21. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One man's Troll is another man's Insightful. I found this insightful.

      "Honey! I'm getting laid off! Let's have a baby!"

    22. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Shows what you know - when your date is under the influence of chloroform, she's actually surprisingly cooperative.

    23. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because maybe his job sucks and his wife is a little hottie and banging her is, well, FUN. It's called life... :)

      DUDE we're on /., having a wife is unbelievable, and now you want us to imagine someone on /. has a hottie wife? MUAHHHAHAHAHAHA!!

    24. Re:Question: by mooingyak · · Score: 0

      Because baby meat is delicious.

      Also, if I spare one or two and indoctrinate them correctly, I can have my minions go get jobs to support my expensive lifestyle.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    25. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      What if we allowed everyone who wanted to do that to do that?

      Oh wait... we'd end up where we are now. Too many people, too few jobs. Planet overpopulated, using more resources than is currently sustainable. (And let's not have any of that fantasy crap about how many people the planet can theoretically support in whatever if-only-we-had-the-technology-or-magically-transformed-the-way-things-work-to-something-a-zillion-times-more-efficient scenario that idiots who want to deny that there is actually a problem bring up whenever it is mentioned that the planet is in fact overpopulated to a currently unsustainable level.)

    26. Re:Question: by Unoriginal_Nickname · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey mods, '1, Insightful' is not a substitute for '1, Glad someone else suffers from crippling social problems too'.

      hth.

    27. Re:Question: by BenJCarter · · Score: 2

      Because someone has to pick up the dog doo. And stuff like this that reminds you it's about more than shekels.

      But perhaps I only feel this way because I'm not an asshole that assumes kids are a status symbol?

      --
      For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
    28. Re:Question: by YttriumOxide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a hard time understanding why the parent was modded "Insightful" for this trolling. Just in case someone does think it's insightful:

      Why have kids at all? I know it's the social norm and there's some nagging instinct to procreate (Darwin practically insures it) but there are some serious draw backs.

      This is true, however to many people, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks.

      * It's environmentally irresponsible at this point to have kids.

      Possibly true; however it's more environmentally unfriendly for those who have kids that will continue to act socially irresponsibly. If the kids are raised with environmental awareness as an important factor, there'll probably be a net benefit for the environment overall. If we only allow the irresponsible and dumb to breed, the environment will suffer far worse.

      * Kids are expensive.

      Reasonably true, but it depends where you live as to how much of a real burden that is. I understand the "Ask Slashdot" was almost certainly posted by an American and there's a lot of American readership here, but the rest of the world does behave quite differently at times. Here in Germany for having kids we get tax breaks; additional money on top; and lots of important things are free (or close to free). I'd say financially, I'm about the same now as before my wife and I became parents.

      (yes, I'm aware it comes out of taxes, so I am indirectly paying all of the costs that way - but I was before she was born anyway; so it's no real difference there)

      * Kids make things complicated when you finally wise up and dump the bitch.

      That sounds like it was written by a bitter teenager. Some relationships DO last...

      Even in the unimaginable case that one day my wife and I go our separate ways, then yes, our daughter will be a complicating factor. But the chance seems so remote, it's a risk I don't even bother thinking about.

      * You can love a dog or cat just as much and spend next to nothing on them. (ok not a draw back.. draw sideways?)

      Anyone who thinks this has clearly never had children.

      * If you're not going to get Social Security what chance to your kids have of getting it?

      Again, see the thing about "rest of the world isn't like the US". There's nothing forcing you to stay there (on original topic: my answer to the submitter would be to consider moving country before he gets too old)

      * Kids are destructive. No really, you'll work 18 years to house break them and they'll still not be house broken by the time they move out.

      Learning to live in society takes time, yes. But I object to the phrase "house breaking" in this fashion. I don't know about you Mr AC, but I was hardly "destructive" since getting past puberty. Or at least, no more so than I still am today (and that can be taken out on non-harmful things like blowing stuff up in computer games from time to time)

      * The status symbol of having a baby really only last about a month. After that you're just the average asshole again.

      Status symbol? I can't imagine the idea of having a baby as a "status symbol". You have kids because a biological imperative pushes you to do so and then you love them. You don't do it for peer approval!

      Not learning your lesson, a few years later you'll be the junky after another hit. It's really hard to just have one.

      My wife and I are deliberating about having a second, but if we don't, just one will be fine. My wife's an only child. There are many others in the world as well, disproving that lame argument fairly thoroughly.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    29. Re:Question: by CheshireDragon · · Score: 0

      Comedy? I thought it was a documentary...

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    30. Re:Question: by eulernet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Congratulations, I think you saved your life !
      I hope you are happier now.

      If your wife quit you so easily, it means that she didn't love you, she was expecting your money.
      I'm sure you'll find a better wife soon (probably in 2 years since our life changes by cycles of 7 years).

      It's not easy to stop living a destructive life, and start following his dreams.
      I don't know what you'll do in a few years, but I'm already sure that you are a great guy.

      And don't listen about people who think only about money:
      "He who dies with the most toys wins"

    31. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is completely and 100% insane, but... what about adoption? It's not as if we don't have a shortage of people on this planet already!

    32. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      *No. No you cannot.

      Sure you can. There is nothing that makes it impossible. Of course, it depends on the person.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    33. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking into account that life is about surviving and not "doing stuff properly", I can confidently say that anybody believing that not having kids is the right options is not "smart", but a complete idiot. Thanks for the extra space, though.

    34. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I know this is completely and 100% insane, but... what about adoption? It's not as if we don't have a shortage of people on this planet already!

      Yes, because if you adopt a child it costs absolutely nothing to feed, clothe, educate and entertain them for the next twenty years.

      What is your point? Why would adoption instead of having more birth children make any difference to the poster's career?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Loving an animal is almost entirely a one way street. They really do not love you back in the same way that a child does.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    36. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      It is almost amusing that you have been modded as a troll for replying to a deranged blurt of mind wank that was modded insightful by children who should be locked away for their own ssafety.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advice for him right now: Slit your wrists.

      If you're 40 years old and can't make enough money to afford a house, you've failed.
      (FFS, Who's 40 in tech, and can't make at least 100k/year?)

      The answer here is make more money.

    38. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks this has clearly never had children.

      Or perhaps they're simply different from you? Or do you plan to back that up? I have a hard time believing that you're magically able to know how everyone else feels.

      It's the people who think the love of a pet can equal the love of a parent for a child, and vice versa, that need to back up their claims IMHO.

      If you really don't like children to the extent that you think you might as well have a pet, it is you who is "different."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      If you're going to post a load of stupid crap like you just did, I can see why you would do it as an AC. Biut why would you then put your name at the bottom?

      Just curious.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    40. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      If you count someone being bound & gagged as peaceful then that's the only type of dinner date he's had.

      Bring out the gimp.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Loving an animal is almost entirely a one way street.

      I don't know how true that is, but that wasn't what was said.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    42. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      No, I have to agree with him. I see lots of people having kids like it was deciding to buy a Diet Coke. They don't get that is a *huge* responsibility that lasts at least 18 years, costs tons of money, time, etc. to properly raise kids. Having kids is easy, raising them properly is not. I'm not going to sit here and say "people shouldn't have kids", but it shouldn't be an automatic thing where everyone decides to pump out three kids "just because".

      Of course the problem is that people who are smart enough to think about it might avoid having kids, and those who aren't "accidentally" have 3 or 4.

      The best way to avoid having kids is never to have sex with someone of the opposite gender, so I suppose most slashdotters are fairly safe

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    43. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      It's the people who think the love of a pet can equal the love of a parent for a child, and vice versa, that need to back up their claims IMHO.

      There is nothing impossible about it. I just think it's ridiculous that someone could state that as a fact as if they knew everyone's feelings.

      If you really don't like children to the extent that you think you might as well have a pet, it is you who is "different."

      Uh, well, yes. If I say that person X is different from person Y, then that's the same as saying that person Y is different from person X. It's not that you have to dislike children, either. Your feelings for an animal just have to exist in a certain way.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    44. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Funny

      she's not a hottie if she's close to his age.

      It's always instructive to hear the views of the younger generation on sexual matters. And by "younger" I mean "twelve or under".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is the slight drawback that if no one had kids, the human race would die out rather quickly.

      There is next to no danger of that happening. I don't think the person was suggesting that everyone stop having children.

      But as you sound like the typical slashdot teenage socially inadequate sociopathic cynic

      I think you forget to add in "rapist," "thief," "murderer," and "psychopath." I don't think your version had enough meaningless, random insults.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    46. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Yes, because if you adopt a child it costs absolutely nothing to feed, clothe, educate and entertain them for the next twenty years. "

      You moron, he obviously meant that the guy gets _himself_ adopted by a rich guy.

    47. Re:Question: by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Why is your family growing if you are looking at possible layoff?

      He could mean in age/expense not size. You know when the kids want driving lessons. college courses, and can't be fobbed off with cheap toys at Christmas.

    48. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They really do not love you back in the same way that a child does."

      Good joke. Both of them 'love' you because you fill the refrigerator.
      You're basically their slave.
      The pets love you more because they can't even open it.
      It's just hormones that _make_ you get a child against your will, no sane person would create an unnecessary 20 year long job if the genes wouldn't fool him into it.

      ( for the protesters here, how often did you visit your old parents you love so much in the last 12 months? )

    49. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, ye of little clue.

    50. Re:Question: by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      You can also read "The Marching Morons" by Cyril M. Kornbluth, he had that idea already in the 50ies.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Marching_Morons

    51. Re:Question: by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sure you'll find a better wife soon (probably in 2 years since our life changes by cycles of 7 years).

      Not only that, but the conjunction of the planets and stars when we were born fixes our character and fate anyway, so no need to worry!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    52. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      for the protesters here, how often did you visit your old parents you love so much in the last 12 months?

      lol, this is slashdot, does it count as visiting whenever we climb out the basement to have dinner with them? ;).

    53. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, youre not retarded; you're just "different". I don't have children, but even I'm not fucking insane enought to think that a person can love pets just the same.

    54. Re:Question: by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      News flash: It's the absolutely poorest countries that have had birth rates of 6-7/women on average, I think one of my grandparents had 9 that lived to adult age. If it was expensive to raise a kid, only the richest countries in the world could afford that. Children are only expensive because today the standard is an all-expenses paid package complete with brand clothing, iPhones, expensive vacations and their own personally decorated private room so that two incomes can barely deal with raising three kids. If you want to invest the time and responsibility, I'd say go for it. Despite that the saying is "putting food on the table", there's extremely few that can't actually put literal food on the literal table. Being raised by good parents in a poor home is still going to beat being raised by bad parents in a rich home by a long shot.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    55. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But these days you can bang a girl without getting her pregnant.

      It's not like the bad old days when there was no birth control (and no "agriculture revolution" too. Hence the supposed harsh laws against fornication, adultery and prostitution were actually quite reasonable[1]. And even today I think there's still good justification for laws against adultery).

      So if he is having children he thinks he can't support, he should just count himself lucky that he's living in a time AND country where he's unlikely to have to watch his children starve to death (nor have to kill and feed the weaker ones to the rest).

      FWIW plenty of poorer people manage somehow. It's ugly sometimes, but assuming he's lucky enough to live in the civilized world, it's not going to be that ugly.

      [1] After all which farmer wants to work more hours for even more years to support someone's bastard? And worse increase the risk of your own kids dying during the famine times. I'd say executing those guilty parties to discourage such behaviour is a lesser evil compared to having a society with many unwanted children (and if they survive to adulthood I doubt they'd be happy to contribute to the society that didn't or couldn't support them).

    56. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so did HG Wells in 1895. It's actually a really old idea, it's one of those ones that every generation bemoans thinking they're the first one with that problem.

    57. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone loves their children the same as they would love a pet (or vice versa), they are not merely "different"; they are insane. Demanding that we include disclaimers for insanity on every comment about human nature... well, so is that. If you really think the two are equivalent (or can be without some kind of underlying psychological problem), then you clearly do not understand the subject (and probably have one).

    58. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hate on Captain Hindsight, haha.

    59. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Out of all the people in the entire world, are you saying, without a single piece of evidence, that not a single one of those people love a pet as much as a child? Calling the idea "insane" because you don't like it doesn't prove anything.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    60. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      If someone loves their children the same as they would love a pet (or vice versa), they are not merely "different"; they are insane.

      "insane" for liking something in a different way that you do? Interesting. And who, exactly, gets to decide that they're "insane"? Why are they "insane"? Why is it even bad to be labeled "insane" by one such as you?

      You're insane for disagreeing with me, my friend.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    61. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you those too? The insults were not actually random or meaningless; they were based on your aspergic nonsense. Look, I'm sure there are some topics that you are capable of offering good advice on... maybe engineering or accounting or building a good deck of Magic cards? But it's pretty clear that you really don't "get" this whole people-life-emotions business. Do us all a favor and stop talking as if you did.

    62. Re:Question: by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Example #3,573 of why asking for life advice on Slashdot is like asking for technical assistance on Yahoo Answers.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    63. Re:Question: by mister_dave · · Score: 1

      It's the absolutely poorest countries that have had birth rates of 6-7/women on average

      Children are a pension plan. Family, churches, neighbours are welfare insurance.

    64. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't offer any better advice than "slit your wrists" then maybe you should take your own.

    65. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      But it's pretty clear that you really don't "get" this whole people-life-emotions business.

      Having emotions does not mean always acting irrational or treating those who are more in control of their emotions as sociopaths. The former seems to be expected behavior (or you're a sociopath), the latter is simply preposterous. I "get" emotions, it's just that I try not to use them to arrive at conclusions I find positively insane. What some people don't seem to "get," however, is that different people exist, and not everyone is the same. Shocking, huh?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    66. Re:Question: by funfail · · Score: 1

      If you read the grandparent post, you will see that his point is that you can adopt a child even if after your wife's fertility period is over.

    67. Re:Question: by funfail · · Score: 1

      even if after = even after

    68. Re:Question: by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      With adoption, you can wait to see whether you will be able to afford more children before deciding. With biological children, the wife's clock is ticking. Every year they wait makes it much less likely to succeed.

    69. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't necessarily think that in this case, the woman is being greedy. She does care about ability to provide for her children, and the guy in this case wasn't willing to make the right sacrifices to do so. Instead he asked her and the kids to make a sacrifice so he could make a shitty career choice. It sucks, but there aren't a lot of marriage partners for who that will fly for. Ultimately, marriage is a partnership where both sides agree to do their best to provide for the family.

    70. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She does care about ability to provide for her children

      Then perhaps she should've also found a way to make money. I agree with the above; there is no way that someone that was actually in love with you would leave you that easily (no, cheat on you and then leave you). Even if they previously popped out a few babies.

      That particular woman was a greedy slave-driver.

    71. Re:Question: by dontclapthrowmoney · · Score: 1

      I've chosen to ignore the possibility that you were trying to by funny. "Woosh" away, people.

      There are a few other safe vendors - VMware, Citrix, IBM? I am sure there are others that have a fairly trusted rep/advertise heavily in the Harvard Business Review.

      You will not get fancy stuff like cloud hosting a la Google

      Google (or bing search, if you really must) for "MCSE: private cloud". They've turned HyperV into a "private cloud" as per the direction VMware have headed, or that's what MS are calling it anyway - a private cloud. They're at least making up ground on the VMware and XenServer offerings.

      My point is that they aren't always that far behind the cutting edge.

      but your stuff always works and is guaranteed to succeed.

      Um, no. You may end up with the best of both worlds though - "deploy this, it's pretty rock solid, it's from Microsoft" and at the same time "this product sucks as much as Vista did, typical MS".

      No matter what you do, if crunch time comes you'll get the blame if it suits for the people above you to let that happen.

      I'm not trolling here, or am trying not to anyway - I am a fan of some of Microsoft's stuff, and other parts of their product suite drive me nuts. I recently built a Forefront TMG deployment and had a lot of fun doing it, at the same time I'd rather be castrated than be a full time Sharepoint dev/admin. (Based on some of the full time sharepoint admins I've worked with, that might be a mandatory employment criteria..?)

    72. Re:Question: by Jesrad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No it isn't. We're barely saturating this one planet despite trying so hard at it for so long, and there's 13.7 billion light-years of visible universe around.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    73. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      No. I haven't. Having kids is not a right and I think a license should be required before allowing a man to procreate, especially in places where infant mortality is high.

      I had a job like yours, with high stress. It was killing me. Fortunately, I'd saved enough money working there for 7 yrs to retire. When I left, the vendors who I interacted with contacted me to take a position in their companies too. It has been 5 yrs and a few days ago, a coworked contacted me to see if I were interested in a job where he works now.

      It isn't my place to say that YOU should not have any kids. There are different cultural expectations, but if you lived in MY country and only earned $4000/yr, you'd starve. Your wife would starve AND all your kids would starve. In fact, your wife would do better to leave you, get welfare and food stamps for her and the kids.

      Also, we prevent animals from procreating - most of the time, before a human adopts an animal, it has already been "fixed" so that no additional animals are possible. I've had 4 dogs in my life - all of them were "fixed."

      Sorry to be so blunt. No, it is not a fundamental right to create life.

    74. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I was young and felt as you do. I'm jot being ageist, I've just seen how shitty life can get and how how absolutely awful the experience is for kids of living with a parent going from upper class to lower class.

      If you're unemployed or about to be, don't have kids. As much awesomeness as kids provide, they make it impossible for both parents to get a job without outsourcing the kids to either daycare or grandma's house which fucks her plans for the next 5 years instead of your own. If someone else is raising your kids then ask yourself why you had them in the first place.

    75. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could volunteer not to spawn at all! That will help make up for the authors 2+ kids and improve the gene pool a bit too.

    76. Re:Question: by mjr167 · · Score: 2

      Or you get a new wife...

    77. Re:Question: by flyneye · · Score: 0

      From a psych standpoint, it is interesting that you feel this way. Do you have a family history of mental illness,physical illness or abnormality? Perhaps you even have homosexual tendencies. If we could correlate your desire to remain childless with a good reason to remain childless then we could explain your stupid hippy attitude and I could put a Nobel on the shelf with my other knick-knacks.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    78. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting as AC because I spent modpoints on good posts here.

      I agree with what you wrote ... But there is a problem with your argument. If only some could be "allowed" to have families and children, who would decide that? Who would decide who can have descendants and who would be erased from history? Or who would decide will be the size of your bank account, for example? You realize the size of the problem?

    79. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks, but at least you found out what your ex-wife liked about you - the fact you were earning money for her to spend. One shallow vacuous bitch gone.

      I truly hope your situation gets better soon. Better alive and unstressed, albeit poor than nearly-dead, stressed and rich.

    80. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Kids can get a job to pay for the driving lessons.
      Kids can get a student loan to pay for their college courses.
      Kids can fucking learn that if there isn't money, there isn't money. Teach money to children when they're young, and they'll adapt if you don't have much.

      The alternative is getting into massive debt living a lie to your kids. And that really doesn't help them in any manner.

      Anyway, a software developer should be able to get another job fairly quickly, _IF_ they're on top of (recent &| current) development trends. Sucks if he has been an in-house MUMPS expert for ten years and doesn't know anything current, but that's unlikely.

      In reality, given the long-term responsibility of having a child, according to some posters here, NO TIME IS RIGHT to have a child as *no-one* can plan 18 years in advance (OMG, hit by a bus! And with the baby due next month as well!). An alternative way to look at it is that NO TIME IS WRONG. You'll just have to adapt if things take a turn for the worse.

    81. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are really, really lonely... aren't you?

    82. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The desire to not have children is every bit as arbitrary and pointless as the desire to have children.

    83. Re:Question: by jedidiah · · Score: 0

      If you want to live like rats, that's fine but you really should not not subject other people to this kind of lifestyle.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    84. Re:Question: by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "freedom of speech, or copy the work of others with no recompense"

      If you weren't such a asshat moron you would realize that those two are interrelated. Also as primates, "copying" is as fundemental as copulating. It's why you have a global audience for your stupid comments.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    85. Re:Question: by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the poorest countries have large families because the women are uneducated and there is a high mortality rate. Solve those two problems in any society and the birth rate plummets.

    86. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this insightful...? way to go mods.

    87. Re:Question: by router · · Score: 1

      IBM ain't safe. Nor are/were they behind the times. This cloud thing you speak of, before it was The Cloud it was On Demand...you may have seen commercials. They did not, however, execute. They had complex network environments before such things were fashionable. In fact, you can pretty much count on the fact that if you are doing it, they already done it.

      Back to the point, start your own business. Its scary. Its way better than corporate, at least until the money runs out.
      I think it look better on a resume anyway, if'n you fail.
      As I still may.

      andy

    88. Re:Question: by DuckDodgers · · Score: 0

      It's difficult to keep up with children even if you're athletic, healthy, and in your early 20s or late teenage years. The older you get, the harder it is. Plus, if you hunt around for statistics people who have children later in life are less likely to be happy parents than those who have children at a younger age. No causation link has been established, but the speculation is that people who have kids relatively soon after school only had a few years of freedom as an adult. People who have their first child in their late 30s or early 40s are more likely to have had fifteen or more years living on their own with relatively few responsibilities, and are more likely to resent the enormous added work parenthood brings.

      So even with adoption, it might make sense to adopt when you are younger, rather than waiting until you have great financial security but fewer physical reserves for chasing an energetic kid.

    89. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love is abstract thing. It can be accurately measured or quantified. If one person says that love form a pet is equal to love from a child, they are as right as you saying the opposite.

      There is nothing wrong with being different.

    90. Re:Question: by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      "I see lots of people having kids like it was deciding to buy a Diet Coke."

      Your parents may have told you that you were planned, but odds are they were lying.

      I'm not saying it is smart and I'm certainly not saying it is economically sound, but for most of us the two factors that chose our conception were a bottle of cheap wine and .5 seconds of thoughtless deliberation.

    91. Re:Question: by hackula · · Score: 0

      You sir, have clearly never met many of the filthy brats running around this planet. My dog is much more deserving of love than the lot of them.

    92. Re:Question: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      And the bad part about all this is that, in today's society, unless you come from a very wealthy family that will bankroll you while you're young so you can raise their grandchildren, you need to spend your younger years in college and working on your career so you can have financial stability to raise a family without going broke. I grew up in a household that didn't have that stability, and it wasn't fun worrying about money all the time when I was 10 or so.

      It's even worse for women since their best childbearing years are in their 20s, which is precisely the time it's absolutely the worst for them to have a kid financially, and by the time they're 40, they're frequently unable to do so. Worse yet is that having a child usually has an extremely negative effect on their career, unless they've established themselves well (which again, by this time they're now not very fertile).

      I will say, however, that I'm almost 40 myself and I don't feel like I'm any less energetic than I was at 25.

      As for adoption, there again you need financial stability, and unlike having your own kids, you really do *need* it. You can be poor and have your own kids, though it's a crappy life for the kids; but if you're poor, they won't allow you to adopt. Plus, adoption is difficult; people say there's all these extra kids out there, but there's a reason Americans frequently travel to Asia or Eastern Europe to adopt: there are very few healthy ones available. Almost no one wants to adopt a special-needs child (and for good reason, as you say, it's a huge amount of work to raise normal kids, but at least there the work steadily decreases after they're a couple years old and can do more and more things for themselves; with special-needs kids you're stuck doing everything for them for their whole lives, to varying degrees).

      As an engineer, I can only see a couple of solutions to this growing problem in society: 1) change society so that people have kids in their 20s while everyone else bankrolls them, and then start on their careers in their 30s; this isn't likely to happen since we already hate giving people welfare to sit around and not work; 2) change society so that most women have kids at 20 and immediately give them to older couples to adopt; this isn't likely to work or be good for the kids, since biologically and sociologically it seems kids are better off raised by their own parents, particularly their own mother; 3) go back to the "village raises a child" society; not likely to happen since a greater population generally requires greater urbanization and less tribalism; and finally 4) re-engineer human biology so that we can have kids at 50 or 60 and still be young enough to raise them and enjoy the experience; this will require greatly increasing the human lifespan, so basically we need to put our hope (and funding) in Aubrey de Grey and his anti-senescence work.

    93. Re:Question: by hackula · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...or technical assistance on Slashdot

    94. Re:Question: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That really depends on the animal and the child. What if your kid is a sociopath? I knew an older lady like this; her (grown, 20s) son was obviously a sociopath and even tried to convince her to sign all her property into his name, so he could kick her out and sell her house. She finally cut off all contact with him. I wonder if some people have multiple kids for this or a similar reason: if one dies early or turns out to be a shitball, at least you have one or two other chances of having a kid you're proud of and who returns your love.

      At least with dogs and cats, if they're not working out in your home environment, you can give them away to someone else or take them back to the (hopefully no-kill) shelter.

    95. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      Have you contemplated for even a split second your future kids' rights? It sounds like given your unfortunate circumstances (self-inflicted, no less) you're just looking for "that light" in your life by having kids.

      Sorry for sounding harsh, but given the mindset you projected in your post, it was probably more than money that your wife left you for.

    96. Re:Question: by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Example #3,573 of why asking for life advice on Slashdot is like asking for anything on Yahoo Answers.

      FTFY. It's incredibly rare to see something I'd call insightful on Yahoo Answers.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    97. Re:Question: by hackula · · Score: 1

      You must have cats. My dogs literally wait around all day everyday for me to come home at which point they can jump into my lap and stare lovingly into my eyes. They do practically nothing besides staring at me waiting for me to show them affection. They are so loving that if they were people, it would be terrifying and I would have a restraining order against them. A kid will never love you as much as a dog, if they end up loving you at all (plenty of people hate their parents). If anything, having a kid seems more like a one way street.

    98. Re:Question: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Possibly true; however it's more environmentally unfriendly for those who have kids that will continue to act socially irresponsibly. If the kids are raised with environmental awareness as an important factor, there'll probably be a net benefit for the environment overall. If we only allow the irresponsible and dumb to breed, the environment will suffer far worse.

      Not necessarily. Sure, in the short term the environment will suffer more, but if we only allow the dumb to breed, then before too long society will simply collapse, as there's no was that a population of morons and irresponsible people can continue the way industrialized societies are going now; it simply requires too much skill and expertise by many different people to keep it going, and if too many things start failing then you're looking at food riots and total collapse and a big die-off of population, sorta like what happened on Rapa Nui but on a much larger scale.

    99. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey mods, '1, Informative' is not a substitute for '-1, Flamebait'.

      hth.

    100. Re:Question: by andyteleco · · Score: 1

      And why does he have the exclusive responsibility of providing for the family (in this case only for her since they had no children)? Did it occur to the bitch to actually WORK to compensate for the money he wasn't making any more? Yes, she IS a greedy whore. Now I only hope that the rich guy will dump her in a few years for an even younger girl leaving her with nothing.

    101. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is your family growing if you are looking at possible layoff?

      Because contrary to Republitard belief, he isn't psychic and 9 months ago he didn't know that he'd be laid off today?

    102. Re:Question: by v1 · · Score: 1

      No, I have to agree with him. I see lots of people having kids like it was deciding to buy a Diet Coke. They don't get that is a *huge* responsibility that lasts at least 18 years, costs tons of money, time, etc. to properly raise kids.

      The first impression I got from the OP was one of "You're pregnant again? Time to re-evaluate my job security!" So, now he realizes he's potentially in a tighter jam than he already was. (no savings, no house, no working wife... should have already been addressing these things) IMHO too little too late. Best he can do at this point is damage control. I'll assume he's at least sane enough to not be considering adoption. Anyone that gives him a kid after considering his current situation is as irresponsible as he is.

      Assuming the wife is preggers, get her into the workforce a year from now. I didn't see any mention of younger siblings, but at age 40 odds are there's one or two by now, and they can help take care of the baby. Or this may have been a case of the wife's biological clock screaming at her to produce at least one kid before the factory shuts down. In that event I'd be asking why hasn't the wife been working? This just looks like poor planning over the long term, and looking for an escape. Or a lazy wife. (or disabled I suppose)

      This might end well, but the odds are not real good. As many above have said, "kids are expensive". If he loses his job, and his wife isn't working, and they're having a kid, this is going to get really ugly really fast. By 40 you should have some buffers built up and it doesn't look like this guy has any.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    103. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (You mean letting the dumb RAISE CHILDREN. Idiocracy was not based on fact. Eugenics is a horrible thing. Nature vs. Nurture, bitch)

    104. Re:Question: by swillden · · Score: 1

      Out of all the people in the entire world, are you saying, without a single piece of evidence, that not a single one of those people love a pet as much as a child? Calling the idea "insane" because you don't like it doesn't prove anything.

      All people in the world is a ridiculously high standard for proof, especially since it includes a lot of people who have no idea if they'd love a child more, since they haven't had one. So the way you pose the question, it's inherently unanswerable.

      A more practical question is: What percentage of people who love both pets and their children would equate the two? Imagine doing a survey with a series of questions "Do you have a pet? Do you love your pet a great deal? Do you have a child? Would you say you love your pet more, less or about the same as your child?". A "no" to any of the first three would end the questions; we're only interested in responses from people who have a basis for comparison.

      Of course, I've never performed such a survey. What I have seen, anecdotally, but dozens of times, is people who have pets they care a great deal about, for years, and then have a child. What happens in every single case I've observed is that the pet instantly becomes far less important. The feelings for the pet don't change, but they're dwarfed by the feelings for the child.

      Might there be exceptions? Certainly there may, but my observation is that if there are, they're very few -- and I suspect the exceptions would be people who are emotionally damaged in some way. Might you be such an exception? It's possible, but you can't know until you have a child.

      That's not to say you should. If you don't feel a powerful desire for children, then by all means don't have them. But it's a stretch to argue that a normal, healthy human being can love a pet as much as a child, from what I've observed. I think we're just hard-wired to love our kids in a way that pets can't replicate.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    105. Re:Question: by swillden · · Score: 1

      Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      What exactly do you mean by "rights"? If you mean that no one should be able to stop you from doing those things, then I agree. If you mean that society owes you a living that enables you do to those things, then I disagree.

      However, raising a family can be done on virtually any income. If you don't make much money, it means a lot of sacrifices by both you and your wife, but it can absolutely be done. Many, many people raise happy, healthy families on very low incomes.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    106. Re:Question: by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      (You mean letting the dumb RAISE CHILDREN. Idiocracy was not based on fact. Eugenics is a horrible thing. Nature vs. Nurture, bitch)

      So you are suggesting:

      • There is zero genetic component to intelligence. Nurture has a lot to do with it, but I find it hard to believe there is no genetic component. I've seen a lot of variation between siblings, but if we consistently remove the above average IQs from the gene pool, that can't be good long term.
      • That we force these dumb people to give up their kids to be raised by smarter people. While we are at it we somehow convince smarter people to adopt. Even if you started mandatory education at age 3 and kept the kids all year for 10 hours a day, parents are still a big influence. I don't know how you'd do that.
      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    107. Re:Question: by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Most kids in todays world are sociopaths. It's society in general that has driven that to be the norm.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    108. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      A more practical question is: What percentage of people who love both pets and their children would equate the two?

      I agree that it's a more practical question, but even among people who haven't had kids, the answer remains unknown. This would be the best starting point, however.

      What happens in every single case I've observed is that the pet instantly becomes far less important.

      No surprise there. For some (probably many) people, pure instinct takes over. From what I've seen, plenty of people become irrational after they have children and easily fall for any "for the children" arguments. Some don't, however. In that same way, someone else could love a pet as they love a child. Different from the norm? Perhaps. But I don't see what's impossible about it.

      and I suspect the exceptions would be people who are emotionally damaged in some way.

      Why? And how do you define "emotionally damaged"? I do not understand what the problem is with caring about something more than others.

      But it's a stretch to argue that a normal, healthy human being

      What is a "normal, healthy human being"? Why is it objectively good to be a "normal, healthy human being," if that is the case? In my experience, I've noticed that people tend to equate "not normal" with "bad." This is not necessarily the case; different does not have to be "bad." Anyone who is different in a way that some people do not like will be labeled "unhealthy" by some arbitrary standard.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    109. Re:Question: by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, same with my dog. It's a pack mentality, it's the one reason I refuse to get a cat. Dogs in general are what humans should be like.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    110. Re:Question: by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You do realize you've placed your entire post in parenthesis, right?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    111. Re:Question: by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Option 5, make work more flexible with fewer "at the office" hours so you have time to work and raise kids.

    112. Re:Question: by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yes, he's married.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    113. Re:Question: by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the other hand, I was 42 when my first kid was born twelve years ago and I had 20+ years before that with few responsibilities. When you have kids late you can never claim, "you didn't get to do things in life" -- if you haven't gotten around to the sports cars, exotic vacations, or advanced degrees by the time you are 40, you are never going to get around to them and so can be content that you already did all the things you wanted to do by yourself. I'm not planning on becoming feeble and unable to keep up with the kids any time soon -- I look forward to when they can give me a good run or tennis match.

    114. Re:Question: by rbeef · · Score: 1

      Why is your family growing if you are looking at possible layoff?

      This whole thread is way off topic. He's asking now that he's 40, how does he stay employable. I'm 56, started in IT well over 30 years ago and have yet to be unemployed. What I have done is bounced around from job to job and from city to city. I started out as an IBM mainframe application programmer, then a developer for a software house, then an MVS systems programmer, back to developer for a software house, then MVS systems programmer, and finally as a UNIX systems admin (for the last 19 years). In the mean time I was invited to the development team of the FreeBSD project (committer) 11 years ago. I think that taking opportunities as the present themselves and being flexible, Be willing to do anything and even if you love or enjoy a technology, be willing to move on to keep bread on the table. The downside to bouncing around is that you scew up your pension. Throw a divorce or two into the mix and early retirement is no longer an option. If I had to advise someone about career choices, I'd say stay out of IT. Get into law or some other career that pays very well. Then retire early and follow your dream without hesitation. Sometimes following your dreams when you're young can lead to struggling for the rest of your life.

    115. Re:Question: by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this is marked as insightful.

      Worries about your current job don't trump other factors when deciding whether or not to create a human being.

      Sure, the timing is unfortunate, but there are a million other concerns that might far outweigh the stability of your current position.

    116. Re:Question: by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      If he loses his job, and his wife isn't working, and they're having a kid, this is going to get really ugly really fast. By 40 you should have some buffers built up and it doesn't look like this guy has any.

      This.

      He should have came to us starting with "Hey /. I really #$%^ed up this time, is there any way out of this jam? I am a ...."

      Because by the sound of it he seems to be in denial that he created this situation. He must have saw his friends buying houses and their wives working but completely ignored it.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    117. Re:Question: by atriusofbricia · · Score: 1

      By your standard, I have no right to marry again (let alone have a kid) and you would perhaps suggest me to do software development (presumably open source for free). Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      You seem to have had a regrettable series of events. That said...

      Do you have the right to make that choice? Sure, absolutely. Self-determination and all that. However, with that right comes the requirement to deal with the consequences of that choice. You have absolutely no right to externalize those consequences by demanding the State provide you with the means to exercise that right or support you or your children. If you cannot support them, for whatever reason, you shouldn't intentionally have them.

      To put it another way, you have the right to choose as long as you're willing and able to deal with the consequences of that choice yourself. You don't have the right to effectively enslave others through the machinations of the State to support you and yours after having made the decision. Saying you didn't mean to have children at this time doesn't change that fact. Your choice, your responsibility.

      --
      I was raised on the command line, bitch

      "Nemo me impune lacesset"

    118. Re:Question: by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > And so did HG Wells in 1895. It's actually a really old idea, it's one of those ones that every generation bemoans thinking they're the first one with that problem.

      "We live in a decaying age. Young people no longer respect their parents. They are rude and impatient. They frequently inhabit taverns and have no self control." -- attributed to an inscription in an Ancient Egyptian tomb, quoted in Buckminster Fuller's "I Seem To Be a Verb"

      Plato quotes Socrates in The Republic as saying,
      I mean such things as these: â" when the young are to
      be silent before their elders; how they are to show respect to them by
      standing and making them sit; what honour is due to parents; what
      garments or shoes are to be worn; the mode of dressing the hair;
      deportment and manners in general.

      "When I was young, we were taught to be discreet and respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly disrespectful and impatient of restraint".
      Hesiod, 8th century BC

      "The young people of today think of nothing but themselves. They have no reverence for parents or old age. They are impatient of all restraint... As for the girls, they are forward, immodest and unladylike in speech, behavior and dress."
      Attributed to Peter the Hermit, AD 1274

      There is NOTHING new under the sun.

    119. Re:Question: by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      best option

    120. Re:Question: by Musc · · Score: 1

      > What is a "normal, healthy human being"?

      There are lots of cases where we can objectively, scientifically prove that people are unhealthy. For example, a doctor can prove that your leg is broken, and this would count as being unhealthy. Some things in life are actually objective, and many areas of health are included.
      Emotional damage is not as simple to prove as a broken leg, but mental health professionals have scientific, objective methods for identifying and treating these problems. Why do you think that all differences are inherently equally healthy?

      --
      Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
    121. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      There are lots of cases where we can objectively, scientifically prove that people are unhealthy.

      That's why I asked.

      Why do you think that all differences are inherently equally healthy?

      When did I say that? I simply stated that sometimes people arbitrarily label those who are different themselves as unhealthy.

      It really depends on your definition of "healthy." And furthermore, whether or not it's bad to be unhealthy truly is subjective.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    122. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sperm degrades over time. Thus people who have kids later in life give their kids more error prone genes. Better to have kids early when you are fresh and your sperm doesnt contain copying errors that build up with age.

    123. Re:Question: by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 1

      A younger wife?

      --
      - d
    124. Re:Question: by xeno · · Score: 1

      Have a look at DSM-IV 299.00 Autistic Disorder. Specifically, Asperger syndrome is primarily characterized by a person's one-sided social relationships and imbalanced interactions. Research shows (generally) that HF Asperger's sufferers have an inability to recognize or process social cues, communication, and other information when interacting with other people. Mistaking pets, machines, or entirely inanimate objects for persons with which one has full human relationships is one of the red flags for this diagnosis.

      This spectrum is classified under "Pervasive Developmental Disorder" ...so "Insane" is maybe not the right word. However, as much as PETA likes to use the phrase "pet parents," asserting a social relationship with a domestic animal on the same level and depth as a human is solidly in the middle of "mental disorder."

      Pets are meat. Children are minions. There's a difference.

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    125. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Even if what you said is true, that doesn't mean all such people have autism or Aspergers syndrome.

      I can't see it as anything more than liking something more than other people. The need to characterize them as "insane" or attempt to diagnose them with random disorders seems short-sighted to me.

      asserting a social relationship with a domestic animal on the same level and depth as a human is solidly in the middle of "mental disorder."

      Only because it deviates from the norm, I suspect. I believe parents driven by instinct can't imagine another "healthy" person having different feelings than themselves.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    126. Re:Question: by maitas · · Score: 1

      The number 1 reason a woman leaves a mariage is because she feels his husband has no ambition, or no clear roadmap up.
      When this happens, it only shows you that she didn't ever loved you.
      I agree with eulernet, you saved your life.
      You really have to do what you love, for the good of all of us, you will be more productive to the world if you do what you love.

      Good luck with your life!

    127. Re:Question: by xeno · · Score: 1

      Far be it for me to defend DSM IV; personally I think it's a relativist p.o.s and contains opinion-based nonsense such as "oppositional defiant disorder" which doesn't pass the giggle test. I'm just pointing out that by the current even-if-crappy standard, mental health doctors have label for a category of behavior; the category has qualifying criteria; and "asserting a social relationship with a domestic animal on the same level and depth as a human is solidly in the middle..." of the criteria for HF Asperger's, a "pervasive" mental disorder.

      Even if what you said is true, that doesn't mean all such people have autism or Aspergers syndrome.

      Actually, yes. That's how measurement works. If you accept that IQ is a reasonable measure of Bob's intelligence, then you have to accept that it's a reasonable measure for Alice too. The APA asserts that DSM criteria apply to all people. If you don't like the system, its metrics or the resulting label, criticize that, but don't assert random exceptions.

      I can't see it as anything more than liking something more than other people. The need to characterize them as "insane" or attempt to diagnose them with random disorders seems short-sighted to me. ......Only because it deviates from the norm, I suspect. I believe parents driven by instinct can't imagine another "healthy" person having different feelings than themselves.

      (shakes head) 'Deviates from the norm' to a sufficient degree that it has been clearly labeled as a disorder. Ponder the word "deviant." Are you a happy deviant? Isn't that ok?

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
    128. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      but don't assert random exceptions.

      It seems like a rather meaningless label if the individuals are otherwise 'well-adjusted.'

      'Deviates from the norm' to a sufficient degree that it has been clearly labeled as a disorder.

      Again, seems rather meaningless to me in some cases.

      Isn't that ok?

      I don't see why not.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    129. Re:Question: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly, agreed 100%. There's a lot of problems with the AC's position, both practical and moral. People have a biological imperative to raise their own kids; telling them to not bother and to raise someone else's instead isn't going to sit well with the richer people. Telling the poor people they're not going to be allowed to keep their kids, and that their natural children will be forcibly removed from their custody at gunpoint isn't going to sit well with the poor people or with most others. How much of the voting public do you really think will be onboard with the idea of using poor people as breeding stock, for various reasons? Plus, what do you do with all the kids who have problems? It's not generally rich people who produce crack babies, kids with fetal alcohol syndrome, etc. There's a reason richer people who use surrogates have strict contracts about how the birth mother must take care of herself during gestation; having a child gestate in a mother that's malnourished (or eating the shit that passes for food in the USA these days), or who smokes or drinks or uses drugs, results in a child with developmental problems. Having poor people be used as baby factories is about the dumbest idea I've seen someone support here in a long time.

    130. Re:Question: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that. Maybe the incidence is higher in certain countries where the social environment is very bad, such as Somalia and the USA, but not everywhere.

    131. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps she should've also found a way to make money

      Different AC, not GGGGP: "left with a very rich man (15 years older than me and 20 years older than her)."

      She did. Her present husband will die at least 5-10 years before she does, and will likely leave her with more than she could ever have earned had she remained in the workforce. Whether she mentally damortize that in terms of 8-hour days (workforce), 24-hour days (marriage), or 1-hour nights (sex-for-money), it was still probably more profitable than working for a living.

    132. Re:Question: by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Indeed... this is by far the most mods I've ever had on one of my posts:

      • 6x Insightful (+6)
      • 1x Insightful that was undone by posting 0
      • 1x Interesting (+1)
      • 1x Informative (+1)
      • 1x Troll (-1)
      • 2x Overrated (-2)

      So, most people seem to think my post has insight; but it's FAR from unanimous...

      I'd hazard a guess that those who don't are the "don't have children" types rather than the "something wrong with them" types. My favourite argument in this thread so far would be swillden's point here.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    133. Re:Question: by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      she's not a hottie if she's close to his age.

      It's always instructive to hear the views of the younger generation on sexual matters. And by "younger" I mean "twelve or under".

      I dunno. When I was 25, I wouldn't have considered a 40 year old woman to be a "hottie". Obviously things change as you get older.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    134. Re:Question: by ktappe · · Score: 1

      Have you ever thought marrying, having kids and a family are fundamental rights of a human (and even an animal)?

      "Fundamental right" or not, you having a "right" doesn't magically make the money to support that kid appear out of thin air. You also have a responsibility to only procreate if you have both the time and resources to properly raise the kid.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    135. Re:Question: by electrons_are_brave · · Score: 1

      "asserting a social relationship with a domestic animal on the same level and depth as a human is solidly in the middle..." of the criteria for HF Asperger's

      No it isn't.

    136. Re:Question: by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

      In The Art of Loving Eric Fromm explains love as action taken to advance the spiritual development of another being. For Fromm, love isn't a feeling but the actions taken whatever one feels toward the spiritual growth of another being.

      For Fromm, pets cannot advance spiritually. Spiritual growth necessitates change and sometimes that change increases the independence of the loved one with the consequence that the loved one and the lover grow apart. Fromm argues pet ownership establishes the dependence of the pet on the owner and that it does not advance the possibility of the pet advancing spiritually.

      I love animals and have had pets at various points in my life. I have never had children. I love communicating in language with others and I presume most other humans do, too. As a result, I'm guessing the number of people who, having done both, find raising pets as fulfilling as raising children is fairly small.

      --
      blog
    137. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never felt the touch of a woman huh?

    138. Re:Question: by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      For Fromm, love isn't a feeling

      If you did not feel anything towards them, it's unlikely that your actions would make it appear as if you loved them.

      For Fromm, pets cannot advance spiritually.

      I disagree with this, as well. Even if someone doesn't change, that doesn't mean you won't love them.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    139. Re:Question: by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to assert that everyone who has children in their 40s instead of their 20s will have a worse experience as a result. I'm just repeating the trends I've heard reported. I'm glad parenting has been wonderful for you.

    140. Re:Question: by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Some European nations have workable solutions to that - universal health care, free tuition for university, and up to 16 months of paid parental leave between the last few months of the pregnancy and immediately after the child's birth. All three benefits vary depending upon the country, of course - Sweden gives the longest leave, Denmark gives 100% pay during the parental leave, others give less. Those benefits won't solve all of the financial burdens of parenting, but it makes it far less financially painful than in the US.

      In an economy based on farming, the government doesn't need to provide financial incentives to make parenting more attractive. The value of children as laborers will lead couples to have more kids. But in modern first world countries, children are an incredible burden and the only possible form of repayment, [i]if you're very lucky[/i], is the care they may have the time and money to give you in your declining years. Any nation that wants its population levels not to decline needs some combination of good financial assistance to parents and lots of legal immigrants.

    141. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is the slight drawback that if no one had kids, the human race would die out rather quickly.

      You say that like it's a bad thing...

  2. As a 45 year old working in the industry by jcoy42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a 45 year old working in the industry, my first thought is find yourself a nice quiet place to cry.

    But honestly if you can do it move to management. If you've got a proven track record in the field, you've got a good chance at being one of those magic managers who actually can manage programmers (it's like herding cats). They won't respect you of course, but at least you'll be able to communicate with them which is huge.

    And the IT managers I know make decent money.

    Personally, I'm too much of a BOFH to go that route.

    --
    Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    1. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As someone who knows nothing about you or your life situation, and is way too young to be giving advice, maybe you should try it anyway? Some of the nicest, most easy-to-work-with people are self-tempered cynics.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by symbolset · · Score: 4, Informative

      BOFH is the tagline for a long-running series of humor articles on theregister.co.uk. It stands for "Bastard Operator From Hell". The series is about how an IT person makes his charges miserable. You will also see "PFY" reference, which is the BOFH's "Pretty Fucking Young" associate and protege.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    3. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind it ( as you won't develop anymore ) , management might be a good idea.
      However, this requires people skills, which is why most developers don't like it ( we want to code :-) ). But you can work on that

      The advantage you have is that you know what's important, due to your experience. Which is a big bonus over a lot of other managers.
      It also means you will get shit from both upper management, and the people working for you.

      So, in short : though job, but very exciting, and you will be able to achieve some great with your team.

      If you don't want to become a manager, I would suggest you expand your knowledge set : learn new languages, technologies, etc...
      That makes you more flexible, which increases your value.

    4. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bzzzt.
      Please turn in your geek card.
      PFY = "Pimply Faced Youth"

    5. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by WormBytes · · Score: 5, Informative

      PFY actually stands for Pimply Faced Youth.

    6. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      PIMPLY FACED YOUTH, as has been used since sometime during the original run (it's possible this was changed after the first couple stories, since it's been a while since I reread from the beginning, but before the '2nd coming', it was definitely enshrined as 'Pimply Faced Youth'.)

      Can someone in the nerd card club please remove his badge and escort him out front? His belongings will be waiting for him at terminal velocity when he exits the building.

    7. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up for correct acronym breakdown.

    8. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by backslashdot · · Score: 0

      It's NAGGERS, you idiot.

    9. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, you can send the GPS coordinates of his home to OADS. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself!

    11. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "management might be a good idea. However, this requires people skills..."

      Not at all, 4 % of the population are psychopaths, they can fake the people skills perfectly and fit right in.
      Beside the serial killers, they are all in management.

    12. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      However, this requires people skills, which is why most developers don't like it ( we want to code :-) ). But you can work on that

      No, you can't.

      If you've got to the age of 40 and genuinely have no people skills, it's too late to try to change. You'll end up like some awful David Brent character, getting everything wrong and having everyone laugh at you behind your back.

      Probably.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by avm · · Score: 1

      I honestly never thought I'd see the day someone had to explain BOFH on slashdot. What is the world coming to?

    14. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's probably just the safe for work version, the above one still fits better IMHO.

    15. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by dbIII · · Score: 1

      getting everything wrong and having everyone laugh at you behind your back.

      Even if you get everything right there's still somebody laughing at you behind their back if there's no other target. It usually doesn't matter. Just look at politics where people are citicised for doing the right thing just because they are on the other team to the critic.

    16. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't move into management at 30, then you were not considered a hot property by your management. Moving into management now will put you at the low end of the pack - not much security there.
      If you move into management you will spend most of your time dealing with people issues, scheduling etc. You WILL quickly lose whatever technical edge you have. If you get laid off, you will find many more opportunities on the technical side then the managerial side. But you won't be able to land them (at 40+, a technical person is expected to be expert in the skills listed on the resume - as a manager those skills WILL fade and that will come out in the inteview).
      Evaluate yourself as honestly as you can. Consider the feedback from prior managers AND how you are treated day-to-day (local guru? pretty much left to yourself?)
      - 56 at a big company and staying as technical as I possibly can.

    17. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And typically Pimply Faced Youth are Pretty Fucking Young... :)

    18. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself!

      Close, but not quite.

      Learn to suck a mean dick, then fuck your boss.

    19. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that management is your best bet. Firstly, managers don't have to worry about keeping their skills up. Very little has changed in terms of how to manage a team/department. If something does change, you company will train you. IF you need a technical question answered, that's what staff is for.

      Second, you're at the age where you can only be hired as a senior level or higher. The problem there is that people expect you to hit the ground running without training. As a senior, you bring skills to a job whereas a less senior programmer is understood to require guidance, maybe ever training.

      I'm a 50-year old programmer who's work for a small company stuck in 1990s. My skillset relfects that. While I can read about newer technologies, I don't have the opportunity to implement them. It's a killer. If you insist on working as a programmer, pick a good manager who has good projects. I had once had a manager that if you were on his team, it was a career killer. He volunteered for the crappiest projects. For one project his team of programmers supported desktop memory upgrades. I wrote a perl script to check each workstation's memory after it was supposedly upgraded. That's the extent of my programming contribution to that project. So when review time came around, my manager did okay because the projects he managed worked. The rest of us were screwed because we didn't do anything related to our titles.

      Don't be a worker bee and expect to be taken care of. Look around and check out the older guys in your company. You'll see what's in your future.

    20. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      The classic BOFH articles are at Simon's page. The stuff at The Register is mainly newer and weaker material, watered down for PFY like yourself. Jesus, the assaults on my lawn just will not stop.

    21. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by snookiex · · Score: 1
      --
      Open Source Network Inventory for the masses! Kuwaiba
    22. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't talk rubbish. Yes you can learn them.

      Also as a manager people will laugh/say nasty things about you anyway. It doesn't matter... one of the tricks of management is to not fucking care about that, and not let a few people spoil the atmosphere. 40 year olds are well placed for that. They've just got past the being-all-that-fucking-bothered-what-anyone-else-of-them thinks stage of life.

    23. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But honestly if you can do it move to management.

      Also consider teaching. I switched to being a lecturer when I was 41, best thing I ever did.

      It is a shame that the normal carreer cycle is not "student --> productive --> teacher --> retired". The advantage of this would be that the teachers have real experience in their field to pass to the next generation, rather than "those who can't, teach."

    24. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      just wait until you're 55 and nobody will hire you

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    25. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...at least originally PFY meant Pimply Faced Youth.

    26. Re:As a 45 year old working in the industry by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It takes a good command of the language and a fuckton more to take my geek card. Nice try though. Keep me on my toes.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    medicare kicks in from cradle to grave in canada, and with many other developed countries....
    may your country develop your health care system to the level of those above..

    1. Re:medicare by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Y'know, you'd think people would notice, but (at least until 2006) we were actually losing more people southward. A reputation as a Land of Opportunity dies hard.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:medicare by jamstar7 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're working on that here in the States. Problem is, they want to do it the capitalist way by requiring everybody to buy health insurance. Main problem is, the insurance companies are not required to sell it to you. And they can pull numbers out of their asses to 'justify' any premium they want to charge you with if they do condescend to sell you health insurance.

      I'm all for socialised medicine. Just stop fighting everybody else on the planet and you can afford to take it out of my taxes.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    3. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As it is very European to have a health care system and other social security stuff based on state controlled solidarity, they will never get it. Look at what they call Obama-Care, it is a faint resemblance of what we have, and they are still pissed about it. We have state driven health care, it costs half of the US per person health case cost, but all are covered and the minimal and average health care quality is better. The OECD report on health care systems is a good read to see what the differences are between the US and (other) developed countries. But it looks like nobody is reading it in the US.

    4. Re:medicare by rednip · · Score: 1

      Is it that hard to read a summary of the health insurance affordability act (i.e. Obameycare)? Already no child can be denied health insurance coverage due to a pre-existing condition and starting in 2014 that protection will be extended to all adults. It seems that the only way a person will be able to be denied coverage is if the company doesn't want to sell insurance in that area any more. Furthermore the minimum standard coverage will allow a good deal of price shopping among the plans available from the state based exchanges. Finally caps are starting this year on the medical-loss-ratio which specify that a minimum amount must be spent on actual health care, with the balance to be return to the policy holder.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    5. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for socialised medicine. Just stop fighting everybody else on the planet and you can afford to take it out of my taxes.

      No, you don't get the message. YOU join the fight against everybody else on the planet, and you may get benefits of veterans medical care!

    6. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you get half the health care too.

      I just had a checkup at 50 years old. The Dr. noticed an wonky EKG. In three days I saw a cardiologists and had a stress echo exam. It turned out to be fine.

      But in the various Shangri-Las of medical coverage throughout the world, it would have been months before I saw the specialist. Sure, it cost me $200 to see him. But that's preferable to dying on a waiting list.

      Oh...I have a high deductible plan that works well for me but does not meet the ObamaCare minimums (doesn't cover women's services). So now I'll have to pay more for shit I don't need.

      Thanks, Mother Fuckers.

      I can only hope that when people start shooting up Hospitals because they are putting down their parents because they are too old, that some of you fucking losers are in the line of fire.

    7. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'capitalist way'? You have no clue.

      Capitalism has nothing to do with the way the Obama is mandating you purchase healthcare.

      Definition: An economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit

      Capitalism is the fact that we get to spend OUR money how WE want. Capitalism is a form of purchase/market power, not a way of life. Capitalism allows us to purchase 'x' product from whoever has it cheaper; e.g. you don't have to purchase a Dell computer over another manufacturer, or a GM automobile over another manufacturer, etc.

      The way the healthcare is trying to be forced on us sits on the side of socialism (even you stated this to be true), mandating a person has to purchase a product and to 'share' the cost for everyone. aka communism

      Definition (Socialism): 1) A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated... 2) (in Marxist theory) A transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism

      Definition (Communism): A political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and.

    8. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, you'd think people would notice, but (at least until 2006) we were actually losing more people southward.

      Being from Canada, I always thought we were North of the USA? Unless you are in the North Pole...

    9. Re:medicare by andyteleco · · Score: 1

      The care you get isn't that much worse. I live in Germany and I have never had to wait more than a few days for any specialist appointment.

      True, in some countries public health care isn't as efficient as here, but at least people who normally would not be able to afford that care can also get checked and/or treated. And people like you who have a decent salary and don't want to wait can always purchase a complimentary private health plan to speed things up and have more comfort.

    10. Re:medicare by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      More Canadians migrate to the United States annually than Americans migrate to Canada.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    11. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, you can always visit a private clinic in Europe as well and pay for a quick and thorough diagnostics. Then you go to the public sector facility with that diagnosis for that long term treatment, or see what treatments your coverage gets you in the private sector.
        Medical tourism is also popular in Europe, just like it is in the US. Asia, Southern America and Eastern Europe are all popular destinations for those affordable heart and plastic operations.

    12. Re:medicare by jamstar7 · · Score: 3

      The summary doesn't go into a whole lot of detail. Sure, the summary says no American is to be denied healthcare coverage by 2014 due to pre-existing conditions, but nothing is said about the price in the summary. And as you pointed out, there is nothing requiring a company to market adult medical coverage in any specific area, say, the ghetto.

      Keep in mind a couple interesting points.

      1. The 'Obamacare' bill was written by the medical insurance 'industry'. It was designed to legislate a revenue stream to guarantee their profits.
      2. The 'Obamacare' bill was written and moving through Congress WAY before the '08 election. It got sat on through most of '08 waiting the results of the election.
      3. It was submitted by Republicans.
      4. The timing of the bill is being used by the Republicans as a 'poison pill'. They shoved it down Obama's throat. Had he not signed the bill, they would have barbequeued him for 'abandoning the middle class', but since he signed it, they get to lambast him for 'adding to the national debt'. Win/win, as far as they're concerned, because they get to make him look bad depending on the spin they apply.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    13. Re:medicare by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      No, you don't get the message. YOU join the fight against everybody else on the planet, and you may get benefits of veterans medical care!

      Been there, done that. I'm a Vietnam Era veteran. I've dealt with the VA in the past, and some of my friends deal with the VA today, being Gulf War I/Gulf War II/Afghanistan vets. Everything I've experienced at the hands of the VA convinced me that if I was a quadreplegic, it's in my best interest to crawl as far as I can from the VA on my lips, if possible.

      The VA is continually being defunded. Why do you think there are foundations like the PVA and the Wounded Warriors Project? If the VA was up to snuff, there wouldn't be as much need for them.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    14. Re:medicare by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Ah, but this is Capitalist, from the viewpoint of the medial insurance 'industry'. They legislated guaranteed profits directly to themselves when they wrote this bill, and you can be damned sure they put enough 'gotchas' in the legislation to cover their asses.

      You're also forgetting that this legislation was introduced near the beginning of Bush II's lame duck term by Republicans at the request of their campaign contributors, and it took forever for it to get through Congress. 'Obamacare' my ass. You need to switch off FauxNews now and again.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    15. Re:medicare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're working on that here in the States. Problem is, they want to do it the capitalist way by requiring everybody to buy health insurance. Main problem is, the insurance companies are not required to sell it to you.

      Um, yes they are. That's what this whole fight over the individual mandate was about. The insurance companies agreed to accept, without a fight, additional regulations (including selling insurance to anybody, without exceptions even for pre-existing conditions, and limits on how much more they can charge higher-risk groups), as long as they were guaranteed a larger pool of mostly healthy customers.

      And they can pull numbers out of their asses to 'justify' any premium they want to charge you with if they do condescend to sell you health insurance. I'm all for socialised medicine. Just stop fighting everybody else on the planet and you can afford to take it out of my taxes.

      Agreed. The health-care reform includes some mechanisms to try to drive down prices (such as allowing more generic drugs), but I'm skeptical that it would work. I think the best, simplest option would be to have a public option that provides a basic standard of care and is transparently subsidized by taxes.

  4. stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At this stage in your career you should be focusing on the bigger picture (in terms of projects) stuff. I know the word is tainted around here, but ... project management.

    Grunt development work should be done by newer developers (who will work for less), you need to be more focused on managing a team, consulting, etc.

    Don't sell yourself short. You've likely seen many projects succeed and fail, and should have learned lessons on how they could be better managed. Leave the grunt work to those developers who don't have that experience, and try to get into the position of managing them.

    Knowing what can be done and how will make you a better manager - you don't need to be the one doing it.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:stop doing grunt work by Darinbob · · Score: 3

      Project managers are the bottom of the manager totem pole. "Project" usually means stuff like getting everyone to use sharepoint against their will. This is different from product manager or team lead or something that is important.

    2. Re:stop doing grunt work by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Project managers also work crazy hours, thats one job thats hard on a family life.

    3. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't sell yourself short.

      Hey. That gives me an idea.

      The guy's in the financial industry. He already knows tech. With a year's education (and his employer may well cover the cost), he could do a hell of a lot better job than most sell-side analysts do.

      Half the barrier to entry to finance is jargon. (Kinda like how they see tech, LOL.)

      Anyone with a 4-year degree in CompSci can handle any of the math required for a CFA Level 1 (even if, at age 40, you'll need to dust off some stuff you haven't used since college). It's basically a 4th-year-college/1st-year-of-postgrad course.

      Whether he uses the acquired knowledge to be more useful to his employer (in that he'll be able to understand the needs of the people his code supports), or to switch careers at his current employer (downside: wearing a suit, upside: possibility of membership in the 1%), or to jump ship and work for another employer, or even if he just wants a skill that can pay the bills outside of work (you don't need a job to have a trading account, and if the markets ever shut down for more than a few weeks, everyone's out of a job except for the survivalists), is up to him.

    4. Re:stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 1

      By project management i didn't necessarily mean for a single project. Maybe i should have said "team lead". I mean't project management as in for a regular task, not a title.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    5. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Please mod parent up for actually giving a good thoughtful answer!
      The amount of juvenile antics and spam around here is appalling.

      Look, I realize most of you PFY here have no chance of actually having a real life with human interactions but I guarantee you will at some point get old and have to face real world problems, so at least show some respect and shut the fuck up if you have nothing constructive to add, oh yeah and get the fuck off my lawn!!!

    6. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The CIO of one of the investment banks once said - in a very public forum - there are really only three roles in IT. Peon - the new guys who don't know very much yet, but should become valuable soon. Worker/do-er - those that actually create the stuff that makes the organization run. Overhead - everyone else. He then said - "be very wary of being promoted into "overhead".

      This is very sage advice. There is no such thing as "grunt development work" - developers will make or break your project. Project managers are only there to support the team and to protect them from the rest of the organization.

      The world is steadily moving to agile - only those delivering value to the team matter. Everyone else is "overhead". Be wary.

    7. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you consider development to be "Grunt Work", then you're part of the problem.

      Stay the hell away from a company that thinks there's a hard line between Architecture, Design and Development.
      If developers are being handed class and ER diagrams, and basically being used as typists, then the company is fucked. Or Enterprisey (which means the same anyway).

    8. Re:stop doing grunt work by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Without jumping in the agile bandwagon, I would recommend to read the Theory X & Y:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_X_and_Theory_Y

      Most of the managers are using Theory X. Agile ones use Theory Y.

    9. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The guy's in the financial industry. "

      Exactly! At his age he should be in jail.

    10. Re:stop doing grunt work by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Half the barrier to entry to finance is jargon

      With that sort of attitude, I'm sure people in finance find you an absolute joy to work with.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:stop doing grunt work by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The world is steadily moving to agile - only those delivering value to the team matter. Everyone else is "overhead". Be wary.

      Yes, I'm sure the adoption of a new buzzword-compliant critical-paradigm-shifting methodology will enable businesses to remove "overheads" entirely. Because obviously, at the moment, companies have no interest in saving money, and indeed love to create overhead just for the sake of it, since profit is never used by anyone as a measure of success.

      Grow up.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:stop doing grunt work by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Without jumping in the agile bandwagon, I would recommend to read the Theory X & Y: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_X_and_Theory_Y

      Most of the managers are using Theory X. Agile ones use Theory Y.

      I would recommend getting some experience of the huge variety in actual work life and not relying on simplistic black and white pseudo-psychological theories from the 1960s.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Building software is still not as reliable as building physical things... Why? becasue the projects are not properly managed and testing isn't done properly. So I would say anyone with real experience should be looking to project manage and proove they are above the rest by actually using proper project management skills, mixed with 'expert' knowledge of how long things take and how many lines of code (approx) are required.

      The real skill (that doen't come natrually to most geeks) is bigging up yourself and pitching yourself to management that know jack shit about creating good, robust code. They need to understand how important it is to get things right and to have acceptance testing. The problem I see is that the current set of project managers are unable to estimate time scales properly or add 'slack' time to the critical paths so that things run smoothly. In fact in some cases you are lucky to get any specification, let alone a project manager. So it's not suprising the program doesn't capture potential issues like searching for 'null'.

      As far as banking goes, it's lost all respect from the common man, for good reasons. I mean how many private companies can rely on goverment bailouts? They would be bankrupt. But a bank can't go bankrupt? Just looking at the pay and bonus culture in banking shows how corrupt the system is at the moment and how they think they are more valuable than doctors, surgeons and many other professions that actuall save lives or help society in another way. The house of cards is falling and people are waking up to the fact that the industry is not an earner at all if you take into account the bailouts over the years. So why are they paying themselves so much when they havn't actually earnt it? It's all based on risky investments and lending to the common man, that eventually falls down when people realise they can't pay as they don't have any income.

    14. Re:stop doing grunt work by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That sounds like the kind of CIO that'd make me want to run in the other direction, fast. To use a military analogy it's like saying an army only need privates, be wary of being promoted to an officer. I know some brilliant coders that have written excellent code on projects that have flopped miserably. Why? Very often because the project was a bad idea to begin with, the scope and requirements unclear, conflicting and changing or they're stuck waiting for input or some other group that isn't delivering so ultimately it failed to deliver any value to customers or the intended users anyway. That view is utterly failing to see the value of breaking down the overall goal into objectives, the logistics, equipment, support and training to put that private in the right place at the right time to pull the trigger.

      That's not to say becoming an officer is for everybody and there's room for special forces, extremely high skill people but still doers that aren't about commanding or supporting other people. I think a lot of people here on Slashdot would like that position, it's not about drawing up battle plans on the map (or is that Powerpoint these days), it's about high quality execution. It still needs commanders with a clue though, if you just put marines in the trenches with everybody else there's little room for excellence, you're just cannon fodder like the rest. You need someone to say "This is the critical part of the mission, and I need you to do it because you're the best of the best". Either that or go into architecture, like what's the backbone of our fighting capability going to be. I think everyone here has tried building a software app on quicksand. It never ends well.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up.

    16. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or go into architecture, like what's the backbone of our fighting capability going to be. I think everyone here has tried building a software app on quicksand. It never ends well.

      I wish the role of software architect would be made clearer, as currently all who compare the role of a software architect to that of a building architect miss the much different roles of a building architect in various markets. In the US, the architect might have a somewhat limited role in the overall project, where as an AEC architect commands a much wider range of responsibilities. In the European markets, the role of an architect is once again varied from country to country and might include tendering, contract negotiations, a role of a contractor, design quality control, the management and execution of the permit process and a whole lot of human relationship management in addition of actual design of the building.
        A software architect could do much more than only ensure that the software is not build on quicksand.

    17. Re:stop doing grunt work by Bigby · · Score: 1

      An office without janitors really suck too. The toilets are messy, garbage cans full and spilling on the floor, etc... It doesn't mean you have to pay janitors more than the other employees.

      Likewise, you don't need to pay project managers more than the people they are managing.

    18. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any project manager that is working "crazy hours" is not a very good project manager. Or probably more likely, doesn't have the balls to stand up and give the project sponsors/stakeholders a dose of reality. Good project management is about leadership, so if you're meek and timid you are going to have a miserable time at it. Far too often projects get saddled with someone who only gives the sponsors news they want to hear and then tries to get the rest of the project team to "make up the difference." Except, if you can't stand up to the stakeholders you're probably just as terrible at leading the rest of the project team.

    19. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, go to Vegas - bet it all on 19 on a no-limit roulette table, 3 times in a row.

      It could work.

    20. Re:stop doing grunt work by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I know the word is tainted around here, but ... project management.

      As someone in a similar position to the OP (no kids at least), I can assure you that trying to move from whatever IT job you have to project management is not as easy as it sounds.

      As a rule, and this comes from own experience trying to move to project management, you need a minimum of 5 years experience to get on the bottom rung of PM. 10 if you want to make near the magical $100/K salary. This assumes of course that you fit a very narrow description, have exactly the skillset within this very narrow description and are willing to relocate to a different part of the country.

      However, the fact that you're 40 and with a family means you are immediately excluded from any job opportunity due to the inherent ageism that exists, contrary what every headhunter/hiring manager/whomever says. If you hear someone say, "If you have the skills, age isn't an issue," they're lying. The only way age doesn't come into play is if you already have the experience at that age.

      Don't forget, most places are also requiring some sort of certification from the PMI. Which is funny, because the only way to get certifications, except for the lowest level, is to have experience doing PM. Which is the proverbial chicken and egg scenario.

      From my personal point of view, project management isn't difficult. The implementation may be hard depending on what the project is (creating software, designing network layouts, equipment upgrades, etc), but the act of managing the project isn't difficult in and of itself. It's how you follow your plan and most importantly, find out what the stakeholder really wants. If you don't know or, more importantly, if they don't know, what they want, no amount of planning/managing/gant charts/etc will help you.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    21. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even better, if you can do CS, you can do law. There is a BIG niche market for attorneys who have CS skills, be it translating Sarbanes-Oxley into actual policy, writing proper contracts, or other stuff. The work is 9-5 with a three-martini lunch, with no having to get dressed up, find a parking place near the downtown courthouse and argue cases.

      Sure beats 80 hour work weeks as a code monkey who is always in danger of being outsourced, fighting people who likely do far better coding for pennies on the dollar.

      40 is when a guy's soldier can't even salute. I'd stop playing in the arena that the 18-25 year olds excel at and change to a game where education and background are more important. With the IT background, two years of law school will ensure employability regardless of economic climate until time to retire (which is not that far away.)

      Why compete in an arena where the competition works for a fraction of the salary? Go law and actually have a future. Retiring at 65 with a decent nest egg is a lot better than having to work at slave labor wages until you die.

    22. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir! the Private believes whatever answer he gives will be wrong, and the senior drill instructor will beat him harder if he reverses himself Sir!

    23. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an apt analogy -- unless your 'military experience' amounts to call of duty(tm) online. The US army is totally capable of waging wars WITHOUT OFFICERS. (Yes, it is true). And whether you want to believe it or not, most businesses can do perfectly fine with 50% or less "management"

    24. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he just doesn't want anyone competing for his CIO job.

    25. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to read your own links. It's 3 years, 3 exams. The average person completes it in 4 years, as the exams have passing rates in the mid 30% range.

      Finally, if you actually want to call yourself "Anonymous Coward, CFA" then you need 4 years of full-time work experience in investment management (analyst, portfolio manager, or trader -- NOT sales or IT).

      And as someone who passed all three exams (2008, '09 , '10), I can tell you that knowing the math is a really small part of it. The rest is tons of memorization and weird problem solving. Many people have described it as "every question is a trick question" and I would tend to agree.

      Also, a CFA is not some sort of magical ticket to a becoming a billionaire hedge fund manager. These days, most of the people trying to get it are either unemployed or worried that they will soon become unemployed.

    26. Re:stop doing grunt work by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Heck, you can basically say the same thing about IT, too. Once you know enough to understand the vocabulary, you're halfway there.

    27. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh... you're mixing your military metaphores...

    28. Re:stop doing grunt work by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for good project managers, work would be chaos in any organization larger than 3-5 people.
      The defining word being, "good".

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    29. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one position that is invaluable to the company, but very hard to fill; liaison between the company and IT contractors. Contractors/consultants is a fact of life for many companies, and it will only continue. It's cheaper to hire talent for a project and then send them on their way when the project is done. But if the person in the company who is managing said contractors doesn't know (and I mean really, really know) what the contractors are doing and what the company's real needs are, then the end product is likely to be something that no one is happy with.

      If you've been working in the company for years then you know how the company really operates. You know the systems, the software, and more importantly you know who's who on the business side. You know how software is typically managed (or not managed) in your company, and you've probably seen more than a few projects go south. And you've had to support software that was written by contractors after they left.

      So you know how things SHOULD be done within your company, and you know how contractors are likely to do things.

      Try to position yourself as a project leader for these projects. If you can sell that to management (who have seen plenty of unsatisfactory software projects), and prove to them how valuable you are in that role, then you could be good for the rest of your career. You'd be too low on the management totem pole to threaten anyone, but too valuable to the company to easily replace or do without.

      One thing: if managing programmers is like herding cats, managing contract programmers can be a lot like herding dogs...who aren't housebroken. Keep a rolled-up newspaper handy...

    30. Re:stop doing grunt work by hackula · · Score: 1

      In my experience, they typically make less than developers. They manage the projects, not the people. In the software world at least, being a project manager does not usually mean you have authority over anyone in particular. It is more of a "coordinator" type position. In practice, most project managers function sort of like a shared secretary.

    31. Re:stop doing grunt work by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      or even if he just wants a skill that can pay the bills outside of work (you don't need a job to have a trading account

      Or maybe he could learn how to play poker, or just play the lottery...

    32. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that "There is no such thing as 'grunt development work'".

    33. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Project manager hours are easy especially compared to developer hours (round the clock, and unpaid, to meet never ending deadlines).

    34. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 1
      Interestingly I didn't use the word "developer" or "coder" in my post at all. I only said "worker". If you understand anything at all about what agile is all about, you would know that it requires multi-disciplinary teams that self organize. Self organization doesn't mean dis-organized - in fact I have found that agile teams are at least an order of magnitude more organized than any traditional team where the "organization" is single threaded through an overworked team lead (for example - stuck waiting for input).

      Rather sadly I have the title of "chief architect" (which I despise since it means nothing) but I am most proud to be a team member (who writes at least some code every day) delivering the right value at the right time to the business I support (not serve). Thankfully, agile says nothing about architecture - it merely says you focus on the most important things and continue to adapt.

      Since I am also one of the management team of 10 people who run the 1,500 person department I work within I am also fully accountable to make it deliver. It didn't deliver very well with waterfall and lots of project managers. It's doing a little better now.

      I am in my late 40's and very happy working closely with some great people and a business that really appreciates what we do. This seems to be at odds with many people posting in this thread. It might not be perfect, but at least I'm enjoying myself.

      Are you?

    35. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 1

      Ever been micro-managed? How was it? That's all the theory says.

    36. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I respectfully disagree.

      I'm a "senior software programmer," but I haven't written a line of code in 6 months. I'm my software departments bug fixing manager. As the bugs come in, I prioritize them, rank them, and then smooth the process and coordinate with the customer to get their software bugs fixed.

      The fact is that you don't want a 25 year old programmer talking to a customer. This would be akin to letting an Army private brief the press or negotiate peace treaties.

      Now don't get me wrong, too much management can be a bad thing, but you need a guy who can speak the language of the developers and the CEOs. I'm that guy, and I certainly think that I add value to the organization or I would have been fired long ago.

    37. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 1

      Funny - agile isn't new. It's actually a shift backwards 20 years getting rid of all the "buzzword-compliant critical-paradigm-shifting methodology". It's really simple at it's heart - you get close to the business, you work on the things they care about most right now and you deliver regularly (weeks rather than months or years). Back to the early 90's. Also, I didn't say remove "overhead" entirely - I only said be wary of being in a group of people who do not actually deliver anything - most especially in these rather challenging times. Management is still needed, but not the 20-40% middle management we see in so many large organizations these days.

    38. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Kirk always regretted his promotion to Admiral. Also If you must draw a military analogy. Its Pvt(PFY)...every one in the middle and Master Sarge running herd. Project managers are kinda like Sarge and Corp Executives are Officers. But out of curiosity how often do enlisted get promoted to officer?

    39. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 1

      Wow - I haven't been so wound up by a post in a long time. I'm sorry but I need to call out the BS. The development teams I run in has an average age of 40-something. They are working on modern stuff (functional programming, very high performance modern architectures). If you're good, you'll get paid (significantly) over $100K as age has absolutely nothing to do with it. At the extremes I have a brilliant 25 year old and at the other a great late 50-something. What I can tell you is that I've rejected/fired/removed lots of people - all of them based on ability and performance. And I am I working on removing the role of "project manager" from the large (1,500 person) department I (co-manage) entirely.

    40. Re:stop doing grunt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as someone who passed all three exams (2008, '09 , '10), I can tell you that knowing the math is a really small part of it. The rest is tons of memorization and weird problem solving. Many people have described it as "every question is a trick question" and I would tend to agree.

      FWIW, I'm not a CFA - I only did the first year. That was basically my point - learn the concepts and the jargon, the math's the easy part. I learned a lot in the process, and while I'll not be taking years 2 and 3, it was an exercise eminently worth doing.

    41. Re:stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the sort of thing I was talking about. Being a go-between, between the techs who just don't know how the business side works and management who don't know what can be achieved with the right technical decisions.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    42. Re:stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 1

      +1, exactly the point i was trying to make.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    43. Re:stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You need someone who understands code, understands what can be done, but has the real world experience to deal with the business side.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    44. Re:stop doing grunt work by smash · · Score: 1

      Grunt development work is writing code - converting an algorithm into language of your choice. Writing algorithms, defining specifications and problem analysis is the higher level stuff. If you're writing code without any of that going on... well, this explains the vast amount of shitty code out there.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    45. Re:stop doing grunt work by cavebison · · Score: 1

      developers will make or break your project

      This is true, but from a job-security standpoint, the individual developer (if not doing something quite specialised) doesn't have much. As a role they're important, but individually they are replaceable. This is why I like working in smaller companies; you tend to know relatively more about what makes the company tick, so you're more individually valuable. And it's nicer than feeling like a small cog in a huge machine.

    46. Re:stop doing grunt work by nixer · · Score: 1

      I agree - it's why I believe you need to focus less on knowledge of the systems you work on, and more on keeping up with current skills and methodologies.

    47. Re:stop doing grunt work by seantide · · Score: 1

      Honestly, that is the worst advice I have heard in a long time. Management is fine if you like it but the argument that at years old means you should be in is just dumb and insanely counterproductive.

      If you are 25 and have the talent to manage, do it.

      If you are 65 and a good programmer or system administrator, do it.

      I realize a lot of companies share this view, but that's because a lot of companies suck, and its one of the biggest causes of organizational dysfunction in the world.

  5. It's a lot easier to find a job... by xtrafe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if you've already got one. If you really think you're a candidate to be laid off, get going while the going's good. Shoot for a more senior or mgmt position at a smaller firm, get some experience in that role, and then rise with the tide when / if it comes back in.

  6. make sure your resume looks good by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you haven't looked for a job for the last several years, make sure you know how to make your resume look good. I've seen people with excellent skill who couldn't find a job, because they didn't know how to write a resume. I've also seen people who horrible, that had no problem finding a job, because they could make their resume look good. Finding a job is a skill like any other.

    After that, you should decide what you want. If you want to become a contractor, focus on skills (and resume writing skills) that will help you get that. If you want to go into management, go for that. If you want to remain a programmer, then aim for that.

    Realistically, there is enough demand in the market for any of those positions if you can do it reasonably well. If you aren't willing to relocate, that could possibly limit your options, though.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:make sure your resume looks good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      related: a lot of schools have people who will help alumni with their resumes, even long after graduation.

    2. Re:make sure your resume looks good by eennaarbrak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Super post, I agree fully.

      Another thing that you may want to consider is to go for "practice" interviews. Having a good interview is also a skill, and the more you do it, the better you get at it. If you interview for positions regularly (even if you are not serious about taking it up), then you become innately prepared for the type of questions that often gets asked, and don't have to overcome your nerves in the process.

      I learned this lesson the hard way recently. I haven't been interviewing in the last few years, but I had to start looking for employment again - and I was shocked at how rusty I was in the interviews. Things that I *know* became difficult to communicate, because I have not thought about it for a while (even the most diverse development project takes you away from some technologies for a while). As I was struggling to find my vocabulary (I'm not a native English speaker), I became self-conscious and nervous.

      But once I interviewed a few times, I found that the common topics came much more naturally to me. My confidence improved, and I think my overall image in the interviews improved a lot.

    3. Re:make sure your resume looks good by Xest · · Score: 2

      It's worth noting though that even getting your resume right is a topic in itself, and can be quite a minefield.

      I've seen companies that want you to basically just provide them a list of all the buzzwords you can think of, companies that don't give a shit about that but want you to write some blurb about your underlying development philosophy and background, and others who throw a hissy fit if you dare describe experience with anything other than the specific technology they use alongside what they use.

      You're absolutely right that a good resume is a key starting point, but I certainly don't think there is a one size fits all resume. I think the key is to just write as best a resume as you can, and any companies that don't like it figure that you probably weren't going to fit in there anyway. Some companies will whinge about CVs being too long, others too short, some too detailed, some not detailed enough, some containing too little description of technologies you've worked with, some too many. Part the problem is that again, whilst you're right, a good CV is important, there's also many companies out there that couldn't spot a good CV if it slapped them round the face.

      Then of course there are the companies who are looking for some god programmer on a junior programmer's wages, despite advertising much higher wages to get you to interview and then whinge repeatedly about how there is a "skills shortage" because they've not been able to find anyone to fill their post in 3 years, and well, I wont even get started on the differing levels of interview quality.

      I've never had any problem getting interviews and getting jobs, but I have had a few companies turn me down based on my my CV so weren't interested whilst others loved it for the exact reason those companies said they hated it with some of the most absurd reasons on earth for rejection. One example is a company that said that they weren't interested because I'd mentioned I had some past experience with Java and they were after a pure .NET developer even though my 3 years prior experience had been 100% .NET as if somehow having had breadth of experience with different technologies and having depth of experience in a specific technology or two are mutually exclusive things - they're not. Most other companies appreciated the fact I had much broader experience than other candidates whilst maintaining the depth of experience needed in the specific technologies they were looking for.

      Then there are companies who do technical tests, companies who don't, companies who want past work, companies who only care about what you want to work on. Similarly with technical tests I've had companies do none at all, I've had ones I've completely flunked because it was on some technology I made it clear before the interview even that I had absolutely no experience in and I've had ones where they've expected me to sit a 3 hour online exam, whom I've politely declined pointing out that there are many other companies out there offering me interviews without expecting me to dick around like that before I even get an interview.

      I suppose one thing is true though, good companies do recognise good CVs, so I guess my point would be to add to yours the caveat that even with a good CV you may suffer rejections based purely on your CV that are related more to the recruiting company's ineptitude than anything you've done inherently wrong, but don't worry about it because again, the good ones will recognise a good CV. Ultimately you'll also find that though it may be tiresome interviewing here and there, rejecting some, and being rejected by others, that you'll know the right employer when you find it. The interview wont feel like an interview, it'll feel like a nice chat with some genuinely decent and competent people.

      One final point I'd add is that it's wrong to prejudge a job also, I had two interviews in one day, one for a software house, one for an engineering firm. I was really interested in the software house one

    4. Re:make sure your resume looks good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The trick to resume writing is to write it different for every job applied for, that is to focus on what strengths you have for each job opportunity as it comes along.

    5. Re:make sure your resume looks good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also: Remember the audience. If you apply for a management position the interviewer are quite unlikely to listen to how well youn can implement thread-pools.

  7. Improve your English skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Improve your English skills

  8. prepare for the worst by pbjones · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a changing world, few people can expect a long career with the same company. prepare you yourself for the worst situation, live in a house that you can afford, not the house that you want. Give your kids a good education, not the best education. Be prepared to shift into a more stable job at the expense of salary. I'm 55, if I lose my job tomorrow then I'm out cutting lawns or doing part-time teaching(?). And if things don't go bad, then you are in a good position for retirement. Start planning for 65 now, not in 10 years time.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
    1. Re:prepare for the worst by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Be prepared to shift into a more stable job at the expense of salary.

      Spot-on. Of course I'm biased, because I've tended to think that way all along.

      Check out local universities - they don't pay nearly as well as the private sector, but generally they're lower stress positions with better benefits.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:prepare for the worst by houghi · · Score: 1

      live in a house that you can afford, not the house that you want

      That is advice that should be heard more often. You can save a LOT of money if you look at what you actually need.
      Now I am single, so obviously YMMV. Many of my friends (male and female) are single as well.
      I pay about a third in rent compared to what they pay. I live in a studio, they live in an apartment with at least 1 some even 2 bedrooms.

      They freak out when they hear or see where I live and say they could not live that small. When I tell them how much I pay, they start to understand.

      The reason _I_ live is because I have had much larger places to live and then analysed what I actually used. I either sleep or sit at my PC. So I do not need a seperate room to watch TV. The few times a year I entertain people, I can easily do outhouse. It will cost me less if I factor in the room and furniture I would need at home. I need less time to clean as well.

      I understand that it will be different for each living situation, but the most important thing I did was to analyse my living habits to see if I lived in something I needed. I also did it in the right order, so I did not defend what I had and tried to explain it. The next important step was to take actions and actually move to something I needed from something I wanted. As I based my decision on facts, I am extremely happy. The sole thing that bugs me is that from time to time I have to explain people why I live this small and some are jealous of how much extra money I have available.
      It also made it possible for me to look for a less paying, more secure job. I have that now and am extremely happy.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:prepare for the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out local universities - they don't pay nearly as well as the private sector, but generally they're lower stress positions with better benefits.

      Until the education bubble pops...

      OP is surfing down the previous bubble's wave. Surely you don't want him to surf down the next bubble's wave too?

    4. Re:prepare for the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the advice to hire on at a university, at least in the U.S. Higher education (and education in general) is under attack and budgets are getting tighter by the minute. It's not a coincidence that our leaders want a dumbed down populace and that we're hearing a scad of stories about the "trillion dollar student loan debt" and questioning whether "college is worth it."

    5. Re:prepare for the worst by hattig · · Score: 1

      All very true, and more-so if you are young and/or single. It is true that possessions (and pets!) own you.

      Depending on your circumstances, in many places, it is actually better to be buying a box than to be renting a house. And regardless, it is better to live close to work than further away.

      Apart from that, buy the best bed you can afford, you spend around 50% of your time at home in it.

      When you have a family, things change, you need a two or three bedroom house, and then you have to choose between expensive and close to work, or cheaper and further away. Schools and partner's needs are important now as well. Things are so much easier at this stage if you've saved $$$ earlier on in life because you decided not to have the penthouse flat :-)

    6. Re:prepare for the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I like about society. A ton of people willing to basically lay down and give up. Makes it easier of those of us who can stomach risks.

    7. Re:prepare for the worst by simplesteps · · Score: 1

      Well.... depends on what you mean by "better benefits". If you mean health insurance, life insurance, etc ... my experience (from both sides of the fence) is that university people *think* they have great benefits but really they overpay in $ for what may be significantly less (or just average) coverage compared to the private sector.

      On the other hand, if by benefits you mean leave/vacation and the more intangible benefits... definitely better leave policies and the intangibles are arguably better* (personal preference). Also, for people with families... there are often reduced or free tuition, etc for their dependents.

      * my experience on one area of "intangibles", processes/efficiency, is that universities have more byzantine and opaque processes than private sector.
       

    8. Re:prepare for the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. I can say the Uni pay is horrible, and declining even faster. As are some of the benefits.

      Three years ago I worked in the private sector and transferred to a university. I had a coworker that was physically violent and we had to threaten to call the police before management...did anything. I was woken up at 3 and 4 AM two nights a week because people were too cheap to buy basic components. Things in the server cabinet were little cobbled together with duct tape. By my own hand.

      You know what -- I could function in that. Barely.

      The current environment ... I have all the (desktop) hardware I could ask for. The management isn't cheap. There aren't enough servers to do the task they want done. I have virtually /unlimited/ software licensing for almost anything imaginable save Oracle. I've never had testing so easy in my life. Probably never will again. With the exception of what I consider a SHIT health plan (vision and dental are good though), the benefits are amazing. But...I think I'm longing for the old place.

      In academia you get university politics. I can't *stand* the backstabbing women and their machinations. And yeah, that's a jab of sexism. But the men compromise with me. The women outnumber me, stick along gender lines, never stop sniping, and threaten vague repercussions that moment the faintest hint of masculine frustration sounds. They don't know when or how to speak candidly. At least in the old place an assault was an assault -- I could physically throw the person out of my office, fire an email to the CEO and HR -- and the problem was solved for a month. At the university the scheming is unstoppable. You can't even record complaints safely. There's at least a dozen people trying to get each other fired, and they all use everyone around them to record it. It's impossible to take any action without a meeting. Anything. In the private sector, software *is* a value-add. It may be an operational cost providing a value-add, but it's still needed. In a university, you are at best an obstacle holding up a grant. Unless you're in IT and doing payroll. Then you're another very expensive, replacable individual the moment there's a product. In the past two years, I have accomplished at most six months of development activity. It's all painfully well documented to some vague government standards -- with no feedback. The manuals are printed out, bound, and left on a shelf until they are thrown out next year.

      And the worst is, people who work here think of themselves as academics. Obsessive nitpicks about whether or not a menu should contain a full sentence properly capitalized in print media title case. One person who wanted me to use subtractive colors in a website because "that's the standard for print media, why do you computer guys think you're special".

      There's *idiots* everywhere in the world -- but this place takes them to a new level. In the corp, I would've let an intern go in the first week for the type of idiocy I routinely witness. An employee would've just taken a few months. The project managers here are ambiguous, or don't care about the difference between an obtained, or purchased library, and implementing it ourself. They also demonstrate no comprehension of this during project design and budgeting. There's people who honestly believe it takes as long to implement some of the google visualizations (compatible with IE6 no less) as it does to make a dropdown menu "They're both web-forms, what's the problem"?

      But the .. machinations and sheer utterly undisguised Richileuian political scheming going on at every level, while I burn through 100k of tax dollars a year is really the reason I can't sleep at night anymore.

      But yeah, if you can not give a fuck... a university might be the right spot. If I can put up with this until I'm... 69 without dying first, I might even get a shitty pension that pays below every 20 year average in the past century for a decent index fund.

      The university is beginning to admit they have a retention problem. Unfortunately, they think it's pay disparity causing it.

      Myself -- I think it's time to go freelance contractor. It's gonna be a scary leap.

    9. Re:prepare for the worst by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      That's just silly. Not everyone lives to work or sees climbing the ladder or getting rich as particularly interesting goals.

      But whatever floats your boat.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:prepare for the worst by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I do work in the US, and at a university. Budgets are indeed tight - but the worst appears to be over (in my opinion).

      I will note that the whole "is college worth it" debate has been going on for as many decades as I can remember - but most people continue to conclude that yes, it is.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    11. Re:prepare for the worst by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      That could very well be a state to state thing. My only point of comparison is what I see comparing my benefits as a Washington state employee against friends who do similar work in the private sector - I haven't worked in other states.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  9. Solution #2 by Jahf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    -> 2. Should I capitalize on the domain knowledge, and move onto business/managerial side? -

    This. I'm in the same boat as you without some of the office politics. However my manager is changing positions (and probably companies) soon. I managed to convince him to put the other person, far less senior, under me on the org chart. Very little actual management should be needed but it gives a bump to the resume' and a little bit of protection should the new boss want to do some house-cleaning.

    If you have someone where you are now who will do that with you, go for it. If not, then start quietly looking around for a place looking for a senior developer who can manage a team. At this point in your career (like mine) it is probably more important to move up than to stay loyal. It gets progressively harder to show management -initiative- (which is what most people want in a development manager) as you get past 40. It seems like under-40 being a direct contributor is fine ... but post-40 the longer you take to make a move to management the less they feel you are able.

    Also ... brush up on your PROJECT management skills if you aren't currently doing alot of it. Get Agile (scrum or similar). See if you can do scrum-master-like duties. Most development organizations will recognize that even if you don't have direct reports ... as a project leader you ARE managing not only people but also development.

    Management isn't some wonderful panacea ... I don't particularly like it myself ... but especially with the huge influx of employable-but-new faces graduating that are very hungry for a job ... it is very hard to stay competitive. Like you said ... you have 25 years to go. If you don't want to manage people in the HR sense, you have options. If you don't want to be coding as much as time goes on, you have the larger group HR-ish options (but not so much until you've done a report or two for a bit).

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    1. Re:Solution #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. How did putting "This." in front do anything but make you look like a smug geek/dick.

  10. Be your own boss. by eggstasy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world. You've already done the employment thing. You need to ask yourself what you really want to do with your life, rather than what you can do to "keep employable". You're not getting any younger. Surely you have some unfullfilled childhood dream. There's more to life than the rat race.
    If you really do want to stay in the industry, I have found it a lot easier to get my foot inside their door as a business owner with a solid value proposition than as yet another resume in the stack.
    Get into some entrepreneurial education program, learn how to do a business plan and where to find investors, or put something up on kickstarter, or just be a middleman for random freelancers on the internet. That's something you can do from any laptop at any gorgeous beach in any country. I did that for a few years and it was great. But ultimately I realized that herding cats and hunting down contracts was not my type of thing. I'd really just rather sit in a corner and be left alone.

    1. Re:Be your own boss. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      I have tried that after being shown the door a few years ago.

      It doesn't pay the bills and work is there sometimes. People want references and someone who can walk on water and can do no wrong. At 40+ I can imagine this guy will need health insurance too and it is will increasingly become expensive. I work maybe 50% of the time so I can not recommend it if his wife spends his money and makes him stay in that house that he has a 30 year mortgage on.

      Sure you might be a millionaire, but the key is these guys invented something no one else thought of and made it to the market. Unless you have the next killer app or think of something cool that 5 billion people have not you will lose. No one will be willing to partner up as someone else is always prefered by customers who hate change.

    2. Re:Be your own boss. by istartedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world

      Hard to say, although the problem is not Big Government, although it's somewhat of a factor. Most of the shit that businesses get comes from Small Government. You will spend a lot more time wrestling with local restrictions than the Feds. The Fed stuff is usually pretty cut and dry. State is harder, and cities can be truly obnoxious. In general, the smaller the government entity the more of a hassle it is to deal with, which is why I always find the complaints about Big Government ironic.

      By the time you drill down to condo associations, it's truly a nightmare.

      In general, the smaller the institution, the worse it is. The smallest government institution in our lives is marriage. It drives you crazy, and 50% of the time it ends in divorce. If the Federal Government tried to do half the things your spouse does, there'd be a revolution next Tuesday.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:Be your own boss. by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Get into some entrepreneurial education program, learn how to do a business plan and where to find investors, or put something up on kickstarter

      And fail, like 95% of those projects do. Entrepreneuring is the game of either the young or the rich; the young don't have enough commitments to make the risk really hurt, and the rich have enough assets to absorb the shock. If you're middle-aged, with a mortgage, and high ongoing costs in regard to the maintenance of your family, the risk just isn't worth it.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Be your own boss. by DerekLyons · · Score: 3

      I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world.

      It's still alive - and just like it always was, the activity of a minority. Not everyone has the skills or the stomach for it.

    5. Re:Be your own boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I disagree with LordLucless's post and here is why. I'm 51 and was downsized twice from a couple of pretty great sys admin positions in the past decade. The first time I was laid-off and after I had been unemployed for a while, I started a small web hosting and design company. Nothing too spectacular but all open source, all my own equipment (bought my first server slightly used on eBay) and utilising some relationships that I had built in my previous positions with the owner of a company that ran a data center. I picked up about a dozen client's here and there. Who in some cases were friends or friends-of-friends who were getting crappy web hosting and didn't even know it. When I started my last position, I still maintained the business on the side. Strictly on part-time basis and quite frankly it was mostly on cruise control most of that time. Then in January of 2009, after 3 years at my last position, I was again laid-off. Only this time instead of worrying about what I was going to do while collecting rejection notices to my job applications, I took some small business courses and totally re-organised my business from top to bottom while looking for work. The unemployment benefits and the long hours of studying and business courses eventually ended, and, knock-on-wood even during this down economy, I have been able to survive and find all the work I can handle.

      My point to all this, is that if you are sincere, and take it deadly seriously, you can build up a business on the side. Is it easy? No, it is almost impossibly difficult and it takes loads of self-discipline. But boy-o-howdy, once you work out all the kinks, it's well worth it. I work from home and do virtually all my work from my laptop working remotely. I can quite literally work from any Internet connection I find so I can take trips, both business and personal and work while on the road. I maintain my own hours, doing what I love to do and get paid well for doing it. I have no trouble getting up each morning. I actually enjoy my IT career again. My doubts and depression have ended, and I get zero stress in the commute between the bedroom and the office. (I've put an average of 4K worth of miles per year on my truck for the past 3 years in a row, so even the fluctuation of high gas prices doesn't phase me as much.)

      Even if you never end up building a business to the point where it is your only gig, you can still be you own boss on a part-time basis and make good money on the side while doing it. It also really helps keep your mind sharp while job hunting and eases the stress a bit when the rumours about layoffs start drifting in the halls...

    6. Re:Be your own boss. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world.

      Most normal peple don't have the combination of sociopathy, lack of a social life, absence of interest in anything except money and generally tedious personality necessary to become a great entrepreneur. People nowadays are generally too well educated and too happy with non-financial rewards (friends, family, hobbies) to devote their waking lives to making money.

      Yes, there are exceptions, and some freaks are still highly successful entrepreneurs. But ask yourself whether Steve Jobs, Larry Ellison or Mark Zuckerberg were/are rounded human beings.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Be your own boss. by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      The smallest government institution in our lives is marriage.

      That is one of the most ridiculous anti-government comments I have ever read on slashdot, and bearing in mind the sheer number of lunatic libertarians here, that's saying something.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Be your own boss. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      if you are sincere, and take it deadly seriously, you can build up a business on the side

      Normal people do not generally take life, and certainly do not take work deadly seriously.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Be your own boss. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world.

      It's still alive - and just like it always was, the activity of a minority. Not everyone has the skills or the stomach for it.

      Same with working as an enforcer for a drug cartel.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Be your own boss. by thePig · · Score: 1

      I disagree on this moderately.
      Unless you take the risk, there is a low chance of escaping out of the drudgery. You play your cards well, and the maximum that can happen is that you will lose out on a job - and maybe 1 year savings (which you should keep before you start out on your own). Which can happen anyways in such a toxic atmosphere (as mentioned by the OP) anyways - the difference is that with entrepreneurship you have a chance of safety and even hitting it rich, while in the job, you have nothing.

      I have tried to be an entrepreneur twice, both after I was middle aged, have a kid, with mortgage, both times failed, but still am in a better position (job wise, not financially) than what I would have been - had I been in a job. One thing I did was that I never took any loan to start the company - that would have messed me up though.

      The biggest part of both the adventures was that it was fun - it was nerve wracking, extremely panicky at some times, had a bad temper - but in the end, it was fun. Daily job is no fun after some time - so I prefer this energy compared to the daily job. And now I have assets - the code and programs I wrote during this time is mine - and I always have a hope that I will be able to sell it some time - with a job - do we have any assets?

      Anyways YMMV.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    11. Re:Be your own boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world.

      They outlawed slavery, the natives were all massacred so there was no more land to grab, the bulk of the natural resources were quickly extracted, processed and sold, the manufacturing and technical knowledge base was largely shipped elsewhere, and the powerful few decided it was easier to squeeze the remaining wealth out of the country than to generate it anew.

    12. Re:Be your own boss. by Arkham · · Score: 1

      And fail, like 95% of those projects do. Entrepreneuring is the game of either the young or the rich; the young don't have enough commitments to make the risk really hurt, and the rich have enough assets to absorb the shock. If you're middle-aged, with a mortgage, and high ongoing costs in regard to the maintenance of your family, the risk just isn't worth it.

      So what if you fail? You get up and try again. There is tons of VC and angel funding out there for people with a good work ethic and some new ideas. Honestly, the idea is the hard part. Once you get past that it's not really hard at all to make a living at it.

      I'm at a startup now after 10+ years at large mega-corporations. It's fun to be back at a company where people actually like to come to work.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    13. Re:Be your own boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask myself what happened to the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit that made America into the most prosperous country in the world.

      Oh, that's pretty easy. The rest of the world isn't bombed into submission and slaughtered. The 40's and 50's were a great time in America weren't they? The USA went from a great power to a super-power. Times were good because the other great powers had their legs chopped off and were taken down a peg in a massive clusterfuck known as WWII.

      That isn't today's world. If you can make it, the Chinese will make it cheaper. If you can code it, the Indians will code it cheaper. We still make a lot of things, and code a lot of things, and we're still on top when it comes to top of the line products. It's... a little pessimistic, but the trend is there. We're facing global competition and it's simply harder to start and run a business.

    14. Re:Be your own boss. by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It's actually a critique of the Big Government meme. I think most people got that.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    15. Re:Be your own boss. by hackula · · Score: 1

      Have you been to any sort of entrepreneurial meetup lately. Try it out if you are interested in meeting some of the most self delusional and obscenely stupid people around. Some people get lucky; most fail miserably. Venture Capital is an entire industry designed to prey on the stupid. Most have an idea they think they can sell to 200 million people, but somehow cannot sell to 20 in their area. Seriously, every single interaction with these people goes like this: "Hi my name is ______. I am the President and Executive CEO of ______, a company that has an idea that allows you to post _______ from your iPhone to Facebook. Would you like to work for me for free as Chief Software Developer?". Of course, they require 3 NDAs and a blood pact before they tell you this, because their idea is valued (in their head) at 200 billion dollars.

    16. Re:Be your own boss. by hackula · · Score: 1

      ideas are a dime a dozen

    17. Re:Be your own boss. by gregwbrooks · · Score: 1

      ... the risk just isn't worth it.

      The risk isn't worth it to you.

      And that's OK -- but that doesn't mean it's a blanket risk assessment for everyone. Failure is always an option, whether you're holding down a desk and a w-2 paycheck or hunting and killing your own food.

      --


      "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
    18. Re:Be your own boss. by maitas · · Score: 1

      According to Stiglitz new book "the pioneering entrepreneurial spirit" of USA never existed.

    19. Re:Be your own boss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand the phrase "Big Government." It applies to any level of government, no matter how local. The more bureaucratic red tape, over regulation and make-work processes, inspections and primarily revenue-generating drivel the more "Big Government" there is.

    20. Re:Be your own boss. by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia supports both points of view. It's one of those common cases where a single term is used to mean several things. A Conservative might use the phrase to argue for dissolving Federal authority and passing control to the States, and then in turn to local authorities. This is the definition to which I refer. A Libertarian might level the epithet at a wide range of government activity, regardless of the size of the authority, as you describe.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. Job Security here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are a Senior Developer for a Bank. By all accounts, you should have job security. Why? Because banks are notorious for having antiquated technology, particularly in-house code. As a Senior Developer, you are in a position to make yourself irreplaceable. Dig your self into the old code that no one wants to touch. Dig in like a tick. If a) you are the only one who knows the language and b) the only one who can understand the logic, then they will keep you. Don't push it, because if they know you are extorting them they will cut off their arm to spite you. Lay low and know where the skeletons are buried. You should have no problem cruising through til retirement.

    1. Re:Job Security here... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are a Senior Developer for a Bank. By all accounts, you should have job security. Why? Because banks are notorious for having antiquated technology, particularly in-house code. As a Senior Developer, you are in a position to make yourself irreplaceable. Dig your self into the old code that no one wants to touch. Dig in like a tick. If a) you are the only one who knows the language and b) the only one who can understand the logic, then they will keep you. Don't push it, because if they know you are extorting them they will cut off their arm to spite you. Lay low and know where the skeletons are buried. You should have no problem cruising through til retirement.

      Banks consider everyone cost centers except the mortgage salespeople and the traders. You think you are invaluable but IT is not as respected when shit hits the fan. It is easier to be dirt cheap and just never update when times get tough. The fact that XP is so popular still is proof of this concept

    2. Re:Job Security here... by complete+loony · · Score: 2

      Right up until the point where the bank goes under and/or merges with a another bank that has a more efficient IT department. Then all of the data will be migrated to another system (that you may be able to consult on), and your entire IT staff will go.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    3. Re:Job Security here... by eennaarbrak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are a Senior Developer for a Bank. By all accounts, you should have job security. Why? Because banks are notorious for having antiquated technology, particularly in-house code.

      You are assuming that banks are rational when it comes to their key resources. I work at a bank, and let me tell you, it simply ain't so. IT workers are just some necessary evil for bankers - they still have to realize that banks are actually technology companies, and that their IT (and especially in-house development team) are key business drivers.

      Round here, if a project comes to an end, the entire development team, except the management and support people, gets laid off (if they were not outsourced to start off with). Two months later, when a new project arrives, they run around like headless chickens trying to find the skills that are required to get a job done, and complain endlessly about the prohibitive licensing cost of software vendours (vendours that provide functionality that are often relatively easy to implement in-house) and external contracting houses. A new contracting team gets hired, and the whole development cycle starts afresh. Worst of all, they congratulate themselves about their "efficiency" and how they are able to implement projects in an "agile" fashion. Bonuses for the management team are often in order (and as bankers reason, the higher the development cost, the higher the associated bonus to the management team must be).

      Now this may not be how all banks operate, but this is my employer's modus operandi. Every time a project a I work on comes to an end, I have to wait to see if I get booted or redeployed on some other project. Even new projects are reviewed every 3 months to decide whether they still add business value, so even if you are working you are never more than 3 months away from the boot. Job security simply does not exist here for the development team.

    4. Re:Job Security here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > vendours

      Not a word. Not even in French.

    5. Re:Job Security here... by eennaarbrak · · Score: 1

      > vendours Not a word. Not even in French.

      Thank you - I learned something new.

    6. Re:Job Security here... by Builder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      RBS (a UK bank) were told by dozens of people that getting rid of the people who knew the batch processing system and moving their jobs to India was dumb. They did it anyway.

      Week before last it all went bang. People weren't getting paid, at least 2 people were stuck in jail because they couldn't prove that they'd paid their bail due to RBS systems being down.

      RBS won't change a thing after this.

      There is no long term loyalty from any job.

    7. Re:Job Security here... by tehcyder · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are a Senior Developer for a Bank. By all accounts, you should have job security. Why? Because banks are notorious for having antiquated technology, particularly in-house code. As a Senior Developer, you are in a position to make yourself irreplaceable. Dig your self into the old code that no one wants to touch. Dig in like a tick. If a) you are the only one who knows the language and b) the only one who can understand the logic, then they will keep you. Don't push it, because if they know you are extorting them they will cut off their arm to spite you. Lay low and know where the skeletons are buried. You should have no problem cruising through til retirement.

      I don't think you understand how banks or other financial institutions work. If you start working your way through the source code of trading software or something, you will be discovered, sacked on the basis you are performing industrial espionage, and probably find it a tad difficult to get another similar job.

      A "senior developer" in a bank is just another cog in the machine, not some superstar responsible for keeping the company profitable.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Job Security here... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      banks are actually technology companies, and that their IT (and especially in-house development team) are key business drivers.

      No, banks are not technology companies. They are companies that take other people's money and use it to earn interest for themselves by lending it out at higher rates of interest than they pay to their customers.

      They need to be able to do this efficiently, but all IT does is help remove a lot of the paperwork. It's like saying that a law firm is a technology company because they have replaced a lot of the typists they had fifty years ago.
      The use of complicated algorithms to manufacture meaningless derivative products certainly is a technology -based activity, but it is not a good thing, in that it helped lead to the bank problems of 2008.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Job Security here... by jimmydigital · · Score: 1

      In short... become Wally!

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
    10. Re:Job Security here... by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      No, this is not how all banks are.
      I also work at a bank, in IT architecture. (And in case it's relevant, I'm 57, and started there last year).
      My bank has some thousands of IT staff, and treats them well. There are a fair number offshore, I don't know how well they are treated there.

      "Dig into old systems like a tick". Not the most professional approach, though tempting. There are COBOL systems down there somewhere - but they do get replaced, albeit rarely. We did. Wasn't easy. Spent 1.5 billion dollars.
      It's certainly true that if you understand many systems in depth you are obviously of value. That sounds much more professional.

      If your bank hires new staff for each project, and fires them when it is complete, it is chronically stupid, and will crash into a screaming heap fairly soon when they realise they have a collection of disparate, poorly designed, totally un-integrated systems that nobody understands - and nobody cares about. Certainly nobody working at the bank.

      I think I'd rather work at my bank.

      Good luck with yours.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    11. Re:Job Security here... by eennaarbrak · · Score: 1

      No, banks are not technology companies. They are companies that take other people's money and use it to earn interest for themselves by lending it out at higher rates of interest than they pay to their customers.

      Yeah yeah, heard it all before, let's just agree then that banks are heavily dependent on technology, more so than their boards generally understand (and *much* more than your silly example of lawyers). I saw a survey that showed that the financial industry employs over 30% of all IT people (the other big industry was telecoms). Risk management is an exercise in who can crunch the most numbers, the quickest. I know of a bank in the city of London who's grid computing infrastructure uses more electricity than the city of Manchester. JP Morgan recently converted their credit risk portfolio calculation to using FPGA's (http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3290494/jp-morgan-supercomputer-offers-risk-analysis-in-near-real-time/).

    12. Re:Job Security here... by debrain · · Score: 1

      They are companies that take other people's money and use it to earn interest for themselves by lending it out at higher rates of interest than they pay to their customers.

      Actually, under the fractional reserve system they use taxpayer money via the overnight lending system. Customer money is really a reserve to cover "catastrophe", but accounts for a fraction of the money lent by most banks. For example, when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt it was borrowing around $75 every day from the Federal Reserve for every dollar that it held in reserve.

      This is analogous to hedge funding, but instead of being built upon discretionary lending of private lenders, it is mandatory lending by the public coffers, purportedly to create an adequate money supply.

    13. Re:Job Security here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, under the fractional reserve system they use taxpayer money via the overnight lending system. Customer money is really a reserve to cover "catastrophe", but accounts for a fraction of the money lent by most banks. For example, when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt it was borrowing around $75 every day from the Federal Reserve for every dollar that it held in reserve.

      This seems mis-leading. Overnight lending is a logical precaution in the fractional reserve system but neither plays much of a role in money creation nor are overnight or discount loans tax-payer funded.

      Overnight lending is governed by Libor (London Interbank Rate) and the Federal Funds rate, which contrary to its name isn't the rate at which the Federal Reserve lends funds. Instead Libor/FF is the rate at which banks (private institutions) lend money to each other overnight. If banks want to borrow money from the Federal Reserve they have to use the discount window and rate, which is approx. .1% higher than the FF rate.

      Customer money is the reserve. Banks are required to have a reserve ratio -- a cushion if you will, that is a percentage of their total liabilities. This is to handle anything from a bunch of customers wanting to withdraw money to a sudden dip in the valuation of bank assets.

      Banks will borrow money from each other at the end of the day to make sure their reserve requirements are met. Bank A might have an extra 2,000 sitting around it isn't required to hold. Rather than just sit on that, they lend it to Bank B -- who happens to be 2,000 short until the next day at which point Bank B pays the 2,000 back plus a little bit in interest.

      The point is, banks don't just get free money from the Fed to do what they want. If a bank is using the discount window that means OTHER banks aren't willing to lend it money. That's odd... And will hopefully lead to pointed questions being asked.

    14. Re:Job Security here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk like a bank executive from the 90s. A bank executive whose bank lost customers in droves to competitors who weren't as stupid since then. Customer retention algorithms. Customer acquisition algorithms. Customer up selling algorithms. Not to mention loan risk assessment. List goes on. Fact is, banks run on technology nowadays and those who don't have been bought out by more intelligent competitors.

    15. Re:Job Security here... by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      If you have security clearance to access the codebase, there is nothing wrong for you to become the master of the code you have access to (for a programmer, owning code means a thorough understanding of the code) . It's only espionage if you reveal that to someone else. In actual espionage, most people don't really bother to understand the thing, but they just copy the whole thing.

      Of course the real issue, as others have pointed out, is when the whole codebase becomes useless at a merger. The core technology of a bank is banking, not programming, which is just a tool in this context. If you own advanced technology of the core business, you job is very secure.

    16. Re:Job Security here... by hackula · · Score: 1

      His implication did not seem to be anything along the lines of a code bomb or anything like that. Sure, that will get you fired. Being the only guy who understands the wacky AS400 Accounting system because it relies on an obscure system of joined excel tables spread across the network? That is job security. I have seen it happen plenty in financial institutions. Usually those programmers are worshiped as the only ones capable of understanding the systems (of course, they only understand it because they wrote it and have maintained it for 25 years).

    17. Re:Job Security here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best comment I've read so far. And it's true!

    18. Re:Job Security here... by ralphdaugherty · · Score: 1

      Being the only guy who understands the wacky AS400 Accounting system because it relies on an obscure system of joined excel tables spread across the network? That is job security. I have seen it happen plenty in financial institutions. Usually those programmers are worshiped as the only ones capable of understanding the systems (of course, they only understand it because they wrote it and have maintained it for 25 years).

      I'm one of those guys. There is no "the" wacky AS400 Accounting system (there is apparently your company's accounting system). There is no obscure system of joined Excel tables (yes, users download data to spreadsheets like everyone else). And we can understand anything with source code, not just the people who wrote it.

    19. Re:Job Security here... by hackula · · Score: 1

      ...then you are not one of those guys. You are describing a quality coder in a quality dev environment. Good for you. Not everyone/place is like that. I am not condoning those scenarios, simply stating they exist and that although it completely sucks, it is far from criminal.

  12. you haven't begun to see tough by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you won't own a house, forget about it. your spouse needs to get a job. education at your age is a scam, it won't help you as employers only care about your experience in what they are immediately using. be thankful you haven't been out of work for over a year like many.

    1. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Unless you are getting a MBA or a PhD. Student loans are cheap anyway. In case you can't get rid of it after 25 years under income based repayment, the loan is forgiven.

    2. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Yeah no shit. I wouldn't want to risk it on my worst enemy.

      My advice was (I admit I am younger than this guy) was to leave for greener pastures as he can tell his industry is not doing well and it is always easier to get a job when you have one.

      HR sees my gap and freaks out! Right now I applied for minimium wage jobs as I am desperate and my wife already left me. I have a grant to go back to school but it is too little and too late at this point. I am becoming a teacher as I have subbed in the past and enjoy chatting and can move to a place I want to live.

    3. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you won't own a house, forget about it. your spouse needs to get a job. education at your age is a scam, it won't help you as employers only care about your experience in what they are immediately using. be thankful you haven't been out of work for over a year like many.

      this is correct on all counts

    4. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Education helped me, a 52 year old system admin out of work since 2001. AS & BS and now a Job.

    5. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless you are getting a MBA or a PhD.

      I know that a PhD is viewed differently in different countries, but if you think it's just a matter of "getting" a PhD, then you sorely misunderstand the entire premise of a PhD.
      Besides that, a PhD is a fast-track to a research career, where salaries are low, competition is high, jobs are typically temporary unless you break through to the upper echelons, and pay is significantly lower than in industry.

    6. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      education at your age is a scam, it won't help you as employers only care about your experience in what they are immediately using.

      It depends on where you're living / working. In Chicago, experience was all that mattered. When I moved to the Bay Area, I've had interviews stop when they found out I didn't have a degree.

      Education is never a scam, you should always continue learning.

    7. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Unless you are getting a MBA or a PhD.

      I know that a PhD is viewed differently in different countries, but if you think it's just a matter of "getting" a PhD, then you sorely misunderstand the entire premise of a PhD. Besides that, a PhD is a fast-track to a research career, where salaries are low, competition is high, jobs are typically temporary unless you break through to the upper echelons, and pay is significantly lower than in industry.

      My understanding is that a lot more people "get" post-graduate degrees in the US than in most other countries, primarily because a Bachelor (first) degrees is relatively easy to acquire.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      education at your age is a scam, it won't help you as employers only care about your experience in what they are immediately using.

      That is only true on the surface. Yes employers (actually the HR department, because they don't know any better), ask for experience in what they currently need. However, if you are truly educated, then you can convince employers (hiring managers) that you are able to learn anything in a short period of time and that is the more valuable asset for long term success. The problem is the computer/recruiter screening when you send in a resume. If it does not fit the buzz words they are looking for then it does not get to the hiring manager. The way around it is to network, network, network.

      That is my advice to the person asking. Get out of your comfort zone and learn something on the side. Go to programmers meetings, learn some new language or some new tech, like mobile app development or building games or SEO or big data. Even better get engaged in a group and help organizing meetings (Facilities, speakers, web-site, ...). Such activities teaches you how to manage things and will build a network of people that know you and value your activities. Jobs will come to you.

    9. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have to pay taxes on the forgiven amount.

    10. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Actually, with NCLB, bad standardized testing, the "everyone is special and a winner" mentality, and basic grade inflation (which started in the 60s as a way to help more folks avoid the draft) what has happened is the degrees have all bumped down a notch. The BA (and somewhat less the BS) degree has become the new minimum standard, as opposed to an AA or AS. The AA and AS have become the new high school diploma.

      So yeah, everyone is getting a BA or BS because well, thats really the minimum college education you can get by with. And once you've doen your 4 years, you may as well delay another year or so and make it a masters....

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    11. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are huge bureaucratic hoops to jump through to get forgiven. your income must be low enough also.

      and you pay taxes on all the forgivable portion.

    12. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Of course he can, he may have saved enough to borrow enough to buy one. He didn' tell where he was living anyway.

    13. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me again why this guy should take advice from you?

    14. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by slew · · Score: 1

      Education is never a scam, you should always continue learning.

      Sadly, that's a common fallacy. Although you should always continue learning, sometimes so-called "education" opportunities are scams. Witness the plethora of diploma mills out there that cater to mid-career angst... Also, there are quite a few that border on scams as in many fields continuing degrees don't seem to help much, yet they are offered anyhow...

      It depends on where you're living / working. In Chicago, experience was all that mattered. When I moved to the Bay Area, I've had interviews stop when they found out I didn't have a degree.

      I've seen many hiring managers that were school snobs and/or degree snobs (both in the bay area and outside). Although on principle I'd like to condemn the school/degree snobbery practice, unfortunatly, I've also seen areas where letters after your name were useful to the company (independent of the actual job performed by the employee). If your company is dealing with lots of foreign companies (especially asian companies, although some european companies as well) and your job is customer facing, or if you are a small company dealing with certain Venture Capital fundraising activities, having employees with petigree sometimes is the trump card.

      Of course this slim slice of jobs doesn't justify the school/degree snobbery that exists (which is pretty rampant and unrelated), it's probably mostly a function of people wanting to hire people that are like themselves. This has been the way that job discrimination has been justified in the past (e.g., against women, minorities, etc ), and probably will, unfortunatly, continue to be tolerated in the future...

      On the other hand, there was a study that seemed to correlate the schools where a student applied (rather than actually ended up attending) was a strong indicator of future success. Sometimes you just have to get that union card and join the club or at least have the motivation to try. Then again, I've also worked with a few people that never attended college, yet were all pretty good programmers and/or technology folks. Although most you wouldn't know it, there was one guy who had lots of experience, but always seemed to have a chip on his shoulder (probably just overcompensating). He was definitely not very pleasant to work with (IMHO, not very different than other folks that I've worked with that had phds and never let you forget it). YMMV...

    15. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're probably right, except don't forget there are some home ownership possibilities within reach by shopping the foreclosures. I have a good friend who got a really nice home for pennies on the dollar in Alabama that way, about a year ago - and he was just recently out of a bankruptcy when his business imploded.

      The downside is, buying a foreclosure property is a huge nightmare of dealing with various people for months on end, doing loads of paperwork, etc. etc. And after all that, you may not even get the house you placed an offer on - so you could be back to square one. But the determined can get a good deal.

    16. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      If you've got more details I'd love to hear them. I'm at 23 years on my student loans that I can't repay due to income levels and a special needs child. Any URL's you have that I can look at would be great.

    17. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1
    18. Re:you haven't begun to see tough by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      You just need to have good record-keeping skills. About the same effort to acquire a mortgage or a loan modification.

  13. Adapt by fadethepolice · · Score: 1

    It's tough. I'm 39 and I've had to reinvent my skills completely 3 times in the last 6 years as technology has been phased out. I don't agree with the post doing grunt work comment. It's easy to cut a project manager, unless you are a truly skilled people person with the skills to market and bring in clients. What has allowed me to stay employable is finding what the market needs and learning it. I rode the housing bubble in the naughties, and now I work in the marcellus shale industry. Try looking for a job in the energy industry. Calgary is booming. GIS is hot. The entire GIS software ecosystem is switching from Vbasic to python. The ability to move where the work is is key. Consider the fact that not owning a house gives you the flexibility of going where the work is. Not everywhere is in recesssion. Calgary. Namibia. Perth Australia are all worth looking at. Alaska as well.

    1. Re:Adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (not trying to make this a religious thread). As a buddhist would say, "attachment causes suffering". Are you attached to your job? your position or status it seems to infer on you? The money? the lifestyle (and concurrent levels of debt) it seems to afford (today)? You've got choices to make, so make a plan and make the choices NOW, either try to ride out what seems to be the Titanic heading for an iceberg (if it hasn't yet hit it), or make plans.

      To be honest, your current employer work won't miss you when you leave (if you leave soon, you'll turn into everyone's WTF guy in a week or two...), nor will HR have any reservations at all about throwing you under the bus to meet new headcounts or to protect someone's executive bonus or quarterly share targets if the shit really does start hitting the fan. You're not in the military, waiting to serve out an enlistment or officer obligation under penalty of law. You still have freedom of action, and you won't be acting out of desperation. If you owe them (e.g., company paid for college courses you haven't "worked" off yet), be prepared to pay them back. DO NOT LET stupid shit like that hold you back.

      As others have said, it's easier to make changes to all of those things on your terms and timeline. Hopefully you've been saving up to weather a rough patch for a year or two. If not, start now. Trim back your lifestyle now while it's voluntary, and stock up cash and get rid of debt. Wife should probably get over being a prima donna stay-at-home mom if she's able to work (if you need the evangelical support for this, listen to Dave Ramsey). Kids tend to come out OK despite our best intentions, so don't let that affect things too much, either. But again, if you wait until it is a desperate situation... They need to learn that shit happens at some point, better to do it when things are sane and not desperate, and see that it's good to accept the situation, come up with new plans, and move on, not "OMG I got laid off. I'm on unemployment, we're buried by bills, and my wife thinks its all my fault!".

      If you wait until the shit hits the fan, you do risk your family relationships going to shit and while you're still in shock moping around, with the world on your shoulders. Child support at this age will suck for you financially, especially since your wife won't have an income of her own to fall back on. Parenting by remote control sucks. Just sayin'.

      Do you remember what it was like to be dumped? Did you also dump others? If so, remind yourself, callous as it is, which position was it better to be in? Only you will know when it's the right time to flee the ship, but if you wait until the stern of the boat is pointing up into the sky, it's probably too late, even if the band is still playing.

    2. Re:Adapt by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Calgary. Namibia. Perth Australia are all worth looking at. Alaska as well.

      It's clear you don't work in marketing or sales. Your pitch is somewhat underwhelming.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being a buddhist, I liked some of your response. However, I think it is wasted. Christians will do whatever and accept whatever because "God willed it" ..... success in life? thank god. Failure? pray to god as if you're Job and talk about proving your faith and endurance, whatever. Save your minutes next time, as a good Buddhist should (see how short this response is)

    4. Re:Adapt by hackula · · Score: 1

      ...Compton, Antarctica, the middle of a volcano, Selling tickets at the Thundersdome... Why can't we fill these positions?!?!

  14. Emigrate by davester666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then apply for an H1B visa to work in the US. I've heard employers prefer to keep indentured servants around rather than their 'valued employees'.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    1. Re:Emigrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then apply for an H1B visa to work in the US. I've heard employers prefer to keep indentured servants around rather than their 'valued employees'.

      they tirrrkk errrr JERRRBBSS!!!

    2. Re:Emigrate by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind he also said he's worried about being outsourced, which a lot of times means out of country outsourcing. Which can happen to many IT based jobs. Even if you were move to another country, what's to stop your new employer(s) in that country from outsourcing you? There really is no defense to outsourcing in the IT field, if I were to offer a suggestion I would say start to transition more from IT / coding to a more physical medium that requires on-hand work such as repair work, an on-site sysadmin, hell even managing a datacenter on-site is more job secure than anything that can be done remotely from another location. Just my two cents.

      --
      Aw Frell this
    3. Re:Emigrate by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      This "indentured" thing does not work well for immigration. When layoff, or merger, or outsourcing comes, H1B workers are much easier to get rid of than citizens. Because of the huge backlog of IT immigrants, H1B is a very risky business unless you just want to work hard for a few years and then leave.

  15. Preparation is Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really have two options here, you can be proactive or you can be reactive...

    If you decide to wait until something necessitates a move, then frankly you will lose. 45 is hardly over the hill, though in the tech sector there is an assumption that it is certainly pushing it.

    So you should instead choose to be proactive... Pick a strategy and start to implement it. Perhaps this means you start with some formal education, though that would not be the route that I would go (your first degree should have generated substaintial returns before you think about spending significantly more money on another one). You need to decide if you _can_ manage people. It is a skill that needs to be learned. On the flip side you need to understand if you are of a mindset that you _can_ consult professionally. You obviously need to be technical, a very clear communicator, and even a little bit of a salesman. If you are not the last two then you are not talking about consulting you are talking about temp-ing, and that is not a game you want to be in long term.

    As for medical insurance... In the US, someone has to buy medical insurance. Alot of times this is managed by your employer. So if you end up consulting as in self employed then you will bear 100% of the cost of this insurance. If you end up consulting at a reputable consulting firm, then realistically you will end up with either a kind of middle of the road plan or if it is a high-end consulting firm you will be very well taken care of in this perspective. If you are temping then you are either going to be on your own as if you were self employed or the company will _manage_ the plan but pass most if not all of the costs through to you. So research this before you end up in one of these situations. You will need to know the rate that you need.

    And finally I know so many people who start to feel that tingle in their knee before a layoff happens that end up doing exactly the wrong thing (buying a house, a new car, whatever) don't do that. If things are not stable the use some duct tape and keep your life and stuff together until you are in a situation where you can afford the expense (either in cash or principal + interest).

  16. Set for greener pastures by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    You mentioned your whole industry and your company is not doing well. We have no idea how big that deck of cards with trading complex debt instruments are in Europe and you probably do not want to stick around and find out when countries start to default and pink slips go out.

    So look elsewhere in a better industry? Construction is going up a little and internet .com, analytical marketing/big data, and cloud providers are the new growth markets right now. Apply to these companies? It is always better to have a job when you look for a job. Also it is best always to be a profit center, not a cost center. Banks see non traders as cost centers and do not value your time so you will be paid less and be let go first when there is a recession compared to the other industries I described above. In a .com you are a profit center and more alianged to the processes of your employer. This means you will be paid more and have more job security statistically. Go see the world and move somewhere else?

    Another option is changing careers or getting a different education if you are worried that 40 is too old to code. Go get that MBA to move into management or a degree where you can combine your IT background in another profesison like marketing (big data analytics), or teaching.

      I am only 35 but hit snags in my employment and it is near impossible to get back in. HR sees the gap and runs screaming. WHat I am doing is going for a teaching credential and changing my career path. It might not pay well for 5 years but if you are worred about a layoff you can get that as a backup and your pension will be paid for in 25 years and you can get $60k a year for life. I also get to choose where I move when I graduate too. You can teach math, computer science, and even business courses in middle school and highschool. It may not pay as much but you can do IT support and teaching for additional income for districts. For example a had a recruiter call me for a teaching/computer support job in rural Alaska for 70k a year!

    I am going to aim for Alaska because I liked to live there in the past and can enjoy the summers and do outdoor activities. But that is just me. If you do decide to keep programming another company might give you more avenues of going into other things such as IT sales.

  17. Easy by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Funny

    Create a program that shifts fractions of cents from your company and puts them in an account you have access to; Then, if anyone gets suspicious, burn down the building to cover your tracks.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  18. Keep Up With Current Technology by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Or find a niche you can ride 'til you die. Unless you actually want to go it on your own, the contracting companies out there will whore you out to any job posting that's even remotely a match and provide most of the benefits you're used to. Just take whatever you're making now, convert it to an hourly number, add 30-40% because when you're paid by the hour you don't get paid for sick time or vacation. Upside is they won't ask you to work overtime unless they're really desperate. Then chuck that number out there and see if anyone bites. You might want to check salary surveys for your area, too.

    Those contracting companies usually provide benefits (health care, 401K etc) for a price and do you a 1040 at the end of the year, just like you're used to now. If the company you're working for likes you, they'll usually do a full time convert or just keep extending your contract perpetually. If you know which way the wind is blowing, it's not so stressful. Sometimes I just shotgun my resume out there again anyway if they drag their feet on a renewal, just to see what's hot in an area.

    It helps to keep a network of recruiters, too. I always try to help 'em out when they come looking, even if I'm not in the market. Currently most of my network of past co-workers is employed, though, so I haven't been very much help lately.

    If the company you're currently working for is very sketchy, I'd farm out the resumes now and ride that job 'til you find a new one. If you get laid off before that, go for the unemployment. Whatever you do, don't let on to what you're up to until you're leaving and don't quit! One way or another you've got to ride that thing into the ground unless you find something else first.

    You can go it on your own as a self-employed contractor, too, but that's really more work than I care to put into working. Sure you make HUGE briefcases full of cash that way, but you're doing all the admin and tax crap the 1040 contracting companies do for you. Some people love that. You might hear from a few of them in this story. I work to live and would rather do other things with my free time.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Keep Up With Current Technology by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      You probably want to say form 1099. 1040 is the return itself.

    2. Re:Keep Up With Current Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto on "Keep Up With Current Technology".

      Once you've been around a while, you realize that the industry reinvents itself every 5 years or so. It's really easy for older developers to 1) settle into a long-term maintenance role, and then 2) find they've missed out on the latest "wave" and their skillsets are obsolete. You have to figure out whats "hot" and have at least passing knowledge of it. Just because you did "X" in the past doesn't mean anyone believes you can do "Y"; a lot of hiring is still direct skillset related.

      Second thing is, everyone keeps reinventing the same stuff; e.g. client-server, thin-clients, object stores, functional programming, TOD, whatever. DO NOT EVER talk about the old days and how you've seen it all before, and how you use to carry your punchcards five miles uphill in the snow. Your coworkers think this stuff is fresh brand new shit & your manager is getting a bonus for implementing it, so don't piss on them, instead learn the tech inside out and apply your accumulated wisdom from the inside.

    3. Re:Keep Up With Current Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably want to say form 1099. 1040 is the return itself.

      ...and no doubt you probably want to say Form W-2. You know, because the poster was referring to what a normal employee receives.

      Unincorporated independent contractors get a 1099-MISC listing their nonemployee compensation.

      Also, I really suggest doubling your current hourly wage/prorated salary when quoting an hourly rate, especially if you are getting 1099'd and/or have to acquire your own benefits. Otherwise, you may end up taking a pay cut despite having a significantly higher hourly rate.

      Furthermore, discipline yourself to deal with "feast/famine" rather than a steady paycheck. Good luck: it can be interesting work if it fits your style.

    4. Re:Keep Up With Current Technology by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not such a good move when he is the sole breadwinner. Which is his biggest problem - choosing to have a partner not working in this day and age is like having a servant. A bloody luxury, and one that makes you so much more dependent on your employer. And you should never let yourselve be in an unequal power relationship for long because you are gonna get yourself rogered big time.

    5. Re:Keep Up With Current Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W-2. An employee gets a W-2. A contractor gets a 1099.

  19. spawn multiple paths by dentext · · Score: 1

    It's likely that you'll get canned there, sooner or later.
    I'm in a similar situation, but temporarily sidelined caring for my folks (dementia). I recently had a boss who's been managing tech since '63. He started at 5am and finished around 7PM, every day.

    Scenario out all the options. A non tech path. A tech/detail path, a management path. A path in a segment that doesn't exist yet. A path that's a total fresh start.
    We tend to believe we're in control of more than we are. Whatever you do, it may not matter.
    You're going to work past the current of Social Security, because it'll be a higher age by the time we get there.
    Your work life will likely end about age 70-72.
    Social demographers expect that you will have 2 or possibly 3 careers between now and then.
    (and post in forums with a younger median age)

  20. Re:Honestly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's you're, IDIOT!

  21. what if there's nothing you can do? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What if there's nothing you can do to stay employable? Then what? It's ugly out there. They will lay you off just for looking over 40 no matter how well you perform.

    I'd shape up my finances as much as possible. Cut expenses to the bone. Trade in the gas guzzlers for gas sippers, set the thermostat higher in the summer and lower in the winter, use a clothesline (actually, an indoor rack works fairly well). Never go to the movies and cancel the cable TV subscription, etc. Use the Internet for that stuff. Pay off the credit cards. You know, all the stuff they advise people to do to improve their finances. As for buying a house, forget it, unless it's some foreclosure deal you can pick up super cheap. (I hear Detroit has houses for under $10k.) Keep renting, and live with the contempt and second class treatment that's routinely dished out to renters. All a house will do is tie you down, make it harder to move to a job.

    With finances not hindering you, you have another option: consulting. Consultants must be set up to weather slow times.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    1. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I'll add to that: diversify your sources of income. The easiest way to do that is for the wife to work part time. Treat housing as an investment and only buy if it makes economic sense. Live below your means, and save for when a good opportunity comes along.

      If you like the stability of big companies, put out feelers on consulting... Maintain your networks and watch where people go. If you are sick of it, look at smaller companies.

      It seems like the only real path to financial stability is to have your own company, which is far from being risk-free.

      Also understand where older workers succeed. It isn't in the production-type positions, sweatshops, or innovative startups. It seems to be more with roles where requirements are concrete, but ill defined.

    2. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only Americans could think its good advice not to buy a house. Christ almighty... just don't over pay, don't buy in an inflated market. Put as much down as you can, get a good interest rate. You'll actually own something instead of paying rent until you die.

      40 and renting is very sad.

    3. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in other words, grab that clothline, make a nice hangman noose and hang yourself.

      If you are a developer with what 20yr of experience? grab a mobile market of choice sit down and develop a killer app and sell it for .99c

    4. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Age discrimination isn't usually illegal until the age of 40, depending on the state. Firing after 40 is something an attorney might be able to help with. IANAL but am an HR "professional".

    5. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      put your spouse to work. stop having kids. luxury purchases are for people who lead luxury lifestyles. you're not in that economic strata, so stop fighting.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    6. Re:what if there's nothing you can do? by Xacid · · Score: 1

      "They will lay you off just for looking over 40 no matter how well you perform."

      I hear this a lot on slashdot - where on earth do you guys live? Everywhere I worked the older folks held high value as they had the existing relationships with certain customers and knew various jobs at a level that would be tough to match.

      FYI- I'm in the southeast US if that makes a difference. Maybe it's a cultural thing. I just haven't seen it in my experience.

  22. Some advice by st0nerhat · · Score: 1

    1. Contracting: Assuming you are in the states, be prepared to give 30-40% of your earnings back to the government. As a self-employed person, you get taxed twice, once as business income, and then again as personal income. This is why contractors typically charge $80-120/hr. They only take home $50-72. Also, don't expect our "business friendly" government to help you out in the insurance department either. If you can qualify, you may be looking at $1000+/mo to insure your family.

    On top of all that nonsense, you still have to find work, and it's unlikely to be steady. You may have a huge flood of work, and have the opportunity to work 60-70/hr weeks and make a huge payday, or just as likely, you may have to float yourself for 3 months on what you've saved up. Your best bet here is to get into a software niche and build up a loyal staff. This will not only provide steadier income, but also allow you to hand pick people that you enjoy working with.

    2. If you get along with people and have leadership skill, then yes. You should know by now whether people tend to take their lead from you or not.

    3. An MBA is a great way to network with other people who are aiming towards executive-level positions. This will pay off in 3-5 years as some of those people land those positions and you can ride their coat-tails, or they can ride yours if you are the lucky one.

    4. I'll let others take a crack at that.

    1. Re:Some advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Contracting: Assuming you are in the states, be prepared to give 30-40% of your earnings back to the government. As a self-employed person, you get taxed twice, once as business income, and then again as personal income. This is why contractors typically charge $80-120/hr. They only take home $50-72. Also, don't expect our "business friendly" government to help you out in the insurance department either. If you can qualify, you may be looking at $1000+/mo to insure your family.

      On top of all that nonsense, you still have to find work, and it's unlikely to be steady. You may have a huge flood of work, and have the opportunity to work 60-70/hr weeks and make a huge payday, or just as likely, you may have to float yourself for 3 months on what you've saved up. Your best bet here is to get into a software niche and build up a loyal staff. This will not only provide steadier income, but also allow you to hand pick people that you enjoy working with.

      2. If you get along with people and have leadership skill, then yes. You should know by now whether people tend to take their lead from you or not.

      3. An MBA is a great way to network with other people who are aiming towards executive-level positions. This will pay off in 3-5 years as some of those people land those positions and you can ride their coat-tails, or they can ride yours if you are the lucky one.

      4. I'll let others take a crack at that.

      http://smallbusiness.chron.com/sole-proprietors-double-taxation-25844.html

      If you are paying taxes twice you should fire your account and stick your head up your touchie, because it's obviously not doing you much good where it is.

    2. Re:Some advice by maitai · · Score: 2

      I wish there was a moderator option of 'misinformed' but there's not, so I'm just going to reply.

      You're not taxed twice (unless you started a corp for some reason). I've been a contractor for over a decade. My effective federal income tax rate was 15% and around 18% if you tossed in self employment tax (SS) and the like. (I'm not actually sure on the numbers, but know it was ~19% total). So hardly 30-40%.

      I don't have a family, but my personal health insurance costs me $180 a month. That's a 10k deductible but I'm more than living with thinking that insurance is for unexpected things I can't afford and am happy to pay for the things I can out of pocket (besides, the insurance is a 100% write off and anything I spend cash for is a write off 7.5% of my AGI. Except I've never spent that much).

      You also get those little benefits (if like me) you use your home to work, etc. Where you get to write off portions of your rent, utilities, phone bills, internet bills, etc.

      And then there's section 179 where you can write off (most) recent tech purchases at 100%, or at whatever percent you use them. And yeah.

    3. Re:Some advice by maitai · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself, but I meant any medical spending that's over 7.5% of my AGI is a write off.

  23. Ass from your head by XenithOrb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only thing I've really gathered from this thread is that no one knows dick about what's going on and no one knows their ass from their head about what to do about it. It's simply amazing that there is no real guidance here and all views are diametrically opposing.

    This tells me a few things:
    1) No way's better than another, no method of thinking is better than someone elses; do your best.
    2) Everyone is still fighting for the same slice of pie and it's only getting more random as to how that's done; competition is a bitch.

    1. Re:Ass from your head by sociocapitalist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing I've really gathered from this thread is that no one knows dick about what's going on and no one knows their ass from their head about what to do about it. It's simply amazing that there is no real guidance here and all views are diametrically opposing.

      This tells me a few things:
      1) No way's better than another, no method of thinking is better than someone elses; do your best.
      2) Everyone is still fighting for the same slice of pie and it's only getting more random as to how that's done; competition is a bitch.

      That's the whole point of discussion, to have different views and opinions even if you, in your infinite wisdom, don't think that any of the opinions posted have value. Personally I think that your post is flamebait and didn't add anything useful to the discussion at all.

      The original poster, and all of those of us who are in a similar position, are interested in those different opinions which will apply more or less to each of us as our situations, while similar, are each different. Training, for example, might not help a 40 year old programmer find a job, but might well be of use to a 40 year old network engineer who is also looking for work.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    2. Re:Ass from your head by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 4, Informative

      Then you haven't read what I have read, or haven't taken it in. There has been quite a bit of useful advice:
      1) The wife should get work - more than one income = greater security
      2) Get into an area of the bank that is high value and obscure
      3) Go contracting.
      4) Drastically reduce costs

      I have no idea why your post has been modded interesting, but all of the above are worth a go, even if 3) is high risk without 1), but as you say in this economic climate things are uncertain.

      My golden rule has always been: Spend what you need, not what you earn. This means that as you earn more money, don't just upgrade the car/house/family/holidays etc as if your new income is the norm. Work out what you need. The rest goes into assets. For a rainy day, or for retirement, which ever comes first.

    3. Re:Ass from your head by hackula · · Score: 1

      /irony

    4. Re:Ass from your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I've really gathered from this thread is that no one knows dick about what's going on and no one knows their ass from their head about what to do about it. It's simply amazing that there is no real guidance here and all views are diametrically opposing.

      This tells me a few things:
      1) No way's better than another, no method of thinking is better than someone elses; do your best.
      2) Everyone is still fighting for the same slice of pie and it's only getting more random as to how that's done; competition is a bitch.

      Pie? All we ever see is crumbs.

  24. Hang in there & keep skilling up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know exactly how you feel. Im a 40 year old programmer and I really enjoy it. I dont want to be a manager (I dont have the A-Hole gene). However I do often look around & see that most people around me are 25 to 35.How will things be when we are 55?
    My skills are very broad, but today most young guns hyper-specialize in a specific skill that takes 1-2 years to pick up (eg WPF, WCF). When you parachute into a task as a jack of all trades, the 20 years of composite knowledge feels largely irrelevant for the specific task at hand.
    Im trying to focus on non cookie-cutter skills - algorithms, 3D etc, but the software industry seems geared towards vanilla CRUD information systems - wash, rinse, repeat.
    I've spent the last 20 years learning APIs in my spare time to broaden my knowledge - this is not such a healthy life balance. I've decided to do some exercise to feel better, and not look like, well a 40 year old programmer.
    Otherwise, thats just life - do your best, what else can yo do?

  25. Stay Hungry by hardgeus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am not in your specific field, but close. I am 36. My advice:

    Stay hungry. Keep reading programming blogs. Work on hobby projects on weekends to keep your skills sharp. Write stupid games in languages you never use at work. Obsess over every little mistake in your code. Post ridiculous nuances of horrible PHP (fill in your language here) behavior.

    When necessary, stay up till 4 AM writing code. Build a team of hungry programmers. Build a team of guys who code all day, and go home and code a little more when they're not playing Diablo or whatnot.

    I hate to be an anus-hole, but your post sounds like the words of a tired burnt-out programmer. I wouldn't hire you. Medicare? Job Security and Office Politics? I didn't see anything in your post to indicate that you're still passionate about software development...And passion, IMHO, is the crux of staying employable in this field.

    1. Re:Stay Hungry by wrook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Passion is important, but so is effectiveness. It seems obvious that the more time I spend doing something and the more attention I give to it, the more I will progress. However, this is not true. Programming is a task of the mind. If you are not alert, there will be things that slip by you. I'm not talking about bugs, I'm talking about missing the abstractions that make you a better programmer. Not only that, but the mind requires time to sift through the information you're giving it. You actually need time to forget what you are doing in order to reinforce it.

      I highly recommend that you limit the time you spend at the keyboard. You will progress faster as a programmer. You need activities that allow your mind to wander. This will consolidate what you are doing. I actually quit my job as a programmer and now only spend about 2-3 hours a day (if that) programming. In the 5 years that I've done that my programming ability has improved at a much faster pace than when I was working 70 hour weeks. Because I have so little time, I'm focused and aware of what I am doing. Because I am not tired, my ability is much higher and I discover things faster. Because I give my brain time, the concepts coalesce faster.

      Anyway, give it a try sometime. I think you'll be surprised.

    2. Re:Stay Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are the problem with this industry. There's no need for employers to offer opportunity, job security, or overtime, because you will work for free pizza, thinking that it's some sort of win. I am also 36, and I went through a period in my early twenties where I thought having access to a playstation at lunch time was awesome. Totally compensated for doing a minimum of 10 hours overtime per week - and you could decorate your 'open plan' workspace with all sorts of toys and stupid shit. I won't do that anymore, and I'll only work at places staffed by grownups. If I can't, I'll find another industry compatible with adulthood.

    3. Re:Stay Hungry by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When necessary, stay up till 4 AM writing code.

      Oh, just fuck off. People like you are part of the problem, not the solution.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Stay Hungry by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      When a 40+ family man has to stay up til 4am writing code just to stay employed to feed his family it makes you wonder why we ever got down from the trees doesn't it?

      Remember that next time you use your democratic vote for your billionaire-funded candidate of your choice.

    5. Re:Stay Hungry by hackula · · Score: 2

      Your 80 hour weeks are devaluing all of us. Thanks asshole. Have some self respect and demand payment for the hours you work. Most employers purchase 40hrs/week, and that is what they should get.

    6. Re:Stay Hungry by maitas · · Score: 1

      NICELY PUT!

    7. Re:Stay Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It have been my experience that code written at 3AM but an exhausted inexperienced developer tends to really, really suck.

      The times when this practice has paid of are few and far between, movies such as The Social Network notwithstanding.

    8. Re:Stay Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... your post sounds like the words of a tired burnt-out programmer."
      Wrong. He's a human being who has enough life experience to realize that what he is currently doing isn't enough to protect himself or the people who depend on him from economic uncertainty.

      Your time will come.

       

  26. Become a freelance consultant by Ranger · · Score: 0

    And marry someone who has a steady job. You'll still be able to do the stuff you love, but the income will be spotty. Though you may get lucky and make enough to live off of.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  27. Obama just handed you the golden egg! by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Look this healthcare bill just handed you a golden egg on the platter. Take advantage of it by opening your own outsourcing shop. Project manage the jobs and ensure the clients get a top quality product by vetting all code that goes through the door.

    Either become the person outsourcing or be outsourced take your pick.

    Two of my huge contracting clients just imposed a hiring freeze this week on all US Employee new hires, offshore and contractors are fine.

    --


    Got Code?
  28. Apprentice to a plumber by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It can't be outsourced, and have you ever heard of an unemployed plumber?

    It's meaningful work, too, work which has saved more lives over the centuries than doctors have.

    (Even I can't tell if I'm serious about this).

    1. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It isn't just a safe job, in many areas now the pay is huge for plumbers. The same can be said for horrible areas in IT, if you want to find something safe to ride you out, then find areas that can't be done away with that are incredibly boring. Where I work there are mainframe cobol contractors that have been on high end contracts for over 15 years now and they will be in those contracts til they retire, they are irreplacable much to the lament of management and even if they do finally work out a way to get rid of all the legacy crap they will see it coming at least 5 years in advance in which time they can find another safe spot or milk the hell out of the last 5 years as no one else will take the work.

    2. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by IceNinjaNine · · Score: 1

      (Even I can't tell if I'm serious about this).

      I'll tell you what I'm serious about: I'm fucking tired of the ageism bullshit in development and systems management. Having an undergrad already, I'm going to start a program at the local state university that allows for a BS in nursing to be completed by a prior degree holder in 16 months (doing all the science right now part time, like o-chem; the 16 months is almost all practicum), and then fast track into an MS in advance practice nursing. I'm looking into oncology, urology, and orthopedics.

      In addition, some friends and I have opened a retail gun store.

      I am tired of living for the code and the tech. It is time for me, for my mental health, to move on.. and for somebody else to take my place.

    3. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It can't be outsourced, and have you ever heard of an unemployed plumber?

      Only in the union.

    4. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's meaningful work, too, work which has saved more lives over the centuries than doctors have.

      Earlier in life that was my dream! But alas it has long since gone down the drain

    5. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lead pipes. :-(

    6. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sound young still but like you have the right idea. I punched out at 32. never easy but always good. sure I wish for more sometimes, but never the ability to turn the clock back.

    7. Re:Apprentice to a plumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last plumber mentioned that the job he was doing for me was his last job before he retired. He was maybe 35. He had started and sold 2 plumbing companies. Oh, he was also a children's book author.

      TL;DR: My plumber made me feel like an underperforming idiot.

  29. I know this will fly against conventional wisdom.. by pongo000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but let's face it, some of us have no interest in management, or consulting. That's why, after a 15-year career in software development, I turned to teaching. And if you're laughing because I'm advocating teaching as an alternative career, you miss my point: Sometimes getting out of the field is a viable option. I grew tired of lining the pockets of CEOs and PHBs and gutless business owners who simply ran their businesses into the ground, businesses built partially on my hard work. Sometimes you have to take a step back and ask yourself "What exactly have I done for society these past years?" Chances are, if you're a software developer at a "large investment bank," not a hell of a lot.

  30. Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Informative

    IT tends to throw out the old and import the young because the old hands don't keep up with the new technology. But if you have special skills that are vital to your industry they'll keep you around until you choose to retire or die of old age.

    You will have to keep up on technologies as they come. Your company will tell you what skills they're looking for... Definitely keep training.

    The suggestion to move to management also isn't bad.

    Work on increasing your value and look at job openings that are close to your skill set. Ideally you don't want to care if you're fired because you're so valuable that you'll just get another job.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by nixer · · Score: 1

      Completely agree - keep training. Keep up to date. Keep increasing your personal value through better skills.

    2. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 2

      IT tends to import the young because they can be bullied into doing crazy hours for no extra money.

    3. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      IT tends to throw out the old and import the young because the old hands don't keep up with the new technology. But if you have special skills that are vital to your industry they'll keep you around until you choose to retire or die of old age.

      You will have to keep up on technologies as they come. Your company will tell you what skills they're looking for... Definitely keep training.

      The suggestion to move to management also isn't bad.

      Work on increasing your value and look at job openings that are close to your skill set. Ideally you don't want to care if you're fired because you're so valuable that you'll just get another job.

      Ah, the optimism of the young.

      Did you really think that we all ossify the minute we leave college? My problem has been that in more cases than not, I was working with technologies that wouldn't be generally in demand for another 2 years in this particular backwater town.

      Skills count for very little, alas, nor does a pride in workmanship.

      What counts more is to work fast and to work cheap, and younger people carry as much a stereotype about that as older people do about not keeping up.

      What counts even more, however, is social skills. Which, unfortunately, a lot of us never possessed at any age.

      The cold brutal truth is that what determines job security isn't how good a job you can do, it's about how good a job you can do in convincing the people above you not to dump you in order to get an extra-large bonus this quarter. But in any event, the idea that in this day and age you'll be at the same employer long enough to recieve a pension and a gold watch is laughable, because virtually nobody holds a job "forever" in this Brave New World, from the CEO on down.

      Which brings us back to social skills again. Maintain a network so that when it comes time to hit the street, there will be people who can help you into the next non-permanent position.

      Or, you could go for Standard Quackbot Ideological Solution #1: "Start your own business and no one can fire you". Which isn't true - your customers can and will fire you. And of course, you need even more social skills, because contrary to what some would like to believe, starting and running a business is something that requires a particular talent set, and is no more a "everyone can do it" thing than software design or accounting. Speaking of which, forget about doing the fun stuff if you run your own business. You can only do that after you do the management, sales, accounting, and so forth. To be replaced with riding herd on the people that you (hopefully) hire to do sales, accounging and so forth - assuming that you either had enough starting capital (hint, picking wealthy relatives helps immensely) or become profitable in your own right.

      Or, do like everyone else says: go into management. Social skills again. Plus politics. And again, kiss the fun stuff goodby.

    4. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Moving into management can just make you the first out of the door when the next range of cuts come, unless you know how to climb over the corpses of your line managers.

    5. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      If they can do the same job the old hand can do and no worse then how is management wrong?

      If certain skills and competencies don't exist at that level then you can't replace the old hands with the young upstarts.

      Don't kid yourself. The younger programmers are frequently very good at their jobs.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    6. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Who cares about management. The idea of burning the midnight oil for no compensation is something that exists mostly in IT, and is heartily encouraged by "management". The sooner people wake up and stand up for themselves the better, more experienced developers have more sense than to allow themselves to be abused like that. And it most certainly is abuse.

    7. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      Programming is not a 9/5 job.

      It's more akin to what you see out of lawyers or law firms. They work similar hours and no one cares if the work day is over.

      There are deadlines.

      If there is an error in the way programmers are managed it is that they're often payed a wage instead of a salary.

      Paying programmers by the hour is a bad idea. It's popular amongst many but it's wrong headed. I know they do that in lawfirms as well but that's also a mistake. Good lawyers know better then to write their "real" hours down. If you do something brilliant then you bill your client for extra hours and go home. Good programmers are entitled to the same thing. That makes the whole payment by the hour thing meaningless.

      If I hire a programmer full time and I give him projects that have to be done by time X. I don't really care how many hours he's in the office or not. I care that the project is done on time. However that happens is his business. If he can't hit deadlines then I'll find someone that can.

      If you're experienced then you should be able to work faster and smarter. If you're young and know less then you should have to work harder to produce the same quality output. I don't really care how many hours you spent doing it. If you spend 10 minutes and some how finish everything and then slack off for the next month... fine. Have fun.

      But meet your deadlines.

      The only people that have a hard time arranging these sorts of systems are managers that don't know enough to set deadlines. All they can do is judge how many hours people are putting into something. And if they're working hard they assume things are working as well as they can work. Never mind that everyone might be failing around doing counter productive tasks or writing garbage code.

      IT managers had better be able to do everything the people they manage do or they're useless. This goes for all managers. You need to understand what your employees are doing or you can't manage them. Simply tracking their hours is meaningless.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    8. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      That's my point though - managers don't care about programmers, they care about managers. They prefer younger programmers because they are easy to manipulate for lower pay into wasting their lives for someone else's profit. And this is the thing - if you're a diligent lawyer and work hard, you can reasonably expect to be pulling in a very healthy wage some day. If you let yourself be abused by managers as a programmer, you may get a line on your CV if they are feeling charitable. And that's not per-project either.

      I'm not saying its everywhere but it is a chronic problem in the industry. Ask yourself - whose profit am I wiping out years worth of nights and weekends for? Mine or someone else's? An experienced programmer already knows the answer to this question and will quite rightly refuse pressure beyond a certain point. An inexperienced one on the other hand is easy pickings, and management know this.

    9. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of companies founded by an run by programmers. If you're good you can work for one of them.

      If you're not then you're going to have to work harder. Deal with it.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    10. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      What are you asking me to deal with? I'm a business owner myself. That doesn't mean I can't recognise widespread abuse in an industry when I see it, an abuse targeted at younger and less experienced workers. This magical nirvana where you imagine good programmers go to work doesn't exist 90% of the time.

    11. Re:Programmers that know their stuff are gold by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      it doesn't exist for anyone... you think young lawyers or accountants are well treated?

      Get real. They're worked like dogs. And you think having a law degree means you're assured a good income? You're lucky if you can get a job at all.

      The point I'm making is that these professions are not paid for by the hour for young workers. They get a salary. That doesn't mean they don't work long hours. You could very well be spending most of your time at the lawfirm... that is in a 24 hour period over 50 percent of that could be at work.

      So don't tell me that programmers are the only ones that have it bad. They aren't. The problem with programmers is not that they're worked hard. Being worked hard is a necessary evil. And it's only going to get worse as labor costs go up and the companies need to work employees harder to justify the expense.

      The problem is rather that pay is by the hour rather then by the job itself.

      We can make the above better but its going to take a lot of labor and tax reform. The cost of hiring and employing people keeps going up. And this is largely why wages have stagnated. Sure, the employee is making less but that doesn't mean the company is paying less. Add up the taxes, insurance, benefits, and red tape and they're paying more.

      People at the bottom income bracket could be making twice their current income if we reformed these systems.

      And this is also a large factor in why unemployment is rising.

      It just is... And until this is fixed enjoy the outsourcing.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  31. ban op, gas thread by cforrester · · Score: 0

    ban op, gas thread

    1. Re:ban op, gas thread by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      gb2somethingawful

      (also mangosteen)

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:ban op, gas thread by cforrester · · Score: 0

      fuck off, troll

  32. Go to a company that respects devs or go consult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's two types of companies out there: those that see the software you create as an asset and a source of revenue (directly or indirectly) to be managed, and those who see the software you create as an overhead cost to be minimized. These companies will treat you accordingly: in short, your salary is either part of a profit center, or part of a cost center. If you can help it, _NEVER_ work building software that is viewed as an expense. In all but the most spectacular, idealistic, privately held utopias of small companies you will be treated like vermin if what you build is an expense. When the software you build generates revenue and you work in concert with business, then you're respected and valued as a developer. You are not viewed as a "code producing resource" to be maximized and controlled.

    A fun spin on this is to sell your experience as a consultant. BDC's (Big Dumb Companies) are full of projects in need of rescue or "quick turnaround" that the BDC will pay out a tasty premium for 6-9 months at over 2X what they pay their own coding slobs who are too dis-organized and balkanized by middle-management fiefdoms to get the chance of doing a project in the first place. When you do this, you're working in a profit center (for you consulting agency or perhaps yourself) _AND_ you get the advantage of exposure to a variety of tools and problem domains.

    Oh. And for the record, don't buy a fucking house. Second worst decision I ever made, IMHO. The idea that it's the smart long term financial solution for everyone is total bullshit: http://genxfinance.com/your-home-is-not-an-investment-dont-treat-it-like-one/

  33. Re:Easy by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

    You wont have to burn the place down if you dont mess up any mundane details.

  34. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Office Space" jokes aside, that's what grid hedging scalper robots do on the foreign exchange market... minus the burnt-down building.

  35. Banks by br00tus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked in IT at one of the larger investment banks for a bit.

    At somewhere like Apple or Google, IT is everything. Or a lot. At an investment bank it is nothing - the investment bankers and sales people are the entire focus. You can argue about how important IT is there, but these are institutions with tons of money to burn, and if they make a mistake, the US taxpayer will always bail them out. That's the thing, they have a ton of money. I have seen insane things go on in terms of technical time bombs waiting to go off. But they have so much money, they can throw money at any problem and it will be fixed. IT is treated like garbage I would say. I think it's insane people would work there in IT over a long period of time. Where I worked, almost everyone who did not leave of their own accord was pushed out - they can people all the time, especially when the market dips. Then again, it is such a big industry, sometimes people find a good spot which seems like a sinecure, and it is not so bad. But some people who think they found a sinecure one day find out they were wrong. It can be a good experience to work at a place like this for a year or two, and it looks good on a resume, anyone who stays for a long time I think is crazy, and their personality always seems to me to change, they seem unhappy. Look how nervous you seem in your post, it does not seem the post of a content, happy person. You're at a company at the apex of world financial power, yet they make you feel insecure. You're one of the workers doing all the work that creates that wealth for them, but they seek to make you feel like a disposable peon. You are a disposable peon.

    Anyhow, your age works against you. People are smart enough to not say any age discrimination stuff, but I've been forced to pass over extremely qualified candidates more or less because (unsaid) they were old, had a family they would have to spend time with, might stick up for themselves etc.

    If you want to stay in finance, connections are everything. When the cuts come, and they always do, the managers will get together and decide who stays and who goes. Are any of the decision makers going to fight for you? Aside from this, keeping in touch with people when they move to other companies is important, especially when you're looking for work. The stupidest thing you can do is stick your head down and do a good job for sixty hours a week. No one gives a shit - at all. If you think the vultures running your company care, if you think your manager's manager cares, you are a complete fool. Politicking is everything in places like that. As far as consulting, usually these places want to deal with consulting companies, so you have to get to know the project managers and such at consulting companies. This is not hard to do - the project managers want to have a good relationship with hired staff at the company, they want their consultants supported and to get more business, they know you can always be the one who is bumped to team lead or manager.

    Also, if you're not chasing the brass ring where you are there is NO reason for you to be there. Your goal should be to be either a managing director in IT (which there are very few of, because the bank considers IT a backroom joke) or in the elite architecture/engineering team. Why would someone kill themselves at these places otherwise, other than to get the experience and resume blurb for a year or two?

    As far as getting a job, it is like this: there is a bell curve. Most people are in the middle. You are probably in the middle. Most interviews are looking for people on the right end of the curve. When you go on a technical interview, do you miss questions? I've interviewed dozens, maybe hundreds of people. People on the right side of the bell curve can answer mostly everything I throw at them - 99 out of 100 questions. A few people are on the left side and know very little. Most people are in the middle, you can tell they kind of know it, and could probably do the job, but you're n

    1. Re:Banks by eennaarbrak · · Score: 2

      People on the right side of the bell curve can answer mostly everything I throw at them - 99 out of 100 questions.

      Yeah, that is probably a good strategy. One thing to look out for though is the "jack of all trades, master of none" guy. I once interviewed (and hired) a guy that had an incredible range of knowledge on all matters IT. I was naively impressed.

      Once hired though, I found he spent an awful lot of time doing little prototypes and experiments instead of doing his job. Now, I generally encourage people in my team to research new technologies and find better ways of doing things, but there are limits to this. This guy was spending 80% of his time playing around, and consistently missed deadlines (without any apparent distress to him).

      It is good to have a broad skill, my argument here is not that hiring people with broad skills are bad. But I think your strategy of only going for the right side of the curve has potential problems (but I assume, you being a smart fellow, you know this and have put in the measures to counter this). In my experience, there is a place on a development team for a middle of the road, hard working, but not necessarily obsessed out of his mind about every single technology person.

    2. Re:Banks by TheMathemagician · · Score: 1

      "Also, if you're not chasing the brass ring where you are there is NO reason for you to be there. Your goal should be to be either a managing director in IT (which there are very few of, because the bank considers IT a backroom joke) or in the elite architecture/engineering team. Why would someone kill themselves at these places otherwise, other than to get the experience and resume blurb for a year or two?" We do it for money. As unpleasant as it is, you earn double what you'd earn in IT.

    3. Re:Banks by eennaarbrak · · Score: 2

      I agree with you - I think the parent has a romantic view on employment, and good for him if he can afford it. We have families to support and mortgages to pay - and once you are in the financial sector, it is difficult to get out, because your business knowledge is specialized. I can't compete with a 3-year geek on ios development - but I stand a good chance for a position in investment banking, because of my domain knowledge.

      Besides, there are advantages to working in banking. The technology is super-cool, especially if you are lucky enough to work in derivatives trading where grid computing and low latency trading is important.

    4. Re:Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't compete with a 3-year geek on ios development

      Can't compete with a 3 year old? What kind of IT guy are you?

    5. Re:Banks by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 2

      Specialised knowledge is not limited to your sector. I have worked for government for the last 10 years and that is pretty much all I get any interest for nowadays. I have previously worked in retail and found it pretty much the same (although poorer paid).

      I have worked in low latency (or zero latency as Tandem liked to call it), but it was online financial transactions - I thin you will find that the telco sector are also very interested in those skills as well, particularly if you have exposure to billing systems. Not sure that the tech is super-cool though - you may just be showing your age :o)

    6. Re:Banks by eennaarbrak · · Score: 1

      Not sure that the tech is super-cool though - you may just be showing your age :o)

      Haha, point taken!

    7. Re:Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol at mobile apps, who the fuck do you work for, zynga? Shit man, no one respecting their own face starts to write fart apps at 40 years of age. If you haven't picked up business know how in that time frame, to be worth consulting for...then you sure are odd. At this age, most likely your expertise should be related to some boring enterprise need (such as banking business in this case?), unless the entire franchise died out completely, but that's rare.

  36. Look for stable areas in all the chaos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The financial industry is not doing well...

    Some parts of it aren't... but some parts are doing great. What's bad for the industry, is often great for the folks involved in making it crappy... I'm talking of course about increased regulation, risk management, and other get-in-the-way-of-business activities that are floureshing right now. If you have a financial background, try looking at jobs for SEC, compliance departments, risk management departments, auditing, etc., there's one in every major corporation---and they're often `safe' places in times of great industry calamity.

    And yeah, keeping up with what's out there, and being flexible and indespensible (and moving to management, etc.,) are also great ideas.

    Consulting (as many are suggesting) is great if you can make it work---but consultants are very often the first folks out of the door when cutting costs, and whenever there's a major screw up, there's great push to "blame the consultants" and get rid of them... lets full time managers save face. That's why they hired consultats to begin with... to be the fall guys.

  37. My advice by quietwalker · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a big believer in the idea that social interactions are more important than job skills when it comes to getting or retaining a job. Just think : how many people have you worked with that seem to have no job skills whatsoever, but they often thrive in an office, undeservedly becoming manager when they don't know how to spell IBM?

    Those people are either lucky, or more likely, they know how to manage the social game. With that in mind, here's my advice:

    1) Learn to play office politics.
    I'm not talking about some sort of 80's and 90's era sabotage-the-other-guy or beat-them-with-a-better-pitch schtick. Just realize that the ability to socialize in a business setting is a valuable job skill. Make sure you know what's going on in the office, and at worst, offer to pitch in where you can, or act to perform introductions between those that need and those who can provide.

    This ability is especially rare among stereotype IT/developer types, so when it's recognized, it's usually well rewarded. If you're having problems in this area, I recommend joining a toastmasters group if simple social interaction is your issue, or asking a manager to mentor you ... which leads to my next item.

    2) Keep climbing up.
    The standard business operates not based on income, but the rate at which their income is fluctuating. If it's not going forward, then there's something that needs to be 'fixed' - at least from a stock, investor, board standpoint. This feeling trickles down though. If you're happy doing the same job for years, then either there's something wrong with you, or the job - according to some managerial viewpoints. That's why they ask you stupid questions like, "Where do you see yourself in 5 years," in your interview/review. They're just checking that you're normal, according to their standards.

    The easiest path up is management. Ask to be mentored, indicate that you want to move into management. Leverage your technical seniority. You can go the project management route since there's an easy certification for that, if you're into certifications (some companies are, some aren't).

    Alternatively, court the architect position. If it doesn't exist at your company, request that it be created for you. You don't need more money (though you shouldn't ~say~ that), in fact, you might not even need new responsibilities. Just do it for the title. It's important. Maybe not to you, but when they make decisions at the top level, they know they can afford to get rid of developers - even a senior developer or two - but an 'architect' sounds invaluable.

    3) Take ownership
    You've spent significant time at your company, and you have a good idea of the technical domain. You must have a million ideas about what can be done, and what can be done better. Find something you can care about and make it happen. That means drawing up a business plan, inserting yourself in manager's schedules, getting approval, learning .. ugh... powerpoint, drawing gant charts, whatever it is that will sell that idea to the business with YOU as the lead.
    It helps then, to be able to pull it off, but honestly it doesn't seem to be all that important.

    4) Self-promote.
    Ugh. I hate this one, but it's necessary. The only people who may really know your value is your co-workers, and if you're on a small or isolated product, maybe not even them. Your manager ~may~ have a good idea of what you're worth, but let's guess that it's 50%. His manager only has about a 10% grasp, and the department manager with 300 people only knows you by job title and the section his direct report manages.

    If your manager isn't whooping up your name and your co-work

    1. Re:My advice by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      This is true of any enterprise over a certain size. The only way to avoid it is to work in an organisation small enough that fuckwittedness cannot go unnoticed.

    2. Re:My advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) Beta blockers

      So you read this far, you're clearly not able to succeed on your own. I know why and you know why, it's in your nature. This advice will handle this matter however. It's as simple as improving your self control, esteem and angst in situations where it matters. Just get juiced up! If you're nervous get beta blockers, this will solve 100% of your insecure problems, do the fuck you want pretty much. Then if you're not nervous yet still a beta faggot, then order test god damnit and transform to a bold man! Be realistic about the situation and do what is needed, don't be a pussy because mommy told you it's bad, it's way to late for that.

    3. Re:My advice by RandCraw · · Score: 2

      Great advice. I think techy types can especialy see the value in: 2) keep climbing up and 3) take ownership. These two foci show that you're keeping your skills up to date, perhaps even advancing them beyond the state-of-the-art, and then applying them where it counts -- to the bottom line. If you can do that, any decent business or manager should appreciate that you're doing all you can to make a real impact where it matters most.

      I agree it's also helpful (though annoying) to add 4) self promotion. But if you've already "taken ownership" of problems or processes, then at least you clearly deserve the recognition for whatever you're promoting. By focusing on the advancement of your tech skills and then manifesting them via task ownership, it shouldn't be too painful to self-promote those results in politically effective yet palatable forms.

      Finally, I'd also propose goal 6) Promote Others In Your Team. If you can join hands with coworkers toward the other goals you've listed, management is likelier to appreciate the value of your work, much more than if you do it solo. Others in the team will be more willing to sing your praises if they think it'll help to float their boat too.

  38. Be better than the rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've interviewed tons of mediocre middle-aged developers, and I don't really have any advice for them other than go to short-term contracting. But if you are capable, be a *great* programmer. Know every aspect of your particular area - .Net, Java, whatever - and dont' expect to get paid more than everyone else. AND STAY ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT TECHNOLOGY! If that isn't your cup of tea or out of your grasp, try moving into management. It starts with being a lead developer, but instead of going into architecture, try to get the foot in the door of middle management. Bad part of this is that if layoffs happen at this point, you're likely to get the heave-ho; but if you make it to software manager or something above project management, you should have some decent longevity.

  39. Suck it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, you should have sucked it up a long time ago. When I left the military, I got a job for 32K/year and my wife had no job and we had two kids. She had to get a night shift position at a convenience store for a while and eventually switched to a night shift job at a chip fab so we could make ends meet. We live a few hundred miles from the nearest relatives and paying for child care was not in the budget. We kept the debt low and cut back on spending. Eventually as our pays went and the kids got older, things got better and we bought a house.
    13 years later, my kids are grown, I have 3 years left to pay off my house, we have ZERO debt (other than the house) and I still drive a 15 year old used car every day, she has a 7 year old used car, my kids could move out at any time, and we live in the same house even though we make over 100K+ more than we did back then. Save money early when you are making decent money, don't take on debt (cars, credit cards, car loans) and you will have many more options as you get older. We could both quit or get fired from our professional jobs and get jobs at Wal-Mart and we could easily make ends meet. If I moved into a house 3-5x the cost of mine with much higher recurring costs and always bought new cars, we would be in a situation similar to yours. We do spend and waste a lot of money now and we each have a lot of "toys" but these are not recurring costs and those expenses could be reduced to almost nothing tomorrow if we had to. An example is I maintain 2 cars I mainly race at the track but I could stop that hobby and the money they require immediately if I had to.

    1. Re:Suck it up by samjam · · Score: 1

      Well said. Paying of the mortgage was my priority, and I now live mortgage free. That is a big pay rise in itself and a lot to not worry about ever again.

    2. Re:Suck it up by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Wish I had ++ mod points.

      The world would be a much better place if people didn't think income = expenditure

      Because then the people doing the employing would have less power, and we would ALL be better off.

  40. Keep it simple by Xacid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pure opinion here - if it was me in your shoes I'd have the wife getting into the job market (heck, what is she going to do at 40 if you get hit by a bus anyway?). At 40 if I was uneasy about my current job I'd start looking at sprucing up my resume and putting my name out there just to see how the market is biting. I'd like to think we're all fairly flexible in case of layoffs - I seem to always run into various people looking for all spectrums of folks in the IT world. The biggest thing is being willing to relocate. Beyond that all I can say is I hope you've made the most of your career thus far because that's what's going to keep you afloat.

    1. Re:Keep it simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it at getting the wife in to the job market! Why would you bust your back anyway while she's been doing shit for 20 years? Let her hawk baby clothes on ebay or some shit and relax with your life, it's 2012 i shiggydiggidy.

    2. Re:Keep it simple by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you but I've grown up with the philosophy that everyone should be capable of taking care of themselves in the end. I'm witnessing a situation now where the wife is leaving the husband and is getting beyond half of his stuff and a huge chunk of future earnings because she doesn't have nearly the same earning power nor any savings. She's in her mid 50s and starting off with essentially no marketable skills. So now she's in a position where, if their genders were reversed, she'd probably get nothing and would have to somehow cram in 20 years of retirement in approximately 15. But being female she was able to get an incredibly hefty reward for basically doing nothing for 30 years.

      I'd rather avoid such a situation completely, avoid the man/woman-hating, and just make sure everyone is in a situation to take care of themselves in the end. As mentioned in the previous post - I very well may get hit by a bus tomorrow. What would my wife do then? The life insurance is there but all it does is provide for a buffer to get on her feet and keep feeding the kids. And that time frame for getting on her feet gets smaller and smaller as she gets older if she's not preparing for it now.

  41. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like your premise. It would make a good movie.

    Maybe it can involve a stapler to some extent. :)

  42. Diversification and management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have two pieces of advice for you. One is for the short/medium term (keeping your job) and the other is long-term (making progress). I make assumptions with both of them, so take whatever applies to you and leave the rest.

    For the short term, try to branch out as much as possible. Get involved with many projects -- within reason, of course -- and make yourself an asset in each one. Avoid coming across as arrogant, but don't be afraid to strut your stuff. Be sure that your employer (and coworkers, for that matter) are aware of and appreciate your years of experience and the wisdom you derive from them, and don't hesitate to go the extra mile when you can.

    For the long term, you need to work on moving into management. You should already be there, really. If you are going to stick with your current employer, the MBA probably isn't necessary; just really work at climbing the ladder within the company. This means getting noticed by the higher-ups as being management material AND showing the initiative to work toward that end. Start trying to get yourself involved with the higher-level aspects of your work, rather than focusing on tasks and code-monkey work. If you're a coder, try to get more involved with design, and then work your way into overseeing a project. If you keep at it but get overlooked, don't be afraid to go to your boss and let him/her know that you're ready to tackle the bigger-picture stuff.

    So to summarize: diversify, apply effort, and be more assertive.

  43. Move where the cost of living is lower. by krick-zero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I assume the reason that you haven't purchased a house is because you can't afford it where you currently live. If that's the case, you really need to move somewhere that has affordable housing. There's lots of places with affordable housing that have developer jobs. I recently moved from New Jersey, which is mostly horribly expensive, to Cary, North Carolina, which is a small town between Raleigh and Durham. I bought my first home at age 41 for $215K. It's an older home, but it's 2000 sqft, on 1/2 acre, with an in-ground pool. My property taxes are $1600 a year. A similar home in NJ would easily cost over twice as much and the taxes would likely be 8K or more per year if I was lucky. Here in the Raleigh/Durham/Cary "Research Triangle" area, you could probably find a job with Deutsche Bank or Credit Suisse if you really want to stay on the Financial/Banking career path.

    1. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Genda · · Score: 0

      Do not listen to this advice. The banks are still gambling with property because nobody in D.C. is willing to stop suckling on the Banker's teat long enough to pass legislation to make them stop. Everything they were doing before, they are still doing, and doing with impunity. Until the global market is flat, insane distortions and financial upheaval is going to be the status quo, and if you think for a moment that owning a home is going to protect you from anything then finding the next job is the least of your problems.

      Find a good place to live. Be ready to move your family if you have to. Look for healthy economies with great need. Software engineers are gods in Brazil, just find the expat. community of the town of your preference and enjoy the view down on the beach. Viet Nam may end up being the next huge resort country (you just have to make nice nice with the locals... and I don't know how you feel about communists.) Point is, You want to our as much thought into your future as you do with your code, and you want to talk with your family about what they want and need.

    2. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I don't know how you feel about communists.

      Given this is Slashdot, the odds are spectacularly good that the feeling would be one of kinship.

    3. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. Move to where the cost of living is rising the most - and that's probably where the cost of living is highest. Where I live, a neighbor on my street (who was a contractor himself) sold his house to a contractor who razed the entire structure and built a new house that he sold for twice what he paid for the property. Zillow (who I will not defend as an accurate estimator of property values), raised the valuation of everyone on the street by about 30 percent in response. That kind of price response makes up for a tremendous amount of additional amount of holding cost that comes from buying in an expensive neighborhood. As you will not get that kind of price response in a cheaper neighborhood - the advice to buy in an affordable neighborhood, while intuitively obvious, is entirely incorrect. Instead, you would be well advised to embrace the fact that the rich are getting and will continue to get richer, and you should get close to where the money is flowing and ride it as far as you can.

    4. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by acid06 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not sure where you got this idea that developers are gods here in Brazil. It is seen by the general public as a good career choice (while, in the US, that doesn't seem to be the norm anymore) but it doesn't really pay that well for the average guy. And a great salary here is about what the average guy earns in the US. Living cost isn't that much lower: rent is cheaper but nearly everything else is 1.5-3x more expensive. In other words: you wouldn't be able to afford a view to the beach.

      Also, the economy is not doing very well. Our current government has managed to fool the international community, but if the current economic crisis goes on for a couple of years more, Brazil will be in trouble. They gambled the crisis wouldn't last for a long time... but their bet is already starting to fall apart.

      Finally, as a foreigner, you'd be a prime targe for robberies, purse snatchers, etc.

    5. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP suggests moving somewhere with a lower cost of living and a thriving job market in his profession and you suggest moving the entire family to Vietnam because it's becoming a tourist trap?

    6. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of all the hype as far as tech areas go Raleigh and Durham is a one horse town. Yes there is work down there and yes the cost of living is low, but the empolyer pools is very small compared to Boston and DC, which are much closer to his current life.

    7. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, both are european banks...just sayin "eat your own dog food" and all that...guess americans don't feel safe with their own banks now. sorry if it sounds like trolling, was just a joke.

    8. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I moved to same area after living in Boston, and though there are not too many startups or "cool" companies, you can't beat the cost of housing and amenities for a family.

    9. Re:Move where the cost of living is lower. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to think again about Cary, locally know as the Central Area for Relocated Yankees. NC has the second highest unemployment in the country. And with Progress Energy merging with Duke Power, about 1500 more people in this area will be looking for a job. It's not all sweetness and light around here. Credit Suisse is laying off overseas, so it's only a matter of time with them here too.

  44. NoSQL and/or data mining and/or big data analytics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking hell, learn Mongo, Cassandra, etc and keep your dumb-ass employed in NoSQL land.

    If you rely on others to tell you wtf you need to learn, you're too lazy to be employed.

  45. Start your own business by sidevans · · Score: 1

    Yes its hard work, and it has many ups and downs, however

    - You choose your hours
    - You choose who you work with
    - You choose who you work for
    - Don't need to apply for holidays
    - Can be drunk at work
    - When you abuse your boss, you enjoy it

    Over the years I've done night/weekend jobs like washing dishes and pizza delivery to support myself, also made myself available for any small jobs from friends to keep me physically fit like gardening, rearranging furniture around houses, setting up complete offices instead of just the computers/network. Doing the shit jobs is priceless in the long term, if a friend wants their laptop fixed they know its going to cost them a bottle of whiskey and a home cooked meal before I even look at it :)

    Its taken 15 years, but now I'm being paid to study Tourism (this is a big thing for me, I didn't even finish year 10), gave my mother a profitable and sustainable hosting company for her retirement and successfully found investors who want me to do project management for them.

    Grow a pear and take the risks, you will never regret it.

    --
    I'm not signing anything
    1. Re:Start your own business by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      Grow a pear? Dude! What you got down there?!

  46. Some suggestions to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (1) Stay physically fit and active, and keep up your appearance. Nobody wants to hire a middle-aged slouch with a pot-belly, tattoos, and greasy hair. Your spouse will appreciate this too.

    (2) Learn another human language. Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, etc.

    (3) Participate actively and meaningfully in the open source projects of your choice, using your real name (not a goofy pseudonym) so that you will have examples of your work to show to potential employers.

    (4) Participate in local charity and volunteer organizations. This will help improve your people skills.

    (5) Turn off the TV and read books instead. Non-fiction is best, but even fiction is better than nothing. Keep improving your mind.

    1. Re:Some suggestions to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #3!!!

      I'm so sick and tired of looking at resumes, especially resumes of experienced engineers with decades under their belt. All you get is 6 pages of project descriptions, which for all I know the candidate only wrote 2 lines of code. Then they try to describe what they did, and you're only more confused.

      Nothing, and I mean, _nothing_, beats real code. I really don't care about algorithms or other crap like that. A team only needs one exceptionally bright guy who can pull algorithms out of thin air, and generally provide guidance. But people who can write maintainable code, who can apply algorithms cleanly and concisely; that's almost as rare, and yet more critical to project success. And the only way to see that is by seeing their code.

      So, please, open source code. Do it. Join a team, or write your own project. Something. Anything!

    2. Re:Some suggestions to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) Stay physically fit and active, and keep up your appearance. Nobody wants to hire a middle-aged slouch with a pot-belly, tattoos, and greasy hair. Your spouse will appreciate this too.

      (2) Learn another human language. Spanish, Mandarin, Arabic, etc.

      (3) Participate actively and meaningfully in the open source projects of your choice, using your real name (not a goofy pseudonym) so that you will have examples of your work to show to potential employers.

      (4) Participate in local charity and volunteer organizations. This will help improve your people skills.

      (5) Turn off the TV and read books instead. Non-fiction is best, but even fiction is better than nothing. Keep improving your mind.

      This is really good advice. Even if it fails to keep you employed, it will still give you a sense of fulfillment and you will be happier and healthier - isn't that really the underlying goal here?

    3. Re:Some suggestions to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) Stay physically fit and active, and keep up your appearance. Nobody wants to hire a middle-aged slouch with a pot-belly, tattoos, and greasy hair. Your spouse will appreciate this too.

      No, you've got it all wrong. The key is this: giant ear gauges, the kind that make it painful to look at. Because seriously dude, I need that job more than you. ;-)

    4. Re:Some suggestions to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with you - I have done all the 5 points above and it works great. I will add one more point here
      (6) Find yourself hobby (the best is some kind of sport but dancing, singing, joga - anything is good) - that helps a lot to keep the stress under control.

  47. What worked for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm of retirement age; I'll tell you what worked for me. (Electronics Engineer)

    Cultivate a very positive and optimistic attitude, regardless of the outlook.
    Seek and accept the most challenging assignments. If the company will pay for any graduate degree, do it.
    Maintain and expand your network with calls, letters, lunches, etc. Stay in touch with everybody.
    About once a year, interview for a job whether you need to or not.
    Represent your employer externally, if possible, at conferences, etc. Speak to groups. If not possible, join Toastmasters.

    Best of luck!

    1. Re:What worked for me by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Represent your employer externally, if possible, at conferences, etc.

      This is really bad advice. Represent YOURSELF and what you've accomplished, not your employer.

      When you start representing someone other than yourself, with or without their permission, you put yourself in a legally precarious position.

    2. Re:What worked for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like I said, what worked for me. I thought it would be obvious that I was talking about representing the employer in an official capacity.

      This is valuable because:
      It shows committment, confidence and poise in addition to technical skill. Most people (even smart ones) don't have what it takes, to put it bluntly.
      Most companies value professional presentation skill over technical skill, other things being equal.
      It exposes you to many potential future employers, for pay. People learn your name and will take your calls.
      Professional presentation skill and the ability to represent the firm transcends any one business sector. All kinds of businesses need skillful representation.

  48. Re:Honestly? by whargoul · · Score: 1

    ummm...I hope you're kidding.
    You never can tell around here.

  49. OP, Inc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to look at your job as just one facet of your overall business - the business of you. So, you need to get out there and network / interact constantly. Benefit from your network (and return the favor) to advance your career - or start a business. Maintaining your job and starting a side business is ideal, but it is tough to come up with a good business idea (I find) but if you can, great. No matter what, you need to diversify your income into multiple streams. Ideally that's a job, a business, and investments. Careers and business are built on personal relationships. Always have, always will. Job-wise, yeah, gotta move from being the grunt to managing.

    Don't worry about not owning a house - so what? More likely than not, it's more of a concern for the wife. In reality, though, you don't need to own to have a home. And you most certainly can rent a whole house (I have some available - interested? FML). Frankly, rough times are ahead and not owning is probably the best thing. And, having a mortgage is a major problem - think about it, you are committing yourself to paying something every month for years and years. FML.

    And forget about medicare, medicaid, social security and the rest of it. It won't be there by the time you retire. Sorry, Charlie. Even if it all survives, it's hardly something to look forward to - enjoy the here and now, as you could be whisked away at any time. Speaking of which, since you have dependents (and only because you have dependents) you might consider life insurance.

  50. Re:Easy by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    "you know who *else* burned down buildings to cover their tracks??"

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  51. Be Ready for Anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bottom line is, anything can happen. Keep your sails short.

    In general, always operate as if you are going to be fired tomorrow. Try to keep at least 3 months worth of cash in savings to keep the bills paid so you have time to figure out your next move. If you are living hand to mouth, you are in a bad way. Live simply and live well within your means.

    Always keep your eyes open for new positions, even if your present job seems secure. Explore the possibilities. Make time for coffee or lunch with colleagues that you haven't seen in a while, just so you know the state of the world.

    Keep flexible. You may wind up doing something different that requires you to dig and learn, while leveraging your experience. That is A-OK. Just don't get into a mental "old dog can't learn new tricks" rut.

    If you suspect that your neck is soon to be on the chopping block, get your resume circulating now. If your current employer can't provide you with security, you don't owe them any allegiance. My resume is always posted on the career boards. My current boss knows this and respects this. This is not meant as offense to my boss, and it doesn't mean I am going out the door tomorrow, but they know that I am serious about keeping myself afloat and paying my bills. That is why I work in the first place.

    The concept of a 20 year career with a company is dead. I have worked at several companies and the longest stretch has been 4 years. I've been laid off several times, and in a couple positions there simply wasn't any way to advance except to pick up and leave. That is how it is.

    Good luck.

  52. here you go: by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    what would be the best way for me to stay employable in the coming years?

    1. Be good at what you do.

    2. Specialize in something that's in demand. Re-specialize as needed.

    3. Don't be the guy with "personality issues".

    4. Cultivate a network of former co-workers who know your worth.

    5. Don't price yourself out of a job; a senior dev with twenty years experience is worth about as much as one with ten.

    6. Choose to live somewhere jobs are scarce and cost-of-living is relatively low.

    7. Try to always be working on something that will make you more employable. If your current job doesn't qualify then try to find one that does.

    1. Re:here you go: by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Err. That should read "where labor is scarce" or "where jobs are plentiful". You get the gist.

  53. You know... by Genda · · Score: 1

    You could always create an online school, you know, record classes on Youtube, that your children will be able to use. Give something back to the world. Maybe even get Bill Gates to throw in a few million dollars... sorry, that was a little cold.

    Things are messed up, and the hogs are running the show (but then you work in the belly of the beast and I don't need to explain how broken it all is do I.) The good news is you can still create something of your own. Look at a thing, any thing that you love, that touches, moves and inspires you. Something you want your great great grandchildren to point at with pride. You will never polish enough turds to be happy, secure or skate through life unexamined. So confront what it is that stirs your soul. Figure out a strategy to migrate from here to there and give it a rip. Yes, you have family to take care of, make them part of the process.

    Or you could just look for the next big thing. I'm guessing that would be home robotics. You know anything about AI?

  54. welcome to the club... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Welcome to the club...

        Posting anonymously for my own privacy.

        It's hard for all of us out there. Rounds of layoffs, and otherwise considering staff expendable is now deeply embedded in corporate culture.

        Plenty of us have given years of service, to only get a short notice "see ya..." Our jobs have been replaced with someone at half the price and a quarter of the ability. Sometimes they're outsourced at a smaller fraction of the price, and commiserate quality. Or they just decide that [pick an IT department] isn't worth the expense.

        Until our corporate environments change to start having some sort of dedication to the employees, get used to it.

        It sounds like you probably have an excellent resume and skill set, so there's a good chance you can find further employment when you're laid off. Others who work for smaller companies may not be as lucky. "lead developer" for some company with no widespread reputation, could mean absolutely nothing. Being able to do an interview well will get their foot in the door, and their performance after that will show their worth.

  55. Guarantee your Freedom First by superflit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a foreigner living in US for some years I got scared by the way our fellow americans live with Debt.

    First thing is check your mortgage and check if it is possible to re-adjust or re-finance with lower interest and after check ways for you pay it in ADVANCE.

    Being as employer and employee I can assure you:

    The man who has freedom, real freedom (paid his house and has 'easy' cost of living) is in better way and better mindset to negotiate.

    Anecdotal story:

    I had to fill a position for medium level from several applicants I had 2 very distinct.

    a) One was middle age (35) but has all his house paid, and he even took one year in Paris just 'for learn French'

    b) Other was 45 and have 20 years of mortgage because he fall for the 'housing bubble'

    The guy with the paid mortgage was very calm on interview, proactive and well mannered.
    Other the mortgage guy was desperate and near a hear attack.
    I had to choose the free mortgage guy because he was the best choice for the company. technically and MENTALLY
    Please, I assure you I want the best for all the fellow man who live this country.
    Can you 'downsize' your costs? move to a smaller but PAID(or lower month paymnt) apt? Bring MORE safety for your family but less 'luxury'.
    I know the american dream is big spaces or house, but really. Do you really need that?
    What about get downsized on costs and Later move on but more security?
    Medicare and Social Security ONLY works if you had ALREADY paid your house.

    I hope for your safety and best for your family

    1. Re:Guarantee your Freedom First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> As a foreigner living in US for some years I got scared by the way our fellow americans live with Debt.

      This is very wise: I wish more of my fwellow Americans would take heed.

  56. This is SERIOUS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of you testosterone-laden Brogrammers should read and heed. No matter how smart you think your are now, you'll work your asses off for the next 20-30 years, become "too old", "too expensive", or obsolete in the eyes of the future hiring managers (and many Slashdot readers). Some of you may hit the jackpot, but most of you won't. Heaven forbid you should want a spouse, a family, AND a career.

    The educational standards around the world will continue to improve, and you'll be competing for lower and lower wages with professionals around the planet. The biggest companies/industries are offshoring the fastest: (see http://www.cringely.com/tag/ibm/ ). The same thing at Oracle, HP, ... Meanwhile, they continue to clamor for more H1-B visa workers.

    If you want to stay technical, keep your skills up, and consider alternative sectors - either niche companies or maybe even DOD contract work (not glamorous, but it won't be offshored...). If you get an MBA, my guess is that you'll be working on business models that just accelerate offshoring.

    I have many 50-something peers who are grappling with these issues. There's no right answer. Best of luck.

  57. Established Interests by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hard to say

    No actually it is quite easy to say - you stopped being a country on the frontier with lots of virgin territory (both literal and figurative) to expand into and became an adolescent country with established business interests that fight tooth and nail against any new, entrepreneurial ideas that threaten their business model.

    On the good side your spirit still seems to be there - look at the boom created by the new virtual territory of the internet which allowed original ideas to flourish briefly again because the established interests did not see it as a threat. Of course now it has its own established interests and, if you start something new and successful, you'll be snowed under by patent court cases until you are bought out or shut down.

    1. Re:Established Interests by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Entrepreneur is just a polite way of saying "ruthless robber baron".

      Fortunately, in civilised countries there are limits on what entrepreneurs can get away with nowadays. It's called the rule of law and democracy.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Established Interests by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 1

      only if you call automobiles replacing horses is robbery.

    3. Re:Established Interests by istartedi · · Score: 1

      I think you've nailed down an important aspect of what ails us. It's a country of incumbents. It's not just incumbent politicians; but incumbent businesses and incumbent unions. They have learned to grab government and swing it like a club against their would-be challengers.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  58. Re:NoSQL and/or data mining and/or big data analyt by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    this is the attitude that prevents more and more people from being employed.. I hope they show up at your door and rob you of everything you own.

  59. o.O by FishOuttaWater · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You are aware that Canada is North from the US, right? ...just checking.

    1. Re:o.O by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      I'm Canadian. The linked article does not mention Mexico whatsoever. Better luck next time.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:o.O by mooingyak · · Score: 0

      Linked article talks about how more people are moving from Canada to the US than the reverse, so he (there are no women on slashdot, it must be an alias) was correct to say 'southward'.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    3. Re:o.O by dbIII · · Score: 1

      there are no women on slashdot, it must be an alias

      Rubbish, there's that girlintraining guy and I know for a fact that he's a woman :)


      To be a bit more serious, it's a big world out there and there's more than fat basement dwelling american males on this site - I for one live in a city outside of the US where the only basements are in office buildings.

    4. Re:o.O by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Rare, eccentric, but not non-existent. Time to hose down that assumption before it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:o.O by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...also, I've always loved your sig. Seemed like a good time to say something.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:o.O by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Good to know I'm appreciated. Can't believe I got modded down for that. Did someone think I was serious?

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    7. Re:o.O by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I think you were too subtle. Alas, those who get shaving cuts by Occam's razor are rarely the ones employing it. Maybe try more self-parody next time?

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  60. Got skillz by VernorVinge · · Score: 1

    If you are truly fearful for your job, apply to other companies. The job market is not at zero right now. I changed careers twice this year without breaking a sweat. If you can't switch laterally, ask yourself, are my skill sets unique or easily duplicated? If you are just a sheep, start diversifying your responsibilities, get additional training, or even go to school part time. Develop skill sets that no one else can replicate, and you will always be in demand.

    --
    Stay skeptical, my friends.
  61. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus? George Bush? I'm totally lost.

  62. Youre doomed buddy as you were from day one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey its going to end in blood and tears for everyone, take comfort in that. The thing that upsets me about my age is not my employment prospects... its more I look at all those hot young chicks all over the place and then I see that old bitch eyeing me and I go to myself, yeah look at her thats the one you could have and oh boy I am so NOT interested. The only thing that helps me out here is that I can do fat chicks, so I compromise I get a bit younger for a lot fatter but hey life is a bad deal that only gets worse.

    Now as far as my expectations of the future go, hey I'm not a piece of cattle like you knees trembling as I'm getting closer to the slaughterhouse. Don't get me wrong my meat is just as sold as yours is, its just maybe I'm not as attached to all of this here than you are. Me ... I actually make good money in IT but you know the day that stops I always have the option of shooting a bunch of cops into the face until one takes me down. Okay probably not my first thing to try but to illustrate. What do I care, its not like I have to spend eternity as a bitter old fuck, everything will come to an end at some point and that is a VERY good thing. The moment I realize that my quality of life drops and the effort I have to invest to maintain it gets too high I can always cheat, lie, steal, rob and murder. Life my friend is a game and it will end. Your 40 now, given your choice of food and habits you may not even live to see 60. I'm in my mid 40's myself but I take very good care of my health and I watch very closely what I eat and drink. if there's any advise for you here then its take huge doses of vitamins (80kIU of vit d3 a day for a few weeks then drop to 20kIU will restart your dick and get your mind focused on bitches instead of doom) research vitamins and minerals, cut out all crap and only eat organic and make sure to eat a lot of animal fat and protein. It'll add to your problem of living longer than you want but when you enter the slaughterhouse at least you wont be limping. Dont take any ( prescription) drugs and meds aside from maybe pot and dont take any vaccines. 4mg of folic acid a day will snap you out of your depression, research that too... in short grow a dick and a brain and know this isnt Disneyland (if you knew what goes on there lol).. In closing its hell, you may find yourself some day panhandling at the traffic light I do know a few things you dont lol but hey it will all end for you too, I promise bro.

  63. Sad fact is... by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    His family *was* growing until he took an arrow to the knee.

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  64. How do you stay emolypable? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    If you aren't talented, suck up and suck dry.

    If you do not have the skills to walk into a small office and dazzle them, then you really need to have a good vacuum connection to you managers needs retain your corporate gig.

    If you really can actually code and provide solutions quickly then finding a small office that needs a "guru" is an option. I found myself in a situation where not only did I need to run from a flaming trainwreck and find a new resource I had to also learn how to run a server that I had to set up from rock bottom that ran a website, media site, kb, and an email solution.

    It's all about work ethic, the ability to walk into a workforce and provide solutions, and just being solid in what you tell others you can provide. You also have to be ready to step up and make the hard things seem easy.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  65. Get a life (Re:Stay Hungry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >When necessary, stay up till 4 AM writing code. Build a team of hungry programmers. Build a team of guys who code all day, and go home and code a little more when they're not playing Diablo or whatnot.

    Are you looking forward to ill-health (Weekends? 4AM? Your body is not going to put up with that kind of shit forever), divorce, and/or alienated kids (assuming you even manage to keep a stable relationship)?

    This isn't meant as an insult. It's just the naked truth. That kind of shit is for twenty-somethings who don't know any better.

    1. Re:Get a life (Re:Stay Hungry) by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about this middle ground: fight to keep your skills current, but remember why you fight.

    2. Re:Get a life (Re:Stay Hungry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Keep your skills current. Any education should be focused on building skills.

      I am 51 years old and in the same boat.

      I have asked myself "what should I do?" countless times during the last few years. I thought about management, but I know that I would be extremely unhappy in that kind of role. I thought about changing careers, but there is little I could do without sacrificing a significant amount of time and money.

      In the end, I decided to continue as a programmer, because I like it so much. I figured that I would keep doing something I liked until they force me out. Then, I'll write a book or two about it.

    3. Re:Get a life (Re:Stay Hungry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. I stay up until 2 or 4 am 30-40 wks a year. 40 years old. raised two kids. still with the same girl. I felt I had better focus and power from ages 33-39 than I ever had. Stop being so closed-minded, not everyone has been a weak basement dweller their entire lives. Passion matters a lot, and like the saying goes "don't know what you got till it's gone" ....Sadly the last year or two I have seen my passion and energy levels drop a bit, but I bet I can still maintain longer and more productive levels than you might, from the sound of your post. Not meant to sound personal, just trying to make a point about power and motivation. Take it as you will.

    4. Re:Get a life (Re:Stay Hungry) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even if you have a family - which would be anyway your top priority, imho you should always keep you informed by reading technical articles.
      Of course trying to work on pet projects would be better to improve / upkeep your skills, but as stated you dont't have the time and mental freshness to do that.
      I am 37 so i understand your position very well.

      From your age employers are not expecting the quicker coder but a person with enough expertise to understand quickly where the problem lies, if a technology is doomed and worthless, if a problem is a hardware or software one by just giving a brief look at it.

      Last but not least, your expertise would make you a good analyst, able to translate people requirements to code specifications.

  66. step one: ask elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming to this site for advice on how to stay employable is about as useful as coming to this site for advice on... well, anything. That is to say, it's not going to help you much, but it does have some entertainment value.

    Anyhoo, since I'm near your age and near your level, I have the same concerns. My advice (and my above statement applies to my advice as well) is to check the job boards and see what's needed. What are employers looking for? This will guide you as to what experience you should add. My second piece is to not burn bridges and keep up your network. I have a handful of people now in other positions who will keep me in mind. I've also helped a couple people get into jobs myself. Granted, there's no guarantee they'll help, but it's all about increasing changes. If you want to stay employable in your current job, make sure your work is seen by as many rungs up as possible.

    It's tough to say whether you should get an MBA, become a manager, do consulting. What works for one may not work for another.

  67. Re:get out by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FWIW I had a check I deposited at an ATM "corrected" for /10 the amount.
    I called the bank and they said they don't make that kind of errors.
    I insisted. Finally they checked and wow, they were wrong!
    All this was in one phone call of 10 min (not several spread over hours).
    Within half an hour I was credited back the proper amount.

    The difference between my experience and what you describe?
    I'm with a Credit Union (NCUA, not FDIC). Seriously, there is no excuse to be with any NA (not BofA, not Chase, not Wells Fargo, no-one).
    Go to a local credit union and you will never go back to a regular bank.
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  68. Re:Easy by gijoel · · Score: 1

    Step 2: Fight Superman
    Step 3: ....
    Step 4: Profit.

  69. Calling BS on age problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry, but I just don't see the age discrimination. Perhaps it is because I don't work in the startup field. Perhaps things are different in Texas. But I just don't see the age discrimination.

    My first official developer position was obtained three years ago at age 42. now I will say that my resume helps a lot. A school I attended helped me with it and it works. In short, I can easily score 5 interviews a week with my resume. And for the record, I see plenty of guys who are older than me doing fine in finding a new job. If you have good .NET skills and are willing to do the work that is needed there are plenty of jobs in DFW.

    I suspect that I would not ind it as easy to work for a startup. Then again, I would be guessing as I have no desire to put the number of hours that startups are reputed to ask.

    But there are some realities that I am aware of. They would include that I have likely topped out on the pay scale. Also, I have to keep my skills current with the market. (I left a job last year because of that.) I don't have any illusions of being in .NET until retirement. At the same time, if it is still the hot market I will stay in it that long.

    But I am confident that there will always be established companies in need of a good programmer. And that is where I plan to stay for as long as the ride is good. Go look at Dice and see what companies are looking for. Make sure you know those technologies. And if your resume doesn't attract attention than something is wrong. Get it fixed. Don't act like you are a gift from heaven, but be confident. And lastly remember that it is easier to find employment when you are employed. If you think they may people off in six months, it is time to be finding the new job. Your current company will not be super loyal to you. Don't put yourself at risk for them.

    1. Re:Calling BS on age problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, but I just don't see the age discrimination.

      Yeah, I didn't either. 52 was a bitch though. Still is three years later. I work for myself. One year was great, one not so great. This year is downright scary. Recruiters call/email all the time. Frequently, I get to the 1st or 2nd round of interviews and then it dies. No explanation.

      I've interviewed all my life. I show enthusiasm, dress properly, know what not to say, etc. I usually got an offer... not anymore.

      What do you think it is?

  70. Are you good enough? by nixer · · Score: 1
    Please don't do an MBA - that fad is done. If I see a candidate has an MBA I pretty much dismiss them at the resume screening stage - too many bad experiences. There are a lot of people who believe the same.

    Contracting can be good (been there, done that for many years), but you have to be prepared for the lean times when they come.

    I am a senior IT manager in an investment bank in my mid 40's, one of six who run a group of 1,500, yet my aim is to still code for some hours of the day. I sit with the core team on the development floor (average age - in their 40's). One of my peers does the same, four do not - this is choice about management style. Management does not mean "not technical".

    Great people are always in demand. Find the "right" sort of organization/group to work for - one that does modern methodologies (agile) and modern technologies (mixed imperative/functional languages, no-sql etc.) where you can stay up to date. Don't assume you'll ever make yourself invaluable by being the guy maintaining the legacy system - it's just that kind of stuff that some crazy manager thinks about outsourcing.

    You don't need to worry if you're truly technical and good at it. Ask yourself - are you good enough? If not, make yourself good enough.

  71. Switch to a trade by Svartormr · · Score: 1

    IT is a dying field because no one in management values it properly and it is mind bogglingly complex. You either struggle in the small companies for too liitle pay and/or too little budget and small office politics or struggle in large companies with the same problems in their large company forms.

    I'd suggest you become an electrician and work up to Red Seal Journeyman. With your knowledge of networks and with the hardware skills on wiring and fibre you get a broad spectrum of related skills that allow you to move between companies and cities. Someone else sells the suits on the project. You implement it.

    Electricity and data flow can't be outsourced and is needed for everything. That's job security.

    1. Re:Switch to a trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it wasn't for vertigo problems, I'd've gone into the electrician field out of highschool. an electrician who can't climb a ladder is useless.

  72. Heard of Facebook? by tonywestonuk · · Score: 2

    I am 39, going 40 this year. 3 years ago, I was an RPG programmer (IBM Iron). My employer, TD Waterhouse bank, had no interest in moving to more modern tech.

    I saw the writing on the wall to my carer, I needed to act. So, I made a facebook game..... it was pretty pants poor, though I did learn new skills. More importantly, I was able to show this game off in an job interview for a Java Web developer.... I got the job because of it.

    So, my advice to you is to build your own personal project, Make a website, make a facebook game. the game might not get you anywere, but it will improve your carrier prospects no end.

  73. Re:Tell everyone you're illegal by Genda · · Score: 1, Informative

    Congratulations, you've just invented the Caricature Assassination, my aren't we clever! Why do you people keep associating Obama with liberals? He is the limpest of milk-toast moderates, he's only liberal compared to the neo-nazi's and religious whack-o-doodles that wander mumbling to themselves on the Republican side of the House/Senate. I'm beginning to think that we should consider spiking the Republican water fountain with Thorazine as a national safety measure. I think the only true remaining liberal in the Senate is an ex-writer for Saturday Night Live. The Dems are now moderate conservatives and the Reps are simply shocking... no, I mean WTF, I get dizzy whenever I read the latest stupid thing uttered by a Washington Republican. They're like flounders, they only have a bottom and a right side. Its like Picasso had a psychotic break and breathed life into a one sided scribble.

    You wanna know who's against managing illegal aliens? The Reps, because it would be bad for business. As for birth control, you can't have it both ways, you can't complain about them being here, then complain about the solution to fix the problem. Let me think, contraceptive pill 30 cents, new American Citizen with poor foreign national parents... from birth to 18, what $200,000 tax dollars? More? Even if you count all the contraceptive pills that couple can use over 18 years, those are some of the best tax dollar that ever got spent, talk about a bargain!

    That's the other thing about these conservative spewings, they keep harping about the same crap, none of it makes any sense, none of it holds up to even the slightest logical inspection. Its just more mouth breathing, knuckle dragging noise being regurgitated by some "Click Head". You know why they call them "Click Heads" right? Because the poor little petrified bean between their ears makes a clicketty sound whenever the breeze between their ears rattles it around.

    Oh, and one last thing... if you been getting that "called a racist, homophobic, bigot" thing a lot, perhaps its not the people pointing out the obvious who are the problem. Just a nugget for you to chew on, nightie, night.

  74. Don't go into Middle Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Despite what many say, middle management is NOT the way to go. I keep hearing people say that becomming a manager means a safe path to retirement because all you have to do is talk BS to justify your own position and tech people can be replaced cheaply by the young. In my experience managers are the ones that usually have the axe over their heads and the tech people who have stayed relevant and up to date (and actually do the actual work that the IT department is there to do) have a brighter future. Really good tech people are HARD to find (at least in Australia) and companies are usually desperate to hang on to them. I see so many tech people loose touch without knowing it though, and 5-7 years later the ground has moved from under them and they are stuck. Basically they get lazy or convince themselves that the way they are used to is the right way. This is one of the reasons I prefer contracting unless I am in a kick arse team.

    I know a guy who is 55 and has an extensive work history as a Software Architect. He is REALLY good at his job and is simply never without work as a contractor. I know good senior developers who have recruiters belting down the doors as well. I currently work with a tech lead on the other hand who refuses to acknowledge anything beyond the existance of .NET 2.0 (and even then only a small subset of it) and spends all of his time reading Sci Fi books...but knows the system back to front so can't be fired. If the company folds though...he is in deep water.

    Swings and roundabouts I guess...

  75. Best way to stay employed is to employ yourself. by englishstudent · · Score: 0

    Rather than doing all that hardwork for someone else, why not work for yourself? It's by no means easy, but assuming you are resourceful enough to keep the business running, no one is ever gonna remove you from your employment.

    --
    We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
  76. Savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offence intended, but how did you manage to get to 40 without savings? A senior developer for an investment bank doesn't sound like a badly paid job.

  77. Consider overseas employment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider emigrating. There are some places in the world where your skills are valued and in demand. I live in New Zealand. Currently there are more openings for skilled IT employees than can be filled. The same is true for Australia and I suspect that there are other places with similar situations. You may find that you have to initially take a lower salary than your US salary, but keep in mind that the cost of living is / may be somewhat lower. Work is available for both full time and contract employees.
    For NZ, if you are under 55 and have documented skills and qualifications, you can probably qualify. You might consider contacting a firm specialising in IT recruitment / contracting. There are several in NZ. Good luck.

    1. Re:Consider overseas employment by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

      WRT Australia, you can only qualify for skilled migration if you're under 40...

    2. Re:Consider overseas employment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  78. Sad story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank you, for sharing it, and hope better luck will find you sometime.

  79. Take the red pill by SuperCharlie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes."

    I took the red pill 4 years ago. I was a senior tech drone at a university and could have easily spent another 25 years to retirement skating in the tech side of academia. I woke up one day at 43 years old, looked back, and realized my life had been stolen. I had spent 5/7th of my existence doing things I didnt give a shit about while waiting for the weekend to cram my life into.

    I decided enough was enough and I walked away.

    I took my savings and retirement and got rid of every debt I owed and bought some land. I started a small business and got my monthly living expenses under $1000. Im at about $600 right now and hope to go lower.

    I built a house by hand..still working on it, but its all mine, every stinking stick of wood.

    Ive got a ways to go as Im working towards doing the farm thing..but thats my path. Decide what yours is and follow it. Maybe it is to be an employee, maybe that fulfills you.. but I suspect deep down that no intelligent person really wants to work until they are old, used up. I suspect they are just doing it because they are afraid of the unknown and afraid of losing their security. The question is, is security worth looking back on your life to realize you never really lived?

    No, its not easy. No, it is not fun. No it is not secure. But yes...yes it is freedom and hell yes it is living. At least for me.

    Which pill ..which pill to choose.

    1. Re:Take the red pill by TheMathemagician · · Score: 2

      OK nice job Jeremiah Johnson but OP has a wife and kids. I doubt they'd be that keen on living in a log cabin and bathing in the creek. Many people (well men with families) would willingly do a boring job of drudgery for 25 years if they could thereby guarantee economic security for their family.

    2. Re:Take the red pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also took the red pill, I wouldn't change my choice.
      The biggest eye opener was to see how many people define themselves by their work and that they can only relate to others who do the same.
      I lost many *friends* in the process, however I realised that they actually were not friends, just fellow drones.
      I now employ drones because people like me have all taken the red pill and do not need employment.

    3. Re:Take the red pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found myself in a situation identical to yours.

      I'll second the LEAVE THE RESERVATION comment but add another twist.

      Most of the advise you've heard thus far has been to stay in place but do something different. For me, THIS was the very definition of insanity. I realized I needed dramatic change, just not total change.

      Like I was, you are renting likely because you can't afford to buy in an extremely expensive metropolitan area.

      I found a job in a small town doing exactly what I do. At work, it's the same problems, just different location. Wife lost her high paying job with no prospect of employment here (small town). But at home, we've managed to buy a house, work towards retirement and my wife can actually raise my kid while volunteering in the community.

      On the up side of rural living, I have a few mile commute with no traffic, no smog, the people are actually friendly and unlike the big city, I know well and like all my neighbors. On the down side, the shopping options blow and there's nothing to do anywhere close (hence, we spend little money). For me, the semi (but not full out living off the land) return to nature has also helped immensely with my stress level and overall health.

      Three years now and this has worked out well thus far for us.

    4. Re:Take the red pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't talk about dependents or medical insurance. If your outgoings are $600/month, you don't appear to have any medical cover.

    5. Re:Take the red pill by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      But is it that ridiculous? The guy is living in fear of losing his job, and the fact that he is hating the office politics means that he is not cut out for management.

      Fuck me. If he is the only breadwinner in the family they should damn well do what they are told and bathe in the creek if that is what is required. Or get some gumption and get work for themselves.

      He is 40 and doesn't own his own home, despite working as a white collar worker his whole life. Let's face it, unless he changes his life path it is not looking too rosy is it?

      I have worked in IT my whole life and am approaching 50 with an expensive divorce behind me. I have land and a house in the country and am working to be able to get the fuck out of society within ten years. It seems like the only sensible thing to me.

    6. Re:Take the red pill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also 39 here. corny matrix reference makes you sound like you've only been "awake" about a year or three and still have a "honeymoon feeling", however I can relate. I did it seven years ago, so in my opinion you're still walking the path even if you sound a bit new (NEO=new, haha get it?).

      Anyway, as long as you still think of your old age, then you're doing okay and will be a welcome addition to ZION. Just kidding, best of luck, but don't expect utopia, hope you're strong, and plan for yourself.

    7. Re:Take the red pill by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      See... I could look at what you did two completely different ways, though.

      1. I could agree with you completely, acknowledging the concept that you finally "made something of your life" by eliminating your debts, buying some land of your own, and building your own house by yourself.

      OR ...

      2. I could view such actions as little more than one man's way to rationalize away the fact he was just burnt out on working a 9-5, Mon-Fri type job for someone else. I mean, quite a few people you'd ask would say they'd much rather be in a position to pay someone ELSE to build their home for them, than resorting to putting it up, stick by stick, themselves....

      Truth is? I think it can go either way, because each individual has to decide for him/herself what they want to do with their life, and what they hope to get out of it. And sure, nobody wants to work until they're "old and used up" (well, almost nobody -- though you can probably find exceptions even there, with people who really define themselves by the work they do each day). But I know I've done both the "employee" and the "small business owner" thing. Both have their advantages, but for me? Owning my own business is less desirable to me, these days, than the idea of a steady job I'm paid adequately for. The problem with business ownership is you really have no security. It's ALL on you, the business owner, to make it work - so you wind up with your business encroaching pretty heavily on your "free/spare time" when things aren't going so smoothly with it. Meanwhile, the more successful you get and the more people you start hiring to work for you, the more govt. starts breathing down your back with taxes and regulations, etc. etc. And to me, that's really *not* my idea of freedom.

    8. Re:Take the red pill by BigSes · · Score: 1

      OK nice job Jeremiah Johnson but OP has a wife and kids. I doubt they'd be that keen on living in a log cabin and bathing in the creek. Many people (well men with families) would willingly do a boring job of drudgery for 25 years if they could thereby guarantee economic security for their family.

      You know, still bothers me that people always mention "men" doing this, I can't wait for the day more women do it. I would love to be a stay at home dad!

    9. Re:Take the red pill by maitas · · Score: 1

      Love your post.

  80. Whatever you do by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, do not go looking up the receptionists address in the records, so you can send her flowers when she's having a bad day. Also, make sure medicare covers a second opinion. You don't want to be diagnosed with a brain tumor that you don't have.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  81. Since '63 huh. by CountBrass · · Score: 1

    So let's assume he started managing at 20, probably older than that but let's say that. So he was born in ~1943. Let's say 'recently' means within the last 5 years, again generous I know, so 2007. That would make him 67.

    I love the smell of bullshit in the morning.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  82. Not everyone is cut out to be a Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are happy cutting code then stay where you are.
    Not every programmer makes a good manager. The psycological makeup of a manager is different to that of a coder.
    Many of my worst managers (I retire in a few years) were pretty good coders.
    Several have given up the management rat-race and returned to developement roles just to keep themselves sane and have some family life.

    I have never wanted to be a manager. I know my limitations.
    In my current role, I cut code but I also do a lot of detailed specification work. I'm off to Brazil for two months soon to write the detailed specs to a large system. I'm taking the wife with me. Rio even in winter is a pretty nice place to work.

    1. Re:Not everyone is cut out to be a Manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rio even in winter is a pretty nice place to work.

      Well, apart from the fact that it's in fucking Brazil.

  83. As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had similar concerns and this is what I did, and how it turned out.
    [Sorry this is so long, but I spent way too much time making it this short.]

    At about your age I was facing the prospect of going the management route or doing what I loved. I had been acting like a manger as a team lead but avoiding much of the messy side of dealing with personel. I was expected to move on up and take on the added burdens of full management and give up the hands-on fun (for me) stuff. Didn't want it, yet I saw what happened to 50 year olds who didn't move up. I didn't want that either. So, I planned an exit strategy, and left becoming more or less a consultant. I had an incorporated company(very important to be an employee of a company - not a freelancer) already set up and 6 months of cash put away before I left.

    Here are a few key things that worked for me. They weren't really part of my strategy, but just came naturally, and really paid off.
    (1) I really cared about the folks (mostly 10 to 15 years younger) I was leaving behind, and I wanted them to succeed after I left. I made it a point to mentor them, so they could survive after I left.
    (2) I really cared about the organization and the current projects I was working on, and delayed my departure for a year, to make sure they succeeded and there was a heir apparent team lead to take over.
    (3) I didn't tell anyone what I was planning, other than my wife, my dad (who had just retired) and a close uncle.
    (4) When I was ready to leave, I went to my boss, and told him I would like to sit down with his boss and anyone else that they wanted to invite and explain exactly why I was leaving, what I intended to do after I left, and make sure that any rumors would be put to bed about why I was leaving. I reviewed everything I would say with my boss, and asked for any suggestions he had that might make what I said as painless as possible for him and his boss.
    (5) The main points of that meeting were (1)(2) and (3) and I wanted them to know what I planned, before my peers and team members found out, so they could prepare to deal with any fallout.
    (6) I also offered that I would stay up to 6 more months to help finish or transition projects, or I was prepared to be escorted by security on the spot to clean out my desk (which was official human resources policy at my previous job).
    (7) The last and maybe most important point I tried to make in this meeting was that I was hoping not to burn any bridges, because they, the organization, the bosses, the team members helped make my career, and I didn't want them thinking bad about me, because who knows, they might even need me from time to time as a consultant. I told them that, I wasn't just thinking about it.

    Now frankly, I figured I had a 50-50 shot of being shown the door immediately or worse. They probably thought I was a bit crazy leaving excellent pay and benefits for an uncertain future, but seemed to respect the approach I was taking.

    Bottom line - they asked me to stay on for 6 more months and gave me a great send off complete with memorabilia. 6 months after that I was their consultant and they started outsourcing some development tasks, and now 12-1/2 years later, I still do work for them. Most of my income comes from other sources, but they are a dependable customer and the people I left behind have brought me a lot of business through their natural networking. My house is paid for, both my kids went to college, for as long as they wanted, and are doing very well in their chosen professions. I'm able to give away a substantial portion of my income to benefit those less who are less fortunate. So at least to this point it as worked out well by any measure.

    One last part but not the least part of this story - (I'm pretty sure this will get mod'ed down because it cuts so much against the grain), I prayed this whole thing through, before during and after. I 'knew' this was the right thing for me to do and there was a right way to do it.
    Full disclosure: Yes I'm one of those. In

    1. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To put a different spin on your "last but not least" part, having faith doesn't always mean 'Jesus Freak'. One can have faith in many things. Personally I take comfort having faith in myself and that the universe will unfold as it should.

    2. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Vexler · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much for sharing your life story here. I turn 39 in a few months and have been doing sys/net admin for better part of the last 12 years, and now am sorting out what my next step is. I enrolled in a part-time Master's program in CS at a major local university and expect to graduate sometime next year, and I am giving serious thoughts about going for a doctoral program in either CS or bioinformatics after that. Eventually I hope to get into either information security research or computational biology research. (Disclosure: I have a B.A. in biology and it's been very helpful to explore that possible career. The fact that I am a Christian also reminds me that God will direct my path ultimately as He is the author and perfecter of my faith.)

      I am of the opinion that I must do what I love, and love what I do. I am not getting out of IT because it's boring - I am actually a technophile. I am moving on to something else because it is more challenging and a higher mountain to climb, but also potentially more rewarding to me. This does not mean I don't experience doubts or fear, but it does clarify the direction for me. In general, I do love what I do and I hope I get to continue doing that until the day I die.

    3. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Satan really wanted your consulting business to be a success! Praise Satan!

    4. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 2

      Great to hear a success story. And it is very sage advice to ALWAYS leave on good terms regardless of the circumstances. A word of caution though. This path probably only works for natural networkers, or at least people who are able to also work as salespeople.

      If you run your own businsess, whatever it is, you have to be a salesperson unless you hire one.

      For the record I am not. In fact I rarely remember peoples names, and don't really care either way.

    5. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it wasn't the faith in myself that mattered.

      You had faith in yourself that you could walk off into the unknown. Give yourself that much credit, at least, before invoking the unknowable.

    6. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      You are welcome and thanks for the feedback. It sounds like you are approaching the possibilities the right way.

    7. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. I think it might be much easier for a natural salesperson (I'm not.). I hadn't thought about myself being a natural networker. There may be some truth to that. I was and continue to be blessed by people who have a persuasive voice (maybe the natural salespeople types) to put my name in the hat for projects they find out about. I rarely look for work, because they are out there selling for me. They are good people doing good things for me because it is in their nature, not because they will see any reward. (Not in this life anyway.)

      Another thing that helps is being or having someone who has a passion for sending out invoices, and following up to get them paid. This I have had to hire others to do, and even instruct them to stay on my case until I provide them the information they need to get the job done. Most recently my wife has taken on this role, she's the best yet, because she isn't the least bit intimidated by me. :-) Sending out invoices early and often makes a big difference to the cash flow, the life blood of any business.

    8. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can agree with the first part from a financial stand point. Satan and I have at times wanted to be much more successful. But it is my belief that God has intervened and killed some plans that may have been great financially, but stood a good chance of making me unsuccessful where it really matters. So I'll praise God for my success and lack of success so long as it comes from Him.

      Thanks for the comment. It was funny and a concise statement of a life lesson I think.

    9. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the kind words. I did have faith in myself, that as you said, I could walk off into the unknown. For me, alone it would be quite an adventure. For me, living out of my car would not be a very big deal, I've slept in worse places. But I did not have enough faith in myself to step out in the unknown and drag my family with me. So, one of the things I prayed about was that my wife in particular, would get the same vision and I wouldn't be dragging her along. That was one of the confirmations to me that God was involved. Nothing I could have said or done would have ever convinced her to get on board, so I didn't try.

      I don't find God unknowable. You know He has had quite a few books written about Him, right. :-) Through the Bible He has actually revealed quite a lot about himself. In fact much more than most people want to know. They know a little, and they don't like where that little bit knowledge is headed. Introspection, seeing themselves for who they truly are, and where their future is headed not pleasant for many people. That is where Jesus comes in. He brings people to God under conditions that both people and God can live with.

    10. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Very true. I wouldn't cross a bridge unless I had faith in it that it would hold me up. People put their faith in different things all the time, including themselves, usually with good results, but also many times irrationally leading to disaster. (Driving while intoxicated as an example.) And most people I meet think faith in Jesus falls into that category, it doesn't hurt most of the time to have faith in some of his teachings, but under certain circumstances or situations, plain stupid.

      But many rational people, including agnostics, atheists and others from various religious backgrounds, come to the conclusion that putting one's faith in the claims and promises of Jesus, is a logical thing to do after some investigation.

      If you value your software as I do, (your soul in Bible terms) it is very rational to look seriously at how it might be protected, and not assume that people who claim there is no hope, that all biologically hosted software must die, are the rational ones. But that is what most people do. They assume there is no hope, and decide not to think about it. They have faith that they are doomed, and will not investigate the claims that there is hope. I recommend "The Case for Jesus" written by an investigative reporter and former atheist (or agnostic I forget which) for people interested.

      Thanks for the thoughtful comment.

    11. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Actually it probably helps when networking to stay in the same place. I have lived in 36 different places (across 7 different major cities in the UK and Australia) in my life, across many different cities. As I said, it doesn't bother me whether I have a network or not, which is probably why I have been happy to live in 36 different places.

      I do invoices for both me and the missus. She is far to cavalier for my liking, despite having an obsessively detailed technical job :o).

    12. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by cogrick2 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this honest, positive, gutsy post.

    13. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the encouragement. I am surprised and grateful it survived the sometimes heavy hand of the moderators.

    14. Re:As someone who was 40 and is now 54... by boley1 · · Score: 1

      Or then again, maybe you are just casting a wide net. :) A counter intuitive example comes to mind of someone who moves around a lot (though not as much as you.) He is the best networker I know. My son is making a good living in the TV/Movie business, working his way up from skate videos to a steady job on a popular long running show. (Has also worked on a couple of feature films, and actually turned down a gig on the Academy Awards.) Sorry proud dad syndrome. You would think he built his network in LA, but actually only passed through a couple of times. It was the contacts he made in New Orleans, Denver, Jackson (MS) and now Northern CA, that helped his career. Not exactly the centers of the industry. Maybe being a colorful fish in one or a number of small ponds, beats staying in one place if there is lots of competition. (Sorry for the mixed metaphors.)

      But I think in general I agree with you. I stayed in one place, and I'm definitely in a small pond, so maybe it takes a lot of the work or tension (if you are aware of it) out of networking.

      I hope the missus appreciates you (for handling the invoices). I love delegating that worry.

  84. 25 long years? by kwerle · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that if you're describing the rest of your career as "25 long years" that you're doing something really wrong. But you and I have made some really different life choices. Me: no degree (dropped out), 2nd house, no kids. But we're both senior developers.

    My last job got insourced (h1b's), which was the right thing for them to do - the work was crap and dull and generic - not much need for clever coding. So it was time to move on to something more interesting. But that's what I've done for the past decade or so - new job every 2-4 years, mostly leaving on very good terms and mostly enjoying the new job.

    But I like coding. I really like it. I've disappointed previous employers when I told them I would in no way consider doing management. Tech lead is fine, but management is right out. I don't have the temperament, interest, or training. Do you?

    Why would you consider keeping with programming? Why would you want to manage at a place where the politics sucks?

    It seems to me that you really have two decisions to make:
    What do you really want to do?
    Where do you really want to do it?

    My advice is that you probably should not keep doing what you're doing. 25 years is a long time to do something you don't enjoy. And certainly you should leave your current workplace.

  85. Ageism by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Several studies have shown that the peak years for sexual enjoyment in women is the range 36-44. I won't bore you with the details except to note that experience bears this out.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Ageism by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      Just because she is enjoying it does not mean that she is a hottie.

    2. Re:Ageism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several studies have shown that the peak years for sexual enjoyment in women is the range 36-44. I won't bore you with the details except to note that experience bears this out.

      Uh huh, yeah, tell me another one. I'm sure glad my relationship bucks that trend. /sarcasm

  86. Re:Easy by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

    MY MOM!!!!

    --
    "That's right...I said it."
  87. I did that at 36... by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By the time I was 40 I had grown up, and I hope you do too. Knowing what I now know, I wouldn't hire you, because your driven lifestyle makes you likely to miss the big picture ("obsess over every little mistake" - no, you need to get a sense of proportion to fix large code bases), and you want a team of people like you (overly narrow focus). Fine, no doubt, if you want to design HFT systems, but not so good when a variety of real world problems with different priorities are flooding in all the time and a balanced, rational approach is needed to manage the workload and stay sane.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:I did that at 36... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was talking about learning new things. That is an effective way to do so. If you did grow out of learning things, I wouldn't hire you.

  88. You're right by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2
    Plumbing in the Roman world made their cities inhabitable by bringing in adequate drinking water and draining away sewage. The problems of the plague in London were solved by Bazalgette's sewage system, water purification plants and piped water.

    Another thing: there are plenty of plumbers but not that many intelligent plumbers. The same goes for electricians. A plumber with IT qualifications will normally have the business and topological skills to do the job better and for less than a plumber without, and before long will be contracting those plumbers to work under his direction.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  89. Determine your value by eulernet · · Score: 1

    You just reached at your mid-life, so these questions appear.

    You must first determine what is your value in your work.
    What are you doing that nobody else can do in your company ?
    This is your real value !

    Ask around you what people think of you by holding them an anonymous questionnaire, where you ask them what is the biggest point they like about you, and all the points they dislike.

    Ask feedback whenever possible, it's difficult to know what we are, only others know it.

    In my case, I had to quit game programming at 38, after 18 years of games.
    I'm now working in a start-up since 9 years, my life is more stable, and I've finished paying my house.
    I'm now 47, and want to evolve even more, so I communicate a lot, and try to improve my relationships with people.

    Good luck !

  90. Re:Easy by pinkushun · · Score: 0

    This is why we browse at +1, proof that the moderation system is in fact not flawed, if only to catch comments from idiots like you.

  91. go to lots of interviews by Alan-Brazil · · Score: 1

    I would suggest you go to lots of interviews... You actually learn a lot in them. I myself did the same a few months ago. I had worked in one job for a number of years, and considered myself up to date with the latest trends. After a few interviews, I noticed how outdated I was. I had absolutely no ideas about a few technologies they would mention. So I decided to catch up, every time I they asked me something I didn't know or saw it in a job ad, I would research the technology for a few days, play with it, and add to my CV (with a low level of competency, I don't like having a dishonest CV). I learned a lot not only in terms of technology, but also best practices like SOLID principles, TDD and BDD, etc... The result was amazing: from my last 3 interviews, I got 3 job offers ! So use interviews as a tool to find out what you need to learn and measure if you are good enough or not. I myself plan to go to interviews at least once a year, even if I don't plan to change jobs, just so I keep contact with the market. The best financial security a person like you can have is having the skills the market demands at all times.

  92. Do not buy a house by codepunk · · Score: 1

    Contracting is the way to go if you have a vast skill set to draw from. Buying a house completely limits your job market. I sold mine and have been contracting every since and I am older than you are.

    When it comes time to jump on a new gig I am not geographically limited, I just pack my shit and roll to where the cash is.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Do not buy a house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh c'mon. This sniveling guy doesn't have the balls to be a contractor.
      He's lifer driftwood.

        Contractors can still have a house, so long as its near (30 mi or less) a bustling tech city.

    2. Re:Do not buy a house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's lifer driftwood."

      fuck yourself

    3. Re:Do not buy a house by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      I would have thought a depressed market is exactly the time to buy a house. Can always rent it out if he has to move.

      And it is not so easy to "roll where the cash is" when you have a family and schooling to consider.

  93. age shouldnt be a barrier by tb1tre · · Score: 1

    only go down the management route if its something you are good at, expect a pay cut at first teer management if you want to stay technical then update your cv, make sure your techinal skills are upto date and get some interviews (think of the first few interviews as practice, dont be put off by rejection)
    most of all, be proactive, it does not hurt to look around, just because you have an interview doesnt mean you have to take the job, and if you know you can get another job it makes you negotiations at your current employerthat much stronger.
    Also the advice about getting into some of the trickier problems was a good one, your less likly to be laid off if your noticedand known to be helpful
    being 40 should not be an issue if your good at your job, keep your skills upto date and remain flexible

    1. Re:age shouldnt be a barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At age 40, you are actually a professional. Just 6 years before, you were just a semi-pro. Computers and Software are incredibly hard and need lots of experience. So his opportunities should be great, OUTSIDE management.

    2. Re:age shouldnt be a barrier by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't, but it is. I have been turned down for roles due to age (I am nearing 50) even though I am quite happy to move cities and technologies, and love new tech etc. We all get tarred with the same brush it would seem, even if my KDR on BF3 is better than yours and I can pull an all-nighter coding my latest game or simulation.

  94. move beyond hunger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hunger is the strategy of the unfulfilled, the novice, the passionate and young. Those who have energy to burn and few other commitments. Most people who see themselves that way cannot conceive of working any other way. It would feel like a kind if death, or sell out to them.

    This is not to say you can't be passionate as an older, more experienced worker, but you have to target it. You have other things, aka, a life, to focus on.

    I speak as someone bridging that gap over the last 5 years or so. I'm 44, with a 3 year old son. I still care, but you wont find me up at 4am sharpening my mad skillz. its different for everyone. For me, I try to apply my experience of building great (and bad) software to our team. I specialised in software security and cryptography. I try to widen the scope of my young, passionate colleagues.

  95. Its harder that it sounds by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

    After leaving University in 1997 I was employed for 10 years before finally being forced to take a sabbatical due to workplace bullying damaging my mental health. I took the time out to write a book, and the success of that one has prompted me to write a second one, which is due out soon.
    It wasn't my planned career goal. I have been trying for many years now to re-enter the workplace and I would be willing to do anything, from data input to development to straightforward admin; and most people won't even look at my CV - perhaps because I have reached that magic age (40) where long-term unemployment becomes an inevitability. I hardly ever receive an acknowledgement for my CV, but have noticed some small recognition after someone suggested that I write a more conversational resume to make it stand out. I try to maintain an active interest in the latest technology and often indulge in small projects to keep my programming edge, but beggers truly can't be choosers, and I'd settle for any employment.
    Because I left my last job, I get no Job Seekers Allowance, and we get a token £5 reduction in our £100+ council tax. Also because my wife works we get little support from anyone - even though, despite working for a major multinational bank and is the recognised top performing employee for this region, she gets paid peanuts.
    I have written to every benefits agency I can think of, and have even tried my MP (Andrew Lansley) but they won't/can't help. Its almost as if the Government is happy to take money off people but when it comes to dispensing support they all turn their backs.
    I am overwhelmed with guilt as my parents, both pensioners, help us with our rent each month to the tune of £500 (our rent is £700, we can't afford to move or put our stuff into storage so we're in a no-win situation); all we get is £100 in benefits and we make up the balance meaning that we often go to bed hungry.
    So good luck to anyone who thinks we live in a society that cares for its down-trodden citizens. Once you're on the road to penury there is little chance of escape.

    1. Re:Its harder that it sounds by BigBadBus · · Score: 1

      In case anyone asks, the "success" of my book venture was relative; it kept my mind active, people liked it, but it certainly hasn't paid for itself. I did it because the only other option was to get despondent and then find recourse in the unthinkable.

  96. Re:Easy by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

    You wont have to burn the place down if you dont mess up any mundane details.

    Mundane details like the fact that banks have extreme levels of protection regarding things like this?

  97. Crap advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No one ever got fired for buying from IBM" was only true until people started getting fired for buying from IBM.

    Enjoy your Zune.

  98. Leverage the accumulated wisdom differently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know anyone who programs as a full time job at 60. And you want to work until 65, right? Start turning your career into project management, program management or software engineering management. Leverage all of that technical know how and years of accumulated wisdom into managing teams and keeping projects running well. There's no shame in that and you can make those around you better and continue to deliver value to the business and your customers.

    Along with that, stay current on the newest technologies, processes, methodologies and tools.

  99. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1- Be part of the 1% by following step 2;

    2- ??? (keep trying till you succeed.)

    3- employ yourself, set your salary and bonuses at the expensive of cheap labor, because worker rights are a threat to your now rich and useless redundant existence, enjoying your new social status by traveling from golf courses to one of your mansions getting high enjoying the company of your family, and your wife's when the kids aren't around :)

    4- Sometimes you'll have to do some quick work, such as signing some checks and papers to bribe..eerr create cheap and vulnerable jobs at some local needed politican to keep business flowing, nothing hard or complicated so don't worry. And you could even get a tax break!

    5- Profit!

    Yes i have nothing usefull to contribute. But really, neither did any of you. None of these advices will help/change the outcome of his employment, whatever that may be.

  100. Insurance Salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would be well served to come to work for Met Life as an Insurance Salesperson. WIth your level of knowledge and skills sets AND contacts, you could do very well for yourself and 'hit the ground running' See two articles in WSJ: "A Hot Job for Hard Times: The Insurance Salesperson". There is another article in WSJ about how a number of Ivy Leaguers are doing the same thing, even though neither them or their faimilies ever anticiptaed it. WIth their contacts, they will do very well for themselves .

  101. You need dirt... by clickety6 · · Score: 0

    If you want job security you need dirt and lots of it. Invest some cash in hiring a crooked PI to follow your higher management and get plenty of incriminating photos. Maybe arrange for a few. At your next appraisal, casually drop a few key words into the conversation to let them know what you have. "I hope you like my submission. As a team leader, I am a strict disciplinarian and can work to a punishing schedule. I know all about stocks and bonds.", etc. Job for life...

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  102. A management qualification gives you options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people think that an MBA will make them rich and is the inside track to success and MBAs got a bad rap because of that.

    However any management qualifications gives you additional options. Also shop around. My company would not pay for a MBA but they were willing to put up 50% towards an management degree from an engineering school. Management degree from the engineering school cost 30% of the MBA but covers 75% of the same material.

    1. Re:A management qualification gives you options by Dun+Kick+The+Noob · · Score: 1

      Hi Unknown Lamer

      Hope you steer clear of retrenchment,
      I don't know much but this I know
      MBAs are valuable for a very short time and in the case of switching careers, they get you the first step and you need to justify
      I have a pretty good MBA and I'm jobless and have been so for past 7 years.
      In fact the MBA will scare of employers because of three things
      1. you become a flight risk
      2. The hiring decision lies with the direct sup, and if he or she thinks u are a threat , you are not getting the job
      3. Everyone's got an MBA

      And its okay if you disclose here(i guess) but never disclose to your colleagues you are pursuing, i made that mistake and Im pretty sure it contributed to my retrenchment.
      The excuse given my manager was someone had to go it was me, he gave another to my retained colleagues, while im not the most brilliant engineer I was pretty decent and was extremely underpaid for my company and industry and was very late for my promotion(i was already put up by my sup). Looking back i feel i would have cashiered me as well. Thats politics

      As for pursuing mba for career switch, remeber the job search actually starts on the first day. The first few weeks in the course are critical, if you dont get job interviews you are done. Quite frankly the world is filled with IT personnel doing MBAs. If career cutting is your objective you are better off trying for temp entry positions and asking around what to do to get perm jobs.

      Ive started my business not because I want to but I HAVE to. Very few people want to employ a 30+ engineer specializing in linux systems. Be prepared its a long hard slog and Im not sure it will survive. Dont forget customers see your size and your situation, they may not pay. you cant sue because you got no money plus its bad for the company to sue anyone. Its very dangerous in your case as you dont have a house. Add to that income is not regular, you will be loaded with worries about making ends meet and I feel im a bit too old to be in a startup much less trying to start one. Ive switched from services to products and am currently trying to figure out which one to purse. Your life will also change, expect fast food, because its the most convenient and the cheapest and fastest and believe me you will need all the comfort food you can get.

      The search for jobs is hard, probably harder here than where you are. Theres always someone younger and someone more suited for the job. And basically older is always less attractive, its not right but it is what it is.

      My advice do side income, start building your biz, do open source, that way you can release and build user base but keep searching and give the MBA a pass.
      My father did one job his entire life, Im trying to find my 4th, there is no such thing as staying with a company, build your job searching skills, i stopped searching 5 years ago and am pretty bad, the previous comments on cvs do matter, get as many hr friends you know to look at your cv
      If you feel threatened you probably are and don't forget when silly season hits everyone looks out for themselves. If your pay is not the cheapest you are a target , cos salary budgets are cut, if you are more advanced in years, you are a target, because nobody wants to stick their neck to justify experience.

      Good luck

    2. Re:A management qualification gives you options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, it seems you are doing something wrong. Linux definitely is on the rise as more and more companies/institutions come to the same conclusions as Google and Facebook.
      Maybe you are at the wrong place ? Maybe you don't have a compelling sales message ? (Can you quickly and easily explain why they should do Linux instead of Windows ??)

  103. Re:Easy by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Obligatory:

    Joke: --------->
    O
    / | \
    / \

    ^You

    And since I suck at ascii art, you are falling apart.

  104. Red Stapler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and be possessive of it.

  105. Being employable is easy by danzvash · · Score: 1

    Dude. You're a senior software engineer. You already have some of the most employable skills on the planet. If you're worrying about job security, you're not trying hard enough.

    How to stay employable?
    Keep abreast of new stuff: new language developments, new development concepts, new methodologies. (flippant examples: Groovy / Scala / NoSQL / Hadoop )
    Learn Agile/Scrum if you haven't already.

    Take up contracting, and get some interesting work in a different field. Try telecoms or media or something - just break away from financial for a bit.

    You should be thinking of graduating to a senior architect level, which will still require technical involvement but with project management expertise.
    You will have no need to worry about being jobless. Be brave!

  106. I retired at age 43 from SW Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At age 43, I retired.

    I was a software developer and never "made it big." I simply lived below my means and was paid above average salaries the last decade. Prior to that, I was paid below average rates. BTW. the house was paid off at age 38.

    If you aren't almost read to retire by age 45 (financially speaking), then you are doing it all wrong. Grow up. Make the hard decisions. LIVE BELOW YOUR MEANS.

    I'm not super wealthy and don't jet off around the world all the time, but I do travel. Did 5 countries of Europe for a few weeks each this year. I've done Asia, South America and Central America in this way too.

    Since most people can't act like adults and manage their money, they need to plan to work until they are 67.

    For SW developers, the only way to ensure that is to stop working for someone else. You need your own company.
    * You should have been building industry contacts all this time based on a stellar reputation at work.
    * You should have been ignoring those non-compete clause contracts from you current employer and been working on a few products at home all this time.
    * You should have been teaching your wife to spend less. After all, exactly what is the use for all those shoes and jewelry? You can't eat them and the market for resale is terrible.
    * With an excellent product nearly ready for sale, quite your job, contact possible clients, and get a few sales. Be certain you set the price to bring in $200K+ yr. 40% goes to taxes - I use 50% for estimating, since there are always "other" expenses.

    Act like an adult the next 20 yrs, save some money, learn to invest in companies stock (not trading), and get ready for a fun time.

  107. Re:5-6 years in one role? Really? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    I interview ALL THE TIME. I have my resume out there ALL THE TIME, even if I like the job I'm in.

    Why? Is money the most important thing in your life?

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  108. also 40, and some things I do to keep it real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am also 40 years old, though most of my career has been in IT and not coding, a few simple things that I do to keep me on the bleeding edge and upwardly employed. FWIW: NO degree, 2 IPO, 10 start ups, 1 patent, and a small family....

    1. Read: get in the good habit of reading something new and related to your area for _at_least_ an hour every day. I am not talking slashdork but white papers, RFCs, other people's code. Learn as much as you can, you don't need a school to do that. Though use the net and avoid books, more often than not the material that hits pulp is damn near obsolete by the time it lands on the shelves of your local book seller.

    2. Experiment and always have something going on the side: I keep a small lab at home, where I code, build, and test out new business ideas, sometimes I turn them up for public use, and more often I sell them outright to people who think they can make money with them. Most often the experiments and ideas go nowhere, but every hour I put into it becomes real resume material and ultimately lands me contracts.

    3. Skip the MBA, and think about alternatives. Perhaps a second BS/BA in something entirely different, something that interests you. Roughly 5% of the MBA I know and have worked with had any sort of technical clue. Most of those had more business sense than technical knowledge. The key is to differentiate yourself from the herd. If you can manage a MBA while constantly improving your technical acumen, then go for it, however, there are an awful large number of unemployed MBA out there.

    4. Consider porting your skills to a less risky enterprise. I got my start consulting and in the early-90s went into IT/NetworkOps for start-ups at the beginning of the bubble. Years later I find myself much more risk aware and less willing to work for stock options, I am again working in consulting, providing my technical knowledge and skill to the highest bidder.

    5. Look before you leap, just because there is a downturn now (hello bubbles of 2001 and 2008) absolutely does not mean that there will not be an uptick in a year or two. During the most recent downturn I spent a year working as a carpenter for the change of pace while i continued working in my lab. I got to see the world with fresh eyes, and got a decent paycheck and work out while building beautiful things and improving my skills in other areas.

    TLDR; exercise caution, keep on practicing and studying, focus on the future doing something you care for, and spend time with your family. For the only things that really matter are the connections we have with those we love, and that we spent our lives doing something that meet our needs. In your old age how much money you made will be the least important of things.

  109. Some thoughts by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    1. Being an independent is t ough - you'll spend a lot of. Ike looking for jobs so you rate needs to cover that. You could sign on with a body shop that provides staff but then hey need to take a cut and will want to beat down your rate. insurance - get your spouse to take a job that offers it. At 40, buying it on your own is expensive. If you do go the independent route, join local orbs with independents and hang out for a year to get a feel for what it takes. 2. That is your best play. Beef up that skill with your current employer so if you do get laid off you can offer an array of skills. You might consider going with an implementation consulting firm that can hire programmers cheap but need good project managers. 3.An MBA can be a good career changer. If you go that route, do night school and get your employees to help foot the bill if the will. Go to the best school you can- if your in NYC, Stern or Columbia. Philly? Wharton. Chigaco - UC or NW. San Francisco - Cal. Atlanta - Emory or possibly GaTech At your age, the job hunt will be harder and you need a name brand to help you out. It can be very rewarding, though, with a combo of MBA/tech background. Don't think about staying in finance - most firms will not think your experience is in finance but IT. Consulting firms are your best bet, along with traditional firms. I'd also consider a government job. While they are suffering from pay freezes, the benefits are good, pay is decent and the retirement is pretty darn good.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  110. Oh-Hoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your model world there will only exist crap software, as there are no experienced software engineers around to make it. That model might correctly describe *some* places, but certainly not all. Just look at all the semi-pensioners who work for Google. Do you think they are employed for charitable reasons ?

    No, but because they are real experts at creating nice, efficient and well-working systems. Good people are valued irrespective of age, but you might have to quite the crap corporation you are currently with and look for a better one. But then, you can develop software until age 79, when Alzheimer's begins to start or your heart craps out.

  111. rose colored glasses, $1.00 each! by decora · · Score: 1

    "the most employable skills on the planet" lulz

    1. Re:rose colored glasses, $1.00 each! by danzvash · · Score: 1

      "the most employable skills on the planet" lulz

      Besides hilarity, what's your point?

      Do you care to give an example of a general professional discipline which is significantly more "employable" than software engineering? I'll wait while you prepare a list.

      Seriously. I'm a 35 year old software engineer. After university, I worked as a permanent employee for a few years in a couple of different software companies. Then I moved onto contracting in the financial sector - greater cash reward, and the work was just as good. I've built up experience in contracting in a few different sectors, doing a mixture of development and infrastructure engineering.

      I can take a break for a few months travelling, come back to town - and it takes me about 24-72 hours to find a new contract job. To actually review the market, interview for my chosen handful of positions, receive an offer and accept it. An interesting job that pays good daily cash.
      And I'm a good engineer, but I know I'm not the best.

      So, I say again - if you're a software engineer, and you're struggling to find work, you're not trying hard enough.

      So try harder.
      (Oh, and do contracting; learn new technologies like I said; and aim at senior technical roles like architecting.)

  112. you see all those peons using your systems? by decora · · Score: 2

    ever notice how they stay in the same jobs for 10 years, maybe 20? while managers, consultants, experts, systems analysts, etc, get layed off repeatedly?

    go be a peon.

    not joking. you can still get layed off, its just that they will always need someone to repeatedly do boring ass work shuffling stuff from one place to another.

  113. Job Opportunities by tango123 · · Score: 1

    I am over 40 years old and the best thing I have done in regard to my career is to get a Top Secret Clearance. In my search for employment I found a few companies who are willing to hire people contingent upon getting a TS clearance. If you record is clear, it is a very good opportunity. Having a TS with a background in software development means that I can easily earn over 150K a year, have a 4 week paid vacation, plus health benefits. Plus at any time I can give my notice because a) There are many developer position open that require a TS b) If you have C++ and java skills you are in high demand. c) Cyber security is hot and will remain hot. If you can get a career in that field you will be in demand for the next decade. Location does make a difference. Most TS jobs are in Northern VA, DC and Maryland. But there are other places such as Huntsville, AL, Atlanta GA. Just look around and see if any companies such as SAIC, CSC, Boeing, Northrup, Lockhead Martin are offering to get you a TS clearance. Remember to apply in areas like Cyber Security which will always remain hot.

    1. Re:Job Opportunities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't just "get" a top secret clearance (or even a secret level clearance, for that matter). You have to have a job that requires it. And after you are no longer in a position that needs it, you lose it (secret you lose after a year, not sure about Top).

  114. Re:Easy by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    that's what grid hedging scalper robots do on the foreign exchange market.

    I have no idea what that means, but it sounds cool.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  115. a plumber can be underemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It can't be outsourced, and have you ever heard of an unemployed plumber?

    The only 40-something American-born plumber I know is underemployed. Much of the work he used to get has been outsourced to illegal immigrants who get hired for cheap as shit pay because they are untrained, unskilled, young and illegal.

    Tradespeople have the same problems that IT workers do except that their pay didn't get as high first.

  116. How to stay employable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get any older; if possible, get younger.

  117. 'my spouse does not work' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Well there's a big part of the problem right there. Maybe her free ride needs to end.

    1. Re:'my spouse does not work' by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Check the price of child care before making such a statement.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    2. Re:'my spouse does not work' by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      then don't have children. you know who has children? poor people from poor countries.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  118. Give up now.. seriously.... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    "Considering medicare does not kick in till 65, I am still looking at 25 long years of career. I am wondering what the best way would be for me to stay employable in the coming years?"

    good luck with your life.. is that the extent of your retirement planning???? and you don't have a house or at least down money socked away yet? from the math I'm assuming you are 40... in a tech career... I'm not trying to be snarky, I don't know you or your background.. but from what few lines I've read I'm not encouraged about your situation from what little I do have. I am forming opinions based on incomplete data. But it is extremely naive sounding that you'll be done at a perfect 65

    Medicare is a failsafe that you can't count on, and even today does not provide enough for recipients to retire on from a medical standpoint.. it's just the only stopgap available.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  119. Ricgt on, brother!: easier said than done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This!

    I've been there (3) times now - started 3 businesses. I worked my ass off, was constantly trying to drum up work, and had to do all the bookkeeping on my own and other chores.

    There's noting like working 80 hours a week and then having to spend a Sunday putting together your quartilies for the IRS - and I had an accountant that helped me. And it's real fun when the IRS informs you that your forms you filed and the money they received don't match! Lot's of running around getting proof that you didn't do anything wrong - and proving the IRS made the mistake.

    The worst is the sales. Getting business. Whenever I see on the net someone saying, "Oh, Just start a business!" ; usually with a tone of superiority of 'how could you NOT have thought of such a thing!', it's perfectly obvious that they never had a business. And it only counts if you are the one driving sales - (I see often folks who have a "consuilting business" where they get a 1099 or have an S-Corp. If you have just one or two clients what you really have is a job with a different tax status.)

    There are a few that have over the years built up a contact list and can get a good start, but eventually, you'll be pounding the pavement looking for work like thaousands of others. And in anything IT related - especially WEB development and support - it is SATURATED!

    But then again, how many of us are schmoozing with decision makers? Most of us just know other geeks and how to talk to them. Can you talk to a business guy and convince him that he needs to hire your firm?

    Just start a business! Easy! Getting work is the bitch!

  120. Re:Go to a company that respects devs or go consul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh. And for the record, don't buy a fucking house. Second worst decision I ever made, IMHO. The idea that it's the smart long term financial solution for everyone is total bullshit: http://genxfinance.com/your-home-is-not-an-investment-dont-treat-it-like-one/

    The numbers in that article look entirely different if you compare them to renting. A profit of $22,000 doesn't look so bad when you compare it to paying rent every month for 10 years - -$1000 every month turns into -$120,000. I mean, you have to live somewhere, right? Think of a home as an overhead cost to be minimized. :P

  121. Switch Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody who cares know the financial industry messed up big-time. So your job might(!) be on the chopper, but I doubt they can easily do that.

    Anyway, if you have some fears, start looking at job boards for postings in all sorts of industries. Solid sysadmin and/or programming skills are appicable to many different settings. Many industries are quickly becoming data-heavy. Think of genetic engineering in the pharmaceutical industry, think diagnostics and error analysis in the automotive industry (more and more electronic control units generate a torrent of error/usage data), think of automation in mechanical factories, think of all those electronic control units in all sorts of machinery, think of genetic engineering in crop development.

    All of these activities are in some way complex and/or high-volume data processing tasks. A modern car is easily as complex as a modern PC (in terms of software), for example.

    So, do some interviews just to sound out the market. If you don't have undue self-imposed restrictions, there will be many, many opportunities out there. Your qualifications are at the leading edge of civilization and it does not matter the industry you are currently working in has messed up. Move to a different industry and see your career prosper !

  122. My advice by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    I am still looking at 25 long years of career.

    Welcome to the club :)

    I am wondering what the best way would be for me to stay employable in the coming years?"

    IMO, remain technical. Regardless of whether you move up the managerial ladder, remain technical.

    "1. Should I stay technical, and be ready to work as consultant/contractor? How does medical insurance work in that case?"

    Depends on the contracting agency. If you go completely solo (1099), it will come out of your pocket. If you go with a big contacting agency, they tend to have health plans for their contractors.

    2. Should I capitalize on the domain knowledge, and move onto business/managerial side?

    That's another possibility provided the business has room to go up.

    3. Will the MBA degree or alternate career help?

    A MBA, or MIS or Engineering Management degree certainly helps provided that you remain highly technical. By itself, such a degree does not necessarily help.

    4. Any other suggestions?

    For starters, remaining technical does not mean simply to become a contractor. You can also move to another company with your skills, for a better salary.

    Always sharpen your technical skills. Seek out what's new, and carve your own niche. If you stay in the "enterprise" realm, go for a MIS and then a MBA. If you stay/go the more engineering oriented fields, get a graduate degree.

    Also, never sell yourself before the level of senior. That is, at our age (and with the experience employers will rightfully expect from us), it is no longer appropriate to sell ourselves as just programmers. Aim for a senior/principal software engineering/architect or team lead position and climb up from there.

    The most important thing is to have a vision (your plan A and plan B and plan ...). Where do you want to be, and what you need to do (work/study) and then go for it.

    Harking back again on the technical, as seniors, we are expected to know about agility, refactoring, domain driven design, modeling, software architecture, project management, some sysadmin skills at least, and good OO and functional design skills (knowing for example *what* makes a class uncohesive for example.) That's where seniority and experience come to shine.

    The worst thing we above the 40-year old bracket is to work just as a programmer/developer. That's a function that a person at the start of his career can do as well (and for less money)... or so that's how management sees it. So being in that position is being in the danger zone.

  123. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't swallow the "old guys cannot be coders/technical experts meme". Actually, too many inexperienced people are calling themselves "experts" on all sorts of computer subjects from Linux administration to C++ development. If you really have strong technical experience, sell that as your "unique skill". Many companies now know that they cannot let some 20-somethings design and built a critical system. As a programmer, you only start to become a really good developer at age 35, so being older than many others is actually a "strong point" when you sell yourself in an interview (regardless of whether is a perm or consulting interview).

    I am a C++ developer of 38 (in the job since age 23, after getting a CS degree), and I only now feel I have solid skills. Should I switch to management now ? That would be a waste of hard-won skills, in my opinion. The free enterprise system normally does not value stupid behaviour, so wasting my skills is certainly not the right thing for me to do.

  124. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by flyneye · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the 70s careers tended to last 20+ years, in the 80s this number dropped to 6 years, The 90s came and distinctions blurred between jobs, careers, hobbies and survival. Buddy, we're 10+ years into the new millennium. Figure out what you need to do and quit looking at standard models.
    Can you work for yourself?
    Is there something you can manufacture or service you can perform without needing an overseer?
    Are members of your family old/strong enough to contribute to a family business?
    If you can quit relying on others for your prosperity, you can dump this whole useless line of worry.
    IT has been a bust for careers, compared to the promise of the 90s. We may even be forced into ludditism by coming solar storms in the next few years.
    Find a need or demand and fill it. Think outside the box. Learn self sufficiency and quit mourning money you threw at the last "career", it's gone and tomorrows challenges may not be helped by it. Dammit, you're a geek, get flexible and quit thinking about the obvious, overcrowded, overrated, overused path to a paycheck. Find something that people could pay cash for, too. If they don't know you have it, they can't tax it.
    If you really need a moment to think and a jumpstart, it may sound ridiculous on the face of it, but, join an MLM. Even if you aren't successful, you will have a low cost education in business,sales and people skills, self motivation and probably a cupboard full of vitamins. These ingredients, less the vitamins are vital to being self employed.
    Good luck with your search, may you satisfy your dreams along with your wallet.
    Keep the kids coming, that's how we achieve some immortality and offset the scumbags of the world, who are breeding too.
    Don't spend your time worrying, it can't help and will hurt. Replace worry with planning and get a good nights sleep.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  125. Some Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can assure you, other people had similar problems. Just take your time to receover (it takes some years), and then Fix Your CV. Make it short and crispy, and most importantly, don't clue them to your "outage". Call it "self-employed" and have a story ready why you want to get a "regular" job again. For example "I regularly get new contracts, but we decided to have kids now, so I want to have more income security, etc, etc"

    If you think that "lying is bad", then I feel sorry for you. The successful people in this world lie all the time; they start wars based on lies, they steal money from the public and their employers based on lies. The whole world would break down if all the little and bigger lies would have serious consequences. Just do it - it is the best for you and the employer who will get a valuable worker !

  126. Make outsourcing work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make outsourcing work!

    Honestly, if you work for a bank and can make outsourcing work, then you are golden. Make sure you learn the skills to communicate requirements, bugs and everything else to the best extend possible. Make sure you become the guy that translates between the local and remote team.

  127. Staying Engaged by SoothingMist · · Score: 1

    Questions and some discussion from my personal opinions: ... Have you enjoyed being a technical expert? If so, management will drive you crazy. You say you are concerned about your career partly because of office politics. You do not sound like you are any good at that game. "Management" today is all about power games and office politics. Knowing about business management, business development, business administration, and business execution are valuable. But, that does not mean you have to stop being an expert in your field and specializing in business execution. From that perspective I do not advise trying to "move up" by getting an MBA and trying to become a manager. ... Does your present situation limit your personal growth? As a technical expert myself, growth to me is having more and more freedom to do what needs to be done to solve increasingly difficult problems and undertake increasingly difficult applications of technology. (Technical team leadership is a part of that.) In this way, you build a reputation for results that does not depend on who you work for. Stay an employee if you like, especially if you would not like running a small business. However, keep your skills so high that you are in demand. Moving on is a risky undertaking but a professional person has to learn to manage risk. The time to move on is when you reach the peak of the wave, not when the wave is dying out. Still, do not ride the wave to the bottom. ... Have you taken the long view of your career? It is important to build your career in such a way that you have something worthwhile to write in a resume and say during an interview. This kind of thinking goes beyond job hunting and into career building. Having a job is not the same as having a career. On my website (http://informationanthology.net/CareerMentor/) are posted articles by myself and others on this topic. ... Best of luck in your efforts.

  128. the root of your problems... by hyperenator · · Score: 1

    "My family is growing, my spouse does not work, and I still don't own a house...." Well, fix that first.

  129. You are asking the question, you're halfway there by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    I am in the same boat.

    Stay current, keep you eyes open, be positive. At this point in your career you can't be pissing people off or burning bridges. Stay fit, try to look as young as possible.

    Move to DC and get a company or GS position that will sponsor you for a security clearance. Not some BS DOD Secret or Top Secret.... they vet school teachers more than that and these clearances are becoming worthless. Intel TS/SCI with a full scope poly. Employment for life as long as you keep your nose clean.

    There are far too many lame engineers who lean on the clearance to remain employed, but it is an excellent hedge against ageism.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  130. Lots of advice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well there is a lot of advice here, so even I'd struggle coming up with a definitive list of best options.

    But here is my example, that may or may not help you:

    I worked as a senior analyst and had hit my limit in terms of salary and want to continue as a senior analyst. The Company I worked for had politics coming out of the management ears, people higher up carving their own empires whilst the staff suffered.

    I am in my late 30's and needed to look either at management or improve myself. I even thought about leaving IT completely. But even though my old company had pushed me almost to the brink of hating technology IT and working in that field. I decided that what really was the problem, was I was not working for a good company, I had grown tired of worked for large or huge companies, where you were a number in IT. I didn't like being a systems analyst and looked at what skills I had to transfer to something else.

    I looked around and found a small company where they had one guy leaving who did development, local IT management of servers etc and also deal with customers on IT related issues. It was a mixed bag, some good stuff and some bad. I did a little hacking around code, but never finished any projects, purely because I had other things to be doing outside of work. I had not dealt with VOIP tech before, being the company dealt with VOIP tech, it was another string to my bow. Lastly improving my server and computer knowledge as the business progress. I replace the IT chap and I am very happy. The place does not have the corporate garbage I come to hate, politics etc. I can directly help the company to grow in terms of IT and no manager can steal my idea, telling the senior managers what they came up with. I can decide on what route to take in tech and help with expanding what we currently have. Its great and I have a chance to do development, be more sociable with the family, because I am not improving my development skills soley at home.

    So take from that what you will.

    In your shoes, start looking, but it does sound like you need to get your passion back or look for alternatives.

    Good luck!

  131. Re:Go to a company that respects devs or go consul by Yogs · · Score: 1

    >

    Oh. And for the record, don't buy a fucking house. Second worst decision I ever made, IMHO. The idea that it's the smart long term financial solution for everyone is total bullshit: http://genxfinance.com/your-home-is-not-an-investment-dont-treat-it-like-one/

    Wow, that's a terrible link. I mean, it's true that a home is not an investment by itself. But (except when the market was at it's most stupid) people don't buy homes to sit unoccupied... they buying them to live in them. So, rent savings is not a footnote, it's the primary freaking motivation. And by the way, their example is transparently stupid because it factors in inflation on money you haven't even put into the house (since in their example you used a 20% downpayment) as necessary to "break even". The math changes rather significantly without that obvious 55,000$ mistake.

    It's not for everyone, but if you're in a city with good fundamentals for employability prospects and a reasonable purchase price to rent ratio, I think it's poor to steer someone away from buying right now. Just buy something modest (like what you would rent) and it will be cheaper than rent fairly quickly... if it isn't from the start. And it's important to do so while employed full time with a regular salary so you can qualify for conforming loans and take advantage of the frankly ridiculously cheap mortgages right now.

  132. So really there are no answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So adter reading numerous posts. The answers are few and depressing. The realization that the Great Recession will likely become Depression II. Companies are about profits not loyalty. And the truth is a young single person, especially a non-social introvert can acquire more current and desirable skills than an older programmer saddled with life obligations.

    Granted there are a few twits on here that point to & blame having children, wives and what not. They provide a third option. They offer good justification for shooting their dub @ss and getting free room and board for life.

  133. Stay informed by realsilly · · Score: 1

    Age discrimination will hurt you. Your increasing wage needs will hurt you. But if you remain top of your game and up to date on new technology you'll remain employable.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  134. Do You Want The Truth? by simm_s · · Score: 1

    The truth is that no one knows how you are going to stay employable!

    We have no idea about the challenges you are facing now and will face in the future. We don't even know what lies before us in the future. The best chance you have is to make sure your lifestyle is sustainable. Make sure you get out of debt (if any) and are physically and mentally healthy. Be kind and considerate to others (even if they do no deserve it). Reduce your attachments to material things. Things do not make you happy anyway. If you are not happy with the work you are doing now, find something that interests you and gives your life purpose (life is too short).

    Good luck!

  135. Think outside the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever consider dropping out? That's my plan for when all of this shit comes crumbling down. I know having kids must make the decision more difficult, but the whole shitty mess of the American economy is headed off a cliff.

  136. my 2 cents... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you *like* programming and developing, you are already in a great spot. Programmers are rain makers, as golden as engineers. You CREATE stuff. Start looking for ways to do more of it or get current with some of the mainstream languages if you're stuck in something like Cobol or MUMPs.

    If your skills are sharp and you can drop into any environment and start coding, then you will always have a safety net with contracting. You might have to travel or take it on the chin with healthcare but you won't starve.

    There are millions of apps that need to be written for tablets and iWhatevers. Start coding!

    For those telling you to go into management or PM, you really need to think hard about that first. I went from doing Network engineering and *nix administration and getting consistent "always exceeds" to middle management hell for 10 years. I made more money but by the end of it I was begging to take a $30k cut to be an admin again.

    If you're a programmer and you love being a programmer, be an excellent programmer and you will do fine.

  137. Look for a different job. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    If you feel that that you don't have a future in the company, that means you will need to seriously need to look for an other place to work.
    My last job, I asked my boss for my 6 month bonus, he gave me some lame excuse on why I don't get a bonus anymore... So 4 weeks later I put in a 3 week notice. Because I got an other job, that was going to pay me more.
    I had made the mistake before of just hanging in there, hopping for the best, I gut burned from it. So while I am hired, I work hard, be a team player, try to be the model employee... However I will follow my gut, if I feel something is wrong in the company and my job is at risk, I will go and find a new job before it becomes an issue.

    1. Should I stay technical, and be ready to work as consultant/contractor? How does medical insurance work in that case?
    As a consultant you can work for a consulting firm who may offer medical insurance, or if you work private, you charge rates that will cover the cost of private health insurance. There is a reason why Consulting rates are $200 an hour. Because the person needs to pay for all their expenses in life, that would normally be covered by companies benefits, combined with the fact that they may not be working 40 hours a week consistently.

    2. Should I capitalize on the domain knowledge, and move onto business/managerial side?
    Management isn't any safer then being a tech. However having more diverse skills and experience tends to help.

    3. Will the MBA degree or alternate career help?
    Will the MBA help... Yes it will, for cases where the job requires a particular level of education. I have an MBA and I am currently working in a position that requires a Masters Degree. the MBA is a Masters Degree so I qualify for the position. I am not in management, however I am the team lead.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  138. This has nothing to do with the security tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It maybe speaking about job security but that's not what the people clicking on the tag are expecting.

  139. Wait until after the elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If team Obama win, you may be better of without a job than with one. You won't need to worry about medical, other people will pay for that. You'll be able to buy a house with no money down or income statements. Since you have kids, most of your food will be free.

  140. Strongly disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "5. Don't price yourself out of a job; a senior dev with twenty years experience is worth about as much as one with ten."
    That is only true for companies who are clueless. 20 years of development experience is clearly better than 10 years. Exceptions apply, but on average, that is true. After 10 years of development experience, you are just out of the worst practices you developed right after college/uni. After 20 years you have done so many good and bad things that you will instinctively not do many things the 10year guy still does.

    1. Re:Strongly disagree by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      My experience has been that if a developer can't figure it out in 10 years he's probably not going to figure it out in 20. There's some incremental improvement, but not enough to merit a significant jump in pay purely by virtue of the additional 10 years experience. The larger point was that you're only worth as much as someone's willing to pay you. Part of being "employable" is having a realistic expectation of the level of compensation you "deserve".

  141. Don't Vote GOP if you want the Affordable Care Act by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Don't Vote GOP if you want the Affordable Care Act to stay in place.

    So at least you don't have find work that will give you a medical plan.

  142. Home ownershi by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    I think your link misses an import detail -- you have to live SOMEWHERE.

    My mortgage is about the same as rent would be on a similar (modest) home, and the property taxes are only $150 a month. I'm not sure saving the $150 a month makes it worth giving somebody else the rent money -- after all, I get to keep most of it even if it's not earning interest.

    And if I "rent" my home from the bank for another 25 years or so, I get to keep it. I figure that's a fair trade for springing for the upkeep.

    Now, if you're talking about a $500,000 McMansion not being a good investment -- well, duh.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  143. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 40 as well. My last job in IT was in 2006. I saw what was coming (the shit you describe) and just threw in the towel back then. Never looked back. My wife and I saved everything we could and managed to buy a small farm in rural New Zealand. You'll only experience pain if you fight it.

    Why fight it?

    Let some other imbecile show up to your shit job.

  144. First advice... by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
    ...put the wife to work!!

    Sounds like she's freeloaded long enough (unless of course, she was home raising kids, that is a job). But if you're 40 or so, guessing she's about that age too, that means if there are kids, they don't need that 24/7 supervision at their age.

    Have her go get a job too, and start SAVING money....save, save, save and....save.

    Live below your means.

    Then, start looking what to do for you...try for mgmt, maybe try keeping up with your skills. Get into govt contracting...long term jobs there with good pay, you just have to be able to pass a security check.

    But seriously.....you should be saving all the money you can, and unless your wife is disabled....get her out into the workforce now....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:First advice... by cjjjer · · Score: 0

      Live below your means.

      Blasphemy! That is not part of the American dream. And how dare you even suggest such a thing when he can just go out and get a couple more credit cards.

    2. Re:First advice... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with credit cards to help get your credit score up.
      Just use them in place of your normal spending, and pay them off monthly.
      Don't fight the system, utilize it properly.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  145. Network and connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    40 years old and not sure what to do?
    Sounds like you've been following the same path over and over again.

    How many years of experience do you really have? Do you have 15 years experience in the industry? or 1 year's of experience 15 times?

    How is your network? Not the people you work with, and not the people you used to work with, but people outside that circle? Are you like most IT folks, and dealing with people who are essentially clones of you? Everyone's great, everyone can code, everyone can be just like everyone else.

    If you have to ask if you've got stability, then the answer is no.

    Reach out to groups out there. real networking happens before the event and afterwards. go to the party early, stay late. It is work. don't let it fool you. This takes effort. And in 5 years you will be able to see a real safety net around you. Folks who understand your talent and can offer you a contract or employment if you let them know you're available.

    But given the question asked, the answer is no, not now. You don't have the right connections, you haven't put in the time to establish the relationships.

    In some parts of the world, these relationships get formed in grade school, during the sandbox years. Other times it's on the sports fields during high school. That's where we were supposed to learn how to network, express empathy. No one wants to deal with a parasite, someone who is always asking "what's in it for me?" After a while, you establish a reputation, at 40 years old, you've got one.

    If the rep is good, that's great. if it is not, then you'll have to do something. I suggest something different, because doing the same thing you've been doing will keep you where you are.

    Having a tight close-knit core group of people you're with day after day, week after week, will be very comfortable. But that network is limited. If you're lucky, you'll know a super-networker, someone who knows "everybody". figure out how that person did it. why does everyone know him/her? why does that person maintain relationships for such a long period of time?

    I read a lot of technical answers to this question. but only a few that showed or understood a larger issue. Right now, employable/employed are different words. People hire people they like, people they know. If no one knows you, then you're just a piece of paper, and just as useful as every other resume.

    You're asking the right question. But the fact you're asking now means you're not prepared today. maybe in 5 years, but not today.

  146. Become an Indian by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    When the original dot-con bubble burst, the guys from India in Silicon Valley were able to hold onto jobs while most of the contemporaries of Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, etc. who had built the computer industry were washed away. How did they do it? By being Indian:
    1. Get a correspondence degree from India.
    2. Turn your skin dark brown like the guy who wrote "Black Like Me" did. (Yes, you'll be risking skin cancer later on in life but by then you're kids will have been put through college.)
    3. Change your name to something appropriately Dravidian.
    4. Profit.
  147. Going strong at 49 by ScotJoseph · · Score: 1

    I'm 49 and still enjoying being a software engineer. Was working for a large financial company a year ago. Finance companies are not my favorite companies but the project was interesting as hell so I jumped from Yahoo to there. Once it was done I moved on. How to do that? You need to do well on the interviews so whatever you know you better brush up to know very well. Your current employer stopped asking details about things a long time ago. Your new one though will. If you are doing Java then reread all about Java's mysteries. Every software interview goes over data structures and algorithms. Take the "Design and Analysis of Algorithms I" through coursera (https://www.coursera.org/algo). It's challenging, get you back into answering questions about algorithms and it's free (as in they haven't figured out how to sell your personal info yet). After 15 years of Java I jumped to iOS development on iPhone/iPad. Get an app out there. If you don't make a million you still have skills that are in demand. I'm forced to do Android some times but the Java background helps there. Stay technical. For every 1 management job there are 10 technical jobs. You do the math concerning your odds of staying employed. I've never been a consultant/contractor. Maybe I'll do it later when I don't want to work full time. I've seen people use their domain knowledge to stay employed but it's an iffy situation. If that domain goes down you've got nothing to fall back on. If you really love it stay in it. I've been a mechanical engineer in a past life and if you aren't working as a mechanical engineer the mechanical engineers themselves will just treat you like any other developer. You'll have a better advantage explaining to other developers what the mechanical engineers are saying. Unless you go to a top 10 school MBAs are close to worthless. Do take finance courses. $1 made on investment is $1 you don't have to make working at a company. You should already be investing a little here and there even if it's just in your 401(k). Don't worry about the young guys. I keep quiet and by the time they figure out I know a lot more through experience than they do it's too late for them. If you see junk that they do just let them clean it up. These aren't your kids you are picking up after.

  148. Re:Easy by Stele · · Score: 1

    If you do a really good job, maybe your program will become self-aware, and you can sell it to the government, or use it to defeat Superman or something.

  149. Project management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best thing to do is to move towards software project management. Get a PMP. Show that you can be the translator between business stakeholders to get more junior developers to deliver working products on time that meet business requirements.

    Start networking a great deal. Companies will come and go, but your contacts who believe in you will always be moving around.

    My wife, a product manager, just brought in two development managers she knew from past jobs for a new project, and they were both over 40.

  150. Re:I know this will fly against conventional wisdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am looking at exactly this option. HTe tech knowledge we have gained as Software Engineers is invaluable. School shave no idea how to really educate kids about the use of technology.

  151. come on in, the water's great! by RumorControl · · Score: 1

    Hey, I just turned 40 and I'm a Senior Dev at Big Bank too. I'm not at all worried about the future because for the last 5 years I've been a contractor, free to charge as much as I want and move where the money is. Working for yourself means not giving a $#!% about office politics.

    To answer your questions:
    1: As a contractor (in America) you can buy your own medical. It's about the same cost. Talk to a medical broker. They will do all the work for you.
    2: Do what you like, if you haven't thought about managerial until now, you're not likely to "get it" or or be good at it.
    3: Knowledge is Power. But the acquisition of a degree can also be a waste of time if you are expecting it to advance your career on it's own. An MBA is great training for being your own boss though.
    4: Stop paying rent. Now is a great market to pick up something.

  152. Emancipate yourself from mental slavery by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

    Read The 4-Hour Workweek by Tim Ferriss. You may not end up wanting to do everything he suggests, but at least it will help you break that mindset where you think working for other people is the only option in life.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  153. Yeah by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    And you solve religious terrorism by raising standards of living. Except all the 9/11 attackers came from middle class backgrounds.

    The point being, poverty isn't the driver of the problems people like to say poverty drives. This is a nice, intellectually dishonest and shallow way for you to dismiss the problem in your mind. Because the problem is really ideology, specifically religious teachings on reproduction.

    The future of the world is the Philippines: the Catholic Hierarchy and their insane teachings on reproduction have a stranglehold on that country, which leads to massive poverty and suffering, and yet no one can get sane teachings on reproduction in that country:

    http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4657&Itemid=189

    http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/philippines-constitutional-framer-more-people-more-glory-to-god/

    You say: "why is the Philippines the future of the world?" Because the guy or gal who is ecologically aware and understands he or she should have less kids breed themselves right out of the world, and leave it to the families having 12 kids and believing in ideological memes that says lots of kids is ordained by god, or whatever belief that overwhems common sense on the issue.

    There are middle class families with 8 kids in the USA: think the Orthodox Jews or the Mormons or Southern Baptists. Economic betterment doesn't solve the problem of having lots of kids.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/19_Kids_and_Counting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quiverfull

    I am a strict believer in freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of movement, freedom of religion.

    But my mind encounters problems like overpopulation, and I have a problem: freedom simply results in a runaway reproduction train, because it's really not about choice, it's about a simple biological imperative combined with bountiful resources and empowered by ideological memes that reproduce right along with the kids. Evolution in action simply means more and more of a biological creature until it is stopped. It does not stop itself. This is our problem: the ideologies of the world that reduce humanity to a fungal growth, which, when resources are so scarce and education is not affordable, we basically will be.

    So, I have come to the regretful conclusion that China, so wrong on so many other freedoms, has it right on population: you need to clamp down on these "vaginas are a clown car" belief systems. I don't like this thought of mine, to embrace such authoritarian control system ONLY in regards to reproduction, but I simply see no other way.

    Please, someone tell me there is another way, turning to Chinese authoritarianism as a the best model in anything creeps me out.

    The problem is a serious one. It does not go away on its own. People who choose to have less kids go away, and leave the earth to the vagina=clown car religions.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're so worried, why don't you go get a graduate degree in sociology or economic development. You may actually learn a thing or two, rather than worry yourself crazy with poor, unsubstantiated theories. (I studied similar issues in my undergraduate years in the late 1990s, and still read widely in the area.)

      Seriously though. Go ahead and do it. During the Bush years I was a raving lunatic: constitution this, free speech that. I decided to go to law school and actually learned about real law, and real history. Then instead of being a raving lunatic, I was just a little miffed, yet much better armed to fight his kind of conservative politics.

  154. That's easy: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT! by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Seriously, it would require you moving to Washington DC but I LOVE it here. I get several job offers a week and I'm very happy doing federal government contracting. We're surprisingly cutting edge in some agencies, I make six figures and I have more opportunity. I have no desire to do project management, etc etc. I just like to develop.

  155. Re:Honestly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These Dave Ramsey nutcases come up on every thread on websites that talk about finances. I think he is some religious nutjob financial guy.

  156. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by dintech · · Score: 1

    If you're 40 and have worked in the industry for a while, you'll no doubt have seen all the various hiring and firing periods that Finance IT has gone through. Since you're still here, you're good at sailing through those periods. It's really common for people to think they're the ones going to be fired any moment, usually they are underestimating their value to the company. Statistically though, it's probably not going to be you. Try to be a bit more optimistic about your situation and your worth. There's probably a lot of knowledge in your head. Guys that have been in the industry for a long time get a lot of respect from the business and you can probably teach the junior traders a thing or too.

    One final thought; this might be the worst downturn our particular industry has seen but it will get better eventually. Hang in there for now and you'll be in a great position when things start improving. Although others will disagree with me, now is the time for major life changes which may or may not work out. Those decisions are for people that actually lose their jobs.

  157. Re:You are asking the question, you're halfway the by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Seriously this is good advice. Being able to get a TS/SCI is a meal ticket. It eliminates all competition from outsourcing, offshoring and non-citizens.

    Plus the wage scale is better.

    Since you don't own a house, moving is easier too.

    The work is interesting, highly mathematical and isn't likely to be downsized much if at all in the upcoming DOD downsizing if the wars wind down.

  158. Prove yourself, demonstrate your value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Resumes tell an employer that you know a few things, but really taking a little coding test doesn't say much in an interview. Take some project work related to the job that you're applying for with you so that you can demonstrate the value you will bring to the table. I work for a large software company and being able to talk over a cool project and how the same ideas can be applied here is much more valuable since the conversation can become very rich. Focus also on how you can elevate other developers by establishing coding guidelines, protocol, performance evaluation....creating supportable, durable, well-written code. Programming is like learning regular languages...there are some that speak it fluently at a high-level and others that speak it marginally at a very low-level (slang, etc.); it comes down to maintaining high quality communication...everyone speaking the same level of a language. I also agree with the project management comments posted here: most projects fail not because of bad programmers, they fail because of poor PM work.

  159. what is your real goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to eat? retire?

    Maybe leave virtual world and try creating wealth; run a business, make stuff, go into farming.

    Then who cares about the mess the financial system is in. You will have something to trade.

  160. Re:Go to a company that respects devs or go consul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is likely the only insightful post here. It is very true that there are two types of companies: those that see the what you create as an asset, and those who see the what you create as an overhead. Be in the former, not the latter if possible.

  161. Do what you want by sylvandb · · Score: 1

    Do you want to stay technical?

    Then you need to keep up your skills and always be learning new stuff. I started 25 years ago with C, Pascal, Fortran, Basic, various assembly and a smattering of other stuff. Transitioned to C++, Java, and a bunch of other new then but now obsolete tech. Now currently working mostly in Python and Javascript and still some C and C++. Being involved in open source projects can help the resume, but everything you learn helps the interview process as well as helps you learn what interests you.

    Want to transition to less technical? Then an MBA and some other management (people and project) classes can help. Might need to be an MBA from a "real" school to do you any good. A promotion or even lateral move within the same company to get management experience will likely be easier than ending a job as technical and finding a new job as management.

    Explore options for doing stuff on the side and other ways to supplement and possibly replace your current income. Remember every advisor will tell you to diversify your investments. How come they don't tell you to diversify your income?

    Networking. Most jobs come thru contacts or contacts or contacts. LinkedIn might help. There are others.

    If you do end up on your own in the U.S., COBRA will keep your health insurance going for a time, but $$$$. My last COBRA quote was $2100 per month for my family. I ended up getting a personal policy with similar coverage for under $400 per month. Current job pays coverage for me, buying additional coverage for the rest of the family is about the same price as buying it on my own for similar coverage.

  162. It's a risky, failure-filled path by sirwired · · Score: 1

    The most likely outcome of a venture into entrepreneurship, is stress, financial strain, and business failure. It has ever been thus, in the US or anywhere. It's not for everyone, and for someone craving stability, like the OP, it's downright suicidal.

    I've said this before, and I'll say it again: Don't look at "working for the man" as "the man" taking a cut of your hard-earned labor. Look at it as "the man" doing the sort of stuff you don't want to do and/or have no aptitude for a pittance over cost. I get to do a job I enjoy and am good at (low level network diagnostics), "the man" takes care of sales, marketing, legal, HR, product design, business planning, international compliance, manufacturing, management, etc. And they do this for a puny 8% over cost (a.k.a. my company's profit margin.) If I strike out on my own, I'm rather unlikely to be able to hire somebody to do those things for me for such a low price, and I know I'd suck at many/most of them if I were to take on those responsibilities myself.

    If you have the stomach for the risk, the right skills, and a LOT of luck, entrepreneurship may be personally and financially rewarding. But it's certainly not a panacea for a stagnating career.

  163. Patent writer? by Begemot · · Score: 1

    It's definitely not for everyone, but with an extensive technical knowledge and experience you could be very well employable till your 70's in a patent attorney firm as a paralegal technical expert. From my experience they see age and longer experience as a big advantage.

  164. Find the Fun by gov_coder · · Score: 1

    If you just can find-the-fun; the skills will blossom almost with you noticing it.

    I'm about your age and recently had 3 job offers to decide from. I think what made me marketable was all the fun development projects I work on outside of work.

    Years ago it was text-to-speach apps, new readers, and personal search tools that I enjoyed working on. Today I'm having fun building software for home-security (facial recognition and object recognition libraries are fast maturing) and helping my neighbors set up their own home-security systems based on this stuff (for free of course).

    There's so much cool stuff in OSS to learn about; you are almost crazy not to be into this stuff.

    I learned a ton about MySQL when I built my first mythTV DVR; and would never want to go back to watching TV any other way.

    My Rss reading project taught me a ton about XML and XML-Schema; plus it cut down on the amount of surfing I do.

    For my next home project I'm probably going to build some tools for my son's MineCraft worlds.

    And I can't wait to start playing with the android SDK a bit more so I port some of my favorite projects over to my tablet.

    --
    Rob Enderle's excellent new book: Everything I needed to know about Computer Science I learned in Marketing School
  165. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT has been a bust for careers, compared to the promise of the 90s. We may even be forced into ludditism by coming solar storms in the next few years.

    LOLWUT? coming solar storms? lol.

  166. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is NOT a mundane detail Michael!

  167. Think about PMP, then MBA by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anyone directly answer your question on "should I get an MBA" yet. This will be variable depending on whether you have good tuition reimbursement policies at your job. (I get 100% tuition reimbursement and don't work in the financial industry; my neighbor, who works for a major financial institution, would love to get an MBA but would have to pony up most of the tuition himself).

    A few people have suggested project management, and with your experience you might find that a good fit. If you are a good PM, it's a path that gives you lots of options.

    In your shoes, I'd be very tempted to start by getting the PMP certification. It's the industry standard, everyone knows it, and if you are PMP certified you can go anywhere in the world and they know what it means & respect it. The key advantage for you is it's a lot quicker to get PMP certified (assuming you've got some project management experience under your belt), and will be much cheaper than an MBA (again, this'll be influenced by the tuition reimbursement policy at your company). My MBA cost ~ $45,000 in tuition. A PMP boot camp class (one week, and several of the people who run these boot camps have offers that guarantee you pass your PMP exam or you get a refund/get to take the class again for free) will cost around $2,000 to $3,000. (This is East Coast USA, so prices may vary a bit, but I went to a fairly respected business school for that $45K, and the PMP prep classes I've seen are all in that price range whether they be in New York, Philadelphia, or Atlanta)..

    Then go for the MBA. That'll take longer (typically two years doing two night classes a week), but it's going to be a big asset. In the financial industry, having someone who knows the technical side and can talk the business side (and yes, you'll get that from an MBA, learning the jargon, understanding about accounting, GAPP, supply chain management, risk management, etc) is much more valuable.

    With a PMP and MBA, plus years of development experience, you now have loads of options. Developer, project manager, business analyst, etc. Are you guaranteed to get a much higher salary? No. Is this a path that could significantly help your employment prospects (assuming you're reasonably competent and motivated)? I'd say so.

  168. his main worry is medical insurance... yikes! by craftycoder · · Score: 1

    How sad is it that his main concern isn't a college fund, food, or shelter, but medical care? He must keep working until he is 65 because he risks ruin if someone in his family gets sick. Even stranger is that not being able to afford medical care is no excuse to not get it, so if he failed to provide it to his kids he would be imprisoned. The mind boggles... Maybe he should move a few miles north to Canada where he can retire whenever he is willing to be done with a fancy lifestyle.

  169. The World Needs Ditch Diggers Too by erdos-bacon+sandwich · · Score: 1

    If you cannot find guidance from the great Caddyshack, whereof will you find it?

  170. I came back to development by ubeans · · Score: 1

    Illcar,

    I am 42. Stayed technical, became a consultant 10 years ago. Over the last 20 years since I graduated from university, I have been a developer, architect, technical team lead, project manager and director. I came back to coding, because that's what I enjoy best, and because in I.T. Projects, there are always far more openings for developers than for architects or managers.

    I do not worry that I will get kicked out of the profession for being too old when I reach 50. First of all, there are not enough younger programmers coming out of universities to replace us, and also the profession has been steadily growing older over the last decade. Yes, I lost a few contracts to development teams in India, but not all projects can be sent off shore.

    Yes, as a consultant, there is always the possibility that I lose my contract and that I have to find another one. But as a consultant I make far more money than a full-time employee, so even if I don't work three or four months per year (never happened) I would still come out better than with a salary.

      Also, let's say I am three months without a job before I find another contract, well I don't really lose 3 months salary. I would have lost 50% of it to income tax, plus work related expenses such as commuting. SO three months off is more like one and a half month pay loss.

    As for office politics, I learned to not let it affect me. My responsibility as a consultant is to provide advice to my client, and then I keep a copy of the email. Sometimes a manager or architect will never believe their solution sucks until the team has spent six months on it and it crashes and burns in front of their eyes. As for myself, I will have spent six months working on a soon to be dead solution, but the only way for me to keep my sanity is to remind myself that I am paid by the hour, so like sex, the longer the better.

    As for not having a house right now, this might just be a blessing for you. It means you are not shackled to high mortgage payments. It probably means that you could more easily move to another part of the country to get a job if you ever need to.

    Being strategic about your next career move is wise. Worrying about all the bad things that may happen in the future is not going to help you, so you might just as well stop worrying and enjoy life.

    Sincerely,

    Pascal

  171. Re:I know this will fly against conventional wisdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is this "society", exactly, and why do you believe that you have some sort of obligation to him/her/it?

  172. Kids are NOT expensive by S77IM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where did this myth come from? As a parent of young children, I found that for the most part, kids are not expensive. There's a marginal increase in food / medical / clothing costs, and saving a bit for college, but it's not bad; most of the big expenses (housing, bills, saving for retirement) stay the same.

    The only thing expensive about having kids is day care / preschool, which is pricey. But if one parent doesn't work, then they can take care of the kids. If both parents work, then it's a two-income household, and most should be able to bear that cost. Single parents are truly screwed here.

      -- 77IM

    --
    Student: Is it true that the foundation of the universe is paradox?
    Master: Well, yes and no.
    1. Re:Kids are NOT expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were a few studies done in the US. Raising a kid until they graduate highschool costs an average of $100k to $200k with the amount correlated to standard of living. Of course, this is an average and different situations will result in different figures.

      As an aside, I suspect that your children haven't been in a socially competitive environment. It is unfortunate but there may come a time where those expensive toys and clothes can have a very big impact on how your children are treated by their peer group. Children and young adults can be quite vicious and, in cases, violent; and school administrators can not always be counted on.

    2. Re:Kids are NOT expensive by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      The only thing expensive about having kids is day care / preschool, which is pricey. But if one parent doesn't work, then they can take care of the kids. If both parents work, then it's a two-income household, and most should be able to bear that cost. Single parents are truly screwed here.

      I'm a little concerned that you can look at the quoted text and conclude that kids are not expensive. Are you ignoring the opportunity cost of having one parent stop working? That's lost income as well as loss of career path/experience. Not a trivial sacrifice at all.

      Also, for what it's worth, kids don't magically become cheap/free once they start public school. You've got activities, summer camp, before/after school care if necessary, etc. Travel all of a sudden cost a ton more with extra tickets and hotel room. And your grocery budget is going to increase substantially once your kids are teenagers.

      So I would still argue that kids can be pretty expensive.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  173. what skill set do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post was really vague. How do I stay current? You didn't tell us what kind of development you have done. There is a big difference in staying current if you do java development vs. old mainframe programming. The mainframe stuff will probably be less transferable, so you will have to go out and do development on the side.

    I would recommend, going to the job boards and seeing what development skills are in demand. It will mostly be buzzwords, but you can get an idea from there. I would pick 1-2 specializations in there and learn it. Don't do everything. You will need to do development in your own time. Yeah it sucks with a family, but what are you going to do? I would also try to get put on projects where you currently work that have newer technologies.

    if you are stuck doing old legacy work, I would get started right away. I would do development on my own and then take that with me to interviews. Bring the laptop. Show that you have been doing legacy work on the job, but here is what I taught myself, so I have 20 years of development experience, plus I am current. Let me show you what I can do.

    I don't understand how developers can post 'how do I stay current' posts. This is so vague. You are in the profession. You should know that current varies depending on what you do. The way to stay more current is always teach yourself, do it in your own time, try to get moved on to more current projects and/or get the hell out of there.

  174. we hire 40+ year old developers all the time. by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

    I work in computational biology at a large research laboratory located in a rural area in Maine. We are the only game in town, and the people we hire are often more senior developers that either want to move to a small town on the coast, or were originally from the state and left to pursue their career. I can only think of one recent hire straight out of college, and in that case the person grew up in the town with our flagship state university and chose to go to school out of state. If you want to avoid managerial work and focus on software engineering, think about leaving the financial industry and look towards other domains -- some of your knowledge will translate. We basically have two types of developers -- those writing research/analysis software and those writing large enterprise systems (like laboratory information management systems).

  175. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can you work for yourself?
    If you can quit relying on others for your prosperity, you can dump this whole useless line of worry.

    This is a great idea if you like working 70 hours a week for little pay and no benefits, combined with new taxes and penalties from the likes of Obama. The cost of my services went up 10% thanks to an Obamacare excise tax. "Well, pass it on to the customers." I do, but raising prices 10% in a struggling economy doesn't exactly help sales. Soon I'll face a penalty for not being able to afford health insurance too. "But if you can't afford it, there will be assistance for you to be able to." Orly? "[T]he state might not be required to expand coverage to ... adults making up to 133% of federal poverty limit, which is $14,900 for a single person."

    $14,900 * 1.33 = $19817. So if I make $20k/year, I'm rich and should be able to afford my own health insurance, else get penalized. How many people do you know making $20k/year can afford living expenses (not to mention paying off debt) AND health insurance? I'm a single white male, so I don't qualify for government assistance anyway. Soon I'll be penalized for it!

    Yay for democracy! Fuck small business!

  176. Re:Go to a company that respects devs or go consul by archen · · Score: 1

    It doesn't look like you read the entire article. $22k is the non adjusted raw sale profit. That's also $22k over 10 years, which may or may not be a good return depending on how you're considering how much is spent. If my math is right, if you spend $1400 per month instead of $1600 (break even point), you'd save $160 a month and make more money that purchasing that house using those calculations. It does not factor in taxes, insurance, and general house stuff - which I'd guess is going to be more than the left over profit, but that depends on a lot of factors.

    Personally I reached the same conclusion as the article, but I also pay such cheap rent for my apartment I'd really have to be crazy to buy a house. If houses where I live weren't overpriced, and my rent were high that would be different. The point of the article wasn't "buying a house is bad", it's that you really need to look at the many factors involved to make a fair comparison. Even if you don't "make a profit", maybe you enjoy living in a house that much more to make it worth it. It seems to be a common mentality that you MUST buy a house because that's what Americans do and you OWN it, but I think the modern real estate market really preys on that mode of thinking. If you don't have a family (especially if you're single), renting may be the better choice.

  177. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't they do this in a movie once?

  178. What to do? Audit CAFR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Audit CAFR documents. There's a promising career.

  179. You are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a cockroach on society. Enabling the banks to use HFT to steal billions of dollars.

  180. Yeah.... have to say I disagree.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Businesses have already moved about as far towards "agile" as they could move, and many have over-extended their staff, just to hang on despite the poor economy.

    What I've seen in I.T. (with my own job, with the jobs my wife has taken in I.T., and with jobs my friends have in I.T.) is a situation where employers are uncertain what to do next. They need more workers, but they lack confidence that their business can remain viable if the economy takes another big stumble.

    Many are trying to hire contractors so they don't have to commit right now to taking on more workers full-time. But they're struggling because the contractors want the benefits and security of a real, full-time job as an employee. So they have a revolving door of contractors who only stay until they find the next contract job that pays a little better or has better hours or working conditions.

    While you'll still find cases where there's a lot of largely useless "overhead" of middle managers that don't contribute much -- my experience is that these tend to be the "lifers" who have been entrenched in those positions from back when the economy was much better than it is today. They may know "all the right people" to hang onto those jobs, or perhaps they have some sort of sweet arrangement where it will cost the company a big severance package to eliminate then. In larger companies, sometimes a big group of these people stick together and do everything in their power to "scratch each others' backs" so the new hires get blamed for their inefficiencies. Whatever the case -- just because you see people in those positions, earning that type of paycheck, doesn't mean those jobs will exist for YOU as a new hire, when someone vacates one of them.

    Basically, we're on a track where everyone in a company is valuable.... Even if that means wearing multiple hats and doing work you never imagined was part of your job description. But that said, there's still room for "project managers". They just might find themselves asked to do BOTH management and hands-on work at the same time, these days.

  181. soylent green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect when I turn 40 my most useful role will be 'soylent green'. 5 years to go! woohoo!

  182. Hug your dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best you can do is stop reading internet comments right now. It's not so strange how this story attracts comments--people just love to vent. But you can't eat your butthurt ego. Hug your dog. Go to church. Enjoy the sun. Don't read any more comments.

  183. Answering your main question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I've seen at the larger companies is a need for:

    1) Senior level programmers. 15+ years experience in the industry.

    2) Breadth of experience. i.e. platforms, OS, frameworks in order to be able to choose the correct one for their projects

    3) Depth of experience. i.e. a Tek someone who knows the systems aspect and innards of the frameworks/OSs/etc..

    4) Business Analyst - Someone who can assess what is happening in a business and propose new ideas, methods, strategies to take. Someone who can transform a paper napkin idea into the Business' reality based on how the business conducts its business.

    5) Project Leader - someone who is senior and can guide developers, get out ahead of the project and research a path to hand off to the team. Talk manager-speak and dev-speak. Keep a project on schedule. Not the manager's unreasonable schedule, but the actual schedule. Have the ability to break down a project into smaller and smaller pieces so one can focus his team's efforts. By doing this, one is constantly moving the project forward.

    6) Project Manager - someone who can assess the team's abilities, apply those abilities to the development timeline and come up with a realistic time estimate.

    7) Troubleshooter - Many devs "give up" and the more senior devs have to solve things. Well, become the "no one else left but me" guy. If you can't solve the problem then no one can. Be a bulldog and never give up on a problem, no matter how complex, how long it takes.

    If you find yourself lacking in any area(s) mentioned, then stop lacking in them and apply yourself. It sounds like you haven't kept your skills current. The current panacea is Java with J2EE and DotNet.

    "But how do I get experience?" - Donate your time to a non-profit to solve their issues. Whatever they may be. No limits. Go in to their site once a week on Saturday to reload OS, answer their questions, write programs for them. Write the programs in the languages you are weak at. Usually a non-profit's needs are basic but you can be doing wonders for them. A private school is another good avenue to apply yourself.
    In any of these cases, you can be BA, PM, and Project Leader all in one. If they have even limited IT "staff" then you ask to direct their efforts. If they have IT "volunteers" then ask to eventually lead them. That's how you can get some BA, PM and management experience. Leading volunteers is harder than at work because any of the volunteers can leave just because you wore a pink shirt or something. Directors who dismiss this experience are ignorant and stupid.

    Safari Library - $500/yr (roughly) - will give you access to all the books you need on the subjects previously mentioned. WELL worth the cost.
    I doubt you'll see this message but Good luck to you,
    Cheers,
    -T-

  184. Bootstraps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick yourself up, get more skills, establish relationships, and keep your eyes open for other opportunities. When one presents itself, take it. I'm in my 40's too. We will never see medicare or social security because they will be bankrupt. You have about 40-60 more years in your career (depending on how long you live). Settle in, get yourself and your family prepared, it's going to be a bumpy ride. Remember, preparedness, skills, skills, skills, hard work, friendships, connections, not being too proud to take any job.

  185. Time for a re-set by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    I'm pushing 50 myself. There's no way Medicare will exist in 15 years, not in it's current state, the numbers just don't add up. Assuming that you'll have medicare OR social security to fall back on is folly. At your age, you'll never get back the value of the cost of an education for a masters degree unless you've got the cash sitting around for it. For Profit colleges are making a bundle, prices are skyrocketing as everyone is jumping into advanced degrees hoping for the nirvana of employment. False road trip. The only place that leads is huge debt. That's the next economic bubble is student loan debt. It's going to be a bad one when it blows. Corporate Banking is a doomed animal. Move out while you still can. There's really only 3 ways to have any cashola at retirement time: 1) Get a govie job. My dads a retired Fed who's been retired for almost 25 years. A major percentage of his health care is still paid by Uncle Sam, as is his $60K annual retirement pay with cost of living adjustment. I wish I would have went this route. 2) Health Care job. Get a job in IT in the health care field. It's the one bright spot. Everyone needs health care and the government has mandated EMR (electronic medical records) - few places have implemented completely leaving lots of room for workers. 3) Work for yourself. This is still America. Shed your corporate masters and spread your wings. Lots of luck.

  186. Health Care IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jump ship, Screw the banks, get a job with health care IT.

  187. Very Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NY finance cooked the American Economy. It is 0% you, and 100% a highly damaged economy. When German banksters fucked up the German financial system, there was massive unemployment and a few years later the Nazi government got elected, because of all the middle class people could not find jobs. Don't blame yourself, blame the politicians who were bribed or incompetent to check the NY insanity.

    1. Re: Very Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime until either A) everything breaks down or B) they manage to fix the financial system by some very strong and effective controls&regulation, I suggest you pick an interesting open source project and start to contribute code. That will keep you working, will keep your skills sharp (or even improve them) and let you forget the crap situation.

      Never, ever give up. Your only fault was to trust in your bankers and your government. Keep saying "I am good, better times will come and my skills will be ready, it's not my fault". Actually, you are one of the best-skilled persons of the whole globe, rationally speaking.

  188. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Replace worry with planning and get a good nights sleep.

    But little Mouse, you are not alone,

    In proving foresight may be vain:

    The best laid schemes of mice and men

    Go often awry,

    And leave us nothing but grief and pain,

    For promised joy!

  189. Get more education by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm 38, and one of the things I did, after working in industry for 9 years, was to go back to school and get a PhD. I'll be starting as an assistant prof this autumn. However, YMMV on more education.

  190. Drug lord by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

    Have you considered cooking meth?

  191. Re:I know this will fly against conventional wisdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. I'm just starting my career and I have no f****** clue where it will lead me except at some point I'll just stop and teach/do something really useful. Give back.

  192. Re:stop doing grunt work - Slaps Forehead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in a large bank as well in the investment side of the house. I have seen countless people from IT take the CFA and never get past level 1. If they do, I have literally, only seen two people make it past level two. You are taking an exam with which most financial professionals struggle. I'm not saying it's impossible, it is actually quite reasonable. However, you will need a great deal of intuition about accounting and advanced finance concepts as well as AN ACTUAL INTEREST to get through the exam. If these topics make your eyes glaze over, forget it. Also, the CFA is a huge commitment in terms of time. Theoretically, it can be done in 18 months. However, it takes most 3-4 years. The fail rates are enormous and each exam has minimum recommended study times in the hundreds of hours.

    The CFA is a bit like a marathon on your knees. Nothing about it is particularly difficult, but it takes forever and is designed to discourage and weed out anyone who doesn't read 10-Ks for entertainment.

    The biggest mistake I see the IT folk make is the belief that the CFA magically makes them a finance professional. Please think about who would hire you. You don't fit in the typical finance box. The bank could pick up a b-school graduate who knows about as much as you would in investment management, if not more, and pay them less, all while demanding they sleep under their desks for no additional pay.

    Your strong technical background could make quant or risk management positions a viable option, but for these jobs you are under-qualified and would need some letters (CFA, FRM Etc) after your name or require additional schooling (MFE programs). While you would do less grunt work in these jobs and need less time to pay your dues, you would not be exempt from it.

    The main issue is this: You are tired of doing grunt work and others are recommending trying a more finance-oriented role in the bank. While not a bad idea, most of these jobs at mid to advanced career are based on experience (you have very little direct experience). This would require you to jump back down the totem pole to a lot of grunt work in finance. Furthermore, if you feel that finance is in some structural downturn, doubling your bet on finance may be a bad idea.

  193. Take inventory, then look for a match. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key to all careers is knowing what skills and services are valuable and then providing those. Start by looking inward. Take an inventory of your skills. Just because you haven't used your skills professionally doesn't mean you can't. Someone with kids can usually manage a team. At least they're used to getting some kind of results from people who don't listen.
    Once you know what you have to offer, you can start looking for a match. Generally there are two ways to go: the guru path or the management path. Gurus use their specialized knowledge to benefit an employer. Managers use their experience to guide team members. Which appeals to you more? Whichever it is, invest more in that direction and start marketing/promoting yourself. Either internally at your current employer or externally at a new job.

  194. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, I thought you were supposed to buy a Ferrari and drive it to the office...

  195. Nobody is truly irreplaceable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does not matter how irreplaceable you are to a company. It only matters how replaceable you appear to be to management.

  196. You're Pretty Screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like you waited a little long to have kids; that doesn't make your proposition any easier.

    Being a high-tech employee is like being a pole dancer: You can still do the moves but no one wants anything to do with an old pole dancer.

    Good luck,

    An Unemployed 51-Year Old Pole Dancer

  197. You waited too long by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    As someone who 'made the mistake' of starting his family early, let me just say this (because everyone seems to think the opposite in today's culture): you waited too long to start a family and get on with your life.

    You're 40 and on the way "up" in your social life. Your family is growing. Things are getting more complicated. Who in their right mind starts having kids at 40? You're "over the hill" and on your way down; your energy levels are lower than in your 20s and kids being up at night is going to murder you. You're already set in your ways and the strain of learning new things is more difficult now than when you were in your 20s (and you will be learning things as a parent - or you should be). My father was born when his parents were ~40, and he's got nothing good to say about the arrangement: his parents were genuinely old by the time he was in his teens, and he was mostly raised by his older sister. I never knew my grandparents.

    Meanwhile, you're at a point in your career where you should be thinking of "settling down" for the long term. You're older and seen as one of the 'old guys', or at least the more seasoned, stable, and experienced people - or at least you should be by 40, in IT careers. Having a child at this point in your career is, IMO, foolish.

    I don't mean to dig into you too hard here (by all means, have children) - we all make mistakes - but part of making those mistakes is learning how to live with them. I personally started my family at 20. That was a decade ago: we've had 3 children, we've been paying a reasonable mortgage on a house now for almost 3 years, and I am able to advance in my career. We're past the "hump", with our kids all out of diapers, talking, and generally approaching the "young adult" part of life. No, it's not going to get easier for us with teenagers, but compared to babies, it's not going to get harder, either. Time is freeing up to the point where my wife is able to consider her career options - going to school, starting a career.

    I'm just putting the above out there for people who are thinking of 'waiting' to start a family. Sorry, there never will be a 'right time', as the OP indicates ('insecure' job, no house, tenuous income potential, etc.) You've just got to do it and make it work if you want it to happen at all. "It never gets easier."

    Now, considering OP's questions:

    1. Should I stay technical, and be ready to work as consultant/contractor?

    Why not do both? From what I'm seeing, there is a big need for what might be termed "sales engineers". Good ones are indispensable in any technical discipline, but they require a good balance of management, technical, and sales experience or ability. From what I've seen, the good ones are typically technical people who cross over to the 'sales' side of things. They're knowledgable enough to keep the sales people in check, and the customers appreciate the hell out of you. You end up doing a lot of PM type work and coordinating with all people involved, becoming a pivotal point for project success.

    How does medical insurance work in that case?

    Generally, this is a "STFW" question, but I'll offer a little experience. Generally, it doesn't. It's not uncommon for contractors to not have health benefits unless they incorporate, but if you do, you go through a private health insurance company or one of those shared burden "timeshare" type healthcare systems. Rates are typically a bit higher but I'm not intimately familiar with them. I've no idea how ObamaCare is going to make things more difficult for people who do this, but my guess is "very" (because it's going to make things a lot more difficult for everyone).

    The other option is to incorporate. If you incorporate (ie, a non-LLC, C-corp), you can get company health insurance. Typically pairing up with several other contractors to operate as your own corporation would be a good idea due to healthcare employee # requirements.

    2. Should I c

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  198. I'm in a similar situation at 44 by undeadbill · · Score: 1

    I live in California, and basically have a kid and a wife that doesn't (actually can't) work. Because I've had enough income (and always had the last IT crash on my mind), I've pretty much paid everything in cash up front and have effectively no credit. Home buying with a mortgage is currently beyond my reach, even though I make a pretty good living. Not having health insurance isn't an option, because of the wife and kid, and it can be pricey because of the wife. BTW, if *your* stay at home wife isn't on board with consulting, its demands (she needs to be very self-sufficient and industrious), and the risks, you will need to stop now, and just find a way of enduring (going into management) until retirement age hits. Or get her on board. Or divorce. Because if you go through with consulting, and she isn't on board, it will end in divorce.

    I've run my own business. Unless you have a product, don't do it. Service based IT consulting is a dicey business at best, and until I understood my market and how C-level people are motivated and think, I failed repeatedly until I learned the market well enough to succeed. Then I got out, because I realized that I didn't have my own assets and self-support aligned correctly. I'll be going back into it in a year or two at most. IF you do decide to go into consulting professionally, make sure you own a property you can live on that does not have a mortgage, car or credit payments, and NEVER EVER EVER borrow/mortgage or open a line of credit against that property- EVER.

    Medical for the self-employed is also difficult to do, especially as I'm growing older. Ultimately, I will have to find a service plan that mixes some of the business back end (payroll for self, taking care of tax withholdings, etc) with the medical. There are companies that do this, but availability of their services varies state by state. Some will even help me prioritize expense spending for business related expenses like laptops, etc. Again, doing this without a product (to base selling services off of) or lots of business contacts that can say "yes" is a recipe for failure until those are developed.

    With this in mind, here is my plan, and you may want to make use of it.

    1. Buy at auction, refurbished, or used. The goal is to keep myself out of debt, and to ensure your costs are as low as possible for when consulting does come around again. My last car, next car, and my next property should come from auction/refurb/used, out of money I have put together in advance. Aggressive saving is the key to being successful at consulting, and saving to buy at auction is excellent practice. Multiple accounts for specific purchases, etc- do whatever it takes to save. Building credit is another term for "I am willing to be a slave to my debt load", and that should only be done with an equal amount of savings set aside to immediately pay any balance if hard financial times should hit, and only should be done if it builds something that adds positive cash flow (cars are not positive cash flow, and neither are properties these days).

    2. Fix everything I buy at auction myself. I have to be self-sufficient, aside from those things that absolutely are a bad idea for me to do on my own. I can do my own light construction, plumbing, and residential electrical, because it isn't hard to learn and there is plenty of information out there on how to do it. Same goes for my vehicles. Double-plus good if the stay at home wife is even halfway motivated to become that self-sufficient (because, really, that is her fucking job if I bring home the only pay check). Drilling my own well or major brake work? I'll be paying for that, because of the cost of the equipment and the risk. A well, septic and off-grid power are really good for a primary residence, as they eliminate monthly expenses. Properly managed, they cost MUCH less than buying that service from a city or county. If I own my own property, this also means growing and canning our own food as a family. Again, self-sufficiency is t

  199. Immigration policies by tepples · · Score: 1

    Again, see the thing about "rest of the world isn't like the US". There's nothing forcing you to stay there (on original topic: my answer to the submitter would be to consider moving country before he gets too old)

    Other than other countries' immigration policies, the language barrier, etc.

    1. Re:Immigration policies by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Again, see the thing about "rest of the world isn't like the US". There's nothing forcing you to stay there (on original topic: my answer to the submitter would be to consider moving country before he gets too old)

      Other than other countries' immigration policies, the language barrier, etc.

      Immigration policies: Most of Europe (and many other countries) is very open for anyone with tech skills. For me, moving to Europe was just a matter of having a company say "Yeah, we want to hire this guy; and we're willing to pay over 45k Euro per year" (which ANY tech job will) - automatic approval. Nothing like the green card system in the US.

      Language barrier: Learning a new language is NOT a difficult thing to do. I'm a native English speaker, and now speak 4 other languages reasonably well and bits and pieces of two more. It just requires a little effort for a few months - more than worth it for the advantages it gives.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  200. Life advice by tepples · · Score: 1

    Where should one seek such life advice?

  201. It's because you're an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, you're 40, don't own a house, don't understand office politics, and don't understand how to get a job. You're a failure at life.

  202. Interview with a foreign company by tepples · · Score: 1

    For me, moving to Europe was just a matter of having a company say "Yeah, we want to hire this guy"

    But how do you get to that point without an interview in person?

    1. Re:Interview with a foreign company by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      For me, moving to Europe was just a matter of having a company say "Yeah, we want to hire this guy"

      But how do you get to that point without an interview in person?

      For me, it was a case that it was the European HQ of the international company I already worked for (in Australia at the time). However I have other colleagues from non-EU countries who simply applied to job advertisements that they saw and then did interviews via Skype.

      Actually, we also just hired a new guy on my team who is also not from the EU - he saw the job advertised through an agency; sent us his CV/Resume; we did our first interview via Skype, but I was unsure because there were still other good candidates, so then we flew him over for a face-to-face interview and he managed to convince me that has was definitely the right candidate.

      Most larger companies will be happy to pay for travel for the interview if it's anything higher than grunt work.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  203. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by dabadab · · Score: 1

    In the 70s careers tended to last 20+ years, in the 80s this number dropped to 6 years

    I would like to see the actual data where these numbers come because to have a 15 year drop in the averages in 10 years... that's extraordinary.

    --
    Real life is overrated.
  204. Pick One, or two: Cloud / Mobile / BI / Social by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a similar situation with a FinServ company. Typical crappy IT job, but I am passionate about new technologies, stayed up late and learned Mobile App development and Cloud based solutions. Got a Masters with company's continuing education benefits, and found myself a job in a cloud computing company that is growing like crazy. BTW, I also got a 25% raise. BTW, I also blogged, created my own website to showcase my projects, tweeted and LinkedIn pretty aggressively.

    Moral: Your work is your resume. We are in an age where developers need to be able to make things, not just do maintenance and production support. Otherwise, a flashy resume and networking will only get you yet another Bank, FinServ, Insurance or something like that....not that there is anything wrong with it ;-)

  205. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    O.K. Capt. Pedantic. careers ending in the 70s tended to last 20+, can you take it from there?

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  206. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Well, it's been brought up here a few times.
    Even if it's only a media story, someone should look into "scare" profiteering by offering lead lined computer cases. On the other hand...

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  207. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY MOM!!!!

    Hey, try not to burn down any buildings between job interviews, huh?

  208. Re:Easy by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    And yet with slashdot's filter, your response (which is +1 simply because of your karma) STILL polutes the page.

  209. Re:I know this will fly against conventional wisdo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes you have to take a step back and ask yourself "What exactly have I done for society these past years?" Chances are, if you're a software developer at a "large investment bank," not a hell of a lot.

    Who is this "society", exactly, and why do you believe that you have some sort of obligation to him/her/it?

    The same logic applied to my case: I took a step and asked myself what I'd done for my employer, and how much I was getting out of it. It also wasn't a heck of a lot.

    On a return-on-investment basis, a broke-ass new graduate with a 1-bedroom apartment and a $50K/year job is a fool to quit. And a billionaire would be a fool to keep working even if he's paid $1M/y; he could make $10M/y by sticking it in the bank at 1% interest.

    I was somewhere in between. I walked. No regrets.

  210. Re:Easy by Archenoth · · Score: 1

    Mmmm... yeah. ... If you could just go ahead and make sure you do that by Friday, that will be great. Mmmm, Ok?

    --
    The arch foe.
  211. I was you some years back by greywire · · Score: 1

    Almost 40, working as a developer for mortgage companies, with a growing family and living in an apartment.

    We all know what happened to the mortgage industry and so my attempt at starting a software company evaporated with it.

    Now some years later, I've just worked for various companies but haven't furthered my own projects. But, my income has steadily increased. My family has grown. Just in the last few months I was finally able to buy a home (thank you CHDAP).

    I keep switching jobs not because I've wanted to but for other reasons (company downsizing or politics, company imploded, etc).

    Right now, I'm beating off the job the offers and practically have to turn off my phone to get any work done because I get 15+ calls a day for job offers. And I'm not that great a programmer, either. There's just plenty of work apparently.

    Sometimes I wonder how long this will last. Will my skills still be needed in 10 years? Will the robots take over by then? I don't know. I do know that I try to keep up with the latest technologies and keep my skills fresh. Will nobody want to hire a 50 year old? I don't know. Thus far, as far as I can tell, no job I've had even really knew how old I was when hiring me. I suppose I don't look my age.

    It may sound silly or simplistic but really, just keep working. Work hard, be an honest worker, but don't kill yourself. Save some money. Spend time with your kids. I've had mostly telecommute jobs for the last 5 years so that helps with the family time. If you can start something on the side, do it. I plan on doing that, but it hasnt happened yet. Get an old car to restore so you have something non-computer to do.

    You'll be fine.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  212. the past is done and gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, get into a whole body exercise regime like Tai Chi or a gentle form of yoga (I'm assuming you spend a lot of hours sitting). Then you won't need to worry about Medicare, which may not be around in the same form when you're ready to retire or qualify for it. Assume that the tech world and the financial world, are never going to have another "golden age" during your remaining "career years." Globalization has or is tearing down the mechanical and geographic barriers that have traditionally protected the relatively higher pay scales and job security traditionally enjoyed by American workers in fields such as finance and IS. That can't be reversed until someone breaks the Internet. You might look into learning auto repair, that is a job that can't be completely exported yet - until car manufacturers take the Mac/Apple approach to building cars. Hmmmm. Growing one's own food is wonderful and quite meditative.

  213. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    In the 70s careers tended to last 20+ years, in the 80s this number dropped to 6 years, The 90s came and distinctions blurred between jobs, careers, hobbies and survival. Buddy, we're 10+ years into the new millennium. Figure out what you need to do and quit looking at standard models.
    Can you work for yourself?
    Is there something you can manufacture or service you can perform without needing an overseer?
    Are members of your family old/strong enough to contribute to a family business?
    If you can quit relying on others for your prosperity, you can dump this whole useless line of worry.
    IT has been a bust for careers, compared to the promise of the 90s. We may even be forced into ludditism by coming solar storms in the next few years.
    Find a need or demand and fill it. Think outside the box. Learn self sufficiency and quit mourning money you threw at the last "career", it's gone and tomorrows challenges may not be helped by it. Dammit, you're a geek, get flexible and quit thinking about the obvious, overcrowded, overrated, overused path to a paycheck. Find something that people could pay cash for, too. If they don't know you have it, they can't tax it.
    If you really need a moment to think and a jumpstart, it may sound ridiculous on the face of it, but, join an MLM. Even if you aren't successful, you will have a low cost education in business,sales and people skills, self motivation and probably a cupboard full of vitamins. These ingredients, less the vitamins are vital to being self employed.
    Good luck with your search, may you satisfy your dreams along with your wallet.
    Keep the kids coming, that's how we achieve some immortality and offset the scumbags of the world, who are breeding too.
    Don't spend your time worrying, it can't help and will hurt. Replace worry with planning and get a good nights sleep.

    First some comforting advice. Vote for Obamacare. That way the USA, the last holdout for universal medical care will join the world, and if by badluck you need some medical treatment, you and your family will not go bankrupt.
    With every opportunity you have, I would look to getting more courses under your belt, more knowledge and try to gain more skills, and do a lot of networking.

      We in Canada can still work our 35 years in IT in one company. But you have to invest in yourself with skills that your employer can use. Be positive and if you follow some of the advice mentioned above, realize it is another lifestyle.
     

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  214. Your first mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was turning 40. Sorry--that's unforgivable.

    BTW, 50 is when damnation sets in.

  215. Where's your passion? by andrewwarrenau · · Score: 1

    For me the question really comes down to this: what are you really passionate about? Does what you do each day still light your fire? Do you find fulfilment and challenge in your work? I'm 45 and got laid off six months ago (third time in 20 years in IT). It was a marvellous opportunity to sit back, take stock and think - do I really want to do this for another 20 years? It surprised me how simple the answer to this was. Although it has been a good career and the money has been pretty good, I know that forward options for me are becoming limited. I don't want to go into management; as an architect I'm not too far from the upper limit of the technical stream; I have zero interest in switching to allied fields (e.g. technical sales), and I'm pretty over having to relearn stuff every five years or so to stay employable. Most of all, I'm sick of doing work that makes no discernable difference to anyone's life... in a global sense it's pretty meaningless. So - I've tossed in the towel and am studying medicine instead. It didn't take too much thinking to realise that this is where my passions really lie... life's too short for regret, so I'm grasping the opportunity while I'm still young enough to get the study done and have time left to practise medicine. If your answers to my first questions point you to the areas you already work in, then great - figure out ways to make your career sustainable for another 20 years or so, and be prepared for compromises. If not, now is the time to grasp the nettle and make real changes, while you still have time for them to make a difference. But know what you are passionate about! This is what will power you.

  216. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by camperslo · · Score: 1

    There's an IT opening at the NTIA. Yes, there's actually an agency besides the FCC involved with spectrum.

    http://www.usajobs.gov/JobSearch/Search/GetResults?OrganizationID=CM61&ApplicantEligibility=All

    http://www.ntia.doc.gov/about

  217. Go into sleeper mode at your main job and consult by Zeio · · Score: 1

    Find a job where you can dig yourself in, prune the bushes and keep things working without breaking your neck. Branch our and secretly start consulting. I use an SSH tunnel to port 443 and do tons of outside work at work. What I find is that in order to have the ability to move to where you want to be it helps to be in 2 places at once, or more. I gave this advice to a developer and he worked at a hotel chain doing programming and IT and worked at Oracle at the same time. Its easier to have more than one job if you have one main and then consult. But its possible to have two jobs. Be careful of background checks when getting the new job.

    Any job which requires 40 hours a week will likely require 80. There is no end to how much blood work can draw from you. Draw the lines, and make sure every hour of your day is productive -

    Most people have a lot of fake work. Most work is fake work. Having consulting work and wage work at the same time just makes you more efficient.

    Double dip. Keep in mind most corporate masters do nothing but land grabs, politics and territory wars, nothing but Fake Work, so defend yourself by double dipping. Consulting keeps the skills relavent.

    --
    Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  218. In globalization, sell first and build later by NewYork · · Score: 1

    And with CHINDIA prowling, you need to sell first and build later.

  219. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    You can go to bed with Obama for all I care, you've obviously got the hots for him.
    Unlike most hypochondriacs that make up the world, I don't need to see a doctor often enough to spend a fucking dime on medical care.
    Besides the fact that there are several religions, including mine that don't turn our temple over to every pill pushing butcher that bought a degree and can't wait to start getting perks from pharma companies.
    I prefer to invoke my freedom of religion, constitutionally guaranteed me in this country.

    Yes I believe if you keep pouring money into an IT education, you may almost be able to sustain a career. Unless of course it is suddenly more cost effective to outsource your job or automate it with scripting. IT changes too quickly to be very profitable or stable, anywhere, anytime. Like grain harvest, the military, and second shift jobs, IT is a young single mans GAME. Not to say others don't , but that is the demographic that best benefits. Of course it's a lifestyle, but you likely won't be a young single man after 35 years.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  220. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Dear flyneye

    I did think like you, until I reached 55. Then I was a) either too expensive to be hired or b) supposedly not up to date with technology or c) too old for a pseudo career.

    That is when I started my independent consulting and it was the era that as I was lucked in, had one contract every 8 months (ERP specialist). Well, there are 8 months of living from savings, 8 months of choosing car repairs or mortgage payments and 8 months of covering school fees for my teenagers.

    What do you do if somewhere in-between, without group insurance, one of the family gets sick. Your response was that of a single person, no family, no parents or grandparents, and lots of belief in autonomy. Well, we all are busy being born and then busy t'il death. And sadly, during being busy, what goes around comes around, such as pregnancy, illness, a broken leg, a chronic medical condition, etc. The unpredictable is something else.

    Well, I am grateful to live in Canada. I twice caught the infamous flesh eating bacteria disease. I was 12 hours away from amputation of my leg when the anti-biotics kicked in. 12 days in hospital, $24,000 in fees and $1,000 per day in medication, xrays, nurse care etc.

    With our wonderful Canadian medicare system, (what Obamacare is wanting to give to 30 million American poor and to the rich is Universal Medicare) did was allow me to walk away with a $250.00 out of pocket amount for antibiotics that I continued at home after hospital release. Before you blow up with a response, look at longevity figures for different countries. It is an indication of the general health of a nation. Low numbers indicate that the poor are dying and unable to survive.

    Private insurance in Canada would cost me over $1000 per person ((we are 5 and my daughter has MS) and private insurers can and do refuse to accept you as a client. They also place limits on payouts.

    My government insurance is about $1000 annually for the family. And it is part of my income tax. So I am grateful to pay. And now that I am 70+, and do not have an income, I am still covered. Wow,

    So here is another thing for you to shoot down. I pay $10/mo per person for drug insurance. Thats under 150/yr. I pay 20% of the prescription cost. When or if my 20% of the cost exceeds $1000.00, the balance is at even a bigger reduced charge (just the pharmacies dispensing fee). Universal medicare is to prevent health costs from bankrupting a family.

    So, paying the government for health is not a worry for me or my kids. The costs are reasonable. Ask your immediate family what they would do if they cannot purchase health insurance.

    flyneye, Please stop watching cnn, fox, abc and learn how the rest of the G7 world lives. Don't follow the corporate propaganda. Universal medicare is not communism.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  221. Just went through this thought process last year by twigles · · Score: 1
  222. choices for real action by prgrmr · · Score: 1

    1. Leverage your industry knowledge and move to a company that's still in the financial industry, but doesn't handle other people's money. These companies (start-ups aside) are generally more stable now that we are 4 years beyond the home mortgage melt-down, and they have less risk. This, of course, means they offer less rewards (lower base salaries, lesser or no bonuses), but that's the trade-off for not worrying about getting laid-off

    2. Management, but only if you want to embrace the accountability. I'll assume you are all too aware of the politics of accountability in the financial industry. Being a manager is willingly putting yourself in the political cross-hairs. It's going to be like that to a lesser degree in any industry, so if you can't take that sort of heat, stay out of the management kitchen.

    3. Stay in programming if you love what you do and are at all good at it. It's much easier to get up and go to work everyday doing something you love, or even just like, than something you hate to do but think it's better because of the pay or benefits.

    4. Look at small and mid-size companies. Ageism is much less of a factor in smaller companies. While being the jack-of-all-IT-trades has it's stress points, it also makes you somewhat indispensable to your employer, and is much easier to do in smaller IT shops.

    5. Stay where you are and try to be the MVP. If you don't already know where the bodies are buried or what skeletons are in whose closet, you're not likely to find out now. So, you'll have to become valuable the old fashioned way: earning it. Find a skill set that is absolutely necessary to your companies bottom line, find out who on the business side cares about it, become and expert in the skill and the friend of those business folks. Now you have an advocate in a profit-center to go with your argument on the IT side for the company keeping you around. If you do good work and can make the effort to politically correctly for your environment to get acknowledgment for it (notice I did not say credit), then your work will *almost* speak for itself.

    6. Pray.

  223. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Congratulations on your consulting business, that was well timed for a while.
    Like I said, I have a religious aversion to doctors as do Christian Science and I believe the Adventists. We do our own medical care including birthing, setting bones, stitches. If we can't handle it, it is surely our time to go. That is just part of my faith. I sit here right now, not in any significant pain, from a molar I extracted with a pair of pliers , Tuesday. Not much swelling either.

    Even if this condition did not exist and I did seek "professional" medical care, I do not believe putting a government designated to perform sundry maintenance jobs and regulate interstate commerce in charge of something best left to an individual. People need to take care of people, governments need to stay out of every aspect of private life. When we put what we should be doing in the hands of a government, we essentially are asking for parenting and regulation of our personal life. While this seems to be fine here in the U.S. with many ethnic subcultures, immigrants that know no better, and lazy people who do not wish to take responsibility for themselves, this interaction of socialist government prospers here. I think this is mostly due to the dumbing down of the population in government funded public schools who "sanitize" and misdirect history of the constitutional liberty we once enjoyed.
      To quote Franklin, one of our founders and super geek, " he who would sacrifice liberty for safety, deserves neither".
    So in a word, No, I don't think socialist medicine would be desireable, would I have an inkling of a need.
    If the G7 countries all got tattoos on their asses, what would yours be?

    Thank you for your considerate and thoughtful answer, Leslie. ( Not sure identifying yourself on the internet is such a good idea, but indicates a coy forthcomingness of character.)

    Fly N. Eye , somewhere in the several supposeably sovereign states.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  224. Re:Here's the secret, bro... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Hi Flyneye

    I need to correct one major error in your response. The doctors are independent, and work on a fixed amount and a variable amount.
    The patient seeks out a doctor, it is not the government that says "Here is your doctor",
    You cannot be entirely correct in your views as there is room for governments which represent society as law and order protectors, provide rules to govern commerce, fraud protection etc, armies for emergencies and protection, etc.

    The government does not assign you a doctor, one is required to go and find our own. My family doctor has been our doctor since we chose him at the time of our marriage, some 40+ years ago. He is a few years younger than me. When we need a doctor, I call for an appointment, just as you would do for your family doctor or specialist. Did you really pull the molar? Is it possible it could have been saved?

    For example of medical treatment. I had a gradual hearing loss problem. Went to my family doctor, he scoped my ears and referred me to a specialist. It turned out blockage was not wax, but eczema. I got an ear-drop prescription (filling plus medication = $10.00) and that problem is cured. My hearing is as good now as it gets for my age.

    We have drifted from the original topic of job and job security. Each person has a comfort zone where, if he is in it, he excels.

    Back to Government and Medicine.
    As I see it, a major problem regarding illness in the USA is overproduction of food. The food is so cheap that fast food joints bigger it up to pull in the crowd, sell the extra large trios for a few pennies more. Obesity is your number one killer. And then there is the ethanol from corn, when the corn could be used to feed the starving in Africa, and by so doing, win America the praise of the (Muslim) world, a world with over a billion people.

    The other problem of course, are medical malpractice lawsuits. Every doctor is never knowing if he was deficient in his practice, so trivial problems require exhaustive testing and of course, exhaustive costs.

    I call the discussion a draw. I live my style, I am delighted with it, I want not, and I will hope to respond to many more slashdot.com subjects where I can add to, or tease the author with a different view.

    Happy belated July 4th.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  225. Re: Question by virginiajim · · Score: 1

    1. You may be able to do the same work, but in another country. I know a math major about your age who worked at a nuclear power plant and was sent to China last year to work as a consultant on a new nuclear plant being placed into operation. He's a black guy, not Asian. You often have to move within the US as a career develops, so why stop at the boarder. 2. For perspective and possible insight go to http://www.econlib.org/library/EconTalk.xml and listen to any of the podcasts that look interesting. All of the speakers are specialists and experts on topics related to economic matters and no topics are dry or uninteresting. And speaking about perspective is what this TED Talk is about, which may also help: http://bit.ly/LDbj8M 3. Buy a copy of "What Color Is Your Parachute" at http://amzn.to/OfdaAs or check a copy out of the library. That book has been around and reissued/revised for at least 20 years. It can help you learn about yourself and perhaps create a new job, even in your present organization. Perhaps you can get $1 million or two from Kickstarter.org! Someone here mentioned folks fighting over the same piece of pie which reminds me of a comment about finding a way to grow the pie larger. 4. More perspective and ideas may come from a reading of "Reflections on Bullough's Pond" at http://amzn.to/LTNpZl . It offers insights and explanations about New England's economic development over the last 400 years that apply today and may offer ideas about your organization and career. 5. Further into left field is this: the Conversations Network is looking for editors of podcasts it offers for free via the internet. It pays a nominal amount for each description submitted and at any given time there are about 100 podcasts in need of being so described. What's neat is that it makes you describe the interesting work of a variety of people, so you have to do some creative thinking, some creative writing, and use your internet skills while learning about work in other fields. This is a non-profit organization, so a career with it won't be your goal. However, the exercise might be useful. Other members of your family, etc. might also be interested. Here's the link with information about how to apply -- a small exercise in job hunting, too: http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/websiteEditorApplication/ Good Luck.

  226. Re:I know this will fly against conventional wisdo by seantide · · Score: 1

    ...but let's face it, some of us have no interest in management, or consulting. That's why, after a 15-year career in software development, I turned to teaching. And if you're laughing because I'm advocating teaching as an alternative career, you miss my point: Sometimes getting out of the field is a viable option. I grew tired of lining the pockets of CEOs and PHBs and gutless business owners who simply ran their businesses into the ground, businesses built partially on my hard work. Sometimes you have to take a step back and ask yourself "What exactly have I done for society these past years?" Chances are, if you're a software developer at a "large investment bank," not a hell of a lot.

    Good points.

    I have found that working for things I believe in, generally has also helped my survival a great deal. Most of the time when I am looking for work it is in military, research, or industry. I believe they are foundations of this country and need help, and whenever I work in those fields I'm generally happy. Yes there is all kinds of bullshit to deal with, but you get that wherever you go. Most of the shops I work for, they are generally focused and have well known goals and needs.

    Every time I have strayed from that past, I've been fairly unhappy. In a couple of places I made a six figure income, and I was absolutely miserable. Management by whim, customers internal and external who were clueless but drove everything, managers who got raises by screwing everything rotten.

    NOTE: I'm not saying you have to focus on those three areas to be happy and productive, that's just my particular choice, and doesn't include a few other qualifiers I have developed over the years. It just happens that much of the time those shops are in the "let's just get work done" category and I find they work better for me.

    Wherever you try to apply for work, think long and hard about actually doing the work and what you are contributing to. That will tell you far more about how happy you will be and how secure you job will be than pay scales. Also remember that even seemingly minor differences in benefits can end up being worth 5, 10, 20K US dollars a year in pay. I took a job for $20K less than what I was making recently, but the benefits are worth over 25K more and all of them are cheaper and less money out of my own paycheck.

  227. Assuming there will be any Medicare left.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are an optimist. Why do you believe that there will be Medicare in 25 years? Or banks? I "look forward" to working until age 75, when I plan to take some kind of friendly poison. If the world has not ended before then.
    That said, I think you got plenty of good advice in this thread, one way or the other. If I were to pick up on one thing, it would be the "side project". Hey, you work for a bank, you should be able to do some kind of financial advice software or something. It helps no end when you want to get another job, and it may even get you some money if you get enough customers.
    Oh, by the way, nobody gets interesting jobs through interviews or resumes. Networking and contacts is the only thing that matters. The ONLY thing. You live in NY, get into the "silicon alley" scene with your side project. You will have more interesting (and well-paid) work than you can think of in a few months.