Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Storing Items In a Sealed Chest For 25 Years?

New submitter accet87 writes "We are celebrating the Silver Jubilee of our graduation next month and have come up with an idea where we will build an air-tight chest in which each of us will deposit something and will open the chest only on our Golden Jubilee, i.e. after another 25 years. I want to understand what kind of items can be safely stored for 25 years and what kind of precautions are required to be taken. I am sure things like paper, non-ferrous metallic objects, wood, etc., will hold up well. What about data storage electronically? I don't think CD/DVDs, etc., will be usable. Even if the data is retained, reading it in 2037 may be a challenge."

310 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Lesson from school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    On my first day of class of Junior High school, my Mother packed a lunch for me, which include a Thermos full of milk.

    I promptly threw it in my locker and forgot about it.

    On my last day of class, I was cleaning out the locker and found the abandoned Thermos. I brought it home unopened.

    My Mother made me take it out to the far end of the lot and open and empty it out there, which I did.

    The moral of the story: Don't put milk in your sealed chest!

    1. Re:Lesson from school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd also like to add do not put a frozen turkey in your sealed chest.

      In my final year of high school, I took one from my parents freezer and placed it in a garbage bag. My friends and I found a locker which was bolted shut in an unused section of school and let it sit for a few weeks. Just before final exams, we carefully cut the bag open just before final exams. The smell was unbearable, and it permeated throughout the school so well that it took a few days for someone to locate it.

      For the love of god, don't put a frozen turkey in your chest!

    2. Re:Lesson from school by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      One year, shortly before Christmas, someone gave me and my mother a whole frozen turkey. Because we lived in a small apartment we only had a fridge/freezer and we didn't have room for the turkey.

      Being early winter in Minnesota, the logical thing was to just put it outside on the porch, in a large cooler, and let mother nature keep it frozen.

      This plan would have worked brilliantly, except we completely forgot about the turkey until late July.....

    3. Re:Lesson from school by plover · · Score: 1

      I had a small Tupperware container of applesauce that was buried beneath some papers for about six months. I went to the restroom to rinse it out, and when I opened it instead of the expected rotten food smell, the smell of delicious apple cider came out!

      I still dumped it down the drain without tasting it. But it probably would have been really good.

      So there you go. Put in a Tupperware container of applesauce. Or maybe skip all that risk and just bury a bottle of 25 year old Scotch, which you know will be good in another 25 years..

      --
      John
    4. Re:Lesson from school by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I once opened a jug of apple juice, decided it wasn't quite what I expected; stoppered it and stuck it under the sink and promptly forgot about it. It spent the winter under there, at temps just above freezing. Rediscovered next spring... turned to delicious sparkling apple cider, in fact I gave some of it to a friend as a wedding present.

      Conversely there was the package of mini sausages I once forgot in the trunk of the car... appeared to be just fine 9 months later, but I wasn't touchin' them, no way!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Lesson from school by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      The moral of the story: Don't put milk in your sealed chest!

      It's fine to put milk in the sealed chest, just make sure to pack it in Foreverware!

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    6. Re:Lesson from school by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Just before final exams, we carefully cut the bag open just before final exams.

      Next time I'll be deadly serious next time!

    7. Re:Lesson from school by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Oooh, I love the Scotch idea :) That would really make the re-opening event something to look forward to!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  2. Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by mlts · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I were storing stuff for a long time, I would consider using an airtight sealed case, oxygen absorber and a dessicant, making sure that if any liquid came out, it could not touch the protected device. I would separate out items just to be safe.

    Some items, like SD media, I'd also consider using anti-static packaging just for peace of mind as well.

    1. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by similar_name · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What should you put in a time capsule? Anything non-perishable that might mean something to you. Consider people recovering their time-capsules from 25 years ago. There might be a 5.25 floppy in there with someone's favorite childhood game. It may be difficult to play the game but the floppy disk's texture, smell, and label will bring back the memories. If you're going to store media you may find that in 25 years the data on it may be a pain in the ass to retrieve but the object itself will mean something. I also suggest media that you've used a lot. For example if you've been using a particular usb drive for the last year and it's time to upgrade put the old one in the capsule. 25 years from now the memories of using it are likely to bring you back more than the data that's on it.

    2. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Acid-free archival paper should be good, even for photos. Look at what the manufacturer says - they mean serious business when they make these papers, real art will be put up in museums reproduced on them.

      As far as data goes, the fastest way is to yenc encode (like MIME/base64) it and print it out on said archival paper. It is possible you can get it transferred to microfilm but that's hard to OCR even nowadays. In 25 years, the yenc algorithms will still be around, and you can OCR and decode the data from the paper; if it consists of an executable it will probably not be a problem to run since we have x86 emulators as we are now, but you never know. libjpeg will still be around, libz, libpng, etc; if all else fails, describe the algorithm and data structure and print THAT out, it is much smaller than an executable. Then you can re-code the lost libz and decompress your data.

      If more data is that important to you, you have a few routes:

      You can make cassette tapes full of data like old computers used to do. Don't laugh. Just put a player in the "time capsule" too.

      You can store multiple redundant archival DVDs including QuickPAR files *along with a DVD drive using USB 3.0*. It may die due to permanent magnet weakening but other than that it'll almost definitely survive. It's true that they degrade with time but that is also usually with usage. It is likely that, if you can read them, they will retain enough information, along with the surviving QuickPAR chunks, to reconstitute one. Even better, since there is a push to archive things on DVD discs, it is possible that in 2037 there may be drives in some public center for people to come in and read their old archived discs.

      A small faraday cage will do miracles with other magnetic materials.

      But if you're going to all the trouble, why not just keep all this stuff with you for the next 25 years? :-D

    3. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't have a 5 and 1/4 inch drive? :-o Put in the whole PC. I recently uncovered an old laptop at work with Windows 3.1 and it was fun playing with it again. (Mainly reinforcing what I already knew: Microsoft Windows prior to 95 and NT4 was complete garbage.)

      It will be fun to look at the old Windows XP or Vista OS and say, "Man things were primitive back then. Only 2 gig of RAM? How did they ever manage to run with so little?"

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      Storing data on some devices may be more reliable than others. E.g. on EPROMS may work, just provide information about how the data is stored.

      And if you look back - 25 years isn't that bad. But it's bad enough to see that we did change physical storage media formats and interface types a few times. Mid 80's saw 8" hard disks, 5.25" floppies, ST506/ST412 hard disk interfaces and CD-ROM:s. Those were replaced by 5.25" hard disks with IDE interfaces and 3.5" floppies. Then the USB bus appeared and we could see all kinds of memory modules - like USB sticks, SD cards etc with a lot more capacity than the floppies and early hard disks. And the IDE interface is now replaced by the SATA interface.

      But even though media has increased in size the last few years I suspect that the rate of change when it comes to hardware interfaces is going to slow down a bit - people will get irritated when old media can't be read. (That's why I still have an old 386sx with a 5.25" floppy drive just in case.) This means that storing data on a memory stick supporting USB3.0 may be possible to recover after 25 years. But don't count on data stored on hard drives since the interface and protocol may change again to improve performance. The SD cards have changed over time a bit, but a micro-SD card may still be readable. However I don't know how well flash memories actually can retain data in the long term.

      Considering the number of devices today that uses the old MS-DOS filesystem (ok, not exactly, but FAT-32 at least) it may be possible that it will still be around by then. Other filesystem formats are less likely to survive that well, but NTFS may survive, and the Linux ext2-4 filesystem formats as well as the ISO 9660 (used by CD-ROM:s)

      During the next 25 years it is possible that the Linux kernel may fork, but I suspect that it will still be around - it has spread to an amazing number of devices even though it isn't on the desktop for a number of reasons. (Except for the more dedicated users)

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A ten year old laptop with a CD drive (or a five year old one with DVD) is pretty cheap to include. I still have one computer with a 5.25"/3.5" combo drive and two more with just a 5.25" drive (no HDD). They last in storage excellent - I only use them a few times a year.

    6. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by shokk · · Score: 1

      So no tuna fish sandwiches?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    7. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      I see internal connectors (IDE/SATA) being easier to come up with than external connectors (USB/firewire) after that much time. There's still plenty of motherboards with a single IDE connector on them, but eventually they may start breaking compatibility with older versions of USB. By 2037, we might be on USB 8.0 that's only backwards compatible with 5.0 and later and you won't be able to find anything that will connect with 3.0. However, they still might stick a single SATA-II compatible connector on some motherboards for backwards compatibility. Of course, this is just assuming current trends for providing older interfaces holds up - hard to say where computers will be in 25 years. We might be standardized on some totally new technology not yet on the drawing boards or we might just have thin clients with no extra ports at all and do everything in the cloud.

    8. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Nyder · · Score: 5, Informative

      What should you put in a time capsule? Anything non-perishable that might mean something to you. Consider people recovering their time-capsules from 25 years ago. There might be a 5.25 floppy in there with someone's favorite childhood game. It may be difficult to play the game but the floppy disk's texture, smell, and label will bring back the memories. If you're going to store media you may find that in 25 years the data on it may be a pain in the ass to retrieve but the object itself will mean something. I also suggest media that you've used a lot. For example if you've been using a particular usb drive for the last year and it's time to upgrade put the old one in the capsule. 25 years from now the memories of using it are likely to bring you back more than the data that's on it.

      I have picked up 25+ year old computer systems that work fine. Floppies that are that old, still retaining the info and working. And we are talking like sitting in an attic or garage or basement for many years. Not only do I and many others have systems that can read the info from 25+ years ago, i'm sure if you put stuff on CD/DVD's and maybe a thumbdrive, peeps will be able to get to it to check out.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    9. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by grumbel · · Score: 5, Informative

      USB is pretty much everywhere these days, in your phone, your game console, in your MP3 player, in your harddrive, in your TV, maybe even in your toaster. In Europe there it's even part of law, as they want to get rid of all the custom phone chargers. For mouse and keyboards you don't need anything faster then USB1.0, so there is no need to upgrade, so I would expect that to be around for a pretty damn long time, especially given that right now there is nothing on a the horizon to replace it and even if, whatever will replace it will very likely be either compatible or can be made compatible with a cheap adapter, just like you can still get a serial port and an IDE apdopter for your computer today.

      The whole obsolete hardware craze is really a little overrated, as when it happened in the past, it was always with pretty damn obscure hardware. Of course not everybody has a machine around to read some old NASA tapes, so you will have trouble reading those in a few decades, but pretty damn near everybody has something around to read USB.

    10. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by icebike · · Score: 1

      I agree. Go with something that is VERY common, and simply a socket connection (like USB, SD card, MicroSD,).

      Don't go with moving media, like disk drives, unless they are in an external drive chassis with USB connectors, because disk drive connectors have changed twice in the last 25 years and its likely to happen again. Bear in mind the desktop or laptop computer may be completely replaced in 25 years by flat screen portable devices.

      Modern interfaces like USB tend to be backward compatible with prior devices. So when USB 6.0 is pushed out in 25 years, there will still be a boat load of USB 1,2 and 3 devices, and chances are if the connectors are the same they will also be compatible.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by similar_name · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying you can't bring back the data I'm only suggesting that the object itself will bring back more memories. So if you include a laptop it should be one you used a lot. Maybe even your first one as that will likely mean more to you. If you go out and buy one solely for the purpose of retrieving data I think you'll find 25 years from now that the laptop gives you a sort of indirect nostalgia compared to a laptop you used frequently.

      I can play River Raid on Stella any time I want without having buried anything. Holding a River Raid Atari 2600 cartridge in my hand provides another kind of nostalgia. The feelings of anticipation and excitement I had as a kid is very connected to that piece of plastic as much or more than the few kilobytes of data on it. Of course an entire Atari with a few cartridges could be even better but likely with diminishing returns for space. I guess what I'm trying to say is don't put the data above the media that delivers it. 25 years from now the physical objects that held your data will trigger more senses. So if you're going to put a computer in a time capsule, do it because it was your computer not because you're trying to preserve what 25 years from now will be a tiny amount of data. Data of any importance or meaning you'll likely still have access to anyway.

    12. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by icebike · · Score: 5, Informative

      Acid-free archival paper should be good, even for photos. Look at what the manufacturer says - they mean serious business when they make these papers, real art will be put up in museums reproduced on them.

      We are talking 25 years here.
      You don't need to be particularly worried about printed documents, even photos, over that short period.

      Go into any business that has been around for 30 or 40, or dig into some boxes in your attic or your parents attic, dig into the back of the file cabinets or storage boxes, and you will find documents much older than 25 years that are in perfect shape.

      Acid free paper is for 100 years plus, and has been the norm for off the shelf office paper since the 60s or earlier. True archival paper is Alkaline paper, which has a life expectancy of over 1,000 years for the best paper and 500 years for average grades.

      So for 25 years, no special precautions need be taken when using common commercial printing paper that you might buy at your local office supply store.

      Even Newspapers can be saved for 25 years by simply bagging them in plastic, but it might be better to access the newspaper's web site and print the desired articles on you laser printer using standard office paper.

      25 years is not that hard to do.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    13. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Acid-free archival paper should be good, even for photos."

      I'm a railway man, and where I live all the official complaints books* in the stations date from 1946.
      *(where travelers can write their complaints in)
      They don't look brand new, especially around the corners, but they're still used 'til this very day.

      PS. People complained about the same stuff 60 years ago that they do now.
      'The company is criminal, the service terrible....'

    14. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering the usage case - i.e, pure nostalgia - there is probably nothing that will be more poignant and meaningful than the voices of your classmates (any number of whom will probably be deceased at a 50-year anniversary mark).

      The plain facts are that any digital medium, for all the reasons discussed in this thread, is unreliable. Sure - there are plenty of anecdotal reports of individual durability; but do you want to put the memories of your life into a statistically unreliable container? I further note that there's a recent (just a few days old) news story about how electronics are up to ten times more likely to degrade from radiation exposure than previously believed - which kind of puts the kibosh on including small computers and/or readers with chips or microprocessors in your time capsule.

      Again - voice.

      Try archival, 180-grain vinyl records. They're the most durable and reliable method humans have devised for long-term storage of information since we chiseled stone tablets. Record players aren't going away any time in the next few decades. And while cutting your own records may not be cheap as a hobby, for this purpose the price is quite reasonable: like $150ish.

      I have records pressed over 60 years ago that play just fine and they're on crappy vinyl, they've been through literally hellish handling, and the technology used to record them was embryonic at best. You won't do any better.

    15. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would consider using an airtight sealed case, oxygen absorber and a dessicant...

      "Stuff" will last longer in the absence of oxygen. Try to replace the air with an inert gas or nitrogen. This is common in food preservation as well where vacuum sealing alone isn't enough. Sometimes the shape of grains or seeds leaves too much space for air.

      What facilitates aging?
      - Oxygen
        - Remove oxygen
        - Make air tight
      - Water
        - Remove moisture
        - Make water tight
      - Light
        - Remove light sources ?
        - Make light tight
      - Excessive heat
        - Remove heat sources
        - Shield from heat
      - ...
      - ...
      - Time
        - Put in box and accelerate to near the speed of light

    16. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Floppies are for the faint of heart, I would record your meeting onto an 8-tracks audio cartridge and put hit in the chest without any other form of protection.. You should learn to take risks. 8-track players are still available for nothing on e-bay: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_trksid=p5197.m570.l1311&_nkw=8-track+player&_sacat=0

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    17. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's think to some of those "ubiquitous" ports and storage we've seen around, shall we:
      - PS/2 connector: 1987-2000s: obsolete within 25 years
      - rs232 port: 1981- late 90s
      - parallel port: 1981-1990s
      - VGA: 1987-present (usage declining rapidly)

      - tape drive (commodore, spectrum, etc): obsolete (as a household reader) within 25 years
      - Floppys:
          + 8 inch: 1971-1980s
          + 5 1/4 inch: 1978-1990s
          + 3 1/2 inch: 1982-2000s
          + zipdrive: 1994-2000s
      - USB drives: 2000-present
      - CD-ROM: 1985-present (thanks to backwards compatibility, otherwise they'd be extinct)

      Etc. etc. etc.
      Morale of this story: using any currently ubiquitous technology for something that needs to be accessible in 25 years is *not* a good idea. Sure, USB is really ubiquitous right now -- and VGA has been for a while. VGA is on the way out, and in 25 years it's really not unthinkable USB will be too (the demands for small equipment such as netbooks and phones are driving manufacturers to mini-display ports and micro-usb at this very moment, so really, don't count on it staying around two and a half decades). In other words: include the entire reading device (not just the drive, but a PC or laptop) and the charger for it. Chances of being able to get compatible voltage out of the wall in 25 years are reasonable (although they've been playing with that too).

      So, for example: dump in an old iPhone, which carries whatever you want it to (pics, texts, movies, etc) -- and add the charger!
      But, even better: don't add anything digital/electronic for storing info -- at most, add it for you to play around with in 25 years and marvel at that quaint old tech.

    18. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Flash memory won't hold data for that long

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    19. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My Ti 99/4a, from 1980, still works fine and it's been stored in various garages and attics over the years. The cassette with programs has degraded but the cartridge games work fine.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      25 years ago, the 5 1/4 inch drive was just about losing out to the 3 1/2 but still outsold it. No not everyone has a 5 1/4 inch reader anymore.

    21. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by papa248 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed. 25 years is no biggie. When I worked for Fitzimmons, we had blue prints for John Deere tractors going back to the 50s. (This was in 2008). Store *data* in a couple of formats, use high-quality CDs/DVDs, use a good thumb drive, and maybe even an SSD. Store all in a moisture barrier bag (check Uline) with dessicant, and seal. They are also ESD compliant. You'll be fine. I just had to buy a bunch of ICs* made in 1990 that were stored as such, and they work just fine.

      * I work for a contract electronics manufacturer that is based in the US

      --


      The higher, the fewer.
    22. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Tough+Love · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft Windows prior to 95 and NT4 was complete garbage.

      As opposed to what after that? Incomplete garbage?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    23. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by tsa · · Score: 1

      But you didn't test it. It would be a nice way to test your hypothesis. What kind of data do you need to test how much is left after 25 years?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    24. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've got a (nearly) complete collection of Analog magazines going back to the 60's that have survived just fine shoved in random boxes. A large number of them even spent several years piled up in a non-climate controlled storage unit. I've just recently gotten them all organized and displayed in chronological order on my shelves and decided to read them in order (I was born in 85 so most of the early ones are all new stories for me! Thanks Dad for being an infohoarder!). I haven't noticed any serious deterioration except some bent pages from careless handling and the inevitable smudge on the cover they get when you read the whole thing in one sitting. :)

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    25. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by deiol · · Score: 1

      The whole obsolete hardware craze is really a little overrated, as when it happened in the past, it was always with pretty damn obscure hardware. Of course not everybody has a machine around to read some old NASA tapes, so you will have trouble reading those in a few decades, but pretty damn near everybody has something around to read USB.

      Ok, well let's think back to 25 years ago. 25 years ago was 1987, what storage medium was around back then that we could read easily now? 3.5" floppies were around, the 1.44mb high density format was brand new for 1987, how easy is it to read a 3.5" floppy disk these days? No computer comes with a floppy drive, you'd probably be able to find a USB floppy drive so it IS possible to read the disk (if the disk is still good). So it is perfectly understandable to be concerned if media from 2012 will be usable in 2037, despite your believe that the obsolete hardware craze is 'overrated.'

      Personally, I'd store whatever on raw media like an SD card, since readers may exist in the future for SD->whatever-new-interfacethereis. A hard drive in 1987 may have had an MFM interface to it, see many MFM->SATA interfaces these days? Nope. But do you see floppy->USB interfances? Yup. So that's why I'd stick with a raw storage format like a floppy or SD card, and not stick to something with its own interface like IDE, SATA, or USB.

    26. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Altanar · · Score: 1

      I haven't had even a 3.5" drive in my computer in 10 years.

    27. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by michael_cain · · Score: 2

      25 years is not that hard to do.

      Absolutely. I've got boxes in the basement 40 years old with ball-point ink in cheap notebooks that are fine. At that age some of the newsprint is getting rather yellowed, but the ordinary paper and ink are okay. Carbon black pigment typical of monochrome laser printers on decent quality copy paper is probably good for at least a century if it's kept somewhere dark and dry.

      My problems with digital media over the years has mostly been a matter of finding equipment that can read the media and then decoding the application-specific bits. If you have something that can handle the file system, flat ASCII or Unicode text will almost certainly be recoverable; open standards like PDF or Postscript are probably okay over 25 years; a proprietary format may not be recoverable at all. I've seen cases where recovering just the text from early Word documents is difficult, and that's only been a little longer than 25 years.

    28. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by ccguy · · Score: 2

      You don't have a 5 and 1/4 inch drive? :-o Put in the whole PC.

      You must be the one that sat next to me in the plan yesterday. Dude, there's a reason for the carry-on luggage to have maximum sizes. It's so that other people can also store theirs on top.
      No worries though, I was happy to have mine on my lap for the 2 hours, really saved me time after landing.

    29. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      VGA is on the way out, and in 25 years it's really not unthinkable USB will be too

      "on the way out" != unreadable. RS232, parallel ports, PS/2, VGA, zipdrives and 3 1/2 floppies still function perfectly fine on your newest most modern high tech PC thanks to USB, all you have to do is throw $15 or so for an adapter or drive. 5 1/4" is a little harder as your mainboard might not have a floppy connector, but it's not so hard to find one that has one or a drive. 8" is probably the hardest, but they never had near the spread in consumer space like the other tech, they never where ubiquitous and thus not much of a good idea for long term storage to begin with.

      Anyway, I'd worry a hell of a lot more about the durability of the medium, then about the hardware getting obsolete. And this ain't limited to digital stuff, a lot of the stuff I printed out 15 years ago on a HP550C deskjet is now completely faded, the printouts that had exposure to light are completely blank. Same is true for a lot of photos, old black&white stuff from my grandparents that is 100 years old is still in prestine conditions, yet color photos from the 70's are completely faded.

    30. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      even photos

      Maybe if they're not exposed to light. Any 25-year-old photo exposed to light (even regular ol' visible light, no UV necessary) will have its colors (typically blues first) fade out.

    31. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But there are still some of 3 1/2 inch USB drives around or you know where to find a computer that has them. 5 1/4 is a different story.

    32. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      USB will be still around simply because we have not saturated the bus. IDE, VGA, the various Tape Technologies and rs232 all had their limits saturated and surpassed by the replacement technologies. USB will have a few revisions still before it becomes obsolete and replaced. I guess the bigger question might be if the standard will remain backwards compatible with the now at least 25 years old standard or if the operating systems will still have compatible drivers.

    33. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by DrogMan · · Score: 2
      I recently bought an old Apple II.. And tried out some of the 30+ year old 5.25" floppies I had in storage all these years (I've got 100's). Most of them still work!

      I'm suspecting that the bit-density is so low that it's hard for them not to work, but I was still plesantly surprised.

      Now all I need is an Apple II serial card so I can get some of the source code for stuff I write way back then off the floppies onto something else...

    34. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look at some of the time capsules that have been discovered. One rural elementary school
      placed newspapers into sealed glass bottles and had their students write letters to the future generations.
      (They hoped future generations would be as pioneering as they were).

      I've been able to recover data off 5.25" floppy disk drives with no problem, but 3.2 disks are much trickier as many LEt's just love to stomp thumbnail directories, trash cans, archive and other dot directories straight onto whatever media they have access to.

      CD's and DVD's didn't fare so well as they suffered moisture damage. There were lots of little holes in some of them.

    35. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Don't seem many these days, do you?

      USB to R232 adapters cost like $4 on Amazon, not exactly an unobtainable rarity.

    36. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Be sure it will power up and run without the battery (a few won't, most will) and leave the battery out. It'll be dead in 25 years anyway and could rupture in that time.

    37. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      25 years is not that hard to do.

      I disagree. Technology has changed and so has its limitations. 25 years ago there was a different printing standard than what we have today. We have many documents more than 25 years old in perfect shape. All of them either hand drawn, blueprints (back when blueprints were blueprints) or using some other form of chemical duplication process. They are in great shape.

      Now fast forward a bit. Our 10 year old documents are in horrendous shape. They suffer various problems depending on how they were made. Ink has faded on them (yes there were stored properly), or my personal favourite laser printed pages are stuck together so well that when peeled apart the text ends up having transferred to the opposing page.

      Inkjets have also gotten CHEAP. With cheap also becomes lack of longevity. I personally have photos printed on a Canon inkjet using canon inks, on canon paper that have faded or changed colour, much more so than my parent's old photo collection from 30 years ago.

      I agree paper typically lasts quite well, but it's the stuff we put on the paper that often won't stand the test of time without some careful forethought.

    38. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by sjames · · Score: 1

      USB 5.25 Floppy controller. I'm not affiliated with them in any way, it's just the first Google hit I followed.

      But more to the point, the USB standard is used for a great many things while the 5.25 Floppy was a one-off. That makes it a lot more likely to hang around, even if it comes to be seen as a cheap phone charger/keyboard interface.

    39. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      I second this. Try to pump nitrogen into the case. If you can't, then put stuff into Ziplock bags that you suck the air out of.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    40. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Urza9814 · · Score: 2

      It may be dead, but you'll probably still be able to use it. USB is around 15 years old, so in 25 years it'd be a 40 year old standard -- partially. USB 1.0 will be 40 years old; USB 3.0 will be around 25 years old. PS/2 is 25 years old right now, and you can still easily find adapters for it. You can still buy computers that use it. 9-pin serial ports are...well, I can't even seem to find an age on them, but wikipedia references them existing at least through the 80s, so we'll put that at 30 years old...and you can still buy computers with a 9-pin jack. Parallel ports are over 40 years old, and you can still buy computers with jacks for those as well, or an adapter. Hell, the last desktop I bought (around three years ago) had a parallel port, and trust me, that was NOT on my list of priorities. I think it's pretty safe to assume that, even if your computer doesn't have a USB jack on it in 25 years, you'll be able to buy an adapter for it.

    41. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Try argon or carbon dioxide. Both are heavier than air so will be easier to manage. They will naturally tend to flow down, like water. With a heavier than air gas, you can just pump it in, in a still air environment, using a best guess method to figure out when the container is nearly pure argon or CO2.

      Carbon dioxide is (in)famous for this property in Africa. Volcanoes will belch out CO2 every so often and it accumulates in depressions in the ground, where animals and children can be overcome by it. Here's an extreme example of it.

    42. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by unitron · · Score: 1

      What kind of ICs?

      54/74xx?

      555s? 723s?

      Perspiring minds want to know.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    43. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by V-similitude · · Score: 1

      Chances of being able to get compatible voltage out of the wall in 25 years are reasonable (although they've been playing with that too).

      Agree with most of what you say, but "reasonable" is pretty conservative in this case. I'd say there's a very very high probability that you'll still be able to easily use any current charger in 25 years. Even if we somehow migrate to another power technology (wireless power perhaps?) in that time (which seems unlikely given historical rates of power technology progress) there's a ton of stuff people have that they would still want to use in that time-frame, in particular, large appliances that tend to last 15+ years on average. Bottom line, is that even if we switched to a new power source this year (but more likely the transition itself would take around 25 years), we'd still have easily accessible converters around for decades. Not to mention, history indicates that any such switch would not be universal, so travel converters and such would exist probably even much longer.

      I'd say you have a reasonable chance of still being able to use a power charger from today in 100 years. Anything less than 50, you're pretty much guaranteed to be okay. (Of course, making sure the devices themselves stay functional is a different problem.)

    44. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The 5 1/4 inch floppy was the core of PC storage and data manipulation technology for years. It was vastly, vastly more important than USB is today. Its like the Hard drive, CD/DVD drive and the internet combined. I agree USB 5 1/4 exist, my point is that few have them, people don't know other people using 5 1/4 inch media anymore.

    45. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by icebike · · Score: 1

      Preserving something for austerity usually involves pinching pennies or something.

      If you meant posterity instead, just recall that we are talking 25 years. Not that big of a deal.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    46. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Kind of along those lines, and relating to ferrous metals as well as wood:

      Historic service weapons, like AKs, SKSs, M1s, etc. will commonly rust up pretty badly in most environments without frequent (once a month or so) application of a machine oil. However, most of these 'classic' arms have been stored in some fairly adverse environments without any serious problems to either their wood or their metal. They are preserved in a number of fashions, but most noteable is that many are submerged in cosmoline (similar to but lighter than creosote) and then wrapped in paraphin paper (or creosote paper), then put in crates within a warehouse. The cosmoline requires a very high amount of heat to become fluid (greater than 180F at least) and 'sets up' like a resin with age, and is a pest repellent to boot.

      All in all, a petroleum seal of some sort doesn't sound like a bad idea for whatever you're trying to preserve. A ham sandwich, if properly prepared and packaged, will last a very long time indeed. :)

      As for wood: it doesn't have the kind of longevity you're thinking it does. It depends on the kind of wood, its curing, and the environment. A warm, damp environment will destroy wood very quickly. Really, moist air alone is enough to do wood in fairly quickly - that's part of why people tend to seal wood structures (at least to some degree). Consider how many 25-year-old houses are already suffering a great many of the signs of age due to improper care and maintenance. Ants, termites, etc. can all do a lot of damage.

      My dad carved a small sign with our last name on it while he was in college, 30-odd years ago. He gave it to me when I was a kid, and I left it at home when I left. He then packaged it up with the rest of my things and put it in a box in the basement - in upstate NY. The last time I was home I went through the box and it was starting to show signs of decay, as were most of the papers (brittleness, mostly). Still useable? Certainly. But it wasn't hermatically stored or preserved, by any stretch of the imagination. :) Non-processed (in one form or another) organic matter does not hold up all that well in general: things like twigs, bark, sticks, etc. fall apart pretty quickly.

      There is a reason why gold has always been considered valuable. It holds its value, in part, due to being useful for trade. It holds its value in so far as it does not decay and is not consumed.

      I found an ancient copy of Mathematica in a university IT department closet once. It was still unopened - an 8" (or so) metal cassette in a plastic cassette case with an "OEM" sticker on the clasp of the cassette box. It was circa mid-1980s, IIRC, but may have been slightly older than that. I suspect it'd been in a closet or a box for most of its life, and had been for at least the past 10 years, but the labels were still faded. I have no idea if the tape works, because I've never seen anything which might be able to play it.

      The only thing I think is interesting in time capsules are cultural artifacts. Not pop culture artifacts (though being a child of the late 80s, hammer pants and slap bracelets would be kinda fun to see again), but the bigger things: what are people's concerns; what are people thinking; what is in the news? I remember putting a Scholastic News (school propaganda rag given to elementary kids in the US) in a capsule at one point as a child: it'd be neat to have evidence of the crazy things we were indoctrinated with today - particularly the predictions about population growth, water, and climate change. Things may be "bad" this year and today in general, but nothing like they were projecting for 2010, 20 years ago... Back on topic: it would be very interesting to see eg. news articles from today about Obama, or from several years ago about Bush, and see how 20 years treat them. The past 12 have not been kind to the Clinton legacy.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    47. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      " How did they ever manage to run with so little?"

      Just testing this out...Test #3 (responding to +5 post/no title mod)
      http://cryptome.org/2012/07/censored-slashdot-post.htm [cryptome.org]

    48. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by sjames · · Score: 1

      USB represents storage, keyboard, mouse, often networking and scanners, etc on the modern PC. Often phone charging and backup as well. Unlike 5.25 inch floppies, the USB port is as good as it can get for keyboard and mouse. With the floppy, we settled for the 1.2M 5.25 floppy because that's all we could get. I can't imagine what more we would want for the keyboard, so USB will likely be around for a very long time.

      Even if some theoretical USB 8.0 is out which is only directly backwards compatible to 5.0, I'm betting there will be a standard converter to 3.0/2.0/1.1 built in to most hubs.

    49. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by mirix · · Score: 1

      RS-232 dates to the early 60's, however I don't think the DE-9 connector is part of the standard, it only specifies the DB-25 connector / wiring. (think IBM PC, big serial port).

      Although PC AT already moved to the DE9, so I guess I'd place it around then..? Not sure if that was the instigator, but it would have had enough market share to move things over to the nine pin connector.

      (side note.. the connectors used, 'D-subminiature', are from the 50's.. I wonder how big the non subminiature ones were, if they ever existed..?)

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    50. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by climb_no_fear · · Score: 1

      While it's certainly not a bad idea, I'm not even sure if acid-free paper is needed, newspapers are now routinely used to date excavated garbage, they remain readable for up to 50 years http://environment.about.com/od/recycling/a/biodegradable.htm, obviously without any special care (they were in the trash, after all).

    51. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing we know that mice and keyboards have been migrating towards a Bluetooth interface. Some are good, some are bad but I see no reason to believe there will be a physical connection in 10 years much less 25 years at all.

      If we go a but further out, there are two major changes:

      1) Mouses may cease to the the dominant form of pointer input at all, and even keyboards may disappear. We are clearly moving towards touch screen devices replacing mice. Apple's primary OS (by volume and profits) already works mostly exclusively this way, and Google's as well. Microsoft has already announced they intend to make this input format ubiquitous. For keyboards, screen keyboards, voice and light keyboards seem to be growing more prominent as input formats. I suspect physical keyboards will still exist, but if they are rare direct keyboard connectors won't be common and that makes something like BlueTooth being the only type available much more likely.

      2) Going out a bit more, I can think of an obvious improvement to the current system. Right now there is a general input buffer that goes to the kernel. From there mouse / keyboard input gets moved to the window manger which then either directly addresses the input or creates an application event and passes it off to applications. As PCs move beyond single CPU architectures, there is no reason that everything should go through a unified kernel that worked well for one CPU, one execution thread with interrupts. The more that systems can operate in parallel the faster they can go. So a far better architecture would be to have the window manager receiving the inputs from mice and keyboards directly and being able to send messages to the kernel or the applications. This way passive applications can run far away from access to input hardware, and you can start to have variable memory subsystems with faster RAM access times; like you see in mainframes.

    52. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Acid free paper is for 100 years plus, and has been the norm for off the shelf office paper since the 60s or earlier. True archival paper is Alkaline paper, which has a life expectancy of over 1,000 years for the best paper and 500 years for average grades.

      Most decent-quality, bright paper sold in office supply stores is acid-free. The exception seems to be (in my observation,) the cheap, bottom-tiered, store-branded, low-brightness recycled stock. Making a special effort to procure acidic paper for a preservation project is seems absurd.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    53. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by cffrost · · Score: 1

      What facilitates aging?

      One more for your list:

      Off-gassing of contaminants such as VOCs:
      - Allow time for materials (particularly plastics) to off-gas before enclosing.
      - Mitigate with adsorbent(s) such as activated alumina, zeolite(s), and/or activated carbon, the last two of which are available at aquarium supply retailers.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    54. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by grnbrg · · Score: 1

      The difference being that 5.25 drives were in millions of devices (and that's grouping the incompatible drives together -- Apple, IBM and Commodore to name a few...

      USB is in billions of devices. There's probably 3 or 4 in your laptop, 4 to 8 in your pc, a few in your TV, one in your phone. Your monitor probably has a hub built into it. And they are all the same "USB". There are probably more USB interfaces in Android phones alone today than there ever was of 5.25" drives.

      -- grnbrg

    55. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Even Newspapers can be saved for 25 years by simply bagging them in plastic

      A bar I frequent has newspapers in picture frames from D-Day and VJ-Day. They are yellowed, but are still perfectly legible.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    56. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I think I self replied yesterday :

      Well for one thing we know that mice and keyboards have been migrating towards a Bluetooth interface. Some are good, some are bad but I see no reason to believe there will be a physical connection in 10 years much less 25 years at all.

      If we go a but further out, there are two major changes:

      1) Mouses may cease to the the dominant form of pointer input at all, and even keyboards may disappear. We are clearly moving towards touch screen devices replacing mice. Apple's primary OS (by volume and profits) already works mostly exclusively this way, and Google's as well. Microsoft has already announced they intend to make this input format ubiquitous. For keyboards, screen keyboards, voice and light keyboards seem to be growing more prominent as input formats. I suspect physical keyboards will still exist, but if they are rare direct keyboard connectors won't be common and that makes something like BlueTooth being the only type available much more likely.

      2) Going out a bit more, I can think of an obvious improvement to the current system. Right now there is a general input buffer that goes to the kernel. From there mouse / keyboard input gets moved to the window manger which then either directly addresses the input or creates an application event and passes it off to applications. As PCs move beyond single CPU architectures, there is no reason that everything should go through a unified kernel that worked well for one CPU, one execution thread with interrupts. The more that systems can operate in parallel the faster they can go. So a far better architecture would be to have the window manager receiving the inputs from mice and keyboards directly and being able to send messages to the kernel or the applications. This way passive applications can run far away from access to input hardware, and you can start to have variable memory subsystems with faster RAM access times; like you see in mainframes.

    57. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Main thing with storing paper (I've got a lot of pre-computer-era paper archived too) is that you need to protect it from light and air (which includes moisture). If it's stacked and packed tight, only the edges and topsheets will deteriorate.

      Side note from the pen-and-ink set, especially ballpoints: Black and red inks usually spread and fade; blue inks generally do not, or at a far lesser rate.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    58. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree computers are more popular today. The question is whether that's going to slow the rate of change as far as digital formats. It certainly should. But taking USB for example I've noticed the number of totally incompatible mini usb's I've had to go through in the last 5 years.

    59. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The easy way to recover text from early Word documents, or Pagemaker files or any other mix of binary and text (such as executables), is to run it through a text extraction utility. I use a little DOS app called XRAY, works good enough for all practical purposes.

      http://www.doomgold.com/pcstuff/xray.zip

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    60. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by sjames · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised to see more changes like that myself. I just expect the legacy to last a very long time. After all, they still put PS/2 connectors on practically every mainboard. I'm still using a keyboard with an AT style large DIN connector (with an adapter to PS/2 style and a PS/2 to usb adapter). Along with the bluetooth mice, there are also a lot of wireless mice with the USB receiver

      The Linux kernel has been multi-threaded for quite a while now. The various input devices are made available to userspace through /dev/input. In turn, X picks those up and presents them to GUI programs. The kernel has supported NUMA for some time as well. Linux also runs on the IBM z-series mainframes.

    61. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by muridae · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just my luck with laptops, but I've never had one who's hard drive survived more than a year or so of being unpowered. They tend to take power and boot up, then start making that horrid metal read-head on spinning glass sound. As someone else suggested, in 25 years you will be looking back going "wow, look at what we used to use" and caring less about the data stored on it. The physical object will mean more. Think of it like your notebooks from senior year; the notes you took mean very little now, but the doodles and the notes to friends and the things that seemed inconsequential at the time are what matter.

    62. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      My 11/23 works fine and is in the garage. I fired it up for nostalgic reasons a while ago but it didn't really do much exciting.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    63. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      2114 for some real nostalgia

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    64. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by Meski · · Score: 2

      What will an SSD do after 25 years? Magnetic media, we know, EPROMs, likewise.

    65. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by unitron · · Score: 1
      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    66. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "If people have been complaining about something for 60 years, maybe you should think about fixing it?"

      Morons walk their dogs along the tracks, forcing the trains to drive whole sections at 5km/h (trains need up to 1 mile to come to a stop)
      Drunks damage crossings with their cars.
      People pulling the emergency stops because they overslept their station and so on.
      Once 1 train gets delayed that way, it needs half a day until everything is on time again.
      Trains are late because people throw themselves under it. _All_ the time, it's just not in the newspaper because they don't want still more people to get the idea.
      Then the other passengers want to know: "How long will this take?" Naturally up to the minute.

      You'll have to find a replacement driver, you can't gross the public out by telling them that the police needs to find all the 250 pieces of the suicidal person along half a mile of tracks, at night, photograph them and pick all of them up, the track has to be cleaned with high water pressure and still the ravens will find pieces of brains to eat during the following weeks.

      Sometimes there is nothing you can do.

    67. Re:Put stuff in sealed plastic cases? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Do not put in Electronic stuff. My 360k floppies have no readers, nor do my 1.2 meggers or the 1.44 ones.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  3. Macbook Pro (retina) by busyqth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just load all of your photos, videos, data, etc onto a retina macbook pro and toss it in the case.
    Maybe by 2037 someone will have figured out how to change the battery.
    If so, you've got your data and you're good to go.

    1. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Best to remove the battery now - if you can't figure out how to do that, buy something that can be serviced instead.

    2. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      Maybe by 2037 the Macbook will look like my remote after the batteries leaked all over the place. White corrosion everywhere.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by AngryDeuce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or, for a cheaper alternative, one of those digital photo frames that can play video as well as display pictures. Most of them plug in and take standard memory cards. A tablet would probably also suffice, but I would opt for something that can take removable media independently and isn't limited to internal storage. Not sure it would work for the data archival, but it should work for the media at least...

    4. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Best to remove the battery now - if you can't figure out how to do that, buy something that can be serviced instead.

      why not use a device with a removable battery and include a charger? I'm sure we'll still be using the same power outlets in 2037, US AC plugs have not changed since electricity became common. At least if the battery explodes or leaks it doesn't corrupt the device and the charger should provide power even with a completely dead or missing battery.

      If including a charger is not possible, use any device that uses AA batteries. AA batteries have gone unchanged since they became a standard in 1947 and they were in use long before becoming a standard. The also account for half of all battery sales, and with that many devices using AA batteries you can be sure standard AA batteries will be around for a long, long time.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I hope we are not using the same power outlets in 2037.

      That would be stupid and wasteful. Most of everything we use now is DC. We should be moving to smart power outlets where power requirements can be negotiated and we can get rid of all the AC/DC bricks we have to lug around.

      Some stuff might use AC better like toaster ovens and hair dryers, but that can be provided at the outlet with some negotiation as well. Plus we also have special outlets already for appliances like washer/dryers, refrigerators, etc.

      It would just be a real shame not to upgrade considering all the power that is wasted right now.

    6. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are power transmission issues associated with DC. Over a hundred years ago Edison and Tesla found that out. Power will still come into our homes as AC. Whatever happens to the power once it gets into your house is another matter. Still I would bet that there still will be AC up to the power outlet in your walls. The issue is simple, to transmit DC the same distance as AC requires thicker wires. Thicker wires translates into more cost for the copper or any other conducting material.

    7. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by icebike · · Score: 1

      Find a device that can run without the battery. Many, if not most laptops can run with the battery removed by simply plugging it in.
      There is no battery technology in common use today that can survive sitting unused for 25 years. Further, most laptops are never truly "off"
      and are always pulling a trickle charge for the clock.

      But the suggestion to include a whole computer seems pointless to me.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everything is DC? Your fridge? Your stove? Geyser? Vacuum cleaner? Washer? Dryer? Everything high power is AC. What may happen is we may standardize that brick. Maybe centralize it in the house. But AC will remain, and rightly so. It is far more efficient to transmit and change voltages with AC. Also AC motors do have some advantages.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    9. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Why did this make Slashdot?

      I mean come on. Things you can store in a box 25 years?

      Well...

      Porn magazines.
      Fossils.
      Watches.
      Art.
      Photos.
      Stones.
      Jewelry.
      Board games.
      Grains.
      Skulls.

      Want me to continue? Really?

    10. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ, although my example might not be seen as mainstream - or even safe enough for general use:

      Radioisotope thermoelectric generators.

      The Voyager spacecraft have been using the same batteries since the 1970's.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    11. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Ok.... What is a Geyser? Is that like some French thing that squirts water up your ass? My stove is gas too....

      I also said most of everything. Yes, major appliances are AC, and we can have specialized outlets just for them.

      As for transmission, I was talking about outlets. Transmitting energy to the homes can still be AC, although I would love to see more point-source energy generation as AC is not all that efficient. Plus, I'm sure a lot of people on the East Coast of the US have some choice words to say about power lines being above ground all the time.

      Why standardize the brick? I'm talking about creating a standardized outlet that can negotiate the power requirements upon demand. Until you actually negotiated a session you could literally lick the outlet. Quite a few safety benefits in such a model. Why worry about toaster ovens burning down the house when the outlet is set to turn off power in 60 minutes?

      It would be far more efficient overall to not have any external bricks at all, but internal or centralized ones, that can deliver variable amounts of power.

      My Android phone is always telling me that it is fully charged and that I can save electricity while unplugging it. Well, that does not work when I need to sleep and the phone will lose at least 1/3rd of its charge by morning and not even fully recharge by the time I have taking a shower and left out the door.

      It would be more energy efficient if I could leave it plugged in and it was smart enough to start requesting enough power to top off the battery before the alarm went off, or at a set time period, or when the battery reaches a certain level.

      In any case, I was talking about smarter outlets and the elimination of power bricks that we just end up throwing away.

    12. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by jkflying · · Score: 2

      Everything is DC? Your fridge? Your stove? Geyser? Vacuum cleaner? Washer? Dryer? Everything high power is AC. What may happen is we may standardize that brick. Maybe centralize it in the house. But AC will remain, and rightly so. It is far more efficient to transmit and change voltages with AC. Also AC motors do have some advantages.

      Brushless DC motors are better than AC squirrel cage motors at household size, the only time inductive motors are better is at industrial levels where electromagnets are stronger than rare earth magnets can be while drawing negligible current. Switch-mode DC-DC power supplies are more efficient than AC-AC inductive voltage converters. The efficiency of transmission is because of the voltage, not because of the AC. If the wall supplied 120V DC it would be possible to leave out the rectifier, essentially cutting out a 2V loss on the output. Hell, most electronics chargers these days convert the 120V AC to ~150V DC then applying either a switch mode supply or a high frequency AC inductive step down. The only thing which relies on AC are motors which need the 60hz timing, eg some fridges where the direction the motor spins doesn't matter, and those big motors which run off of 3-phase. So really, it's not as big of an issue as you make it.

      Sure, back in the day, AC was better because we didn't have the transistor technology to step voltages up and down with charge pumps and switch-mode regulators. But this has ALL changed...

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    13. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by richard.cs · · Score: 1

      Or, for a cheaper alternative, one of those digital photo frames that can play video as well as display pictures.

      I like the digital photo frame idea for playing videos. Cheaper, less complicated and smaller than a laptop. I really wouldn't worry about powering it, throw the original brick in the box anyway but if we can't manage to provide a 12V dc supply in 25 years time we've got bigger problems.

      Of course for storing video really long time put it on film and use the technicolour process - three monochrome prints will last far longer than a single colour print.

    14. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by galanom · · Score: 1

      Every SMALL device is DC-powered. My opinion is to have only one AC->DC rectifier centrally in the building and have DC sockets in each room providing standard voltages, 3.7, 5 and 12V. Actually this can be done even now.

    15. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Altanar · · Score: 1

      Seems a lot like cryogenics to me.

    16. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Altanar · · Score: 1

      A DC wired house is fun until one of your outlets go out. Good luck trying to restore power.

    17. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Um, why is that a different situation than an AC outlet going out?

    18. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      3 words: Power over Ethernet

      But for power, it really doesn't matter: you can always rig something up to get the right voltage, polarity, etc. to your device if you know how it works. Same goes for electronics with RS232 and RS486 connectors.

    19. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that lithium batteries don't leak from sitting around, right?
      This isn't powered by Duracell or something.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    20. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I would hope so too, but the tech to do this has been around for decades and I haven't seen the slightest hint of it happening yet. Some people wire up 12V DC in a few outlets, but even that is problematic - requiring heavy wires if you're delivering any significant power.

      Smart switching outlets that vary voltage based on some conversation with the appliance might take another 50 years to show up in the average house.

    21. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by fnj · · Score: 1

      I'll bite. I am familiar with every device you name except one. What the hell is a GEYSER??? The only geyser I know is a natural hot spring which periodically emits a fountain of water and steam.

    22. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that power will need to be delivered to homes in 25 years time. I doubt it. I think by that time each house will pretty much generate and store its own power in some way. Remove transmission needs and DC is a logical choice.

    23. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      No. Switch mode converters are less efficient at any significant power level. Look it up if you do not believe me. Also as sibling poster points out, at any significant power level, dc contacters are a nightmare.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    24. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      In Africa, where we don't need central heating, it is a large tank of water in your ceiling which is heated so you can have hot water out of your taps. Normally we use electricity or solar power. I had no idea the term wasn't widely used. It does make sense though... "A fountain of hot water..."

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    25. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Every SMALL device is DC-powered. My opinion is to have only one AC->DC rectifier centrally in the building and have DC sockets in each room providing standard voltages, 3.7, 5 and 12V. Actually this can be done even now.

      The problem is low-voltage DC sucks. Unless you want to wire them with huge-ass wires that are thicker than your regular AC wiring.

      You see, losses through electrical wiring is known as IIR losses - they increase linearly with wire resistance (i.e., length), but increase with the square of the current. A wire carrying 2A of current will lose 4 times a much power as it would carrying 1A of current. To carry DC around the house, you'd still need to use 120VDC or so, and need a DC-DC converter for the last connection (i.e., a power brick, either built into the outlet, or carried around).

      As for digital storage media - you're really out of luck. Flash media is really only rated for a max power-off data retention of around 10 years or so. Either you have to keep them powered up periodically, or you'll find it mostly blank and corrupt when you pull it back out.

    26. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That's most likely because the "tank on top" configuration is pretty much only used in places where you get enough sun to gain a significant benefit by using it. If you look at Europe (excluding the Mediterranean area) you'll find that the temperature and average sun exposure would mean that the water in the tank just gets cold. Hence we use boilers which are usually located well inside the house or basement.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    27. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, your cellphone charger isn't at a 'significant power level' 100% of the time, and people are too lazy to plug/unplug every wall-wart every time they use it.

      60Hz just isn't fast enough to limit current in an inductor the size of a wall-wart without using wire resistance to help, so there are lots of losses there. What is most efficient at the moment (for big low power at least) is to rectify, smooth, put a square wave AC into a little transformer at high frequency, then rectify and smooth at the output. This is what Apple did for the iPhone chargers, it's complicated but it does work well (for fixed input voltages, at least).

      I have no problem with inductive step down/up transformers, it's just that they aren't suited to a single fixed frequency across varying sizes of transformers. Right now the frequency is optimal for the big ones the power companies use, but in our homes, we'd prefer to have something smaller than a garbage can charging our cellphone, so switching is actually more efficient. The other nifty feature switching has is that it can handle a whole slew of voltages without batting an eyebrow, so you don't need another ugly wall-wart to plug your wall-wart into while travelling.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    28. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by fnj · · Score: 1

      So in other words it's an ordinary hot water tap fed by a water heater. But it doesn't fountain upward, right?

    29. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Gravity feed for the taps. Works very well... Geyser is just the term that is used to describe it in this area of the world...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    30. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      "Significant" for me is over 1kW.... :) But even as low as a couple of hundred watts you need special dc contacters to switch dc. Or you could use a FET and sacrifice efficiency. Basically your average light switch would eventually fail if you powered your lights on DC. Resistance would build on the contacts in the switch, that is if it did not fuse closed... That is why the ac and dc ratings on the same relay are different.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    31. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Having a RCL in series across your switch can help with arcing, and isn't something that can be done without permanent drain in an AC system.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    32. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      It all depends where you want to put the complexity... Arcing is not a problem on an AC system. I have switched between milliamperes AC and kilo amps. Arcing is not an issue if the switchgear is designed right. Even with good DC switchgear, issues arise quite quickly...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    33. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I have one of those and now have a name for it. Thank you.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    34. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Also everyone is assuming that we will have an electricity grid that works in 25 years. I don't think we will.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    35. Re:Macbook Pro (retina) by undefinedreference · · Score: 1

      Ok.... What is a Geyser? Is that like some French thing that squirts water up your ass? My stove is gas too....

      No, that's a "bidet".

      "Geyser" it's a common term for a water heater in the UK. The name came into the language from a product name, much as "Aspirin", "Styrofoam", "Velcro", "Band-Aid", "Sharpie", "Escalator", etc (among hundreds of others - a quick search turned up this list of generically-used trademarks).

      To expand on this a bit: The average person with a US-centric world view probably only knows of tank-type water heaters, which are far less common outside the US. In Europe, where people still live in houses that predated indoor plumbing or at least predated hot water from a tap, they may heat water anywhere from a centralized on-demand instant heater through a point-of-use on-demand water heater. Large tank water heaters would be impractical to install in any house that was not initially designed for one. As a result, they're also harder to come by, so newer houses are also designed around on-demand water heaters...

      For a more humorous example of English-American language incompatibility, see "Trousers", which Americans call "Pants".

  4. Nitrogen by heptapod · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get a container which is airtight and watertight. Pump it full of nitrogen.

    I disagree with CDs and DVDs not being readable. Compact discs are a mature technology. As long as they're kept someplace cool, dark and dry they should be fine and readable when the container is opened in twenty five years. No idea if memory sticks or hard drives would survive.

    1. Re:Nitrogen by busyqth · · Score: 1

      I disagree with CDs and DVDs not being readable. Compact discs are a mature technology. As long as they're kept someplace cool, dark and dry they should be fine and readable when the container is opened in twenty five years. No idea if memory sticks or hard drives would survive.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disc_rot

    2. Re:Nitrogen by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      typical retention on E data is around 40 years.

    3. Re:Nitrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Archival media. It's more expensive, but if their claims are true, it may be worth it. I'd recommend storing the data in multiple forms, and in formats with redundancy. I'd probably get a CD, DVD, Blu-Ray and USB flash drive. If you were feeling adventurous, I might also distribute a highly encrypted file all over the internet (usenet, ftp, gmail, web, etc) and then put the password in the container.

    4. Re:Nitrogen by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I've got hundreds of self-burned DVD's from the early 2000's that I had to trash because they're unreadable now. I wouldn't consider that being a real long-term solution. Flash memory (in some form) will probably be okay, though. Even the oldest flash drives I have (32-64 whole MB's of storage! WOW!!) are still readable today. They're useless due to their size, of course, but they still work and the data is still on them.

      Now, if the USB interface disappears in the next 25 years you could be screwed, but I somehow doubt they will be entirely gone in 25 years, considering the availability of serial ports still in place today that predate USB by decades themselves.

    5. Re:Nitrogen by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with CDs and DVDs not being readable. Compact discs are a mature technology. As long as they're kept someplace cool, dark and dry they should be fine and readable when the container is opened in twenty five years. No idea if memory sticks or hard drives would survive.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disc_rot

      I started buying CDs in 1984. They're still playable today. I also have some still-readable CD-R disks that are pretty old, but of course not as old as the pressed disks. So is is possible that optical media could be readable after 25 years--assuming there are working players available? Yes. Guaranteed? Not so much.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    6. Re:Nitrogen by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      Get a container which is airtight and watertight. Pump it full of nitrogen.

      I disagree with CDs and DVDs not being readable. Compact discs are a mature technology. As long as they're kept someplace cool, dark and dry they should be fine and readable when the container is opened in twenty five years. No idea if memory sticks or hard drives would survive.

      Cheaper, better option: any container, filled with large ziplock bags. I have bought 2.5 gallon bags at Walmart so they're easy to find, and they're very cheap, pennies per bag. I bought some to hold a 1 gallon gas can where I did not want the gas to possibly leak out and was hoping to prevent any gas fumes. It worked, the bags are completely air-tight. And you can always double or triple bag your items. However ziplock bags are not puncture proof, so you will want a container outside the bags if you're concerned about something possibly cutting through the bag.

      But I would recommend you include whatever player you need within the chest along with an AC charger. US AC plugs have not changed since electricity became standard. Media player does not need to be high-tech, any old laptop will do as long as you can remove the battery and store it separately or remove from chest completely so if it does corrode or possibly explode it won't damage the laptop. I would put the data on the laptop hard drive and also on SD cards or thumbdrives since they should be fine with no moving parts and costing about 50 cents a gigabyte they're very cheap.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    7. Re:Nitrogen by SJHillman · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I was in college, I remember scientist in Japan announcing they had found a way to store data in bacterial DNA - every time the bacteria underwent mitosis, the data was also duplicated so when you want to read it again, you have billions of copies in case some are corrupted/mutated. The expected lifespan before the entire colony had corrupted data was extremely long - thousands or millions of years.

      So throw in a petri dish.

    8. Re:Nitrogen by Sandman1971 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pressed music CD's DVDs are not the same as the ones you use to burn. Pressed CDs/DVDs are not made of the same materials as those used for burning, and will last decades if properly taken care of.
      For CDs/DVDs used for burning, the first couple generations of these (when you were paying 2-5$ A DISC) were made of much thicker material and most of the stuff I burnt in the 90s on these types of discs are still readable today. However, with cheap discs came cheap/slim material, which are greatly affected by disc rot. I have some CDs and DVDs that I burnt just 2-3 years ago that are unreadable due to disc rot. If you hold them up to a light you can see the holes.

      That being said, you can buy archival DVDs & CDs. The companies claim they will last 100 years if stored properly. I use them to back up my pictures. Those should be sufficient for the time capsule. Burn 3 or more copies to ensure greater chances of being to read everything.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    9. Re:Nitrogen by thsths · · Score: 1

      > I disagree with CDs and DVDs not being readable.

      The CD-ROM is a stable format - it has been around for over 25 years already.

      The die however may not last that long, depending on temperature.

      Finding a CD-ROM drive in 25 years may be a challenge, flash memory way well have taken over by then.

      And finally you also need to read the file formats. Common ones and standards like jpeg, mpeg2 etc should probably be fine.

    10. Re:Nitrogen by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      I bought some to hold a 1 gallon gas can where I did not want the gas to possibly leak out and was hoping to prevent any gas fumes. It worked, the bags are completely air-tight.

      This may be a workable short-term solution for you, but beware that plastic bags not explicitly designed for exposure to organic solvent (like gasoline) liquid and vapours may be prone to failure, sooner or later. Solvent exposure can do all kinds of aggravating things to plastics, including causing them to fog, to swell and weaken, to become rigid and brittle, or in the worst case to dissolve into sticky goo.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:Nitrogen by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      I have 22-year old music CDs and they work fine.

      I also have a semi-automatic pistol, the barrel of which rusts very easily. I store it in a special ziplock bag that prevents it from rusting. Works great.

      If you are going to fill the container with nitrogen, then you should actually keep it barely pressurized relative to atmosphere, so probably want to have a bottle of nitrogen and some sort of regulator/differential pressure detector. Pretty much every container leaks after 25 years, unless you're talking about something really serious like a welding tank. Actually, come to think of it, maybe you could use a propane tank of appropriate size, just cut it open, weld it back together, evacuate it, and pressurize substantially with nitrogen (maybe 100 psi?).

      Another media that works pretty well and has been around for a very long time is vinyl records. We can still listen to Edison's very first recordings. Of course, I have no idea where one would go to get records pressed, but I think the data storage would be more dense than printing on paper. And for 25 years, I don't think archival is even necessary - I've got mimeographed elementary school papers over 30 years old that I can read just fine.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    12. Re:Nitrogen by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about finding the drive. I was a used computer parts store and saw a box full of 8" floppies. When were those last used? My latest motherboard is the first one I've bought that doesn't have a floppy port, so how long was that standard around? I'll bet SATA ports and optical drives are going to be around for a while yet. I was happily surprised to see a DOS .exe file run just fine in Windows 7 command line, although I haven't tried running any Windows 3.x or 95/98/NT files yet, I imagine there are emulators, so I would think a Windows .exe file with an accompanied .txt readme would be just fine for 25 years. We're not talking about the distant future here.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    13. Re:Nitrogen by no+bloody+nickname · · Score: 1

      There appears to be quite a bit of difference between the durability of DVD and CD storage though.

      I just recently checked the oldest of my burned CDs I could locate. The oldest is from early 1997 so that's more than 15 years old.
      I checked most of the files on it (mainly archives so they were easy to validate from checksum). Of some 30+ archives only 1 indicated that a
      file was corrupt. 3 more CDs from the late 90s were also very readable. Even the signature of the CIH virus (which someone had helpfully sent
      me as an attachement) was quite readable as my antivirus software started acting up when I opened an old mail folder.
      Only one CD was completely unreadable and that may have been due to it being heavily scratched.

    14. Re:Nitrogen by icebike · · Score: 1

      And then remember to open the chest every year and feed the bacteria.
      Dumb idea.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    15. Re:Nitrogen by icebike · · Score: 1

      Actually pressed CDs will always be readable, because they do not depend on a chemical ink.
      They are composed of physical pits in a metallic layer.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:Nitrogen by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      Pressed music CD's DVDs are not the same as the ones you use to burn. Pressed CDs/DVDs are not made of the same materials as those used for burning, and will last decades if properly taken care of.

      Obviously I knew that pressed disks are different from those used in CD writers--I did mention that the older disks were pressed. Perhaps I shouldn't have mentioned them at all since it seemed to confuse you. There was some concern about the longevity of the pressed CDs and some thought the upper lifetime might be as little as 10 years. The failure mechanisms are mostly different between the two types.

      As I pointed out, I have some fairly old CR-Rs that are still readable, despite similar concerns about the longevity of CD-R as with pressed CDs. Those concerns may be pessimistic, as they were with pressed CDs. You correctly point out that there is a difference in the type/quality of writable media. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    17. Re:Nitrogen by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      Dye type in CD-Rs makes a difference in longevity, at least with exposure to light: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    18. Re:Nitrogen by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I have a CDR I burned in 1996, on HP media. Still perfectly readable. Dye layer is sandwiched between two layers of plastic.

      I have a CDR I burned last month on a PNY disc... yep, it's peeled. Dye layer was protected by a layer of ink.

      It's all down to the physical media. If anyone has a stock of HP CDR media, circa 1995-2000, that they're not planning on using, please let me know.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    19. Re:Nitrogen by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Re: "finding a drive". It may be hard to buy one, but there will almost surely be someone you can pay to get the data off it. Consider that there are services out there now that will move home video footage off VHS and/or off reel-to-reel if you happen to have some really old stuff. It seems unlikely that 25 years from now there will be nobody out there offering to transfer your old CDs to {insert future technology}.

    20. Re:Nitrogen by jbolden · · Score: 1

      8" floppies were common on systems for minis all during the 1980s. For example high end Xerox printers like the Docutech still used them into the 1990s. They never really were very big on PCs though IBM and other manufacturers offered them. My guess is that those 8" floppies weren't PC floppies ever.

    21. Re:Nitrogen by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Ideally you'd be looking for the Kodak Gold discs, they were archival rated to last in excess of 100 years. They achieved this rating through a combination of the gold metallic layer and the use of high quality dyes developed by Kodak in it's film business.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    22. Re:Nitrogen by Pope · · Score: 1

      Or just don't buy shitty new media. PNY, seriously? Taiyo Yuden, man.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. "reading it in 2037 may be a challenge." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No worries man, end of epoch isn't until 2038.

  6. The CD format has been around a long time by cpu6502 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been over 30 years now, and as long as DVD or Bluray players still exist, the CD will still be readable. CDs aren't going anywhere. (Note I said CD not CD-R or CD-RW which are self-erasing when the dye fades.)

    VHS video will still be readable too (if necessary you can buy a used VCR from ebay in 2037). It's analog so even if it degrades it will still be watchable..... I know this from personal experience with 25-30 year old tapes.

    That's about it. I wouldn't trust hard drives or flash drives to still work 25 years from now. I have an HD that I left sit for just 2 years, and already it's sluggish as if it doesn't want to start spinning.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I'd think that a USB memory stick is a good bet for 25 years... kinda like RS232 ports, even if USB is passe', there will be conversion dongles for it for quite awhile.

      Flash memory 25 year longevity prognosis: good, spinning hard drives: not so much.

    2. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      There is actually a CD format that is just called CD? I know for DVD you only get DVD+R, -R, RW, RAM, probably a few others.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      That's about it. I wouldn't trust hard drives or flash drives to still work 25 years from now. I have an HD that I left sit for just 2 years, and already it's sluggish as if it doesn't want to start spinning.

      SD cards are solid state. They include no capacitors (the USB interfaces on flash drives, I can't say the same for). To my knowledge, semiconductors don't degrade. They're made out of sand, more or less. As long as the container is properly sealed with an oxygen-eating packet and is airtight... problem solved.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      SD cards store the data in electric charge trapped in special types of transistors. This charge does leak over time at a very slow rate. The cheaper flash chips are only rated for a limited number of years without the data being accessed and recopied. These effects are temperature dependent, and I think 25 years isn't too long of a time period, but it isn't forever.

    5. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      SD cards are solid state. They include no capacitors

      If they don't include *any* capacitors, how do their memory cells retain their charge, huh?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by vux984 · · Score: 1

      There is actually a CD format that is just called CD?

      He's referring to a standard non-writeable pressed CD.

      There's also these things...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millenniata

      The discs at least appear to live a long time. The only question is whether the technology will catch on enough.

    7. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      VHS video will still be readable too (if necessary you can buy a used VCR from ebay in 2037).

      True, but it's quite a lot just to watch one video for a few minutes of amusement. I doubt the prices for the players are going to go anywhere but up from now.

    8. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Flash memory 25 year longevity prognosis: good,

      Then how come I keep reading articles about flash drives dying after only 2-3 years of use. Not just minor failures, but complete and utter loss of all data w/ no warning.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    9. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Any data you put into a black box for 25 years has a significant chance of being gone when you open it. There are no off the shelf solutions for this. My best advice is encode the info and drop it on a Golden Record, or something else that is as 'permanent'. Only that kind of hard encoding will ensure the data is readable in 25 years.

      --
      Good-bye
    10. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by TemplePilot · · Score: 2

      And this is one of the reasons I fear eBooks moving to eFormats Only. One day there will be no libraries. A single EMP could take out the entire collected knowledge of a certain time period in one go. (theoretically). Archaeologists of the future will wonder where all the 'amazing knowledge of the ancients vanished to.'

      --
      This strange comment at the bottom of the message is illogical.
    11. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by oxdas · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not a format. CD's (and DVD's) you buy in the store are not made the same way as CD's you burn at home. Professionally made CD's have the disk image physically pressed into the media, whereas with home burning a laser is discoloring a dye to produce the same effect. Unfortunately, the dye will eventually fade and the disk will become unreadable. So, CD's are not the same as CD-R or CD-RW and the same holds true for DVD's.

    12. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>There is actually a CD format that is just called CD?

      Yes the ones you buy in stores and are already *pressed* with music data. The keyword there is press, because they won't fade over time. Like records the recording is permanently etched in the disc.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    13. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Flash memory 25 year longevity prognosis: good, spinning hard drives: not so much.

      Flash memory storage relies on trapped charges which eventually dissipate over time (if not refreshed). While older flash memory might be ok, as cell sizes have shrunk (and the number of bits per cell increased), retention times have plummeted -- I've heard that manufacturer's quoted retention times for modern flash usually run in the 5 to 10 year range.

    14. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      VHS video will still be readable too (if necessary you can buy a used VCR from ebay in 2037). It's analog so even if it degrades it will still be watchable..... I know this from personal experience with 25-30 year old tapes.

      Buy the VCR and throw it in the box as well .. that way you are guaranteed to have a VCR when the box is open.
       
      25 years is an awful long time for most electronics to remain available. So why not ease the burden and include all the devices which can then be donated to the computer museum after you have had your fun opening the box!

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    15. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      Semiconductors are made by diffusing impurities to make junctions for transistors and to create resistors. Diffusion is done at high temperatures. However, even at room temperature diffusion is still happening, even if it's very slow. So there is an upper limit to how long semiconductor devices can last--we're talking decades if not hundreds of years. There are other issues that could be shorter term, including but not limited to: metal migration, corrosion, both on die and on the interconnects, loss of programming in the EEPROM cells and so on. Metal migration is usually happens under current flow, but there are some defect mechanisms that can cause metal breaks even if the IC is just sitting there.

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    16. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      The read/write process is the main problem - if you don't network your time capsule it'll last longer. Personally I'm a little skeptical on the 25 year claim, but in general the more you use flash memory the quicker it will fail.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    17. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Actually -RW typically employs phase-changing crystal, you can't un-burn dye to re-record after all. As such it's pretty stable, far better for long-term storage than the write-once variants.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    18. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But the CDs and DVDs that are pressed still need to follow some formatting guidelines in how information is on the disk.
      I imagine, for the most part, pressed CDs are CD-R formatted. And pressed DVDs will be either + or - R formatted.

      It might not be technically right to call pressed CDs CD-R, but it does not seem wrong either.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    19. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Well, the drive may well last, but the data likely won't. Flash works by trapping electrons within the transistor gate, and while they don't escape quickly, they do escape. In a drive that sees normal use the wear-leveling algorithms should ensure that data gets refreshed periodically before the charge degrades excessively. That won't happen sitting in a box for a couple of decades though.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    20. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      In my experience, magnetic tape will start to stick together if you don't use it for a long time. I once tried playing back an open-reel tape that had been lying around for 10 years. Even a Studer PR99 (with 3 drive motors at several hundred W each) had trouble peeling the tape from the reel, and afterwards I had to clean the machine as the tape had dumped half of its magnetic layer as dust.

      Same thing with audio cassettes, my deck has trouble fast-forwarding those and can't keep the tape at nominal speed when playing back.

    21. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Then how come I keep reading articles about flash drives dying after only 2-3 years of use

      "of use" is the key part. Flash memory, specifically their NAND gates, have a limited number of program-erase cycles before they fail. There's no reason a gate will lose it's data while sitting in a storage container, except due to the occasional gamma ray, or other background radiation (ie, don't leave it sitting on a block of granite).

      As for why you might hear of cases where you have a sudden loss of all data, that could be due to wear leveling causing simultaneous failure, some sort of static shock/power surge, or simply that the number of failed gates passed the threshold of what Hamming error correcting codes are able to overcome.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    22. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about an actual CD-ROM, the format is described in the Yellow Book. CD-R's are in the Orange Book.

    23. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by jasonmantey · · Score: 1

      Electrons are stored in "trap" layers of Silicon between the gate of a transistor and the channel of the transistor. On either side of this trap layer is dielectric that blocks the electrons from leaving.

      --
      JM
    24. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Tastecicles · · Score: 2

      Makes me wonder just how many "Dark Ages" we've actually been through?

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    25. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      It's not wrong. It is somewhat backwards in the connotations. I would say that CD-ROM discs are not in CD-R format, but that CD-Rs are in CD-ROM format.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    26. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Electrons are stored in "trap" layers of Silicon between the gate of a transistor and the channel of the transistor. On either side of this trap layer is dielectric that blocks the electrons from leaving.

      So it's an Insulated conductor with a charge? To me, that sounds awfully like a capacitor, don't you think?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    27. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2

      Yes but the power of eFormats could mean that in theory all books ever published could fit onto a single, or a small number, of portable reading devices. Just one of them stored in a faraday cage (a plain old iron box is all it takes, or the trunk of a car for some models of car, etc) and all of mankind's knowledge survives. MUCH harder to lose every copy of a particular book than there is with the library system.

    28. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Hmm... charged conductors ... either side of a dielectric... sounds familiar...

    29. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      In my experience, CD-R using a gold based dye do not suffer from that problem. All my CD-R from 1995 are ok, it was the only type of blank CDs available at that time in my place. For all my CD-Rs burned between 1999 and 2009, the unreadability seems to be distributed according to a Poisson law. It looks like that the durability of a given CD-R is random, it do not appears to be correlated with the dye color (except gold archival dye) nor the brand and only slightly with the year it was burn...

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    30. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That won't happen sitting in a box for a couple of decades though.

      That's not such an obstacle. You should be able to build such a circuit yourself. An MCU, waking up with a period of few months, checking, repairing and rewriting the data should do the job. The battery is a more interesting question, though. Also the longevity of the refresh circuit (soldered, comprised of multiple components). Dry nitrogen inside, hermetically sealed, perhaps? Should prevent corrosion, at least.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    31. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The stability of the dye is not the only problem. Oxidation of the silver reflective layer over time due to pollutants in the air is perhaps a bigger issue for storage over a decade.

      The gold reflective layer is immune to this, of course.

    32. Re:The CD format has been around a long time by JonySuede · · Score: 1
      Yeah, my message was go for the gold dye! Sorry accet87 for my inbuilt +verbose modifier.

      Oxidation of the silver reflective layer over time due to pollutants in the air is perhaps a bigger issue for storage over a decade.

      The thing i like about reliability is that I know that the readability is still distributed according to a Poisson law (assuming that dye decay and reflexive layer are independent) with a different lambda, since, as you might known X[1](A1)+X[2](A2) where X[n] are random independent variable following Poisson distribution with a lambda of A[n] is equals to E[1+2](A[1]+A[2])

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
  7. Hermetic Seals by iamscottevil · · Score: 5, Informative

    Be careful about your hermetic seals, water leakage has turned many time capsules into a soggy brown liquid. I suggest some silica gel (the kind you shouldn't eat) to absorb any latent water in the air when you seal it so you don't get condesation. Anything you seal inside should either be readable by normal human means or include the reader. Avoid batteries or other volatile chemicals as they will leak. Burned CDs are really just like polaroid photographs and fade in about 15 years on the outset depending on the burn speed and qualities of the dyes. Include black and white photos or 3 color separations so that it is easy to put back together. Same goes for 3d photos, the future is likely to use more stereo photography so take a picture with 2 cameras next to each other of the same type. I use two iphones and tap the shutters simultanously a few times to see if I can get a match. Make sure you deposit the item in a place unlikely to face future development or it will just be shoveled up onto a trash pile. There's a start, but think long term. A lot can happen in a quarter century. LONGNOW DOT ORG

    1. Re:Hermetic Seals by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      Wait, there's a kind of silica gel that you should eat? Does it taste like soylent green? I love that stuff

    2. Re:Hermetic Seals by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Same goes for 3d photos, the future is likely to use more stereo photography so take a picture with 2 cameras next to each other of the same type. I use two iphones and tap the shutters simultanously a few times to see if I can get a match.

      Stereo photography has been around for a very long time, and you can even get consumer digital cameras now that have two lenses and take 3d pictures and movies that can be played on 3d tvs. My dad has been a fan of 3d long before the current trend - I grew up in the 80's looking at 3d pictures through special viewers. And of course, last time I saw him, he was holding a 3d digital camera...

    3. Re:Hermetic Seals by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the best way to take 3D photos right now is the nintendo 3DS it has stereo cameras and you can see the photo in 3D right on it

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  8. Meh -- I can read stuff on a 1987 floppy. by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 1

    Just for kicks, I pulled out a floppy with some files on it from 1987 ( My resume was short back then! ). I had no problems reading the files. However, I could not run any 16 bit programs ( I found a copy of Norton SI -- I was wondering what the speed index on my Core i7 would be ).

    1. Re:Meh -- I can read stuff on a 1987 floppy. by causality · · Score: 1

      Just for kicks, I pulled out a floppy with some files on it from 1987 ( My resume was short back then! ). I had no problems reading the files. However, I could not run any 16 bit programs ( I found a copy of Norton SI -- I was wondering what the speed index on my Core i7 would be ).

      Try using DosBox. It's an emulator so it'll work on modern hardware.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Meh -- I can read stuff on a 1987 floppy. by Immerman · · Score: 1

      If you really want to run the executables there's always Dosbox, or whatever emulator is relevant to your platform.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  9. Your special beer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Brew your own beer. Make sure there's anough alcohol in it and let yourself be surprised that in 25 years the taste will certainly be different but if brewed good it will still have a chance to taste good.

  10. Media will last longer than you think by crow · · Score: 2

    I have some 5.25" floppy disks that are over 30 years old, and I can still read them. I also have some that don't work, but most are fine. We're just hitting the point where it's hard to find PCs that will read 25-year-old 3.5" floppies (but good luck with an 800K Mac floppy).

    In an air-tight container with no light exposure, I would expect a CD or DVD to be just fine after 25 years, and I would expect that you would still be able to find older computers that could read them.

    Your best be for electronic data would probably be a USB flash stick. While the USB standard will evolve, if it goes to something incompatible, there will be plenty of conversion dongles.

    Also, a USB flash stick would be a good representation of portable storage.

    Or just put the data in "the cloud" and write the URL down on a piece of paper. I'm sure that will work. :)

    1. Re:Media will last longer than you think by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      You can read those disks? Wow. I need a drive to do that.

    2. Re:Media will last longer than you think by busyqth · · Score: 1

      good luck with an 800K Mac floppy

      I've got an original Macintosh II here. Works great.

    3. Re:Media will last longer than you think by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      USB sticks are NOT FOR LONG TERM STORAGE. They are vessels to carry data short term. In no way are they considered archival.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Media will last longer than you think by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why store the data in only one format? Why not put one copy on USB Flash, one copy on DVD-R and possibly one copy on some other flash with a different interface like SD?

      Unless its allot of data this should be fairly cheap and odds are good that at least one of the three mediums will survive and you will have tools to read it easily. Watch your file formats too, i'd stick with lowest common denominator very standard stuff like jpg images, mpeg2video (main mode) with either ac3 or mp2 audio for videos, and mp3 for just audio.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Media will last longer than you think by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>I've got an original Macintosh II here. Works great.

      For what?
      Certainly not games.
      Ba-bum-dah!

      Wow it's like the 1988 Amiga v. Mac v. PC flamewars again! ;-) "Yeah sure the IBM PC is great for business software..... but I'm at home. I want entertainment! Not a boring work PC. The Amiga is THE best music, video, and gaming machine by far."

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    6. Re:Media will last longer than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While the bulk of your comment makes sense, I have to disagree on one point:

      Or just put the data in "the cloud" and write the URL down on a piece of paper. I'm sure that will work. :)

      How many URLs from before the Dotcom Crash are valid today?

      The 'Cloud' is only as trustworthy as its component parts, and its parts are made out of a bunch of companies dedicated to slavishly following fickle trends. My webhost has changed hands three times in ten years, and if I'd not been on the ball at each juncture, I'd have lost everything. Even then I've lost large tracts of data due to server meltdowns, etc.

      The 'Cloud' is more like a living memory system; use it or lose it.

    7. Re:Media will last longer than you think by crow · · Score: 1

      That's why I put the smiley after that one.

      On the other hand, it might be an interesting experiment to find as many free online storage sites as possible, put something up on each of them, and then see how long they really last.

    8. Re:Media will last longer than you think by busyqth · · Score: 1

      >>>I've got an original Macintosh II here. Works great.

      For what? Certainly not games."

      I turn it on, verify that everything works, then stroke it gently while softly chanting "$10,000 was totally worth it baby."

    9. Re:Media will last longer than you think by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be quite so paranoid with regards to file formats. AVC (H.264, MPEG4 Part 10) is a fine video choice and will be easy to handle in the future on account of it being so prevalent now. You discover that getting software that reads popular old formats it easy to do. It is a minor bit to implement code to read the older formats so why not?

      The only thing that gets you in trouble potentially is stuff that wasn't popular. If only one program liked a format then it could be something that few things will read, if any. However AVC is extremely popular, you needn't worry it will be something future software can handle.

      In terms of storage the multiple media is a good idea, but one thing to go for is archival DVD-Rs. They make discs that are designed to last a century. They cost more, but hey for a project like this why not?

      Also maybe toss a DVD-ROM drive in there. Were I to guess, tracking one of those down will be the biggest pain in 25 years. Certainly doable, but if you have one in there, reasonable chance you'll be able to hook it to whatever computer system you have at the time.

    10. Re:Media will last longer than you think by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Why store the data in only one format? Why not put
      > one copy on USB Flash, one copy on DVD-R and
      > possibly one copy on some other flash with a
      > different interface like SD?

      Put a micro SD in there too, which, in 25 years, will be known as "jumbo SD." :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  11. Readability of media by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    Perhaps now would be a good time to point out that solid-state media can hold many times that of optical media for equivalent or lower costs. A 32 GB flash drive costs around $1 per GB these days. For another $30, you can buy a pico computer capable of HDMI output. The display may be a problem; You will need to bury your capsule to a depth of about 8 feet (if memory serves) to prevent it from freezing. It will then maintain a temperature of about 50 degrees.

    Electricity hasn't changed at all in the last 50 years... you should be able to just plug it in and go. Total cost: Less than $150. And anyone can drop a pen drive in the box then with hours of video footage and recordings. Although, you'll have to wait longer than 25 years for it to be legal to play it back... A lot longer. -_-

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Readability of media by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Yes, but flash essentially stores data as charges on billions of tiny "capacitors" (the floating gate in each transistor, or similar mechanisms in other technologies) - you need to refresh it periodically or the data fades away. Normally your wear-leveling algorithm will do that plenty often enough, but not when it's sitting in a box for a couple decades. For longevity without refreshing you need much larger and better-isolated "capacitors" than you're likely to find in any consumer product.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  12. Use a tiny PC by Nemilar · · Score: 1

    Even if no one uses the same physical media as we do now, and even if no one uses the same file formats, storing an entire PC is likely to solve the problem. You can get a small, inexpensive PC for cheap - a couple hundred dollar atom-based machine should do the trick - and throw a large amount of storage in it. I'm fairly certain that standard power connectors will still be available 30 years from now. VGA connectors may not be, so think about storing a small monitor in there as well (someone else can speak to the chances that a monitor will turn on after 30 years).

    Going this route gives you practically unlimited storage for photos, music, text, etc.. with very high chances that it will be recoverable.

    --
    Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    1. Re:Use a tiny PC by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      Just be sure to get one that doesn't have a cmos battery or one that has electrolytic capacitors (almost all do). That said, I've got a Toshiba laptop that has operated since its inception in the mid 80s. It still worlds.

    2. Re:Use a tiny PC by Vahokif · · Score: 1

      This seems like a good idea. Just stash a netbook with some kind of USB storage/reader and a charger. Even if power sockets have inexplicably vanished or changed they're probably the easiest thing to recreate. I don't know how much information degrades on different media, you should probably research that.

    3. Re:Use a tiny PC by Vahokif · · Score: 1

      Maybe use archival DVD's?

    4. Re:Use a tiny PC by Old+Grey+Beard · · Score: 1

      IIRC, tiny PCs use a single 1GB DRAM chip soldered (not socketed) to the mainboard. You might want to toss in a few carefully-wrapped spares. And a soldering iron if you're really concerned.

      If everybody knows there's a PC with Linux / USB / SATA then you've got a good storage standard all can adhere to.

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it."
      - H. L. Mencken
    5. Re:Use a tiny PC by agnel.kurian · · Score: 1

      Why USB storage? Save data on the hard disk itself..

    6. Re:Use a tiny PC by Vahokif · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more DVDs + a USB reader. Might be better to store it separately, plus I don't know about bit rot in hard drives, and you don't have to take the netbook apart to get it out if it breaks or to do add more storage.

  13. Two suggestions: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1) In 25 years any foam rubber will have turned to goo.

    2) Obvious but easily forgotten: remove batteries from electronic devices.

  14. i helped with 50 year capsule in 1986 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I helped setup a "time capsule" back in 1985 for my college's centennial celebration, we expect to open the capsule in 2035. I hope to be alive when it happens, because I put some items in there. We placed lots of plastic, wood, paper, and metal objects in the capsule. For paper products,we treated each piece of paper with a mild basic solution that neutralizes the sulfur compounds used in the paper production so that the paper doesn't yellow and deteriorate. For wood, we only allowed solid pieces, and only "natural' wood, without lead or "weird" paints. Plastic was a wild card.. we didn't really know how they would react, so we decided to only allow "hard" plastic items, and no styrenes or lightweights. Metals had to be brass, iron, or "slightly" reactive metals. We wrapped each and every item in a anti-static bag, and then evacuated the bags before boxing them up. We used normal cardboard boxes for boxing.

    So.. stay away from color printer output (they degrade very fast) and any pseudo-soft plastics like polycarbonate (CD/DVD) because they'll break down too. Black and white prints are the safest picture types. You might spray your paper products with a baking-soda bicarbonate solution and then dry out.

    good luck!

    1. Re:i helped with 50 year capsule in 1986 by westlake · · Score: 1

      Black and white prints are the safest picture types.

      The LOC has restored color photographs from the Czarist Russia of 1910. The Empire That Was Russia

      The idea that you could use color filters to record color images on stable black and white media is as old as photography itself. The difficulty was always in maintaining alignment and color balance in print or projection.

      The color photograph can change the way you look at an entire era:

      "Color Photographs From The New Deal (1939-1943)" , Bound for Glory: America in Colour 1939-1943

      The details can be telling:

      in the thirties, bulk flour and seed was sold in sacks printed in floral patterns and prints suitable for dress making, as you will see here,

    2. Re:i helped with 50 year capsule in 1986 by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      We wrapped each and every item in a anti-static bag, and then evacuated the bags before boxing them up. We used normal cardboard boxes for boxing.

      It's so very amusing - you went to all that trouble with the items, and then packaged them without any care as to the packaging. Actually, it's not amusing. It's stupid.

    3. Re:i helped with 50 year capsule in 1986 by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      There is no current color photgraphic media that will last as long as the Kodachrome that these images were taken with.

             

  15. Oil Barrel by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about an oil barrel?
    You'll need it in 2037!
    Plus, you could sell it for a few thousand dollars and buy vintage stuff from 2012 :D

    1. Re:Oil Barrel by Flipstylee · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent +1 Realistic

    2. Re:Oil Barrel by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just keep the payments up on the storage unit or they'll auction off the contents and find the bodies.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Paper by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    paper has been around for a LONG time. There is even paper that is made to last long. Bit more expensive, but it will last much longer.
    For 25, just use normal paper. Write whatever you want. e.g. how you feel about people, politics, the future, your state of mind. Write about your dreams and your thoughts of now.

    Once you have printed it, seal it in plastic. You can put a LOT of information on it and it will be very personal as well.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  17. Iron packs by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    People who store food for long periods either often put nitrogen in, co2 in, or throw iron sachets in that eat the oxygen. The CO2 might join any moisture to make a weak acid and the iron can eat so much oxygen as to create a small vacuum that just pulls in air anyway. So a toot of nitrogen is probably best. Compared to oxygen nitrogen is basically inert. But an iron sachet wouldn't hurt on top of the nitrogen as it will eat any oxygen that leaks in.

    The other key will be variety. If you use a technology that you could be certain of can you be certain of the longevity of the materials. I have 10 year old burnable CDs where the data layer just flaked off. I also have a very old external HD where the rubber feet turned to liquid goo. So even if you decided that a USB memory stick would be the way to go I would suggest buying 2 or three very different brands.

    As to worrying about how to read the format just throw in an old laptop (minus its battery) which might last and be ready to read your data.

    Also separate the different storage media into different ziplocks or containers so that if one melts into a corrosive goo that the rest might be spared.

    If you throw in some silica gel packs to eat any moisture be aware that if moisture is getting in regularly over time those packets can start pooling moisture around them. Thus put it at the bottom with the good stuff propped above to keep it safe. Also the iron packs can become warm if exposed to a blast of air (like the handwarmers) so keep that away from the important bits that you don't want cooked.

    Lastly keep the temperature cool and stable as entropy is slower when cold.

  18. Apple II elephant disks by Steve1952 · · Score: 1

    From personal experience, I can vouch that Apple II floppy disks hold up over 25 years!

  19. scotch by KernelMuncher · · Score: 1

    I'd add a bottle of good scotch. It will be even better in 25 years (and something to toast your discovery with).

    1. Re:scotch by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      whiskey at least won't deteriorate fast. Almost all wine actually loses flavor over the long haul, check out the "cellar years" to maturity, usually 8 to 15. However, there are a very few types that have the 50 to 100 year ranges, such as sweet Vouvray with a century maturation!

    2. Re:scotch by BigBunion · · Score: 2

      Liquor doesn't improve in the bottle- only in the barrel. Wine improves with age because of interactions between sugars, yeast and/or bacteria. The alcohol content in liquor is too high for bacteria or yeast to survive. That said, I'd consider putting in a couple of bottles of a hardy red wine or a port. It should age gracefully over 25 years.

  20. Well, this 1995 CD-r seems OK by prestwich · · Score: 1

    /me takes dusty 1995 Linux CD-R that we wrote off shelf, and puts it in:

    dg@major:/media/CDROM$ ls -l
    total 575
    dr-xr-sr-x 3 dg dg 69632 Jul 12 1995 bitmaps
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 2048 Jul 5 1995 ddd
    -r--r--r-- 1 dg dg 441397 Jul 18 1995 DirList.180795
    dr-xr-sr-x 13 dg dg 6144 Jul 18 1995 documentation
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 4096 Jul 10 1995 ELF-GCC
    dr-xr-sr-x 10 dg dg 2048 Jul 11 1995 emulators
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 2048 Jul 5 1995 fvwm
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 18432 Jul 10 1995 gnu
    dr-xr-sr-x 11 dg dg 2048 Jul 10 1995 kernel-source
    dr-xr-sr-x 3 dg dg 2048 Jul 11 1995 languages
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 6144 Jul 18 1995 leftovers
    -r--r-xr-- 1 dg dg 99 Jul 13 1995 Leftovers_dir_list
    dr-xr-sr-x 7 dg dg 4096 Jul 12 1995 logos
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 2048 Jul 11 1995 Networking
    dr-xr-sr-x 6 dg dg 2048 Jul 18 1995 pgp
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 2048 Jul 11 1995 Printing
    -r--r-xr-- 1 dg dg 5814 Jul 18 1995 README.html
    dr-xr-sr-x 11 dg dg 4096 Jul 10 1995 slakware
    dr-xr-sr-x 4 dg dg 2048 Jul 18 1995 sunsite.unc.edu
    -r--r--r-- 1 dg dg 1015 Jul 18 1995 TRANS.TBL
    dr-xr-sr-x 5 dg dg 2048 Jul 10 1995 www
    dr-xr-sr-x 3 dg dg 4096 Jul 11 1995 X
    dr-xr-sr-x 2 dg dg 2048 Jul 5 1995 xemacs

    Looks ok :-) That's been stored on a dusty shelf in my room for the last ~17 years (in jewel
    case) having said that it was a good quality kodak blank, and your mileage may vary.

    IMHO store multiple copies written on multiple vendors media written on multiple drives;
    use a few types of storage (CD, USB-flash from a good vendor), and something like
    laser printed (not-ink jet) QR code on good paper; I'd wrap each separately (hmm what in?)

    Oh, and in 25 years come back and tell us how much data is visible.

    1. Re:Well, this 1995 CD-r seems OK by fa2k · · Score: 2

      Check for read errors, .. .

      find /media/CDROM -type f -exec cat \; >/dev/null

      or something. CDs have a large amount of redundancy, but maybe it's degraded sufficiently

    2. Re:Well, this 1995 CD-r seems OK by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

      Check for read errors, ...

      find /media/CDROM -type f -exec cat \; >/dev/null

      or something. CDs have a large amount of redundancy, but maybe it's degraded sufficiently

      If you have read access to the block device (ie. root or group read access), an even faster method:

      dd if=/dev/scd0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k

      (or equivalent CD block device; check with 'mount | grep cdrom' after you've mounted the CD filesystem).

      This does a full linear block-level read from the CD device and avoids the seeking that would be necessary when scanning at the filesystem level.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:Well, this 1995 CD-r seems OK by prestwich · · Score: 2

      Well, not too bad,

      dg@major:~$ dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k
      dd: reading `/dev/sr0': Input/output error
      580+1 records in
      580+1 records out
      608698368 bytes (609 MB) copied, 179.877 s, 3.4 MB/s

      [32062.556698] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
      [32062.556704] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32062.556707] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
      [32062.556710] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32062.556712] Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
      [32062.556717] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32062.556720] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
      [32062.556723] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB:
      [32062.556725] Read(10): 28 00 00 04 89 00 00 00 30 00
      [32062.556736] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1188864
      [32062.556742] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297216
      [32062.556748] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297217
      [32062.556756] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297218
      [32062.556758] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297219
      [32062.556761] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297220
      [32062.556764] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297221
      [32062.556766] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297222
      [32062.556769] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297223
      [32062.556771] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297224
      [32062.556774] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297225
      [32069.527607] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
      [32069.527613] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32069.527616] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
      [32069.527619] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32069.527621] Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
      [32069.527626] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32069.527629] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
      [32069.527632] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB:
      [32069.527634] Read(10): 28 00 00 04 89 00 00 00 02 00
      [32069.527646] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1188864
      [32069.527650] quiet_error: 38 callbacks suppressed
      [32069.527653] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297216
      [32069.527658] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297217
      [32076.499895] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Unhandled sense code
      [32076.499901] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32076.499904] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
      [32076.499907] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32076.499909] Sense Key : Medium Error [current]
      [32076.499914] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0]
      [32076.499917] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error
      [32076.499920] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB:
      [32076.499922] Read(10): 28 00 00 04 89 00 00 00 02 00
      [32076.499934] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 1188864
      [32076.499938] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297216
      [32076.499943] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 297217

      so I'd say it looks like it's found at least 2 bad logical blocks on the CD, and I suspect it eventually
      retried it OK, because a df on the mounted CD shows 581M which MB v MiB is equivalent to the 609 figure
      that came out of the dd - so I reckon it eventually (after a try or two) read the lot.

      Dave

  21. Storage tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Leave a gap at the bottom for stuff to drip into safely if anything can leak (think a tiny pallet).
    Put dry cloth between surfaces that might stick to each other.
    No Polaroid photos unless the chemical packet isn't present).
    Oxygen getter and desiccant.
    Store it somewhere cool - preferably with a non-varying temperature.
    Don't make it look like a valuables container like a safe.
    Put data on at least 2 types of media (duplicate copies).
    No food or liquids unless very very stable.
    Nothing with batteries.
    ---------
    Finally, no kittens. They'll just turn into cats.

  22. Seal the reader along with data. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Whatever format you choose to use, CD, DVD, blue-ray, harddisk, VHS tape... Seal a playback device along with it. Remove the batteries, even the tiny button cells packed inside the circuit boards, if possible. They might corrode and leak and damage the circuits. Record what all you have taken out and the specs in good quality paper, so that you could restore them. 25 years from now, either the 110 V electricity supply and a service industry to restore the play back devices will still be available, May be store two play back devices so that one can be cannibalized for parts.

    Talking about cannibalism, if the electricity supply has gone, or if a suitable transformer is not available, not the society has already fallen apart and the roving bands of hungry feral humans have already killed you and eaten your corpses so it would not matter.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Seal the reader along with data. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      Typo: meant to type now ended up typing not, confusing the last sentence. Not that my English was great to begin with, this is too stupid even for me.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. Put it in the CLOUD! by toygeek · · Score: 1

    That'll never go down or anything- just password protect the file and then don't open it until then. It'll be the worlds first Cloud based Time Capsule! Epic!!! Duuude!! EPIC!!!

    1. Re:Put it in the CLOUD! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Because everyone knows that Dropbox will be around in 25 years ;)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  24. Keys in the box... by John.P.Jones · · Score: 2

    Instead of storing data in the box directly, where you then rely on media retaining viability over 25 years you could always strongly encrypt the data you would like to logically store in the box and then write (or etch in stone, whatever) the decryption key and store that human readable quantity of data in the box and then maintain the cipher-text outside the box in a redundant distributed fashion over multiple generations of media. Of course I fail to see what the advantage of keeping the data secret over the time period would obtain, and it prevents transcoding to new file formats, so I'd just suggest keeping copies of the data as you would any data you want to have in 25 years (not locked in a box).

    You see, physical objects are placed into a time capsule because they would normally deteriorate and not be archived properly if they weren't removed from the harsh existence of everyday life. Data however doesn't work like that, neglect is the biggest problem and hence a time capsule is not a good means of preserving data the way it is for preserving objects.

    1. Re:Keys in the box... by Ferzerp · · Score: 1

      This. A "time capsule" is a construct for physical items. Storing data in something like this just seems asinine, yet that's what almost all the suggestions here are...

  25. A chest is big enough for a laptop too... by Meleschi · · Score: 1

    I'd get a cheap laptop that has the ability to read all of the media you're putting into the chest, into the chest as well. I'm sure you can find something cheap on ebay. Make sure to remove the battery and DO NOT put it in the chest. If the battery blows, there goes all of your data... You can run most laptops just from the power cord without an attached battery.

    You may even have an old laptop laying around that you can donate to the cause. Just remember. Remove the battery. Don't even think about putting it in the chest. throw it away so someone else doesn't throw it in there "just because there is room". =)

    CD-Rs and DVD-R's tend to loose their 'readability' due to heat and light. If they are stored properly, the data on them should be readable in 25+ years. That being said, if that's your media of choice make sure to make duplicate copies of your data, and store it on different brand's / types of media.

    32GB of data, whether it's on DVD, USB hard drives, or SD cards, is extremely affordable nowadays. I think SD cards may loose their charge after 10 years or so but hard drives will always be readable as long as they spin up. For Hard Drives, 25 years ago from today, SCSI/IDE drives were the standard, and I know I can still read them today using a cheap USB interface.

    I guess what i'm trying to say here is you have options. Depending on how important this data is, use multiple options to ensure the data is readable. If you include a reader in your chest (the laptop sans battery) you increase your chances of easily being able to read the data.

    Oh, and if you do put a laptop in the chest? Don't forget the power cord. ;-)

    --
    Meep Meep!
  26. Apply a little food science by cvtan · · Score: 1

    Throw in a couple of Twinkies and the aura will keep everything fresh for 100 years.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  27. All of the above. by Nationless · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Make it a science project.

    Put identical data on one of every type of storage technology and see which survives. In 25 years you will have a very interesting case study while being nostalgic about the data storage media used back when you were young.

    If they all fail then laugh at how silly you were all those years ago and how you should have done x instead.

    1. Re:All of the above. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the only survivors will be the stone tablet and possibly the printed-on-paper version, if it doesn't get wet and you don't have ground termites (which will get into even the smallest crack) or paper-eating fungi archived along with the paper.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  28. Freeze everything in carbonite by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

    I use it for everything I need to store; backups of tax returns, keeps veggies crisp for decades, and turns incompetent employees into wonderful conversation pieces.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  29. Paper by bstrobl · · Score: 1

    Forget Flash memory, the data retention of 10 years won't be enough even if usb ports remain viable in 25 years.

    My tip: print your digital data out in hex along with documentation on how to read it out. Be sure to include redundancy among multiple stacks of paper. Oh and make sure the shipping container you use keeps out moisture...

  30. Outgassing Can Ruin Everything by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is not a trivial request to ask how to make things survive a 25 year isolated containment, even if you solder or weld the outer container shut and it stays sealed.

    Batteries, capacitors, wood, paint, plastics, bugs in the wood, polymer coatings can all outgas. Some plastics naturally keep changing very slowly as their molecular cross linking changes and plasticizers move to the surface.

    Those outgassing chemicals can wind up interacting, or corroding if you wish, the other item's materials and you don't get what you think you will in 25 years.

    If you actually put a battery in their you can get other reactions occurring very slowly as the battery discharges. Don't forget that many electronics use a milliamp or so to keep some functions ON all the time, even though the devices is supposed to be turned off. Batteries are notorious for having their liquids eventually leaking out.

    When you handle all the items, getting ready to load the time capsule, there are going to be all sorts of finger oils and millions of bacteria that are on each piece you put in the container, plus what is on the inside of the container and its seal materials. Some bacteria are anaerobic, so just because there is no Oxygen (if you load the capsule with Nitrogen), doesn't mean there won't be live bacteria in there.

    Lastly, if your container is totally sealed and outgassing raised the internal pressure, then chemical reactions can occur more rapidly.

  31. No rubber or elastic by trasgu · · Score: 2

    I did some temp work at a document storage warehouse repacking some damaged file boxes. One thing I learned is that rubber bands have a useful life of about two years. After about five years, all rubber and elastic bands had failed, and worst of all, after about eight years, the remnants of rubber bands had all turned into a permanent solid glue. Lesson learned: no rubber bands allowed for long-term storage.

    1. Re:No rubber or elastic by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      I second this. Some pictures I had bound together with rubber bands were damaged when the rubber turned into some glue-like substance...I think it only took about a decade for this to happen.

      Stone tablets, on the other hand, have a proven shelf life. Try engraving them with a laser -- it may be nostalgic to see something produced by 2012 'high tech' 25 years from now...

  32. Lard by he-sk · · Score: 1

    You know, in case the apocalypse happens in the next 25 years, you'll have something to eat when you open your time capsule.

    Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16852830

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  33. Traditional English Fruitcake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The cake should last edible for a 100 years, if it's made correctly.

    1. Re:Traditional English Fruitcake by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that you are suppose to replenish the alcohol periodically.

    2. Re:Traditional English Fruitcake by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      actually, there is a protocol for VERY long term storage of fruitcake that has been already properly treated with alcohol. it is wrapped in an unbleached muslim cloth soaked in the same hard liquor, then the whole thiing "buried" in confectioner's sugar which is sealed into a metal case. Good for decades, sometimes more than a century.

  34. Re:If you can't think of what to put in it... by mk1004 · · Score: 1

    do something else. How weak minded do you have to be to be unable to to think what should go in a box.

    They're not having trouble thinking of what to put into the box. It's parsing what will LAST from what won't that they are having trouble with.

    --
    I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
  35. Toss in a box of Peeps for reference by smchris · · Score: 1

    They're practically indestructable.

  36. All of the above by theEnguneer · · Score: 1

    Why not store data redundantly in several different formats? You could use flash, HDD, and DVD. That will increase your chances that at least one will work. Or, you could store it online, and just put the password on a piece of paper in the chest.

  37. nothing unusual by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    that's only due to the 1, high salt content 2. dessication, not the other preservatives. Essentially the same things that make jerky last. nothing to see, move along

  38. RW not R by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Assuming they're well made and don't delaminate, pressed CDs and DVDs may still be readable, if you can find a drive. As may re-writable CDs and DVDs, which store data in phase-changing crystal which requires high temperatures to change. Write-once discs on the other hand store data by burning off a die, usually an organic one. And that die will spontaneously degrade so errors will start creeping in within a year or so, and your data will likely be completely unreadable after a couple decades.

    As for being able to find a drive to read them - I doubt that'd be a problem only a few decades out. People made a huge investment in CDs and DVDs, and just as today you can still find a cassette or VHS player without difficulty I doubt CD/DVD drives are disappearing any time soon.

    High-quality flash memory might theoretically last long enough, but there isn't much real data on the subject. Low-density Hard drives would probably last, magnetic media tends to be fairly stable as long as the bits are large enough - I'd go for the physically largest, lowest-capacity drive you can find. If you can find a 5-1/4" drive go for it (does anyone even still make those?). I'd probably use an external USB drive as well - or at least include a quality USB-to-SATA adapter. That will give you two potential interfaces to work with, odds are at least one of them will still be supported.

    Regardless of medium, I'd recommend storing at least two copies - one in "normal format" for easy reading, and one in a heavily redundant ECC format, the kind that doubles or triples your data size, and ideally has low physical locality so that a corrosion spot on the platter will remove a little redundancy from a lot of data rather than all copies of a little data. I can only assume that there are archiving tools out there that will store data in such a format.

    And I second the nitrogen idea - oxygen is a rather hideously destructive element.

    Of course if you want data to be *really* reliable go with HD-Rosetta, good luck finding someone to record it for you though.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  39. The only storage medium proven to last 100 years by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Paper.
    I suggest acid free paper. If you're familiar with high density 2D barcodes you can store digital on it but most inks in inkjets will degrade fast. Laser printers are even worse as the pages will stick together.

    Pick a good India ink and acid free paper and learn to write. ;)

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  40. Best Solution by NEDHead · · Score: 2

    Take everything you want included as information (as opposed to toys, etc) and incorporate in into a book. Send a copy to the Library of Congress, and let them deal with the maintenance. Include a stone tablet in the box with the ISBN number chiseled into it so you can find the book when the box is opened.

  41. Semiconductors DO degrade. was: Re:The CD format by zenaida_valdez · · Score: 1

    Semiconductors do degrade over time. They're made of pure silicon (an insulator) which has been precisely contaminated in specific places with very small quantities of dopants (e. g. boron, phosphorous) giving one side of the junction an excess of electrons and the other side a scarcity. Over time, the dopants diffuse across the junction, changing the characteristics of the transistor by leveling out the excess/scarcity gradient. A 25 year old transistor will no longer meet it's specs. A diode will have greatly increased reverse leakage. AND gates turn into MAYBE gates.

    Some capacitors will degrade quickly, some will last much longer. Ceramic capacitors will last a century, electrolytics at most 20 years. The electrolyte dries out.

  42. Confirming neckbeard status by pointyhat · · Score: 1

    Use a DLT tape (30 year retention guarantee), use tar as the archive format and transcode everything to a non proprietary codec or plain text. That'll probably be fine in 100 years. I've got a 25 year old DLT my father created on a VAX and that was readable last year still!

  43. Re:Crazy. by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Or inflict you on them.

  44. A cat, radioactive source & detector, cyanide by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Then you will have something to do for the next 25 years - discussing if the cat is probably dead yet.

    I suppose lots of food & water might be needed as well. Anyone know a breed of cat that might live 25 years ?

  45. Jubilee by glodime · · Score: 1, Funny

    You should write down the definition of Jubilee and put it in the container.

  46. Cockroaches by InPursuitOfTruth · · Score: 1

    Stamp the # of living roaches you throw in there on metal, and compare to the number that are there when you open it. Hopefully, you won't be restoring them after a successful global extermination.

  47. Global warming by Smivs · · Score: 1

    Just make sure it's at a sufficiently high altitude so it's still above sea-level when you want to retrieve it.

  48. netbook? by agnel.kurian · · Score: 1

    How about storing all digital data on a netbook with instructions on how to recharge the damn battery?

  49. Actual time tested media. by bmo · · Score: 2

    Stone (everyone)
    Intaglio bronze plates (Romans, especially for Senate documents)
    Clay tablets (Babylonians)
    Parchment (Everyone)
    Acid free rag paper (Chinese and later the europeans)
    Linen - required in many town halls for registered surveys and plats (last hundred years)
    Mylar - also required for many town halls for registered surveys (ever since the invention of mylar drawing media).

    We have clay tablets from thousands of years ago.
    We have parchment documents from hundreds of years ago
    We have paper documents from hundreds of years ago
    Linen became popular when it was machine made - it is extremely durable and will last hundreds of years if given even minimal care.
    Mylar can last thousands of years even after being abused.

    One of the most indestructible and compact ways of storing data is punched mylar tape. It can be dumped in a bucket of oil in the shop, wiped off, and sent through the reader. It's simple to make a reader too. Herman Hollerith would have understood immediately how to read punched mylar tape had he been alive to see it. Mylar is also very stable, and not prone to rot. I would like to see the look on a wandering novice monk's face in a few thousand years unearthing an earthenware container packed with dessicant and spools of mylar and all of it entirely readable mechanically or electronically with simple tools.

    It would be a new twist on the Sacred Shopping List.

    And here we're merely talking about 25 years. Even a paperback written on fast-yellowing paper will survive that, given an airtight and light tight container and a pack or two of silica gel. Photographs on archival paper would be good. Microfiche would be excellent. Anything on an acid-free paper. Basically anything that can be read mechanically or optically including QR codes printed out on acid free paper with good ink.

    Things to not store for 25 years and expect to be able to read: Any electronic format that depends on a proprietary reader in a proprietary format. That is *guaranteed* bit rot.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:Actual time tested media. by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      The really hard storage problems are the 1000+ year ones. Linguistic drift means there's a good chance it would take a specialist to even read any of the info, if anyone knows the language at all (very few people understand Old Church Slavonic, and that was first used in writing around 860 CE). For really long storage the best way is to include things in as many formats and languages as possible.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  50. The elephant in the room by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The elephant in the room that nobody is discussing... what's your container going to be made of? How are you going to seal it and keep it sealed? These are non-trivial questions. Containers react with the materials inside and corrode both inside and out. Seals dry out. Etc... etc...

    There's a lot more to this than just the items inside. The container has to maintain its integrity too.

    1. Re:The elephant in the room by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      US 50 cal ammo box, painted shut with 2 part silicone RTV. Don't use the one part stuff, it releases acetic acid on cure, just the opposite of what you want.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  51. Do it the easy way by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    Surprised nobody has suggested this...save yourself the hassle of trying to pick a storage device that will still be compatible in 25 years and just get something with a network interface, I.E. a NAS. If you want to bank on something still being easily available in 25 years, bank on HTTP. It's been around for a very long time and isn't going anywhere. Just get yourself a NAS that supports IPv4 and IPv6 with an integrated webserver and you're golden for probably the next 50 years. Make sure it has a ethernet port, you should definitely be able to find ethernet enabled gear or at least some sort of ethernet adapter in 25 years. Also, most NAS boxes will also have USB and potentially firewire, Thunderbolt, etc. Those don't hurt, the more connectivity options the better. Make sure you have the data you want to save on several drives in case one goes bad.

  52. 25 years by Retron · · Score: 1

    Aside from the suggestion of packing a cheapo minibook (or netbook, or whatever they're called these days) along with say a USB flash drive, the best way would be to use good-quality media.

    25 years isn't much time really. I've a 21-year-old IBM PS/2 which still boots up just fine (into Windows 95) - its Seagate SCSI drive is still going strong. I've a box full of Commodore Plus/4 floppies which still read just fine despite being over 25 years old, as do the old PC Plus coverdisks I kept back from my first PC (although they're only 21 years old).

    I have a 5.25" drive hooked up to my (Sandy Bridge) PC and yes, it still works. I've another drive in an old P3 I keep ticking over for DOS games; that one's hooked up to a CatWeasel ISA card and that can read pretty much any format you're likely to come across.

    As for optical media, I was too poor to afford a CD writer in the early 90s but by the late 90s I could afford one - I still have a few dozen CD-Rs containing source files from back then. The Kodak Gold Ultima discs read perfectly fine, but they were expensive - over a pound a disc. Some of the cheaper discs haven't made it, as the dye's faded and they're now unreadable using standard equipment.

  53. Re:Romney - VOTE FOR YOUR FUTURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Mitt is the creepy guy in your fraternity who thought it would be a good idea to assault fans of the opposing team because he thinks that's a prank (no it isn't) and that it's funny (no, it's a crime). Then he had his obligatory Mormon wedding and produced 5 clones of himself. If he runs healthcare there won't be a line for bypass surgery. There will be a footrace. He'll have a jolly good time watching grandma grab her chest and fall 10 feet short of the finish.

  54. I'm not an expert by assertation · · Score: 1

    but I've had factory made DVDs die on me after a few years simply because I preferred to keep the AC in my apartment low.

    As good as the ancient Egytians were at making mummys, an anomalous ancient Chinese genius beat them. Instead of a corpse that looked like a charcol brisqute, the royal woman he preserved, found thousands of years later, still had skin, organs, bendable limbs, etc. Like she died recently.

    His method? Concentric coffins.

    The inner one holding the body, floated inside of another larger coffin filled with a liquid antiseptic.

  55. Use CDs by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Archival Gold CDRs should be fine. The medium is supposed to good for 300 years based on accelerated testing.

    http://www.mediasupply.com/mamgold.html

    Make a redundant copy and you should be fine.

    As far as being able to read it, there is so much stuff on CD sized optical media I would be truly shocked if in 25 year readers would not be commonly available. I've already had CD music players for that long.

  56. Re:The only storage medium proven to last 100 year by icebike · · Score: 2

    Laser printer pages don't stick together.

    I have banker's boxes full of documents (mostly code listings) circa 1986 printed on the first HP laser jet. No sticking problem.

    The only sticking I've seen in laser printing is from early models (circa 1975) of IBM 3800 laser printers (mainframe laser printers) which printed so fast the thermoplastic never had time to cool before it was pressed down by the sheet above. Print jobs directly off the back end would sometimes stick together. This was solved in a few months by a toner change.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  57. You'll be in your seventies...? by drkim · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Keep it low tech:
    Assuming you graduated college at 21, you'll be around 71, you won't be that interested in figuring out high-tech stuff. It won't be long until the tech we have now is obsolete, because the rate of change continues to accelerate. Try finding a punch card reader these days.
    Print stuff out on paper, regular paper works fine for only 25 years. Add a desiccant, and pump in nitrogen or argon if you can.

    2. Redundancy:
    Many of you will be dead and many will have lost their memory.
    Print out a copy for everyone. Everybody gets one. Store in metal boxes clearly labeled on the outside so you don't have to keep opening it to see what it is.

    3. Locators:
    Include a list of everybody who gets a box in the box. Include personal identifiers (full names, DOBs) so you can track people down on the Internet (or whatever it is called 25 years from now.)

    You may find 25 years from now that there are already records or copies of whatever you put in the box* but the greatest treasure will be locating your old buddies.

    *Most people who open time capsules find old newspapers. The exact same newspapers which are also in storage in the newspaper office down the street. Probably when you open your box in 25 years you can find everything you put inside still on eBay.

    Good luck!

  58. CDs from the mid-late 1990's still work here by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

    I've got CDs I burned sometime in the mid-late 1990's that still work just fine, 1996-1998ish. I don't know why you'd be worried about them not working. They'd possibly degrade and become unreadable if they were in the sun all the time, but how much sun do you think they're going to get in your package? ;)

    1. Re:CDs from the mid-late 1990's still work here by allisia · · Score: 1

      my cd 10 year old from Thailand and is work good. 1990 GOOD MUSIC CD thailand

  59. Re:The only storage medium proven to last 100 year by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I'd also recommend regular cheap paper. It can have a nostalgic look to it, when it turns yellow.

  60. Don't put data in the chest at all by arobatino · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to read the data until the chest is opened, encrypt it and only put the encryption key in the chest (something like a piece of paper will do). Periodically migrate the encrypted data itself to new media as you would with any data.

  61. Re:A cat, radioactive source & detector, cyani by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    Any domesticated cat can live up to 25 years, but it's hit or miss. The odds are low, though.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  62. be here now by swell · · Score: 1

    I'm a lot older than the OP and have a different perspective. Some people my age spend a lot of time thinking about 'the good old days'. Those people strike me as non-functional, fossils, relics...

    A few people my age forge ahead, engage with the world, eagerly anticipate exciting changes in our culture. They don't have time for ritual, reminiscing and memorabilia.

    The OP doesn't say what he graduated from. If it was the Apollo astronaut team, then go for it- you've earned a place in history. Otherwise, reconsider the silly ritual; live in the present and enjoy the unfolding of history around you.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  63. Re:Beware the batteries! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    don't include the battery then, just a power supply. most laptops will function without the battery as long as they are plugged into the wall. As for the battery in the PC, you are thinking of the CMOS battery. A laptop would have one of these as well, but I've had computers in closets for decades that never showed any indication that the CMOS battery leaked, so i figure its a non problem. If you are really worried about it, remove the battery, and place it in some other sealed (non conductive) container.

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  64. Throw it in a drawer by srwood · · Score: 1

    I have underwear that old!

  65. Overthinking by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

    Personally I think you should just put whatever seems poignant into the time capsule and see what happens. To me that's the fun.

  66. Gamma Seal by VermifugeRT · · Score: 1

    25 years isn't all that long of a time. I think you could easily get away with using something like a "Gamma Seal." these seals easily last 10 years with regular use. 25 years should be easily attainable. In theory they attach to any bucket but this may not be durable enough for your needs. A Vittle Vault is both durable and sealed tight from the elements thanks to a Gamm Seal. Becoming a variety of sizes and can be picked up at any pet supply store.

    For good measure throw in one or two blocks of silica gel and some oxygen absorbers. I don't see why set up like this wouldn't deliver your stuff 25 years to the future and beyond.

  67. Re:Metal platters don't degrade unless... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    re: your last point.

    The Milne Speaking Clock currently housed at the Science Museum in London uses optical glass discs for playback (source shines through the discs, sensor on the other side). It is still equipped with the same optical discs it was installed with during its 1964 refit (the Pat Simmons voice), although the device at the Science Museum has not been used as the line clock since 1964 (replaced by a much smaller device with a magnetic drum rather than optical discs). The original GPO Speaking Clock voice (Jane Cain) was commissioned in 1936. As of 3 April 2012 (I've been and photographed it), it's still running to a tolerance of thousandths of a second.

    As far as I can make out from seeing the device first hand, the discs are made from a very highly polished quartz glass, coated with carbon(?). The entire device is encased in a sealed glass container, I would venture a guess that it is filled with an inert gas to prevent the carbon coating on the discs from oxidising. Whether this is part of the original design or if it's part of the museum preservation process, I couldn't tell you.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  68. NASA Already Thought About This! by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    The records on the Voyagers and Pioneers didn't just contain audio, you know.

    They contained video as well.

    RCA tried (and failed) to commercialise this technology in 1981 as the CED Videodisc System.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  69. Ya I have books that are 25 years old by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Paperback novels, that I've reread a number of times and that live on my bookshelf. They aren't in pristine condition, but they are just fine.

  70. Put it in a safe deposit box by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Assign a handful of people to be on the contact list for the depository, and put your materials in a safe deposit box. The climate-controlled environment will make things last a lot longer, and the depository will be in contact should something happen, such as a move, or an accident, or the depository failing.

    Definitely keep track of people who pass on, and assign new contacts in that event.

    Set a date for everyone to appear at the depository to open the box.

  71. Great idea - not at all hard by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    This is a great idea but it is not all that hard. I have lots of stuff that is in my attic which has been sitting for over a quarter century and it is fine. I would agree with the concern about CD-R dyes however there are some disks that are advertised as being archival quality and good for over 100 years. I buy those and I make multiple copies.

    The biggest issue is format changes and lack of support for old software, hardware and data formats. Companies like Apple should be ashamed at their abandonment of compatibility with the old in their relentless drive for new, new, new.

  72. Just like a VHS tape by TechieRefugee · · Score: 1

    Sure, you can use CDs/DVDs. I mean, look how long some people have been using VHS (which has been around since the mid-70's). So, it shouldn't be so bad to do that. If nothing else, toss a few random CDs in there anyways just as a display of the, by-then, incredibly antiquated storage medium.

  73. Alzheimer's medication by BobK65 · · Score: 1

    You may need by then.

  74. Guns! by VTI9600 · · Score: 1

    ...after the gubernment takes them away you'll be glad you did! Just in time for the epochalyse too!

  75. And trains still don't run on time! by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Nuff said

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  76. Dry nitrogen by rjh · · Score: 1

    For long-term storage I've had good luck with the following. You will need:

    1. Heavyweight plastic vacuum-sealable bags
    2. Vacuum cleaner
    3. Tank of dry nitrogen (ask a local welder where he gets his)

    Place your objects in a vacuum-sealable bag. Use the vacuum cleaner to extract as much air as possible from the bag. Replace the air with dry nitrogen (i.e., nitrogen at 0% humidity), but do not overinflate: leave some room for the nitrogen to expand with temperature changes. Seal the bag. Place the bag inside an opaque plastic bag (a black garbage bag works well) and put into storage.

    The two major contributors to chemical decomposition over time are oxygen and energy. By purging the air (78% nitrogen, 20% oxygen, approx) with nitrogen, you get rid of most of the oxygen. By making sure you're using dry nitrogen there's no water present in the bag, and water as you can probably figure out is an oxygen source. No oxygen equals no oxidation reaction. Nitrogen is also a fairly inert gas: it's not argon-level of inert, but it's pretty damned unreactive.

    By putting things into a black garbage bag, you seal it off from sunlight. No more ultraviolet light doing ultraviolent things to valence shells, kicking out electrons, etcetera.

    Now that you've got oxidation and ultraviolet light controlled, store it in a fairly temperature-controlled place. 25 years of thermal shock can destroy things, and your keepsakes deserve better. A basement works well.

    Insofar as how to make sure the digital media is still readable... buy a cheap laptop and put that in the nitrogen-atmosphere, UV-shielded, temperature-controlled time capsule, too, along with a USB-to-RS232 cable. In 25 years we'll still be able to read data out over a serial connection, even if Ethernet is still a thing of the past.

  77. Simple... by Genda · · Score: 1

    Store your data on ROMs. Include a VERY simple ROM Reading device that emits a serial signal. Include a small paper document that explains the ROMs, the ROM Reader, and how to properly hook it up to a serial data input line on any digital device. Provide basic information of data format, start with an ASCII character table, then simple text files describing in technical detail whatever other file types are on the ROMs including images, video and or sound files. Your ROMs could be electronic, laser etched glass with a metal coating, hell, cuneiform on clay tablets, choose a technology that's nonvolatile and sports the data density you like and have at it. Oh, yeah, mark your ROMs so that they're read in proper order... don't make future readers have to guess about anything.

    You know, seeing as this question crops up repeatedly every so often, it would be a great idea to have someone come up with a nonvolatile storage medium that is high density, standard, and registered among a number of international governments and standards agencies, so future generations can access these things at some future time without scratching their heads and asking WTF. Of course if as a species, considering we have a bugger all hard time ensuring the future air is fit to breath and water fit to drink, we probably aren't gong to make sure that future generations get the pleasure of seeing reruns of "Gun Smoke".

    You may also want to include a paper document that explains human based data starting with our math. Just in case we extinct ourselves, and the folks who open the capsule have zero human context. Just a thought. Don't forget to use acid free paper.

  78. Re:Beware the batteries! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    No, they do not catch on fire with age, and they are NiCD or Lithium so they don't have battery acid.
    At least any laptop created in the last DECADE. Desktops' tiny battery is a lithium battery.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  79. Sounds like my guild chest by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Sounds like my guild chest on my guild ship in DDO. Nobody ever touches the crap in there lol. My suggestions for an "IRL" one would be lots of shotguns and shells...for the zombie apocalypse (or hyper-intelligent monkeys).

  80. Re:Beware the batteries! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but where are you going to find a three-prong plug in 25 years?

    Maybe if you flash froze some gerbils and a wheel... :^D

  81. Just say no to SSDs for archival storage by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Very authoritative /techon.nikkeibp.co.jp article. It claims that even resting the newer 3 bit per cell flash chips earmarked for consumer grade USB thumb drives can lose data in as little as a year. There is better one bit per cell flash. But having read this piece (if it is at all accurate) I would never store a consumer grade SSD for 25 years and expect to read it without difficulty.

    I think If I wanted to store data reliably for twenty five years on machine readable media I would choose -- as some have already suggested -- an archival gold DVD. Since a lot of important data are being stored on these currently it should be no trouble to find a reader capable of reading them in twenty-five years. My guess is that at least some future optical drives will be backward compatible. If only because 100 year archives are currently being created on long-life discs. You might have to pay a professional to load your data to your cloud account, however, as consumer hardware might include optical drives. But there is little doubt that you could get a DVD read in twenty five years with ease.

    I have read that optical discs should be stored in their jewel cases standing on edge; that is, perpendicular to the ground. I think if you add in a duplicate to the mix then you will guard against some random defect sandbagging you. Maybe the dupe should be from another brand, like Verbatim. Bag the discs in plastic. And throw in a pouch of desiccant as others have said. Not a need for special treatment for the box IMHO. Cool dry place. Twenty five years will go by in the blink of an eye. Lemme tell ya. I recently opened some storage that was put up when I went overseas in 1989. Everything was in pretty good shape.

    The broader question of what to put in the box is more interesting than how to preserve it. A video postcard from each participant would be nice. (Stored on the gold DVD.) A small personal item worn on the day of the silver jubilee might be worth seeing. What about a secret message from each person in a sealed envelope?

    Something like: "I loved you from afar in history class back then. But you noticed me not. And I would have never divorced you and taken every penny like SHE did. But then you always were a damned fool, you damned fool."

    Then again you could always just do butt scans on the copier. My guess is that the copy paper will hold up better than your butts will after 25 years.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
    1. Re:Just say no to SSDs for archival storage by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Then again you could always just do butt scans on the copier. My guess is that the copy paper will hold up better than your butts will after 25 years.

      Think of all the fun you could have trying to identify which butt is which.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  82. Stick a laptop in there by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    Put the data in on various forms such as a portable USB hard drive, flash drives, and multiple DVDs. I would suggest looking into a RAID array as well--if a hard drive or two has errors, the error checking might make it accessible anyway. Stick a PCI-e/PCI USB and SATA adapter card in there as well. Also stick a laptop in there with the power adapter but don't put the battery in there. The battery will have died by then, and might blow up or something after a while and destroy everything. I think it would be safe to assume that power plugs will always be the same for the next fifty years or so. You would be safe even if USB/CD are not in use anymore if you have the entire device needed to read them in there.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  83. I'm too lazy to see if these people can help... by unitron · · Score: 1

    ...answer your questions, but you should at least register it with them as extra insurance of not losing track of where you put it.

    http://www.oglethorpe.edu/about_us/crypt_of_civilization/international_time_capsule_society.asp

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  84. Re:Rocks by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

    Why don't you do an experiment and put assorted items in a sealed container for 25 years and then open it and tell us how well things stored?

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  85. dessicant, oxygen absorber on the cheap by Zinho · · Score: 1

    There are cheap ways to get oxygen absorbers and silica gel desiccants:

    Hand warmer = oxygen absorber

    (some) kitty litter = desiccant (make sure it has silica gel; Fresh Step Crystals, Petco Crystals are both OK)

    The hand warmer will generate more heat than a food-grade oxygen absorber, so make sure it doesn't touch the stuff you want preserved. Also consider putting your kitty litter in a cloth bag to keep it contained.

    Good luck!

    --
    "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  86. single level flash based media by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    It's expensive... often 4-10 times as expensive as the common MLC media, but flash media is the most promising at this time for long term storage... 25-50 years I think. If you look at it, even today, it is possible to read 8" floppies with a little effort. With a bit of work, I was able to help someone read an old IBM370 disk pack on a PC a little while back. Whether it is convenient to read or not is a different story. But the fact is that reading ancient media isn't impossible. Flash is promising since it should experience almost no bit rot if you use single level media which tends to have fairly gigantic cells. Making use of 45nm or larger tech is an even better idea. So, in reality, a USB thumb drive that was a bit price a while ago might be your best option. I regularly buy industrial grade flash which is single level based, in an age where a 256gig flash drive can cost $300 or less, these still cost about $300 for 8gigs. They will however last a great deal longer than the alternative varieties.

    I am not a big believer in disc based media since purchasing a 8" floppy drive and connecting it to a PC can easily end up costing $1000 or more these days. I feel strongly that it will be much harder in the future. I would even recommend finding a really cheap single board computer with a USB port on it and putting it into the box. With some exposed pins and access to the Internet, a high school kid in an electronics course should be able to use that to rig up a reader for the Flash drive if USB happens to go the way of the dodo. Remember though, this is 2012 and I still use RS-232 every single day I'm at work.

  87. Re:Beware the batteries! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Well I recently plugged in a desktop that had been sitting abandoned in a warehouse since 1993 and while the CMOS battery was of course toast it certainly didn't damage the unit and it booted right up...Windows 2 was on the machine and I have to say THAT was a trip back in time. You don't realize how much things have changed until you fire one of those old monsters back up, remember how LOUD the hard drives were then? i had gotten so used to silent drives it took me a minute to realize it was that big old clunky HDD making all that noise.

    As for something to throw in there I figure space will probably be at a premium so I'd throw in a pad like this along with the power supply and a ton of pics on a microSD card. this way you'll be able to laugh at how primitive the tablets were plus have an easy way to show everyone all the pics you've taken on the MicroSD. You can include a message from everyone to their "future selves' on the MicroSD which will be fun to look back on then as a nice bonus.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  88. Endless hard disk by mattr · · Score: 1

    This is just an idea I'm throwing out there, based on the idea of a networked disk.
    You could have a legal firm tasked with updating the media every 5 years in perpetuity.
    Of course if you actually kept a disk connected to the Internet it could be hacked, this is probably 100% certain by the year you are planning to open it. So you could instead put a usb drive in a bank vault. Perhaps put a laptop in too.
    Then every 5 or 10 years, someone comes along to copy it onto the latest media type. Perhaps one day soon we will even have a Library of Congress data vault where people can pay to store data and have it preserved. If such exists, it can also be used in parallel.
    I am thinking it is going to be much more secure to put things into a vault than burying it in the ground and wondering if random chemical processes will destroy it or not. It sounds very possible you could even have flooding from rising seas or natural disasters from global warming, get zapped from EMF bombs or who knows.
    So while burying a time capsule is romantic if you want something to be safe maybe you should at the same time, distribute it digitally in commercial physical structures.

    1. Re:Endless hard disk by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      we already have such archives that are pertetually on the net, like many of the text usenet discussions. It would be easier for several people in your class to run websites, and just mirror the archive. Allow new additions as people's life story has major events.

  89. Re:Beware the batteries! by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    3-prong probably, 120V most definitely. Worst comes to worse, just cut the end off and hard-wire it. Failing 120V AC, I'm sure the DC output equivalent should still be available.

  90. Get Schrodingers cat by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    It should be perfectly fine in a perfectly sealed box for 25 years. Or not.

    Note how I did not use "purrfectly". There is still some sanity left!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Get Schrodingers cat by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Proceeding to clean coffee out of my keyboard. Poor Schrodinger's Cat to still be putting up with all this abuse after so much time. It must be suffering from PTSD after everything that's happened to it (or not).

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  91. Re:The only storage medium proven to last 100 year by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, I have code listings printed back in 2002 on a low-end LaserJet 1200 using an HP cartridge that were stuck together pretty badly when I went through them a couple of years ago. Different printer/toner/paper combinations can yield different results.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  92. McDonald's hamburger by Rohobian · · Score: 1

    That is all.

  93. Re:AC vs DC by jkflying · · Score: 1

    Different places require different technology. For a pole-pig, inductance works well because of the relatively high inductance*frequency which means you aren't just sending all the power into eddy currents. In a wall-wart, there isn't enough size to get more than a mH or so of inductance, meaning they have to use resistance to keep the current down. If the frequency were around 1kHz then sure, wall warts would be nice and efficient. But at household size conversion and with 60hz input it is better to rectify, smooth, then square-wave-AC at high frequency into a little transformer which does the conversion with less current therefore less I*I*R losses.

    --
    Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
  94. scotch by strack · · Score: 1

    a bottle of scotch, duh.

  95. Re:Romney - VOTE FOR YOUR FUTURE by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    nonsense, here in illinois we have several schemes to soak the poor for what little they have. One is the State Lottery, there are at least six more.

  96. All your information in the box by hicksw · · Score: 1

    Put a single sheet of paper in the box with the details of a cloud storage account to which you have uploaded all your digitized memorabilia. Like, say, maybe, Megaupload....
    --
    If you tell the truth you don't have to remember anything. - Mark Twain

  97. Re:Beware the batteries! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    The sooner the rest of the world moves to 240V the better. Half the transmission loss or twice the power?

  98. contact a professional archivist via the SAA by ffflala · · Score: 1

    There are myriad number of issues you might not find addressed on this thread and will not be able to guess at. Archivist are professionals in long-term storage in various environments; some of them have been at it for over 25 years already. Society of American Archivists (SAA) members have a certification process. You should be able to find contacts and relevant publications here:http://www2.archivists.org/

  99. Ha ha. by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    -- Wife looks menacingly at husband of 26 years when he is ten for ten on the smoothest ones.

    -- Another wife looks on in dismay at her husband when he is ten for ten on the hairy ones.

    -- And all look on in fear at the smug woman who is 20 for 20 -- both hairy and smooth.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  100. Could we quit asking this question? by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    It feels like once a month there is an Ask-Slashdot question worrying about the long-term storage of digital information.

  101. Raspberry PI + SD by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    Get two or three raspberry PI, and copy the same data (a linux distro + everything needed to read the files) in a dozen or so different SD cards, from different brands. Data redundancy should keep you safe, and having more than one hardware, too. Add a cheap screen (although Raspberry can output RCA), and you are good to go.

  102. Judith Martin reccomends: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Be sure to leave an apology note for destroying the environment in your box.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff