Slashdot Mirror


Can a Regular Person Repair a Damaged Hard Drive?

MrSeb writes "There's a lot of FUD when it comes to self-repairing a broken hard drive. Does sticking it in the freezer help? The oven? Hitting it with a hammer? Does replacing the PCB actually work? Can you take the platters out and put them in another drive? And failing all that, if you have to send the dead drive off to a professional data recovery company, how much does it cost — and what's their chance of success, anyway? They're notoriously bad at obfuscating their prices, until you contact them directly. This article tries to answer these questions and strip away the FUD." What has been your experience with trying to fix broken drives?

355 of 504 comments (clear)

  1. One word by mknewman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No.

    1. Re:One word by DarrylM · · Score: 4, Informative

      One word: Yes.

      Longer version: But it may be more difficult to do nowadays; I don't know. About 7 years ago a family member had a computer with a lot of photos that were, sadly, not backed up. The Maxtor drive had suddenly quit. I was able to eBay another drive with the same model number and swap the boards, and voila! We had a working drive with all of the photos (and other data) intact.

      Again, I have no idea how easy that would be to do nowadays... It was hard enough to change boards with my clumsy fingers on a 3.5" drive, let alone a mobile drive.

    2. Re:One word by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I repaired a drive once by overwriting the entire drive with zeroes, and overwrote the whole thing from /dev/random. After that I repartioned it and it worked fine for another 4-5 years. Before I "fixed" it, it was reporting bad sectors all over the place, and constantly had read and write errors. I salvaged what I could, but wasn't able to recover much. I never really trusted it with important data after that point, but it also never failed me after that. I eventually just stopped using it when I purchased a new hard drive, it realized the old one didn't have enough space to be useful. It was only 12 GB. Most USB sticks are bigger than that these days.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:One word by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Informative

      The old write-over trick. Yes, what you're doing is actually forcing the drive to remap bad sectors. How reliably it works after depends on what caused the bad sectors in the first place.

    4. Re:One word by t4ng* · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone that worked as an engineer in the hard drive manufacturing industry for 15 years I would have to agree, "No."

      You might be able to revive a drive if it is a problem with a PCB, but if it is a problem with the disks or heads, forget about it!

      Incidentally, a "hard drive crash" used to mean a head touched the disk and physically damaged the head and/or the disk. But for nearly two decades now, heads in hard drives are "contact heads," meaning the smallest part of the gap between the head and the disk is smaller than the mean free path of air molecules. However the heads are "flying" at a fairly high angle of attack, so it is really only the trailing edge of the head that is in contact with the disk at all times. Between that contact head design and auto retracting armatures that pull the heads off the data area of the disks, actual head crashes are extremely rare under normal operating conditions.

    5. Re:One word by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing, 5-6 years ago. Drive still works now.

    6. Re:One word by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative

      I repaired a drive once by overwriting the entire drive with zeroes,

      TFA is about a physically damaged drive. (Burnt out component on PCB.) The aim is to recover the data from that.

      Your method won't work on that kind of failure, and certainly won't recover any data.

    7. Re:One word by ckedge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, this frequently works at making failing disks "work again" -- as the manufacturer test sequences and/or simply zeroing the drive gives the drive a chance to find and mark all the bad failed blocks as bad, and the remaining blocks are all the ones that didn't fail and so the disk keeps working for a few more years. I've used this a half dozen times at work.

      Of course, this is to make a failing disk "work again", it doesn't help with recovering existing data.

      The first thing I'll try with a failing disk is to setup a file by file mirroring program (robocopy is one cli program I use a lot) and set it's "retries" to a moderately high number, like 5 or 10 or 20. Even though you are getting read errors, there are a class of problems where occasionally the read will work, and so each time you try and "rsync" the disk, you get more and more of what's there, till you have a mostly complete copy of the data. This is the same method that some enthusiast utilities use (like grc's disk recovery program, iirc).

      I've personally used the freezer trick once. Because of the possibility of condensation, I used the fridge first. I don't recall if I had to use the freezer, but I know I would not have left it in the freezer long (metal transfers heat fast, so it doesn't need to be deep freezed, just a bit colder than the fridge), maybe 5 minutes max, and I recall thinking that I'd end up putting it inside an anti static bag or something with an elastic closing the bag on the cables ... so that the amount of condensation would be limited, either that or run the dehumidifier and/or AC really hard first so that my apt was at low humidity. Definitely would not try it in the middle of a humid summer. Better to wait till winter and turn up your heating system and open your windows so the humidity drops really really low. That's always another option (for those of us that live far enough north), take the system into the chilly cold arid garage so the freezer trick doesn't result in lots of condensation.

      Of 5 drives that were failing, 3 I recovered by "retry reads over and over", and 1 I recovered using the freezer trick.

      I have one more left that I need to try a "platter swap" with an identical working model number using the "bathroom cleanroom technique". But I'm not looking forward to that, getting the platters out without scratching them on the heads is going to be a massive bitch. I think I'll practice on a few old 9GB drives before I try it with my failed 120GB drive. (I've had it sitting around for forever waiting for me to find the time to do it, I don't actually still use drives that old.)

    8. Re:One word by Briareos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Betteridge's Law of Headlines applies again... :)

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    9. Re:One word by Immerman · · Score: 1

      As the question specifically mentions data recovery specialists, I'm pretty sure that sort of "repair" isn't applicable

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:One word by t4ng* · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can see how that might work if it were a pretty old hard drive. Since hard drives have magnetic recording media, you can't just write raw data straight to disk. For example, if you truly wrote all zeros or all ones (the recording bias all in one direction or another) there would be no way to figure out if it were all zeros or all ones or how many bits of zeros or ones that you had recorded. So all data is encoded before writing it to disk to ensure that there is always an alternating magnetic field on the disk. A zero might be expanded to 1001, or something like, that before it is written to disk. Different encoding techniques have certain known data pattern weaknesses, data patterns that when encoded will produce a more difficult to read signal on the disk than other patterns. These bad data patterns are used to test drive designs. Additionally, each data track on a disk is sandwiched between two servo tracks. These help keep the head centered on the data track no matter where it is without having to worry about drive calibration. And finally, drives include a lot of spare sectors that the drive electronics are supposed to automatically swap out, without the OS knowing about it, when bad sectors are detected.

      So, it is possible that you had a drive that after a lot of writes and rewrites was having some signal-to-noise ratio problems detecting data written on the drive. Your rewrite operations may have normalized the media on the disks just enough to get a little more life out of it. But what was actually being written to the disk wasn't all zeros. If that were possible, you would really make the drive unusable!

    11. Re:One word by Immerman · · Score: 2

      As I understand it a much larger problem than clumsy fingers is that modern drive manufacturers tend to silently go through several revisions for the same model number, and you often need a board from *exactly* the same revision for a board-swap to work.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:One word by Sancho · · Score: 2

      Only the real answer is "sometimes."

      The PCB swap works if the PCB is what's damaged. I've seen it happen several times in my 16 years of IT. I've also recommended the trick to non-techie friends, and had a nonzero success rate. So it can be done, if the failure scenario is just right and the person can follow directions.

    13. Re:One word by blackicye · · Score: 5, Informative

      One word: Yes.

      Longer version: But it may be more difficult to do nowadays; I don't know. About 7 years ago a family member had a computer with a lot of photos that were, sadly, not backed up. The Maxtor drive had suddenly quit. I was able to eBay another drive with the same model number and swap the boards, and voila! We had a working drive with all of the photos (and other data) intact.

      Again, I have no idea how easy that would be to do nowadays... It was hard enough to change boards with my clumsy fingers on a 3.5" drive, let alone a mobile drive.

      This will not work with many newer drives, especially WD Caviar Black and Blue. There is a firmware chip on the PCB that also needs to be transplanted, and this is tricky even with a Surface mount electronics soldering station, the type that uses channeled hot air.

    14. Re:One word by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've personally used the freezer trick once. Because of the possibility of condensation, I used the fridge first.

      There is little possibility of harmful condensation if use a limited version of the freezer trick, and simply suck as much air out of the bag as possible (use a vacuum sealer if available) and then let the disk return to room temperature before opening the bag. You don't NEED to run the disk while you thermally cycle it if the problem is stiction. And there is also always the option of using one of the many waterproof enclosures available on the market, and simply slipping some dessicant packets in there before you start your quest. You could also just put it in a tupperware and seal the hole the cable passes through with silicone, and put the dessicant in there with it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:One word by blackicye · · Score: 3, Funny

      No.

      Any home user who has a Scanning Electron Microscope and the appropriate algorithms in their basement can recover data from almost 90% of mechanical failures.

    16. Re:One word by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      That may make the drive work again, but it won't recover the data that was already on it (which it what they are asking about here).

      The reason what you did works in some circumstances is that all drives beyond a certain point have more capacity than they actually let the outside world see. The extra capacity is used to remap back blocks to when they appear: meaning a multi Gbyte drive doesn't fail because a few MByte worth of surface goes bad. This only works until the "hidden" capacity is all used, after which there is nowhere to map bad sectors to. One of the readings usually offered by SMART is how many sectors have been reallocated this way: if that goes up too fast or nears full the drive will report itself as near to failing or in need of immediate replacement. If it is just one or two small spots that have failed due to some impurity in the platter, then a drive won't fail for writing BUT may still fail for reading: if the sector goes completely bad between being written to and read there is nothing the drive can do: it can't read the data to write it elsewhere, it will retry the read a number of times and if that fails you get a permanent error reported (if it succeeds the drive can remap the sector and all you see is an unusually slow read). Your drive will have had several sectors that went bad fast, so could not be remapped before the data was unreadable, by repeated writing you forced the drive to reconsider every sector and remap those ones that were iffy. You were lucky: there were enough sectors going spare for that to work and what-ever caused the bad sectors in the first places was not something that was drive-wide so no more failures occurred.

      lt;dr: Yep, that sometimes works, but it doesn't get you any lost data back and I personally would never trust the drive again. The fact that this can work, and sometimes only temporarily as the drive my degrade further, is why I never but a drive from eBay or other second hand sources...

    17. Re:One word by sribe · · Score: 1

      ... the possibility of condensation...

      Use a long cable and perform the entire operation with the drive running in the freezer. Nothing sucks worse than getting half the data off, only to have the drive overheat again.

    18. Re:One word by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure SATA has strict length limitations, hence the use of a different type of (shielded) cable for eSATA.

    19. Re:One word by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      If the data is important enough to warrant trying to repair it (which would involve paying me for several hours of research and then the attempt), Im just going to take it to a recovery lab. They charge more, but they also have tons more experience, a proper cleanroom, and a much better chance of not making things worse.

    20. Re:One word by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Will an electron microscope actually be able to recover data from magnetic platters?

    21. Re:One word by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      One word: Yes.

      Like you, I have swapped out controller boards (quite a few times, actually), and it seems to work even on fairly modern drives. I have also removed platters and transplanted them with success, but only on 5-1/4" drives. Today, it's much easier to swap the controller card. Although I haven't done it recently, since everything I have runs RAID and is backed up, I don't see how the three years or so since I last resorted to these methods would make that much difference.

      I have also done the freezer trick to recover data from drives, but this only seems to work on drives that boot OK and work for a while and then give you issues. I don't know what on the drive is most affected by the heat, but I suppose that must be the problem if the freezer works.

      I would never recommend hitting with a hammer, but if a drive doesn't spin up at all, plugging it in and dropping it about 1" onto a carpeted surface might get the drive going. For such sticky drives, I have also opened the drive up and manually spun it to move it off any "flat spot", then closed it back up and recovered data.

      Unless the data is worth a lot of money and you don't have a backup, a drive recovery service isn't worth it. All these other tricks work just fine for the "I've got backups of everything but the last day/week/whatever and just need it working for a few minutes" scenario. Also, it kind of goes without saying that booting off a different drive when doing the recovery is smart, as any OS errors should be avoided that way.

    22. Re:One word by repvik · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the PCB trick doesn't work anymore. Atleast not on the drives (from the same batches) I've tried. I've done it successfully >10 years ago myself, so I know it wasn't impossible.

    23. Re:One word by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I've personally used the freezer trick once

      Could you explain how being put in the freezer gets the drive to work? Please don't make me read the article, but I'm really curious (but not curious enough to read the article).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re:One word by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Incidentally, a "hard drive crash" used to mean a head touched the disk and physically damaged the head and/or the disk.

      ...and today, "my hard drive crashed" can mean basically anything. I can't count how many times I've heard someone say "my hard drive crashed" only to have their response to my question of "how do you know" sound something like, "well, when I go to 'my documents, Word doesn't load" or some other similar error where the hard disk is clearly not to blame. I tried educating people on the actual meaning of the term, but it seemed a losing battle, so now "my hard drive crashed" generally translates to "something is broken", unless it's a fellow computer tech who I'm certain knows what an actual hard disk crash looks like.

    25. Re:One word by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing, but it did not work, until I swapped the rom chips (firmware and servo data?) from the old to the new board, then it worked fine. This was a long time ago however.

    26. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      About two years ago I had a 1TB Hitachi drive go bad on me, and a few minutes with a multimeter told me the board was the culprit. The drive was still under warranty, but they would have replaced it with a new drive instead of trying to repair the old one and 1TB is a lot of data to lose. Fortunately I found the same model on eBay with a bad head for a few dollars.

      Simply swapping the boards didn't work for me, so I hunted down the location of the NVRAM and swapped those with a rework station I've owned for a while. After that it worked just fine, and I'm still using it today as a backup for the new drive I received from Hitachi after RMA'ing what was left of the other.

      In the end I saved my data and doubled my storage space for less than $25.

    27. Re:One word by Whuffo · · Score: 1

      That's the best answer out of a whole bunch of bad ones.

      Stiction? Yes, this was a problem once upon a time. If you have a hard drive that old that just quit working, that's amazing. Go ahead and bang on it. But if your hard drive was made within the last 15 years - this isn't the problem, don't bother.

      Replace the circuit board with one from an identical drive? This works for drives that have controller failures; Maxtor had an issue with a chip on the controller board about 8 years ago; the chip (made by Philips) would fail - usually burning a hole in the top of the chip as it died. I worked in a large corporate IT department, and we saved data from dozens of dead Maxtor drives with controller board swaps. That was an isolated incident; the chances of a hard drive controller board failing these days is somewhere between zip and zero.

      The real killer of hard drives today is due to the embedded servo technology they use - there's a servo track written to the platter that the drive uses to find the tracks and sectors; if a write error (usually due to a bug in the drive's firmware that only shows up in edge cases) causes the servo track to be corrupted, the drive becomes totally unreadable. This is unrepairable; even by the data recovery companies.

      If the data is valuable - you should have been making backups. If you didn't, data recovery services *may* be able to recover some but probably not all of it. Watch out for the charlatans, though - some big name drive recovery companies just give it a half-hearted try and bill you for their failures. And be aware that a competent drive recovery service will charge you thousands of dollars to recover the data - and they'll earn every penny. There are techniques for reading drive platters, but they require clean rooms, electron microscopes, and a high level of knowledge and skill.

      If it's your personal hard drive, then go ahead and futz around with it trying to recover some data; you've got nothing to lose. Whatever you had on there doesn't justify the price of recovery. If it's a drive in a corporate environment with critical data - then it may be worth paying for recovery. Don't mess with it first, give the recovery service the drive untouched so they'll have the best chance to save the data. And if recovering your data is any concern at all - back up your data. Do it regularly. The question of hard drive failure is not "if", it's "when".

    28. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Incidentally, a "hard drive crash" used to mean a head touched the disk and physically damaged the head and/or the disk."

      In a previous lifetime I was an operator on an IBM 360, where we had installed some STC (Storage Technology Corporation) cartridge hard drives, which they swore COULD NOT have a head crash. Yeah, about a week later we called them to report one had crashed. They refused to believe it, so we turned it back on and they could easily hear the screeching over the phone. So much for "cannot have a head crash".

    29. Re:One word by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The correct single-word answer is 'sometimes'.

      If the PCB is dead, replacing the PCB (and swapping the appropriate chip which contains some drive-specific information even if the PCB revision is the same) will work. (Done it myself with a 160GB samsumg, two co-workers did it too (Seagate 1TB with buggered firmware and 320GB Western Digital with a controler that burnt out)

      The freezer/fridge does work too. Combine putting the drive in the fridge for several hours + dd_rescue and you can get more data off. The freezer sometimes works better than the fridge (at condensation risk)..

      If you have had a head crash, none of the above will help.

    30. Re:One word by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Sometimes, the read heads are stuck to the platters. Lowering the temperature might make the metal contract enough to loosen them.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    31. Re:One word by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Real data recovery places are too expensive for the average person to use. I think there's a middle-ground between your two extremes.

    32. Re:One word by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      My sister-in-law is the office manager at a small business and their computer died a few years ago without a recent backup. When they powered it up, the hard drive just knocked repeatedly and the machine wouldn't boot. I was able to recover everything they needed from the drive by placing it in the freezer then installing it back in the computer. The first time or two it booted but quickly failed again. I believe it was on the third try that it continued working long enough for me to copy the files they needed.

      The process may not be dependable or optimal, but "No" is not the absolute answer.

    33. Re:One word by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      One word: Hammer.

      I had a (10-year-old) 5GB WD Enterprise SCSI drive at home that refused to power up after an extended system shutdown while on vacation - system normally ran 24/7 (ya, for 10 years - suck it IDE/ATA). Rapped it with a hammer when I heard the clicks - fixed. Of course, I backed up and replaced the drive then and there.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    34. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have one more left that I need to try a "platter swap" with an identical working model number using the "bathroom cleanroom technique". But I'm not looking forward to that, getting the platters out without scratching them on the heads is going to be a massive bitch. I think I'll practice on a few old 9GB drives before I try it with my failed 120GB drive. (I've had it sitting around for forever waiting for me to find the time to do it, I don't actually still use drives that old.)

      You're extremely unlikely to succeed if the drive has multiple platters. Even if you don't scratch the platters, modern drives need the platters to be aligned at the to the micrometer. This essentially means that you cannot remove the platters one at a time, and one mistake and the platters will be unaligned.

    35. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That worked for me. Wrapped the 3.5" disk drive in
      clingfilm, then a freezer bag and let it cool down.

      Bought an external USB enclosure with interface card and cable. The enclosure wasn't necessary, a
      but the cable and interface card were. Plugged the USB cable in and gave the drive a good
      hard fast twist and it ticked back into life. Managed to get all the data off just in time. Never restarted ever again.

      Her indoors had moved the laptop to a sidetable, foldedUTthe lid down and opened the window to let direct sunlight in. Complained that it had started to make a grinding sound.

    36. Re:One word by danceswithtrees · · Score: 3

      You mean like "my program has a bug?" You probably don't mean there is moth interfering with a relay closing.
      Certain phrases come to encompass more than their original meaning.

    37. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I've had the same thing happen to me twice. Both drives (one was a 2.5", the other is a 3.5") were a mess - SMART failures all over the place and s-l-o-w to read. After a complete wipe using the internal secure erase, both drives came back working fine.

      The 2.5" drive no longer reports any SMART failures. It even wiped the relocated sector count. I converted it into an external drive and, other than a weird first cold plug in where it doesn't respond, it has been working fine.
      Unfortunately for the 3.5" drive, SMART values were all over the place (heck, none of the values or attributes make any sense), but the slow reads were no longer there.

      So far, I have 4 drives that I have attempted such repair. However, as far as I can tell, the 2 drives that worked were both suffering from heat (reaching 70 C for both), so perhaps that's why they had a full recovery.

    38. Re:One word by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      I've seen it work against the infamous "click of death", which I'm pretty sure is a different problem, but I like your explanation. Something's stuck those platters in place.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    39. Re:One word by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As the GP, I once had a burnt component on a PCB of a hard disk. I changed it using the *exact* model of the disk, and it worked. The disk was 100$ for a 500GB off eBay, which is a bit expensive, but afterwards I had a brand new disk to keep (I put the PCB back on the new disk once I finished retrieving the data). The seller on eBay provided the complete serial number in order to make it easy to find the correct replacement disk.

      There are also companies in Hong Kong that specialize in selling replacement PCBs. It's much cheaper, but bigger delays.

    40. Re:One word by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      Used the freezer trick more than once, but I don't remove it from the freezer to try. I have a few LONG cables. Place the computer on top of fridge with long cables hanging out and into the freezer. Close door and wait, power up computer and read the drive. When I get all that is getable. I take a hammer to drive.

    41. Re:One word by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I never ever want to be in a situation where i have to tell someone, "Your wedding pictures were previously recoverable at a lab, but I took a risk to save a few hundred dollars and now your data is gone for good."

      The only way I would attempt it is if they made it clear this was something I could try off-the-clock, and that they had truly given their data up for lost unless I could revive it. Its just too risky for me to EVER attempt in a business setting, and is completely unprofessional to attempt such a risky operation on valuable data with no experience.

    42. Re:One word by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Obviously.

      I was just answering the question. "Sometimes" a regular person can do it. Of course it should be a last resort.

    43. Re:One word by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      USB sticks nothing, sometimes I still get thrown for a loop over 32GB microSD cards.. and hell, there's 64GB and 128GB ones out, I've not seen any bigger but it's coming. Size of a fingernail. I have WANG disks in my attic.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    44. Re:One word by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You could always put the drive into a USB/firewire enclosure, then put the whole thing into the freezer.

    45. Re:One word by tragedy · · Score: 1

      The "Click of Death" I know of affected Iomega Zip drives. The way I heard it there was a design flaw where the read/write head could overextend and damage itself. The really insidious thing was that the damaged head, when accessing a disk, could damage the disk in such a way that, when the disk was read in an undamaged zip drive, it would cause the read/write head to overextend and damage itself. It made it essentially an infectious problem. Throw a zip disk in a damaged drive and the disk would subsequently damage another drive if you put the disk in it. I think it only occurred with some drives, however.

    46. Re:One word by timnbron · · Score: 1

      At school, I told my German teacher that the computer had crashed. She looked at me strangely, and then said she hoped I'd picked up all the pieces.

      --
      There are some who call me ... Tim.
    47. Re:One word by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help that many people refer to the computer case as "the hard drive". A slightly smaller percentage refer to it as "the CPU", which isn't a lot more helpful.

      But yeah, I've repaired registry errors and removed malware from cow-orkers' and relatives' PCs and miraculously "fixed" the hard drive...

    48. Re:One word by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2

      ... the possibility of condensation...

      Use a long cable and perform the entire operation with the drive running in the freezer. Nothing sucks worse than getting half the data off, only to have the drive overheat again.

      I took this a step farther with an 18" PATA cable and a couple 3 Lb. blocks of dry ice (local supermarkets often sell it). It took forever but I got my data copied off... and yes beware of condensation, use ziptop freezer bags around the drive and rubberband them flat to get all posible air away from the drive before cooling. I let my drives get pretty cold before I spun them up using a PATA to USB cable and stand alone power block. I was too chicken to risk the IDE controller on the mobo. After getting my data I scrapped the drive, I would never trust it again.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    49. Re:One word by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Condensation won't kill electronics. The water from condensation is pure and free of contaminants. The electronics will quite comfortably run with beads of water on them.

      This is a common trick in electrical equipment fault finding. Any fault that is caused by thermal expansion or contraction can be located on a giant PCB by using a localised blast from a freeze spray. The end result is everywhere the freeze spray has been used frosts over then gets wet. I've yet to kill electronics using this method and have been through about 10 cans in my life.

      I used the freezer trick to recover a HDD which died of neglect (unused drive for about a year), I assumed the motors just suffered stiction. Out of the freezer and straight into service. Worked beautifully even with condensation running down the side of the PCB. After about 5 minutes it all dried out.

    50. Re:One word by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      It all depends on HOW the drive has died. if you just flip the switch and nothing happens? Good chance its a dead board and if you swap it out you've got a shot just like you found out.

      But if on the other hand you fire it up and its hot as hell and makes a grinding or clicking noise? yeah...you're screwed. I've managed to save some files from a head crash by chilling the drive and then grabbing data as fast as I possibly can but its tricky as hell and every second its doing more damage.

      Finally there if the big "Boy are YOU fucked!" which is of course SSDs. i have yet to hear of anyone bringing one of those back to life, when the controller goes on one of those you're just boned. The bitch with those is you get ZERO warning, just flip the switch and bye bye. That is why i tell my customers to go with HDDs or hybrids until they get the bugs worked out or backup backup backup, which frankly they should be doing anyway but few do.

      So it all comes down to 1.-what you are trying to get back, the smaller the better. pics and docs are a hell of a lot easier to do a quick snatch on than video, 2.-What kind of damage you are looking at, failed controller, head crash, burning motor, and 3.-How much data you need to get back, the shorter the better. You don't know what "fun" is until you try to save 4Gb+ of pictures and clips of somebody's dead mother when they have NO backup. Its a hell of a lot easier to grab 40Mb than it is 4000Mb when the drive is dying.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    51. Re:One word by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      No.

      Short answer: No
      Long answer: Yes

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    52. Re:One word by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Try ddrescue for the copy attempts. It's quite nice, and has the added benefit of not causing filesystem metadata writes to the bad drive. A little slower than attempting to copy just the files though.

    53. Re:One word by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      It's condensation on the PCB you need to worry about.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    54. Re:One word by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      There are also companies in Hong Kong that specialize in selling replacement PCBs. It's much cheaper, but bigger delays.

      Any details? Might be useful to know.

    55. Re:One word by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had to do that trick once as well and I'm glad to say it worked. Man you want to talk about a tense as hell experience, there I was with a gal just crying her eyes out because that drive was the ONLY source of a couple of hundred pics and little video and audio clips of her dead mother.

      But I did just as you described, vacu-sealed the drive and let it come back to room temp before opening the bag and it worked just long enough to get that data off. Luckily that one close call was enough for her so I was able to set her up a backup routine using a combination of DVDs plus Cloud plus USB HDDs that are rotated out weekly between her home and that of her sister. that way everything she has is backed up thrice on 3 different mediums at 3 different locations just to be safe.

      Please folks, i don't care if its flash sticks, get your friends and family to back up the important stuff, okay? Make digital copies of all pictures and documents and store them in multiple locations. I had a customer come home from a 3 day business trip to a smoldering pile where his house once was so I know how important they can be. Thankfully he had listened to me and all it took was retrieving his backup drive from his brother's house and he had all his records and pictures back in a few hours but he could have lost everything, all the photos of his family, all his childhood videos, the whole thing just gone.

      So backup backup backup folks, and make sure everyone you know does the same. Hell you can get a 32Gb flash stick for less than $20 off of Newegg and that will hold most people's precious stuff right there and fit into your pocket or a safety deposit box. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it, as I've seen time and time again here at the shop.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    56. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, you've certainly proven that you're one who doesn't know how hard drives work.

      First of all, they're NOT sealed. There's a small bleed hole in the chassis that is covered with a filter. That's to equalize air pressure during shipping and use (since HDDs do warm up a bit during use). Crack open a junk one if you don't believe me, all you need is a set of Torx screwdrivers. Secondly, there is NOT a vacuum inside of a drive, the atmosphere is actually useful, in that, at high rotational velocity, it forms a thin layer over the platter that keeps the read/write head from scraping against it. A drive with a vacuum would have to be kept extremely stable (as in zero vibration) in order to keep working.

      Lastly, those little fingernail-size filters aren't able to absorb much, because they're only built for average use. If you put your drive in the freezer and then thaw it out without having sealed it in a plastic bag, then yeah, I could see the condensation swamping the filter entirely. Then you've got all sorts of extra problems on top of whatever killed your drive in the first place.

    57. Re:One word by Mathieu+Lu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here are two PCB sellers in HK who ship overseas:
      http://www.onepcbsolution.com/
      http://www.hkmingdi.com/enindex.asp

      I found them off the forum of this site:
      http://www.deadharddrive.com/

      I wrote a short post about it in French, you can probably run it in google-translate. It took me a bit of time to figure out the PCB number on my Seagate drive, which is on the PCB, but on the side facing the disk, so I had to unscrew it to obtain it. (both HK sites were helpful and responded to my e-mails in good English).
      http://www.bidon.ca/fr/random/2011-04-12-disque-dur-ressuscite

    58. Re:One word by unitron · · Score: 1

      "Could you explain how being put in the freezer gets the drive to work?"

      Depends on what's wrong with the drive.

      What I've done is is freeze a TiVo drive with problems, and then use

      dd_rescue

      to copy it to another drive on the theory that it would run better at a lower temp long enough to read what's on there.

      As for exactly why it would run better at a lower temp, if it would, there's probably more than one reason, but if you want to make a subtle difference in the physical relationship of the internal parts to see if that helps rather than hurts, freezing seems less risky, and more reveresable, than any sort of percussive maintenence.

      This is not the same as making the drive good as new, it's just getting the data off of it.

      Of course TiVo drives seem to be subject to problems not usually encountered in drives used in other circumstances, or at least data on TiVo drives can't be rescued by some, if not most, of the methods available for use on those other drives.

      If you stick one in the freezer, wrap a couple of layers of paper towel around it so that you don't leave any skin on it when you take it out.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    59. Re:One word by ambidextroustech · · Score: 1

      The answer is no. The best plan is to backup, backup and backup.

      Any physical dinking around may provide a one-time shot; however, you cannot open the drive and successfully transplant the platters. Also, you cannot simply swap the PCB with a healthy donor--without exchanging the EEPROM chip, which is programmed specifically with that drive's specific "contact points" (ie. start sector, maintenance sector, how far to swing on each track [basically any imperfections during manufacturing]).

    60. Re:One word by kcelery · · Score: 1

      The read/write is not touching the platter, it is flying on a thin cushion of air. Thus after spinning for a few years, when you smash it open, you don't see any scrap mark on the platter. That is because the read / write head is not in contact with platter.

    61. Re:One word by tconnors · · Score: 1

      No.

      That's very confidently stated.

      But unfortunately, wrong. I had a 40GB (or was it 13.6GB?) quantum fireball that wouldn't spin up anymore. I had suspicions that the PCB had contacted the bottom of the metal case, and so had likely shorted something to ground. Most of the data was unimportant, but several years down the track I had a niggling need to get all the data off that disk, and trawled ebay for a little while for the part number of the disk. I managed to buy 4 PCBs for something like $20+postage (same part number, slightly different markings). And you know what? It worked perfectly long enough for me to do a DD onto a new disk.

      Sure, the data recovery firms state that the servo parameters of each individual disk is burned into the EPROM of each disk, but that's just presumably tuning data. Servos continue to work when not perfectly tuned. And given that each disk is manufactured exactly the same way, the servo parameters shouldn't be entirely different anyway.

      So in other words, it has been done.

    62. Re:One word by unitron · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that at most a drive will have one side of one platter devoted to servo info.

      The idea is that the various components of a head stack are fixed in place relative to one another and that relationship does not change, so if you know where the servo reading head is, you know where the rest of them are.

      The space betweeen data tracks on the same side of the same platter is a sort of guard band where no information should be.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    63. Re:One word by unitron · · Score: 1

      "...if a write error (usually due to a bug in the drive's firmware that only shows up in edge cases) causes the servo track to be corrupted..."

      Isn't the servo track written just once, at the factory?

      Or did you mean corruption occuring during that one write?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    64. Re:One word by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      posting to undo mistaken mod (tried for Informative, finger slipped...)

    65. Re:One word by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      That's why my SSD is a boot/software drive. All my media/photos/papers go on my oldish TB HDD. Plus, it makes reimaging a snap - back up any current game saves, make sure XMarks has synced, slap in the Win7 disc and go to town!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    66. Re:One word by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      Makes perfect sense. It's like when people say "can I crash at your place?" and what they mean is "my wallet is broken and I don't want to walk home"...

    67. Re:One word by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The platters are in a vacuum, but the PCB is not. GP was concerned about condensation on the PCB.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    68. Re:One word by Solandri · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a firmware chip on the PCB that also needs to be transplanted, and this is tricky even with a Surface mount electronics soldering station

      Just to be clear, the HDD manufacturers didn't stick it on there just to make it harder for users to fix their own hard drives. It contains mappings of bad sectors which the drive swapped out with reserve sectors through the normal course of operation. Older drives had smaller capacity so proportionately fewer bad sectors and could get away with just mapping them out (reducing capacity) or storing the mapping on the drive itself. The high capacity of modern drives makes it a virtual certainty that it's going to develop multiple bad sectors through its usage life. So you need a more systematic and reliable method of dealing with them. The norm is to set aside some reserve space, and when the drive detects a sector going bad, map it out and replace it with a sector in the reserve space, and note the new mapping in the nonvolatile memory of the firmware chip.

    69. Re:One word by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Let me ask you a question...what difference do you REALLY see in an SSD? I ask this because for one to be large enough to actually install my games to (the things faster access would be good for) it'd cost crazy money and since I almost never boot the OS...what's the point?

      I mean you mention Win 7 which I use as well and it has the excellent Readyboost and Supercaching so with 8Gb of RAM and an 8Gb flash I have all my small I/Os already on solid state and all of my basic programs fit into the Supercache so no gains there, and I can't honestly think of anything OTHER than games I'd really give a crap about loading faster. The problem of course is my Steam folder is already over 100Gb and my regular games folder adds another 60Gb or so, so obviously games on the SSD would be right out.

      So is having JUST the OS on the SSD really worth the hassle? You've got higher failure rates, less space, and without being able to put your games on them what are you gonna speed up other than boot? MS Office?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    70. Re:One word by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Informative

      For fuck's sake, am I the only one who knows how hard drives work?

      Actually, it looks more like you are the only one who doesn't know how hard disks work.

      Even if a drive were stuffed full of air (pretty sure they're a vacuum),

      Actually, the drive does contain air. The HDD's spindle system relies on air pressure inside the disk enclosure to support the heads at their proper flying height while the disk rotates.

      it's not high humidity air

      Actually, drives usually have tiny "breather" holes to allow air through for pressure equalization if ambient air pressure changes. These also let through along any humidity that is in the air. The only thing that they are designed to hold back is tiny dust particles, which might otherwise cause a head crash. The environment within a hard drive is merely dust free but not a vacuum.

    71. Re:One word by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Metal expands and contracts with temperature...

      --
      No sig today...
    72. Re:One word by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Head crashes are usually caused by dust on the platter. Anything in a 'cartridge' can have a head crash - they're not sealed units.
      .

      --
      No sig today...
    73. Re:One word by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Add to that that many people don't know the difference between their computer and its hard disk...

    74. Re:One word by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is worth it to me. I only run my PC when I am home for the day, so having the OS boot in a quarter of the time is awesome (ESPECIALLY on the laptop, where I am often trying to pull up something quickly for class), but everything ELSE I do with it runs faster, too, like opening up Office as you said, Paint, Winamp, FRAPS, the control panel, or Firefox. I've never seen Superfetch use more than 2 GB or so of RAM, even on my desktop that has 16 GB and close to a year of data to predict, and Readyboost is only useful if you are running very limited amounts of RAM, i.e. 2 GB or less, and even then, USB and SD cards are a bottleneck to flash performance - putting an SSD into my old netbook (1201N with 4 GB of RAM) made a huge difference, even with a Class 10/8 GB SD card dedicated to Readyboost.

      I have 120 GB drives in both my laptop and my desktop, so with a bit of pruning, all of the games I have a reasonable expectation of playing in the near future (Borderlands, Torchlight, L4D, TF2, Path of Exile, Alien Swarm, whatever games I've recently bought) fit on the drives with plenty of space. A few multiplayer games that I don't play often, but do play on occasion on a Friday night when my friends are baby-free, like Counter-Strike, Civ IV, DoD, AvP, I keep installed on my media drive with Steam Mover, so when it does come up every couple of months, I don't have to wait to download it. Most single-player games, like Fallout 3, or Arkham Asylum, I don't bother to keep installed, because they're play-once-and-done kind of games, at least until I decide to revisit them two years down the line, when I just reinstall them (since I've undoubtedly reformatted once or twice since then anyway).

      Plus, on my laptop, using Readyboost is a pain, because I have to plug/unplug the SD card every time (full recess SD slots have pretty much gone the way of the dodo).

      As to failure rates, I have four SSDs (my first two, 60 GB drives that are now in my HTPC and my stepson's 1201N), and I have not had a problem with any of them, though I have had two of the eight or so HDDs I have purchased since I built my first PC about ten years ago fail. Not comparable sample groups, of course, but in my experience, SSDs are more reliable.

      Now, without Steam Mover, I might very well still share your opinion - having Steam tied to a single, small drive was a pain in the ass, and there were several instances in the first few months of my SSD ownership where I missed an hour of gaming with my friends on Friday nights because they were playing something I had deleted to make room for War for Cybertron, or the Ghostbusters game, or whatever I was currently playing. But being able to keep the old favorites on a slow drive for the rare instances when I do need them immediately makes it a superior system.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    75. Re:One word by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I thought the NSA was able to read hard drives that had been overwritten with zeros?

      So, step 1: overwrite with zeros...

    76. Re:One word by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      When I was a student I worked at a not-very-reputable computer shop, which did the replacement trick in the original post quite often. At the time, it was more common for drives to fail because of the control circuitry than because of the spinning rust bit. Replacing the controller board worked in a lot of cases.

      With hard driver repair, it's often the case that it can either be repaired easily, or it can't be repaired at all without a significant investment in time and equipment. If the platter is damaged, you're basically screwed: if you've got the right setup then you can read the undamaged bits after disassembling the drive in a clean room, but you probably won't get much useful data. If the head or motor has died, but not damaged the disk, then a cleanroom disassembly and remounting of the platters will work, but it requires specialised equipment and is likely to be more expensive than the value of the data (you have backups, right?). If it's a failure on the controller board, then just swapping them over is easy, and a repair shop will probably have replacement boards in stock and can do it for you easily.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    77. Re:One word by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      For fuck's sake, am I the only one who knows how hard drives work? (...) pretty sure they're a vacuum.

      No, you are definitely not "one who knows how hard drives work" :-)

      Ever noticed the little air hole? And ever heard about drive heads riding on a cushion of air? Sure, they're sealed pretty well against dust (the air hole has a fancy filter on it so only air can get through) but they're definitely not vacuum and not even hermetically sealed.

      At least one drive I opened had a little bag of salt in it to keep the air inside dry.

    78. Re:One word by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Yep, I experienced the click of death as well, put the drive into the freezer, took it out, started copying data untill it started clicking again, back into the freezer, back out again, copied some more, etcetera. I never worried about condensation, but that must have been beginner's luck. I managed to copy the entire drive in about four reading sessions between freezes. Afterwards I opened it up and saw that it actually contained a little bag of salt inside the case. I don't know if all drives have those.

      I tried the same with an entire laptop some years later (not the click of death, just lots of read errors so it didn't even boot up anymore), it didn't make that much of a difference but didn't seem to hurt either. It seemed to have slightly less read errors when cold, but that may have been just my imagination.

    79. Re:One word by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      I repaired a drive that had a piece of circuitry knocked off by heating up a knife on a gas stove and resoldering it. I didn't have a soldering iron. Apart from that the only recourse I have found is to use a ide/sata to usb bridge. The fact that plugging in via usb means the OS doesn't have to boot up with a broken drive means you can try over and over till you get lucky, and I am usually able to salvage 90% of data this way.

    80. Re:One word by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Thanks

    81. Re:One word by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IMO there is a middle ground between "put every game on the SSD" and "put no games on the SSD" some games have really annoying load times that can be considerablly shortened by putting them on a SSD, with others it doesn't really matter. Also many people have a large collection of games but only actually play a handful of them regularly.

      A 120GB SSD is affordable and should be enough to hold the OS, the non-game apps, the most frequently played games and the games that have the most annoying loading times. Other games can go on the HDD (as a sibling poster said steam makes this a bit more of a pain but there is a soloution called "steammover" which mostly solves that problem).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    82. Re:One word by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Condensation won't kill electronics. The water from condensation is pure and free of contaminants. The electronics will quite comfortably run with beads of water on them.

      In a perfect world free from dust, that might be true. This is not that world. Most HDDs have dust on the PCB. Of the three I just disassembled for their shiny and magnetic bits, one had significant dust on the top side of the PCB, between it and the disk. It's not expensive to mitigate this risk.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    83. Re:One word by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, drives usually have tiny "breather" holes to allow air through for pressure equalization if ambient air pressure changes. These also let through along any humidity that is in the air. The only thing that they are designed to hold back is tiny dust particles, which might otherwise cause a head crash. The environment within a hard drive is merely dust free but not a vacuum.

      Indeed, drives have breather holes covered with a fibrous filter media to keep out the dust. And many of them have a dessicant bag in the drive as well, to mitigate the effects of moisture penetration. I've been taking apart disks for their magnets since the full-height era. The only disk that ever really seemed sealed was a 20 MB Conner Peripherals 3.5" half-height drive. I couldn't get that one open :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    84. Re:One word by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      it's not high humidity air

      Actually, drives usually have tiny "breather" holes to allow air through for pressure equalization if ambient air pressure changes. These also let through along any humidity that is in the air. The only thing that they are designed to hold back is tiny dust particles, which might otherwise cause a head crash. The environment within a hard drive is merely dust free but not a vacuum.

      It's not high humidity air. Every HD that I've opened had a desiccant packet in it. Give how little air gets exchanged through the breather there's unlikely to be any humidity in a sealed drive. If a frozen drive looked anything like the one in the article it wouldn't even begin to read because of the ice. But that's an *open* drive.

    85. Re:One word by ewok85 · · Score: 1

      Now this is a repair. Swapping boards may fix the problem if that is really what is wrong, and the drive supports it. I'd argue that a "repair" involves being able to understand the problem, isolate it, and make an effective change which makes the device workable again.

      "Computers" are fairly easy to "repair" - almost anyone with a little instruction can replace components with little more than a single screw driver.

      Individual components such as hard drives, motherboards, video cards and everything else are practically impossible to fix for someone without more intimate knowledge of electronics. And no, using various tricks does not count as a "repair" - it's just luck.

    86. Re:One word by graphius · · Score: 2

      Another anecdote:
      Years ago, an accountant came into my shop with a "dead computer". He had all his clients accounting records for the past 12 years on his hard drive and could not access anything. He did not have any backups, and if any of his clients were audited, he could be held liable to the point of facing jail time. One of my techs replaced the controller on the drive, copied all the data to a new drive and told this accountant about backing up data to dvd.
      The kicker was that when I offered to sell this accountant a spindle of discs, he said he could probably find them cheaper elsewhere....
      PS, he did buy the spindle when I asked him point blank how long he was going to take looking for the best deal before he backed up his data...

    87. Re:One word by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      They could use a socket, then, so the chip could be swapped without all the drama. What, 5-cents additional cost?

    88. Re:One word by lightbounce · · Score: 1

      No, the drive generally does not remap bad sectors on writes. Even today writes are done blindly; the drive seeks to the track and then pumps out the bits when the sector comes under the head. The drive has no idea whether or not the media was good or the bits were written properly. It used to be many years ago that the drive had to read a "sector header" (which was located just before the data area) to find the sector, and during a write an error on this small read (only a few bytes) could trigger a remap. I don't know if sector headers are still used today, but if not a write won't trigger the remap.

      If you want the drive to discover and remap the bad sectors, you've got to have it do reads. Any reads will work, even a simple dd to /dev/null.

      I don't know why the random data writes worked for the OP in this thread, unless he was also doing reads.

    89. Re:One word by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      I helped someone recover data fram a drive that would fail after about 15 minutes of runtime by alternating between the freezer and my desktop PC. I was able to get almost all the data off that way. I just scrapped the drive after that (with a hammer, since there was personal info) so I have no idea what long term effect there might be. Certainly the freezer worked for the short term.

    90. Re:One word by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Backup early.
      Backup often.
      And you'll be back up soon.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    91. Re:One word by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      That's about what the US based recovery houses charge. Who's going to send their HD to Hungary (unless they live near there) when they can have the work done at home (again, assuming that "at home" is US)?

      I know that /. is international but by quoting your prices in USD instead of Euros I get the impression that you're addressing the US audience with this.

    92. Re:One word by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Once *ATA drives got into the >100 GB range it became impossible to controller-swap to recover a failed drive. There are unit specific parameters stored in drive controller that compensate for the slight differences between each unit.

      At least in the old days SCSI drives were able to build their own parameter tables when performing a low-level format. *ATA drives rarely supported this capability AT ALL.

      Now days none of them do. It requires far more support on the controller than manufacturers are willing to invest. Though I don't have specific information to cite, it seems likely that the controller cant write servo information to the platters at all because the hardware is not accurate enough, and this can only track a low-level (servo level) format that has been established during the assembly process.

      TL; DR: The magneto-electro-mechanical-digital systems in hard drives are most likely so highly tuned and toleranced now that repair or recovery is out of reach for most entities.

    93. Re:One word by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1
      In the last two years, I have: Retrieved data from a 160gb disk that wasn't detecting by freezing it overnight in a sealed plastic bag with several silica-gel dessicant sachets in it; Replaced the controller board on a buzzing 1tb disk with one from an identical model drive (not from ebay, but a similar site) and retrieved 100gb of important data when the backups turned out to be invalid; Removed a 500gb hard drive from a broken external USB case and replaced it into a new functional case, with all data intact.

      So yes, it can be done, and several data retrieval companies wanted thousands of dollars to do it for me (and my family/friends).

      --
      ... wait, what?
    94. Re:One word by jrumney · · Score: 1

      For my mother, the hard drive was that big box under the desk. The computer was the monitor. So any symptom that displayed on the screen (blue screens etc), were caused by the computer, things like the switch being off at the wall were "my hard drive stopped working". Now she has a laptop, I've yet to get a call about the hard drive for that, but if I do, the first thing to check will be the power supply brick.

    95. Re:One word by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I've done it, but generally it's a one-time shot, and the drive will run till you power down.

      Be ready to copy everything on your next boot! (preferably on a machine that has it's own primary HDD, not your dying drive)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    96. Re:One word by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      While your arguments are sound I'd point out a few things. One that article is frankly worthless, they tested Vista at RTM and never bothered to go back. I can tell you that with Win 7 I have on average 3Gb in Readyboost at any time and I can tell a pretty big difference in load times, it can easily cut a good 30% off, more if you have something like XFast USB which I do.

      Second it sounds like your gameplay is predictable...mine isn't. I get bored easy and switch around a lot, hence I have a lot of games installed. hunting down those discs are a royal PITA, especially since the last time I moved and have some stuff still in storage.

      While I like that Steam Mover thing, thanks for the link BTW, the problem I see right now with SSDs is just to get my OS and apps installed, NOT my games, just the OS and programs, I'm gonna need probably a 256Gb as my C: drive is already at 124Gb. I already keep my games and music and docs on a separate 2Tb drive but I have a lot of AV software I use and between that and my other programs it'd be a damned tight fit onto a 128Gb. I haven't been able to find out what the failure rate on an SSD filled to the brim is anywhere but I know it needs space to move things around so I doubt filling it to within a couple of Gb of full would be the smartest move.

      Until the 256Gb SSDs come down to where the 128Gb SSDs are now its simply too hard to justify that purchase, not when I could get a new GPU to replace my HD4850 and see a hell of a lot more real world difference. I simply don't boot my computer anymore, with 8Gb of RAM I just don't see the point in not putting it to sleep. I use hibernate on my netbook but it does have a flush SD card slot (sorry to hear yours don't) so I just leave a class 10 8Gb in there so I have Readyboost all the time. Wake from hibernate is a little slow but once loaded with 8Gb of RAM all my programs are preloaded so its all instant access.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    97. Re:One word by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      No, the drive generally does not remap bad sectors on writes. Even today writes are done blindly; the drive seeks to the track and then pumps out the bits when the sector comes under the head. The drive has no idea whether or not the media was good or the bits were written properly. It used to be many years ago that the drive had to read a "sector header" (which was located just before the data area) to find the sector, and during a write an error on this small read (only a few bytes) could trigger a remap. I don't know if sector headers are still used today, but if not a write won't trigger the remap.

      You have to do both. A read alone will not cause a remap, however enough reads to a bad sector will convince a drive that the sector is bad, and the remap happens the next write afterwards. This lets software try to see if it can recover partial data without actually remapping the sector and losing it.

      Though for some drives, the first N hours or N loads of the head brand new will cause writes to be followed by a silent read to verify the surface to map in any new sectors that may have gone bad since the drive was built (best to do it when new and writes are plentiful as the user installs the OS or copies their data onto it). If an error is discovered, the drive can rewrite the data since it's fresh and the user doesn't lose data.

    98. Re:One word by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I thought the NSA was able to read hard drives that had been overwritten with zeros?

      Correct, there is no such thing as perfect, and heads are out of alignment just enough. Overwriting with random data many times might keep you safe, but if I had data that were THAT sensitive, I'd sand the oxide off the platters.

    99. Re:One word by Cramer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is what we used to call a "low level format". It's next to impossible to do outside the factory these days. For one, because the firmware is stored on the platter(s) -- flash is expensive, so they save $0.03 by not putting any on the board. (the board has the tiniest ROM possible to hold a boot loader.) The FORMAT UNIT command just zero's the drive; it does not actually reformat the surface, which rewrites tracking information, parameter block(s), and padding not normally user accessable. ('tho there are vendor specific commands to get at that. similar to a floppy disk "full track read".)

      [I've had a few Maxtor drives (bulk) that weren't programmed. The boot rom has just enough brain to show up on the bus. Maxtor will not give you the necessary tool to fix this -- i.e. there is no firmware upgrade tool available outside the factory. Other manufacturers are not as lame.]

    100. Re:One word by Jaxim · · Score: 1

      This is an odd coincidence that this Slashdot article came out when my hard drive died. I looked around and decided to try to replace the circuit board after I watched this youTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoVBHG4kajA

      I got the replacement PCB from this online store: http://www.onepcbsolution.com/

      I'll report back here if I am able to repair my hard drive.

    101. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      you DO know, that Maxtor was bought up by Seagate in 2006, right?
      They kept the Maxtor brand alive, but for some years now, I've only seen external harddrives with the name on the box.
      Internally, they do have Maxtor-branded drives, and bad (power-sucking) ones at that.

      I had a Maxtor III OneTouch 300 GB: the drive consumed 21.7 Watts at max. (I'm not kidding).
      I kept a picture of it: http://bayimg.com/baainAaen
      I took the Maxtor hdd out and put a 1 TB WDC hdd in the box (consumes ~8 Watts at most).

      In 2010, I sold the Maxtor to a guy who, just as he left, said he intended to use it as a system drive in his PC, instead of the old hdd that died.
      I felt sorry for the guy, but said nothing.
      I am pretty sure he learned the hard way not to use extremely power-intensive drives as a system drive.
      Well, either that, or he learned to cool it really well.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    102. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      In the Athlon era (2003 or so) I read about a local guy (in Denmark) with a dead motherboard, and an Athlon processor, which somehow fried another motherboard he put it in, which then fried another Athlon. Supposedly, it could have gone on until he ran out of money.
      Fortunately, he wasn't that stupid and dumped the whole lot in the trash and ordered a new motherboard and processor. Can't remember if it was Athlon again, or Pentium IV.
      AFAIR, the Athlons were visibly burned (when looking closely), the motherboards weren't. No idea what brand they were.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    103. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      That should be a no-brainer, for pretty much anyone with some knowledge of electromagnetism.
      If the temperature is above the Curie temp. for any material, and there's still a magnetic field, then that magnetic field is caused by an electric current.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    104. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      He's extremely unlikely to succeed, period.
      Even assuming the 120 GB is a one-platter drive, any dust and moisture that gets on the platter during the move will damage the surface initially, and then extensively when the drive spins up and the dust specks get whirled around, hitting the surface again and again, and sometimes coming between the head and the surface rushing by.
      Imagine a vertical-axis cement-mixer with some tiny pebbles in it,
      (like this one: http://image.ec21.com/image/sunday6323/OF0009411949_1/Sell_JZW350_Vertical_Concrete_Mixer.jpg )
      only shrunk down to harddisk-size and running at 7200 rpm.

      The filesystem might look okay in Windows Explorer (or in some file manager in a different OS) at first, but when you try to read/copy the files, there will either be a plethora of errors, or the system will just hang.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    105. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that could mean a lot less 'dead' drives, and a matching drop in sales, so..
      Now, if they'd used a socketed chip with bad block mappings since the first harddrives came along, there'd be no problem, no drop in sales.
      But in that case, somebody probably would have suggested dropping the socket somewhere along the way, to get a nice increase in sales..

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    106. Re:One word by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      it'd cost crazy money

      What's 'crazy money' in numbers (and currency)?

      The problem of course is my Steam folder is already over 100Gb and my regular games folder adds another 60Gb or so, so obviously games on the SSD would be right out.

      Unless you think SSDs are too expensive for their size, an OCZ Agility 3 240GB will speed up boot and especially your games quite a lot.
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227727
      If it's still too small, perhaps use this one solely for games and get a small SSD just for Win 7 (if you want the faster boot). It's not like one more SSD makes more noise or wastes a lot more power.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    107. Re:One word by Meski · · Score: 1

      Just one thing to add: Make sure your backup contains valid copies. And that you have a device for reading them. (I've got a drawer of 5 and a 1/4s somewhere, just no drive that's connectible to a current computer.

  2. It Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sometimes just the controller portion fails. If you remove it and replace it with a working one from a identical drive you're back in business. Only tool needed is a torx driver I believe.

    1. Re:It Depends by imagined.by · · Score: 2

      I tried this once, and it didn't work.

      My guess is, there are different revisions, then are several batches, and the odds of getting exactly the right controller are pretty slim. In addition, how do you know that the controller isn't somehow "linked" to the specific platters?

    2. Re:It Depends by tiberiumx · · Score: 2

      Replacing the controller board works if your problem is with the board.

      I shorted one out once doing something stupid (inserting another drive in below it while the system was on). It sat unused for a couple years until I decided to see if I could recover the data. Bought one of the exact same model (very important) off of e-bay and swapped the boards. It worked perfectly.

    3. Re:It Depends by cyrano.mac · · Score: 1

      And that 's THE reason to buy all drives at least in pairs...

    4. Re:It Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And that 's THE reason to buy all drives at least in pairs...

      That way they fail at the same time and you can be double screwed.

    5. Re:It Depends by skids · · Score: 2

      Works with some models, doesn't with others. Some PCBs have parameters flashed into them that are tuned to that particular set of platters after some sort of tuning process at the factory.

    6. Re:It Depends by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      I tried this once, and it didn't work.

      My guess is, there are different revisions, then are several batches, and the odds of getting exactly the right controller are pretty slim. In addition, how do you know that the controller isn't somehow "linked" to the specific platters?

      I replaced a controller once to revive a dead drive. I had to order a used drive off EBAY at an inflated price to do it though.
      The seller explicitly listed the FULL model number of the drives he was selling. I'm fairly certain his intent was to sell to people in my position.
      In the end I got the data back and the drive continued to work. I was paranoid so I really only used it as a junk drive from that point on...

    7. Re:It depends by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Other failure modes include head "crashes", spindle bearing failures, drive motor failures, controller circuitry problems (bad electronic components), and mechanical breakage of connectors, solder joints, etc. These typically are not user repairable.

      Spindle/motor failures: Potential workaround with heat/cold
      Controller circuitry problems: Replace board
      Solder joints & other cracks: Potential workaround with heat

    8. Re:It depends by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      It's often sufficient to gently knock the drive with e.g. a screwdriver handle. The stiction isn't very strong.
      You don't have a metal-to-metal weld. The disk surface is covered with an organic lubricant and the head just gets stuck on that. That's why heating the drive up also can help in this case.

    9. Re:It depends by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I would like to add that sticktion is very, very rare today, because of better surface coatings and changed heads. It used to be a common problem. It is not anymore.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:It Depends by OAB_X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sysadmin where I work once bought two Seagate drives, they had sequential serial numbers. They failed within 5 days of each other (killing the RAID-1 because the array had not finished rebuilding).

    11. Re:It depends by woboyle · · Score: 1

      True enough. However, the original poster didn't specify how old or what the make+model of the drive was... :-)

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    12. Re:It depends by woboyle · · Score: 1

      I like the "starter" cord idea! :-) Cute!

      --
      Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
    13. Re:It Depends by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I had two drives purchased at different times fail at the same time... does that mean that hard drives die from loneliness?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    14. Re:It Depends by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      If you're going to pay for two hard disks anyway, why not use one to backup the other? Attempting to revive a failed disk should be the very last option.

    15. Re:It depends by knet99 · · Score: 1

      I did something similar, I held the connected drive in different angles in my hand and "snap rotated" it while restarting. After an hour not giving up, countless restarts in different angles, the drive did start and we could copy the content to another drive. Saved a long day and nights work when we were making a small news paper for an organization, and had no backup.

  3. Freezer "fix" by Georules · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't ask me how, but I had a failing drive that couldn't even manage to be on for 30 seconds before being unreadable. Since I was curious, as a control, I first let the drive sit at room temperature for an hour. Afterwards, again, only 30 seconds of read time. I then put it in the freezer for an hour, and was able to read for 10 minutes, just enough time for the data I needed. I have no idea what actually happened, and am still skeptical to attribute the success to the freezer, but I did get what I wanted.

    1. Re:Freezer "fix" by TrueJournals · · Score: 2

      I've had the same thing happen: I've been able to get a drive to run longer before failure by putting it in the freezer for a bit. I'm not really sure why this article is so against the freezer fix. Can it damage the drive more? Sure, probably. But, if you want to get some data off the drive, but that data isn't important enough to spend $1,500 for recovery... why not just try it? If you do damage the drive more, you're no worse off (again, assuming spending money on the recovery is out of the question).

    2. Re:Freezer "fix" by toygeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Something on the PCB was cracked. The freezing caused everything to pull back together, and heat separated it. So, bringing it to a lower temperature kept it together longer. Simple enough. Is it a repair? No. Its a workaround. A temporary one.

    3. Re:Freezer "fix" by genkernel · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. The freezer trick does work, and I havee used it to bring a hard drive back to life for just long enough to get the data I wanted off of it. It would work fine for a very short amount of time after boot, and then it would start producing more read errors, and eventually would become completely unreadable until turning the computer off and on again. After putting it in the freezer, the amount of time I had with the drive was enough for me to say my goodbyes and copy my data. Naturally, drive necromancy of this sort only creates temporary slave drives, and I suspect condensation would drive it even further into the depths of Hades, but the data really is all that is important in these cases.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.
    4. Re:Freezer "fix" by HycoWhit · · Score: 1

      The freezer trick works very well for me with "clicking" drives. I too would really like to know the science. Will the cool temps might contract the PCB board and fix bad solders--I think there is more to that with the clicking drives. My shoot from the hip guess is the freezing thickens the viscous lube inside the drive and slows and armature/drive heads. Perhaps time has allowed the head to get a little too much travel and the thicker fluid slows down travel enough that the data can be read from an otherwise wobbly drive head... Bottom line is I have more success than failure recovering clicking drives with the freezer trick and something like Stellar Phoenix (www.stellarinfo.com)

    5. Re:Freezer "fix" by ClassicASP · · Score: 1

      That might work if you had a dry ice freezer that was full of dry ice while you were doing the recovery. The drive is gonna create heat once it goes into motion, so to keep it cold while doing the work, it'd have to be FRIGGIN cold. Like south-pole cold.

    6. Re:Freezer "fix" by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      freezer worked for me too. Drive was failing after 5 minutes. After 3 hours in the freezer it failed after 30 minutes. Just enough to copy data.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    7. Re:Freezer "fix" by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I've had two hard drives that I've been able to temporarily 'resurrect' by freezing. It's definitely very real.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    8. Re:Freezer "fix" by sjames · · Score: 2

      Freezing, like tapping with a hammer can free a sticky bearing just enough to let the drive spin up. If you succeed, read everything off of the drive immediately, then write it off. It may or may not ever spin up again, but it is certainly on borrowed time at that point.

    9. Re:Freezer "fix" by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Most 3.5" 7200 RPM drives have power consumption of < 10W. The smaller or slower ones < 6W. I think most freezers can keep up with that.

      Plus if you surround the drive with ice (but drive must be insulated from any water!), it'll take quite before the drive melts all of the ice, even if the freezer can't keep up.

      You need the dry ice or similar if you do need the drive to be very cold.

      --
    10. Re:Freezer "fix" by gweihir · · Score: 2

      That is BS. The real reason is that heat-damaged semiconductors may work for again for a while when cold. Well known to electronics experts.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Freezer "fix" by Georules · · Score: 1

      Not a rigorous one, but did control for "just leave it alone for 1 hour".

    12. Re:Freezer "fix" by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      When drive bearings begin to fail (when you can hear it whine or groan), the freezer method is what I use.

      I have recovered data from 5 drives this way.

      The problem with freezing is moisture. Any moisture in the drive can freeze onto the platters or heads causing physical damage when the drive spins up. I've seen a video telling users to never freeze their drives, and they show the internals of a drive covered in frost. I'm convinced they rigged the drive to do this so they could boost their own data recovery business.

      My method is to wrap the drive in paper towels while it's warm. Two or three layers will do. Then, take the warm/wrapped drive and put it into a zip-lock bag. Use a straw to pull out the air - you don't need a vacuum seal or negative pressure - just remove as much air as you can. Then put the drive in the freezer for several hours.

      While it's cooling off, make a list of the data you want to retrieve in order of importance. The freezer method might not work a second time - so it's important to get the most valuable data first. Prepare your recovery system - use a USB adapter to connect the drive to an already running system. Don't try to insert your frozen drive into your computer and boot from it - you will be wasting valuable time.

      When the drive is nice and cold - attach it to your computer and immediately begin to recover your data. Don't waste time - you might only get one shot at it.

      5 times I've done this - mostly for customers - once for my own laptop drive.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    13. Re:Freezer "fix" by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      Same here. At room temperature, the drive would run for 2 minutes before succumbing to clicking. 10 minutes in a Zip-Lock bag in the freezer extended it to 10 minutes. It took me several trips to the freezer to recover all the data, but the company wasn't willing to ship the user's drive out for recovery. The tech support department got a pizza party from the user as a thank you.

    14. Re:Freezer "fix" by Georules · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I have a hard time believing it was the freezer that did it, mostly because I don't know what mechanism would be fixed by being chilled for a while. Point is, I got 10 minutes of read time after putting it in a freezer for an hour in a ziplock bag, instead of the 30 seconds I was getting letting it rest at room temperature. Call my real-life experience a fairy tale if you like. If I had a failed drive and needed to copy data, I'd do it again it as a last shot.

    15. Re:Freezer "fix" by FPhlyer · · Score: 1

      The freezer trick has worked for me innumerable times. There are some caveats:
      1. Place the drive in a freezer bag packed with as many "silica gel" packets as you can muster. The silica gel helps wick away moisture from the drive.
      2. Before plugging the drive in, wait until after all visible condensation has evaporated from the drive.
      3. Have a plan in place as to what data is most important. Backup the most critical data first because you won't have a lot of time and repeatedly freezing the drive only increases the chances of the drive experiencing an unrecoverable failure.
      4. Use a Linux machine to read the drive. Linux implements a slightly different method of reading NTFS partitions then Windows. In fact, if Windows can't see the drive to begin with, try reading the drive with a Linux system before you even begin sticking the drive in the freezer.
      5. This method should only be used as a last resort. If the data on the drive is absolutely CRITICAL hire a professional.

      --
      Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
  4. PCB swap is cheap, quick, and often works by thatseattleguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the very limited (3) cases that I've had to try and revive a client's dead desktop drive, replacing the PCB board from an identical model - usually purchased cheaply, used or new, online - has always worked.

    The other advantage of this approach is that if the first drive becomes revivable, even a time, you now have a second same-capacity drive to transfer the data to (using intermediate storage media if in fact it was the PCB that was the problem and you can only get one drive working at a time).

    If it doesn't work, you're no worse off and still have a replacement drive to load data from your (hopefully recent) backups.

    1. Re:PCB swap is cheap, quick, and often works by rrohbeck · · Score: 2

      That depends on where the drive stores its calibration data. Used to be that is was stored on an EEROM on the PCB, and in that case it's improbable that the HDA will work with calibration data from a different PCB. However, newer drives got rid of the EEROM for cost savings (that was in the late 90s for low cost drives; later for higher end drives) and store calibration data on the disk itself. So if the PCB doesn't store any state it's generic and should run with any HDA (of the same revision.)

    2. Re:PCB swap is cheap, quick, and often works by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      I had a dead drive with a relatives photos on it once, and came across an identical drive a while later. The PCB connections and crimp-ons looked far too fiddly for my level of tool experience, but on close examination I found one surface-mount capacitor appeared to have lost its magic black smoke.
      With a fine soldering tip and some patience I managed to remove the matching capacitor from the working drive and stick it to the dead one. This worked long enough to retrieve the personal files off the drive. I was not prepared to use the drive for any longer than that tho.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  5. I've never met... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... a regular person.

    1. Re:I've never met... by Antarius · · Score: 3, Funny

      You need to hang around with people who eat more insoluble fibre.

    2. Re:I've never met... by erdos-bacon+sandwich · · Score: 4, Funny

      You need to hang around with people who eat more insoluble fibre.

      They typically don't have to worry about being backed-up

    3. Re:I've never met... by allo · · Score: 1

      maybe a context-sensitive person?

  6. AU $2600 to repair... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I broke an external USB hard disk once (it tipped over while running). It cost me AUD $2600 to get it repaired. They got most of the data off; some was corrupted but fortunately nothing important. I take more regular backups now!

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    1. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by jabelli · · Score: 1

      I did that, but since it actually WAS the backup, it didn't cost anything but replacement cost.

      I no longer buy vertical external drives. Who the fuck thought that was a good idea in the first place?

    2. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I no longer buy vertical external drives. Who the fuck thought that was a good idea in the first place?

      Maybe you should just buy better ones. I've knocked MyBooks and GoFlexes over repeatedly while accessing them, yes that was lame, but no they didn't fail.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      It is less about the quality of the manufacturer and more about the mechanics of hard drives. When one is knocked over or dropped it can cause a catastrophic head crash

      Some drives have their own free-fall sensor, I'm having trouble determining whether this is the case with a GoFlex or not, but anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I have several external WD 3TB ones that are supposed to run vertical. Put rubber feet on their sides and am running them horizontally now. Risk of knocking them over gone.

      I do suspect foul play though, designing them to run vertically is an accident waiting to happen.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      Mine was a Mybook. I went to Seagate after that, but I have vowed never to purchase a Seagate drive again after my most recent experience. I plugged the drive in, and it kept trying to install software. Lucky my virus scanner blocked it. It was linked to an autorun.inf file that would try and install every time I even clicked it. They had managed to lock the file down so tightly that I could not remove it, copy it, or even view its contents. I had to reboot my computer into safe mode, log in as an administrator, and run CLI commands against the file just to get rid of it! That is so arrogant, and blatantly misleading given that they advertise the drive as "no software required".

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    6. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Those damn dancing with your iPod commercials cost customers worldwide millions in hardware damage.

      Said like a true glass is half empty sort of person.

      Cheer up mate, Apple made millions in repair fees and sales of new iPods. That's you're happy ending right there.

    7. Re:AU $2600 to repair... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      :s/you're/your/

      OK, OK, so I didn't preview long enough.

  7. Some, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I used to do precisely this kind of work for a local repair shop. For problems with the motor or the actuator, the freezer trick can work to successfully power the drive up and maybe get some data off of it -- it does not "fix" the drive. For problems with a physically damaged PCB, of course replacing the PCB works -- again, though, the good practice is to use this only to power the drive long enough to get your data off of it. Moving the platters is pretty much an impossibility without a clean room and some specialized equipment. I have seen "percussive adjustment" get one to power up when everything else fails, but it's by no means the option of first resort. Never heard of placing one in the oven, but I wouldn't try it.

    We had to send off for professional services in about 10% of cases, and the success rate was pretty bad. I think it was somewhere around $200/hr., but this was on the order of ten years ago, so take that with a grain of salt.

    1. Re:Some, yes by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Saw someone using the oven method once. (actually it was a hair dryer, but whatever...)

      The indication for that method is a drive that worked without problems for a very long time (and without any funny sounds!) but refuses to power up again after a shutdown. The lubrication became too hard during cool down(*) to start it up again. Heating took care of that.

      (*) Due to letting a desktop drive running nonstop in a server-like environment. But then, it was an experimental setting with no important data on it.

      --
      bickerdyke
  8. my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Had a disk at work with our sourcesafe database on break. Due to responsibility falling between chairs, there was no backup at all. Sent it to one rescue firm, came back without successful restore, sent it to another one, got more than 99% back, lost nothing important, cost somewhere in the low 4 figures.

    With private disks where data rescue is out of the question, I've had good experiences with freezing and in other cases replacing the circuit board. If doing it yourself, always mount RO and have somewhere with enough with enough space to make first a "cp" of selected really important stuff, a recursive "cp" of everything, and last a "dd" or "rescue_dd" of the whole disk. I've had better luck copying files from within a read-only mounted filesystem at first, you are fighting the clock after all.

  9. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by txoof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've tried the freezer trick to help what sounded like an ailing bearing , but with limited success. No amount of freezing seemed to help. To make things worse, when I took the drive out of the freezer, moisture started condensing immediately on the cold PCB. I tried to place it on a sponge to help sop up the water, but I can't imagine this helped the drive at all.

    I have some friends that swear by this, but I am extremely doubtful especially because of the condensation problem. I feel like this is an a apocryphal bit of "knowledge" that has been passed down from a time when drivers were larger, slower and had less precise bearings. I can imagine that on a big old drive freezing the drive *may* have helped. But then again, perhaps it's something like throwing a pinch of spilled salt over your shoulder or touching wood--something your grandma told you to do, but doesn't actually do anything.

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  10. It's obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just 3D print whatever new part you need. A new read/write head? Just pop some plastic in the 3D printer and print one out. Then head over to the clean room and the tool box and jigs and use your dexterity and skill to change the head. Bad IC somewhere? 3D print out a new chip. Yes, 3D printing is the future!!

    1. Re:It's obvious by Georules · · Score: 4, Funny

      Broken 3d printer? Print a new one!

    2. Re:It's obvious by toygeek · · Score: 2

      Make sure you use a 3d printer based on an arduino running linux!

  11. One trick not listed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I took my hard drive to the Geek Squad and they wanted $500 to send my hard drive away to get the data.

    I yelled at them and I told them that was robbery. Asked for the manager. But, when I was leaving one of the Geeks told me a secret.
    He said just go home and drill a hole in the hard drive and then set it on top of your new hard drive with the hole facing down. All the data will just pour out to your new drive.

    It didn't work for me, but maybe I didn't do it right?

    1. Re:One trick not listed by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably used the old 32mm hole. Newer computers are built using 64mm bit technology, you need to use a 64-bit to compensate. It's a very delicate operation though, as 64mm is a very big hole and you need to be careful to keep it perfectly round, else the data will be unevenly distributed.

    2. Re:One trick not listed by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you remember that you also need to drill a hole on the top of the new drive?

      Otherwise, the data will just spill out onto your desk.

    3. Re:One trick not listed by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I have heard that some guy in some obscure location that I have forgotten about actually made this work! The trick is to make a copy of your data before the main drive goes bad. Then you can use the hole-trick to "activate" the copy!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:One trick not listed by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Be sure to chamfer the whole edges first. Sometimes, the sharp edges cause a bit of a flow issue.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    5. Re:One trick not listed by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      no no, he had to get another good drive that is the same as the failing drive and drill mirroring holes in these 2 drives and then tape them together so the holes would line up, but make sure that the bad drive is on top. Place both of the drives on an old vinyl player, all of this goes into a fridge, and then spin the turntable.

      He'd have to calculate the appropriate number of turns of the turntable, it has to be precisely proportionate to the number of the revolutions a disk inside the HD would rotate in order for the reading head to read all of the data from the disk.

      Oh, I forgot, he has to kill a puppy and poor puppy blood into both drives before sticking them together, the iron in the blood of a puppy acts as read/write heads would, in fact they use puppy blood during HD manufacturing process. The quality of the HD is directly proportionate to the cuteness of the puppy, the cutter the puppy, the higher the quality.

  12. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    As far as condensation, perhaps it depends on the climate? A freezer-temp piece of metal in Arizona doesn't pick up much condensation, but one in Georgia will sweat all over the place.

    I do agree that stories of it actually fixing modern drives are probably either apocryphal or obsolete.

  13. It depends by woboyle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some HD problems (stuck platters so it doesn't spin up) are user-fixable. Most are not. There is a syndrome called "sticktion" where the read/write heads settle on the platters when shut off (most modern drives will elevate the heads when shut off, but some, including many older drives, do not). Because the platters and heads are so flat, they mechanically weld themselves together over time. To fix this (a technique I have used often in the past), you need to remove the drive, and then snap rotate it on the plane of the platters, so that the momentum of the platters trying to counter rotate against the impetus of the rotational momentum you are applying to the drive will break the "weld" loose. If you then quickly re-install the drive and turn it on, it will most likely spin up and continue to operate without problems. Other failure modes include head "crashes", spindle bearing failures, drive motor failures, controller circuitry problems (bad electronic components), and mechanical breakage of connectors, solder joints, etc. These typically are not user repairable.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  14. won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe the PCB swap used to work, it almost certainly won't work anymore. When a HDD powers on, it needs to load some parameters for the servo system (i.e. positioning the arm) and other tuned parameters for the controller to read back off the disk. These parameters are probably stored in flash memory on the PCB and the parameters will vary from disk to disk. So, parameters for drive A will not work to spin up drive B because of small variances in their manufacturing even if they're made on the same day in the same plant on the same line by the same underpaid employee

    You can't swap disks because even if you get a tiny fingerprint on the disk, it's the size of Mt. Everest compared to the distance between the read head and the media. You'll be putting your own home-grown media defects all over it. Forget about getting your files back.

    Aside from common firmware related problems (search for "reparing 7200.11" in google for an example), you're not going to have much luck.

    The only other thing I've seen work: a guy took his neighbors HDD (which was not responding in Windows) and had to use an oscilloscope to realize the read waveform from the read head was a low amplitude. He built a small in-line amplifier which brought the amplitude back up to spec so the data could be read off. I was impressed.

    Source: I have work experience on manufacturing processes for HDDs.

    1. Re:won't work by rrohbeck · · Score: 2

      That amplifier trick must have been a few decades ago.
      These days the preamp is inside the HDA because it has to be as close to the heads as possible. Microvolts at hundreds of Mhz with gnarly S/N requirements are not easy to handle.

    2. Re:won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PCB swap does infact work, and it works often but not always. It varies from drive-to-drive, some the correct model is fine, some also need to be of a specific firmware version. For those that it just won't work for, the solution is to also swap the eeprom, it's often conveniently a separate chip on the board.

      You can swap disks in your own home, and quite successfully if you take the right precautions. I now have a proper clean environment and jigs that make the work easier and safer, but I started in my own garage.

      7200.11's were so common at one stage, I built myself a dedicated self-powered un-bricker with a teensy board.

      Source: My job is data recovery from damaged hard drives.

  15. I used a slow computer by mpol · · Score: 1

    I haven't had a disk crash for a long time, but it used to be that when a disk crashed while reading, I could still connect it to a 486 and read all the data on it. I guess the slower computer doesn't stress the disk as much.
    This was during the IDE days. Now it's all SATA, so I threw the 486 away.
    There often was data corruption, but without a reliable backup it was the best thing to have.

    --

    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    1. Re:I used a slow computer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      See above where I used a painfully slow K6-2 for the same purpose.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  16. Try percussive maintenance by Dodgy+G33za · · Score: 1

    It was a while ago now, but back in 1994 I used to regularly swap out PC bits. I found a couple of hard drives in the bottom of my drawer that had been there a while - not sure how long. One worked fine, the other one wouldn't spin. A colleague recommended a hitting it with something. I rapped it sharply on the desk sideways on a couple of times, put it back in the PC and low and behold it was fine and then worked okay for at least the few months I noted it. The thought was that the grease was holding it in position, which I had broken with the blow.

  17. Burned out PCB's? Yes. Other? Probably not. by Discopete · · Score: 1

    I've replaced burned out PCB's a few times on critical data drives, but it requires finding another drive of the exact same model and if possible nearly the exact same production year and month and sacrificing it. Once the PCB is swapped out and the drive is accessible, get the data of of it immediately. I normally use Ghost to clone the drive and then wipe it before disposing of the previously failed drive.

    If anything else goes wrong with a drive I'd either just toss it or send it to a data recovery professional. As has been stated before, opening the case requires a clean room.

  18. I used to repair a certain type of failure by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    This goes back about 10 years. There were fuses on the PCB, little surface mount affairs that look like a 1206 resistor. So this goes back to the days of the bad capacitors, and sometimes power supplies would fail explosively and take out the entire electrical system of the PC. I guess the PS must have gone out of regulation when the capacitors fail, who knows.

    The HD just didn't spin up or show up in the BIOS when taken to a new PC. I just traced out the PCB and found the open fuse and changed it. There you go, HD spins up again.

    That was my boring story for today.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
  19. Yes, maybe. by Fished · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first job in "the industry" was in a PC repair shop in 1991. Back in those days, we had a huge crop of bad Seagate 40MB (yes, that's "mega" children) hard drives. The usual problem was that the spindle had frozen up, and if we took the circuit board off and gently tapped the spindle, you could often (about 75% of the time) get the drive to start spinning again long enough to get your data off.

    Hard drives have gotten a lot more reliable and a lot smaller since then. I don't know whether this would be a wise thing to do with a modern hard drive.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Yes, maybe. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the "stiction" problem that used to plague our old Mac SE drives on campus. We weren't quite so gentle with trying to un-stick them, however. ;-)

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    2. Re:Yes, maybe. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Seagates of that era, i.e. the ST-225, were infamous for stiction problems. I don't know WTH the OP is talking about, though. When *we* had those come in the shop, we were anything but gentle with them. ;)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:Yes, maybe. by dpilot · · Score: 2

      I accidentally fixed a stiction problem once for a friend. He gave me an "old dead PC", and I stuck it in the back of the minivan. By the time I got it home, it had fallen over sideways. When I plugged it in to begin diagnosis, it simply booted up.

      I told him what happened, and gave it back. I have no idea how long that "repair" lasted.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Yes, maybe. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. That went on until the mid-90s, until automatic retract to a textured landing zone and later ramp loading became common.

    5. Re:Yes, maybe. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Back about 1997 I was given an 800mb HD that had stiction problems. Being reluctant to give up on it and a cheap bastard to boot, I used the accelerating taps method...

      tap-tap-tap
      HD: rrrrrrrrrrrrr
      TAP-TAP-TAP
      HD: RRRRRRRRRRR
      **!!!WHAP!!!**

      And the durn thing started right up and has worked fine ever since. I still use it for testing motherboards and such.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  20. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was in college some friends came to me with a dead computer. It didn't recognize the drive so I pulled it out, hooked it up to mine and powered it up. I had it in my hand and heard it clicking and clicking like it was stuck. The jdrive was dead so I figured what the hell so I hit it hard with the heel of my other hand. It was kind of funny the click click, bam! Whiiiiiiirrrrr sound it made. I took the disk back, told them it was working but likely not for long and to get a new drive and copy everything ASAP. My hand hurt for a while though

    Unrelated story, years later one of our dev servers died. Broken raid, no backups, second disk died after a while. The IT crew didn't monitor the dev servers as often as production. We lost months of work and ended up shipping the disks to a professional recovery service. They charged about $10k IIRC but got most of the data out. Handling of the DEV servers changed afterwards.

  21. Also ... swap the circuit boards by Fished · · Score: 1

    In some cases, the problem is not in the drive but in the on-board controller circuitry. If you're desperate, and you have a 100% identical drive, you can swap the controller boards and that will often work.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Also ... swap the circuit boards by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It may also make things worse. If you are desperate, go for professional data recovery.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. Starting Over by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    First of all anyone who said No is wrong. You can attempt to fix a hard disk using several methods.

    The first idea is to replace the controller on the back, this would be the PCB, as long as you have a controller of the same revision you can swap them. This wont always work but I've seen it unbrick a good number of drives.

    The second method I've seen work is to take a molex connector cable to serial, it attaches to the four little pins on the back of the drive and allows firmware access through a terminal program like hyper terminal or minicom. I've seen drives corrupt there firmware and this is really the only way to get into the settings and play with it, you can sometimes unlock a drive and get it spinning up, however copy the data off ASAP and swap the drive, it's at it's lifes end.

    The last method I've used and had work is to solder the controller from one hard disk to another using a flywire setup. This is a hack job and it is really a last attempt, you can take wire and solder it from the pins of one controller to the pins of another controller that is working. I've only ever had one disk kick over this way but I was able to copy data from it.

    Apart from all the garage hacks I just talked about there is alway the manufactures tools, they usually will allow you to download a disk image full of apps that can talk to the drive and try to recover it. If you don't care about the data you can always try a LOW level format, not a format! This is a special kind of high risk format, it will nuke the drive and if you get a power outage can brick the drive but again might work.

    For going all of that, hard disks are cheap just buy a new one.

    1. Re:Starting Over by rmstar · · Score: 2

      Forgoing all of that, hard disks are cheap just buy a new one.

      Better yet - buy two and set up a decent backup scheme.

    2. Re:Starting Over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Attempting to fix a HDD yourself is like attempting to fix a tumor yourself. You may be successful (very, very rarely), but in most cases you will just kill the patient. If the data has no worth, of course you can take your chances. But if the data is valuable, you should not compound your serious mistake of not having backup by doing more damage to the drive. Sure, not having a backup was stupid in the first place, and stupid people will try to fix the drive with the only copy of their valuable data themselves, bit for every one success story, there will be 100-1000 utter failures. Of course, stupid people will ignore them and latch onto the tiny chance of making it better themselves.

      The thing is, anybody smart enough to actually have a chance, does not need these self-help instructions. Those that do are doomed from the beginning.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Starting Over by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Everything I posted is safe enough that even if it doesn't work your data wont be effected. If a hard drive recovery professional can't fix a removed controller then I seriously would recommends staying clear. Of course there are off the shelfs software and hardware you can buy but your right, if your really really smart just get someone to do it for you. However I've managed to save a ton of drives by just hacking a solution up.

    4. Re:Starting Over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. PCB replacement has a real risk of frying everything if you do not get exactly the right PCB. Only an expert can be sure. Even then, the new PCB will have slightly different calibration values and may run unsafe as it does not know about your particular drives previous problems.

      The molex-to-serial is pure foolishness. There are a lot of serial interfaces today that use non-standard voltages and you will fry them immediately with a proper serial adapter. Also, most drives do not have the "four little pins" in the first place, which is a strong indication that you have not actually seen a lot of drives and are lying through your teeth.

      Everybody else: The advice from this person is dangerous. Do not follow it!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Starting Over by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      The first idea is to replace the controller on the back, this would be the PCB, as long as you have a controller of the same revision you can swap them. This wont always work but I've seen it unbrick a good number of drives.

      Having clearly not read my post, just look above. You need to use a controller from the same revision! If your going to slap any old PCB on the hard disk and power it up then it's your fault, hell you even called a PCB, why don't I just a rasberry pi or I could use an xbox controller or maybe a mother board, the correct word is controller and you need to have the right one which I mention above.

      As for the four little pin they have the following pin out

      - 1.5Gbps limitation jumper
      - Ground
      - Rx (serial terminal input)
      - Tx (serial terminal output)

      You can power it safety off 5 volts, in fact you can even power it off 12 volts and not damange most desktop drives.

      As for my last option just attempt it on old drives for fun, I've seen it kick a drive over.

      So I don't really know where the bullshit is coming from, clearly you have absolutely no idea what your talking about at all. The first two options I gave are real solutions that infact a lot of hard disk repair shops will use. As soon as you can actually prove I provided a bullshit response I'll recant my post but you'll never manage to do that.

    6. Re:Starting Over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      - 1.5Gbps limitation jumper
      - Ground
      - Rx (serial terminal input)
      - Tx (serial terminal output)

      You can power it safety off 5 volts, in fact you can even power it off 12 volts and not damange most desktop drives.

      You seem to be unaware that a proper RS232 is putting out +/-12V symmetrically. Also a RS232 is not "powered off" anything. Worst case with using a normal RS232 driver on a 5V tolerant, positive-only serial interface is blowing the controller chip (literally). My guess is that you have been lucky because you do not have a proper RS232 interface, just a wimpy USB-attached one with weak bus drivers. In that case the input-protection circuit may just survive the abuse for a while. But telling people that do not understand these fine points to just use "a serial interface" is asking them to get hurt.

      And side note: That is 8 pins or 4x2 pins you are talking about, not "4 pins". And your "pinout" description is lacking badly and not universal. At least learn the terminology if you are trying to pass as somebody that knows what he is talking about.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Starting Over by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      Actually using RS-232 Revision F the correct voltage ratings for a line is 15+/- volts :-). Revision C ( outdated ) is 12+/- volts, I've never tried but you could actually interface a hard disk controller with a USB input, it would work prefectly fine.

      I will agree I never said that I was only quoting for SATA disk drives, I've never had a reason to go back and get information from a IDE drive but the process would be the same you just need the correct controller and the correct pinout. Oh and I should mention that my friend ( Steve ) does this for a living so I'm not pulling this out of my ass.

    8. Re:Starting Over by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      The second method I've seen work is to take a molex connector cable to serial, it attaches to the four little pins on the back of the drive and allows firmware access through a terminal program like hyper terminal or minicom. I've seen drives corrupt there firmware and this is really the only way to get into the settings and play with it, you can sometimes unlock a drive and get it spinning up, however copy the data off ASAP and swap the drive, it's at it's lifes end.

      Other than the infamous Seagate 7200.11 firmware problem where instructions were eventually posted for the unwashed masses http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/128807-the-solution-for-seagate-720011-hdds/, how would one know what commands to send and what data to provide with such a serial connection? It's not like the HD manufacturers' support folks will give you the info when you call them up and break into tears.

      Apart from all the garage hacks I just talked about there is alway the manufactures tools, they usually will allow you to download a disk image full of apps that can talk to the drive and try to recover it.

      Seagate's SeaTools won't do that. Western Digital's DataLifeguard won't do that. Hitachi's DFT won't do that. I'd love to find some software from those guys that will allow attempts at data recovery but all I see these days is that they are touting their own data recovery services. Where did you find these tools?

    9. Re:Starting Over by gweihir · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? USB has completely different signal levels at completely different data-rates, protocol and electrical characteristics as RS232. And USB is differential, while RS232 is SE. My point for RS232 was that many USB-to-RS232 adapters only have something like +/-5V output at a few mA, which can be brought down to the, e.g., 0...3V that an asymmetric serial interface can tolerate by the logic input protection circuitry.

      Now, I am not disputing this may work for some drives, but it is not a general recipe at all. For example, just a quick survey of my older SATA drives brought up several with 8 pins and one with two pins in the connector you are referring to. In fact I found 4 pins only on 2.5" drives in my collection (not checking all 20+ different drives).

      Maybe you should have let Steve write that posting, he may have not garbled the facts so badly or at all. I suspect you have no idea what I am talking about with the interface incompatibilities.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  23. Phillips Colon Health, prune juice, MOM by rossdee · · Score: 1

    What has being 'regular' got to do with fixing hard drives?

  24. Take it apart and learn something by Gim+Tom · · Score: 2

    I have dissected a few hard drives, but have never been able to repair one -- and I have repaired lots of things unrepairable. The problem is finding the failure point. As the article said, if there is a component failure on the drive circuit board, AND IF YOU CAN FIND IT, then you might have a chance. However, most electronic components silently give up the ghost with no trace of having failed. The exception shown in the article really is an exception and if there is that much damage to a component I would suspect other damage to nearby components or even to traces on or within the board.

    On the other hand taking a hard drive apart is a wonderful study in just how well these things are made. The precision with which they are made would be the envy of many old time watch makers. It does take some special tools, however. A good set of strange driver bits really are needed and often include what are called security bits. Inside are lots of cool things like high power magnets and voice coil assemblies to move the heads and the amazingly delicate flying heads themselves. Although it is fun to take one to the range for target practice, you can also have a lot of fun just taking one apart.

    Now, the other reason to take one apart is to be REALLY sure you don't leave any recoverable data on the platters. Some of the platters are actually glass and by wrapping them in a few sheets of newspaper and pounding with a hammer for a while you can produce a nice pile of powdered glass that I doubt even NSA could recover data from. In any case with the platters removed and destroyed the data is really gone.

  25. dd_rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've had this program save my butt more than once, even when a drive "starts making bad noises." My theory is that it is very gentle on the head positioning mechanicals inside the HD. So while normal file system operations to read files off a HD will fail, since it sends the heads all over that place, dd_rescue succeeds since it's only moving the heads one cylinder at time.

  26. A Better Word by epp_b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Backup

    1. Re:A Better Word by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Informative

      his answer: truth

    2. Re:A Better Word by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Your answer: correct.
      But... your answer: pointless.
      His answer: correct.

      Though backups are not your only line of defense, redundancy is one too. For data that you care about you need both. Redundancy (via RAID) protects you from single (or more depending on arrangement) device failure (though not all failure routes so don't go feeling too safe!), backups protect you from catastrophic failure or an error (human or otherwise) that causes lost or corrupt data (if you delete everything, your RAID array will have redundant copies of nothing and your backups are what will save you unless they are stale).

    3. Re:A Better Word by hazem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Backup seems to be one of those things people don't learn until they've learned it the hard way.

      After my unrecoverable hard-drive crash, I set up a NAS with RAID that my computer backs up to every night (incrementals daily and full every 7 days). I then backup that NAS every couple months to an external USB drive that I store in another building.

      The key there, though, is it go and try to do a restore from your backup every now and then to make sure you can. There are few things worse than feeling secure in your backup process only to find it was not running correctly all along - or that you can't actually restore all your data from the process after all.

    4. Re:A Better Word by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      The key there, though, is it go and try to do a restore from your backup every now and then to make sure you can. There are few things worse than feeling secure in your backup process only to find it was not running correctly all along

      A key point that many people miss until it is too late. Depending on your backup solution, automated testing is possible. Some of our Live databases get transferred back from the backup site and restored on another machine, then if that fails or the data in the restored copy seems to old (for that daily backed up DBs the test is that the last audit trail entry is no more than 24 hours after the last one in Live), an email is pinged out to several people so the situation gets looked at. That doesn't protect against everything (it is feasible that corruption in the backup file won't be picked up by the checksums used by the DBMS as it restores, and our last-audited-action check would still pass in most cases where that to happen) of course...

      Similarly my home mail/calendar server gets its backup restored to a copy in a VM. I don't have automated checks on that though, I must do something about that omission soon (I currently manually log in occasionally to check things look right).

    5. Re:A Better Word by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      The OP was asking about DIY fixes for hard drives. And once again we get some sanctimonious dufus making a snide 'backup' remark. FFS, we all know back up your drive. And since we don't know the OPs circumstance to make another pointless "backup" comment is just fucking annoying. Who knows if the guy is trying to recover data from another less tech savvy member of his family or a friend. And if it makes people think twice before posting stupid "backup" comments, then my post was not pointless.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    6. Re:A Better Word by danomac · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's nothing better than a backup, even if it's only to an external drive.

      I find it amazing how many people use their computer to store irreplacable items like pictures with no backup.

    7. Re:A Better Word by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I actually use FB as an off-site backup, now - since they've added the "high-def" uploads, I find it an excellent resource in addition to my regular backup.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    8. Re:A Better Word by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a backup plan. There is only a recovery plan. Backup may be a required step, but a backup-plan as a recovery plan is like printing the phone number for the insurance company in place of the evacuation plan map in an office building. It may be necessary in case of a fire, but it's not going to do any good if all the people to call the number are dead in the fire.

  27. Quite easy... by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    Fixing a broken hard drive is quite easy. Simply restore from your backup to a new working drive. While you're at it, get a higher capacity drive as the prices will have dropped and the capacities will have improved. ...ah, you do keep daily backups, right? If not then you're one of those people who hires people like me to recover your data. It's expensive. Making backups is a lot cheaper.

  28. Highly improbable by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    Hard drives are really, really finicky. What works for some might not work for others, even if they are encountering the same problem. For instance, sticking a drive in the freezer worked for an older drive I was repairing for my mom but not for a former girlfriend's drive that, all things considered, had the same issue. I also once owned a Dell DJ (piece of shit, if anyone is considering getting this) that used a full-height 1.8" hard drive whose actuator would frequently stick; dropping or tapping it worked every time (to everyone else's curiosity), but has never, ever worked for any other drive that seemed to have the same issue.

    I think you're pretty much fucked if your SSD starts going south, which is unfortunate. Thankfully, backups are easier to make these days.

  29. Platters no way by ArchieBunker · · Score: 4, Informative

    You will have great difficulty taking the platters out. The read heads have to be removed without physically coming into contact with the platters. You'll need specialized fixtures and tooling to even begin. If the data is that important then send it to a professional.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Platters no way by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You will have great difficulty taking the platters out. The read heads have to be removed without physically coming into contact with the platters. You'll need specialized fixtures and tooling to even begin

      I recently disassembled several fairly modern dead hard drives (for the magnets) and I strongly disagree. The heads generally will swing all the way out of the way without any special tooling, if you remove parts in the proper order.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Platters no way by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Further, you would need some way to identify and align the platters properly to read them again without a low-level format.

      I wouldn't even try to align the platters properly, anyway. Won't the drives still do their own low-level format, initiated by the vendor's downloadable tool, like ATA drives did since time immemorial?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Platters no way by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Yes, they will swing out, leaving a huge radial scratch on the platters and damaging the heads' glider surfaces.
      Pros use "combs" in a fixture to lift the gimbals before moving the actuator.
      Unless you have a modern drive with ramp load of course.

    4. Re:Platters no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "You'll need specialized fixtures and tooling to even begin."

      I can add some experience to try and quantify this for other interested readers.

      I'm a physicist with lots of practical ee and me experience. At the university I work at I have access to a lot of useful equipment.

      My brother's HDD died and I attempted a home-brew platter swap after sourcing an identical drive from eBay. Initially I tried swapping boards: no luck. Freezing: no luck. And some mechanical taps, in case of stiction: still no luck.

      Under clean room conditions I swapped the platter from one drive to another. I was as careful as I could be, using all of my experience and on-hand equipment to guide me through the process.

      I failed. The "new" drive with the "old" platter would not work at all. Trying to put the "new" platter back in the "new" drive didn't work (unsurprisingly) at all, so the entire process was a complete bust. My general skills were not up to the task - you need to be a HDD expert to do this, and in that case your own experience probably tells you not to bother...

      Has anyone here ever succeeded to perform a home-brew platter swap? It would be great to read about!

    5. Re:Platters no way by drdoc · · Score: 1

      do you just make this stuff up? the top and bottom heads are definitely used. loading ramps are generally only used in laptop drives.

  30. Last ditch efforts at home by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    I've replace the PCB before to get at damaged platters, but both times I was lucky enough to have *exact* same model and run drives around, it typically doesn't work otherwise.

    I've had luck with freezing a drive once, though I was only able to recover a few files before it gave up the ghost completely (luckily, expecting that, I'd created a script to hunt for and copy the important files before I ever took the drive out of the freezer.

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:Last ditch efforts at home by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That is utter BS. If the platters are damaged, no amount of PCB replacing will make any difference. That would be like replacing a tire fixes your broken windshield.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Last ditch efforts at home by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      Just utter typo, I meant "damaged drives"

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:Last ditch efforts at home by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. That makes more sense.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  31. Hammer method may work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some years ago, my 40GB Maxtor drive stop working. No boot, no partition table, etc... So i bought a new drive and tried to copy the data, after many attemps, and all hope lost. I took a piece of wood and used it as a mallet, and gave to the drive a good round of hits, then connected it again and it worked. I copied 20GB of my data and threw the drive into a wardrobe and never used it again. I forgot to mention that I lifted the drive cover a bit, by unscrewing partially to give a gap that allowed to lift the cap a bit, this was another rumour myth that i was hearing about drive recovering. I don't know what make the reading possible, but i can say that i recovered my data.

  32. Been there, done that, time wasted.. by brokenin2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We fixed a drive by trading the pcb with another *IDENTICAL* drive (same rev of board etc)..

    The funny part was that when we went to recover the files they desperately needed back from that drive, all we found were shortcuts to a network drive, where the files had been safe and sound the entire time.. The user just had no idea that they hadn't lost their files..

    1. Re:Been there, done that, time wasted.. by brokenin2 · · Score: 1

      I should note though, that being able to fix a drive this way is fairly rare.. Most of the time you're hosed..

    2. Re:Been there, done that, time wasted.. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      I hope you charged them a couple grand. That kind of stupidity needs to be punished.

    3. Re:Been there, done that, time wasted.. by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Indeed. And this only works for electronics damage, not for anything mechanical.

      I have to agree that the network drive thing is hilarious though. People do not understand the technology they are relying on not at all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  33. Yes, but you probably shouldn't by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    Data recovery centers have dust-free environments when removing the platters from hard drives. Air contamination can easily cause data corruption. Sure you can try fixing your broken hard drive, but you'll most likely lose all your data in the process. If you have critical information that you don't want to lose, just use a professional. I switched to Gillware for my clients. Their prices are some of the cheapest I've seen in a while. Was always a fan of DriveSavers in the past, but their prices are expensive.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:Yes, but you probably shouldn't by u38cg · · Score: 1

      How on earth have you gotten to know them so well? Generally, most people learn to back up after the *first* time.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:Yes, but you probably shouldn't by Danzigism · · Score: 1

      As I said, I use Gillware for my clients. There are still plenty of residential customers who have no idea what a backup even is, yet they store all of their family photos on their computers and experience a hard drive crash. As a matter of liability, my repair shop will not attempt to remove platters from a hard drive and put it in another one. So, we recommend a 3rd party.

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  34. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

    2 drives out of 7 started spinning for me after the freezer trick long enough to get some/most data off them.

    I think, as Billy Crystal would tell you, it depends if they are dead, or just mostly dead.

  35. Oh, and photorec by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    photorec does a pretty damned good job at getting data back if the drive is still readable. Even "simpler" methods, like chkdsk /f /r, work sometimes as well, though you might have to wait a long time to see results. (I once tried to recover a drive for a client that had several thousand bad sectors using chkdsk and it took about a month of continuous operation to recover about 40GB of data. Which was unfortunate because the drive was 1TB large.)

    I use the physical methods as last resorts, since all of the ones I'm aware of can cause further damage.
    I wonder how many people shell up the $1500+ for professional recovery when a few hours or days would have solved it for them...

  36. Keep backups by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    We live in an age when these questions should be obsolete. Data without backups is data that wants to die.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  37. Spin the heck out of it. by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    I had a USB drive that was sitting in an attic for 2 years w/o use. It had become "sticky" and didn't want to start spinning (just went click, click, click). After about 5 minutes it did eventually start so I downloaded a 6 hour radio show and played it back at 1/4 speed to keep the drive spinning. Now the drive starts-up without any problem.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  38. Don't try it by nine-times · · Score: 1

    It's better for "regular people" to find someone who knows what they're doing. It's important to understand that many of these things you can do to fix a broken hard drive are actually actions of last resort. If you know your hard drive is broken and there's no other way, you might try one of these techniques, but if you aren't sure what's going on with your hard drive, you're more likely to damage your hard drive further rather than fix it.

    So let an expert determine whether your hard drive is really seriously broken or if it's something easily fixable. Your problem may actually be very minor and fixable, but if you try these things, you might break it beyond repair. If someone is going to attempt any of these measures, let it be someone with some experience.

  39. moving serial memory chips by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sometimes it's possible to ressurect a dead drive by swapping the controller board with another from the same model (or a very close model from the same range). Unfortunately with modern drives there is often information stored on the controller board which is needed for the drive to start. This information seems to be stored on a serial memory chip (usually an 8-pin device in a SOIC or similar package) on the controller board.

    What i've found you can do is remove the serial memory chip from the dead controller board and solder it to the donor controller board. Provided you have a hot air rework station it's pretty easy to remove and re-fit the serial memory chips. So-far i've tried this twice and it's worked both times, YMMV of course.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:moving serial memory chips by drdoc · · Score: 1

      most manufacturers stopped using separate rom chips years ago. Now its stored in the cpu which is a large 128 pin 4 sided surface mount chip. Good luck swapping that with a how air gun.... I do this daily - www.alandata.com

  40. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you do that you want to put a dessicant in the bag with the drive. Otherwise you are just sealing the humid air in.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  41. Re:It depends - Sticktion Y2K Repair by InitZero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In preparation for Y2K, we had to turn off our text archive server (at a newspaper) for the first time in, literally, years. The machine itself has been in production for six years, the last two or so of which without a reboot.

    It was an IBM AIX machine with an array of 4.5GB SCSI drives. After sitting with its power off for a couple hours, we turned it back on and Nothing Happened. No drives were spinning. Crap.

    Called IBM tech support. Got the run-around. Finally got to a guy who said something along the lines of "you're going to think this is crazy but do what I say in this order" followed by...

    * turn machine off
    * remove drives
    * turn the machine on
    * bang the drives on their edge a few times on the floor - don't go crazy but harder than you think is a good idea
    * spin the drives flat on the ground as though they were tops
    * immediately, put the drives in the enclosure
    * reboot the machine but do not power it off

    Damn if the guy wasn't right.

    His guess was that the drives had been powered for eight or so years and the lubricant had either broken down or the heads were simply stuck to the platters. The thumping dislodged the heads and the spin gave the grease a fighting chance. {shrug}

    In any case, we dared not turn it off for another year and a half until at such time it was replaced. We thought about buying replacement drives but IBM wanted something along the lines of $600 for a 4.5GB drive. Even on eBay, they were three times what we felt was reasonable.

    Cheers,
    Matt

  42. Bad contacts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had a drive that I fixed by cleaning the contact surface between PCB and heads' connectors.

  43. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    The issue is when you take it out of the freezer and if you have any sort of humidity around you. The moisture in the air will condense on the cold surfaces. You can't really put a plastic bag on the drive while it's in your machine now, can you.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  44. If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick... by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least do it the right way.

    1. Get ahold of long cables that can reach *outside* the freezer to your machine.

    2. Wrap the drive *before* you put it in the freezer. Heat a towel in the oven to make sure it's dry, then wrap the drive in the towel. Now stick it in a plastic baggie, along with some silica gel packs to suck up more moisture. Try to close the mouth of the baggie around the cables as much as possible. Use duct tape if necessary.

    3. Put it in the freezer, route the cables through the door seal, and make damn sure the door is shut tight as possible. Seal it with more duct tape if you have to. Let it sit in the freezer for at least 6 hours to get really cold.

    4. Make all your preparations before plugging in the drive. Situate your primary machine right next to the freezer, make sure you're ready to go. If you can somehow manage it, and you know what you're doing, boot into an old copy of DOS, or a command-line interface of your preferred *nix distro. Don't waste time loading Windows if you can help it.

    5. Turn off your machine, plug the drive in, then reboot.

    6. Move *fast*. Start copying the drive contents over to the backup drive as fast as you can. If you can do it via a script or batch file, then even better. Speed is of the essence. In fact, if you know the locations of the files you need, as well as their general file names, then creating a batch file BEFORE starting would be your best option. Just tell it to copy everything in C:\MyLifesWork\coldfusion*.*

    7. MOST IMPORTANT STEP!!! If this does not work, and you can't pull anything off the drive, then don't panic just yet. Turn off your machine, unplug the drive, then unplug the freezer.

    Do NOT open the freezer until it has reached ambient temperature, which will take at least 24 hours or more.

    This will prevent the drive from getting roached from the condensation, and make it more feasible for a drive recovery company to save your data.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  45. Freezer trick... by bayankaran · · Score: 5, Funny

    Few years back a 20GB drive I salvaged from an old dead Thinkpad stopped working. No whirring sound, nothing...the green light on the USB enclosure stayed on.

    There was no important data, but I thought "this is the chance to learn how to salvage a hard drive".

    I did the freezer option. I had already used the freezer to kill ants in sugar and bugs in rice. Froze the drive overnight, took it out and immediately connected and waited for whirring sound. No sound. The drive is dead.

    Gave the drive couple of almighty whacks. Still no sound. No life at all.

    I threw it in the dust bin.

    The next day I tried to connect a camera. The SD card on the camera failed to be identified on Windoze and Linux.

    I tried another USB cable. And the camera connected fine.

    It took me a few seconds to remember the old hard drive. Took it out of the trash, wiped it clean and connected.

    The drive works perfectly fine even today. But it still got the smell of decomposed tea leaves.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Freezer trick... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      On a similar note..

      I have a 120GB external USB that came from the factory formatted FAT32 as One Big Disk. This is begging for trouble (FAT32 has a wraparound bug that hits at 32gb and causes data loss) but I didn't notice the durn thing was FAT32 til I'd put ... oh dear, 32GB of data on it.

      The 1.8GHz WinXP-SP3 system refuses to have anything to do with it. Shows directories but won't see files, making the drive appear kaput. (This machine also has USB quirks, such as you can only use certain ports at the same time, or it refuses to see one or another of 'em.)

      The crappy old K6-2 450MHz WinXP-SP1 system sees the drive just fine, so I used it to get all the files off it. The big difference is that this PC is slow as dirt... I was gonna toss out this piece of crap, but occurs to me that if this worked once, it might work again....

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Freezer trick... by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Probably not but freezing made it much easier to pick out the ants and bugs for a special dish.

  46. Correct by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    It really depends on what has failed and how. I've repaired a number of drives at work well enough to get data off with just basic software tools, like using Knoppix to force mount problematic partitions and so on. The drive may be failing but not completely so a software-only solution can do the trick.

    Also I've had Spinrite work. It has about a 40% success rate but on drives that nothing else could read, I've had it make them readable again. In one case I ran Spinrite (it takes many hours, put a fan on the disk), copied the data to a new disk with Ghost, did a chkdsk, did a repair install of Windows and the system functioned flawlessly, no data or app loss. Of course the other 60% of the time it destroys the disk beyond any repair so it is a "Use only as a last resort and only if the data isn't important enough to pay for professional recovery," tool.

    Replacing controllers can work if the controller is what has failed. Needs to be the precise controller so one from a like disk but different size won't work and occasionally even the firmware version can matter.

    However if the problem is with the heads themselves or the platters then no, you can't do shit. You need a clean room to open the drive up without destroying it, and then of course you need something to put the platter in to for reading them.

    So you can try to self repair a drive. As I said using recovery software (Knoppix with force mount is a great thing to try first) is a good first step, so long as the BIOS can see the drive. May be that you can just copy the data and call it good. However there are also plenty of situations where you can't repair it so don't count on it working. If the data is really important, send it to a pro.

  47. My experiences by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    WAY BACK WHEN I took the cover off a 40MB RLL disk, pushed on the spindle by hand (it had so much stiction it could not be repaired by any other means) to free it, put the cover back on, and it worked. Note, 40 megabytes. I didn't even try to improvise a clean room. My cleaning procedure was to blow on the top platter gently before I closed the drive. The drive spun up and I was able to recover 100% of the data from it, and it was nearly full. Before this happened this disk actually burned a power-carrying trace off the board and I replaced it with a wire jumper. Then later that wire got so hot that the solder melted and it fell off, and I put it back on and used it some more. You guessed it, Seizegate.

    MANY TIMES I have got a non-spinning drive spinning again by whacking one corner (from the side of the drive) with a screwdriver. The last one I did this with was 80GB or so, but there's no reason why this technique should not be valid today. Connect to power, give it a sharp rap in the appropriate direction, listen to it spin. I started doing this with ST-225s which needed it very often, but I've applied it to many different disks successfully over the years.

    My experiences aside, many people have put disks in the freezer or even the oven (not hard to stay below reflow temperature) and got them to free up. If it's a stiction problem it's all about thermal expansion and contraction. If the drive spins but does not work, if you're very lucky you might have a PCB problem, and if you can find a disk of the same model and version then the PCB from the other disk might work on your disk.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:My experiences by drdoc · · Score: 1

      wacking a drive is very risky - you can pretzel the heads or detach them. Now if it does spin you are scraping bare metal arms across shiny platters - this is a bad thing... On the other hand you have nothing to lose except your data. The freezer trick doesnt work much anymore - it used to work on older drives with termal compensation issues or hot electronics parts. Now not so much. On the other hand its not likely to damage the drive - unless condensation forms. I know, I do this daily (www.alandata.com)

  48. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can't put it entirely in your machine but if it is bad and you just want to try to recover data you don't have to. Maybe you could get extension wires for the power supply and data cables. Attach the cables, put it in a plastic bag with the cables hanging out, seal the bag with tape and then put into the freezer. When the time in the freezer is over, do not open the bag and reattach the dangling cables. Yes, there is the matter on the HD not being grounded but for the short time you need, it is not necessary.

  49. Repair a hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless the drive has valuable data, don't bother attempting it yourself. Drive recovery companies have plenty of spare parts to swap (ha, that would be the PCB board on the back of the drive), they might be able to help as long as it isn't a head crash.
    1. Gimmicks like heating and cooling a PCB have a remote chance of helping.... for a few minutes, until the PCB has operated long enough to come to normal (and implicitly failing) operating temperature. If you were super lucky you might get it to work long enough to copy off a limited amount of critical data.
    2. If the value of the data on the drive exceeds a few hundred dollars (which would buy you several new hard drives), and it can't be re-input by hand at a reasonable cost, then it may be worth paying to get recovery done.
    3. If your bad drive won't spin up - That is something a PCB will likely fix it.
    4. If you heard your bad hard drive make a horrible sound just before it went bad - It could well be a head crash, you drive and it's data are unrecoverable, pray you have good backups.
    5. If you have a few bad spots (which seems unlikely from your tone), you may be able to run Spinrite, which has a good track record for fixing this specific problem. But... If your drive is getting bad spots, it's time to retire it to the trash can and put in something (new and ) reliable, immediately after data recovery. A significant percentage of the time when the surface of the disk is starting to decay, it's from bad treatment or bad manufacturing. Replace it, rarely is peace of mind and not loosing work time worth the cost of less than $100.
    6. if you have critical data, it should be backed up on to a second media, these days likely a hard drive.

    My credentials?
    I worked on a development engineering team for one of the first 3.5 inch (ahem, 'full size') hard drives, back in the 70's. I did drive recovery for pay as a consultant for 3 years in the early 80's and have continued working on PC hardware ever since as a professional.
    The likelihood of recovering data on a flaky/bad hard drive, less than 1 in 4 is my gut estimate, being very optimistic.
    I've attempted drive repair at a commercial repair companies on 3 occasions in the last 15 years, one was less than wonderful but genuinely helpful (I got 90% of my data recovered and sent to me on a new drive). But 2 were failures, and I still had to pay the fee for the data recovery service regardless, which was a few hundred dollars each time.
    sigh...
    Rarely does data recovery make sense.
    Rarely does a TESTED data backup practice NOT make sense.
    Hard disks are cheap relative to lost work and lost data.
    If all else fails, buy a second drive and copy the important stuff from on to the other.
    If you can't afford a second drive, Dropbox (and other similar services) will allow you to keep 2 gigs of data on there servers at no cost to you.
    Clearly backing up you music or videos isn't practical but you get what you pay for. If you have work product (maintaining web sites, writing a books or training materials, etc.) or other valuable files, this will be adequate.

    Good luck.
    YMMV

  50. Re:Hard drive problem...both on and off topic by abelb · · Score: 1

    Power supply maybe. Perhaps your external chassis provides cleaner, better power than your PC PSU?

  51. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by Xolotl · · Score: 2

    Yep, freezer trick worked for me on two drives, and not on a third. Recovered all the data from one drive, and about half off the second. The thing is, it's a one shot, last chance attempt, since the thermal shock is as likely to kill the drive as revive it temporarily. You need patience, and dry air, and dessicant in the bag with the drive.

    Two other methods which have worked were running a drive on its side (!) instead of horizontally, and keeping an overheating drive cool with extra fans (well, that one should be obvious).

  52. you must be new here by anarcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Regular person? This is slashdot, there are no "regular persons" here.

    --
    Semantics is the gravity of abstraction
  53. Splurge for a new drive... by libtek · · Score: 1

    Is it really that hard to keep your important data backed up on an external HD? Sync up yer loadz drive with the external once a week and then if either one dies, you just copy/paste the good stuff back onto the new one (after a fresh OS install if it's yer comp drive). I format once every-other month (for that brand-spankin new feel) and use this method to restore. Yeah you have to reinstall yer programs and games, but how many games do you really need installed at one time? Keep the isos and install only what you need.

    --
    Unequivocally the realest of the realz...
  54. Removed shorted diode, fixed! by neurocutie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My boss handed me the hard drive from his laptop. He said it was totally fried. It had ALL his work on it, no backups.

    What had happened was that he had some minor NTFS corruption problem, so he went to our IT dept. Some IT monkey removed the laptop drive and tried to hook it up to a SATA - IDE converter. However he managed to wire up the power backwards. That fried the drive, but actually all it really did was burn/short the power polarity protection diode.

    So with magnifying glass and soldering iron, I simply removed the shorted diode, and voila (not wahlah or viola), the drive was working again. I was then able to easily clean up the NTFS problem. Boy was he happy to get all his stuff back.

    1. Re:Removed shorted diode, fixed! by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Boy was he happy to get all his porn back.

      - FTFY.

  55. Some things work by wakeboarder · · Score: 2

    I've done this a number of times, it depends what the problem is:
    1) Component on controller board is dying
    2) Component or mechanical failure in the main hard drive

    The problems that result in the first category usually stem from components dying, usually this results in you plugging the in the drive and getting no response or os won't load the driver or incorrect bios settings for auto detection, in this case its worth a try to replace the board. I've had about a 75% success rate with this.

    Mechanical problems are different. The first thing I do for these is look at the smart disk parameters, if its something to do with reading, writing, arithmetic or access times this means your drive is dying. You should immediately try and get your data off, I've seen drives get worse in a matter of hours and become completely unusable. Since you have no idea what is actually causing the problem the only thing you can do at this point is randomly change the temperature or orientation of the hard drive and hope to get some usable data off. I first try an initial copy, then turn the drive on one side and copy, then put it in the fridge. I've had success with both of these. I've also tried dropping the drive on its side to try and shift the r/w heads but I don't think that helped, sometimes I think it would if the r/w head column was misaligned or jammed. Of course, if you really want the data back you should fork out the ~1000$ and send it in, I've asked hundreds of customers if they want to do this or have us monkey around with it, I have yet for someone to take me up on paying and sending it in, maybe data isn't worth that much to most people.

  56. Been there, done that... many times by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Had a hard drive (Seagate 3.5" drive) that quit, I had another dead Seagate someone gave to me that had
    the same PCB board, but a few versions off (newer). I exchanged PCB boards and my dead drive
    was fine again. Nothing lost, and it continued to work until it became too small.

    Had one drive that wouldn't spin-up, so I took the cover off and spun it up myself. Once it
    got going it was fine so I could grab whatever I needed from it. It worked every time I need it to (no data loss).

    I had used NT resource kit's Diskmap as part of a recovery preparation I'd never use. I figure
    messing around somehow screwed up my hard drive. Just happened to find a print out of the Diskmap
    and used NT resource kit's Disk Probe to rebuild the partition table - I would wish that upon an enemy, horrid program.

    Just a few of my hard drive fixes, Oh ya a person can fix their own.
    Hiren's BootCD - everybody needs this as part of their utilities (I like version 10)

    Side note: I've suggested the freezer trick to others, never used it myself. I did use the oven trick on my Video Card, fixed it right up.

  57. my experience by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    "There's a lot of FUD when it comes to self-repairing a broken hard drive.

    Not really. There is a lot of anecdotal "it worked for me" experiences. Failed drives are a replacable item. Most people working the field don't replace drives long enough in their field to hit all the corner cases - like that awesome mechanic who's pushing 120 years old and can fix your bent drive shaft in about 15 minutes.

    Does sticking it in the freezer help? Hitting it with a hammer?

    Yes, but I've found a bucket of ice with some water in it to level it off, and the drive in multiple bags to keep the water out while you try to pull data from it, is a good approach if you want to recover data. This seems to work about half the time when simply using something like I've found that giving a drive a good short drop (4 foot) onto a non-cement floor or a very short drop onto a table, or evenly hitting it with a heavy rubber mallet (eg. and using a 2x4 to distribute the percussive impact), then submersing it, will typically work about half the time when the symptom is the disk won't spin up or has clicking/causes crashing/etc.

    Never, never hit it with a metal mallet or drop it on a cement floor. You'll blow the thing up inside (or at least it did the two times I looked).

    The oven?

    I've never tried it, but it's doubtful unless the problem is electrical current related on the PCB. I suppose it's possible you damaged the drive PCB by hitting it with the hammer could damage it, and the oven might 're-flow' the shitty tin solder on the PCB or within the drive. It might also 'knock down' tin whiskers. I suspect the oven would've fix some of the newer drives which supposedly use better tin based solder to avoid the whisker problem.

    Does replacing the PCB actually work?

    Can you take the platters out and put them in another drive?

    You can, but you're going to want to have a 'clean room' environment to do it. Some people's houses are approaching that, but I would not personally trust any place of business I've seen or my house.

    And failing all that, if you have to send the dead drive off to a professional data recovery company, how much does it cost — and what's their chance of success, anyway?

    I've only had to do it a 3 times for people. $1200-$2100 and they got "their" drive shipped back to them - same make and model - with their data on it. In one case it was a dump of 'random' recovered files (everything had a seemingly random name, but it all appeared to be there - it took him months to go through it all) and another it was just a normal filesystem. A third time (the more expensive time) they got a newer, larger drive shipped to them with the contents of the disk. In all cases it was "all" of the data, so 3/3 were recoveries with ~100% success rate of useful data.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  58. Spin-R-Up! by jtara · · Score: 1

    Don't know how successful this would be today, but I've seen it done maybe 10 years ago.

    I think most drive failures are bearing failures. So, sometimes you can get it to spin-up by tapping, etc.

    A co-worker couldn't get a drive going that way, so he just opened it up, and gave it a little push and it spun-up. He got his data off, and then left it running, to see how long it would last. It worked for a week in open-air before it finally failed. I don't remember now if it started getting errors or just physically stopped spinning. (It *was* a bearing failure in process, after all...)

    1. Re:Spin-R-Up! by agoodm · · Score: 1

      Most drive failures I see these days are not bearing or spindle motor related. Out of around 100 dead hard drives in the last 5 years 2 were spindle motor or bearing related and the rest were media type errors possibly caused by trouble with the drive heads.

    2. Re:Spin-R-Up! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That time is over. There are no ball-bearings in the spindles of todays FDB drives.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Spin-R-Up! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but there still has to be some sort of surface that it rotates against, yes?

      And not all bearings are balls. I have a collection of rod bearings that came out of cars.

      As to bearing failure... that's what I see most with Seagates. First the drive gets really hot, then it makes horrible noises, then it quits.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Spin-R-Up! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      No. It does not. Read up on how FDBs work before posting nonsense.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Spin-R-Up! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Then why don't you consider posting an educational explanation rather than just telling the rest of us how ignorant we are? Light a candle rather than cursing the darkness.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Spin-R-Up! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Spending some effort to find things out is critical for any learning effect. Pointing out to people when they are ignorant is often needed, because they have no clue they are. Unfortunately the perverted pest of "political correctness" makes doing so a faux pas in the spirit that a brief avoidance of possible unhappiness is better than people actually getting a real assessment of their level of insight, which then allows them to do something about it. Possible one of the reasons why more and more people think they can competently contribute to discussions when they actually have no clue.

      I should also point out that posting things as factual that you have not even done minimal research on is (baring mistakes that anyone can make) highly disrespectful to any reader and potentially dangerous. Not that this is new. The Dunnig-Kruger effect is a fundamental problem some types of personality have, not an invention of the Internet.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Spin-R-Up! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The flipside is that someone has to also be willing to educate, not just denigrate. You seem a lot more interested in pointing out how much smarter you are than everyone else, than you are in helping others learn what you feel they're ignorant of.

      'Course, it could be that you're the one who doesn't really know what you're talking about; how are we to judge?

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Spin-R-Up! by drdoc · · Score: 1

      drives use fluid dynamic bearings these days. Extremely tight tolerance. If they run hot then the fluid can gas out and they seize. usually people drop them and cause them to seize.

  59. Another word by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Backups.

  60. More detail, please, neighbors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please put dates on your war-story recovery experiences. If you don't remember, give the drive's size.

    Please don't be pointlessly coy about naming the recovery vendor who could or couldn't recover your data, the price they quoted, the price you finally paid them. Don't say nothing. Don't say "a certain major vendor, har har." Just tell us who they are. You don't have long before these sketchy tradies see the article and flood the comments with self-serving FUD.

    Please state what was wrong with the drive before you tried to recover it, ex:

      * didn't spin

      * didn't identify

      * latent sector errors (ex. "OS keept crashing")

    None of the upvoted comments have these details which is making the article useless for me.

    For my own experience,

    (a) I had full, easy success swapping the controller of an IBM 9GB SCSI drive, but the old controller had been visibly damaged. SMD gull-wing (?) pins were smashed. This is a rare failure case for me.

    (b) I'm often able to recover data from the third category of drive with 'dd if=/dev/olddrive of=/dev/newdrive bs=512 conv=noerror,sync'. (there is also dd_rescue, but I don't use it). This works on Linux or Mac, but on Solaris you must use GNU dd for it to work---the included one is just broken. Obviously you need to boot off a drive other than the one that's failing. The drive must be unmounted when you use dd. It takes several days to read a failing drive this way, and about a quarter-day to copy a fully-working drive this way, so the excessively slow/dumb retry cycles in the firmware and storage stack mean your drive is spinning long enough to get worse, if it's decaying (something to consider for self-service vs. pro recovery).

  61. Sometimes... by firesyde424 · · Score: 2

    I've been able to recover data from several hard drives over the years using the "freezer trick." But I have never repaired a drive using that trick. The drives would always eventually stop working again, usually within a half hour or so..

    1. Re:Sometimes... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is not a repair. The way it works is to shift the physical parameters slightly from what is normal for a short time. That can be enough to get the drive working for a few minutes (or spin up when it would not before), as most mechanics and electronics work better when cold.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  62. Hammer by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    There was an old Quantum SCSI drive popular in older Macs (Performa desktops IIRC) that would suffer a seized spindle bearing after being idle too long. These could be revived by taking it out of the chassis, cables still attached, and hitting the frame with a mallet as you power the machine on.

  63. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    You're doing it wrong. The approach works, but it's kind of like replacing an oil filter on a car: it doesn't really help much unless you also put more oil in.

    Use a bucket full of ice with water in it. Double/triple wrap the drive in water-tight plastic bags (test them), and get a good air-tight seal going with the drive inside. Meanwhile, you've got a power and data cable snaked and taped into the bag, attached to the disk.

    No condensation - you just have to be careful about splashing. Added bonus, it keeps the drive cool throughout the recovery - with heat or friction-induced mechanical tolerance loss being the primary causes, but other mechanical tolerance issues can also be helped.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  64. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The issue is also what the humidity was in the room in which the head-disk module was assembled/sealed.

    Except that hard drives are generally not sealed. They have a filtered breathing hole to exchange air with the outside. Otherwise, the casing would balloon when you took your computer on an airplane or when the drive is shipped via air.

    --

    Enigma

  65. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It depends. If it's part of a RAID array (as in part of a RAID 1 array) you undoubtedly have at least two drives of the same make/model. However this is the only situation where replacing the PCB works, and the PCB failure rate is not that high. We're talking about literal damage to the PCB to warrant replacing it.

    The drive platters itself, forget it. If they've been damaged, or the heads have struck the platters, they've likely been snapped off and will not work. It's not possible to fix.

    The bearings (eg the drive makes whine or grinding noise) you may have some luck recovering it. This will only work around the spindle motor not starting up, you may be able to change the temperature or humidity to get it to spin up, but if it spins up, copy everything off immediately, because it's unlikely to work a second time.

    Laptop drives are rather brittle, and generally die a lot more often than desktop drives (one laptop I had went through one drive per year) where as the MacMini with the same size of drive, still is running on that drive.

    Captcha: drives

  66. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by Bengie · · Score: 2

    IBM Deskstars used glass platters which had a much higher expansion per unit of heat. After they got too warm, the heads would be out of position relative to the surface. Freezing those drives were nearly every time for me. I do find it interesting that the drives couldn't compensate correctly for expansion, but they worked just fine for contraction as the platters should have shrunk at the same rate as they cooled.

  67. Professional help with mixed results by FridayBob · · Score: 2

    Once I had a client who's hard disk broke down when his last backup of it was several months old. It seemed dead, but there was a lot of expensive data on it, so I took it straight to a professional. His services cost me about $2.000 and did restore a lot of the data, but not in the way that I expected. He sent me a couple of DVDs ten days later with on the one hand long lists of the names of the files that had been restored, and on the other the files with the data. The only problem was that the data files all had random names, so we were still faced with the task of figuring out which files had which names. For about 10.000 files. My client was relieved to have (most of) his data back, but was obviously disappointed with the results.

    Of course, the trick is to never allow yourself to get anywhere near this kind of situation. The worst of it could have been avoided if my client had stuck to making his regular backups or had simply used RAID (or preferably done both).

    1. Re:Professional help with mixed results by drdoc · · Score: 1

      I do data recovery every day (www.alandata.com) The first thing we try to recover is the master file table - which has all the names and maps the files. Often we find their is damage in the master file table. This is because the heads go there more than anywhere else. Without this its pretty messy - no names or paths - unless you just want pictures which usually self identify.

    2. Re:Professional help with mixed results by drdoc · · Score: 1

      Good point! Defragmenting makes data recovery much easier. The easiest files to recover are pictures because they get written in 1 piece. The hardest files to recover are things like email and databases where a little bit is added to the file all day long. Then it get fragmented all over - with out the master file table you got nuttin... (I do this daily alandata.com)

  68. Give Spinrite a try by SouthernPolarbear · · Score: 1

    Best Hard Drive Disk Utility available. License structure Steve has is pretty liberal. http://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm

    1. Re:Give Spinrite a try by gweihir · · Score: 5, Informative

      Pure snake-oil today. It used to have some merit in the MFM and RLL days, but these are long over. The only thing SpinRite can do today is to cause more damage to the drive if it has mechanical problems. If the drive is mechanically fine, repeated read accessed do exactly the same as SpinRite does, because it does not have any other possibility on modern drives.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Give Spinrite a try by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      Exactly, SpinWrong is tool designed for exploiting the credulous which appear in every industry. However for all intents and purposes this is a religion for these fan boys. Nothing, no evidence, no logic, no debunking of absurd claims will ever shake the faith many belonging to the cult.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    3. Re:Give Spinrite a try by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Today, yes. Originally, by understanding MFM and RLL encoding, it could in fact do better than the disk itself. But these days are long over and today it is basically a scam. While I do not get the fanboi stupidity at all (why be a fan of something that does not work?), I have observed the same.
       

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  69. Re:Hard drive problem...both on and off topic by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I have a hard drive that makes death knell clicking noises when it's installed internally, but works like a charm when it's installed into an external enclosure. I'm probably just replacing it, but what might be causing the different results?

    I've heard of this before, you might be putting a strain on it; by it's position (warp/uneven) in the case or screws too tight.

  70. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by lhaeh · · Score: 1

    I did exactly that and it worked well for the 120BG drive I tried it on. I attached a USB PATA adapter onto it, then a power supply that came with the adapter, put a ziploc bag around that, sucked the air out, put tape around the opening where the wires came out. Closed the freezer door with the wires sticking out and waited an hour before hooking the drive up. No point in doing it while the drive is out of the freezer since they heat up fast. Best to do it where the cold air comes out and turn the temp down as far as it will go too.

    In my case, I think it was the electronics heating up that was the problem, not a mechanical issue, but it worked.

  71. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

    Freezer trick only works on 'clicks of death', i.e. to get the head to stop recalibrating so much so you can get the data off the drive before permadeath.

    Whenever you hear of 'hard drive tricks' you always have to qualify the statement.

  72. personal experiences by v1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been a repair tech for the last 10 yrs. (and I don't mean I'm a "I built my own PC, I'm a computer god! I fix my friend/family''s computers" I actually know what I'm doing and have electrical engineering experience) I'd estimate I've seen around a thousand bad hard drives in that time. Of those, I'd say 65% would tap repeatedly, 25% had some io errors but were still working, 8% would sound normal but would never post on the bus, and the other 2% were the other weird issues like chirping or no power at all.

    The tappers were very rarely recoverable by me. Every now and then I'd see one that if you powered it up dozens of times, you might get lucky and it would post properly and you could get data from it. None of the other common methods were helpful.

    Over 90% of the drives with io errors and slow blocks could be recovered from. Most of those simply required a file level copy from bad drive to good. Most would have a handful of unrecoverable files. Depending on what was lost, an OS reinstall was sometimes required on the new drive, but not usually. A small percentage of them would have a large number of errors and require days to recover, or would fail completely during the recovery. A few of them would look promising but then quickly becomes apparent that almost nothing will be recoverable.

    Sometimes a drive would stop responding during recovery and require a break. Trips to the freezer helped on about 30% of the drives. Some drives required numerous trips to the freezer, using rsync to resume copying where it left off last time, a process which could take days but could result in a complete recovery. I pondered ways to cool a drive during the recovery such as using a peltier, but never got anything implemented. I also use ddrescue and another custom script I wrote that works in a similar way, doing block-level recovery while splitting problem areas for smaller recovery chunks. That's useful for windows or other foreign OS where you can't do a file copy. (mac shop here)

    I've never dried "drop therapy" or "impact maintenance". I'm sure it could help under specific circumstances like a stuck spindle or loose connection but I've never witness it.

    I've done a little bit of onboard controller card ("OBCC") swaps for identical drives where the bad one wouldn't power on at all. About 25% success there. For that reason I tend to keep old tapping drives because their cards can work in dead drives. I assume the tapping drives have head failures, which isn't related to the OBCC. I've talked with multiple data recovery places about this process, and to my surprise every single one of them has told me "that won't work". They usually explain the remaps are stored on the OBCC, which makes sense, but isn't a good excuse not to try when the remaps probably don't account for more than one in a hundred thousand blocks. I think they just want me to send the drive to them.

    The sled you place the drive into makes a HUGE difference in recovery. Avoid usb. I don't care if you insist on windows, install a firewire card. Almost all USB bridge chips handle misbehaving drives very badly. Only use one of those little external adapters with the build-on 2ft usb cord on it as an absolute last resort. OWC's "mercury elite aluminum" series are the best (reasonably priced) recovery sled I have found, and I have tried many. USB (39MB/sec, not 36, 26, 16, 12, etc), FW400, FW800, AND esata interface. In the past I used a Granite Digital "fireview", those absolutely rocked for drive recovery (LCD panel with diag menu....) but they stopped making them and they were IDE only. Someone needs to make a modern sled like that for sata please.

    As for paid recovery, results seem random. Techs tend to have a recovery place they swear BY, and others they swear AT. But my observation is simply that methods vary and different places handle different problems with varying success. I think many techs' impressions are based on their first few experiences - if good they like, if bad they don'

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:personal experiences by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      I've never dried "drop therapy" or "impact maintenance". I'm sure it could help under specific circumstances like a stuck spindle or loose connection but I've never witness it.

      That seems like something that would never work on a hard drive. However, I had a Deskstar drive that actually came out of a broken computer and sat on the shelf for a couple of months before I tried to re-use it. I plugged it in, along with an identical model drive that worked fine, and it would not spin up. I tried multiple troubleshooting techniques, and I had pretty much resigned myself to checking the warranty and sending it back, but at that moment of frustration I slammed the thing on the floor, and low and behold it started right up!

      It worked fine for I know years after that, and is probably still working now.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:personal experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      We have personally had to send them a drive of ours - clowns at corp accounting didn't back up their data and lost an accounting drive. That was a $10k lesson I do hope they've learned from.

      Accountants? Their backups are paper, and the backup method is glaring suspiciously at the computer while they use it.

    3. Re:personal experiences by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Accountants? Their backups are paper, and the backup
      > method is glaring suspiciously at the computer while they use it.

      Actually, I know an accountant who glares suspiciously at the boxes of paper she's required by law to save and wonders why it can't just all be kept on the computer.

      But yeah, accountants usually have paper backups. Although, recovering data that you need to actually work with from paper would be excruciating if there were very much of it.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    4. Re:personal experiences by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The sled you place the drive into makes a HUGE difference in recovery.
      > Avoid usb. I don't care if you insist on windows, install a firewire card.

      Firewire? Why the heck would you...

      Suppose I forget that and just plug the drive directly into the best drive controller (of the appropriate type for the drive) that I can lay my hands on. What am I missing?

      The rest of your post made pretty good sense.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:personal experiences by djconsultingmeister · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this well done explanation of various ways you have actually used to recover from HD nightmares. ? When you mention "sled" does it mean like an external HD enclosure? CrazyOldMan

      --
      CrazyOldMan
    6. Re:personal experiences by ambidextroustech · · Score: 1

      But yeah, accountants usually have paper backups. Although, recovering data that you need to actually work with from paper would be excruciating if there were very much of it.

      Perhaps this is where OCR can be helpful?

    7. Re:personal experiences by unitron · · Score: 1

      Sounds like 'stiction'.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    8. Re:personal experiences by unitron · · Score: 1

      "The sled you place the drive into makes a HUGE difference in recovery."

      I wouldn't dream of doing anything other than connecting it directly to the IDE controller header or a SATA port on a known good non-GigaByte brand motherboard.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:personal experiences by martin-boundary · · Score: 2

      Perhaps this is where OCR can be helpful?

      LOL. Think about it. There are no perfect OCR tools. Since all OCR tools make mistakes, now the accountant has to go through both the paper copies *and* the computer versions just to check that all the numbers have been properly "read". Talk about doubling the amount of work involved...

    10. Re:personal experiences by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Sometimes a drive would stop responding during recovery and require a break. Trips to the freezer helped on about 30% of the drives. Some drives required numerous trips to the freezer, using rsync to resume copying where it left off last time, a process which could take days but could result in a complete recovery. I pondered ways to cool a drive during the recovery such as using a peltier, but never got anything implemented.

      The first problem drive I had where the freezer trick worked, I stuck in a ziplock bag with a (slightly) long IDE and power cable. Taped that shut, then stuck it inside a mini-fridge. The cables are mostly flat or thin enough that the magnetic foam on the refrigerator makes a good enough seal.

      The second problem drive I had, I was going to do the same thing. Then I realized it was winter and below freezing outside. So I just put the entire computer into an unused bedroom in the house, opened the window, and closed the door. Even with the freezer trick it took about 2 weeks to copy nearly all the data to a new drive. A garage would probably work too, but my house at the time didn't have one.

    11. Re:personal experiences by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've had the same results with an alternator. We were stuck in the middle of nowhere on a weekend college roadtrip, and AAA sent out a bubba who explained NASA built their rockets by tapping his mind while he slept. Yes, that means he belives he single-handedly designed the space shuttle. Well, he smacked the alternator with a wrench, and it worked after. It's common with electrical motors to be "stuck" sometimes, and a tiny rotation will unstick it enough to start spinning again. So an electrical buzz without spin may be helped by percussive maintenance.

    12. Re:personal experiences by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firewire? Why the heck would you...

      Quite a few reasons really.

      - I like to get my work done quickly, I'm impatient. MOST internal IDE/sata attachments require a reboot. It's inconvenient to have to reboot one of my service machines every time I attach a drive to it. Which happens many times every day.

      - I can replace a laptop drive with a new drive, boot off a USB stick, and plug the failing drive in and run the recovery directly. There have been days when I've been running four recoveries at once. Often more efficient than trying to get several things going on a service machine at once. And with having to reboot it would get that much worse. You can't attach an old hard drive internally to a laptop at the same time as the good drive. (most cases)

      - failing drives have a habit of hanging their interface until power cycled or unplugged. Again, not something you want to be doing with your service machine or even target machine. If it hangs, I pull the fw cable which un-hangs my service machine, power cycle the sled, plug back in the cable and resume. Cranky drives can require a dozen sled reboots, or periodic trips to the freezer. Having a recovery hang a service machine while I was trying to use it for something else at the same time causes TWO of my jobs to have to be started over.

      - When necessary, I can get more than one recovery going at the same time on a single service machine. Can't reboot a machine for one drive while you're doing another.

      - Firewire isn't as fast as many sata and most ide, but a lot of the time I need to be attaching one drive or another over firewire anyway. If I have a laptop booted into target mode and attached to a service machine for recovery, attaching the bad drive internally doesn't save me any time since it will have to go TO the good drive over firewire anyway.

      - When I have a lot of things going at once around here, speed becomes less important than the ability to multitask, and firewire offers me many more options and flexibility. Careful consideration of your options, how you do things, and in what order greatly reduces turnover time. This can be the difference between a process taking four hours of time and monopolizing a service machine, vs taking 90 minutes of time and using one sled and a usb stick off in the corner while I do other things. OR 30 minutes of my time focusing on a single job vs shuffling something like that off to a corner to run for a few hours on its own while I get other things done. Most things I do can arguably be done in many different ways, requiring very different amounts of clock time, hands-on time, and various resources. Prioritizing, availability of options, and planning my methods are very important to my job productivity.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    13. Re:personal experiences by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Dude, get a few of these:

      http://www.amazon.com/Vantec-3-5-Inch-Aluminum-Removable-MRK-401ST-BK/dp/B003DVTWQ6/

      http://www.amazon.com/KingWin-2-5-Inch-Internal-Tray-Less-KF-251-BK/dp/B00475DQ6Y

      The benefits of the external trays with the benefits of direct bus connections. Assuming you have a sane OS to recover with, hot-swapping should be a non-issue.

    14. Re:personal experiences by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Helpful, yeah, sure. OCR will _help_ you to be extremely motivated to develop a new backup strategy that does not involve paper. That'd be helpful. Also you might gain a much greater appreciation for the few remaining hairs you haven't pulled out of your head yet. Appreciating what you have is good, so that'd be helpful too.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    15. Re:personal experiences by colinnwn · · Score: 1

      you mean he smacked the starter? That works not because the motor was frozen, but because the high temp grease in the starter relay gets sticky, and that is frequently enough to break it loose.

    16. Re:personal experiences by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      I've talked to a few who tried it, and it worked. Fortunately I never needed it myself, usually replaced my HDDs after 2-3 years and sold off the old ones, many months or years before they (I assume) would start to fail.

      I've had it work myself two times - with cell phone batteries (my sister's and her son's). But that was probably NiMH type, that had developed some memory effect, which the freezing undid.

      Nowadays, it's either Li-ion or some other type of Lithium-based batteries, which die because people discharge them way too deeply and probably also do that too often.
      Li-based batteries, especially Li-ion should never be discharged below 50 %. I've consistently made sure my cell phone batteries never went below that, and I'm quite sure that's what made them last 4-5 years each.
      By the way, the freezer trick will NOT help recover Li-based batteries.

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
  73. somewhat by Causemos · · Score: 2

    Personally I have had one success swapping PCB's on a drive and getting the data off. Of course this requires that the PCB is bad and not the platters. Most bad drives don't sound good (platter issue) so I don't usually bother (ear to drive can tell you a lot).

    I have tried the freezer method 3-4 times with no luck, though friends say they have had success.

    Usually if the drive is semi-accessible you can use tools like Easy Recovery (OnTrack) or Recuva (Piriform) to get some data off.

  74. Quantum 105 drives by russbutton · · Score: 2

    When I worked at Sun Microsystems back in 1992, the Quantum 105 mb disk drive was still pretty common in desktop systems. They had a problem with the bearings getting sticky, so that if a machine were powered down, the drives would often not spin back up when they were powered back on. Different things were tried to get 'em to spin back up. Some guys would power the machine on, pick it up and drop it on the table, hoping the jarring would get the disk spinning, and that would sometimes actually work. What I found worked for me was to loosen the drive from its mount, but leave it cabled. I'd then power the machine on and holding the drive by its side, give it a quick little twisting motion and that would loosen the disk enough to get it start to spin. It would take it a few seconds to get up to speed, and then it would begin boot. I had to reseat the drive live after that, put the cover back on the case, and then the monitor back on top (pizza box cases on those old Sparc 1, 1+ and 2 machines). We also still ran thick ethernet. Good times...

  75. No. But they can make it much, much worse. by gweihir · · Score: 2

    The consistent experience is that most people messing with broken drives make it worse (i.e. more expensive) or impossible to recover. You have to take into account that people needing to recover a disk in the first place have usually already demonstrated gross incompetence by not having a reasonable backup. This does not bode well for their chances to accomplish a complicated recovery operation right.

    That said, if it is just a matter of convenience, i.e. if the data on the drive is not important, go for it. There is a small chance (5% in my experience) that you can actually recover things. That is for a drive not quite dead only. For a dead drive, professional data recovery services are the only real option. Take care though, that there are a lot of data recovery services that are anything but professional and will not only grossly overcharge you, but likely break a recoverable drive permanently.

    As to prices, the usual fees from professional services are quite reasonable. Recovery of a drive with real mechanical problems at, say, 5000...10000 USD is not overpriced. Just because the mass-produced equipment is cheap does not mean doing any non-standard operations on it is. My guess is that the reason for the complaints about prices stem mostly from the fact that people needing these services were to cheap or stupid to do backups before anyways. These complaints cannot be taken as a representative sample.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  76. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    "7. MOST IMPORTANT STEP!!! If this does not work, and you can't pull anything off the drive, then don't panic just yet. Turn off your machine, unplug the drive, then unplug the freezer."

    That's ridiculous. You don't have to defrost your fridge. Just leave the drive in the air-tight bag, ideally with some dessicant in it. Once you've taken the moisture out of the contents of the bag, changing temperatures aren't going to cause any condensation. Don't break the seal until you are back to ambient temperature, and there will be no issue.

  77. MOD PARENT UP by MasterOfGoingFaster · · Score: 2

    I've done a LOT of data recovery, and Spinrite is the first tool I grab. It's cheap and works regardless of the OS. I've recovered Windows, Linux, BSD and Mac drives. I've recovered SAS RAID arrays, too.

    I've done the freezer trick too, and it works in many cases, as does the PCB swap.

    --
    Place nail here >+
  78. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that occurred to me after posting it. Also, under "ideal" conditions, this would be done using a "college" freezer, preferably one without any food in it.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  79. DC Experiences by maas15 · · Score: 1

    I work in a datacenter with large numbers of un-raided servers. Generally when someone wants to fix a drive, they just want their data off. Corrupted Filesystems due to Physical Problems: Corrupted filesystems are frequently due to bad blocks in the filesystem metadata. The fs metadata tends to go first because its the most read part of the disk. I've had really good luck with ddrescue for this sort of error (at least for ext3). Have ddrescue skip error blocks and keep a log of bad blocks, otherwise it'll literally take a week to recover. (Instructions: http://www.forensicswiki.org/wiki/Ddrescue) Fried Drive Controllers: These will generally completely fail to turn on or read at all. They're usually not detected as disks. Replacing the PCB would probably work if I were any good at hacking type soldering. If you're tempted to try sticking a drive in the freezer, just let it sit for 1-4 months instead. I believe it's effectively the same fix but with far lower of a chance of borking the electronics due to mosture. Believe it or not a fair number of drives will come back to live after this period of time (~15-20% I would *guess*). Mainly you should just be aware of the warning signs. Disappearing files, folders that cause crashes, ext3 related stack traces, and filesystems being auto-remounted as read-only are all signs that its about time the evacuate to a new disk within a day, two at the max. Bad ball bearings generally don't kill hard drives. Disks making weird unlubricated drive bearing/shaft sounds can still work for a year or so. If this disk seems to shutter or obviously has problems starting to spin you should definetely copy your data to a new disk, anything less will mainly just injure people's hearing. The main problem with bad bearing is that it *really* increases the amount of heat in the computer (which in turn can kill hard drives).

  80. Can a regular person... by dadioflex · · Score: 1

    ...repair a broken heart, tame a wild spirit, forgive their nemesis, build a cabin, fight a whale, milk an otter, trip an elephant, shame a newspaper, lose a habit, wear it down, in a fashionable sense?

    Probably not. But let's keep trying.

  81. Unstick head from the platter; dd_rescue by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

    I once was given a drive to repair that had probably been dropped. It wouldn't even spin up. The owner wasn't willing to pay $500 for recovery, and asked me to just do anything possible. So, I carefully removed the lid (no dust precautions!) and tried to rotate the platter by hand - it wouldn't go, because the head had physically stuck to it. With the careful application of brute force, I was able to free it, and to my amazement it actually worked. Then the use of dd_rescue was able to recover almost all the data!

  82. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

    Generally I've seen the freezer trick as "stick it in a bag of rice or silica gel, then put that in the freezer. When you take it out leave it in the bag and plug the cables in without removing it from the desiccant."

    --
    Not a sentence!
  83. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by hlzr · · Score: 1

    I used a temperature/humidity chamber designed for environmentally stress testing electronics when I did the freezer trick. This machine has holes for cables already, so it was pretty easy. I set the chamber to 2 deg. C (water to ice expansion would be bad if water is inside the drive) and a low relative humidity setting, turned the computer and drive on, and got the data off. Worked like a charm!

  84. Can't make any generalizations, but... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    I'm 1 for 2 with PCB swaps over the years. Swapping out the PC board is about as basic as it gets assuming you know how to turn a Torx screwdriver. Some newer drives have coded ROM chips that may also need to be moved from the original board to the replacement PCB. That was the case for a Samsung 1TB drive I recently lost. I did a PCB + ROM swap on it only to learn that the head servos had gone and the PCB was fine. I was out a total of $25 for the PCB + Shipping from China, which was a logical first step considering the next step required spending upwards of $1000+ for a clean room extraction.

    In any case, I wouldn't generally recommend doing a surface mount ROM swap with a heat gun unless you know what you're doing, but I've been quite successful using a few layers of aluminum foil with a precise cut out for the chip to reduce the amount of heat that gets through to the rest of the board.

  85. Many times by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    1- Clicking Ultrastar in my IBM PC Server 330. Bought a similar model on eBay (altough standard SCSI, not SCA) and swapped the PCB.
    2- Blown PCB on a 80GB Seagate (thanks LaCIE). swapped PCB from an identical I had. Still in service.
    3- Stuck spindle on an old Conner, gently hit the desk with the drive, got the data.
    4- Freezer trick worked on an old Quantum.

    BUT, if the data is vital to your business, I suggest not messing around or use any recovery software. It will just make it harder (and more expensive) for data recovery companies to get your data back.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  86. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

    It worked for me the one time I tried it. The hard drive was knocking like a fiend and the computer wouldn't boot. I wrapped the drive in plastic wrap before freezing it then unwrapped it right before plugging it in. I had no condensation problems and I was able to recover the data needed.

  87. Open the enclosure ? Maybe. by feufeu · · Score: 1

    Years ago I got a 512mb IDE HDD either from the trashcan or a friend who worked in a computer shop gave it to me. It might have been a Maxtor, but I wouldn't bet anything on that. It would show ok on the bus but didn't spin up albeit emitting some mechanical sound. Just to give it a try as a last resort I opened the enclosure as little as possible and used a small screwdriver to spin the disks a turn or two by pushing them along the edge. After that, the enclosuse sealed again, it DID spin up and I could use it, e.g. get data from it, write to it. Not sure how it would have done in the longer run, but touching the enclosure wa suseful in this case.

  88. RAID is for performance. by gd2shoe · · Score: 2

    RAID does provides some redundancy, but it is NOT a backup method. I can't tell you the times I've seen/heard of RAID failure causing data loss. Of particular consequence are the drives that fail to store store and retrieve the correct data. Even RAID 5 and 6 can only reconstruct data if the drive reports a failure. If the drive is spitting out bad data, or failing to record data, it's gone.

    RAID is primarily for performance. It only adds a smidgen of reliability.

    (I keep waiting for someone to come out with a RAID 6 ECC standard. Yes, It would be slow, but it would be reliable. Sometimes that's desirable. I think some of the expensive RAID cards can do this, though I've never seen one.)

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    1. Re:RAID is for performance. by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      RAID does provides some redundancy, but it is NOT a backup method.

      I didn't say it was a backup method. RAID provides availability through redundancy (if the array succeeds in protecting you from a single drive failure, it stays up and can be repaired with very little downtime (or no downtime with hot-swap) so you don't jhave to wait how-ever long for your backups to restore (nor do you need to worry about work that might be lost that was done between now and the last backup) before getting back to work. In the last six months I've had drives go back in two locations and I was saved much hassle in both cases by them being members of RAID1 arrays.

      RAID is primarily for performance. It only adds a smidgen of reliability.

      Only RAID0 is about performance. Other arrangements can offer improved performance for some I/O patterns but availability through redundancy is the main aim of them. In fact for write heavy patterns, particularly for lots of small writes, levels 5 and 6 can impose a significant performance penalty.

      I keep waiting for someone to come out with a RAID 6 ECC standard. Yes, It would be slow, but it would be reliable. Sometimes that's desirable. I think some of the expensive RAID cards can do this, though I've never seen one.

      You might be interested in some of the data integrity features in ZFS (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Data_Integrity as a starting point, if you are not already aware of it). I've not been in a position to use/test/benchmark it myself, but the descriptions of what it does (checksums of all blocks, data or meta, with self-healing from other array members as needed) certainly make it sound most impressive in that regard.

    2. Re:RAID is for performance. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Only RAID0 is about performance. Other arrangements can offer improved performance for some I/O patterns but availability through redundancy is the main aim of them. In fact for write heavy patterns, particularly for lots of small writes, levels 5 and 6 can impose a significant performance penalty.

      So much so that I get the best performance while still allowing a drive failure by using RAID 50 or 10, and lying about the stripe size when making the file system.

      For large file speed, RAID 100 and being religious about your fs stripe and stripe unit sizes is the way to go, but not for small/random writes, no.

      Having a large battery backed up RAM buffer on the controller helps too, for peak write performace, but not for high volume sustained random small writes.

      (And for linux, turn off the cfq IO elevator if you can. It's a performance killer for anything but desktop systems. Adusting vm.dirty_ratio and vm.dirty_background_ratio too can help, especially if you have lots of ram and want to deal with peaks better (increase), or little ram or need minimum latency (decrease).)

    3. Re:RAID is for performance. by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      The people working on ZFS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs) agree with you (though that isn't applicable to all OSs).

    4. Re:RAID is for performance. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      *sigh*

      epp_b brought up the context of backups against the theme of drive failure. I'm sorry that I didn't read the word "protect" in your post as availability and uptime. ("protect" seemed to imply integrity.) It just wasn't in the pre-existing context.

      You have no idea how many people I've talked to who seem to believe RAID is a fancy backup mechanism. I know of one small business owner in particular who had RAID 5 on his office computer, but no backup regimen. He didn't even know that the first drive had failed till he had lost all his business records. People ask about it regularly, with no apparent knowledge of its inherent limitations. They seem to think it's magic (like "the cloud").

      Maybe I'm predisposed to see this particular lunacy everywhere.

      You might be interested in some of the data integrity features in ZFS

      I am. I'm also given to understand that BTRFS is barking up that particular tree. (Though I haven't looked into it in a long time, and could easily be wrong.) I'm a little skeptical of mashing all of this into the file system level, but I'm not sure my fears are rational. It just feels like it ought to be easier to detect and fix problems if there were a separate RAID layer. They're probably concerned with performance, and I can't fault them there.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    5. Re:RAID is for performance. by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how many people I've talked to who seem to believe RAID is a fancy backup mechanism. I know of one small business owner in particular who had RAID 5 on his office computer, but no backup regimen. He didn't even know that the first drive had failed till he had lost all his business records. People ask about it regularly, with no apparent knowledge of its inherent limitations. They seem to think it's magic (like "the cloud").

      Aye. Many expect it all to magically work without monitoring. There are many people out there with Linux software RAID setup (which I use in a few places) but without any monitoring or alerts setup because the recipe they copied didn't mention the need and they didn't think further than "RAID makes me safe". At very least have either smartctl or madam (preferably both) mailing you when there is any sort of issue with the drives and arrays, but people don't think "but how would I know if something has failed? How would I know a drive needs replacing?".

      Maybe I'm predisposed to see this particular lunacy everywhere.

      That is healthy, especially where us humans are concerned. A pessimist is never disappointed, and more often pleasantly surprised than an optimist!

      You might be interested in some of the data integrity features in ZFS

      I am. I'm also given to understand that BTRFS is barking up that particular tree.

      I believe it is though I've not kept a close eye on it. ZFS is far more mature at this point (IIRC BTRFS is still officially "experimental", not even declared "beta" yet, and ZFS is considered production-ready in some environments (though not Linux)). Last I heard there are licensing issues that stop ZFS proper being ported over to Linux directly, there are various ways to use it (via FUSE is one example I remember though that seems far from ideal IMO) though I don't know how stable they are considered. BTRFS is in part a reaction to the feature set of ZFS (i.e. wanting some of those features without the licensing issues) though I think the Linux fs developers had some of the plans formulating before ZFS hit the scene in a big way.

      I'm a little skeptical of mashing all of this into the file system level, but I'm not sure my fears are rational. It just feels like it ought to be easier to detect and fix problems if there were a separate RAID layer

      I think part of the rational for keeping it all together is efficiency. Two separate layers that may not be aware of what each is doing can easily be very sub-optimal. Even if you get everything aligned perfectly and the filesystem is aware of your array's stripe sizes, there are still extra data copy operations going on. ZFS (and BTRFS) does a lot that would traditionally be elsewhere (like dealing with different storage types for performance, like moving things between SSD and spinning metal as needed (or using SSDs as cache rather than separate fast areas that add to the total space available).

    6. Re:RAID is for performance. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I'm a little skeptical of mashing all of this into the file system level, but I'm not sure my fears are rational

      Far more than performance, they are concerned with the "write hole". Raid is inherently risky because of this.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    7. Re:RAID is for performance. by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      True, but that's a minor problem compared to a disk that's spouting garbage. The Article doesn't address very well how it's dealing with that problem, but I think I can puzzle out the basic idea.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    8. Re:RAID is for performance. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      What ? The very basic assumption of RAID is wrong, and it is a minor problem ?

      Disk spouting garbage is a hardware problem. RAID-Z does mitigate it. RAID doesn't, so I don't see a point of bringing that up here.

      This is a case where traditional concepts of "layering" are WRONG.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  89. Yes, but only for specific cases of "Regular" by homesteader · · Score: 1

    First off, you have to define "Regular Person"

    Regular Non-Tech-Interested, Non-Tinkering Person: No.

    Regular Tech-Interested, Tinkering Person: Maybe. Could possibly recover from basic platter damage(1 to a few thousand bad blocks), possibly from PCB failure of the overheating type. Not likely to recover from total pcb failure, motor failure, head failure, etc.

    Regular IT Person: Yes. Can definitely recover from basic platter damage, possibly from PCB failure of the overheating type(if patient enough). Still not likely to recover from total pcb failure, motor failure, head failure, etc.

    There may be better software out there, but all of my successful recoveries have used 3 or more the following 6 components:

    1. Non-Windows OS for recovery platform. As far as I can tell, you need an OS with /dev. I've yet to figure out on Windows how to hit the block level device directly. Maybe the drive recovery apps do it, but I haven't had much luck. For marginal drives, it seems like Windows mounts the drive and starts trying to muscle it's way through reading it, which either locks up the UI or makes the drive worse by repeatedly trying to access the same damaged regions of the drive.

    2. ddrescue (not dd_rescue). ddrescue is IMO a great example of "the culture of unix-like development(?)", which is to say it is simple, does one thing, but does that one thing really well in a refined manner. ddrescue basically does block level copying of a disk to a file, avoiding error areas on it's initial pass by randomly skipping ahead when read errors are encountered. Error areas are logged to a simple text file, and when the full disk has been read it uses the log file to go back and narrow down the error areas. Nearly every successful drive recovery I've handled used ddrescue. I've had disks that would not mount in Windows, and actually clicked rhythmically like they had head/pcb failure, that boiled down to a single bad block. The clicking was from the drive repeatedly trying to read the same location early in the mounting process.

    3. testdisk/photorec. After using ddrescue, if the error areas affected the partition map, testdisk can often help recover the partition info. It's not particularly user friendly and not something I would risk telling a non-tech to use, but does what it does well. Photorec is an undelete program.

    4. rsync. (sometimes used with #5). Basically a file sync utility. Could just as well be robocopy in Windows, although I think rsync may be a bit more intelligent in terms of doing an incremental update with repeated interruptions.

    5. Cold. PCB/component failures that are heat related will obviously respond to the freezer trick. I had a drive that when warm, wouldn't mount at all. When chilled to freezer temps it would mount and be fully accessible for about 2 minutes. I was able to identify the overheating chip with a human digital instrument of the index sort. I took a small flat copper plate, about 1/16 thick and 1" long, applied thermal paste to it, wedged it on top of the chip while ensuring it wouldn't short anything else(chip was on drive side of PCB), then re-did the freezer test. With this make-shift heat sink I was able to get about 20 minutes of uptime on the drive, which was long enough to use rsync to do a full recovery.

    6. Patience. None of the above methods is quick. A simple ddrescue recovery will take several hours at the least, and can take much longer if there are tons of error areas.

    As for the non-recoverable scenarios, platter/head replacement supposedly requires a clean room, clean box. PCB replacement supposedly requires the ability to read custom firmware parameters from the dead drive and write said parameters to the donor PCB, or requires de-soldering/re-soldering of firmware/eeprom chips from the dead board to the new board. I haven't had success with PCB swaps since the days of 540MB hard drives.

  90. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by homesteader · · Score: 2

    2. Wrap the drive *before* you put it in the freezer. Heat a towel in the oven to make sure it's dry, then wrap the drive in the towel. Now stick it in a plastic baggie, along with some silica gel packs to suck up more moisture. Try to close the mouth of the baggie around the cables as much as possible. Use duct tape if necessary.

    Now that your house has burned down from the towel that caught on fire, that dead HD doesn't seem like such a big deal!

  91. Old School by pbjones · · Score: 2

    I have changed boards in old drives, and I have had drives that worked after I cooled then down. The secret is, once you get them working, back up all of the data that you can get off them, and then THROW THEM OUT! You are kidding yourself if you think that a repair drive is OK.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  92. Only a fool would not try by kanoalani · · Score: 1

    Why the desire to scold people for attempting to fix a broken HDD? Even the referenced article seems to want to underscore the idea that it's impossible. I personally have recovered data from failed drives (including modern ones) using the freezer, the hammer, the heat, the platter swap, the PCB swap and just removing the cover and freeing a stuck component. I've failed but more often I've succeeded. Clearly the people shouting about it being impossible are not using real-world experience to base their opinions on. For most people the $2-10K recover fee is simply out of the question and in their case at least attempting, though increasingly extreme measures, to get the drive to spin up one last time is the most rational choice since the only alternative is to toss it in the trash.

  93. For what it's worth by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2

    Back in the early 1990s (when I was working for a company that had more money than sense), we took the top off a 20MB Seagate HD and ran it for a day with no protection from dust, moisture or whatever.

    Everyone in the building came past to watch the heads move and the platters spin.

    It performed faultlessly.

    Quite surprising -- considering the weight given to clean-rooms and the supposed risk of head-crash that even the tiniest speck of dust was supposed to produce.

    We didn't put the drive back into proper service but it was enlightening.

  94. Sure! Oil it. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2

    A "friend" gave me a Seagate 50MB SCSI drive back when it was just a little bit outdated. It powered up to a horrible grinding, shredding sound but still managed to read out maybe 10KB/s of data. That grew old quickly because I really wanted the sweet, sweet Amiga warez stored on it. Fearing that it was going to die at any moment and figuring I had nothing to lose, I flipped it over and squirted some 3-in-1 oil into the bearing.

    The grinding smoothed into a high-speed whine and I watched with glee as the transfer rates crept up to a more civilized 700KB/s. I copied its contents onto my palatial 250MB drive and put the geezer out of its misery.

    I have not before or since sped up a computer by oiling it.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Sure! Oil it. by deroby · · Score: 1

      I actually have 2 old A4000's in a closet somewhere that I've been willing to revive but have been postponing because I'm not sure I have a monitor that can handle the signal, plus I very much doubt the disks will spin up anyway : they've not been powered since the year 2000. That said, the longer I keep putting this off, the bigger the chances I'll never get to my (then) beloved .mod collection / Fidonet archive.

      I've been holding some 1.2 GB disks in storage in the hope they'll be recognized by the A4000 and actually hope to copy the data from the old disks (200Mb-ish) to the new disks. I'm a bit wary about doing so on the Amiga directly fearing that any malfunction on behalf of the disk might fry the motherboard/disk controller of the Amiga.

      The most logical approach thus seems to be to start up my old trusted PIII and do the operation on that one. The question that comes to mind is though : what software is out there that can reliably copy a FFS partition from one drive to a (much larger) drive ? From what I've read ( http://linux.about.com/od/fsy_howto/a/hwtfsy10t02.htm ) Linux can do R/W on FFS partitions so in theory simply installing Ubuntu should do, but I'm wondering if anyone has ever done this and if so, how well does it handle (potentially) corrupted data ? Maybe I should start out with ddrescue ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dd_(Unix)#Data_recovery ) to create a file-image and see how far I can get using the tips found in this topic... and worry about getting it actual use later on... (I should have my Workbench disks around somewhere (if readable!) and could probably simply re-install the OS on the 'new' disks and then copy everything across from the PIII (linux) to the Amiga using some ArcNet cards I have... again, if they still work ... lot's of if's here =P

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
    2. Re:Sure! Oil it. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely go the ddrescue route and make a backup image before attempting anything else. If I were attempting this, my next step would be to install UAE on the P3 and created a filesystem-backed disk for it, so that saving a file inside UAE to SYS:/foo actually writes the file to ~deroby/amigadisk/foo, for instance. Make a copy of the image you got from ddrescue and mount that inside UAE as a second hard drive. Finally, inside UAE copy MyFiles:* to SYS:Backup/ (or whatever names you come up with). Then you'll be able to retrieve them from ~deroby/amigadisk/Backup.

      Why trust a possibly-incompatible FFS implementation when you can use the real one?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  95. Fixing drives by Plekto · · Score: 1

    I've been a computer tech and consultant for almost exactly 20 years now. Back when I started, nobody could afford to just get a new drive or do data recovery. We had to try things to get them to work if at all possible, or to recover the data. So we learned a lot of tricks. .000001 - Run air over your drives. ALWAYS. 90% of the reason drives die is due to excessive heat and no way to get rid of it in the case. If you have a big fan at the rear and are generating negative pressure, placing your drive(s) in slot 1 and 3 and opening up the panel cover for slot #2 also works. Mount the drives with one upside-down so that the circuit boards are in the airflow. Or use a fan to push air over the drives. If they are too hot to easily touch, they are literally frying and will die in a year or two. Sometimes in a few months.

    0.5 - Run your system in Raid 1. This uses a drive as a live backup, so if there's a physical problem with one, the array crashes - pull the bad drive and reboot - it's a normal single drive system now. WAY cheaper than data recovery. I use 250-300GB drives or whatever is smallest and reliable for the boot drive array and the main programs and data is on a second drive. It's almost always the main boot drive that gets corrupted or dies due to the higher usage.

    1 - If the drive is a brick, it's almost always the controller board that fried. A swap will work, though it will also lose track of what sectors are bad, so you want to mount the drive as a data drive or under linux/knoppix so that you're only reading data off of it. If you get it up, aim for the email and critical personal files entirely. Ignore the applications directory and system as those will need to be be re-installed anyways.

    2 - If turns on but fails to spin up/clicks and does nothing (it'll make a small "tiktik" sound), the motor and bearings are gummed up or shot. The solution is to get the computer in as dust-free of an environment as possible. Get your data recovery software running. Put the drive in an external drive box. Leave the top off. Try cycling the drive several times - it will mount and un-mount the drive - and if it spins up, do data recovery immediately. If it doesn't spin up after about ten tries, carefully un-do the screws on the top while it isn't running. DO NOT take the lid off. Get your fingers clean and take the cover off. Power up the drive and when you see the drive nudge a bit and try to start, give it a little help with your fingers around the center spindle assembly. Do not touch the platters, obviously. Once it starts up, put the lid back on and put something fairly heavy on it to seal the lid a bit. Since the drive is compromised and dust can cause crashes and data errors, you have one shot to get the data off, essentially. Dump it all and toss the old drive.

    2a: if you see a massive scratch in the surface and the head is at one end of it (this will cause the motor to also jam up). you've had a classic "head crash" - see #4 below. Earthquakes often cause this or dropping your laptop. Most drives park their heads between writes, but it's also why you should try to keep the system from running tons of background crap all the time - because when one DOES hit, the drive will be reading or writing (say, you run a torrent program or a game server all the time)

    note - usually you can hear bearings going out long beforehand. Whining drives are a sign of a drive nearing its end of life. IME, most drives last about 3 years of daily use before they start to have issues.

    3: if it starts up do you see no data, the boot sectors likely got fried. Power surges and unmounting drives without turning them off usually will eventually lead to the area where it parks the heads getting fried or worn out. Download a tool like Easy Recovery Professional. The trial version only allows you to recover 1 file, but the main mounting tool and boot sector repair tools function just like in the full version. Sometimes I've gotten clients data visible b

  96. Time Machine (or some equivalent) by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    The easy way to fix it is to use Time Machine (or some equivalent), then when the drive dies you replace it.
    Really, it's the easiest fix since putting a drive into your system only takes 15 mins - 1 hour (depending on the system... generic PC case Vs iMac/Macbook Pro), installing the OS only takes about 30 mins - 1 hour, and restoring from Time Machine (or it's equivalent) is probably the longest part.

    Or just go RAID.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  97. Where did the other TB went? by ulzeraj · · Score: 1

    One of the weirdest problems that I've experimented with hard drives was the case of a drive "shrinking" to half its size. It wasn't a file system or partition problem because even the setup of various computers reported that 2TB drive as 931GB corrupting all the data in the process. I've almost threw the drive in the trash but after some research I've discovered that the real problem some stupid shit made by my motherboard flash utilituy. It basically tries to backup itself on the Hidden Protected Area of the drive and "resizes" it to remain invisible that. The problem is that it resized the drive quickly.

    Although the only tools that I've managed to find that could recover the size of the disk only run in 32 bit Windows XP I was able to recover that hard disk to its correct size.

    But yeah I had backups and the drive that got shrinked was a member of a mirrored ZFS zpool but I cringe in fear that I might accidentally touch "F9" every time this system boots up.

  98. Sometimes it's just dumb luck by davecason · · Score: 1

    I've done things as simple as opening the top of the drive and it started working again. This isn't a long-term fix, but it seems to confirm that the drive was just a little tweaked. I'm guessing that the freezer trick has a similar effect of shifting things, just a little. Replacing a circuit board is pretty far out as I bet each drive has an individual defect map, so it would likely have random problems after. I've seen this done, with success, but I wouldn't bother. If it matters a lot, get somebody professional to help. If you can live with total loss, I'd sure pop the top again... just long enough to transfer the data.

  99. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by unitron · · Score: 1

    Wrap a couple of layers of paper towel around the drive before you put it in the freezer.

    This will also help avoid leaving a couple of layers of skin on the drive when you take it out of the freezer.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  100. Re:For the 57th time on Slashdot by unitron · · Score: 1

    "Yes, there is the matter on the HD not being grounded..."

    If you have a power and/or data cable attached, it's grounded.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  101. Re:WD Caviar Black by unitron · · Score: 1

    Copy all the data to something else and have a quick word with WD about invoking that 5 year warranty.

    And make sure you can use an "advanced format" drive, 'cause that's bound to be what they'll replace it with.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  102. http://www.deadharddrive.com by unitron · · Score: 1

    They have a forum section where you can commiserate with others and maybe find somebody with the PCB board you need.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  103. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Just a little hint from someone who used to repair electronics by freezing them insitu with a can of freeze spray, condensation won't kill electronics. I've done your trick before too. It wasn't nearly as complicated though:

    1. Take harddisk and put it in the freezer.
    2. Wait a few hours.
    3. Take harddisk out of freeze and plug into computer.
    4. Bootup and start copying like mad.
    5. Stare in wonder as your drive covered in frost and condensation still works while realising that pure water is actually non conductive.

  104. 100% success rate by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

    Every fortnight, illuminated only by silvery moon light, rub a black cat on the failing drive -- always rub away from you -- while chanting the Lorem ipsum prayer.

    3-4 repetitions should yield a fully working, fault-free drive. If not, the cat just isn't black enough.

  105. Did one recently by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    Fixed one for a work colleague - it was a 1TB drive in an external enclosure and had 'stopped working'. The IT guy had deduced it had gone short circuit after it blew two of the IT guy's power supplies when he removed it from the enclosure and tried to power it directly.

    It (as usual) had very important documents and photos on it. So I said I'd take a look and IT guy with a laugh bet me $100 that I had no hope. ....CHALLENGE ACCEPTED....

    I poked about on the board with a multimeter for a bit and discovered there was a dead short on the 12V rail. A suspicious-and-large-looking (for a SMD component,anyway) was just inboard from the SATA power connector, so with nothing to lose, I desoldered it.

    Ta-da! Short was gone. Drive powered up fine, so we immediately pulled all the data off it. Looked up the number on the device, turns out it was a 14.7V zener diode. I presume at some stage the drive had been subjected to overvoltage and shorted out the protective zener. Seeing that it was in an enclosure, it's possible someone put the wrong power adaptor on it I guess.

    Anyway, happy ending and the drive still works... it's just used for non-critical stuff now.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  106. At-home repair of internal failures? by ternarybit · · Score: 1

    Anyone know of successful at-home internal failure repair, e.g. head crash? I know it's super risky, but tools are available to replace heads, etc.

  107. Step 4: Hire a professional by epine · · Score: 1

    PS. Donâ(TM)t do the freezer thing. Really.

    God forbid anyone would foolishly deprive themselves of the opportunity to blow $1500 on a drive recovery from the grand masters of service fee obfuscation.

    I recovered one drive using the freezer method. Another one didn't come back to life and we did end up paying the extravagant recovery fee, which succeeded despite my freezer attempt.

    Sad story: I identified the recovered drive before it failed as a catastrophe waiting to happen based on a combination of age/uniqueness of contents. It died seat-belted upright into the back seat of a plush sedan in a mild-mannered 15m drive en route to a site with full network backup facilities. In this case, the mountain should have gone to Mohamed. This was circa 2000 where high capacity external USB drives were not exactly a dime a dozen, and people still thought time was money ("have mountain will travel" is so post-recession 2009).

    PS. Don't ever eat anything contaminated with Jerry Germ. Really.

    PPS. Jerry Germ was my first childhood experience with post-war paranoia, disguised as Hun-hating Hand-i-Wipe brain washing for young children.

  108. Roadkil's Unstopable Copier by serialband · · Score: 1

    I was able to rescue data from an older 120 GB drive using Roadkil's Unstopable Copier http://www.roadkil.net/

    It really all depends on the type of failure you have.

  109. Re:It depends - Sticktion Y2K Repair by Jonathan+C.+Patschke · · Score: 1

    "Back in the day" (mid-90s) when that was more common, the term for it was "stiction." I don't know if it's less common these days because disk mechanisms are more reliable, the lubricants are better, or machines have much shorter average service lifetimes.

    SGI field-service engineers actually had a rubber mallet specifically dedicated to coaxing stictioned drives to run for long enough to get the data off them. The Micropolis disks they shipped in their workstations back then were notorious for that (among many other problems). The company I worked for at the time had such a service call, and the technician told me that the hard part wasn't getting the disk running again, but convincing the disk that whanging the disk with a hammer was a sane thing to do!

    --
    Pining for the days when The Glorious MEEPT!!! graced SlapDash with his wisdom.
  110. Freeze Drive by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

    About 8 years ago my primary hard drive crashed. I was devastated! But, I bought a new drive and re-loaded my operating system and all my apps. There I was with a clean computer, but, all my pics, data, saved game files, etc. were on the "crashed" drive. Even though I've been fiddling with computers since my first Commodore Vic 20 in the 80s, I don't consider myself a computer geek. Hell, I'm a Pharmacist. Drugs I know, computers, not so much. However, I searched the net and ran across the freezer trick. Since I had nothing to lose, I proceeded to try it. I stuck the drive in a sealable baggie and forced out as much air as possible. Then I stuck it in the freezer overnight. Before taking it out of the freezer I made sure I had a power and data lead sticking out the side of my computer. I booted the computer up and pulled the drive out of the freezer. I did not wait for it to reach room temp as others have have advised, but, hooked it up and it worked. I immediately started dragging files off of it to the desktop. It ran for about 7 or 8 minutes before crashing again. I then thought, hell, it worked once it may work again! So, I stuck it back into the freezer for another half an hour. I then repeated the process. I did this a total of 8 times, but, in the end, I managed to pull all the "lost forever" files off of the drive. I still don't consider myself a "geek", but I do consider myself considerably lucky! It worked!!!, and I didn't have to pay some data recovery company $750 to save my files. When I finally bought a new computer, I got an identical extra hard drive and now use a raid configuration to mirror the primary hard drive. I also tend to back-up my pics and important data, etc,. That was the first and only drive I ever had crash, and, I hope it will be my last!

    --
    My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
  111. Re:work by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod! That URL just crashed my hard drive!

  112. Re:It depends - Sticktion Y2K Repair by InitZero · · Score: 1

    AC: There were recent, reliable backups and the RS/6000 system was under an (expensive) IBM maintenance contract. While we had one or two spare drives on the shelf, we didn't have the six that locked-up.

    We were paying IBM for its knowledge through the service contract and we got our money's worth there. Where we were in line to get screwed was in the hardware replacement cost.

    At a time when the going rate for hard drives was about two cents per megabyte, IBM wanted more than 13 cents per megabyte. We would have gladly paid double but six times more was off the table for a system that was already in the budget for replacement.

    Cheers,
    Matt

  113. Re:Depends upon the problem by crypticedge · · Score: 1

    The data recovery company we use whenever our customers need it is about 1200 to start, 1800 if you don't provide destination media, and quickly skyrocketing if the damage is bad enough.

  114. Re:If you're crazy enough to try the freezer trick by subreality · · Score: 1

    Or the much easier way that I use: Buy a block of dry ice. Put it in a cooler. Drop the hard drive on the dry ice and close the lid, dangling the cables out. The CO2 drives out any water vapor. When you're done you just leave the drive inside until the rest of the dry ice sublimes away and the drive gets back to room temperature while still sitting in the dry chest.

    It's also much more effective at cooling - the hard drive in the freezer will quickly warm up above room temperature when it starts operating. The cold air in the freezer doesn't conduct heat quickly enough. Sitting on a block of dry ice often lets you run nonstop. For the same reason, if you DO go with the freezer method, pack it in between a couple bags of peas or something instead of just sitting on the rack.

    Also, there's no point in unplugging the freezer if you have the drive in a plastic bag. Any moisture that was in there originally will still be there tomorrow. All the new moisture condenses on the outside of the bag.