Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Releases Batch of Windows 8 Input Devices

jones_supa writes "To accompany Windows 8, Microsoft has released some interesting keyboard and mouse devices, all of which are wireless and use Bluetooth. The Wedge Touch Mouse is an artful product shaped as an angular wedge, being compact enough for travel too. Wedge Mobile Keyboard follows the style of laptop keyboards and includes a snap-on cover. Sculpt Touch Mouse is more like a classic mouse, but features a four-way touch-scroll strip. Finally, we have Sculpt Mobile Keyboard, which is a lighter version of a classic curved keyboard. All four are on the expensive side, but at first blush seem high-quality."

156 comments

  1. Best input device ever... by Thundaaa+Struk · · Score: 0

    The telephone....man I got so much output from that thing in my heydays.

  2. why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wireless needs batteries and can be issues in a big office full of them.

    1. Re:why no wires? by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

      wireless needs batteries and can be issues in a big office full of them.

      Not to worry, no one in a big office will be using Windows 8.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:why no wires? by TankSpanker04 · · Score: 1

      wireless needs batteries and can be issues in a big office full of them.

      Because all bluetooth means these will work with tablets and desktops alike, just like Win8.

    3. Re:why no wires? by Grave · · Score: 2

      If done right, a pair of AA batteries will last in a wireless keyboard/mouse for nearly a year, so it's not as dramatic an issue as you might think. I still can't see many offices using these by default, but no doubt consumers will like them.

    4. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not in bluetooth devices.

      I've had and used a microsoft wireless mouse with bluetooth, I had to change the batteries every 3 weeks. After a few months, I got rid of it, because the upkeep was simply too high.

      Release a version that runs on diesel, and then I might consider it.

    5. Re:why no wires? by somersault · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Logitech also do a nice solar powered keyboard. My desk doesn't get any direct sunlight, and often I leave the lights off, but it always has plenty of charge. The batteries will apparently last 3 months even in complete darkness.

      Now somebody needs to make some decent solar powered trackballs or trackpads and I'll be cable and battery free :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1.

      Wireless lasts okay, Bluetooth eats two batteries a month.

    7. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Logitech also do a nice solar powered keyboard. My desk doesn't get any direct sunlight, and often I leave the lights off, but it always has plenty of charge. The batteries will apparently last 3 months even in complete darkness.

      Now somebody needs to make some decent solar powered trackballs or trackpads and I'll be cable and battery free :)

      You're probably effectively recycling the energy from light of your LCDs,

    8. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Logitech also do a nice solar powered keyboard.

      It seems someone forgot to tell them that geeks and sunlight don't mix!

    9. Re:why no wires? by jerk · · Score: 1

      Maybe not in your bluetooth devices, but my bluetooth keyboard has close to 6 months on 3 AA batteries (newer models of this keyboard use only 2 AAs) and it's at 43%. After two months, my trackpad is at 77%. This is on my "workstation", so it sees a lot of use 5 days a week, at least 8 hours per day (not a solid 8 hours, of course.)

    10. Re:why no wires? by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      We have a lot of Bluetooth mice here, the Logitech and Dell (made by Logitech) last 3-4 months on average, whereas the Microsoft ones barely make it one month.

    11. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were probably using regular Bluetooth instead of the relatively new Bluetooth Low Energy standard.

    12. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link to said product? I want one.

    13. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely the flourescent lights, but sure, it's recycled light energy and not actual "solar" energy. Who cares, though, those lights were going to be on anyway, might as well reclaim some of the energy.

    14. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac, iPhone, iPad version: http://www.logitech.com/en-us/keyboards/keyboards/Wireless-Solar-Keyboard-K760-for-Mac
      PC version: http://www.logitech.com/en-us/keyboards/keyboards/k750-keyboard

      Captcha: isotope

    15. Re:why no wires? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      But still you have a battery... Wired just works, no toxic products to dispose of safely.

    16. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the first one had a numpad I'd buy it in a heart beat.

    17. Re:why no wires? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Ahem :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:why no wires? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, that point would have worked while I was still sitting at work.. but right now I'm sitting at home with normal battery powered bluetooth keyboard and mouse.. so in this situation the solar powered keyboard would still be more environmentally friendly.. though I could get rechargeable batteries of course..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't use bluetooth.

    20. Re:why no wires? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it did.. I just googled it and found this on their blog though:

      "The short answer is that Logitechâ(TM)s Unifying receiver delivers much greater energy efficiency than Bluetooth and is one of the ways that weâ(TM)ve optimized the keyboardâ(TM)s energy management.

      To explain it further, unlike Logitechâ(TM)s Unifying receiver there is there is a very noticeable latency upon reconnection of Bluetooth technology when a product âoewakes-upâ after a period of non-use. To side-step this issue, Bluetooth requires a device keep the wireless connection active as long as possible, which is an unnecessary drain on energy. A Bluetooth solar keyboard like the Logitech Wireless Solar Keyboard K750 would not have been feasible with todayâ(TM)s available technology."

      I linked both my keyboard and trackball up to one receiver, which I have hooked into a USB hub on my desk, so it doesn't waste any ports on my laptop..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:why no wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't say that you said it did.

      I want Bluetooth so I can use it with different devices (Mac, iPhone, iPad, laptop, etc). I can't use the transceiver with iOS devices, and I don't want to have to move around a dongle between devices. I also don't want to take up one of the very few USB ports my iMac has, I also don't like using USB hubs.

      I'd rather just keep my current wireless keyboard and replace the batteries every couple of months.

    22. Re:why no wires? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Keyboards and mice are very different beasts when it comes to battery life. A keyboard is basically a passive device emitting only when you press a key. A mouse is a constantly on device that needs to detect movement. In general, Mice consume 2 to 4 times more battery than a keyboard.

  3. Wedge (Puck) Mouse by wazzzup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks like Microsoft is taking a page from Apple and emphasizing design now - along with the warts that go with it. I've never used the wedge mouse but instinct tells me that using one will invoke carpal tunnel induced rage like Apple's Bondi iMac puck mouse and clit-scroll Mighty Mouse.

    1. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like Microsoft is copypasting Apple's design...

      Like good old Jimi would say, "Hear my lawyer a comin'"...

    2. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by preaction · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which is sad, because Microsoft had made the best mice in recent years. I can only hope they realize that they DON'T have to be Apple to succeed in the marketplace.

    3. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by pigiron · · Score: 0

      M$ has been chasing Apple design-wise for decades.

    4. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed, ever since the GUI. The popular saying goes, "Microsoft's R&D lab is... Apple."

    5. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The GUI which Apple knicked from the Xerox PARC lab.

      Jesus, do we really have to rehash this yet again?

    6. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The point is Apple fanbois such as yourself can't handle having Apple called out as being a thief just like Microsoft.

      Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    7. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't really want to use any kind of mouse other than vertical mice ever again.
      I got one at home, and I'm considering buying my own to take in to work.

      Doesn't look super stylish (although it does look funky because it's so unlike other mice), but it's just super comfortable.

    8. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Jaysyn · · Score: 2

      Which is sad, because Microsoft had made the best mice in recent years.

      Compared to who?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2

      Microsoft was always good at input devices. Microsoft Natural keyboard is the one I instantly fell in love with and use it ever since. I also have some trackball from them. Don't remember the model and won't bother to look for the picture, but it is very comfortable.

      Apple's keyboard only looks nice. Pretty crappy when you actually try to use it (when compared to MS's).

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    10. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      Go do an image search for Microsoft Mouse and tell us that they are only just started thinking about design now.

      Go on, keep scrolling the images. It is actually kind of hypnotic seeing all the shapes and colours scrolling by. It would be super freaky to do this if you were high on drugs!

    11. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It looks like Microsoft is taking a page from Apple and emphasizing design now - along with the warts that go with it. I've never used the wedge mouse but instinct tells me that using one will invoke carpal tunnel induced rage like Apple's Bondi iMac puck mouse and clit-scroll Mighty Mouse.

      Generally speaking, Apple mice are among the worst, and always have been since the original Mac. Mice, though. Their trackballs tended to be quite nice at least on the powerbooks way back when). Their touchpads have gotten way better in the last few years (acreage... I don't understand where PC manufacturers get their awful smaller-than-the-original-ipod-screen touchpads from that you can barely fit your finger on).

      But Apple mice? Generally crap.

    12. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      I actually find this guy to be more comfortable than vertical mouse, because besides the hand being in a natural position, you don't have to move it. With the vertical mouse (at least the one I have -- Evoluent) I find it kind of hard to grab when you need to lift it and also I often hit the "back" button on it, when trying to reach for it without looking (i.e. it is too tall).

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    13. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used an MS natural keyboard for years at work, but couldn't justify the 80 or so bucks they wanted for it so I could have one at home.

      I have to disagree about the Apple keyboard though. Coming from the standard Dell desktop keyboard, the Apple is a dream.

    14. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The GUI which Apple knicked from the Xerox PARC lab.

      Jesus, do we really have to rehash this yet again?

      Apple paid Xerox for access to PARC. I guess we really do have to re-hash this every time.

    15. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by pigiron · · Score: 1

      Watch M$ stock tank with the failure of its tablet and Windoze 8.

    16. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming by "best" he implied everyone. That's the only use of the term best i understand anyway.

      I'd disagree with him, but still pretty good, solid mice.

    17. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their touchpads have gotten way better in the last few years (acreage... I don't understand where PC manufacturers get their awful smaller-than-the-original-ipod-screen touchpads from that you can barely fit your finger on).

      I would buy a Macbook over the equivalent but less expensive PC laptop for this exact reason. Apple touchpads are the best on the market bar none.

    18. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      +1 for trackballs. They are better than any mouse. Once you get used to them, you'll never go back. A trackball is always in the right position. You never have to reach for it, and you never have to put your arm in weird positions to use it, because it stays in the same place. Sadly, it's getting harder and harder to find them these days. You can pretty much only order them online, and they cost way more than they should given their simplicity.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by raydobbs · · Score: 1

      ..you mean...like the way Windows engineers designed Windows 8?

    20. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Sable+Drakon · · Score: 1

      For general purpose usage, you're right. Even for graphic design, you're right. But a trackball pales in comparison to a mouse when you're a PC gamer.

      --
      The Amarri pray for god, the Caldari pray for profit. the Gallente pray for peace, but the Minmatar pray their ships hol
    21. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      While not a professional PC gamer, I've been able to hold my own against people using a mouse. As long as they were similarly experienced to me in the game. Maybe at the top end it matters, but at one time, I was pretty good using not only a trackball, but also using the number pad instead of the standard WASD controls. It really just depends on what you are used to for the most part. The nice thing about using the trackball is that you don't have to constantly pick it up and reposition it like you would with a mouse. You can turn the in the same direction indefinitely without ever moving your hand.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    22. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You may be onto something. Since MS doesn't grow, the only way to make money from its stock is to buy when they release a duff OS version (ME, Vista) and sell when they release the next working version (XP, 7).

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    23. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently using this one from Logitech with my laptop: http://www.logitech.com/en-us/mice-pointers/trackballs/wireless-trackball-m570

      Got carpal tunnels in the mid 90's from playing too much Doom and Quake, my Dr gave me the option of either switching to a trackball or stop playing all together and stopping wasn't an option, so I went with the trackball.

      Making the switch won't happen overnight, you'll get abused online for a couple months before you get really comfy and back to where you were with a regular mouse.

    24. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Wolfraider · · Score: 1

      The GUI which Apple knicked from the Xerox PARC lab.

      Jesus, do we really have to rehash this yet again?

      Apple paid Xerox for access to PARC. I guess we really do have to re-hash this every time.

      And Microsoft licensed parts of the GUI from Apple

    25. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by SilenceBE · · Score: 1

      The point is Apple fanbois such as yourself can't handle having Apple called out as being a thief just like Microsoft

      That Apple "stole" the GUI from Xerox without the latter getting any benefits from it, is a myth. They made a ton of money (could be more as they sold to soon) with Apple shares that as a deal they got on the cheap.

      Read some history books or interviews with people that where present at the time. Facts instead of thoughts influenced by your hate for a company.

    26. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windoze

      I've never understood the compulsion of angry little people to intentionally misspell 'Windows', it seems to come from people foaming at the mouth with such hatred of Microsoft. Is it that you feel it does Microsoft at least some disservice to spell it wrong or something?

    27. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by pigiron · · Score: 1

      Yes!

    28. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by exomondo · · Score: 1

      I would buy a Macbook over the equivalent but less expensive PC laptop for this exact reason. Apple touchpads are the best on the market bar none.

      I've got a Pro and an Air but having also used a Samsung Series 9 ultrabook I wouldn't say the Apple trackpads are better, in fact they might even be the same part.

    29. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To everyone. I have an Explorer trackball. It is godlike.

    30. Re:Wedge (Puck) Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which they probably wouldn't have gotten, or at least that cheap, if it had been legal for Xerox to monetize on it's non-photocopying inventions and even less so, if software patents had been in place at the time.

  4. Re:First by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, no, no. This was first.

  5. I don't get it. by Guano_Jim · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    I wouldn't use the Wedge Touch Mouse for extended, serious work because of its small size, but it seemed to work well for basic tablet navigation.

    Isn't one of the selling points of a tablet that one doesn't need to use a mouse with it? Who is this targeting?

    1. Re:I don't get it. by Mia'cova · · Score: 2

      Mobile users who don't need to use a mouse for extended periods of time. But if you wanted to pick one golden scenario, it would be 'perfect' for on-the-go users of office on a win8 tablet, which is still mostly a desktop-based experience.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      If you use your tablet as a screen together with a keyboard, you will want a mouse as well (or perhaps a separate touch tablet). Having to reach over your keyboard for any mousey action (moving the cursor, menus, etc) gets tiring real soon. I found the same when I tried typing for an extended period of time on an iPad + bluetooth keyboard.

      Then again, your question is a good one in light of the remark from the article. That mouse looks insanely ill-suited for extended work, and if you're only using the tablet for short periods of time, the touch screen and virtual leyboard should work well enough.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:I don't get it. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Who is this targeting?

      People like me - I travel regularly for business. At airports and on planes I would use the device in tablet-style. When I get to my hotel room, I'd set the device up on my desk and use it with a mouse and keyboard.

    4. Re:I don't get it. by tsa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So basically you need a laptop.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're important enough to do that much traveling then you can afford a real laptop and a real tablet. Why piss around with a Windows tablet that has shit for an ecosystem and a half-ass tab-vertible 10 inch glorified netbook for mouse and keyboard sessions when you can just get the real thing? Macbook Air and an iPad would stomp these Windows toys in the ground.

    6. Re:I don't get it. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, he needs a hybrid. Did you miss that part?

      At airports and on planes I would use the device in tablet-style.

    7. Re:I don't get it. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      Why carry two widgets if you can carry one?

      For that matter, an Intel Win8 tablet has the single ecosystem in terms of apps (since it can run all the existing Windows ones), and the announced Asus Win8 tablet/laptop hybrids come in various sizes all the way up to 14".

    8. Re:I don't get it. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      If you're important enough to do that much traveling then you can afford a real laptop and a real tablet.

      It's not a matter of being able to 'afford it' you Anonymous Coward - It's about not having to carry as much crap around, and through security checkpoints. Why would I carry a tablet and a laptop when I only have to carry one device? ...and as a 6'3 guy, it's a pain trying to use a laptop in economy. A tablet is much easier.

      Why piss around with a Windows tablet that has [snip] for an ecosystem

      Huh? The tablet has a fantastic corporate ecosystem - It ties perfectly into Windows. An i86 tablet runs Windows apps natively, has full integration into AD and a familiar desktop.

    9. Re:I don't get it. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      So basically you need a laptop.

      No, because at 6'3 a laptop is unusable in economy class on most airlines.

    10. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why carry two widgets if you can carry one?

      Because the two widgets in this case are significantly better than the one. The x86 Windows tablets are netbooks with the keyboards lopped off. You are not going to enjoy doing real work on one of those things. And the touch based ecosystem for Metro is a joke compared to iOS. If you are traveling add up the weight of all your luggage etc. and then with a straight face pretend the the extra 3 pounds for the MBA is going to matter. And if it does matter, it will be more than made up for with the added productivity of having a big screen and a real keyboard. As for the 14 inch Asus things, by the time you get that and the requisite keyboard/mouse you will have a combined weight and trouble of more than you would have experienced with the MBA/iPad combo. This is a case of adults wanting toys.

    11. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about not having to carry as much crap around, and through security checkpoints.

      You don't think you're going to get tired of typing on the shitty little keyboard case that the windows tablets come with? You will get a mouse/keyboard thereby fully defeating the purpose of the all-in-one unit in the first place. And now you have more shit to carry around as you have to keep up with it all.

      Why would I carry a tablet and a laptop when I only have to carry one device?

      I answered you above that you're just dreaming if you think you will just have one device. Listen, Cohiba, I used to to a ton of traveling too. I tried everything. Every dinky little gimmick you can name I've used it. From the little tiny $2500 Sony tablets a few years back to the Samsung Origami things to netbooks and on and on. I tried wireless keyboards with integrated trackballs integrated touchpads and everything in between so I understand how it is trying to get out of dragging shit around. I'm going to tell you something though, all of that shit is junk. Pure gimmick junk. You will spend more time cursing at it than you will using it because it is all a compromise of a compromise. A real laptop is by defnition a compromise. It is a portable personal computer. There is a point of diminishing returns that starts almost immediately after 13" laptops. Trying to be cute with x86 tablets and netbooks and all of that shit will just piss you off and cost you a lot of money. And when you're done, you'll say, "damn that Anonymous Coward was right." Mark my words.

    12. Re:I don't get it. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      The x86 Windows tablets are netbooks with the keyboards lopped off.

      Incorrect, you Anonymous Coward. The i86 tablets have much better processors than netbooks ever did, with better displays and longer battery life.

      And the touch based ecosystem for Metro is a joke compared to iOS.

      Incorrect, you Anonymous Coward. Have you used touch on an i86 Win8 tablet? We have prototypes here where I work and they're a pleasure to use.

      If you are traveling add up the weight of all your luggage etc. and then with a straight face pretend the the extra 3 pounds for the MBA is going to matter.

      You need to pack lighter, Anonymous Coward. It does matter. Plus it's about having all your data in one place, not spread across multiple devices.

    13. Re:I don't get it. by KevReedUK · · Score: 2

      That is SOME laptop, to have a six foot 3 inch screen... just how big is your lap?!?

      --
      Just my $0.03 (At current exchange rates, my £0.02 is worth more than your $0.02)
    14. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun spending your money, dude. Don't say I didn't warn you.

    15. Re:I don't get it. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      How could I? You're an Anonymous Coward.

  6. Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    Does anyone use these tiny mouses?
    I don't know A SINGLE person who actually uses these mini-mouses, and ultraportable tiny mouses, etc.

    As a matter of fact, I own a Logitech Performance MX, which is quite huge actually, and don't have any issue carrying it around. Especially since the laptop is the actual bulky thing. I've also noticed most people that try it seem to prefer to actually have something large and comfortable, since it's only ~150g vs the ~2kg that a laptop can weight.

    What's the point of saving space and weight in a mouse, when you can't even save 10% of what the laptop weight. Not to mention the charger. Especially since the price you pay (in comfort) by using a small mouse is really really high.

    1. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by MikeS2k · · Score: 1

      Those tiny mice are quite popular where I work, but then I do work in a school where most of the users have tiny hands :p
      Probably the only real use for them.
      I prefer a larger mouse even though I have small hands myself.

      --
      120 characters should be enough for anybody
    2. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tiny cats.

    3. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad uses one of those tiny mice with his laptop. He apparently can't stand either the touchpad or the trackpoint, and when I gave him a normal sized mouse he complained that it was too big and uncomfortable. So, I guess some people do just prefer them.

    4. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

      Does anyone use these tiny mouses?
      I don't know A SINGLE person who actually uses these mini-mouses, and ultraportable tiny mouses, etc.

      As a matter of fact, I own a Logitech Performance MX, which is quite huge actually, and don't have any issue carrying it around. Especially since the laptop is the actual bulky thing. I've also noticed most people that try it seem to prefer to actually have something large and comfortable, since it's only ~150g vs the ~2kg that a laptop can weight.

      What's the point of saving space and weight in a mouse, when you can't even save 10% of what the laptop weight. Not to mention the charger. Especially since the price you pay (in comfort) by using a small mouse is really really high.

      Yes, I do. I currently use a Dell bluetooth travel mouse, as my main mouse. I do also have a full-size Logitech cordless mouse (similar to yours) but it's on a computer I use less often. The 'travel mouse' isn't 'for a laptop', it's just a mouse I really like. I find it comfortable and easy to use. Small mice also mean more desk space to fill with clutter.

      As an aside, I started using mice on Xerox workstations back in 1985, and they were pretty small by modern standards. The original Mac mouse was also quite small.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    5. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

      even though I have small hands myself.

      Not something I would admit to, there buddy. :)

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      I have used a tiny mouse for years. My current one is a Logitech M185 which is huge in comparison to my previous ones. It is 117g, but for me a 1.1kg notebook is at the upper limit of weight (my lightest was about 700g) so it is still one tenth the weight of my computer.

      To be honest, it is not so much the weight of the mouse that interests me, but just being able to fit it in my backpack. A standard size mouse seems a lot larger when crammed it into a fairly full bag than it does sitting on a desk.

    7. Re:Does anyone use these tiny mouses? by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      Does anyone use these tiny mouses?
      I don't know A SINGLE person who actually uses these mini-mouses, and ultraportable tiny mouses, etc.

      I'm using a Logitech Notebook mouse.
      Picture: http://laptopmouses.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/83e45_usb_laptop_mouse_4129QW8T4NL.jpg

      Especially since the price you pay (in comfort) by using a small mouse is really really high.

      Huh? I'm using it because I find it a lot more comfortable than a bigger, heavier mouse.

  7. Microsoft make good hardware by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft should reinvent themselves as a hardware house. A lot of their hardware is very good; I've never regretted any of the Microsoft mice I've bought.

    It's a shame their software is (generally) so rubbish.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    1. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Meh. I got a Mobile Wireless Mouse 4000 a couple of years ago. Complete garbage due to the "nano" receiver. It burned out, and the receiver was too hot to even touch. I got a warranty replacement, and it suffered the same fate after a couple of months. Into the trash it went, and I now use a Logitech M305, which has been rock solid.

      It is a shame, too. I rather liked the design, since the receiver snapped into the bottom (no need to remove the battery cover like you do with most of the Logitech mice).

      I do suspect that Microsoft has fixed this bug by now, but it is too late for me. To make a nano-receiver that doubles as a space heater is sloppy design. I suspect that they also learned this lesson on the early models of the X-Box 360 too.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    2. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'll take Logitech over MS any day of the week, especially considering the differences in warranty policies. Heck, even Logitech pays both ways for shipping. That is if they even want the product back at all for warranty.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'll take Logitech over MS any day of the week, especially considering the differences in warranty policies. Heck, even Logitech pays both ways for shipping. That is if they even want the product back at all for warranty.

      I can't speak for Logitech's warranty policies, but I've had to deal with MS once. I had one of the first laser mice (ball less?) that broke on me. I remember it came with a 5-year warranty. I called MS's support and the girl asked me when I purchased the mouse. I told her I wasn't sure, but it came with a 5 yr warranty and that type of mouse had not existed for 5 years. She laughed, took my address and sent me a brand new mouse. No questions asked. No sending my old mouse back. No receipt. No registration (who registers a mouse?). Nothing. Just here's your mouse. Thanks for playing... Love Microsoft.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      That is if they even want the product back at all for warranty.

      It just means the company knows how much it costs to process a warranty claim.

      I had the same from Logitech - they sent me a brand new mouse after my existing one quit working - even in the new packaging.

      I figure it's because when they bother doing an RMA and shipping back and forth, plus paying guys to process RMAs, it would cost them more in the end than just shipping out the replacement alone.

      After all, a mouse is a relatively low-value item and doing a warranty replacement would probably just cost more money in the end than whatever fraud could occur (want another mouse? Call in yours as defective and get a free new one).

    5. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the same mouse and never had the problem you describe. Neither has anyone I've known.

    6. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Into the trash it went, and I now use a Logitech M305, which has been rock solid.

      I also have Logitech M305. Very good basic mouse.

      By the way, Logitech is a Swiss company. I recently checked the bottom of an optical USB version of the Pilot Wheel Mouse from 2004, and it's made in Hungary. But I suppose the newer stuff all comes from P.R.C.

    7. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I typically lease systems for my offices so I end up seeing a lot of the different OEM mice. The MS Optical Wheel Mouse is still the best mouse I have ever used.

      On an unrelated note, WTF Dell??!! The last batch of desktops I leased came with this nearly unusable laptop style keyboards and ridiculous mice.Every single person in my office complained about the keyboards. If I wanted to type on a laptop I would type on a laptop. I mean, it seems like Dell has been slowly making their peripherals crappier and crappier every year. I still have this Dell KB with the silver volume control knob that I have kept through all of my lease turnovers.

    8. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I just did a warranty claim with Logitech. My x-540's were dying a slow painful death, channels dropping out. They sent me a new pair of the z-906's, covered shipping both ways. That's a hell of an upgrade in my book for warranty replacement, from $90 to $300 replacements. The first warranty I had for a mouse, one of their very first laser jobs they had me send back, to the US. Though, Logitech has sent me a replacement mouse without a problem every time I've needed a new one without a problem.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought Microsoft's fingerprint scanner years ago way back during CompUSA's fire sale for about $5 or so. It was neat, used it occasionally on my HTPC.

      Fast forward to last year, I upgraded to Windows 7 64-bit. MS doesn't make a driver for the scanner for 64-bit. In fact, real support ended around Vista 32-bit. I read up on what people were doing to perhaps get it working again, and found that some people were getting refunds on it. So I did that. Called up MS support, told them the issue, read them the product ID on the scanner, and a week or so later, I got my check for $40. And I still have that fingerprint scanner that I can hook up to any 32-bit Windows (with a working/hacked driver).

    10. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by phorm · · Score: 1

      Do they make their own hardware? I thought it was just rebranded stuff from other manufacturers?
      Most of what I've had in terms of Microsoft-branded hardware has been good. Typing on an "MS Natural" keyboard right now, which I've always appreciated.
      I did find that some of their early wireless mice sucked though (IIRC, the "Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse Blue"), but I believe they've improved with age.

    11. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me help you with that. If you're going to shill then at least give us something that isn't so easily debunked.

    12. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Now that's actually pretty good. Too bad cannon won't do that.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:Microsoft make good hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, as an avid linux person, windows 7 is pretty rock solid. If it was easier to work with ssh and had really good shell support I would be 100% windows. Windows 8 is dogshit though

  8. No, Thanks by denmarkw00t · · Score: 0

    M$ is really trying hard, and I'll give them that. While the "Wedge Touch Mouse" is an interesting idea, that's where I want to leave it. Just like Apple's Mighty/Magic mice, it doesn't look comfortable and lacks any decent usability - just from the looks of it. My Logitech MX does great, travels just fine, and has a scroll wheel (yay!). The other mouse looks like the HP and Logitech "entry-level" types, of course it has that neat 4-way touch area that looks about as wide as my pinky finger, so, you know, touch left and right at nice small increments. Finally, the keyboard, well, it's curved. Neat.

    Nothing to see here other than M$ jumping further into hardware, which kind of reminds me of the old days of them doing the same thing with their wave keyboards and all that fun stuff that never really made a difference, overall, for the company. But keep on trying to "out innovate" Apple with all your shiny new...things.

    1. Re:No, Thanks by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      M$ is really trying hard, and I'll give them that.

      So is the Special Needs guy who cleans the tables at my local Burger King, but that doesn't mean the deep fryer he made out of plastic grocery bags is a good idea.

  9. At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by pointyhat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We appear to be entering the age where we are the mercy of the designer and the consumer.

    Every "innovation" is now in the design space and is simply about establishing a brand and adding a layer of turd polish rather than solving problems or increasing efficiency.

    Look at Metro, look at Windows Phone, look at these input devices, look at everything Apple has done for the last 10 years, look at everything.

    It still takes us 3 months to knock out a simple bit of software, stuff still needs endless updates, problems haven't got any simpler to solve, nothing connects or works with other things properly without arguing with endless layers of configuration. Computing has become the activity, not the saviour of our time which is supposed to deliver us from mind numbing repetitiveness. We've gone nowhere.

    Real technical innovation is dead. RIP.

    1. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Informative

      It still takes us 3 months to knock out a simple bit of software, stuff still needs endless updates, problems haven't got any simpler to solve, nothing connects or works with other things properly without arguing with endless layers of configuration. Computing has become the activity, not the saviour of our time which is supposed to deliver us from mind numbing repetitiveness.

      You clearly weren't alive in the 70's or 80's, when nothing talked to anything else and nothing was easy. It would be an amazing feat to get a database to import data from a spreadsheet on the same machine. CSV was the best you could hope for, and you'd loose all your metadata. And networking two different machines together? Good luck with that. Maybe with a serial cable and some Kermit scripts, you *might* get text files to transfer if you were lucky. Unless you had a few thousand dollars for a nice DECNet or Banyan system, of course. Want wireless data access? RTTY baby! A few suitcases full of equipment and batteries and you could open a Mainframe session at 50 baud.

      Now, two people can be nearly anywhere in the world and send any type of data they want to each other instantaneously using devices that fit in their shirt pocket, for the price of a few bucks a day.

      As Louis CK once said, everything is amazing and nobody is happy.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really!? When was the last time you edited your CONFIG.SYS or AUTOEXEC.BAT file? Or hunted down video card drivers from the manufacturer's website? When did you last have to run a game with some special launch/emulation settings?

      I can throw together an HD video slideshow in less than five minutes and have it up on YouTube in less than 10, then share it with whatever circle/list of friends I have via social networking in two clicks.

      I can create a blog website complete with a semi-custom theme, AdSense revenue generation, and start posting to it via my mobile phone or Microsoft Word all in less than an hour.

      And speaking of Microsoft Word, I can create a document on my mobile phone, save it to the SkyDrive, share it with people who don't even have Microsoft Word and let them edit it, then open it in the full Microsoft Word and add dynamic, high-quality diagrams and charts with just a few clicks each. I can save it as a PDF just as easily as any other format, without plug ins, and email it to my local Staples or FedEx and have it printed and waiting for me when I arrive.

      I haven't even opened the case in my PC since I bought it a few years ago, save once to blow out some cat hair.

      Sorry, but you're doing it wrong.

    3. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every "innovation" is now in the design space and is simply about establishing a brand and adding a layer of turd polish rather than solving problems or increasing efficiency.

      Look at Metro, look at Windows Phone, look at these input devices, look at everything Apple has done for the last 10 years, look at everything.

      Quite wrong. Windows 8 and the matching phone do have some very nice efficiency improvements, the problem is that Metro can't be disabled on towers. If they did the internal optimizations and left the UI exactly like in 7, most users would consider it a true upgrade, with a few complaining that there's nothing "new" about it.

      The initial developer preview had an option to disable Metro, and it was a very nice improvement over 7 that way. Much less overhead, smoother startup, the whole thing could run on VM hardware settings far below the "minimum" specs, and run pretty well.

    4. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      That's because there are no more hardware limitations. Standard hardware is able to handle HD video or animation or anything else, let alone word processing. So of course all the current innovation is in the area of design. Hardware speed could double tomorrow and it would not make much noticeable difference.

    5. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by pointyhat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The social and entertainment wankfest works, if it makes someone an advertising buck. The moment you're no longer earning for them, you're tossed on the street.

      When it comes down to doing important things, it's a fucking disaster.

      Config.sys? Yeah I remember that, setting IRQ7 and port 220h for my SoundBlaster AWE32. Hard times eh? Well compare that to trying to get VMWare ESX 4 talking to a SAN so I can persuade it that the LUN has more than 2Tb of capacity. Esp when your kit costs £0.5m a whack. Nope doesn't do it, so we have to fuck around and do volume spanning to get our desired 42Tb array (for storing real shit like financial documents and medical data, not pissy videos of your kids falling off shit and facebook wanking).

      Autoexec.bat? Yeah I remember that, loading in my TSRs. Hard times eh? Well compare that to working out why the fuck an MS hotfix broke our entire .Net stack by setting cache expiry wrong, causing a problem with a certain version of IE8 which happened to be deployed to 20,000 of our client machines...

      Haven't opened your PC since you bought it. We have 20x 48 Core Xeon boxes which needed assembly and arrive on pallets. That and 1540 workstations and laptops which need to be secured. We have 10-20 workstations cycled per week due to failures and users fucking them up.

      I'm not doing it wrong - you're not doing enough to gain experience of how shitty it is. You are a consumer. You are the people who they bother to fix stuff for and the point of my email above. Unfortunately, what we do (the non consumerists), makes the world go round. Noone would blink an eye if half of the tech you mentioned above disappeared overnight.

    6. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      Hardware is irrelevant. The software progress is non existent other than turd polish.

      Great discussion here, which explains why I still lug a 17 year old Ti-85 calculator around for math related tasks: http://www.loper-os.org/?p=300

    7. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      I'm the GPI've sat in front of Windows 8 for 8 weeks now on a Touch PC (Sony VPC-J1). We're a MS Gold Partner so I get the joys of test it. I also have a Nokia Lumia 710 so I think my point is more than speculation. It's simply a visual and process clusterfuck for any user who invested any time in Windows, both metro and not. Office 2013 and Visual Studio 2010 are also Metro-ized which is just horrible (I've tested both). It's a step backwards.

      I have a 5 year old Lenovo T61 with an SSD and Windows 7 starts up from scratch in about 22 seconds. No app starts in less than 2-3 seconds. It gets rebooted once every couple of weeks (the rest of the time it's hibernated which takes 5-10 seconds to recover) so what is the problem on boot time and startup time people moan about?

      I'd be less pissed off if they just lost Metro and removed all the Metro styling from new apps.

    8. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      The TI-85 comment made me laugh, mostly because I've got one sitting in my desk drawer because it's so much faster. I'd routinely drive myself up a wall if I had to rely on any of the "quick" software calculators for short* calculations (especially those which are easier broken into a couple steps, as "Ans" isn't available on quick software calculators). And forget using software (short of Maxima, Mathematica, or whatnot) for anything but basic trigonometry.

      *Up to a half-dozen or so parenthetical expressions.

    9. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      That's exactly my point :)

      I can also hack the TI on a train/bus. I've built some software which does geometric calculations and BOM for building yurts recently.

    10. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not happy because we're worried that forces outside our control are working to bring us back into the dark age of communication you're describing.

    11. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you are, what our industry considers, to be an edge case.

    12. Re:At the mercy of the designer and the consumer. by theCoder · · Score: 1

      $ type bcc
      bcc is a function
      bcc ()
      {
          echo "$@" | bc -l
      }

      This is a great little bash function I made many years ago. It's very nice to be able to add up a long string of numbers, or do large multiplies, or even more complicated stuff like '256/sqrt(2)' right on the command line. You have to be a little careful about shell expansions: 42*7 is OK, but 42 * 7 is not, and parenthesis are a pain (I usually just put the whole expression in single quotes if there's a parenthesis somewhere in it). The best part is the answers are just printed out to the terminal ready for a quick double click/middle click to paste it into the next computation.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  10. Re:Microsoft will be huge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could at least try to sound like a person.

  11. Gahh! by onyxruby · · Score: 2

    Keyboards and mice are one thing Microsoft has always done right, what happened? Even in their darkest days, I could get even the most zealous of Linux diehard users to admit that they made some of the best mice and keyboards around. This is especially important when you want ergonomic products to avoid injuring your wrists! Apple made the puck and microsoft makes the wedge. Google, please don't make the square, if you do I will mock you forever, ok?

    Look, copying Apple with a design over function is not always a good thing ok? Simple isn't always better, sometimes functional and usable really is more important ok? Grr

    /arrow keys in the Android keyboard - where did they go? My list of examples could go on and on. People need to quit assuming that apple does things better just because their apple and do their own thing. dammit.

    1. Re:Gahh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But multiple buttons confuse people! That's why we all should copy Apple. Microwaves should have just one button. Phones should have just one. Keyboards and mice should have just one! It's the right direction - you can't get confused by it.

    2. Re:Gahh! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Apple is the new Microsoft and Microsoft is the new Apple.

      Apple is making money hand over fist, quarter after quarter. They have the 'desirable' products which everyone wants and clamors for, and nobody really seems to care that the 'added functionality' of the new products is mostly glam shoved on top of poop, with no concrete improvements or functionality: it's mostly just window dressing. Welcome to Microsoft, circa mid- to late 1990s.

      Microsoft is languishing and slowly losing market share to their competitors. They can't focus. Their products are stuck in a slow, grinding revision process with everything good and/or desirable about their products being phased out for the Big New. They've started to stagnate, and people see their products as commodity - you have them because you need them, not necessarily because they're superior or desirable. All of their changes are seen as regressions by the loyal and technically savvy. Welcome to Apple, late 1990s.

      In terms of input devices, we're at a point where gaming consoles threaten general purpose computers for "better, more complex input devices". How fucked is that?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. It's like sex furniture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for your computer.

    1. Re:It's like sex furniture... by santax · · Score: 1

      Yeah if your computer happens to be into BDSM on the more masochistic-side of the spectrum. Just make sure to put a condom on these things. Don't want to good ol' chap getting a viral-infection now would we?

  13. Re:Microsoft will be huge. by zlives · · Score: 1

    I miss borg gates

  14. New logo by tepples · · Score: 1

    I noticed something strange about the "Microsoft" word mark on these devices. It's no longer bold italic and no longer with a notch cut into the 'o'. I'm not saying these products are fake, but is Microsoft rebranding itself?

    1. Re:New logo by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      Yes they are going through an extensive rebrand to make everything Metro-esque, including hardware. While I appreciate it for web sites and branding, it's shit if you have to do anything other than consume with it.

  15. A Batch? by PPH · · Score: 1

    Ha, ha. I get it.

    Shouldn't groups of Microsoft products be referred to as a rafter?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Bluetooth Keyboard? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    From what I can tell, this is the first actual Bluetooth keyboard to be released by Microsoft for years. Looking for a replacement for my Wireless Entertainment Keyboard 7000, all I could find from Microsoft were "wireless" keyboards, using their usual proprietary wireless connections (and no mention of encryption).

  17. Bring back the trackball! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    Wake me when they bring back their best input device ever... the 5-button Microsoft Trackball Optical. Ergonomic, useful, and an efficient number and layout of buttons for work and play.

    As for WinMetro, what use is a mouse? Can somebody explain how, WITHOUT USING A KEYBOARD, you can exit a Metro app on the desktop strictly by GUI?

    Microsoft shills keep popping up explaining how we are all idiots for notusing the simple keyboard shortcuts. I rebut this by stating a UI is useless if you MUST use the keyboard to do basic operations (like exit the app)

    1. Re:Bring back the trackball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top left corner of the screen > right-click>exit/close (can't remember which)

    2. Re:Bring back the trackball! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      Nope, not working in Metro Maps. Left-clicking does nothing in the upper corners, right-clicking just brings up the menu at the bottom with no "Exit app" icon. Same goes for a quick check in Metro IE.

      Alt-F4 works, but as I said, that is complete GUI Fail on Microsoft's part.

    3. Re:Bring back the trackball! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for WinMetro, what use is a mouse? Can somebody explain how, WITHOUT USING A KEYBOARD, you can exit a Metro app on the desktop strictly by GUI?

      You mean like clicking on the top of the Metro app and dragging to the bottom of the screen? Or dragging with your finger from the top to the bottom of the app?

    4. Re:Bring back the trackball! by Avidiax · · Score: 1

      Can somebody explain how, WITHOUT USING A KEYBOARD, you can exit a Metro app on the desktop strictly by GUI?

      Just move the mouse to the lower left corner of the screen and click the start button that appears.

    5. Re:Bring back the trackball! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      That doesn't exit the application, though. It merely switches to the Metro screen.

      How can Microsoft feel OK designing a GUI that does not allow you to CLOSE AN APPLICATION without a keyboard command?

    6. Re:Bring back the trackball! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't close the app, though any other metro apps do seem to be closed after launching something else.

      Still no good for a GUI. Beyond the counter-intuitive "guess the gesture to perform an action" - I'm not working with a touchscreen, so gestures are about the LEAST efficient way to do things. It's also doubtful that, short of a table top touchscreen, tablet or phone, I would ever desire a touchscreen on my PC.

      This remains a major FAIL on Microsoft's Metro UI.

      Remember, closing an application means it no longer consumes memory and CPU cycles or any other resources... not just that it goes out of site.

      Even in webOS I can close an application with a swipe. I actually like tablets and smart phones, I just don't think it's smart to try and use the same UI on a desktop.

    7. Re:Bring back the trackball! by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      How can Microsoft feel OK designing a GUI that does not allow you to CLOSE AN APPLICATION without a keyboard command?

      I guess the OS is supposed to do the closing. Just like in iOS.

  18. no more mouse wheels! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i like the touch strip idea replacing the mouse wheel (i've had many broken wheels over the years). i just hope it can be clicked like a mouse wheel.

    1. Re:no more mouse wheels! by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      Odd, I prefer the feedback of a wheel, and while I've been using them for 2 decades, I've never broken a single mouse wheel, nor had one fail for me.

      Perhaps you are doing it wrong?

    2. Re:no more mouse wheels! by dittbub · · Score: 1

      the elastic band inside my logitech mouse broke once. anything held together with an elastic band can't be good.

    3. Re:no more mouse wheels! by alices+ice · · Score: 1

      tell that to the original G.I. Joe dolls!

    4. Re:no more mouse wheels! by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I've had one fail on me, recently even. Although I literally went into the Best Buy, grabbed the cheapest mouse they had (a small Logitech wireless), and bought it with the express intent of "if it fails, I'll just buy a new one".

      And given how long it lasted (~ two years, constantly being tossed into a bag or otherwise abused), and how well it fits my needs (fitting into bags), I'm satisfied. I'll probably buy another.

  19. Am I the only one who read... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

    this: "The Wedge Touch Mouse is an artful product shaped as an angular wedge..."

    as this: "The Wedge Touch Mouse is an awful product shaped as an angular wedge..."

    Looking at it, it in no way looks like it is designed for comfort of use.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  20. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.chungcu24h.com.vn/

  21. Re: Mighty Mouse by djbckr · · Score: 1

    I have the Mighty Mouse and it's my favorite out of probably a dozen I've tried. Apple quit making it in favor of the Magic Mouse, which I hate. I know people have had issues with the Mighty Mouse ball getting stuck, and from time to time mine gets stuck. However, a good soaking in 90% alcohol and a stiff fabric (I use a piece of denim on a wood surface, invert the mouse and rub the ball vigorously) and all is right with the world. A little compressed air gets whatever is left. I even bought a spare in case the one I'm using quits working for good. The one I'm using has been in service for a good 5 years so far...

  22. Ironically enough... by bbbaldie · · Score: 1

    Microsoft hardware has consistently been good stuff. If they would abandon coding altogether, their company might have potential.

  23. Just bring back the Trackball Explorer! by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    The single most perfect input device ever created was made by Microsoft: the Trackball Explorer. With a futuristic, ergonomic shape (it's the navigation control for Moya) that's comfortable to use all day, I can't believe they still stopped producing them.

    All they need to do is bring this back with Bluetooth a few other touch-sensitive features, and I would be estatic. Not having to pay $400 for a replacement when my current one eventually dies would be nice, too.

  24. Not all of us by bbbaldie · · Score: 1

    We who run Linux can still pretty much be the masters of our own desktop domains. :-)

    1. Re:Not all of us by pointyhat · · Score: 1

      None of our software works on Linux, and it cost about £24m to build. I don't think there's a cost justification there.

  25. I want to try them by elabs · · Score: 1

    These look really compelling. I just want to handle and feel them before I buy.

  26. Here's Hoping ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they release a large padded oval button controller that we can slam our heads into repeatedly. That's how most people will be interacting with Windows 8 anyways.

  27. start button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which input device turns on the start button?

  28. Bluetooth Mouse and Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse for use with my notebook computer when working in my home office. The keyboard is solar powered while the mouse requires 2-AA batteries. The only wires are the power cord for the notebook computer and the HDMI cable connecting the notebook computer to the 22-inch HDTV which I use as an HD monitor. By the way, Logitech makes these two peripherals. For the win I am running Ubuntu with Microsoft Windows 7 in a virtual machine.

  29. Wedgie mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mouse should be designed to be useful not to resemble abstract art.

    Touch pads suck enough on laptops I see no need to have one built into my mouse..I'll keep my physical scroll wheel thank you very much.

  30. So metro is designed for touchscreens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the first input devices designed "for" Win8 is... a new keyboard and mouse? Is Microsoft paying any attention?

    1. Re:So metro is designed for touchscreens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the first input devices designed "for" Win8 is... a new keyboard and mouse? Is Microsoft paying any attention?

      I don't think so. They all seemed to have passed out after drinking their own koolaid.

  31. This is progress!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An overpriced netbook (Surface) and a bag full of wireless junk is BETTER than a 17" laptop? What are these people smoking? Apple stopped making a 17" MacBook Pro, and now MS thinks overpriced netbooks are the future. Don't people use computers to do real work these days?

  32. Eugh! by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Normally I like Microsoft hardware. Their mice and keyboards are good (not the best, but the best for a reasonable price), and the Xbox controller is one of the best controllers you can find (I have two and I don't even own an Xbox!).

    But these?

    SHIT on a fucking STICK these suck. The wedge looks unusable. It was obviously aimed at being tiny (for laptops), but it's not much smaller than the Logitech wireless I have, which has ergonomic contours and a proper mouse wheel.

    The small keyboard combines the worst parts of a bad laptop keyboard with none of the advantages. Half the keys looked too small to even hit reliably.

    The full-size mouse was the closest to being decent, but it made the mistake of thinking expensive, fancy touch surfaces HAVE to be better than anything else. It's not. After using Apple's no-button mouse, I can say for sure that I will never use any mouse without an actual fucking wheel. It's just not usable.

    And then there was that curved, "ergonomic" keyboard. Which looked about as comfortable to use as a keyboard made of razor blades and used needles. Maybe it's just me (not a fan of so-called "ergonomic" keyboards), but I wouldn't take one of those even if it was free.

    So that's zero products out of four that I'd even think about buying. Which is about what the rest of Microsoft is batting - so at least they fail consistently.

  33. In mourning... by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    This article again makes me mourn the loss of Logitech's corded trackball lines. Over the years I've had to progressively downgrade my trackballs as they died and were no longer available. I avoid wireless desktop peripherals because batteries are absolutely unnecessary waste in a fixed installation which doesn't need backup power. The only wireless desktop devices I'll use are Wacom mice and pens, since they work via induction rather than batteries.

    Since the only corded Logitech trackball still being manufactured is the (to me) eminently uncomfortable Trackman Marble, I think I'm going to have to break down and model a Marble FX case which will fit the Marble electronics then have it 3D printed somewhere. You'd think it might be worthwhile for Logitech to revisit their discontinued trackballs, since they typically sell for 2-3x used what they ever did new. A 15-year-old FX in terrible condition will still sell for what it cost new.

  34. Hardware is where Microsoft are competent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Making hardware like keyboards is one of the few areas where Microsoft has shown some degree of competence over the years. They should recognise where their real strengths lie and can their failing software business.

  35. what i really need to know is by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    the price of the retail dvd

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  36. wow that's so impressive by gzuckier · · Score: 1
    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.