Slashdot Mirror


Kindle Fire Is Sold Out Forever

An anonymous reader writes with this excerpt from geek.com: "Amazon has released a rather bizarre bit of news today. The Kindle Fire has completely sold out. You can no longer buy one, and the wording of the press release suggests there won't be any more manufactured. In nine months on sale Amazon claims to have secured 22 percent of tablet sales in the U.S.. With that in mind, Amazon will definitely be selling more Kindle Fires, however, the next one you'll be able to buy will probably have a '2' at the end of the name. Jeff Bezos said that the Kindle Fire is Amazon's most successful product launch so far and that there's 'an exciting roadmap ahead.' He also confirmed Amazon will continue to offer hardware, but there's no detail beyond that." Also covered on Slashcloud.

309 comments

  1. Slow news day? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Product withdrawn from sale pending announcement of new product.

    Film at 11.

    1. Re:Slow news day? by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, most companies keep selling the old one until the new product is actually available though. Some even continue to sell the old model afterwards as a budget model.

    2. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, this is how you do it folks, unless you want to be Osborne.

    3. Re:Slow news day? by Applekid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair, most companies keep selling the old one until the new product is actually available though. Some even continue to sell the old model afterwards as a budget model.

      I remember there was a lot of grumbling when the Kindle 3 came out like a week after the Kindle DX (based on the Kindle 2) did.

      Meanwhile, back in the days when Apple products were announced AND were available in stores immediately, any pending orders would get upgraded to the new models automatically, which was pretty cool of them.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    4. Re:Slow news day? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      This means their sales projection was only off by one week.

      They were trying to avoid ending up with a warehouse full of unsold Model Is, I'd say they did a pretty good job.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:Slow news day? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Some even continue to sell the old model afterwards as a budget model.

      ie. They lose money.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Slow news day? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Why would they ever worry about this. They can always put a couple of pions on the job of creating a crappy ebay page and sell off the old stock under the name "Redneck Electronic Sellers Ltd."

    7. Re:Slow news day? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      It's scheduled to come out in two weeks.

    8. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They lose money.

      I have a bridge to sell you.

    9. Re:Slow news day? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      Why support a competitor when they have their own in-house "Redneck Electronic Sellers" Warehouse Deals?

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    10. Re:Slow news day? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some even continue to sell the old model afterwards as a budget model.

      ie. They lose money.

      Or gain market share.

      In the case of a Kindle, the expectation is you'll be buying eBooks from Amazon.

      The reality is, selling it at a loss is better than having unsold inventory you'll never sell anyway. So you might as well sell at a discount and recoup *some* of your costs, or you just end up with junk and recover none of your costs.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:Slow news day? by Xest · · Score: 1

      No one loses money on budget models, because by the time something has become a budget model the cost of production has decreased so much there's a healthy margin on the product.

      It's the same with phones, tablets, and consoles. The PS3 and 360 both made hefty losses on release, but now make healthy profits per unit sold.

      If you're still making a loss on your old model by the time it is actually old then you're doing something very very wrong.

    12. Re:Slow news day? by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Margins. With margins this low they can't afford to have any units left on "clearance" because they lose money on every one of those, and each one wipes out the profits from many successfully sold units.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    13. Re:Slow news day? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You have a very strange idea of loss.

    14. Re:Slow news day? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      This is a much better way for them to do it I think. They don't want people to by a crappy device compared to what they can get at the same price point a couple weeks later. They are already not making a lot (or any depending on which tech news site you believe) on the device so dropping the thing to a budget model doesn't make sense. If the body or screen or something is in short supply why use it to make the old device when you need to ramp up for the new one? I think it is perfectly fine for a company to say "we aren't going to screw you over so sorry you can't buy this device this week. See you in a couple weeks with a more awesome device".

    15. Re:Slow news day? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? They would be competing with themselves. Someone looking to buy one would have to decide "New model for full price, or steeply discounted old model". Why would you want to do that?

    16. Re:Slow news day? by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      They were already losing money, the Fire is (was?) a loss leader for Amazon. Hard to drop the price if you're already selling at a loss.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    17. Re:Slow news day? by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think Amazon planned it this way. They stopped production on the older Kindle Touch and Fire, and sold-out faster than anticipated. That's all..... no grand conspiracy.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    18. Re:Slow news day? by bigkahunah · · Score: 1

      [citation needed] in the parent. Intuitively it seems ludicrous that reducing production would decrease the marginal cost.

    19. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem being that anyone entering the market for a tablet in the interim will /definitely/ not buy an Amazon product. That is a poor business decision.

    20. Re:Slow news day? by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>any pending orders would get upgraded to the new models automatically, which was pretty cool of them.

      Unless you didn't want the new models, then it would suck. For example I wouldn't want the new 4S phone because it has a dualcore that drains the battery faster than the old 4 model. If I order the "4" then that's exactly what I want..... not Apple to upgrade me.

      Another example of this is where I ordered a stick-shift Beetle and the dealer "helpfully" upgraded me to the Automated Shift because "it gets +2 more MPG". Yeah. True. But I wanted to shift the car myself.

      He lost a sale that day.
      Then he begged me to keep the business.
      So I told him to knock $1000 off the price. His foolish behavior cost him some cash. A customer wants Exactly what they what, not a a car dealer's or Apple's switcheroo.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    21. Re:Slow news day? by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      Are they? "IHS iSuppli said the components that go into the Kindle Fire cost $191.65. Additional manufacturing expenses bring the total cost to $209.63."

      Maybe Amazon negotiated a really good deal where the mysterious "additional expenses" are near-zero, and the Kindle costs less than the $199 pricetag. For that matter we don't know what the components really costs; I used to negotiate pricing and depending upon the day-of-the-week/supply/etc the total cost could fluctuate as much as $50.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    22. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I somehow think most customers would appreciate an upgrade at no cost, albeit with an option to refuse the upgrade if possible.

      Also, don't let your self-righteous indignation impact your typing skills - it reflects badly on you.

    23. Re:Slow news day? by jnork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the old auto-shifter. The very idea makes my brain itch.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    24. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The poster doesn't have a strange idea at all. Do you realize that if they're set to release in a few weeks and have run out of old stock that they can't just call up Foxxconn and get a few thousand at the same price point that they could get a few million? If they plan on releasing a better model at $199 it may well cost them most than 199 to have a short run produced.
       
      you do understand large scale production, don't you? You do understand why producing a limited number of units may cost you more, don't you? You do realize that someone at Amazon can't just pick up a phone and say "make another 50 thousand for Monday." Don't you? You do understand that some of the hardware may not even be available if the same suppliers have retooled for a new product and new parts, don't you?
       
      I'm amazed by how short sighted Slashdotters are anymore and how they dismiss another post with a flippant remark instead of having some logic to back up their ideas.

    25. Re:Slow news day? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Maybe MickyTheIdiot..... never mind I can stop right there. LOL. Warehouse Deals has a lot of good bargains on products. However I still find a get better bargains through private sellers because so many of them are dishonest (describing used items as "new"), and therefore I can negotiate a refund to get the item free or 50% off.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    26. Re:Slow news day? by msauve · · Score: 2

      Now add packaging, shipping to warehouse, storage, order processing, shipping to customer, advertising/marketing, support, and corporate overhead costs, none of which iSuppli is concerned with.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    27. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, IT administrators are the only smart people in the company after all.

      In reality none of us has the internal financial data, if you're even commenting on these things as if you know something, you're a fool.

    28. Re:Slow news day? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Intuitively it seems ludicrous that reducing production would decrease the marginal cost.

      1. NRE and other sunk costs have already been amortized.
      2. Component costs are lower
      3. They don't have to reduce production: They can just do one last run at full production to use up their packaging, cases, PCBs and other components, and then sell from stock

    29. Re:Slow news day? by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      Intuitively it seems ludicrous that reducing production would decrease the marginal cost.

      I think the theory goes that by the time you're retiring a product (unless it was a complete flop), you're likely to have recouped the start-up and development costs, and then the cost of units after a certain point get cheaper per unit and you flip over into the black.

      If the product was successful, you recoup your costs from the first units, and then start becoming profitable. Over time, by the time you're well into production, the unit cost of each item drops (because you account for your costs first).

      Of course, if you lose money from the start, never sell enough units to recoup your costs ... well, then you have a net loss.

      Nothing radical is being proposed here unless Amazon really shot themselves in the foot.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    30. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you stil buy a PC1 from IBM? Things move on and newer and better products emerge.

    31. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem being that anyone entering the market for a tablet in the interim will /definitely/ not buy an Amazon product. That is a poor business decision.

      Yeah, I'm sure no one at Amazon ever considered the idea when making this decision. They should hire you!

    32. Re:Slow news day? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      They also own Woot. ([citation provided] http://consumerist.com/2010/06/amazon-buys-woot.html)

      In fact, I'm surprised there haven't be MORE Kindles sold on Woot.

    33. Re:Slow news day? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Yes, I expect Amazon didn't do their work properly and didn't keep enough inventory as a buffer, in the period where manufacturers stop producing and rework for the new model to be produced.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    34. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can negotiate a refund

      Shipping back an empty envelope and then telling your credit card company to issue a chargeback is not "negotiating a refund". In fact, it's pretty much the exact opposite of negotiating.

    35. Re:Slow news day? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      Also, nobody know what specific deals Amazon is getting with their suppliers. I don't know about IHS iSuppli (got a link?), but most of the time when I see these breakdowns of how much things cost, they are going based on prices for single units, or small runs. When you're selling millions of units, the price gets severely reduced. Assuming This is the article you refer to, I have serious doubts about their prices. For one thing, they rate the WLAN at $4.50, but you can easily get USB WLAN dongles from Alibaba for $4.50 a piece. I'm sure that Amazon could get a much better deal on such a similar product. Not only that, they price the touchscreen at $87, but you can easily buy a complete tablet with a similar screen for about the same price.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    36. Re:Slow news day? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      So, you bought a Kindle DX because it has a 9.7" screen, and then you had regrets because you could have gotten a Kindle 3 with a giant 6" screen.

    37. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that every relevant indicator points to the sell-out being an unintended outcome, you are absolutely right about nobody having considered it. Did you have a point, or is stating the painfully fscking obvious pretty much your thing today?

    38. Re:Slow news day? by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

      They probably ran out of stock. They would be well into ramping up the next one. They aren't Apple that has enough new products to keep a whole factory dedicated just for them to keep knocking them out.

      I'd guess they missed their "out of stock" date, and the new ones aren't ready to be announced and shipping just yet. Or maybe some other company started buying up 7" panels even though that company denies a 7" tablet?

    39. Re:Slow news day? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      PC1? IBM made a PS/1, (after the PS/2 failed), but I don't think they ever made a PC1 model. Maybe you're thinking of the 5150, (not to be confused with John Titor's 5100). The 5150 was discontinued in 1987, long after the PC/XT and PC/AT were released.

    40. Re:Slow news day? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible Amazon didn't anticipate the back to school demand, and ran out of Kindle Fires and have no more in the pipeline, and the '2' isn't ready in enough volumes for sale yet.

      I could certainly see there being a very dramatic demographic shift, where some year suddenly a huge portion of university and college freshmen just don't care about physical books. I have no particular reason to see why it would be this year, but it's certainly a possibility. When you're a computer scientist, and having been hanging around computer scientists who've managed to do some sort of ebook stuff since 2000 you forget just how far ahead of the general public we are on these things.

    41. Re:Slow news day? by Dishevel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Jobs ghost raped him last night, While Balmer and Paige cheered from the sidlines.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    42. Re:Slow news day? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Amazon is an internet company. What they lose on the margin, they can make up in volume.

    43. Re:Slow news day? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They can always put a couple of pions on the job of creating a crappy ebay page

      How can spinless mesons create a crappy ebay page??

    44. Re:Slow news day? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      So, you bought a Kindle DX because it has a 9.7" screen, and then you had regrets because you could have gotten a Kindle 3 with a giant 6" screen.

      Me? No, size drives my decision, so any small factor Kindle is off the table. Although it would have been nice to get improved pdf rendering. I'm referring to rabble I see to recall right here on /. , but this was what, 2 years ago?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    45. Re:Slow news day? by msauve · · Score: 1

      How does being an on-line company have any bearing on the second half of your statement? Do you have some evidence that the price elasticity of demand for comparable products is different for "brick and mortar" stores?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    46. Re:Slow news day? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Oh. I see. The firmware is different. I only have the Kindle 3, so I don't have experience with the earlier software.

    47. Re:Slow news day? by luther349 · · Score: 1

      well in the case of your car i would not have called that a upgrade. i never herd of any automatic shift getting more mpg highway then a standard shift. automatics are for the lazy and i mean that once you know master a stick you drive it just as easily as a auto. really i prefer them because when they brake there cheap and easy to fix and a modern clutch will just as long as a auto anyways.

    48. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon is an internet company. What they lose on the margin, they can make up in volume.

      How does being an on-line company have any bearing on the second half of your statement? Do you have some evidence that the price elasticity of demand for comparable products is different for "brick and mortar" stores?

      Woooosh...

    49. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are a tea-partier that drives a stick-shift Beetle Quite an image you are painting.

    50. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's completely intentional. I am, perhaps subtly, pointing out that Amazon is another corporation. I'm pointing out how libertarians (which I suspect the GGP to be, as slashdot is full of them) shouldn't be trying to defend Amazon, but take an opportunity to bash government

      And for the record, I actually do lean on the side of being against copyrights and patents.

      My genius and wise insight is not a coincidence. I actually AM smarter and prettier and a generally better person than you :)

    51. Re:Slow news day? by scheme · · Score: 1

      well in the case of your car i would not have called that a upgrade. i never herd of any automatic shift getting more mpg highway then a standard shift. automatics are for the lazy and i mean that once you know master a stick you drive it just as easily as a auto. really i prefer them because when they brake there cheap and easy to fix and a modern clutch will just as long as a auto anyways.

      Check out VW's DSG. There's similar systems out there for other brands as well. They get more fuel efficiency than manuals and offer better shifting as well. BTW, F1 racing has switched over to systems like the DSG with paddle shifters a while ago. It's simply better than manual shifting.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    52. Re:Slow news day? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      If you made more than you can sell then you lose money. If you have to sell them off at a reduced price you lost even more.

      --
      No sig today...
    53. Re:Slow news day? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The reality is, selling it at a loss is better than having unsold inventory you'll never sell anyway.

      Much better idea: Don't have any unsold inventory that you have to sell at a loss.

      Which is what they've done (...unless they're lying and it's a publicity thing).

      --
      No sig today...
    54. Re:Slow news day? by blagooly · · Score: 1

      A grand screw-up. Selling stuff is what they do, arguably better than anyone. Planning to have nothing to sell? Nope. If they announce a new gadget Friday? Call it a PR trip. Otherwise, no way this was the plan.

    55. Re:Slow news day? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      If you made more than you can sell then you lose money. If you have to sell them off at a reduced price you lost even more.

      Do you really think Apple is losing money on all iPhone 4 sales? Really?

    56. Re:Slow news day? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that stock is costing money !

    57. Re:Slow news day? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      >>>any pending orders would get upgraded to the new models automatically, which was pretty cool of them.

      Unless you didn't want the new models, then it would suck. For example I wouldn't want the new 4S phone because it has a dualcore that drains the battery faster than the old 4 model. If I order the "4" then that's exactly what I want..... not Apple to upgrade me.

      Another example of this is where I ordered a stick-shift Beetle and the dealer "helpfully" upgraded me to the Automated Shift because "it gets +2 more MPG". Yeah. True. But I wanted to shift the car myself.

      He lost a sale that day.
      Then he begged me to keep the business.
      So I told him to knock $1000 off the price. His foolish behavior cost him some cash. A customer wants Exactly what they what, not a a car dealer's or Apple's switcheroo.

      This is why I always purchase refurbs -- I know I'm getting exactly what I want, and I know the device has been fully tested and has reliable parts. It has the added bonus that refurbs are discounted :)

    58. Re:Slow news day? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I would be really surprised if Apple lost a dime on every iPhone 4 sold this year. Even on the 3GS models.

      They don't have to produce a limited number. They still sell more iPhone 4 than any other phone around save Samsung and the 4S. What makes you think they need to produce a limited number of anything? They sell plenty of everything.

    59. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The post was about Kindles, not iPhone. We know there is a substantial difference between the companies both as far as hardware production and profit per unit.

    60. Re:Slow news day? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      With enough volume, they can make more on the float than you'd believe. For their best selling product ever, I'm sure they can ask for and get net-60 on completed units.

    61. Re:Slow news day? by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Unless you didn't want the new models, then it would suck. For example I wouldn't want the new 4S phone because it has a dualcore that drains the battery faster than the old 4 model. If I order the "4" then that's exactly what I want..... not Apple to upgrade me.

      Do you have anything to back this up? 4S *may* cause increased battery drain if you have the geo-fencing turned on (ie, location based reminders) - I used those for a week before I realized that it was draining my battery much faster.

      In the case of your Beetle dealer, it was entirely possible that the manual shift was either sold from underneath his feet (ie, more attractive buyer) or the auto-shift had some nifty incentive for him.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    62. Re:Slow news day? by jelle · · Score: 1

      That logic does not hold up if you have a new product that you intend to sell at full price and that is meant for the same market as the old product, because selling the old product at a discount cannibalizes the sales of the new product in the same market, causing it to take longer to 'recoup' the costs, etc, etc... You don't want to be in that spiral.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    63. Re:Slow news day? by slashmydots · · Score: 0

      I think it'd get more readers with "New Report Finds Amazon CEO Did Not Take Economics Class Ever" because if your supply demand curve hits a certain demand level then goes straight down, your company is beyond all levels of stupid. They might have to actually name such a level of business stupidity after Amazon. To have customers saying "shut up and take my money!" and then a company saying "Ummm we're just not going to sell to you" that's mind-bogglingly stupid.

      As a 3-month old small business owner who's trying all day every day to get every last interested customer possible in the door to buy any of my products, I frankly find it offensive and disgusting that they think they can afford to do something like that. That's right up there with Dell getting Windows 7 for $50 and me getting it for $100.

      By the way, the US and possibly world's largest online retailers, in order, are as follows:
      #1 Amazon
      #2 Newegg.com
      I think I know which one of those two I'm going to support now.

    64. Re:Slow news day? by slashmydots · · Score: 0

      Really? Because I distinctly remember in economics class learning the very popular business technique that as soon as you reach a certain level of potential demand and product sales, you stop everything, say "fuck you, we're Amazon" and don't sell any more of that product. It was one of the top surefire ways to run a successful business.

    65. Re:Slow news day? by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Uh, so you still bought the car??????? And you didn't get what you wanted. I don't care if you knock $5g off, I aint driving an automatic. And $1000 is nothing, you probably still got taken for a ride, pardon the pun.

    66. Re:Slow news day? by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

      Just for reference, I believe the 22 percent of tablet sales includes all Kindle sales (i.e. the Kindle e-readers). Because of Amazon's lack of transparency for details you have to parse their announcements aggressively.

    67. Re:Slow news day? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The reality is, selling it at a loss is better than having unsold inventory you'll never sell anyway.

      Even better is not over-producing to begin with.

      Looks to me like they under-estimated recent demand.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    68. Re:Slow news day? by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      You are mixing together two different events. Event #1 is a thieving corporation named amazon that sent me a Gamecube instead of a Bundle, and then refused to take it back (thus forcing me to goto Mastercard for a resolution).

      Event #2 is the case where a *private* seller sends me a "new" game that is scratched, so I negotiate with the seller by saying, "This game isn't new. The disc is scratched; it's clearly used. May I have a 50% refund to reflect the true value of this non-new item?"

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    69. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just /. being overridden with the marketing fanboys today (Kindle, EMC, MS, Apple).

    70. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mixing together two different events.

      Am I? No where in this thread were we talking about your encounter with Amazon regarding a Gamecube purchase. But let's take a look at that post, shall we?

      In that post, you claim that the "thieving corporation" simultaneously refused and honored your request for a return. If that wasn't confusing enough, now you're completely rewriting that encounter in order to get MasterCard involved?

      Event #2 is the case where a *private* seller sends me a "new" game that is scratched, so I negotiate with the seller by saying,

      I'm gonna stop the quote right there because the rest is nothing but a filthy lie.

      Tell the truth, it doesn't actually surprise you that we all know you are nothing but a lying, cheating, thieving, sack of shit of a concritter*, does it?

      *Like a congresscritter, you aren't deserving of the label "person".

    71. Re:Slow news day? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      To be fair, most companies keep selling the old one until the new product is actually available though. Some even continue to sell the old model afterwards as a budget model.

      Not when the entire production run of the "budget" model was sold at a loss...

    72. Re:Slow news day? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      iSuppli is not stupid, they are one of the leading teardown analysts whose goal is to estimate the BOM cost *to the company*. They quote the prices on large component orders (which is pretty standard research data for them). They are NOT going to the local Radio Shack and trying to build an iPad or Kindle from off the shelf parts.

      And as for the bits you quote - the Fire uses an infrared touch screen, which is less common than capacitive or resistive, so your comparison doesn't really make sense. You need to compare Apples to Apples, Fires to Fires ;)

    73. Re:Slow news day? by drolli · · Score: 1

      >A customer wants Exactly what they what, not a a car dealer's or Apple's switcheroo.

      Wrong. Maybe you. Maybe me. Maybe we like to go to a shop and say what we want. I realized that i am in a dying minority when i asked for a mobile phone with a minimum feature set, but long battery life, 6 years ago and was explained in the shop (in the middle of ~40 different phone models which all looked the same) that "it is really impossible to build a phone for *every customer*".

      Most consumers happily swallow whatever you give them, as long as blinks, has icons, sounds cool and is hyped by the media.

    74. Re:Slow news day? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Fire uses a capacitive screen. I recall the Nook Touch used an infrared screen, and did so because it was cheaper.

      Leaving aside the fact I can't find anything online to contradict the above, as I understand it, you'd expect a raised bezel for an infrared system - the Fire's surface is completely flat. I have one right next to me. Looks, feels, and acts, like a capacitive touch screen.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    75. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I told him to knock $1000 off the price. His foolish behavior cost him some cash. A customer wants Exactly what they what, not a a car dealer's or Apple's switcheroo.

      Yet you did not want what you wanted. Sounds to my like you bought the car the guy wanted to sell you. Nice example.

    76. Re:Slow news day? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      First law of showbiz: ALWAYS leave them wanting more.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    77. Re:Slow news day? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think you're right, the Kindle Touch was infrared, not the Fire.

  2. Kindle Fire 2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. Electric boogaloo?

    Seriously, what a wierd way to market a product. You'd think they'd announce the launch of the successor before they stop selling.

    I'd rather have that new google branded tab anyway.

    1. Re:Kindle Fire 2.. by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      If you remember correctly, Amazon isn't the first one to do this. Apple did this as well with the first generation iPhone, the original iPhones were sold out before the launch of the iPhone 3G.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    2. Re:Kindle Fire 2.. by noh8rz8 · · Score: 1

      they might have been sold out, but the understanding at the time that more stock was on the way... apple never said "we're not going to sell the iphone any more!"

      --
      You want to upvote/downvote? Go back to Reddit! Here we mod up/mod down.
    3. Re:Kindle Fire 2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, Amazon's doing the same thing, only with a tiny bit of honesty? How dreadful!

  3. you mean until next week by milkmage · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:you mean until next week by SailorSpork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Great! Now that there is a temporary shortage of supply, I can sell mine and trade up to a Kindle 2 or a Google Nexus 7. Once the new ones are announced, I'm sure demand for the old ones will drop to zero. Thanks for the alert!

    2. Re:you mean until next week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Nexus 7 rocks. It will be a screamin' upgrade from the Fire. You should definitely do this.

    3. Re:you mean until next week by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Great! Now that there is a temporary shortage of supply, I can sell mine and trade up to a Kindle 2 or a Google Nexus 7. Once the new ones are announced, I'm sure demand for the old ones will drop to zero. Thanks for the alert!

      Not really, there are enough people who probably are waiting for the KF2 to come out so they can pick up used KF's for under $100, hoping people will upgrade and force a glut on the market.

      Of course, Amazon probably doesn't want to risk having ot sell out the old stock at super low prices that they can't make up the loss through content sales. Better to leave it to upgraders doing so as part of the early adopter premium.

  4. They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire. by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the only reason I can think of that they would stop making money. It's like how Microsoft used to lose money on every Xbox sold, or Sony and the PS3. They wanted a foot in the door of the market, and their next offering will be something that makes them money for each unit sold, rather than losing them money.

  5. Remote deletion by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll consider the KF2 if Amazon can prove they've permanently removed the ability to remotely delete files from it. No "Sorry (that we got caught)," no "We really truly promise, cross our hearts and hope to die, that we won't use this remote-kill feature which we've conveniently left fully intact and operational on our store servers." I'm not settling for anything less than "We're sorry we fucked with your property, we were wrong to do it irrespective of any licensing disputes, and we've irreversibly crippled our own ability to ever do it again. Here's proof and here's the list of files to rename or delete on your own device to make sure that even if we change our minds, we won't be able to do it to you ever again." Otherwise, I'll keep steering people toward Nook, BeBook, Onyxbook, Kobo, and other brands. Except Sony, of course.

    I'm unwilling to buy a device that I end up not truly owning and controlling. I consider the lack of WLAN connectivity on my BeBook to be a feature after what Amazon pulled with 1984.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm unwilling to buy a device that I end up not truly owning and controlling.

      Then your choices are becoming increasingly thin, because selling devices users don't own or control is the direction of the entire industry. And people rush to buy those devices, so they sell like hotcakes, so the trend will only continue.

    2. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just back up your books with Caliber, if you're so worried about it. You should be doing so anyway, so that you're protected in the unlikely event that Amazon suddenly goes belly-up.

    3. Re:Remote deletion by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just get a Google Nexus 7? It seems to tick all those boxes and is, IMO, a nicer device to boot.

    4. Re:Remote deletion by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      It's pointless to try to swim against the tide and, yes, tablets are getting more and more locked down. There's still jailbreaking, rooting, and Nexus devices though. The really funny thing is that if I'm reading the tea leaves correctly the most open tablets will be the new Windows 8 stuff coming (not RT obviously). Crazy talk.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    5. Re:Remote deletion by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I'll consider the KF2 if Amazon can prove they've permanently removed the ability to remotely delete files from it. No "Sorry (that we got caught)," no "We really truly promise, cross our hearts and hope to die, that we won't use this remote-kill feature which we've conveniently left fully intact and operational on our store servers." I'm not settling for anything less than "We're sorry we fucked with your property, we were wrong to do it irrespective of any licensing disputes, and we've irreversibly crippled our own ability to ever do it again. Here's proof and here's the list of files to rename or delete on your own device to make sure that even if we change our minds, we won't be able to do it to you ever again." Otherwise, I'll keep steering people toward Nook, BeBook, Onyxbook, Kobo, and other brands. Except Sony, of course.

      I'm unwilling to buy a device that I end up not truly owning and controlling. I consider the lack of WLAN connectivity on my BeBook to be a feature after what Amazon pulled with 1984.

      Actually, one of the points agains the Kindle Fire in my book was that it offloaded so much to the Amazon servers. Who needs to remotely delete files when they're not really local to begin with?

      I'd scratch Nook from that list if I were you, though. The color/tablet Nooks do not allow access to local book storage the way the original Nook did. So your local copy is now more imaginary than real.

    6. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: DRM. Calibre will not touch DRM-ed .azw files. The so-called plugins available do not work either.

    7. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm not settling for anything less than "We're sorry we fucked with your property, we were wrong to do it irrespective of any licensing disputes, and we've irreversibly crippled our own ability to ever do it again. Here's proof and here's the list of files to rename or delete on your own device to make sure that even if we change our minds, we won't be able to do it to you ever again."

      Because of course it's perfectly reasonable to expect Amazon to keep up with every licensing lawsuit running through the courts in every jurisdiction. It's apparently also perfectly reasonable to want Amazon to release source code "proof" for a proprietary product, and openly endorse users screwing around in the filesystem of a device they support, opening up their technical support to infinite variety and infinite complications.

      Even if they did offer such proof that the original system was removed, any mechanism for remote code execution (whether intentionally present or not) could be abused to reimplement the same function, so the proof itself is meaningless. Even a promise not to do it again is meaningless, because a court order could trump that.

      They don't even have a reason to be sorry for altering "your" property. There's a nice "terms of service" contract that you agreed to by using the product, and those terms let Amazon do whatever they want. They had your permission to do what they did, so why should they apologize for it now that somebody regrets that contract?

      I'm unwilling to buy a device that I end up not truly owning and controlling.

      And manufacturers aren't willing to support or in any way deal with the inconsistent administrative mess of letting you control the devices. Nobody really cares if you buy a device for the hardware, mod it 'til your heart's content, and never let the company know it was turned on. The moment your untrusted device starts dealing with their network, though, you become a threat. So go ahead, and use your offline reader. The companies that offer connected devices don't want to deal with your need for "control", anyway.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    8. Re:Remote deletion by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are well beyond the "if things arent exactly as i demand, i wont participate.". Like it or not, we are not the drivers of tech anymore and our influence in telling people not to buy spy machines is gone. THe only path left is RMS style or else a doctrine of mitigation like stripping DRM yourself, and backing up on your personal network.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:Remote deletion by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      They can only rip you off if you Let them rip you off. Amazon screwed me over a couple years ago. Sent me a product that did not match what was advertised, and refused to offer me a discount or refund. (It was a Gamecube Bundle and it came with none of the games Amazon advertised; they called it a "typo" and did nothing to make it right.)

      So I just screwed them back: Dear Amazon: I returned the Gamecube, but you never issued a refund. Here's my proof: Tracking number 0123456789. "We're sorry sir. We'll issue you a refund immediately."

      Meanwhile the Gamecube is sitting under my television. A corporation can only screw you if you LET them screw you. Learn to fight back. In my view Amazon is a THIEF that falsely-advertised a product & refused to make it right, so they deserved to have some karmic payback.

      Just as if I see someone stabbing a citizen in a street, I won't hestiate to pull-out my gun and kill the stabber immediately. Don't mistreat people. Payback's a bitch.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    10. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look harder...Calibre plugins that "decode" .azw files are out there.

    11. Re:Remote deletion by bws111 · · Score: 2

      So what you're saying is that you're a thief. Since obviously they would have refunded your money if you had actually sent the thing back, they have not 'ripped you off'.

    12. Re:Remote deletion by 0xDEAD · · Score: 1

      I felt the same way for the longest time until I discovered Calibre. I download all my books of the Kindle, convert them to a different format and keep local backups. If Amazon decides to delete the version they have in "the cloud" I simply copy the one from my cloud over! In the mean time it is quite nice to have hundreds of books on a single device the size of a paperback that fits in my back pocket.

    13. Re:Remote deletion by DougDot · · Score: 1

      I agree too. Love my Nexus 7, much beter device than the KF.

    14. Re:Remote deletion by Dreamlandlocal · · Score: 2

      The default OS on a KF is a wretched, miserable mess with so much customization and lockdown that you would hardly recognize an Android OS in there at all. I could not recommend using FK in this fashion - before any consideration is made of Amazon's sneaky remote access issues.

      At the same time, for those with the ability and/or nerve to do so, rooting and installing an ICS Android ROM gives you a fantastic Android device that can do *just about* everything the stock KF can do... and a whole lot more. The process is well documented and relatively easy.

    15. Re:Remote deletion by interval1066 · · Score: 0

      You do not have a legal right to do absolutely anything you want.

      Your tagline is not enlightening, witty, or interesting.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    16. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just get a Google Nexus 7? It seems to tick all those boxes and is, IMO, a nicer device to boot.

      I thought so too, but they suffer from a pretty nasty flaw where the screen (apparently only held in place by 1mm wide tape) lifts out of the device on the left side. The resulting stress results in the screen cracking.

      My first N7 started lifting out before I'd owned it even a day. Now I'm thinking even if the replacement doesn't show the issue right away, it will once my 15 day warranty is up.

      Buyer beware.

    17. Re:Remote deletion by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Ahh, but the Nook Tablet can be soft-rooted with nothing more than an SD card. Warranty issue? Pop out the SD card and it'll boot the stock firmware with no trace of the soft-root. More to the point, when you soft-root and use the Nook app, all your downloaded books are saved to your SD card.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    18. Re:Remote deletion by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Google can remote delete apps at the very least. Probably more.

    19. Re:Remote deletion by firewrought · · Score: 1

      They don't even have a reason to be sorry for altering "your" property. There's a nice "terms of service" contract that you agreed to by using the product, and those terms let Amazon do whatever they want. They had your permission to do what they did, so why should they apologize for it now that somebody regrets that contract?

      I have never felt sorry for breaking a law per se, only for the harm that I have caused others and the gracelessness of my own behaviors... regardless of whether I was acting within or outside of my legal rights.

      The moment your untrusted device starts dealing with their network, though, you become a threat. So go ahead, and use your offline reader. The companies that offer connected devices don't want to deal with your need for "control", anyway.

      Gracious... this sounds like the ma bell mentality back in the day when you could only hook up AT&T-authorized equipment to the phone network. Your statement has an accuracy of sorts, but it's an old world command-and-control mentality, and the tech support burden [imposed by user control] is getting less all the time as new OS'es have smarter app isolation.

      Do you support gun rights, just out of curiosity? Do you believe the rhetoric about people have an intrinsic human right to defend themselves? Some of these gun people sound a little paranoid (with their "need for control"), but they have some good arguments, and maybe someday Microsoft/Amazon/Google/someone else will push out an update so egregious that people will realize they have a fundamental need for control over their own computational technology as well.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    20. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Just as if I see someone stabbing a citizen in a street, I won't hestiate to pull-out my gun and kill the stabber immediately. Don't mistreat people. Payback's a bitch.

      Then you'd be guilty of murder. Merely having a gun does not entitle you to take someone else's life. You are first obligated to try everything possible to resolve the situation using minimal force. That means first yelling, then approaching, maybe attempting to separate the assailant and victim (if you can reasonably do so), and attempting to disarm the assailant. Finally, if you have tried everything else, or if you are directly threatened with imminent lethal force, you may use your firearm as a last resort.

      "I'm helping karma" is not a legal defense, though it could help your insanity plea.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    21. Re:Remote deletion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read the rest of this guys posts? He does not need any additional help with an insanity plea.

    22. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I have never felt sorry for breaking a law per se, only for the harm that I have caused others and the gracelessness of my own behaviors... regardless of whether I was acting within or outside of my legal rights.

      Good for you. Perhaps Mr. Bezos will have a change of heart and become a users'-rights fanatic. Perhaps then he'll feel sorry, and risk his company by not complying with a C&D notice. The law is only supposed to represent a consensus (ideally) of baseline morals. If someone's personal ethics raise the bar higher, that's perfectly fine.

      this sounds like the ma bell mentality back in the day when you could only hook up AT&T-authorized equipment to the phone network. Your statement has an accuracy of sorts, but it's an old world command-and-control mentality, and the tech support burden [imposed by user control] is getting less all the time as new OS'es have smarter app isolation.

      It's exactly the same argument, for the same (surface) reason: In any connected system, one misbehaving device could compromise the integrity of the entire network. While I certainly hope Amazon's infrastructure is a little more stable than that, actually putting openness into a legal framework is an exceedingly difficult task. Where does the open requirement end? Should Kindle users be able to hijack their devices' Whispernet access to feed a WiFi hotspot? What if a botnet of Kindle-impersonating devices starts buying ebooks to launder money?

      There are so many pitfalls to current legislative efforts that all have failed quickly. What I'd like to see eventually is something similar to the phone system: Defined standards that the provider must expose, and any standards-compliant device must be allowed. Of course, applying that to a field as broad as "user devices" is an enormous task. I expect that definitions will eventually be reached, but it will take time and yet more generations of devices that offer wide arrays of features, until a particular feature set is molded into a standard.

      Do you support gun rights...? Do you believe ... people have an intrinsic human right to defend themselves?

      No and yes, respectively. While I believe people have a right to be secure, guns do not provide that security. They provide empty comfort. Today, anyone who can gather $1000 can buy some basic body armor online, and be fairly well-protected against most small handguns. Regardless of that, having a gun pointed at you is terrifying, and easily removes clear judgement, so rather than being an effective deterrent, a "defense" gun is just likely to add to the bullets flying around.

      Currently, though, practically anyone can get a handgun, get drunk, and kill an innocent bystander because they thought it would be a good idea to shoot cans in the street. While I like the ability to shoot things in a safe manner (and I'll do so myself occasionally), public presence and use of firearms is a hazard, for which I have no good solution.

      Some of these gun people sound a little paranoid (with their "need for control"), but they have some good arguments, and maybe someday Microsoft/Amazon/Google/someone else will push out an update so egregious that people will realize they have a fundamental need for control over their own computational technology as well.

      That's begging the question, RMS...

      In my opinion, what people should first realize is that there are two distinct models: One where you own information, and one where you only use the information. To illustrate with a car analogy (this is Slashdot, after all), it may be compared to owning or renting a car. If you own a car, you can do anything you want with it - rebuild the engine, customize the aerodynamics, or even blow it up (safely, please) if you want. If you rent a car, you can only use it per the details of your rental agreement, but you aren't responsible for maintenance, upgrades, or often even emergency rep

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    23. Re:Remote deletion by gewalker · · Score: 2

      Clearly you are not a lawyer. A Good Samaritan defense for use of lethal force is perfectly viable in many jurisdictions, often explicitly excluded from the definition of homicide. E.g.,
      Mississippi code 97-3-15 paragraphs e&f.

      It might even be considered the moral thing as well depending on the circumstances.

    24. Re:Remote deletion by swillden · · Score: 1

      Now I'm thinking even if the replacement doesn't show the issue right away, it will once my 15 day warranty is up.

      I doubt it. Judging by the reviews and comments around the web there are a small number of defective devices (especially the 16 GB versions, for some reason), but they are a small minority. It's unlikely you'd have gotten two bad ones in a row. The couple of dozen owned by people I know -- including my own -- are all trouble-free.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    25. Re:Remote deletion by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The Nook Color can be rooted that way. I don't think the Nook Tablet can be.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:Remote deletion by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I'm 100% positive, since I did it.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    27. Re:Remote deletion by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      I thought you had to revert to the factory ROM before you could root at all on the Tablet.

      Rooting the Nook and re-downloading to SD is a bit much. Why not just install the desktop app and bypass the middleman, as far as that goes? It's not like you really gain anything. The Nook's internal book store is still off-limits.

      Anyway, the next-generation Nook will probably be based on Windows 8. With Secure Boot.

    28. Re:Remote deletion by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Mr. Bezos will have a change of heart and become a users'-rights fanatic. Perhaps then he'll feel sorry, and risk his company by not complying with a C&D notice.

      Yeah... not holding my breath on that one. :-)

      The law is only supposed to represent a consensus (ideally) of baseline morals. If someone's personal ethics raise the bar higher, that's perfectly fine.

      No... law and morality are quite different. That was my point... you feel sorry for something based on your morals, not based on whether you are in the right legally or not.

      In any connected system, one misbehaving device could compromise the integrity of the entire network. What I'd like to see eventually is ... Defined standards that the provider must expose, and any standards-compliant device must be allowed.

      I don't think this a big concern for vendors. Or rather, it's such an intrinsic concern of exposing content over the internet that it's taken for granted that security is something you have to do whether you have control over endpoint devices or not. Keep in mind that Amazon delivers ebooks to Kindle, Android, IPad, and PC (and so does Barnes & Noble, Google, Netflix, etc.). The real reason to control the device (aside from simpler support and better DRM) is to set yourself up as the sole service conduit and create "an optimal branding experience" (gag).

      Actually putting openness into a legal framework is an exceedingly difficult task. Where does the open requirement end?

      Interesting question, but I think the original poster was boycotting instead of demanding a legislative solution. Now your original point to him that Amazon can meaningfully surrender control of purchased content (without also surrendering servicing of the device) is quite valid and quite pertinent. You've got to wonder though if laws covering ownership/sales don't also apply to digital sales (unless countermanded by an EULA)... a consumer-friendly legislative approach might be found in our existing laws.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    29. Re:Remote deletion by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      >>>Then you'd be guilty of murder.

      No wonder juries send people to jail for self-defense. They must be idiots like you. If I see some stabber mutilating a citizen with his knife, I'm not going to just say, "Hey you stop that." It only takes seconds to stab a person to death. You need to act to save the life, and do it immediately. If you don't act the victim will be a corpse.

      Srtuipid painsy-assed liberal Democrat. Afraid to punish a killer when you catch him IN THE ACT of murder. Go burn ion hell.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    30. Re:Remote deletion by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Actually I typed the wrong word. It was MASTERCARD who I gave the tracking number to, because Amazon refused to refund the money. The amazon operator just kept insisting they delivered the advertised product & refused to take it back. So I had to take it to a higher level-of-authority above amazon. TG for credit card protection.

      And somehow I don't feel guilty about stealing from a Dishonest corporation that false-advertises Gamecube Bundles and instead just mails a regular gamecube. Anymore than I would cry if Foxconn was put out of business for labor abuse. Or if I learned Goldmann Sachs is being dissolved for mortgage fraud.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    31. Re:Remote deletion by Golddess · · Score: 1
      Maybe I misread the post, but it looked like cpu6502 was explaining a scenario where they walked in on someone being actively stabbed. Not a pair of people standing off at a distance, not a pair of people with one beginning to advance on the other, not even a pair of people with one beginning to make a first strike. No. It was two people where the one had already gotten off at least one good shank, presumably somewhere in the gut.

      That said..

      That means first yelling, then approaching

      Both of which I do as I am drawing my firearm. I'm not exactly a supershot, so a yell may be the faster way of getting the victim to safety (by causing the attacker to flee) than my trying to aim and fire at the attacker as he is stabbing his victim (I may end up hitting the victim instead, or missing entirely). After all, my first priority is to get the victim to a hospital, not to enact vengeance.

      But if the attacker hasn't stopped stabbing by the time I am ready to take my shot, you can be damned sure I'd take it. I wouldn't first mess around with trying to separate the two or disarm the attacker. He's got a fucking knife! I don't know about you, but I ain't exactly stab-proof. So I'm gonna keep my distance from someone who is actively stabbing another person.

      And if that makes me a murderer in your eyes, well, all I can say is that I feel sorry for you.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    32. Re:Remote deletion by tylernt · · Score: 1

      is, IMO, a nicer device to boot.

      Huh, it never even occurred to me to evaluate a device's startup sequence when considering a purchase.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    33. Re:Remote deletion by Xest · · Score: 1

      Only if they're installed from the Play store, and only explicitly so if they're malicious.

    34. Re:Remote deletion by Xest · · Score: 1

      It sucks if you got a faulty one, but the vast majority seem to be fine - certainly all those delivered more recently seem to be past the problem. I guess it was a manufacturing fault in the earliest batch(es).

    35. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      A Good Samaritan defense usually does not override the requirement to use minimal force.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    36. Re:Remote deletion by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Start with the factory ROM, root it on day one, run your aftermarket shit off an SD card, and keep your warranty. What's so hard about that? I somehow managed, with no prior research other beyond "it's possible to root the nook tablet", to gather everything I needed in order to do this within 15min of unboxing my tablet back in March; it's come a long way farther since then.

      I'll grant your point about installing the desktop app, but then I'll ask... If you're going to acknowledge that as an option for obtaining the files for backup purposes, then your original reasoning for dismissing the Nook becomes invalid. I was purposely ignoreing that solution in an attempt to work around your logic, rather than invalidate it. That said, if you do as I said above, there's no redownloading, because you never download them to the Nook's internal book storage to begin with, making it a perfect workaround (functionality-wise) and not "a bit much" as you say.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    37. Re:Remote deletion by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I changed thoughts mid-sentence there, didn't I? Well, the original questions would have been "If you're going to acknowledge that as an option for obtaining the files for backup purposes, isn't your original reasoning for dismissing the Nook invalid?" Shame on me for setting up the conclusion I wanted you to come to on your own.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    38. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I've been stabbed before, in a dark alleyway. There was blood everywhere, and a kid crouching behind a trashcan. That kid was our cameraman, and my good friend with the prop knife would probably not be too happy to get a bullet wound for making a crappy amateur movie. Even being caught in the act of stabbing, there can always be an exception.

      That said..

      Both of which I do as I am drawing my firearm. ... After all, my first priority is to get the victim to a hospital, not to enact vengeance.

      And that's probably enough to satisfy the requirement for using minimal force. Tried yelling and approaching, and neither worked? It might very well be time to shoot. There is of course leniency over whether you should try separating the attacker and victim, or throwing rocks, or stripping naked and streaking past the attacker. Unreasonable options (or ones that likely seemed unreasonable given the moment) aren't expected to be tried, but trying anything before resorting to your weapon is a good sign of where your priorities are.

      My point was that the anarchic vigilantism cpu6502 is so fond of is not inherently more legal or moral than the acts being avenged. As a firearm ex-instructor, if I'd heard any student making a serious comment about killing anyone "without hesitation", I would likely fail them immediately. That mentality just isn't safe to be in control of a firearm.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    39. Re:Remote deletion by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>> You are first obligated to try everything possible to resolve the situation using minimal force.

      Tell that to the cop who found a homeless man *sitting down* and whittling some wood, told them man to drop the knife, and then fired 3 shots a mere 1/2 second later..... killing the guy who was doing nothing wrong.

      At least in MY case I'm saving who is being brutally stabbed to death (by shooting the murderer). What's the cop's excuse?

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    40. Re:Remote deletion by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      According to a news report of the only similar incident I could find, the man with the knife was walking, and approached the officer with the knife in hand. Though the shooting was eventually determined to be "unjustified", under Washington law, the officer was free to kill if he believed the man to be a threat.

      I'm sure in your case you'd think you were saving someone being brutally stabbed to death, but you're just as likely as the officer to have no idea what's really going on.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    41. Re:Remote deletion by Golddess · · Score: 1

      I've been stabbed before, in a dark alleyway. There was blood everywhere, and a kid crouching behind a trashcan. That kid was our cameraman, and my good friend with the prop knife would probably not be too happy to get a bullet wound for making a crappy amateur movie. Even being caught in the act of stabbing, there can always be an exception.

      Funny you should say that, because it demonstrates another important reason to not shoot first and ask questions later that I only realized after I'd posted. Since I've just walked into an unknown situation, it makes sense to give the attacker time to do something to indicate that they are no longer a threat (or never were in the first place). I mean, if someone else saw me draw a firearm, but didn't see the reason, I'd hate to end up shot because they decided to take a "shoot first and ask questions later" approach.

      By the way, thanks for explaining what you meant, and I apologize if I sounded a little rude.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    42. Re:Remote deletion by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      The ability is there, The software doesn't know if what it is deleting is malicious or not. Plus taking google at face value is a bit dim. After all this is the company that supposedly had no paid journalists and then managed to come up with a list after the judge told them to get real. They're not going to disclose anything that makes them look bad.

    43. Re:Remote deletion by Xest · · Score: 1

      The ability is there to remove playstore enabled apps and nothing else. That's been examined over and over and over.

      Sure Google could delete non-malicious apps, but in the past 4 - 5 years since release they haven't, whereas Amazon has removed legit content.

      "After all this is the company that supposedly had no paid journalists and then managed to come up with a list after the judge told them to get real. They're not going to disclose anything that makes them look bad."

      Ah I see, so you're just a Google hater, because that's a complete twist on reality. In reality the judge asked for a list of who'd been paid to blog about the case. Oracle explicitly paid two people to blog about the case, that is, Oracle paid them precisely for that purpose with the intention of swaying public opinion. In contrast, Google paid absolutely no one to do this explicity, but asked the judge if they needed to include people whom they had paid for some other reasons, but who had also blogged about the case off their own back - poining out this could include completely independent bloggers who get money from Google via AdSense for example. The judge said they didn't need to go that far but just a list of people who Google had paid at some point and whom had blogged about the case. Looking through the list you can see that the pay/blog link of those they listed is tenuous at best and merely a cautious list. Unlike Oracle, Google didn't explicitly pay anyone to blog about the case, only that some people they paid chose to blog about the case. Note that some Oracle employees did this also, but Oracle chose not to disclose any of them - Oracle only disclosed those they explicitly paid for the case - so Google were much more open than Oracle in that Google had no explicitly paid bloggers for the case, but some bloggers who they'd paid for other work in the past, and Oracle had 2 explicitly paid bloggers for the case, and some undisclosed number of bloggers who blogged about the case whom they'd paid for other stuff and blogged off their own back. Note that we know someo of this people exist, because Oracle has paid Gosling in the past, and we know he blogged about it, and yet Oracle didn't disclose him.

      So yeah, I know Google has the potential to be evil over this sort of thing, but unlike Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, et. al. the evil they've done to date is relatively non-existent. They haven't sold my personal data illegaly like Facebook, they haven't taken away legit apps time and time again whilst abusing their monopoly position in digital music etc. like Apple, and they haven't strangled the market and abuse their monopoly like Microsoft. Perhaps they'll do something like Apple and Amazon and will remove legit apps at some point, but until then they're still the most trustworthy.

      This wont matter to you though, as you clearly have some fanboy agenda. That much is betrayed by your attitude.

  6. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    Ya that was my exact thoughts as well. I went the nook route rather than the kindle route, and I went with an actual Ereader than a tablet but I've played with the fire and it is a good tablet especially for its price.

  7. typo by noh8rz8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    tfs:

    Amazon will definitely be selling more Kindle Fires, however, the next one you'll be able to buy will probably have a "2 at the end of the name.

    I take it this is a typo... surely they meant 2", as in, Kindle Fire 2", Finally, a kindle fire that you can fit in your mouth!

    --
    You want to upvote/downvote? Go back to Reddit! Here we mod up/mod down.
    1. Re:typo by pmontra · · Score: 1

      The Kindle Fire 1" could fit in an eye. Prior art against Google glasses!

    2. Re:typo by Meski · · Score: 0

      Hmm, length, radius, circumference, diameter? :) Radius wouldn't be bad.

    3. Re:typo by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Kindle Fire 1" could fit in an eye. Prior art against Google glasses!

      And they could call it the 'EyePod'.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    4. Re:typo by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      There is plenty of prior art to google glasses, no need to make stuff up.

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:typo by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Radius, but it's spherically shaped, which is weird.

    6. Re:typo by noh8rz8 · · Score: 1

      I think apple was recently granted a patent for wearable computers. Doh!

      --
      You want to upvote/downvote? Go back to Reddit! Here we mod up/mod down.
    7. Re:typo by skine · · Score: 1

      Simpsons did it.

      Er... wait...

  8. I'd like to see.. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An all season, outdoor weathersealed version. Probably won't happen, but it would be more useful to me than one which shorts out in a light drizzle (the ones they've been making.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:I'd like to see.. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      An all season, outdoor weathersealed version. Probably won't happen, but it would be more useful to me than one which shorts out in a light drizzle (the ones they've been making.

      Most people, and I do mean most people - read indoors when it's raining.

      Hopeless edge cases like yourself are often left on their own to sink or short out.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:I'd like to see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put it in a ziplock bag.

    3. Re:I'd like to see.. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Most people, and I do mean most people - read indoors when it's raining.

      Most people with e-readers, and I do mean most people with e-readers, take the e-readers with them. That's their purpose -- so you don't have to lug around fifty pounds of paper. This not only goes for e-readers, but tablets, phones, and laptops as well. They whould be at least water-resistant if not waterproof.

    4. Re:I'd like to see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's raining indoors you should be fixing the roof instead of playing with your tablet.

    5. Re:I'd like to see.. by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you must indeed be a 'hopeless edge case' if you enjoy reading in the bath, by a pool, on a beach, on a camping or hiking trip, etc.

    6. Re:I'd like to see.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Yes, you must indeed be a 'hopeless edge case' if you enjoy reading in the bath, by a pool, on a beach, on a camping or hiking trip, etc.

      Yep, that's me. I've been known to go hiking when it's pouring rain out and carrying an umbrella. I do tend to go places regardless of weather and having something to read or be able to read documentation on, while out and about would be a big plus.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:I'd like to see.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I know! One think I hate about reading on my e-Ink Kindle is how when you're outside and it starts raining, all the e-ink starts to smudge...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  9. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by iceperson · · Score: 1

    All of the examples you give are closer to a razor and blade business model I think.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freebie_marketing

  10. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Or at least, they must not have been making much. If they can increase the specs slightly and the profit significantly that's enough reason to bring out a new edition. There's a zillion tablets out there now, so they could have a rebranded whatsit with a slightly modified bezel and a different rear panel sticker with little agony on their own parts.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. A bit of a mouthful by Bogtha · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    With that in mind, Amazon will definitely be selling more Kindle Fires, however, the next one you'll be able to buy will probably have a "2 at the end of the name. Jeff Bezos said that the Kindle Fire is Amazon's most successful product launch so far and that there's 'an exciting roadmap ahead.' He also confirmed Amazon will continue to offer hardware, but there's no detail beyond that."

    Huh. I don't really think that an Amazon Kindle Fire 2 at the end of the name. Jeff Bezos said that the Kindle Fire is Amazon's most successful product launch so far and that there's 'an exciting roadmap ahead.' He also confirmed Amazon will continue to offer hardware, but there's no detail beyond that. is a particularly catchy name for a tablet, but I'm sure Amazon have done their market research and focus groups.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:A bit of a mouthful by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

      Amazon Kindle Blaze
      Amazon Kindle Bonfire
      Amazon Kindle Campfire
      Amazon Kindle Charring
      Amazon Kindle Combustion
      Amazon Kindle Conflagration
      Amazon Kindle Embers
      Amazon Kindle Flame
      Amazon Kindle Flare
      Amazon Kindle Heat
      Amazon Kindle Inferno
      Amazon Kindle Scorching
      Amazon Kindle Searing

    2. Re:A bit of a mouthful by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Since the old Kindle Fire is gone, there is no need for a "2." They'll probably follow Apple's recent strategy; it's just be "The New Kindle Fire."

  12. Hope it has a media slot by identity0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know Amazon is trying to get everone to store everything in the cloud, but I really hope they put a media slot (micro or regular SD) on the new Kindle.

    I'm seriously considering the nook tablet over the Kindle or Nexus 7, because I can't imagine doing anything on a tablet that really pushes the CPU/GPU, but I can see needing more than 16gb of storage. And not having a nearby wifi spot for the cloud, or the patience to download everything over wifi instead of swapping out a memory card.

    1. Re:Hope it has a media slot by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      as an owner of a kindle fire i would seriously consider upgrading even if the only improvement was an sd card or microsd card slot.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    2. Re:Hope it has a media slot by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      Media slots are fading, not growing. Expect to see less and less of them from the big players. They dont want you to 'side-load' content.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:Hope it has a media slot by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather store it in at amazon's warehouse.
      My apartment is already full of VHS tapes, DVDs, and Games. Oh and books. I have to sell stuff just to make room for more.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Hope it has a media slot by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Ehh, I haven't needed more than 8GB so far (I do have a 16GB though) on my Nexus 7. If/when it comes to it, I've got my £2 usb OTG adapter cable and my existing 16GB thumbdrive on my keyring should I need more portable space - and I'm sure I can chuck a 32GB or two in my luggage if I'm travelling far.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    5. Re:Hope it has a media slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you would rather store a movie/book/whatever on Amazon's servers than on an SD card because your apartment is littered with things that are a couple of orders of magnitude larger than an SD card? Are you on crack, or are you simply confused about the concept of having something on the SD card that you do not have a physical copy of?

    6. Re:Hope it has a media slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm currently building what I'm calling 'a portable cloud' of my own to go in the car for this very reason. Cheap tablets have little storage, and I don't want to be loading 3 up for the kids every time we go away for a couple of days given how long they take each time.

      My plan is that the portable cloud will sync up to a repo on my server using git and this will contain a dynamic website with movies and music on it encoded to be streamed through the android browser. I'm not sure if the Allwinner A10 tablets can do HTML5 H264 video or not yet though.

      There is also a power supply requirement that I haven't quite sorted out yet, I plan to use the switched 12V to act as an on trigger and run Pi, HD & wifi from a large LiOn portable cellphone charger. The Pi will be notified when the car stops and will decide for itself when to turn off with the GPIO. Pretty simple, and one evening of hacking was enough to confirm that it's possible to serve content to an SGS2.

    7. Re:Hope it has a media slot by luther349 · · Score: 1

      the new acer icona 110 is coming out in a few weeks its also a 200$ tigra 3 but it also has hdmi out joypad support and a sd slot.

    8. Re:Hope it has a media slot by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they don't want the FAT problems.

      it's simple though, don't buy them. aaanyhow, don't most win8 devices have them? and I think winpho8 is bringing them back too?(of course.. not for app installation or such haha).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Hope it has a media slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Licensing is the big issue with FAT, specifically FAT32. Microsoft wants $$$ for that.

      I haven't seen any problems with 'side-load' content though, as I've had no issues with loading content on the several devices I've had including my Nexus 7.

    10. Re:Hope it has a media slot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK the stock OS on the Nexus 7 doesn't recognise USB storage devices, which is a shame. Keyboards definitely work fine.

    11. Re:Hope it has a media slot by swillden · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the stock OS on the Nexus 7 doesn't recognise USB storage devices, which is a shame. Keyboards definitely work fine.

      You have to root it, but Stickmount works on the Nexus 7: http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1093875-how-to-use-usb-drives-with-nexus-7-root/

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  13. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Swampash · · Score: 1

    Either that or they're just plain shitting themselves that Apple is about to eat their lunch.

  14. Out before the iPad mini by Picass0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good timing for Amazon if they can sell out their existing inventory before Apple moves into the 7 inch device market. Perhaps Amazon has seen the writing on the wall. I expect many players will be forced out of the market.

    If Amazon does a Fire 2 it will need to be more than a vanilla Android with a custom GUI. 7 inch devices are about to become a market requiring innovation, not just low pricing.

    1. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good to know there's no innovation in the 7" tablet market until Apple arrives :P

    2. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just you watch.. Someone will claim that apple invented the 7" tablet form factor...

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    3. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have had to. They have a 4ish ipod touch and a 10ish ipad, its preposterous, they didn't invent everything in between. Sheesh, yous peoples...

    4. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Bigby · · Score: 1

      I don't care what the iPad "Mini" does, price is always the #1 factor when it comes to market dominance. Based on prior prices by Apple, Amazon won't have a problem selling 7 inch tablets. You have to be joking if you think a several hundred dollar tablet can compete with a $100 or $200 tablet.

    5. Re:Out before the iPad mini by fermion · · Score: 1
      I like the Fire because of size and price. I bought a refub for $140 as an alternative for time when the iPad was too big, such as late night reading. It was money well spent. The Fire is a well designed Android device, makes little effort to be a iPad, but is integrated well with Amazon content. I don't know if I would be interested in a small iPad.

      The only problem i have with the Fire is the battery life and the choice of USB. I only charge my devices overnight, and mostly they can last all day. Yet the Fire often is not able to last all day, even if minimal use. I have seen battery reports as little as three or four hours. This is unacceptable and make the fire not suitable as a primary device. I know the issue is the wireless, but really, am I going to manually turn on the wireless as I need it and off when I don't? If they are going to have a new Fire they need to have a rated battery life of at least 10 hours, not the current 8.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      They should focus on e-ink tablets instead of trying to compete with Apple. Because if you're not Apple, then you're competing with everybody else on the price tag. And low-cost Android tablets are already available for under 100$ and I don't think Amazon can beat companies like Coby on pricing.

      What we need is the next step, color e-ink Kindles. I they can keep wi-fi and the Webkit browser in the new e-ink Kindles, it's a plus. It makes a very nice low-power and long battery life portable browser.

    7. Re:Out before the iPad mini by chispito · · Score: 1

      They have had to. They have a 4ish ipod touch and a 10ish ipad, its preposterous, they didn't invent everything in between. Sheesh, yous peoples...

      There are several reasons for Apple hate in this case.

      1) Apple often does claim to invent features that have been around forever, but that they had previously said were unnecessary. Example: multi-button mice, or scroll wheels.

      2) The company has already said nobody wants a 7" tablet.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    8. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. If it doesn't come close to my current tablet, there's no reason to upgrade. Actually, unless you're seriously short on money, there's no way to justify any ~7 inch tablet other than this.

    9. Re:Out before the iPad mini by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can compete on quality.

    10. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be why the ipad is selling so poorly.

    11. Re:Out before the iPad mini by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      7 inch devices are about to become a market requiring innovation, not just low pricing.

      I completely disagree with you on that. Low pricing is what sells low-end tablets, period. See: HP Touchpad.

      People who demand "innovation" (an overused term) will pay extra for high end tablets.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    12. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people shop based on price, they don't shop based on quality. If they shop based on quality, they buy an iPad.

      Apple: 1
      Coby: 1
      Amazon: 0

    13. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I shopped for a tablet on quality, and I didn't pick an ipad. I picked the Asus Tranformer Infinity.

    14. Re:Out before the iPad mini by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      as to 2), Apple says a lot of things, like that IE is a fine browser, powerpc is the way to the future and a bunch of other nutty things.

      I wonder about kf2 though if it's going to be based on ics 4.0 and if it'll allow sideloading as easily as kf1.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, they did invent the 7" tablet. It was called the "Newton"

    16. Re:Out before the iPad mini by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      I've had my Fire for 6 months and don't have any battery problems, including when WiFi is turned on. All day is not a problem, although I do not watch video with it. I'm guessing your battery doesn't hold a full charge anymore. Can you swap it out?

    17. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just you watch.. Someone will claim that apple invented the 7" tablet form factor...

      I'm just waiting for someone to claim that Apple invented the "inch." They've already "invented" everything else.

    18. Re:Out before the iPad mini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you see the patent applications? One each for the Number 7 and the inch...

    19. Re:Out before the iPad mini by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I can typically get two days of moderate use out of a fully charged Kindle Fire, which is a hell of a lot better than my incompetently designed Galaxy Nexus (even with an extended battery I'm lucky to get 24 hours out of it with light use.) So I suspect you just have a bad battery.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can get a cheap, no-name, Android tablet with a capacitive touchscreen for less than $150 and the KF's specs were always fairly low. The CPU's OK, but the screen is 1024x600, there's stereo speakers but no microphone, there's no camera, and the only ports are audio out and micro USB - no video, no audio in. Oh, and it has a whopping 6G of RAM.

    I suspect, actually, the KF does cost less than $200 to build. Not much less, but enough for it not to make a loss if someone buys one and never buys a single app or piece of music.

    This development strikes me as a classic "Build anticipation for KF2" thing, not a "Phew, we got rid of the things. They were taking up space" type complaint.

    Bear in mind that if the KF2 is a sub-$100 device, or alternatively is a $200 device with specs rivaling the N7, people who just bought a KF1 a few days before are going to be very upset with Amazon unless they issue free upgrades. Older Slashdotters may remember Amstrad's CPC664 fiasco where Amstrad replaced a 64K home computer with a 128K one over night, and the resultant bad press it got Amstrad! Consumers think they're being ripped off if a manufacturer makes their brand new device obsolete.

    I'm very interested to see what the KF2 will be. Are Amazon going to go for cheap, or are they going to go for a Nexus 7 competitor?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  16. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...but I've played with the fire..."

    Traditional wisdom would recommend against such actions.

  17. Kindle Fire 2 by Danzigism · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would you continue to make an old product when your new product (Kindle Fire 2) is scheduled to be released any day now? Nothing about that seems bizarre to me.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:Kindle Fire 2 by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Its not, this is a non story, except it may shine as an annoying beacon of truth to Apple that tablets people want can be had for half the price they want to charge for theirs.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  18. Keyboard? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Still want Kindle Keyboard v2. Browsing dictionary via or typing on touchscreen is quite cumbersome. I read mostly foreign language books - a real keyboard is a big deal to me.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Keyboard? by Reibisch · · Score: 1

      +1

      I'd love an upgrade to my precious Kindle Keyboard 3G.

  19. Somewhat relevant VGCats reference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  20. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a cheap, no-name, Android tablet with a capacitive touchscreen for less than $150 and the KF's specs were always fairly low. The CPU's OK, but the screen is 1024x600, there's stereo speakers but no microphone, there's no camera, and the only ports are audio out and micro USB - no video, no audio in. Oh, and it has a whopping 6G of RAM.

    6 gig of "RAM"? If you have a geek card, you need to turn it in, dude.

  21. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by bws111 · · Score: 1

    The headline of the article is "Kindle Fire 2 expected next week". Why would they deliberately increase the stock of the current generation, when they are going to have to sell them at a discount when the new generation comes out, thus competing with themselves?

    The ideal situation for a manufacturer to be in is to sell out all of his old stock exactly when the new product is available. Next best is to have a small gap between product availabilty, building a little pent-up demand. Worst is having excess stock of the old product which must be dumped on the market.

  22. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Based on the fact that they have some sort of event scheduled for next week, I'd guess that they ordered what they thought would be enough units from manufacturing to hold them over until the KF2 is released, but ran out. Rather than order a whole new manufacturing run to tide them over for a week, looks like they just decided to wait for their new product launch.

  23. I agree by daninaustin · · Score: 1

    The Nexus 7 is a great device. It's nice to be able to run the latest software without having to jailbreak/root the device sine most MDM software checks for this and disables your access to corporate data. So far I couldn't be happier with mine.

  24. No Touchy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice the Kindle Touch is also "out of stock" ?

    1. Re:No Touchy! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The Kindle Touch 3G and the non-touch Kindles are not out of stock.

  25. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    They are probably releasing the Kindle Fire 2 next week. Most likely they incorrectly managed their supply lines, didn't order enough Kindle Fires, and now don't want to order more.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  26. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Brain fart. Yes, I meant flash, or whatever it is you youngsters call non-volatile memory used for long term storage these days.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  27. That makes my shopping simple by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

    Barring some announcement from Amazon, my next tablet will be the Google Nexus 7.

    1. Re:That makes my shopping simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the announcement next week?

  28. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Incorrectly managed their supply lines? Sounds damn near perfect.

  29. Ziplock by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Using a ziplock bag seems like a reasonable hack for some people. I even confirmed it works just now. Grabbed a bag from the cabinet, shoved a Kindle Fire in the bag (case and all), turned it on, and proceeded to use it without a problem.

    I also just tried a Kindle Touch and LeapPad. Both work fine (though the LeapPad stylus is awkward).

    Buy a good ziplock bag and you should be fine even if you go swimming.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  30. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    And maybe not. The original Kindle sold for around $500. Do you think they felt "ripped" off when Amazon released the K2 for $250? Or the current base version for $79? Another example: I know many people who paid $25,000 for their Echo-style Priuses but a year later a dealer offered me one for a mere $18,000 because he knew a Prius 2 was coming soon. When you adopt something early, you should understand that you are paying a premium price and that later versions will be cheaper.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  31. get a real car by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    stick shift -> automatic is rarely an upgrade.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:get a real car by Dreamlandlocal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although I would nonchalantly agree with you, many people including my wife, would vehemently disagree. From her perspective, an automatic transmission is an obvious upgrade over a manual in so far as you don't have to know how and when to shift the gears yourself and don't have to worry about rolling back into the car behind you on "tricky" incline starts.

      I recently tried to sell a 2001 vehicle with a manual transmission. For every interested buyer I probably encountered three or four who were no longer interested as soon as I mentioned that it had a manual transmission.

    2. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much no longer true. Aside from low-end cars where they won't include the electronics due to profit margins, today's automatic transmissions > stick shift for every purpose except the "I want to choose my gear and when I shift" driver.

    3. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife loves the stick. Can't keep her hands off it.

    4. Re:get a real car by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not exactly. An automatic transmission is a *requirement* for some drivers, so there is no upgrade/downgrade about it. For someone who is good at (and enjoys) driving stick, manual->automatic is not an upgrade. For instance, an electric->gas stove isn't an upgrade for my parents because they don't have a gas connection at their house.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    5. Re:get a real car by katleman · · Score: 2

      I love manual transmissions. Last thing I want to do when I buy a car that I'll be driving for years is to ask myself, man it's going to be hard to find someone to buy it when I'm done. I just think of myself doing some other manual transmission enthusiast a favor, years from now.

    6. Re:get a real car by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      As good as they are, they still can not anticipate the road ahead.

    7. Re:get a real car by admdrew · · Score: 2

      For someone who is good at (and enjoys) driving stick, manual->automatic is not an upgrade.

      Sometimes? But after I moved to a far busier city than I was in before, automatic became the way to go; there was too much stop and go traffic for me to really enjoy shifting.

      I also grew up in a city on a fairly large hill (~1000 ft elevation difference between the lowest and highest points), and driving a manual was a pain at times when you were heading up the hill - although learning how to drive stick in that environment, especially in winter, definitely built some character.

    8. Re:get a real car by dshk · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe it is not an upgrade for you, but it is definitely an upgrade for the driver behind you, who has to stop accelerating each time you switch gears manually. At least 3 times after a red lamp.

    9. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With GPS, they could have it programmed in. Just give Google time.

    10. Re:get a real car by Mithent · · Score: 2

      I believe that torque converters are generally less efficient than the use of a mechanical clutch, due to the inherent losses involved in having a heavy additional piece of machinery that transmits torque through a fluid bearing compared to the relatively simple and direct clutch mechanism. No matter how intelligently the car shifts, the simpler transmission in a manual is inherently more efficient. CVT might be better than manual, though.

    11. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The VW auto stick wasn't an automatic transmission. It was a manual with a torque converter and vacuum actuated clutch (it had only two pedals: accelerator and brake. The transmission released the clutch when you grabbed the stick).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostick

    12. Re:get a real car by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      CVT, not currently due to current designs and materials. It theoretically could be though.

      VW's DSG could theoretically be on par but is more costly and complicated. It still can't anticipate the road ahead though which is what my preference for manual is about (though that can be compensated for with the correct control interface).

    13. Re:get a real car by Richy_T · · Score: 3, Informative

      What *are* you talking about? Maybe *you* don't know how to drive a manual.

    14. Re:get a real car by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>definitely an upgrade for the driver behind you, who has to stop accelerating each time you switch gears manually

      Good shifters don't slow down. Professional shifters (raccar drivers) do it so fast you have to rewind the tape to see what the blur was. And of course good automatic drivers should stop following so damn close so they don't need to brake when I shift from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3.

      Volkswagen comes with Direct-Shift-Gearing which has discrete gearing like a manual, but does the shifting by itself. That's what it gets +2 MPG on the highway (for diesels; gasoline car don't appear to have a difference).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    15. Re:get a real car by Golddess · · Score: 2

      don't have to worry about rolling back into the car behind you on "tricky" incline starts.

      I don't know if this is a good technique, but I used to use my parking brake to hold the car still so that I had both feet free to work the clutch and gas pedals when starting from an incline.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    16. Re:get a real car by Hodr · · Score: 2

      The CVG version of the '12 Subaru Imprezza is more efficient than the manual.

    17. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I wish she'd leave me alone sometimes. Can't you keep her at home more often?

    18. Re:get a real car by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I work in a travel agency, and I've lost count of the times Americans want to rent a car with automatic transmission in Europe or Latin America and get upset because only the luxury models have it...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    19. Re:get a real car by publiclurker · · Score: 2

      that's the way to do it, however, this can be tricky on older American cars where the parking brake was a handle under the dash.

    20. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is not an upgrade for you, but it is definitely an upgrade for the driver behind you, who has to stop accelerating each time you switch gears manually. At least 3 times after a red lamp.

      Depends on the car. The last time I had a Corvette for a few weeks (we do automotive engineering) it was easy to start in 3rd gear in the city (flat ground) and leave it there. It has a very flexible, torquey engine and engine mounting to match (hard to make it lug accidentally). No shifting required between stop lights. Of course with any kind of up-hill, I started in 1st to make it easy on the clutch.

    21. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you shouldn't be driving stick. What a pussy.

    22. Re:get a real car by scheme · · Score: 1

      >>>definitely an upgrade for the driver behind you, who has to stop accelerating each time you switch gears manually

      Good shifters don't slow down. Professional shifters (raccar drivers) do it so fast you have to rewind the tape to see what the blur was. And of course good automatic drivers should stop following so damn close so they don't need to brake when I shift from 1 to 2 or 2 to 3.

      Volkswagen comes with Direct-Shift-Gearing which has discrete gearing like a manual, but does the shifting by itself. That's what it gets +2 MPG on the highway (for diesels; gasoline car don't appear to have a difference).

      Professional F1 drivers use paddle shifters on the steering wheel to shift. That's coupled with automated transmissions. No foot actuated clutch or anything similar. It's probably the best of both worlds although it's a bit more complicated and more expensive than either a manual or automatic.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    23. Re:get a real car by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is not an upgrade for you, but it is definitely an upgrade for the driver behind you, who has to stop accelerating each time you switch gears manually. At least 3 times after a red lamp.

      Either the "you" in question is bad at shifting, or the guy behind is driving too close.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    24. Re:get a real car by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      For stop and go traffic I'd think driving a stick would be better in the long run - you get lower consumption and the gearbox probably lasts longer. That is assuming you know realyl well how to drive a manual.

      --
      ics
    25. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      These days basically all torque converters have a lock-up feature -- a mechanical clutch that eliminates slip after the engine and vehicle speed get close. You're still spinning all that oil around, but no slip means negligible losses to fluid friction. As to whether a slipping torque converter with computer-controlled fuel-injection blipping to match revs with minimal power loss is more or less efficient during an upshift than a clutch (with some driver-selected portion of slip, wheelspin, and throttle adjustment), it depends on the driver, but it's a small fraction anyway. There's more efficiency difference among driving styles or among different transmission models of the same type than between manual and automatic as a whole.

      But the one place automatics are, and always will be, inferior to manuals, is that they can only react to control inputs -- so I can't shift in preparation for a planned maneuver (e.g. downshift preparatory to passing) or upcoming road condition without actually beginning the manuever.

      While I'm enough of a gearhead to like manipulating a good 5-speed, I can't make an argument that it's mechanically better than a modern automatic-like (torque-converter & planetary gearing) transmission, provided it has paddle and/or push-pull interface to directly select gears. (Of course, the funny bit is that automatic transmissions are increasingly changing to conventional design, with the shift yokes and clutch controlled by a computer.)

    26. Re:get a real car by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      stick shift -> automatic is rarely an upgrade.

      Whether it is an upgrade or not is a matter of opinion. And using computer terminology, it isn't an upgrade at all because nobody buys an automatic transmission, opens the "transmission cover" on their car, pulls the stick and installs the auto.

      What it IS is an UPSELL by the dealer.

    27. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I lived in San Francisco for years, and drive nothing but manuals, and will drive nothing but a manual, ever (barring some really cool electric cars). I deal with heavy traffic, outrageous hills, dangerous drivers, etc., and get by just fine. If a dealer tried to switch the gearbox on me, I'd immediately walk out the door. Just like an automatic transmission is a *requirement* for some drivers, a manual IS a requirement for most driving enthusiasts.

      Personally, I think automatic gearboxes are pointless if you're healthy and not somehow disabled. A car is not an appliance, and no amount of automated bullshit will change the fact that it's an explosion powered death machine. The more abstractions we add on top of that just allow people to be more ignorant about how serious driving a vehicle actually is.

    28. Re:get a real car by Jon_S · · Score: 1

      I am looking at getting one of them or the XV version. I wonder if the better mileage in the CVT is just based on the way the EPA test is run. You can get better or worse mileage from a stick, depending on how you use it (many who want the manual want it for better performance which gives them worse mileage).

      Then again, the CVT has a lower ratio for its tallest "gear". It can afford to do that since if there is a slight incline, it only needs to infinitesimally upshift to maintain speed. If the manual transmission had that tall a gear for the highway, small inclines would make the engine lug and/or lose power requiring much more frequent upshifts. So I can see how theoretically the CVT could get better mileage on the highway. City, not so sure.

    29. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^ This. I have a friend that thinks of himself as a gearhead (I'm looking at you, Michael), but he's always driven automatic & even though he has far less stop & go than I do, he whines it is too much work. Those who really know how, prefer it.

    30. Re:get a real car by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      the automatic version of the same car costs more, so yes i think that can be construed as an 'upgrade'.

      not that i've ever owned an automatic, im with OP - I want to shift myself

    31. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know...

    32. Re:get a real car by adolf · · Score: 1

      many who want the manual want it for better performance which gives them worse mileage

      I replaced the 4-speed automatic in my car with a manual 5-speed, mostly for that reason, and my mileage in-town improved by about 5%.

    33. Re:get a real car by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. An automatic transmission is a *requirement* for some drivers, so there is no upgrade/downgrade about it.

      Yeah. Think about it this way. An automatic is like a GUI and an automatic is like a CLI.

      Oh shit, I'm doing this backwards, aren't I.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    34. Re:get a real car by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      I believe that torque converters are generally less efficient than the use of a mechanical clutch

      Yes and no. Torque converters are not used exclusively anymore, they have an integrated piston to 'lock up' the converter at cruising speeds. The computer can also control the shift-points to maximize fuel economy.

      As a fun fact this technology is not new, it was available on Studebaker and Packards in the early 1950's...but I guess when gas costs a nickel nobody cares about this sort of thing.

      I still choose a stick, because I'm a sad panda when I can't downshift into a turn.

    35. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buying a stick shift today is like buying vinyl records today. The people who do this are also generally people who claim that vinyl is better for whatever reason than a CD...riiiight. you like the nostalgic clicks and zips and pops---great, but don't tell me the quality is better, richer, or whatnot, because it's not.

    36. Re:get a real car by admdrew · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't surprise me mileage-wise, but for me the difference was negligible compared to the annoyance of having to be shifting a lot. For the same reason, I don't like motorcycle riding too much in big metro areas; your clutch hand gets tired pretty quickly.

    37. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men trust the car to change gears for them.

      And many automatics now get better gas mileage. Because it knows when to shift, versus "doodz" who just think they know.

    38. Re:get a real car by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I wonder if that's real-world too. If they did that in a diesel, I would be seriously tempted.

    39. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I solve that problem a different way: I drive them until they no longer function. I maintain them along the way. The least I've gotten was 125k miles (I could have fixed that one but bachelor::sporty-car -> father::minivan.

      Currently at 165k and 205k on my cars.

    40. Re:get a real car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. Auto costs you more when it's an option so financially it's an upgrade. Also when you're stopped (e.g. traffic light) going uphill, the stick shifters roll backwards a bit while automatics just accelerate away. I find that I can get to 50 km/h (Canada) a lot faster with an automatic, without high revving the engine of course. Plus... with the exception of touring, we're all lazy. Automatic is a lot easier in heavy traffic (standards: 1-2-1-2-3-2-3-2-1-2-1-2 Auto: [auto]).

    41. Re:get a real car by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure dshk is one of the people driving an automatic, who has to slow down. That's the only way the post makes sense, unless you are narcissistic about your clutch skills and assume everyone else is terrible.

      I intentionally shift slowly for people who are too close. If they seem distracted, I tap the brake enough to turn on the light but not make much impact on speed.

      dshk , stop tailgating.

    42. Re:get a real car by narcc · · Score: 1

      I still do the same thing on particularly steep hills. Over time, of course, you'll find that you need the extra "help" less often.

    43. Re:get a real car by synaptik · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I think automatic gearboxes are pointless if you're healthy and not somehow disabled.

      Do you have any idea how hard it is to hold onto the steering wheel, work the clutch, talk on the phone, eat a messy taco, *and* have to shift gears manually? Do you *want* me to get in an accident, or something?

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    44. Re:get a real car by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      If I don't have to be bothered with paying attention to the gear/RPMs, I can pay more attention to distractions on the road.

    45. Re:get a real car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What I take exception to is being called mentally deficient. I dont care if Apple's phone came with a hotline app straight to God himself. I wouldn't buy it.

      That's why so many automatics these days have gear selectors (wheel mounted or on the shifter).

      I'll wait until CVTs are better than manuals in acceleration and economy before I make the switch. Right now, they tune to be better at one or the other, so they are almost always inferior to the manual. And I've not seen a CVT with a shifter, though there may be on the CVTs that have "gears" to make people think they are 7-speeds and not CVTs, as CVTs feel like a high-torque engine with a slipping clutch. The engine revs slower as you accelerate faster.

    46. Re:get a real car by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It is almost always an upgrade. You get

      Then you proceed to list reasons manuals are better. Sure, you can't wear out the clutch on an automatic, but, in general, they cost more in upkeep than a manual. Rebuilding a manual is almost never done, they just don't break, and if you had to do it, it's cheaper than an automatic. A clutch change occassionally doesn't change the overall trend of autos being more expensive.

      And I've driven *only* manual cars in Alaska. Much, much better in ice and snow. What your foot does, the wheels do. Period. Never are they our of sync, as they are always directly mechanically connected, unless you give inputs otherwise.

      I'll bet you hate power brakes because you don't need that cool anchor. Amiright, huh, huh?

      Manual 4-wheel drums worked better on my '67 Bug than power discs on an '87 Olds Cutlass Calais. It's not the tech, it's the implementation. And you obviously suck at driving so you need the tech to help cover your inadequacies.

    47. Re:get a real car by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      On most cars you can actually shift fears without the clutch, the only time you really need to use the clutch is when starting from a dead stop. Given most Americans fail to master a clutch at all, I suspect this technique probably isn't very well known there.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    48. Re:get a real car by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      More like the less you have to do while driving the easier it is to ignore everything...

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    49. Re:get a real car by admdrew · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm referencing having to start from a dead stop. In the city I'm in now, the traffic is very stop and go, even if you're not at an intersection. In the city I grew up in, you were often in situations where you're stopped at a light or stop sign, facing uphill on a steep incline - a very interesting way to learn clutch.

    50. Re:get a real car by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I recently tried to sell a 2001 vehicle with a manual transmission. For every interested buyer I probably encountered three or four who were no longer interested as soon as I mentioned that it had a manual transmission.

      So 3 or 4 out of five interested buyers couldn't read English and therefore didn't see "manual" in the car ad? Who are you targetting, recent immigrants?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    51. Re:get a real car by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I phrased my response badly. Personally, my gear changing is fast enough to leave almost no discernable slow down and even my wife, who has only been driving stick for a couple of years and where I see some room for improvement does not take long enough to change gears in a way that would affect all but the most impatient of tailgaters.

      You would have to be pretty bad at the changes to have that effect. I drive spiritedly and currently in an automatic and have been driving more than 20 years and I can never recall being affected by a stick-shift driver in that way (Though newbs to occasionally stall out). Distracted, inconsiderate and incompetents drivers are by far the rule.

    52. Re:get a real car by somersault · · Score: 1

      Um.. no. Just no.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  32. I don't want a Kindle Fire 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a Kindle with a good color e-ink display. And not washed-out colors either.

  33. Those would be "additional expenses", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you think that was something different?

    1. Re:Those would be "additional expenses", right? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Additional manufacturing expenses" are different than the expenses I listed, or did you simply not read the GP? I'd guess not, ACs aren't known for their intellect.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Those would be "additional expenses", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      packaging and shipping are not "additional manufacturing expenses"? I suppose manufacturing stops when the product is finished and sitting on the floor of a factory. Oh well, msuave is not known for his intellect.

  34. who cares about amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fine for ecommerce but as a device manufacturer? Tine to backout of that strategy, mr bezos....

  35. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    That new Nook Glow is pretty sweet, but I went with the Kindle e-ink because it was cheap ($70) and it's the only one that has a subscription to Fantasy & Science Magazine for a mere $1/month (instead of $3). I couldn't pass up that bargain.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  36. Prime Lending Library by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Access to the prime lending library is the thing keeping me with Kindle at the moment.

  37. Amazon support is extremely poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People have been asking for over two years for custom screen savers on their Kindle 4. Amazon has not replied, published any reply or pushed any firmware update in all that time. The worst part is that the Kindle 3 had custom screen savers.

  38. Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome! Interstate fraud is a federal offense!

    FYI, in order to be convincing that you weren't trying to take advantage of an obvious mistake (eg. expecting $180 worth of games for $18), you need to get your story straight. You claimed that Amazon screwed you, admitted a typo on the deal, and then refused to offer you a refund. So, to balance the karmic scales, you engaged in fraud while claiming to return the merchandise... and they issued you a refund.

    Based on this inconsistency, you can understand why a reader may draw the conclusion that you aren't relating the whole story. Readers presume you've omitted salient, prejudicial facts that would change the interpretation of your anecdote in the mind of a normal person—and that's *before* considering your admission of fraud.

    It seems Amazon offered you your money back/undo the transaction, but apparently that wasn't good enough for you. Then again, perhaps you're the kind of person who would sue a Down Syndrome person for promissory estoppel after they offered to sell you their parents' car for $3 and a hug, but the parents blocked the "deal" from going through.

  39. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by s0nicfreak · · Score: 1

    people who just bought a KF1 a few days before

    Amazon has a 30 day return period

  40. Sounds typical for Amazon by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    Sounds like typical Amazon efficiency. They planned the stock of the Kindle Fire to run right up until the introduction of the new model, and hit it pretty close. They don't want to just list the old one as out of stock, because then they would have a backlog of orders that could never be filled, and they'd incur additional expense contacting customers and switching the order to the new one (which might not be exactly the same price).

  41. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    You're as bad as the marketers. My Ipad 3 has 16gig of flash, but only a gigabyte of RAM.

  42. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original Kindle sold for around $500. Do you think they felt "ripped" off when Amazon released the K2 for $250? Or the current base version for $79?

    Try reading the whole post before responding. squiggleslash isn't talking about "early adopters", they are talking about anyone who may have bought an original Kindle for $500 mere days before the K2 was released at $250.

    *I don't know if those prices are accurate, I'm just using them since they are what you used.

     

    Another example: I know many people who paid $25,000 for their Echo-style Priuses but a year later a dealer offered me one for a mere $18,000 because he knew a Prius 2 was coming soon.

    I'd be willing to bet that if I then came by the next day and bought that same model Prius for $10,000, you'd be pretty pissed off and would be back at that dealership to rightfully demand compensation.

    Or how about a more pertinent example. You've mentioned in the past how you've been thinking about picking up an iPhone 4 once the new iPhone 5 is released, thinking that the iPhone 4 will be lowered in price then. But lets say that for whatever reason, you figure the iPhone 5 is still a year away and decide to buy the iPhone 4 now. But then the very next day after you've made your purchase, the iPhone 5 is released and the iPhone 4 goes down by about $100. I imagine that'd piss you off, and rightfully so.

  43. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must have been subsidizing ... That's the only reason I can think of

    That's a pretty limited imagination. Tablets are highly integrated. A specialized manufacturing site must exist to produce products like the Kindle Fire. Amazon projected demand too low and not enough were made before the lines were retooled for the next model.

    This is normal manufacturing. Apple can't make old versions of their phones and tablets either for the same reason — the facilities don't exist any longer. They just do a better job projecting demand and having the replacements on shelves before they run out of the old stuff.

  44. oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Kindle Fire is based on Android.
    I guess Apple will be suing them sometime down the road. Its what Apple seems to do best these days.

  45. Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Why not Kindle Air, Wind or Earth?

    Kindle ICE...even.

    1. Re:Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by tekrat · · Score: 2

      Because the fire benders wiped out all the air benders...

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    2. Re:Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Kindle Heart!

    3. Re:Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Mod+1

    4. Re:Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by Dr+Fro · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point!

      --
      ********************
      I object to Intellect without Discipline.
    5. Re:Does it have to be Kindle Fire 2 ...LAME!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Apple has exclusive rights to the word 'Air' in all contexts. They could use Kindle Aire, as that word has a different meaning...

  46. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Sounds damn near perfect.

    Yeah, one week of lack of inventory with no excess inventory to have to liquidate at a reduced price is close to ideal for forecasting sales (months in advance for retooling). So the Fire slightly exceeded their sales expectations over that period (perhaps by ~4%). Give the man a bonus.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  47. Drebin! by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    That was a Shakespeare-In-The-Park production of "Julius Caesar", you moron! You killed 5 actors! Good ones.

  48. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Obviously you do not have any involvement with manufacturing or supply chains. "Having replacements on shelves before running out of the old stuff" is, and most cases, NOT better planning. Having excess inventory on hand at the end of a product lifecycle is not good. It means that you have spent money to build stuff that people are not going to want to buy (because of the new product). To recoup that cost, you MUST sell that excess inventory, which usually means steep discounts. If someone buys your old product at a steep discount, it means you have lost a sale of the new product. Not good.

    On the other hand, running out of supply is only a problem if the potential sales dry up. Even then, the loss of some potential sales to a competitor may still be preferable to losing more sales to yourself by having excess inventory.

    Running out of supply on Black Friday is bad - you are going to lose a lot of customers to competitors who have supply. Running out of supply for ONE WEEK at the end of August (after back to school sales and before Christmas sales), is brilliant planning.

  49. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    I got my nook simple touch off ebay for 60 bucks used, in pretty much perfect condition before they announced the glow. Over all though I'm really happy with it.

  50. Marketingspeak by Crypto+Cavedweller · · Score: 0

    " Amazon claims to have secured 22 percent of tablet sales in the U.S." .... That might mean something if it actually *were* a full featured tablet running a modern version of Android. It's not. It's an Amazon media content delivery system, like the Kindle before it. And at that, it's probably very good. I was a huge fan of Kindle until I replaced it with a genuine tablet that does more things in one package. If they release a Fire that is *actually* an Android tablet I'll take a look. But the shallow perception of the media that tries to link the Fire to much more powerful and flexible platforms might as well be written by Amazon's marketing department.

  51. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by tilante · · Score: 1

    Actually, no, he doesn't. It's memory. It's random access. Therefore it's RAM. The terms you are looking for are "long term storage" and "working memory". RAM can be used for either; so can oxide on a surface. See, for example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drum_memory

  52. The question that started it all.... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    Exec: There's a lot of less than perfect reviews of the Kindle Fire. Any ideas?

  53. This is smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless of an impending product launch, create scarcity.

  54. We've got one of each, both 5-speeds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The automatic is actually fairly good at choosing gears, in normal driving doing
    almost exactly what I would do. I do like the manual, it's more entertaining because
    you can use full throttle around down (it's a modes 2 liter engine). But if I've got
    to navigate our legendary traffic jams it's the Automatic (having AC helps).

    I'm looking forward to driving one of the DSG boxes.

  55. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by webheaded · · Score: 1

    Oh, and it has a whopping 6G of RAM.

    I know I'm being picky here, but it isn't RAM. It's flash storage. Or just storage. Or storage space. Anything BUT RAM in fact. RAM is the memory the computer uses to run apps and such. Flash storage is what the computer uses to store files. This drives me insane when I'm trying to judge specs on products and the people reporting it call everything the wrong name.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  56. ha, nice. by sootman · · Score: 1

    "Also covered on Slashcloud." -- LOL. Heck of a site you got over there. One comment, and amazingly enough it doesn't say "first post".

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  57. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not the first to notice and I apologized earlier. Sorry about that.

  58. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by webheaded · · Score: 1

    Whoops...guess I missed that. Probably below my threshold or something. :p

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  59. Automatic vs manual by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    My first car was a automatic. My second was a manual. I'm not going back short of a hybrid/EV where a manual transmission makes no sense. It's a matter of learning; once you've learned how to use a manual you generally prefer them(worldwide).

    My Anecdote: last 2 times I went car shopping I had horrible times finding them; 'Oh there's not much interest in them' combined with 'Whenever we get one in it's sold in a few days'. From the same dealer... Of course, I'd also get the 'but an automatic has a higher resale value!'. Tough cookies; I buy a car for a decade, not it's resale value. I'm not going to pay $1-2k more for a car that I don't like, to get $500-1k more in resale. There's plenty of used car buyers who like manuals as well.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  60. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    It's OK, I feel like a complete dumbass over it. Normally I would flame someone over such a mistake! I think I'm just getting old...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  61. I want one!!!! Must have! Must have!! by wreakyhavoc · · Score: 1

    Never wanted one before.
    But now that I can't buy one, I want it more than anything!

    What's that you say? "Just get a used one for a third of the price?" "Wait until the next version of shiny?"

    This is just pre-school psychology applied to marketing.

    Baby is surrounded by thousands of toys. He ignores all save the one he's currently chewing on. Pick up one that's five feet away and take it out of the room. Baby drops current chew toy. Face turns red. Tantrum ensues. Baby miraculously speaks, "I want a Kindle Fire!"

  62. Re:They must have been subsidizing the Kindle Fire by webheaded · · Score: 1

    I at least try not to be a complete asshole about that stuff. xD

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  63. Not planning on upgrading by IsoQuantic · · Score: 1

    Works for me. I don't think anything a new KF will offer will make me want to suddenly run out a replace my KF1, if you will. The usage model for me is simple-- store and read books and docs. Access the internet from time to time, too. Do not see a need for a camera or increased memory footprint as I will likely never be able to read all that I have stored on my KF1 now. I guess the only thing that will force me to upgrade will be a failure of the battery.

    Then again, if they had some utility that would completely duplicate all the items I have installed, including all apps, then I might consider making the upgrade. I just do not want to go through the pain and effort spent tweaking all my apps and what not all over again.

    --
    -- I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.