Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Dealing With Disabilities In the Workplace?

mpol writes "The job market can be hard right now, depending on your background and location. Having a disability makes things even more interesting. Seven years ago I suffered from a psychosis, and I was diagnosed with schizophrenia. I have been recovering quite well, and last year I started searching for a paying job. I found one, but it didn't turn out to be the right place, so I'm back at my volunteer job as web developer. My current workplace is quite unique, as there are several people who have had a psychosis in the past, or have been diagnosed with autism. When I look at myself I know that I have some things that will always play a role: I'm very sensitive to the atmosphere in the workplace for example. I also need clear communication, more so than other people. Furthermore, a workweek of maybe 20-25 hours is the max for me. I tried self-employment, but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by, and it's not something that will work for me long-term. In theory it's perfect, in practice not so much. I'm not sure what my short-term future will look like, and for this year I'm quite happy where I am, but next year I might go searching for a salaried job again. I'm wondering if there are more people on Slashdot who have a job in ICT, or are seeking one, and also have disabilities. How did you land at your job, and what issues do you run into in daily practice?"

184 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. I work from home... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    So your story of a workplace with "several people who have had a psychosis in the past" while yourself being a schizophrenic made me laugh when I imagined you working alone at home as I do while being surrounded by other "people" with mental problems.

    Sorry... I'm a bad person it seems.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:I work from home... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, but a schizophrenic may very well hear other people talking to him. Often it's God.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:I work from home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or Sam

  2. Re:Holy Shit! by somersault · · Score: 2

    Sigh. I guess this troll makes a valid point that the average idiot might think something like this. Most educated people would know better of course. I hope you find a job that you enjoy!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  3. Re:Holy Shit! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Congratulation, you've just won the Inappropriate Generalization of the Month Award. We'll contact you shortly.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  4. From experience... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My last job included an employee with well controlled schizophrenia and another with moderate autism. The employer did all the right things as far as I'm aware, shorter hours and short-notice time off were available, and all of the management were made aware of the issues. There were plenty of staff meaning that unsuitable or particularly stressful jobs (eg dealing with large crowds at busy periods) could be avoided and the members of staff in question would pick up on the jobs more suited to them instead.

    By far the most useful thing, however, were the pub trips after work. Both employees were quite happy to talk openly about their respective conditions, which took it from being a confidential, management-only issue to being an open one where people were encouraged to ask questions and understand how they could help the employees adapt. The chats over a beer/coffee were far more useful than any management policy could have been.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    1. Re:From experience... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's kind of the point - if they don't know then the days off, unusual behaviour etc will simply mark you out as an awkward colleague, but if they know the reason behind you "not being normal" then they'll have a much better understanding of what's going on. Granted, some people will react with fear, suspicion or derision, but I think you'd probably be surprised at how few. The worst reaction I saw to my colleagues "coming out" was awkward embarrassment.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    2. Re:From experience... by lymang · · Score: 2

      This. I agree with this. It's awkward, perhaps, to get past the reveal, but I expect there will be a good collection of folks who will not react poorly. There are a bunch of jerks in the world, but often they are just noisier than the equally large crowd of decent folk.

      --
      Meh.
    3. Re:From experience... by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      some people will react with fear, suspicion or derision

      What about when that's one of the bosses?

    4. Re:From experience... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 2

      A fair call on all points, I won't say you're wrong with any of the above.

      If I'm going to argue then I'd say screw the boss who's not able to deal with it, this is the point to bring in the no-win-no-fee lawyers and kick his/her backside. I'd say who cares that it's a mental disorder which still attracts more stigma than a physical one, and I'd repeat what I said above about (in my experience) an open and curious workplace being better than awkwardness.

      I would, but I don't have a mental disorder beyond a high functioning borderline cases of Asperger's and depression, as most of us probably do, so I have no experience of being on the other side. If any of my colleagues has been dicks about it, however, I can assure you I'd be one of the very high number defending the person coming out.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  5. ...from another insensitive clod... by KendyForTheState · · Score: 1

    If only you had multiple personality disorder you could sell yourself as an entire development team! They say I have megalomania... once I'm emperor of the world I'll show them a thing or two!

    --
    ...I just came for the free beer.
  6. Can't work for 40 hours? by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    Sitting in an office for 8 hours a day is not a big deal? I have whole weeks where I go without talking to a single person (except email updates). Even during meetings I often just sit there without talking.

    And when I get bored (or stressed) I stop the work and just zone out or listen to music until I feel better. Maybe you should try to find a job like mine (designer/programmer).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by s0nicfreak · · Score: 2

      I don't even have his condition and sitting in an office for 8 hours a day would be unbearable to me.

      Some people are designed to be desk jockeys, some aren't.

    2. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think the part time hours are the biggest stumbling block. Most of IT expects a 40 hour work week, part time is difficult to find. You can see if you can find a place that allows flex play were you can make up some time during the weekend.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >>> sitting in an office for 8 hours a day would be unbearable

      Which is why I bring-in a USB drive filled with music, college lectures, and movies. Or listen to newsradio or RT.com. It makes the boredom of the office less-bearable.
      And the guy below is correct:
      I tried to find a parttime engineering job and it didn't exist. So I just take the fulltime job, with 6 hours of actual productivity, and 2 hours zoning-out when the stress becomes too much (like now).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, could you get by with doing 2 hours of productivity? I presume he needs the usual zoning outs like the rest of the engineers making the workday pretty short.

      (possibly, yes, but then again even in slacking off in slashdot _can_ be productive from the engineering career point of view because you gotta learn of the new stuff somehow.. I might "zone out" every now and then but I never for example start watching movies, play nethack or such. reading some kind of news or another however....).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by tuttleturtle42 · · Score: 1

      When dealing with a disability, there is a lot more than people realize that causes people to be unable to work the 40 hour work week. Working with my therapist, we've determined that I currently would have a maximum of a 20 hour work week. I'm starting with one day a week in a volunteer position at a school. (So 9:30 - 3 one day a week is all I have currently)

      The things that you're mentioning help, but they don't take into account the physical environment (which is a major part of my disability), the atmosphere of the workplace and the time you can handle that (which the OP mentions and is something that affects my ability to work as well), the time of managing the disability and what that takes out of you mentally as well as just simply for time. There's a lot to manage with disability.

      I don't have a solution for the OP. I'm trying to manage my own disability, went through vocational rehab, was told I was currently unemployable, and am trying volunteering in somewhere that will both benefit from my help a lot and will help me build up skills that will help with my ability to work. But I do know its even harder than people think it is, because people overlook so many different parts of what living with a disability is like.

      When it comes to schizophrenia, people know about the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but many people don't know about the negative symptoms or the cognitive symptoms. Those need to be taken into account as well in a work environment.

      (And I'm not even schizophrenic - I'm just autistic.)

    6. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by Macgrrl · · Score: 2

      The 40 hours per week isn't always the biggest problem. It's the random out of hours work that some sectors of the industry requires. For many people with physical disabilities and mental disabilities, they need to manage energy reserves, sleep cycles and predictability to manage stress. Being on call is about the worst thing you can do to people in that situation.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    7. Re:Can't work for 40 hours? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Part time is easy in critical ICT just think laterally, Friday night to Monday morning, catch though trust is a priority. Anything that brings your trust into question is going to be a problem especially on the weekend shift with less supervision. Networks doing contract installations generally occur on the weekends.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  7. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    News for nerds, stuff that matters to the people using your fillings to monitor your conversations

  8. I think the OP mentioned self-employment by tepples · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Coward wrote:

    You're already a webdev...be your own boss and don't mess with anyone else.

    I think the OP mentioned that:

    I tried self-employment, but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by, and it's not something that will work for me long-term. In theory it's perfect, in practice not so much.

    1. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by hawguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anonymous Coward wrote:

      You're already a webdev...be your own boss and don't mess with anyone else.

      I think the OP mentioned that:

      I tried self-employment, but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by, and it's not something that will work for me long-term. In theory it's perfect, in practice not so much.

      That's going to be a problem when he seeks a salaried job -- few employers want an unmotivated, undisciplined employee. If I wanted to hover over the employee and make sure he's doing the work he's supposed to be doing, I'd hire my son.

    2. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by mpol · · Score: 4, Informative

      > That's going to be a problem when he seeks a salaried job -- few employers want an unmotivated, undisciplined employee. If I wanted to hover over the employee and make sure he's doing the work he's supposed to be doing, I'd hire my son.

      I can clarify that.
      When I'm at the workplace this is different. I am motivated and disciplined. I'm at the place where it is expected to work, and that's what I do. Also there's a clear border, when I'm home my workday is over and I don't have to worry about it.
      Working from home is a lot harder, to me at least, and I heard other people mention it. When I'm home I am usually relaxing a bit, so the place has a complete different association with me. Also there's no clear border, I can work for 7 hours straigt and still feel the rest of the day that I should be doing stuff. Or take a day off, like any normal person, and feel that way the whole day. That gets tired very soon.
      So I figured out I need a real work environment, and I can't work from home.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    3. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      being the type that needs micromanagement and being the type that doesn't care to run their own business are not the same thing. thanks for coming out.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    4. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by gagol · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are collectives such as the renocollective.com that offers very affordable workspace to freelancers and start-ups. This way you can be self-employed, not working from your home and meet other creative people during the day. You can pay by the day if you plan to work few days a week. I think this can be the next best thing for you if you cannot land a job. Look around your area. Best luck to you.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    5. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by ah.clem · · Score: 2

      >>> "If I wanted to hover over the employee and make sure he's doing the work he's supposed to be doing, I'd hire my son."

      Priceless.

      --
      "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
    6. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by kwerle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In addition to collectives, there are other public places that you might do well in. I sometimes work at the public library. It's generally quiet, and it's not home. There's a cafe' I often work at (I make a point to spend money there, so I don't feel bad using one of the several open tables).

      But if you need a routine, then an office might be the place for you.

      I might look for government employment. City/County. Very large organizations tend to be better equipped to handle and understand unusual worker needs.

      Good luck.

    7. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Roogna · · Score: 1

      As I said in a post down below, the key may be starting a business with someone you already like working with. Then you can keep each other motivated. Plus find a location (others in this thread have linked it) besides home to call your "office".

      And note: Starting businesses is the advice I give to -everyone- asking a question about employment right now. The current IT job market is simply broken in a number of ways.

    8. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by hilltaker7 · · Score: 2

      I had similar issues (working from home focus issues), and I found that I was able to work from home iff I set aside a work area (an office) that I only used for work (no-multitasking allowed). This gave me enough of a psychological barrier that I changed from work to play mode just by entering the space. I no longer work at home, but maintain the space as my project room, and it still serves it's purpose. Give it a try.

    9. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by azadrozny · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So I figured out I need a real work environment, and I can't work from home.

      FWIW, I have a friend who started working from home, and expressed the same concerns as you. To compensate, he did a few things. First he has a general daily schedule that he follows as strictly as he can. This schedule includes two hours in the middle of his work morning, part of which he uses to cook breakfast for his family before they leave for the day. He logs off email, and lets work calls go to voice mail outside these times. He also has a home office. He only uses the office when he is working. Personal time spent using the computer is done outside of his office. Finally, he hangs his company ID around his neck, just like when he is in a company office. It is a visual indicator to let his family know when he is is working. The point of all of this was to create mental and visual barriers between home and work.

    10. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Ryanrule · · Score: 2
    11. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Just make sure it is the right person all around. A business venture is a good way to take a person you like and who likes you, and turn them into someone you hate with every fiber of your being. For instance, some people work really well with their spouses, some divorce over it and still others divorce but still work together on the business.

      In short, if you are creative and smart, but perhaps a little on the less structured side about things, you need someone who can give you the needed structure, but at the same time has the patience to deal with you and recognize your critical abilities. Even as a part owner, you might want to go as far as to voluntarily subordinate yourself to their oversight somewhat.

      To drag in an Apple example, if you're a Woz type, you probably want a Steve Jobs there. Your Jobs will tend to get richer, more famous and may even be a complete asshole, but if he can take care of making you both money so you can do what you like to do, you're probably making out pretty well.

    12. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by xystren · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with you and you clarified it better than I could have.

      I too, also like that distinct boundary. My g/f runs her own business, an association management company, and a tattoo studio. The tattoo studio isn't that bad, as there is the clear boundary between - but the other, it bleeds into every other aspect of our life. Even when on vacation, I don't feel we are really on vacation - there are always phone calls, email, operational issues, and continual emergencies that require her attention. The boundaries are extremely diffused.

      It is not the choice that I would make myself - I appreciate my away time from work and the distinct boundary. When I go on vacation or rock-climbing, the last thing I want to be worrying about is what my company is doing or what bad decision the association happens to be making. When you work for yourself, you are never truly off work.

      As you said, you play on your strengths - and recognizing those strengths is the important part. Both you and I are not work at home type of people. And personally, Thank GOODNESS we aren't.

      Cheers

    13. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      I might look for government employment. City/County. Very large organizations tend to be better equipped to handle and understand unusual worker needs.

      Yep, I'd second this...go govt. work. They HAVE to take disabled people, and frankly, often they need someone to fill their quotas.

      That's your best option...from the sounds of you problems, short hours only, special needs, I'm sorry to say, but in the private sector, you're kinda fucked.

      There's really no compelling reason for them to hire someone that is going to be trouble when there are 20-30 "normal" people out there for the same job.

      I'd start looking at the federal level first...you're best shot. But the psychosis treatment might hurt you there..as that these days most any federal position requires a pretty extensive background check...but if you can get on there, you'll have a job for life, especially if you have disability...they'd never dare fire you...good luck.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Good idea, but some folks can't work from home no matter what they do. It's not good or bad, it just is. At our office we are required to take a "evaluation" (for lack of a better word) to gauge our suitability before working from home. I don't know if anyone's been denied, but it does give a good idea on how much you rely on the social aspect of working. Unfotunately, I believe your ultimate success is determined by your boss. Fortunately, more and more of them are being trained or becoming familiar with managing a remote workforce.

    15. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Roogna · · Score: 1

      And that is all absolutely true. Mind you I give the advice to start your own business knowing full well how difficult it is, as I've made my living for nearly 10 years being self employed (Well basically, I co-founded a LLC, we both mostly do our own thing within it, but we also keep an eye out for one another and step in and help wherever we can).

      It's highly important to find someone who you feel you can safely have fairly intense arguments with.

    16. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by kwerle · · Score: 1

      >

      That's your best option...from the sounds of you problems, short hours only, special needs, I'm sorry to say, but in the private sector, you're kinda fucked.

      I think that's almost entirely true - but there will be some exceptions. If you do good work, there will be small consulting companies who will hire you for what you are - a good worker with some special needs. There are some very large companies that are so large they know how to handle unusual employees. And some of those are government contractors, so they're required to do so.

    17. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bring your child into the workplace (autistic or not) and I will give him/her a whoopy cushion, plastic barf or both.

      The workplace is no place for snot monkeys. That said they aren't to blame. Whoopy cushions punish the parents.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I would never start a business with someone who only has 25 hours/week before he melts down.

      That _will_ be a problem for almost any conceivable partner. The partnership agreement will have to be carefully crafted to account for different levels of effort.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find that wearing shoes is critical to feeling like I'm 'at work', pants not so much.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Norwell+Bob · · Score: 1

      No points right now, but I'd mod this up insightful rather than funny... and it's not a knock to OP.

    21. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by lymang · · Score: 1

      I was going to make this kind of comment too: I have worked at two big companies (~100K employees worldwide) over the past 20 years and both have systems in place to handle a variety of different types of workers. I have not met any who specifically have had your issues but that's more a function of polite conversation not including that kind of information than it is that such workers don't exist. I encourage you to look at large employers in the healthcare or related industries. I think they will be more likely to accommodate your specific needs. I bet there is a niche out there for you.

      --
      Meh.
    22. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you set aside a room or a corner that is strictly for work. When it's time to 'go to work', go there and stay. When it's time to 'go home', move to another room. That helps some people, but not everyone.

    23. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by hazem · · Score: 1

      It's good that you've figured out what you need to be productive in your work.

      Just out of curiousity, in your treatment, have you seen any social workers rather than psychologists/psychiatrists? In my experience, they often have a very practical approach dealing with problems and can often help with developing coping and adaptation strategies.

      Maybe you can look into one of those office-sharing groups - that way you're going to an office to do your freelance work and won't have all the distractions of being at home.

    24. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Agreed, he's going to have to make it worth it for someone to put in more hours than he does. Some people could do it. If I could get a 50%-50% cut with Warren Buffett where he only worked 25 hours and I had to work 60, it would still probably be worth it because I know he knows how to get people stinking rich and I don't. I'd probably let him own 50% if he just called me every morning with some specific directions or tips for the day.

      Unfortunately, our poster is probably not a financial leader, captain of industry, famous researcher, or a genius artist, but his skills may be worth partnering with him, just the same. Consider again Steve Jobs. Without a Woz, Jobs is a guy without a college degree who has a thing for design and marketing. He *might* have still done well, but it could be cast into some doubt.

      Some people who have an insanely good work ethic, but lack specific skills that could give them a product to sell might be okay if their partner was just productive enough so that they could crank out something they could work with. Many agents, editors, and trainers work with what might be called flaky people every day, and they make money by adding their work to the flake's talent to produce something that can make both a good deal of money.

      So, if he can only work 25 hours a week, he's going to need to learn some way of making those 25 hours of work the most productive possible. It can be done. High levels of automation, careful time management, complete focus, development of an in-demand skillset could achieve that. If he can work solid blocks of time without the usual distractions, he can probably achieve more than he would if he decided to be the usual sort of social butterfly at work.

      It will not be easy, but I presume that no one ever told him that life was going to be carefree.

    25. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Auroch · · Score: 2

      When I'm at the workplace this is different. I am motivated and disciplined. I'm at the place where it is expected to work, and that's what I do. Also there's a clear border, when I'm home my workday is over and I don't have to worry about it.

      Really? You suffer from motivation problems? You don't want to work when you don't have to?

      Listen, I'm not against accommodations. But what you describe is the EXACT SAME THING everyone else deals with on a day-to-day basis. If you get special accommodations because you find it hard to work, I want them too. Why is your situation different from mine? Because of an internal mental state that can't be directly observed? So I'm denied support because I'm trying harder to keep my sh*t together?

      Mental illness is a serious issue. Please treat it seriously. IF you don't want to work, don't blame circumstances outside of your control.

      --
      Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
    26. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      As it happens, I work for a government department, my boss is an aspie (Asperger syndrome), I am a borderline aspie. On the whole, we get the job done. 20-25 hours a week may be a killer. The public service tend to want full time employees. However, if you can deal with the 40 hours for a year, you might be able to do some job sharing stuff.

      I shall now stop wasting your tax dollar and get back to work.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    27. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      People frequently underestimate the skill sets required to be a good small business owner, even when you are the sole employee.

      I have a strong work ethic, I have worked in some form or another since I was 14, I am generally motivated to do a good job and get tasks complete, I chase things down and seek extra work if I feel my load is light.

      I would suck running my own business. I loathe job hunting because I am introverted and hate the whole sales aspect of marketing myself to recruiters or potential employers. The though of having to market myself day-in, day-out to keep the mortgage paid gives me nightmares. Everyone who is self employed is in sales on some level, I can't handle that.

      Some people revel in that part of being their own boss. Others don't. Some of us are self aware enough to know whether it will work for us or not before we sink our life savings into finding out.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    28. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by LukeWebber · · Score: 1

      There are strategies you can use to work around this mindset. Set aside a room exclusively for use as an office, and "go to work" each morning at the same time. And don't touch yourself during work hours. I mean it, don't... ah, why do I even bother?

    29. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by jackbird · · Score: 2

      That's hell when the UPS guy rings the doorbell and you try to quickly put pants on over your shoes.

    30. Re:I think the OP mentioned self-employment by jythie · · Score: 1

      Even with support, the issue can be pretty significant. The options for people with certain mental health issues are very limited, they get even less limited if they are not a computer geek with a college degree. In fact they get vanishingly small... resulting in the 'support' simply taking a larger and larger burden for a person society is not structured to find a use for.

  9. Well, for starters... by localman57 · · Score: 1

    but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by,

    For starters, If you get an interview, leave this part out.

    Honestly, it seems like you're going to have to settle for what you have now, change your expectations a bit, or get motivated to work on your own. Everything you wrote will scream "Undependable and Hard to Work With!" to an employer. We hire people who are disabled at my job, and make accomodations. But typically, the accomodations are more in line with giving them what they need (a first floor work space near conference rooms, specialized equipment, etc) to succeed, because these things typically don't cost all that much compared to recruiting / hiring cost, plus it's the law. Employers will often do what's necessary to elevate you to be able to perform on par with employees of a typical ability. But they're far less likely to lower their standards.

    1. Re:Well, for starters... by mpol · · Score: 2

      Ah, yes. I should have elaborated in the startpost, but it was too long already.
      At my workplace I'm really motivated, and do a lot of work. It's not a problem there.
      It's only a problem working from home, because of many different factors.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    2. Re:Well, for starters... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      so you basically need an "in box" and a "to-do list" (you are fine once you get started its just the day to day getting started that gets you)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  10. You have to make up for your short comings by na1led · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If you have a disability, you're at a disadvantage to the thousands of other job seekers out there. You have to make up for it in other areas, but if you lack motivation, then forget it. Without ambition and motivation, you're just another slug feeding off others.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by Hatta · · Score: 1

      With schizophrenia, the lack of motivation is the disability. You can control the positive symptoms(hallucinations) with medication, but we have no treatment for the deficits in executive function caused by schizophrenia. Shrugging your shoulders and saying "try harder you slug" should not be acceptable in a modern society.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by na1led · · Score: 1

      Hunger is a pretty good motivator in most countries.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    3. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The problem is we live in a competitive world. We have limited resources, the best of the best get picked up first, then Above average, then the below average and well below average get the short end of the stick.

      If live gives you something that gives you a disadvantage, you will need to find a way to work around it, it will probably cost you. You may be the worlds best programmer but if you can't output as much as the second best programmer, you are at a disadvantage, and you may just need to work as an average programmer, where you World Best Skills, can compensate for you lack luster output, but it will bring you down.

      It is not that you have to be a burden on society, it is just a fact that you know your abilities and skills in life.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

      Why should someone who has a lack of motivation disability get a job over a person who doesn't have that disability?

      Asserting that we should sacrifice the able-minded because of sympathy for those who suffer from motivation disability should not be acceptable in a modern society. One might as well insist that the U.S. Olympic sprinting team include a 500 pound diabetic, and kick off someone who can actually run.

    5. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The problem is we live in a competitive world.

      Maybe we should fix that problem. I'd far rather live in a cooperative world.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. On point it's not a problem any more then the sun rising in the east is a problem.

      Also: Never turn your back on anyone who says 'we're all in this together': He already thinks he's entitled to everything you have.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Maybe we should fix that problem. I'd far rather live in a cooperative world.
      Totally agree. I find the modern dog eat dog world quite depressing. It's not big and it's not clever. It's selfish and ultimately self detructive. Trouble is, those that are like this tend to be in charge so it's not changing any time soon.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    8. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by na1led · · Score: 1

      'survival of the fittest' has kept this world in balance for millions of years. You recognize that everyone is special and should be treated all the same regardless of what they contribute, you end up with 8 Billion People with nothing to do, but feed of what others can give. Sounds like Dystopia to me.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    9. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The world we live in has limited resources. We are not going to live in a cooperative world.

      Not everyone will be able to get everything. If they share then no one will really get it. So they need to show that they need it more then someone else.... Competition.

      A cooperative world is one where all people are equal. They are not. They have different needs and desires.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      The rules are that you can't discriminate against a disability that can be reasonably accommodated. I don't think anyone would argue that an unproductive employee should be tolerated, but there are ways to structure assignments such that they make a person with a motivation disability more or less likely to succeed at them. All other things being equally or, by a reasonability standard, close enough, a business is compelled to choose the structure that accommodates the disability.

      FWIW, software engineering tends to do this organically, perhaps because of the probably larger-than-average number of ADHD folks in the ranks. The breakdown and tracking in Agile techniques, as well as the frequent communication checkpoints and the intentional urgency, are very similar to techniques a motivational- and organizationally-challenged person would use to successfully maintain momentum and achieve complex objectives.

    11. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by tftp · · Score: 1

      Imagine that you are a hiring manager. You have two candidates. One has problems; he requires special (non-technical) accomodations, special way to talk to him, special way to task him. You also need to train his coworkers about what they can say and do, and how they should react. The candidate cannot work full time, let alone overtime, and he is not dependable because his special needs may preclude him from showing up on a random day.

      The other candidate needs none of that. Who will you pick, given that otherwise both candidates are equal?

      If I were in place of the OP I would pick self-employment, even though the OP specifically mentions that he is not capable of managing himself. So go and get a partner into the firm who complements you! The partner does not need to be as smart as the OP in programming; but he needs to be a strong leader.

      By the way, many successful startups are organized like that - simply because all people are different, and you need different personalities for different kinds of work. You cannot honestly expect a C++ coder to draw ads for a magazine or to fly into a different town, meet an executive of a different company, give him an elevator pitch, take him for drinks and in the end sign a contract. Similarly, your CEO is not likely to write a bubble sort of two integer arrays even if his life depends on it.

    12. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Be a shining proof that communism works!
      If you genuinely think not shitting on your fellow man = communism then I really don't know what to tell you.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    13. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by tftp · · Score: 1

      If you genuinely think not shitting on your fellow man = communism then I really don't know what to tell you.

      Tell nothing. I lived under communism (or socialism, to be technically correct) for several decades. You can treat this as a fallacy of appeal to authority, but I know from the inside that the slope is very, very slippery. It's a positive feedback loop, constrained only by how much can one steal. If you think otherwise you are an idealist. Early socialists, in 1900's, had the same thoughts as you have today. Their society failed, and they understood why. But there is nothing in this world, short of mind control from satellites, that can make all people to not seek advantage over other people. If you know control theory you then know what happens next.

    14. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Quiet bitch, I went to school in Kentucky and they taught us that the Great Designer has a plan for everyone. If we have 8 billion people with nothing to do, then they're obviously there to help the rich get rid of their money and do good by using it to support the poor. That's what capitalism is about: from he who hath the ability to he who hath the greatest need.

    15. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by na1led · · Score: 1

      'The Great Designer', his design is so great, I can't imagine doing a better job.

      --
      -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    16. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Imagine that you are a hiring manager. You have two candidates. One has problems; he requires special (non-technical) accomodations, special way to talk to him, special way to task him. You also need to train his coworkers about what they can say and do, and how they should react. The candidate cannot work full time, let alone overtime, and he is not dependable because his special needs may preclude him from showing up on a random day.

      The other candidate needs none of that. Who will you pick, given that otherwise both candidates are equal?

      Up until you said "cannot work full time" and "not dependable" my answer would have been that this is precisely why the ADA exists, to keep employment in the face of disability from being completely a cost/benefit ratio. Since people with disabilities are a sharp minority, C/B analysis never comes out in their favor.

      Past that, if the disability means they simply cannot fulfill the requirements of the job even after reasonable accommodation, there's no protection there. In that case, I might agree that self-employment might be best so that they can structure their own job, particularly with a strong partnership.

    17. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There are no two identical people in the world. C/B analysis does indeed sometimes come out in favor of people with disabilities. Generally when the disabled person has achieved something despite the disability. You know the whole 'stop complaining and do something mentality'. Those of us that have worked with people like this want to kick people square in the balls when they asset that disabled people can't 'suck it up and work'. They can and do.

      If they can't and don't then perhaps a disability pension is the right thing for them. If they have the mental strength it is a major point in there favor.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    19. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Sorry you ran into an asshole. IT contracting for government is a crooked incestuous swamp 100% run by weasels in the USA. Best avoided in any case. If your good it will make you crazy, if you suck you will make you suck more. Your classmate is actually a good fit for them.

      You don't belong in IT though. Being a 'digital janitor' simply requires you to learn fast and independently. Often not very deep knowledge, not always shallow, but rarely expert. Good enough is key.

      You belong in programming. That requires deep knowledge, while you still have to keep up, it's much less running on the upgrade treadmill. It will mean you have to learn an industry, but more often then not that involves meeting people, not reading about them.

      Without denigrating your accomplishment (getting a degree) you should aim higher and play to your strengths. Write something. Write a smartphone app to help yourself (and people with similar problems).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:You have to make up for your short comings by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Guess what I'm not getting through to you is that there are disabilities that very specifically affect your ability to "suck it up and work," particularly in an adverse environment. I have one of them.

      I'm also a very successful and effective engineer. I've become that by working with my employers to take approaches to work that I can not only handle, but excel with. In doing so, I add significant value, well past the cost of any accommodations made for me.

      But when I hit a boss that insists it's done "their way" arbitrarily, to fit their thought process, I'm significantly less successful. You would be too, but the nature of my disability is such that it changes from being impacted somewhat to stopped cold. And to be clear, I'm not talking about shirking work. I'm talking about simple things like making sure that I have somewhere quiet to work, that requirements are clearly communicated and agreed upon, that deadlines are reasonable to the task, and that I have flexibility in how I structure my workday in order to achieve the best results I can.

      Nowadays, it's not a problem. I've been around long enough that I have enough clout and experience to carve this out for myself. But early in my career, I did not. I also did not have the diagnosis of the disability (though I certainly did have the disability) and I had some pretty precarious job situations because I was not able to assert this for myself and find ways to be successful. That I managed to get through that was as much luck as it was tenacity, and it was quite a bit of both.

      So think of it like this: the ADA exists, in part, to make sure that my professional chances aren't unduly damaged by rigid and inconsiderate bosses. Assuming I'm willing to put in the effort and can give back good results with reasonable concessions, people are required to be flexible enough to allow me to do so. If I ever quit trying for them, I'd expect them to quit trying for me. And if despite all best efforts my work isn't acceptable, I'll go elsewhere. That's the nature of a good relationship, business or otherwise. That's all I expect, and it's all I'm guaranteed.

  11. No Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're unemployed, have no personal motivation, need to be handled with kid gloves from environment right up to management, cannot work a full-time schedule, and are pretty much untouchable as far as a clearance goes. Good luck finding a job that can cater to all of your needs in such a depressed market... and make a note to count your blessings (thank your sugar-mama?) that you are able to survive by working in a volunteer capacity for months or years at a time.

  12. It's going to be a tough road ahead for you..... by fatboy · · Score: 1

    To be quite honest, it's going to be a tough road ahead for you. Companies usually are not very accommodating of the types of requirements you have laid out. I would suggest looking for work with your municipal or state government. They are more open to special needs employees. That's going to be you best bet.

    Something that did strike me as interesting is the requirement for a workweek of maybe 20-25 hours. Is this due to your mental disability or do you have other obligations in your life that would limit your ability to work? I would try to rectify that issue if possible, because even government jobs require that you work 37.5 hours a week. (Around here at least)

    Best of luck.

    --
    --fatboy
  13. autistic adult sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hello. I have autism, and I'm 36 years old. I'm a sysadmin at a well-respected university in the United States. No one at work knows I'm autistic.

    Unfortunately autism is not a legally protected disability in the United States, so "coming out" to my coworkers, boss, HR, et al is much too big of a risk.

    No doubt my coworkers must think I'm one of the strangest people they've ever met.

    so, it can be as simple as not telling people.

    1. Re:autistic adult sysadmin by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've got good news, most people in I.T. seem like they have autism to non I.T. people. You'll get by just fine.

    2. Re:autistic adult sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      so, it can be as simple as not telling people. Sure, until someone drops the toothpicks.

    3. Re:autistic adult sysadmin by vlm · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately autism is not a legally protected disability in the United States

      You need to do more research... or you're playing word games with "what is the meaning of the word is" or trolling for sympathy

      so "coming out" to my coworkers, boss, HR, et al is much too big of a risk.

      As a sysadmin you have to realize that a law is not like having a root password. Unless you have enough money to enforce the law, volunteer lawyer or friend lawyer or whatever, the law may as well not exist.

      No doubt my coworkers must think I'm one of the strangest people they've ever met.

      I've met some pretty strange people on the job, so I find this extremely unlikely. Or you're got really boring coworkers, this does happen. I've experienced that as a class the hard core drug addicts are pretty much all weirder than all of the disabled people I've ever met, so unless you're also an alkie or coke fiend or meth head there's a whole entire class of weirdos who will seem weirder than you. I've worked with autistic people and they're unusual (which is OK/cool) but the real weirdos have all been alkies and coke fiends and so on, a whole class of weirdness above the disabled people.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:autistic adult sysadmin by vlm · · Score: 5, Informative

      Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 as per http://www.autismpolicyblog.com/2011/03/americans-with-disabilities-act-new.html

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADA_Amendments_Act_of_2008

      http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-7-11a.cfm "Comfort Suites To Pay $132,500 For Disability Discrimination Against Clerk With Autism"

      This one is very important, look at page two "Examples Illustrating Definition of Disability" one of the examples used to define a disability was specifically to list autism, by name. Its kind of hard to wiggle out of "autism isn't a disability" when its specifically listed by name in regulation as an example of a legally protected disability.
      http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/regulations/upload/adaaa-summary.pdf

      I mean when the EEOC uses your diagnosis as an example of what the law covers, its kind of hard to claim that example doesn't fit under the definition. Now my ingrown toenail was not listed by name, so I would have a fight in court to prove its a disability by definition, unlike your diagnosis.

      Obviously your best bet is as per your own comment:

      Accordingly, at the advice of my attorney

      Yeah that'll probably work a hell of a lot better than the advice of some idiot on /. who none the less knows some people with autism and also knows how to use google really well. However if you haven't talked to your lawyer since 2008 when they passed the law, or 2011 when the EEOC released their new regulations specifically naming autism, maybe its time to talk again, or at least think about it?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:autistic adult sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (I'm not the person you were responding to, just a random lurker).

      Just popping in to say that you are my Internet hero for the day. A patient, helpful response, where you could have escalated. So rare. Thank you!!!

  14. Independent Contractor by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

    I'd suggest being an independent contractor for a company that performs IT work. You already mentioned that you are a web developer, if you have any other skills like systems administration or engineering then use those skills as well. Companies do not mind a independent contractor because frankly, they only have to pay you when there is work and there are no associated benefits (sorry).

    Being an independent contractor will give you the ability to work at your own pace. If you need a break, just don't take the job when they call you. Without more information about your skill set, I cannot recommend any specific companies. Web design is a pretty saturated field these days, however more back-end tasks are still in high demand, like database admin.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  15. About success ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry to hear about your conditions.

    > but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by
    While that may be true, success like anything else is learned. It starts the first thing you wake up, and ends when you go to sleep. In order to get good at it you have to keep practicing. They say a person becomes proficient at a skill when they have done it for at 1,000 hours. In order to have discipline you must reprogram your mind. With time + effort you can achieve it.

    WRT motivation no one can give you motivation. The trouble with companies that often times they should of focus on NOT DEMOTIVATING people. Being self-employed you need to find your own motivation. i.e. There has to be at least _one_ thing you enjoy doing, what is it? You say you are a web developer. Do any programming languages interest you? Any kind of computer science problems? The reason I ask is because:

    There are 2 hard things in life
    - finding your passion
    - finding how to make money at it

    Take care of the first one, and the second one will follow.

    You say you require clear communication. That's true in all relationships. Your relationship with your computer (i.e the compiler / interpretor requires clear syntax), relationships with your co-workers (miscommunication is the cause of many problems), relationships with friends and family. The point of all this is that there are courses you can take to help with this. Dale Carnegie is a popular one. Shelf-Help books are another.

    One of the secrets to happiness is to remove false expectations. You have to match you ideal world with the reality of your situation. Let's play a game for a moment. I have a magic wand; with it you can do anything you want. What would it be? Forget about all the impracticalities for a moment. If you could do anything in the world what would it be? The secret recipe is to now make a game plan on how you could achieve that big goal, but one small sub-goal at a time.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:About success ... by mpol · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your kind and insightfull response.
      Maybe I am too quick at judging that self-employment is not my thing. I don't think I had too high expectations. Some of my goals were to have this year a turn-around of 3000 Euro's, which I might make. And also to have fun at what I do. But during the first 8 months of this year I started to slowly have less fun. And that's not right. So I need that to turn around first, and then consider picking up my company again.

      And if I could do anything I wanted, haha. I would want the job I have now, but then being paid for it :).
      I thought I found that last year, but it turned out differently. So I'll need to search again :).

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    2. Re:About success ... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I think it is a fine goal to have fun at what you do, but maintaining a serious business is not always going to be fun. You may, instead, want to consider what categories of work are considered obligatory and what is actually useless BS. You should definitely avoid useless BS, but there is no way around the obligatory stuff.

      For instance, paying your taxes is a pain in the ass sometimes. I don't mean paying them, but doing the paperwork. You have to do it, and you won't have a business unless you can, period. I'd say that if that sort of obligatory work is work you can't handle, you might be counseled to work at making yourself do it whether it is fun or not.

      If we could make a living on stuff that we considered to be 100% fun, no one would complain about work. Admittedly some people are too willing to give up fun for money, but there is a reasonable balance to be found.

    3. Re:About success ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > All I can tell you is it's not about how often you fall, but how good you are at getting up, picking up the pieces and going on. Successful people don't get that way because they never make mistakes, they are just better at minimizing them from happening, minimizing impact and most importantly, making sure that once they happen, they are back on their feet as quickly as possible.

      I also 100% concur! That is one of the secrets to being successful!

      There is are 2 old cliches that paraphrase this philosophy:

      You are only a failure when you quit trying.

      Quitters never win.
      Winners never quit.

      For me one of the biggest surprises was learning that success was not only about planning + execution, but also included the necessary philosophy / attitude / mind-set.

      It is a hell of a lot of work, because you are constantly (re)training your mind, but the destination is completely worth the journey.

    4. Re:About success ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Those that never win or quit are idiots.

      There is more then one game in town. If the one you are playing is rigged you are a fool not to quit. That said it's not quitting in the larger sense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  16. I'll get modded down for saying this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But the reality is in this economy there are dozens of other people who are equally as skilled as you are, but are willing to work 40+ hour work weeks and aren't "sensitive" to the work environment. Your best option in the long run is to try to cope the best you can with your condition.

  17. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by na1led · · Score: 1

    Getting a job as a Politician should be easy for someone of his condition.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  18. You're a real catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by

    Make sure you put that on your resume. Employers -- you know, the people that stand to profit or lose money on you, depending on whether you have sufficient motivation and discipline -- will want to know about that.

    Unless you're willing to work for yourself, you're not in much of a position to demand this workschedule and that type of communication and the other environment. Either pay yourself and set your own working conditions, or take somebody else's paycheck and whatever working conditions they decide to offer.

  19. Re:I deal with disabilities right here on Slashdot by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    I speak English and I've down modded morons before.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  20. Americans with Disabilities Act by Aglassis · · Score: 2

    Your diagnosis fits under the requirements of the ADA (if you are looking for a job in the US). Any employer (of sufficient size) must make reasonable accommodations and cannot discriminate against you in the hiring process or during employment if they are aware of your disability. That is not to say that discrimination does not occur. In order for you to be protected by the ADA, the employer must be aware of the disability which will then allow them to discriminate if they are assholes. Considering the level of discrimination against people with mental illnesses, I would keep a record. You are also not required (ethically or legally) to disclose your diagnosis at any time unless you want ADA protections.

    --
    Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    1. Re:Americans with Disabilities Act by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      I have seen it discrimination at the hiring process and it's can be as easy as makeing some write out down some Q and A on on paper and not let them type it out.

    2. Re:Americans with Disabilities Act by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You don't have to hire a blind person to fly an airplane, it's plain letter ADA law.

      You don't have to hire a chronically unmotivated person for a self directed position, even if he claims the chronic unmotivation is related to a disability. Chronic unmotivation can't be more closely related to a disability then being blind is related to blindness.

      Basically, you have to make reasonable accommodations IF they can do the job.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  21. Re:Holy Shit! by CrudPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in IT, and am profoundly Deaf. Working with a disability is definitely a challenge. You have to set expectations and remind people constantly--I work in a company of only 35 people and I have to remind people I can't hear for shit. You have to advocate for yourself, and let people know what YOU need to be successful in the job. That being said, all of these things are difficult to do.

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
  22. Try going through a community college or church... by realsilly · · Score: 2

    When I was just starting out, I originally found work in my field because I showed an aptitude to learn and to help, and was constantly searching for more to learn, but I was unemployed student. I spoke with my professor and expressed my difficulty in looking for a job that suited me. Now granted, it was sheer luck for me, my professor came back to me a week later stating that he knew of a place I could / should apply to. He wrote a letter of recommendation and I submitted my resume / application. It took a month before I was offered an interview, but it happened. It started out as part-time work, and once I proved my eagerness to exceed, and I showed that I was responsible and truly cared about my work ethic, it was a word-of-mouth lead that landed me some additional work to get full-time.

    I didn't have a disability other than needing glasses, but I had to prove myself, that I was more than just some college kid. I think that is what you're in need of, is a little help from friends and a lot of proving yourself. Performing volunteer work is a good start, and I think you're on the right track. If you are a solid member in your community you might look to community associations to try to garner some work, or through your local congregation if you attend church. A good Samaritan is a great place to start, but remember, you have to prove that that Samaritan is right about you and show that you're worthy of that praise. Once you've established yourself again then you'll probably see a lot more open doors of opportunity.

    This is only my 2 cents, I hope it helps. Good luck.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  23. Similar issues here by gagol · · Score: 1

    I burned myself after working like hell for 15 years. After my first breakdown, I decided to move to country where it cost me much less money to live, and access to nature really help. I took some online classes and now im looking for venture capital to fund my patent and startup. I hope I can be successful enough to not HAVE to work unless I feel like it...

    This is my experience with deep depression... I hope it will help.

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  24. Sounds like you already have your solution by Roogna · · Score: 1

    You say you don't want to be self employed, but from what you say that's simply because of "motivation and discipline". That can usually be helped by having people to work with. You seem to already be working with people who you get along with, so perhaps your solution isn't going self employment alone but starting a business with others.

  25. Re:Motivation by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, because it pays sooo well. Sorry you hate your life. Maybe you should chop off a few fingers and jump on that sweet sweet gravy train.

    Granted, OP was probably being a fascist dick in making the comment, considering the assholish phrasing, but whether they meant to or not, they actually made an excellent point - too much income from a job will substantially decrease the amount of disability assistance this individual receives, likely to the detriment of their livelihood.

    It's not a 1:1 ratio; getting a higher-paying job (or even a raise) can totally fuck the impoverished over financially.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  26. Re:Holy Shit! by virgnarus · · Score: 1

    Don't you see that the OP is just disgruntled because his workplace doesn't properly consider his disability?

  27. Re:Holy Shit! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    You're behavior suggests you are a sociopath, so you stay away from MY workplace.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  28. More detail... by vlm · · Score: 1

    I'm very sensitive to the atmosphere in the workplace for example.

    So work at home X percent of the time? Do you mean physical airborne atmosphere or emotional level?

    Furthermore, a workweek of maybe 20-25 hours is the max for me.

    For most of my "full time" coworkers that would be a heroic non-crunch time achievement. Do you mean 20 hours of "being in the building" with the usual ratio of 50% watercooler conversations about sports and TV / smoke breaks and 20% formal/informal meetings leaving about 6 hours of actual nose the the grindstone work, or 20 hours of actual nose to the grindstone work which would be pretty fabulous if anyone can actually do it?

    I tried self-employment, but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by, and it's not something that will work for me long-term. In theory it's perfect, in practice not so much.

    Partnership or small group is the way to go. Not 100000+ person megacorporation and not going it alone. Are people motivated to play MMORPGs because 1E6 other people they don't care about also play? No. Because the storyline (kill 15 bears and bring NPC the pelts!) is so amazing? No. Because their "friends" raid with them. Thats why.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:More detail... by gagol · · Score: 1

      If your employer lets you spend half you time chatting around the water cooler and schedule you for a full day of meetings a week, start looking for another job cause the business cannot make a profit in any legitimate way.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:More detail... by mpol · · Score: 1

      I'm somewhat sensitive to emotional atmosphere. People haveing an argument at the workplace which turns sour, that sort of thing. I can handle something, but too much wears me out.

      Ah, haha. I'm not a slacker, I do my job. Last year I started at a paying job, which I decided to not continue with. The employer offered me the same job again half a year later. He was really happy with me.

      Thank you for the rest, some others already pointed that out. I'm now with nice people at a volunteer setting. Setting up a commercial company might be a good idea.
      Actually, when I got at this volunteer job, there were some other people making that step. So maybe it's time for me to find people to make that step with.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    3. Re:More detail... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Or a government sponsored monopoly.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  29. Re:Worry Not Lord Obama by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Shall Set You Free. /don't count on it.

    I don't think he does, given that he lives in the Netherlands.

  30. Re:Motivation by Mindscrew · · Score: 1

    You guys are all Anonymous Cowards.

    Just sayin'...

  31. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    Something that did strike me as interesting is the requirement for a workweek of maybe 20-25 hours. Is this due to your mental disability or do you have other obligations in your life that would limit your ability to work? I would try to rectify that issue if possible, because even government jobs require that you work 37.5 hours a week. (Around here at least)

    That's for full-time employment. If you can only do 20-25 hours, don't look for a full time job because they'd want 35+ hours/week. Instead, look for part-time employment, where 20-25 hours is more typical (and usually the maximum because after that you'll be counted as a FTE).

    The only down side is that benefits to part timers are practicaly non-existent, and many tax benefits also only apply to FTEs.

    Instead of looking for full time employment on part time hours, narrow your search down to part time employment. This way the hours you work can be discussed (and they will be in the range of 20-25 hours a week tops normally).

    Plus, because the wages and benefits are a lot lower, many employers are more willing to hire part-timers (as more people are looking for full time positions).

    That's probably the best place to start.

  32. Attitude by Kjella · · Score: 2

    Furthermore, a workweek of maybe 20-25 hours is the max for me. I tried self-employment, but motivation and discipline are a bit hard to come by, and it's not something that will work for me long-term. In theory it's perfect, in practice not so much.

    I don't want to be self-employed either, but it's because I'm not a good salesman, not a good negotiator, hate the administrative parts of contracts and schedules and billing and I don't want my entire paycheck to depend on finding work. If you don't have the motivation and discipline for the work itself you're not going to be much of an employee either, on top of your other issues. If you want to find a job I wouldn't let that shine through, because I saw big red blinking "do not hire" signs that had nothing to do with your schizophrenia.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  33. Re:to the PUB? by Mindscrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just because you are at a PUB doesnt mean you are forced to get drunk. Get a Ginger Ale on the rocks and have a good time instead of ruining it for everyone else that does want to have a beer or something.

  34. Re:Man up... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    You do realize he has a neurochemical disorder, right? That's like telling a guy with no legs that he just needs an attitude adjustment.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  35. Re:This is going to sound harsh, but... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Not every employer is a selfish miserable cunt.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  36. Shameful Mistake by hilltaker7 · · Score: 1

    I am new to Slashdot and for the first time I played with the display settings because nearly half the comments were hidden. That was a mistake. I now know why the default is to hide the down modded. Most of those comments were shameful and indecent. The writer asked for help. There are only two choices that one can decently make at that juncture. Help, or get out of the way of those who will try and say nothing. Teasing someone like this was not accepted in elementary school. Grow-up.

    1. Re:Shameful Mistake by Thing+I+am · · Score: 1

      Most of those comments were shameful and indecent.

      That's about the correct ratio for "Ask Slashdot" posts.

      --
      That sucking sound you hear is my bandwidth.
  37. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by mpol · · Score: 1

    A requirement for 20-25 hours a week is because I really need to have my restdays. I can work a week for 5 days, and maybe 2 weeks. But it does wear me out. I get tired, can't get out of bed anymore, and I'm just generally unhappy. And that's just not the right path to take.
    Right now I work 2 days, have a day off, and then work another day. There are jobs available that suit this rythm, but ofcourse not very much of them. I live in Europe, and the lifestyle is somewhat better. And I should take care not to get hired by an American company :).

    And about other obligations. I have a girlfriend who needs time with me, and I have a healthy social life. So yes, you can call those obligations.

    --

    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  38. Re:to the PUB? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    Hence the mention of beer/coffee. I used to regularly go to the pub with an Islamic colleague, nowt wrong with ordering a glass of coke.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  39. Re:to the PUB? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Why does going to the pub mean getting drunk?
    I am pretty sure he meant have a couple beers, funnel rotgut until you can't stand.

    Good for you not drinking, no one cares nor asked about it.

  40. I am highly sensitive to distractions and use foam by gatesstillborg · · Score: 1

    ...ear plugs almost continuously. I have found the "Quite, Please!" brand of white foam to be the best (~only effective) ones.

    Though I am not formally diagnosed, based on their receptions I suspect that many former employees would consider this a technicality. :) (Which is fine, because I generally thought the same of them. Note: my main work place challenges include some level of ADD, largely inhibiting my verbal cognitive and speaking skills, though this does seem to have improved somewhat over time.) I have found discipline the key element to both coding and interpersonal success. I have found the need to pretty much stone-wall (feign either obliviousness or complete unwillingness to enter into) any standard workplace provocations or psychological games or intrigue. I seem to have a history of inheriting the most perversely ill- conceived and implemented projects. I allow myself all the time such monstrosities should conceivably merit, including ample mental decompression and recuperation (eg. reading slashdot).

    Though your condition might gain you some consideration, if you get to feeling overwhelmed, they can instinctively, unconsciously come swarming after you. In the end the onus is always on you to control your response and maintain your mental equilibrium. I have come to view many "normal" people as actually deranged along highly standardized lines. Time will tell...

    After working for a number of "dud" companies, finally joining an extremely ambitious, motivated one highly prioritizing technical excellence, and being given meaty, challenging projects seemed to fundamentally improve my over-all productivity and general state of mind.

  41. Re:to the PUB? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Sorry I left out the not.

    Should have been:

    I am pretty sure he meant have a couple beers, not funnel rotgut until you can't stand.

  42. Basic Problem by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why hire you when there are probably hundreds of alternative applicants without your baggage? Either you have some crazy unique skill to bring to the table, or they have a financial incentive to hire you (pay less money than someone "normal", or maybe there's some weird tax writeoff).

    I don't mean this as an insult or anything, just as a shot of reality. You say you are happy doing volunteer work right now, which sort of implies that you are able to pay bills and stuff. If that's the case, stick with it. You can do that and some self-employment on the side as your motivation allows. You aren't going to find that kind of happiness with a salary job.

  43. Re:to the PUB? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    Well...not every week.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  44. Zoning out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (AC since my employer may be reading this and they don't know I have Aspergers)

    Zoning out doesn't work if you need quiet around you, not music or forty people frantically discussing whatever comes to their mind, sometimes even work related stuff. One of the things a lot of these disabilities have in common, is that you need an environment with little distraction and very well dosed social interaction. That doesn't mean people can't do high pressure jobs or perform as good as the next guy. It just means that they need their space and quiet and a well defined border between work and private life. This essentially works better for practically every human being, disabled or not. It just happens to have a rather more pronounced effect on people that have mental disabilities in the Autism spectrum or schizophrenia.

  45. Salaried job by jeko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's going to be a problem when he seeks a salaried job

    Undoubtedly. So, what are we as a society going to do with our schizophrenics in particular, and the problem of mental illness in general?

    Let's begin with the understanding that schizophrenia, like autism and Down's Syndrome, is an organic problem, where something physically went wrong with the body. It isn't the result of harsh circumstances like PTSD (also a very real and crippling problem) or a "learned behavior" like certain phobias. This means we can put schizophrenics right next to victims of childhood polio who can no longer walk. The disabilities they face aren't their "fault," and any "bootstrappy" behavior we might expect from them is right off the table. These people, who certainly can still live full, meaningful and productive lives, are simply going to need some help and consideration.

    It's really unlikely that their condition is going to make them brilliant crimefighters.

    This is supposed to be where the "compassionate" part of "compassionate conservative" kicks in, but unfortunately, it's actually the case that proves "compassionate conservative" is an oxymoron. They say the problem with mental illness is that it's "invisible," that it's harder for people to empathize with a schizophrenic than say, the blind, because mental illness doesn't show obvious trauma the way that MS does.

    I'd be more inclined to agree if my state's schools for the blind and deaf didn't keep getting their funding slashed time and again. I can tell you from first-hand experience that my State's plan for the handicapped, despite an awesome amount of empty spin and window dressing, basically boils down to three choices; Family, Homelessness or Prison.

    The people of the United States used to unanimously agree on this, that we had an obligation to care for and support the infirm, that a basic benchmark of civilization was that we took care of people who could not care for themselves. We lost that conviction sometime around the time when Reagan turned mental patients into homeless people, and then used that collection of homeless people to demonize the poor.

    So, I guess the question I'm asking here is aimed at my fellow citizens and especially fellow Christians who identitfy as "conservatives." How about this guy? Schizophrenia. An actual medical problem, no fault of his own. Able to lead a productive life if we just shield him a little from the Darwinian bloodbath.

    Can we get your heart to bleed at least a little bit for him? Can we set up a filthy Socialist program to make sure "the least of these" gets the help they need, or are we going to sit back and cheer as Ayn Rand slashes his throat?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Salaried job by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      Able to lead a productive life if we just shield him a little

      There's enough wiggle room in that statement to make the actual policy anything from soup kitchens to mass institutionalization. So yeah, he needs help, but the devil's in the details.

      I work part time at my state's main mental hospital.The campus is lovely in design, but maintenance often leaves something to desire. In the era of mass institutionalization, the campus was self-supporting for food, and patients served as groundskeepers and light maintenance personnel. That's a big part of how they were able to do it at all - effectively slave labor. Although the other extreme, where we are now, prevents them from taking such jobs even if they want to. A room full of schizophrenics, nothing to do all day but watch TV... no way that could go wrong, eh?

      BTW, what do you mean about Reagan? Deinstitutionalization was almost complete by 1980. Look here at the first graph.

    2. Re:Salaried job by hawguy · · Score: 1

      "Reagan turned mental patients into homeless people"

      Nice strawman. Please now indicate which section of the constitution authorizes the federal government to provide mental health care for the citizens of this country. Please be specific and clear.

      There are state laws that allow the government to involuntarily institutionalize someone for mental health care if they are shown to be a danger to themselves or others - these laws are (now) compliant with federal laws. View the references at the end of the Wikipedia article for details about specific laws:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Involuntary_commitment#United_States

      But mental healthcare services by the government doesn't have to mean involuntary confinement, there are plenty of voluntary mental healthcare options with inpatient and outpatient programs. And I don't think they need constitutional authorization for voluntary services since the government provides many services that are not explicitly named in the constitution.

    3. Re:Salaried job by gagol · · Score: 1

      The same reason a church actually needs money from its constituents to pay the bills. I have yet to see someone praying for money and getting it. Preaching for money is another matter.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    4. Re:Salaried job by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The scorpion is also a scorpion through no fault of it's own, but it's still dangerous. If someone threatens to kill people because blue armed men from Russia licked the doorknobs, and we're all in on the coverup, then I'll classify them as a danger first and a victim second. Then I'll call the blue armed men and tell them their cover is blown.

    5. Re:Salaried job by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1:

      The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

      I think it's easy to argue that providing mental health services to those that need it (thus keeping crazy people off the streets) benefits the general welfare of the United States.

    6. Re:Salaried job by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Having been through this, it was a lot more Ford-era and Carter-era than Reagan when the state hospitals were emptied. There was adequate proof that the hospitals were not necessarily doing their inmates a real service but what people missed was they were doing the rest of us a real service by keeping these people off the streets. Admittedly, they may not have been doing the patients any good other than simply providing a roof over their heads, but in booting them out even the roof disappeared.

      Yup, they just took those people and put them out on the street. Many of them ended up in long-term nursing facilities which were completely unable to care for these people. There was nowhere else for them to go.

      But blaming Reagan for this is completely wrong. Most of it was over long before he entered office. I had a girlfriend that lived next door to one of these long term nursing care facilities and they got a bunch of new faces around 1976 or so. It might have taken until 1978 before the job was completely done and all the hospitals were closed down. These people were clearly straight from a state hospital and were not like the elderly folks that were the sole residents there before that. It was rather distressing to see how they were mismanaged but as I mentioned, it didn't last long. None of the nursing care facilities could handle these new patients and they probably knew that going in. Meanwhile, the government folks were talking about how much better care could be given in these smaller and more responsive facilities.

      I suspect the government folks knew going in how it was going to turn out because it shouldn't have been a surprise at all. Now this is not to say the hospitals were doing their job properly. No, the reports that came out around that time showing patient abuse and outright cruelty were correct - that was happening. But pushing the people out on the street made potential victims of every passerby as well as the former patients. And it certainly didn't help anyone - no one got better because of being booted out of the hospitals.

    7. Re:Salaried job by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The problem is, it was clearly shown in the 1970s that the government was doing the patients a disservice by holding them in hospitals where care was minimal and there was abuse and cruelty. So the logical decision was made (???) that the right thing to do was to close the hospitals down and move the patients to smaller neighborhood centers.

      So you can say that the government was being cruel and inhumane to the mentally ill by holding them in these hospitals. Which was why they were closed down.

      Sure it was a mistake. But be clear about when it happened - it was over long before Reagan took office. This decision was made mostly at the state level and the hospitals were state-run. It is just that after enough reports of abuse and movies like The Snake Pit everyone was pretty well convinced that the hospitals were doing more harm than good. You see the date on The Snake Pit? This wasn't a new revelation by any means - everyone thought the state hospitals were something straight out of a horror movie.

      It was easy to get them shut down, but it wasn't to save money, it was to improve "care" such as it was. The problem is there was no care and nobody wanted these people. Especially not in neighborhood centers like the one that was across from a large neighborhood park.

    8. Re:Salaried job by jeko · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the question is, how do we -- as a society -- deal with our population of schizophrenics?

      Do we put them in jail? Leave them to fend for themselves on the street? Or do we decide we are a civilized people and give them the help they need to live productive lives?

      --
      He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    9. Re:Salaried job by tuttleturtle42 · · Score: 1

      Reality is that people with most disabilities, including schizophrenia, are more likely to be victims of violent crimes than be the perpetrator.

  46. Re:Motivation by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    This is true, and until it is corrected, you're almost ensuring that poor, but otherwise non-stupid people remain on welfare/disability/unemployment. If you make more or even the same amount on one of those than on a job, you're better off without the job. No bosses to please, no co workers to deal with. No commutes to make.

    The sad thing is, as much as there are people out there who seem like they want to help other people with welfare or disability, these little discrepancies keep appearing that make me wonder if it is not a political calculation on one side to ensure that remaining on government aid remains much more attractive than getting a job. Those who rely on the government for support cannot realistically vote for someone who wants to take it away from them, even if it makes long term sense to do so.

  47. This might sound insensitive, but by PPalmgren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I know the problem is a serious one and its fully classified as a disability, it almost sounds as if you're using it as a crutch in the summary. What I'm trying to say is that no situation is ever going to be perfect, and everyone has some nag or another that wears on them whether it be a disability, family problems, or in my case severe OCD to the point of trichotillomania. I think that finding a manager who is understanding and willing to work with you is the best thing you're going to be able to do. If you demand they heed your every desire and consider everything else unacceptable, you aren't going to ever land a job in a positive work environment. This is something you're going to have to meet others in the middle on and try to focus on the positives rather than the negatives. Its all relative and everyone has to do this, whether its visible to the observer or not.

    In short: try to not wait for the ideal scenario, meet people halfway. That doesn't mean you shouldn't be open about your issues, it just means you shouldn't lean on the issue as an "out" when a less-than-perfect scenario shows up. Give it a shot, you may surprise yourself.

  48. Re:Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And you post behind a handle which is most certainly not your real name, which means you aren't any different than those of us, save for the 30 seconds you spent registering an account on this site.

    (Unless your name actually is "Mindscrew", in which case then hats off to you.)

  49. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    No, he has the wrong sort of mental condition. You were thinking psychopath or sociopath. Both of those have no trouble at all with motivation or hard work... for their own goals. In fact, they tend to be very adept at getting themselves ahead, at least until someone gets wise to them anyway.

    The poster is having trouble with motivation, which is one way to ensure that you don't make it as a politician.

  50. Re:Man up... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    What's the limit? Say, you have an allergy to anything more than 1 hour of work per week. Or a neurochemical disorder that means that without a constant pedicure and massage chair, you can't do any work? Or what about a permanent vegetative state? At what point can a company reasonably say, "sorry, but we just don't have a position for you?"

    If the costs of the accommodations affect the bottom line in any significant way, it's irresponsible to hire someone who needs those accommodations, versus someone who doesn't. Now, if you're some rock start quadriplegic programmer, the cost/benefit might make sense for a personal assistant during work hours. But honestly, the case needs to be made that despite all the required accommodations, there is profit to be had by the company.

  51. requiring degrees maybe discrimination by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    requiring degrees maybe discrimination.

    As there some people who can do tech work / apprenticeships and can take tech school classes and or Community College but are not cut out for college / not college material.

    Not all people can learn in a pure class room.

  52. Re:to the PUB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Solution: stop going to shitty frat-boy pubs.

  53. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by trevc · · Score: 1

    Wow.

  54. Re:Holy Shit! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    While we would all like to think most educated people would know better the fact is that it just isn't true. Educated people will not care. All they will care about is how the individuals presence in the workplace will make others feel. All it would take is for this person to be hired a coworker looking for a reason to find out about the psychosis and then sue the company citing them creating an unsafe workplace. While the fact may well be that OP may not be a threat to others or to self as there are many different types of schizophrenia and not all are violent.

    I think rather than your perceived handicap, your time constraints for your work week may be your biggest challenge.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  55. Oh, I'm talking to everybody by jeko · · Score: 1

    Think of it as working the problem from all sides. :-)

    Anyway, here's where you, I and Bertrand Russell's ghost undoubtedly agree. I think it would be great if the Church would disengage from politics, rediscover humility, and go back to providing food, clothing, shelter and medicine to those in need. Yeah, I know it's not all you'd wish for, "last king and the entrails of the last priest" and all that, but surely we can agree that it's a start?

    Now, apart from the flame war, what can we do for the poster? Can we find him the breathing room he medically needs, or do we literally kick him to the curb and then prison?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  56. Re:to the PUB? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

    Better solution: don't go to places people go to hook up and/or get drunk if you're actually trying to socialize. Bars are shitty places to choose to hang out in.

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
  57. Re:Motivation by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Not to worry. They just work for cash.

    Which helps 'starve the beast while bleeding it', so I'm all for it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  58. Re:Man up... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if I follow. If I were to be judged by some supernatural master of the universe, I'd hope that they'd understand the free market, and the idea that making unreasonable accommodations simply destroys wealth and well being.

    In fact, I'd bet that any supernatural master of the universe already understands that, otherwise they'd have used their omnipotence to simply make everyone equal in outcome already.

    Frankly, any omnipotent being who presides over a universe like our own, what with the pain and innocent suffering that does exist, should be worried that *we* will judge *them* when we finally meet up. I mean, what does the master of the universe say to the spirit soul of a young child who was raped, tortured and killed by some marauding band of child soldiers in africa? Or to some baby who dies some horrible death of vitamin deficiency thanks to vegan parents?

  59. Re:Man up... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    So eliminating gender discrimination is equivalent to forcing companies to employ people in permanent vegetative states, or to otherwise employ people that force them to fire a dozen other employees due to cost?

    The law has its limits too, doesn't it?

  60. Re:Motivation by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Hats off to his dad. You won't believe how much shit Mom gave mine for naming me HornWumpus.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  61. Well this is an easy one by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    Government work. State or federal.

  62. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Government jobs usually require 37.5 hours of face time but 0 hours of work.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  63. Poe's Law Strikes Again by jeko · · Score: 2

    The sad commentary on our times is that I can't tell if this is a troll or someone's legitimate belief...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  64. Re:to the PUB? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    I don't drink, you insensitive clod.

    Why are you advocating that the only way to "help the employees adapt" is to get them drunk? how absurd!

    I had to quit drinking couple of years ago(at under 30, pancreatitis). I loved drinking - it's a really special thing and a lot of the world ultimately revolves around it and if you don't participate you'll see 20% of what people really are and hear just 10% what they got to say. And I have to say, pretty much _ALL_ of industry socializing revolves around drinking in the end. Industry fairs? drinking. evening meetings? drinking. motivational building days? well, perhaps a token activity and then again drinking and drinking some more.

    Pretty much all "bonuses" from the jobs are free booze and a place to drink it in(in case of Finland that's a sauna). I was on a gig once(consulting/rent-a-coder at a big firm) that lasted for almost a year under constant project changes and pressure(pressure that was plastered all over the fucking media no less) - and so they had this budget to reward us and what I got out of it was in practice free pizza and ramblings of some higher ups who were already drunk as fuck at 5 pm (still, a worthy experience I suspect in larger scheme of things, but I didn't feel too rewarded). Had I been drinking it would have probably been quite fun. Not participating in drinking shouldn't be a disability but damn if it isn't.

    So now I just give bonus points if they bother to remember that I can't drink and at least try to make an effort to provide something entertaining if they try to entertain me - at least get some coca cola, candy, games, strippers - just arrange _something_ ffs.

    I still go to bars occasionally, with colleagues and with friends. I stick to being by myself way too much to drop that totally and occasionally I'm curious about people and you just don't get to know otherwise - and for some funky reason I judge people by how they can behave when they're drunk, if they're douches or not - and for that you just have to see them drunk, you can't just hear about what they do when they're drunk - you have to see it, have to participate.

    The point about the pub was though to get to know your employees - if your disability is the sympathic kind of then the original asker has to get his foot in the door and he might be good to go if he's okay with discussing it with his colleagues and getting shitfaced is a fast way to get to know people(for good or worse, since some people are just asshats).

    though I suspect the 20-25 hours/week might be a stumbling block in getting a regular job. if he can give some good input to some projects, perhaps he should look for a startup that might not be so concerned about doing the full hours - they might even want it that way, and a startup because it's a small environment so it doesn't take forever to inform everyone that you are what you are.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  65. Re:This is going to sound harsh, but... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    All employers that self insure. Many big corporations.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  66. Schizophrenia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I too have schizophrenia and was hospitalized just before xmas. I work as a the sysadmin in an ecommerce company with around 100 servers, in an often stressful environment.

    When i first started i had a lot of days sick and my boss took me to one side and said do you want to stay in the job? I thought about how much i love working with linux compared to the often extra hours i need in bed after my illness has affected my sleep and said yes. He replied well if you don't have another day off in six months i won't outsource your job (he knows he cant fire me due to discrimination).

    OK so my boss is a dick but the choice is mine. A job i enjoy with people i mostly like, cool tech and going to bed early or sitting around collecting the pittance that is disabled living allowance, bored shitless with little self worth.

  67. Re:to the PUB? by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Yesterday I spent almost two hours in the pub with a couple of friends of mine. We had a great time. I didn't drink anything alcoholic since I had to ride my motorcycle home. It is not compulsory to drink alcohol in a pub.

  68. Re:Man up... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    All depends on the cost, and whether or not it is voluntary. First, I'd assert that any sort of charity for schizophrenics should be voluntary, not involuntary taxes. Second, if the charity for schizophrenics made their gainful employment profitable, I'd support that, but if it was cheaper to simply have them stay at home, I'd argue that the charity should simply provide them with food and shelter.

    The two take home points -> 1) do what is efficient, 2) forced charity is false charity

  69. full time volunteering by John_3000 · · Score: 1

    mpol, you say " I'm back at my volunteer job as web developer" and "for this year I'm quite happy where I am, but next year I might go searching for a salaried job again."

    Just curious: who pays your bills?

    Is it me?

    1. Re:full time volunteering by waltmarkers · · Score: 1

      You betcha. Isn't is nice of you to do that so he can consider maybe taking a part time job in IT this year?

      100 years ago his factory job would have found his request for a soothing emotional atmosphere amusing.

  70. Give it a few more years by na1led · · Score: 1

    With the way kids are growing up today, you'll fit right in with everyone else.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  71. Re:to the PUB? by Anrego · · Score: 1

    Totally disagree..

    As a previous poster said.. avoid the university "sawdust on floor" type joints and the pickup joints. They are usually fairly obviously marked. Here in Atlantic Canada we have lots of nice cozy historic pubs. Great atmosphere, live music, good food.. it's a great place to unwind with the guys after work.

    And when there is a game on, nothing beats a sports bar... again.. avoid the university crowd and it can be a great time.

  72. Job Type by denvergeek · · Score: 1

    Depending on your financial needs, have you thought about pursuing a different line of work?

    It's certainly a different gig and level of stress (for example) bumping around in a truck in the forest as an environmental technician for 35 hours a week, as opposed to staring at monitors for 50 hours a week. A better-matched work environment might make the difference, enough that you can get close to FT hours but not feel the same amount of stress.

    Depending on what country you live in, there might even be educational assistance to retrain in a different career

    Good luck!

  73. Don't even have to go that far down by jeko · · Score: 1

    In fact, "Ensuring Domestric Tranquility" and "Promoting the General Welfare" is right there in the first line of the first page. Sort of like they though it might be important, you know?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  74. Re:Motivation by tuttleturtle42 · · Score: 1

    Actually SSI isn't even $900 a month in most states - federal SSI is a little under $700, and then states add onto that some. Massachusetts maximum is under $900. SSI is about $750 a month if you're living with other people and paying a fair share of expenses in Massachusetts (a bit over $500 if you're not paying a fair share of expenses, a bit over $800 if you're living on your own).

    SSDI is dependent on previous incomes, but that assumes you worked enough before becoming disabled and is where people get higher disability payments. With schizophrenia or autism this tends to be less frequent.

  75. Is it the money? No, of course not... by jeko · · Score: 1

    It was easy to get them shut down, but it wasn't to save money, it was to improve "care" such as it was. The problem is there was no care and nobody wanted these people. Especially not in neighborhood centers like the one that was across from a large neighborhood park.

    OK, so we're arguing we shut the programs down without replacing them because we were trying to improve care. Have we considered the theory that the bureaucrats and politicians used the accusations of gross misconduct and malpractice as political cover to simply stop funding mental health treatment? Especially considering the stated intention of the 1980s GOP to dismantle the "Great Society" programs?

    I see in your other posts where you argue that we just don't have enough to go around, and even if we did, government is entirely incompetent to deal with anything, so simply taxing the rich won't fix our problems. OK, fair enough. The problem is that our nation's experience in the 40s, 50s and 60s contradict your stance. If the government is as incompetent as you argue, then why on Earth do we trust them with national defense?

    We've been cutting taxes for 30 years, and instead of boosting employment, wages and employment have been falling like rocks. How about we try this as an experiment? Let's put taxes back where Man-Who-Defeated-Hitler-Republican-President Dwight D. Eisenhower put them. We put the new funds to work. We then refund education at the same rates Nixon did. We re-instate Glass-Steagal. We rebuild our crumbling infrastructure, and then modernize it with the introduction of true fiber-to-the-curb. We lower the age of medicare coverage to 55 ... seconds before birth. :-)

    Let's run that program for five years and see where we are.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  76. Yeah, a right shame the country was founded by us. by jeko · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's a real shame the country was founded by Hippies like us. Franklin and his free love obsession, Jefferson and his miscegenation, Washington's stalwart stance against Authoritarianism...

    Seriouly, you need to read the document you're flailing around. "We the People," "Form a more perfect Union," "Establish Justice," "Secure Domestic Tranquility," "promote the General Welfare," limit military spending to two years, decentralized power structures, and a firm argument against including the Bill of Rights for fear that some "blockhead in the future," might think these were the only rights we had and not a merely listing of some of the more obvious ones.

    The only thing those Hippies were missing was rock-n-roll. Sex was plentiful and both Jefferson and Washington grew hemp (marijuana) on their farms. Can you imagine how awesome our nation might have been if Beethoven had been born a mere 30 years earlier to complete the "Sex, Drugs and Rock-n-Roll" trifecta?

    We had a name for Conservatives in 1776, and that name was "Tory." Our founding fathers were "black bloc" anti-corporate terrorists that got blitzed at the local tavern, dressed up and painted their faces like savages and dumped corporate property into the water like they were "Fight Club" members smashing Starbucks.

    You got no right to wrap yourself in a flag until you're ready to ride through the night warning the undesireables that the cops are on their way....

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  77. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by tuttleturtle42 · · Score: 1

    There's a difference between "I get tired and really don't want to work" and "I cannot drag myself out of bed or make food for myself and I'm losing the ability to take care of myself if I keep pushing myself to work when I shouldn't." I can't say for sure what this person deals with, but that difference is a meaningful one and is one that is common in disabilities with symptoms that include some that are common in schizophrenia. So, that might be what he's trying to say there.

  78. Re:Holy Shit! by CrudPuppy · · Score: 2

    Agreed, but the post isn't about people with mental problems, it's about people with disabilities in the workplace. And as my boss, you most certainly DO have to worry about my environment as a Deafie. You have to make sure that I don't have too many meetings, because it takes INTENSE mental focus to stay up to speed in crowds when I have to 1) figure out who's speaking, 2) focus on them and try to read their lips and foreign accents, 3) provide meaningful feedback.

    But yes, you are absolutely correct in that it's a different ballgame hiring someone with a mental problem vs Deaf.

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
  79. Re:Holy Shit! by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

    Before I got my cochlear implant, the work-place was rough: simple things that everyone else took for granted, like fundamental communication, was nearly impossible for me. An innocent question about how you're doing could be a major hassle, ending up in embarrassment for me.

    True story: at a "division" meeting - I don't recall what level of the organization it was, but it was high up there and there were lots of people in attendance - I'd sat through what seemed like forever, not having a freakin' clue as to what was going on, what we were discussing, etc. I did catch when, near the end of the meeting, the CxO said, "Are there any more questions?" I said, "Yeah, can we leave, now?" I saw him chuckle, slightly, and he wrapped up the meeting after that, but I still cringe thinking about how rude I must have appeared. It certainly wasn't "professional."

    Since I got my CI, it's almost like I'm "normal." I may have to ask someone to "Say that again," but I'm able to follow along, for the most part. I don't just sit there like the invisible man, and can participate in meetings, conversations, etc.

    If I was a manager of someone with disabilities, having my perspective, I'd definitely go out of my way to find out how we could help them become productive, contributing members.

  80. Re:Holy Shit! by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Informative

    How is accommodating someone with a mental disability any different that dealing with someone with a physical disability?

    If you have someone at work who is in a wheel chair, you would need to ensure there is access for them, everything they need to do their job can be reached from the chair, that in the event of an evacuation their location is rapidly determined and they are evacuated along with everyone else even though they can't take the stairs.

    If a person is deaf you have to adapt meeting practices, phones, etc..., if a person is blind they may need screen readers or braille output devices. If a person is recovering from an injury they may be on reduced hours and reduced duties.

    If you, as an employer, have decided that this person will add benefit to your company sufficient for them to be on the payroll (or volunteers list), then you have a responsibility to make it a safe workplace for them.

    My husband has a medical condition which can result in him having fits and seizures. It can be triggered by stress and heat among other conditions. His work has ensured that the first aid officers on his floor know how to manage someone having a seizure. They have provided a standing fan near his desk so he can control the air flow if it's a warm day and he needs more breeze than the aircon is providing as a base. His coworkers have my number in their phones and visa-versa so that we can communicate if he has an episode. My boss is aware that I keep a chat window open to him during the day to monitor him (especially on bad days) so that I can call his boss if I notice him starting to have symptoms (aphasia is often a warning sign).

    His boss has found him to be an excellent employee who occasionally has bad days. The good days outweigh the bad days. Lots of places wouldn't consider him knowing he is subject to seizures.

    I get incredibly angry listening to policy wonks talking about getting the disabled back to work and off benefits. That's all well and good, but how do you get employers to take a chance on someone with a medical condition which may unpredictably affect their capacity to work. It's incredibly tempting to lie about it in the recruitment process, but it's likely to come up before your trial period is over - and then your boss has to assess that if you lied about that, what else may you be deceiving him about.

    Most people with some kind of mental disability have triggers. Your responsibility as a boss is to provide them with a 'safe' environment where you minimise their exposure to trigger situations - for example, don't put them in a customer facing role, keep them dealing with internal staff who are familiar with some degree of routine. If you take on someone with a chronic medical condition (mental or physical) then you sign on for the possibility that they may have medical absences on potentially short notice.

    But guess what. You sign on for the same thing with parents who may have to take time off to look after sick kids. Or people with partners or older parents or siblings who may have to take carers leave to look after other members of their family. Or singles who may have accidents, injuries or just a cold or flu at various times of the year.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  81. Yeah, like that pesky elastic clause by jeko · · Score: 1

    The whole point of the elastic clause is to enable us to keep forming that "more perfect union."

    That's why we eliminated slavery, despite it being enshrined 3/5ths of the way into the document. That why we established the air force, despite no mention of it made in the Constitution.

    But leaving all the nit-picking aside, here's the real issue:

    Are we going to take care of our own or not?

    Are we going to leave the weakest among us to die in the gutter? Are we going to stuff our prisons full of people with schizophrenia, autism and Down's Syndrome? Are we going to follow Sparta, and bash out the brains of defective children, or are we going to find our humanity and care for those who cannot care for themselves?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  82. Re:Epilepsy by Macgrrl · · Score: 2

    I'm glad things worked out for you. My husband was misdiagnosed as epileptic for nearly a decade before his apnea was correctly diagnosed. According to his specialist he rates about a 3.5 on the 1-3 scale for severity. He has acquired amnesia covering several years from where his condition meant he couldn't form long term memories and often couldn't distinguish between short and long term memories and was hallucinating frequently.

    I do most of the driving even though he never lost his license just to be sure that if there was an accident the insurance company can't weasel out of paying because he was behind the wheel - even though he would never drive if he was experiencing pre-seizure symptoms.

    He spent nearly 5 years out of the fulltime workforce after he was recovering from his lowest point medically, and we have been blessed with friends in positions to recommend him for roles since getting back into full time work where the employers have known about his condition upfront and been fabulous about dealing with it. However any role he interviewed for where he mentioned it outside of interviews where he had a personal recommendation from an existing employee have resulted in a closed door.

    As the spouse of someone with a chronic medical condition, I feel I have to disclose it when I interview because I periodically get calls asking me to take him home because he's collapsed at work and isn't competent to make his own way home unescorted.

    He currently has a application support role with a large university. One of his coping mechanisms for memory issues is that he documents EVERYTHING to the nth degree. He is highly organised at work, because he needs familiarity. He is good at researching solutions and can follow instructions/read the manual. It makes him good at his job in a way some people who rely on memory and 'wing it' aren't.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  83. Work for a mental health organization by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

    If anyone would be a good employer it would be a foundation that works in some aspect of mental health, whether it be support, advocacy, research erc.

    I used to work across the street from one of the Lighthouse for the Blind organization and at least half of their staffers were visually impaired.

    You can have a job where they get you while also doing some good work for other people who need it, and everyone wins.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  84. Re:Holy Shit! by jythie · · Score: 1

    Because a lot of people in the US do not believe in mental illness.. they think it can be overcome with work or faith or something, or that it is simply moral weakness, or is just plain made up. It is still pretty stigmatized in a way physical illness isn't, and physical illness is still pretty stigmatized.

  85. Re:to the PUB? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Just because you are at a PUB doesnt mean you are forced to get drunk. And a good thing too, since most psychiatric meds don't mix well with alcohol.

  86. Working with a mental illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I actually had my prodrome and then psychosis while working and I managed to keep my job through that period (software development), but I had some advantages. Firstly I'll acknowledge good insight due to a family history of mental illness, symptoms that were relatively manageable for me and it didn't take that long for me to seek treatment. Apart from that, my job involves a lot of work for government, so things tend to be seasonal (more work around budget time); this helped because it meant that I had some time that was a lot more relaxed, while still having some pressure put on me occasionally, which helped a lot with managing motivation and keeping me focused. I work from home, have flexible hours and only have to see clients and colleagues semi-regularly; this was good because it made it so I could fit things into my periods of peak energy/focus and when I was least likely to experience symptoms (my most frequent times are in the morning after getting up and at night). So yeah, I would say time and workload management are some of the biggest factors.

    Working actually helped me a lot, because the kind of work I was doing required a lot of logical/critical thinking and it kept my mind sharper than it would've been if I was doing nothing. Your critical and logical faculties are actually the key to managing psychotic symptoms (along with maintaining your physical health, forcing yourself to socialise and a good psychiatrist that helps you find the right dosage/medication), because this is what keeps your mind pointed in the right direction. In fact, the worst part of the illness for me was the cognitive decline and trouble focusing that came with the illness (I could feel my focus slipping and my mind becoming more disordered, things stopped making sense so easily) and the extra mental power that had to be dedicated towards dealing with symptoms. This was worse for me than the positive symptoms, day night reversal or other negative symptoms.

    The other big thing is that the longer you receive treatment and the more you take care of yourself by exercising, eating well (most of the time), not drinking too much (most of the time), taking regularly holidays, socialising and everything else that helps, the healthier you'll be and the easier things will become. Personally, I am at the stage where in bursts of a few weeks or even months, I can work at the levels I could pre-psychosis. But the important thing is that I need downtime, not necessarily where I'm not working, but times where I'm not working as hard or under as much pressure.

    Of the people I work with, only one knows about my condition and that's because we're related. If I wasn't good at managing my symptoms, more people would need to know.

    1. Re:Working with a mental illness by mpol · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your response. I wish you the best.

      --

      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  87. Re:to the PUB? by hsqueak · · Score: 1

    Bars are shitty places to choose to hang out in.

    Bars, yes. Pubs, no.

  88. Re:It's going to be a tough road ahead for you.... by tuttleturtle42 · · Score: 1

    Yes. And I commented "I can't say for sure what this person deals with."

    Sure, he might just be lazy. I don't know this person. I know other people with schizophrenia and know that they'd say similar statements and do deal with what I said. I have some of the symptoms that are common negative symptoms as part of my autism. But what I've seen hasn't said for sure that he is, and what people have been saying have been showing that they don't understand the possibility of it not being all being lazy. Likely he's lazy in the sense of not putting more of his capabilities in than abled people do in their 40-60 hour work weeks, like some disabled people will and like we are expected to. Whether this is acceptable or not people can decide on their own.

  89. Re:Man up... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I've done a bit of research here and there. There is a widespread belief in what I'll just call God, and a human tendency to have certain experiences that imply the existence of such God, as well as a certain set of beliefs about God. This is apparently what inspires religion. The evidence is consistent both with an evolutionary quirk in the human brain that causes such experiences, and with God being real and rather imprecisely perceived on occasion.

    I've seen approximately no evidence that such a God cares much about optimizing the economy for wealth generation, and lots of evidence that such a God cares about taking care of the weak and sick.

    Your second and third paragraphs assume omnipotence, which I don't think is necessarily implied by religious experiences, and your second ignores the possibility that a hypothetical God might want a process, not an outcome.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  90. Re:Man up... by hsthompson69 · · Score: 1

    lots of evidence that such a God cares about taking care of the weak and sick.

    Wouldn't an all powerful being, that is asserted to be "good", simply provide for the weak and sick by making them not weak and sick through their supernatural powers? Heck, even if you're not talking about omnipotence, but just oh, say power over most of the physical nature of the universe, don't you think even a minor deity could choose to cure all ills and infirmities?

    a hypothetical God might want a process, not an outcome.

    My point exactly. And thus far, the evidence shows that the process God has chosen is the ultimate in laissez faire economics.

    So, you've really got two choices:

    1) God is good, but impotent

    2) God is omnipotent, but not good

    Seeing as most folk would argue that God must be good, I guess the real question is about just how impotent our resident deity is.

  91. Re:Holy Shit! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Your a geek. Can't you run a speech recognition package and read the conversation on screen? At least have it running and be able to back read. Going to be problems with people talking over each other, but that has to be a problem anyhow.

    Also can't you just sit there and not contribute, like most people in most meetings?

    I'm reminded of a Red Green predicament. 'Q: I was sitting there minding my own business, reading my paper and drinking my coffee when my wife shut up and looked at me. I realized she had just asked me a question. What should I do? A: restart your last mild fight.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  92. Re:to the PUB? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Assuming your a Fin you have to realize you live in the most soused nation on earth. You guys drink Ruskys under the table for fucks sake.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  93. Office presence... by advbg · · Score: 1

    I'm in a wheelchair. Unfortunately I have to work from home 2 days a week and 3 in office. The office was fully accessible. Some time ago I've joined VMware Bulgaria. Still I was fired because my manager wanted 100% presence in the office. So beware of your manager :)