Slashdot Mirror


How Noah Kagan Got Fired From Facebook and Lost $100 Million

First time accepted submitter abhi2012 writes "Noah Kagan, a former Facebook product manager, has written a brutally honest article about how and why he got fired from Facebook in 2006 and what he learned from it. The experience must be particularly painful, given that it eventually cost Kagan a $100 million fortune."

236 comments

  1. That.. by Guru80 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Would suck

    1. Re:That.. by binarylarry · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Illuminati had her offed a while ago.

      They secretly replaced her with Jon Lovitz, a high ranking mason.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:That.. by mrjb · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "It would suck?" It's pretty hard to lose 100 million unless you have it. So, he had more than most people make in a lifetime, and even got to enjoy it for a while before he lost it. He was lucky enough (this kind of money doesn't just come from hard work and talent, people) to have a taste of something that other people can't even begin to dream of, and now he lost it? Boo fscking hoo.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    3. Re:That.. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      "It would suck?" It's pretty hard to lose 100 million unless you have it. So, he had more than most people make in a lifetime, and even got to enjoy it for a while before he lost it. He was lucky enough (this kind of money doesn't just come from hard work and talent, people) to have a taste of something that other people can't even begin to dream of, and now he lost it? Boo fscking hoo.

      Ever heard of something called "earnings"?

    4. Re:That.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The funny thing about earnings is that you have to earn them before they're yours to lose.

    5. Re:That.. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Hardly. It's a pretty normal counting of future earning. It makes some assumptions such as:

      1. He wasn't bad enough at his job that with him facebook wouldn't be where it is today.
      2. The guy who replaced him wasn't so good at his job that facebook wouldn't be where it is today without him.
      3. That he wouldn't have left for other reasons before facebook got sold for way more than it is worth.

    6. Re:That.. by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's the ticket!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Facebook has products? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What exactly does Facebook _do_ ?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Facebook has products? by tapspace · · Score: 5, Funny

      What exactly does Facebook _do_ ?

      They deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to!

    2. Re:Facebook has products? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you have a Facebook account? If so, YOU are their product. They sell your eyes and ears to people who give them money for the privilege.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sell my eyes and ears? How? All the crap I notice on Facebook comes from my friends, not from anyone who pays Facebook money.

    4. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the scary thing is that there are still so many people who genuinely don't know.

      They provide free time-wasting software to you, and encourage you to tell them all about you. and your friends. Information about you is the product.
      They sell info about you to advertisers and businesses. They are the customers.

      Will they make enough money to become a long-term stable business before Twitter and/or the Next Next Next Big Thing (TM) steals all of their thunder? Will Justin Timberlake resurrect MySpace, fulfilling one of the signs of the impending Apocalypse? I hope the Cubs winning the World Series is the next sign on the list.

      We'll see.

    5. Re:Facebook has products? by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Facebook took the old adage from the late 90s: Attract eyes and ears then you'll make money somehow.

      Nowadays there are ad networks that you can cash easy with this, but back in Google's time, it was like the underpants gnomes equation.

      The irony is Classmates.com was first on the scene for meeting your fellow highschoolers, but they charged you for the privilege!

      This teaches us one thing: Don't put any barriers in your website for adoption, even if the barrier is a paywall to profit you in the short run.

      I think this is why freemium games are coming into their own. You have more people playing, money from ads and some money from premium good sales, and if your game is good, more people will come play it than a traditional 60$ game.

    6. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make one person an insane amount of money.

    7. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If so, YOU are their product.

      I love that people keep saying this like it's correct. No. They are not in the business of slavery. Grow up.

      They sell advertising space. That's it and that's all. Same as a newspaper, same as a TV show, same as a magazine, same as Slashdot. There's no reason to try to make it sound more evil than it is. They just do it better because they know you're (probably) between 30-40 and like automobiles.

    8. Re:Facebook has products? by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 1

      Facebook currently harbors "products" that have left MySpace, Orkut, Friendster, Bebo, ICQ, AOL.. These products will soon migrate further to some new social verticals as the social web matures.

    9. Re:Facebook has products? by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What exactly does Noah Kagan do? Writing blogs is certainly not his superpower. After reading it I felt I knew less than when I started.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    10. Re:Facebook has products? by epyT-R · · Score: 5, Interesting

      typical marketer perspective. things that cater to the masses are the most watered down boring cliche products possible. No one bothers with the niche anymore and that's too bad. That's where the interesting things hide.

    11. Re:Facebook has products? by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      they also track your cookie trail.. that's different than being pitched at a grocery store..at least before they started handing out those scanners that track your movements through the store while pretending to be a convenience.

    12. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is being a product evil?

    13. Re:Facebook has products? by MrLizardo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you must be an optimist: They're no *less* evil than television networks, newspapers or Slashdot. (TV shows are sold to TV networks, i.e., the TV show is the product.) When organizations like this are private they (potentially) *can* retain the goals of their founders, but once they're public (and they're founders sell off their stock), they're *required* to try and make the biggest profit possible. They do this by selling certain demographics of eyeballs to certain advertisers. The user's attention is the product.

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    14. Re:Facebook has products? by buddyglass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure. And yet they're paying me (in free services I use to interact with my friends and acquaintances) in order to monetize me. If that payment ceases to motivate me to put myself in a position to be monetized then they lose.

    15. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy sounds like a meathead. I don't know if he is, but he comes across like the typical, know-nothing, intellectual-lightweight you usually find in business departments.

    16. Re:Facebook has products? by rnswebx · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is not all. Facebook also makes a tidy sum from their Facebook "credits" by taking a 30% cut from app transactions on their platform.

    17. Re:Facebook has products? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They sell advertising space. That's it and that's all. Same as a newspaper, same as a TV show, same as a magazine...

      I don't write the content for the newspaper, TV, or magazines. That little distinction there is important enough that everybody else gets it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    18. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not the profitable things apparently....

    19. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Do you have a Facebook account? If so, YOU are their product.

      Do you have a Slashdot account? If so, YOU are their product.

    20. Re:Facebook has products? by tnk1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's money in niche products, but things like broad social networks are not built on niches. When you have a social network, you either get as many people on it as possible, or you alternately find a smaller group who is willing to pay and capable of paying. This is not an easy task. And if they pay, you'd better have some first class service and content, preferably service because content these days is pretty easy to copy unless you are marketing something with a short shelf life.

      Something like Facebook was started for college students and spread to everybody. They did what they needed to do, which is market for mass appeal. I can't argue with what they did, although I do wonder how far they can take it. The craptastic IPO was just another signal that FB needs to do something or it may not fare so well in the near future.

    21. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "they're *required* to try and make the biggest profit possible"

      Prove it. I keep hearing that this is "the law", until I read something much more intelligent and educated sounding that said that's not true. I don't know.

      All I know is that the one time I was "given" stock options, it ended up as a tax burden for me and a tax right off for the company.

    22. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They have people skills! They are good at dealing with people!

    23. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Copied from http://definitions.uslegal.com/b/breach-of-fiduciary-duty/ (emphasis mine)

      Breach of Fiduciary Duty Law & Legal Definition

      A fiduciary duty is an obligation to act in the best interest of another party. For instance, a corporation's board member has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders, a trustee has a fiduciary duty to the trust's beneficiaries, and an attorney has a fiduciary duty to a client.

      A fiduciary obligation exists whenever the relationship with the client involves a special trust, confidence, and reliance on the fiduciary to exercise his discretion or expertise in acting for the client. The fiduciary must knowingly accept that trust and confidence to exercise his expertise and discretion to act on the client's behalf.

      When one person does agree to act for another in a fiduciary relationship, the law forbids the fiduciary from acting in any manner adverse or contrary to the interests of the client, or from acting for his own benefit in relation to the subject matter. The client is entitled to the best efforts of the fiduciary on his behalf and the fiduciary must exercise all of the skill, care and diligence at his disposal when acting on behalf of the client. A person acting in a fiduciary capacity is held to a high standard of honesty and full disclosure in regard to the client and must not obtain a personal benefit at the expense of the client.

    24. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A fiduciary duty is an obligation to act in the best interest of another party. For instance, a corporation's board member has a fiduciary duty to the shareholders, a trustee has a fiduciary duty to the trust's beneficiaries, and an attorney has a fiduciary duty to a client..

      The wording proves the point - "act in the best interest of another party". Not "must try and make the biggest profit possible". The false equivalence between the two is why you hear things like "the board of directors/CEO/CFO must make as much profit as possible or they will go to jail" or some such nonsence.

      "Best interest" is purposefully vague: you can argue that long term profits (building a trusted and respected brand) is better than next quarter's earnings. What we have now is a direct consequence of tying bonuses to options, leading to risky behavior. If we tied it to wealth, it would be different (there was a article on this in the Harvard Business Review). If a CEO has 1 million shares right now, he wants to make sure that the stock price doesn't tank - and won't do something stupid. On the other hand, if you say - You'll get X extra shares/Y dollars if the stock price rises, he has an incentive to take risky decisions. If the stock price tanks, he doesn't lose anything. Most CEOs have a mix (they already own some stock, and also have some interest in taking risks).

    25. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they also track your cookie trail..

      No, actually they don't track mine, because I don't have one.

      that's different than being pitched at a grocery store.

      Again no, it's just the same. When the guy hands you a flier, either say "no thanks" or drop it on the floor, stuff it on a shelf, etc.

    26. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell info about you to advertisers and businesses. They are the customers.

      I keep seeing this repeated and it's false. They don't tell the advertisers anything about you or me specifically. Advertisers get to pick certain demographics they want their ads to play for, they don't get information about who actually sees those ads. Yes, there are ways that the advertisers can get you to "leak" information, but they're the same exact methods they can use to get information by means of a newspaper coupon or an in-person purchase at a brick and mortar store.

      They are not selling your information. They are not even really selling access to your information. What they are selling is access to your eyeballs- and we already have a word for that and that word is "advertising".

    27. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there's an interesting distinction. Being a slave is not evil. Dealing is slaves is evil.

      But ask yourself, is voluntarily being advertised to evil? Is advertising to people who volunteer for it (in exchange for something) evil? Personally, I'd say "no" in both cases. But that's me.

      I think it gets just a little murkier when you starting thinking about doing some correlation via embedded code in 3rd party sites, but again, that's really only of any use for advertising profiles on people that are, again, volunteers.

    28. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I agree with you in general that it does not say "try and make the biggest profit possible." But it does say something close to that.

      The client is entitled to the best efforts of the fiduciary on his behalf and the fiduciary must exercise all of the skill, care and diligence at his disposal when acting on behalf of the client.

      "Best interest" may be vague, but investors (shareholders) as a class have only one interest in common. I concede your point about short-term vs long-term profit. But it is still, after all, profit that the shareholders consider to be their "best interest." The quoted definition clearly says that corporate officers are legally required to "exercise all of the skill, care and diligence at his disposal" in representing that interest.

    29. Re:Facebook has products? by dcollins · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing in that language asserts that "client's best interest == biggest profit possible".

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    30. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What other interest do you imagine investors as a group having? The only ambiguity conceivable is the time-frame.

    31. Re:Facebook has products? by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, niches are exactly why Facebook and Google want as much data from you as possible. In hindsight their business models should actually encourage all sorts of niches, because a big problem getting in a niche market is not knowing how to find the right customers. They are more likely to seek help from these data-mining advertisers, and they also pay more per click. Niches, both in terms of demand and supply, is probably essential to their business. The problem you state is in the unimaginative that only try to mimic the success of well-known big players.

    32. Re:Facebook has products? by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      What exactly does Facebook _do_ ?

      This is a bit hard to believe but I have heard that its a bit like Slashdot but they talk about things other than tech. Not only that but female posters are not the exception. Strange, but true?

    33. Re:Facebook has products? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Yes. Accept it.

      On the other hand, know that creating favourable conditions for the lettuce is in the best intrest of the farmer. So it's a win-win situation. You watch ads, you get a service.Fair and suqare until you confuse yourself with a customer.

      --
      bickerdyke
    34. Re:Facebook has products? by Theophany · · Score: 0

      Google+ is pretty niche and trust me, not that interesting.

    35. Re:Facebook has products? by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 1

      Niches, in aggregation, is a very large part of the world.

      For every person that exists, there is something he likes that most others don't. It could be beer, software, or medicine, and so on. Even if you look at a big, profitable generic category like smart-phones, and among only the big players, there is still a considerable variation of products (except for Apple).

      Now Android has its market share because hardware come in many forms that appeal to certain different niches. Crudely you say it's low-end and high-end. Then you can talk about screen-size, processor speed, style. Now it could come to external SD card support, removable batteries.

      If you divide the 100% by the number of smart phones you will get a very small number (I won't count properly, but I know HTC has produced 30+ Android phones - much, much more if you include other OS's and brands). A lot of phones don't even hit this small number. Some are simply unsuccessful, but many people simply don't buy a lot of the best-selling phones.

      Then there are tens of thousands of software in app-stores. Everyone only cares about some of them, but all these apps are used by somebody, and a sizable proportion is being used constant.

      Now don't let me talk about dumbphones...

    36. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. This. A thousand times this.

      The thing is... not only do I still not know wtf Noah Kagan was supposed to be doing at Facebook, I also have no fucking clue why exactly was he fired (which, IIRC, was the whole point of the blog post, no?).

      I'm going to go ahead and assume he got fired for thinking self-evident statements such as "The BEST way to get famous is make amazing stuff. Thatâ(TM)s it. Not blogging, networking, etc." pass off as insightful.

    37. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't write the content for the newspaper, TV, or magazines. That little distinction there is important enough that everybody else gets it.

      This is a subtle point that is too often overlooked. I would give mod points to you if I had them, though.

      I seem to always be saying: the marketing process is prospect->message->media, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND PEOPLE! Of course, I partially learned this the hard way, working as/for a specific media outlet (small format print/direct mail), but I know for a fact they DO teach the 'proper' way in good schools.

      Hit me up sometime (Hint: I'm the IT guy in the contact us page listed on my profile)
      "Mr. Z"

    38. Re:Facebook has products? by mr_zonules · · Score: 0

      That AC post was me. That's what you get for posting at 1:30 am. Is this like the like drunk texting? Probably. "Mr. Z"

    39. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for modpoints... +1 Insightful! "Skill, care and diligence", wouldn't diligence imply making sure the client isn't going to get bitten in the ass by fines/legal action at a later date?

    40. Re:Facebook has products? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Slashdot does not require me to link my account to others as part of the deal. Slashdot has no interest in my physical location. Slashdot does not track me on a multitude of other websites (OK, maybe a few that have /. buttons). Slashdot allows me to remain pseudonymous and still access the full range of non-subscriber features. Slashdot allows ACs. Slashdot has content that is generally of interest to me. Nobody on Slashdot knows who I really am.

      This is why I have a Slashdot account and why I have never signed up to Facebook.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    41. Re:Facebook has products? by Stormthirst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ad-blocking FTW

    42. Re:Facebook has products? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in general that it does not say "try and make the biggest profit possible." But it does say something close to that.

      Close to it != it.

      Lots of corporations make donations in cash or other resources to charitable causes. If your original assertion was correct then the officers of those corporations would be breaking the law by doing so.

      You were wrong, and you got called on it. Now just shut the fuck up already and in future check your facts before repeating shit you read on teh intarwebs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    43. Re:Facebook has products? by am+2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      No one bothers with the niche anymore and that's too bad.

      Kickstarter takes care of a lot of niche projects and projects that turn out to be not-that-niche-after-all now.

    44. Re:Facebook has products? by Teancum · · Score: 4, Informative

      The purpose of a corporation can be for things other than to "maximize profits and increase shareholder equity" (a typical phrase in many corporate charters). A really good example of a corporate charter that has other purposes is Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, which explicitly put social progress and other corporate goals besides making a profit into its corporate charter.

      If you are an investor and have not read a prospectus about the company and especially if you don't have a clue what the goals and corporate charter have to say about that company, you are being foolish in even investing into such a company.

      I know of one particular company (I won't bother naming it because this was said informally) whose express purpose is to provide full employment for the citizens of South Dakota. Another company (Fortune 500 and traded on the NYSE) has in its corporate charter to act as a beneficiary to the development and welfare of a smallish Mid-western town in America. There are also a few corporations that have been established "to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ" or to promote science and other various purposes that have nothing to do with making a profit. Elon Musk, in the case of SpaceX, openly admits that the purpose of his company is to "make mankind a multi-planetary species". The "Newman's Own" company also has a strong charitable mission where none of the profits are even given to shareholders.

      In some cases (like SpaceX) earning a profit is certainly very useful and helpful to the ultimate goal so it doesn't even hold that the company must be a "non-profit" company to have purposes other than maximizing profit. If a company fails to meet the overall purpose of the company, it could be argued that the fiduciary responsibility of the board of directors and the corporate officers has not been met, even if perhaps they are maximizing profits.

    45. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      charitable donation == marketing

      or sometimes political influence.

      And it's often tax deductable. This is often consistant with making as much money as possible in the long run.

    46. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gather passwords from users so the owner can use 'em to log into other systems - or so I've heard.

    47. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, it says in the article, you must have missed it. Apparently he can use spreadsheets.

    48. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing - the ultimate non-product

    49. Re:Facebook has products? by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sell my eyes and ears? How?

      They grow them on your arms and harvest them while you sleep. :)

    50. Re:Facebook has products? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Herp derp

      You had my full attention right there (not!). :p

    51. Re:Facebook has products? by joaosantos · · Score: 2

      Technically you are the supplier and your attention the product.

    52. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the beauty of it. It doesn't _do_ anything.

    53. Re:Facebook has products? by Bengie · · Score: 1

      You as in the "general public". If you don't have ad block on, then you see ads.

    54. Re:Facebook has products? by Bengie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then don't browse sites with the "like" button. In order for the like button to work on a website, you must first authenticate. To make this transparent, it's done via a cookie and the site must also authenticate.

      From that info, FB gets to see which account you are and which site you've loaded. FB created this feature, end users love it, and web devel are using it. FB does not force this on anyone.

    55. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no I don't!

    56. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with you people!?

    57. Re:Facebook has products? by Zcar · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. But, IIRC, there is a fair amount of case law which does take that view.

    58. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The misconception is that data goes only to facebook ads. It also goes to things like market research, if you have a TV ad for a certain product and notice a certain demographic is more likely to "like" your product, and that same demographic tends to "like" a certain TV show, you can make a TV ad for that TV show. Adblock does not stop this. Even if you yourself never "like" things, by being X age, living in Y location, etc... they can surmise what things you are likely to like, and cross advertise across those items.

    59. Re:Facebook has products? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It seems it's you who needs to brush up on what they don't know. You just described entirely how online advertising, including Facebook, does not work.

    60. Re:Facebook has products? by himself · · Score: 1

      >
      > In order for the like button to work on a website, you must first authenticate.
      >

          I didn't think not authenticating with FB was enough. That is, even if I don't stay logged into Facebook, they can still query my cookie(s) and correlate it with my FB identity, right?

    61. Re:Facebook has products? by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      They're manure dealers.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    62. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you might be missing the point with Facebook. It allows the USERS to create/publish all the niches they want! Facebook doesn't really create content. They provide a platform for everyone else to provide and share their own.

      I can join Facebook groups dedicated to everything from enthusiasts of my specific make and model of car to groups for amateur female wrestling fans to ???

      Sure, there's a lot of bland generic content posted, but that's simply because the majority of time, the majority of users don't have anything more interesting than that to say. Like always, if you want Facebook to show you "interesting" stuff, you have to dig for it a bit and probably get selective who you "friend".

    63. Re:Facebook has products? by Spuffin · · Score: 5, Informative

      What exactly does Noah Kagan do? Writing blogs is certainly not his superpower. After reading it I felt I knew less than when I started.

      Here is another of his sites which has more of his experience: http://noahkagan.com/

      I'll echo some of the same sentiments others are posting here in that I don't know what he really did at FB but given the information on the site above, here are some highlights:

      Internship at MS in 2003 for ~3 months during the summer before his Senior year; the experience definitely looks like he took a few liberties describing his responsibility.
      Bachelor's in business administration and economics from UC Berkeley in 2004
      Moved on to Intel from 2004-2005; again his experience looks a bit exaggerated. I don't doubt there is truth to it but in my opinion, the way it reads gives the reader the impression his responsibilities were much more than they actually were.
      Moved on to Facebook in October 2005 until he was fired in June 2006. For those keeping tabs, that is less than 1 year of experience at FB. Furthermore, the experience he lists has a lot of what I would consider technical in nature yet he does not have a Comp Sci or related degree. Given the liberties I feel he has taken with his other experience, I don't think this one would be any different. If he helped market facebook during its infancy then he should be marketing that (hah) a lot more than "his" experience with these technical items.

      At the end of the day, he joined Facebook with about 1 year of actual work experience under his belt and he got fired from Facebook after having worked there less than 1 year. Did he lose out on $100M other than what he feels he would have eventually worked up to had he been there until the IPO? Not a chance.

    64. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is the most repeated, unoriginal comment ever about facebook.

    65. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are famous for being famous on the social wave. Some people are just sold that social computing is just correct in and of itself. But FB is --Usenet + restricted connections + media.

    66. Re:Facebook has products? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Facebook also makes a tidy sum from their Facebook "credits" by taking a 30% cut from app transactions on their platform.

      This is a key understanding that I wish more people would get: Because of this, Facebook is financially aligned with Zynga's goals. IMHO this was a poor decision because it goes against what most of their users want out of a Facebook experience, which is more of their friends' content and less "Help me till my farm!" BS. Gotta pay the bills somehow, I suppose.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    67. Re:Facebook has products? by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Prove it. (Thus returning us to the great-great-grandfather post.)

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    68. Re:Facebook has products? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Are all of those companies legally incorporated as the same "type" of company?

      In other words, even without for profit vs non-profit differences, are there different types of companies?

    69. Re:Facebook has products? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      It is called the corporate charter. In terms of what the government thinks and how you pay taxes (the only thing the government cares about), these other corporate types are irrelevant.

      The corporate charter is the contract that shareholders agree to when they purchase shares of the company. It can state any legal purpose for its existence, and making a profit certainly doesn't need to be the reason for its existence. The fact that making money is a strong reason for making a company and a typical reason doesn't matter other than it is a typical purpose.

      That is also one of the reasons why attending shareholder meetings is important if you own shares of a company, especially if you own a substantial number of shares in that company. As long as you can get a majority of the shareholders (as determined by the number of shares... or by other voting mechanisms in the corporate charter that can even be one vote per shareholder regardless of the number of shares you own) to agree with your viewpoint, you can make changes to the charter or certainly hold up corporate officers to abide by the conditions of the charter.

      That this isn't done as often for purposes other than making money is only something that just needs to be pointed out. These companies can be traded on major stock exchanges and still have a social purpose that goes beyond making money... even though most folks who are "institutional investors" on Wall Street only care about making money alone.

    70. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Safari for Facebook and only Facebook. Chrome for everything else, cookie tracking solved. Of course they can probably track IP addresses as well......

    71. Re:Facebook has products? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing blogs? Try writing period.

  3. Should have listed to jwz by busyqth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do you hate your job? Are you only still there because you're waiting to vest? I feel your pain, brother. The only thing that kept me from leaving Netscape in 1997 and walking away from a dumptruck full of cash in frustration was this script. I ran this every morning for at least a year: it prints out the following motivational message:

    Today's NSCP price is $__._; your total unsold shares are worth $____. You are __._% vested, for a total of ____ vested unsold shares ($____). But if you quit today, you will walk away from $____.
    Hang in there, little trooper! Only _ years __ months __ days to go!


    It's amazing how this script can put it all back into perspective and keep you from going postal and strangling someone. Fill in your numbers, and let it remind you not to do something you'll regret later.

    http://www.jwz.org/hacks/

    1. Re:Should have listed to jwz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today's NSCP price is $__._; your total unsold shares are worth $____. You are __._% vested, for a total of ____ vested unsold shares ($____). But if you quit today, you will walk away from $____. Hang in there, little trooper! Only _ years __ months __ days to go!

      What if you're fully vested, but it's a private company with no exit plan? I'd love to say FYIFV, but FM, being FV without liquidity means sweet FA!

    2. Re:Should have listed to jwz by njahnke · · Score: 1

      he was fired, though.

    3. Re:Should have listed to jwz by jmerlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the event of a pre-IPO company, it should also include the difference in a competitive salary vs current salary (and reasonable bonuses or raises) for the duration it will take before vesting occurs and insert "You're paying $____ for the possibility that you will cash out big." Just to put that in perspective.

    4. Re:Should have listed to jwz by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      What if you're fully vested, but it's a private company with no exit plan?

      There are private shares markets. Also, if you can find someone who the CEO can't stand, tell him you're selling your shares to that guy. They will buy you out instead.

  4. What? by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I actually mostly read TFA. This guy sounds like an asshole, but at least he does a decent job admitting it. For those of you too impatient to slog through it, he basically says "I was a product manager but I wasn't very good at product managing" and "I used the brand more than I added to it" (w.r.t holding parties at the office, self-aggrandizing on his blog about working at FB). Not to mention going behind people's backs, like all of Marketing, on a new feature.

    Short version: I was a liability, and they fired me for it. At least I learned something.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:What? by rgbrenner · · Score: 5, Informative

      That, plus.. according to wikipedia he worked there for 8 months over 6 years ago.

      At that point, Facebook was already running for nearly two years.

      Get over it already... you didn't lose $100m... you were a momentary employee of facebook, where had you stayed for 10x longer, and your share wasn't diluted, and etc etc etc.. you might have made $100m.

    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      In his previous blog post he lists The Fountainhead as a book that changed his life. That's like Charles Manson carving a swastica into his forehead: it's a clear warning to everyone else. Thanks for letting us know up front and saving us the time, benefit of the doubt wise.

    3. Re:What? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say he is an asshole. I'd say he's someone who made some mistakes when he was younger, lost an absolute fucking fortune over it, and then did something unusual (for assholes) - he conducted a brutally honest self-assessment, used it to make himself better, and bared it for the world.

      Sounds like somebody who grew the hell up to me.

    4. Re:What? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyway, the lessons he learned don't worth 100M. Almost everyone learn them for free. Nothing special in this story at my humble opinion. Everyone with about 5 years at the workplace got these lessons. I estimate that 5 years is the average time to be fired these days.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say he's someone who made some mistakes when he was younger,

      Agreed.

      lost an absolute fucking fortune over it,

      Disagree. He didn't have a fortune, therefore he didn't lose it.

      then did something unusual (for assholes) - he conducted a brutally honest self-assessment, used it to make himself better, and bared it for the world.
      Sounds like somebody who grew the hell up to me.

      Sounds like somebody who has been having a lot of trouble getting steady work with his job history, making a feeble attempt to shore up his reputation.

    6. Re:What? by umghhh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the actual lesson from this may be that marketing people are a waste of bandwidth and the articles about them are that too. TFA confirms this quite nicely.

    7. Re:What? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Yet his "grammer" and writing haven't improved. Just sayin'...

      And I love some inconsistencies in the article. First he says Facebook was first in his life, then he says he was valuing himself more than Facebook. he should really make up his mind.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually mostly read TFA. This guy sounds like an asshole, but at least he does a decent job admitting it. For those of you too impatient to slog through it, he basically says "I was a product manager but I wasn't very good at product managing" and "I used the brand more than I added to it" (w.r.t holding parties at the office, self-aggrandizing on his blog about working at FB). Not to mention going behind people's backs, like all of Marketing, on a new feature.

      Short version: I was a liability, and they fired me for it. At least I learned something.

      Aha... and now can somebody please remind me: Why are this guy's conversations with his psychotherapist news?

    9. Re:What? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      The only lesson he learned was that it's better to be the bigger asshole and let it rain down on the people underneath you. Note that he's now all about being the shitcanner rather than the shitcannee.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:What? by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Almost everyone learn them for free.

      I beg to differ; IMHO, I'd say most never learn them at any price.

    11. Re:What? by Arrepiadd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's pretty funny that he says one of his mistakes was using Facebook to promote himself and that he learned not to do that. That he should help build something and the publicity comes as a consequence of that. And here we are, 6 years after he left Facebook, reading about him and Facebook.

      Clearly he learned all he's preaching

    12. Re:What? by mTor · · Score: 1

      That Wikipedia page reads like a resume. Doesn't Wikipedia have a policy against pages like that and especially for non-notable people?

    13. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his previous blog post he lists The Fountainhead as a book that changed his life.

      What an idiot Atlas Shrugged is much better.

      (roman_mir, censured again)

    14. Re:What? by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I read the article too. I am a product manager, been doing it for > 14 years, in a variety of companies and environments. He clearly wasn't up to the task, and really should never have been hired for that role in the first place. Then I read about how soon after graduating he had that role. That is one of the paths to failure in this field. Dumped into a product management role without the foundation or background? You're gonna have a bad time

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    15. Re:What? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      What was the foundation and background that your consider necessary? I'm actually that guy right now (as long as we're all being brutally honest). I've been thrust into this role and I don't know what the fuck. Have any good books I should read, college degrees I might be missing? Should I get a PMP cert?

      Seriously it's only a matter of time before they get me but I figure I should try to learn something in case I ever want to do this again (i don't).

    16. Re:What? by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I will probably get scraped and spammed to death, but my email address is gander @ tralfaz dot org and I would be happy to have a discussion outside of this forum. Geoff

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  5. A lesson by mallyn · · Score: 5, Informative
    I did read the article.

    The person may be an ******, but that does not mean the article is worthless. It is a lesson to take with you.

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    1. Re:A lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a lesson to take with you.

      Indeed. I learnt that Zuckerberg can't spell.

    2. Re:A lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is worthless because that he might have been a 100-millionaire and that's about it.

      Otherwise it was such a vague emo nonpiece that I think it was crap.

    3. Re:A lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Save me some time, is it a lesson for normal people, or just assholes?

    4. Re:A lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what an hunter2

  6. why do we care? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't know why we care about this guy, but he took firing pretty hard. Who doesn't? As he said, Facebook had an important part in his life, from the article:

    At that time, here’s the order of what was important in my life:
    1- Facebook
    2- Myself
    3- Food / Shelter

    OK, it sucks the get fired, but he lied in that list above, in reality he actually put himself above everything, and really abused his relationship with Facebook. As he later admits:

    I wanted attention, I put myself before Facebook. I hosted events at the office, published things on this blog to get attention and used the brand more than I added to it.

    Add to that he wasn't paying attention at all in meetings (well, I don't blame him for that but sometimes meetings are important), he didn't work well with others, and eventually he just annoyed the wrong people too much.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:why do we care? by timeOday · · Score: 5, Informative

      The single best take-home message in the post is nothing new, but have you truly internalized it? You are replaceable, and firing you would hurt you much more than the company. I work in research and it's even worse: whenever somebody leaves, nobody even bothers to carry on the work they'd been doing. What does that mean?

    2. Re:why do we care? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      You are replaceable, and firing you would hurt you much more than the company

      Speak for yourself. As an underpaid squab, I am much more valuable to the company then they are to me! Firing me would only improve my salary! I would be smiling my way out the door!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:why do we care? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      their research is a dead end

      otherwise, you'd hear about their research again

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    4. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of clueless asshole...

    5. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So quit.

    6. Re:why do we care? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      There are more reasons to stay at a company than just money. I make enough money to satisfy me (more than anyone in my extended family, actually), and there are other things that make me happy. But it won't bother me at all to get fired, because I've been through that and know how to find other work.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So piss into the coffee maker every morning until they catch on... ... if it would be such an obvious improvement for you, and they're such dumb fucks anyways... really, you're just doing them a favor.

      I don't want to see your stupid face at any "occupy" rally in a few months time though.

    8. Re:why do we care? by petsounds · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The single best take-home message in the post is nothing new, but have you truly internalized it? You are replaceable, and firing you would hurt you much more than the company.

      Generally, no. People are not replaceable. When you try to replace one person with another person who on paper seems to be equivalent, you will end up changing the company. At low-levels, the effect will generally be localized, although even at this level the Butterfly Effect can come into play. As you move up the pay scale, switching personnel can have more and more noticeable effects on the company. What role they are in tends to have different effects -- switching out people in a role of creating value for the company can change the company's value in an extreme way. Replacing middle managers tends more to have a multiplier effect on the value creators. And then there is the social dynamic one brings, which can cause huge problems within the company organism.

      I think an equivalency to your statement would be: you have no job security. And from an employer perspective: you have no security in retaining the people who give your company value. When either of these parties take those statements for granted, one or both parties will hurt from the loss.

    9. Re:why do we care? by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, I was at the occupy rally last year. Protesting is fun! It was a party!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:why do we care? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Yes each person brings something different to the job. Often so different that I am at a loss to say whether one person is "better" or "worse" than another who is at least in some sense their predecessor. And you know what? Maybe Facebook would now be worth $104,001,000,000 instead of $104,000,000,000 if it had not fired Noah Kagan, and firing him was a mistake. Then again maybe not. There is no way of knowing and nobody at Facebook cares. That is what replaceable means.

    11. Re:why do we care? by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right it's impossible to know because we will never see the alternate timeline where this guy wasn't fired and he continued to be a douchenozzle at FB. His continued presence there might have had no impact, or might have put their efforts to expand in disarray. In a position that was more crucial to the company -- say, the guy in charge of keeping the servers from being crushed as the user base increased -- the What If might be more severe.

    12. Re:why do we care? by umghhh · · Score: 1
      If it is really so that nobody picks the work after other people leave then I would seriously considering leaving too because they are just burning money.

      As replaceability goes - everybody is replaceable that is true. Of course there are differences. If difference between you leaving and another one coming and moving along is small i.e. small cost then you were working in call center and being fired is not the way to think of it - you just got a new opportunity. Higher you go in salary and position more difficult it is to replace you but then hey - sometime they downsize sometimes you do not fit no more. Sometimes it costs lot if you live but company just deals with it.

    13. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You are replaceable, and firing you would hurt you much more than the company.

      I disagree. Sure you're replaceable but at a very high cost. 6 months to find someone new, negotiate salary, maybe the replacement needs to finish up at their other company before moving over etc. In all it costs the company 6-8 months of down time and even then the new guy might turn out to be just as much of a flop and the employee you fired.

    14. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, no. People are not replaceable. When you try to replace one person with another person who on paper seems to be equivalent, you will end up changing the company. At low-levels, the effect will generally be localized, although even at this level the Butterfly Effect can come into play.

      I don't think anyone really tries to replace the person just fired: they try to improve. You fire someone because they're not doing their job, or because they're poisoning people around them, or otherwise not 'adding value.' You try to take the lessons learned from that person and exactly how he failed into the hiring process and find someone better. If you, as an employee, set a low bar for performance, it will make it much easier to find a better person to do your job. If you, as an employee set a low bar for performance, some of your co-workers will try to live down to that bar.

      Telling people they can keep their job no matter how bad they suck is every bit as demotivating as telling them they can be replaced on a whim.

    15. Re:why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That there is no job security in the US is certain. However American companies don't give a damn about retaining people who give your company value and in fact largely deny that it is possible for employee's to contribute value to an organization. American's have a psychopathic culture led by psychopaths (maybe up to 10% of the population). Most US organizations have become nearly totally Theory X (Maslow) driven. This naturally squelches creativity. The other aspect to this is that organization's are heavily clique and are-constraint driven so negative expectations can be directed against groups while other groups or people are not subjected to this negativity.

  7. 'How' may be a bit of an exaggeration. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There isn't really a how here—just (rather gamy) reflections on possible "why"s. The piece is not really very good at generating sympathy, either; the author comes across as erratic, impatient, and insecure—more than a little like a stereotypical teenage girl in disguise. Perhaps the true lesson is that marketing is a strange, shallow world. (And more importantly, why doesn't the blog article mention any attempts at intervention before he was let go? Do they just randomly axe underperformers at FB, or was that another critical part of the coherent thinking process left out of the story?)

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    1. Re:'How' may be a bit of an exaggeration. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Most HR policies are a no nonsense and zero tolerance to posting inside information and blogging proprietary information. You do it and security and an HR representative arrives at your desk, gives you a piece of paper to sign, and shows you to the door. Or they gave him a warning and he did not heed it?

      If it is financial information that is a big no no and can mean heafty fines and a lawsuit. Much more than the cost of letting you go. So money takes and the door it is.

    2. Re:'How' may be a bit of an exaggeration. by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why doesn't the blog article mention any attempts at intervention before he was let go?

      That's what I was wondering. From the sound of it, things went from hunky dory to gone in 60 seconds. Weren't there any warnings? Don't people communicate at FB? (Extremely ironic, that.) That end run around marketing, a instance in which communication was very badly handled, sounds like the likely reason, and could justify an immediate firing, but we can only guess. Zoning out at meetings is bad too, but not necessarily fatal. If the meetings were just big wastes of time, as too many tend to be, then he should have done something about that. Don't go to those meetings, or cancel them, or refocus them. It doesn't sound like those meetings were wastes of time, rather it sounds like they were about vital functions, but he found the subjects (massive spreadsheets and more meetings) "boring". Typical non-engineer attitude.

      He also goes a little overboard on eating crow and humble pie, which has me wondering about the sincerity of it. He may be doing some posturing, in order to better sell people on something such as his reformed character.

      Finally, he recommends that everyone go through the experience of being fired. Like hell! Good for people with hugely swollen heads, perhaps, when it is their fault. But many people are not massively overconfident braggarts, and many firings are very unfair, executed to cover up someone else's mistake, or to make room for the boss's nephew, or out of personal dislike and jealousy, or sheer and totally impersonal bureaucratic bungling, or dozens of other reasons that would get the employer sued for wrongful termination in a heartbeat if disclosed. All a firing does in those cases is show workers that employers won't treat them fairly. Stories of such firings are legion, but employers don't have to care because there are more desperate workers than jobs. We're expected to suck it up, and for the most part we accept this treatment.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    3. Re:'How' may be a bit of an exaggeration. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He publicly gave himself the warning:

      "He ended up publishing it that night (I was at Coachella and will never again attend) before the actual product was released in the morning. I immediately notified the e-team and assumed full responsibility."

    4. Re:'How' may be a bit of an exaggeration. by thesandtiger · · Score: 2

      During a hyper growth phase the important thing about human resources is to bring in and keep superstars and ruthlessly cull anyone who isn't for any position that isn't basically administrative or infrastructure. You don't want someone merely good when you can try for someone who is amazing, especially when you are trying to completely dominate what you imagine to be a huge marketplace.

      Once the company is firmly established then you can take people who are merely good and work on getting them to up their performance.

      It isn't a particularly nice mode of operation, and it certainly doesn't place much value on people as people, but for the people who can thrive in such an environment it can lead to amazing results.

      For reference, I have been a single digit employee in multiple firms that have exploded to over 1000 employees within a year of my coming on board and seen this process through multiple times - the first time I was horrified at how casually people were canned, but I couldn't dispute the huge difference in performance between the ones who stayed and the ones who were let go. I had a series of amazing experiences but I'm extremely glad I got my financial security taken care of so that I could get out of that kind of environment and into something relatively non-competitive like academia :)

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  8. how did he get hired at facebook by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    to me, that would be the more interesting article now that we know where he ended up.

  9. If you haven't been shitcanned and ripped off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't been in this business long enough.
    Expect to work long hours at low pay with promises of riches, stock options and extravagant benefits, real soon!
    This kind of arrangement usually comes with a huge increases in pay when the product ships.
    Of course, you only collect one check at your new higher pay rate.
    As soon as the work is done, you contemplate pulling into the path of that logging truck on your way home that last day.

  10. He lost out on a lot of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And is still a millionaire. So who gives a fuck.

  11. He didnt... by WGFCrafty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He didn't lose the money when he got fired, I would say he lost it by not having a golden parachute.

    And he wasn't very insightful, I mean, he named 3 specific events and a SINGLE reason he thinks contributed to why he was fired.

    His reason is stupid. He's was a show-er (rigid non adapting thinker) and not a grow-er (some one who adapts and 'grows the brand') or a veteran (some one who grows a bunch).

    Completely arbitrary and meaningless stuff. He sounds like he was working in an environment where hyperbole sold, just apparently not for too long.

    1. Re:He didnt... by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Indeed. I have no idea who this person is, yet having read his post, I am now convinced that he missed out on a bigger lesson.

      My take-away thoughts: if I'd lost out on $100 million in stock options, I'd probably be fairly pissed as well. And his arguments are kind of backwards / contradict themselves: what he's really saying is "don't be replaceable -> work on as much of the core product as possible, as opposed to trying to be 'friends' with everyone around the office, as being the company dandy won't save you from being fired, but having written (and potentially not fully documented) the core code-base will." What he wrote was "everyone is replaceable" and "I should have spent more time working on the main product than schmoozing."

      But then, a fair number of people know this, having studied Aesop's fables -> only an idiot kills the goose that lays the golden eggs, or in modern parlance, only a class A mistake in human evolution fires the main engineer / scientist that actually knows in and out the core product that your company sells / is responsible for your good fortune (not that we haven't seen many a higher up think that someone was accumulating too much power, fire them on pretense, then run around screaming while the company burned down to the ground because his / her replacement(s) would have to spend 5 years taking apart their predecessor's work before they'd gain enough understanding of its inner workings to be able to modify it without destroying it).

      So, I'm late to the party. Did Zuck fire him to get the $100 million back? One of those "Oh Shit, we've given out too many stock options, we need to do something to get some of it back" kind of deals? Always, always, assume the worst will happen when pursing a job offer. Any potential intellectual property is purposefully mentioned and locked out, and stock options are kept and vested independent on continued employment, save you are charged with a capital crime (like offing the company founder). Arbitration is handled by an objective third-party, and no conflict of employment (working for one of their competitors) agreements signed without compensation for the time spent not working. And so on...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:He didnt... by sootman · · Score: 1

      > He didn't lose the money when he got fired, I would say
      > he lost it by not having a golden parachute.

      If nothing else, it should be your goal to steal your weight in office supplies every 8 months.

      BRB -- department admin just opened a new box of post-its.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  12. He trusted Michael Arrington... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone who trusts Michael Arrington needs to be canned. This guy was a walking social engineering liability.

  13. like the guy says, everyone should be fired once by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it teaches humility

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  14. Moral: marketdroids get sacrificed first by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The guy's basically a marketing manager. You might be the smartest person in company, but if a glorified salesman is all you are, you can easily be cloned. The exception is if you developed enough good connections OUTSIDE the company that you can take a shitload of the client base if they fire you. I don't think this is the case with Facebook users, fake or otherwise.

    Of course, marketing types get paid more than the typical engineer if the product is successful. But if you want a more stable job, it's better to be the craftsman working at the product, than the pretty face selling it at the counter.

    1. Re:Moral: marketdroids get sacrificed first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between marketing and sales, involving quite different skills and responsibilities. You're not going to rise very high in your company if you don't know that.

    2. Re:Moral: marketdroids get sacrificed first by suso · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between marketing and sales, involving quite different skills and responsibilities....

      Marketing is all about turning on the customer.
      Sales is all about sucking them off.

      You're right, they are different skillsets.

    3. Re:Moral: marketdroids get sacrificed first by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'd imagine sales would be more high pressure. Marketing requires outsourcing demographic studies and ensuring that you attract some attention without offending anyone. Sales requires reading people / their reactions with split timing, and being able to close a deal.

      Marketing is filled with the 'beautiful people,' and Sales is filled with the people who give off the oddball wavelength that you can 'trust' them, or when that fails, that you're still getting a 'deal' out of the proposed arrangement.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    4. Re:Moral: marketdroids get sacrificed first by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Well, he was hired as a product manager.

  15. Re:like the guy says, everyone should be fired onc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've already been humbled enough in my life I don't need to be humbled at my job I already know how to work hard k thx bye.

  16. grammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The product is strong with this one. Now learn some grammer. --Mark"
    Guess he should have replied to him with a dictionary.

  17. So some guy gets fired by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    and its front page on Slashdot 6 years later?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:So some guy gets fired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you're not from the future

  18. Not a healthy topic. by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a familiar story. I worked with a guy who interviewed at a certain small software company back in 1982, and refused their offer because he thought their CEO was an insufferable dork. And of course that dork's name was Bill Gates.

    Another bunch I worked with on a skunkworks startup had been with a certain other Big Name back when (this one I have to keep to myself) and just barely missed out at cashing in when they got bought out. The whole point of the startup they had brought me in on was to try and recreate that magic moment they had missed the first time. And of course the startup's product was hopeless, since all it's motivations were the wrong ones.

    Which kind of demonstrates the stupidity of the whole approach. I don't mean the obsession with might-have-beens (though that's pretty unhealthy). I mean the obsession with getting rich by being part of The Next Big Thing. Unless you're a fucking genius (and trust me, you're probably not), you're not going to invent something really brilliant, and that's the only sure way of cashing in. Otherwise, you're just rolling the dice. OK, you roll the dice every time you start a business. But to have any hope of succeeding, you have to be focused on the the basics of making your company work, not crapshoot aspects, which are simply beyond your control.

    I'm not saying that nobody ever lucks out and gets big bucks. But it's just not something you can plan. If you want to gamble, buy a lottery ticket: the odds in your favor are just as good, and it'll screw up your career a lot less.

    1. Re:Not a healthy topic. by OutputLogic · · Score: 2

      Not all startups invent something brilliant, and it certainly doesn't require to be a genius to get big bucks. A decade ago I worked for a startup that developed a better product than its competitors (evolutionary, not revolutionary). It had a slightly better engineering team, more effective sales force, and more nimble org structure than its closest competitors. As a result, it went public in 2000 and got acquired in 2004. Founders and most of early employees got big bucks. Well, certainly not billions, but many millions. So the obsession of getting rich doesn't mean the stupidity of the whole approach. It's a matter of calculated risk when joining a startup, hard work while working for the startup, and some luck.

    2. Re:Not a healthy topic. by fm6 · · Score: 2

      Not all startups invent something brilliant, and it certainly doesn't require to be a genius to get big bucks.

      I didn't say genius was required to get big bugs. I said that genius was required to make it a certainty.

      From your description, that startup you worked for was a well-run company that managed to build some solid value. Now there's no denying that this is the right way to build a good business. And of course well-run companies have a better chance of winning the fat buyout crapshoot. But the crapshoot is still a crapshoot.

      My only point here is that if you focus on winning the crapshoot, you almost certainly won't.But if you focus on building a real future for yourself and your company, then you've got something that's worth having whether you win the crapshoot or not.

    3. Re:Not a healthy topic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to gamble, buy a lottery ticket: the odds in your favor are just as good, and it'll screw up your career a lot less.

      False.

  19. Re:like the guy says, everyone should be fired onc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fired for the sake of being fired then? People who do good work should be fired?

  20. wow by buddyglass · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't know the guy from Adam, but Kagan comes across as a bit of a douche. His lessons learned:

    1- Selfish. I wanted attention, I put myself before Facebook. I hosted events at the office, published things on this blog to get attention and used the brand more than I added to it. Lesson learned: The BEST way to get famous is make amazing stuff. That’s it. Not blogging, networking, etc.

    How about this lesson: be a little less superficial and worry about something besides getting famous.

    2- Marketing. The marketing team’s plan was not to do anything and the night before we opened Facebook to the professional market (anyone with a @microsoft.com, @dell.com, etc) I emailed TechCrunch to let Michael Arrington know to publish it in the morning. He ended up publishing it that night (I was at Coachella and will never again attend) before the actual product was released in the morning. I immediately notified the e-team and assumed full responsibility. Lesson learned: I don’t think what I did was that wrong since the marketing team did not do anything to promote our new features. My lesson learned was more I should have involved them instead of just going around them.

    Two lessons not learned: discretion and the ability to abide by someone else's decision when you disagree.

    1. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. "Waaaaaaaah... I was a whiny asshole who didn't respect others, and they *fired meeeeeeeeee*." Yeah, real hard to see that coming.

    2. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the email to TechCrunch was a really bad betrayal that I don't think, from reading TFA, that he even now really gets. I've been involved in multiple technology roll-outs in which a deliberate decision NOT to call special attention to new features was made. Usually this means management or marketing wants to do a "soft opening" - just put it out there and let the natural discovery by users work for a bit, to allow marketing and the devs to collect data about how the new features are being used or misunderstood, before a very public flood of new users pours into it. It allows time to tweak or solidify things, to make sure when the marketing push comes, the featureset will not faceplant.

      Shooting an email to TechCrunch in that case would be like shouting from the bushes with your squadron to your unsuspecting foes "We are so about to ambush you right now!" - If you are well placed, you might still win, but you've blown the strategy before it had a chance to work.

      Sounds from the article like he still actually doesn't get that.

  21. and how does he figure he "lost" $100 million by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1, Troll

    He figures he somehow "lost" $100 million that he never had, and that he had no hand in creating. I'm always surprised at how people view that they were "cheated" out of other people's money. This is similar to saying the Winklevoss's "lost" $400 million.

    1. Re:and how does he figure he "lost" $100 million by Teancum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He is showing regret that he should have learned these lessons before he screwed himself out of this kind of money. I didn't see anything in that blog post that suggested he was "cheated out of the money" and indeed suggested that he really wasn't fit to be getting that kind of money... at least with the skill sets that he had at the time he was fired. In fact, he even goes so far as to express that if the him of here and now was in charge of the him of then and when, that he would have fired himself in nearly the same way (perhaps more diplomatically, but it would have still happened).

      I've been in some of the same position more than a couple of times, where I made the wrong decision in my career where had I been able to take the skills I have today and have been in the position I was at elsewhen, I would have been a multi-millionaire myself. No real regrets, and I've learned those lessons over time. My hope is that other opportunities will arise that I can take advantage of and hopefully not screw up if it comes up again.

  22. Re:like the guy says, everyone should be fired onc by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    People who do good work should be fired?

    It happens.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  23. Noah, worry not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worry not, Noah. Once hyperinflation hits, $100,000,000 bills will litter the street, as worthless paper.

    1. Re:Noah, worry not by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Once hyperinflation hits, $100,000,000 bills will litter the street, as worthless paper.

      Not worthless; people will be running around, trying to scrounge up 100,000,000 of 'em so they can buy a cheese sandwich...

  24. Learn Some Grammer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To which I would reply to Mark: 'Learn some spelling.'

    And then Noah would be all 'Nice burn, dude!'

    End scene.

    1. Re:Learn Some Grammer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To which I would reply to Mark: 'Learn some spelling.'

      And then Noah would be all 'Nice burn, dude!'

      End scene.

      GrammEr?

      Don't quit your day job.

    2. Re:Learn Some Grammer? by Shaiku · · Score: 1

      Click the picture in the original blog post. Grammar is misspelled in TFA. Don't quit YOUR day job.

  25. Dont Care by Osgeld · · Score: 1, Insightful

    about some asshats reflection and regret brought on because he lost money

  26. Comments Disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else notice that the comments on his page are disabled. A whiny asshat bitches that he sucked and got shit-canned, and he ends up afraid of what people might say on his blog about it. Yeah, that's being "brutally honest" and manning up to it.

  27. "Everyone is replaceable" by FoolishOwl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of his lessons learned is that "everyone is replaceable", which is the sort of things action movie villains say when they're pointing a gun at the hero's head.

    1. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. What he fails to realize is that, just because he is replaceable, doesn't mean everyone else is.

      What he should have learned was "I was replaceable, at that time, in that context", rather than "Everyone is replaceable", but it's so much more fun to make broad, general, meaningless statements.

    2. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. What he fails to realize is that, just because he is replaceable, doesn't mean everyone else is.

      What he should have learned was "I was replaceable, at that time, in that context", rather than "Everyone is replaceable", but it's so much more fun to make broad, general, meaningless statements.

      Everyone IS replaceable.

      Charles de Gaulle said it best: "The grave is full of irreplaceable men."

    3. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the thing is, everyone is replaceable.

      There is not a single job someone is doing right now that somebody else couldn't do. If every important person was to be hit by a bus tomorrow, the world would carry on and somebody else would pick up where they left off.

    4. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by VAElynx · · Score: 1

      There are a few exceptions. The Soviet space programme stood and fell with S.P. Korolov - his premature death was the reason the USA won the moon race.

    5. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Teancum · · Score: 2

      The argument against that is how the Soviet Union simply didn't have any sort of system in place to identify and find a suitable replacement. With 300 million people in the Soviet Union, it would seem that somebody somewhere should have had at least the aptitude to take the place of Korolov. The tragedy was that due to politics, war, pograms, and general corruption such an individual simply couldn't be found when it was needed.

      There were also other reasons why "the USA won the Moon race" that had nothing to do with Korolov's death, and it should be noted that his company, now known as RKK Energia, is still in business in a capitalistic Russia with many of the ideas that Korolov pioneered and in fact sadly makes the only current vehicle that can reliably take anybody from the Earth into space at the moment. I haven't forgotten about the Shinzhou or Dragon vehicles either, but both are arguably still in a prototype state.

    6. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      There is not a single job someone is doing right now that somebody else couldn't do.

      My job is not particularly special or amazing, but there are only about 10 people worldwide who could walk in and do it straight away with comparable quality to the way I do it (and I know all of them; and since they're all already doing basically the same job, but somewhere else, they couldn't just jump in and replace me).

      There are of course millions of people who could walk in and start doing it with 3 to 6 months of hard-core study. It's not special; or amazingly difficult; it's just that my job requires knowing the inner workings of several different technologies, of which about 50% are "reasonably well known" and the other 50% are totally and completely proprietary to the company I work for.

      I've spent 10 years working in my job; and almost daily learn something new with at least one of these technologies. So, am I replaceable? Absolutely I am. Would it however be a serious pain in the arse for the company to do so? Most definitely.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    7. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Stirling+Newberry · · Score: 1

      You have a "boat anchor." You are invaluable until the day the company decides to move, then you are a liability.

    8. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      You have a "boat anchor." You are invaluable until the day the company decides to move, then you are a liability.

      Yes and no... since the chance of us replacing ALL our proprietary technologies simultaneously is basically zero (breaking backwards compatibility on our software to our hardware would be VERY painful to the company), we tend to migrate slowly from one to another, phasing one out as we phase another in.

      I'm the guy who learns the new one as it gets phased in, so the only way I'm getting fired is if we hire someone new as we phase in new technologies, then I get fired after the last technology that I was responsible for gets phased out. And I'd of course see that coming.

      Don't forget that as I said I've been with the company for 10 years now - we've already gone through several technology changes in that time.

      Plus of course, there's absolutely no sensible reason for the company to do such a thing - they've expressed their happiness with keeping me; and I've expressed my happiness to stay there basically indefinitely (also having turned down several offers for "promotion" to management, since I'm a pretty good developer but quite likely a very crappy manager).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    9. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      which is the sort of things action movie villains say

      Or people like the character Kevin Spacey played in Horrible Bosses. :)

    10. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      The Soviet space programme stood and fell with S.P. Korolov - his premature death was the reason the USA won the moon race.

      Interesting, thanks. I hadn't heard of him, but considering that he survived torture and forced labor under brutal conditions, maybe "premature" is not an apt description for his death.

    11. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by VAElynx · · Score: 1

      If I recall right, he died of heart complications during an operation of stomach ulcer. That sort of death is premature.

    12. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely right. I have a boat anchor myself. I can see that the company is going to be moving in a year or two, so I've bugged out after 15 years to do something new. Everyone is telling me they're screwed without me. I've said no, it'll be hard for a few months, that's all. I am replaceable, at a cost.

    13. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, in the words of Charles de Gaulle, the cemeteries are full of irreplaceable men. If you think you're irreplaceable, you're living in a movie, not reality.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:"Everyone is replaceable" by imnotanumber · · Score: 1

      Charles de Gaulle said it best: "The grave is full of irreplaceable men."

      So he confirmed that there are irreplaceable men but, unfortunately, they are also mortal.

  28. You are special, but still replaceable. by Sun · · Score: 2

    From TFA:

    You are NOT special and there is guaranteed someone better than you on this planet.

    First, sure you are special. Everyone, best or otherwise, bring something different to anywhere they work at (unless it's a soul crushing place). Yes, there is guaranteed to be someone better than you on this planet (well, there is a 1:7,000,000,000 chance there isn't). If, however, you are one in a thousand, the company is highly unlikely to find those better people.

    To summarize my comment so far: You are special, and it is possible that the company cannot get any better than you. You are still replaceable.

    Yes, your replacement will not be as good as you are. They might cost more (at least when amortized over the time it takes them to complete a given task). They might not be as organized as you. They might turn out inferior solutions. At the end of the day, however, they will get the job done.

    Shachar

  29. Re:like the guy says, everyone should be fired onc by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

    That's right! There are millions of people who will tell you, with a smirk, that you suck. They aren't doing it for you. Their criticisms aren't constructive. They're trying to get ahead, and if they can get ahead of you by convincing you that you really do suck, they'll do it. Bullying doesn't end when childhood ends.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  30. That is nothing... really. by gagol · · Score: 1

    1. First job, not even out of college, I got sucked into a marketing firm that was doing ... okay... And I invested time (a lot) to make things going from ok to profitable. I n exchange I was supposed (no contract... I was naive) to inherit 50% of company. I even worked over 100 hours per week sometime, no overtime charged, only vacation 1/1. All that just above minimum wage.

    2. I changed jobs 10 years after because the first company got bankrupt. But at that point I was exhausted, as in depression exhausted. I rided it for over a year (good pay, good insurance plan etc...) but not two. When I finally fell, I was unable to work for over a year. That is when I decided to move to the country, no matter what, cause I cant stand stress anymore. Even to that day.

    3. I worked as fuckin representative for a clothing company based in my new home town. Middle of the wood to be precise. But it was a family business, and the niece of the big boss was my boss and she knew I was more competent than her. Felling cornered, shed cornered me out of a job using clever and subtile subterfuges.

    4. I am currently unemployed, developped a C++ library to handle fuzzy inputs (ai principles applied to user inputs to resolve them in certain time), and no one would employ me around because I have the tag "depression" hangned around my neck. I will probably go to work again in couple weeks as labor for a cheese factory, me, professional of communication products and hobby programming guru.

    Life is a bitch... as they say. Is it your bitch? That is the question.

    Enjoy my rant!

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
    1. Re:That is nothing... really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU and go to work! You pussy you shoulod have died already, you arte the problem with capitalism! No time for whiners!

    2. Re:That is nothing... really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude!

    3. Re:That is nothing... really. by gagol · · Score: 1

      Come on, my point was, he has learned valuable lessons and much more people are much more poor and dissatisfied than him in life. We all carry our crosses, so to speak, in a way or another.

      This kind of rant will not bring anything useful to the conversation. Please get a life.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    4. Re:That is nothing... really. by raehl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will probably go to work again in couple weeks as labor for a cheese factory,

      Do they have an employee discount? It will come in handy when you'd like something to pair with your whine.

    5. Re:That is nothing... really. by gagol · · Score: 1

      I just opened to the community... and I will have to live it through. Good for me I am stronger now, but no, I will not have an employee discount. Point was, he is probably not that bad in life as I, or many other people, went through. I even have the courage to Slashdot it using my login name...

      Being employed in factory when you are used to have direct access to the big boss is not an easy thing to do. Please, be respecful to those who open up.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    6. Re:That is nothing... really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should realize that life in this world is all about giving and receiving pain. Ethics are for losers. You'll live a lot happier and carefree afterwards.

    7. Re:That is nothing... really. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      and no one would employ me around because I have the tag "depression" hangned around my neck

      Can you elaborate (if you don't mind my asking)?

    8. Re:That is nothing... really. by gagol · · Score: 1

      I live in a very small community by choice... with its good and bad. So far the goods are far more important to me than the bads.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  31. The Elements of Style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can certainly see why Mark bought him this book, his writing is terrible.

  32. I like the note from Zuckerberg by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    The product is strong with this one. Now learn some grammer.

    Now learn some spelling.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  33. don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    who fucking cares? also, he didn't lose 100 million dollars. he lost his options. there is a big difference between losing money and not making it.

    1. Re:don't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      there is a big difference between losing money and not making it.

      people do empirically make a big difference between the two (see just about anything Kahnemann has ever written) but this is not rational... disregarding opportunity cost is right up there with caring about sunk costs on the ranks of basic economic fallacies.

  34. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I got out of it:

    "I did alright at first. Of course, I spent way too much time browsing and not nearly enough time actually doing anything. However, I knew how to use flashy three-letter acronyms and how to sound smarter than anyone else, and I'm amiable / someone's friend, so I got away with it. Then, the company grew and I could no longer get by on my personality and ability to appear busy while actually doing fuckall. The same reckless attitude and lack of consideration for other people that allowed me to cruise by on reading Livejournal and my friends' pretentious WordPress blogs also caused me to completely miss that I shouldn't be throwing fucking PARTIES at my fucking COMPANY. By the way, I am such a raging dickhole that I thought it would be okay to do an end-run around marketing (which I will contradict in another session by pointing out how good I am at marketing.) I also think nothing of making allusions to flaccid vs. erect penis length in a mea-culpa.

    BUT: It's actually because of these MINOR, CORRECTIBLE FLAWS that have nothing to do with the above, and not because I'm essentially a fuckup! I swear, guys!!!!!!!!! Now, here are some Stockholm Syndrome-induced bullet points about firing people, which I am now doing, and feeling fairly sanctimonious about. Please beleve I am not lying. I am not lying to myself. Especially.

    Man, I'm so glad I didn't have to suffer in Facebook and have to take a hundred million dollars. Shit, I'm so lucky that I now work for a company no one has heard of & have lost all my stock options."

    1. Re:Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS: He has another blog post called "How to make your customers orgasm."

    2. Re:Summary by Magada · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget, this blog entry is here for ME not for YOU, so comments are closed. Yeah. Classy move. But, I have a feeling this is the kind of "talent" the Zuck attracts.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  35. I find the article helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not an asshole like the poster (although I'm reasonably sure I'm as equally ass-holey in my own special way).
    I joined a small company as a graduate, stuck with it as it grew, stuck with it as it was eaten by an 'evil' enterprise company etc.
    Job was always tough - but for every bit of despair (I've no idea how we're going to do this, we need to lay off half the company etc), there were an equivalent number of great moments (I've just made a perfect little piece of code that solves that problem, does something with half the clicks, delivered a great solution and come back bearing a piece of paper with some silly-large numbers on it).
    Not had those good moments for quite a time now. I think I've finally moved through "Those bastards have destroyed my company" stage and am emerging into the next stage of acceptance.
    Basically, I think my own motivations are no longer aligned to the company, and more importantly reflected in the majority of my colleagues (although there are plenty of amazing ones left). I genuinely couldn't give a toss about my dept's quarterly figures - sure I want the company as a whole to do well, but it's quite apparent that success/failure of my dept is mainly based around how our managers haggle with those in other depts ($200k to lease dev environments from another internal dept for example). Or, yes development was slower than you'd expected, but surely that may be connected to the fact we have no suitable staff and you 'cancelled training' 4 years ago - and I'm reasonably sure I did mention this as a potential 'bad idea' 4 years ago.
    More generally though, I just don't think I'm suited to work for a large company. I didn't mind breaking my back to get something done - we were all on the same side, striving to get the same goal achieved. Now should I say work the weekend, but then have to spend the next few days sat on my arse waiting for a somebody else to do their bit (sure a 3 day SLA on rebooting a database is fine, not something I wasn't capable of doing before you didn't trust me with an admin account) - well I just go from 0->bitter immediately and can just feel the motivation shrivelling up.
    Not quite sure where I'm going with this, so I should probably stop. I think if I had a point, it's just that the original article touched me a bit - you have to accept that you change, your employer changes - and at some point it's likely it's just not going to become a good fit, through no real fault of either side.

    1. Re:I find the article helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very, very interesting. Either you for the same large company I do, and I know you, or there are more little companies swallowed up 4 years ago by a big sluggish company that happened to also dropped their training budget around that same time frame.

  36. Check the letter section by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you think the letter section is?

    Oh and what are you doing when you create a post on slashdot which generates revenue from advertising?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Check the letter section by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      What do you think the letter section is?

      I think it's completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. Or is there a bunch of magazines I've never heard of with titles like: 'Letters to the Editor'?

      Oh and what are you doing when you create a post on slashdot which generates revenue from advertising?

      Apparently I'm writing content that people don't read... I didn't say what Slashdot is or isn't. I'm starting to think your confusion stems from lack of reading comprehension.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  37. any solid reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for sharing this wonderful Information.Great job.
    Accountancy Firms in Dubai

  38. Someone said it's the lesson that's important... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and not whether the guy is an asshole, but (a) he is an asshole and (b) what the hell WAS the lesson? This dipshit can't put together a coherent thought. To wit:

    Lesson 1 is not only wrong, it's uninformative. A company gets famous by making a fabulous product? No s**t. Or was it that a person gets famous by making a fabulous product? But he's a manager, not a creator. Did he mean he figured HE could get famous by... managing... a fabulous... product? F**k it, I'm done with that one.

    Lesson 2 insists in two consecutive sentences that he shouldn't have gone around the marketing guys, but what he did (i.e., go around the marketing guys) wasn't wrong. So, it's not wrong. But he shouldn't have done it. F**k it, I'm done with this one, too.

    Lesson 3 is that you need to see if your weaknesses are hindering your ability to do the job. That's... a lesson he needed to learn? Did he also learn that he needed to put on pants when he left the house in the morning? Who IS this idiot?

    The guy actually admits that he thought the company missed him after firing him, like Facebook (even in its early days) was some high school s.o., pining away for him. You're kidding, right? Who the hell has that kind of sense of self importance, especially a guy who, by his own admission, wasn't one of the driving forces at the company? I love that he actually follows this up with the insight that "everyone is replaceable." In fact, most people (but not all) are replaceable. Most of the people who are replaceable are business types who specialize in bureaucratic process control... like this dope. The creative types... less replaceable, depending on their skill and originality.

    Seriously, he talks about how he just wants to focus on the job instead of, you know, self-promotion, but here is bloviating on the internet about his "insights," all of which would be old news to anyone with emotional and intellectual maturity of a sixteen year old.

  39. Re:like the guy says, everyone should be fired onc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it teaches humility

    That didn't work for Jimmy Carter...

  40. Heartbreaking by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3

    Ooh, that's truly heartbreaking. I feel so sorry for this lad missing out on a completely disproportional lump of money.

    Back to important things. I wonder what's on the menu in the cafeteria.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  41. Lost a fortune? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I presume the $100 million figure comes from stock options, and not from salary or personal investment. However anyone who has been watching the facebook stock (and smart enough to not buy it) knows it has been dropping rapidly; already less than half its IPO price. Being as employees are still not allowed to sell their shares, you can't say the employees have made anything off of the stock values yet.

    We'll see what its worth when employees start to cash out - or if it survives that happening.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  42. Hmm, from reading the article, by VAElynx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I suspect that /. might be selling him slightly short - after all, he says he was promoted a while before that.
    What I suspect happened is that he was a fine worker where he was, and someone up thought of promoting him. What resulted was him peacocking as he admits, and not being of particular use at his new place, even creating fuckups. Well, they couldn't quite demote him again because he'd read it as being a stop to his career and would leave anyways, not doing much in the meantime - the logical, if nasty option was to show him the door as unexpectedly as possible.
    The actual lesson is: getting promoted doesn't mean you have everyone in your pocket yet.

  43. Re:the lesson by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I really wish people would get over this ridiculous "I hate jews" crap. You literally cannot hate an entire category of people regardless of how precise you are about it. And "jews" (kikes if you must) is an extremely imprecise categary.

    I *want* to hate the jews. I really do. Convenient to blame problems on. And we've got lots of them. We've got the money systems. We've got wars. We've got victims being victimizers and lots and lots more. But with few exceptions, every jew I have known personally, I found to be endearing and intelligent people. At best you're looking at a small selection of very powerful assholes.

  44. I guess I'm a veteran... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the blog's archtypes, but a veteran of getting fired :)

    The thing is, these are all completely normal situations. The guy is discribing exactly what people go through after getting laid off or fired. It happens. It just so happens that the company was Facebook. Meh.

    For for any of you who though t TLDR, here's the lessons learned:
    Keep your ego in check, you are replaceable.
    You aren't gods gift to anything, even if you work for facebook.
    Move on and be kind to people.

  45. No one will ever hire him again... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That page will go over great on his next job interview. Even if you could overlook the fact he was incompetent as a product manager, would you want to hire someone so willing to air his dirty laundry in public?

  46. "Profit" != Money Grabbing by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    If you are in business to provide a service/product then you may actually pass up a few things to serve The Greater Good.

    an example Chick-Fil-A is in the business of selling Chicken but they have a Moral Obligation as a rider for thier company so

    1 They always promote Traditional Family Values
    2 the whole company is CLOSED ON SUNDAY (as an Operator you could use sunday as a Fix Day if you had to but the Corporate Office is Closed)

    but in any case your BOD does need to know what you are aiming for so they understand.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  47. Why you should work for yourself. by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    That is all this is.

  48. summary of tfa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And if nothing else, it's taught me to respect the Romans!"

  49. $100 Million by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could convert every car in the U.S.A. to run off of water with that much money

  50. Informative, and wrong by Guru80 · · Score: 1

    That post he made is very informative, and explains exactly why he got fired....it just isn't for the reason's he lists, you get a good feel for the d-bag just from the words he chooses and repeatedly says he is wrong without saying those exact words then backs up why he was right...except that he was wrong, but it was right.

  51. sex? by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    OT, but: corporate blocker (WebSense) apparently thinks a URL with "okdork" in it is referring to a penis. Site's blocked out here.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  52. Selling himself short by QuincyDurant · · Score: 1

    "There is a sort of man who pays no attention to his good actions, but is tormented by his bad ones. This is the type that most often writes about himself. He leaves out his redeeming qualities and so appears only weak, unprincipled and vicious."

    W. Somerset Maugham, The Summing Up

  53. The IT Crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever heard of the British comedy show, The IT Crowd ?

    Go watch the first season. Then you'll at least get the GP's bit about "people skills".

    1. Re:The IT Crowd by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1

      Whoosh

      Another whoosh for the joke in IT Crowd, as they were making the same reference

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    2. Re:The IT Crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is from Office SPace you fucking fagget. I just emailed this thread to my GODDAMN wife, and she will not be impressed now.

    3. Re:The IT Crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just had to explain this thread to my GODDAMN wife you faggats. Replu to the write message next time

      captcha: shivers - shivers me timbers

  54. The end is awesome by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    "Follow me on Twitter for more"

    XD

  55. Fedora by w1nt3rmute · · Score: 1

    I stopped reading when I saw the picture he posted of himself on his blog wearing a fedora: http://okdork.com/about/

  56. Best thing to happen to my career by pwileyii · · Score: 1

    Getting fired from a company was the best thing to happen to me. Obviously, I didn't think so at the time, but it being 12 years later makes me realize how valuable getting fired was to my life and my career. I really was in the wrong job and it got my mind straight and I starting doing stuff I enjoyed much more and even got a massive raise from my previous job on top of that. When it happened, it was pretty much out of nowhere and I was furious. I couldn't sleep for several days just thinking about how angry I was at the company. Once I got a new job and a 50% raise from the previous one, I kind of got over it. I didn't lose $100 million dollars in the deal, but the company did get purchased by a publicly traded company, so I did lose some money in the firing. Overall, my life and career are better off because of it. It taught me some valuable lessons about job security (you can always be replaced) and my career path and, looking back, I'm glad it happened.

  57. Re:the lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with few exceptions, every jew I have known personally, I found to be endearing and intelligent people.

    Well they would do, wouldn't they?

  58. The $100 million dollar fortune yuo never had by gsgiles · · Score: 0

    It boils down to a simple concept that is well codified into law. It’s called the “Four Corners Doctrine” i.e. if it ain’t in the 4 corners of your employment contract it ain’t. You should have known this not when you got fired but when you got “HIRED!” No such thing as friends is business pal, allies and enemies is a better model, read Sun-Tzu. You never had that $100 million because you were stupid. Better a friendship based on business than a business based upon friendship. Zuckerberg fucked you and now he is fucking his stockholders because at this point he is lost. Facebook's business model is not Google and eventually the whole world will realize it is spyware, then the stock tanks. Zuckerberg is probably selling his as fast as he can. He is not the next Bill Gates, more like Apple, a fad. Fads fade, Apple stock will be $20/share again. Facebook will go to zero sooner. Remember how awesome Novell, the VAX and Silicon Graphics were?

  59. Right on by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    He's a product manager. They're a dime a dozen and I've seen plenty.