Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Bay Co-Founder In Solitary Confinement

pigrabbitbear writes "Things aren't looking awesome for Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm, who's currently under lock and key in a newly built jail about 15 minutes north of Stockholm. Svartholm's mother Kristina says that her 28-year-old son is being held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day without any human contact other than his interactions with the guards. It's been nearly two months since Svartholm was arrested in Cambodia, where he'd been living for years, and extradited back to Sweden, where he's due to spend a year behind bars and pay a $1.1 million fine for copyright offenses related to his role at the Pirate Bay. But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities. They haven't charged him with any crimes yet in that case, however."

259 comments

  1. As Fashion Nihilist said : Fuck you Stockholm ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As Fashion Nihilist said : Fuck you Stockholm !

  2. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Take that pixel thief

    1. Re:LOL by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 2

      To the gallows with this barbarous binarian plagiarist beast!

      --
      Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  3. Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

    1. Re:Messed up by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Messed up by bobthesungeek76036 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you say "sending a message"? Sure, I knew you could...

      --
      Karma: Bad
    3. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lol you mad.

    4. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To protect him from all the other inmates that want to make him their b!@#h?

      There's a conceptual problem with the policy, however.

      Once the Criminals in government begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", their bid for global domination will commence. You can never have enough power.

      Once the Criminals who break the law begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", they will adjust their tactics.

      To steal one must willfully suspend belief in property, and to willfully suspend belief in property one must, inevitably through the discipline of practice, willfully suspend belief in self. Both the thief, and the victim, experience the loss of self.

      Raids will evoke distributed "Terrorist" Cells, Arrests will be countered with retribution attacks in increasing severity, physical targets will move to countries where they can become hardened targets evoking military involvement resulting in casual piracy turning to militant piracy with the objective of destroying content producers. All the while the concept of property becomes perverted until it fails to exist whatsoever.

      The fundamental problem here is the lack of a mediator to find a common ground upon which both parties can agree. The eventual result of no mediator, specifically a government mediator, means the publics view of the events swings towards extreme fascism until, inevitably, collapse becomes inevitable. If you think that's extreme, read Ben Bagdikians media monopoly and ask yourself why every news station ignores the same things at the same time (one would think each would cover something unique and different).

    5. Re:Messed up by Doodlesmcpooh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can hold him for a year for the Pirate Bay conviction possibly longer if they add on time for non payment of fines. However they think he was involved in hacking Logica but as yet they can't prove it. Most people break eventually in solitary and will say and do anything to get out of it. They probably plan on leaving him there for his whole sentence "for his own safety" unless he confesses.

    6. Re:Messed up by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I get your point: If you want to make money on content, rip-off creators and artists with LAWYERS, not with TECHNOLOGIES.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    7. Re:Messed up by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Assuming the information is used to hack into a secret government computer, and you choose to play "Global Thermonuclear War." If you decide to play chess instead, not really.

    8. Re:Messed up by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

      Because they can't find enough evidence to charge him with a real crime, so they just torture him instead.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Shhh... nobodies caught on yet!

    10. Re:Messed up by blippo · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's standard treatment in Sweden. If the crime is non-trivial, the attorney almost always requests solitary confinement. The reason is to prevent the accused from interfering with the criminal investigation, but I think at least partly it's done in order to break the accused, helping the interrogations.

      Sweden has been criticized by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture for this practice, but nothing seems to change.

      I'd say that I am not that proud of our judicial system right now. This practice, the not-so-competent handling of Assange, the recent turn of events relating to a convicted serial killer (Tomas Quick) being found innocent for crime after crime, after withdrawing his own confessions, and the follow-up revelations of a closed boys-club judicial system - these events makes me ashamed and worried.

      It's not necessarily attributed to malice, but it is certainly incompetence combined with the attitude among Swedish bureaucrats that the government is always right, always efficient, and certainly *never* wrong.

    11. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 3

      Then... please stop using netflix, itunes, amazon video & music, etc...

      Piracy was only about stealing to some, to the rest it was a way of saying I'm sick of paying $15 for a cd to hear one song 10x.

    12. Re:Messed up by helix2301 · · Score: 2

      They did the same thing to Kevin Mitnick he spend almost all of his 5 years in jail in solitary be cause "he could launch a nuclear bomb from a phone"

    13. Re:Messed up by r1348 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Basically they're giving him the Guantanamo treat.

    14. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Solitary confinement doesn't technically fall under 'torture', so they can leave him there for 20 years if they want, going absolutely insane due to the complete lack of stimulus. But it's not torture, oh no. It will absolutely destroy his mind, and ruin the rest of his life, but it's not torture, so it's all fine and good and legitimate.

      Isn't the legal system wonderful.

    15. Re:Messed up by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2

      It's standard treatment in Sweden. If the crime is non-trivial, the attorney almost always requests solitary confinement. The reason is to prevent the accused from interfering with the criminal investigation, but I think at least partly it's done in order to break the accused, helping the interrogations.

      As is the case with most slashdotters, he should be immune to their tricks. Better than being surrounded by frat boys and jocks (aka general population).

    16. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've known Kevin for years. He did not spend 5 years in solitary. He spent 8 months in solitary and it was over a dispute about whether to sign a document that, among other things, would allow them to restrict his telephone privileges (yes, there was actual concerns that he had the ability to hack the telco system - but not start a nuclear war.) He spent the vast majority of his time in general population awaiting trail.

    17. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Bradley Manning in solitary in the US = TORTURE!
      Julian Assange in solitary in Sweden = meh...business as usual.

      I wonder why this is...

    18. Re:Messed up by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      be cause "he could launch a nuclear bomb from a phone"

      If that a quote from the powers-that-be, or from Mitnick?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    19. Re:Messed up by Mike_Theory · · Score: 1

      Once the Criminals in government begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", their bid for global domination will commence. You can never have enough power. Once the Criminals who break the law begin taking into account that "There's no where to hide from [Insert Country] law, irregardless of how wrong it is", they will adjust their tactics.

      so... Regarding of how wrong it is? (not usually a grammar nazy, but irregardless bugs the shit out of me)

      --
      /endrant
    20. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't likely need to keep a person in solitary confinement to keep them from utilizing or dissemination information which could be a major threat to the world. He should at a minimum get a trail and be able to communicate with lawyers and others whom would not pass on such information. Utilizing this as a punishment is wrong. Particularly before he has been charged let alone convicted or been put in front of a judge with lawyer present.

    21. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're not at all the same thing? "Solitary confinement" in a jail in Sweden simply means you get your own room, a TV, books, right to visitors, etc. and get to go outside for a set amount of time every day, but you can't interact with other prisoners, only the guards.

    22. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mitnick's prosecutor.

    23. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you won't necessarily get access to any of those things, if the attorney extends the restrictions to cover media, etc.

    24. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      My mistake...not Julian, but rather Gottfrid Svartholm

    25. Re:Messed up by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Firstly, it's not stealing. That's logically impossible, and can only be attributed as such due to an emotional reaction to the fictitious loss of one's property arising from ignorance, in some cases willful, about how copyright and intellectual property actually works.

      Secondly, the "getting tired of paying $15" was, and is, a justification for a much larger and more serious problem.... content creators and distributors no longer needed to be compensated directly in order to receive copies, or expressions, of the intellectual property. They no longer needed to be accompanied by the licensing in accordance with the laws, or in other words, be authorized.

      I'm fucking tired of paying so much for water and gas. However, regardless of my feelings, the utility companies continue to charge those rates and I have exactly one entity to receive it from. The expense and challenge of creating my own water and gas sources are considerable.

      Once a content creator adds their contributions to the world, it is far more trivial to distribute that content in a manner in which it can be suitably consumed. MP3's and the emergence of broadband Internet connections made it possible to cheaply distribute all that content. Software which allowed "ripping" of content off CDs enabled legions of younger people to convert intellectual property from a state that required physical distribution, to one that only required the Internet and a hard drive.

      Peer to Peer communications software vastly exacerbated the problem by bringing many orders of magnitude more efficiency to the distribution process.

      There was no great intellectual movement against the content creators and distributors. It was far more simple than that:

      A) You are in a huge bazaar. Merchants are offering their wares and haggling prices. You only have $15, and this allows you to purchase one item, with restrictions on how it can transported and used.

      B) You are in an even bigger bazaar. It's a bit more dangerous, and sometimes that banana is really a penis, hiding inside the skin of a banana. However, everything is free. All it cost was the gas to get there.

      How can content creators and distributors compete with free?

      Therein lies our fundamental problem. It no longer costs nearly as much to create copies of intellectual property and distribute them. The technology and resources are widely available.

      The laws and society have simply not kept up, or have been able to adapt to our changes in technology. People, however, adapt extremely quickly. This disparity is the cause for all our strife, and the imminent destruction of free societies.

      Hyperbole? Hardly.

      The response of content creators and their uber rich distributors is not to adapt themselves to the new world and possibilities, but force the world to adapt back to them. Unfortunately, with great consequences, the only way to allow content creators the temporary control over their works (to benefit all of us, not just them) is to destroy freedom. It's the only way to effectively do it.

      That's the real nasty truth of it. People don't want to pay for shit if they don't have to do so . It takes effort, sophistication, and commitment on the part of those that have the ability to not pay, to actually pay.

      Most /.'s that claim they are paying, or are willing to pay, only do so because they understand the consequences of not even attempting to compensate the artists.

      In most cases, claiming some noble truth, or great cause is what compels you to infringe copyright, is just a lie .

    26. Re:Messed up by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      From the AC:
      Because they're not at all the same thing?

      But the particulars seem quite the same. 1 hour a day outside surrounded by high walls, minimal contact (once a week) with family, I guess the difference is the quality and color of the paint on the concrete walls. Oh, and Sweden vs the USA.

      From the link:
      “He is offered one hour ‘outdoors’ each day in some kind of exercise yard with high concrete walls. That is all he is allowed to leave his cell for. No gym, no opportunities to meet other people except for the guards.

      “I have got permission so far from the prosecutor to meet him once a week for an hour each time, together with two policemen who listen to our conversations and stop us if we get close to the ‘case’, which we happened to do in the beginning.

    27. Re:Messed up by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Wait... is this the same country that "life in prison" for murder is 10 years?

    28. Re:Messed up by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      "Life in prison" in Scandinavia means that you are put to a reevaluation each 10 years to see if its "safe" to but you back in society. If there is no reason too, its another 10 years. The difference from life imprisonment is not really present if the case is horrible enough.

    29. Re:Messed up by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Well the first problem is that there is no such thing as intellectual property. It simply does not exist and never will. Selling zeros and ones was always an overly optimistic exercise. Information wants to be free and the only way to prevent that freedom is not to release the information into the world. Once that is done you can't get it back. It is out there. It doesn't matter how many people go to prison. The nature of information will remain unchanged.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    30. Re:Messed up by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      This makes Sweeden a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    31. Re:Messed up by CHIT2ME · · Score: 1

      This makes Sweeden a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!

      --
      My karma is bad. Don't get too close!!!
    32. Re:Messed up by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because TV in his cell, and only being able to buy cigarettes and sweets on Mondays and Wednsdays (as TFA says he can) with an hour outdoors a day is torture. Yeah, totally, that is a perfectly reasonable (although, for some Slashdotters being outside for an hour a day would be painful, I suppose).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    33. Re:Messed up by tqk · · Score: 1

      This makes [Sweden] a worse torturer than the U.S. under George Bush!!!!

      That's sarcasm, yes? If not, then you think a private room with TV and library privileges and access to regular visitors is worse than Abu Graib and waterboarding? Uh huh.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    34. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your comment is pretty hilarious if you actually read the article or know anything about custody or prison in Sweden. Would it be better if he was thrown in a cage with other, no doubt, rather more hardened criminals?

    35. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "They believe he may have played a role" .

      In other words, they don't have anything on him, but they are still getting a lot of pressure from the US, so they invent an excuse to keep the public quiet.

    36. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to buy your house. I have $200. Give it to me.

      Why do you ask for what you think it's worth. I have $200. Give it to me.

      Wah. whaaaaahhh.

      If you're not going to sell me your house for $200, even though I've offered you my money -- what I think is a fair value -- then I'm just going to move all my stuff into your living room. Fuck you.

      ---

      Seriously.. pirates are selfish assholes. If I don't want to sell you my work for what you're willing to pay.. then fuck off. I wrote my software/music/etc, and you don't have a right to tell me what I have to sell it for.

    37. Re:Messed up by dcollins117 · · Score: 2

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      While I don't disagree, I think it is much more likely that he openly mocked and ridiculed his way into solitary confinement. Prison guards aren't really known to enjoy being challenged.

    38. Re:Messed up by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Because information is more dangerous than violence.

      Or in other words: "The Pen is Mightier Than The Sword" which Edward Bulwer-Lytton wrote back in 1839.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    39. Re:Messed up by tsa · · Score: 2

      Information does not want anything.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    40. Re:Messed up by ipwndk · · Score: 2

      "The Swedish prison system is not generally severe. The emphasis is on humanitarian treatment of prisoners and rehabilitation. Sentences are generally short and prisoners enjoy a high material standard." ~ wikipedia

      They are torturing him. They do the same to anarchists in Scandinavia.

      --
      01 REDEFINE REALITY.
    41. Re:Messed up by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      When the utility company sell me gas or water they have less gas and water and have to go and find some more, when the record companies sell me music they still have exactly the same amount of music to sell

      They have found a way of selling the same thing over and over again almost indefinitely, and people of "steal" from them are hard to find because there is nothing missing to trace ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    42. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron. You can copy my house all you like. I don't give a shit.
      But if you move your stuff into my living room, it's going on ebay.

    43. Re:Messed up by TheHonch · · Score: 2

      True, I spent 47 days in solitary confinement at the infamous Kronoberg then they released, no charges, and after about 6 months I got 37000SEK for the "inconvenience". They thought I had something to do with a kidnapping (I really didn't)... But the wardens were actually quite nice, I got an Xbox in my cell, unfortunately a TV remote was required to change the channel to AV, which they didn't have (they said the tweakers broke them)... But it was miserable that I couldn't speak to anyone but the lawyer, couldn't pay any bills, it was even hard to make arrangements for my cats.

    44. Re:Messed up by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This is insane, why is a computer programmer under solitary confinement?

      Why, should computer programmers have some special exemption from the law?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Messed up by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Well the first problem is that there is no such thing as intellectual property. It simply does not exist and never will.

      Nor does real property, in any sense apart from the trivial. You see that piece of land there? Why does it belong to you? That's right, because you paid for it, and in our legal system that means you own it. No other reason. There is not some magical "propertyness" about physical things. Without a legal system, I could just squat on your land or beat you up and take away your car. Similarly, if we agree that there are intangible things like goodwill, trade names, trademarks and so on that can be bought, they are property.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:Messed up by Xest · · Score: 1

      To be fair I think this is just the Swedish way.

      Before Assange was granted bail the Swedes wanted him locked up in solitary until he could be extradited too.

      Thankfully we're a little less backwards than they are in this respect at least.

    47. Re:Messed up by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      Oh my... this is the only anti-piracy post on slashdot that I can think of that's been modded up :)

      And you are right, musicians & artists can't compete with free (could this be why we barely get anymore good movies or music released or is that just me?) , however think of this situation as a seesaw, pre-piracy: there was a heavy lean towards the RIAA & musicians, pay $15-20 a cd, or don't listen to it period. Want to watch last night's episode of walking dead that you missed... buy the season. A bunch of people got onto the other side of the seesaw saying we won't give you a dime for years of fixed pricing, draconian copyright laws, and an overall disregard for the consumer. The seesaw started leveling and eventually tipped in the pirate's favor, everything was free, available and fast in tracker clouds. You'd have to be stupid to go to the store and buy media. And just as the law started catching up to the new technology, things like netflix & $1/song music came along to tip things to a relative balance. Suddenly it becomes: Why pirate this when it's on netflix, or at redbox, or on amazon... $2 for a movie or the potential of a $$$$ fine, redbox it is. So, in the history & future of media, piracy has and will always have its place.

    48. Re:Messed up by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      We are content creators and distributors too. We don't compete with free, we contribute to free. We fund ourselves with our dayjobs.

      We can't help that the tools we create and the communities we create don't support your business model. You can't compete wtih what we give away for free, so stop trying to legislate away our freedoms.

    49. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of information is more dangerous than violence to the PTB

    50. Re:Messed up by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Wow, the moment you call out some people as just being cheap and lazy when they infringe copyright... people jump to the conclusion that you must support old business models and toxic laws to support them :)

      I don't support "piracy" because we have to figure out some way to motivate the content creators to continue to contribute to the Public Domain (which is what you meant to say).

      I support copyrights, in theory, because they allow a temporary set of legal entitlements over some works, separating them from the Public Domain (temporarily), with the end goal of nourishing the Public Domain even further.

      I don't support the draconian enforcement laws and perversion of copyrights because they are an extreme danger to freedoms, a functional and fair economy, and represent a slippery slope to actual intellectual property. The very idea of owning an idea, or expression, is abhorrent.

      None of my positions actually contradict each other at all, and much like politics, it seems you just can't talk rationally about it sometimes.

    51. Re:Messed up by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Find an example that doesn't involve an inmate that was arrested for extradition at the request of a the United States and you may convice someone.

    52. Re:Messed up by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      Would it be better if he was thrown in a cage with other, no doubt, rather more hardened criminals?

      ...said the pimply-faced 40-something basement-dwelling recluse whose prison "experience" is watching reruns of Oz.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    53. Re:Messed up by Xest · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Swedish examples? If so then this very case is an example in itself- Svartholm isn't wanted in the US. Though if you want an actual factual article about how solitary is endemic in the Swedish justice system, you may want to start here:

      https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/Abstract.aspx?id=201907

      If you're talking about British examples then even Abu Hamza wasn't kept in solitary in the UK, and Richard O'Dwyer is even being allowed to walk free and finish his degree until extradition goes ahead (if it does).

      So I'm not really sure what your point is, or did you not actually have one?

    54. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its Sweden, not the USSA. What you just described has a probability of zero.

    55. Re:Messed up by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't mean "Public Domain". I meant free. You could look to the various Creative Commons innovations along with Public Domain. These innovations are a necessity when derivatives of Public Domain are privately owned.

      "we have to figure out some way to motivate the content creators"

      Really? Is there a shortage of new content?

    56. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      money is a scam, truth will always be free

    57. Re:Messed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that people don't want to pay for shit so much as it is that they can't. The content creators, particularly in America and the UK, are intentionally creating a system where most people cannot purchase it beacuse they're trapped in poverty with no reasonable means of escaping.

    58. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 1

      The Wire you insensitive clod!

    59. Re:Messed up by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Ask Hans Reiser.

  4. hacking of Logica? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    If so, then that would be crossing the line.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:hacking of Logica? by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      His booking papers only cite pirate bay activities.

      If it was because of hacking, then his paperwork damn well should say so. The fact that it doesn't means that this is nothing but an attempt to use allegations of hacking as an excuse.

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

    2. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up, I'm not going to believe a word they say.

      If you'll believe it afterwards, I have an affidavit stating that I own an over-water property I think you might be interested in purchasing.

    3. Re:hacking of Logica? by Mephistophocles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...a crime worthy of punishment equal to manslaughter.

      Remember, the death penalty for hacking has been seriously discussed. If such a discussion can be considered serious.

      --
      Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    4. Re:hacking of Logica? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      He should have holed-up in the Ecuadorian embassy.

      http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/4038/fbcmmt.jpg

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... fingering a keyboard and embarassing some corporation is certainly a crime worthy of punishment equal to manslaughter. /snark

      But is that commentary on the severity of the sentencing when it involves said corporation-embarassing-keyboard-fingering, or on the severity of the sentencing when it comes to manslaughter?

      In addition, what jurisdiction is being referenced here? And what type of manslaughter?
      If just going by Swedish law, wikipedia has citations stating "Manslaughter (DrÃ¥p) is defiend[sic] as murder when it is less severe, either due to the circumstances or the crime itself, and is punishable with a fixed prison term between 6 and 10 years. (3-2 Â)".
      That's certainly more than 1 year.

      In the U.S. you've got a bunch of distinctions of manslaughter. The lowest I've seen (under Measure 11) is 6 years 3 months for Man 2, 10 years for Man 1.

      In the U.K. there is technically no minimum, but supposedly 7 years is pretty common.

      That's not to say there aren't people convicted of manslaughter who walk scott free in sentencing, or that there aren't corporation-embarassing-keyboard-fingering people who have been sentenced to more severe punishments... but that would warrant a far narrower brush to be painting with.

    6. Re:hacking of Logica? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      ...a crime worthy of punishment equal to manslaughter.

      Remember, the death penalty for hacking has been seriously discussed. If such a discussion can be considered serious.

      What the fuck did I just read? John Tierney is a disgusting hack of a writer. Kind of drivel like this belongs on extremist blogs that nobody reads. This is why print media is dying.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    7. Re:hacking of Logica? by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Some may argue that the potential of hacking has only touched the tip of the iceberg.

      W/b hacking the power grid during a heat strike & causing some deaths of the young & elderly?

      Or causing a component at a factory to explode by overriding it's original programming?

      It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

    8. Re:hacking of Logica? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

      The method used to commit the crime should rarely be a significant issue in determining guilt. If your actions led directly to someone's death or injury, or was the proximate cause of the same, then you're guilty. We don't need new laws, or stiffer punishments based on the involvement of a computer -- if you hurt or killed someone, you should be punished on that basis. Whether it was with a gun or a keyboard, the result was the same... the only question then left for the jury to answer is whether it was accidental, negligent, reckless, or intentional.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you brought up the J-word, I must bring up the V-word, namely VOIR-DIRE. Those with much to lose in such a situation have no place on the panel.

    10. Re:hacking of Logica? by tqk · · Score: 1

      Some may argue that the potential of hacking has only touched the tip of the iceberg. W/b hacking the power grid during a heat strike & causing some deaths of the young & elderly? Or causing a component at a factory to explode by overriding it's original programming? It's no longer about gaining user names / passwords to pron sites and finding out-dated wordpresses. Something like stuxnet has shown the dangers of the next level.

      Yeah, about that, ...

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I- if you hurt or killed someone, you should be punished on that basis.

      So how do you explain the way the murderers of Rachel Corrie were not punished ?

      I can hardly wait to see your attempt to weasel out of THAT.

    12. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have holed-up in the Ecuadorian embassy.

      http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/4038/fbcmmt.jpg

      Cute, but let us not forget that Julian Assange is wanted for questioning in relation to rape. Whether it's legitimate or not is not the issue.

    13. Re:hacking of Logica? by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      Until someone puts their ass on the line and signs a piece of paper under oath as to why he's locked up

      Absolutely, there's no way Swedish officials would break the law to gain a conviction on someone.

    14. Re:hacking of Logica? by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, there's no way Swedish officials would break the law to gain a conviction on someone.

      I guess that depends on the bribe offered by the MAFIAA?

      A two-week luxury cruise paid for by the MAFIAA was enough to make the Swedish attorney general break a dozen laws by authorizing a raid on The Pirate Bay...

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    15. Re:hacking of Logica? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If you are the idiot that hooks up the power grid control systems to the internet to save a few dollars in administration costs, then you are the one that deserves to go to prison. Air gaps and parallel networks, is what is required for serious security, don't do it then you should be going to prison for criminal negligence.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:hacking of Logica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What IS crossing the line, is making up unfounded accusations, and TORTURING a person (tor it?)!!

      Yes, psychologically, solitary confinement is a form of torture. If you disagree, let's do it with you for a month. Then we'll see if you still disagree.
      People go insane from it. For the same reason that they go insane in those water tanks with no sensory input. Just that here it is dragged out longer, with less pain, so it hurts longer, before the person goes so insane nothing matters anymore.
      The scars will last a life long. And: Yes, you can measure them with a tomograph. So don't fuckin' tell me they're "not real"!

  5. Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

    Does that seem right to you?

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Not charged by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's not been there for years yet. However, it seems not unreasonable to think that they're trying to "soften him up" for the Logica case. Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    2. Re:Not charged by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what if he made millions? Does that warrant solitary confinement? What kind of bootlicking pro-authoritarian are you?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      Yeah, it destroys a person, utterly and completely. A few months of it a person can endure; But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat. The person will have long ago left. It's disgusting and inhumane. A bullet would be more compassionate.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Not charged by pclminion · · Score: 2

      No, he made millions of dollars allowing other people to download music/movies/games/software that other people made and own the rights to. Oh, he was a brazen prick while he did it, too. Karma is a bitch.

      I'll agree with your sentiment when corporate leaders are held to the same standard. Wear a suit, fuck over another company or group of individuals for millions of dollars, you get solitary.

      Until then, please cram your self-righteousness directly into your ass.

    5. Re:Not charged by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, he made millions of dollars allowing other people to download music/movies/games/software that other people made and own the rights to

      Hm...made millions of dollars on creative work that other people made and have copyrights on...where have I heard that before...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollywood_accounting

      Funny how there was no torture^H^H^H^Hsolitary confinement for the people responsible for that.

      Oh, he was a brazen prick while he did it, too

      Otherwise known as a hero:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_jobs

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    6. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Does that seem right to you?

      From the article:

      “He is kept under restrictions as decided by the prosecutor. TV in his cell. He can buy cigarettes and sweets from a kiosk that comes Monday and Wednesdays,” Kristina explains.

      “He is offered one hour ‘outdoors’ each day in some kind of exercise yard with high concrete walls. That is all he is allowed to leave his cell for. No gym, no opportunities to meet other people except for the guards.

      “I have got permission so far from the prosecutor to meet him once a week for an hour each time, together with two policemen who listen to our conversations and stop us if we get close to the ‘case’, which we happened to do in the beginning. It has been a process of amazing bureaucrazy (Freudian spelling!) every time before getting there, I assure you.”

      Allowed to exercise daily, allowed to meet with a loved-one that he trusts weekly, access to television and books, kept safe in solitary as opposed to housed with the general population of psychopaths; it's not quite the sensory deprevation white cell that we might imagine.

      Depending on how long he's there, it actually sounds like my idea of the ideal vacation.

    7. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been there for a couple of months, he has a access to books, tv, letters, and newspapers- plenty of things to keep him occupied. Heck, that's as much "interaction" as some unincarcerated people have every day.
      I have little to no sympathy for people guilty of copyright infringement. It all boils down to their inability to control themselves. "Oooh I want that DVD now, but I don't have $20. Instead of waiting until I have the money, I'll just download it for free!" Or the digital hoarders who collect terabytes of video and audio files simply because they lack the intelligence to pursue a more useful hobby.
      If people would exercise a little self control they wouldn't be getting themselves into troubles such as this.

    8. Re:Not charged by Elbereth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When it comes to jail, many people will spontaneously express enthusiastic support for extreme authoritarianism, even when they'd never support it otherwise. Prisoners, by virtue of having been found guilty by a court, are safe to treat as subhuman, as far as they're concerned. It may very well be an outlet for their authoritarian tendencies, but I think it's also equally likely that they're just assholes experiencing shadenfreude.

    9. Re:Not charged by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      He's a member of the 1%. If there's anything I learned from OWS, it's that it's good for laws to be abused as long as the victims are acceptable targets.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    10. Re:Not charged by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings.

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    11. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's not been there for years yet. However, it seems not unreasonable to think that they're trying to "soften him up" for the Logica case. Plenty of "civilized" governments exploit the fact that the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation.

      This does not sound like the kind of solitary confinement that produces severe psychological damage. He gets an hour a day in the exercise yard with others; his mother, at least, says that she visits him regularly, and if she can, perhaps others do; he has access to e-mail, books, and television; and he talks to the guards. I'm not saying I would like this, and I have no idea about the justice of his incarceration, but calling this solitary confinement really seems like trying to put the worst spin possible on the prisoner having a room to himself. His mother describes him as being quite entertaining during their talks, which makes some of the comments here sound alarmist.

    12. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hell for an extrovert, sure enough.

      But an introvert? Oh please.

      If you want to torture an introvert, force them to go to parties and dance with a bunch of people they don't know. Even better, have some of those dumb ass "icebreaker" games beforehand so everyone gets to talk about themselves to a bunch of total strangers.

    13. Re:Not charged by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      "Rodriguez's Sussex albums were issued in South Africa, where they sold upwards of half a million copies, but Rodriguez received no money for those sales."
      http://www.nashvillescene.com/nashville/rediscovered-singer-songwriter-sixto-rodriguez-embraces-newfound-fame-through-the-doc-searching-for-sugar-man/Content?oid=3036007

      Ok, some more solitary cells needed.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    14. Re:Not charged by Nyder · · Score: 1

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Does that seem right to you?

      That would never happen in The United States of America....

      --
      Be seeing you...
    15. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings. Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      That argument is patently absurd. That's like saying when a woman gets raped, it's not as bad because they can handle it better. It doesn't matter whether someone is better or worse equipped to handle violence and mistreatment -- it's still inhumane, and the person is still damaged after. Solitary confinement is torture; It's something no civilized society should tolerate. How we treat our most vulnerable and disadvantaged citizens is the true measure our own humanity.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    16. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly sucks, but just being in isolation for long periods of time most definitely does not automatically destroy a human being. People can survive that easily. Cosmonauts have had a lot of experience with this on Mir. It is inhumane, but can be survived in tact. You might come out a bit kooky right off the bat, but you aren't gone for good. Boredom and lack of social contact sucks. It doesn't drive a sane person insane (not at the time periods we are talking about.) If this were decades, and he was in a hole at alcatraz, I'd give you that. Otherwise, its just going to be very very boring and passing time will be a challenge. He can get books, he does have regular interaction with other people, etc. It is not as horrible as death.

    17. Re:Not charged by BadgerRush · · Score: 1

      They don't have “rape, beatings and stabbings” in Swedish prisons.

    18. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      He's a member of the 1%. If there's anything I learned from OWS, it's that it's good for laws to be abused as long as the victims are acceptable targets.

      Then you learned some bad lessons, man. "The rule of law does not mean that the protection of the law must be available only to a fortunate few or that the law should be allowed to be prostituted by vested interests for protecting and upholding the status quo under the guise of enforcement of civil and political rights. The poor too have civil and political rights and the rule of law is meant for them also, though today it exists only on paper and not in reality." - Supreme Court of India, PUDR v. Union of India (AIR 1982 SC 1473, 1477),

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    19. Re:Not charged by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Hackers don't usually go into the same jails as violent crime offenders. Not in civilized countries at least. Your inmates would probably be people guilty of fraud or whatever.

    20. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this: http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3202751&cid=41734247
      Though, I doubt you'll let facts get in the way of your hyperbole.

    21. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with your sentiment when corporate leaders are held to the same standard.

      I won't. Torture is wrong, no matter whom it is directed against. Whether you're rich or poor, justice is supposed to be fair, impartial, and blind. Punishment should be based on what someone did, not who they are. Nobody should be put in solitary confinement or denied regular socialization for a prolonged duration. It's not a deterrent. It doesn't reform the person. It accomplishes absolutely nothing except the destruction of that person's humanity. If the punishment is to destroy someone, do it with a bullet, quickly... not taking their mind and humanity a piece at a time in some dark, forgotten room.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    22. Re:Not charged by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yet another example of how the U.S. is not a civilized country.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    23. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't continuously making money off of a one-time created system with no extra labor thereafter make him as guilty as the industry execs?

    24. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we don't have any sympathy for people like you either and there are hundreds of millions of us. This is only one man in a highly civilized (read not American) jail for 12 months. It is the tiniest of victories for your people, but you will never stop all of us. We will be here and we will continue to fight against the copyright cartels. Forever.

    25. Re:Not charged by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I won't. Torture is wrong, no matter whom it is directed against. Whether you're rich or poor, justice is supposed to be fair, impartial, and blind. Punishment should be based on what someone did, not who they are. Nobody should be put in solitary confinement or denied regular socialization for a prolonged duration. It's not a deterrent. It doesn't reform the person. It accomplishes absolutely nothing except the destruction of that person's humanity. If the punishment is to destroy someone, do it with a bullet, quickly... not taking their mind and humanity a piece at a time in some dark, forgotten room.

      Let's not get melodramatic. The house is burning down and you're worried about a broken window.

    26. Re:Not charged by khallow · · Score: 1

      But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat.

      From actual prisoner of war stories, it's survivable. For example, US Senator McCain spent something like two years in solitary as a prisoner of war of North Vietnam and was imprisoned in total about five and a half years under hellish conditions. Nor was his ordeal unusual. Similar stories come out of most long wars.

    27. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he made millions off of theft, they should also be rationing his food, water, and cell airflow to the bare minimum needed to sustain life.

    28. Re:Not charged by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings.

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      Hackers aren't considered "dangerous offenders" they'd end up in min. or medium security in most countries. The fact that they're using solitary is exceptionally underhanded and says they're trying to break him for some reason. Solitary is meant as either punishment or protection. Examples would be paul bernardo who's locked up in solitary 23hrs a day, because he'd be dead in the general population, because he assaulted, murdered, mutilated and raped young women and teenage girls.

      In a general med/min security a hacker is in the middle-high ranks, same with embezzlers. They usually know how to "get things" making them valuable to know or have on your side.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    29. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Does that seem right to you?

      We need a revolution let me just say. This absolutely barbaric. A thief, especially a "virtual" thief is not a murderer. There is far too much meta politics and interference going on in situations like this--so this has nothing to do with justice. If there is any comfort, at least we all know. I will be discussing this issue with my students in my media class.

    30. Re:Not charged by future+assassin · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    31. Re:Not charged by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Does that seem right to you?

      He 'stole' from rich people. That's how it works in the 21st century.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    32. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has sent people to be tortured, and has colluded with the CIA to frame Julian Assange. What more to do you expect from this "leader" in human rights abuses.

    33. Re:Not charged by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They don't have “rape, beatings and stabbings” in Swedish prisons.

      No, they have våldtäkt, misshandel och knivskärning

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    34. Re:Not charged by camperdave · · Score: 2

      But a year? Years? When they finally open that door, there won't be anything left but meat.

      From actual prisoner of war stories, it's survivable. For example, US Senator McCain spent something like two years in solitary as a prisoner of war of North Vietnam and was imprisoned in total about five and a half years under hellish conditions.

      But when he came out he became a US Senator and tried to become President. Obviously severe mental damage and psycho-social derangement occurred.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    35. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 2

      Hackers could probably handle being alone a lot better.

      That's like saying when a woman gets raped, it's not as bad because they can handle it better.

      I usually enjoy your posts and sympathize with your POV, but that's BS. You've ignored the fact that there are many different manifestations of "solitary confinement." Sweden's sounds particularly benign. Read up on Japan's. That sounds like pure torture. I can only imagine Mexico's or Ecuador's or Syria's or Turkey's.

      A room to myself, with TV, access to the library, regular visits with family or friends, shopping for smokes or candy two times a week, ... Hell, that's like living in Mom's basement, and he doesn't even need to leave the premises to shop. Rent free! They probably even do his laundry.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    36. Re:Not charged by russotto · · Score: 1

      Hackers don't usually go into the same jails as violent crime offenders.

      They do if the hacker failed to play ball with the prosecution and the prosecution wants to send a message... or hell, just if the prosecution wants to send a message. Then the Business Software Alliance gets to start their whispering campaign "violate a software license and get raped in prison" again. Disgusting, all of them. We've got a society where obedience to the law is enforced by the threat of prison rape.

    37. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      Examples would be [Paul Bernardo] [wikipedia.org] who's locked up in solitary 23hrs a day, because he'd be dead in the general population ...

      Bernardo was a piker. Cf. Jeffrey Dahmer. "At his sentencing hearing, Dahmer expressed remorse for his actions, and said that he wished for his own death. " "Dahmer served his time at the Columbia Correctional Institution in Portage, Wisconsin, where he ultimately declared himself a born-again Christian. "

      "While doing janitorial work in the prison gym, Dahmer and another inmate, Jesse Anderson, were severely beaten by fellow inmate Christopher Scarver with a broomstick handle on November 28, 1994.[51] Dahmer died of severe head trauma while on his way to the hospital in an ambulance."

      Nelson: "Ha haaa." He got his wish. Who says prison is cruel?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    38. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      But an introvert? Oh please. If you want to torture an introvert, force them to go to parties and dance with a bunch of people they don't know.

      Hell, just send me to an interview with a potential client. "Yes, I can do miracles. What's with all these stupid questions?!?"

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    39. Re:Not charged by Wandering+Voice · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, is that if a prisoner is a ward of the state, then the state is responsible for that prisoner and also their actions. So when a prisoner gets raped in prison, I see it as no different than if the state had raped that person.

      I also feel that the victim of rape has every right to pursue revenge against the offending party, a state or otherwise.

    40. Re:Not charged by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      OK, not sure what an obscure ruling from a court in India, of all places, has to do with anything, but let me restate my point: Fuck the 1%. Fuck the sons of wealthy rich politician pricks, beat the shit out of them. Fuck the 1%. The rule of law in itself is inherently racist and exists only to serve the 1%.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    41. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad they won't let him among the general population so that he could get the AIDS rape. That's what he deserves for being a piece of shit pirate.

    42. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damages aside, he was military. He was (hopefully) trained, and presented danger to his captors, so solitary confinement in his case was more justifiable (but still shouldn't have happened). A pirate/nerd/hacker who never hurt anyone presents no real danger to prison guards or other prisoner, so Gottfrid shouldn't be in solitary unless he does something to deserve it. His ideology, however, is a (very small) threat to powerful people, and the least thing you want in a democracy is people with ideas that go against the status quo, so I wouldn't expect even Sweden to treat him fairly.

    43. Re:Not charged by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      So a man is languishing in solitary confinement for years, not allowed visitors, and is mistreated to a degree that if he were a prisoner of war it would be considered a war crime under the Geneva convention, without being charged, given a trial, or given an opportunity to defend himself... and when this man is finally released, they'll be sending him back to jail because he enabled people to download music and movies... and he's only in that country because of the aforementioned.

      Look on the bright side, at least he's not being waterboarded.

    44. Re:Not charged by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You missed my point: The fact that some people have better tolerances than others is not license for greater mistreatment of those people.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    45. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Royal Game" by Stefan Zweig comes to mind...
      http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Royal_Game

    46. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitely would prefer solitary confinement over mingling with criminals. Give me internet, and I'm right at home.

    47. Re:Not charged by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      the population is largely unaware of the psychological effects of extended isolation

      Well, I guess learning Buddhist meditation can become a quite useful ability for grey hat hackers then. Worst case scenario, time passes faster. In a better one, you'll arrive at some kick ass level of focus and be able to become extremely productive in anything you do once you get out of prison. Best scenario? All the benefits of the better one, plus enlightenment.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    48. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to add that the prison guards will be nothing like what we know from US TV series. They'll have education and training in spotting psychological and mental problems and there are routines for how they interact with detainees to activate and stimulate them to prevent problems. Svartholm will also have access to a medical team and a priest, and as he's under investigation chances are that he'll also spend some time interacting with investigators and his lawyer (and prosecution). He's not been left alone in "the hole".

    49. Re:Not charged by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      I would extend that to read "Prisoners, by virtue of having been accused". A lot of people start railing against people who have been accused of a crime, regardless of whether or not they have been convicted yet, or even if there is any evidence against them. Once arrested, they are guilty to a lot of people it seems.

      Of course, in this case he pissed off rich people so he *will* be found guilty no matter what happens, and because the offense concerns Big Media's rights, the punishment will be much more severe than is justified.
      There is no longer any justice in the world if your accusers are rich and influential, only the illusion of justice and a system that plays along with the rules to give the suggestion that everything is being done according to the book, but the corruption will out in the end.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    50. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that the prison conditions you describe are, in Western nations, pretty much US-specific? Most European countries have much more humane and safe prisons.

    51. Re:Not charged by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      You missed the OP's point: he was claiming that a hacker might fare better in solitary than in the general population (based on the stereotype of the general prison population being largely abusive and dangerous). Combined with the above comment about the solitary confinement not being the deprivation of simulous you would expect, he could have a point. Even so, I doubt he's right unless the general prison population really is as bad to interact with as he suggests.

      He's not claiming solitary is good, he just thinks its better than the alternative (being in the general population).

    52. Re:Not charged by tqk · · Score: 1

      The fact that some people have better tolerances than others is not license for greater mistreatment of those people.

      You're not thinking like a tyrant (to your credit :-). If you were, you'd notice that some of your victims have very little difficulty handling the punishments you're meeting out, so you need to step up your game and come up with really intolerable punishments. Sweden's definition of solitary sounds damned near idyllic compared to some of the environments I've experienced, and I've read and heard about far worse ones (ie. Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, or Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago).

      As for rape, consider the life of a brothel slave of the Romans in Herculaneum, prior to Vesuvius' eruption. Death would have been considered a precious gift from Heaven.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    53. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      honestly - I think that would be my preference: solitary. Compared to spending time confined in close quarters with a bunch of predators. Which of those two options would do more "psychological damage".

      Nobody's going to shank me in my sleep in solitary.

    54. Re:Not charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd think putting a hacker in general population would be worse, with all the rape, beatings and stabbings.

      He's not in the US. Civilized nations aren't in a mad rush to drop the soap and have fun times in the shower like Americans are.

  6. anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    this guy offended power but didn't stay anonymous, so he was nailed

    unless you are rich and powerful expect the machinery of society to be turned against you if you ever upset the rich and powerful

    what we need is an anonymous, distributed internet

    freenet and tor are both good starts but too hard to use for normal people

    now is the time to start building it, when the regular people rely on the conveniences of the internet but don't yet feel the restrictions on their freedoms
    if there is no alternative built by the time they do feel it and look for one then we will have lost

    learn how to configure and run a freenet and tor node on an old computer in your house, throttle the bandwidth if you want to and don't run an exit node if that is scary

    but run a node, you can be part of the solution

    look at http://project-byzantium.org/ if you are feeling more adventurous

    1. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

      Martin Luther King, Jr., Mohandas Gandhi, and Henry David Thoreau would disagree.

      If you want to change an unjust society, somebody has to step forward with pride and dignity to defy the system. If nobody does then we know then digital pirates are just selfish freeloaders who want to watch free movies.

      If you want to be heard, stand up and be counted.

    2. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      In our cynical world martyrs don't work anymore. It avails not to sacrifice yourself for the cause. Anonymity is the only real defense against governments these days. And we are best served by efforts to make anonymity more impervious to governments than by martyrs.

    3. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Their examples are great, yes, but I have to disagree. In our modern world where everyone is constantly under barrage from all kinds of distractions it is way too easy to just forget what a single person, or even a small group of people, do. Also, the constant barrage of war here, war there, terrorist threat under that, threat of terrorist thread over those makes these things seem too insignificant for the Average Joe to bother his pretty head about. Standing up and making yourself a martyr just doesn't work any longer, there are too many distractions everywhere.

    4. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't decide if you're trying to be ironic or not.

      Two of the people you listed were martyred. There are many other examples, as early as Socrates in ancient Greece (and most likely earlier). Of course, a lot of cases we simply don't know, because history is written by the winners.

      Now, the case in point (the Pirate Bay founder) is not as drastic as that, but he's in solitary confinement for copyright infringement, for crying out loud.

      I'd say that remaining anonymous looks like a damn good option.

    5. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Really? Because I'm pretty sure martyrs just brought down four Middle Eastern governments, with a fifth on its way.

      Martyrdom doesn't work for little shit that nobody cares about. Martyrdom is the only solution against actual, we-will-kill-you-if-you-resist oppression. People fight for symbols, not for faceless ideals.

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    6. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be this naive... US interests brought down four Middle Eastern governments with a fifth on the way, which happens more frequently there than you think.

      Martyrdom serves nothing nowadays, because it is too easy to deconstruct martyrs in a World everybody is too eager to think the worst of people, but by all means, keep to your beliefs and be a martyr yourself for all that it is worth.

    7. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In countries where honor is still... honored? Ask anyone younger than 60 in the US about honor these days and you'll get laughed at 19 times out of 20. Honesty, sure. Humility, no problem. Courage, still respected. Honor is the red headed step child.

    8. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Martyrs had very little to do with bringing down those governments, and the replacement governments are going to be far worse for the people of those countries. The new governments will just be more willing to cooperate with certain western interests.

    9. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by bug1 · · Score: 1

      US interests brought down four Middle Eastern governments

      If you really believe this, then explain why they didnt do it earlier.

    10. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by del_diablo · · Score: 2

      Neither of these 3 figureheads would have gotten anything done if their opposition decided to just stomp them. And thats the problem with the idealists.

    11. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      But US did it earlier, and many many times in the last 5 or so decades. Basically all the governments brought down now were put in place by US.

    12. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by bug1 · · Score: 1

      You didnt answer my question.

    13. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by fredprado · · Score: 1

      I certainly did.

    14. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask anyone ... about honor these days and you'll get laughed at ...

      Because honour is a far more arbitary metric than honesty or humility. Honor is entirely cultural in its rules and those rules override honesty or humilty. It is frequently framed as a 'us versus them' concept allowing the people called 'them' to be abused as necessary.

      Fighting this, we have the Magna Carta and the ideal where 'everyone is equal before the law'.

      We also have the meme 'First, they came for the Jews ...' which warns of the slippery slope created by placing criminals beneath the law.

    15. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      I am being serious. If you say the vested interests are too power to overcome – guess what – you just granted them that power.

      I have issues with the peace protestors, tea parteries, etc. But I will give them a certain amount of respect because they put forward a cognizant argument, stand up and get organized, and try to move the ball forward. I know I picked martyrs but I don’t think anybody has to die over IP.

      There are times and situations where anonymity is useful.

      However, saying that you can watch the latest Game of Thrones for free so a anonymous bit torrent is the answers is a weak, whiny argument.

      We need to come up with argument and plan of action – or nothing will change.

    16. Re:anonymity is the only defense against power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am under 60. I was taught about honor. It seems like a fairy-tale to me.

  7. Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

    Really? Am I missing something about why this is necessary? Otherwise, it seems to be an act of vengeful spite or an unreasonable fear of computer technology?

    --
    Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    1. Re:Solitary Confinement by Iamthecheese · · Score: 2

      nope, it's spite. You can't expect to piss off people giving bags of money to congresscritters without suffering for it.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has been criticized for this kind of thing before, but as far as I know jail (not prison) here is worse than prison because it's practically solitary confinement.

    3. Re:Solitary Confinement by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      I honestly thought their justice system was more enlightened over the pond. I mean, even the US there are some people that are starting to wake up to the fact that solitary confinement is an extremely cruel and tortuous thing to do to a human being. Fuck, I mean, green peace gets pissed if you keep a whale or ape locked up alone for any length of time; how can anyone think that is an ok thing to do to a human being in any but the most extreme circumstances.

    4. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, it's spite. You can't expect to piss off people giving bags of money to congresscritters without suffering for it.

      But, of course, if one corporation were to violate OUR copyrights (say, a GPL violation), or worse, publish guides to doing so while thumbing their noses at us and trolling our community, all while exploiting an antiquated legal loophole they're desperate to keep open at all costs, a thousand lifetimes of solitary confinement wouldn't be enough justice. Tearing the guilty's head off in front of their spouses and children then forcing them to drink the newly-spilled blood directly from the neck hole wouldn't be enough justice. We'd DAMN well make sure we nevar forgive, nevar forget, all out of an overinflated sense of spite we'd have the balls to call "justice", and anyone who questions US would be labeled "teh enemy".

      Just wait for the next GPL violation article on Slashdot. Take the top-rated comments and see how far above spite WE are. Then imagine all of those commenters with nigh-unlimited guns, armies, money, and the support of mass media and just TRY to say we'd do any better. I dare you.

    5. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have already posted, this is not the "solitary confinement" that you have in US prisons. From what I've gathered he's simply in a standard jail (i.e. where you end up before sentencing if arrested) cell with a TV, books, etc, gets post, access to the library and gets to go outside for an hour each day. The article as well as the summary is hyperbole even if I don't agree with the reasons for his imprisonment.

    6. Re:Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

      As others have already posted, this is not the "solitary confinement" that you have in US prisons. [...]

      [...] In solitary confinement you get bed, PRIVACY, tv (if officially charged, or prosecutor allows i.e. after giving your sworn statement), table, toilet, water, foodstuff, books and library visit, paper and pen, access to phone (with permission of prosecutor), training room, shower, and so on. It's not the american "solitary confinement" nor is it to punish you, it's way more costly, and they try to put you into "GREEN" ward asap. After that you'll be sent to prison where there is place for you, and if you are unlucky, you get to be 3 or more in one cell. [...]

      In that case, the initial question about "missing something" as to why solitary confinement was necessary, was answered. The reason makes sense, based on what the AC above is saying, which is confirmed by the second AC being quoted from another post made later in these comments.

      Here in the States, whether the individual deserves it or not, with the exception of some issues involving high profile cases, the tendency is to treat the prisoner in isolation like a caged dog.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    7. Re:Solitary Confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has the concept of 'uppmjukningshakte', i.e. softening period before a trial.
      Depending on how cooperative you are, you get better treatment. If you are less cooperative than wished, they will:
      - Wake you up every 30 minutes, and have you stand up (formally to see that you are alive, and haven't killed yourself) [ Ref: barnlakaren ]
      - Play blaring music outside your cell 24/7 (to prevent you from communicating by shouting with other inmates)
      - Solitary confinement (to break you down)
      etc,

      There are people who have been kept under such conditions for years without a trial (while the police performs an investigation, and if you don't cooperate the investigation takes longer and longer).
      In fact, there is a case in Swedish supreme court now where someone has been kept without trial for over two years, and is trying to contest that. Almost as scary are the comments in the newspaper on this (two year wo trial) case. Basically saying "if they do that to him, he is not innocent -- and probably deserves it".

      Once you get out, and try to file a case against the treatment you received, the cases are always dropped. "Brott kan inte styrkas".

    8. Re:Solitary Confinement by hutsell · · Score: 1

      Then it's not always the idyllic scenario described in a couple of other comments. The pleasant ambiance would mean little to myself with the additional harassment combined with an indefinite time span -- the results being the same as a prison sentence. However, is this a rarity? Is it also violating a fundamental right for Swedish citizens to force government employees to formally explain themselves to a separate legal entity within a reasonable time?

      Here in the States, they supposedly eliminated this problem with the right of Habeas Corpus. I say supposedly, since it has been suspended on occassion. Otherwise, anything over 5 working days is considered abuse and (in theory) puts the defendant in a strong position to be successful in requesting the charges be dropped. (Ianal.)

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  8. canadian company by Keruo · · Score: 1

    Logica is owned by CGI, it's canadian company now.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:canadian company by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      And before that it was a UK-based company. I used to work for these guys; not a bad company and in the past they have been involved in some rather cool stuff. They seem to have lost their way somewhat in the late 90s though, going from being a respected tech firm to trying to be a so-so consultancy, and growing by buying several other businesses and doing a poor job of integrating them into the whole.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:canadian company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logica merged or took over the huge VM Data company in Sweden. Basically, old VM Data is still here, doing what they always have, but under the Logica brand.

  9. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In other news, recent financial transcripts show record donations by both the RIAA and MPAA to Swedish re-election campaigns.

  10. If only he had raped or murdered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then he would at least have gotten a trial.

  11. Exessive by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities.

    What does it matter if there was another crime? Of course he should be tried and prosecuted if he committed a crime, but to give someone solitary confinement before he's even been charged for a non-violent crime seems completely excessive. If your justice system has people leaving it more dangerous and damaged when they came in, you are doing it wrong.

    I suppose that not every country has an innocent until guilty system though, is this usual in Sweden?

    1. Re:Exessive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god he's doing ok without his _favorite_ tabloid.

      But Kristina says that her son is filling his time watching television and reading books, since the one newspaper he’s given access to is a tabloid that he refuses to buy. “It’s not exactly his favorite,” Kristina says. Overall though, Gottfrid appears to be coping well.

    2. Re:Exessive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is probably not coping to well because of the abstinence issues. But he has as all jailed subjects access to full medical services 100% free of charge. He doesn't even need to pay any standard fees.

  12. IMHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, solitary was only used for dangerous or troublesome prisoners (where troublesome means doing anything apart from what the guards say so don't be a smartarse. Guards generally don't give a shit why you're in jail and are just looking for an uncomplicated day), suicide risks, initiation into the system (so you know what to expect if you step out of line), or for protection. Solitary is expensive so prison management don't like to over-use it.

    Unless it's for protection, two months is an extraordinary amount of time to be there, though. For all of the other reasons for being in solitary, people usually buckle under and play the game fairly quickly so they can get back out into general.

    1. Re:IMHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      23 hours a day, in a cell by yourself - but with tv, visitors, reading materials, and an hour outside to exercise and get some fresh air... sounds like a pretty standard prison accommodation, except he gets a private cell. (Which, incidentally, is far better than being fresh ass-meat for a prison gang.)

      "Solitary confinement" would suggest that he's not allowed contact with anybody but prison staff, which is demonstrably false because the prisoner's mother reports that she knows exactly where he is, sees him regularly, and that he's doing well - healthy and in good spirits. So, he's in a private cell, he gets an hour of exercise a day (pretty standard), and he has access to reading materials, and visitors. That's NOT solitary confinement.

      The title of this article would be much better as, "Pirate Bay Founder wants pen pals while he's relaxing in a private cell."

    2. Re:IMHE by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is being portrayed as some "Cool Hand Luke" scenario where he gets a night in the box "cause that's how he wants it". When you're in prison not getting to mix with other prisoners is a feature, not a problem.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    3. Re:IMHE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHE (which is for only one institution) it was standard to be out of the cells from breakfast time until about 4 or 5pm. The prisoners all had work to do during the day, mostly to keep them occupied but meal prep and the laundry are useful and cost-saving. Solitary is no picnic and (as I said before) it's expensive.

  13. Solitary confinement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One possible reason, they're trying to weaken his resolve to get some information out of him, and or he is combative and the prison wants a compliant prisoner.

  14. The Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Torrents are the modern day The Library of Alexandria.

    By law, every book and scroll was copied.

    It was critical for the development of civilization.

    A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it.

    Don't let the plutocrats destroy our library!

    1. Re:The Library of Alexandria by jjjiii · · Score: 1

      I actually feel pretty religious about file sharing, and the internet in general. Like, besides friends and family, do I love anything more?

    2. Re:The Library of Alexandria by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      "A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it."

      That's a fairly bold assertion. Historians are not at all sure who, or even WHEN, the Library of Alexandria was destroyed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria

    3. Re:The Library of Alexandria by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      By law, every book and scroll was copied.

      At a time before the printing press, this meant lots of jobs for manual labourers.

      It was critical for the development of civilization.

      Employment for the sake of employment is apparently a good thing. It keeps people off the streets. Copying by computers is bad, because it is too efficient.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:The Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Torrents are the modern day The Library of Alexandria.

      By law, every book and scroll was copied.

      It was critical for the development of civilization.

      A golden age lasted until the christians and muslims destroyed it.

      Romans. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Library_of_Alexandria#Destruction

  15. Assange right not to trust them by Dan667 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hard to believe anything they say after watching how the swedish government acts.

    1. Re:Assange right not to trust them by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And now, Julian Assange's desire *NOT* to be extradited to Sweden begins to make a bit more sense...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  16. If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

    Of course, he has not been charged with any crime, so "if so" would be an overstatement. I might as well say, "nurb432 decapitated a 12 year old girl and drank her blood? If so then that would be crossing the line."

    (But you probably would not face as severe a punishment for that crime as for running something like TBP...)

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:If so... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Except im not in jail currently, and with a suspicion attached to my back. There is a difference.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      He is in prison for aiding copyright infringement by running a torrent site. How does that raise suspicion of him hacking into anything?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:If so... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      It shows he can use a computer and is willing to break the law... exactly the characteristics needed to black-hat hack.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:If so... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and by using Slashdot, you have shown that you know how to use a computer to view images and web pages. Therefore, I suspect you are downloading child pornography...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
  17. Wow by shemyazaz · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds it horrific to use intense psychological tactics like this in such a case? What sort of permanent damage might be caused by long term isolation like this? For what purpose? Is there some loss of life or other high impact event they hope to prevent by sweating information out of this guy? Geez.

  18. Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Glad to see your government is doing what it is told. Good dog. Sit, stay.

    Honestly everyone there should be up in arms angry as to how they are handling this. Why are you people doing my country's bidding?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has been that since the 2nd world war. They've only been having trouble hiding it the last decade. Most of our 50+ politicians adore and love USA and more or less are brainwashed USA is the Best fanatics. All I can say, US propaganda is working perfectly in Scandinavia.

    2. Re:Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are Swedish people. It's a Father Knows Best state where the citizens' non-confrontational personalities are quite well recognised even in the insight of the local culture.

      The closest thing they get to a real protest is someone not recycling their garbage.

    3. Re:Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being in Australia, I thought it was the 51st state. We've got the ANZUS treaty and the 'free-trade' agreement. Airport and sea port security has become more onerous. We've slowly changing our language to American, a dialect spoken by about a fifth of the English-speaking population. And now we're synchronising our laws to allow US jurisdiction in Australia.

    4. Re:Sweden, the USA's 51'st state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the 52nd. The 51st was Iraq.

  19. I wonder if he will succumb to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Stockholm Syndrome.

    1. Re:I wonder if he will succumb to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, leave Dave Schools out of this!

  20. Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Solitary confinement isn't same as in US prisons. First of all he isn't in a prison where it would be strange if he was held in solitary confinement. Everyone who gets 'häktad' is held in solitary confinement or the "red" ward until the prosecutor says otherwise or he is officially charged (i.e. "förundersökningssekretess" is released).

    I've been myself confined in solitary for 2 months, where 2 weeks were voluntary. It's good times and way better than sharing a cell with some douche bags and being able to relax because the psycho in your cell is about to get a psychosis and can't take being locked in.

    In solitary confinement you get bed, PRIVACY, tv (if officially charged, or prosecutor allows i.e. after giving your sworn statement), table, toilet, water, foodstuff, books and library visit, paper and pen, access to phone (with permission of prosecutor), training room, shower, and so on. It's not the american "solitary confinement" nor is it to punish you, it's way more costly, and they try to put you into "GREEN" ward asap. After that you'll be sent to prison where there is place for you, and if you are unlucky, you get to be 3 or more in one cell.

    There is a different type of solitary confinement that I doubt Gottfried is put in, and they usually only exist in prisons and people dangerous to themselves.

    BTW, I never been to prison. Just accused of crap. Gottfried should be happy he is put in "häkte" because when he goes to prison he'll love the solitary confinement benefits. Only negative is of course that you only get to meet the wardens and a few people the prosecutor wetted before letting them see you (and they can be friends not necessarily family).

    1. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here are some pictures from the solitary confinement room he is in:

      http://www.kriminalvarden.se/upload/bilder/pressbilder/Bostadsrum_hakte.JPG

      The other rooms are allowed to be accessed during the day when you are in the "GREEN" ward and mingle with the other jailed people. I bet he is feeling way better than when he was jailed in Cambodia.

      http://www.kriminalvarden.se/sv/Medier/Pressbilder/Haktet-Sollentuna/

    2. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Antipater · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this guy up, please. An actually-knowledgable reply in a sea of kneejerksmanship? Jiminy Jillikers, Radioactive Man!

      --
      Everything is better with chainsaws.
    3. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the law he is jailed under in english, read it and compare to any other non-scandinavian country.

      http://www.kriminalvarden.se/upload/English/Documents/Hakteslagen_eng.pdf

    4. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for those details. I think it greatly clarifies everything.

    5. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Only negative is of course that you only get to meet the wardens and a few people the prosecutor wetted before letting them see you

      Always check the door to the prosecutor's office for a bucket of water propped on it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by bug1 · · Score: 2

      I've been myself confined in solitary for 2 months

      ...

      BTW, I never been to prison. Just accused of crap.

      Its really hard for me (as an outsider) to understand how people can get locked up for 2 months just for being accused of something, and how a modern society can consider such a legal system acceptable.

      Did you get compensated for your ordeal ?

      How do you feel about the justice system after being through that ?

    7. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is compensation involved but it's not enough and I rather have stayed free. But they can't really lock you up unless there is some good evidence and they really think they can catch you. Every 1-2 weeks court has to renew the detention. I never said I wasn't guilty they just didn't have enough evidence to find me guilty.

      The important here is whether it was really necessary to keep me locked up for 2 months for such a crime. Some prosecutors take comments and replies way to personal. So a good advice is not to intentionally irritate or make a mockery of their stupid attempts to incriminate yourself. I did, but it was worth it. Anyway, if you keep your mouth shut you need to expect a longer time in jail until they exhaust all their options and pressure on you.

    8. Re:Not excessive, solitary confinement is standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kinda standard, actually. watched it happen to several friends here in the US -- their biggest crime was being too broke (or stubborn) to pay for a lawyer the second they were charged.

  21. not surprised. by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It isn't that hard to see the reason is pure vindictiveness on the part of (monied) rights holders, exercising their purchased cronies in world government.

    If you followed the press releases surrounding the pirate bay, and bothered to read their "legal threats" page before they were busted, you would know that the founders of the pirate bay frequently and bluntly told the large media companies to go fuck themselves with collapsable metal batons. (And even gave suggestions about which ones were of superior quality.)

    [No seriously. They really did.]

    This tidbit was alluded to discreetly by various media groups covering the trial, since their peers had made open complaints to the court about the group's lack of tact and seeming lack of seriousness, demanding harsher punishments. (Essentially, they didn't like being told to go fuck themselves, and wanted the court system to use 'harsher' punishments, because they were butt-hurt over it, illistrating their own lack of professionalism in the matter.)

    The outright illegal raid on PB servers, followed by the dubious cambodian extradition to sweden, and the endless trail of clearly damning evidence of government corruption in the case pretty clearly sums it up.

    Do I think the guy is a hero? Certainly not. Is he getting unfairly punished in proportion to his crimes? Oh yes, certainly. Is it due to government corruption? The evidence is pretty damning...

    What is he really guilty of that they want to punish him so severely?

    He threatened their hegemony, and was shamelessly unafrad of him. They can't stand that, and want to use him as a poster child to instill fear in people that would be like him, and flaunt their authority.

    More than anything, I'd say he is a political prisoner, on par with what the russians do routinely.

    1. Re:not surprised. by Nyder · · Score: 0

      Dude is a hero. He took a stand against the thieving corporations who are raping cultural for profit.

      Corporations have been buying up governments, 1 official at a time since they first formed. Worse, we now have Movie and Music companies who do not want to accept the new market, and instead have spend billions of dollars buying up politicians in the last 20+ years trying to get a strangled hold on keeping their monopoly on profits from Music and Movies. They would prefer that we had no rights at all, that we are monitored at all times just to make sure we do NOT view/listen to ANYTHING without them getting a cut of the profits, preferably, the biggest cut.

      And please note, the Music and Movie industry has been raping our heritage, our myths, our public domain, all to make a profit and want a lock on it so you can't do anything with out paying them first.

      So ya, I'd tell them to fuck off, and I'd even suggest what sort of toys they can use when they fuck off. And people like you who are too stupid to see the big picture, can fuck off also.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:not surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "legal threats" page is still there. It has been added to in the years after the raid.

    3. Re:not surprised. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I believe you have misinterpreted my tone.

      I don't ascribe "heroic" status (a hero is somebody above the ordinary. Somebody with larger than life characteristics, that others can ascribe noble ambition or cause) to the pirate bay founders. I see them as being ordinary in every respect; the result ordinary people have when confronted with the absurd. (Which is to respond with similarly absurd defiance.)

      I hold absolutely no love for big media. The world really would be a much better place without them. However, like nietche said, "those who fight monsters must be careful to avoid becoming monsters themselves."

      The monied plutocrats behind this farcical miscarriage of justice want us to be terrified of them so we will fall into line.

      Rather than suggest anal auto-eroticism to them, I suggest we ignore their threats, and allow ourselves to be imprisoned. Non-violently. Without contest. Be shameless in admission of guilt.

      The idea is to make their campaign of terror backfire on them, much like the taliban's attempted assasination of Malala has caused serious backlashes.

      Instead of allowing them to paint ordinary people as greedy bastards who want nothing more than to put production people and artists out on the street (nevermind about the hollywood accouting. 'These aren't the crooks you're looking for!'), we need to deny them that ammunition, and let their own insatiable viciousness be their own condemnation.

      Remember when they were sueing little old ladies and 12 year olds? We need that. Lots and lots of that.

      We don't need to give them ammunition.

  22. TOO BAD HIS CRIME WAS NOT THEFT !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'd gotten a 100 SK fine and a slap on the wrist !! Stupid punk had to go and infringe copyright !! What a dumbass !! Moral: if you want to steal, steal real, tangible stuff !!

  23. Real nihilists(tm) say: by hessian · · Score: 1

    If you flout their rules, AND THEY CATCH YOU, expect to find yourself in solitary confinement.

    Moral of the story: don't get caught.

    -or-

    Have sensible rules.

    1. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is "they think he might have something to do with whatever", so let's punish him now.

      Due process? Nah, that's for civilized countries. Which there is none on Earth right now, and things only seem to get worse.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    2. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself: don't let emotions (such as frustration) cloud your judgments, and make over-generalizations. Some countries such as Iceland and Uruguay still have sane people in government.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: don't get caught.

      -or-

      Have sensible rules.

      The latter you can't control, so the first is the only option.

    4. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "moral" of the story is Assange is right, Sweden is the USA's bitch and they jump through the hoops like a good doggie. Think actual Swedish content was even one half of one percent of TPB? Nope but he pissed off the media cartels which along with the other megacorps own the USA so they just told their pitbulls at the state dept "Make sure they fuck him hard" and wadda ya know? that's what they are doing.

      Sigh...I remember when extradition was actually a big deal, when only murderers and organized criminals had to worry about it, but now every. country. on. the. planet. has to follow the USA's rules and jump through the hoops, because God fucking forbid our media cartels have to get with the 21st century and use new models of business, why God that would be horrible!

      Just think, if the cartels would have been in place at the turn of the 20th century you'd be forced to this very day to buy a saddle and buggywhip for every person riding in a vehicle. I mean how dare they have to change when they could just buy the laws?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by netsentry · · Score: 1

      The disappointing part is I had always looked at Sweden's government model as being efficient and well-balanced in the past, especially in terms of education and health care. I wonder if this type of action is typical of their judicial system.

    6. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by cavreader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may want to re-evaluate your history of the late 1900's and early 20th century in regards to the existence of cartels and over bearing monopolies. It was during this time period when worker rights were non-existent and monopolies were not restricted in how they conducted their business enterprises. And stop blaming the US and let Sweden take responsibility for their own actions for a change. That is of course unless you have any proof to back up your statement.

    7. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      I remember an ftp server for windows that prohibited it's usage by the military and police as the author felt that they were too corrupt and he was a Norwegian.... it was WarFTPD if I remember correctly

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    8. Re:Real nihilists(tm) say: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is "they think he might have something to do with whatever", so let's punish him now.

      Due process? Nah, that's for civilized countries. Which there is none on Earth right now, and things only seem to get worse.

      No worse that Guantanomo

  24. Progress by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

    It's like people invent computers and then decide to throw out justice in the process...

  25. Cages | Expediting Evolution by Penurious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    The act of caging any individual without a high probability of recidivism, is essentially spite. It is a form of archaic, wanton penalization probably not even presumed to have any preventive or rehabilitative effect past its end. More practical would be an imposed condition for a ruled duration that would make repeating the crime wildly unlikely or impossible -- preferably while improving rather than weakening the subject. A cage is an efficient method of preventing people from doing anything that cannot be done in a cage with the limited resources at hand. Under typical conditions beyond basic toiletries and tattered books (if they are so lucky), such resources are their own forms and little more, thus leaving violence, idleness and anticipation of food as the majority of very few options. Solitary confinement might actually be more widely practiced for the betterment of society, but only for the violent or voluntary. Otherwise, it makes little sense unless one thinks like a criminal their self.

    I have never observed any value (beyond monetary) in caging anyone who poses no imminent threat to themselves or society. However, as displayed by the practice, it is not ethics that guide such tyrannical policies; it is often pettiness, laziness, or profit. The cage is the gangrene that handicaps society -- by placing problems out of sight and out of mind, sweeping them under the carpet to fester and haunt us any time but now. But it haunts us now despite.

    Of course the answer to this comes from the very fiends who cultivate this gangrenous rot. In the US especially, prison-labor is on the rise like never before. Next time you eat your potatoes, you might ponder what crime the man who harvested them committed.

    --
    Forward! -- Emperor Norton, 2012
  26. Assange's reluctance by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

    1. Re:Assange's reluctance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

      Right, to avoid due process. That doesn't make him a hero.

    2. Re:Assange's reluctance by Nyder · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

      Right, to avoid due process. That doesn't make him a hero.

      but it's not about due process, it's about not getting extradited to the USA, which most everyone agrees Sweden will hand him over to the USA if they get their hands on him.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    3. Re:Assange's reluctance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. If Julian Assange said it was sexually stimulating to shove firecrackers up your own ass and light them, you fucking idiots would do it.

      Why? Because Julian Can Do No Wrong!(tm)

      In the eyes of the faithful, the holy book is god's infallible word. Think about that next time you look in the mirror.

    4. Re:Assange's reluctance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is exactly the reason why Julian Assange is so (wisely) set against being extradited to Sweden.

      Right, to avoid due process. That doesn't make him a hero.

      but it's not about due process, it's about not getting extradited to the USA, which most everyone agrees Sweden will hand him over to the USA if they get their hands on him.

      No, I think it's about being extradited to Sweden to face charges in Sweden. Where in TFA or TFS did anyone get extradited to the USA? Did you even read the GP? I quote them for a reason.

    5. Re:Assange's reluctance by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 1

      The fact that "most everyone" believes something, doesn't make it true. It really bugs me that a lot of causes that I agree with (human rights activists, envionmentalists, and others) are filled with very vocal, very naîve, mostly young pepole who will repeat anyting they percieve to support their cause, weather true or not. This severely hurts the cause, and in a time when a simple Google fact check takes only seconds to do, there is no excuse for repeating untruths. (Unless you consider "being an idiot" an excuse for any kind of behavior.)

      The extradition treaty between Sweden and the UK means that Assange can not be extradited from Sweden to a third country unless the UK agrees. So it would be much easier for the US to request extradition directly from the UK (requres consent only from a UK court) than from Sweden (requires consent from a UK court and a Swedish court.) (Sources are linked from this article wich took me only a few seconds to find on Google.)

  27. Solitary Confinement is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've spent time in jail. Maybe Swedish jail is different (ie, instead of blacks and hispanics, they have muslims) but solitary confinement is preferable to the alternative. Because the alternative is sucking dick and hanging out with the kind of people that are in jail.

    1. Re:Solitary Confinement is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When were you in? I've heard that rape is less common than it used to be. And swedish jails are certainly completely different from US jails. Most countries have more civilized jails than we have. We (or rather our sadistic guards) treat our prisoners like animals.

  28. Dial it down a notch, MAFIAA, will you? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could never imagine how fast will the "content industry" bring upon us a totalitarian, corporatist dystopia. The US is pushing for extradition of people who engaged in copying - not violent attacks, not murder, not kidnapping, not arms or drugs dealing, no, nothing but fucking COPYING copyrighted content.

    The only thing more alarming is the great majority of sheeple, I mean people, watching all this and going "oh well, I guess Bono's got to buy food, too". Pathetic.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Dial it down a notch, MAFIAA, will you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick taxonomy of crimes listed in your post:

      not violent attacks, not murder, not kidnapping

      Acts which hurt others.

      not arms [dealing]

      Acts which allow others to hurt others.

      or drugs dealing

      Acts which allow others to hurt themselves.

      nothing but fucking COPYING copyrighted content.

      Acts which ... make it harder for others to profit from others.

  29. maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe solitary is a bit much, but we do not know the circumstances. all we have is a moms word. i am not saying shes a liar, but if their police are like our police....

  30. The Lesson by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't fuck with big corporations.

    You get thrown in jail and the key thrown away.

    The upside-down world: a co-founder of Pirate Bay is in solitary, but the guys who stole $18 trillion in the 2007-08 economic collapse scam are running around free and using their cash to influence the US election.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:The Lesson by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and despite blowing all that cash trying to get their buddy Obama re-elected, it's looking more and more like they might fail after all.

    2. Re:The Lesson by FuzzyHead · · Score: 1

      You assume that they haven't bought both sides. Last I checked the major players buy the vote both from Republicans and Democrats.

  31. Due process has already been avoided by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due process has already been avoided. By the government trying to get him extradited.

  32. Complete bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He hasn't been held for months yet alone years. He _is_ allowed visitors (but like anyone in jail while a crime is being investigated, he's not allowed any number of visits from just anyone). He's not being mistreated. He's got a TV, books, he can buy newspapers and candy and whatnot from the kiosk once a week. He _has_ been charged, and he _has_ been in court and had the opportunity to challenge the reasons for his incarceration. He's being held in the exact same cells under the exact same conditions that people in Swedish jails are held under, pending trial.

  33. Violation of his human rights by jonfr · · Score: 2

    This treatment is a clear violation of his human rights. Sweden state should be sued over this treatment to ECJ. Since Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is part of Lisbon Treaty that Sweden has agreed to. I am not sure where the first one might be sued to. But that might be European Court of Human Rights.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_Fundamental_Rights_of_the_European_Union

    1. Re:Violation of his human rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This treatment is a clear violation of his human rights. Sweden state should be sued over this treatment to ECJ. Since Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is part of Lisbon Treaty that Sweden has agreed to. I am not sure where the first one might be sued to. But that might be European Court of Human Rights.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_of_Fundamental_Rights_of_the_European_Union

      A. This is new, because you haven't heard of it before.

      B. It's routine and you are a misinformed cockwad.

    2. Re:Violation of his human rights by jonfr · · Score: 1

      You need to get familiar with CoE stand on this. This treatment is not dignifying or fair at all.

      You can do so here.

      http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/Viewpoints/070305_en.asp

  34. Detox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With what i know about this mans meth addiction, getting him extradicted from Cambodia and shipped home before he does himself over was a pretty nice thing to do for him.. Contrary to popular belief..

  35. The stainless steel rat ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    would have approved of anyone hacking the tax man!

  36. Leverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    66

    Remember, the death penalty for hacking has been seriously discussed [nytimes.com]. If such a discussion can be considered serious.

    99

    He is being punished harshly by reason of the leverage that hacking offers. It's like planting nuclear charges in just to right spots on Cumbre Vieja to slide that part of the island into the ocean to flood out the North American East Coast.

  37. Sensible Court Opinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That court decision was made during the socialist autarky period of India. Equality before the law is socialism in/of the judiciary. The world can no longer afford that any more. It's UNSUSTAINABLE!

  38. For white collar crimes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solitary confinement for commission of white collar crimes seems beyond the pale--and even more so before conviction.

  39. Cruel and Unusual Punishment by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    23/7 Solitary Confinement is cruel and unusual, and designed with the express purpose of torturing an inmate into submission.

    How any court can hold that "segregation" is compatible with the 8th Amendment is beyond me, and I would think that Europe would be much farther long in eliminating such punishment.

  40. Democracy? Haven't heard of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democracy doesn't actually exist. It's no more than a facade to cloak what is essentially advanced feudalism: the self-preservation of the ruling powerful at the expense of the peasants. Democracy exists in name only; only as far as is needed to keep us proles from becoming organized and revolting.

    The rich and the powerful who put the enforcers up to task via translucent bribes to the ruling class are no more virtuous than those they accuse of infringement. Copyright is not a moral proposition; no one is directly, physically or mortally harmed by duplicating a sequence of 1s and 0s. The only perceived harm is completely imagined by the rights-holders because they have exploited their power by rearranging the world to lock up the yields of culture and share it with only those who are deemed financially worthy to obtain it. Culture is not just for those who can afford it, culture is humanity and it is for everyone.

    Every time the peasantry stands up to the powerful, the powerful continue to further the rule of law to sustain their power in giant game of whack-a-mole, and the moles are us. Honestly, do we really need *anything* in the text of law beyond murder, rape, assault and theft? Is not anything else simply an assertion of the powerful to sustain and increase their own power?

  41. big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the guy should rot for allowing child molestation advocacy websites to exist

  42. Sweden, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the new U$A whore.

  43. An Unfortunate Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nation States are moving swiftly to instrument USA style Rendition, Torture and Murder Facilities across the globe.

    Look like this one has landed in such a 'New" Rendition Center.

    As deplorable as these new Rendition Centers are, they do serve a valuable purpose.

    The purpose is to provide Pedophiles a safe and secure work environment provided by the 'State'.

    This allows Pedophiles to 'Be All They Can Be' and not be sexual predators on the city and country streets of the 'States'.

    As such the pedophiles of the 'States', a King and a Queen, a Prime Minister and a 'President' enjoy their fantasies without
    drudgery or bothering or hunting. Their 'States' are all too eager to supply them with ... Succulent Meats.

    A sad statement on the value of Home Sapiens and its organizations. :(

  44. Swedish Prison Industrial Complex: by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    Fuck You.

    But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison. Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities. They haven't charged him with any crimes yet in that case, however."

    Oh, I see- on the SUSPICION he MIGHT have done something to fuck with your tax system, he deserves solitary confinement. Has he been charged with such? NO. Has he been convicted of such? NO. They just think he did it. ASSHOLES. FUCK YOU. Get off your knees and stop sucking the MPAA and RIAA's dick.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  45. How they people in power really feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the thing about computers. Anyone who seems to know anything about them - extensively - seems to be considered a fatal threat to the establishment. Look at the long history of hackers locked up for no reason other than demonstrating knowledge. Hackers, within their own domain, believe they are free to learn whatever they want. The reality is contrary, the establishment comes down with the boot like the gestapo in great fury just to make the point that knowledge is not free and is incredibly dangerous to their security whenever anyone demonstrates any critical aptitude with the great mystery that are computers.

    1. Re:How they people in power really feel by Spectrumanalyzer · · Score: 1

      They should fear the ones they dont ever hear about. They are, however our unsung heroes, well never know their names, never truly know their actions, but theyre making our world a better place, you can rest assured of that.

      How do I know? Truth be told - I dont.

  46. No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect Sweden to rise up in arms for such injustice; or at least raise their voices until justice is upheld!

    or?...

  47. National Anthem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what they did to Francis Scott Key.

  48. Mystery solved by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    I wondered why, on waking up thus morning, I felt safer - as if a great threat had been removed from the world. Well done, Sweden, and may I compliment your recent applications of extradition. I know Ben Stiller can rely upon you to execute international justice if anyone should slate his movies.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  49. Yes, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's not why Sweden's being so tough on him in prison.
    Authorities believe he may have played a role in the hacking of Logica, a
    Swedish technology company with ties to the country's tax authorities.

    Yes, but why Sweden is being so tough on him in prison? Is he acting violently towards other inmates? Does he need protection from the other inmates? Are there vulnerable computer networks with a sweet Layer 1, serving time and being very afraid of the leet hacking powers he possesses? Or are the Swedish officials just breaking their national laws relating to the Swedish Prison and Probation Service?

  50. Sollentuna Prison, Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how when ordinary people go to this jail it's touted as a luxury prison, while when a hacker celebrity goes there it's shockingly grim and inhuman... and really, Svartholm isn't getting any special treatment, he's getting the same thing as many others in the same situation (that is: under investigating and awaiting trial).

    http://www.takepart.com/photos/worlds-most-luxurious-prisons/sollentuna-prison-sweden