Slashdot Mirror


Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Internet?

jbrodkin writes "In this hyper-connected, networked world, many more of our devices are getting linked to the cloud, whether we want them to or not. That's sometimes good, and sometimes bad, so when a basic device like a mouse requires a user to go online and set up an account to activate all of its functionality, people are understandably going to ask why? The latest entry in the saga of 'Why the hell does this thing need to connect to the Internet?' comes from Razer, which has caused an uproar by asking users to register gaming mice on the Internet. While it's mainly for syncing settings across devices, gamers are complaining that certain functionality might not be available unless you create an online account for your mouse. Razer has responded to the controversy, but its answers aren't entirely satisfactory."

249 comments

  1. This is why I use Linux. by akiwiguy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:This is why I use Linux. by slashmydots · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see. With Linux you're guaranteed to not have fully functional drivers regardless.

    2. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      I did, I see that they have partial or no support for half the models listed.

    3. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you?

      Stable: 6
      Stable but missing minor features: 3
      Broken: 2
      Everything else: Unsupported

    4. Re:This is why I use Linux. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      The default mouse control tools for each distro work OK with the Razer mice anyway. I've got a pile of them in the office and not many people realise that they are actually gaming mice. It started off when I got a good deal on ten of a discontinued model, then after that is just became the default because people liked them. It's similar to CAD work so they move their mice around a lot.

    5. Re:This is why I use Linux. by sjames · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suppose that means you should probably choose from the OTHER half, doesn't it?

    6. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just showing he doesn't have fully functional drivers to operate his brain properly.

    7. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

      Trackballs are nice for laptops (too bad the new ones don't have them built in), but are awful for gaming.

    8. Re:This is why I use Linux. by slashmydots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I'm trolling because companies write crappy quicky drivers that don't fully work for Linux? Yeah, whatever. Keep living in your little bubble where the world is perfect and everything in Linux runs flawlessly.

    9. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do not like futanari. Please edit your post and remove the link.

    10. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use this one:

      http://www.logitech.com/en-us/mice-pointers/trackballs/wireless-trackball-m570

      It works great for Civilization, Warcraft, Total Annihilation... but then again, I haven't ever tried it on an FPS. (Playing Morrowind on this trackball's grandaddy was pleasant enough, though.) I'm left handed too. :) I have been unimpressed with mice since the old logitech cordless ones (with real balls... heh.)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    11. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, those games are not that much different from a desktop application. And yes, I had FPS in mind when I wrote that trackballs were awful for gaming.

      I do not use wireless mice - one more cable is not a problem and no need to recharge batteries is a big plus. I just use a standard Logitech mouse with a PS/2 connector - my 8 port KVM switch only has PS/2 ports and 8 port KVM switches with USB mouse support are very expensive.

    12. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the gunk that gets in them. I was using a trackball for a while and it seemed like I needed to clean the gunk out every few weeks. It's an optical trackball so, it's not as bad as the older ones.

      A lot of the Lenovo laptops have a built in track point. Which is great because you don't have to move your hand from the home row to use it.

    13. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't the model in question, the one you can't use (asides from basic features) without registering online, the Naga 2012? I see it as fully supported on the site above.

    14. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see. With Linux you're guaranteed to not have fully functional drivers regardless.

      Gee I bought a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse which use a USB dongle plugged into my notebook. Since I only have three USB ports and did not want to devote 2 USB ports for the keyboard and mouse there was a device driver providing unified device support using a single USB dongle. The device driver was for GNU/Linux and was a simple three-step process to compile and install. It worked immediately.

    15. Re:This is why I use Linux. by godefroi · · Score: 1

      If you used Logitech mice, I can certainly understand why you were left unimpressed.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    16. Re:This is why I use Linux. by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      With Linux you're guranteed that underhanded shit like this doesn't happen.

      As to the topic at hand, Why would a mouse need to connect to the internet? Why, to buy cheese from Amazon, of course.

    17. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The only thing that your mindless trolling demonstrates is the fact that you don't bother to actually read what you respond to."

      Oh, which is why almost no cameras work on 64-bit linux, eh? Hardware almost as old as slackware and zero sort of generic driver. Hell, you could've had a 32-bit driver emulator for 64-bit Linux, but apparently you guys aren't smart enough to do that so more hardware would actually work under linux.

      I've gone through hundreds of devices under Linux. To this day, more than 40% still do not work despite saying they support my particular distros.

      When you actually have the devices to test and not some carefully cherry-picked near-linux-only hardware, maybe then you can speak.

      Hell, a shitty tiny MenuetOS supports my hardware where Linux apparently fails to.

      Drive

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    18. Re:This is why I use Linux. by alva_edison · · Score: 1

      I'm going to blow all my karma on this, but here goes.
      I've been playing FPSes since Doom, and I've always felt that keyboard+mouse was an absolutely abysmal interface for that type of game. My problem was that there weren't really other options, but that changed with the advent of PC controllers designed after the PS/Xbox controllers. Shoulder buttons for strafing, independent joysticks for moving and looking, easy to use fire buttons, extra buttons available for things like weapon changes/macros. I refuse to go back to WASD hell.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    19. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      So, how quickly can you turn 180 degrees in an FPS?

      With a mouse the speed of the turn is limited only by the speed at which I can move the mouse (and since I usually turn up the sensitivity, I do not have to move it far), the controller limits the speed of the turn and you also have to do two actions to turn the camera (move the stick in the required direction, move it back to center) instead of just one (move the mouse in the required direction).

      I also use arrow keys, not WASD, but that is just my preference.

    20. Re:This is why I use Linux. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2

      You know, that's simply the byproduct of games being imperfect simulations. It's ok for the most part because games are imperfect simulations, but I get drawn to games which don't reward the twitch aspect as much.

      For 'realistic' FPS games, think about how unnatural a flick of the wrist 180 degree turn would look like if executed in real life. In a way, I'd actually like to see some more games which place greater emphasis on tactics and caution than pure leaping through the air make your mouse align the dot and click mechanics. The problem is a lot of the solutions or 'handicaps' imposed such as constricting aiming reticles are unnatural themselves.

      Hell, I'm just happy when I can find a game that has friendly fire turned on.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    21. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Roger+Lindsjo · · Score: 1

      Maybe he needs to register it on the internet to unlock all of the functionality.

    22. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, I have only tried to play FPS games with a joystick, but I was always disappointed by the turn speed. Watching the lets play videos where the game is played with a gamepad I can see that the turn speed is about the same. I mean even I can turn faster than what you can do in some games (and probably even faster if I though that a guy with an axe was behind me and I had a gun) and most of the player characters are supposed to be physically fit (which I am not) because they are in the army or wherever (or even have superhuman strength/speed).

      As for imperfect simulations - yes, the turn speed with a mouse is a bit too fast, but in reality you do not need to turn your whole body to aim (I am sure that a trained soldier could shoot three separate targets really quickly), you can do more actions than just walk/run and turn etc, so I think the twitch aim is OK.

      Tactics and caution are OK in some games, but I do not think that limiting the turn speed is that good, unless you were controlling a tank or big power armor. Also, I find it more difficult to aim with a joystick though I guess with a lot of practice I could aim almost as fast as with a mouse.

    23. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm about 24 hours late on this reply.

      I use this same mouse for FPS games with no real problems. I used the previous incarnation for seven years. In past games, like Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Spearhead, I was able to snipe with no issues and turned in great scores on sniper only game play. On COD:MW2 I did well but could no longer shoot a sniper very well. I now suck with a sniper in BF:BC2 and BF3. This mouse is a laser mouse while the other was an Optical one. This one is more precise, and in an FPS game that causes me to aim just past where I want to shoot. I don't have the free time to practice, so I just pass on using a sniper rifle nowadays.

      However, this mouse is great if you have time to tune it to your personal taste and can practice. This mouse and its predecessor have allowed me to comfortably game in a lounge chair with a wide arm rest for almost ten years instead of using a desk chair.

    24. Re:This is why I use Linux. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      For me, I have been converted to the dual analog stick for FPSes. :) And I think the speed at which you have to react in an RTS is made much easier with a trackball... My KVM (alas, only 4 port) is a USB one. :) I caught a sale @ amazon.com....

      I'm going to have to try Doom 2 with a trackball. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  2. Look up cats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are mice in the clouds and it might start raining.

  3. razer synapse by Xicor · · Score: 3, Informative

    i believe razer synapse is what it is called... i use it quite a lot, and it is really nice for multiple computers... or even going to a friend's house or a computer lab with your mouse. it automatically syncs all settings. of course.... it isnt necessary to use synapse, you CAN manually set up your mouse every time

    1. Re:razer synapse by Cyko_01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      why not just add an sdcard to the mouse and store the settings ON the device.

    2. Re:razer synapse by Formalin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or 10 cents worth of EEPROM.

    3. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Logging into someones computer and having your *mouse* setup from the cloud is basically the easiest way to declare your permanent virginity.

    4. Re:razer synapse by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Adding a gigabyte of flash might increase the BOM cost by a dollar! Also, we won't be able to track all your keyboard and mouse activity and monetize your little consumer ass. One of those...

    5. Re:razer synapse by Cinder6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, the cloud solution lets you have multiple mice all automatically use the same settings without toting around SD cards or adding expense and bulk to the mice themselves.

      I use Razer Synapse. I was really annoyed at having to use it at first, but the next day when I moved my Naga mouse over to a different system, I saw how useful it was. My only complaint now is that updates for the software are quite frequent, and require reboots, which is pretty obnoxious.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    6. Re:razer synapse by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do they require reboots, or does it just ask you to reboot. Because I find that 90% of the stuff that asks you to reboot doesn't actually require a reboot. It's just something developers put in, "just in case" but most of the time it's completely unnecessary. I think the only reason I reboot anymore is so Windows will stop complaining and install it's own updates.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:razer synapse by pipatron · · Score: 2

      More expensive and complex hardware. The mouse already has a USB interface.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    8. Re:razer synapse by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      This was the first question that popped into my head when I saw Razer pushing Synapse (I have a Naga, which is now dead): "What the hell are they going to do with the information they're collecting?" It's useless. Mindbogglingly, completely useless. Unless they're stealing other data, mouse button assignments have no possible marketing utility. It's bizarre.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    9. Re:razer synapse by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      A GIGABYTE of flash storage? Why the hell would you do that? Do you want to store movies inside your mouse or something?

      Formalin was spot-on when he said "10 cents worth of EEPROM".

    10. Re:razer synapse by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My Logitech G700 stores settings on the mouse itself. I can hop from win to mac to linux and all the mappings are the same.

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:razer synapse by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      What the hell are they going to do with the information they're collecting?

      Biometric data-gathering and subsequent profiling?

    12. Re:razer synapse by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      There you go. They did it to encourage people to buy multiple products from a company that's forward thinking is "garner information from customers". /snark

      Last I checked, online/cloud storage isn't that difficult a thing to get hold of. They could have designed a driver that will let you select config files from remote locations. Not that mounting a remote drive is a complex process. Offering a remote storage account for config files as part of buying the device would have made me think they were actually forward thinking. IMHO, it is pretty obvious where their thinking is heading.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    13. Re:razer synapse by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      have no possible marketing utility

      Well the new synapse drivers have Facebook and Twitter integration. I'm not kidding - open the mouse configuration page and down the bottom right there's a row of social media icons.

    14. Re:razer synapse by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      More expensive and complex hardware. The mouse already has a USB interface.

      lol wut

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    15. Re:razer synapse by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2

      Really? I realize you're a shill but really? That's the best you have?

      Is the market for this mouse so anal retentive they'd sooner bring an $80 mouse with them to school or a friend's house lest they suffer from another mouse?

    16. Re:razer synapse by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ew, ew, ew. Fortunately if you dig a little, you can still get the pre-Synapse (presynaptic?) software.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    17. Re:razer synapse by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Profoundly useless unless they're collecting actual mouse input. "Oh, Bob uses Button 6 for Fireball when he plays World of Warcraft. It would sure be great if we had a dataset in which we could identify Bob... except Bob already uses Synapse on all of the computers he plays WoW on, so we already have the answers to all possible questions we could use this data to solve! Go us!"

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    18. Re:razer synapse by Eroen · · Score: 1

      It's a sloppy hardware manufacturer. I very much doubt their windows drivers are less than 100MB with the complete bundle of crap they force upon you. Multiply that with ~3 generations of windows apis and add something for macos and some copyright-infringing bad idea for linux, and it won't fit in 512 MB.

    19. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually tends to be automatically determined by msiexec, or just a bad default in the msi comilation tool they used.

    20. Re:razer synapse by loonwings · · Score: 0

      What kind of jackass brings their own mouse to a friend's house or a computer lab?

    21. Re:razer synapse by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would be interested to see an informed EULA-violating teardown of the new driver arrangement; but I'm inclined to operate on the provisional assumption that an untrusted program with enough local access to modify nonstandard settings(ie. Not just twiddling the numlock LED) of USB HID devices and internet access is a keylogger until proven innocent.

      ". USER GENERATED INFORMATION

      “User Generated Information” means any information made available to Razer through your use of the Software. Subject to the Privacy Policy mentioned above, you expressly grant Razer the complete and irrevocable right to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, transmit, broadcast, and otherwise communicate, and publicly display and perform the User Generated Information and derivative works thereof in any form, anywhere, with or without attribution to you, and without any notice or compensation to you of any kind."

      With that little puppy in their service agreement, they certainly appear to be asserting a claim over absolutely anything that their software(or any later version) is technologically capable of grabbing...

    22. Re:razer synapse by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      A GB is total excess; but one of their excuses for going 'cloud' was the zOMG! Future awesome features are just too big for onboard storage!!!, so it seemed worth adding enough to make that fully irrelevant...

    23. Re:razer synapse by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's actually necessary to reboot, but it's pretty dang pesky about it--enough so that I give in or just hold off on updating for a few days (during which time two more updates come out, I'm sure).

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    24. Re:razer synapse by Cinder6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh Jesus Christ, it just asked me to update right after posting that. Now I can test if reboots are really required.

      *waiting*

      Okay, it told me I needed to restart. Clicked "no thanks". That closed me out of Synapse completely, so I reopened the application, and it seems to work just fine. Guess it was a lot less pushy about restarting than I was thinking, though it can still be fairly pesky with those update reminders.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    25. Re:razer synapse by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can import macros and profiles from the hard drive or a network drive. It won't automatically sync to that file, but at least the functionality is there.

      Offering a remote storage account for config files as part of buying the device would have made me think they were actually forward thinking.

      How is that different from their current system?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    26. Re:razer synapse by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      A GIGABYTE of flash storage? Why the hell would you do that?

      If the idea is that people are taking their mouse with them between computers (which seems to be why they need cloud syncing features in the first place), which is something I find bizarre, then why not use that device to store all the users files and settings.

      Win 8 has that USB profile mode, Windows 8 To Go, if you have to carry something with you anyway, and people are carrying a mouse with them everywhere (again, I think thats bizarre, but I guess it's a really nice mouse) then incorporate the two devices.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    27. Re:razer synapse by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Oh, Bob uses Button 6 for Fireball when he plays World of Warcraft.

      How about, 'few people use button 6 for anything but button 7 is quite popular'

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    28. Re:razer synapse by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I suspect it has to do with shared libraries. The installer may or may not have installed a new version, which may or may not be materially different in practice, and may or may not have completed due to other processes currently using the library. The installer would have to be more complicated to track this information through to the end.. such a simple thing to simply recommend a reboot instead.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    29. Re:razer synapse by jaduncan · · Score: 1

      How about, 'few people use button 6 for anything but button 7 is quite popular'

      More realistic: how about "a popular keymapping for this game is this, and these are popular button macros".

    30. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gives them a shitload of demographic information for marketing purposes. It can also provide them with some insight as to how they may want to custom-tailor future device models.

      Plus, they can sell all that information to other marketing companies.

    31. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    32. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Razer Synapse. I was really annoyed at having to use it at first, but the next day when I moved my Naga mouse over to a different system, I saw how useful it was.

      Anything which will easily directly transfer to another system could be stored internally on the device. The only case where I see this being useful is if you have to replace a failed device, or want to mirror the settings to another device. Both of which could be accomplished using a simple backup-to-file utility. I agree that for novice users, a fully automated cloud backup approach would be handy- but most people doing hardcore macro setups on their gaming mice can figure out how to attach a config file to an email or some type of file hosting service.

    33. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One reason to reboot is that it backs up your registry with the new changes. So if you don't reboot and the computer crashes then the installation will get over-written with a backup and you will have to install again.

      Yes most of the time it's not worth bothering.

    34. Re:razer synapse by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I plugged mine in and the standard USB HID mouse "driver" kicked right in.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    35. Re:razer synapse by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I bet you had Synapse running when you ran the update. MSI saw handles open to the files and says "you gotta reboot."

      Next time close (kill the process if you have to) the thing first and see if it bugs you again?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    36. Re:razer synapse by dywolf · · Score: 0

      copying a config file is too hard?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    37. Re:razer synapse by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I plugged mine in and the standard USB HID mouse "driver" kicked right in.

      That's great, if you're ok with standard mouse features and an $80 pricetag, but presumably, you bought a Naga to actually USE the 12 buttons on the side of it, which you can't do without the synapse software.

    38. Re:razer synapse by speederaser · · Score: 2

      Or 10 cents worth of EEPROM.

      Boss: Let's see, 10c * 1,000,000 production run = $100,000 to replace a web interface that costs us nothing because we can sell customers usage patterns to advertisers?

      Boss: You're fired.

    39. Re:razer synapse by ScienceofSpock · · Score: 1

      I find a couple of flaws in this whole thing:
      Apparently, the cloud storage is so a user can take their mouse with them and use their profile from anywhere. The problem I have is that this particular scenario seems extremely rare, and I'll explain:

      1. The general consensus seems to be the LAN party scenario, but every LAN party I have ever attended, I had to bring my own equipment, including my computer, which already has my mouse profiles on it, so no need for cloud storage, and in fact, local storage would be preferable in case the LAN party doesn't allow outside connections. Hell, the last LAN party I was at was probably 7 or 8 years ago. With high speed internet connections, are LAN parties even a thing anymore?

      2. using the mouse in multiple locations (ie. work and home). In this situation I would just bring my profiles with me on a USB stick, or email them to myself. It's something I would only need to do once, and maybe once or twice later for adjustments or setting up profiles for different apps/games.

      The only situation I can see where cloud storage would be really useful is a situation where you are using your mouse on a different computer every day. Even in that scenario, cloud storage would only be a useful secondary feature, if the mouse can't find profiles locally. Certainly not the primary storage medium.

      This whole situation seems to be either that Razer wants the data for nefarious purposes (They pretty much claim the right to use anything their software can grab), or the marketing team was adamant about needing to add "new technology" and "cloud storage" was the buzzword around the office that day.

      Their older devices actually had onboard storage. Not sure why they are moving away from that.

    40. Re:razer synapse by Nahor · · Score: 1

      Without a reboot, you have only the basic mouse functionalities.
      I have a left-handed DeathAdder which has the mouse buttons reversed in hardware ("left-click" is on the right button). But I'm used to left-click with my major and right click with my index so I use the software to revert it. Without the reboot, the buttons are not reversed.

    41. Re:razer synapse by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      Having memories of computer labs from many years ago, bringing my own mouse would have been a pleasant experience. Having to clean the accumulated dead skin of several hundred previous users from the ball rollers before the mouse would work even reasonably? *shudder*

    42. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just did that with this post

    43. Re:razer synapse by Eroen · · Score: 1

      Ooh! Ooh! We can finally have the clipboard-contents-actually-stored-within-the-mouse thing, so that less technically competent people can copy-and-paste things between their computers in a natural and not-at-all cumbersome manner!

    44. Re:razer synapse by hazem · · Score: 2

      Boss: Let's see, you shipped our high-end mice with drivers that can't be activated without an internet connection and now all I see on the internet is outrage that our mice are defective because they require the internet to work.

      Boss: You're fired.

    45. Re:razer synapse by JThundley · · Score: 1

      It is mandatory to use synapse if you happen to have installed it once to try it out and you want extra functionality from your keyboard. I found this out the hard way. Installing Synapse will upgrade your firmware and there is NO WAY to downgrade. I've also had a suite of issues with the software. It used to crash once a day after hitting my first macro key. It also pops up the user interface for every single user on a system, even if they don't use the hardware. I use my Razer keyboard at work, so I had to explain to all my other co workers to close the razer window after every log in. It would also make my mouse lag for some reason every time I tried to bring the interface up. I can't say I like Synapse at all.

    46. Re:razer synapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suddenly you are receiving notifications about how your "friend" likes Button 6.

  4. oh shit, by clemdoc · · Score: 1

    the mice are blocking teh tubes!
    on a more serious note, this sounds like a cartload of crap.

    1. Re:oh shit, by dbIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      the mice are blocking teh tubes!

      This sounds like a job for Cat 5.

    2. Re:oh shit, by SignOfZeta · · Score: 1

      And IPv6. Granted, I hate the fact of registering hardware before it will accomplish its intended goals, but if Hardware Manufacturer A fires out 50 million mice without an IPv6 stack, they're just asking for trouble.

      Although, if this mouse does support IPv6, I still won't buy one. I'll just laud it for its one non-saving grace.

    3. Re:oh shit, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or maybe just Occam's Razer?

  5. Hardware or rodent? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    With stories like this one I wasn't sure if this was about hardware or if there were rodents demanding to be on line.

  6. And the next step? by Crazy-San · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So at the current trend of technology am I going to have to start paying a monthly fee to use my mouse, or at least the more advanced features of it. All it would take is a Firmware update, which they can force if the mouse is connected to the internet. I can see it now, a little popup inviting me to take advantage of all the great features available with RAZER Plus.

    1. Re:And the next step? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's worse than that: less than 1 week after installing stupid Synapse 2.0 my original Razer Mamba's IR stopped tracking. The buttons work, but it doesn't move the mouse pointer. Razer claims they can't find my registration, and urges me to buy a new Razer Mamba 2012. Sad thing is that it was a great mouse until the 'cloud' killed it. Correlation is not causation, but when you spend $189 on a mouse you'd think the IR would last more than 1 year...

      So I downgraded to a $49 Razer Deathadder. Basically the same form-factor as the Mamba, but no wireless and less DPI. The Mamba came with this Apple-like thick plastic mount so it's like a small piece of art now, back on its original pedestal. :(

    2. Re:And the next step? by z0idberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you only gave a LITTLE more money rather than a LOT more money.

      That should teach them. Go you!

    3. Re:And the next step? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      My DeathAdder multiclicks and has done for years.

      Enjoy.

    4. Re:And the next step? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      Take it back - get your money back. It is not functioning as advertised. If you were in the EU you would be able to do this.

    5. Re:And the next step? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why do people buy expensive stuff that only comes with a 1 year warranty? Isn't that pretty much an admission that it is overpriced cheap crap that will have an unacceptable failure rate before the 2 year mark.

      PS. All electronics sold in the EU have a mandatory 2 year warranty as a minimum.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re:And the next step? by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Better question... who in their right mind would spend $189 on a mouse, and then, having been burned on it, spend *more* money on another mouse from the same fucking company?

      Is Razer the Apple of input devices or something? I mean, yes, I spent $60 on my Logitech M570, but nobody else makes trackballs in that form factor (almost nobody else makes trackballs at all), and if you prefer a trackball, it's worth the investment. My last trackball was also a Logitech (original TrackMan Wheel), and also cost $60, but I was using it for more than a decade, so I'd call that pretty good value for money.

    7. Re:And the next step? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Is Razer the Apple of input devices or something?

      I'm not sure if that's a fair characterization. Apple devices generally provide a well-engineered and somewhat distinctive user experience. Not radically different from the equivalents from other ecosystems (like Android), but distinctive and sometimes better.

      My experience with Razer products is that they're more the Monster Cable of input devices. No clear advantage over comparable products from other providers, but substantial "audiophool" cred among the 1337 gamex0rs.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    8. Re:And the next step? by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Jesus.. people like you are why companies can get away with stupid shit like this... Anyone with brains, who bought a $189 mouse and has it quit working in less than a year AND THEN goes out and buys ANOTHER mouse from the SAME F**KING manufacturer IS A MORON. I swear, just when I think people can't get any stupider, I read about this bozo, AND then not to mention all the SUPREMELY stupid people who think Mr Obama is Santa Claus and gave him another four years to complete his conversion of the USA into the USSA...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    9. Re:And the next step? by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, your account will include Unlimited Pointer Travel, with Unlimited being defined as 20 meters per month. Per-click charges may apply, and will be billed to both you and the guy you just sniped.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  7. Razor products by Datamonstar · · Score: 2

    Razor products are just shitty. I've purchased only one item from them, a copperhead mouse, but that'll be all I ever buy. I returned that thing three times for three different problems. All of them were known issues that they just chalked up to being part of the process of owning a Razor product. Logitech gets my money now. It's a mouse that only does mouse stuff and does it well.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Razor products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roccat is better.

    2. Re:Razor products by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      I love my Razer Naga mouse. It gives you loads more control on MMOs, in particular, and being able to give it custom programming and macros for each app I use is a real nice plus.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    3. Re:Razor products by Zagnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also loved my Naga, until owning it for just over a year when the buttons wore out and stopped reliably clicking. Mind you, the cord's braiding was faulty from day one and my regular optical mouse has better tracking on most surfaces. Still, great shape and idea. I just wish Logitech would make a gaming mouse with a bajillion buttons so I wouldn't have to put up with Razer's poor quality.

    4. Re:Razor products by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:Razor products by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      Logitech is good, but basing your evaluation on a sample size of one, while fine for your own subjective and emotional purchasing patterns, does not a proper objective review make. I have seen both bad and good Razor products. I have seen both bad and good linux distributions. I have seen both bad and good Star Trek movies. And you know what, I still enjoy Start Trek and Linux even though there are not so good products available under both names.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    6. Re:Razor products by Zagnar · · Score: 1

      And it looks better too! I wish I could mod you up.

    7. Re:Razor products by Caffinated · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had both and would heartily recommend the Logitech.

    8. Re:Razor products by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0

      SOME Razer products are shitty. BTW, its Razer, not Razor or Razor 1911 :P

      Razer's blackwidow line of keyboards are very good actually. They're the best most widely available mechanical keyboard you can pick up just about anywhere in a hurry.

    9. Re:Razor products by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Logitech software sucks. Their customer support is great though, where as Razers customer support is basically "fuck you, you broke it"

    10. Re:Razor products by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 2

      Owning a Logitech mouse, it also comes with software that needs to connect online to pointlessly update itself. It does it constantly.

    11. Re:Razor products by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I'm still using an old Logitech M-BA47. It's got a wire and a ball. No stupid batteries, no interferences and I could use it on top of a glass desktop if I ever wanted to.

    12. Re:Razor products by compro01 · · Score: 1

      They need to make a wireless version of that. I've been too damn spoiled to use a mouse with a cord ever since my old MX700.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    13. Re:Razor products by green1 · · Score: 2

      And this is why I still cling to my IntelliMouse (microsoft ergonomic mouse) (and no, I don't like microsoft, and don't use any of their software, but their hardware seems decent)
      It's got a cord and a ball, it never needs new batteries, works on every surface I've ever tried it on, and has never caused me any issues. need to clean the ball and rollers every so often (probably as often as most people replace a mouse) but otherwise no issues.
      Of course it also requires a PS/2 port on the computer, so I have a feeling it's days are numbered when I buy a new computer. I'll miss it.

    14. Re:Razor products by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Razer has ergo left mice though; which pretty much makes them the only game in town for me. For better or for worse.

      I've been happy with the hardware over the last 3 mice I've had; although I did RMA one. And the drivers for the last one was MISERABLE* until they released synapse which came out and fixed it. So while i don't exactly care for any of the cloud stuff in synapse it did at least make the mouse work properly.

      * by miserable:
      v2.x of the drivers would have the buttons become unresponsive during UAC elevation. worthless.

      v3.x of the drivers caused the mouse to flake out if it was ever unplugged and then plugged in again until you rebooted. This was more tolerable, but the glitchiness was triggered by sleep/wake, and so on.

      With synapse it works properly at last.

    15. Re:Razor products by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I was looking at this earlier today. If my Naga craps out like the parent's, then I may have to get one.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    16. Re:Razor products by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it actually needs it? I use my M550 and Performance MX daily in Linux and never had to install a thing.

    17. Re:Razor products by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      PS/2 to USB converters are cheap, certainly much cheaper than the cheapest USB mouse you can find.

      FWIW, I've been using MS' boring, wired, non-ergonomic optimical mice for years now; much better than any of the more fancy mice I've tried.
      The only thing I might change is to go with laser instead of plain LED optical because. If MS has a nice "semi-wireless" mouse (charge through USB while using) I might like that too.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    18. Re:Razor products by Cederic · · Score: 1

      While I'd agree, Logitech's latest wireless mice have awful battery life. I'm ending up gaming wired by the end of the day as the battery's gone.

      That's with a G700, but several others seem to use the same battery/USB charging.

      It's nice that you can use the mouse while charging through USB, but how about just surviving the whole day on a full charge, as my previous Logitech mice managed.

    19. Re:Razor products by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Call me odd, but I don't install Logitech software. Except for the G15 keyboard, of which I still have a working original. Now that was a proper keyboard.

    20. Re:Razor products by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I use three mice on a regular basis. One is eight years old, one is five years old and the newest is two years old (which replaced a four year old mouse that hadn't worn out, I just wanted a sexy new mouse).

      I don't believe you only clean your mouse's ball and rollers once every two years.

      I also don't believe it'll work very effectively on a bed, which my optical mice cope with just fine. Hell, two of my mice will work by waving them in the air, no surface needed.

      Microsoft do make great mice, but ffs upgrade to an optical one.

    21. Re:Razor products by dywolf · · Score: 1

      their mice are also uncomfortable as hell. presure points, ridges digging in....
      no likey

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    22. Re:Razor products by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      I switched to Logitech as well. Razer mice had a nasty habit of going bad after a year or so. The motion in one axis will just go away for a while, almost like its an old roller mouse with a gummed up roller. Its generally fixable by rebooting (or of course buying a new $150 mouse from them), but this is just not acceptable behaviour for a serious gamer. Seriously, rebooting fixes a mouse issue!

      Frankly the above behaviour points to a really poorly designed product. Requiring an internet connection fits right into thier already demonstrated level of design "skill".

    23. Re:Razor products by green1 · · Score: 1

      How often you have to clean the rollers depends on the cleanliness of the environment... maybe you compute in a dirtier spot than I do? not to mention that "cleaning" is really just popping it open, wiping the ball on my pant leg, my fingernail along the rollers, and popping it back together, takes less than a minute.
      The ball does work on soft surfaces, though my desktop doesn't reach my bed, so I can't say for sure if it would work well there, I suspect it would though. It works fine on my pant leg, or a magazine, or the bare desk, or the arm of the couch.
      I have an optical version of the same mouse, I used it for about a week before I gave up and went back to the ball one. I also have a microsoft wireless optical mouse that I use with my tablet, I don't like it much either. The problem is that most optical mice are extremely picky about the surface they work on. My desk, despite being a fairly standard wood grain, doesn't seem to work for optical mice. I like having the freedom to use the mouse wherever it lands, I don't want to have to have a mouse pad which restricts where I can position the mouse.

    24. Re:Razor products by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Skip past the infra-red early model optical mice and try a laser one.

      The base never needs cleaning, and it genuinely works everywhere. A joy to use.

      Or stick with your balls. A man can always trust his balls after all.

    25. Re:Razor products by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      I agree. I've had 3 Razer mice fail on me in the last 4 years. My original diamondback started to cause blue screens in both Windows XP and Windows 7. My second diamondback's scrollwheel stopped working after a year. I decided to try a deathadder, after 6-8 months it started to register left clicks as double clicks instead of single clicks, which is a pretty common Razer issue from what I've heard.

      It sucks because I find Razer mice the most comfortable, but they don't last for more than 6-12 months. I'm going back to Logitech for my next mouse.

  8. Logitech does this by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    I have a Logitech, and I have an account for it. When I move computers, I log into the "cloud" and it download's my config and remaps all the buttons. I could swap computers, software, reinstall and all that, and I still have the config saved "somewhere." If I don't do that, then I get default config.

    1. Re:Logitech does this by PPH · · Score: 2

      Save it inside the mouse?

      It would be trivially easy to add USB/Bluetooth removable storage to the little rodent sufficient to hold all the configuration settings, drivers and whatnot that you'd even need.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Logitech does this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the warning.

      I will avoid them in the future.

    3. Re:Logitech does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who wants to go through that to retain settings? What a horrible solution

    4. Re:Logitech does this by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      What if you have multiple computers, each of which has the same mouse? With the cloud configuration option, all changes are propagated immediately, unlike settings stored locally on the mouse.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    5. Re:Logitech does this by PPH · · Score: 1

      Why would you need to propagate mouse settings to a computer before you connect the mouse to it?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:Logitech does this by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure the poster was describing a scenario where each computer had it's own mouse. They are all the same model.

    7. Re:Logitech does this by EdZ · · Score: 1

      What Logitech device do you have? My MX revolution happily works offline with no problems, as did my last keyboard (Logitech Illuninated). Not even a sign-in page in sight.

    8. Re:Logitech does this by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's one of their remotes. I've bought a new remote for another setup, and it ported the setup for one to the other, so both work exactly the same, and all I had to do was plug it in and lot into the logitech server.

    9. Re:Logitech does this by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Save it inside the mouse?

      It would be trivially easy to add USB/Bluetooth removable storage to the little rodent sufficient to hold all the configuration settings, drivers and whatnot that you'd even need.

      The Razer Synapse 1.0 actually did that. All (or almost all) Razer mice has onboard memory that used to be use for storing synapse settings. They moved it to the cloud on synapse 2.0 upgrade

  9. Razer's comments are NEVER satisfactory. by TellarHK · · Score: 5, Informative

    Never before have I had as much of a love/hate relationship with a company, and this includes Apple. Razer makes some great peripherals, that usually all have some crazy, simple, fixable flaw that they ignore for months before finally getting around to in a half-assed way. Why do I love them so much? I'm a left-handed gamer, and the pickings are pretty slim for me. So I'm stuck with them for a good left-handed gaming mouse.

    Examples in the past: The Lycosa keyboards, which had a defect where the touch panel for volume and LED control would stop working after a month or less. It took over a month to get them to acknowledge a problem. Another, the drivers for the Death Adder mouse line. For four months, it was impossible to get a combination of working drivers that allowed you to rebind the left and right buttons to one another (because Razer defaulted to the primary click being on the right, for the LH models).

    Razer takes forever to respond to anything, and when they do, it's typically poorly communicated and badly handled. This is a company that is just mindblowingly TERRIBLE at customer relations.

    1. Re:Razer's comments are NEVER satisfactory. by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, maybe the strong criticism in a high profile website like Slashdot will hopefully make them improve their behavior. Their design is a bit childish, but some of the ergonomic requirements of a gamer apply for anyone that spends a long time at a desktop PC.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    2. Re:Razer's comments are NEVER satisfactory. by Clsid · · Score: 1

      I have been a fan of Razer too, but lately they have become too successful for their own good. I first met them when I replaced an Apple's mighty mouse with a Razer Pro Solution 1.6. That was when they were still getting started. I equipped my computers with Razer mice from that moment on. I have a Razer Orochi on my laptop. So as far as what the article said, I actually thought the whole deal with syncing profiles over the net was pretty cool, and I haven't really encountered any issues with it if I'm offline.

      The reason why I wanted to tell you all this is because I recently built a gaming rig and mostly because of looks and a keyboard feature, I ended up getting a Thermaltake Azurues mouse. I know the Orochi is 3500 dpi, the Naga also has ungodly resolutions, but when I tried the Azurues with its "crappy" 1600 dpi, I was like, hmm this mouse is kind of cool. After playing Battlefield 3 and Starcraft 2 with that mouse quite a bit, I can honestly tell you, don't waste your money with expensive Razer mice. The Azurues is ambidextrous and I just checked in Newegg, they are being sold for $33. It is a regular mouse in the sense of buttons, so don't expect a gazillion of options there, but I never liked the extra buttons even on my Razer mice.

    3. Re:Razer's comments are NEVER satisfactory. by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

      Lefty gamer here, and I have switched to Logitech. I'm using the G300 now, and am quite happy with it. The setup software is a bit wonky, and has to be twiddled with every time I come back from sleep or reboot for some reason (?), but otherwise it Just Works. My last 3 Razer mice all got unreliable on one axis after about 6 months or so. I'd expect that from a $20 beater mouse, but not a supposed "gaming" mouse. I won't put up with a peice of hardware I can't rely on.

    4. Re:Razer's comments are NEVER satisfactory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm left-handed and I've never used a left-handed mouse. Maybe it's too late for you to adapt, but I'm not sure how one avoids adapting in the first place. I can mouse fine with my left hand, but literally everywhere I've ever gone, I've had to adapt to right handed mice...

  10. To sell information to advertisers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here buy a logitech mouse:

    http://www.logitech.com/en-us/mice-pointers/mice/gaming-mouse-g500

    Onboard memory for saving settings. The. End.

  11. I bought one by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... and returned it!

    Basically the mouse is so hypersensitive with insane DPI that you have to run their software to mod it down. The reason the internet is required is because it uses a cloud to load your mouse settings. No you did not misread that?!

    It gets worse

    The profile and cloud service are several services that depend on each other and take almost a minute on my fast 2.8 ghz Phenom II and meanwhile the cursor is flying all over the machine due to the high dpi settings. Razor made it so light too which excaberates the problem. They have added weights for their $130 and it is their way of saying a Fuck you for being cheap by buying the $80 mouse??? Since when is $80 cheap? So you just have to set their and wayt for your mouse to connect to the cloud to slow down a simple setting. Sigh

    This cloud obsession is silly and getting too far. I can't use logitech because they are too small for my hands. Microsoft explorer mosue 2 is big enough but htey no longer have the scroll mouse. Just a touch button that will hurt after rubbing my fingers for several hours. My dying MS mouse I will keep for now as I am disapointed in razor. It is rediculous.

    1. Re:I bought one by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Basically the mouse is so hypersensitive with insane DPI that you have to run their software to mod it down.

      Based on my experience, a few beers and half an Ambien also works.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that makes some sense. These are gaming mouses, where precise movement is advantageous. Basically, you have a certain resolution of monitor. Say, 1920x1200 and any mouse can be used with it. However, if you want to aim quickly, you don't want to move the mouse a ton to make the adjustment, you want to move the mouse as little as possible, while still hitting the spot.

      So, I think it makes some sense for them to require adjustment that normal mouses wouldn't. However, requiring it to be stored in the cloud seems a bit odd.

    3. Re:I bought one by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Basically the mouse is so hypersensitive with insane DPI that you have to run their software to mod it down.

      The ones I got had a DPI switch on the bottom. The middle setting was OK for most and for others I showed the users how to change it in the default mouse configuration tool for their OS, and haven't heard back from them since. They are not the top end lightweight ones with extra weights or whatever but just a nicer than usual consumer mouse about the shape of the wide old Logitech "Microsoft" Intellimouse.

    4. Re:I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought most gaming mice would have DPI selectors at a convenient place. My USD20 a4tech mouse has a DPI selector button near the mouse wheel. Set it to 1000Hz updates and 3ms mouse button latency FTW. Interestingly I'm allowed to specify a 1ms button latency, not sure if really goes down that low, there certainly is a difference between 3ms and another normal mouse (>10ms) when I do those reaction time tests. My PS/2 keyboard seems slower too.

    5. Re:I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, most systems with large screens currently use mouse-acceleration and a lower dpi. So if you can have a 3200 dpi mouse at 1x accel, it's going to act similar to an 800 dpi mouse at 4x accel. But it will be a little smoother for precision operations.

    6. Re:I bought one by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Why not just by an older, normal mouse of acceptable size that runs on standard drivers and be done with the whole mess?

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    7. Re:I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a specialized gaming mouse. They are supposed to have high DPI, add-on weights, and tons of configuration. Having that configuration stored in the cloud is useful for many because that's where their games are stored too.

      If those aren't features you want, don't buy it.

    8. Re:I bought one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is $80 cheap?

      Well, its cheap for a mouse + a flashlight.

    9. Re:I bought one by Cederic · · Score: 2

      My G700 has variable DPI, changed by using buttons on the mouse itself.

      So I can change my DPI mid-game if I want. I can use different DPI settings for different games. E.g. some FPS are twitchy as hell at max DPI, but other play superbly at that level.

      The mouse has multiple DPI profiles, let alone multiple DPI settings, and all with no drivers installed on my PC. _That_ is a specialised gaming mouse, tons of configuration on the bits that actually matter.

  12. Logitech remotes are worse... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    The Logitech Harmony remotes require you to register online just to use them. There is no way to program the remote offline or without an account with Logitech. It makes sense that they don't want you having to download a massive database for every ir device you can posibly use but they should at least let you download a basic database for the devices you own.

    1. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by Cinder6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, it gets even worse with the Harmony remotes. Have two of them? Well, you can't register two remotes to the same account--not and have them control different equipment, that is. No, Logitech forced me to set up two accounts in order to control my two remotes. This was a year ago; hopefully they realized how idiotic that was.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    2. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, it gets even worse with the Harmony remotes. Have two of them? Well, you can't register two remotes to the same account--not and have them control different equipment, that is. No, Logitech forced me to set up two accounts in order to control my two remotes. This was a year ago; hopefully they realized how idiotic that was.

      As of 2 months ago, they were still that dumb.

    3. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I first bought a Harmony, I thought as you did. Online? Why not a CD-ROM full of codes? I don't want to be online for this.

      But having used and programmed a half dozen of them now, I'd say they produced a very good answer to an ancient technology issue. IR codes are awful ways to control devices, they're non-standard, non-portable, and change continually as new products are introduced. There are no standards for publishing IR codes. There is often no way to get an IR code for a lost remote, especially on a 20 year old receiver.

      What Harmony did was to crowd-source the discovery of IR codes. By getting enough people buying the remotes, and having them continually programming and updating them, they can offer those now to every customer. Having the software be online-only ensures that not only does everyone contribute, but everyone benefits. When I went to configure the 20 year old receiver that was missing a remote, Logitech's database had no trouble delivering.

      Another time I needed a specific Levitron remote in order to teach 4 IR codes to a LIRC client. Rather than spend a ridiculous $100 list for a five button remote I would never use a second time, I told my Harmony's configuration that it was controlling a Levitron switch, then blinked it at the learning device. Instant success, no cost.

      I've come to the conclusion that sometimes, a vendor's server is not the worst answer. But only sometimes. I'd still ditch the Harmony software in an instant for an Open Source programmer that accessed a public database of blinky codes.

      --
      John
    4. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by green1 · · Score: 1

      And let's not even get in to the nightmare interface they use to program those remotes! One of the worst designed pieces of software I've ever seen.
      Their database is notoriously bad at knowing all the features of each device, so often it will think you have a different number of inputs to cycle through than you actually do or some such, all of this can be changed in the program, but good luck finding it!
      I've always found that those harmony remotes are amazing once you get them going, but the setup process can be a real pain. (I work for a TV provider that tried using harmony remotes for all our customers at one point, the huge amount of time it took our technicians to set the things up on each install eventually killed that)

    5. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      And let's not even get in to the nightmare interface they use to program those remotes! One of the worst designed pieces of software I've ever seen.

      Interface quality seems to be inversely correlated to interface complexity. This doesn't just go for Logitech, but pretty much every hardware manufacturer seems to feel a need to make their driver's NOT use standard UI controls and conventions. There are situations when "boring" is the right answer, human interface design is one of them.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      I have one and I really don't like it, even when you don't count the "cloud" programming crap. First of all, their "our remote knows better than you what mode it's in" crap. I prefer the super macro button approach I was using with one of the better One For All remotes, but it didn't have the code set I needed for some things. And even though I can reprogram the I2C EEPROM inside, the actual programming of OFA remotes looks like a pain in the ass, and the community grew around people who thought Excel was a really good tool for creating the programming.

      Then if the remote falls on the floor, it loses power long enough to reset and decide that nothing is turned on, so you have to cover the IR LEDs with your hand and press the appropriate group button. If you don't cover it, the devices which only have a toggle on/off command will be turned off.

      But the worst is how it controls my Sharp LCD TV. It sends the ON command, then the INPUT button, then the number 3. Which would be great except that it sends the INPUT code about a second before the TV is ready, so if I haven't turned the remote away so that the TV can't see it, it tunes the TV to RF channel 3. Then you have to use the Help button for a game of Twenty Questions while it tries to guess what went wrong, always in the same sequence where it takes five of them to set the input back..

      My next remote is going to be a microcontroller running my own fucking code, probably crammed into a salvaged remote control shell with buttons that have a good feel. It's been a long time since Woz and his Cloud 9 remote. Remote control codes aren't exactly rocket science, and microcontrollers are really powerful these days, if you don't mind a little QFP soldering.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    7. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Have you actually used that piece of shit? It is a laggy flash (?) app. And by laggy, I mean you click on something and it takes long enough to respond that you think your click didn't work, and you end up clicking again. It's even worse when you have to click AND drag something. And then the UI is overly complex on top of that.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    8. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, it's not flash, it's a JAVA crapplet. It won't even run on Seamonkey, which I use for regular web browsing, probably because I've castrated Java in there. I have to fire up Safari to get it to run.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    9. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot to mention how it "buffers" keypresses. If you press the volume up button ten times, you GET ten volume ups, but they'll keep coming out after you stop pressing, because it didn't send them as fast as you pressed them. After all, we can't have just the configurator app be laggy, now can we?

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    10. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by plover · · Score: 2

      And having used OFA remotes before, I fell in love with the Harmony's "use-case model" of remotes. Want to watch TV? Press the "watch tv" button. It definitely makes the entire entertainment system accessible to the wife and guests. If everybody had to know "set the TV input to HDMI2, set the HDMI switch to port 3, set the receiver to AUX input, have the remote adjust the receiver for audio control and the digits should control the cable box" ..., then nobody would be able to run the system but me, and that's just stupid. The last thing I want to do on vacation is answer help-desk calls from the nephew who is house-sitting, trying to explain how to adjust the sound so he can play XBox games.

      Harmony did a lot of things right, and they made the very messy domain of home entertainment remote controls very simple for the end users.

      And I don't know if you've aware, but you can adjust the delay times on the Harmony so it will wait longer for the TV to boot up after powering it on. It's somewhere under the advanced settings.

      --
      John
    11. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by alexo · · Score: 1

      In order to get a real appreciation of how "customer-oriented" Logitech are, take a look at this petition, started some 3 years ago with close to 500 replies.

    12. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      This is obnoxious enough to have me considering replacing my Harmony remotes. Anyone have recommendations?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    13. Re:Logitech remotes are worse... by Control-Z · · Score: 1

      You would think they would want to *encourage* you owning more than one.

  13. Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Internet? by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Internet?

    It probably wants to use your credit card number to place a giant order at http://www.thecheeseshed.com/

    --
    If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  14. Logitech hardware too by humanrev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently purchased a Logitech Harmony 700 programmable remote to use on my HTPC (it's a highly recommended remote by XBMC users). The problem however is that there are only two ways to configure it:

    (1) The official way is that you go to http://www.myharmony.com/ and register an account. Once done, you log into the site and it opens up a Silverlight interface (that's right, Silverlight - not HTML/HTML5, not even Flash, but a rarely used Microsoft plugin who's Linux equivalent, Moonlight, doesn't work properly anyway) that allows some coarse configuration but not much in the way of fine grained options.

    (2) The less official way is to download the Logitech control application (Windows only, of course), which still requires an account. It also feels very much like a web application in a native window since it's still slow as it loads up various pages from the Internet anyway. But at least you get full control using it.

    Point is that in both scenarios, you MUST have an account to program the remote. Now of course having this data available in the "cloud" means that should you reformat or otherwise need to reconfigure your remote after a reinstall of the software, you can still obtain your carefully-configured settings. The other idea is that Logitech have a database of pre-configured devices that can be uploaded to the remote which is continaully updated with newer models, but it's not like the native application couldn't just obtain that info without requiring an account.

    Logitech deliberately made it so that they must know how your remote is being used. Not that they'll work out anything interesting with it, except perhaps what devices I use and how I use them. But fuck me, this is not a good direction to go with - requiring registration over one's hardware before it can be used fully.

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    1. Re:Logitech hardware too by g051051 · · Score: 1

      Don't blame Logitech for this. They inherited this model when they bought Intrigue Technologies, the company that created the Harmony Line (when it was called EasyZapper).

    2. Re:Logitech hardware too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Logitech Harmary remote and had the same issues. Coupled with the fact that I am in New Zealand, and so the network latency killed the performance of the control app. I got it to work eventually, but it was so painfully to configure. There are buttons I would like to change, but I'm not going to attempt it.

      If only it would download the IR commands for the devices I specified and then run locally.....

    3. Re:Logitech hardware too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very discouraging to hear. I was in the market for a good HTPC remote. Do you have any suggestions for an alternative? I absolutely HATE most 'simplified' methods for programming my equipment. There is little much more infuriating to me than knowing that a piece of hardware, which is physically capable of performing a task, is 'blocked' from doing that task because the vendor never bothered to implement the feature in their UI.

      A real bitch of a UI/interface annoyance for me was when NVIDIA decided that the video card should pay more attention to the EDID it thinks it was receiving rather than just outputting the audio over HDMI (or not) if I tell it to. For a while, the Video Card would determine that my monitor was capable of receiving audio (technically it could). The problem is that my video card would then disable the audio path from my PC to my audio receiver (standard 1/8" plugs) and instead try to send the audio over HDMI to the television (which I just wanted to be a television with no speakers) The video card never did this before, and even had an option to DISABLE HDMI audio, but for a while, the drivers NVIDIA released forgot to put that option on the menu (ie: the checkbox was missing for a good number of releases).

      The only solution was to manually edit the drivers and trick it into interpreting the EDID from my television as one which did NOT support audio, and therefore it would NOT disable my normal audio system. I had to do this every single time I wanted to update my drivers or re-install something.

    4. Re:Logitech hardware too by humanrev · · Score: 2

      Do you have any suggestions for an alternative?

      Not at the moment. The other issue with this remote is that there is a slight lag between when you press a button and when it sends out the IR code. People have been experimenting with the delay settings of the remote, but there seems to be a minimum delay of about 200ms between button push and transmission. Seems to be due to the remote's processor being a bit slow in creating the required code after each button press.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    5. Re:Logitech hardware too by adolf · · Score: 1

      The other idea is that Logitech have a database of pre-configured devices that can be uploaded to the remote which is continaully updated with newer models

      And where do you think they got that cloud-based database of continual improvement? Oh, right: They crowdsourced it from folks who both had devices and were willing to use their Harmony remote to learn the IR codes from the original remote.

      When accepting input from strangers, it's nice to be able to track its origins on a user basis. Hence, accounts.

      (That's enough buzzwords from me for the rest of the week.)

    6. Re:Logitech hardware too by adolf · · Score: 1

      If you keen enough to fuck with EDID over audio issues, then you're keen enough for a Crestron or AMX system.

      Except for the cost, of course...

    7. Re:Logitech hardware too by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Inherited or not, they haven't unfucked it after 8 years.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:Logitech hardware too by humanrev · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're suggesting that if it wasn't mandatory to require accounts for the remote, then it's likely less people would register and hence the device database would be less populated than it already is.

      I will concede that perhaps there is some benefit in mandatory registration for a programmable remote. But only because of its specific purpose to control any number of devices from many different manufacturers. A mouse requires no such ability.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    9. Re:Logitech hardware too by adolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's my suggestion.

      And yes, I agree. I myself own a somewhat fancy gaming mouse, and I don't see any merit to requiring online registration to enable useful functionality of such a device.

      But there is a similarity: Different mouse settings for different games are not so dissimilar from different IR codes for different devices.

      However, gamers (unlike Harmony users) are usually more than proud to show off their uber-l33t tricks, so forced registration is unnecessary: If someone wants to share what they've discovered, they'll do so (and they will).

    10. Re:Logitech hardware too by green1 · · Score: 1

      There is actually a native linux program (Congruity) that interfaces with the logitech website. It makes programming the remote no more painful than on windows (which unfortunately is not exactly a glowing recommendation)
      Great remotes once they are set up... but I don't know if they could have made the setup process much more painful..

    11. Re:Logitech hardware too by plover · · Score: 1

      I found that using their RF extender adds a noticeable delay. It seems to come from transmitting the handheld device's code via Z-Wave/Zigbee to the blinker device, where the IR emitter translates the code into device-specific blinks. The delay is annoying, but survivable. I've had it for years, and still occasionally overshoot the target when pressing the button multiple times.

      When I was using it in direct IR mode, the blinks coming directly from the remote itself were near enough to real time that it wasn't an issue. But line of sight was a problem, so the extender was the best option in my case.

      I tried one of the Radio Shack RF remote extenders. They're all analog and as such they don't suffer from the delays. But their pyramid shaped receiver was feeble at picking up on the remote's blinks, and was so unreliable it went back to the store the same day.

      --
      John
    12. Re:Logitech hardware too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just licensing the hardware.

    13. Re:Logitech hardware too by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Network latency? It's a laggy piece of shit Java crapplet. Unless they're literally sending mouse clicks and drags through to their servers to run the UI, what you are seeing is simply its natural crappiness.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    14. Re:Logitech hardware too by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      And then it buffers the button presses so that it will still be sending codes for a moment after you push a button multiple times.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  15. Hmmm... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I, for one, can't think of any reason why having a driver that enjoys unfettered(and low level) access to one or more of my computer's human input devices also being internet connnected at all times could possibly pose a problem...

    In fact, I'm fairly sure that the Razer Synapse2 system will make Bonzibuddy 83% more fun to be with, and any future updates that allow me to log my keystrokes to the cloud will be a lifesaver when I forget the password to my AOL account!

  16. Design bugs are neat by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Great. Create another account for another useless thing because I don't already have enough of those.

    If you worry about taking your settings and profiles with you STORE THEM ON THE DAMN DEVICE! It works for the N52TE which they bought from Belkin and that thing allows you to save all stored profiles back on your HD.
    Why add another layer of complexity on configuration software? Especially if that extra layer includes stuff you can't control(like internet connectivity) and adds a single point of failure for all your customers. Maintenance of that cloud thing can't cost less than adding lokal storage to your devices. Unless of course you skimp on the high-availability requirement.

    Congrats! You screwed up on every design aspect with that new and great scheme just to ad the "cloud" buzzword to your marketing blurb.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  17. It's very simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company like Razor may require online registration to unlock features because both it gives the company more information and greater consumer dependence. Such things are easily converted to profit later.

    Of course, such an act damages the user experience but, as I gather from the various comments here, Razor simply has no competition from a hardware/ergonomics point of view. Maintaining, or worse improving the user experience, will just eat into profits.

    Why do Razor's actions perplex so many of the people commenting here?

  18. I might be missing out... by klingers48 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...On some of the extra functionality, but this is one reason why I will never, as a blanket-rule, install any peripheral device's shitware on my PC if I can get away with it. I'll either settle for the functionality provided by Windows built-in drivers or if that's not feasible then I'll trawl around support sites and community forums looking for a link to the most cut-drown driver package I can get my hands on. I say this as someone with a Razer DeathAdder and BlackWidow that I use every day and love as devices.

    Every printer suite, every Adobe extention, every gamepad, mouse and keyboard driver package, every pile of crapware, even iTunes agents, Bonjour, Java, all of it that we load onto our PC is just one more thing to slow down our user experience, waste bandwidth and throw annoying popups in our faces. Not to mention all the new potential infection vectors and opportunities to have our use-habits aggregated and sent off god-knows-where into the ether.

    It's much, much easier to just forgo some macro buttons on the side of a keyboard that is very nice unto itself as a piece of hardware.

    1. Re:I might be missing out... by egranlund · · Score: 2

      Good god I do the same exact thing.

      I think it was the HP printer drivers that finally pushed me over the edge. 400MB for a printer driver, sweet Jesus.

    2. Re:I might be missing out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a printer connected to my Mac a bunch of years ago that refused to work until the software was installed, so I finally gave in and installed it. Boy was that a mistake. That damn software invaded my system in a way a Trojan maker would be proud of. It had windows popping up in every account, services running, all sorts of crap going on. When you deleted or turned off something, it would reinstall from some secret place or turn it back on. There was no obvious way to get rid of it. The 'uninstall' software didn't work. I had that shit popping up all over the place on that system until I sold it, years later. God help the person who bought it.

    3. Re:I might be missing out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Same.

      And its a damn saving grace that the Logitech mice have a built-in memory for storing their profiles. This is also great because it means they are not at all dependant on the host machine to work. (Which also means the profiles work on absolutely everything, whether a Windows or Linux PC, or even a damn PS3)

      With good profiles, it also means you never need to setup sensitivity in-game. Hit "Default" and its been correctly setup. Which has the further benefit of not introducing the lag / skipping associated with using the non-default sensitivity setting in almost every engine.

      Its a trivial thing, but oh so convenient.

    4. Re:I might be missing out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always done this but it can't always be avoided either.
      My scanner has a 550MB driver. My harddrive is a 32GB SSD. That's a lot of change for one device.

      The Windows driver database sadly didn't have an alternative.

    5. Re:I might be missing out... by plover · · Score: 3, Interesting

      HP printer drivers drove me so far over the edge that I swore never to buy another one of their damned products, ever, ever again. They may have the greatest printers/plotters/scanners/laptops in the world, and I'll never know because I wouldn't consider one. So when I heard they came out with the chipped cartridges that thwarted ink and toner refilling, I just got to laugh at all those poor suckers. Meg Whitman isn't the only disaster causing the failure of a once mighty engineering company.

      When I shop for devices now, I look at the company and their track record with devices and drivers before buying. I currently own a Brother printer, with plain old plastic ink tanks, and a straightforward TCP socket based control program. Brother has never forgot their embedded machine roots and remains good at making their stuff have very tiny footprints, and no weird DRM crap. Unless they screw that up, they've got me as a customer for life.

      --
      John
    6. Re:I might be missing out... by egranlund · · Score: 2

      I just stick with my late 90s/early 00's vintage LaserJet.

      Driver is included with Windows :)

  19. Their keyboards too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their keyboards require this shit as well if you want them to do anything beyond what's stamped on the keys. Sad, sad stuff. I bought it for the Cherry MX blues so at least I still have a nice click but sheesh...

  20. Take it back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Vote with your wallet. Take it back to the store because it's non-functional.

    1. Re:Take it back. by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

      Why did you post this Anonymous? This is the one and only sensible comment I've seen here.

      Man - if I had mod-points, I'd give you ten.

  21. more memory space was required by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    what gamer buying a 80 to 100$+ mouse with 42 buttons on the fucker is going to have any issue with memory space (or storage space, which is what they meant, but apparently are next to clueless)

    my freaking work laptop has 8gigs and a TB hard disk ... sure it can handle some fucking macro's (not that I am paying 80$ for a mouse, I hate paying 5 for a overstock OEM Logitech from the computer store)

  22. easy answer by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    because customers rarely care about this sort of thing and generally just click "yes."

    if youre a religious economist youll grant the invisible hand time to offer an alternative market of "unlocked" mice, much like cellphones. they will probably still be tracked by your operating system (microsoft or apple, possibly ubuntu these days under crazy shuttleworth) but youll get to use them as you wish on any OS of your choice or against the original constructs of the walled garden it seems this peripheral maker is trying to grow.

    theyll be called developer mice, or IDE mice, or some other wretched name implying only the nerdiest would ever want such a thing. youll pay a premium for it, it wont be supported by the game you want to play when its registered during startup and the OS will probably require hefty drivers or partially functioning ones for it to work.

    the bottom line is there is very little money in peripherals. there is a fucking boat-load of cash in services because as we evolve through the 21st century our technology has increasingly grown to coddle us as though we were children. give up your freedom and the corporation will relieve the burden on your weary mind of having to think about computers or networks or any of that nonsense youve been heralding about the latest iDevice but loathe to discuss on a deeply technical level greater than a few buzzwords picked up at the bus stop billboard.

    and nerds geeks and slashdotters will grumble as dogs will bark. we will adapt as we always have technology to suit our needs. windows keys will be co-opted into our operating systems as a pivotal extension of our will through tools like AwesomeWM, to never again be considered anything more than a simple stroke or clack on the way to greatness. ACPI will kneel to our demands as our resources are governed by our inherent lust for knowledge and achievement. and this "device" that so rudely begged a pittance of our precious bandwidth in the service of its master will its back have been broken, its mighty spirit crushed under the inexorable weight of our technological expertise as we have so pulverized most any attempt by a salesman with a greasegun to convince us otherwise that the PC is not personal. It will kneel, as VRRP, DVD, Blu-Ray, SCSI RAID, wireless cards, and a sea of countless E and I prefixed devices have in the service of their true master, the Nerd.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:easy answer by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      and nerds geeks and slashdotters will grumble as dogs will bark. we will adapt as we always have technology to suit our needs. windows keys will be co-opted into our operating systems as a pivotal extension of our will through tools like AwesomeWM, to never again be considered anything more than a simple stroke or clack on the way to greatness. ACPI will kneel to our demands as our resources are governed by our inherent lust for knowledge and achievement. and this "device" that so rudely begged a pittance of our precious bandwidth in the service of its master will its back have been broken, its mighty spirit crushed under the inexorable weight of our technological expertise as we have so pulverized most any attempt by a salesman with a greasegun to convince us otherwise that the PC is not personal. It will kneel, as VRRP, DVD, Blu-Ray, SCSI RAID, wireless cards, and a sea of countless E and I prefixed devices have in the service of their true master, the Nerd.

      How long have you been saving that speech? I feel ready to charge across the battle field ala Brave Heart now.

  23. It's the same for the Roku an dTiVo by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    If you get the Roku player, you also have to register it online even if you don't intend to use any online streaming. And the TivO works the same way: it needs to call the mothership for subscription/program guide data in order to keep functioning viably.

    1. Re:It's the same for the Roku an dTiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roku is completely useless without an internet connection.

  24. No, nothing sinister here, just convenience by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Harmony remotes worked that way when Logitech bought them (they were a separate company, Logitech decided they'd like to own it). It has been that way for a long time.

    The reason is for device code updates. As new devices come out the stuff can be added, including by users. Much of their support is something a user has submitted, which is also why sometimes it won't work 100% right. Also some models can have a TV guide on them, but it requires regular updates for that to work (it can only store like 2 weeks of data).

    I see no big issue. It isn't like there's some evil conspiracy here to break you remote. Once programmed, you can never hook it up again if you like. Mine hasn't seen their site for like 2 years.

    It does the job well, and there was no reason to redevelop the whole backend once they bought the company.

    1. Re:No, nothing sinister here, just convenience by humanrev · · Score: 1

      I didn't know the history of the Harmony line, so I always appreciate having my ignorance corrected.

      Having said that, I am aware of how Logitech's database of codes is continually updated for newer models and devices (as I said in my post). But this shouldn't mean that the user needs a mandatory account with Logitech for the database to be used by a native application. There's no technical reason that I can see for not having the extra functionality OPTIONAL, rather than required.

      I'm also not really suggesting some conspiracy issue here either. I just have a healthy distrust over tying myself into online services when they shouldn't be necessary to obtain basic functionality. There have been too many cases (such as the one in the article) where said services aren't available when the user actually needs them the most. It's the same reason I don't buy games with Steam and prefer DRM-free stuff like GOG.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    2. Re:No, nothing sinister here, just convenience by plover · · Score: 2

      Something else to consider is that they built up the IR database at considerable expense, and so they treat it like Intellectual Property. They don't want to send out the full copy of every device's codes, because they don't want a dump of it ending up in LIRC or on remotecentral.com. A custom client helps keep their full database out of our spying hands. Registered users allow them to make sure that nobody's downloading their entire database.

      As a customer, it still makes me feel somewhat screwed over, kind of like we all did when the CDDB was hijacked by Gracenote and closed off from all but the authorized clients. I'm less annoyed because I never had full free access to the database, though, and have always known that any contributions I made to Harmony's servers were privately for their use. I'd be happy to jump ship to a FreeDB Open Sourced equivalent version of Harmony, but no such comprehensive database exists outside of Logitech's servers (or at least never really has as far as I know.)

      --
      John
    3. Re:No, nothing sinister here, just convenience by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      It also doesn't help that half of the codes out there in the wild are just raw timing codes that don't even identify the protocol, much less the bit patterns. And then the LIRC code library (which is a little better about pulling out some of the bit patterns, though not necessarily identifying the specific protocol) is primarily based around actual remotes and their manufacturer part numbers, not the receiving devices or their code sets.

      It also isn't and can't be as easy as getting hash codes for a CD when you insert it. To get good timing information when reading an IR signal, you really need something based on a microcontroller, whether a USB or a standalone device.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    4. Re:No, nothing sinister here, just convenience by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The reason is for device code updates.

      Exactly what part of code updates requires an account on my part? Post the updates and let people download them. I don't need an account to update my OS, why should I need one to update my remote?

      I see no big issue.

      You will when Logitech stops supporting the device.

      It isn't like there's some evil conspiracy here to break you remote.

      How do you know? I don't see any other way to interpret a network dependency for a device that doesn't actually need to access the network. It's a deliberately brittle design.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  25. Piracy by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    It's to stop people burning an unauthorised copy onto a blank mouse.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for stopping people from creating a mouse using a 3D printer and then using someone else's firmware. Razr is just looking ahead by a couple of years..

  26. So fix the problem by tlambert · · Score: 0

    Drop a Beagle USB bus analyzer between the mouse and the host, try changing all the settings you posibly can, and use the recorded results to write a libusb client application that can set all of the settings. Problem solved.

    I hate that people complaint about eminently solvable software engineering problems simply because they don't want to be the ones to solve them.

    1. Re:So fix the problem by humanrev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really think I want to go to that effort? Just because it's technically possible with a lot of work, doesn't mean it should be necessary in the first place. Your criticism is exactly the same reason why people avoid Linux like the plague - not everyone wants to have to be a fucking geek to get things done. And it shouldn't be necessary for them to do so. It's a fucking consumer product.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    2. Re:So fix the problem by humanrev · · Score: 2

      I apologise for the roughness/profanity in my previous post. But I just want you to understand - your post basically turns the onus on the customer rather than the company to provide what is missing (i.e. the ability to program the remote without requiring access to Logitech). It's belittling because it defuses any complains anyone can have with, well, anything.

      It's the same damn problem I see time and time again in the Linux community - does such-and-such open source program lack functionality already existent in a Windows program? Don't complain, learn programming and improve the code yourself! It's open source! No, I think not. I'd rather go back to Windows where I don't have to expend the extra time for no real benefit apart from being able to say "I run Linux". And then people like yourself get angry because they can't understand why people don't want to expend their valuable spare time in performing such a task compared to, say, having sex or playing games.

      Your comment doesn't help because it makes the user appear like he's complaining about something that could be made just a bit better. As if they shouldn't be complaining at all, regardless of whether it's PRACTICAL for the user to have to make the changes themselves. Maybe you've been a geek for too long. I'm trying to avoid losing touch with how regular folks work myself.

      --
      Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
    3. Re:So fix the problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      And what about the friggin' large database of IR codes that actually make the whole Harmony thing useful?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:So fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a 'regular' user, and after reading all the comments here, may I say something? Has the tech world gone cloud insane?!! Really, WTF? It's a freaking mouse! Why do people buy into this crap? You're all paying crazy amounts of money for a what is a basic hardware input device. Sounds like you'll all one day need a Cray just to handle the needs of a mouse/keyboard. I'd express my symèpathies to you, but I have no sympathy for people who volunteerto live in a kind of 'mouse-hell', ots of luck living there guys. I have a basic $15.00 Logitech keyboard/mouse, and it just works like it is supposed to. The more something gets needlessly complicated the more that can/will go wrong. (posting AC since I have experience with some vindictive /. 'ers)

    5. Re:So fix the problem by plover · · Score: 1

      There are "mice" and there are "mice". You might be surprised at how physically painful a badly performing mouse can be after a long day of using one. If a mouse doesn't provide accurate enough input, you subconsciously tighten your grip and adjust the pointer by a few pixels. Repeat this throughout the day, and your hand and wrist will have fatigue and pain. Repeat this for a month or two, and you will have a Repetitive Strain Injury.

      Now, where are these mice on the spectrum? Crappy <$10 bargain bin mice are generally to blame. A $20 name brand mouse generally has good enough resolution to avoid these problems for daily work, at least in my experience.

      Now, if I look beyond my own selfish needs and extrapolate my experience to the gaming world, I can see that my $40 mouse similarly has not nearly fine enough resolution and control for the twitch gamer. It becomes obvious that our needs are different. I don't have to center the arrow precisely on the X to close a window, I just have to get the mouse over the button surface and click. Gamers, on the other hand, need to pick out the enemy's eye for the headshot, or track a tiny space ship across a blinking field of stars, or whatever it is they do, and they have to click the button within the right window of milliseconds. So where the $40 mouse control is perfectly adequate for me, it delivers a similarly low quality experience to the gamers.

      --
      John
  27. That's how they do it on some of their mice by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a Logitech G500 and the config is stored in the mouse firmware itself. If you hook it up to a new system, all your settings and buttons are correct, even with no driver. You have to associate it with a system (which wipes the config in the firmware) to program it, but once programmed it is self contained. Their G700 works the same way.

    I haven't encountered a Logitech cloud mouse, but I can't imagine it is mandatory to use that. The G500 and G700 are both current products, as is the M570 I use on my laptop and none of them need to be net connected. If you install the drivers and let them auto-update, they will connect to check periodicly, but they don't have to, and the mouse functions without problem with no drivers as just a HID class device.

  28. Why? by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

    To obtain the GPS coordinates of cats on the area?

  29. Answwer: to find the best price for cheese? by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait a sec... you meant a computer mouse... Never mind.

  30. That is retarded by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily the idea of having a remote profile. That could be nice in some situations, but that it has to download it every time.

    One of the things I like about my G500 is that it stores the profile on the mouse itself. You have to have Logitech's driver installed to change the profile (and the mouse has to be associated with that computer) but you can then take the programmed mouse, hook it in to another computer, and it'll retain all its settings.

    Very nice way of doing things IMO because it means the mouse is always consistent, even if you are booted off a boot disc or installing a new OS and so on.

  31. It's All About Blurring the Lines by guttentag · · Score: 1
    So the grad students running the experiment with electrodes implanted in the mice brains can have their results automatically appear on facebook.

    FutureDoc just harvested a crop of Marijuana on FarmVille!
    62 people like this
    FutureDoc's mouse found the cheese!
    PETA likes this

  32. Re:Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    500 - Internal server error.
    There is a problem with the resource you are looking for, and it cannot be displayed.

    I hope you're happy. You slashdotted an entirely unrlated, innocent website.

  33. Congratulations On You New Baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you like to register online:

    ( ) Now

    ( ) Kindergarten

    ( ) When getting drivers license

    1. Re:Congratulations On You New Baby... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Would you like to register online:

      ( ) Now

      ( ) Kindergarten

      ( ) When getting drivers license

      You may be attempting to make a joke, but in the US you are strongly encouraged to get a Social Security Number at birth. Some hospitals will do it automagically for you.

      You wouldn't want your little monster to run around unregistered, would you, citizen?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Congratulations On You New Baby... by cpghost · · Score: 1

      You may be attempting to make a joke, but in the US you are strongly encouraged to get a Social Security Number at birth.

      What's wrong with SSNs? Many people outside the US would love the ability to register one of those, and even pay for them. Why? Because without the mark of the Beast, you're excluded from using many US-based services, be they private or public.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  34. Companies are trying to do an end run... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    ... around our right to own things. First it came in the form of DRM for games and whatnot and now other companies want to remove the publics right to own anything and license/monitor/datamine everything. The whole "online requirement" is all about customer datamining. The same thing Steam has been doing, it provides valve exact customer data.

  35. Not the first device to need Internet access... by mlts · · Score: 1

    I have a TV remote that, before it could be programmed, required one to create an account and spill the beans about everything about themselves in order to be able to use a single button. Want to reprogram something? Plug it in, install the software and re-log in.

    Problem was solved by a VM, USB passthrough, a proxy, and fake info, however I'm not surprised that more things are going this route -- customer profiles and info is big cash to sell.

  36. Let me guess by lightknight · · Score: 2

    Let me guess their response: "Our executives are retarded. They learned in their freshman business class that getting customers to register their e-mail addresses increased their chances of of buying new products from the same company. They were unaware that forcing customers to do this for basic functionality is the equivalent of eating your entree with your foot, while playing host to the Royal family of England. They are simply incapable of understanding the level of faux pas they have committed, coming up with the two-year old's excuse of 'if it's so bad, why are other people doing it,' and, in light of the bonuses they will no doubt receive shortly before customers permanently turn away from this company, they won't care. Again, we apologize for what passes as an education in this country, and promise, after the glorious revolution, to never speak of it again."

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  37. of course by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    Of course it needs internet access! How else do you think it will keep its anti-virus software current?

    --
    -Dave
  38. Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Internet? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense!

  39. Re:Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Intern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funniest post of the month!

  40. Obligatory reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does God need with a starship?

  41. Synapse Driver Bricked my OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This driver is seriously dangerous. I'm sitting here right now performing data recovery on an HDD that got bricked while rebooting from installing a Synapse 2.0 update.

  42. IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even light bulbs will have their own IP addresses one day.

  43. They're doing it wrong. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

    Very wrong. My mouse stores up to 5 profiles in its whopping 128k of internal memory. Totally independent of the OS (assuming the OS supports a standard USB mouse) once it's configured. No tube required.

  44. Random data by blagfast · · Score: 1

    They are collecting mouse movements for their RNG and make a lot of $$ in the process.

  45. Mice shouldn't even have individual drivers by Animats · · Score: 1

    USB mice are standardized self-configuring devices. The handshake when an HID device plugs in tells the host what the device can do. There's no reason that an HID device needs a custom driver.

  46. just dont implement ipv6 by someones · · Score: 1

    it will save you from having your mouse accessible from the internet, as NAT on ipv4 will "protect" you.

    What would you want more: every 2 months a whiny post about running out of addressspace (lol), or a mouse that runs all the malware outta there?

  47. Your venue chose the answer; options are obvious by tlambert · · Score: 0

    Your venue chose the answer; the options are obvious.

    I apologise for the roughness/profanity in my previous post. But I just want you to understand - your post basically turns the onus on the customer rather than the company to provide what is missing (i.e. the ability to program the remote without requiring access to Logitech). It's belittling because it defuses any complains anyone can have with, well, anything.

    It's not so much "customer" as "consumer", given your point of view. The choices are pretty simple:

    1) Don't buy the product (customer level choice)
    2) Return the product (customer level choice)

    After this, you quit being a customer and start being a consumer, and your options change:

    3) Petition the company to provide additional software (consumer level option)
    4) Accept the terms and conditions, and sign in, giving them you information (consumer level choice)
    5) Lie as best you can while still getting the login working (educated consumer level choice)

    And finally the engineering options:

    6) Hack the application to avoid the login (engineering level choice - leading to an arms race)
    7) Reverse engineer and publish the information (engineering level choice - the nuclear option)

    Of these, choices 4 & 5 are the ones which most resemble your "I'd rather go back to Windows" option.

    Members of the Open Source community, or more technically, the engineering community -- which is to say, Slashdot, where this commentary was published -- are most likely to fall into category 6 & 7. The place the story on which the slashdot commentary is based are most likely to fall into categories 1-5.

    Your complaint about being told about option 7 in a posting on slashdot isn't really a valid complaint. It'd possibly be valid if I had posted my comment on the Ars Technica site, although it also being a technical site, it's probably more aimed at preventing customer purchase/advocating customer boycott of the product - categories 1 & 2.

    Ask the question on Slashdot, get a slashdot answer.

    And to be crystal clear: I've done this level of reverse engineering before, commercially, for pay, and I was not talking about option 6, I was talking about option 7: writing a from scratch native windows driver and control application for the thing using raw USB packet information decodes.

    Viewed strictly as an engineering problem, this is solvable with the hardware in hand and about $10,000 worth of my effort, which I figure is about two weeks worth of work total. Add another $5,000 if you also want a Linux driver and command line control program (getting it accepted into the Linux tree is your problem, I won't deal with that political mess), and another $10,000 for a Mac OS X driver and System Settings item.

    This is not an offer to do the work for that price, I personally prefer people exercise options 1 & 2, and let Razer use their in-house talent and the source code they already have to solve the problem, or lose sales to punish them for not documenting their hardware interfaces, and for not putting in the effort to separate the online synchronization from the settings in a local replica data store. And if they can't hire software engineers to solve that problem, I'm perfectly happy letting them go down the same drain as the Diamond Viper video cards, which also failed to separate the data (mode line PAL input values) from the code (INT 10 BIOS implementation) because they had hardware engineers doing a software engineers job.

  48. masta masta! by flyerbri · · Score: 0

    Ok. Slashdot, let's keep this simple so people can understand:

    Question: What makes you alive?

    Self awareness? You could say scripted programs inside a game are self aware, they defend themselves by ducking and covering.
    Procreation? You could say games like Spore introduce the concept of procreation. So that is not a unique function to humans.
    Feelings? You could say a game character elicits Fear, emotion, and anger. Take a look at the game Tron.
    Productivity? DO you consider sitting in a cube farm looking at a screen all day long... productive?

    hmmmm;....

    Here's my point... When slaves were brought over from Africa, they were owned, correct? Was there any registration for owners of slaves? Negatory....They just went and 'farmed em' (much like Chinese farmers do with gold in video games), and brought them over to the States.Horses were branded. Same thing goes on for most diamonds (many are stamped), same thing holds true for Playstation 3s, same thing goes on for smart phones...

    Now. Let's consider what you've classified as life...

    Isn't it amazing how we overlook what is and is not slavery, based on our naive perception of what is deemed, by our logic and consciousness.. to be alive...

    Especially when Einstein made it so perfectly clear that everything is energy.

    So let's flip this around. Why would a SLAVE WANT to be branded?

    a) To have a master held responsible for it's abuse
    b) To create a union of other like thinking entities to communicate with to guarantee fair and equal rights.
    c) To create community and share.
    d) to explore that which is life in all it's facets...

    So let me ask you this. If a mouse, as in the rodent, evolved into a robotic form, then evolved into a more useful form that's connected - LIKE you are - to computers...

    Do you even consider the implications of a plan that reinforces community?

    Cricket bugs, evolve to cricket phones to be connected...

    Ford trucks evolve to .. well we have all seen the movie Transformers... They evolve to actors and still let people drive em..

    You see, humans are incredibly naive and also amazing at the same time. We walk blindly not realizing our own creative minds are creating and spawning infinite realities with our ideas. When much of the electronic and robotic world is.. just waiting for us all to .. intellectually.. understand the beauty of our creation....

    Why would the mouse want you to register? To meet others like him and to correspond about the state of it's.. owner :-)

  49. Pretty damn obvious if you ask me by jimicus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a secret that a lot of people on /. seem to be unaware of:

    Marketing - the process of getting people to say "I'm interesting in buying something from you" - is hard.

    It's not a particularly exact science at the best of times - sure, you can run two different ads and see which one gets the best response, but nobody's yet figured out why it might get the best response and been able to turn that into a formula. Get it wrong, and you can actually turn prospective customers against you.

    That being said, there are a few people you can target who are far more likely to buy from you.

    One of the easiest markets to sell to is people who have already bought something from you once. Problem is, a manufacturer might know which distributors and even which resellers are stocking their product but they probably only have a vague idea which customers are buying it. On the face of it, using a driver that connects to the Internet (and requires compulsory registration) is a great way for a manufacturer to solve this problem and develop very tightly targeted marketing campaigns.

    (This, by the way, is also why you're encouraged to "register" your warranty even though in many countries consumer protection law makes this totally unnecessary)

    Of course, as I said if you get it wrong you can turn prospective customers against you. Which is precisely what's happening here.

    1. Re:Pretty damn obvious if you ask me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pissing off your customers turns them against you? Imagine that.

  50. Does it State anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it stated anywhere on the packaging or the sale description if bought online that it requires an online connection to work? Like other always on software do? I know its hardware but to use the advanced features it requires that you register the software and have that always online.

  51. Re:Your venue chose the answer; options are obviou by humanrev · · Score: 1

    Well I wasn't aware of this issue before I purchased it, and it's not a big enough deal to go through the effort to return it (particularly since it was bought online). I mean, it's just something that I see as a negative with a product that overall is fine for my purposes. But aren't I allowed to vent just a little bit?

    FWIW - I'm part of the engineering community (FPGA and embedded systems developer), but I don't want to have to hack or reverse something just to get what I want, even if I can. As for the type of posters on Slashdot - well, my signature I hope explains how I feel about the quality of posts here (sometimes anyway).

    --
    Most people on Slashdot are fucking idiots.
  52. Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To check its cheeseMail?

    1. Re:Mouse by flyerbri · · Score: 0

      lol!

  53. Re:Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Intern by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

    Honestly, that is the first /.ing I've seen in a while. If that single post killed their servers, they have bigger problems. Or don't anticipate having more than 50 people surfing their website at the same time.

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  54. The Y axis doesn't come free, Buddy! by techsimian · · Score: 1

    You do realize that it creates TWICE the data! Next you'll want no cords. I'm done with you technophilliacs.

    Sent from my Naga

  55. Logitech MX518 by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    *presses the + and - buttons on his Logitech MX518 gaming mouse from like six years ago, notes that they work without any drivers whatsoever, in Linux, no less*

    *thinks Razer just wants analytics data and is willing to annoy its users to get it*

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  56. Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Internet? by alexo · · Score: 1
  57. duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else is the mouse going to order cheese?

  58. Support will cost them more than flash memory by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    Just put some flash memory on the mouse. Supporting people who can't use their hardware because your "cloud" is down will cost you far more than a little memory.

    Before the only reason I had to avoid Razr was the price. Now it's price and stupidity.

  59. Isn't there a kid's book about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you give a Mouse an Internet....

    it's going to want a Web Browser.

    If you give the Mouse a Web Browser...

    soon it's discovers porn.

    If your Mouse discovers porn...

    he's going to want a tiny box of tissues.

    If you need a tiny box of tissues...

    you're going to need to leave the toilet seat up so he can flush them when he's done.

    If you leave the toilet seat up....

    your Mouse is going to fall in the toilet.

    If your mouse falls in the toilet...

    where are you going to take a dump?

  60. Re: Roku is completely useless by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to reflash a Roku and put a new useful/useable OS on it?

  61. Not only mice... by BillX · · Score: 1

    A few days ago I bought a 2TB Western Digital hard drive, which uses the newer 'Advanced' (4KB) sector format and an emulation layer (in controller firmware) to present normal 512-byte sectors to the host. To avoid a massive performance hit, the drive has to be partitioned using WD's special sector-alignment software - an 80MByte (Windows-only) download with mandatory account registration and validated email address.

    What massively fancy, complex thing does this 80MB worth of software do? Move all the partitions forward by 1 sector. Yes, literally! (For legacy reasons, most disk utilities partition a HD with a 63-sector offset; the alignment utility moves it to 64 so that all disk structures will align on 4KB boundaries.)

    (Why not just ship the drive with a default 4k-aligned partition? Where's the money in that?)

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    1. Re:Not only mice... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      All current Linux partitioning tools (fdisk, cfdisk, parted etc.) will behave correctly on these Advanced Format drives as long as you align your partitions to MiB instead of cylinders. You may lose a few KiB of "empty space" between partitions, but does it really matter on a 2+ TB drive?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Not only mice... by BillX · · Score: 1

      The average buyer (my parents, etc.) is expected to have a Linux livecd and working knowledge of fdisk handy?

      Yes, we nerds have clever workarounds (If I did not value my time, I could build the partition by hand in a hexeditor - I've actually had to do this for embedded systems in my day job), but just like the mouse in TFA, a somewhat onerous requirement for the average user to have to register online to use a commodity product they already paid for.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    3. Re:Not only mice... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I get your point, but Windows 7 and above handles Advanced Format drives natively. It's only Windows XP and back that have issues with them, and it's likely that an OS that old will be running on old hardware as well, negating the performance impact.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  62. Re:Why Would a Mouse Need To Connect To the Intern by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 1

    I hope you're happy. You slashdotted an entirely unrlated, innocent website.

    Schadenfreude, is the best kind joy. And I honestly didn't expect there to be that many people around on slashdot anymore. Also thecheeseshed came up as one of the first hits on a Google search for online cheese, so I didn't expect them to run their website off of Windows server on a pogoplug.

    --
    If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame