Slashdot Mirror


Sandy Island, the Undiscovered Country

Big Hairy Ian writes "A South Pacific island, shown on marine charts and world maps as well as on Google Earth and Google Maps, does not exist, Australian scientists say. The supposedly sizeable strip of land, named Sandy Island on Google maps, was positioned midway between Australia and French-governed New Caledonia. But when scientists from the University of Sydney went to the area, they found only the blue ocean of the Coral Sea."

182 comments

  1. Kate... by Drophet · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have to go back!

    1. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      During low tide. Time to blame global warming!

    2. Re:Kate... by vivtho · · Score: 3, Funny

      FTFA The sea level was 1400+ metres below the sea level ... that would be a hell of a tide

    3. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Woosh. It was a reference to Lost, particularly how the characters got stuck on a island which couldn't be found and had a mechanism which made it move around the globe.

    4. Re:Kate... by jhoegl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thanks jerk. I hadnt seen any part of Lost yet and I totally thought about being bored and suicidal enough at some point that I would want to watch it one day.

    5. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it has been off the air for two and a half years, you can hardly complain about spoilers now. You know Vader is Luke's father, yes?

    6. Re:Kate... by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's too late. The joy of Lost was the promise of a satisfactory conclusion to a coherent story arc. Now we know that there isn't one.

    7. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No!

      That's not true!

      That's impossible!

    8. Re:Kate... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Believe me. He just saved you the horrors of the final episode, where you say, at the end of it, "WTF! I suffered through the fifth and sixth seasons and this is what you hand me as a tie-it-all-together episode?"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't seen any part of Lost yet either, that's why I had no idea that it was a reference to Lost and thus did not spoil anything for me.

    10. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first thought as well, that someone would say that there had been an island there and that global warming and sea level rise had wiped it out. How are they not gloaming onto this like flies on fly paper?

    11. Re:Kate... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      No worries! He didn't actually spoil anything because they don't really go back. :-)

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    12. Re:Kate... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Because even the highest sea level rise estimates that could be attributed to global warming so far cannot account for a sea level change of over 1400 meters.

    13. Re:Kate... by pushing-robot · · Score: 1
      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    14. Re:Kate... by EvolutionInAction · · Score: 1

      Because we have more brains than a mayfly.
      1.4 km deep. Yeah, that ain't sea level change.

    15. Re:Kate... by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That it ended wasn't enough of a satisfactory conclusion?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    16. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too late. The joy of Lost was the promise of a satisfactory conclusion to a coherent story arc. Now we know that there isn't one.

      You expected a satisfactory conclusion? Honestly?

    17. Re:Kate... by queequeg1 · · Score: 2

      Yes, a spoiler alert was definitely justified.

      SPOILER ALERT!!!!

      that hot chick in The Crying Game is really a dude

      The white whale lives

      Jesus dies.

    18. Re:Kate... by radtea · · Score: 1

      It's too late. The joy of Lost was the promise of a satisfactory conclusion to a coherent story arc. Now we know that there isn't one.

      TV viewers are like Charlie Brown and the football: for some unfathomable reason you keep hoping that these shows with a mysterious back-story will end up with a grand revelation that is coherent and satisfactory, and despite disappointment after disappointment you always fall for the same trick again.

      I'm guessing this is in part due to younger viewers who've never seen it happen before getting mislead by the entertainment industry press, whose job it is to put bums in seats.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    19. Re:Kate... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      SPOILER ALER! Verbal Kint was Keyser Soze! Rosebud was a sled!

    20. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sixth Sense: Bruce Willis is a ghost.

      THX1138: Society is underground.

      Soylent Green: is made of dead people!

    21. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guessed there would be no satisfactory conclusion by the sixth episode of the first season and stopped watching.

    22. Re:Kate... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Here's a plot fragment:
      The characters are walking through the jungle when they encounter a (rolls dice, gets 45, looks up table) Polar Bear!

    23. Re:Kate... by slim · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I believed Damon Lindelof when he was in interviews -- during the first series, he'd say "We already know how it's going to end; there's a full story arc planned out". Then during the second (or third?) series - "We've been treading water a bit because we weren't sure we'd get the green light to see through the story we'd planned, but now we're going to".

      And that convinced me that, unlike (say) The X Files, there was a planned end in sight, and that it was conceived to be a coherent whole.

      So it was only about halfway through the final season that I realised, nah, they're just glibly explaining their way out of corners they painted themselves into.

      I don't mind admitting that I really enjoyed almost all of it, up until that realisation.

    24. Re:Kate... by witherstaff · · Score: 2

      The idea of shows filming their season cliff hangers before a renewal makes it hard for shows to function. Although with Lost building up hype, or the BSG "They have a plan" was just outright lies. TV isn't alone on dragging things out. Any Wheel of Time fan had to feel cheated when it started taking over a page to describe a dress or over 2 decades to finish a trilogy.

      On TV Fringe has somewhat closed the hanging threads.I'm glad they managed to get a 1/2 season to work on this. Eureka did the same thing with a half season closer. I recall Angel was notified they weren't being picked up so Whedon decided to go for broke on the ending. But it's far too rare.

    25. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOILER ALERT!
      Aerith dies! Sephiroth kills her!
      Squall is a sissy!
      The Earth is round!
      Brazil wins the 1970 World Cup!

    26. Re:Kate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple comments (I'm not any of the other A.C. posters in this thread)...

      Angel was picked up in comic form. So is/was Smallville I believe.

      How long is too long before you can no longer truly spoil something whether on TV or on the Internet?

    27. Re:Kate... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Well, at least with Star Wars, there's still an element of surprise left. In the next version you see, will Han shoot first? Or will he shoot second? Or won't he shoot at all?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    28. Re:Kate... by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      Verbal Kint was Verbal Kint, and there was no Keyser Soze. That was just a story Verbal made up to dazzle that cop. By keeping the cop thinking about the story he was telling him, the cop didn't have time to think about other stuff that didn't add up. By the time Verbal was done telling the story, his release came through, and it was time for him to go. As soon as Verbal stopped talking, the cop started thinking, but by the time his thinking started producing results, it was too late, because Verbal was gone. Verbal FTW!

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
  2. Good. Gooooood.... by asdf7890 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Excellent, my evil island cloaking device is functioning perfectly. They'll never know my nefarious plans until they are too late to do anything about them!

    1. Re:Good. Gooooood.... by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are John Galt and I claim my five gold dollars.

    2. Re:Good. Gooooood.... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Whose plans?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:Good. Gooooood.... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      That only works if it's a *volcano* lair.

  3. Monsters be here by slashmojo · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was actually just a really really big whale.

    1. Re:Monsters be here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cthulhus head maybe. That crew is lucky they werent Old One fodder.

    2. Re:Monsters be here by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      No. Actually, it was an enormous turtle, with a species of large, alcoholic martial-arts pandas living in elegant splendor on its back.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  4. LOST Island was there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh that's the LOST Island! Now if only we could go there and prove the show misrepresented the ending ....

  5. Lost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're holding the map upside down...

    1. Re:Lost? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs, is that you?

  6. Had to read the ad by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 2

    Sandy Island: reserve before departure

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  7. Funny! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The funny thing is Google seems to have doctored the satellite photos to put a dark blob where this fictitious island is supposed to be.

    1. Re:Funny! by EasyTarget · · Score: 3, Informative

      They seem to have a system that matches known land areas (they incorrectly have this identified as land) and remove the 'blue fog' they use in lieu of real aerial photography over most deep water. You can also see this effect any place with shoals, sandbanks, small island groups etc.

      --
      "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
    2. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The funny thing is Google seems to have doctored the satellite photos to put a dark blob where this fictitious island is supposed to be.

      I doesn't show up on my new iOS 6 Maps app ... and here I thought this missing island was Apple's fault.

    3. Re:Funny! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You mean any place they think (or want you to think) there are shoals, sand banks or small island groups. If Google doesn't correct this within a few days, I'll be surprised. As of now, there's a 15-mile long virtual island out there where ships have sailed and say there's no such thing.
      S 19 13' E 156 56'

    4. Re:Funny! by Albanach · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Google doesn't correct this within a few days, I'll be surprised.

      I'll be surprised if Google doesn't announce their street view cams have been adapted and installed on board ships. That island is out there somewhere, and I trust Google to find it.

    5. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was probably labelled "Canada" on your iOS 6 Maps app

    6. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MyGod! It's full of stars...!

    7. Re:Funny! by sjames · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is, a bunch of Apple fanatics with shovels actually removed the island rather than admit Apple was wrong.

    8. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My Times Atlas (big papery thing, pub. 1992) has a long thin ellipse-ish shape with a couple of small blobs on it in about the right place that might indicate something was once there.
      Called 'Sable' (French for 'sand') and just to the left of the 160 line, looks like it got washed away or fell over some time in the last 20 years.
      Assuming it existed - or is this the 'copyright check' glitch added? It is not a nautical chart, just a home atlas.

      Times atlas of the world, concise edition, 6th ed.
      ISBN: 0 7230 0493 5

    9. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "fell over" is an interesting conjecture. One would need to look for evidence of an underwater long run-out landslide and, maybe, a tsunami of unknown origin in the area.

    10. Re:Funny! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      I'll be surprised if Google doesn't announce their street view cams have been adapted and installed on board ships.

      That's nothing. They've already gone underwater.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    11. Re:Funny! by Sique · · Score: 1

      Try this: Google search for Sandy Island. Then Google can find it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    12. Re:Funny! by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Apple Maps had to make up its island quota in other ways.

    13. Re:Funny! by HiThere · · Score: 3, Informative

      FWIW, it's common for map makers and atlas makers to include some false streets and features. This is to enable them to prove that someone else copied from them. Perhaps this is one of those receiving publicity?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Funny! by perplexing.reader · · Score: 2

      S 19 13' E 156 56'

      Actually, Sandy Island is S 19 13' E 159 56' not E 156, maybe this is the reason why they cant find it!

    15. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to think what would happen if iOS6 Maps were to miss a continent.

    16. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is Google seems to have doctored the satellite photos
      Look can't you just give a guy a break? So there I was creating a new WoW environment during my lunch break - How was I supposed to have noticed that I was using the wrong PC?

      thanks ano nymus
      Google Inc.

    17. Re:Funny! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      +5 insightful, if I only had mod points

    18. Re:Funny! by vjoel · · Score: 1

      FWIW, it's common for map makers and atlas makers to include some false streets and features. This is to enable them to prove that someone else copied from them. Perhaps this is one of those receiving publicity?

      Like "Geek Street" in San Francisco, a spurious feature like this is known as "bunny":

      http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl/1989_608868/phony-streets-protect-copyrights-on-maps.html

      http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Mapmakers-sleight-of-hand-Cartographers-put-2889584.php

      --
      What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
    19. Re:Funny! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      S 19 13' E 156 56'

      Actually, Sandy Island is S 19 13' E 159 56' not E 156, maybe this is the reason why they cant find it!

      Actually, Sandy Island isn't there, either.

    20. Re:Funny! by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Sandy, you're drunk. Go Home.

    21. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On street maps we do. Not on nautical charts.

    22. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an awful and childish practice. People are really annoying with their copyright feelings.

    23. Re:Funny! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      MyGod! It's full of stars...!

      They misplaced Hollywood?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    24. Re:Funny! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      There are four lights!

    25. Re:Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This island is on iOS 6.0.1 maps
      http://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b597/Giggitygoebbels/image-2.jpg
      I am running iOS 6.0.1 and NOT 5.1.1.

  8. Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Putting non-existent features onto published maps to provide proof of future copyright infringement is a well-known practice, after all...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA

      A spokesman from the service told Australian newspapers that while some map makers intentionally include phantom streets to prevent copyright infringements, that was was not usually the case with nautical charts because it would reduce confidence in them.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I get lost all the time reading maps. Because of all those false entries.

    3. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That are normally dead-end streets in the middle of nowhere that are not likely to cause any issues other than raised eyebrows, and someone thinking "oh, a piece of road to no-where gone". Putting a complete island on a map where the sea is supposedly 1400m deep, that's a totally different thing. Such an island could be used as orientation point: a single island in the vast ocean is great for that. Not finding an island where it's expected, can give serious problems.

    4. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting non-existent features onto published maps to provide proof of future copyright infringement is a well-known practice, after all...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_entry

      You make a very interesting point, but someone should have told Alan Dershowitz that several years ago. He plagiarized a fairly-well debunked hoax of a book supposedly about how the pure Israel was against the Palestinians, but was found innocent by Harvard university. Never mind the fact that he copied word-for-word several glaring mistakes. Not that it matters anyway, he being a Zionist Jew and a Harvard professor and all. I mean seriously, what other reason would Harvard have to completely drop the ball on this one?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dershowitz%E2%80%93Finkelstein_affair

      http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/02/11/the-case-against-alan-dershowitz/

    5. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're called paper towns.

    6. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Maps isn't a nautical chart <__<.

    7. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Yes but when I encounter a "fictitious street" on a map - I assume its a shitty map, not that they were protecting their copyright.
      I then get a new map that looks up to date, or at least competently made.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    8. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Indefinite,+Ephemera · · Score: 2

      Phantom islands aren't really anything new in themselves, but they usuallly date from before satellite imagery: a ship would spot what looked like an island in the distance, nobody on board would bother to go and confirm the existence of terra firma, the island would be named and reported to cartographers later on, and it would keep turning up on charts until someone tried and failed to find it. Some of the better stories that grew up around these islands are in this book: http://www.librarything.com/work/20956/

    9. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Very good, reply to the RTFA comment without RTFA.

      The island appeared on their nautical charts, which is the original reason they went to see.

    10. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by radtea · · Score: 1

      RTFAMC: the nautical charts the ship's crew was using were correct. The /. summary is misleading and wrong (boy, that's a surprise!)

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    11. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He/she right, you wrong:

      "We wanted to check it out because the navigation charts on board the ship showed a water depth of 1,400m in that area - very deep," Dr Seton, from the University of Sydney, told the AFP news agency after the 25-day voyage.

      Zero for comprehension.

    12. Re:Copyright Trap, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not usually the case with nautical charts because it would reduce confidence in them.

      Actually, not usually the case with nautical charts because then the Hydrographer responsible for producing the chart has legal liability under international maritime law for any and all shipping accidents that may consequently occur. Hydrographic Offices in all countries tend to take this shit very seriously.

  9. Send Captain Cook by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    Alexander Dalrymple insists.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  10. Pumice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumice_raft

    1. Re:Pumice? by stavrica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pumice seems most plausible.

      We obtained worldwide elevation data from NOAA, for our BattleCell land conquest game. (a super-evolved version of Risk) Game coordinates for Sandy Island are: -1911,15956

      Sure enough, the NOAA data shows an elevation of 1 meter, for the entire Sandy Point island.

      Possibly, the island was a dynamically generated object, based on the original NOAA elevation data. What else, besides pumice could generate such readings?

    2. Re:Pumice? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that the Dharma Initiave did their experiments on a pumice raft? Nonsense.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    3. Re:Pumice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure enough, the NOAA data shows an elevation of 1 meter, for the entire Sandy Point island.

      I wonder what that does to the data on sea level rise. Scientists are currently investigating why satellite readings are higher (double!) compared to tide gauges - see the GRASP mission from JPL.

    4. Re:Pumice? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Interesting, such islands.

      But I can hardly imagine them to form in 1600m deep water.

    5. Re:Pumice? by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it was a garbage patch, like this one:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  11. Some folks will believe anything... by Third+Position · · Score: 5, Funny

    But when scientists from the University of Sydney went to the area, they found only the blue ocean of the Coral Sea.

    April Fools!

    --
    American Third Position
    Finally, a real choice!
    1. Re:Some folks will believe anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it already April in Australia??

  12. ship? by calmond · · Score: 2

    I have no idea of the scale of this island, but I find it strange that it has the basic contours of a ship. Is it possible a ship was originally pictured and misidentified?

    1. Re:ship? by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

      Not unless the ship is 12 miles long.

    2. Re:ship? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Look at the scale. That would be one rather large vessel.

      I think the earth got Photoshopped.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ~15-20km long ship? It's possible, but then I'd be even more interested.

    4. Re:ship? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Or someone mixed up imagery from different scales.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:ship? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Not a ship. My experimental, secret nuclear submarine carrier :-)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    6. Re:ship? by thereitis · · Score: 1
      It does sort of look photoshopped. Rasterized looking dark spot with a smooth area around it that looks drawn in.

      Of course I'm not saying this *is* photoshopped, but try and find somewhere else on the map with similar properties.

    7. Re:ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many submarines can it carry? And why would you need to carry submarines? Is it a car?

    8. Re:ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALIENS!!! It's it the ALIENS, I tells ya'. We caught them coming up from their secret undersea base. We need to aim all the nukes in the world on that spot and kill them before they kill us.

      (Makes as much sense and anything else these days. :-)

    9. Re:ship? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Or someone read "12m" to mean "12 miles" rather than "12 meters". Errors of such magnitude have been made occasionally. Of course, they typically get exposed pretty quickly, everyone laughs, a correction is made, and life goes on. Except when it doesn't, because some person or piece of automatic navigation equipment believes the erroneous unit.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    10. Re:ship? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It is photoshopped, well, of a sort. Apparently "satellite" view in Google Maps has black anywhere that isn't photographed, which includes most of the oceans. However, areas that are known to be ocean get photoshopped as blue on the map. So, since this spot isn't marked as ocean the blue goes away, but it isn't actually photographed, so it just shows up as black.

      They don't actually use photoshop, but you get the idea...

    11. Re:ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the explanation!

  13. floating islands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ther is an entire island country that is moved by the ocean when tidal waves hit it. in the las t big tsunami to hit the asian coast line there this very place feared to have been whipped out. But, as had happened in the past, the entire island country and the mountain base in the ocean floor that supports it (I'm venturing the guess --with sediment- moved 2500 miles.

  14. That's exactly how I felt by joeflies · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... The last time I visited Alderaan

    1. Re:That's exactly how I felt by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly how I felt the last time I went to El Paso.

    2. Re:That's exactly how I felt by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Me too. Everyone takes that same wrong turn at Albuquerque.

    3. Re:That's exactly how I felt by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Sooo...

      "It felt as if perhaps one person, if any, cried out in terror and was suddenly silenced."

  15. It doesn't seem to be news... by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given it doesn't appear on the nautical charts of the HO responsible for the area, I would suggest that it was already proven not to exist.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    1. Re:It doesn't seem to be news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Never trust a ho to give you good directions.

    2. Re:It doesn't seem to be news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never trust a ho to give you good directions.

      ...but good head? Maybe. On the other hand, rakes give terrible head and impeccable sense of direction.

  16. Bikini bottom by cyberspittle · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Good show. Good times.

  17. Google Satellite View is interesting by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    So there is a non-existing island on the map, happens.

    What is stranger is that on Google maps' satellite view at that exact location there is a black area, which looks like as if someone has gone over it with an eraser, wiping out a part of the image. Roughly the size of the land mass indicated on the normal map.

    Wonder why they did that.

    1. Re:Google Satellite View is interesting by alexhs · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is stranger is that on Google maps' satellite view at that exact location there is a black area

      For lands, Google Maps is displaying satellite/aerial imagery. For seas/oceans, they're displaying a seabed topology map. The black is just the color of the ocean as seen by satellites, showing through the sea/land mask.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    2. Re:Google Satellite View is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet Google maps shows "Get Deals & Reviews for Hotels near Sandy Island",

    3. Re:Google Satellite View is interesting by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      So there is a non-existing island on the map, happens.

      Much?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Google Satellite View is interesting by fjolnir · · Score: 1

      For lands, Google Maps is displaying satellite/aerial imagery. For seas/oceans, they're displaying a seabed topology map. The black is just the color of the ocean as seen by satellites, showing through the sea/land mask.

      But the topology around it is shaped like the island is there.

  18. An idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I propose we call the island "Amercia" and put Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich on it. That's the "New Amercia" Mitt was talking about. I'm sure there's plenty others we can put on the new island.

  19. That's where .... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Mitt Romney had his off-shore bank account!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  20. R'lyeh by plopez · · Score: 5, Funny

    ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:R'lyeh by Grayhand · · Score: 2

      ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

      A translation for all heretic non believers. R'lyeh only rises when the stars are right. All other times Cthulhu lays dreaming on the bottom of the ocean. I have a feeling it may rise on December 21st, fingers crossed.

    2. Re:R'lyeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hey there Cthulhu, I’ve been studying your gospel
        The Necronomicon, it gives me nightmares something awful
        Where I see
        The death of all reality
        It fills me with glee"

      -Eben Brooks

    3. Re:R'lyeh by dkf · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling [R'lyeh] may rise on December 21st, tentacles crossed.

      FTFY...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  21. For Sale: Sandy Island by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    Current legislation have no problem charging millions for Imaginary Property

  22. Serious Safty Error? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this is on navigational maps, it could be a serious safty issue - not in avoiding it, but if for example a ship in distress navigated to it verses a actual existing piece of land...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Serious Safty Error? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not on the navigation maps used by ships. that was one of the main reasons the scientisst and seaman on board actually raised it. basically the navigator plotted a course, one of the scientists on board commented they would take longer to get to where they where going due to Sandy Island in the way. Navigator looked at his map (the navigation maps) and went "what island?"

    2. Re:Serious Safty Error? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source? Because that's not what several news accounts say.

    3. Re:Serious Safty Error? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you are using google maps for navigation you have lost the plot.

    4. Re:Serious Safty Error? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Especially if you are stranded on this island. I mean ... you'd cease to exist!

      It's like one of those cafeterias that everyone is talking about, but no one has seen.

  23. Dolphin lure by Jaza · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just a marketing stunt by the area's resident Dolphin community. They want to lure tourists to this patch of the sea, so they can do some backflips in return for loose change and hearty gifts of plankton.

    1. Re:Dolphin lure by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Dolphons are toothed cetaceans and thus, do not consume plankton.

      It's as if the phrase "so long, and thanks for all the fish" was never penned.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:Dolphin lure by Spykk · · Score: 2

      How do you think the dolphins paid all the whales to pose as the island?

    3. Re:Dolphin lure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think the dolphins paid all the whales to pose as the island?

      With clams.

    4. Re:Dolphin lure by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Dolphons are toothed cetaceans and thus, do not consume plankton.

      It's as if the phrase "so long, and thanks for all the fish" was never penned.

      You're thinking of Dolphins.

      Dolphons are elementary sound particles invented by Mattel.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  24. WILSOOOOOOOON!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wiilllllsooooooooon!!!

  25. It was never added to OpenStreetMap by ribuck · · Score: 1

    Another reason to prefer OpenStreetMap. There's no pressure for contributors to add fake map features in the name of copyright enforcement.

    1. Re:It was never added to OpenStreetMap by hobbes+vs+boyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh please. There are plenty of good reasons to prefer OSM over Google Maps and other non-free maps and I am an active contributor myself. But using this case as an argument? No. I've seen plenty of phantom cities added to OSM, either by mistake or intentionally. My favorite was a road shaped like the Batman symbol somewhere in the mountains of Washington. In addition, OSM does import a whole bunch of data (from government sources etc.) and thus it's quite possible that they could replicate someone else's mistakes.

  26. Pumice? by slashmojo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps it was just a floating pumice island.. http://blogs.smh.com.au/science/archives/2006/12/post_3.html

  27. Dr. Pronoun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll never know my nefarious plans until they are too late to do anything about them!

    [They] will never know your nefarious plans until your nefarious plans are too late to do anything about [them]!

    You must work for the government.

    Wait! Maybe asdf7890's plan was to waste time of ACs everywhere with ambiguous pronouns all along. That means I fell right into his trap. Damn you Doctor Pronoun! You evil magnificent bastard!

  28. Obvious by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Funny

    The truth should be obvious to any Doctor Who fan. The "it's only ocean" that the scientists saw was obviously a perception filter. The island is being used as a staging area for a Dalek assault.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:Obvious by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      They've been planning this for years. Wheelchair access is a Dalek conspiracy.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Obvious by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      The truth should be obvious to any Doctor Who fan. The "it's only ocean" that the scientists saw was obviously a perception filter.

      Any Doctor Who fan should have read h2g2, where the perception filter is much more funnily known as "Somebody Else's Problem" field.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    3. Re:Obvious by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Funny H2G2 created by Douglas Adams a former script writer & editor for Dr Who :) the conspiracy plot thickens

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    4. Re:Obvious by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      True, but the perception filter was first mentioned after DNA died.

      The Tardis wiki page has some interesting things to say about this, including that Life, the Universe and Everything was at first supposed to be a Doctor Who serial. The plot becomes wibbly-wobbly.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  29. Saddam's Stash? by IRGlover · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this island is where Saddam stashed him WMDs - it appears to be just as real.

  30. By Jingo! by timbit · · Score: 2

    It's Leshp!

    1. Re:By Jingo! by Opyros · · Score: 1

      Which was based on a real-life instance of an island which emerged from the sea, then disappeared again (through erosion) before the squabble over it had been settled.

  31. Sandy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this would be about one of Trump's casinos on the Jersey shore.

    1. Re:Sandy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you're telling me it's not the latest Intel processor?

  32. Apple maps is cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't show an island there, but the 3d mode shows a massive water spout shooting up...

  33. Obligatory by alexo · · Score: 3, Informative

    map

  34. Anybody notice the submitter? by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 1

    =~Script~=

    Big Hairy Ian: WILSON!!!!

    --
    I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
  35. Nuke tests by faustoc4 · · Score: 0

    It's the result of french nuclears tests in the Pacific

    1. Re:Nuke tests by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      It's the result of french nuclears tests in the Pacific

      TFA says the sea is 1400 m deep at the place the island should be. If that figure is correct, it rules out island suppression caused by nuclear tests IMO. I am not sure one could have wiped out that amount of land with a nuclear nuke without causing a tsunami on australian beaches.

  36. Should have used Apple Maps by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    No sign of the fake island on Apple Maps. In general Apple Maps have more recent satellite coverage for lots of areas, which makes sense as they bought it more recently...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Should have used Apple Maps by Xest · · Score: 1

      It probably is on Apple maps, just in the middle of Lake Ontario or something.

  37. Less of an "Undiscovered Country"... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

    ... and more of a "Discovered Uncountry", wouldn't you say?

  38. Documentation by jcfandino · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "The world is a constantly changing place, the Google spokesman told AFP, "and keeping on top of these changes is a never-ending endeavour'.'

    tell me about it.

  39. That was fast by Gerinych · · Score: 0

    Oh wow, it already has a Wikipedia article

  40. Capsized by akeeneye · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking that, due to overpopulation, it simply capsized and sunk. Like Guam might. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=bs23CjIWMgA#t=76s

    --
    The man who dies rich dies disgraced. -- Andrew Carnegie
  41. The Friends of Carlotta have struck!! by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

    See this documentary for more details. :-P

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  42. It does exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who says the island isn't there? Just a couple of scientists who don't want us to find Jurassic Park!

  43. Audiovisual Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article, like a rather unfortunate number of articles, starts streaming multiple videos as soon as the page loads. With multiple, conflicting audio streams layering over each other. Not worth the trouble of trying to read over the noise.

  44. Maybe a UFO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could have been there hidden in plain site.

  45. QUESTION! by alexmipego · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I get that an error or bad pixel matching might have misdetected the island but... who named Sandy Island?

    1. Re:QUESTION! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Probably the person who first put it on the map - which is exactly the next thing these researchers are going to try to figure out, according to TFA.

    2. Re:QUESTION! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It should be noted that "Sandy Island" is a fairly common place name. Try feeding it to google maps; it'll find lots of them. The closest one to where I live (a western suburb of Boston, Massachusetts) is in Hopkinton, just west of I-495's exit 21, about in the middle of Lake Maspenock. From the aerial photo, it looks like a small local park with a swimming beach (probably artificial). It's reachable via Hayward St, which looks to be connected to the "island" by a short causeway. Maybe I should drive there and get a few photos.

      Google also returns a web site for Sandy Island, South Carolina, a small island amidst the marshland inland from the state's barrier islands. It has a small African-American community, and is reachable only by boat.

      There are hundreds of other Sandy Islands scattered around the world. You might have problems finding them all, though, since they're usually so named in the local language. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  46. Island vanished? by cyclohazard · · Score: 1

    "The world is a constantly changing place", the Google spokesman told AFP, "and keeping on top of these changes is a never-ending endeavour."

    In these circumstances that's a rather unfortunate sentence unless the spokesman is suggesting that the island just vanished.

  47. It was a ship. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something large... an aircraft carrier, surfacing group of nuclear subs doing exercises, a mothership hovering just above the water while scouts took area samples.... ...and someone didn't want it's location revealed. So, they sent a couple of guys with dark glasses and very serious looks to the satellite image processing center and then made sure that was the only copy released.

    It's so simple!

  48. False item planted for copyright fingerprint? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2

    Didn't encyclopedia and dictionary authors in days gone by add spurious entries to ensure they could back up any copyright violation claims?
    Google maps. Hmm...

    Or perhaps it's the Island of San Seriffe...

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  49. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regrettably, the laser sharks destroyed it some years back. The locals called it Sealand 2.

  50. Re: It's on maps over 100 years old by qubezz · · Score: 2

    There's a pretty clever blog that has found even older references to the island right where it shouldn't be:

  51. Re:Nonexistent entities on maps... by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    That's because you are expecting a city, where in reality there is just a field where they grow Jessicas.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  52. Life of Pi by dbIII · · Score: 1

    All these posts and nobody else seems to have read "Life of Pi" and got to the bit about the floating carnivorous island full of Meercats.

    1. Re:Life of Pi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And nobody mentioned Atlantis (because it's either fictitious, or in the wrong part of the world). Hey, maybe Atlantis started out as a map error like Sandy Island?

  53. Lost island? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Atlantis has finally been found, then they "Lost" it again?

  54. GM link to the place by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to Google Maps for Sandy Island.

  55. ccTLD by PPH · · Score: 1

    For Undiscovered Country is .uc

    Its available.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  56. A hole? by HighPerformanceCoder · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else think this was just a hole in the data? Or has the island been expunged already on GMaps.

  57. Google's Tax Haven disappears? by trevc · · Score: 0

    That was the Nation Google claimed to be paying all of their corporate taxes too.....could be bad for them.