Slashdot Mirror


John McAfee Explains How He Milked Information From Belize's Elite

paysonwelch points out John McAfee's latest blog post, which "details the complex spy network that he used to tap information from the highest echelons of the Belizean government. He might consider a new career as a movie producer — this blog post is enthralling. Here is an excerpt: 'I purchased 75 cheap laptop computers and, with trusted help, intalled invisible keystroke logging software on all of them — the kind that calls home (to me) and disgorges the text files. I began giving these away as presents to select people — government employees, police officers, Cabinet Minister's assistants, girlfriends of powerful men, boyfriends of powerful women.'"

170 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nut Job

    1. Re:Two words: by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is one of the places where the story rings false. Given any 30 people involved in full-time spying on dozens of other people, it is _inevitable_ that at least one of them would notify the police of this operation. Not only because the activity is illegal, but because very few people can keep quiet about what their wage paying job is for an extended period, and they would inevitably inform lovers, family, or friends. That then multiplies the number of people who might inform on the operation in a plea bargain.

      For anyone who's been involved in handling security of any kind, such as a shared administrative password or simply keeping a corporate merger private before the public announcement, it's simply not feasible: it _will_ leak out with many participants.

    2. Re:Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hope someone he screwed over delivers him some "permanent" justice

      That's how he got found out, the boyfriend of a powerful man ratted McAfee out because it pissed him off that only the straight people got a laptop.

    3. Re:Two words: by xyourfacekillerx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Absolutely. This guy's mind is mangled beyond repair from all the MDPV and other cathinones he's been doing for years. He's worse off than a meth addict on a binge, because what he's done to his brain is likely permanent.

    4. Re:Two words: by Freddybear · · Score: 1

      Megalomania. Is that in the DSM? Ah, wiki says no, it's a type of narcissistic personality disorder.

    5. Re:Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is why you don't do certain drugs at all. Not even once.

    6. Re:Two words: by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      This is one of the places where the story rings false. Given any 30 people involved in full-time spying on dozens of other people, it is _inevitable_ that at least one of them would notify the police of this operation. Not only because the activity is illegal, but because very few people can keep quiet about what their wage paying job is for an extended period, and they would inevitably inform lovers, family, or friends. That then multiplies the number of people who might inform on the operation in a plea bargain.

      For anyone who's been involved in handling security of any kind, such as a shared administrative password or simply keeping a corporate merger private before the public announcement, it's simply not feasible: it _will_ leak out with many participants.

      ===
      You would have to know that there was spy software on the laptop. You do trust new toys, don't you.
      What was the TROY horse for?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    7. Re:Two words: by edibobb · · Score: 2

      He might not be nuts. He might be laughing his head off at all the people he suckered into believing this story.

      Or he could be a nut job.

    8. Re:Two words: by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      This fascination with McAfee rivals the "Diana is still dead" nonsense (including the annual repeats).

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    9. Re:Two words: by beckett · · Score: 1

      Given any 30 people involved in full-time spying on dozens of other people, it is _inevitable_ that at least one of them would notify the police of this operation.

      correct. in TFA, one of the people he trusts betrays him.

    10. Re:Two words: by boethius · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It's very, very obvious what a nut McAfee is.

    11. Re:Two words: by detritus. · · Score: 2

      "CIA agent."

    12. Re:Two words: by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      This is obviously being promoted by the Norton Antivirus people.

      McAfee is going to be as valuable a trademark as AIDS the diet drug.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:Two words: by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Or, he could be building a body of evidence to get himself remitted in court on the basis of being 'mentally insane'. Given his predicament, this is a very smart thing to do. Just have a look at Christopher Skase. My friend was one of the QCs responsible for getting him charged in court, the stories he relates about Skase pretending to be mentally insane in the hearing and then everyone listening to him bark orders to his lawyers out the back are quite interesting.

    14. Re:Two words: by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Bravo, his plan has worked. Now he can safely plead insanity in the courts.

  2. If he wasn't in trouble before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He certainly is now.

    If I were in charge, I would send him to Belize as a show of good faith.

    1. Re:If he wasn't in trouble before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

    2. Re:If he wasn't in trouble before by Goaway · · Score: 2

      He's in trouble, all right, but the trouble is mostly inside his head.

    3. Re:If he wasn't in trouble before by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Beware of geeks bearing gifts.

      Errr, why?

      Given that this is a site of "News for Nerds", any geek presenting a computing device to someone reading this should be expecting that before the wrapping is in the bin, it'll be being dissected, and before the coffee has finished being made, there will be a Linux distro being downloaded for the device, so that it's capabilities could be thoroughly investigated.

      What the sheeple think .... someone else's problem.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Slashbloat by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The amount of coverage McAfee has received on Slashdot and other "news" sources rivals the bloat his software adds to a system. Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Slashbloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He sold McAfee the software company over 20 years ago. Just saying.

    2. Re:Slashbloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just wish Peter Norton was this awesome. Fucking superspy.

    3. Re:Slashbloat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait until he blogs about bribing his way out of Belize with BitCoin.

    4. Re:Slashbloat by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Just wait until he blogs about bribing his way out of Belize with BitCoin.

      Or if some of those computer gifts were Raspberry Pi's. :)

    5. Re:Slashbloat by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean the Peter Norton who hasn't been caught yet?

    6. Re:Slashbloat by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      We need some kind of heuristics, or some other method of inoculating us against bad antivirus jokes.

      How about some good innocuous ... oh, never mind.

    7. Re:Slashbloat by poity · · Score: 2

      And also, "milking" implies coaxing/persuading stuff out of people. This is just data theft (or "fraudulently gaining access to other's private information", if you're anal about that)

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    8. Re:Slashbloat by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      McAfee serves the role as the Lindsay Lohan of the Geek World. Poor folks love to read about rich folks looking like dumb-asses by finding unfeasible trouble to get themselves into.

      Most of us hear have not become billionaires with our work in the tech industry. It's sometimes refreshing to hear that, despite them having billions, they still do dorky things.

      Or something like that . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    9. Re:Slashbloat by sentientbeing · · Score: 1, Funny

      The case has already been booked. Theyre expecting a 30 daily trial..

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    10. Re:Slashbloat by stox · · Score: 2

      No one knows when you are a good spy!

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    11. Re:Slashbloat by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I call BS. My proof? James Bond.

      The best kind of spy is the one who can keep spying despite the fact that absolutely everyone knows exactly who he is, and knows of his penchant for martinis, loose women and gambling.

    12. Re:Slashbloat by edibobb · · Score: 1

      Doesn't everybody use substances?

    13. Re:Slashbloat by gentryx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps Peter Northon is more for you.

      --
      Computer simulation made easy -- LibGeoDecomp
    14. Re:Slashbloat by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      He presents evidence that Iran (Hezbollah) is building up a supply of ricin gas in the US, preparatory for a large-scale attack.

      That's newsworthy, assuming he isn't completely making everything up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Slashbloat by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Kind of like Carl Sagan or Feynman?

    16. Re:Slashbloat by mikael · · Score: 1

      I only use duck tape and WD40 - just about holding it together and slowly creaking along.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    17. Re:Slashbloat by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

      I mod you up 1000000000 for that.

    18. Re:Slashbloat by OneAhead · · Score: 2

      Ricin is not a gas. It's a protein, which makes it difficult to get into gaseous phase without decomposing (at least on a larger scale than a mass spectrometer).

      Also, that's quite the assumption you're making there.

    19. Re:Slashbloat by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Ricin is not a gas. It's a protein, which makes it difficult to get into gaseous phase without decomposing (at least on a larger scale than a mass spectrometer).

      True, but it can be powdered small enough to inhale.

      Also, that's quite the assumption you're making there.

      Which assumption am I making exactly? I was basically trying to summarize the article as I understood it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re:Slashbloat by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Ricin is not a gas. (...)

      True, but it can be powdered small enough to inhale.

      He presents evidence that Iran (Hezbollah) is building up a supply of ricin gas in the US,

      Which assumption am I making exactly? I was basically trying to summarize the article as I understood it.

      That's newsworthy, assuming he isn't completely making everything up.

      It's OK, we're all getting old. I'll get off your lawn now.

    21. Re:Slashbloat by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    22. Re:Slashbloat by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Fucking superspy.

      I think you meant the other Peter.

    23. Re:Slashbloat by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      No its called espionage albeit of the a private venture nature - Presumably the Belizean government will be wanting him extradited ASAP.

    24. Re:Slashbloat by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      The amount of coverage McAfee has received on Slashdot and other "news" sources rivals the bloat his software adds to a system. Nothing to see here, move along.

      But... but... It's always fun to watch a train wreck in progress!

    25. Re:Slashbloat by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      totally OT, but cool noththeless -- staged train wrecks used to be a popular tourist draw

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  4. Not possible. by iceworks · · Score: 2

    I have to call BS, I live along the border of Belize and nowhere, and I mean NOWHERE can you find electronics that cheap. Electronics are gold in these countries.

    1. Re:Not possible. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have to call BS, I live along the border of Belize and nowhere, and I mean NOWHERE can you find electronics that cheap. Electronics are gold in these countries.

      Custom forms are bullshitted every day.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Not possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I generally live in Belize 1/4 of the year now, and its certainly possible to get Chinese generic laptops very cheap here. Much cheaper than in America.

    3. Re:Not possible. by CdBee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm inclined to agree, also because I suspect the kind of mindset who would actually DO this isn't the sort of person who would ever admit it - not least because he's forever besmirched his chance of ever doing it again. I suspect McAfee's suffering the after effects of various experimental chemicals, or delusions brought on by withdrawal symptoms

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:Not possible. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> Chinese generic laptops very cheap here

      Plus they come preloaded with spyware.

    5. Re:Not possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I countercall BS. He never mentioned a price in his article.

    6. Re:Not possible. by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      One less thing to install, then. Just reconfigure it andgift it away to powerful people.

    7. Re:Not possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only there were a way to detect such things -- you know, some sort of program that can locate and maybe even remove the offending code. Someone who could produce and sell such a thing would surely do well...

    8. Re:Not possible. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Remember that 'cheap' for him could be a macbook air......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Not possible. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      In "The Hacker Crackdown" (a great book, for those who haven't read it), the author interviewed and profiled various hackers. He found every single one of them was eager to brag and tell what they'd done. The hacker mindset seems to be that you want to brag about it.

      Understandably I guess, you feel really awesome when you've done something that (you think) few people can do.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:Not possible. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      >> Chinese generic laptops very cheap here

      Plus they come preloaded with spyware.

      McAfee anti-virus?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    11. Re:Not possible. by dwye · · Score: 1

      Yep. And FBI profilers who deal with serial killers will tell you the same thing. They pretty much can't shut up.

      Serial killers presumably are operating under the burden of being (1) insane or sociopathic (2) already caught, so silence won't help, anymore.

  5. Possible alternative explanation by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    He might consider a new career as a movie producer — this blog post is fictional.

    FTFH?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Possible alternative explanation by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I also started to wonder if the stuff is fictional.

  6. Trusting anti-virus producers by maestroX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After the rumours that av producers were also producing virii, at least this confirms McAfee antivirus cannot be trusted.
    No doubt J McAfee will explain his actions as totally justified and honourable.

    1. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Viruses. Also, 'virii' has an extra 'i' (if 'virus' was pluralized like that).

    2. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Virii" was originally a joke, a hyper-Latinized ersatz plural meant to be used with tongue firmly in cheek.

      Then some Asperger's types took it seriously and actually started defending it as a legitimate form.

    3. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and 'viruses' is the correct form in English. Not 'virii'.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plural_form_of_words_ending_in_-us

    4. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      John McAfee hasn't owned, worked, or been involved with the company McAfee since he sold all his shares in 1994.

    5. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Unless it's for the Wii

    6. Re:Trusting anti-virus producers by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      Unless it's for the Wii

      I see, i own one Wus. Together we have two Wii.

  7. Hmm by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, let me get this straight: John McAfee is the founding-father of a large anti-virus company, he's worked with Zonelabs on their firewall software and so on, and then in the end he ends up doing exactly the same thing he's tried to protect people from -- namely, installing keyloggers and spying on everything they type on their computers?

    1. Re:Hmm by CdBee · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was Ok though - he supplied McAfee AV on each of the laptops

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >So, let me get this straight.
      "Gaygirlie", you don't seem to have the best suited nick for the job.

      Anyway, the AV business is about making people pay to "secure windows". When did this not sound like a scam?

    3. Re:Hmm by Gaygirlie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >So, let me get this straight.
      "Gaygirlie", you don't seem to have the best suited nick for the job.

      Touché, my dear, touché.

    4. Re:Hmm by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Well, he does have expertise. Nice to see him stand up to a government that's mistreating him. Hopefully he gives some free laptops out in the US next.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:Hmm by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Don't you see? It's all a part of the plan. You will need a new license of McAfee anti-virus software to be able to protect yourself from these new pieces of surveillance malware. Norton will not do.

    6. Re:Hmm by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      I sure hope he purchased 75 licenses for those keyloggers. Otherwise the SPA will be on him like a Bond woman on a corrupt Belizian official.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    7. Re:Hmm by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      I would say that's probably pretty accurate. People just unpackage the system, set it up, turn it on and use it. Furthermore, I wouldn't trust the OEM Windows re-installers either since they tend to just install all that OEM shit right back with the OS. That basically makes it a royal pain in the ass to reinstall Windows in trusted form on a modern computer without buying yet another license to the OS in the form of the official retail version.

    8. Re:Hmm by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing about 99.9 percent of people don't reinstall the OS after acquiring a computer.

      And yet that doesn't change the validity of the GP comment one whit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Hmm by satuon · · Score: 1

      That's why I always install Linux with the encrypted home folder option checked.

    10. Re:Hmm by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but I was taking into account the fact that if these people aren't even sophisticated enough to reinstall a copy of Windows, then they sure as hell won't know how anything about Linux.

    11. Re:Hmm by timeOday · · Score: 1

      You're looking for consistency in whether someone's actions might benefit you, and not finding it. Instead see if there is not consistency in the person's set of abilities, and willingness to take actions in their own self interest.

    12. Re:Hmm by poity · · Score: 1

      Knowledge isn't ethics; knowledge is power. I doubt he founded his AV company as a personal moral crusade, but did it like everybody else to make money in a niche in which he thought he could excel.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    13. Re:Hmm by hawk · · Score: 2

      More seriously, is there any reason to believe that he wouldn't do the same thing with the software he sells--the ultimate trojan on your machine . . .

      hawk

    14. Re:Hmm by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      "Anyway, are there really people out there dumb enough to accept a computer from ANY source and use it without completely reformatting it and reinstalling their own OS?"

      Yes. Hell, people have done studies where they left USB keys lying in the parking lots of major corporations. People happily took 'em inside, plugged them in and starting copying confidential data to them.

    15. Re:Hmm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's not even the biggest thing.

      In the article he accused Iran/Hezbollah of planning a massive ricin gas attack in the US. He also accused the prime minister of Belize of ordering the murder of a prisoner (the actual murder did happen, that's been independently verified).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:Hmm by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Because he has nothing to do with McAfee the company anymore. He says he doesn't even like their software.....

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight: John McAfee is the founding-father of a large anti-virus company, he's worked with Zonelabs on their firewall software and so on, and then in the end he ends up doing exactly the same thing he's tried to protect people from -- namely, installing keyloggers and spying on everything they type on their computers?

      FIRST OFF. it's widely belived that this is completely made up, and Copy pasted from wiki leaks espionage,and McAfee is a paranoid fruit cake from all the drugs he's done.

      but SECOND, Mcafee has not working with computer security for 20 years,

      and THIRD. so what? if anything that would be logical, as it's in a area where he is knowledgeable.

    18. Re:Hmm by Nyder · · Score: 1

      >So, let me get this straight.
      "Gaygirlie", ...

      I want a straight Gay Girl also...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    19. Re:Hmm by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      It's been my personal experience that "criminals" and "protectors" all come from, and live in, the same cloudy moral grey area.

    20. Re:Hmm by hawk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no reason to suspect he left back doors, given this other behavior . . .

      hawk

    21. Re:Hmm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      He left the company 18 years ago. How much of his code do you really think they still use?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Please can we stop it with the John McAfee stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This first one was interesting but seriously; does Slashdot need to 're-blog' everything he says and does?

  9. If John could be so kind as to by nimbius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    explain how he sidestepped a murder charge from a soverign nation and has since remained unaccountable as to the history of his seventeen year old female companion and alleged methamphetamine production operation, I believe slashdot can finally put "the amazing adventures of John McAfee" back on the bookshelf.

    There is nothing about this entire series of unfortunate events that shouldnt warrant immediate extradition to Belize, where he can face his accusors in a court of law and presumably vindicate himself. Otherwise this is an indignant millionaires whitewash campaign to secure his innocence through astroturf and puffery. Unfortunately Mr McAfee wasnt found accused of these crimes in say, the Soviet Union or China, both countries willing to mail a dead millionaire back to his respective embassy for nothing short of a Benny-Hill approach to their criminal justice system.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:If John could be so kind as to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I wouldnt particularly trust any western court to vindicate me on minor issues I think a man who has royally pissed of the powers that be in a 2nd world country is wise to stay as far away from "justice" as he possibly can. The only difference between multinational corporate bully boys and sovereign nations is that one thinks its above the law and lets everyone know it, while the other knows its above the law and would rather people thought otherwise.

      This is why we have a man who had consentual sex with two women, and then was told specifically by a cheif prosecutor he had no case to answer and was free to leave the country holed up in a london embassy being painted as a fugitive rapist on the run from the "law"

    2. Re:If John could be so kind as to by stenvar · · Score: 1

      explain how he sidestepped a murder charge from a soverign nation

      I don't believe he was ever charged with murder. They wanted him for questioning, which is not extraditable by itself.

    3. Re:If John could be so kind as to by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      explain how he sidestepped a murder charge from a soverign nation

      It was really easy. He was never charged with murder. That's why he hasn't been extradited either, because there isn't even a warrant for his arrest.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:If John could be so kind as to by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      They wanted him for questioning, which is not extraditable by itself.

      It is when your name is Julian Assange

      Extradition isn't a matter of common universal norms, its a matter of particular treaties between particular countries, and the extradition treaty between the US and Belize is, surprisingly enough, not the one that governed Sweden seeking the extradition of Julian Assange from the UK.

  10. McAfee is not a drug addict by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Informative

    As someone who knows many drug addicts and used to be one himself over 15 years ago: John McAfee's blog is not the writing of a drug addict. Either he is as clear from drugs as he says he is or he has someone else write the stuff for him.

    1. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know, Philip K. Dick or Hunter S. Thompson could have wrote that in their sleep. :D

      Hell, it reads almost like one of Dick's short stories.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by arth1 · · Score: 1

      As someone who knows many drug addicts and used to be one himself over 15 years ago: John McAfee's blog is not the writing of a drug addict. Either he is as clear from drugs as he says he is or he has someone else write the stuff for him.

      Yes, cause all drug users are obviously the same.
      Just because he doesn't write like Hunter S. Thompson, Jack Kerouac or Horselover Fat doesn't mean he's not on drugs.

    3. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most heavy drug users (i.e. addicts) I've known have written like complete and total crap while on drugs, I suspect that's what dnaumov means. Depending on the drug we're talking writing which is more garbled than an Irishman's speech after two bottles of whisky and plenty of beer or with substances simply an inability to write anything coherent (if you've ever chatted with someone on a massive dose of any serious hallucinogen you should know what I'm talking about, their spelling might be perfect but either order of the words or their choice of words is all wrong or each sentence seems to be completely unrelated to the next).

      If McAfee really is really hooked on stimulants/euphorics (like for example Mephedrone, one of the more common substances found in so-called "bath salts") then I'd expect his writing to be a lot less sane. Not the content, the actual writing.

    4. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Jack Kerouac, Baudelaire and Dumas also... There are tons.

    5. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Just something to think about for the future: that was a great post up until the moment you threw in the disgusting stereotype about drunk irishmen. If you'd just left out that phrase, I'd be thinking to myself "hunh, what an insightful comment" rather than "christ, look at this racist twat."

    6. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

      If he's getting it on with that many women, may I suggest condomS? Using the same one over and over might not get the results he's hoping for.

    7. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Psyborgue · · Score: 2

      I lived in Ireland for three years. By US standards, they're mostly all alcoholics (by their standards, we're prudes). After work it's customary to go to the pub and it's not looked down upon to get drunk, even to the point of throwing up. I don't even think the Irish are bothered by the stereotype. It's just their culture. Nothing racist about it.

    8. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You're just stupid, nothing more.

      I myself as well as a few people I know have/were drug addicts to the extreme and were perfectly capable of hiding it from direct relation sometimes even those that lived with us. Hell I did it for years by just being 'discrete' about it and it wasn't until I brought it up that other people found out I did drugs even though I was pretty much high the entire time I was around them for YEARS.

      Just because you are unable to function and be a drug addict doesn't mean the rest of us are as slow as you are.

      I assure you, I could be sober or stoned off my ass on various different drugs and you'd never know.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      It's just their culture. Nothing racist about it.

      Q: "Why did God create Whisky?"
      A: "To prevent the Irish from taking over the world."

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    10. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Hentes · · Score: 1

      So what, he uses spellchecking. The actual content is still complete lunacy.

    11. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by Nyder · · Score: 1

      As someone who knows many drug addicts and used to be one himself over 15 years ago: John McAfee's blog is not the writing of a drug addict. Either he is as clear from drugs as he says he is or he has someone else write the stuff for him.

      No, he's probably not a drug addict. But he seems pretty obvious he has fried his brain. Did this drub usage lead to his current situation? Seems very likely. We got paranoia, we got delusions. Using drugs doesn't make you addict.

      I remember when designer drugs started raising there head in the late 80's. I took acid and MDA all the time then. My buddy started to get some "new" designer drug, my memory says it's what got called Special K later, but I've taken a lot of drugs, so I can't say if it was. But the point is, my buddy started getting really paranoid and delusional about shit after he kept taking the stuff. We got him to stop and he finally maybe got back to normal (only to turn in to a basehead later (freebase, before crack reared it's head). But it goes to show, you don't know what you are doing to yourself with these "designer" drugs, or using weird substances to get "high".

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I can't be racist, I get drunk with my Irish friends.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by metlin · · Score: 1

      I don't know, Philip K. Dick or Hunter S. Thompson could have wrote that in their sleep. :D

      Written, not wrote. It's rather important to be grammatically correct when you're talking about... writing.

    14. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I took it as an allusion to 'Finnegan's Wake'. Famously incoherent writing. Fans can find what they want in it, like people looking at clouds.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Popeil Galactic Prophylactic: It's more than a contraceptive, it's a family heirloom!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:McAfee is not a drug addict by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Crack rolled thru most of the USA in 83-85.

      Don't even look at what they are doing today. Google 'test chems'.

      Every six months a new legal analog. All completely untested. It's only a matter of time. Crazy kids, at least acid was tested by millions of hippies. You know it's not 'safe' but it's not going to give you Parkinson's.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  11. Sounds rather self-incriminating to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or not?

    I mean spyware on other people's computers sounds pretty criminal to me.

    1. Re:Sounds rather self-incriminating to me... by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 2

      Hey, they were free gifts to those people given one. And no one forced any of them to just trust it and not manually wipe and re-install a known clean OS.

    2. Re:Sounds rather self-incriminating to me... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Self-incrimination is the next "Big Thing" in the Internet. Commit a crime, and then post a video about it on YouTube or Facebook. Some notable examples:
      The kids teasing the bus lady.
      High school football players bragging about raping an unconscious teenage girl.
      Drunk driver hit and run.
      And now the McGaffster himself.

      If this trend continues, it will make police work easier. Forget expensive DNA analysis and detective work. Just search for confessions on the Internet.

      Now, if these confessions are submittable as evidence . . . will be an interesting legal question.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Sounds rather self-incriminating to me... by Pandare · · Score: 1

      It's already covered. Generally speaking in the US, out of court, uncoerced statements are admissible at trial. Such a statement counts as what is called a "party admission," and is usable by an adverse party (in a criminal case, the prosecution).

    4. Re:Sounds rather self-incriminating to me... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Many Arabs believe Israel has a virus that kills only Arabs. They've believed that sense well before gene sequencing. Must be the same lab that made HIV.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  12. deport? by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    He probably has been in trouble for a long time...or at least running with a bad crowd.

    It will catch up to him, but I don't know if there is any reason to deport him.

    As far as his blog ("TFA") goes, it could be anything. Maybe he thinks he's been working for a gov't...maybe he thinks he's above international law...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:deport? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      John McAfee is no Chuck Barris

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  13. Murder suspect by burni2 · · Score: 1

    Even that one can think that the Belize authorities are corrupt, but a man (his neighbour) was killed and John Mcafee is/was the main suspect
    but everything that slashdot publishes are the desperados-like yet successful attempts of John Mcafee to prevent from being captured and to stand trail.

    And why does he publishes these details now, if he is innocent and this is all a conspiracy against him, he could have used these spying capabilities to bust the scam and reveal the real killers with live audio.

    When he has such proof of such a conspiracy, he should compile it into a report and release it to the public leaving away his personality issues.
    Just clear facts.

    1. Re:Murder suspect by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      he could have used these spying capabilities to bust the scam and reveal the real killers with live audio.

      Why do you so naively assume that he knows who the real killers are?

  14. Re:Please can we stop it with the John McAfee stor by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Sure, why not. At least I want to see how this crazy story continues.

  15. Poor Intel by mseeger · · Score: 1

    The brand name McAfee is getting thoroughly trashed. Now all that remains from the purchase is a bloated digital placebo software.

  16. Free Tools page more interesting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.mcafee.com/us/downloads/free-tools/index.aspx

    "McAfee is committed to your security and provides an assortment of free McAfee tools to help in your software development. Simply select a tool and download it for free."

    You may remember most of these tools as coming from Foundstone:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundstone

    "Foundstone is a practice within McAfee Professional Services that provides tactical and strategic computer security services."

    "Although Foundstone is owned by McAfee, it stays vendor neutral in order to remain impartial in its services."

  17. McAfee Has keylogers in it that phones home by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    McAfee Has keylogers in it that phones home that must be why it's so slow.

  18. no wonder by stenvar · · Score: 1

    And McAfee wonders why the Belize government is out to get him? This kind of crime easily would carry a very long prison sentence in most countries.

    1. Re:no wonder by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      and a 9mm Pill in a few others

  19. Why is nobody stating the obvious? by dills · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is clearly bullshit.

    At every turn, he attaches quantities to resources:

    75 cheap laptops
    23 women
    6 men
    8 of the women lived with him
    2 people in the Nicaraguan Hezbollah camp
    3 people in Mexico dealing with the Zetas

    The only "evidence" supporting his story are his "so easy to fake my kids could it" screenshots and audio files.

    I think the original assessment stands: This is a guy who has snorted waaaay too much MPDV, is seeing shadow men in bushes, and killed his neighbor in retaliation for his neighbor killing his dog.

    He escaped the country via a combination of his charisma, money, and the ineptitude of the Belize law enforcement.

    This is all just a retroactive attempt at explaining why the Belize government would want to frame him. Look, it's simple...why would Belize kill his neighbor to frame McAfee, when they could simply just kill McAfee instead?

    Paranoid bullshit, and so obviously so.

    1. Re:Why is nobody stating the obvious? by dcigary · · Score: 1

      How did he have time to hang out next to the pool with the 9 hot babes, do mounds of MPDV, and plot his exit from the country when he was running such a big spy network?

      And if any of this tirade is true, how did he get back into the USA....alive?

      Occam has a big razor. The guy's nuts.

      --
      ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  20. He puts super perv powder up his by Ranger · · Score: 1

    butt.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  21. Look a gift laptop in the mouth by fruitbane · · Score: 1

    So, the real lesson here is not to accept and technological gifts from a security guru. Gee, thanks!

  22. One word: paranoia! by rvw · · Score: 1

    Megalomania. Is that in the DSM? Ah, wiki says no, it's a type of narcissistic personality disorder.

    How about paranoia!

  23. There is no murder (or other) charge yet by DragonWriter · · Score: 5, Informative

    explain how he sidestepped a murder charge from a soverign nation

    He didn't. He is a person of interested wanted for questioning, not a charged criminal. If he was a charged criminal, fleeing to the US wouldn't help, as the US has an extradition treaty with Belize that provides for the extradition of criminals charged with any of a wide array of crimes, including, naturally, as #1 on the list, murder.

    There is nothing about this entire series of unfortunate events that shouldnt warrant immediate extradition to Belize

    You mean, other than the fact that Belize hasn't criminally charged him with anything, much less anything subject to the extradition treaty with the US?

    Unfortunately Mr McAfee wasnt found accused of these crimes in say, the Soviet Union or China

    Or, for that matter, anywhere else. Because he hasn't actually been charged with any crimes, anywhere.

    1. Re:There is no murder (or other) charge yet by mortonda · · Score: 1

      explain how he sidestepped a murder charge from a soverign nation

      He didn't. He is a person of interested wanted for questioning, not a charged criminal. If he was a charged criminal, fleeing to the US wouldn't help, as the US has an extradition treaty with Belize that provides for the extradition of criminals charged with any of a wide array of crimes, including, naturally, as #1 on the list, murder.

      .. and after posting this to his blog, he has a rather strong argument that he would be the victim of political persecution if sent back, so I would highly question whether we would send him back even if they did press charges.

    2. Re:There is no murder (or other) charge yet by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      .. and after posting this to his blog, he has a rather strong argument that he would be the victim of political persecution if sent back

      After posting this, there's certainly a number of additional crimes in Belize (including a variety of frauds and acts of bribery that would seem to fall squarely within the scope of the extradition treaty) for which he has provided evidence -- in the form of a public admission -- against himself. As well as, I suspect, a number of violations of US law which have extraterritorial application. And since he has accused the US government of being in league with Belize in the posts, I doubt he was won much leverage with the US authorities with the posting.

    3. Re:There is no murder (or other) charge yet by jrumney · · Score: 1

      After posting this, there's certainly a number of additional crimes in Belize (including a variety of frauds and acts of bribery that would seem to fall squarely within the scope of the extradition treaty) for which he has provided evidence -- in the form of a public admission -- against himself.

      Doesn't evidence have to be credible to be accepted in a US court? Even for extradition hearings. The only body of credible evidence I see being built up on McAfee's blog is evidence for an insanity plea in any future charges he may face.

    4. Re:There is no murder (or other) charge yet by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      yes but he has just admitted to hacking a number government officials which sort of makes that easy.

    5. Re:There is no murder (or other) charge yet by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Doesn't evidence have to be credible to be accepted in a US court?

      No, it needs to be legally admissible. Credibility is assessed by the jury or court (depending on the type of proceeding) after the evidence has been accepted. (Some assessment of probative value -- which relates to credibility -- may be made by the court in determining admissibility if there is a challenge to admissibility on some grounds, because probative value is a factor which weighs against certain bases for inadmissibility.)

  24. Precis by smugfunt · · Score: 3, Informative
    To summarise:
    After the GSU raid on McAfee's Orange Walk compound he decided to go on the offensive.
    He gave away 75 cheap laptops complete with keyloggers and backdoors to key people in the GOB. He backed these up with human spies.
    Things he claims or implies to have discovered:
    • Prime Minister Dean Barrow ordered the murder of Arthur Young, an uppity Belize City gang leader who died in police custody last year. channel 5
    • Minister John Saldivar heads an operation smuggling Lebanese Hezbollah operatives into the US. 10 per month. (One was caught in Mexico last year: channel 7)
    • Hezbollah have a base in Nicaragua where they are mass producing ricin.
    • Hezbollah are using the Zetas to smuggle the ricin into the US.
    1. Re:Precis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      • Prime Minister Dean Barrow ordered the murder of Arthur Young, an uppity Belize City gang leader who died in police custody last year. channel 5
      • Minister John Saldivar heads an operation smuggling Lebanese Hezbollah operatives into the US. 10 per month. (One was caught in Mexico last year: channel 7)
      • Hezbollah have a base in Nicaragua where they are mass producing ricin.
      • Hezbollah are using the Zetas to smuggle the ricin into the US.

      OK, this seriously reminds me of a couple of Mission Impossible episodes. Any Leonard Nimoy fanboys care to comment???

    2. Re:Precis by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Most of those are independently verifiable except for the small details (the exact person who did it, for example). We know Arthur Young was killed, and we know Hezbollah operatives are being smuggled to the US, and that Iran has ties to Mexican gangs. Naming those people will likely cause problems for them inside their own country, but nothing more.

      The biggest thing here is that Iran/Hezbollah is sneaking manufacturing ricin and bringing it into the US for an attack. If he's right, we're either going to see another terrorist attack soon (despite the heroism of the TSA), or we're going to see a massive arrest of terrorists possessing sarin. 10 people at a time is a LOT.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  25. Turning out to be interesting by BlkRb0t · · Score: 1

    Whatever it is, fictional or fact, his blog posts are turning out to be far interesting than anything else I've read in the past few months.

  26. One word. by hey! · · Score: 2

    Asshole.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  27. the story is a bit more complicated. in the 80s by decora · · Score: 2

    the rise of the 'computer virus' was not as clean cut as we remember it. there were people who actively 'played' the 'news cycle' of the day to promote the idea of huge virus attacks. McAfee was just another one of these.

    The problems come when some people start wondering --- where exactly did the viruses come from in the first place. Now there is no evidence that McAfee wrote viruses or spread malware --- but here we can see that he has no moral qualms about doing it. Hence - his entire 80s business was not built around protecting people, it was about something else (making money? technical challenge?).

    The other parts of his history are as interesting - look up the Pow Wow software, where was involved in the creation of a corporation run by Native Americans, including it in marketing materials on the website. Turns out there were no natives on the dev team nor on the management nor anywhere else. IT was likely just for a tax break or maybe just plain old racism.

    John's next feat was to become a 'spiritual adviser' and he wrote several new age books under a fake name. He would charge people huge sums of money to come be 'spiritual' with him at his retreat.

    So .... to some this latest twist might be gob smacking. To others, its just fucking John being a fucking sociopath. And the thing about sociopaths? They never change.

    1. Re:the story is a bit more complicated. in the 80s by Nyder · · Score: 1

      . And the thing about sociopaths? They never change.

      The age of jailbait doesn't seem to change either. Must be a connection.

      --
      Be seeing you...
  28. Where is the CIA in this??? by hawk · · Score: 1

    > I think a man who has royally pissed of the powers
    >that be in a 2nd world country is wise to stay as far
    >away from "justice" as he possibly can.

    Where is the CIA in all this? And the Navy?

    How did Belize fall into the Soviet sphere of influence? I thought the Monroe Doctrine was quite clear on US use of force in such matters . . .

    hawk

    1. Re:Where is the CIA in this??? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The US is currently headed by people intent on its destruction. Nothing can be depended on.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:Where is the CIA in this??? by hawk · · Score: 1

      Sure, but the second world was down to North Korea and Cuba.

      Now we've got another in the Americas?

  29. Ya pretty much by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can believe in corrupt police framing people, heck we've seen them do it across the globe. I can believe in corrupt police murdering people, again, we've seen it. But why would they murder someone, to frame someone else? That seems like a "supervillian" move, meaning needlessly complex to achieve the actual goal. Just murder the person you want killed and be done with it.

    There is just no credibility to this guy.

    Also, as a practical matter, if what he says about all this information grabbing is true, he's probably guilty of a bunch of computer crimes in Belize too. He certainly would be in the US. You can't just go and keylog people because you want to.

  30. you only hear about blabbers by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is one of the places where the story rings false. Given any 30 people involved in full-time spying on dozens of other people, it is _inevitable_ that at least one of them would notify the police of this operation. Not only because the activity is illegal

    You only hear about the cases where people blab...

    Also: people blab when it's in their perceived interests. If you live in a country where leadership is bumping off political protesters, there is much less self interest in admitting that you've been helping some rich American engage in espionage. The problem with being brutal and corrupt is that a)it makes people hate you b)it is excellent incentive to not blab about things you're doing against the government.

    There also can be plenty of blabbing, just not to anyone who is in power or those associated with them. Information doesn't flow freely - it tends to be like the ocean, with thermoclines representing class/power levels, political affiliation, religion, language, etc. Damn near everyone in a city who works as an office cleaner could know that Joe Big Bank Executive is banging his secretary after-hours, for example.

    An even better example would probably be DC. I bet there's all sorts of bullshit that everyone in political/diplomatic circles in DC knows about, but your average person off the street doesn't.

    1. Re:you only hear about blabbers by cduffy · · Score: 1

      An even better example would probably be DC. I bet there's all sorts of bullshit that everyone in political/diplomatic circles in DC knows about, but your average person off the street doesn't.

      That reminds me -- one of my former coworkers (a computational linguistics specialist) used to live next door to Bush Sr's mistress. She described her neighbor's station as something everybody knew, but which there was a tacit agreement not to discuss.

  31. I always thought... by ebcdic · · Score: 2

    ... that the people with the most interest in putting malware on computers were the very same people who sold you software to remove it. So I don't find this in the least surprising.

  32. one word by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Nut Job

    May I suggest "pervert" as an alternative?

  33. Can't wait for the movie... by raftpeople · · Score: 4, Funny

    starring Gary Buse as John McAfee

    1. Re:Can't wait for the movie... by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO, yeah Gary Busey would be great for the part, either that or Nick Nolte. What amazes me about this case more and more is that somebody in authority, either than the government of Belize, would just have him submit to a psychiatric evaluation or have him committed as a nut job. He has enough money I'm sure they could get Dr. Phil to go take a whack at it.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  34. Is it real? You never know. by mveloso · · Score: 1

    You can't discount this stuff just because you don't believe it's possible that one man and his team could have dug all this stuff up. Motivated individuals can do quite a lot, if they have lots and lots of time, money, and focus. Apparently he has all three.

    A lot of stuff here could cause problems for Belize, but really, the big problem for McAfee is he's now a bona-fide target. Before, he was just some pain in the ass. Now he's probably become a target of opportunity. Depending on how this plays in Belize, he might even be upgraded to active removal.

    It must be fun working for him...until the hammer comes down.

  35. Re:Time for a CIA Drone attack. by Omnifarious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like to extend the mandate for drone killings to people who decide that people should be killed because they're irritating.

  36. That explains Pres. daughter's bf plot by davidwr · · Score: 1

    No wonder the fictional President in 1600 Penn is so involved in his daughter's choice of boyfriends.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  37. Reminds me... by JasoninKS · · Score: 2

    This is all starting to remind me a bit of Randy Quaid. Formerly relatively sane, had a decent career and money, and now going completely nuts. Telling all kinds of stories on conspiracies and how people are out to get him. (although in this case they really do want McAfee)

    Makes me wonder (besides the obvious drugs) what flips in someones head to make them bonkers like this.

    1. Re:Reminds me... by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone's doubting that high-frequency trading happens, or that people were short-selling his stocks. What people didn't have patience for was his unshakable faith that anyone with differing opinions on these topics (even in the detail) was part of a criminal conspiracy targetting Overstock.com. I mean, he thinks that Wikipedia is in on the conspiracy because some of its contributors wanted the articles on those financial topics written differently.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  38. Re:Please can we stop it with the John McAfee stor by Nyder · · Score: 1

    This first one was interesting but seriously; does Slashdot need to 're-blog' everything he says and does?

    Since it keeps happening, I would say yes.

    Look, dude is loony, most likely from the bathsalts he shoves up his butt. This is Reality TV at it's best, by not being on TV. If you can't understand why this appeals to us, then just ignore these stories. Very fucking easy to do.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  39. Re:Time for a CIA Drone attack. by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I would like to extend the mandate for drone killings to people who decide that people should be killed because they're irritating.

    You irritate me.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  40. Invalid cert for apis.google.com by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    I get 'invalid cert' for apis.google.com when I click on www.whoismcafee.com/a-clear-and-present-danger/

    --
    AccountKiller
  41. powerful? by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Belize couldn't get a better publicity if it paid for it. It's a nation of less than half a million people. They are trying to attract US retirees as a business model. Powerful people? C'mon.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  42. Legends aren't built in a day by yusing · · Score: 1

    I'd say that, if Mr. McAfee were tired of being just another retired millionaire who few people know or care about -- and so he figured out a way to score himself a couple of books, maybe a movie, and get the whole internet busy turning him into an underdog celebrity millionaire -- even if he winds up notorious in the same way as Billy the Kid or John Dillinger or Hunter S. Thompson, who most of have heard about all of our lives -- he's going about it exactly the right way.

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  43. TREATY OF MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE - 2002 by westlake · · Score: 1

    the US has an extradition treaty with Belize

    The extradition treaty of 2000 isn't the only one in play here.

    The Treaty provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes:

    taking the testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and articles of evidence; locating or identifying persons; serving documents; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to immobilization and forfeiture of assets, restitution to the victims of crime and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the State from whom the assistance is requested.

    I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Treaty, and give its advice and consent to ratification.

    GEORGE W. BUSH

    TREATY WITH BELIZE ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS/a

  44. Re:Time for a CIA Drone attack. by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    When are you sending a drone to attack me?

  45. Re:Please, McAfee, stop posting ./ puffery by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It's the Norton Antivirus people sponsoring McAfee stories. Duh.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  46. Belize and Elite ? by tmjva · · Score: 1

    I knew the story was laughable when I read "Belize" and "Elite" in the same title.

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  47. I don't understand by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    Why did he spy on the government in the first place?

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  48. Trust by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    This is why you don't completely trust hardware. Ever.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.