Microsoft R&D Burgled: Only Apple Products Stolen
Sir Realist writes "Apparently Microsoft's R&D offices in Mountain View were broken into over the holidays: the only things stolen were Apple iPads and the theft has apparently been confirmed from a number of sources."
Doesn't that make you feel all better about paying the premium for Tide^H^H^H^HApple?
Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
They were likely the only things of value in the building.
Yesterday's news tomorrow :P
It was an R&D center for making Apple software, so there probably were no Surface tables around...
But it would be extremely funny if there were left out in the open for all to see.
This too closely fits the decades-old stereotype that MS just steals Apple's ideas as their "R&D" M.O.
Table-ized A.I.
It was information what was stolen, not the devices.
Now the thief can sell for analytics and bloggers the information what kind software Microsoft is cooking for Apple devices.
Like think about screenshots and actual apps of MS Office for iPad.... THAT IS MONEY! Not the devices but the SOFTWARE.
I seem to remember a Melissa Gates interview where she stated that her kids were not allowed Apple devices. They would be likely to have access to their father's keys, and they would have no need to steal any Microsoft devices.
When someone breaks into your R & D shop and the only thing they see of value is someone else's gear.
it's all part of the new Movie.
Hobbit, 2013
id do well to make my next mp3 player a zune?
Good people go to bed earlier.
"They're stealing our ship!"
"Bloody pirates!"
Ballmer asked R&D to make a translucent minimalist-style Apple chair.....with a parachute.
Table-ized A.I.
The thieves wanted to rob Apple, but they made the mistake of using Apple Maps to find it.
Table-ized A.I.
Microsoft still turns a hefty profit. They've got massive market share and the company is still experiencing revenue growth, though the rate of growth is declining.
http://ycharts.com/companies/MSFT/revenue_growth
Microsoft is losing market share in key markets. There are reasons why Microsoft could stumble, but they are so diversified and have so much capital that it would take a great number of massive failures for them to really go under.
I wonder how much longer Ballmer will remain CEO.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
Microsoft prototypes can't easily be sold. I see the obvious joke that the Microsoft prototypes were not of value, but in a sense, if they can't be sold, then that is true.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
Maybe it was totally random- à la Steve Jobs?
Sauer
It was surely an inside job. Maybe they thought it wouldn't be as bad for their co-workers if they only stole the Apple stuff.
My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
from: andnothingofvaluewaslost
to: andeverythingofvaluewaslost
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
microsoft continues to make money from two things
1. xbox - the only product they make people actually enjoy using
2. vendor lock ins, and enterprise sales of windows/office/sharepoint/etc... No one gets excited about their software, they just feel compelled to use it.
The XBox division has gone back and forth between profit and loss over the years.
http://www.edge-online.com/news/microsofts-xbox-division-loses-229-million/
The enterprise market really is the bread-and-butter for Microsoft. That is what really amazes me. They seem to be alienating the enterprise market in many ways currently.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
It's estimated that Xbox has not yet turned a profit, and is 3 billion in debt since inception: http://www.neowin.net/news/report-microsofts-xbox-division-has-lost-nearly-3-billion-in-10-years
It's okay, Microsoft have got lots of money; I'm sure they can afford to replace the stolen phones/pads. Besides, they'll have insurance to cover themselves.
You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
thats because the enterprise market feels they have no other options.
Large businesses generally have large programs, with large databases that would take millions and millions to switch away from, and the ever present "uncertainty" of the FUD.
they stick with windows because they've been using windows forever, and are scared to change. microsoft's marketing people are adept at FUD(Fear Uncertantiy, Doubt), and playing up already stewed fears of the non-technically competent decision makers.
I just converted some large MS SQL databases to Oracle (on Solaris) recently with 10 years of historical data. It doesn't cost millions. But I get your point that many companies do operate under the assumption that Microsoft is the only alternative.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
Microsoft is losing market share in key markets. There are reasons why Microsoft could stumble, but they are so diversified and have so much capital that it would take a great number of massive failures for them to really go under.
Microsoft is making a fuckton of money (I'm talking about profits, not just revenue), that is true. And yes, they have an iron grip on the desktop, especially in corporations, and a dominant position that is a gift that keeps and will keep on giving for years to come.
But they are not diversified. People buy Office because they have Windows. And the same reason why they buy Windows Server and Sharepoint. The myth is that if you have Windows desktops, you must use Microsoft on the back-end as well. That's good for MS, but it also means that they're not diversified, because if Windows fails, everything follows, and MS implodes.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
However revenue is not the interesting part, income is. And net income for Microsoft has been falling lately to 2010 levels. See this chart. Not that this is proofs impeding doom on Microsofts part, just that business hasn't been nice to them lately. A fate they share with many other companies in these difficult times. What is interesting is that neither Google or Apple share this kind of dip.
They have:
* Desktop
* Server
* Cloud
* Office
* SQL
* Development
* Games
* Mobile
* Hardware
* Search
* Advertising
* Music
I'd call them relatively diverse.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
I do think Microsoft is on a decline that will likely only be rectified if they change leadership.
http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
I thought Apple was Microsoft Research.
iNinjas
---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
Microsoft was conducting research into the security of their devices versus Apple's. These findings concusively show that your data is more likely to be stolen on an Apple device. Therefore, Microsoft products are more secure.
The badge access was probably run by a Windows computer.
Yes, but they are very small billions!
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
microsoft continues to make money from two things 1. Windows 2. Office
FTFY
But you do have a point about vendor lock-in.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
no one really buys windows, its kinda given(forced) to you when you buy a new computer.
Doesn't matter - it's still a sale.
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
yes and no.
it doesn't matter because MS makes money, and the product gets distributed either way.
it does matter, because this type of consumption does not predispose consumers to actually enjoyment of, or seeking out this product over competitors.
In fact the opposite. When given the choice, most people choose not to use windows. People don't actually like using it.
Only so long that can go on for.