Slashdot Mirror


BioWare Launches "Gay Planet" For the Old Republic

DavidGilbert99 writes "Labelled as an 'oddly regressive move,' developers of Star Wars: the Old Republic have decided that all gay characters will be stuck on a single planet called Makeb. The move comes with the release of the Rise of the Hutt Cartel pack and the Makeb planet will be the only place in the game where players can select 'flirtatious' dialogue options with characters of the same gender. From the article: 'BioWare executive producer Jeff Hickman apologised for same sex relationships taking so long to be added to the game, referring to the company's most famous title Mass Effect, where homosexual relationships are available by default: "First of all, I want to apologize that this is taking so long to get in the game," wrote Hickman in a blog post. "I realise that we promised SGR (same gender relationships) to you guys and that many of you believed that this would be with a companion character. Unfortunately, this will take a lot more work than we realised at the time and it (like some other pieces of content we talked about earlier in the year) has been delayed as we focused on the changes required to take the game Free-to-Play. '"

71 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Srsly? by Orleron · · Score: 5, Funny

    *Checks calendar to make sure it's not April 1st*

    1. Re:Srsly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Look elsewhere in the Star Wars universe...

      You have the desert planet, the ice planet, the forest moon, the city planet...

      Every planet has one damn definable feature. What's so absurd about it when Star Wars is nothing BUT a Planet of Hats type setting?

    2. Re:Srsly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You have the desert planet, the ice planet, the forest moon, the city planet...

      And now, finally, the FABULOUS planet.

    3. Re:Srsly? by bornagainpenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn you, warn people if you're going to send them to TVTropes!

      --
      Have a Virgin Mobile USA smartphone? Give VMRoms.com a try!
  2. Acceptable by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well that takes care of 10% of their players. Now what about the robot female planet so the remaining 90% can feel accepted by their "I was born that way" mate preferences, too?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, you're saying you want a new area on planet Eroticon 6 called Valley of the RealDolls?

    2. Re:Acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's already plenty of female robots and characters you can bang.

      Or Clang, as the case may be.

    3. Re:Acceptable by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      Which in turn depends on how they define their terms.

    4. Re:Acceptable by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's already plenty of female robots and characters you can bang.

      Or Clang, as the case may be.

      Clang? The compiler?
      Ah, I get it, to program the sex bot. I guess the geek sex bots have a built-in terminal, and the conversation begins with: "How do you want it, Emacs or vi?"

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:Acceptable by Golddess · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think that means you would not be screwed. ;)

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    6. Re:Acceptable by AlamedaStone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      5 - 12%, depending on which survey you read

      Although the AC troll brings up an interesting point. I theorize that the rate of homosexuality among the geeks n' gamers crowd is probably higher than in the general population, if only because of the outsider appeal of the subculture. In my experience, us nerds are generally less judgmental about inconsequential things like sexual orientation and focus on things that really matter, like Who Shot First, or whether SSDs have finally solved the cost/performance ratio problem. Additionally, gamers skew younger (even with us Gen Xers bumping up the numbers), and young people tend to be more tolerant of gay folk too, in their way.

      In any case, I'm growing a few throat oysters for Bioware the next time I see them walking down the street. They totally caved on their commitment to GLBT, which was a major reason I bought the game to begin with. At first it was "we'll definitely have gay stuff", and then around release they said "we'll have it in a content patch", and later they shoved queers back into the closet with "it will be a companion relationship only, so other people don't have to be grossed out by your gayness". Now they're backing away from that too? Just goes to show, a few Jesus nuts can really fuck it up for the rest of us when corporate interests are involved.

      Support indie devs! Invest in crowdsource projects! Freedom is cheaper and better made.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    7. Re:Acceptable by LordLimecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every group thinks theyre more insightful, wiser, and generally more intellectually mature than everyone else. I have no reason to believe-- especially after about 5 years on slashdot-- that this would be particularly true of the nerd subculture. If anything, it seems more clannish, because as people get progressively better in a niche area, they seem to progressively become closeminded and intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them.

      Dont agree? Look for any article discussing Apple vs PC, or MS vs Google, or religion, or politics. As a conservative I tend to regularly get called interesting things here... "less judgemental" indeed.

    8. Re:Acceptable by Omestes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or it could be because sexuality is a pretty complicated thing. While you have the majority of people who are "straight", and a minority of people who are just "gay", within both groups you have a ton of variation. How many "straight" people have had at least one homosexual encounter? Impure thoughts? How many of either group are actually "bisexual"? Where do gay people who are "closeted" and only have sex with the opposite sex fall? Where do people who can't figure it out yet fall (in high school in the early-mid 90's being gay was the big thing for some crowds, and now most of these people are happily married and straight). Pretty much every girl I know has had sexual encounters with another girl, but identify as straight. In my male acquaintances this is less common, but still it isn't terribly uncommon.

      Also where do various nontraditional gender identifications fall? You identify as a woman, but are biologically male, and still only have sex with females? Or in the case of my dad's neighbor, you were born male, had operations and hormones to become female, but still only sleep with your wife of 20 years?

      Sexuality is a thorny and hugely complicated subject. Any study will differ based on definitions, and sampling.

      most honest researchers avoid the subject since the radical gay activists savagely attack anyone who publishes studies which run counter to gay dogma.

      Who actually gives a shit how many gay people there are in the world? Why does it matter to anyone? I suppose I'm the wrong person to ponder this, since I don't actually care one bit, what people do in their bedrooms, consensually, is no business of mine. As long as people are happy, I don't care.

      I am happy that there is a "gay dogma" but not a "intolerance" dogma. Which is odd, since last I checked the intolerant crowd was much louder than the other bunch.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:Acceptable by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      Since only 1-3% of the population is homosexual, I presume you are suggesting that players of Bioware titles are faggier than the general population.

      At least post-Dragon Age that does seem to be the case. Maybe as high as 30-40%. They are the official LGBT developer. Half the devs themselves are gay.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's sadly ironic is if Jesus was around today, I truly think he'd be deeply saddened by his supposed followers' discrimination of gays. If your neighbor is gay, should you not still respect them as a fellow human?

      That's why I hate religion. The members.

    11. Re:Acceptable by AlamedaStone · · Score: 2

      Where are these crazy entitlement posts even coming from? You may not realize it, but this game was marketed towards the gay community before release - but they never put the work into the design. That's why it's so technically difficult to hack it in now. Get it? It was just a bunch of bull. That makes people mad. If this was about feature X instead of feature Gay, you wouldn't hear about entitlements or special interests.

      This is like the black thing with Obama all over again. People are afraid to face their internalized hate of some group or another, and so they rationalize this kind of oblique discrimination. Look, we're all a little xenophobic - it's cool. But work on it, okay? Because it really feels like shit to be treated this way. And feeling like shit feels like shit! Which, if you've ever felt like shit, you know.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    12. Re:Acceptable by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Called interesting things" means seeing posts indicating I (as a conservative) deserve to drown in a hurricane (post was clarified to indicate it was serious), that Im racist, bigoted, and quite possibly the greatest threat to world peace out there.

      Is this supposed to be an indicator of tolerance and non-judgementalism? Am I being "reactionary" here for not thinking that this is the bastion of objectivity and rationalism that you seem to think it is?

      Im not trying to warp facts here, Im saying what anyone who has been on slashdot, digg, or reddit for a while knows-- that Geeks like everyone else suffer from "im a genius and everyone else's values suck" syndrome.

      Now I know that's a kind of intellectual fad with conservatives right now,

      Case in point. Trying to have a discussion and you cant for one moment just hold off on the attacks? Is it really necessary to bust out the ad hominems?

  3. Go be gay over there... by Manfre · · Score: 5, Funny

    sounds like the digital version of don't ask, don't tell.

    1. Re:Go be gay over there... by ThePhilips · · Score: 4, Funny

      They should have called the planet "Hell" or "Purgatory."

      Might have attracted christian players.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    2. Re:Go be gay over there... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems more like "if this offends you, don't go there", since you neither have to ask nor be told to know what's going on there.

      If there is no need to rub the GLBT issue in people's faces, why do it? If you ask me this is the reason places like California still do not have gay marriage. You can't make people change their minds, you arrange it so that they don't have to until it's too late.

    3. Re:Go be gay over there... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would have been much easier to allow everywhere and let the individual players block incomming "flirtatious" dialogue for their own character(s). That way you could block or allow all such dialogue if you wanted, or just for your specific "female protocol droid" preference.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:Go be gay over there... by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That kind of cheapens Apartheid, doesn't it?

      Also, Old Republic is still around?

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    5. Re:Go be gay over there... by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      Oh, you have detailled knowledge of their system and it's workings and know for a fact that it would be simpler to implement your idea?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    6. Re:Go be gay over there... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is some people are offended merely by seeing same sex couples together, allowing them to stay in the same hotel room together or just thinking about it. Bioware took the cowards way out, instead of calling out the bigots for what they are.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Go be gay over there... by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize that this isn't about interactions with other players, right?

      TOR is a very story-driven game, and thus this is all about NPCs having dialogue options which include romance options. Many such NPCs already have romance options, but up to now only heterosexual ones. What's been decided there is that apparently homosexual romance can only happen on this one planet, which is part of a paid-for expansion pack.

      This isn't about other players doing unsolicited homosexual romancing. It's about the player having the ability to, if he/she so chooses, romance other characters of the same sex.

    8. Re:Go be gay over there... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      "If you dont approve of my behavior youre a bigot", is that how it is?

      Would I be a bigot for example if I disapproved of seeing someone else commit adultery?

    9. Re:Go be gay over there... by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      I wonder if it's not incompetence, laziness, or a lack of manpower, rather than cowardice. We're talking entirely new dialogue trees here, and adding the content to back it up, not just throwing one option onto each NPC.

      Imagine the blowback if they did do it that way.

      [Aggressive] Give me the databank codes or I'll nail your tongue to a wookie!
      [Diplomatic] Surely we can come to some mutually beneficial arrangement...
      [Flirtatious] Forget the databank codes. Let's talk about us...[0]

      Player selects the new third option:

      NPC: Fine. You can have my copy of the code book for twelve thousand.

      Player: *RAAAAAAAAGE*

      NB: Not a huge fan of Bioware, never have been, but I think it's not inconceivable that the vitriol here is yet another example of gamers being unreasonable and clueless.

      [0] Oh, shut up. I don't even know how flirting works in meatspace, much less how it goes in another galaxy!

    10. Re:Go be gay over there... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2

      Very true, my comment merely serves to point out that he had no right to stop it.

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    11. Re:Go be gay over there... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      I believe my post was specifically about disapproval, so perhaps simmer down a bit.

    12. Re:Go be gay over there... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "If you dont approve of my behavior youre a bigot", is that how it is?

      No, disapproving of people because they are gay makes you a bigot. Being gay is not a choice someone made, just like being black or a woman isn't.

      Would I be a bigot for example if I disapproved of seeing someone else commit adultery?

      Depends. You can disapprove of adulterous behaviour because when it is a choice and it is harming that person's partner. On the other hand there are situations where it is usually deemed acceptable by society and the law at large, such as when a couple is separated but not yet finally divorced or when both parties agree to have other sexual partners.

      The main point is that adultery is a chosen behaviour, where as homosexuality is not. Additionally, there mere fact that two people of the same sex are married does not harm anyone else.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  4. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...don't make RTFA, but where's Disney in all of this?

  5. bigotedly delicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    yellow stars, blue moons and now pink triangles!

  6. Why is there flirtatious behavior? by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought attachment was forbidden for a Jedi. It leads to jealousy, and last I heard the shadow of greed, that is.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    1. Re:Why is there flirtatious behavior? by RKThoadan · · Score: 2

      Actully, 2 out of 8 base classes, 4 out of 16 advanced classes. There were already standard Heterosexual relationships available for those who don't care so much about what the Order thinks.

    2. Re:Why is there flirtatious behavior? by BriggsBU · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the Jedi starting area there's a quest chain where you discover two Jedi in a romantic relationship and have the choice to tell the instructors about them because it is against the Jedi code.

      So.. Still was against the code in SWTOR's time frame.

    3. Re:Why is there flirtatious behavior? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      Just because a straight relationship is in there does not mean that has to be changed.

      There is already hidden gay content in KOTOR. Click here at 2:25, then tell me a regular woman would describe just a friend that way? "... she was a dear companion for many years. We would spend nights alone and gaze at the stars ..." if that does not spell out lesbian RT I do not know what else does?

    4. Re:Why is there flirtatious behavior? by sexconker · · Score: 2

      KOTOR takes place in the world where rules are not really enforced all that strictly, even though they are in place. So if new kids in the order bang each other and they get found, they face about the same punishment as the kid in military school getting caught. Stop or be kicked out.

      But lore on the Old Republic suggests a lot less obedience to the rulebook then at the time frame of the movies. Jedi order (and by extension sith) are not all that powerful, and there are quite a few force users that openly choose other paths and live to tell the tale.

      You can't be a Jedi without the Jedi Order granting you that title. The Jedi Order doesn't allow fraternizing. If you fraternize you're not a Jedi.

      They'll kick you out and you won't be a Jedi anymore. You'll just be some washed-up force user, juicing on midichlorians at the age of 48 so you can stay on the D-list and play softball with Kathy Griffin on a mid-season special on Fox.

  7. Ah, virtual segregation... by Ossifer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... a heavily pixellated Geroge Wallace must be smiling in his recycle bin...

  8. "Regressive"? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Expanding sexual diversity in new content is not regressive. They've made it clear that they want to make it a full option throughout the game, but you can't just snap your fingers and make that happen. Same-gender romance is "restricted" to one planet because only one planet is being added in the expansion.

    I'm not sure what the agenda is of the submitter/poster/etc., but it certainly isn't equality if they're whining about a step towards that. Also, this is a video game for crying out loud. Chill the fuck out.

    1. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This.

      Going back and changing scripting and bringing back all the original voice actors to voice new dialog for same-gender/same-sex dialogue is costly and a pain in the ass. So for new content moving forward, they're planning for it.

      Bioware is trying to be inclusive by adding the content in the first place. They aren't trying to segregate players.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:"Regressive"? by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      but you can't just snap your fingers and make that happen.

      Perhaps if you snapped your fingers in a Z formation.

    3. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bioware has included same-sex options in every game since Dragon Age. They're not afraid of any agenda. They don't just take heterosexual romance options and remove gender filters. Their same-sex romances in their games are written to be meaningful and different.

      And bringing back all the original voice actors to record new dialogue is costly for a game that is reporting losing tons of money.

      So instead of spreading FUD based upon assumptions, you should actually play SWTOR and look into Bioware's track record.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

      Grr. Shouldn't multi-task while typing. I meant Baldur's Gate, not Dragon Age. They've done same-sex for quite some time.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    5. Re:"Regressive"? by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah, you're missing the point:

      In previous Bioware games they allowed people to have same-sex relationships by default. In this latest Bioware game, they did not allow people to have same-sex relationships by default, and are only bolting it on in a clumsy fashion after the fact.

      It's literally regressive in that this newest game by Bioware handles same-sex relationships less well than previous Bioware games. It's a step backwards for Bioware, even if it's a step forward compared to some other game makers.

      Imagine the complaints if you took any $franchise and removed $feature that said $franchise was known for. People would rightly call it a step back.

      As I said elsewhere, I find relationships in RPGs to be almost always poorly executed and pointless because they're not handled well, but as a gamer I can certainly see how people who come to a publisher expecting that publisher to deliver on something they usually deliver would be bothered when they don't get what they expected.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Dragon Age and Mass Effect, Bioware owned the properties. They could do what they wanted without asking permission.

      Adding homosexual content to Star Wars requires the permission of Lucas and LucasArts. Karen Traviss added a gay character/couple in one novel I believe, and it turned into a huge controversy even though it was a minor background character. The debate as to whether or not homosexuality even exists in the Star Wars universe had never been determined. George Lucas is a self-described "hippie" living in Marin County, so it is quite possible he had no problem with it personally, but the Lucas-empire had to decide how it would financially affect the brand.

      Amazingly enough, they eventually signed off on it, and homosexuality does apparently exist in Star Wars.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:"Regressive"? by HaZardman27 · · Score: 2

      All of the dialogue in the game is voice-acted, so they would actually have to go and record dialogue for each class for same-sex flirtatious conversations (assuming they just used the same dialogue of the opposite gender).

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    8. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not saying the gay community shouldn't be upset over how they're treated by the media, or the lack of romance options in video games.

      But this article and summary attack Bioware, which is absurd. Bioware has gone out of their way for years to cater to all players. The fact that Bioware needed permission from LucasArts isn't Bioware's fault. Calling this regressive behavior on Bioware's behalf isn't fair.

      And you're also mistaken. Gay players don't have their own planet. The article is misrepresenting the facts and spreading bullshit that is getting people outraged over lies.

      All players are being directed to the new planet for new content. All future planets and all future content will include same-sex romances.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    9. Re:"Regressive"? by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

      Gay characters aren't being segregated. The article is mistaken.

      The new planet holds new content for all players and is the center of the expansion pack. Same-sex romance options are only being added to new content, including this new planet.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  9. Remove suggestive dialog options by sanosuke001 · · Score: 2

    How about, instead of banning flirtatious dialog to a single planet, they remove it altogether if they intent to coddle their user base? If you're going to censor your players either go all or nothing. If you intend to take a stand at ignorant and bigoted viewpoints, then open it up game-wide and don't try to hide possibly objectionable content in the closet so to speak and, instead, put it out in the open. It's 2013 ffs and if people can't deal with other people being different, well, they can go fuck themselves.

    Now, if this is because they don't want people harassing others with same-sex comments without actually being gay and are trying to limit that to a single planet then they should remove all suggestive comments entirely. If you're worried that a gay male character is going to offend a straight male character by telling him he looks sexy then don't have the comment available. The same can be said for a straight male making suggestive comments to a straight female; it can still be inappropriate and they don't have to be gay. If that's their issue; remove it entirely. (Well, I'd rather them ban players who can't behave like adults but that's another discussion I think.)

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Remove suggestive dialog options by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      SW:TOR is a fully voiced MMO. Every line of dialogue has a voice actor. And most NPCs have a unique voice actor. Adding same-sex romance into the game meant going back and changing the scripting for each NPC, as well as bringing back the previous voice actors to record new dialogue.

      That is why they're only doing it for new content.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:Remove suggestive dialog options by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Okay, I'll buy that, but why would they have to do that at all? If all the female NPCs have flirty options for males and all the male NPCs have flirty options for women, just use those existing options.

      i.e., change this:

      if( ( player.gender() == male && NPC.gender() == female ) || ( player.gender() == female && NPC.gender() == male ) )
      {
              dialogChoice.flirty == true;
      }

      to

      dialogChoice.flirty == true;

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:Remove suggestive dialog options by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      And yet they seriously have no problem at all with C-3P0? That robot would have been kicked out of a 70's era San Fransisco YMCA.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:Remove suggestive dialog options by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

      Because Bioware has never done it that way. For example, there is a character in Dragon Age 2 that is bisexual and can be romanced by a male or female character.

      They don't just ignore gender in the equation. The romance is actually different if it is started by a male or female, even though both can romance the same NPC.

      And as I stated, they still need new voice recordings. Voice actors aren't cheap. They have to line-up all the original voice actors to add new dialogue, and the game is reportedly losing a lot of money. So long as they are presenting options in the new content, I doubt they feel it is worth the cost to re-do all the old NPCs.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  10. Re:Just NPCs? by pr0nbot · · Score: 3, Informative

    I presume it's dialogue with your companion NPC. In hetero-SWTOR (as I suppose we must now call it) you can end up flirting with your companion NPC, provided they're of the opposite gender.

  11. WBC by Sparticus789 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in response, the Westboro Baptist Church has announced that all 12 of their members will take to the streets of Makeb to protest.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:WBC by CheeseTroll · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll be edited into the background of Darth Vader's funeral pyre, harassing Luke with anti-gay vitriol, in the next release of ROTJ.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    2. Re:WBC by Sparticus789 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And on the other side of their signs, WBC will write "But marrying your sister would be OK"

      --
      sudo make me a sandwich
  12. Inflammatory headline by turiel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What actually happened:
    New content will include will include same-sex options. It just happens that the new content only includes one planet. Future new content will also include same-sex options.

    I don't understand why the submitter is taking such an offensive stance with their post. There is no conspiracy against gays, especially when it comes to Bioware who are one of the pioneers of same-sex relationships in their games (dating back to Baldur's Gate).

    What would you prefer, that this content wasn't added at all? No let me guess, you'd prefer they revamp the whole game. Nevermind that their team has been cut down to a fraction of their original size due to the commercial unsuccessfulness of the game. Instead lets invent a big issue out of their good-faith attempt to add same-sex content even with their dwindling resources that would arguably better be spent on content like warzones, flashpoints, and operations.

    1. Re:Inflammatory headline by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Bioware hasn't been "Bioware" in quite awhile, sadly.

  13. Jar Jar Binks by RedHackTea · · Score: 3, Funny

    Queen of Makeb.

    --
    The G
  14. Misleading much... by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

    Same gender relationships are new content to TOR. New content goes in new places. Trying to back add it into existing content would be a nightmare. It's not that Markab is the 'gay'planet, it's that it's the first planet going forward that supports what they are calling SGR. And all future planets likely will as well.

    There are two basic problems with trying to add SGR into existing content

    First: Cost. TOR has been an epic financial failure. Trying to rehire a bunch of voice actors, add in appropriate points for them to have SGR dialogue etc. is a lot of work, and importantly:

    Second: What do you do for characters that have already done the content you're changing? For good or ill, your character has made a series of choices throughout the game that set the state of that characters relationships (notably with companions). Building huge content branches where you can either change after the fact, or only effect new characters is certainly possible, but it's a lot of work for content a lot of players aren't going to see.

    Besides that, as was said, BioWare didn't really understand just what it was getting itself into with an MMO, and discovering after the fact that this is going to take a lot longer than they thought necessarily means making some compromises. And the longer it goes on without SGR the harder it becomes to fix because there will be more players who've gone through the existing content because they've given up waiting on the developers.

    1. Re:Misleading much... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      As a semi-casual player, I think I can answer the question on replaying content. Replaying content is the core of SWTOR. They even made a legacy system which specifically requires you to play through the game time and time again to get rewards. Vast majority of their content and essentially most if not all of the interesting content is in the personal stories, which require you to keep replaying the game time and time again to see.

      It's simply the way the game is made. It's also why so many of us were confused at F2P model which gave the best content for free, and tries to charge for content that is sub-par (such as end game).

  15. This summary is stupid. by twocows · · Score: 2

    I'm biased against EA, Bioware, and SWTOR. KotOR 2 is my favorite game ever (especially with TSLRCM), and I think SWTOR ruined the franchise beyond repair, like George did with the new trilogy. There's no going back, they already retconned like half the stuff form KotOR 2 and just labelled Kreia (a fantastic character with a lot of depth) a "crazy old woman." I doubt we'll ever get another KotOR game; this is probably the end, and for what? Yet another MMO moneygrab, and a buggy one at that. I think what EA did with this is absolutely shameful and I refuse to buy EA products now because of it.

    That said, this summary is absolutely ridiculous. How is adding content that people requested (if only in a small chunk at first) "anti-gay?" The summary makes it sound like anyone who ever wanted same-sex options are forced to stay on one planet, which isn't the case at all; the content just hasn't been added to the other places yet. I don't know who wrote this summary, but they ought to be ashamed, too. There are plenty of bad things to say about SWTOR, EA, and Bioware that are actually true that nobody should need to make shit up.

  16. Planet Name by kdogg73 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uranus

    Okay... I'm sorry. Don't be mad. I cringed too when it crossed my mind.

    --
    Let's face it, most of us are scoffers. But moments before zero hour, it does not pay to take chances.
  17. finally... by Shivetya · · Score: 2

    all those guys playing female Jedi can chase Kira and have her talk dirty to them....

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  18. Re:separate is not equal by darkshot117 · · Score: 2

    Who is forcing non heterosexuals into one area? Nobody. This article is EXTREMELY biased and is completely misrepresenting the truth. Nobody is being forced anywhere, they are simply developing same-sex dialog stories into the new planet that they are releasing. They didnt have same sex storylines on previous planets, but from this point on they are adding it to all new planets, starting with this first one. Why is this so hard for people to understand?

  19. Well MMO players are gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least half the general chat messages I saw in WoW were people calling each other fags, so it stands to reason half of all MMO players are gay. Bioware is just trying to capture this market.

  20. This isn't "regressive" by cfalcon · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a bit long, but I don't see anyone else saying it, so I will. I power-played this game from launch to max level, and then for a few months after, until it was obvious my friends weren't going to keep at it- the TLDR version is that this isn't about shitting on gays at all, but instead money. Ok here's why:

    If you play the main plot of TOR, you quickly find out that each of the four "base classes" on each "empire" or "republic" side (so eight base classes total) has their own plotline. Each plotline takes you through the same planets in the same order as the other base classes in your faction, with the exception that each faction has two starting planets- one for the Jedi/Sith, and the other for the tech heroes.

    For instance: if you are a smuggler, you begin by pulling into the same planet that the Troopers start on, and your ship gets stolen. You then fall in with a kind of small time crime boss, and when he is assassinated his right-hand man becomes yours.

    The smuggler can become a "scoundrel" or a "gunslinger"- the two "advanced classes". The "scoundrel" has a shotgun that has close ranged positional attacks, and a stealth belt, as well as some brawler type moves. You also gain some heals. The "gunslinger" has a belt that creates a portable force-field cover that can knock people back, and they use two weapons. The "scoundrel" is essentially a rogue with a healing spec, and the "gunslinger" is kind of a ranger or archer role. Which you pick has NO RELEVANCE on your plot, even though they play differently.

    The "trooper" can become two types of thing as well (a character with a shield generator and the best armor who can tank or deal damage, or a character with a super advanced huge gun who can deal damage or use the gun to heal), as can the "Jedi Knight" (dual wield damage guy or single wield guy who can tank) and the "Jedi Consular" (force caster/healer or a stealthy two-bladed light saber guy). Both of these start on the planet with the Jedi Academy.

    Meanwhile, on the Sith side, all of these choices are mirrored- the Imperial Agent can become an "Operative", who has the exact same powers as the "Scoundrel", or a "Sniper", who has the same powers as the "Gunslinger". But all the "Imperial" side plots are TOTALLY DIFFERENT than the Republic ones- there are EIGHT total paths you can follow in this game, based on all eight character types you can start the game with (Sith Inquisitor, Jedi Consular, Sith Warrior, Jedi Knight, Imperial Operative, Smuggler, Bounty Hunter, Trooper). As you play through, you get "companion characters"- you get one very early, and then others as you play through your plotline. You can have one with your character at most times, but you can't hang out with all of them at once unless you are on your ship. Each has a series of mini plotlines that you can play through.

    Importantly, THESE ARE THE CHARACTERS YOU CAN BE ROMANTIC WITH. In your plotline, you meet some NPCs that are just mentioned once or twice, and that will attempt to seduce you, or you can attempt to seduce them. That's not what anyone who wanted same-sex relations in this game was hoping for, and that's what this planet seems to be offering. The companion characters are all individually voice acted by professional actors and have a ludicrous number of things they can say, ways they can respond, etc. It is seriously high production value.

    As an example: My smuggler is female. The first guy you meet, Corso Riggs, is a possible "romantic companion" for a female smuggler. Your wookie companion is not, and neither are the female companions or the fish-head alien. If you accept Corso's advances, he will prove to you that he's both desired by others and totally into just you, a reasonably common romance novel thing, and you can even marry him. A male character has similar options with his two female companions- for instance, Akavi Spaar, a rough and tumble alien warrioress, can fall for your advances, as can Risha, a human woman.

    So everyone was expecti

  21. Chewie... by Lorem_Ipsum · · Score: 2

    Would have been much easier to allow everywhere and let the individual players block incomming "flirtatious" dialogue for their own character(s). That way you could block or allow all such dialogue if you wanted, or just for your specific "female protocol droid" preference.

    ...turn on the gaydar jammer, would you?

    --
    --- Void where prohibited. Your mileage may vary. ---
  22. Still a BAD game you mean by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    The complete and total failure of SWTOR will continue to be ignored by an industry that is stuck on the PC, hates PC gamers but can't optimize their games to run on decade old hardware. MMORPG's of old were MASSIVE games designed to make games from the Elder Scroll series seem claustrophobic. And, if you want to be nasty, just as empty and pointless. Star Wars Galaxies had HUGE planets with some sparse content strewn around (it actually had quest chains (outside the themeparks) but most were very obscure and rarely done, talked to lots of players that didn't even know about them).

    Recently MMO's have changed such as that every meter of terrain will have been trodden on by everyone else on your server. In older games, you might actually find spots nobody had ever visited. of course that was partly because it had far fewer gamers but still. MMORPG's have tried to appeal to the Xbox crowd and failed to satisfy either their old core audience OR the new xbox kiddies.

    SWTOR is a prime example of this and BIG piece of proof of this is that they did NOT include same gender romance options from the start. Everyone who talks about how costly or hard it is to fit it afterwards forgets that it would have cost NOTHING more to add it right form the start. Voice artists and writers are payed by the line so instead of a same-gender neutral line, they would have been payed for a same-gender flirt line. Neither is this complex writing this is flirting with QUEST GIVERS, NOT party members/companions.

    The game instead gave an extremely bland experience, in gaming and story, geared towards young kids in the hope of not upsetting anyone and getting massive sales. It failed. In trying to appease everyone, it managed to please nobody. Oh the game has heavy loads on its servers, both of them. Mostly free players finishing their personal stories while all the time Bioware keeps tweaking the F2P exprience to try to squeeze the last dollars out of the game. Only 1 quickbar, 2 quickbars, now 4 quickbars. 2 playable characters, all existing characters playable (max 2 creatable over all servers) and now only 6 out of 8 per server playeble/creatable for preferred status players. GIVE IT UP ALREADY!

    The game was simply for 6 years of development piss poor in every way.

    • Primitive graphic engine with animation that makes The Secret World look fluid and totally out of date compared to Guild Wars 2.
    • Low rez character textures even on PC's that could easily handle more, Lord of the Rings Online looked better, a game half a decade older.
    • Bioware always re-used content but for SWTOR they went into overdrive EVERYTHING was re-used just with different palletes, once slightly curved cave pattern was present several times one each planet.
    • Combat classes mirrored or recycled across sites making them play to much alike, useful for PvP (but that is boring anyway) boring in PvE.
    • Simplistic moral story, no real going good/bad option, as a saintly Sith my story ended pretty much the same as a Sith so nasty Vader would puke.
    • While each of the 8 classes has their personal story, most quests are shared across a faction, so if you want to pay all 8 classes and see their personal stories you have to wade through the same faction story line 4 times. And the faction story line is BAD. Really bad. So fucking bad it beggars believe.

      In SWTOR you are a hero, liberation/occupying a planet. Except NOTHING CHANGES. Ever. This is something most MMORPG's have to deal with, that the army you defeated as you hand in your quest is still standing there respawning often in sight. SWTOR however does it worse then most, the place is incredibly crowded AND you are supposed to be Jedi. At one point when you would make Vader your whipping boy, you are fighting union workers. COME ON!

      Lotro already went nuts with high level bunnies kicking your ass when you have defeated Nazgul and Elder Dragons as a full elf (read the book, a full elf is NOT a whimpy sickly character but can take on SEVERAL nazgu

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  23. More like go BEKAM gay over there... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Named Makeb, the planet will be launched as part of the new Rise of the Hutt Cartel pack and will be the only place in the game where players can select "flirtatious" dialogue options with characters of the same gender.

    Go to Makeb, bekaM gay.*






    *There's a campaign slogan for Makeb tourist board in there somewhere.
    Maybe a transparent postcard with Makeb printed on one side, read as bekaM from the other...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens