Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Could Take Over RIM

judgecorp writes "China's Lenovo could take over RIM, according to Lenovo chief financial officer Wong Mai Ming, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos Switzerland. The Canadian authorities might object, and so might BlackBerry users, after what ultimately happened to the ThinkPad brand under Lenovo's guidance. Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said, 'It’s something that we would look carefully at. We always look at foreign investment in Canada as a cause for reflection. We have to look at intelligence concerns.'"

72 of 114 comments (clear)

  1. What happened? by gtirloni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    after what ultimately happened to the ThinkPad brand under Lenovo's guidance

    You mean, they would object if RIM devices kept working as before?

    --
    none
    1. Re:What happened? by JackL · · Score: 2

      I was wondering that as well.

    2. Re:What happened? by Enry · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, I'm a bit curious about this too. I've had two Thinkpads since the purchase and both have been as good of quality as when it was IBM.

    3. Re:What happened? by rwven · · Score: 2

      Yeah... I was under the impression that Lenovo was doing very well. I personally feel that they made some of the best quality devices...even if they happen to be a little more on the "utilitarian" and "ugly" side of things.

    4. Re:What happened? by loufoque · · Score: 1, Informative

      While Thinkpads have essentially stayed the same (some would disagree, but I still find them to be of good quality), the services associated with the purchase, such as support and warranty, have become way worse than they used to be.
      This was to be expected though.

    5. Re:What happened? by scifiai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I type this on a Lenovo ThinkPad T520i, I think to myself that the ThinkPad is the best laptop on the market.

      --
      www.scifiai.com
    6. Re:What happened? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's not like RIM is doing a sterling job with the Blackberry brand anyway. Their new OS has been coming along for how long now?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:What happened? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      With what remains of the laptop computer market, we probably won't see decent customer service again. Prices and costs are cut to the bone because it's an industry that is in its final years. There's no incentive to premium-price becuase that market is so small. Cheap componentry and minimal support are the new normal in this industry. If you want more, the answer regrettably is probably Apple.

    8. Re:What happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work at an ASP for Lenovo, and if you're talking about their 'Think' branded stuff... the part fulfillment is still handled by IBM. The same ASPs are providing support. There are the same if not more warranty options as before. Perhaps you are talking about call centers? I've talked to them and they don't seem any worse or better than any other big brand OEM call center. Not sure how anything is 'way worse' - sounds like your perspective.

      I expected things to get worse, and was somewhat surprised when they didn't.

    9. Re:What happened? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      The question in my mind is why lenovo would want to acquire RIM at all. It's like adopting the mangiest, sickliest animal at the shelter.

    10. Re:What happened? by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      I find it odd (and sad) that Lenovo seems to offer the best and most personable support out of any PC manufacturer I've dealt with. Assuming their support has not changed in the last few years.

    11. Re:What happened? by steevven1 · · Score: 1

      +1...I loved having an IBM logo on my computer as much as anyone, but my Lenovo ThinkPad X220 is still an excellent machine.

    12. Re:What happened? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Unlike IBM and thinkpad, where the company wasn't in any risk of bankruptcy, it was just not part of the new strategic plan, RIM is a whole other ballgame. They could well be completely bankrupt and liquidated in a couple of years and if someone is dumb enough to pay billions for it we (as in canada) should probably happily take their money. A change in direction might save the company, and failing that billions of dollars is better than not billions of dollars.

    13. Re:What happened? by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 1

      I've been putting Lenovo's on all the desks where I work, and I've found the hardware quality to be middling-to-decent, and the support to be pretty good.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
    14. Re:What happened? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      And its basically ready, gold, good to go, with the public launch this coming Wednesday.

    15. Re:What happened? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Uh, China + secure (other) government email = large subsidy from China govt.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    16. Re:What happened? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The question in my mind is why lenovo would want to acquire RIM at all

      "Traditional" computing platform sales continue to flatline (Notebooks / Desktops). Lenovo's attempts at a tablet have, to date, flopped. RIM is currently undervalued and still sells millions of handsets. It's a quick jumpstart into the mobile business for Lenovo.

    17. Re:What happened? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I bought a T60 shortly after the takeover and it's excellent.

      Unfortunately I also bought a X series (the lower cost subnotebooks) two years ago and it was awful. I don't mean in a "Poorly spec'd" kind of way, I mean appalling quality, right down to constant freezes if connected to the wireless because of the way the wireless driver operated. And the other options at the time, in the Thinkpad range, were dreadful, with virtually every larger device having a crappy WXGA screen regardless of computer size and a sad set of CPU/GPU options.

      I bought that for my home office. I replaced my T60 a year or so ago with a Dell. That's right, a Dell. NOBODY buys Dells for themselves. But I did. The choice of Thinkpads, coupled with my new experience of Lenovo "quality" pushed me to abandon the laptops I've loved and bought exclusively (one Powerbook excepting) since 1999.

      It's only anecdotal evidence (but so was yours...) but I genuinely don't see Thinkpads today as having anything in common with the range at IBM except for having the only decent mobile pointing device in existence. They need to be better quality, and they need to go back to having decent hardware specs - decent screens, CPUs and GPUs.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:What happened? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a collection of ThinkPad laptops that date back to the early 90's and their overall look has not changed very much, but they're damn solid machines. Even the oldest one can still run its OS. If it ain't broke, don't break it.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    19. Re:What happened? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      The question in my mind is why lenovo would want to acquire RIM at all. It's like adopting the mangiest, sickliest animal at the shelter.

      Patents?

    20. Re:What happened? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Try a T530, with the 6-row tictac keyboard... and then look here:

      http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/T400-T500-and-newer-T-series/ThinkPad-T431s-User-Guide-amp-Pictures/m-p/993279/highlight/true#M73300

      THAT is where Lenovo is taking Thinkpads.

      As a fellow T520i user (btw, swap out the display for the 1080p one... it's AWESOME!), let me be the first to say: We're fucked!

    21. Re:What happened? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of is they broke the ThinkPad long term support model. With the advent of the 6x series you could no longer expect the port replicator/dock or accessories you purchased with your R60/T60 to work with the subsequent R6x/T6x models. For a consumer this is not a big deal but for corporations that buy hundreds to thousands of units a year this is huge. It's akin to Microsoft, Oracle, Red Hat, or Canonical removing key features of their LTS policies. We got burned because our hardware refresh happened right when the R60 came out so we standardized on that model and when they dropped it for the R61 six months later we found the Configure To Order (CTO) we had specced was no longer compatible with our docking configuration. I worked with their support engineers (IBM was still engineering them at the time) and they finally decided it was simply incompatible despite being standards compliant.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    22. Re:What happened? by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      So if they remove the trackpoint buttons, then you'll switch to a laptop that also does not have trackpoint buttons?

      --
      /* No Comment */
    23. Re:What happened? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      That's because they were fully outsourced by IBM to Lenovo. The only thing that changed was the label. The Canadian Finance Minister needs to think before he speaks, or at least have staff people who can think for him.

    24. Re:What happened? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      By "flatline", do you mean that no one buys these items anymore?

      Or, by "flatline", do you mean that the market is no longer growing?

      See, "flatline" is a medical term, to me, implying someone is dead, dead, dead. Obviously, laptop and desktops aren't "dead, dead, dead" because millions of us use them. Newegg and other retailers still offer and sell them.

      Using the term to describe markets that no longer enjoy astronomical growth is misleading at best, and probably dishonest.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    25. Re:What happened? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Let's see... chiclet keyboard, move to 6-row keyboard layout (no more grouped F-keys, no Del/Home/End/PgUp/PgDn grouping), and this abomination (coming soon!):

      http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/T400-T500-and-newer-T-series/ThinkPad-T431s-User-Guide-amp-Pictures/m-p/993279/highlight/true#M73300

      Non-removable battery, trackpoint buttons nixed (they're now integrated in the top of the trackpad), an even bigger trackpad (aka space-waster)...

      Two more generations and we'll be looking at black MacBook clones.

      Ummm, it's an ultrabook. How many ultrabooks have removable batteries? As for the bigger trackpad, well, they could have used a smaller screen, which would have allowed a smaller case or used this screen with a lot of plastic around the trackpad instead. I do agree, though, I don't like trackpad buttons at the top of the trackpad instead of the bottom (where my thumb can hit them). However, if using the trackpoint, having them at the top of the trackpad works out pretty well.

    26. Re:What happened? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Yes, if only out of spite.

      If I don't have a working trackpoint, I might as well get a retina display in exchange...

    27. Re:What happened? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter that it's an Ultrabook? Call it whatever you want, it's still a T Series Thinkpad... :(

    28. Re:What happened? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      There were a lot of lemon thinkpads in IBM's history. The iSeries was spectacularly crappy. The 570 was flimsy, the 760 line would burn your legs if you used it as a laptop. The crap coming out of Lenovo these days isn't much worse than the worst of IBM's history, so I'm still reserving judgement.

      Thinkpads were never a sure thing. You had to know that the line was good before you bought.

      Before Lenovo though, the thinkpad X and T models were a rare run of excellence. After Lenovo, they were merely okay. Hopefully they fix it.

    29. Re:What happened? by krinderlin · · Score: 1

      Flatline is used commonly in business speak to refer to a market that no longer sees growth. It isn't misleading, you're just using a different context.

      However, the connotation you've brought from the medical field is purposely intended. Under the current Commandments of United States Capitalism, failure to grow over last year is a precursor to a long drawn out death spiral that will cost investors a lot. Whether this should be the way of things or not, is beyond the scope of whether or not this term is valid.

      TL;DR: This is an actual term in finance and business.

    30. Re:What happened? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Maybe flat but not flatlining. That's RIM. Some facts.

      Lenovo’s market share is growing in the beige box market.

      The market for beige boxes is flat - i.e. with little to low growth. Partly due to market saturation in the developing market, partly because the emerging market is jumping straight to tables & smartphones.

      The market for beige boxes is a commodity market. Sure, there is some difference – particularly in the lap top side, but not much. Mainly it about competing by being more efficient in manufacturing then your competitors – so think high volume with low margins.

    31. Re:What happened? by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I think the death spiral is due to the fact that fewer and fewer people buy these items each year, items which were sold on razor-thin margins anyway.

    32. Re:What happened? by supremebob · · Score: 1

      The ThinkPad T30 also had the "burn your legs if you put it on your lap" issue. The Pentium 4 M processor in that thing ran really hot, and sucked down a fully charged battery in under 90 minutes under load.

    33. Re:What happened? by QuantumBeep · · Score: 1

      and they don't seem any worse or better than any other big brand OEM call center.

      This is not the yardstick of customer support. IBM Thinkpad support used to be miles ahead of everyone else.

      In general, the customer support in the PC industry is stupendously bad. Now Lenovo's support is also horrible.

    34. Re:What happened? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Yes it matters. An iPad isn't a Powerbook and an ultrabook isn't a full laptop either. All of those devices are designed for different needs and using the wrong one based on one's need is sure to be frustrating.

    35. Re:What happened? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      You disable the trackpad in software so that the top edge still works.

    36. Re:What happened? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      The typing feel really is pretty decent, I like it too - but the layout is pretty atrocious :(

    37. Re:What happened? by alendit · · Score: 1

      This, my dear kids, is called FUD.

  2. Unfortunate Name by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    I always felt Rim was an unfortunate name now it looks like they may have to bend over :D

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  3. thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So what is alleged here that happened to the ThinkPad brand under Lenovo?

    It seems to me ThinkPads continue to be solid laptops under Lenovo, as they were under IBM.

  4. Nothing wrong with ThinkPads by __aanqgi3349 · · Score: 1

    While there's been some backsliding on customer service -- IBM set an unequalled standard in this area -- the ThinkPads are still at the top of the class in the PC space. Since moving to Linux I've run only ThinkPads, which are solid and (except for their new ultrabook) easily user-upgradable. Even the help, when I've needed it, has been fine. The customer service issue I had was a very late delivery with poor communications from Lenovo while I was waiting for my most recent model (T430s).

    1. Re:Nothing wrong with ThinkPads by gmack · · Score: 2

      How do you define "easily user-upgradable"? Of the major notebook brands, only HP joins them in BIOS locking their mini PCIE slot so that third party wireless cards cause the machine not to boot. That's hardly customer friendly.

  5. This would probably kill all US Federal contracts by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After examining how the United States treats Huawei networking gear, I'm sure this would kill all the US (and State/Local) government contracts with RIM.

    US Government contracts are one of the few highlights of RIM's business right now.

    --
    No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
  6. No... you don't do that !!! by martiniturbide · · Score: 1

    You don't say "we may buy", "we could buy", "we could do...". You do it and your announce it later. Haven't learn anything from Léo Apotheker?

  7. Re:Taking over RIM is not making any difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You are incorrect. RIM has positive cash flow, no debt, and significant capital assets and cash. RIM is far from dead and with their new offerings have continued opportunity to grow.

    Another thing to consider - RIM is still has the only FIPS compliant smart phone on the market. That means that any government agency that needs to send "secret" data to remote agents will almost certainly use this device set.

  8. Encrypted communications? by Tweezak · · Score: 1

    The Blackberry devices have been a favorite among lawyers and government workers for a long time because they were inherently more secure than similar portable email/telephony devices. Considering the Chinese government's position on encrypted devices and communications I seriously doubt the Blackberry as we know it would continue to exist. And even if it did...would you trust it?

  9. Blackberry & Thinkpad? by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does China have some sort of late-1990s nostalgia thing going on that I haven't heard of?

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Blackberry & Thinkpad? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Companies with a lot of solid technology that aren't particularly trendy taking a big slump in the market and thus can be had for a fairly cheap? Sure. The value at Wall Street is pretty well measuring customer appeal, but China isn't interested in buying customers they're interested in buying technology which makes their valuation quite different.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  10. Re:Taking over RIM is not making any difference by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way I understand it is that while RIM is struggling in North America, they're still pretty dominant in the rest of the world. And the rest of the world is still a pretty big market.

  11. Re:This would probably kill all US Federal contrac by internerdj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a discussion at work with a mapping vendor. They were involved with discussions on mobile device support. From what he had seen, the survival of RIM to this point and beyond was related to the way they play ball with the government in regards to encryption compared to other companies. Apparently, Apple flat out said no.

  12. I have a lenovo thinkpad... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't feel that Lenovo really changed anything too badly with the thinkpad line. Granted, I wouldn't buy a thinkpad edge, but the T series that I purchased works great. I've had it for over 2 years and the only problem I had was with a faulty shift key on my keyboard, which they resolved by sending out a new one for me to replace myself (much better IMHO than certain other vendors who would have asked me to send it to them).

    I don't really see the difference between IBM thinkpad and Lenovo thinkpad as being significant.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I have a lenovo thinkpad... by Hel+Toupee · · Score: 2

      Typing this on my T520 right now. The reason there isn't any difference in the ThinkPad branded equipment is because Lenovo bought them, but didn't change anything. Factories stayed the same. Distribution, Management, Fulfillment, and R&D never changed - just Chinese cashing the checks and paying the bills now. Now, the 'Idea' branded stuff is different - and I think that the Edge is technically their consumer-grade junk. I wouldn't touch any of that.

      --
      PERL:
      All of the power of Voodoo with most of the understandibility!
  13. Re:concerns? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Let's see, might China have an incentive to make some changes so they could listen in on all communications with BlackBerry phones in use by the US government?

    Gosh, I suppose the might.

    As BlackBerry is the only certified secure phone presently, having the company in the hands of a pretty much hostile trading partner might just be a bad idea for both US and Canada.

  14. T430 by Frankie70 · · Score: 4, Informative

    So what happened to Thinkpads after Lenovo purchased it?

    I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T430. I find it to be a very good laptop.

    I have only 1 problem with it.
    There are tons of programs it comes preinstalled with
    - Evernote
    - Intel AppUp(SM) center
    - Intel WiDi
    - Intel Control Center
    - Intel Management Engine Components
    - Intel OpenCL SDK
    - ThinkVantage Communication Utlity

    and lot more stuff. But I think lot of extra software shipped even when this was from IBM.

    If someone could publish a list of stuff which could be uninstalled, it would be great.

    1. Re:T430 by redfox2012 · · Score: 2

      If someone could publish a list of stuff which could be uninstalled, it would be great.

      I'm guessing:

      - Evernote
      - Intel AppUp(SM) center
      - Intel WiDi
      - Intel Control Center
      - Intel Management Engine Components
      - Intel OpenCL SDK
      - ThinkVantage Communication Utlity

      We just rolled out 190 of the L series and started with a clean image; the only thing Lenovo support were keen to see put back was the battery saver tool.

      More love for Lenevo here, never had such a positive response to a laptop roll out!

  15. Re:Taking over RIM is not making any difference by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    Not if Lenovo buys it.

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  16. Re:concerns by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    "... We have to look at intelligence concerns.'"

    I think what concerns the educated public the most is RIM's lack of intelligence

    Awww, you beat me to it!

    Any business that's not totally dominate by a PHB should have by now at least started diversifying critical resources away from reliance on RIM.

    Sadly true. And even more sadly...BB is the only device authorized for 'business' use for many companies in Canada. Is it because of too many PHB's, or too much IT inertia? I'm not sure. All I hear when I ask is that 'BB is the only secure platform', and they simply don't trust anyone else. That may have been true 10, or even 5 years ago, but now?

    Anyhow, *picks up the popcorn*, let's sit back and enjoy the show! :)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  17. Re:concerns? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    If security depends on who owns the company (rather than baked into the device and supporting equipment), then it wasn't secure in the first place.

    You can't trust anybody.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  18. Re:Taking over RIM is not making any difference by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    You are incorrect. RIM has positive cash flow, no debt, and significant capital assets and cash. RIM is far from dead and with their new offerings have continued opportunity to grow

    I think your key word here is “opportunity”, because right now they are in a tail spin.

    All of the keys stats you quote are declining in the past 2 years. They are selling fewer phones at a lower cost. Yes, they have secure phones. They could survive as a small niche player selling only to a select few – until somebody else decides to make one. Remember when Apple had 5% market share vs. WinTel? It struggled financially.

    It doesn’t mean they can’t turn it around – but I can’t see an easy fix.

  19. Re:This would probably kill all US Federal contrac by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    Huawei is an opaque company. We are not sure who owns. We know there is a relationship with the Chinese military but we are not sure exactly what it is.

    Lenovo, on the other hand, operators much more like a standard international company that just happens to be located in China. It has offices, engineers and factors in the US. I would assume a good chunk of RIMs offices would remain in Canada.

    In short, it would be easier to establish that security was being done right with Lenovo then Huawei. I have concerns about China – let’s just make sure our fears or rational.

  20. Another desperate attempt to sink RIM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think RIM needs to be rescued and as you can see, RIM have no comment on this "news". It is probably another attempt orchestrated by Apple, Google, and the gang to sink RIM. Obviously, if RIM is to become a Chinese company then the US should consider staying away RIM devices and services due to potential national security issues. Just FUD, is what it is.

  21. Too little cash and unattractive products by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RIM has positive cash flow, no debt, and significant capital assets and cash

    RIM has had an operating loss for the last 4 straight quarters. While you are correct that the company isn't on financial life support (yet), their prospects are not looking especially cheery. Their cash hoard is around $3 billion which while substantial is tiny compared to Google, Apple, Microsoft and Samsung. All their major competitors have extremely strong balance sheets, far stronger than RIM. It's a bit like playing poker when everyone at the table has a much larger pile of chips. You still can win but the odds are not in your favor.

    RIM is far from dead and with their new offerings have continued opportunity to grow.

    The sales numbers for RIM's products are do not back you up. Competing products from Apple and Android makers are in far higher demand. RIM's product line is pretty widely considered to be not competitive. While RIM might succeed yet with some brilliant new products, there is little evidence so far that we should expect anything that will put them ahead of the curve.

    Another thing to consider - RIM is still has the only FIPS compliant smart phone on the market.

    Which is something that the majority of the market could not care less about. At best it gives them some breathing room for a little while. But the number of people who really need that level of security is a pretty small fraction of the overall market. RIM needs a product offering with much broader appeal and significant advantages over the competition. Right now this is a battle they are losing and losing badly.

  22. Since when? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    Since when does “We are looking at all opportunities -- RIM and many others,” automatically translate into "We are taking over RIM"? Seeing how countries are treating ZTE and Huawei in the network space Lenovo would be crazy to buy RIM (Everyone knows RIM has a global network infrastructure right?). It does however make a lot of sense to partner with them to offer devices outside of RIM's current core.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  23. Re:Taking over RIM is not making any difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The way I understand it is that while RIM is struggling in North America, they're still pretty dominant in the rest of the world. And the rest of the world is still a pretty big market.

    I think you need to look at real numbers instead of antedotes... RIM is struggling nearly everywhere...

    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/technology/20121128_RIM.pdf

    Here's a smattering of numbers for new phone sales (for Oct 2011 -> Oct 2012) those that don't want to read the link....

    USA: 8.5% -> 1.6% (expected)
    UK: 19% -> 7.9%
    France: 16% -> 7%
    Spain: 23.7% -> 3.4%
    Brazil: 8.7% -> 2.7%

    Only in germany they increased share from 1.6% to 2.5%

    Even if their installed base is large (which it isn't 80M active users vs 1B smartphones total), I don't think any of these numbers can be considered "dominant".

  24. Re:This would probably kill all US Federal contrac by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

    Maybe, but the US State Department banned Lenovo computers from being used for Classified work back in 2006.

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/19/state-dpartment-bans-lenovo-pcs-from-classified-work/

    --
    No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
  25. Re:This would probably kill all US Federal contrac by steelfood · · Score: 1

    I know RIM will give the government its encryption keys at the drop of a hat, but I figure Apple'd do the same too. Unless Apple was actually refusing to not give it to the U.S. government at the drop of a hat.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  26. Burn by WizADSL · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that if Lenovo goes through with this, they're going to get burned. I don't think many businesses would trust China not to peek into the data going through those Black Berrys and the devices will be dropped like hot potatoes. If Lenovo's strategy is about getting their hands on patents, then that may be an acceptable consequence to them.

  27. Jim Flaherty ..... Intelligence Concerns by stoicio · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm.....intelligence concerns......
    The party that sells out citizens info to foreign powers at every turn,
    or worse loses everyones data on a portable hard disk, or just looks the other way
    while personal information is bled and leaked from government databases by
    public employees (ex, bored, or otherwise).

    I think I'll just move to China. It's safer.

  28. The Chinese govt owning all that security by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I can hear thousands of corporate and government accounts bailing when China and by definition the Chinese government and army get their hand on all the secure data and transmissions that RIM has. BB's are in fact the only handset allowed in many US Federal agencies because of the security. Not anymore.

    1. Re:The Chinese govt owning all that security by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Well, they have to buy SOMETHING!

  29. Stuff that can be uninstalled. by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    I just cleaned up a new Gateway laptop. The amount of pre-installed stuff I wasn't interested in is comparable to what was on a ThinkPad I setup last week. From the Gateway, I removed:

    Adobe Air
    Bing Bar
    E-Bay Worldwide
    Evernote
    Foozkids
    Foozkids Platform
    Gateway Games
    Gateway MyBackup
    Gateway Registration
    Gateway Recovery Management
    Gateway ScreenSaver
    Gateway Updater
    Identity Card
    Kobo
    Microsoft Silverlight
    Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition
    Nero DiscSpeed 10
    Nero SmartStart 10
    Nero Update
    Norton Internet Security
    Norton Online Backup
    Skype
    Welcome Centre
    Windows Live Essentials

    I also change the branded home page in Internet Explorer, and disable or remove all the browser add-ons I don't want, including "accelerators" such as "Map with Bing", "Translate with Bing", etc. After all that, there are still programs starting up automatically that I don't want, which I disable using "msconfig". And we haven't even mentioned the numerous services running that may not be required. (A good guide to disabling services can be found here).

    I often tell people that buying a new computer these days is like buying a new car that comes with 500 lbs. of sand in the trunk.

  30. Re:This would probably kill all US Federal contrac by chrish · · Score: 1

    If you have your own BES, RIM absolutely does not have your encryption keys, and therefore cannot hand them over to anyone. In that situation RIM can't read your email, period.

    Spoiler: I work for RIM.

    --
    - chrish