Slashdot Mirror


What's the Best RSS Reader Not Named Google Reader?

Hugh Pickens writes writes "The news that that Google is killing off Google Reader in their annual spring cleaning means hordes of abandoned RSS users will need a new home to get their news fix before July 1, 2013. Sure, Google Reader may not have been the most beautifully designed product to come out of Mountain View, Calif., but it sure was convenient. And now that it's going away, it's evident just how valuable it has been. 'It's a tough question that's not unlike asking what's the best planet to live on not named Earth or the best thing to breathe not named air,' writes Casey Chan. 'Google Reader was that obvious a choice.' So what's the best RSS reader not named Google Reader? Is it Reeder? Or NetNewsWire? Maybe Feedly? Or should we all just ditch RSS and get with Twitter?" Personally, I've taken a liking to Akregator on my desktop and Sparse RSS on my phone (syncing done woefully manually by exporting the list of feeds from my desktop reader and importing into the phone reader now and then). Update: 03/14 14:43 GMT by T : Depending on your aesthetics and platform of choice, you might like one of these four options, too.

287 comments

  1. Feedly looks ok by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

    Feedly looks OK so far, http://theoldreader.com/ maybe?

    Twitter is no replacement!

    1. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried Feedly for a few minutes, but it felt like it was trying to prioritize and reorganize my news stories automatically for me and the design was awful for simply reading stuff. And it required simply too many clicks to read slashdot since I had to expand the whole summary for each item myself and even mark items as read manually. Not going back.

    2. Re:Feedly looks ok by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

      Netvibes seems ok to me for now. I'd like to try Old Reader, but it's limiting feed imports for now due to the huge influx of traffic and I haven't been able to import all my Google Reader feeds yet. I'm avoiding Feedly out of principal - it keeps asking me to download the app for Firefox in order to view it. I shouldn't have to download an "app" to view a web page, especially if I'm not on my own computer and just want to check my RSS feeds quick. Just give me the web page.

    3. Re:Feedly looks ok by msk · · Score: 1

      I just installed Slick RSS for Chrome and so far it looks pretty nice. It does not rely on any outside services to function.

    4. Re:Feedly looks ok by gatzke · · Score: 3

      There are ways to make it look like GoogleReader I think. In the top right gear / settings, I tried "Timeline View" which gives you a blurb and image. Decent shortcuts as well.

    5. Re:Feedly looks ok by mblase · · Score: 3, Informative

      I tried Feedly for a few minutes, but it felt like it was trying to prioritize and reorganize my news stories automatically for me and the design was awful for simply reading stuff. And it required simply too many clicks to read slashdot since I had to expand the whole summary for each item myself and even mark items as read manually. Not going back.

      I'm giving Feedly a try starting today, and I think you probably have the same reaction I did: It's NOT EXACTLY THE SAME AS GREADER. But it's learnable, and it's customizable.

      Keyboard shortcuts exist, but they're all different than GReader, and that takes some getting used to.

      If you like GReader's compact title-only view, that's an option -- but you can also show everything by default, which is preferable if you have a folder of comics feeds like I do.

      I think Feedly has two big points in its favor, though: it can sync ONCE to GReader to download your feeds (including what articles you've already read), and it's cross-browser and cross-platform with its own mobile apps. (Plus it's ad-supported, which means they have a revenue stream to keep them going in the future.)

    6. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everything you just complained about can be changed in the preferences.

      http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/tips-for-google-reader-users-migrating-to-feedly/ might be of interest for you.

    7. Re:Feedly looks ok by pr0t0 · · Score: 2

      I've been playing with settings in Feedly to make it more Reader-like. There are a few problems though. First, I don't see a way to hide the number of Facebook or Google+ likes. I don't care how many people like it, only whether I do or not. Second, the Android app does not have a simplified list view; it's limiting the number of stories I can see on my phone by including a thumbnail pic that makes entries too high.

      News reader makers - If you are reading the /. coverage with interest, I highly encourage you to simplify the views. I can judge whether or not I want to read something by the headline alone. The more headlines I can see at once, the better. A simple list is all I want. Give me the headline and a little icon that allows me to 'favorite' or 'star' it...maybe some small text or icon indicating what feed originated the article. On the web view, you can throw in as much text as the horizontal resolution will allow, but don't increase the vertical space per article. Make picture display and social media tie-ins preferences that can be turned off.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    8. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also swapped to feedly, and I have been genuinely pleased. All the other alternatives are ok but include fees and limitations.

    9. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read above comments by others regarding http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/tips-for-google-reader-users-migrating-to-feedly - you can change the views for all of what you're asking for. Just change it to inline view.

    10. Re:Feedly looks ok by jaymz666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I need something that is cross machine compatible, linking my read/unread to a single machine isn't fun

    11. Re:Feedly looks ok by craigminah · · Score: 1

      There's still ads in Feedly which makes it annoying.

    12. Re:Feedly looks ok by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was turned off of theoldreader because I went to the page, and... SOCIAL SOCIAL SOCIAL MEDIA!!! See what your friends are reading! Sign in with facebook and goole plus and twitter and myspace!

      I use RSS feeds mainly for research journals to watch for relevant papers as they come out. And... er... webcomics. Why the hell would I care to include my friends on either one of those? My friends are idiots. If I find a particular journal article relevant to them (or funny webcomic), I can post it to one of those various services.

      Why does it seem like every RSS reader out there is trying to get me to merge it with facebook?

      Step 1: Make a website that does something
      Step 2: Integrate social media
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: PROFIT!!!

      I try to avoid companies that seem to have that plan.

    13. Re:Feedly looks ok by msk · · Score: 1

      I understand. It'd be nice to have something else that's consistent between OSX and Android, in my case.

    14. Re:Feedly looks ok by nightgeometry · · Score: 1

      Inline, text, condensed not showing up for me - Feedly in a Galaxy Note2. Annoying, I'll look for something else.

      --
      The best is the enemy of the good
    15. Re:Feedly looks ok by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I tried Feedly on iOS a couple weeks ago. It was a mess; I couldn't ever get it to display more than one article. It also seems to be too focused on looking pretty.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    16. Re:Feedly looks ok by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      I now realise that feedly requires a browser plugin to work. This doesn't work for so many people who can;t install plugins on work machines, public access machines, etc.

    17. Re:Feedly looks ok by alen · · Score: 1

      yep

      been using feedly for at least a year. i've used flipboard a little as well and they will probably work on their own RSS subscription service now

      the geeks probably hate feedly because it looks pretty, but i hated using google reader's GUI.

    18. Re:Feedly looks ok by jjp9999 · · Score: 1

      Feedly just sent out an alert today that they launched some new program that replaces Google Reader with syncing (I can't remember the name of it now). I just started using them recently.

    19. Re:Feedly looks ok by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Your first clue was when it asked for "Manage Contacts" permission for google...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    20. Re:Feedly looks ok by LatePaul · · Score: 1

      Hardly a surprise since theoldreader was set up when Google dropped the social side of Reader (in favour of G+ integration).

    21. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like it either when services want to integrate with social media, but, quite frankly, I think you have more important things to worry about:

      My friends are idiots.

    22. Re:Feedly looks ok by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This has been a pet peeve of mine for ages now as well. However, this particular instance is what convinced me to finally get off my ass and do what I've been meaning to do for about 2 years now:

      1) New Gmail account
      2) Fake Facebook account
      3) Fake Twitter account
      4) Use these for every sign-in thing on all the stupid websites that have a boner for social media.

      These accounts will never have friends. They won't have any followers to spam. "Will you allow us to post to your feed?" 'Sure. Even I will never ever see it.' I'm happily experimenting with a couple news readers now despite their asinine requirement that I sign in or otherwise attach one of the above.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    23. Re:Feedly looks ok by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Feedly requires the use of gestures on any tablet or phone. Everything is done with swiping, with a difference between long and short swipes. I don't trust gesture commands on a screen as small as my phone, and I hate gestures in general. (Oh, why have we strayed from the almighty command line?)

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    24. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The google reader of yore had reasonably good sharing options. "The old reader" is meant to emulate that RSS reader + sharing system.

      You'll probably also won't like Reader2K : http://www.reader2000.com/

    25. Re:Feedly looks ok by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I need something that is cross machine compatible, linking my read/unread to a single machine isn't fun

      I know Netvibes have mobile versions specific to iPad, iPhone and android. They're just mobile websites, though. Even so, you're essentially looking at your same data on all devices.

      Personally, I like the idea of not having to install a separate app on other devices.

    26. Re:Feedly looks ok by helix2301 · · Score: 1

      Feedly lets you stream podcasts like Google Reader did. What a waist 1 of the reasons I switched from iPhone to Android was because of Google Reader.

    27. Re:Feedly looks ok by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Mobile website or whatever is nice, however the key is to keep the same data available across all the devices I use. So my tablet, phone, laptop, desktop and work PC can all access the same aggregated information and I don't have to re-scan already viewed info.

    28. Re:Feedly looks ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you might be quite happy with the Skimr RSS reader: http://www.skimr.co

    29. Re:Feedly looks ok by DavidTabachnikov · · Score: 1

      There are a bunch of alternatives to Google Reader, but none of them retrain the Google Reader feel. Kind of a turn off for me. We are working on an online RSS reader which will keep the Google Reader feel, at http://www.mainfeeds.net/ and without the "social media" hype.

  2. Any readers out there have good filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a lot of feeds and get a lot of chaff in the mix. Are there any decent readers out there that have per-channel filtering of feed elements? Something like rules for culling the chaff? Keywords, search strings, filter on a data element, etc.

    1. Re:Any readers out there have good filters? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep I'd like to filter off CNN's "fast facts" and "N things you should know about" articles, and news about certain celebrities.

      Actually now that I think of it, almost all the crap I'd like to filter comes in on the CNN feed...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Any readers out there have good filters? by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

      I get systems data feeds in RSS form and would love to be able to filter the streams by relevancy of the content. Any reader that provided some filtering tools would be an upgrade.

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    3. Re:Any readers out there have good filters? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Tiny Tiny RSS has filters, but there's also Yahoo! Pipes, which works with every reader.

  3. Guess how the team found out by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Informative

    "There are two simple reasons for this: usage of Google Reader has declined, and as a company we’re pouring all of our energy into fewer products,” Alan Green an engineer at Google said.

    The RSS team got the axe via Google Reader, which suddenly became their least favorite app.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Guess how the team found out by rgbscan · · Score: 2

      Grrrrr.... I am SO TIRED of all the apps I use integrating with Google products that later get canceled. I was using NetNewsWire on my iPhone until the new version practically forced me to sync with Google Reader. I resisted for a long time, but I really liked that app so I grudgingly setup a google account and sync'd with google reader to make the app happy and work right again. Now they're pulling the plug. *Sigh*

    2. Re:Guess how the team found out by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      They got axed? "All our energy into fewer products" sounds to me (someone who works in real science, not "tech") like you'd keep the people and move them to fewer products. I suppose energy here = money and products = shareholders?

    3. Re:Guess how the team found out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (...) sounds to me (someone who works in real science, not "tech")

      Could you please elaborate on what you actually *do*?

      As someone who uses the Scientific Method daily for a couple decades now to write code, I am a tad bit offended, actually.

    4. Re:Guess how the team found out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Male penetration testing for dragon dildos.

      - interkin3tic

    5. Re:Guess how the team found out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new to American business.

      Axing the team and re-hiring entirely new people is the standard practice.

      • * Seniority is not retained by the original employees
      • * Fewer benefits to new hires
      • * Far more advantageous (to the employer) stock and option plans - often by axing the old employees you can eliminate these entirely.
      • * Slower vacation accrual
      • * New hires are not as much of a "threat" to management
      • Transferring the team members means they need to be re-trained on the new product anyway.
        • - The cost delta between training a current and new employee is irrelevant, sadly.
  4. Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The terrible thing about this is, I went with Google Reader a couple years ago because it was stable and seemed like it would be around forever. I previously used Bloglines which shut down as well.
    I don't understand how people think they can get the same news through Twitter, Google+ or Facebook. Pre-RSS I had to visit some 35 sites to get the news, updates, and hot topics I now get through Reader. Without that, I've got random garbage on FB, semi-interesting personal posts on Google+, and self-promotion blurbs on Twitter. News? Hardly.

    1. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by jaymz666 · · Score: 2

      Assuming the same content is available via twitter or facebook, it's a lot easier to miss critical information there with a constant stream. In reader I know how many updates each blog, comic or whatever has had and can easily keep up at my leisure. Instead of intermixed with all my friends on whatever social interface.

    2. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The only way you can be sure that software will be around forever is if you have the source and are able to compile it yourself.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      And even that assumes you have a working compiler for your machine.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re: Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such as http://selfoss.aditu.de/ - a single-user self hosted php rss reader

    5. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I was a big user of Bloglines, then Reader, and never saw a big reason to use Twitter, G+, or Facebook.

      This seems to me to be a symptom of the Old Guard/New User syndrome. We in the Old Guard used power tools on the Internet -- shell accounts, news aggregators, Usenet, etc. Those power tools are no longer being supported because the New Users want social networking and pretty graphics.

      All I can say that if they try to take away my shell account I will blackout the Eastern Seaboard. Don't think I can't. Don't underestimate the power of the shell side. :)

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    6. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by doctorfaustus · · Score: 1

      Daily Rotation has been around for 14 years now....

    7. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by Urkki · · Score: 1

      And even that assumes you have a working compiler for your machine.

      Well, if it is a web app, all you need is one service provider in the accessible part of the world, where you can host the app, and a machine (say, a fridge) which can access the web.

    8. Re:Not the first time I've had to switch RSS by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Host it yourself: http://tt-rss.org/

  5. NewsBlur by lennier1 · · Score: 3

    In my case it's newsblur.com

    Only problem is that it's still a rather small operation and right now the unexpected flood of new users is wreaking havoc on its servers.

    1. Re:NewsBlur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the free version only allows 10 feeds. Feedly wins this round on my system. Also their iOS app kicks ass.

    2. Re:NewsBlur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's USD 1 /month.

    3. Re:NewsBlur by lennier1 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. That's barely the price of some smartphone game.

      Funny thing is, I would've gladly paid Google five bucks per month for the comfort Reader's interface offered.

  6. Feedly isn't perfect but it works everywhere by technomom · · Score: 1

    Feedly is my choice and I'm very happy that they announced a seamless transition from Google Reader to their own backend services. They were right on top of this. http://blog.feedly.com/ There are some who don't like the UI but I've never really had a problem with it. Works nicely on Chrome/ChromeOS through its plugin, on Android, iOS, even Kindle Fire.

    1. Re:Feedly isn't perfect but it works everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Feedly is my choice and I'm very happy that they announced a seamless transition from Google Reader to their own backend services. They were right on top of this.

      http://blog.feedly.com/

      There are some who don't like the UI but I've never really had a problem with it. Works nicely on Chrome/ChromeOS through its plugin, on Android, iOS, even Kindle Fire.

      It's not good for people who can't install extensions on their work computer

    2. Re:Feedly isn't perfect but it works everywhere by LihTox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, why DOES Feedly need an extension to work? I can see where an extension might make it more *useful*, but the basic functionality doesn't need it.

    3. Re:Feedly isn't perfect but it works everywhere by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

      It was enough to put me off, the moment I realised it needed a plugin just to show it's own webpage I got rid of it quickly.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    4. Re:Feedly isn't perfect but it works everywhere by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what everyone is complaining about. Feedly's interface shit, who gives a fuck if it requires an extension?

  7. Keeping feeds separate by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe I use RSS feeds differently than other people; but I've had trouble finding a decent reader that allows you to look at your feeds separately (on my iPad anyway - Firefox and Safari do fine if I'm on my desktop). Apparently most people like all the data all mixed in together, but I am generally reading RSS to find more targeted info - new Netflix streamable movies, for example.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Keeping feeds separate by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Google Reader you can do that, you just click on the feed you want to view in the "Subscriptions" list on the left instead of "All items" which mixes them all together.

      But it's fun to mix the satire news with the real news and guess which is which.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Rainer · · Score: 1

      RssRunner or xFeed might work for you.

    3. Re:Keeping feeds separate by tracphil · · Score: 1

      I use http://reederapp.com/ [reederapp] app currently for iOS devices and OSX. I plan on setting up http://feedafever.com/ [feedafever] and seeing how it works with the OSX version of reederapp, the iOS versions already support it.

    4. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Google Reader you can do that
       
      Not for long.

    5. Re:Keeping feeds separate by jockm · · Score: 1

      For what its worth, I have been using Fever for a few years now and think it is hands down the best reader on the market (wish the mobile version were better though)

      --

      What do you know I wrote a novel
    6. Re: Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Reeder on the iPad....is what I would have said before Google decided to axe Reader. Although, I'm sure they'll update and you'll be able to sync with other services soon.

    7. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      on computers (not phone AFAIK), RSSOwl does this (and is best to me) on all platforms, open source; on macs only you also have Vienna. Both scale really well (like, 100+ feed sources, 10000+ unread instantly handled), both can sort, search, display html site inline, lock feed items...

      --
      Herve S.
    8. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Really? What do you mean?!? Is something going to happen to Google Reader?!? How did you find out!?

    9. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I use RSS feeds differently than other people; but I've had trouble finding a decent reader that allows you to look at your feeds separately (on my iPad anyway

      I use mobile Safari exclusively to view feeds... seems to do what you want, but I'm still on iOS 5. It's not really the browser that displays the feed, though... it's an Apple server, reader.mac.com... and the rest of .Mac went away some time ago, and Apple's server is becoming increasingly flakey... but I can't even fathom the idea of using something similar to an email client to view feeds. I just use the iOS 5 mobile safari / .mac server because the feeds load really fast, and I don't have to load another app if I want to load the actual news page.

    10. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Newsrack. It's simple and functional, it keeps feeds separate.
      It can handle regular RSS feeds unlike most of the other so called RSS readers in the AppStore which all seem to require a google reader account.
      The downside to this app is that since a certain version, your feeds and starred articles no longer get included in your backups. I found out too late when upgrading iOS. Sad panda.
      There is a Cydiap app for the jailbroken called AppBackup which can backup and restore App data individually. Hooray.

    12. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reader

    13. Re:Keeping feeds separate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Skimr? Looks very nice. http://www.skimr.co

  8. Tiny Tiny RSS by DarkSkiez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Run your own google reader:

    tt-rss.org

    1. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

      This indeed, tt-rss is pretty nice!

    2. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by david.given · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately it requires you to run an SQL server and PHP, both of which require admin overhead to maintain. Does look nice, though.

    3. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This really is superb. Has a really nice Android client as well as the web interface.

    4. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Hydrian · · Score: 2

      This looks to be the closest replacement of Google Reader I have found. I'm still investigating mobile multi-user support. That is a showstopper for me. If this does workout, I may even be better than Google Reader. This way I control the data and not Google.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished.
    5. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe port it to use sqlite?

    6. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by akunkel · · Score: 0

      I just installed it on my linode server and it works great with the 400+ feeds that I exported from Google Reader. I also installed the Android app since I read most of my news during my commute and so far it seems pretty solid. It could use automatic downloading for offline reading and some other little things but otherwise very usable especially since it syncs my read articles with the server. It's all open source so maybe I will give a shot at adding some functionality myself.

    7. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's also gritttt-rss (http://gritttt-rss.nicolashoening.de/) which extends tt-rss with some sharing and import features. I haven't tried installing either yet.

    8. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      Just gave it a shot. Polished web interface, nails the key features from what I can see, and seems rather nice overall, but it's frustratingly slow and painfully unresponsive on the shared host I'd be using. If you have a dedicated host, then this definitely seems like something that's worth using, or at least worth looking into. As for me, I'll be looking for something else, since I don't want to be staring at "Loading..." for 15 seconds every time I click on one of my feeds.

    9. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Worth bearing in mind that it's likely there'll be an influx of contributions to this and other open source alternatives from the Reader exodus. So even if tt-rss doesn't have some feature you need right now...chances are high it'll mysteriously show in the next few weeks =)

    10. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      Do you have a PHP accelerator in line? (Can you do that on shared hosts? I don't know, never used one). Most PHP webapps are basically unusable in practice without an accelerator, inc. tt-rss.

    11. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Afraid I don't have one, and yeah, I wasn't expecting it to be outstanding, especially since they made a point of saying that shared hosting was unsupported, but I figured I'd share my results, that way others would know what they're getting into. This may be a good reason to finally upgrade to a dedicated host or repurpose one of my old computers for such a use.

    12. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What kind of problems do you see? I use Roundcubemail for webmail and it's on a vanilla CentOS 6 box running under stock PHP under Apache and Apache Traffic Server in front of that. I haven't noticed performance problems. I'm no fan of PHP either - just calling it as I see it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why is this unfortunate? you expected something which aggregates data to not have a database in which to store it and a functional UI for the user to access it with?

    14. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's multiuser, and it has mobile interface, tough i don't use it on mobile. So it might be worth to try...

    15. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by icebraining · · Score: 1

      When you say "shared", do you mean VPS or actually shared "web hosting"? Because TTRSS need a background daemon running to work well.

      I run it on my cheap VPS and it's been working just fine, even with a machine running a slew of other stuff (websites, email, git annex, etc).

    16. Re:Tiny Tiny RSS by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I mean shared shared, not VPS shared. And from what I read, the daemon only affected the polling of the subscriptions. As long as the interface was kept open in the browser, it could poll the feeds and pull data just as quickly. The advantage of the daemon was that it could do so when there wasn't a browser window open. I don't see any reason to believe that would have affected my "Loading..." screens that I was seeing, though obviously if you were on a VPS or a dedicated host, you'd probably be better provisioned than I am on my shared host, meaning that you'd see significantly better results.

  9. I just use an IRC window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    using:
    https://www.freshdot.net/?page_id=12
    there's also:
    http://scripts.irssi.org/html/irssi-feed.pl.html

  10. Newsbeuter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Mutt of RSS feed readers"

  11. Firefox Live Bookmarks by gman003 · · Score: 1

    It's a much different flow from Google Reader (and every other RSS reader I've ever seen, actually), but I use Firefox Live Bookmarks exclusively.

    I've tried switching away numerous times. Particularly during the entire Firefox 3.x series, which had a major bug where refreshing Live Bookmarks caused the whole browser to stop responding until it finished. With the 100+ blogs and webcomics I read, that meant every hour or so, it would freeze up for 2-3 minutes. I switched to Chrome for literally everything else, but I still kept Firefox for the Live Bookmarks. I just don't like how the others operate.

    1. Re:Firefox Live Bookmarks by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I used to use Live Bookmarks but they are simply too cumbersome and inconvenient. You have to check every feed separately, manually for updates. That is barely a step up from manually checking the websites you got the feeds from!

      With an RSS feed reader, you can see all unread messages at once and just page through them. So if I have 100 feeds and only 5 of them have new items, I am just looking at 5 new items in a single list. It's stupidly convenient. Plus simple features like being able to "star" items to save them for later or e-mail/share items is useful.

    2. Re:Firefox Live Bookmarks by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2

      Try doing RSS in Thunderbird, which might be closer to what you want. From what I recall, you can choose to keep the RSS feeds in a single folder, or split them by feed, plus all the easy things like marking / emailing.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    3. Re:Firefox Live Bookmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Feed Sidebar. It uses Firefox bookmarks and displays all new items in a sidebar, but uses its own history. The downside is that the "read" status doesn't sync across devices.

  12. FeedDemon Was by SrLnclt · · Score: 1

    I personally used FeedDemon for the better part of a decade, which had an option to synchronize with google reader. Unfortunately the author is also ending development of the software with the Google news being the last straw, effective today.

  13. Liferea by knuthin · · Score: 1

    I don't read stuff while moving anyway. Liferea (Desktop app).

    --
    Some apps are WYSIWYG. Some others are WYSIWTF.
    1. Re:Liferea by ssam · · Score: 1

      +1 for liferea
      I have used it for years. I like that it grabs all the headlines in the morning, then i can read them on the train (or where ever else I might be without a net connection). I can flag the interesting ones and read them later when i am online

      over the past couple of years the way its hard some odd bugs in it counting and displaying of unread or flagged mails, but it seems mostly good now in 1.8.12

  14. BazQux by Pebizop · · Score: 1

    BazQux is nice and fast: http://bazqux.com/ That's a web-based one. Imports your subscriptions from Google Reader.

    1. Re:BazQux by craigminah · · Score: 1

      BazQux isn't free...$9/year or more.

    2. Re:BazQux by kraut · · Score: 1

      That's a feature, not a bug..

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  15. Miss RSS in Apple Mail by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

    I really miss the RSS functionality from the last version of Apple Mail. I really liked being able to have my favorite feeds in the same place as my email, but separate from my Inbox. It was nice that each feed was separate, instead of munged together.

    Why this trend away from RSS I wonder? It is because Google wants you to use G+ as the reader for all your "feeds" in some Facebook-wannabe fashion?

    1. Re:Miss RSS in Apple Mail by undeadbill · · Score: 1

      I use Vienna on my Mac. I pull the feeds directly, instead of depending upon some intermediary site, and I can still organize things the way I like.

    2. Re:Miss RSS in Apple Mail by Fatalyst · · Score: 1

      Opera browser has integrated Mail client and RSS reader. It's pretty the same as mentioned Apple Mail, but more sophisticated and has feed folders (categories). See a screenshot (a bit outdated though) here: http://www.techishare.com/tech/how-to-import-rss-feeds-from-firefox-to-opera/

  16. Netvibes by unfortunateson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been using Netvibes for several years now, and am mostly pleased, partly due to its "widget" mode, which lets me separate posts by feed rather than seeing them piled up by time. It will aggregate facebook, twitter, email (subject lines only), and has various widgets for just about anything: google news searches, ebay bids/sales, stock tracking, etc.

    It's mobile interface, however, has some serious flaws: it reports the wrong feed name when you select a post (I think it's showing the one you previously selected), and some feeds don't display at all (TechCrunch and MAKE, I'm looking at you) -- it might just be a matter of selecting a different version of the feed, though.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Netvibes by misterooga · · Score: 1

      I haven't used it much... but so far I like Netvibes as well. It will also likely replace my iGoogle, which is going away this year too. (Nov 2013)

      I tried using Newsblur and functionality wise, that came pretty close to Google Reader. But I got really turned off by freemium. If I can only track 12 feeds, that's useless. (I keep reading 64 somewhere but when I tried it last night, it was limited to 12; regardless, I track more than 64 anyway so it doesn't work for me.) I did love the fact that you can 'close the account' with a click of a button.

      Feedly looked alright but once in a while, the whole page shifted far to the right that I only had about 20% of the browser on the right side. Some CSS issue, I imagine. As well, I couldn't add RSS for some reason. (Site not found error). I've closed the account by emailing team@devhd.com (need to provide Google Reader user id) and un-installing the plugin.

    2. Re:Netvibes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have using Netvibes and I have been disappointed by the slowness of the display because it is computed by Netvibes servers.

      I use ustart.org[www.ustart.org] for my rss needs. It's simple and it is fast, enough said.

    3. Re:Netvibes by MagicM · · Score: 1

      I'm impressed by ustart.org. The interface is definitely fast. I wish they supported keyboard shortcuts though.

    4. Re:Netvibes by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      So a replacement for Reader isn't worth $12-36/year? I'm sorry, but free options out there are going to be limited.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    5. Re:Netvibes by wile_e8 · · Score: 2

      Now that I've been trying Netvibes for a few hours, a few things are bothering me:
      - Do I really need to confirm every time I want to mark all items as read?
      - Why can't it put all the "new" items at the top? Sure, it was posted yesterday, but you didn't find it until right now. Why display it after all those other articles I've already read? Google Reader sorted by the time it found the new articles, putting new stuff at the top above all the stuff I already marked as read.
      - Why so slow to update feeds? Maybe this is just the crush of new traffic, but it is finding new articles multiple hours after they showed up in Google Reader.

      It's ok, but the only thing it has going for it for me right now is that it isn't completely crushed by all the new traffic. Maybe once I can get my feeds imported to Old Reader or Newsblur those will fit my usage patterns better.

    6. Re:Netvibes by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      I'd glady pay $12-$36 per year for a good Reader alternative (or for Reader itself.)

      However Newsblur Premium, if I'm reading the web page correctly, looks like it costs $500.00 / month. I assume it's priced like that for professional news organizations. That's wayyyy outside of my price range.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    7. Re:Netvibes by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      My apologies -- that pricing is what I see at NetVibes. These Reader replacements are starting to blur together in my mind. I may have to pace my evaluation of them, so that I don't get confused.

      (Also apologizing for the unterminated bold text. :) )

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    8. Re:Netvibes by ynp7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd pay a lot more than $36/year for Google Reader. Pretty much hating all of the alternatives though. Really, is it so fucking hard to have a list of feeds on one side and a list of article headlines that expand to show the full text when clicked on the other?

    9. Re:Netvibes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Skimr? If you like simplicity, this might be it: http://www.skimr.co

    10. Re:Netvibes by icebraining · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind self-hosting, try Tiny Tiny RSS, it's a barebones reader with just that kind of UI.

    11. Re:Netvibes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All news readers do that
      http://gnome.eu.org/index.php/Evolution_RSS_Reader_Plugin#Evolution-RSS_displaying_an_article

    12. Re:Netvibes by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      What part of having separate viewing panes for the article and the headline list do you think is like what I described? Even if that weren't the case, Evolution is going to lack the cloud-based syncing that I find mandatory _and_ involves entanglement with GNOME garbage. Both deal breakers. The user experience of Outlook tied to a single local computer is hardly what anyone should want from an RSS reader.

  17. It was called RSS Reader by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 2

    My favorite used to be RSS Reader (rssreader.com), but it hasn't been updated lately. Basic simple interface: List of feeds on the left, headlines on the right. That's all I want.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:It was called RSS Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NewsFox add-on operates similarly. Memory coupled with article time/date are enough to make syncing read/unread articles between devices pointless for me. It does export/import lists if that matters though.

    2. Re:It was called RSS Reader by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

      I just started using it, thanks!

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
    3. Re:It was called RSS Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favourite used to be Feedreader, which I ditched when it went closed-source. I've switched to RSSOwl which was fine at first, but now it seems new versions suck up more and more memory and are somewhat sluggish. I've seen that Feedreader is now acquired by a new developer and open source again, maybe I should switch back?

    4. Re:It was called RSS Reader by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Basic simple interface: List of feeds on the left, headlines on the right. That's all I want.

      Out of curiosity, what exactly needs updating if it already meets all your requirements?

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    5. Re:It was called RSS Reader by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

      It didn't work well past Windows XP.

      --
      You never expect irony, do you?
      Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
      @iyfwrestling
  18. Feedly. by sidragon.net · · Score: 1

    http://feedly.com/

    I just switched, and I'm already wondering why I was on Reader for so long.

  19. Bloglines was not bad in the day by del_ctrl_alt · · Score: 1

    I used this before Google.... signed up again today, They are now reporting on a banner at the top that service may be slow due to many new accounts being setup, At least I didnt get the old plumber!

  20. Have your own server? Tiny Tiny RSS by WoodburyMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    So Google, you're shutting down Google Reader? Yeah, well... I'm gonna go build my own Web-Based RSS Reader with blackjack and hookers. In fact, forget the RSS Reader! I have been a avid Google Reader user for 3-4+ years. I check it every break at work and usually first thing in the morning on my Tablet and at night before I go to bed. Love it. After hearing this, EVERY other web based RSS / Reader site was slammed and down. Then I thought... what if any of those services just randomly *poof* overnight went offline, like Google Reader, but without notice? Having my own shared server, I looked into PHP / MySQL solutions. So far Tiny Tiny RSS Reader Wins out. http://tt-rss.org/ Set up and running in 20 minutes. Being a shared server I couldn't run daemons so I had to use a cron job to have it update the feeds every 10 minutes but it works great so far for the last 12 hours.

    1. Re:Have your own server? Tiny Tiny RSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 minutes is AN ETERNITY

  21. Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. 1kpl.us by dFaust · · Score: 2

    A buddy of mine wrote a Google Reader replacement back when they started making Google+ changes to it. I don't if its the best, I haven't checked out the others, but it meets my needs and I use it daily. It has some social features so you can share and comment on posts with your friends as well. http://1kpl.us/ (The name is a reference to when you have too many feeds and not enough time to read them - the old Reader counter would simply say "1000+" once you hit 1k unread posts)

    1. Re:1kpl.us by flingbob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hi, I created 1kpl.us, I'd love it if some /. users checked it out. Thanks!

    2. Re:1kpl.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looks great, but I can't find a way to make it display just the titles of items and have them expand by clicking on them. My Google Reader looks like this: http://i.imgur.com/M8Td2mU.png
      It's much easier to go through a lot of items like that.

    3. Re:1kpl.us by sapped · · Score: 1

      I managed to get my feeds from Reader over into 1kpl but nothing displays for me. Do you have a help page hidden away somewhere really well that I should be looking at?

    4. Re:1kpl.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Mr. Reader on the iPad, any hope of integration?

    5. Re:1kpl.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is 1kpl.us open-source? If yes, maybe we could give you a hand.

    6. Re:1kpl.us by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, it looks like it may be a bit swamped at the moment. My preferences show all of my feeds as having been imported and have a complete list of them there, but they're only slowly filling in within the main interface. It looks like it may be a few hours before all of my feeds start showing up as expected at the current rate that things are going, though that may just be the /. effect.

    7. Re:1kpl.us by Troed · · Score: 1

      *) No quick way to select feed - I seldom read all but choose one at a time.
      *) Not seeing any umlauts in my Swedish feeds.

      Besides that I'm ok with the current layout and love that you use the same quick navigation keys as Reader.

    8. Re:1kpl.us by dFaust · · Score: 1

      *) No quick way to select feed - I seldom read all but choose one at a time.

      There's actually a feed button on the left that will expose all of your feeds and let you read a single feed. If your browser is wide enough that will be always exposed. I read my feeds in the same way.

    9. Re:1kpl.us by Contact · · Score: 1

      It looks good, but... I can't see a way to sort feeds by "oldest first" (I hate reading things out of order) and there's no obvious way to make the feeds list permanently display, every time I switch feeds it slides off again.

      Perhaps most annoyingly, there's no contact information or anything else on the site which allows users to ask questions like this on the site.

  23. None of those seem to filt the bill... by Junta · · Score: 1

    So I see two sorts of things being mentioned:
    -Desktop/Phone applications that have no idea what you have read/not read on other devices
    -Hosted RSS readers that do not have that problem, but could just as easily be shut down at the whim of the operator.

    What about self-hosted alternatives internet accessible? Install something on my own http server and go to town (e.g. like roundcube or squirrelmail for email). RSS reading is sufficiently low load that even most home internet connections suffice to serve it up to you personally.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  24. Well, DomDocument, obviously. by cshark · · Score: 1

    If I can't code against it, it's not good enough.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  25. dose of reality for geeks, RSS not used by iggymanz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    most people on planet earth have never heard of RSS and don't use it. sad but tru.

    1. Re:dose of reality for geeks, RSS not used by jbssm · · Score: 2

      most people on planet earth have never heard of RSS and don't use it. sad but tru.

      That goes against all evidence presented by the fact that RSS readers are constantly on the top downloaded apps in Apple's App Store.

  26. Emacs and Gnus by jason8 · · Score: 1

    Emacs with Gnus is a nice low-bandwidth way to check your feeds. I'm not kidding either.

  27. Upgrade your domain to Google Apps Business today! by ftobin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google has quite some balls sending me an email today asking me to upgrade my personal Google Apps account to their business tier today. Only $5/month!

    You know what I would pay for? Google Reader.

    (For the record, the reason I don't upgrade is because I'm a single user of the domain, but have 3 accounts - one personal, one for root, and one for a separate alerts mailbox...labels don't suffice yet).

  28. So far down to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • The Old Reader which replicates the look and feel of Google Reader reasonably well, is having some capacity issues at the moment, but is at least functional. Major issue is that it doesn't refresh feeds automatically on page refresh, which when following stuff throughout the day can be problematic
    • Feedly which is having some capacity issues at the moment, and looks a bit too "new" and "shiny" for my liking, but functionally is OK. Has the advantage of refreshing quickly, and remaining in sync with Google Reader, which is good for the transitional phase.

    I've been through about 4 or 5 readers since last night, and those are the only two that look promising for my use-case. Was tending toward Old Reader while Feedly was (to all intents and purposes) down, but now might be moving across to feedly... We'll see...!

  29. Will still work standalone by critter42b · · Score: 1

    FeedDemon will still work as a standalone desktop app after GR shuts down, you just won't be able to sync article read/starred status across multiple systems, but it appears not work with Windows 8 and as noted above there will be no further development

    1. Re:Will still work standalone by SrLnclt · · Score: 1

      I just recently started using the sync function anyway to view some of the same feeds at home/work. I'm running Windows 8 at home (don't ask), and haven't had any problems with FeedDemon so far.

  30. How about one I can install on my webserver? by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

    Since we're on the topic, does anyone know a good RSS reader that I can install on my own web server?

    I currently use Gregarius but the project is no longer under development.

    I don't want a desktop based one as I need to ensure it checks the feeds whether my computer is on or not. Also, there's nothing more convenient than simply clicking links within a browser.

    --
    Beetle B.
    1. Re:How about one I can install on my webserver? by misterooga · · Score: 1

      Tiny Tiny RSS: http://tt-rss.org.nyud.net/redmine/projects/tt-rss/wiki

      I keep hearing about it. It worked for some; not for others.

    2. Re:How about one I can install on my webserver? by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      Sux0r (sorry not having seen you earlier, I just announced it 1 km below)
      http://sourceforge.net/projects/sux0r/
      plenty of interesting features including bayesian filtering of lots of posts...
      If you try it do tell me!
      H.

      --
      Herve S.
  31. Reeder is dabomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Reeder on my Mac, phone and iPad. Unfortunately, I organize my feeds through Google so I will have to do over.

  32. My own, self-rolled RSS reader by blindcoder · · Score: 1

    Honestly? Yes, it's a shameless plug, but my favorite RSS reader is the one I wrote myself, unspectacularly named 'blindRSS' (google it, I'm not yet THAT shameless). Okay, I am: https://github.com/blind-coder/blindRSS/tree/dev

    Main advantage IMO: Runs on your own server.

    --
    See my blog for my free opinions.
  33. If applicable: host it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Self-hosting solutions are available, will never get canned in this manner, and are highly customizable. But, of course, require a place to host it.

    I've tried both Tiny Tiny RSS and RSSLounge before in an attempt to rid myself of the Google Reader addiction, but found them both lacking in some respects every time. Since Google Reader is disappearing though, I made a new attempt this morning.

    RSSLounge seems to have been abandoned a year or two ago, but perhaps it was stable enough (RSS aggregation is not nuclear science).

    Tiny Tiny RSS have some in my eyes quite horrible default settings, especially coming from Google Reader. The good news, however, is that it is configurable to mimic Google Reader quite closely. With some work with custom CSS rules it is quite close at a first glance.

    My Tiny Tiny RSS configuration:

    • Enable "Automatically expand articles in combined mode"
    • Enable "Combined feed display"
    • Long date format: "Y-m-d H:i"
    • Short date format: "Y-m-d H:i"
    • My custom RSS

    Last time I installed it on Debian I ran into enough caveats that it led me to write a guide for others to install it, but since then it has been included in the unstable repository. To install it, some manual work was still needed, though:

    • sudo aptitude install tt-rss libphp-simplepie #the second package is a correct dependency now, bug fixed very recently, so that should no longer be needed.
    • sudo vi /usr/share/tt-rss/www/config.php #Enter server URL. I also set SINGLE_USER_MODE=true per preference.
    • ln -s ../conf-available/50-tt-rss.conf /etc/apache2/conf.d #A bit weird by the Debian package to not put it directly in conf.d/
    • sudo vi tt-rss.local #This was for my local configuration. Needed a entry for Apache to give access to a directory outside of DocumentRoot. I also locked it to localhost access per preference.
    • sudo service apache2 reload
    • sudo vi /etc/default/tt-rss #Set DISABLED=0 to be able to start the service.
    • sudo service tt-rss start #Hopefully the aggregator will start fetching feeds.

    Then go to http://localhost/tt-rss and start configuring. All subscriptions can be exported from Google Reader and imported in Tiny Tiny RSS, keeping dirctory structure intact.

    I'll try to migrate fully to this solution now that Google apparently no longer wants my traffic :-) . I'd say I probably use Reader the most of all Google's services, including Search, Gmail, Youtube, etc., so the decision to can it is quite strange from my personal view.

    1. Re:If applicable: host it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, I found out what happened to RSSLounge: it was superseded by the author's new project Selfoss. Probably also an alternative to check out, though a lot of project communication seem to be in German, which might be a problem for some :-) .

    2. Re:If applicable: host it yourself by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      But you're never going to get the relative consistency and convenience of Google Reader out of a self-hosted solution. At least not if you care about having mobile access and hate the idea of using a mobile web browser for access it.

    3. Re:If applicable: host it yourself by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Why not? TinyTinyRSS has native mobile apps, including an official Android client.

    4. Re:If applicable: host it yourself by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. That's awesome! I'll definitely be looking into that, thanks.

  34. BeyondPod by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

    BeyondPod is my RSS client of choce. It is for mobile platforms (Windows and Android), and has a ton of features (including an in-built media player for podcasts, scheduling capabilities, etc.).

  35. Re:Why does this even matter? by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

    You have no clue. Google Reader aggregates all of those bookmarks into one web site. With your method, if you have 35 web sites you like to read, you have to open 35 bookmarks to see if they've posted anything new. With Google Reader, you only have to visit one site to see if any of those 35 sites has been updated. And even if they only post snippets in the RSS feed (most I use show full articles), it's still tons more convenient than visiting each website to see if they have new articles.

  36. Re:Crap post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSS is a simple XML file, you can parse it and write a "reader" in about 40 lines of python code.

    Or one line of Perl. One long line.

  37. Firefox by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Firefox is all you need. You also eliminate the need for a second program to do what amounts to having "live" bookmarks. Get it, eliminate chrome and reader in one fell swoop.

    1. Re:Firefox by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I used Thunderbird's inbuilt reader and I'm very happy with it to be honest.

    2. Re:Firefox by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      That's great if you only read your feeds from one machine. I use five (home PC running Windows and Opera, Android Tablet running Chrome, Android Tablet running Dolphin, Work PC running Windows and Firefox, and remote BSD account on which I websurf using Lynx. Yes, goddamnit, Lynx.)

      A web-based RSS reader is necessary if you use multiple machines and OSes.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    3. Re:Firefox by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      That's great if you only read your feeds from one machine. I use five (home PC running Windows and Opera, Android Tablet running Chrome, Android Tablet running Dolphin, Work PC running Windows and Firefox, and remote BSD account on which I websurf using Lynx. Yes, goddamnit, Lynx.)

      A web-based RSS reader is necessary if you use multiple machines and OSes.

      Actually Firefox has a sync feature which synchronizes bookmarks. It treats RSS feeds as "live" bookmarks, and synchronizes them the same way. It works on Windows (or winders as we call it in the south), osX, Linux, and Android. You can't beat lynx, though.

    4. Re:Firefox by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      So where's the iOS version of firefox? Or firefox for the Kindle?

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    5. Re:Firefox by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      So where's the iOS version of firefox? Or firefox for the Kindle?

      Talk to the boys in cupertino about FF for iOS. Cupertino doesn't allow other browsers than webkit. What we've got here is failure to communicate. Some companies you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way Apple users want it...well, they get it. I don't like it any more than you might.

      As for kindle, you can download FF for kindle from the ftp here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/mobile/releases/15.0/android/multi/fennec-15.0.multi.android-arm.apk It used to be available from the amazon store but the Mozilla team pulled it because Amazon modified the apk! I think it only works on Kindle fire HD.

  38. RSSOwl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSSOwl is by far the best RSS reader I've found.

    1. Re:RSSOwl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the overview page on RSSowl's site:

      Google Reader Synchronization With RSSOwl it is easy to keep your list of subscriptions and articles synchronized with your Google Reader account.

      Therein lies the problem.

  39. Re:Why does this even matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always felt the same way, but I have a nagging feeling there's something I'm missing.
    Anyone have an explanation? What's RSS good for?

  40. Old fashioned? by eabrek · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm old fashioned. I use the NewsFox add-in to Firefox at work, and Thunderbird at home. They are not cloud based. I keep my own data, so I don't need to worry about people shutting off service...

  41. I went looking and found... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BlogTrotter. RSS to Email engine, and seems to work well so far. At least you can download your email via IMAP and keep it forever if you want!

    http://blogtrottr.com/

  42. Outlook by happylight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    *gasp* Yes I use MS Outlook. Just so it's all sorted together with my email.

    1. Re:Outlook by jimharris · · Score: 1

      I also use Outlook for some of my RSS feeds and it works very well. I'd use it for all my feeds except that it fills up my Unread folder with too many unread messages. It overwhelms my work email. If Outlook had Unread Email and Unread RSS folders, I'd probably use Outlook for all my RSS feeds.

    2. Re:Outlook by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have to have Outlook open all day at work anyways, might as well use the features in it. It is actually a pretty good RSS reader.

    3. Re:Outlook by happylight · · Score: 1

      It does have its own RSS folder by default...

      On top of that you can set up incoming rules to auto sort them (mail too not just RSS) into folders, tag them, mark as read, or just about anything.

  43. Feedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have started using Feedly as they sync with Google Reader feeds, and promise to transition your feeds to their backend by 1-Jul

  44. Sage(s) by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Long, long ago, I started using Sage with Firefox. When it was sort-of abandoned, I moved to Sage-Too.

    Then, the main developer of Sage-Too went on a rant about not liking ad blockers, and left. Problem is, I like ad blockers and hate people who force me not to use them. The Sage project resumed working, but it didn't work with Ad Block. I managed to keep using Sage Too until I couldn't avoid upgrading from Firefox 3.6x. At that point, I cobbled together something with PHP on my local Apache server, plus Stylish in Firefox, to keep using a very Sage-like interface with Ad Block.

    Point is, I'd never use an RSS reader that was on a remote server. Now my main problem is that while Firefox converts RSS feeds to HTML, Google Chrome doesn't. If I found a good RSS-to-HTML converter in PHP, I'd probably have an at-least-Github-ready "Sage Three".

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  45. Multiple devices ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I like (or liked...) about Google Reader was that I could read some things at home on my Mac, some other at work on my PC and some others in between on mobile phone, and that the "read" status is synchronized.

    I am ready to switch to anything else, as long as I can keep on reading stuff from everywhere. I am ready to install client applications.

    Any idea ?

    1. Re:Multiple devices ? by aaron44126 · · Score: 2

      Feedly is cloning the Google Reader API and implementing a new back-end as part of their "Normandy" project, so it's likely that other clients will turn to it to keep their apps working (and synchronized). Naturally, the official Google ones will be left out.

    2. Re:Multiple devices ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tiny tiny rss http://tt-rss if you want a self-hosted solution. It's multiuser and has an android client too.

  46. I'm a geek and I don't understand the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSS is the button at the top of Firefox, it shows when the page has an rss fee, you click it, it subscribes and the entry in the bookmark menu looks like title menu with a popout list of articles.... I do a quick access, it pulls the list and I see what's new. I don't get what Google reader was, or why I would care.

    Seriously, I'm missing the problem here, why do you need something special for that?

    I can't imagine visiting a special site for it, when my RSS feeds are right there on the bookmarks menu.

    Can someone explain what the real problem is here??

    1. Re:I'm a geek and I don't understand the problem by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      RSS is the button at the top of Firefox, it shows when the page has an rss fee, you click it, it subscribes and the entry in the bookmark menu looks like title menu with a popout list of articles.... I do a quick access, it pulls the list and I see what's new. I don't get what Google reader was, or why I would care.

      Seriously, I'm missing the problem here, why do you need something special for that?

      I can't imagine visiting a special site for it, when my RSS feeds are right there on the bookmarks menu.

      Can someone explain what the real problem is here??

      Different strokes.

      I use the Firefox RSS too and love it. On my desktop. On my mobile devices, I prefer Pulse, though. Even though their latest UI "improvement" for selecting sets of feeds is really annoying, I love the way I can see all those headlines and thumbnails at a glance.

    2. Re:I'm a geek and I don't understand the problem by wile_e8 · · Score: 1

      Two main advantages Google Reader had over Firefox RSS bookmarks:

      • Sorting: Instead of needing to go into each bookmark to check if it has new items, just visit Google Reader and it'll have an updated list of all new items for all feeds (or just per folder if you set them up).
      • Syncing: The list of new items you haven't read is constantly in sync no matter what device you access Google Reader on or what device you last accessed it.

      Firefox RSS bookmarks provide a workable RSS solution, but it was just much easier to keep up to date on a large number of feeds with Google Reader.

    3. Re:I'm a geek and I don't understand the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google reader works on any HTML device, your feeds and tracking of read/unread is automatically synced across all devices. Google reader does not require any specific browser, does not require a plug-in to your browser and is generally excellent. It is also used as a back-end component by many other services.

    4. Re:I'm a geek and I don't understand the problem by thoth · · Score: 1

      I do a quick access, it pulls the list and I see what's new. I don't get what Google reader was, or why I would care.

      Seriously, I'm missing the problem here, why do you need something special for that?

      I have 100+ RSS feeds. What you're describing doesn't sound like it scales at all. I'm not going through 100+ bookmarks to see what's new, I want an RSS reader to display new items.

  47. Do Not Want Desktop Reader by ossuary · · Score: 2

    My problem is that I liked being able to dump all of my feeds into Google Reader as sort of a central storage, then use various iOS apps to read them later on. I do not have time to read them during the day, so a desktop application or web reader is useless to me. I just want a central convenient storage area for my feeds and a good mobile app to read them later that night. I will have to hold off moving my Google Reader feeds until I see where Reeder may be going with their app development.

  48. SharpReader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is for windows only, it gives me three panes, one for the feeds, one for the messages, and the third one for reading. It's no longer supported, but it does just what I like. Yes, this was my first one and I've tried others, so as usual we normally stick with the first of what we use.

  49. Firefox addon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used NewsFox for years and it does all I ask for.
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/newsfox/

  50. Android app with alt text support by barlevg · · Score: 1

    I posted a similar comment in the first Reader thread, but what I'm looking for is an RSS reader for Android with support for alt text (aka mouseover text). Google Reader, amazingly, has this. It's the only Android app--RSS reader or even web browser--that I've found that will let you read alt text. And yes, xkcd is a big motivator, but it turns out xkcd is popular enough that products like Pulse have special feeds with the alt text built in. The same can't be said for the myriad of other webcomics I read that use alt text.

  51. Brief by fbumg · · Score: 1

    The Brief plugin for Firefox. Look at them aggregated, look at them separate, your choice. Been using it for a long time. It's simple, and it works. At least for me.

    --
    I know I don't know what I don't know.
    1. Re:Brief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works for me too. And I'm quite sure that you could set it up to sync your live bookmarks across computers, and the add-on itself. For those strange people who don't carry a single device everywhere they go.

  52. Re:Why does this even matter? by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who can use bookmarks and Google has no need for an RSS reader. RSS as a whole is just a solution to a problem that never existed in the first place.

    But how do you know the site updated its contents in the first place? Would you manually go to 24 sites (the number of RSS feeds I currently have) just to find out if any of them have updated their contents? Also, don't diss on snippets. Why do papers have abstracts/summaries when I can read the whole thing I am interested in? A snippet is somewhere between a sensational headline and a long text that (should) give me a good 10 second idea on whether I want to read the whole article. If you have feeds that might have 10-20 updates each cycle, it can be quite tedious to go to each article and peruse it trying to get a summary of the article.

  53. You are doing it wrong by Merenth · · Score: 1

    I don't think that most people who weren't avid Google Reader users have any idea how it was used. Suggesting Twitter or Live Bookmarks as an alternative is absurd. Reader was great for putting feeds into categories and helping you keep track of what has been read. Once you read something, it didn't show up again unless you starred it. You could search your old articles, forward them, share them, or do nearly anything that you needed to do. It was simply the best was to manage large volumes of news/web updates without getting bogged down. I'm working with Feedly and a few of the others now, but the fast and simple interface of Reader will be sorely missed.

  54. Isn't the cloud great? by treadmarks · · Score: 1

    If you have a program and a company stops supporting it, it means no more patches. In the cloud, it means it's gone forever and you're out of luck.

  55. USSRSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In USSR RSS Reader not namned google _is_ USSRSS

  56. Re:Why does this even matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who can use bookmarks and Google has no need for an RSS reader.

    Anyone who has a pad and paper has no need for bookmarks. Sometimes a different method is easier/more convenient.

    I use a desktop feed reader (Akregator) to keep track of feeds which are rarely updated, but that interest me. Some have posts once per month; if I don't use the feed reader, I'm liable to forget checking the sites at all.

    I use a web feed reader (Netvibes) to read news. This way I don't have to bother with going to each site directly, which is especially useful since I have at least a dozen sources for my news.

    If you don't like RSS, that's fine, but that also doesn't mean that nobody else has a use for it.

  57. SelfOSS by stuporglue · · Score: 2

    I wanted a web-based reader, and did some searching last night.

    I decided I wanted to go with a self-hosted option, and found SelfOSS. It's light-weight, PHP5 and the code is very clean. It can use MySQL or SQLite.

    It's a single-person reader, with one username/password supported.

    http://selfoss.aditu.de/

    You can see a live demo here: http://stuporglue.org/selfoss/

    The only downside so far is that with SQLite, the database locks when updates are running. This is fairly quick, but might be an issue for some people.

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
    1. Re:SelfOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or Tiny Tiny RSS, lots of features. http://tt-rss.org/redmine/projects/tt-rss/wiki

    2. Re:SelfOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My install loads really slowly. It needs OMPL import / export very soon.

    3. Re:SelfOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about Skimr? If you like simplicity, this might be it: http://www.skimr.co

  58. Here's what I'd like to see by Inda · · Score: 1

    One HTML5 webpage.

    That's it.

    Pull the RSS feeds once an hour. Use HTML5 to store the data. Use Javascript to write the HTML. It doesn;t have to be fancy.

    Bonus if I can 'install' my own CSS.

    I'll save it on Dropbox, Google Drive, Mega.co.nz or even my own local storage.

    I haven't kept up my skills, so that's me out. It's a weekend's work for someone...

    Help a nerd out?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Here's what I'd like to see by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

      Several exist. On Linux check out Curn (a java app with no GUI) or Rawdog (a Python app, I think; maybe PHP). I use both and like them. Rawdog produces my personal feed at http://www.therandymon.com/rawdogger.html and I can access it from any device on any OS. I stayed with the stock CSS, but you can customize it any way you like. Have fun!

      --
      If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  59. What we really need by LihTox · · Score: 1

    isn't a new RSS reader but a new RSS syncing standard. Google Reader let people use several different viewers and they would all stay in sync: what was marked read here was marked read over there too. (OPML lets you import and export a list of subscriptions, but not a list of read items.) Clearly, relying on a single company to provide that service was a mistake. Can we come up with an open-source standard system that won't go poof at the whim of a single website, so that people can use multiple reading platforms easily?

  60. Google Reader Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rolio is an alternative to Google Reader which, in addition to RSS, also supports the integration of Facebook and Twitter into your timeline for real-time updates. Rolio also supports the importing of your Google Reader feeds.

  61. what's the rush? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    are we really so bored we must find the replacement OMG SKY IS FALLING on the very next day?

    chances are that two months from now you'll have better auto migration tools and the people recommending you a replacement have then actually used the replacements for more than a day.

    personally I don't find the need for a rss reader to be that big. niche blogs tend to be best read at many articles at a time and and major stuff hits sites like slashdot at least twice so.. if the actual site is too fucking crappy to read on phone or browser I'm not going to read their articles anyhow.

    and personally I've had the opinion as well that if you trench yourself into reading news just from your feeds you'll end up getting just a small slice. I often read the related articles, followups on other sites etc. and google for extra information on the subject if it's interesting. some rare stuff I have emailed(dilbert).

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:what's the rush? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      personally I don't find the need for a rss reader to be that big.

      For people working in particular tech branches, RSS feeds are the simplest and fastest way to keep themselves up-to-date. Most web sites and news wires allow subscribing to a feed of articles with a tag. Often hard to find, occasionally manual editing of the URI is required - but works like a charm in the end. Sparing you the need to fish for those few articles.

      and personally I've had the opinion as well that if you trench yourself into reading news just from your feeds you'll end up getting just a small slice.

      That is very true. And sadly if I for example have 5 subscriptions related to a certain topic, the recommendation by most of the on-line RSS readers would be another subscription about the same topic.

      My response is very simple: once a week a I read a tabloid. :)

      And check the week-end posts on The Register which is almost a tabloid, but for tech news.

      are we really so bored we must find the replacement OMG SKY IS FALLING on the very next day?

      There are alternatives to Google Reader. But the problem with them is that they are all try to sell you something else. Or designed by a bunch of monkeys who never in their life needed to read anything longer than a twitt. Reader was the best because it didn't bother you with the redundant, annoying stuff. You could actually concentrate on the reading and be done with it in a half hour. Last Google redesign (after G+ rollout) started dismantling the usability (and I personally use right now very large Stylish' style for the reader) but it still mostly worked. And still mostly works.

      Another thing about the Reader is that Google keeps at least one month of feed history. For example, with the Reader a 2 week vacations do not mean a 2 week hole in the updates.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  62. Bloglines by alphadogg · · Score: 1

    I was pretty happy with Bloglines until it was to be killed in 2010 (a white knight rescued it, http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/110510-bloglines-shutdown-avoided-as-merchantcircle.html but I had already switched to google reader by that time). I'd consider returning to it, since it remains alive, though am also open to some of the other alternatives being shared.

  63. Q: What's theName of the Best Reader? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    A: Aaron Schwartz

    Seriously, Google should release all sources under a BSD-derived license, with a memorial dedication to Aaron, in place of the UC Regent's notice.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  64. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious why Google felt the need to kill off Reader... Their users are basically feeding them their interests on a platter... Tech, fashion and beauty products, etc. Maybe it was redundant to the information gained from normal Google searches? Still though, I don't do Google searches for Slashdot, or Anandtech , or Gizmodo... So it certainly would be useful for them to know I monitor those sites.

    It probably didn't require too much resources to maintain an RSS aggregator.

  65. Opera by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

    I actually love Opera's feeder. Clean, simple, not beholden to web services like Google. Of course, this comes with its own set of problems:

    1) Requires installing another browser and a proprietary one at that
    2) Opera's mail client is utter shit (hence the reason I use Thunderbird for my E-mail or I'd just use Opera and have a one-stop.
    3) Opera tends to have good releases then buggy ones. Stick to the odd point releases.(12.11, 12.13, etc. 12.14 has issues with certain pages hanging again).

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  66. Sage for Firefox by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

    I use Sage. Very unobtrusive, no need for a server account (ie. no one tracks what I'm reading), easy method to search a web page for RSS links, links are a part of my bookmarks (easy to manage, organize, back up), RSS links are copied to all of my computers as a part of the bookmarks using XMarks (make a change on one computer, the change shows up on all computers automatically). In fact, I do NOT use Chrome specifically because Chrome doesn't have Sage.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Sage for Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no need for a server account (ie. no one tracks what I'm reading)

      RSS links are copied to all of my computers as a part of the bookmarks using XMarks

      Do I sense a contradiction here?

  67. ownCloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use ownCloud daily for other purposes and today, with the latest update it has support for a news reader: http://algorithmsforthekitchen.com/blog/?p=479.

  68. Thunderbird by guanxi · · Score: 1

    I just want a simple, fast RSS reader. I'm not looking for many features.

    I tried a few dedicated products, but Thunderbird 2.x works best for me (I didn't try a later version). It's got a 3-pane interface, it's lightening fast (essential for browsing hundreds or thousands of headlines), you can turn off remote images for more speed and privacy (use View > Message Body As > Simple HTML), and you can navigate (mostly) by keyboard (the amazing Nostalgy extension may help here; I've used it for so long that I'm not sure how TBird works without it).

    For people looking for more alternatives, here is what I found when I looked around a couple of years ago:
      * Awasu (local client)
      * NewsGator (local)
      * Brief (Firefox addon)

    Hosted:
      * MyYahoo
      * MyAOL
      * NetVibes
      * Bloglines

    Also, discontinued but still available at the time:
      * Newzcrawler
      * FeedReader
      * Sharp
      * Omnea
      * AmphetaDesk (FOSS)

  69. RSS Owl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RSSOwl is one of the few readers I've found to include really strong filtering, tagging and organizational options. I haven't found anything that has nearly as much functionality. May not be important for somebody who only follows 5 or 10 feeds, but when you've got over 50...

  70. I don't know about the best by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

    But certainly the least *fussiest* for me has been Feedly. Install extension, sign-in with google, bam, done.

    (tip: do full article view and it's as close to gr as you can.)

    All the others, oldreader, newsblur, netvibes have been bitching one way or another.

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:I don't know about the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya this one currently is the least fuss because its using existing current google reader infrastructure just like it was before the google reader announcement. Pain will probably come on or after July 1.

  71. no replacement by arunvk · · Score: 1

    I dont think there is an exact replacement for google reader.. maybe the features can be emulated but not the ease.. google reader can be accessed from my office network but not feedly which is blocked.. .. I just needed to sign in with my google account to check mail,rss etc .. I wish google didnt decide this.. I have been using it since 2006..

  72. Owncloud by 101percent · · Score: 1

    Owncloud 5 is out and it has a builtin RSS reader

  73. Re:Upgrade your domain to Google Apps Business tod by Synn · · Score: 1

    For $5 a month you could rent a VPS and run Owncloud on it.

  74. Sage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sage for Firefox works fine for me.

  75. host your own! Sux0r, plus bayesian filtering! by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    If you own or share your webhosting, what about setting the agregator just there, so you can access it from just any platform you want?
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sux0r/
    You can even train it, bayesian like, to sort your very own interesting posts...

    --
    Herve S.
  76. HAHAHA! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    uh, no. not true for either top ten free apps or top ten revenue generators. they're gmail and youtube related things, plus games.

    rss is great for us geeks, but the world at large not so much

    1. Re:HAHAHA! by jbssm · · Score: 2

      I was obviously talking about the News category, not the overall shop. As an example, the 3rd, 5th, 7th, 17th, 18th apps in my local App Store, are all RSS readers.

    2. Re:HAHAHA! by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      interesting, but could be a minute percentage of the whole, do they have raw numbers?

    3. Re:HAHAHA! by jbssm · · Score: 1

      I don't know how to check the sale numbers. But, I forgot to mention, these are the paid apps, although in the free category there are some as well.

  77. claws-mail & plugin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use claws-mail with the RSSyl plugin. It's quite fast even with tons of feeds, the only downside I can think of is that, like claws-mail, it's text based, but this for me is actually a plus. Does not work of mobile platforms though.

  78. RSSOwl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really dislike most RSS readers, be they web-based or otherwise, because they are either too simplistic, or just have a bad layout; I've found RSSOwl to be an extremely good RSS reader, which I've been using for about a year and a half now, and is open-source/cross-platform too.

    For me, it's pretty much perfect, but I will caveat that it has a longstanding bug, where certain feeds don't update properly, due to having certain 'atom' element formatting; not a huge problem, but have been waiting for a fix for that a very long time; other than that though, this is a really great program.

  79. Feedly is NOT a straight RSS Reader by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 1

    I love Feedly. But it is NOT a straight RSS Reader. It personalizes and selects those stories that it thinks you want to read. It also has some pretty neat discovery features. That said, I've used Feedly for weeks, without realizing that I had missed stories from some of my favorite sites. I like to switch between Netvibes and Feedly, honestly.

  80. Thunderbird by vanyel · · Score: 1

    It seems to work well for me...

  81. Rawdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://offog.org/code/rawdog.html

    Few dependencies, runs as a daemon, accessible from anywhere since it's web-based, and incredibly modular.

  82. My.yahoo.com anyone? by cshay · · Score: 1

    Anyone still using My Yahoo? I've been using that since the late 90s (when it was the best aggregator by far). I have never had any reason to leave.

    I love the layout... very customizable and lots of info jammed into a compact space (especially if you customize it to remove summaries and icons and use four columns). They have good stock portfolio and calendar widgets.

    What am I missing out on? Why should I leave my yahoo?

    1. Re:My.yahoo.com anyone? by terryo · · Score: 1

      I use My Yahoo as a newspaper replacement but their rss feeds are limited to 10 items. (I don't know if adding your own has that limitation.) Many of my Reader feeds push out that in a few hours. And there's no way to skim a weeks worth (or more) of info to get up to speed on a new subscription. No way to star or flag content to keep. This could be an opportunity for Yahoo to woo some of the GReader users if they offered a proper RSS reader embedded.

  83. I just need syncing by mbadolato · · Score: 1

    I'm fine with not having the Google Reader interface as I use Reeder on Mac and iOS, but I rely on it's integration with Google Reader to 1) Have a unified place for all of my subscriptions so I don't need to manually add them (or export/import) and 2) Keep my Articles Read in sync so that I don't have to scroll through all the stuff I've already seen that day, when I get home or on another device.

    I'm hoping Reeder and other RSS aggregators come up with their own cloud-based sync. Barring any current good alternatives, there's an opportunity for a start up there, me thinks.

  84. Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 2

    I have a confession to make. I'm forbidden from surfing the web at work, so I SSH into my own BSD shell account and browse using Lynx. Yes, Lynx, the text-only web browser. It's surprisingly functional on a lot of websites, and for some bizarre reason Google Reader has a page optimized for Lynx. 80-90% of my RSS reading is through a text-only browser.

    I don't see any other services meeting that need. Feedly, or any other 'app', is a non-starter. All the services I've tried so far do not work under Lynx. I think it's the end of text-only web browsing for me -- for the entire world, in fact. That's a shame; text-only browsing is much faster, and with the ability to pipe web pages to Linux commands there's a lot of power there as well.

    I feel that a subtle and powerful knowledge is passing from this world.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by slam_mjg · · Score: 0

      I use a text-based browser too for similar reasons. I found that NetVibes has a special page: http://wap.netvibes.com/ that seems to work for me. I just signed up today so I can't tell yet if it's good enough to replace Google Reader.

    2. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't surf on your smartphone??? Jeez.

    3. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run ssh -D 8888 (or create dynamic tunnel in putty if that's what you use) and set your browser's proxy to localhost:8888 (socks) - this will tunnel everything through ssh.

      There are also browser extensions like FoxyProxy (Firefox and Chrome) that allow easy switching of proxies and even set them for url/patterns so you don't have to switch manually.

    4. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Government installation -- cellphones at my office get zero reception. There's too much concrete and faraday cages around me.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    5. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      had a script somewhere to grab feeds with python-feedparser and drop them in a mbox/maildir/mh mailbox. supported etags, etc. try writing one.

    6. Re:Need a solution for Lynx, believe it or not. by srpatterson · · Score: 1

      Do you have access to an IMAP mailbox? I've started using feed2imap - http://home.gna.org/feed2imap/ (use IMAP on Gmail for more entertanment)

      Alternatively, as a lynx user, you may like Snownews - https://kiza.eu/software/snownews/ - its a text-mode rss reader.

      --
      -- The Heineken Uncertainty Principle: You can never be sure how many bears you had last night.
  85. Lifrea by houghi · · Score: 1

    I have been using Liferea for a longer time now. But then I do not need or even want everything to be web based. I like to have separate programs for separate tasks.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  86. Re:Why does this even matter? by Myopic · · Score: 1

    "Why wouldn't I just run my web browser and read the entirety of each of those same interesting articles?"

    Is this a serious question? Isn't the answer obviously "because I don't have time or desire to read 975 articles a day, but I do have the time and desire to scan past 975 headlines a day then read 22 of them"? That's my answer, anyway.

    So, you use bookmarks? Can I ask you why you bother using a bookmark when you could simply memorize each URL you want to visit and manually type each one in? Oh, the answer is obviously "because that would not be as good".

  87. Re:Upgrade your domain to Google Apps Business tod by terryo · · Score: 1

    I would pay for iGoogle and Reader. Once they are gone, I may just quit using Gmail and let it go to spam. I already have a Hotmail/Outlook account from school (and it isn't all that bad - surprisingly) and a paid Yahoo account. If they are putting all their focus on G+, good luck with that. Until my 70 year old mother can/will use it, I'm stuck checking Facebook every day.

  88. oldreader melting down by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    So, the old reader seems to be having problems with the sudden influx of refugees. I was able to login, but import is currently disabled, so I can't import all my feeds from G Reader yet. Hopefully they'll find some way to scale up to the new demand, soon.

  89. Mr. Reader for iOS by Schlemphfer · · Score: 1

    Disclosure: I'm an (unpaid) beta tester.

    This is hands down the best RSS reader I've ever used, and I think tablet computers are by far the best platform for reading RSS feeds. Mr. Reader is elegant, massively customizable, and constantly improving. I use it every day and I can't recommend it more highly.

    It currently synchs with Google Reader, and like every active RSS reader client the developer is now researching a replacement RSS service.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
  90. Accessing blocked sites by terryo · · Score: 1

    Many employers use web blocking software and a couple of the alternatives listed below are not accessible. I can adapt to just using my desktop at home and phone but browsing via Reader on breaks at work let me keep up with Hack a Day and other stupidly blocked sites. (Because the word hack upsets the net nanny.) And cloud services are blocked, too, so I can't sync to Dropbox or Box, either. Hopefully by the time the dust settles, there will be better alternatives but I'm not impressed with the choices at the moment.

  91. Feedly sucks by lupine · · Score: 1

    https does not work.

  92. Feeds by email! (Blogtrottr) by jhonsrid · · Score: 1

    Not the same as a reader, but I switched to doing everything feed-related via email a while ago, always local, always available, handy since that's where I spend most of my time, and most usefully for me, means that everything is searchable in local email archives.

    http://blogtrottr.com/

    1. Re:Feeds by email! (Blogtrottr) by Errabes · · Score: 1

      That looks nice.
      Though I like better to be in control, and use a perl script (plagger) to post RSS items in IMAP folders. So it's a self-hosted solution that need more handwork, but is very customizable.

  93. Android widget by sremick · · Score: 1

    My main use of Google Reader these days is to consolidate the RSS feeds from several specific news sources of my choosing. Then I pass this RSS list to the Google Reader Android ticker widget which is the best of its class. This allows me a nice, clean rotating news widget with the specific news sources I want. Not only that, but I can manage the feeds used from my desktop.

    I have not found anything else that can do this, or looks as good, let alone both. I have no alternative once Google Reader goes away. :(

  94. RSS to IMAP folders (using plagger, in my case) by Errabes · · Score: 1

    I don't like webservices because I have no control over it.
    IMAP is a nice protocol and there are clients for everything, offline modes, etc. Then RSS items can easily be managed, sorted, searched, forwarded...

    I use a perl program named "plagger" that need a bit of time to set up (and patch, if you like to), but I guess there are other ways.

    1. Re:RSS to IMAP folders (using plagger, in my case) by Errabes · · Score: 1

      I don't like webservices because I have no control over it.

      I meant *closed source* webservices.

  95. May also affect Google Listen by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    Google Listen, the Android podcatcher that Google designed to work with Google Reader, has been dead for a while now, but it was still usable because Google Reader was still working even if they didn't update the Android app. However, it looks like the demise of Google Reader itself will doom Google Listen to uselessness.

    Of course, Google claims they dropped Google Listen because there were apps out there that did the same thing better, so it's not exactly the end of the world.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  96. Feedly by BenBristow · · Score: 1

    Been using Feedly for a bit. Requires Google Reader to login at the minute (It's built upon Google Reader) but they're going to migrate all accounts automatically once Google Reader shuts down. Really nice site, clean and simple.

  97. With vi/vim bindings? by Boawk · · Score: 1

    What I loved about Google Reader was the vi bindings. Any of the best-of-class alternatives support that?

  98. Tin foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sense a conspiracy to push everything to g+ and kill RSS in general.

    1. Re:Tin foil hat by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I sense a conspiracy to push everything to g+ and kill RSS in general.

      RSS generally doesn't have a lot of benefit for anyone but the person socuming the content, and then it's more or less a replacement for reading the old UUNet NetNews and keeping track of where you were at across devices. It has the negative benefit for most content creators that most RSS readers permit filtering of the RSS stream to remove their monetization.

      On a per sit basis, the RSS reader has the vendor disadvantage of denying them lock-in. If you can get your G+, Facebook, and Twitter streams all in one place, then it keeps you from tying your product to their private APIs, which is of less benefit to then than had you tied your product to their APIs.

      In general, RSS content is a lose-lose proposition for anyone doing anything with content streaming who wants you to buy into their ecosystem. For G+, for example, it means that you aren't going to tie your information organization into the idea of organizing things as "circles"; Facebook, it means you aren't going to necessarily buy into their "TimeLine" concept, and so on.

      So yeah, if you want to have an RSS feed reader, expect it to have to come from some place other than someone with an advertising supported business model, particularly if they have their own information streaming model they are trying to monetize.

      If you think you can figure a way to monetize RSS streams in any scalable way, you should feel free to found your own reader application company, and go for it. There are several companies attempting to move in this direction already, so you'll have competition, and you probably won't get to Google Reader level quality quickly, particularly since you will have a small team. Google Reader attracted a lot of 20%'ers, and if nothing else, Google's back end is built for building and deploying stuff like this reliably, and getting syncing, etc. right the first time, or to keep chipping at it or have a 20%-er pitch in and get it right the 15th time, in rapid iteration.

  99. Google App Engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about running a reader from google app engine?

    Is this possible/has anyone written one?

  100. Akregator and RSS Demon here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm late to the party and this will probably be missed by anybody reading now, but...

    I've been using Akregator for a few years and still like it. I try other readers occasionally, but something always brings me back to it. It has a lot of options, so the other readers I try always come close, but end up missing some odd feature that makes them not work out for me.

    On Android, I use RSS Demon, but only because it was the least-bad option I could find that didn't require Google's reader. (I was told I was being silly avoiding Reader, but it looks like I was right)

    Only thing I don't like about this setup is having to manually sync feeds with OPML export/import, but so far, I haven't been able to get around that. At one point, I tried looking at a self-hosted solution, with the intent to automate export-and-upload of my akregator feeds, but it didn't pan out. All the self-hosted solutions like TT-RSS want PHP and/or MySQL, so they're not an option for me.

    If anybody knows a good option that uses PostgreSQL and something like Python or Perl instead, I'd love to hear about it.

  101. Daily Rotation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the first, and still the best. Literally no frills, just news... http://www.dailyrotation.com

  102. TICKR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.newsrssticker.com/

    Displays news in cable news/stock ticker format, and you can have multiple instances running, all independently configurable, for several lines of news overload.

  103. ownCloud News by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

    ownCloud News is in alpha, but it is not a third party app - so it's pretty good quality. https://github.com/owncloud/apps/tree/master/news and the main guys blog (screenshots): http://algorithmsforthekitchen.com/blog/

    Hopefully there is a public instance running ownCloud News for those people who don't run their own ownCloud instance. Most instances will probably enable ownCloud News when it comes out of alpha (very soon I think).

  104. Liferea by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Decent RSS reader for Linux.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  105. Cognitive Disconnect by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 1

    Why do people keep suggesting that Twitter is somehow in any way a reasonable replacement for a good RSS client? I really don't get it, but maybe other people use RSS like twitter, or something...

    I have many (~100) RSS feeds sorted into a few categories (one is news sites, one is webcomics, for example). Rather than manually polling all these sites I check my RSS list to scan through the post titles, then open new tabs *at the original site* for whatever items I actually want to read (control-click the little icon in Firefox). This makes sure the sites get their advertising and that I don't miss out on the things I want to know about. It's not rocket science, but it's been damn near impossible to find a tool that let me do this. It seems like a reasonable thing to want to do.

    I guess the Open Source "way" is that I should start up a project with other disenfranchised code-savvy people and write something better, but I'm married with a full-time job and other issues with prior claim on my free time, so that ain't flying unless I win the lottery. Plus Google Reader is really slickly done. Everything else I've looked at is still crap by comparison in it's interface.

  106. I wrote one! by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

    It's called http://www.weegeeks.com/

    It's utter, utter, rubbish and has no features other that reformatting your chosen live RSS feeds into a readable clean format.

    The point is... It's perfect for me, does just what I want - no more, no less.

    Instead of you all rushing to Feedly like lemmings, why not explore what's involved in creating your own? There's no innovation any more... Where did all the hobbyist coders go ?

    -Jar

    --
    Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  107. RSSOwl by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    I have been using RSSowl for years and will keep doing so as I never found a better reader. Runs almost everywhere, displays RSS, manages feeds and is quite configureable.

    uh... and it's free and open source, of course.

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  108. Nasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just subscribed to Slashdot with Currents and I get this nasty feeling when I see all the Slashdot troll headlines. So official looking yet the content is not official.

  109. Google reader source code? by tlambert · · Score: 1
  110. pyrfeed Google Reader API - replacement for that? by wessman · · Score: 1

    I use the pyrfeed Google Reader API to aggregate categories of other sites' RSS/Atom feeds to my personal website. Basically, Google Reader is a aggregator, feed subscriber, database, and single API/XML for my website.

    https://code.google.com/p/pyrfeed/wiki/GoogleReaderAPI

    Do any of the web-based aggregators people are suggesting here offer a similar API?

  111. The Old Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend told me about The Old Reader and I went check it out. I liked it!

    Like they say: "It's just like the old google reader, only better."

    I loved the internal sharing (share with others IN Google Reader), then when Google took it out I stopped using it.
    And The Old Reader has it, so I'm back to reader.

  112. There might be a way out of this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long time Google Reader user, I am pretty moved by Google's decision to sunset this great product. That's why I created Skimr - a very simple web based reader, so that I can continue consuming RSS feeds. It's free. http://www.skimr.co

  113. Re:Why does this even matter? by Urkki · · Score: 1

    If you have any sites, which update at intervals, and you want to read the new content when it comes? In other words, do you find going to a website to see if it has updated? Do you perhaps have bookmark folders,which you use by opening all bookmarks in the folder in tabs, then going through them? If you do, please stop! Start using RSS and make your life a lot better.

    Web comics and blogs are squarely in this category, for example, as are rarely updated news feeds (often for software products etc).

  114. Re:Why does this even matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um... nope:

    he said, Google Reader has a page optimized for lynx. He uses Google Reader, he will miss it when it's gone because it has a page optimized for lynx, his preferred browser.

  115. Re:Why does this even matter? by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Keeping up with anything besides MM crap without wasting half a day opening different websites which only update once in a while.

    If you're content reading aggregators like Slashdot, it doesn't offer you much, but if you want to read say, Lambda-the-Ultimate, it's much less annoying to be told when there's new content.

  116. Re:Upgrade your domain to Google Apps Business tod by icebraining · · Score: 1

    I speak as someone who hosts his own email, website, RSS client, etc: paraphrasing an often quoted saying, "it's only $5 a month if your time has no value".

    While I enjoy administrating it, it's not set it and forget it, unless you want some security flaw in ownCloud to allow someone to break in and delete your stuff, or worse. You need to monitor it, keep up with updates, deal with larger upgrades that might break your stack, etc.

  117. I never left Firefox. by yenic · · Score: 1
    I've been using toolbar RSS feeds since I adopted FF in the early 2000s. I never switched to Google Reader, and always preferred to stay away from all for-profit, single-sourced products for my computing uses. I'm able to access my RSS feeds from any OS that can run Firefox. Being as I feel it's the superior web browser to Google Chrome, and I wouldn't use a browser from Google if they paid me (and they should be paying you to use it, as you can get FF for free without feeding Google's data center your info)- this isn't a problem for me.

    Down with Google, down with Chrome, and good riddance to Google Reader. Maybe it will wake a few people up.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  118. Which is better, AOL or CompuServe? by joh · · Score: 1

    Well, the Internet is better and do you know why? Because it's not a product but build on open standards like HTTP.

    The question is not what product is a replacement for Google Reader, but how we can manage to not rely on products anymore but on a standard for what it does. And then have hundreds of servers and clients implementing that standard to chose from and have them compete for greatness. Like, you know, on the Internet.

    God, what have we come to. First we let Google soak up all the market for such services, then we look at Google either throwing their products away or cutting off support for standards (like ActiveSync or CalDAV) and what do we do? We look for OTHER proprietary products to be herded into a corral by. A smaller one, granted. And then another smaller one. And then the butcher comes.

    Have fun in there, it's surely nice and warm and there is comfort in numbers, right? RIGHT?

      I've turned around and now go for the plains instead.

  119. canto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Late to this, but I *really* like *canto* for efficiency and convenience. Comes with debian, text mode, very efficient from the keyboard, good built-in help (brings up the man page), shows article titles, you can see summaries or bring up whole articles in the browser of your choice. Configurable if you wish but easy to use if not. Very useful.

    Some might be put off that (at least I think) you have to put RSS URLs into a text file with some quotes and parens, and some web sites don't clearly show their RSS URL, but with firefox's menu option to view rss, or using chrome's rss plugin then show source and grab that URL works.

    No connection to the project except being a happy user. Their online documentation got me what I needed for a customization I wanted, once I asked the author a question and he very helpfully replied.

  120. Not an RSS, but an awesome news curation altrntive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the last year or so, I've been slowly transitioning to Prismatic (getprismatic.com). While it's not an RSS, it uses machine learning and functional programming to optimize web reading. While there are still a few RSS items that I can't get in my Prismatic feed, I've found the news quality to be exceptional - and less overwhelming than my Google Reader feed (I don't feel like I have to get through a million items). It sounds like they have a good iPhone app, but I'm still waiting for the Android....

  121. Opera? by Rangelus · · Score: 1

    Not a single mention of of the web browser Opera, which has a fantastic rss reader built in (and it does email, too!). Of course, it doesn't sync between computers, but that's nothing a little Spideroak (or similar) won't fix.