Slashdot Mirror


Lamenting the Demise of Hangups

An anonymous reader writes "Ian Bogost writes about a cultural tradition we've mostly lost as smartphones have become ubiquitous: hanging up. While we still use the terminology (in the same way we say 'rewind' when skipping backward on our DVR), the physical act of hanging up a telephone when we're done using it no longer occurs. And we don't get that satisfying crash and clatter when hanging up on somebody to make a point. 'In the context of such gravity, the hangup had a clear and forceful meaning. It offered a way of ending a conversation prematurely, sternly, aggressively. Without saying anything, the hangup said something: we're done, go away. ... Today a true hangup — one you really meant to perform out of anger or frustration or exhaustion — is only temporary and one-sided even when it is successfully executed. Even during a heated exchange, your interlocutor will first assume something went wrong in the network, and you could easily pretend such a thing was true later if you wanted. Calls aren't ever really under our control anymore, they "drop" intransitively.' It's an interesting point about the minor cultural changes that go along with evolving technology."

215 comments

  1. They beauty of smart phones by dmomo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Make an aggressive hang-up app.

    1. Re:They beauty of smart phones by dmomo · · Score: 5, Informative

      And of course, dmomo's law rings true once more:
      "The Internet already did your idea":
      http://www.appbrain.com/app/the-cell-slammer/The.Slammer

    2. Re:They beauty of smart phones by nametaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't remember aggressive hang-ups being audibly distrubing. Maybe it's because you had hammered the switch down before the crashing noise.

      The real problem is that mobile phone calls disconnect all the time, and for a number of reasons. So terminating a call prematurely isn't always a definitive, "fuck you, you've been hung up on."

    3. Re:They beauty of smart phones by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hanging up on someone was as rude as telling them to go fuck themselves. Anyone who misses hanging up on someone has something wrong with them.

      We've traded hanging up on someone with the even ruder talking on the phone when you're conversing with someone face to face. When the phone rang, the polite thing to do was answer it, say you had company and offer to call back. Now assholes just ignore you and gab on their phone. Didn't you kids have parents that taught you how to act like a human being?

      Don't get me started on musical ring tones, sometimes I feel like walking into next cube over and smashing their goddamned cell phone. Whoever came up with the idea should be tied to a chair and made to listen to the first fifteen notes of the song they hate worst, over and over.

    4. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just send a followup text message with the goatse image attached and the quote "this is what your mama ate last night!" That will get the message across, while also permanently psychologically scarring the individual and preventing them for ever again displaying affection to their mother--you know, what you really want in the moment of anger during a hangup.

    5. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, I had the pleasure of hanging up on someone at work recently, using my VoIP desk phone. The tradition lives on.

    6. Re:They beauty of smart phones by mrbester · · Score: 1

      So you prefer the Apple way where half a train carriage fumbles for a pocket whenever one goes off?

      What pisses me off is the Morse code style SMS notification. It's always at top volume, goes on for ages and is the preserve of those having long conversations with the other person. If you've got that much to babble about fucking call them instead of "BIP-BIP-BIP BEEP-BEEP BIP-BIP-BIP" (twice) every minute. You're probably going to see whoever you're texting obsessively in about an hour anyway.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    7. Re:They beauty of smart phones by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, people could just grow a pair and yell, "You know what? FUCKKKKK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU" into the phone before 'hanging up'. I'm pretty sure the message would be conveyed.

      Also: I'm a fan of the "fuck this shitbrain, I'm putting it on mute and setting it on my desk while I do something important," dis. Then they have to hang up: I care just enough to show them that I don't value their time, and will denigrate them by making them hang up on me.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that mobile phone calls disconnect all the time, and for a number of reasons.

      What, when you press the disconnect button? Are there any other reasons?

    9. Re:They beauty of smart phones by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I have done it and have it done to me, however a sudden hangup is more about timing as opposed violent response. As the other party never hears that crash of the phone hitting the receiver by that point the phone call was already over.

      Ring tones yea that I agree with being able to modify ring tones so a room full of (popular brand name of phone) everybody doesn't reach into their pockets, but most of them are just plain wrong.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    10. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the same people in the demo video made the app....yeah fuck everything about that app.

      .

    11. Re:They beauty of smart phones by theskipper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slight variation, I sent the goatse text to myself after having an angry conversation with my mom. I feel much better now.

    12. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hanging up on someone was as rude as telling them to go fuck themselves. Anyone who misses hanging up on someone has something wrong with them.

      Some people deserve rudeness.

    13. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel sorry for you.

    14. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hanging up on someone was as rude as telling them to go fuck themselves

      The two go hand-in-hand, always did and still do.
      The point the story is making is that with cell phones, a call disconnecting is not all that unusual so you're often unsure if it was intentionally done by the other person or just a technical issue. Which is where the "Go Fuck Yourself" comes into play, and helps remove such questions.

      When the phone rang, the polite thing to do was answer it, say you had company and offer to call back.

      If you're a Pavlovian Dog, yes. The polite thing to do, if you have Free Will, is let your answering machine or voicemail take the message. It amazes me how many people will absolutely freak out if you don't immediately drop everything to satisfy the trained 'stimulus-response' behavior.

      Don't get me started on musical ring tones, sometimes I feel like walking into next cube over and smashing their goddamned cell phone.

      That's a personal problem. I'd rather hear some short-lived drivel than put up with the sound of a shitty little metal bell being rattled. But more to the point, if you're at work in a 'cube farm then you need to either shut off your phone, or figure out how to put it on vibrate, turn down the volume, get a headset, or do something so it's not bothering everyone else. It's a personal call just for you, the rest of us don't need to hear it and you can take it with you so there's no reason for it to be audible to anyone else in the first place.

    15. Re:They beauty of smart phones by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Lost signal, failed tower handoff.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the need to be polite about telling someone to go fuck themselves, just tell them to go fuck themselves instead of slamming the phone down?

    17. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. And then there's the worst of all, rude talking on the internet! Goodness sake kids, behave yourself!

    18. Re:They beauty of smart phones by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real problem is that mobile phone calls disconnect all the time, and for a number of reasons. So terminating a call prematurely isn't always a definitive, "fuck you, you've been hung up on."

      This problem is easy to solve:simply say "fuck you" before disconnecting.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing is more compelling than old men whining about social norms changing.

    20. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead battery.

    21. Re:They beauty of smart phones by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. When my phone rings when I'm talking to someone I switch it to vibrate and apologize for not having done so before.

    22. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just say "fuck you" before hanging up. problem solved.

    23. Re:They beauty of smart phones by jbolden · · Score: 1

      If you're a Pavlovian Dog, yes. The polite thing to do, if you have Free Will, is let your answering machine or voicemail take the message.

      We are talking about the days when phones had physical bells. There was no voicemail.

    24. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love everything about that demonstration video

    25. Re:They beauty of smart phones by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume it's only one person? The heavy texters I know are usually conversing with multiple people at the same time.

    26. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Answering machines have been widely available since the late '70s. Voice mail is just "cloud" based answering machines.

    27. Re:They beauty of smart phones by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Which, incidentally, is exactly what is done to achieve the desired dramatic effect in the (painfully amateuristic) video accompanying 'The Slammer'.

    28. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever came up with the idea should be tied to a chair and made to listen to the first fifteen notes of the song they hate worst, over and over.

      If it makes you feel any better, he or she gets that everywhere he goes.

      Hell, they probably killed themselves years ago.

    29. Re:They beauty of smart phones by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, I see by your UID you're not that young and were used to landlines and phone manners. I don't know why things changed with cell phones.

    30. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One size doesn't necessarily fit all. Sometimes the call is just more urgent than the face-to-face conversation. In that case, it's not unreasonable to say to the person in front of you "Excuse me, I have to take this", and switch to the phone conversation instead.

      Emergencies happen. Difficult-to-establish contacts happen. Things happen. Get over it.

    31. Re:They beauty of smart phones by mrbester · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with obsessive texters, just the sheer lack of common courtesy to others that would dictate that a loud notification going off all the fucking time should be muted especially when you know you're about to get a text and have the phone in your hand in readiness. But no, they just hold on to it while it yells out to all and sundry that they're really important because someone texts "lol" to them.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    32. Re:They beauty of smart phones by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I understand, answering machines might even be earlier. There were automatic phone recorders since the 1960s. But voicemail OTOH not so. Same function very different mechanism.

    33. Re:They beauty of smart phones by sjames · · Score: 1

      Stiff breeze, phase of the moon, butterfly in Brazil flaps it's wings, dogs, cats, a gopher sneezes, .......

    34. Re:They beauty of smart phones by sjames · · Score: 1

      What's REALLY amazing is when people interrupt a face to face conversation to gab on the cellphone and then get upset if the other person goes away to do something else!

    35. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that mobile phone calls disconnect all the time, and for a number of reasons.

      The number 1 reason being: Using a shitty US cell carrier.

      Here in Europe I have never been disconnected during a call.

    36. Re:They beauty of smart phones by sjames · · Score: 1

      With the older phones you actually could hear a distinct and loud clack before it disconnected the line. Those were the phones sturdy enough to beat a burglar to death with and still be able to call 911.

    37. Re:They beauty of smart phones by sjames · · Score: 1

      Widely available enough that everyone knew what they were but only a minority actually had one.

    38. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      Your fooling yourself. By the late '70s they were common. If you want to nit pick it, by the mid 80s they were ubiquitous. Either way, letting the machine pick it up has been an option for decades.

    39. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Who cares what the mechanism was. Letting the caller leave a message has been ubiquitous for decades. Besides, the GPP specifically said "answering machine or voicemail".

    40. Re:They beauty of smart phones by sjames · · Score: 1

      Yes, by the mid '80s (about the time they started to be built in to mid-range phones) they were nearly ubiquitous, but in the '70s, not so much.

    41. Re:They beauty of smart phones by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      The best thing that worked for me is to now slam my phone on the desk a few times before pressing hangup. I highly recommend that your device has the gorilla glass. I only had to learn that once.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    42. Re:They beauty of smart phones by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      What? You never bashed the receiver on the desk a few times to get a few loud 'clunks' in before you hung it up?

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    43. Re:They beauty of smart phones by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Because the hipsters and douche bags are now able to leave their house with one.
      AND you have to remember they bought that super awesome ring tone that they just have to hear every 2min. "OH the good part is coming up!"

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    44. Re:They beauty of smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to yell "Die in a fire!" and THEN disconnect. That works pretty well, generally.

    45. Re:They beauty of smart phones by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You remind me of something I wrote back in 2004. You may find it amusing.

  2. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really just an updated version of Seinfeld's cordless phone bit

    1. Re: Lame by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought at first, but if you read to the end of the summary, you'll find out that they're actually talking about how calls drop unexpectedly all the time any way so, the person on the other end is never sure if you hung up on them or if the call just dropped.

    2. Re: Lame by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      I had a call drop... once? twice maybe? in the last 10 years. Must be an American thing.

    3. Re: Lame by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Agreed; unless the battery gives out - and then the phone will warn me earlier, so I can warn the other person - I never have dropped calls, even when talking inside a car on the highway.

    4. Re: Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody really pays attention to the battery meters during a call, and the audible warning can get easily ignored due to ignorance or negligence. In the past 2 years I've had two or three hour plus calls dropped without any warning and even done so myself. Eventually I get back to the person on the other side and hear that their phone discharged.
      I did hang up on my mother (completely out of character for me) and it didn't have the intended effect. I discovered she just assumed it was a dropped call despite how bad the conversation was going. I kept my mouth shut to avoid making things bad again.

    5. Re: Lame by sjames · · Score: 1

      I went a whole week without a call dropping once or twice in the last 10 years. Perhaps it IS an American thing.

    6. Re: Lame by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      or perhaps people don't like talking to you, so they hang up and claim the call dropped.

    7. Re: Lame by sjames · · Score: 1

      Then they must be masochists since they often call me right back.

  3. There Must be a Slam-the-Phone hang-up app... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    With all the craaps out there, how can there not be an app that plays a phone-slamming sound over the connection and then disconnects the call?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:There Must be a Slam-the-Phone hang-up app... by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the hanging up that was the annoying bit, it was the beep-beep-pause-beep-beep of an engaged number, when attempting to call back to resume the argument, but the handset was off the cradle following an aggressive slam down...

      --
      If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    2. Re:There Must be a Slam-the-Phone hang-up app... by drcagn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we've still got that. You know, when you call back, and it rings once and then goes straight to voicemail.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    3. Re:There Must be a Slam-the-Phone hang-up app... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we've still got that. You know, when you call back, and it rings once and then goes straight to voicemail.

      Or you call back and hear the phone company's generic message saying "The subscriber is not accepting calls from this number. Goodbye."

  4. Thank goodness we can still slam doors. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    n/t

  5. Even by the standards of crappy Soulskill posts... by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...this is a crappy Soulskill post.

    Even for a slow Saturday night.

    Couldn't you find another Apple linkbait troll piece to post instead? You know, "Rumor Says New OS X Release Locked to Processor." You know, the lame crap that gets posted here every day which is still better than this...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  6. Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the physical act of hanging up a telephone when we're done using it no longer occurs"

    Oh really? At work I have a Cisco VOIP phone where I have to lift the traditional ear/mouth piece off the cradle and then put it back down (hang it up) when I'm done with a call.

    Plus I'm sure someone can write an app for jailbroken phones with a button labeled "Angry End", so if you press that, it transmits a loud slamming noise just prior to disconnecting the call.

    1. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright, Methuselah; now tell us all about your grandson's boat again.

    2. Re:Summary is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *I'm hanging up on you*

  7. No app necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Preface disconnecting with the following: "This is me hanging up on you".

    1. Re:No app necessary. by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Fuck off" also works well.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    2. Re:No app necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO CARRIER

    3. Re:No app necessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say hello to Mr. Click, bitch.

  8. Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the full duplex, circuit-switched, not-laggy realtime conversations I used to have on a landline phone. I could be talking, and the other party could be talking at the same time, and both of us could hear each other and understand everything.

    The young uns here will probably think I'm making this up. I'm not; back in the day, Candace Bergen could drop a pin and I could hear it over the phone.

    1. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And calls that go through when you dial! That's what I miss most about landlines. Every week I have someone say they tried to call me, and the call didn't go through. That bothers me more than the several dozen dropped calls per week that the average cellphone victim has to suffer through.

    2. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What kind of third world country do you live in? Up here in Canada I get about one dropped call a year.

    3. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by slimjim8094 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest I don't recall ever having a dropped landline call since 9/11 (northeast NJ so it's understandable that the network was properly overloaded)

      Say what you want about the Bell monopoly (and its Baby Bells) - they sure knew how to engineer a damn solid network.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's full duplex low lag on my phone/telco. Maybe it's the echo/feedback cancellation stuff on your phone?

    5. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When I had AT&T, I couldn't keep a call up from home to work or vice versa. Also, about 10% of the time, I'd not be able to receive any calls until I rebooted my phone. I could call out, but not receive. I assume from an improper handover from the home towers to the work towers (4th largest metro area in the USA). I'd know it was a reboot day when I'd get a text about a voicemail or missed call when it never rang.

    6. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by romiz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      they sure knew how to engineer a damn solid network.

      That's what regulated, cost-oriented prices in a monopoly do. Gold plate everything, spare no expense in the research of perfection, and earn a fixed percentage on it. Nowadays, we spend money on advertisement instead, because it's much more efficient at recruiting clients than quality in a competitive market.

    7. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of third world country do you live in? Up here in Canada I get about one dropped call a year.

      I live in Canada.

    8. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2

      I'm missing [...] the full duplex, circuit-switched, not-laggy realtime conversations I used to have on a landline phone.

      That depended on the distance involved. I grew up in an era when most phones had a rotary dial and a real bell that rang (now I settle for an mp3 recording of a 1960s post-office phone on my Android device), and it was quite common to get a noticeable lag on international calls. Not as badly as with some VOIP calls, but there nonetheless.

      But if your call connected (which it always did except when lines became congested at Christmas-time), the line was yours until you ended the call.

      Even back in the 1980s, with analogue mobile phones (glorified push-button POTS phones with no wire plugged into the wall), you very rarely got a broken connection. Now, at least 50% of mobile calls drop out before I'm ready (thanks, Telstra) and even VOIP isn't very reliable.

      Another thing about the old POTS network was that without caller-ID display, there was an element of surprise involved in taking a call, so if you wanted to reject calls from anybody in particular, you had to reject them from everybody. Which probably makes for better manners.

    9. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No kidding! A person could talk for hours and hours with "unlimited long distance" and hear every waver in a person's breath with a crappy $5 telephone.

      Currently, I'll get randomly dropped on my cell at least once a conversation while at home. This only started occurring a week ago, when I got back from a long trip: I'm right at the periphery of two different carrier towers, and while I had been able to pick up the good signal of an off-brand carrier, I'm only getting a (much weaker) AT&T signal. Fail. This says nothing about the line noise, "talking in a tunnel", echo, and disconnects after 2 hours, OTD.

      Of course, I could always just get a consumer landline again. But that's just an analog bridge from a VoIP setup maintained by the "phone company". I could also set up my own VoIP setup, but I've btdt and the QoS they set up these days makes it certain I'll have all the lovely jitters, lags, and drops I can expect from my cell.

      Things like WebEx are additionally infuriating. I've had clear-as-day conference calls before - with real telephones. Even with VoIP. But try getting a dozen people, half of which are calling in with bad cell signals and most of the remainder on VoIP connections of variable bitrate, etc. and then having WebEx reencode the result for everyone. This is insufferable when it's a 'mandatory teleconference', because then you're on the phone for an hour+ or more with an inability to provide input due to not being able to understand a single fucking word anyone's saying.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the problem I've been having lately while on AT&T towers. Weak signal, random jumps in signal quality (loss of signal to full bars and vice versa), and calls not coming in even when I supposedly had full signal. I really want to get my phone to hop over to the nearby iWireless (an affiliate of my carrier, t-mobile) and I know have good signal (I was on them previously but can't find them now), but I'm not quite sure how...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      The service providers are not solely to blame. Smartphone manufacturers have consistently been using worse and worse antennas over the last few years.

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    12. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by hb253 · · Score: 1

      There's a whole generation now that thinks cell phone voice quality is the way it's supposed to be. In the mean time, every cell call I make is an exercise in frustration because I know how good it *could* be.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    13. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Was the lag due to the call going over satellite? I'm pretty sure all international calls now go through ocean cables.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    14. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sure mean "when you had AT&T since the breakup of their monopoly", not "AT&T back when they provided analog phones and had the US telephone monopoly".

      Earlier in my electrical engineering experience, I actually reconnected 50 and 60 year old phones in old houses to active, analog, land-line circuits from almost any decade between 1920 and 1980, and it _all worked_, including the older phones that were wired directly to wiring jacks inside of wall plates, and lacked modern RJ-11 wiring connectors. (The 1900 era phone took some extra work.) Many, if not most, of those old phones frankly had better sound quality than the modern consumer grade phones. And because the entire setup was analog, they filtered but still carried some small amount of higher frequency signals that modern digital phones _cannot_ carry, particularly useful for sharp sounds that digital analysis and remixing smear. A "bang" or "clatter" including that of hanging up the phone, was much more clear.

      There are some very real advantages of modern digital systems, such as more reliable transmission over long distances and easier central switching without mechanical relays. But the robustness of the equipment and overall quality of the equipment that AT&T was providing for consumer use was not one of the problems of older phones.

    15. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No...this is your "friends" lying to you about trying to keep in touch.

    16. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^This

      i could never understand why cell manufacturers think they could change the laws of physics, there is a reason a YAGI looks the way it does, sure you can design it all onto a pcb but the signal loss is absolutely massive compared to a 4" omni, even an external antenna socket on a phone would be a step up from what we have today

    17. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Candace Bergen could drop a pie and I could hear it over the phone.

      FTFY

    18. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Your phone calls over land lines stopped being pure analog in the 80s when everyone switched to fibre back hauls. They've essentially been VoIP (not in the strictest sense, but in the 'converted to digital from analog' sense) since then.

      Your conference calls will have bigger problems with conference/speaker phones than anything else, those are the ones that really destroy a conversation.

      I haven't used WebEx in a while, but you can certainly tail the difference between everyone using a handset or headset in GoToMeeting and having someone mixed in with speaker phones.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    19. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice attempt at trolling. The technical people here are smart enough to think to call their own phones so they know if it is dropping incoming calls. We test rather than making guesses like you are. Over a two week period when I was trying to get out of my AT&T contract, I had 49 dropped incoming calls out of 100 test attempts on weekdays between 9am and 5pm while in downtown Seattle. My new Verizon phone is a lot better. It only drops about 25% of the incoming calls. Note, I work in downtown Seattle so some people have somewhat better experiences due to lack of call volume, but most people have even worse experiences because they're farther from a tower. There's a reason doctors still demand that people with health problems have a real phone line they can depend on. Cellphones are simply not dependable.

    20. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the old analogue switched days, I remember there being services where you could listen to music over the telephone.

      It was around AM radio quality, but was really quite listenable, especially on a speaker phone.

    21. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 2

      If call quality was an important aspect of cell phones, Nokia would still rule the world. Apparently, angry birds is more important, so you get what most other people pay for.

    22. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm sure mean "when you had AT&T since the breakup of their monopoly", not "AT&T back when they provided analog phones and had the US telephone monopoly".

      No, it was back before. They were big into cell phones in the 1950s.

      I didn't read past your opening sentence. Anyone so deliberately obtuse is not worth talking to. Throwing out irrelevant statements that look to be a pro-monopoly political stance in a discussion that's not the least bit relevant to set off my "ignore the loon" meter.

    23. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've essentially been VoIP (not in the strictest sense, but in the 'converted to digital from analog' sense) since then.

      Yes. Tech reliability degrades when we go digital because all sorts of crazy things can be done in software without spending a cent on having the user phase out hardware
      What annoys me is that they think compression and range reduction is a must.* I recall how much better video looked in analog cable boxes on a 27" inch analog TV. The combination of gradient clipping and huge screen sizes scaling those artifacts for all eyes to see in 40 inch glory is horrible. I sometimes format videogames 4:3 with black bars rather than make everything wide and abnormal.

      It's just sad that voice uses so little bandwidth and we can no longer tell what song is on the radio on the other side, or ID a known voice right next to the person talking on the phone with you. It's information loss at its best... and we call it the "Information age"

      * and for the privilege, they're charging us much higher prices and in rougher conditions

    24. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      You're right of course.

      What has happened is that people's expectation of quality - is not at all what it used to be.

      I am old enough to remember when an operating system, or a language compiler, we rock solid, never questioned, and if you actually found a bug you got special recognition at the annual "get together" which was the only chance you had to meet fellow developers.

      No more. Today, crap is king. Not because of the stupid ideological bullsh*t reasons, it is because the consumer simply accepts it.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    25. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Communications satellites certainly existed back then, but I'll never know what calls were routed through them. The lag was nowhere near as bad as VOIP calls via satellite. I've done that, and the experience was nothing short of horrible.

    26. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Conference calls are extremely annoying - for all of the reasons you mentioned. But they beat the shit out of the alternative - an actual fucking meeting. At least you can put it on mute and get some real work done.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    27. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      No kidding! A person could talk for hours and hours with "unlimited long distance" and hear every waver in a person's breath with a crappy $5 telephone.

      Currently, I'll get randomly dropped on my cell at least once a conversation while at home.

      One could argue that dropped calls like that help carriers by forcing a maximum duration of phone calls. Plus it forces everyone to be briefer because the call may disconnect at any time, making for shorter calls.

      Heck, it's probably a liveness test as well - drop your call and see if you're there to restart it.

      With wireless, it's easy to force QoS on people who "use too much"...

    28. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      No matter how good wireless technology gets, it will never be as reliable as a wire. Life is a trade-off. We have traded convenience for reliability. In my opinion, the best thing that has ever happened to the telephone is caller ID. Now we only answer callers we know and like, but everybody else gets sent to voicemail. After that we decide whether any of those calls is worth replying to.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    29. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your phone calls over land lines stopped being pure analog in the 80s when everyone switched to fibre back hauls.

      You're off by two decades and media type. Try the 1960s and copper instead.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-carrier

      They've essentially been VoIP (not in the strictest sense, but in the 'converted to digital from analog' sense) since then.

      If you meant to say "converted to digital from analog", why not just say that instead of bringing up an irrelevant and much more recent technology? The digital public switched telephone network (PSTN) predates the invention of TCP/IP itself, much less VoIP. And it's not even a packet-switched network, so it's dissimilar to IP at a very fundamental level. Ask engineers familiar with the analog PSTN to design a digital telephony system in the 1950s and 1960s, and what you get is a circuit-switched digital network similar to (and easily interfaced with) the existing circuit-switched analog system.

    30. Re:Forget the hangup.... I'm missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earlier in my electrical engineering experience, I actually reconnected 50 and 60 year old phones in old houses to active, analog, land-line circuits from almost any decade between 1920 and 1980, and it _all worked_, including the older phones that were wired directly to wiring jacks inside of wall plates, and lacked modern RJ-11 wiring connectors. (The 1900 era phone took some extra work.)

      This has about the same meaning as the fact that your computer can still correctly interpret ASCII text from many decades ago: new systems had to be rolled out without immediately retiring the old, so backwards compatibility was a requirement.

      Many, if not most, of those old phones frankly had better sound quality than the modern consumer grade phones. And because the entire setup was analog, they filtered but still carried some small amount of higher frequency signals that modern digital phones _cannot_ carry, particularly useful for sharp sounds that digital analysis and remixing smear.

      You're not much of an EE if you believe this sort of analog-essentialism garbage. It'd sound at home coming out of the mouth of an audiophile.

      Also -- since the 1960s, the public switched telephone network (PSTN) has been inserting an 8-bit 8KHz analog/digital/analog conversion into the middle of the "analog" signal chain. This system had two main motivations. One was increased demand for services during the postwar economic boom, coupled with increased cost of adding new cabling, particularly in urban centers. Digital trunk systems permitted expanding the capacity of pre-existing cable installations by an order of magnitude or more, using multiplexing to route many calls over each wire pair. The second reason was to permit use of fully computerized call switching and accounting systems.

      By the 1980s and 1990s, digital signaling and call switching had spread nearly everywhere in the US, even rural areas. It's been a long time since you could get a true end-to-end analog connection. And, as you should know if you're going to represent yourself as an EE with relevant domain knowledge, the Nyquist-Shannon Sampling Theorem dictates that with an 8 KHz sampling rate, you cannot reproduce frequencies higher than 3999.99 Hz. In theory. In practice, the limit is probably about 3500 Hz.

      Even before the digital conversion, the system couldn't preserve high frequencies. "Analog" does not imply "infinite bandwidth". Especially not when the analog system in question has tons of reactive impedance -- parasitic capacitance from long cable runs, load coils, etc.

      So: sorry, it's just not true at all that landlines can carry high frequency audio information.

      A "bang" or "clatter" including that of hanging up the phone, was much more clear.

      The reason a cellphone doesn't have a "bang" or "clatter" on hangup is that there's nothing to make a bang or clatter when hanging up. Unless you feel like slamming it around a bit before you hit the hang-up button. It's not that the system is incapable of transmitting bang and clatter.

      There are some very real advantages of modern digital systems, such as more reliable transmission over long distances and easier central switching without mechanical relays. But the robustness of the equipment and overall quality of the equipment that AT&T was providing for consumer use was not one of the problems of older phones.

      The reason your calls may drop on a cellphone has nothing to do with the quality or robustness of the equipment and everything to do with the many-orders-of-magnitude higher difficulty of achieving rock solid call stability in the context of digital radios which must literally extract signals out of the noise floor. It took a lot of amazing developments in signal theory (and practical application of same) to make this possible. And tremendous advances in computing power. Can't do it without having more compute in

  9. bs by fazey · · Score: 1

    This is nonsense. People still hang up on each other. The load crash just isnt there... instead its a simple call ended. Then they attempt to call back unsure if you did it on purpose only to get voicemail. Then it dawns on them.

    1. Re:bs by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      This is nonsense. People still hang up on each other. The load crash just isnt there... instead its a simple call ended. Then they attempt to call back unsure if you did it on purpose only to get voicemail. Then it dawns on them.

      That the callee's battery has run out?

    2. Re:bs by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      But now calls almost always go to voicemail after being disconnected by accident. Either either a phone on the other end thinks the call is still on, or the person did not notice dropped call because he holds the phone to his ear or the person is trying to call you at the same time, and call waiting does not work.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    3. Re:bs by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Happens all the time in what has been unofficially called The Clapham Triangle:
      "Yeah, that was fun. Look, we ought to get the others involved in this so we can organise this when everyone is free and then... hello? Hello?"

      "Are you still there? Hello?"

      "Hello?" *looks at phone, call appears to still be connected* "Hello? HELLO?"

      *other commuters express facial irritation. I mean, come on, you make this journey every day at this time and this always happens. What's wrong with you?*

      "Hello?" *rechecks phone, call has now dropped, exasperated sigh (FFS muttered by others)*

      *Stab redial button on screen, watch phone intently for successful dialling* ...

      "Yeah, hi, don't know what happened there. Anyway..." (seriously?)

      This is always an iPhone user BTW, but all phones bar ancient Nokias tend to drop calls between Vauxhall and Clapham Junction. I blame MI5.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:bs by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Glad that's not just me.

      I wish they'd trash all calls for much more of the route; what do you think we'd have to club together for that service?

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    5. Re:bs by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No. A phone that isn't on the network will go directly to voicemail, no ring. A phone on the network will ring at least once to the caller before the phone even responds, and that gives the caller notice that it went to voicemail because it was directed to.

      No rings = not on the network (Dead battery, turned off, out of range, airplane mode)
      1 ring = forced to voicemail ( I don't want to talk to you )
      many rings = ignored. (I'm busy or not near my phone)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:bs by icebraining · · Score: 1

      If the other person didn't warn them that the battery could give out, there's no practical difference from an hang up on purpose.

    7. Re:bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A caller always gets two or more rings when dialing my Google Voice number regardless of the state of my cell phone.

  10. Uh... you can still hang up on someone... by drcagn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to hang up on someone and deliver the same experience, just shout "fuck you!" and tap the "end call" button. You get the same satisfaction and they'll get the message. Is that so hard?

    --
    Scorta futuere amo!
  11. Yes, and a generation of kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    yes, and a generation of kids will grow up clicking on a stylized picture of a floppy disk to save things, without having ever used a floppy disk.

    This is news how?

  12. Proof of copyright concept right here? by macraig · · Score: 1

    So this here is why we have copyright, to protect the inane misguided ramblings of those who have nothing constructive to say but are desperate for people to listen to them. So we call it "art" and give them a monopoly on their inanity for several generations.

    1. Re:Proof of copyright concept right here? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they flip side is that no one else will ever be allowed to say these same inane ramblings and claim it as their own. Only Ian Bogost will ever be seen as THAT stupid (at least on that subject).

    2. Re:Proof of copyright concept right here? by macraig · · Score: 1

      Touche, a silver lining!

  13. I grew up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a button that I smashed on my old Sanyo phone from Sprint if I wanted to "rage quit" the call.

    Never had the interest of smashing the headset against the hook. I always knew that would damage it. :)

  14. On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now you can cool down, call back an hour later and blame the dead battery for the hangup.

  15. If only... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    If only hangups really were on the decline. Seems to me people have more and more of them these days. The day when nobody has any hangups at all will be a great one for the human race.

  16. SIGHUP by davidwr · · Score: 2

    Yeah, when my process gets a SIGKILL it doens't know what happened (or even THAT it happened), but when it gets a SIGHUP it knows someone or some thing hung up on it or at least pretended to.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:SIGHUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most daemons do not behave as originally intended by a "hang-up": They simply reload their configuration on SIGHUP...

  17. You can always throw a phone against the wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I did 3 or 4 times with a nokia E63 and a few times earlier with whatever dumb-phone I had.
    I'm not kidding, I kinda see the point of the article, that split second felt liberating.
    Afterwards, not so much: a mixed feeling of guilt, shame, resentment at you and at the other person, etc. Depending on whatever the hanging-up was for...

    Then after you cool off you would just pick up the back cover, the batter, other parts of the phone, assemble it and calm down.
    However, you cannot do this with a smartphone. I imagine the screen or the case would crack, plus a smartphone is usually expensive to replace.

    1. Re:You can always throw a phone against the wall by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Depending on whatever the hanging-up was for...

      Telemarketers. It is not illegal to call random people by thousands at a time to try to sell them something. It is illegal to do that using cellular phones (or faxes), People without landlines, or with VoIP landlines don't have to deal with that anymore, however when we had switched landlines, it was multiple times a day that you have to answer to some sleazy salesman. They even messed with caller IDs when people started using them.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:You can always throw a phone against the wall by dwye · · Score: 1

      I imagine the screen or the case would crack, plus a smartphone is usually expensive to replace.

      Back when you were throwing that Nokia E63 at the wall, it cost as much as a smartphone does now. Once all the smartphone data is kept in the cloud so you don't have to manually recreate it, you will be able to start gratuitously ruining them again.

    3. Re:You can always throw a phone against the wall by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      It is no longer illegal to telemarket to cell phones in America. Law was changed a year or so ago, maybe slightly more but within the last couple of years.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:You can always throw a phone against the wall by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Then, I guess, they did not notice, because I never get those calls on my cellular and VoIP lines.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  18. Showing your age by ThreePhones · · Score: 0

    Hasn't anyone IM'd you that voice calls are obsolete?

    1. Re:Showing your age by vinayg18 · · Score: 1

      You clearly need someone to send you printed instructions to download Whatsapp :) Or maybe they could just Voxer you

  19. Call center work by fredgiblet · · Score: 2

    I work in a call center where we still have physical phones (though we only use headsets), I remember hearing about one supervisor call where the sup eventually advised the customer that there was nothing more to discuss and he was going to end the call, he picked up the receiver, de-activated the headset then hung up the receiver, just for the sound.

  20. Re:Even by the standards of crappy Soulskill posts by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that the idea put forward here was done on a Seinfeld episode years ago.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  21. No in civilized world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Calls aren't ever really under our control anymore, they "drop" intransitively.' "

    The writer must be living in some 3rd world country, like Usa maybe?

  22. The best hangup by virb67 · · Score: 2

    The best hangup is when, mid-conversation, you whip your cell phone off a wall, smashing it into a million pieces. Didn't have those in the old hangup days, did you?

    1. Re:The best hangup by relyimah · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know someone who has done this with a traditional phone... they break better than a mobile -- i saw the mess. For a mobile, I find the Otter Box case has saved my phone a couple of times from that frustrated throw...

    2. Re:The best hangup by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yes, traditional phones break into many more pieces of shrapnel... hopefully you don't get hit by the whip-around effect when the phone cord reaches its maximum length...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:The best hangup by Smask · · Score: 1

      Otterbox didn't save my HTC when the phone and other stuff fell off a table. The LCD was smashed, but the touch sensor and the glass were undamaged. Something managed to hit the back of the phone, right on the battery connector, which pushed into the LCD panel. A replacement panel, via Ebay, later and the phone is up and running again. The IQ isn't as good as the original one (blueish tint), but what the heck, replacement parts that aren't overstock are rejects that failed QC one way or another.

    4. Re:The best hangup by relyimah · · Score: 1

      Agree the Otter Box won't save a direct screen hit, but mine saved my iPhone after a rather hard throw into the wall after a particularly irritating call from work one day when I was on holidays... The Otter Box was destroyed... The phone was fine. Can't comment on how well they are made for the HTC but appear pretty darn solid for the iPhone. Granted the best way to save your phone is probably to keep your temper :-)

  23. No more horse shoe'n for me. by twebb72 · · Score: 1

    we don't get that satisfying crash and clatter when hanging up on somebody to make a point.

    We also don't have to get up early to shoe our horses anymore. Bummer.

    1. Re:No more horse shoe'n for me. by dwye · · Score: 0

      You shoe horses in the late morning or afternoon; you milk the cows and feed the chickens in the morning. Now got to the woodshed and pick out the switch for your father to swat you with.

    2. Re:No more horse shoe'n for me. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Why do you shoe in the afternoon? Just because of other responsibilities in the morning that are more important or is there some other logic that I'm unaware of?

      You sound experienced, I'm asking out of ignorance on my part.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:No more horse shoe'n for me. by 517714 · · Score: 1

      A cow with a full udder is very uncomfortable; if you delay milking her, her body will reduce her milk production. Chickens start feeding as soon as the sky brightens before sunrise, if you don't feed them when they are ready, they won't eat as much and their egg production may suffer. You feed pigs before the heat of the day because they eat less when they are hot. The time of day for shoeing a horse has little impact on one's daily food production, so it waits.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  24. Technology to the rescue... by KonoWatakushi · · Score: 1

    Dare I say that one could "improve" on the so-called hangup, and make it arbitrarily more obnoxious if so desired. Hell, in place of the end call button, present a menu of your favored obnoxious call termination options.

    Better act quick though; this brilliant innovation is just the thing patents are made for!

  25. intransitively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is not a word

    1. Re:intransitively by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Intransitively is a perfectly cromulent word. And it's use is valid, if something of a stretch.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  26. I miss the hang up... by lxs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...about as much as I miss putting a new roll in the fax machine. i.e. not at all.
    But then again I bet if you look hard enough you'll find an old fart who thinks that VHS tapes are superior to Bluray.

    1. Re:I miss the hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you could record a live TV show onto a VHS, you can't do that with a Bluray. Just saying...

    2. Re:I miss the hang up... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Well you could record a live TV show onto a VHS, you can't do that with a Bluray. Just saying...

      Sure you can. You can even get writable discs for your camcorder, if you like tinkering with old technology.

    3. Re:I miss the hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I can't- I have Bluray in my PS3 and it can't record at all. Do you get the point now?

    4. Re:I miss the hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you bought the wrong BluRay player?

    5. Re:I miss the hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were VCPs that only played vhs tapes. So what's your point?

    6. Re:I miss the hang up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      VHS tapes are superior to Bluray.

      Well, of course they are. VHS has a warmth and vibrancy that Bluray just doesn't have. When you watch a Bluray, you'll find that your eyes start to tire. That's because of the sharpness of the transitions between pixels in space and time. There's not enough space or time between them for your eyes to adjust, which will give you eyestrain and headaches. VHS gives you smooth analog transitions between pixels, so it soothes your occipital and temporal lobes, a bit like how accupuncture works.

      You'll also notice that Bluray has too much synchronization between the audio and video. This forces your brain into a kind of rigid lockstep that causes hypnotic trance. Check your buddies some time when you're watching a Bluray; chances are at least one of them will have the characteristic glazed eyes, vacant stare and open mouth associated with BREAST (BluRay Encephalic Audiovisual Synchronization Trance).

      Now, some of these problems can be ameliorated by using gold-plated HDMI cables, but what the media companies don't want you to know is that coax will naturally filter out most of these problems: another win for VHS.

      Finally, consider the fact that VHS is made using all-natural magnetization, like the Earth's natural magnetic fields or in magnetic healing bracelets. Bluray is made by man-made lasers. I'm sure you already know why consuming all-natural products is better for you than using artificial ones! I mean, these are just a few of the many reasons why VHS is superior to Bluray. You can look up some more at my website: VHS Geocities Page

    7. Re:I miss the hang up... by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      This comment so deserves a higher score.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    8. Re:I miss the hang up... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Well, we're getting OT now but just from the top of my head here's a few advantages of VHS tapes over Blu-Ray:

      • You can fast-forward all the previews and copyright messages. No UOPs of any kind.
      • If both your tape and player have "VHS" written on them, there's a very good chance they will just work together. No mucking around with regions or BD revision numbers. (Okay, assuming your VCR and TV can handle both PAL and NTSC)
      • You can start watching something, stop it part way through and come back to it in six weeks from exactly where you left off.
      • Look after your player and it will likely work for 20+ years from the date of purchase. If the player starts acting up, you can usually just clean the heads and you're good to go again.
      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:I miss the hang up... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      No I can't- I have Bluray in my PS3 and it can't record at all. Do you get the point now?

      PS3? Isn't that a games console? So you deliberately bought a play-only device and are complaining that it won't record for you? I bet people who bought play-only VCR[1] sets were a bit smarter than that.

      [1] VCR is Video Cassette Recorder, I assume the play-only versions might have been called VCP's but if I used that TLA it would probably cause more confusion...

  27. And before the phone? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before we had the phone, there was no way to hangup at all! Let's lament the lack of smacking someone on the face and stalking off!

    1. Re:And before the phone? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is fairly lamentable. You can't do that at all anymore without serious repercussions. Meanwhile, cowards who would never even look someone in the eye get away with screwing them over every day through various back room dealings and lies.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:And before the phone? by dwye · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Slap a man's face, and his seconds would contact yours and arrange pistols for two and coffee for one; in the Old West, he would just draw on you, or, if Wyatt Earp, pull your revolver from your holster and pistol-whip you into unconsciousness. As for cowards and back room deals, how did the Templars lose everything, or what happened when Thomas Cromwell broke up the monasteries for King Henry VIII?

    3. Re:And before the phone? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what you think, duels and gunfights were far less common than you think.

      You didn't openly shoot people or challenge them to duals since there was a 50/50 chance your ass would be dead. In about 3 duels you're almost certainly going to be dead (yes, I know one of are particular presidents was a dueling fanatic, but there are exceptions to every rule that do not make the normal).

      Gunfights weren't common in the old west. Duels weren't common either. It had to escalate considerable further in most cases before it became a challenge.

      Shooting deaths were lower doing those periods of time, not higher.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:And before the phone? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what you think, duels and gunfights were far less common than you think.

      And slapping a man a far worse insult than you think (unless the slapper was female, of course -- in that case, it would just be embarrassing or foreplay). Also, most duels ended with both men exchanging fruitless shots, then deciding that honor was satisfied. Slapping another man, however, was far more serious than A making ambiguous comments about another man (B) (probably that he was entirely too close to his daughter) then refusing to publicly apologize for the third hand comments that got back to B unless B stated what those comments were (ie, the Hamilton-Burr cause of action).

      The main reason that the West was so safe was that everyone went armed, and as Robert E. Heinlein pointed out, a well-armed populace is a polite populace. Punching a man would be less of an insult than slapping him.

  28. Re:Even by the standards of crappy Soulskill posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simpsons did it first.

  29. Hmm by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Anyone I'd hang up on like that would already just ring straight through to voice mail. Not that I actually associate with anyone I'd hang up on like that. I suppose in a hypothetical situation where I did, I could return their call specifically to hang up on them. But then I'd have to tell them that. "Hey! I called you back, just to hang up on your! (click!)" Maybe the poster isn't putting enough artistry into his hanging up! Or maybe he's just hanging out with the wrong people.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he's just hanging out with the wrong people.

      Or hanging up on the wrong people.

      (captcha: seismic)

  30. Welcome to the mid 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pointless article this has nothing to do with smart phones, you couldn't hang up any but the most early briefcase type mobile phone

  31. Isn't that what swearing is for? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Swear at the person, then hit "End".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Isn't that what swearing is for? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Swear at the person, then hit "End".

      the two aren't mutually exclusive. Swearing at the person before throwing the handset down just added to the satisfaction.

    2. Re:Isn't that what swearing is for? by radja · · Score: 1

      dont swear.. get a referee whistle. works especially well against call centers, as they cannot take off their headphones fast enough.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    3. Re:Isn't that what swearing is for? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

      Whilst tempting, that is mostly cruel to the poor who have no alternative but to work in a call centre. However it may be justified for SOME call centre callers.

  32. What are these "dropped calls", then? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing people talk about "dropped calls" - is that when the landline develops a fault and the audio keeps dropping out? I don't know if they still do that, because I haven't had a landline phone for about ten years - and their inherent unreliability is one of the reasons I got rid of it.

    1. Re:What are these "dropped calls", then? by dwye · · Score: 2

      Where do you come from, 1960s or 70s France, or Eastern Europe?

    2. Re:What are these "dropped calls", then? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      No, a fairly remote part of Scotland. I got rid of the landline because frankly it was crap and I wouldn't want to have to rely on it in an emergency. I still have the copper pair for ADSL, but that's crap too - and in fact failed while I was composing this post so the router has switched to 3G.

      It's raining and a bit windy, so the line has probably failed somewhere.

    3. Re:What are these "dropped calls", then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the USA and in England, it's normal for mobile phone calls to disconnect in the middle of the conversation. Each instance of this is a "dropped call".

    4. Re:What are these "dropped calls", then? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      In the USA and in England, it's normal for mobile phone calls to disconnect in the middle of the conversation. Each instance of this is a "dropped call".

      I go to England quite a lot. I've never had one of these "dropped calls". I don't know about the USA though, I hear their phone system pretty much sucks.

  33. Seinfeld Routine by nuckfuts · · Score: 1

    Jerry Seinfeld summed this up years ago in one of his standup routines.

  34. Would Someone Please Explain This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't own a smartphone or a cellphone, so I don't understand what this article is talking about. Don't you have to do something proactive to the phone to cause it to disconnect a call? How can "hanging up" have possibly gone away?

  35. Why are we blaming smart phones? by makubesu · · Score: 1

    Has the author never seen a cordless phone? You know, what practically everyone who still uses a land line has? You can't hang that up either. In fact, the only thing keeping the aggressive hang up going was the flip hone.

    1. Re:Why are we blaming smart phones? by 517714 · · Score: 1

      You keep the person on the line until you reach the old style phone in the other room, pick up its receiver, hang up the cordless phone and slam down the receiver of the old style phone. You do realize that the value of a land line is reliability, and that a cordless phone is the weak link in the chain? A phone that requires no power other than what it draws from the phone company is needed for real emergencies, and most landline users have at least one in their homes.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  36. It's just another quirk of a particular technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did we do before the telephone was invented? Slam doors. And so on.

  37. Re:Even by the standards of crappy Soulskill posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't know. I find it fascinating that somebody is able to make a living by making facile commentaries on how telephone etiquette changes over time.

    Who do I need to fuck to get a job like this?

  38. Erh... it may be me, but ... how about SAYING so? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I needn't slam a phone to tell the other person on the phone that I'm done with him.

    We recently invented a technology called "talking". It allows to "tell" them instead of using possibly ambiguous actions that may be misinterpreted. "Go to hell, you old bastard" is hard to misinterpret.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  39. port o rotary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a port-o-rotary so I can still hang up on A-holes.

  40. Hang-up, dial, ringing.. by tbird81 · · Score: 1

    There are tons of words that are in use that derive from something else - yet people still cope.

    It is neither novel nor clever to point these out. And even worse to make a Slashdot article about a stupid observation. Hang-up means "to end a phone call" - the term is derived from the action of older phones, where hanging the receiver on the phone ended the call.

    I'm going to bed to do some that's word has these origins:
    "The long-standing speculation is that this Latin word is altered (probably by influence of turbare "to stir up") from *manstuprare, from manu, ablative of manus "hand" (see manual) + stuprare "defile" (oneself), from stuprum "defilement, dishonor," related to stupere "to be stunned, stupefied" (see stupid). "

    1. Re:Hang-up, dial, ringing.. by verifine · · Score: 2

      No, not quite. That's not what "hang up" means.

      When I was a boy, you young whippersnapper, we had a candlestick phone (look it up: http://www.collectorsweekly.com/telephones/candlestick). When the phone rang our distinctive ring pattern, you picked up the candlestick with your right hand, then picked the receiver up with your left and held it to your ear. When the call was complete, you hung the receiver on its hook. Not placed, hung. That, sonny boy, is where the term "hang up" comes from.

      Since the telephone operator in town listened in to every call, she knew who was visiting who, so if I'd lift the receiver hook carefully to see if someone was on the party line, then hang up and give the magneto crank one long turn to call the operator, I'd ask in my little boy voice to talk to my aunt Della. The operator knew she was visiting Luella and put the call through. Our phone consisted of the candlestick, plus an oak box on the wall with brass bells and the ringer on the top, a crank on the right side for the magneto, and two dry cells with Fahnestock clips wired in series for power. The phone guy came out and replaced them twice a year. It wasn't even a "central battery" system in those days.

      The really scary part is, it's true. We had a candlestick phone until I was about 12 years old in '62 or '63 when we got our first party line dial phone. How freakin' old am I?

  41. Dial tone by johnny5555 · · Score: 1

    What about for the recipient of a modern hang-up? You don't hear a dial tone on cell phones when that happens, just silence. Kind of takes the bite out of someone hanging up on you.

    1. Re:Dial tone by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      You don't hear a dial tone on landlines either. I've always wondered about that on TV shows because I've never heard a dial tone on a landline when the other person hung up, just silence.

  42. Dont you people have phones at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh

  43. Hangup depends on the point of view by houghi · · Score: 2

    When I am in a conversation and the other person suddenly hangs up, I will know that the person calling was the cause or that it was a technical issue. Ask anybody and they will tell you that they can tell the difference.

    This is the case when I am on the phone and the other person calls with a cellphone. This happens when the other person is on a landline.

    What you do not have with a cellphone that you have with a landline is, as caller the satisfaction of slamming the horn down, missing the phone in anger and needing to slam it down several more times.

    If you missed, the callee could hear the callers frustration and giggle, However if he did not miss, you would not hear all the noise and you still were sure that the person hung up on you.

    So in the past you suddenly did not hear the person anymore. Now you suddenly do not hear the person anymore. There is no difference, except maybe in the theatrical sense.

    And yes, we still use the same words for things. That is language. I am sure there are many words we use for things that we do not even know what the original meaning was. That is why ethymology exists.

    My guess is that this is about trying to be nostalgic, while there is nothing to be nostalgic about.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Hangup depends on the point of view by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be...

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  44. Give me a break by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Stories like this are like a broken record.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  45. Catch-22 by Ly4 · · Score: 2

    From Catch-22:

    "It takes brains not to make money," Colonel Cargill wrote in one of the homiletic memoranda he regularly prepared for circulation over General Peckem's signature. "Any fool can make money these days and most of them do. But what about people with talent and brains? Name, for example, one poet who makes money."

    "T. S. Eliot," ex-P. F. C. Wintergreen said in his mail-sorting cubicle at Twenty-seventh Air Force Headquarters and slammed down the telephone without identifying himself.

    ...

    General Peckem roused himself after a moment with an unctuous and benignant smile. His expression was shrewd and sophisticated. His eyes gleamed maliciously. "Have someone get me General Dreedle," he requested Colonel Cargill. "Don't let him know who's calling." Colonel Cargill handed him the phone.

    "T. S. Eliot," General Peckem said, and hung up.

    Today, someone would ponder why Wintergreen would slam down the phone, since that would break the screen.

    1. Re:Catch-22 by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Today, someone would ponder why Wintergreen would slam down the phone, since that would break the screen.

      That book made me wonder about a lot of things that went on in it.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Catch-22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they're also wondering what a mail-sorting cubicle is, and why General Peckem can't make his own phone calls.

      Depending how ignorant you are of history, any book is going to need footnotes, whose extensiveness will be directly proportional to the age of the book (ostensibly the age of the book's setting, but in reality authors write for their own time and will make their references comprehensible to a modern-in-their-day reader).

  46. Sounds like a new app by Skapare · · Score: 1

    We have the "End Call" button. We just need an app that adds "Hung up" and "Hang up hard" buttons, that insert the sound of a legacy phone receiver hitting the holder. The app needs to randomize these sounds, otherwise a "Hang up silencer" app will come out. Well, it probably will, anyway. And we'll probably end up with a market in "hang up sounds", like spitting, laughing, mooing, etc.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  47. Usenet by c · · Score: 1

    What we really need is an app that generates a *plonk* sound, hangs up, and dumps the caller into a block list.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  48. go fuck yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works pretty well for ending conversations over any medium.

  49. Words mean things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "hangup" means

    hang-up (hngp)

    n. Informal

    1. A psychological or emotional difficulty or inhibition.

    2. An obstacle to smooth progress or development.

    I thought this would be a story about people losing some neurosis or something. I have never heard the word "hangup" used any other way. It's a noun, not a verb. Is this like the weird use of the word "shutter" as a verb to mean "close", even though everyone understands "close"? Or like the bizarre American insistence that "anymore" means "lately"?

    1. Re:Words mean things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing, in this case, that we're talking about TWO words. "Hang up." Dipshit.

    2. Re:Words mean things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you see the title of this story? Do you see two words? Do you see it written as two words in the discussion? Who's the dipshit, again?

  50. Why would you want to keep them? by rssrss · · Score: 4, Funny

    It took me years of psychotherapy to get rid of my hangups. Why would I be sad about their demise?

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  51. Dumb phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I miss about my old flip phone. Snapping it shut was just as good as slamming down a handset.

  52. Hanging up on someone is still powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if hanging up isn't rude enough, throw your phone at a child's face.

  53. Phone slam 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Remove cell from ear.
    2. Slam phone face forward on desk.
    3. Quietly pick up and verify screen is intact.
    4. Carefully push the end button.
    5. ???
    6. Profit

    I like to follow up with a tersely worded email cc'ing superiors. Lamenting the lack of carbon paper required for such a task.

  54. Slam down the Receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that isn't some football terminology?

  55. Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a friend who kept a referee's whistle next to the phone for sales people. Just remembering that. Thank you.

  56. Smashing it on the ground is even more satisfying by RealGene · · Score: 1

    ..but becomes an expensive habit.

    --
    Mission: To provide products that consume time and energy as entertainingly as permitted by the laws of thermodynamics.
  57. Disconnect about hangups... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

    First of all, If you are simply hanging up on someone, then you are just doing it wrong....

    Secondly, disconnects became relatively common as people started buying cordless phones (as opposed to cell phones) as the battery would die unexpectedly. Cordless phones became common in the 90's. This, in my opinion, is what changed how people viewed disconnects (i.e. the need to call back), not today's cell phone usage. In other words, this behaviour change started much sooner than you think.

    Finally, who just hangs up the phone? No matter how angry, disgusted, or stressed most people will at least say something to indicate that the conversation is over. In my opinion, anyone who doesn't, and hangs up deliberately, is either consciously or subconsciously indicating that they want to continue the conversation, but on their terms. Of course, the other party doesn't know this, so it is a completely useless gesture....

  58. Re:Violence in the Old West by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shooting deaths were lower doing those periods of time, not higher.

    (Note: Posting AC because I don't have an account. I know, I know, I should get one)

    Mod Parent way, way up. One of the joys of my college education was taking the history classes of Roger D. McGrath. His book (highly recommended) "Gunfighters, Highwaymen, and Vigilantes: Violence on the Frontier" shows that, contrary to popular perception, the old west was quite safe. Safer, in fact, than many cities of the era and farrrrrrr safer than society of today. There is, admittedly, one area where that was not true. In the category of accidental deaths caused by drunken cowboys, the old west had a problem. However, take out that one category, and the old west was quite a safe place.

    Gordon

  59. Use an Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think it has this 'slam the phone face down to hang up' option. The other side however probably doesn't hear the slam.

  60. other languages by allo · · Score: 1

    for example, in german the word hangup "aufhängen" was displaces by "auflegen" (to lay sth. down), like you did with the old telecom telephones with keys on one big block and a receiver to hold at your ear. Of course, you could try to implement this by an app, which hangs up when you lay down the phone ... but face it, you did not hang up or lay down your DECT mobile, as well.

  61. That's retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >It offered a way of ending a conversation prematurely, sternly, aggressively

    Or you can stop being a fucking crybaby and learn how to end conversations like a rational, thinking adult. Shouldn't be too hard if you're not an American.

  62. Bleak House's clue is lost, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Charles Dickens put a whopper of a clue at the start of Bleak House that probably 99.99% of modern readers would totally miss because no legal paperwork has been written in longhand in living memory. It's just not possible to preserve this stuff.

  63. Samsung Galaxy S3 and iPhone by kriston · · Score: 1

    My Samsung Galaxy S3 and iPhone hang up when I slam them down on the table.

    The Galaxy also mutes when I cover the screen with my hand.

    I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.

    --

    Kriston

  64. An app for that? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't be hard to make an app for that. Digitize the crash of a bakelite handset on a rotary phone, and make an app that plays that clip before disconnecting.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  65. First world concerns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess crime, disease, poverty have been eradicated, since people are actually concerned about stuff like this.

  66. LED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we are specilize in LED lightings LED bulbs,tubes,table lamps,etc in China.Nowadays, LED lightings are eco- friendly, have long lifespan and high efficiency, help focus features of articles and create varieties of atmosphere.They also save your money
    We adhering combine with Western Freedom, fraternity blends with Chinese traditional culture,and with all,like-minded people to set up a bright, civilized, happy, passionate atmosphere for business.
    Wish to become friends with you!

  67. Stupid or just Insane? by Molochi · · Score: 1

    If someone calls me and the call drops I'll call them back, immediately. That, to me, seems like common curtesy. But only if I know who the hell you are. If you block your number I'm not answering. If I don't call you back, fuck off and call someone else.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  68. Philips Genie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first (or second, I think first...) mobile phone, the Philips Genie had the ability to satisfactorily hang up on people. It had a spring loaded microphone at its base, you could press the mike to answer calls (and extend it) and hang up (and retract it.) It was actually kind of cool, viscerally hanging up on a spam call...

  69. Sounds like a Telemarketing daemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pesky little devils, aren't they?

  70. If you can even hang up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just my cheap HTC smartphone or lack of ability to correctly use a smartphone, but the slightest bit of mosture on my fingers or change in skin temp. turns a simple hangup into a series of inabilities to hang-up followed by a series of hang-ups and accidental call-backs. Why must the end button be the same button used to call someone back?

  71. New rudeness: hurling / throwing cell phones by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1
    The L.A. Times has an article that points out that the new idiocy of the rude is flinging and hurling their cellphones in anger, and they call their article Anger issue: When phone goes from mobile to aerial, with an illustration to go with it demonstrating "How To Throw a Phone" like a baseball as a (1) curve phone
    (2) knuckle phone
    (3) fast phone

    rendered in a faux-retro style. It has also entered the Taylor Swift breakup-song stage:

    Taylor Swift also discloses a phone-flinging episode in her song "Stay Stay Stay":
    "...I'm pretty sure we almost broke up last night.
    ... I threw my phone across the room at you. ..."

    The object of her aggression/desire returns ready to talk, wearing a football helmet.
  72. Throwing Cell Phones by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1
    Yeah, the LA Times even has an article about the phenomenon of "hurling and throwing cell phones" at Anger issue: When phone goes from mobile to aerial. I like the cute illustration showing the three baseball pitching styles for hurling a cell-phone. It reminds me of Steve Jobs explaining the antenna debacle for the iphone: You're holding it wrong!"
    .
    In fact, cell phone throwing has become so common-place now that the concept is even part of a Taylor Swift break-up song, Stay, Stay, Stay with the lyrics in the music video being: "... I'm pretty sure we almost broke up last night.
    ... I threw my phone across the room at you. ..."
    The object of her aggression/desire returns ready to talk, wearing a football helmet.

    You know it's trendy when Taylor Swift's all over it!