Slashdot Mirror


Egyptian Forces Capture 3 Divers Trying To Cut Undersea Internet Cable

Egypt's Naval forces claim they have captured three scuba divers who were trying to cut an undersea Internet cable in the Mediterranean. Col. Ahmed Mohammed Ali said in a statement that the divers were caught while “cutting the undersea cable” of Telecom Egypt. Internet services have been disrupted since March 22 in Egypt. From the article: "The statement was accompanied by a photo showing three young men, apparently Egyptian, staring up at the camera in what looks like an inflatable launch. It did not have further details on who they were or why they would have wanted to cut a cable."

166 comments

  1. Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    But did they even cut once?

    1. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, they cut into the cable but not all the way through it. It resulted in slower Internet traffic in the region fed by those cables.

    2. Re:Measure twice. by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      It is going to be one royal pain in the ass, repair optical cable undersea.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    3. Re:Measure twice. by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      With modern cable ships, it's actually pretty routine work. They get damaged by ship anchors on regular basis.

    4. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, I do wonder why they run the cables to Asia via the Mediterranean? What is there to prevent Jihadis from Egypt, North Sudan, Yemen or Somalia from trying it again? Why not route around South Africa and for some more redundancy, from the Americas, route the cables along the Pacific rim through the east of Japan to Taiwan, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Myanmar and India? That way, the routes are clear, since there are fewer people on that side who would want to take the trouble to cut undersea fiber cables in that part of the world.

    5. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The cable was slightly bent during the process, so 0's could get through, but 1's would get stuck where the cable is bent. That's how you end up with slower Internet traffic.

    6. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably latency + colonial ties

    7. Re: Measure twice. by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      The cable was slightly bent during the process, so 0's could get through, but 1's would get stuck where the cable is bent. That's how you end up with slower Internet traffic.

      That's peculiar. 1s look so much more slender than 0s. You'd think they'd be able to slip through a space where a 0 would get caught.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vietnamese fishermen were trying to salvage optical undersea fiber for copper a few years ago. There are idiots everywhere.

    9. Re:Measure twice. by letherial · · Score: 1

      idiots, or desperation?

    10. Re:Measure twice. by wiredlogic · · Score: 2

      There is some copper in an optical fiber cable which is needed to supply power to the repeaters spaced along its length.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    11. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vietnamese fishermen were doing it out of ignorance, and not out of any desire to sabotage the internet. In the case of the Egyptians here, chances are more likely than not that they were trying to sabotage the internet and either disrupt internet access in Egypt to the West, or cut the links between Europe and Asia. Or both.

    12. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as latency goes, it would be more useful to have that redundancy, so that if the groups listed above do cut the cable at the Suez or near Somalia, then Asia is not cut off from the internet as a result. Which is why it's useful to have something run from Seattle/Vancouver via the North West and down via Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam and ultimately terminating in India.

    13. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They must be using some kind of amplitude encoding where the 1's go higher on the amplitude curve, so they require a thicker piece of cable to get through.

    14. Re: Measure twice. by foobsr · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's peculiar. 1s look so much more slender than 0s.

      Here is the magic: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensegrity

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    15. Re:Measure twice. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You already have a lot of redundancy through multiple operators running the cables. That is not a problem.

      Latency on the other hand is a huge factor. So are costs of laying and maintaining the cable.

    16. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably read the /. question about mining bitcoins and the 4 campuses connected with dark fiber. Connecting via dark fiber is much leeter than using a connected cable.

    17. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It works the same way as sickle cell anemia. The 1s bunch up and cause a clog.

    18. Re:Measure twice. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      There is some copper in an optical fiber cable which is needed to supply power to the repeaters spaced along its length.

      Unless they use Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers that require no electrical power to be fed down the cable.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    19. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly something to do with not wanting to run the cables across active fault lines, with all that Lava 'n' stuff....

    20. Re:Measure twice. by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 1

      Unless they use Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers that require no electrical power to be fed down the cable.

      You still need electrical power for repeaters, though, as the fiber amplifier has a pump laser that has to be powered. It's not practical to send high power at the pumping wavelength through a series of erbium-doped repeaters.

    21. Re:Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's less redundancy in the backbones than commonly thought, in fact there are unnecessary chokepoints which are probably intended to simplify intercepts. The ARPANET "designed to survive a nuclear war" thing wasn't really true then and isn't now. If a major exchange was taken out somehow there would be widespread and lasting disruption.

    22. Re: Measure twice. by mikael · · Score: 1

      Coaxial cable, the 0's slide along the outside of the inner cable, the 1's travel along the core of the inner cable. So if the cable gets bent, the 1's back up all the way to the server.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    23. Re: Measure twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That article was laughable. The age of CPU/GPU mining is coming to an end with ASICs.

    24. Re:Measure twice. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last time I researched this (admittedly some time ago) they did send the pump laser signal down the fiber like this. There were two choices - send the pump signal down the same fiber as the signal, or down a different fiber that was physically joined/merged with the signal cables(s). It looks like that didn't work out, since Wikipedia agrees with you: Repeaters are powered by a constant direct current passed down the conductor near the center of the cable...

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    25. Re: Measure twice. by motorhead · · Score: 0

      It's using ring topology and when they cut the cable the tokens fell out.

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    26. Re: Measure twice. by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      Efforts are being made to retrieve all the lost 1's and 0's floating out to sea.

      --
      /* No Comment */
  2. Col. Ahmed Mohammed Ali by Cito · · Score: 4, Funny

    Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee, he makes sure Egypt doesn't lose internet tv.

  3. Copper prices by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It did not have further details on who they were or why they would have wanted to cut a cable."

    They probably thought it was copper cable. It sells for a pretty penny as scrap right now you know. Imagine their shock when they were told by the cops it contained only "worthless" fiber.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Copper prices by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking that Telecom Egypt needed an excuse for screwing up the Internet for so long, so they are framing somebody for it. Two months in jail for $100,000. There were hundreds lined up, and they took the first three.

    2. Re:Copper prices by Hentes · · Score: 0

      Fiber has a kevlar sheating which should worth something.

    3. Re:Copper prices by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fiber has a kevlar sheating which should worth something.

      Why? It's not like you can use it for anything. Kevlar needs to be purpose made for specific uses. You can't melt it down and reuse it like metal. You can buy sheets of Kevlar fabric for very little. It's mostly the labor and skill that it takes to make stuff that adds the value. Not the material itself.

    4. Re:Copper prices by plover · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fiber has a kevlar sheating which should worth something.

      Worth what, exactly? The stuff is woven about the plastic sheathed glass fibers, some insulated copper wires that carry power to the repeaters, and encased in a waterproof coating. If you cut it open and empty the useless crap out you'll destroy the integrity of the fibers. It's not like you can knit yourself a bulletproof Kevlar sweater out of it.

      The copper will be worth a few farthings per furlong, but that's likely to be it for value.

      --
      John
    5. Re:Copper prices by c0lo · · Score: 1

      They probably thought it was copper cable.

      So they were after a copper cable, but got a navy colonel? Doesn't matter, looks like they were arrested anyway.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:Copper prices by plover · · Score: 2

      It still has a copper conductor carrying 7kV, used to power the undersea signal repeaters.

      You can, however, imagine their shock when the saboteurs encountered the 7000 volts.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Copper prices by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I used some mysef to make an ndestructable dog toy. Worked nicely: Kevlar-denim-silicone composite fabric witht two squeakers inside. Super-tough.

      Dog doesn't like it though. He prefrs toys with bits that can be ripped off, so e just have to keep buying new toys every week.

      Silly tablet keyboard is dropping letters.

    8. Re:Copper prices by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You can, however, imagine their shock when the saboteurs encountered the 7000 volts.

      The police arrested three people in a harbor, not pulled three bodies out of one. I know throwing a plugged in toaster into the bathtub with you in it is an efficient way to suffer a total existance failure. So that must mean voltage is less deadly the higher it is. I can't help feeling though like maybe we're missing something important here...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:Copper prices by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      The copper will be worth a few farthings per furlong, but that's likely to be it for value.

      Some farthings are worth quite a lot. Offer me a few of the several-thousand-sterling each types, and I'll gladly deliver a furlong of cable.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    10. Re: Copper prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, amps.

    11. Re:Copper prices by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      If he ingests Kevlar fibers, they'll likely perforate his GI tract and kill him.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    12. Re:Copper prices by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yet the dog lives.

      I took that into account. The outer layer is a very tough, abrasion-resistant denim. Dog-safe. The kevlar is used underneath that to add tensile strength, and kevlar thread is used in all the stitching. Seams turned inwards, of course. Dog had has that toy for a year and subjected it to a lot of demanding use, and it has yet to tear or puncture.

    13. Re:Copper prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAPPY EASTER!

    14. Re: Copper prices by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Do the ones in your bathroom go up to 11?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Copper prices by plover · · Score: 1

      An ocean full of salt water is a somewhat different environment than the confines of a bathtub, a toaster, and a victim. I'm guessing that if someone breaches the inner aluminum waterproofing shield, the conductivity of the salt water probably popped whatever circuit protection they have, shutting down the power.

      If you're somewhat interested, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_communications_cable has a good description of the materials making up the cables. And if you're really into it, Neal Stephenson wrote a brilliant story on the laying of the SEA-ME-WE-3 cable network, which you can still read on Wired: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass.html . It's one of the most fascinating looks I've read into a world I use daily but will probably never see. I can't recommend it highly enough.

      But really, this was just meant to be a pun referring to the GPs use of the word 'shock'.

      --
      John
    16. Re:Copper prices by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Dog had has that toy for a year and subjected it to a lot of demanding use, and it has yet to tear or puncture.

      That must be very depressing (and mildly humiliating) for the dog....

    17. Re:Copper prices by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The toy doesn't get played with often, probably because it is so tough. It's beanbag-shaped, and contains two squeaker balls. You can throw it, and the dog will run and fetch it. But what it seems to really like are the flimsy rolls, something it seems to take great initial interest in de-limbing. Once only a torso remains, the dog loses any interest. Something about tearing a toy into pieces seems to satisfy it.

    18. Re:Copper prices by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Flimsy dolls, rather. Think http://www.feedem.co.uk/images/products/zoom/1304760047-55473900.jpg - they'll last about a day, and then we'll be finding stuffing and scraps of fabric around the room for a week.

    19. Re:Copper prices by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I would hardly call the price of Kevlar fabric cheap. It's 4 or more times the price of fiberglass.
      Your point stands however. The Kevlar in an underwater cable would be thin strips and possibly impregnated with epoxy: useless for resale.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re:Copper prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like they were just grabbing whatever scrap they could find underwater to sell. Of course they'd try to get a cable that might be copper. Sadly for them they will cop it now, cos doing something seemingly political in an unstable place like egypt is bad for your health.

  4. Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can see two likely possibilities:

    1. Plausible deniability.

    Say that a foreign government decides they want to tap a cable. The easiest way is to cut the cable a few hundred miles away so that nobody will notice while they're severing and reconnecting fibers. Sure, they could blame somebody dragging an anchor across it, but that starts to look suspicious if you do it too many times. But if you can create what looks like a botched terrorist act, then you can later come and sever the cable, and everybody will assume that the successful cut was also a terrorist act. Even better if Egypt can host a mock show trial.

    2. Something to hide.

    Say you're the Syrian government and you don't want the world to have proof that you are beginning to gas the dissidents. What better way to cut off communication than to sever the right undersea cables?

    Of course, I could be wrong—it could really be a terrorist organization—but I really can't think of any plausible aims that could be achieved by doing something like this, which is why it seems more likely that it was done by some random government's black ops team, either for nefarious purposes or to distract attention away from something else nefarious.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1. Not necessary. The worlds superpowers can tap undersea cable without interrupting services.

      2. Plausible.

      3. Most likely local third country nationals who are mad at the Egyption gov.

    2. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Why go to all that bother and expense?

      Egypt can just seize the servers at any time. Weren't there stories about Egypt and Blackberry servers? Government wanted the ability to intercept and decrypt communications going through those servers, and Blackberry eventually rolled over, IIRC.

      Putting divers in the water is risky and expensive.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Say you're the Syrian government and you don't want the world to have proof that you are beginning to gas the dissidents.

      Stop with the war mongering please.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tapping fiber is not so easy, as it's photonic. The cuts would be seen by optical time domain reflectometry on the other side. Doing it underwater is ugly. #1 isn't so easy.

      Hiding something, like a service outage while you're about to do something evil is somewhat plausible, save that it's no longer possible to actually shut down ALL of the communications going out of a country, just a large bulk of it. Why would Syria, Israel, or even the Eritreans try to cut the cable? I think #2 is equally implausible.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    5. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but who might have a grudge against Egypt?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    6. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Modmodded for being antiwar! How shameful can it get? Are they busing in moderators from the New York Times and Washington Post? You people are sick!

    7. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by jamesh · · Score: 2

      Of course, I could be wrong—it could really be a terrorist organization

      If so, then they've really lost their way. Sure it's easier to cut an undersea cable than to blow up a nightclub or to fly a plane into a building, but where's the terror? Sure it's inconvenient to have slow internet, but they are terrorists not invonvenientists....

    8. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Far easier to imagine religious nut seeking to cut off the evil influence of the internet. Well, at least the young gullible pawns of religious nuts. So idiot religious proselytizers with no real understanding of anything, trying to cut the tube full of internets.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by mysidia · · Score: 1

      How about 3....

      #3... They are divers. They might cause damage, then later offer their services as divers to assist in repairing the damage (for a large fee, of course).

    10. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Stop with the war mongering please.

      So, observing the war that someone else is conducting against the people in his country, and paying attention to the fact that he has WMDs, and that he is a meat puppet for Iran - big sponsors of terrorism and medieval theo-thuggery throughout the region ... that's war-mongering? When a meteorologist tells you that there's a hurricane moving up the coast, do you tell them to stop starting storms?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking old fashioned extortion. Cough up some protection money, or bad things will happen to your network access... which is why the Egyptian authorities knew to look for them.

    12. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Same bullshit we heard before. You people can't stop, can you?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot. Maybe you should check the kind of terrorists you are allying yourselves with and try to convince us they're any better. No, you all are addicted. The thuggery you are practicing is no different from theirs. You will do anything to rationalize your wars. Shameful.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Say you're the Syrian government and you don't want the world to have proof that you are beginning to gas the dissidents.

      Stop with the war mongering please.

      Always nice to hear from peace-loving Russian friend.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Same bullshit we heard before. You people can't stop, can you?

      What a lazy, pointless attempt to avoid talking about reality. Classic ad hominem response to anyone who points out reality. Aren't you just a little bit embarrassed when you don't even bother to try to explain away Assad's actions? Or the complicity of Iran? Regardless, how is it, again, that simply pointing out what other people are doing as they slaughter their own citizens is "war mongering?"

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      You will do anything to rationalize your wars.

      How is Assad's slaughter of his own people "our" war? How was Saddam's invasion of Kuwait "our" war? How was the Taliban's brutal tyranny in Afghanistan "our" war? Your cognitive dissonance on this topic is pretty amazing. I suppose you'd consider the US's involvement in beating back German and Japanese tyranny to also be "our" war, right? Please, be specific.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    17. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You're a real sucker for the same old propaganda and lies that got us into so many wars. There's no way to argue with that. Obviously you have learned nothing from the previous ones.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    18. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      Oh please! Just stop. These are all people we like when they give us cheap/stuff, or kill the right people. You only get upset when they change the target, or decide to buy from the competition. The hypocrisy is very thick.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      :-) Damn, you all are funny. Another blast from the past.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You're a real sucker for the same old propaganda and lies that got us into so many wars.

      In other words, you have absolutely no explanation for why observing the fact that a regime is slaughtering its own people is "war mongering." You've carefully avoided addressing reality in order to call someone else names. It's a strange reaction - a form of shrill argument that normally ends once one grows out of grade school.

      There's no way to argue with that.

      You're not arguing about anything. You're making pointless personal attacks without even beginning to address the substance of the matter. Which is a sure sign that you know your understanding of the substance is poor, or that the point you're trying to make can't possibly hold up to any sort of scrutiny. Having no point to make, or cravenly pretending that you've got something to say about the person delivering facts to the conversation - sure signs of someone who just wants attention, and who lashes out at anyone who actually has the patience to press them for some indication that they can back up their empty rhetoric.

      So, let's try something, so show how cowardly you actually are. A simple yes or no question:

      Is the regime in Syria using gunships and artillery to kill its own civilians?

      I'll bet you can't just say yes or no. But I'll stick around to find out.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    21. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Is the regime in Syria using gunships and artillery to kill its own civilians?

      Maybe so, but so what, when the Saudi/Israeli mercenaries we are paying have probably killed more, and so far the chemical weapons use points to them, not Assad. But let's do our best to keep that under wraps. Cowardly.. How funny to hear that from an armchair little general who believes every lie because of their source. You have no facts, only statements from people with an interest. You were full of it ten years ago, and you're full of it now. Same crap, different day. All for money and power. Cowardly indeed.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      In other words, no, you can't answer a simple question honestly. Which makes your ranting about honesty really hilarious. Thanks for showing your true colors.

      More importantly, thanks for also demonstrating that you don't actually understand what the phrase "war mongering" actually means. With the sort of loose, rudderless thought process you prefer, I think we can safely say that you are a war monger. You like it when people like Saddam invade countries like Kuwait. You like it when the Taliban drag school teachers out into the street and shoot them in the head for teaching girls to read. You thrive on the existence of countless flaming little wars and conflicts, in the ongoing effort to crush democracy, and in the growth of power among backwards tyrants murdering for Allah and the rest. You're the worst sort of war monger, because you're too dumb to realize you are one.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    23. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, pull the other one. But hey, don't sweat it. You'll get your war and many more. Be happy. You like it when we torture people and kill innocents for your god. You like seeing the Saudis flog women for not covering their faces. You don't want peace. You want compliance. And your projection.. Oh my! A gold star for you... Keep up the good work!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    24. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Second reply, because, you know, screw it:

      In other words, no, you can't answer a simple question honestly.

      And neither can you because the info you have is unreliable. All you are hearing and believing is one sided propaganda. Both sides are firing mortars and other artillery, so you have no idea what's up. You just want war. Exactly like you did in the last one. If that is for business reasons, I can understand. If it's personal, then I think you're nuts.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    25. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And neither can you

      Neither can I what? You haven't asked a question. You've just been waving your hands and making vague assertions without any details, and pretending that talking about what other people are doing is "war mongering." As far as I can tell, the only person here who is obsessed about anything is you. You're dead set on preserving the conditions in which little wars fueled by idiotic inter-Islamic racism and sectarianism can become regional catastrophes. You're a refugee fetishist who prefers hundreds of thousands of people fleeing Assad's murder crews and swamping Jordan's ability to feed and care for them. Why? Because you like the slow burn, the rot, and the death that comes day by day from people like Assad, rather than admitting that the Baathist thugocracy approach to life is a horror show.

      What's he paying you, anyway? Or is it his buddies in Russia and Iran and China that are paying you to help perpetuate the little war that you like so well?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    26. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Neither can I what?

      You can't tell me who is killing whom. I've seen enough of this crap to feel perfectly comfortable telling you that your mass media is lying to protect government interests, whose only interest is not to stop the killing, but to make sure the 'right' people are being killed. Our business in that area is to foment destruction, chase off the competition, and make money from it. There is absolutely no morality of any kind. It's about interests, not principles. You're okay with it because you are on the winning side, sitting a comfortable distance away collecting the spoils. I couldn't expect anything else from you, and can easily understand your motivations. Same goes for the Europeans, Russians, and the Chinese. Your propagandizing is very revealing, and funny in a sick, nostalgic kind of way.. A real believer in American 'exceptionalism' you are. Might makes right.

      Word. American, the the others' thugocracy (where did you dig up that one?) is no different from Baathist thugocracy aside from the target. But thugs you are. Pirates actually. Old time pirates, who can now do their pillaging from the basement of the MGM Grand.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    27. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      That sure is a lot of hot air to avoid explaining how talking about events in Syria is "war mongering." I know, I know, you can't bring yourself to admit that you're just spouting BS, and have no sense of causality, and are a completely invertebrate moral relativist with situational ethics and an abiding hatred of the US. But since everything you write makes all of that clear, why not just come out and say it? Just that one moment of honesty will make you feel so much better. Then you can move on to the next step, which is using phrases for what they actually mean. Then you'll be making some headway.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    28. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That funny. As if you're speaking from a position of honesty. It's okay. You're just a victim of the propaganda. All you can produce is a conditioned response, unable to logically argue anything. You are Pavolian, and another statistic in BF Skinner's studies. Pure animal, baby. The nature (get it?) of all your posts illustrate that perfectly.

      ...a completely invertebrate moral relativist...

      Ah, an absolutist, the worst kind of war monger, thinking you have the right to impose yourself upon others, on the crusade, killing for Jesus.. Heh, your god and the Islamists' are birds of a feather... kill kill kill.... No, not really. We know that you all are just in it for the money, and the hookers.

      No, I don't hate the US. I'm just showing that they are no better than anyone else. And you're actually helping in that regard. Thank you very much. Have a good day, sir.

      Peace out!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    29. Re:Plausible deniability and/or something to hide by Dabido · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be terrorists, it just needs to be Islamic Fundamentalists (not affiliated with any terrorist group), who are severing the cable to stop porn from getting into Egypt.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  5. The ultimate man in the middle attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, how do you top that?

  6. How were they able to tell by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    they were Egyptian simply by the way they looked?

    1. Re:How were they able to tell by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      they were Egyptian simply by the way they looked?

      I've hear of DUI, DWI and DWB (Driving While Black). But this is the first case of DWE (Diving While Egyptian) that I'm aware of.

    2. Re:How were they able to tell by mingle · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... maybe it was the way they walked?

    3. Re:How were they able to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fur, pointy ears and paws?

    4. Re:How were they able to tell by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad for them that not all the cops were in the donut shop.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:How were they able to tell by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      This. Is. Not. Funny? Elliots....

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    6. Re:How were they able to tell by houghi · · Score: 1

      When my dad was in Egypt, people thought he was Egyptian. When he was in Israel, people thought he was Israeli.
      Just saying.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:How were they able to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhh... Susanna Hoffs... hnnnnnnngggg

    8. Re:How were they able to tell by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "they were Egyptian simply by the way they looked?"

      They obviously walked like an Egyptian.

    9. Re:How were they able to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you inherit the big nose?

    10. Re:How were they able to tell by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they had to get them to dry land to see how they walked.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  7. Picture... by MasseKid · · Score: 1

    "The statement was accompanied by a photo"

    So how about a damn link to the photo since TFA doesn't have a copy?

    1. Re:Picture... by They'reComingToTakeM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Photos are included on The Register's coverage of the story.

  8. I mean... by RandomUsername99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who, at some point, hasn't gotten *that* tired of seeing stupid reddit memes?

  9. YouTube comments by RandomUsername99 · · Score: 1

    I generally feel like doing the same thing to the largest internet tramsmission cable I can find, when I disregard all of the good sense and wisdom that I've gained from my prior negative experiences, and actually read the comments on YouTube videos.

  10. Re:Really? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that even a real name? I swear news stories sound faker and faker every day. So what right will they want to take away in the US because someone "tried to cut an Internet cable"?

    You will no longer be able to have flippers in your carry-on luggage. The TSA will require cavity searches of anyone going to tropical locations that may attract scuba divers. Regulators and frog masks will be banned from carry-on and checked luggage. Anyone purchasing or filling any kind of tank (including, but not limited to oxygen, water, CO2, propane, argon, nitrogen, etc.) will need to be registered, fingerprinted, and relinquish their constitutional rights and future social security payments. Additionally anyone who uses more than 100 gallons of water per month must turn over their first born daughter to spin straw into gold to help finance the new agency offshoot of the TSA to "protect" us all from this new vile form of terrorism.

  11. Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by Thagg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    During a week in 2008, three undersea cables were cut off of Egypt. At the time (and still) the cuts were attributed to ships dragging anchors -- although the fact that there were three cuts so close in time was, and remains, hard to believe.

    So, now we see people intentionally cutting a cable. Hmm.

    During the second world war, there were teams of saboteurs who were tasked with cutting telephone cables across France, in preference to almost any other target, because it was much easier for the British to intercept radio messages than telephone messages. I can't imagine any other reason for this.

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by jewens · · Score: 2

      I wonder if anyone has yet designed a task-specific cable-cutting anchor or is this an untapped market?

      --
      That group of bovine standing over there appears quite portentous. That's right it's an ominous cow herd.
    2. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Wait, you're saying teams of saboteurs cut the wires so that the Egyptian government has to use radio to communicate, so it can be spied on? And you can't think of any other reason? You either need to be more imaginative or less, I'm not sure which.

      Try this reason: these three guys thought it was copper wire, and wanted to steal it and sell it as scrap.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "although the fact that there were three cuts so close in time was, and remains, hard to believe."

      I debunked this conspiracy theory at the time. I can't be arsed to do it in such detail again, but the gist of it was that using the ITU's stats on cable cuts 3 cuts in a week wasn't out of the norm and submarine cables tend to get cut all the time (at least once a week). It's a more common occurrence than people realise.

      Couple this with the fact that Egypt has the Suez canal which is one of the busiest (or even simply the busiest?) shipping lane in the world and there's really nothing hard to believe about that sort of incident at all.

      I know some people get excited when they see a chance for conspiracy but I'm afraid the world is often much less exciting. Much as I might be amused by the idea that this woman is part of a crack commando unit for example, I think she really was probably just looking for salvage:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13158351

    4. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure someone has developed them, not that difficult just make em sharp.

      Now, develop one that cuts the cable and inserts a tap automatically you have a market.

    5. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      During the second world war, there were teams of saboteurs who were tasked with cutting telephone cables across France, in preference to almost any other target, because it was much easier for the British to intercept radio messages than telephone messages.

      From what I've read, that was more a matter of the Germans using different codes for radio than for telephone.

      Guess which set of codes the Brits had cracked?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      During a week in 2008, three undersea cables were cut off of Egypt. At the time (and still) the cuts were attributed to ships dragging anchors -- although the fact that there were three cuts so close in time was, and remains, hard to believe.

      So, now we see people intentionally cutting a cable. Hmm.

      Maybe these three were moonlighting as ship anchors?

    7. Re:Eerily reminiscent of 3 cable cuts in 2008 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. Porn is pretty big here. Even if your a fundamentalist Islamist, you still gotta get your porn.

  12. Egyptian need slogan by loki.tang · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Cable contains no copper, Steal it will put you in jail". Chinese print this slogan everywhere in China.

  13. Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The MB does not like the West very much, and that cable links Egypt to (in their way of thought) the West

    Maybe that's the reason they cut the cable

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Doubtful. The Muslim Brotherhood isn't isolationist like, e.g., the Taliban, nor do they have anything in particular against the West, as with Wahhabism. In other words, they don't necessarily see a conflict between modern institutions and Islamic life. They just have a really, really, really conservative opinion about how to live as a Muslim within a modern, technologically progressive nation-state.

      They're more like what you'd get with Pat Robertson and his ultra-conservative compatriots controlling all three branches of the government. You could kiss the Constitution goodbye, but you'd still have some semblance of federalism, a free market, free-ish speech, etc.

    2. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are not isolationist in the sense that they are happy to support foreign Jihadi organizations, like Hamas, CAIR, al Qaeda, et al. They are certainly isolationist when it comes to Western - read Infidel - influences on Egypt - that's a part of what those 'Arab Spring' revolutions were all about.

      Really, the last thing that we need is apologists here for a Jihadi organization that's the parent organization of terror groups like Hamas and al Qaeda, and trying to paint them as being nicer than Wahabis or the Taliban. The only difference between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Wahabis is that the former believes in the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence, whereas the latter follow the Hanbalis. But to non-Sunnis, it's a distinction without a difference.

    3. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Bongo · · Score: 1

      I gather "deal with us or deal with the Taliban" is a tactic ––but their aims may be quite similar.

      And at some point is gets hard to tell the difference. Ordinary folk write comments like, "we don't want Communism, and we don't want Capitalism, we want Islam."

      It is the path of renunciation and purity — everything will work so much better if everyone just submitted to the proper and good system, namely Islam.

      The West also had a thousand years or more of that sort of strive for purity — but in the end it largely dawned upon us that you can't crush the impure stuff out of existence —people need to think for themselves how to deal with the messy stuff in life, like sex and relationships and the meaning of life.

      Islam is a political system —there is no separation of Church and State. It also considers itself the best and purest version 3, where Christianity was v2 and Judaism v1. Version 3 seeks to "correct" all the mistakes (corruptions) made by versions 1 and 2.

      Versions 1 and 2 failed to pursue purity far enough.

    4. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      They were probably trying to steal the copper.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      They were probably trying to steal the copper.

      From an undersea cable? I admire the ambition, but...

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    6. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Ther is a deeper problem, a sectarian one, Though they seek "pure" Islam, there are two "Islam"s to seek. Obviously the Sunni see the Shia as heretics, and their reverence of Ali as idolatry. And the Persians have this "hidden Imam" thing going on. With each revolution of Earth, this gets more and more interesting.

      I hope Israel's renewed diplomatic relations with Turkey does something to keep this part of the world from melting down.

    7. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Muslim Brotherhood isn't isolationist like, e.g., the Taliban nor do they have anything in particular against the West

      Oh, well they don't sound all that bad...

      They're more like what you'd get with Pat Robertson and his ultra-conservative compatriots controlling all three branches of the government.

      OH GOD KILL IT WITH FIRE!

    8. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2

      Israel IS the "world melting down".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You're gonna lump CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) in with Hamas or al Qaeda? CAIR is a regular advocacy group. They get to sit down w/ the President and discuss policy.

      You're clearly prejudiced against Islam, and not in the "I'm atheist and dislike all organized religions" way.

      I stand by what I said. The Muslim Brotherhood is not anti-Western. It was founded, and is still chiefly controlled, by professionals--scientists, doctors, accountants, etc.

      They don't advocate violence. But, much like Zionists or Evangelical Christians, they don't exactly go out of their way to renounce extremists. Is that wrong? Yes. But it doesn't make them terrorists.

    10. Re:Are they from the Muslim Brotherhood ? by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      You could kiss the Constitution goodbye, but you'd still have some semblance of federalism, a free market, free-ish speech, etc.

      Sounds like the United States.

  14. Re:Really? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    Anyone purchasing or filling any kind of tank (including, but not limited to oxygen, water, CO2, propane, argon, nitrogen, etc.) will need to be registered, fingerprinted, and relinquish their constitutional rights and future social security payments.

    Actually, last I knew, at least here in the US, if you want to have your tanks filled, you needed to be registered with PADI.

  15. you guys will believe anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except for those that believe in nothing.

  16. It's more like a grudge against the Western world by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, but who might have a grudge against Egypt?

    In the case of the Muslim Brotherhood, the grudge is more aiming at the "immorality of the Western world" than anything else

    The Internet (at least that cable) is a symbol of Internet, and to many of those holier than thou folks, the Net is a "tool of the West" that brings in all kinds of filth

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  17. Can't get off this ride by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Stop with the war mongering please.

    How about you stop the wars first, Mr. "sticking my head in the sand".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Can't get off this ride by fustakrakich · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can't do that by shipping them weapons.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Can't get off this ride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you still believe all the lies that were used to start the last wars. Well, we can say your head is not in the sand, but it is in a very dark place..

    3. Re:Can't get off this ride by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we need to make state genocide as easy as possible. Just imagine what a terrible world we'd be in if all the millions of victims of Hitler or Stalin or Mao could have fought back? Why, there might not be any totalitarian police states at all! Horrifying!

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Can't get off this ride by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      So, you still believe all the lies that were used to start the last wars.

      Lies? Let's see...I'm guessing that you think:

      The Taliban was not actually running Afghanistan at the point of a sword, or harboring Al Queda. Or, they were happy to give up the organization that attacked embassies, the Cole, NYC, etc ... all an illusion created by the Tri-Lateral Commission and the Illuminati, right? Right!

      Saddam didn't invade Kuwait. That was all staged, and the thousands of troops, tanks, and supply chains set up for that invasion was actually faked by the Bush administration. Or, maybe that DID happen, but you're thinking that everything that Sadddam did after he agreed to the terms that ended the ongoing destruction of his military when he got kicked out was correct, but every news agency and government in the world lied, right? He actually WAS allowing inspectors everywhere they wanted to do. He actually WAS showing what he did with mountains of VX gas (instead of trucking it to Syria). He actually was NOT slaughtering thousands of people with WMDs (all fake dead bodies, of course!). All of the time he spend shooting at US and allied aircraft patrolling the no-fly zones was actually fake. All of the long-range missiles he continued to make and import from North Korea - just props, right (and the fact that he was able to shoot those props into places like Israel - all just CGI, of course). The UN's documentation of his scamming the Oil For Food program to rebuild his military and more palaces - fake, of course (all of those well fed soldiers and new weapons were actors and props shipped in by the Bush administration).

      No point going on, since you already know you're a trolling fool.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Can't get off this ride by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You too, eh? So far the evidence of chemical weapons use points to the people the US is aiding. But let's not quibble over details. TO WAR!!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    6. Re:Can't get off this ride by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      The US was perfectly happy with the Taliban until they cut off the opium (kinda funny that your buddy, OBL was in Pakistan the whole time), and they gave the green light for Saddam to invade Kuwait... until the Brits 'asked' us not to. The only thing that makes them into 'terrorists' is the target they choose. But they were all our peeps. And our new people that we install will all perform the same trick, and we'll be rich, I tell ya! Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon, DuPont, Bayer AG, BOA, etc. are still great investments. Buy now, if you haven't already.

      Keep on keeping on, mah brother. The faithful are on your side.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Can't get off this ride by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      If I say to you "I won't stop you from beating up that girl over there?" does that make it OK when you go and beat her? Is it then wrong if I change my mind and stop you?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    8. Re:Can't get off this ride by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      That's not the way it worked. They are not concerned about the beating. They only care about which girl is being beaten.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  18. SMW4 by kokoko1 · · Score: 1

    Is this the same cable cut which effecting the internet services in the region?

    --
    http://askaralikhan.blogspot.com/
  19. Re:Really? by unimacs · · Score: 2

    I got my certification years ago and my card was falling apart. So I recently went to the PADI website to see what it would take to get a new one. I was shocked at how easily they'd give out another card. With very little verification of who you claim to be, they'll send out a new card to any address you want, - and update the photo to one that you upload.

  20. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regulators and frog masks will be banned from carry-on and checked luggage

    I've tried traveling with a regulator in my carry on. After seeing the TSA guys at the x-ray scanner scratch their heads for a minute, they pulled me aside and gave me the extra special screening.

  21. These stories spook me by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    It's a reminder of how tenuous modern society is. It doesn't take a major act of vandalism or terrorism to bring things to a halt.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  22. Could be some dumbass thieves by Biff+Stu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Quite a few years ago I was hanging out in Egypt at a Red Sea resort with my girlfriend. Now I can hang on a lounge chair on a beach for a few hours, but that's about all can take before I want to get up and do something. So, I decided to take a tour boat out to the coral and go snorkeling. When the boat got to the coral reefs, they dropped their anchor right on the reef, which pissed me off. The captain explained that the government had installed permanent mooring buoys in order to preserve the coral, but these had been stolen by thieves.

    Now, fiber cable doesn't have the same resale value as copper, but then try to explain that to a third world dumbass thief.

    1. Re:Could be some dumbass thieves by neil_rickards · · Score: 1

      I was out there in November. You'll be pleased to hear they're now very strict about not anchoring near the reefs. Usually they attach to a fixed chain. Sometimes they need to send down a diver to find it. On one occasion, when they couldn't find it (possibly it had been stolen) we actually went elsewhere

    2. Re:Could be some dumbass thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds a lot like Holden Caulfield. At least that's how I read your comment in my head.

    3. Re:Could be some dumbass thieves by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Nice anecdote, but you blew it with the girlfriend reference and the fact that you can't sit in a chair for hours without getting bored. You therefore lost at least 90% of the slashdot audience.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  23. why they would have wanted to cut a cable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy. Allah wills it.

  24. Iran and friends by Required+Snark · · Score: 0
    If this is true, the logical culprits are Iran along with their allies.

    They have the animus and the motives. Iran is internally attempting to heavily censor/eliminate internet access. They are the target of network enabled attacks: Stuxnet. It would fit their profile to attack the same kind of international infrastructure, even if Stuxnet was injected by USB memory, not network connections.

    The Assad regime is an ally of Iran, and has been receiving military aid. An attack on internet cables is an attack on the West, which is supporting the anti-Assad forces.

    Reduced internet bandwidth could be seen as a way to decrease US force effectiveness in the region. Even if the US military has connectivity that is not directly impacted, it still makes things harder for Western interests.

    If the three divers are terrorists, they will be associated with something like Hamas. Iran is too smart to have their nationals in a direct attack in another country, or in international waters. I would guess they are Egyptian/Gulf region nationals. Anyone but Iranians.

    On the other hand, they could be three guys out diving for fun. The cable could be undamaged, or it could have been damaged in an accident unrelated to terrorism. Even if they are tried and convicted, they could still be innocent. A confession means nothing at all. Remember, the US has used torture to get confessions, and places like Egypt have a history of torture for political gain going back at least to WW One (yes, before WW 2).

    If this is not picked up by the western press it is not likely to be actual terrorism. The west is so primed to see these types of events as the result of evil opponents, that even when accidental explosions occur the first reports always talk about terrorist connections.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
  25. Collateral damage by Kelerei · · Score: 5, Informative

    The East African SEACOM cable has been having outages lately; they posted an outage notification due to a cable break off the Egyptian coast at 08:40 UTC yesterday (March 27th, 2013). Of course, this has been having knock-on effects: for instance, many South African ISPs use this cable as their primary international link, and have had to fall over to secondary links resulting in significant service degradation.

    Co-incidence? Perhaps, perhaps not...

  26. Wired's Hacker Tourist wrote of Alexandria, Egypt by SpzToid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's an amazing article that gives all kinds of historical telecom cable information, including the internet exchange in Alexandria Egypt. It also discusses repair ships and some inherent physics problems having to do with the pressures placed on the spindles (of the undersea cables) on-deck.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.12/ffglass_pr.html

    Sadly, I can't locate a version of the article with the wonderful photos of the original printed piece.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  27. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PADI = Pay And Dive/Die Immediately.
    NAUI = Now An Underwater Idiot.

  28. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, the whole US is already cut apart from the world. You are being fed fake news and propaganda. Remeber the war with eurasia? Have you seen news about north-korea? It's actually you, but presented in a comical kind of way. See how their soldiers walk? Yeah, pure comedy effect. I'm actually a "EURAI", an Artificial Intelligence designed to appear on forums as a european. Your own sea cables were cut years ago. When you fly to europe you really only do circles above atlantic ocean and then go to one of the fake european cities manned by actors.

  29. Other Option : Blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a heise-article the background might be "normal" criminals. The article states that a single cable-company SEACOM faced 3 cable-ruptures in 5 days. this and the capture of the 3 gusy by the egypt navy might be a hint for blackmail.

    http://heise.de/-1831866 (in german)

  30. Re:Really? by cbope · · Score: 1

    I always travel with my regs in my carry on. Apart from security opening the bag and looking at them, there has never been a problem. The only extra scrutiny I ever got while traveling with scuba gear was from my underwater camera housing while transferring through Frankfurt. They wanted to test it for residue using the sniffer. Took all of 60 seconds, no drama.

    If it was in the US, I would be questioned WHY I am carrying this "device", what it is used for, where did I buy it from and how long ago. Did my neighbor ever touch it. Not to mention that we would be going to a resort location carrying only vacation clothes, wearing flip flops and shorts and well... you get the picture. Long live TSA!!!

    Regulators should never be packed in your checked bags. They are semi-delicate and sensitive equipment that keeps you alive under water. They have many moving parts including a diaphragm that is sensitive to pressure changes. What do you think happens to the pressure in the cargo hold of an aircraft? I would not trust my life to a reg that has been "mis-handled" by checking it in bags going into the cargo hold.

  31. Extreme IRCwar by GhigoRenzulli · · Score: 1

    Don't blame them. They're just trying to retake #sphinx from a netsplit.

  32. The USA is happy to support the Taliban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Al Quaeda and other "Jihadi" organisations if it's in their interests. E.g. to tie up Russia or to remove a popular president who doesn't do as the USA demands.

  33. Slowdown Felt in India by inhuman.games · · Score: 2

    "Dear Customer, Due to international undersea cable system down between India to Europe, you may face slow issues in some sites. Inconvenience regretted-Beamtele". I just got that message from my Indian ISP, Beam Telecom. Some European sites are noticeably slower for me here in India.

  34. Satellite provider ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know other countries where this has happened as well and it turned out to be a backup satellite ISP that sent their people to cut the submarine cables to get more business and money.

    It happened three time while I was working in Bangladesh, it annoyed the crap out of me, internet speed went from 96 Kbps to 0.5 Kbps for a few days. By the way Bangladesh is the only country I lived in that has worse general ISP connectivity than USA.

  35. Re:Really? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    What do you think happens to the pressure in the cargo hold of an aircraft?

    The exact same thing that happens in the main cabin. They carry animals in the cargo hold all the time.

  36. Re:Wired's Hacker Tourist wrote of Alexandria, Egy by rabidMacBigot() · · Score: 1

    That Hacker Tourist is Neal Stephenson, so the article has the verbal density of a neutron star and is intensely fascinating. I read it a while ago, pretty good stuff.

  37. Inflatable launch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like a pretty easy problem to solve with a sharp object. Then position your armed vessel between them and shore.

  38. Gee, who could have done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel. Mossad. Duh.

  39. fishy story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something's fishy about this (no pun intended). In shallow water down to several hundred feet, the cable is buried by a "jet sled" that is pulled along the cable and digs a trench using water jets. So how can divers locate (much less cut) such a cable?

  40. Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illiteracy here in Egypt is upwards of 35%. Perhaps they could use hieroglyphics. ;)

  41. The Greatest by RavenousRhesus · · Score: 1

    Since when is Mohammed Ali an Egyptian, much less a Colonel in the Egyptian Navy?

  42. WTF? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    The article says "divers were arrested while 'cutting the undersea cable'", "The statement said they were caught on a speeding fishing boat just off the port city of Alexandria." So they were caught on a small boat while cutting an undersea cable? Makes perfect sense.

  43. Re:Wired's Hacker Tourist wrote of Alexandria, Egy by geddo · · Score: 1

    Good read thanks! I found this part interesting as well, at first I read over it and it didn't click then I realized he wrote it in 1996. "The collapse of the lighthouse must have been astonishing, like watching the World Trade Center fall over. But it took only a few seconds, and if you were looking the other way when it happened, you might have missed it entirely - you'd see nothing but blue breakers rolling in from the Mediterranean, hiding a field of ruins, quickly forgotten."

  44. Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just racist parrots here in the comment section, eh?
    Keep repeating bullshit the media feeds you, my little darlings.