Slashdot Mirror


North Korea Declares a State of War

paysonwelch writes "North Korea has declared a state of war against South Korea, stating that neither peace nor war has ended. Quoting the news release via Reuters: '1. From this moment, the north-south relations will be put at the state of war and all the issues arousing between the north and the south will be dealt with according to the wartime regulations.' The DPRK goes on to say that this will be a 'blitz' war and that they will regain control of the south, and destroy U.S. bases in the process." Great line from the declaration: "[The U.S.] should clearly know that in the era of Marshal Kim Jong Un, the greatest-ever commander, all things are different from what they used to be in the past." A senior U.S. official called this statement "pot-banging and chest-thumping." The official said, "North Korea is in a mindset of war, but North Korea is not going to war."

111 of 628 comments (clear)

  1. Surely they wouldn't start it unless they can win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our glorious new Democratic overlords.

  2. Didn't they get the memo? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Korean "war" never ended. It has been ongoing since 1950

    1. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have to agree that Marshal Kim Jong Un is the greatest-ever commander...after all, most commanders have lost lives, while Kim Jong Un hasn't lost any lives, or even a single battle. What US commander in chief could say that?

      Now, if he actually does have his people go to battle, I'd change my opinion, and call him an egomanical turd.

    2. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Korean "war" never ended. It has been ongoing since 1950

      well how many times can you announce that you're going to attack? they don't have their own memos from last week(apparently memos are in trade blockage as well).

      I'm more inclined to believe that the military is worried the middle rung layers of the military might start doing something enterprising, since their portions of booze and dried meat have lately gotten even smaller than usual.. hence the current state of things in which the entire north korean military is effectively in house arrest.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by data2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I realize reading TFA is frowned upon, so just for you:

      "The state of neither peace nor war has ended on the Korean Peninsula."

    4. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Imagine you're a guy in your mid-30s, educated in Switzerland, a smart enough guy. You're not particularly interested in politics, just want to have a good time and enjoy the luxuries you've always been accustomed to. Then all of a sudden, you're dragged from your your cosy, relatively anonymous life and told you're the leader of one of the world's remaining military dictatorships.

      You don't particularly want to lead, you'd rather continue your life as a pampered playboy, but the people around you are murderous, and will brook no signs of weakness. This is a roller-coaster you're on, you have very little control and you can't get off. How do you stop it? What do you do?

      If you go soft, you'll be assassinated, you know that because it almost happened. One way might be to push harder than the generals expect and try to provoke the rest of the world into stopping the ride for you.

      Just a thought...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      The UN involvement was described as a police action. The war itself was always a war, but Truman declared the UN's involvement as a "police action".

    6. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, you know, try to escape to Japanese disneyland like his brother did...

    7. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, getting out of the country would be easy, but what are the odds that commanders #2 through #9 will happily roll over and accept #1's sudden rise to dominance? Any disruption in the line of succession will destabilize the balance of power within the government, and the fallout could cost a whole lot of innocent people their lives. Would you want that on your conscience? Provoking international action on the other hand might seem like a relatively clean solution - any invasion would likely start with a tactical strike against the military elite. And knowing that, the generals might well be willing to accept voluntary banishment with all the severance package they can plunder if faced with an actual invasion.

      Of course any such invasion would require the cooperation of China to avoid ballooning onto the global stage, which has been why they've been in such a comfortable position for so long. If China's getting tired of their antics though then that protective umbrella is rapidly fading, and all that remains is for they and the US to agree on what the new government should look like and how many puppets each of them get in it. The other regional powers might have some voice as well if only as a moderating influence - i.e. China might prefer that a couple puppets answer to Japan rather than directly to the US in order to diffuse our influence.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Didn't they get the memo? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I was responding to the idea that Kim might somehow be compelled to keep his position in order to protect his life of privilege. I don't think it's true, I think if all he wanted was to be an international playboy there are those who might help him. Wether or not command #1 hischosen successor, is able to fend off #2-n or not is really nothing to Kim who has his suit case full of money is 1000s of miles away.

        In my hypothetical #1 helps Kim leave with some cash in exchange for the political advantage Kim naming him the legitimate new leader will offer. Kim getting away could happen any number of ways. My point is Kim is where he is because he wants to be leader of the DPRK; and that is true wether or not he is an absolute autocrat or mostly a puppet of some cabal. I mearly suggest he could probably find away to leave and do so as a wealthy man if he were so incline.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  3. Nothing New by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC, North Korea has declared war on the South multiple times since the armistice. In short, it's nothing new.

    NK has had particularly bad farm yields and has trouble feeding it's army - recently China returned 12 NK soldiers that tried to escape. In years past, this wouldn't have happened as NK was keen to always make sure the Army got food but rations were cut last year. It needs an increase in foreign aid to hold itself up. That's what all this sword rattling is about. I hope that everyone lets them drop.

    1. Re:Nothing New by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What happens when the NK leadership gets to a point where they feel they have nothing to lose by attacking?

    2. Re:Nothing New by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unified Korea and scores of dead North Koreans.

      But the people in North Korea have created this mess, so it's only right they take the heaviest losses.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Nothing New by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2

      Then watch the regime falls quickly within days and people will be liberated. This is even easier than Iraq.

    4. Re:Nothing New by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unified Korea and scores of dead North Koreans.

      This, and its the last thing that China wants. Korea would become the next Germany in 25 or so years.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The North Korean military isn't any match for the South Koreans & the USA. Everyone knows that.

      The real threat is because Seoul is so close to the border. You'll get thousands (millions?) of artillery shells fired at Seoul, resulting in lots of civilian casualties & destruction.

    6. Re:Nothing New by confused+one · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No it won't, for two reasons.

      For 60 years they've been instilling in their populous that their Dear Leader is a god (or god-like). While many fear and loath him, any that have shown open dissent have been killed or put in re-education camps. The population will not rise up against the NK leadership.

      For 60 years NK has been digging in and building weapons. They may not be as technically sophisticated as their neighbor, they may not have the weapons technology available to the U.S., but they have weapons and personell in quantity. Technically, they have one of the largest armies in the world, with over a million active and eight million reserve. A conflict with NK could drag on for years.

    7. Re:Nothing New by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unified Korea and scores of dead North Koreans.

      But the people in North Korea have created this mess, so it's only right they take the heaviest losses.

      The situation on the Korean peninsula wasn't exactly created by the Korean people. It was engineered by the Americans, Chinese, Russians and Japanese; because a unified Korea would have been so economically powerful NONE of the above wanted it to exist. Even though these parties were so ideologically opposed to each other they could still agree that a powerful Korea would be bad for their interests.

      Seriously; had Korea not been divided it would be immensely powerful economically and militarily, due to mineral wealth PLUS strong agriculture and industry; a genuine rival to China and more powerful than Russia in the region. It would have been a major threat to American control over Japan following WW2 due to the sway it would have had over the post-war Japanese economy.

      So between them they engineered North VS South and divided the peninsula.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    8. Re:Nothing New by CdBee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or it could be ended in 5 minutes if anyone had the balls to use a neutron weapon in the role it was designed for.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    9. Re:Nothing New by Sqr(twg) · · Score: 2

      What is new is that U.S. media is making a big deal out of it this time. Normally, this kind of talk does not even make it into the news, much less on to the front page.

      All the wars that the U.S. has fought in recent time have been preceeded by massive media coverage about the country that was about to be invaded.

    10. Re:Nothing New by dinfinity · · Score: 5, Funny

      but they have weapons and personell in quantity

      Half of them are photoshopped, though.

    11. Re:Nothing New by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure we've always been at war with East Asi....uh.....North Korea.

    12. Re:Nothing New by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For 60 years they've been instilling in their populous that their Dear Leader is a god (or god-like).

      I seriously wonder how quickly their beliefs would change should food, clothing, medicine, etc become readily available by the "imperialist aggressors".

      If I'm cold, sick, and on the brink of starvation, it's not going to take much for me to ditch whatever current beliefs I have.

    13. Re:Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This, and its the last thing that China wants. Korea would become the next Germany in 25 or so years.

      Not exactly. East Germany's economy was much more developed than South Korea, yet unification almost crippled the Germany economy. Unification with N. Korea is not going to be an easy task.

    14. Re:Nothing New by gtall · · Score: 5, Informative

      N. Korea attacked first. History is always an interesting read.

    15. Re:Nothing New by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All four nuclear nations had designs and probably operational devices for enhanced radiation reduced blast weapons, aka neutron bombs, that released the neutrons generated by the initial phase of the bomb instead of the full ionizing and shock blasts. They did this with fission-fusion bombs with deliberate ineffective X-ray and neutron mirrors. The US W79-0 had a neutron bomb mode.

      All such weapons were destroyed as part of SALT and SALT II, but who knows what still sits in a cupboard.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    16. Re:Nothing New by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative

      The situation on the Korean peninsula wasn't exactly created by the Korean people. It was engineered by the Americans, Chinese, Russians and Japanese; because a unified Korea would have been so economically powerful NONE of the above wanted it to exist.

      When this situation was 'engineered', "Made in Japan" wasn't even a joke yet, "Made in Korea" came along even later.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    17. Re:Nothing New by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      Exactly this.

      Its a ploy to get more handouts from the West nothing more nothing less. You can't say "shut up or the aide check is void either." If he shuts up he will appear weak and it will probably get him killed. The best thing to do here is simple cut the aide off no discussion. The time to do this is now before they create more reliable weapons and delivery systems. One of three things will happen in order of likeliness:

      1) Nothing; South Korea and China will step in and provide the food and monetary aide the DPRK needs. We are better off its less of our own wealth going out the door and we don't lose any influence because we never had any with DPRK anyway.

      2) DPRK lashes out and strikes at South Korea, Japan, or us; Chances are good the actual damage is minimal or the attack outright fails. Depending on who gets attacked Either we or China take the lead in shutting it down fast. China will either do this or allow it because they don't want the region developing into a war zone. Ultimately China probably ends up effectively occupying the country or at least running it. As far as we are concerned this changes little where the balance of power is concerned.

      3) DPRK is simply allowed to collapse and becomes just another failed state like Yemen or Somalia; South Korea and China are forced to spend a little more on border security. The DPRK becomes a slightly more of a sad little hell hole than it already is, but unlike today the rest of the world simply stops thinking about it; well until some dipshit tries to blow up time square after fixing some fireworks to the side of propane cylinder with sticky tape after posting on some DPRK militant web forum.

      Really that is about the whole of it. Send a memory to the USAID folks to stop payment on the next check and wait.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    18. Re:Nothing New by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      N. Korea attacked first.

      No, Han did.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    19. Re:Nothing New by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Seoul is within shelling range of a huge number of N Korea artillery. It wouldn't be outrageous to say that millions of S Koreans could die on the first day of the war.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re:Nothing New by mikechant · · Score: 2

      The majority will adapt quickly (if you are starving, food is a *very* powerful motivation); a minority will go postal.

    21. Re:Nothing New by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are pretty useless in modern theatre, which is why no one really objected to their destruction. They were originally meant as tactical weapons, as they have very low range, to take out massed tank forces. They became utterly inefficient as armour on tanks became thick enough to effectively prevent terminal effect of neutron bombardment around 70s-80s.

      They could still be used against uncovered enemy, but their low range makes them largely unfeasible for this purpose. If you're willing to use nuclear weapons, you're much better off with conventional nuclear warheads that produce the destructive effect through combination of high temperature and pressure shockwave.

    22. Re:Nothing New by unixisc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If North Korea collapses and becomes part of South Korea, thereby uniting, it would create a lot more real estate for the Koreans as a whole, and enable them to fill up the country. Like East Germany, the population, once it recovers, can be a part of the Samsung/LG/Hyundai success story. The South Koreans, instead of outsourcing their manufacturing to China, can instead outsource it to their Northern comrades for much cheaper, while they do the quality checks. A united Korea will be the biggest economic challenger to China

    23. Re:Nothing New by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the second the first rounds are fired in earnest by either side or the first troops cross the DMZ, Seoul is going to be leveled by the massive, emplaced and already aimed, artillery barrage that NK has had set up for decades

      Nonsense. Just surf on in to Seoul with google street view and the first thing you will notice is that it has hardly any tall buildings. It is a huge sprawling expanse of low concrete and steel buildings. An artillery barrage to level it would take months or years like in Syria, and that just isn't going to happen. A few hours at most, and Seoul is so big that the damage would be only a small fraction. And at the first sign of trouble the whole population will be in the subways and other prepared shelters. Don't imagine that this scenario has not been anticipated.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    24. Re:Nothing New by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 2

      The original Powers of USA, USSR, UK and France in the early heyday of nuclear weapons development in the 50's and 60's when these devices were developed. The other five are johnny-come-latelies. :)

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    25. Re:Nothing New by rastoboy29 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nice theory, too bad it's nonsense.  Seriously, do you have any evidence?

      Isn't it much more logical that it was simply a struggle for control over Korea by the more powerful nations, that ended in a deadlock?

      Korea had never been a potent independent economic player in history--I very much doubt the current status of the south, for example, was something anyone from outside Korea was expecting.

      It's *not* that big a country, bro.  Your argument doesn't make any sense, and you have no evidence, so please don't spread drivel.  Bad enough we have Glen Beck conjecturing on camera...

    26. Re:Nothing New by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Informative

      The situation on the Korean peninsula wasn't exactly created by the Korean people. It was engineered by the Americans, Chinese, Russians and Japanese; because a unified Korea would have been so economically powerful NONE of the above wanted it to exist.

      Not really true. Japan might not have, but no one was really listening to them at the end of WWII. America and Russia both wanted a United Korea to exist, and both wanted to direct how it was going to be set up. Same as in Germany, they each saw half a loaf and not fighting a war with each other immediately as superior, in the short term, to any other alternative that was on the table.

    27. Re:Nothing New by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Just as Poland is the natural invasion route between Russia and Germany, as is Belgium between France and Germany (and I might add between Germany and England), Korea is right in the middle of a natural invasion route between China and Japan. That Siberia isn't too far away as well and Korea makes a nice route between Russia and Japan (for at least some ways to attack Japan including how America planned on attacking Japan in World War II had the nukes not worked), you get Korea stuck in the middle of a whole bunch of major global powers.

      This isn't really something engineered but simply something that developed due to physical geography. Compared to all of these huge countries, they are a people that have been ravaged over the centuries with constant attacks and regularly changing allegiances depending on who had the upper hand at the time. World War II went through Korea both from Japan trying to get to China as well as Russia trying to get to Japan. That is where you ended up with the current situation.

      Korea is a fairly big country, but China, Russia, and Japan are far larger and have many more people. Due to circumstances of geography, they are kind of stuck between all of these huge countries that frankly don't mind letting a much smaller nation stand in the middle acting as a buffer to each other's empires. That America ended up with Japan as a more or less friendly ally in a "cold war" against China and Russia sort of make Korea an inevitable flashpoint as well.

    28. Re:Nothing New by Teancum · · Score: 2

      South Korea got foreign aid (both food and money) from Ethiopia during the Korean War. That should say a great deal about how they fit into the global pecking order at the time. They've certainly improved themselves considerably over the past fifty years.... and North Korea largely hasn't.

      The largest difference here is that many people in North Korea still are family members who were divided by the war. Of the older Koreans, it includes full siblings and even a few parent-child relationships, but it is mostly cousins at this point in time. Still, they want to maintain those relationships and there still is a common language and culture to draw upon that would more than simply treat the people of North Korea as mere destitute refugees. It would be harder for North Korea to move into the 21st Century than it was for East Germany to modernize and for the two Germanies to reunite, but it could be done if the opportunity presented itself.

  4. They got the wrong idea from the Korean War by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know you're seriously off the rails when you start provoking the planet's grand champions at killing people and breaking things and Russia and China are telling you to calm down.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:They got the wrong idea from the Korean War by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even OJ Simpson was quoted as saying, "Cool it, Kim. You should ratchet things down by looking for the real killers who sunk that South Korean destroyer."

    2. Re:They got the wrong idea from the Korean War by dotHectate · · Score: 3, Funny

      You should check out my collection of Pogs.

      --
      Patience is a virtue, but haste is my life.
    3. Re:They got the wrong idea from the Korean War by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think at this point China wouldn't have anywhere hear the concerns they had 60 years ago with a unified Korea provided that unification got an agreement from the US to withdraw from the mainland. The resulting "Korea" would be a competitor but not a military threat and it would be a competitor that was saddled with the cost of trying to absorb the North. I think that the US pulling back to Japan would be well worth the trouble of shutting down "Best Korea".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  5. Go ahead by Hentes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But China won't help you out this time.

    1. Re:Go ahead by Rich0 · · Score: 3

      In fact, China didn't let them import any oil in Feb. At this rate they might not have oil for a while.

      That will start to hurt pretty soon. Nobody really wants a nuclear war in Asia.

    2. Re:Go ahead by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nobody really wants a nuclear war in Asia.

      Nobody?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  6. Actually scary by bryan1945 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really think there is a chance that NK leadership has gone so bonkers they would actually try something like bombing SK. I doubt it would be effective unless they bring a nuke to the fight, but we're still talking about one of China's maybe-buddies. The USSR was scary, but they weren't so honking insane as these guys.

    Hopefully, NK will just keep doing the "chest thumping" thing until they get tired. Or it's all just a bluff in the first place. I, personally, have had enough wars/actions/what-have-you for now. Too much death. Everyone (including the US) just chill and have a cup o' tea and a biscuit.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Actually scary by stevew · · Score: 2

      Looking at history ( a novel concept I know) you find that indeed this has happened before.

      You have a few things coming together that is causing this noise. 1) New leader in NK trying to show his ability to stand up to the West. 2) New leader in South Korea which is a cue for NK to become bellicose. 3) Annual SK/USA war games which NK always uses as a provocation. 4) Even tougher sanctions just put into place.

      The US has no desire to go to war, nor does SK. The US is doing what has been doing for 50+ years as far as demonstrating capability but not employing it. The problem is that in the past US leaders have fed the ego of the maniacs in charge in NK by dealing with him. That has NEVER worked! Clinton thought he had peace with NK by giving them food and money. Whoops - Neville Chamberlain moment. It actually is very much like dealing with the local gang trying to run a racket on a business. It doesn't go away until the Gang is thrown in jail. The only ones who can do that are the Chinese or the people of NK.

      --
      Have you compiled your kernel today??
    2. Re:Actually scary by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      China is a buddy to North Korea in the same way that Iraq was a buddy to the United States.

      Kim better not give them an excuse.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Actually scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      2) New leader in South Korea which is a cue for NK to become bellicose

      This is one woman with whom they should not fuck. Seriously, her mother was killed by a North Korean assassin, and she was the de-facto first lady in her place. I'm think we might have a Korean Maggie Thatcher on our hands; she's not cowed by the North. From what I gather her attitude seems to be "we don't want this.. we won't start this.. but if you do, we're fucking bringing it hard."

    4. Re:Actually scary by Teancum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Japan decided to go to war against its largest trading partner in the 1930's. Germany did the same against it largest trading partner during the same era. Sometimes people deciding to start a war don't really care about trade relationships or economic damage that might come from a full scale war.

    5. Re:Actually scary by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      They aren't going to support regime change

      What makes you think that? North Korea has a new leader, and maybe things arent going well from their viewpoint.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    6. Re:Actually scary by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

      I'm no fan of Obama, but it's obtuse to interpret his foreign policy in that way in light of how he continued both the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars and intervened militarily in Libya and is training rebels for the Syrian Civil War. He's not a pacifist in any sense.

      Not to mention that while the CinC is the top of the chain of command, he's still technically subordinate to the Congress, and if Congress says 'fight those people' it will be his duty to carry that out.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    7. Re:Actually scary by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      That happens when they think they can win. Are they really *that* bat-shit insane? (serious question ... they'v been conditioned for years, but their new leader knows the military capability of the US, etc.)

    8. Re:Actually scary by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      We will surrender in a heartbeat if enough lobbiests scream! We are owned by lobbiests from Walmart, Apple, and others and do not care about our own country.

      If North Korea bombed Samsung, Apple would win.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. Re:Ut oh. by firex726 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well China has recently voted in favor of sanctions against NK; previously they did not.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-21710919

  8. Suddenly... by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suddenly, Zergling rush!

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:Suddenly... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      No problem. I'm pretty sure you aren't even allowed citizenship in South Korea if you can't execute the standard terran openers with alarming speed and precision. The entire DMZ will be a wall of supply depots and swarming with marines within ~5 minutes.

  9. They should call their bluff already by Kwelstr · · Score: 2

    North Korea is trying to blackmail the west once again. It worked in the 90's with Clinton and it worked in the 2000's with Bush, they make a big fuss and they get money to calm down. And the US media loves it too, they get to scare people and talk endlessly about it during a slow news cycle. Ratings up, win-win.

    --


    ~~~Please pass the salt, I hate unsalted MD5s :-/
    1. Re:They should call their bluff already by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      Yesterday on the PBS New Hour, a Clinton era official was upset US actions in Korea were labelled a failure, pointing to agreements that in the end were not honored. He could not get it through his head that the measure of success is whether or not those policies lead to lasting peace and cooperation, which they clearly did not. It was a pathetic exercise in "We got it right, we were awesome, the bad things happening now have no relation to my successes."

    2. Re:They should call their bluff already by jjohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, in the '00s, Bush tore up the Agreed Framework negotiated by Carter, under which NK received regular food and fuel aid in exchange for placing their nuclear weapons program under international inspection. "Axis of Evil", he said. "No more blackmail", he said. So NK ripped the UN inspector's seals of their uranium, built a nuke, and detonated it. Bush came running back, and now the crazy Norks are still demanding food and fuel aid while rattling their sabres, but their sabre is nuclear.

      Heckuvajob, Bushie!

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:They should call their bluff already by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

      And the US media loves it too, they get to scare people and talk endlessly about it during a slow news cycle. Ratings up, win-win.

      http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/02/15/what-else-did-eason-jordan-give-north-korea/

      Ever wonder why CNN seems to be the only Western news organization regularly allowed into North Korea? The next room perhaps offered a clue. In the 'Gifts from America' room a whole section of one wall is taken up by gifts from CNN. A few engraved plaques, a coffee cup (yeah, a freaking coffee cup!), a logo ashtray, etc. Probably at most a couple hundred bucks worth of crap that nonetheless get pride of place in the museum - for they reveal obvious signs of respect from a world famous news organization. The people at CNN are certainly using their heads and showing they know how to play the game. Though one wonders how that fits in with journalistic integrity . . .

      ...

      Wednesday night at 6:30pm ET CNN ran a special, "Inside North Korea," based on the reporting of CNN International President Eason Jordan who managed to get into North Korea. Anchor Jonathan Mann asked who or what are being blamed for the lack of food. Jo rdan replied:

      "It depends on whom you talk to. The international relief agencies, some of the people who work there say that the plight of the people here is not just the fault of Mother Nature, that it's also the government's economic policies and agriculture policies .

      Government officials dispute that and they say this is solely a problem generated by Mother Nature and only Mother Nature can solve this problem. So there's a real dispute about the blame in this case, but General Kim Jong Il has been personally involved in this. He has ordered all of the entire army, hundreds of thousands of troops, into the countryside to help the farmers try to harvest what crops will survive."

      Another example of the problem with Western reporters applying Western journalistic norms to reporting from an oppressive nation. Jordan gave equal weight to views of both the communist regime and the relief workers, as if each are equally credible. And the fact that the General "is personally involved in this" is more ironic than reassuring. In a closed off, backward nation run by a military dictatorship the army is hardly the solution to anything.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  10. This little guy by blackholepcs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can someone explain to me what it is that gives such a small country that has comparably weak military (they are ranked number 28 in the world according to http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp) and pretty much zero chance of surviving a week in a real war the balls to be so dickish and war-hungry?

    Are they really THAT brainwashed and misinformed (or uninformed) as to believe that they can just threaten nuclear war every time they don't get their way? It's like a little kid threatening to run away every time he has to eat his broccoli.

    The only scary thing here is that sometimes, very rarely, the little kid DOES run away for an hour or so. Well, I hope for the sake of any innocent people in North Korea that this little boy doesn't run away, and instead learns to shut the fuck up and eat his broccoli.

    --
    Halitosis - (n.) Halle Berry's Camel Toe.
    1. Re:This little guy by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can someone explain to me what it is that gives such a small country that has comparably weak military (they are ranked number 28 in the world according to http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp) and pretty much zero chance of surviving a week in a real war the balls to be so dickish and war-hungry?

      It keeps working.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:This little guy by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quite simply, it is twofold. First China does not want Korea unified under an nominal U.S. ally (South Korea). Second, China finds NK a useful catspaw to find out how far they can provoke the U.S. before the results become unpalatable. There is a third element that purely involves NK, but that only works because of the first two. Every so often the situation in NK becomes so bad that they need an infusion of outside aid to keep things from completely collapsing. They have learned that by rattling their cage and threatening violence, they can gain such aid. If the outside world does not respond with sufficient aid soon enough, NK starts various low level acts of violence against those in the vicinity, gradually escalating until the aid is forthcoming (which is why ignoring them is not an option).
      If NK ever stops being useful to China, they will cease to exist.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:This little guy by AdamHaun · · Score: 2

      Can someone explain to me what it is that gives such a small country that has comparably weak military ... and pretty much zero chance of surviving a week in a real war the balls to be so dickish and war-hungry?

      They have artillery lined up by the border. Within the first few hours of a war, they can devastate Seoul and probably other South Korean cities, killing millions. I think they also have rocket artillery that could hit Tokyo. North Korea would lose the war pretty quickly, but the civilian cost would be *very* high.

      --
      Visit the
    4. Re:This little guy by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      wrong

      N. Vietnam did no such thing, the military was restrained by politicians. we could have wiped the vietnamese race off the face of the earth, and with only conventional weapons.

    5. Re:This little guy by Subm · · Score: 5, Informative

      This series of posts describes North Korean strategy at a high level -- http://joshuaspodek.com/north-korea-strategy-preview

    6. Re:This little guy by Teancum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      North Vietnam defeated a South Vietnam that had the American military removed from it along with any foreign aid to help South Vietnam able to pay for its army... and a North Vietnam reinforced by Russian equipment and foreign aid.

      It took North Vietnamese tanks and massive infantry formations to conquer Saigon.... it wasn't just a "popular uprising" of the South Vietnamese people like is sometimes portrayed.

      Had the U.S. Congress really wanted to win in Vietnam, they could have appropriated the money, sent the necessary soldiers, and given a blank check to the U.S. President at the time (Richard Nixon... somebody Congress really wanted to get rid of at the time) with a formal declaration of war. That never happened, thus your logic really fails here.

      America abandoned South Vietnam and let that country go away in defeat, but America was not really "defeated" in Vietnam. It was just another front in the Cold War from an American perspective.

  11. Kaesong Industrial complex still open... by spanky_poppagasket · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Kaesong Industrial complex, a North/South industrial park, is apparently still open for business which means economic relations are undisturbed. Most news sources are highlighting this as a sign that the North isn't serious about the threats. If I were NK, though, I'd keep that puppy open as long as possible considering the new sanctions.

  12. Coo, the P is silent by rmdingler · · Score: 2

    There has to be a growing group of North Koreans who are rolling there eyes every time this Tard opens his mouth nowadays... Tell me they're not going to put up with Lil Kim much longer. This is right out of Machiavelli's playbook. Lil Prince needs to keep his citizens occupied with a foreign 'conflict' to keep their collective attention away from strife at home.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  13. nothing major by crossmr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since i live in South Korea, I base my concern level on the people around me, rather than western media.

    Today all the girls were out in their 6 inch skirts, 10 inch heels, and all the guys were out following them around.

    Seems to be just another day.

    1. Re:nothing major by sydneyfong · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pics, or it didn't happen.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    2. Re:nothing major by russotto · · Score: 2

      Since i live in South Korea, I base my concern level on the people around me, rather than western media.

      Today all the girls were out in their 6 inch skirts, 10 inch heels, and all the guys were out following them around.

      This is the same South Korea where the DMZ is a tourist attraction. There seems to be a rather blasé attitude, but that doesn't mean nothing's going to happen. After all, there was all sorts of partying going in in Honolulu on December 6, 1942.

  14. No more rhetorics by rasmusbr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that the North Korean leadership has just spent all of its rhetorical ammo. If the next thing out of Kim's mouth isn't a launch code and an authorization to launch a nuclear tipped missile he's just ruined his credibility. And North Korea does not even have a nuclear tipped missile.

    This is very dangerous, because this means that at some time before the next time Kim wants to blackmail South Korea and the US he is going to have to use enough force that his threats will regain credibility. I don't think there will be a major war, but I think a minor exchange of fire, at least, is inevitable at some point in the not too distant future if Kim wants to stay in power.

    I wonder what his generals and other top officials in Pyongyang are whispering to one another when he can't hear. I guess the time to stage a coup without looking like total traitors would be a couple of months after this blows over.

    1. Re:No more rhetorics by slashmojo · · Score: 2

      I guess the time to stage a coup without looking like total traitors would be a couple of months after this blows over.

      Maybe that's the plan all along.. someone (or some group) somewhere is pushing young kim to make a fool of himself and his country so that he can then be deposed and NK can finally be rid of the old dynasty..

      Or maybe they are all just nuts.

  15. Re:North Korea thinks the world is flat by tigersha · · Score: 2

    Those are Chairman Kim Blessed missiles. He does not obey the laws of physics and neither do they.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  16. Schrodinger's war by CanadianRealist · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's Schrodinger's war: neither peace nor war has ended

    They're just threatening to open the box and have a look.

  17. Re:North Korea thinks the world is flat by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute. Only Chuck Norris gets to disobey the laws of physics.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  18. Cyberwar by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see prices of Android tablets skyrocketing.
    Apple must be behind all this.

  19. Re:North Korea thinks the world is flat by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    I watched the video at that link and saw one interesting thing. When one watched similar videos from Soviet era Russia, or the Mao era China, when the people in the videos did something like the "fist pump" salute that is in these videos, it has a lot of emotional energy behind it (even if sometime that emotional energy seemed contrived). As I watched this video, the "fist pump" salute the soldiers gave reminded me of management meetings I have been at where the company tried to get all of the managers excited about some new program by getting them to do something similar. You had to go through the motions of "cheering" and taking part in this new, "exciting" thing the company was doing, but most of the people present had a "wait and see" attitude before they got excited about it. The military people on the parade seemed to have the attitude of "Yeah, that's great. What's in this for me?"

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  20. Re:Ut oh. by interval1066 · · Score: 2

    This won't end well.

    If by not well you mean for the PRK, you're right. They won't get what they want this time (free food and other perks that they get every time they wag the dog). If you mean its going to end in some kind of fire fight, 100% wrong. You apparently are unaware of the history of this sick little state. I see they're building up Un like they did his father.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  21. What if US stealth candy bombed Kim's house? by raymorris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what would happen if the US used a stealth bomber to drop a 500 lb. bag of candy on Kim's house, just to make the point that we can drop anything on him at any time. Just a reminder that he lives precisely as long as Obama chooses to allow. Maybe follow it up with dropping a few thousand teddy bears on major population centers.

    1. Re:What if US stealth candy bombed Kim's house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That doesn't seem useful.

      Kim Jong Un knows that the US can kill him at any time, Kim Jong Un also knows that the North Korean military leadership can kill him at any time. He has to appease both, which he does by rattling the saber enough to please the military and not quite enough to make the US really angry.

    2. Re:What if US stealth candy bombed Kim's house? by Chemisor · · Score: 3, Funny

      It should be cake. Then he'd know it's not a lie.

    3. Re:What if US stealth candy bombed Kim's house? by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

      Better idea: take the top generals in the hard-line faction, and identify which of them have a bunch of young grandchildren. On a day those grandchildren are at the general's house, drop a dud bomb loaded with 100lbs of Pop Rocks dead-center of the courtyard. A nice dual message: "Yes, we know who's really behind this and are perfectly willing and able to put an end to you." and "Yes, we're perfectly willing and able to make you suffer before we put an end to you.".

  22. Blitz by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is not how you conduct a blitz.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  23. Re:Lets just nuke NK out of existance by detain · · Score: 2

    With all their current pollution, i doubt china would even notice.

    --
    http://interserver.net/
  24. Re:Ut oh. by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah, I think that's what's going to be different this time. There are signs that China is getting tired of North Korea's crap.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. Re:this is a joke by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2

    You must be new here. Slashdot doesn't have 'mods' and doesn't delete posts. Bad posts are scored down by others, that is all. The system ultimately works better and is less frequently abused than I think any other on the internet.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  26. On a side note... by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So... during all this falderall, we get to see a lot of photos of Young Dear Leader surrounded by elderly men in military uniforms with ridiculously large hats, pointing dramatically this way and that. Occasionally you get a side view of Dear Leader and... all I can think of is MAN he's fat. Looks like close to 300 pounds. They try to disguise it with clothes and camera angles but there's no denying that he is a Big Boy. Maybe we should just send truckloads of Cinnabuns and wait for the inevitable?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  27. Re:North Korea thinks the world is flat by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

    not technically true, Chuck ass-whoops the laws of physics until they obey him

  28. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know perfectly well why communist (or other) dictatorships go to war. They're close to losing control over their own country, either because the population is rising up (unlikely here) or because they're out of resources because they've built a state system filled with people used to divert state resources to personal ends (very likely the case here).

    This won't end well, as it will force China and the US into a confrontation when the cleanup happens.

  29. Re:Ut oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obama isn't bending, so North Korea is losing face. The only thing they can do to regain face is a military victory. In the past this has involved attacking ships and shelling islands. Let's not kid ourselves, while a war with North Korea is unlikely, they still might kill people just up to the point where the US and SK would respond.

  30. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're close to losing control over their own country, either because the population is rising up (unlikely here) or because they're out of resources because they've built a state system filled with people used to divert state resources to personal ends (very likely the case here).

    This won't end well, as it will force China and the US into a confrontation when the cleanup happens.

    I'm lost... Why are you calling the U.S. a communist dictatorship?

    --
    Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
  31. Re:Lets just nuke NK out of existance by ericloewe · · Score: 2

    Because the treaty of Versailles was a great achievement that brought an end to war in Europe forever and was universally seen as fair and just. /s

  32. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like you are describing the inverted dictatorship in EU, next year. And the US in the next 5.

    They have a dictatorship of a Family. You have one of a Bank.

    Big whooping difference.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  33. Re:WARNING: this is not me... apk by tolkienfan · · Score: 4, Informative

    You need help.

  34. Re:Ut oh. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obama isn't bending, so North Korea is losing face. The only thing they can do to regain face is a military victory. In the past this has involved attacking ships and shelling islands. Let's not kid ourselves, while a war with North Korea is unlikely, they still might kill people just up to the point where the US and SK would respond.

    Saw an editorial yesterday that said what might be different this time is that Junior is inexperienced at how the game is played, and might think actually starting some sh*t is a good idea.

    Millions of people stand to get killed - Seoul is targetted by a *huge* collection of conventional artillery - but if he thinks there's any outcome that won't leave him as a smoking hole in the ground, he's delu...

    Uh-oh, the world's in trouble.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  35. They ARE the memo by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine the US is winding down it's two cash cow wars; almost done with Iraq, and Afghanistan's end is in sight, if not in fact.

    Imagine the USMIC without a constant flow of cash.

    We'll be needing -- and having -- a new war. Just watch. NK could be very convenient for the USA. And if not NK, then someone else. But NK has all the characteristics we want: A smallish country, an easily defeated military, a huge population to keep us there fighting in the bushes for 5-10 years, no particular economic value to be concerned about, has been described as part of the mythical "axis of evil"...

    Yep, I'm pretty sure I smell another uptick in USMIC stocks.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:They ARE the memo by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And 11 million lives in Seoul that are pretty much forfeit in under 5 minutes when the shelling starts. No profit for Haliburton and other Contractors if all that's left is a smoking hole in the ground. Read up on the Korean DMZ, then you'll see exactly why te USMIC doesn't want to touch this. And exactly why they DIDN'T touch it under Bush and his warmonger cronies when they had clear evidence that N Korea was seeking Nuclear Capability.

  36. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NK has value of a buffer. Neither South Korea nor NATO who's bases it houses are friendly towards China. North Korea is near Chinese heartland.

    This is the same issue as "holy shit, USSR has tactical nukes in Cuba" for USA. Only imagine if Cuba had land access to US mainland. And USSR put their best tanks and tactical bombers in there as well.

    There will be a cold day in hell before China lets North Korea fall to the West.

  37. Re:Lets just nuke NK out of existance by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Because the treaty of Versailles was a great achievement that brought an end to war in Europe forever and was universally seen as fair and just. /s

    One Allied general famously heard the terms and said, "That's not a peace treaty, that's a formula for a 20-year ceasefire."

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  38. Re:Ut oh. by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2

    Yes. This is all because the military dictatorship's tantrum isn't working this time, so it is trying what all spoiled brats do (spoiled by China of course): they scream even louder. Of course giving them a smack on the behind would end the annoyance right now and teach them discipline... but unfortunately it is too expensive an option, so better to just let them cry themselves to sleep.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  39. engineers testing bot by globaljustin · · Score: 2

    The frequency and specificity of these 'apk' posts makes me think it is a 'beta' test of a next-level automatic comment bot.

    It looks like it *may* be trying to 'optimize' the functions that automate actions like 'linking to other discussions' and 'responding by name to a critic in same thread'

    These are things that usually give bots away easily.

    The sheer volume of these 'apk' posts mean it has to be automated at some level.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  40. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by Dins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm calling bullshit. What possible (non-conspiracy theory related) reason could the US have for provoking a war with North Korea? What would we stand to gain? Obama has already been re-elected, the economy isn't doing great but also isn't awful, there's no oil involved, and the US public is already war-weary and has little stomach for another one.

    I think the overwhelming majority of Americans just want NK to shut up and stop aggravating the situation...

  41. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by SplashMyBandit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually there was an attempted military coup in North Korea in November 2012 (Citation: http://intelnews.org/2013/03/15/01-1217/) . Looks like the Party can't trust the military anymore. Hence, we have North Korea declaring war (that they cannot possibly hope to win).

    Strange the grandparent attributes the declaration of war to Us actions. The US were simply not letting North Korea get away with the same provocations they did in the past. After 60 years of bad behavior and criminal acts from North Korea the patience of the US and South Korea have finally run out. However Jeremiah Cornelius would like to ignore the kidnappings (of South Koreans and Japanese actresses), assassinations, murders, drug running, weapon proliferation, DMZ shootings and axe attacks, and brutal oppression of the NK people by the NK leadership. Instead Jeremiah continues his bankrupt crusade to demonize the US at every opportunity, by selectively choosing facts. Shame on you JC ! and your ilk.

  42. Re:US Desires this - nad deliberately PROVOKED it. by RogL · · Score: 2

    Who's "Provocative Action"?

    March 29 2013 - Hagel says U.S. has to take North Korean threats seriously

    Umm... how is saying we're going to take a country's statements seriously, provocative?

  43. Just partisan stupidity by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many hardcore lefties who have the tribal, partisan mentality of "My side good, other side bad," will keep blaming Bush for whatever is bad until there is another high enough profile Republican to blame, probably another president.

    Same shit you see now from the righties. Obama has suddenly become the new favourite target for everything bad. Clinton was the favourite but now it is Obama. He's the newest, most powerful "other guy" so they dump all the bad shit at his feet.

    Unfortunately, many humans are still very tribalistic and you see it in how they relate to politics. Their tribe, whatever they identify that as, are the good guys, the other tribe is the bad guys and thus all the bad things are the other guys fault.

  44. Re:Of course the North Koreans.... by gtall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No one is paying attention to what Lil' Kim is saying (except you). The U.S. military watches for troop movements, equipment positioning, missile priming...you know, the things that actually count if you wish to start a war. If the Norks start that, the U.S. has already promised to ramp up.