Slashdot Mirror


Huge Explosion at Texas Fertilizer Plant

A massive explosion took place around 8:50pm ET at a fertilizer plant in a small town in Texas. The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but the plant was on fire beforehand. The casualty reports are tentative and expected to rise, but two people are dead and over 150 are injured. Firefighters responding to the initial fire are unaccounted for. Over a thousand residents have been evacuated from their homes. Officials are worried about the volatility of another tank at the plant, but also about the potential damage from exposure to anhydrous ammonia. The blast was heard in Dallas, 75 miles away. "There are lots of houses that are leveled within a two-block radius. A lot of other homes are damaged as well outside that radius." A brief YouTube video shows the explosion of the plant.

422 comments

  1. 20 years passed by darkob · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Has anyone noticed that tomorrow (on April 19th) there will be 20 year since deadly siege at Waco, TX?

    1. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which has what to do with a chemical plant 40 miles away...? Exactly...?

    2. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, for starters, they both begin with "W"—what more evidence could you need?!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:20 years passed by Pseudonym · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every day on the calendar is an anniversary of something.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that when some crazy hick religious cult led by some loser child molester got righteously bitch-slapped by the federal government, right before I pretty much forgot about it and went about my day? Yeah, what about then?

    5. Re:20 years passed by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yes but this fertiliser plant seems like a poor target for people who recognise that anniversary.

    6. Re:20 years passed by darkob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, my deepest condolences to all families and friends of dead and injured in this explosion. Apparently, some facts need further clarification. April 19th is a critical date in US history, since, whereas siege at Waco, TX ended on that date probably by coincidence (ATF went in on that particular day after 50 days of siege, negotiating and waiting), it was Tim McVeigh who "comemoraded" that day (and the deadly siege) two years later by bombing federal building in Oklahoma City. To do that he used masive amounts of fertilizer as an explosive. Fertilizer itself is inert, but under certain conditions it may explode. In any case after that bombing sale of fertilizer is severly restricded and I suppose non-farmers are not even capable of obtaining big amount of it. So, if somone wants to make a huge explosion by fertilizer the only other option (apart from stealing it) is to set it on fire wherever it may be. Either some stock on some farm, or directly in some fertilizer factory. I surely hope that this explosion is caused by an accident. However it's up to authorities to determine how did this happend, and possibly why the affected area had not been evacuated after initial fire broke out.

    7. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what i was reading there was a small fire at the plant... Fire dept called... They put it out.

      Some time later it flared up again and got way out of control. fast. And the local fire dept had no idea what they were doing on such a scale... (volunteers) And were in there when it went bang.

      This is a town of about 3000 people... so... yeah. middle of nowhere.

    8. Re:20 years passed by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1, Troll

      Fertilizer itself is inert, but under certain conditions it may explode. In any case after that bombing sale of fertilizer is severly restricded and I suppose non-farmers are not even capable of obtaining big amount of it. So, if somone wants to make a huge explosion by fertilizer the only other option (apart from stealing it) is to set it on fire wherever it may be.

      What you are saying only applies to ammonium nitrate fertilizer.

      Ammonium phosphate is also commonly used as an ingredient for fertilizers, and not only won't explode--it's actually used in fire extinguishers.

    9. Re: 20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! Very well written post!

    10. Re:20 years passed by darkob · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thank you for your observations. Apparently we live in two different worlds. In my world there are (still) sirens and warning signs that are used in case of an emergency. In fact those sirens are turned on for testing purposes on every first saturday in month at noon. Also, I counted eleven (11) instances of a "F" word in your (anonymous) writing. I suggest that you practice that activity more. Live long and prosper.

    11. Re:20 years passed by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      These conspiracy theories would be slightly more plausible if this had actually happened on the anniversary, not the day before. As it is, it's not even really a coincidence, is it?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:20 years passed by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Sure but Timothy McVeigh at least intended to attack the US federal government. Most of the people killed and injured here are people who he would have regarded as peers. His intention wasn't specifically to make things go bang. He had a specific message to send and the only message I see here is about worksite safety.

    13. Re:20 years passed by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nice spin.

      Objectively speaking, the Waco incident was needless as it was. 1) What was being done at the compound was not illegal and amounts to government harrassment. 2) The government tends to be quite full of itself to the point that when someone pushes back, they tend to lose control.

      For another example of such, do a search on "active duty soldier illegally disarmed and arrested" and especially find the Youtube video while it's still up. A couple of cops literally claimed they were above the law and one insisted he was enforcing the will of the people and it didn't matter what the law says.

      But this is rather off-topic you know?

      Anyway, I watched the video -- impressive. The blast was amazingly powerful and the child, despite being scared to death, handled herself pretty well too. I think the end game on this story is that it was industrial safety gone wrong. It happens too often.

    14. Re:20 years passed by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sure it is. But there has just been a terrorist attack in Boston which no group has taken responsibility for.

      Terrorists do their stuff to send a message. If no one understands what the message is, it's a failure from their perspective. The obvious way to make people get the message, is to say what your message is.

      In some subcultures, certain dates and events have special significance. Neo-nazis, for instance, have a habit of doing stuff on Hitler's or Hess' birthday. Because these days are special to them, they may either

      * Suffer from the misconception that the date is special to everyone else as well, and thus people will get the message without an explicit statement, or

      * Accept that the date isn't special outside the milieu, but their friends and enemies will get it. They are content sending a message to just those groups, rather than the public at large.

      The Boston Marathon terrorist(s) haven't published what message they wished to send. So, they think it will be obvious to everyone, or at least their friends and enemies. That means they are probably not foreign - foreign terrorists know that we don't share their ideas of significant days, and are comparatively more eager to accept responsibility (that they're harder for the USG to track down probably is also a factor).

      Now, is there an US subculture where Patriot's day, Tax day, and the Waco siege anniversary are special days? You bet there is. Could this subculture breed terrorists? It can, and it has.

      It's very legitimate to draw a connection here, this is not just any day on the calendar. Even if this plant's explosion was a complete accident, it will be filled with significance to the anti-government conspiracy theorists centered on Waco. If they don't believe one of their own did it, they're probably going to think God/Fate did it. If the Boston Marathon terrorists come from this subculture, they couldn't have asked for something better. (If they don't, though - if for instance, against the odds, they're islamists - they're probably frustrated as hell at this, and will publish a manifesto or similar in the upcoming days to correct impressions).

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    15. Re:20 years passed by isorox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which has what to do with a chemical plant 40 miles away...? Exactly...?

      The fertilizer plant and the OP are both full of shit?

    16. Re:20 years passed by Vintermann · · Score: 1, Informative

      Comments like this reminds us why you're called anonymous cowards.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    17. Re:20 years passed by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

      Every day on the calendar is an anniversary of something.

      Feb 29th has fewer anniversaries than normal though

    18. Re:20 years passed by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      September 3rd 1752 wasn't the anniversary of anything.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re: 20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I graduated from high school in TX, and I know the area very well. I don't understand where your anger is coming from. This is a horrible situation, and we need to focus on what we can do to help rather than saying hateful things to each other.

    20. Re:20 years passed by clarkkent09 · · Score: 0

      You are as much of a nut as he was.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    21. Re:20 years passed by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      40 miles isn't far by Texan standards. Perhaps it's the closest bangy-thing to Waco?

      Though I suspect this wasn't tairzum, but someone seeing a no smoking sign and going "Herp, it'll be okay if I open a winder, right". He never made it to "derp".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:20 years passed by dave420 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Terrorism is a motive, not an action. Until it has been proven that the perpetrator(s) committed their deed in order to coerce people, it's simply not terrorism - just barbaric murder.

    23. Re:20 years passed by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 0

      It's obvious that was bin Laden. No question about it! Don't you watch [Fox ]News?

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    24. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The celebration of the skipping of 10 days in the british empire?:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1752

    25. Re:20 years passed by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking idiot.

      - How long do you think it would take the emergency services in a small town in central Texas (West is a VERY fucking small town of less than 3,000 people) to evacuate everyone in the area? There's not enough fucking personnel to make door-to-door fast enough and even then stubborn fucks don't want to do what "TEH GUBMINTZERS!!!!" tell them to, even when it means they're going to get blown to shit and back.

      Three words: "Emergency Broadcast System"

      --
      No sig today...
    26. Re:20 years passed by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      Three explosions on TV in three days.

      We're still building up to the big one...

      --
      No sig today...
    27. Re:20 years passed by flyneye · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So, then like the Boston tea party, conducted by terrorists,
      this has potential to be the Texas shit party?

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    28. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which has what to do with a chemical plant 40 miles away...? Exactly...?

      More like 15 miles.

    29. Re:20 years passed by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      he's probably pretty much a hero to many Americans on slashdot. Being a religious nut [...] is just an added bonus.

      What? Being religious gets someone a bonus on slashdot? Protip: you might like to try reading this website first to get a feel for the commenters first.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re:20 years passed by Teancum · · Score: 3, Informative

      You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds of chemicals. It doesn't matter if they are produced in a factory or grown from manure in your back yard.... it is the same thing. Nitrates are one of those key ingredients that plants need in order to grow, and depending on soil conditions and the species of plant you are growing it may need those kind of fertilizers.

      In fact, in earlier times people would literally sell their cess pool contents (not really septic tanks, but the same general construction) to Nitrate manufacturers for the purpose of extracting the Nitrogen compounds to be used in explosives. Cheaper ways of getting that accomplished can be had today, but in theory you could use the stuff that is flowing out of your toilet if you cared.

    31. Re:20 years passed by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Three explosions on TV in three days.

      We're still building up to the big one...

      North Korea nuking Tokyo or Anchorage? Perhaps. It does seem nuts though.

    32. Re:20 years passed by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh great, I guess I should have previewed then!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    33. Re:20 years passed by egcagrac0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Probably going to be Bitcoin.

    34. Re:20 years passed by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      the only message I see here is about worksite safety.

      Boston wouldn't have happened if the spectators had been wearing safety boots, helmets and high-vis jackets?

      --
      No sig today...
    35. Re:20 years passed by jythie · · Score: 0

      I actually kinda wonder if this would have gotten nearly as much press if not for the Boston bombing. As you point out, chemical plants do blow up now and then, and usually it does not get much national attention.

      Heh, which is why I tend to be amused at the people who think that just because they can print gun parts now that they will start mixing their own smokeless powder at home and be free of federal gun laws.... since gunpowder plants, with all their training and safety equipment, still blow up more frequently then people realize.

    36. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Leave Republicans alone!

    37. Re:20 years passed by flyneye · · Score: 0

      No, No, the Repubmocrats are the shitHEAD party, different concept here.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    38. Re:20 years passed by erroneus · · Score: 5, Informative

      A standoff meaning the people pushed back against tyranny and harrassment. What made it a stand off was that the notion that the government players could not and would not admit defeat. Once they start down a path, they can never ever back down and that's for a lot of reasons. Not the least of which is to maintain the perception that they never lose under any circumstances. Right vs wrong and Legal vs Illegal was never going to see any discussion in a court room once the chain of events got started.

      If they wanted him in a court room, they had many other opportunities to snatch him up away from his arms and his bretheren.

      At the end of the day, the government's case was never made, many assertions blaming the victims have been debunked and the teeth of the ATF have been all but removed.

      I'd say proof of fscking-up is well established here.

    39. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8r4MK3R4PI

      On March 16, 2013, my son and I were hiking along country roads among pastures and fields with my 15-year old son to help him earn his hiking merit badge. I always enjoy these father/son hikes because it gives me time alone with my son. As I always do when we go on these hikes and walks, I took my trusty rifle with me as there are coyotes, wild hogs, and cougars in our area. In Texas, it is legal to openly carry a rifle or shotgun as long as you do so in a manner that isn't calculated to cause alarm. In other words, you can't walk around waving your rifle at people. I always carry my rifle slung across my chest dangling, not holding it in my hands. At about the 5 mile mark of our hike, a voice behind us asked us to stop and the officer motioned for us to approach him. He got out of his car and met us a few feet later. He asked us what we were doing and I explained that we were hiking for my son's merit badge. He then asked me what I'm doing with the rifle, to which I responded in a calm manner, "Does it matter, officer? Am I breaking the law?" At that point, the officer grabbed my rifle without warning or indication. He didn't ask for my rifle and he didn't suggest he would take it from me. He simply grabbed it. This startled me and I instantly pulled back - the rifle was attached to me - and I asked what he thought he was doing because he's not taking my rifle. He then pulled his service pistol on me and told me to take my hands off the weapon and move to his car, which I complied with. He then slammed me into the hood of his car and I remembered I had a camera on me (one of the requirements of the hiking merit badge is to document your hikes). This video is the rest of that encounter. Up to this point, I am not told why I am being stopped, why he tried to disarm me, or even that I'm under arrest. We did not set out that Saturday morning to "make a point" or cause problems. Our goal was to complete a 10-mile hike and return home without incident. My son chose a route that away from populated areas but near our home. The arresting officer is Officer Steve Ermis and the supervisor is Sergeant Minnicks of the Temple Police Department. If you agree this was a gross act of exceeded authority, please help me fight these charges: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/2nd-amendment-legal-defense-fund/x/2679348

    40. Re:20 years passed by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      If your assumptions are correct, April 19th (anniversary of the Murrah explosion & the Branch Davidian fire) and April 20th (Hitler's birthday, Columbine, and possibly the date of Mohammed's birth) are coming right up. Let's hope the worst is not yet to come. As an aside, there was an ammonium nitrate explosion 10 days after 9/11 in France that was later blamed on human error, and there is such a thing as happenstance,

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    41. Re:20 years passed by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Are you crazy? A huge explosion somewhere in America, that killed and wounded people. Have you not heard of the cable news channels, or something?

      They need to fill 24 hours of airtime each day when on most days about 15 minutes of newsworthy shit happens. Sure they just repeat the same recorded reporting over and over but even that doesn't fill all the time. If it wasn't for the Boston bombing they'd be giving this even more press since their big name reporters wouldn't be up in Boston discussing 5 seconds of video footage for the 152nd time.

    42. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takeaways: "If you're LE, don't ask someone for their gun because that's dangerous. Instead, try and grab it from them without warning." "Law doesn't matter, feelings matter."

      Also, unmentioned in the video is that the kid was questioned illegally without a parent present after the incident and detained illegally in the officer's vehicle ("You're not getting out of the car until you answer my questions")

      The father was arrested for resisting arrest. Literally.

    43. Re: 20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI bombed Oklahoma.

    44. Re:20 years passed by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      David Koresh may have been a child molester but the government chose to try to arrest him in his compound instead of when he went to town. The government double-down on stupid when they created a seige; and doubled-down on stupid again when they attacked. The fault w lies with the Federal Government for unnecessarily creating a seige and attacking the compound. It wasn't necessary. It was an excessive force.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    45. Re: 20 years passed by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      The anger is towards people claiming this was a terrorist action in response to the events at Waco compound 20 years ago. Until there is some significant evidence showing otherwise, this was just a simple, catastrophic, industrial accident.

    46. Re:20 years passed by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Are you counting Boston as two separate explosions, or was there one I missed?

    47. Re:20 years passed by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with the "resisting arrest" is that he is ALLOWED that by law if the LEOs aren't operating in a legal manner- even to the point of using deadly force if needed. See the Supreme Court decision on John Bad Elk v. United States - 177 U.S. 529 (1900) for more details there.

      The LEOs violated 18 USC 242 and should be decorating a jail cell awaiting trial for the FELONIES they commited, caught on video. Since we're talking a deprivation of rights involving firearms if it were enforced, they'd be facing up to 10 years in a Fed Pen.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    48. Re:20 years passed by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Informative

      While terrorism has not been ruled out based on the ammonium nitrate in the fertilizer the plant produced it is suspected the water from the firefighter's hoses is what caused the explosion. The ammonium nitrate is handled in such as way as to keep it inert but the plant suffered a fire and ironically the water used to put out the fire is most likely what caused the ammonium nitrate to react. This video on YouTube is a guy shooting video of the fire when the explosion occurs. For reference the OK City bombing had a small fraction of the amount of ammonium nitrate this plant had stored in the one tank that exploded. Remarkably a second tank did not explode and is preventing emergency personal from approaching the site for rescue and recovery efforts.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    49. Re:20 years passed by Golddess · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful, your last name also begins with "W". You don't want people to start making a connection between this and you.

      ...unless this was actually a clever ploy to try and throw people off from making that connection.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    50. Re:20 years passed by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not the AC in question, but I guess anger clouded the phrasing so as to hide the point. Let me try to rephrase to make it more palettable and contribute to the discussion.

      It's impractical and infeasible to evacuate the people of the town. The people in this small town wouldn't even listen to a government mandate, let alone request, to evacuate even if one were given. The company, however, said there was zero chance of an explosion, and the people need their jobs, etc. too much to gainsay that. These sorts of factories/plants are so incredibly dangerous that this event is easily a coincidence and until evidence is shown otherwise, it should be treated as such. There's nothing here that suggests it's an act of terrorism.

      I know GP is marked -1 flamebait, but the gist of the message is relevant and insightful.

    51. Re:20 years passed by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      Three words: "Emergency Broadcast System"

      Almost no one is watching broadcast TV these days. The emergency broadcast system is largely pointless. Even amongst backwoods hicks, a lot of them are watching satellite or on the internet (at whatever speed they can attain where they're at) rather than watching broadcast.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    52. Re:20 years passed by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds of chemicals.

      You're right and you're wrong. In theory, you're right. You look at what the plant needs and you give it that. But in proper practice, you're wrong. You simply return the shit to the soil and the system works cyclically, if you plant guilds. It's monocultural so-called "green revolution" farming (which turns nations and indeed whole continents brown) which causes soil depletion. Most of these crops aren't even rotated any more!

      In fact, in earlier times people would literally sell their cess pool contents (not really septic tanks, but the same general construction) to Nitrate manufacturers for the purpose of extracting the Nitrogen compounds to be used in explosives. Cheaper ways of getting that accomplished can be had today, but in theory you could use the stuff that is flowing out of your toilet if you cared.

      We could be using AIWPS to convert our waste into fertilizer, algae as a fuel feedstock, and methane gas, while cutting our water use. Or we could use composting toilets to turn crap into soil directly without any special facilities. By adding compost to your crap and letting it sit for a year (with occasional aeration) you turn it into soil that you can lift out of the digester by hand if you choose, it's that well-cooked.

      The simple fact is that we only need to produce industrial fertilizers with an explosion risk because we are engaging in inherently destructive farming practices instead of employing a cyclical system which existed before we did.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    53. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does Windows 8 - another disaster!.

      You could be onto something here, Ms Wright...

    54. Re:20 years passed by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      It's very legitimate to draw a connection here, this is not just any day on the calendar.

      No, it's a day after the SS Grandcamp did it's thing.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    55. Re:20 years passed by flayzernax · · Score: 2

      Well, we all know that the rule of law has been questionable for a long while in our country. Back in 1950's if you were black you had this problem, now its just escalated to anyone without official government sanction. Thanks for sharing your story.

    56. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, folks around here are mostly a bunch of anti-religion, pro-socialism libtard fucks.

    57. Re:20 years passed by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " I surely hope that this explosion is caused by an accident."

      This is Texas, land of shit regulations. Of course it was an accident. This sort of shit happens in Texas ALL THE TIME.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    58. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a stupid, smug, self-righteous prick.

      I think the GP AC had it right. The post he was responding to was written by a loon and a moron.

      But don't let that convince you to turn on your brain when you browse teh intarwebs.

    59. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was plenty of wrongdoing on the Waco compound, among other things shooting officers of the law in the entryway for some perceived infraction.
      Deciding that the best course of action was to then barricade yourself in and engage in an armed conflict with the police, while your families are inside, doesn't exactly scream lawful action. There were just a bunch of right-wing nutters whipped in to a frenzy of their own design.

      Objectively, what happened was probably the best possible outcome. It was a conflagration of stupid burning itself out.
      What happened at Waco was gene pool cleansing.

    60. Re:20 years passed by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Every day on the calendar is an anniversary of something.

      Yes, a fun, if somewhat maudlin, game to play is to try to guess why the flag is at half staff today. You can play it almost every day now. Perhaps they will soon introduce a quarter staff, for when things really are bad.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    61. Re:20 years passed by tqk · · Score: 1

      September 3rd 1752 wasn't the anniversary of anything.

      (0) infidel /home/keeling_ /usr/bin/calendar -l 0 -w 0 -t 17520903
      Sep 03 Richard ``the Lionheart'' crowned king of England, 1189
      Sep 03 Anniversary of the Founding of the Republic in San Marino
      Sep 03 Independence Day in Qatar
      Sep 03 Memorial Day in Tunisia
      Sep 03 Bonne fête aux Grégoire !
      Sep 03 Kriegserklärung Großbritaniens und Frankreichs an Deutschland, 1939
      Sep 03 Vier-Mächte-Abkommen über Berlin, 1971
      Sep 03 Hilda

      Perhaps you meant that nothing worth celebrating or remembering appears to have happened on 1752-09-03?

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    62. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ..."West," Texas, actually. The town was named West. I'm not sure what possesses people to name a town "West," and it's too early in the morning to go looking it up, but there you go.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    63. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Oh no, I've been compromised!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    64. Re:20 years passed by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

      there's something about spring, and april particularly

      there is such a thing as seasonal affective disorder

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seasonal_affective_disorder

      my point is, it is possible to suggest that there is some sort of deeply rooted seasonal psychological fluctuation in humans that might explain why mid spring / april in the northern hemisphere is the time of crazies

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    65. Re:20 years passed by Mattcelt · · Score: 0

      In English, an adverb is a word that modifies a verb or adjective.

      As an example of modifying an adjective: "He was very tired."
      He - noun (subject)
      was - verb
      very - adverb (modifying 'tired')
      tired - adjective (specifically a predicate adjective

      As an example of modifying a verb: "Danielle quickly ran to the corner."
      Danielle - noun (subject)
      quickly - adverb (modifying 'ran')
      to - preposition
      the - definite article
      corner - noun (the object of the preposition in this case)

      So to borrow from your first instance: "His murders were clearly terrorism."
      His - possessive pronoun
      murders - noun (subject)
      were - verb
      clearly - adverb (modifying 'were')
      terrorism - predicate nominative, a special use case for nouns (not an adverb)

      The easiest way to identify an adverb is to ask what the word modifies. If it modifies a noun (a blue sweater, where blue is describing the sweater), it's an adjective. If it modifies an adjective (a very blue sweater) or a verb (a sweater permanently dyed blue), it's an adverb. (One can often identify verb-modifying adverbs by looking for the suffix -ly: quick -> quickly, intelligent -> intelligently.) Though the constructions of the latter sentences are more complex, none of those examples you cite are actually adverbs: they are all adjectives in some form. Terror, terrorist, and terrorism are all nouns. There is actually no adverbal form of terrorism that I'm aware of. The closest I can think of is "terrifyingly".

    66. Re:20 years passed by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      In other words, just lay over and take whatever the state gives you. Expand that to include any random thug because you've happily given all of your rights to the state.

      Trespassing and burglary are not "percieved infractions". They are common law crimes.

      As far as stupidity goes, one would hope that law enforcement professionals would meet a higher standard a random civilian or even a collection of them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    67. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice spin.

      Objectively speaking, the Waco incident was needless as it was. 1) What was being done at the compound was not illegal and amounts to government harrassment

      Nice spin yourself!

      Not illegal - was that the child molestation, the resistance against a lawfully executed search warrant, or the shooting deaths of ATF agents, or all three?

    68. Re:20 years passed by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Cable has EBS as well. I'd be shocked if satellite didn't.

      Source: I was up at 1 am the other night and got to listen to the test.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    69. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the "resisting arrest" is that he is ALLOWED that by law if the LEOs aren't operating in a legal manner- even to the point of using deadly force if needed. See the Supreme Court decision on John Bad Elk v. United States - 177 U.S. 529 (1900) for more details there.

      Sorry, not in Texas.

      Texas Penal Code 38.03 (Resisting Arrest) - (b) "It is no defense to prosecution under this section that the arrest or search was unlawful."

      Texas Penal Code 9.31 (Self-Defense) - (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (2) to resist an arrest or search that the actor knows is being made by a peace officer, or by a person acting in a peace officer's presence and at his direction, even though the arrest or search is unlawful...

      As a civilized society we don't allow people like you to decide on the street that an arrest is illegal because you "think so" and take the life of another human being to avoid being arrested and brought before a magistrate.

      Instead, you don't get to resist unless the officer is using excessive force before you offer resistance. If the arrest is illegal, you will be released, the officer admonished or even charged criminally, and you will be entitled to collect damages in a civil tort.

      Wasn't that nice? No one dies and everything works out?

      Oh, and the police can disarm you if they are detaining you. I know you don't want to hear that, but an officer who wouldn't should be fired. I'm not going to go into the nuisances of detainment vs arrest here, but I would judge a guy walking down the street with an Assault rife as "reasonable suspicion" enough to temporary detain (not arrest).

    70. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only true in England.

    71. Re:20 years passed by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that siege and military assault by the FBI on helpless civilians was unimaginable.

      But obviously this was part of a coordinated attack by al-Qaeda, part of the Boston multi-bomb affair.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    72. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I note that Boston is a main Irish centre which enthusiastically took collections for the IRA to go and bomb Belfast.

      I wonder if anyone has considered the possibility that this is some group in Belfast trying to return the favour...?

    73. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fertilizer plant and the OP are both full of shit?

      Just the OP. A fertilizer plants input is natural gas and air.

    74. Re: 20 years passed by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      This is a horrible situation, and we need to focus on what we can do to help rather than saying hateful things to each other.

      I agree. Further, I fail to see why the deaths in this case should be viewed as any less (or more) tragic than the deaths in the Boston bombings. Both occurred due to a failure of some sort of safety system. Quite possibly both are essentially 3-sigma events which cannot ever be completely eliminated.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    75. Re:20 years passed by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I thought Fox "news" blamed everything on President Obama.

    76. Re:20 years passed by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, very interesting point. Let's say, however, that I wanted to frame a particular group of people or a subculture, such as Waco sympathizers, anti-government or anti-tax groups, pro-gun folks, you know the types. If I wanted to make it look like that group of people were unstable, or needed to be "rounded-up", or were a danger to society at-large, you mean to tell me I could simply wreak havoc on a certain day or period of days and that group would take all the blame or at least be the prime suspect? Wow, I'm surprised the people who want all those things to happen to that particular group hasn't decided to blow some things up on or near the dates of those events you listed..........

    77. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was arrested for interfering with a peace officer performing a duty. It is still a bogus charge, and I believe there was a resisting arrest charge that was later dropped.

    78. Re:20 years passed by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Cable has EBS as well. I'd be shocked if satellite didn't.

      Cable has EBS because its distributed from a local office (and people out in the boondocks generally don't have access to cable). Satellite is the same signal broadcast all over the country. Unless they wanted to interrupt the programming across the entire country it can't be targeted locally (except on local affiliates that one might get over satellite, though only a small fraction of people watching will be watching their local affiliates).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    79. Re:20 years passed by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Two questions...

      How long does it take for an official to write up an EBS statement and get it pushed in to the proper channels.

      How long from the realization that a serious fire had broken out till the explosion occurred.

      The EBS works very well for weather events because of the National Weather Service coordinates with them almost daily, especially in spring. You must remember this is a *tiny* town of a few thousand people at most, not a large city with full time staff. In a small town a person with the responsibility of managing the EBS would probably be at the scene dealing with other issues.

    80. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down Michael Moore. There's just as many liberal nutjobs that would've loved to attack us. Prominent liberals have been saying for some time that they needed a terrorist attack in order for people to regain faith in Obama. Perhaps someone helped them out. Maybe it was Obama's good friends at the Weather Underground?

      Do you see how baseless accusations work?

    81. Re:20 years passed by lgw · · Score: 1

      Chemical plants blow up, and if you live or work near one you know it. And no, no one is casual about smoking. While it may be trendy right now to ridicule rural folk, there's a very strong culture of safety around known risks at plants. No one fucks around, or tolerates anyone else fucking around - because chemical plants blow up, and if you live or work near one you know it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    82. Re:20 years passed by mk1004 · · Score: 1

      You can make the "TEH GUBMINTZERS!!!!" argument all you want. In small towns, "the government" is made up of the townsfolk, and they tend to know each other. I'm not saying that everything in small towns is unicorns and glitter, but people are likely to heed the words of the officials that they actually know if those officials say "danger Will Robinson, danger!"

      --
      I can mend the break of day, heal a broken heart, and provide temporary relief to nymphomaniacs.
    83. Re:20 years passed by lgw · · Score: 1

      If they wanted him in a court room, they had many other opportunities to snatch him up away from his arms and his bretheren.

      At the end of the day, the government's case was never made, many assertions blaming the victims have been debunked and the teeth of the ATF have been all but removed.

      I knew someone in the ATF in Texas at the time. He wrote a letter to his chain of command before that standoff warning of exactly what happened: that a standoff would result in many needless deaths, and you can just arrest the guy the next time he goes to the grocery store. I guess the ATF wanted to make a point that they're the big dogs and can win standoffs - in the long run they were about as wrong as it was possible to be.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    84. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Obama bin Laden.

    85. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what possesses people to name a town "West,"

      Horace Greeley: "Go west, young man, go west!"

      Young man: "Eh, that sounds like a lot of work. Can I just stay here and rename the town?"

    86. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      September 3rd 1752 wasn't the anniversary of anything.

      1752 U.S. adopts Gregorian calender (becomes Sept 14)
      1731 Willem KH Friso installed as viceroy of Friesland
      1725 England, France, Hannover and Prussia sign Covenant of Hannover
      1709 1st major group of Swiss/German colonists reaches NC/SC
      1697 King William's War in America ends with Treaty of Ryswick
      1683 Turkish troops break through defense of Vienna
      1658 Richard Cromwell succeeds his father as English Lord Protector
      1651 Battle at Worcester-Oliver Cromwell destroys English royalists
      1650 Battle at Dunbar: England vs Scotland
      1632 Battle at Nurnberg: Duke wallenstein beats Sweden
      1543 Cardinal Beaton replaces earl Arran as regent for Mary of Scotland
      1483 Utrecht surrenders to Habsburgs army
      1260 Battle of Ain Djaloet, Palestine defeats Mongols army
      1189 30 Jews are mnassacred at King Richard I (lion hearted) coronation
      1189 England's King Richard I (the Lion-Hearted) crowned in Westminster
      590 St. Gregory I begins his reign as Catholic Pope

    87. Re:20 years passed by SAU! · · Score: 1

      They both also have exactly four letters. Clearly, it's a conspiracy.

    88. Re:20 years passed by Sique · · Score: 1

      This was attempted in Spain after the Madrid Train bombing. The Partido Popular based government then tried to seize the opportunity and blamed Basque separatists for it to improve its chances at the election three days later. The Partido Popular lost the election.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    89. Re:20 years passed by Sique · · Score: 1

      You're right and you're wrong. In theory, you're right. You look at what the plant needs and you give it that. But in proper practice, you're wrong. You simply return the shit to the soil and the system works cyclically, if you plant guilds. It's monocultural so-called "green revolution" farming (which turns nations and indeed whole continents brown) which causes soil depletion. Most of these crops aren't even rotated any more!

      If I remember my history courses correctly, then at least in Europe, the soil depletion came long before the green revolution. In fact, the green revolution and the synthetic fertilizers were what finally helped Europe to overcome constant soil depletion.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    90. Re:20 years passed by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I bet it was that Al Kayeeda guy again. His name seems to come up whenever there's an explosion somewhere.

    91. Re:20 years passed by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Unless you like skiing, the only thing worth doing outside in the northern winter is to head inside. All that aggression is pent up for spring release.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    92. Re:20 years passed by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Presumably you think it's odd that it stands alone, with nothing after it, as in ~ Hartlepool, ~chester, ~on-super- Mare? Or indeed before it, as in Haverford ~.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    93. Re:20 years passed by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of EBS being done on satellite TV, but that doesn't mean it can't be done. Satellite TV sorts out subscriptions on a per-receiver basis, including which set of local channels is used and customized weather forecasts. Customized warnings appearing on-screen no matter what channel is active is feasible.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    94. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Now I never really understood the finer points of english

      Indeed, you can't even spell it. And yet you somehow feel qualified to make authoritative statements on it. Why don't you just shut the fuck up?

    95. Re:20 years passed by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      How would there have been a pitched battle if the government forces had just left? How was the murder by the government of 76 men, women, and children the best possible outcome?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    96. Re:20 years passed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If I remember my history courses correctly, then at least in Europe, the soil depletion came long before the green revolution. In fact, the green revolution and the synthetic fertilizers were what finally helped Europe to overcome constant soil depletion.

      It's what permitted Europe to temporarily ignore the effects of soil depletion. Unfortunately, it causes still more problems. You can add to the depletion hardpan and the death of beneficial nematodes and other organisms necessary to make nutrients bioavailable to plants. Eventually, soil becomes dirt and growing crops becomes hydroponics in a soil medium.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    97. Re:20 years passed by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Appending a region code to the EBS and region checking in the receiver would easily fix this. I don't know that they do this, but it could be done trivially and I doubt that the government hasn't thought of it.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    98. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      A tad, but it grows on you after a while. Perhaps post-apocalyptic, we'll see some settlements named merely "Upper," "New," and "-upon-Tweed."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    99. Re:20 years passed by AJWM · · Score: 1

      September 3rd 1752 wasn't the anniversary of anything.

      Ah, but that's not a day on the calendar (in some countries) now is it?

      --
      -- Alastair
    100. Re:20 years passed by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I need to correct you on a point of history.

      The Boston tea party was not carried out by terrorists. It was carried out by smugglers.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    101. Re:20 years passed by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Why is it always boring "the Muslims are taking over" or "technology is our end! (Though I'm an ivy league mathematician)" manifestos. Why not a manifesto inspired novella depicting your nutty pet cause. You may still be violent and deluded, but at least you will be less boring!

    102. Re:20 years passed by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point. My comments were mostly directed at people engaging in menological pareidolia.

      (Yes, I just made that phrase up. You're welcome, Internet.)

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    103. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall it, although the ATF started the mess, it was the FBI's HRT (Hostage Roasting^wRescue Team) that finished it.

    104. Re:20 years passed by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 2

      You make it sound like any fertilizer will work in any situation as a "one size fits all" position. That isn't how you grow plants, which needs a much more balanced approach and several different kinds chemicals.

      I don't know where you get that conclusion from. The prior poster asserted that ALL fertilizer is explosive, and I merely pointed out that's false in the vast majority of cases. I was in fact pointing out that his "one size fits all" position was bunk.

      Most fertilizers contain less than 5% nitrate nitrogen, since plants are able to utilize more than one form of nitrogen. Thus there are formulations using ammonium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, urea, biuret, etc.

    105. Re: 20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's named after a person whose last name was West.

    106. Re: 20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I definitely expected that.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    107. Re:20 years passed by flyneye · · Score: 1

      It's a perspective thing. The revolt was carried out by terrorists. Ask yourself from whose perspective that is true

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    108. Re:20 years passed by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they didn't celebrate the events fom 19xx in 1752!

    109. Re:20 years passed by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Both of what? There's no antecedent to your post.

    110. Re:20 years passed by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      ...RTFAing or looking at some of the other replies might have revealed to you that the fertilizer plant was in West, Texas. I think you've just earned some kind of award.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    111. Re:20 years passed by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +5, Insightful.

      The statement "What was being done at the compound was not illegal" is completely retarded as well as irrelevant. All that matters is that government agents decided to arrest someone and that person evaded arrest. In civil society we don't allow people to evade arrest. If you are innocent, tell it to a judge. You certainly aren't allowed to hole up and shoot at agents when they come to arrest you. Give me a break. People who defend the Waco cult are ridiculous.

    112. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, OK, I admit it: All the anonymous cowards in this threads are me.

    113. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorism is the prerogative of the victims. The Brits weren't terrorized by the US-financed IRA bomb attacks in London in the 1980's and 1990's. Guess they aren't natural drama queens.

    114. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " it was industrial safety gone wrong. It happens too often."

      The odd explosion is probably cheaper than long term maintenance of proper safety facilities.

    115. Re:20 years passed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US no longer has Rule Of Law, it now has Rule By Law. The law is used to oppress and suppress the ordinary citizen

  2. How Tragic by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fertilizer plants are dangerous places. I am surprised that in such a sparsely populated part of Texas the plant wasn't further away from houses.

    1. Re:How Tragic by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think its a bit like Bhopal, where an economy grew up around the plant.

    2. Re:How Tragic by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      As always it likely would have been at the time. Then as the town expanded the plant would have been suddenly across the road. We've gone through the battles with town planners near a refinery here in Brisbane for the same reason. It's apparently prime land, yeah 500m from a 50t supply of HF acid.

    3. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "It was a like a nuclear bomb went off," Muska said.

      Maybe we could drop a *real* nuclear bomb on Muska, show him what one of those is like.

      The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but the plant was on fire beforehand.

      Golly, do you think there's a connection?

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a job you lazy scrounger.

    5. Re:How Tragic by Saffaya · · Score: 0

      Could it be about this refinery ? (just a quick search)
      http://www.fluoridealert.org/news/24-hospitalised-after-chemical-leak/

    6. Re:How Tragic by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 2

      The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but the plant was on fire beforehand.

      Golly, do you think there's a connection?

      "Explosion" can mean many things--from a pile of ammonium nitrate being detonated to failure of a tank or tube in an air compressor.

      There is a world of difference between how you need to deal with an ammonium nitrate explosion ("Everything within a mile is flattened and on fire") vs rupture of an anhydrous ammonia tank ("Evacuate everyone 17 miles downwind".)

    7. Re:How Tragic by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a kid we had a flour mill not more than two blocks from my house(about 0.1km). Within roughly 0.25km there was also a highschool and a middleschool, and a grade school around 0.15km from it. Back before we moved to the same area, there was also a fertilizer plant just down the road roughly 0.3km. Industrial plants like what I mentioned and others, it wasn't all that uncommon for houses to spring up near where people worked.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:How Tragic by Vintermann · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hear Texas isn't so cool with strict zoning laws.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    9. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      I mean a connection between the massive fire and the subsequent explosion. Do you think they might be related?

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go boil yer bum, you bludging drongo.

    11. Re:How Tragic by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Still, if they have the letters "fluor" in them they must be the same thing, right. Them thar chemmerculs.

      I could tell from the url that it's a nutter site.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:How Tragic by cbhacking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Contrary to what Hollywood may have led you to believe, things on fire do not normally explode. They normally just produce a lot of smoke and burn down. Seriously, go watch the video... it's a big fire, but it's just burning steadily and in a not-even-remotely explosive way... until from one frame to the next it flashes so bright it washes out nearly the entire light sensor of the camera.

      Yes, obviously the fire is related to the explosion, thank you Captain Obvious. The question is, what about the situation even had the potential for such an incredible explosion? Because that shit is not normal for a fire. What part of "not precisely known" are you having trouble understanding? Also, as Phase Shifter pointed out, knowing exactly what blew up and possibly also knowing why is important for proper response to the incident.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    13. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The question is, what about the situation even had the potential for such an incredible explosion?

      That'd be the fact that the massive fire was in a factory where they make explosive stuff.

      --
      No sig today...
    14. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GOD HATES TEXAS

      Don't mess with Texas! It's not nice to pick on the retarded.

    15. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the fire was in a factory where *they make fertiliser*

      And yes, I know fertiliser (Ammonium Nitrate in particular) is a component of ANFO (which is explosive), but the fertiliser itself isn't.

    16. Re:How Tragic by Teancum · · Score: 2

      Fertilizer plants are dangerous places. I am surprised that in such a sparsely populated part of Texas the plant wasn't further away from houses.

      Knowing that the facility produced a product that could be explosive (especially after the Oklahoma City bombing by Tim McVeigh), they could have and indeed should have taken some engineering steps to protect not just workers but also the surrounding town.

      I happen to live somewhat near the ATK facility which used to make the solid rocket boosters for the Space Shuttle and also makes the fuel used in other solid rocket missiles used by the military. It is intentionally put out in the middle of nowhere with all kinds of safety berms and evacuation routes for the workers just in case something goes wrong. There isn't a residential house anywhere within a dozen miles of the main manufacturing building, and the only other non-company structure is a visitor's center for the location of the Trans-continental Railroad (aka the "Golden Spike Monument").

      Instead, this looks like some Mom & Pop company that started on some bootstring budget and couldn't afford to put in those kind of safety features into their plant design. Making fertilizer isn't exactly a high profit business anyway, so the design of the building may have been for practical reasons as well. Still, I hope that a good engineering review of this plant will happen and help with town planners and fire safety codes for buildings of this nature in the future. Safety rules are usually created when people die, and this particular plant looks like it will be a good way to learn some lessons about what not to do. Perhaps these deaths will not be in vain.

    17. Re:How Tragic by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could drop a *real* nuclear bomb on Muska, show him what one of those is like.

      Ammonium nitrate explosions can, in fact, approach small nuclear explosions in power.

    18. Re:How Tragic by Goaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, the fertilizer is explosive.

      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonium_nitrate_disasters for examples. In particular, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Disaster .

    19. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fluorine is a commie plot to steal our precious bodily fluids.

    20. Re:How Tragic by Teancum · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The question is, what about the situation even had the potential for such an incredible explosion?

      That'd be the fact that the massive fire was in a factory where they make explosive stuff.

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers. It is stuff that like many chemicals can in some situations be explosive, no doubt.

      If you think this was bad, you should see some grain silo explosions. That is just a bunch of dust in a tube where unfortunately a bad spark can cause the whole silo to explode in a fashion just like was seen on the video in the link in the original story post. That isn't even something remotely connected to explosives but just ordinary grain that otherwise you would make into your next peanut butter & jelly sandwich.

      Under ordinary circumstances, even a fire wouldn't be a problem for a plant like this. In fact, the fire supposedly was put out by the local fire department only to flare up again and quickly get out of hand. There should have been some safety features in that plant to help suppress the fire and there definitely could have been some different procedures put into place to prevent this explosion, but this was a situation far from normal.

    21. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what Hollywood may have led you to believe, things on fire do not normally explode.

      Uh, sorta. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/04/dayintech_0416

      ammonium nitrate fertilizer is extremely dangerous around fire.

    22. Re:How Tragic by cbraescu1 · · Score: 1

      The fertilizer explodes if on fire and reaching a specific temperature.

      --
      Catalin Braescu
      Ofaly.com
    23. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers.

      They put their output in sacks marked "fertilizer" instead of packing it into little red sticks marked "explosive"?

      Apart from that, there's not much difference. The IRA used sacks of fertilizer quite effectively. All you need is a suitable detonator.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      PS: The bomb attack on the world trade center was also a fertilizer bomb. Fertilizer bombs have been extensively used by terrorists across the globe.

      http://metro.co.uk/2007/04/30/the-carnage-caused-by-fertiliser-bombs-330214/

      --
      No sig today...
    25. Re:How Tragic by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make the event any less tragic.

    26. Re: How Tragic by CGordy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ammonium nitrate is initially produced as an aqueous solution, and the water is then boiled off using carefully designed heat exchangers. The problem is that the resulting pure AN liquid will freeze if the temperature drops below ~170C but it decomposes increasing rapidly once the temperature rises above 200C, lower if the pH is too high or sensitising agents such as chlorides (salt) or oils are present. Decomposition can result in detonation when the AN is confined, and it's a significant hazard concern when designing or operating an ammonium nitrate plant or even just a large storage facility.

    27. Re:How Tragic by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the suburb was Wynnum Actually the proposed suburb development was called "Wynnum North" Have a look at what is exactly north of Wynnum.

      HF Alkylation is a scary process, and HF acid is psychotically hard to contain in a very wide range of possible operating scenarios.

    28. Re:How Tragic by Ash+Vince · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Still, if they have the letters "fluor" in them they must be the same thing, right. Them thar chemmerculs.

      I could tell from the url that it's a nutter site.

      It's not really a nutter site. They are just against the idea of adding small amounts of fluoride to drinking water just because people can't be arsed to brush their teeth. I kind of have a bit of sympathy for this to be honest even though I personally use fluoride toothpaste (some people don't even do that). I have this strange belief that if I want to let my teeth all go to shit that is my prerogative and the local company who supply me tap water have no business trying to prevent me from doing so.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    29. Re:How Tragic by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Many fertilizers have ingredients than burn well.

      Many of those ingredients are in a powdered form.

      Common flour - made out of ground up wheat - makes a huge dust explosion, and it's not particularly flammable. Flammable dusts make REALLY HUGE explosions.

    30. Re:How Tragic by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it will be ignored. I once reviewed a school in West Virginia and when I was done, I told the owner that his floors were only rated for about 1/2-2/3 of what they should be for a school building. He'd built the thing himself (it was constructed much like a pole barn) and hosted underprivileged city kids for year round programs, teaching them about the outdoors. His response: "We don't have codes in WV, I just need to know that it's safe."

      I told him they had basically the same code as everywhere in the US (the International Building Code), but his county simply chose not to spend any money on enforcement. I also mentioned that if anything happened to the building, he would be held personally liable - as the builder - for violating the state building code. I wished him luck and went on my way. I no longer practice engineering in WV - it's just not worth it, as it's several hundred dollars a year to keep my license up.

      Building codes don't address explosions like this. Even OSHA doesn't really have much way to require safety measures that would save people if an explosion occurred. BATFE isn't involved in fertilizer (afaik), though even in a manufacturing facility BATFE regs won't save people in the process area. These people will have died and their legacy will be nothing.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    31. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You have that prerogative, you just can't drink the tap water. Public health is the rule not the exception, that's why you can't complain that your food doesn't have enough lead in it, you have to add it yourself.

    32. Re:How Tragic by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      nstead, this looks like some Mom & Pop company that started on some bootstring budget and couldn't afford to put in those kind of safety features into their plant design.

      Right because only a hand full of Mega-Corps should ever be allowed to do anything other than operate a retail kiosk. We all know that leads to a stable and secure economy.

      I am not disagreeing with your post really. I am sure there are some lessons to be learned here and some basic safety standards that need to be put in place or improved. I just want to point out that we need to keep in mind a sense of balance. What we don't want to do is set the requirements so high they become a barrier to entry in the marketplace.

      I know there is a segment of the slashdot crowd is just sure the owners were thinking "I am going maximize profits no matter what; and hey if the plant explodes fuck-it I'll declare bankruptcy and disappear." I suggest its far more likely they were doing everything they felt they reasonably could do to run a safe business that could continue to operate and provide for their future and that of their employees. While accidents like this happen they don't happen all the time so we must already be doing things mostly right.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    33. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Love Parades were techno music festivals, with all that entails, but not gay and lesbian events per se. The 2010 Love Parade was the last one, because "21 people were killed, and more than 500 injured, in an incident near an overcrowded tunnel leading into the festival. At least 20 casualties resulted from suffocation, caused by crowd pressure." (Wikipedia)

    34. Re:How Tragic by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      They should have been smart and made sure there were no homes, schools or other facilities near such a dangerous plant. Even if the plant was there first, why the hell would homes be built next to what amounts to an explosives plant? Its not like this didn't happen before, just google "pepcon disaster". That plant explosion blew out windows 12 miles away in Las Vegas. History repeats itself.

    35. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be the fact that the massive fire was in a factory where they make explosive stuff.

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers.

      It didn't make explosives, but it did make explosive stuff.

    36. Re:How Tragic by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      Ammonium nitrate explosions can, in fact, approach small nuclear explosions in power.

      I'm sure they can. So can a 15000lb daisy-cutter, etc.

      I just LOLed because he's acting like he has first-hand experience of nuclear explosions and can contrast/compare with other types.

      --
      No sig today...
    37. Re:How Tragic by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      When it was built it was. But people love to sprawl, and apparently don't mind living next to industrial sites prone to exploding.

    38. Re:How Tragic by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      It's pretty like, however thinking it exploded because it as on fire is not "precisely" knowing the cause.

    39. Re:How Tragic by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      No his using the common comparison for "big" when it comes to explosions.

    40. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ANY explosions can approach small nuclear explosions in power. You just have to have a big enough pile of explosive.

      I can imagine a paper bag popping with that kind of explosive power. If it were big enough...

    41. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you even buy a non-fluoride adult toothpaste in regular U.S. grocery stores?

    42. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ingesting fluoride can cause bone spurs. Brush your teeth with fluoride, but don't swallow. Rinse thoroughly and spit. Similarly, don't swallow tap water.

    43. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silo explosions are fuel-air explosions. Quite benign stuff compared to what happened here. You see, here we have stuff that doesn't need air to release energy. You just heat it up and it decomposes. Contain it for a bit, and you have an explosion.

    44. Re:How Tragic by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers. It is stuff that like many chemicals can in some situations be explosive, no doubt.

      fertilizers and explosives share a common trait:

      lots of nitrogen

      for the fertilizer, it's the bioavailability of nitrogen for plants that is the point

      for explosives, the point is that nitrogen really, really wants to be N2 again

      for explosives, AND fertilizer, when you pack a lot of nitrogen together in a chemical, and then heat it up, the nitrogen tends to figure out how to become happy N2 again, releasing a lot of energy in the process

      a fertilizer factory is basically the same as an explosives factory, in regards to the existence of lots of chemical feedstock compounds containing nitrogen grumbling that it is not N2

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    45. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most fertilizer plants are not any more dangerous than any other large scale chemical plant. However, Ammonium nitrate is very dangerous!

    46. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nutter site, not an eco site? not a safety site, not a site you approve of? My god, what kind of a short sighted snob asshat are you? Don't they have a right to an opinion. More then likley, as above the company moved into a crossroad community. One that could not afford the proper fire inspectors, and with texas, no proper training to hazmat materials, and weakened rules for hazmat. And you can guess whats going too happen.
      And vol fire departments are called to that problem every day, and with a weakening economy, with less to work with to keep the public safe, they will be among the worst hit. Its a shame, Companies used to fund that training to vol departments in the past. Very few are willing to do that now. The government used to fund some of that training, now you are having to justify the fire colleges, and some have required the "college" classes for firefighters so they do not have to be current in their training now. The same thing is continuing now to the police departments, more talk of the science of police departments, not the handeling of manpower, and less on logistics of police work.

    47. Re:How Tragic by denvergeek · · Score: 1

      Been to Houston, can confirm.

    48. Re:How Tragic by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Part of what kept West going was the plant, I suspect. It's kind of like the situation in Dodge City, KS. The town's size is buoyed up by two meat packing plants, which employ nearly half the town in some manner.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    49. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But after they started the business, as a owner, would you not be interested in limiting your liability, now, in addition to the dead, they have surrounding cleanup and mitigation. Just as there are/were laws in kansas about grain dust, there are still explosions at milling facilities along with the deaths. Why? because the owner refuses too invest a dollar in prevention.

    50. Re:How Tragic by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I don't know but got that feeling from CNN this morning, that it was happily minding its own business in BFE and people built houses around it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    51. Re:How Tragic by wjousts · · Score: 0

      Don't they have a right to an opinion.

      Everybody has a right to their own opinion. What they don't have is a right to their own facts.

    52. Re:How Tragic by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Protesting the addition of toxins to drinking water is not the same as WANTING toxins added to one's drinking water. The overseers added fluoride to the water, and you act like the guy who wants his water as free of contaminants as possible is the crazy one. You ignored the main argument and substituted a straw man to make yours sound reasonable.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    53. Re:How Tragic by operagost · · Score: 1

      Houston is an anomaly. They have no zoning, although that doesn't mean they have no ordinances. They still have regulations regarding setback, utilities, digging, etc., but no distinction between areas. The rest of Texas is not like that.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    54. Re:How Tragic by torsmo · · Score: 2

      Not quite, as Bhopal was already a large city (approx. 350,000 people in 1970; plant construction completed in 1969) even before the plant was constructed.

    55. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Texas doesn't really do zoning. The plant was there first, and the only way they could have prevented the enroachment would have been to steal the surrounding land by eminent domain.

    56. Re:How Tragic by Amouth · · Score: 1

      All plants are dangerous, some more than others. But people rarely think about the "what if"s in a plant environment enough to really be safe.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    57. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think that OSHA would require facilities that handle a large amount of hazmat to have some kind of protocol that ties into the local EAS. You know, so if the chemical plant is likely to blow up or poison everbody, there'd be disaster sirens and some kind of message on the TV or radio to either seek appropriate shelter or get the hell out of dodge.

      I've also heard that some communities do have such a system in place (so it's not impossible to implement), but I guess it's something not mandated at the federal level.

    58. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't the fertilizer that exploded, it wasn't even a flammable chemical.

      The explosion was caused by adding too much heat (the fire) to a pressure vessel (the ammonia storage tank).

      This was a BLEVE.

    59. Re:How Tragic by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      I also think that this stuff should not explode in a fire normally. Heat alone will not make it explode, there must be high pressure too. The fertilizer might explode if it is stored in a closed metal tank, but probably not if it is stored on a pile or in sacks. This would mean that they stored it in a dangerous way.

    60. Re:How Tragic by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Hindsight.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    61. Re:How Tragic by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Yes, at Sprouts and Trader Joes, that's where I get mine.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    62. Re:How Tragic by xanadu113 · · Score: 1

      Yes you can, it's called Tom's of Maine, but read the label, not all varieties are fluoride free!

      Tom's of Maine Website

      --
      -Myke
    63. Re:How Tragic by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      I only noticed the name of the site once I made the post. However, it was the second of two different sources corroborating the event.
      A quick search will provide you with confirming results.

    64. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not seen a single TV news report or looked at a single newspaper? The answer to your question is NO, it was a fertilizer plant. The same kind of fertilizer McVeigh used to blow up the OK fed building, only tons and tons rather than a single truckfull.

      And since I can't log in on this machine and have a limited number of comments I can make, I want to add something from CNN:

      In 2006, West Fertilizer had a complaint filed against it for a lingering smell of ammonia, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality website shows.

      Separately, the plant had informed the Environmental Protection Agency that it presented no risk of fire or explosion, according to The Dallas Morning News. It did so in an emergency planning report required of facilities that use toxic or hazardous chemicals.

      The plant's report to the EPA said even a worst-case scenario wouldn't be that dire: there would be a 10-minute release of ammonia gas that wouldn't kill or injure anyone, the newspaper reported.

      Seems like someone should be in some serious trouble over lying to the EPA about the danger.

    65. Re:How Tragic by alreaud · · Score: 1

      Does 54,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate create the potential? Texas is VERY familiar with ammonium nitrate and it's destructive potential. They had a ship blow up in Texas City in 1947 that killed almost 600 people and destroyed the town. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Disaster

      It's dangerous shit that can blow up under the right conditions of detonation or fire. Which leads to the idea that the missing firefighters knew what they were getting into... Looking at the video taken by the guy with his daughter, all I can say is condolences to the families, and may they rest in peace. They passed as heroes, IMHO.

    66. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The factory didn't make explosives, it only made fertilizers.

      I can't figure out if you're actually this stupid, or if you're intentionally being obtuse.

    67. Re:How Tragic by redneckmother · · Score: 1

      Fluorine is a commie plot to steal our precious bodily fluids.

      Yes, we must preserve our "Purity Of Essence" (or was it Peace On Earth?). Grain alcohol and branch water. We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

    68. Re:How Tragic by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2

      This is a very common method of city growth in Texas. Build something annoying/dangerous way out of city limits. People build close to it for jobs,cheap land, and since it's not incorporated, easier building rules. This happened around our local airport, now the people who knowingly built by the airport are bitching that airport wants to expand because 'it will be to noisy'. WTF people.

    69. Re:How Tragic by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Good thought, but the plant was built within a short distance of the central business district of West which hasn't moved much since the town was incorporated in 1892. The plant was a bit newer than that.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    70. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Come now, it's not just Texas, and it's not new either (not that you said or implied it was "new", just clarifying my point). Pittsburgh grew up around smelters and steal mills, Detroit grew up around them too. Both of those grew out of towns that grew because of mines (salt in Detroit, coal in Pittsburgh). Living near where you work is a very sensible thing to do in most cases. It allows people to balance work and home responsibilities and still get some rest.

      Safety zones are a rather new phenomon in human history, and for a lot of things we don't have them. Don't really need them in my opinion either. We'll never be able to make everything accident proof.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    71. Re:How Tragic by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Yes, wanting "pure" water is pretty nuts. I mean, seriously, what could possibly go wrong with adding "stuff" to water? It's not like we've been wrong about stuff we add turning out to be harmful before. And, clearly, we've done long-term/human lifetime tests to make sure adding it to our water is entirely safe with no side effects. Right?

      If we haven't, then it's not nuts to prefer NOT to add it. And it's definitely not nuts to prefer to have the government leave the water alone. If the government wants us to have fluoride, then try mandating that we all take fluoride daily - I'm sure that would go over well :) That's basically what they're doing, only a bit more subtly.

    72. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      You have never experienced conflicting facts? If that's the case, call the rest of the world after you come out of that very small cave you hide in.

      The reason these debates become so heated is because of conflicting facts. Much of the debate is weighing the merit of each sides "facts" and very little time is spent on the opinions.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    73. Re:How Tragic by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Give me an easy way to REMOVE the fluoride from tap water and I'll be happy.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    74. Re:How Tragic by lgw · · Score: 1

      Because safety is not and should not be mans highest goal? Plants blow up. Texans know this. They weren't blind to the risk, they chose to make other parts of their lives easier and accept the risk. Their choice. I wouldn't buy a house next door, even if I worked there and wanted the short commute, but that's my choice.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    75. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same issue with Lucas Heights nuclear reactor in south Sydney. When it was built, there was nothing around at all, now people keep building closer and closer. People move in, realise that its there and all of a sudden there's community cryout to shut it down.

          Never mind the fact that it produces isotopes for medical purposes and the airport is really close (some of the isotopes have a half life of hours). Or the fact that it has been there long before the people complaining were even born...

    76. Re:How Tragic by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Way to hijack the thread. Flourine in drinking water is absolutely nothing compared to HF acid. If there was a factory with large amounts of HF anywhere near my house, I'd be gone very quick. That is some of the nastiest strong acid you can spill.

    77. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I don't get your reference to what is North of Wynnum at all. Generally a "N-City North" is "North" of "N-City". "N-City South" would be "South" of "N-City". Can you extrapolate your point a bit and why it links to what is North of Wynnum?

      Not being an ass, simply confused.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    78. Re:How Tragic by headwes · · Score: 1

      Protesting the addition of toxins to drinking water is not the same as WANTING toxins added to one's drinking water.

      Neither lead nor fluoride is a toxin

    79. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "vol"? wtf? why did you abbreviate volunteer but use complete words for the rest of your post? Weird.

      and to the anonymous asshat above, yeah douchebag, sodium fluoride and fluorine in carrots is exactly the same.

      next time you're anemic try eating rusty nails, i hear they're a good source of iron.

    80. Re:How Tragic by bored · · Score: 1

      And, the regulations in Texas can be overridden if it poses undue financial restriction, or some BS like that. So, basically the act of the zoning board refusing to promote something to some kind of retail or commercial properly is overridden by the needs of the landowner. That is why you have apartments and condos being built (literally) 15 feet away from freight lines, and gas stations being built on top of creek tributaries, etc..

      The results are usually predictable. In Austin the freight train derailed and slammed into a condo that had just been completed a couple years ago (http://www.kwtx.com/home/headlines/27183369.html). Thankfully, it wasn't a bad derailment and the part of the building it struck was vacant.

      But, anyway common sense and public good falls to the needs of the landowner to maximize their profits in Texas. Its not even news anymore when the legislature passes some law to ban some obscure practice some town/etc is doing to protect their residents from some corporate interest hell bent on making a buck. Damn the damage. Heck Texas even has "Tort Reform" which is code-speak for making sure that when the explosion kills a bunch of people in an apartment complex an chemical factory built to close together no one can be held liable for ignoring common sense (and getting zoning permit wavers).

    81. Re:How Tragic by bored · · Score: 1

      Building codes don't address explosions like this.

      No, thats a zoning problem. Something that Texas basically doesn't have. Well, I should rephrase that. Texas has a lot of zoning commissions, the problem is that they can't enforce anything. The state laws are written in a manner such that the landowners can request zoning changes, and the boards basically can't refuse.

    82. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I can't hear you... The airplanes from that airport are TOO BLOODY LOUD!

    83. Re:How Tragic by geoskd · · Score: 1

      PS: The bomb attack on the world trade center was also a fertilizer bomb. Fertilizer bombs have been extensively used by terrorists across the globe.

      The world trade center bomb used about 800 Lbs of fertilizer. This refinery had 54 Thousand pounds of the stuff on site. This wasn't a small explosion. If something like this had gone off in the basement of the twin towers, the question would not have been whether the buildings would have collapsed, it would have been: How far away would they find pieces. I would be very surprised if parts of this refinery aren't found at least a county away from where the building was.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    84. Re:How Tragic by jbengt · · Score: 1

      What they have, instead of zoning, is a lot of restrictive covenants attached to the real estate deeds. So you can't just up and build a fertilizer factory in your back yard, because, even if the lack of zoning laws would allow it, your deed, and the neighborhood association groups that often enforce the restrictions, wouldn't allow it. Restrictive covenants also used to be popular to prevent you from selling to Jews, blacks, and other minorities, but those restrictions have been ruled unlawful. Nowadays they can be used to prevent you from painting your house garish colors, limit the types of fences you can put up, etc.

    85. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a fertilizer plant. Pretty safe to say this was ammonium nitrate (aka fertilizer) and also highly explosive. Ever heard of ANFO? Probably not...

      Potential for explosion? HUGE! If I lived there and I saw a fire coming up from the "plant", I would have headed in the opposite direction as quickly as possible.
      Some retard took his kid in a pickup close to the plant to video the fire for us. Permanent hearing loss and a nice video is what he came away with.

    86. Re:How Tragic by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your particular case, but you'll find that a lot of farm country has no building codes for what the farmers can build. A friend of mine built a house and workshop in rural Wisconsin, and they definitely had no code to follow, "as long as it wasn't commercial or industrial".
      Also, the IBC is definitely not the code used everywhere in the US. Some states, like Illinois, have their own codes. Large cities, like Chicago (separate from the state code), often have their own code (and some smaller towns, too). The Uniform Codes are still popular, especially the Uniform Plumbing Code and especially in the West. NFPA and NEC are often enforced. Most authorities promulgate amendments to the standard codes they cite, often significantly changing parts of the standard code.

    87. Re:How Tragic by Sique · · Score: 1

      Conflicting facts are almost ever measurement errors or wrongly applied theories about facts. Conflicting facts are a pretty sure sign of at least one of the facts not really being a fact (and could be one of those "Well, that's odd"-moments, which according to Isaac Asimov are the most common greetings to great discoveries).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    88. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Disagree, it's more an issue of people presenting a partial set of facts which back their position, which has become extremely common. The debated issues are complex, and it's not simply facts showing one black and two white items. There are hundreds to millions of facts that need to be considered together.

      If presented partial facts, of course my theories will differ from someone who has the full set or a different partial set. The same would be true with you, or anyone else.

      Most often, the heated debates are trying to cycle through each set of facts and reconcile the differences.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    89. Re:How Tragic by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wynnum is a suburb immediately south of the Caltex refinery. Parts of Wynnum are already within Caltex's major hazard zone. The new suburb proposed was was Wynnum North, basically replacing what little bit of bush and parkland is just above Wynnum with a residential development. If you look at the google maps, that bush and parkland is basically on the otherside of the road to the Caltex refinery (which may I add has had more than 1 major HF release in its history and at least one of which was fatal though that was a long time ago).

      Another funny case is happening on the northside of the river. The government is proposing reclassifying half of that picture as residential. A scary thought when you see Neumans, Caltex, and BP terminals right next to each other. They clearly didn't see any pictures of the aftermath of the Buncefield explosion. It makes a mockery of the whole Industrial zoning and major hazard facility zoning system if they are just planning to house people opposite the road.

    90. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Makes better sense now, thanks for the extrapolation. I still think the geography reference of "North" would not fit, but the explanation adds clarity to the bad decisions portion of your comments.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    91. Re:How Tragic by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There are filters available (not the cheap ones available everywhere), and also distillation systems, that will remove most of the fluoride from tap water.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    92. Re:How Tragic by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      With respect to fluoride in water, the tests were already done by the fact that some areas had naturally high concentrations, so all that was required was examining the residents and analyzing the data. An optimum range was established, and maintaining fluoride at the low end of that range has value. Alas, not all communities decided to add fluoride in the optimum range, and at least one community used too much, causing damage.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    93. Re:How Tragic by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      I think its a bit like Bhopal, where an economy grew up around the plant.

      Kind of. West is a small Czechoslovakian community founded in the late 19th century. Now it might have grown towards or around the plant, but it was founded far earlier. Their city has a kolache restaurant right off the highway on I35, I always stop when heading past. In fact a picture shown on one of the cable news networks showed the mushroom cloud from that parking lot. I hope the 35 casualty count I just saw on USA TODAY is wrong.

    94. Re:How Tragic by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I don't know who voted that down, but there's a good point in there: the Westboro Baptist Church can't be in two places at once.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    95. Re:How Tragic by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      There may still be a couple of exceptions, but they're all based on the same code, and (again, with some exceptions) nearly all states have moved to statewide blanket codes. The IBC and it's variants are based on the old UBC codes mostly. They're ALL based on ASCE 7 for loads and load factors. NFPA has a competing set of codes, but I think they're mostly being unified with the I codes. NEC is identical to an NFPA number, which is referenced as the electrical code in IBC - they're all the same. States make their own exceptions and changes, but they are relatively minor.

      "Farm country," again except in VERY rare cases has the exact same code as big cities - it's just not enforced. In nearly all states the state legislature makes the building code law (again, they all use a national code as a base and modify it to their liking), and it's valid statewide. In the I codes, agricultural buildings are generally exempt from code enforcement. That's why I get to go see all the barn failures in high winds. And the usually get denied by the insurance company because they're not built to any code standard. See - code standards all exist for ag buildings. They're storage, or office, or any of a dozen uses specified in ASCE 7, or a representative load can be calculated by an engineer (which is what the code says you must do BY LAW if your use doesn't fit a defined category). It's not too challenging, but it does take some time and experience. Which, translated to the non-engineer farmer, means money - and there's no money for engineering in farming until you break something enough times that you can't afford to have it fail again.

      In some states - even red Virginia, a building official not enforcing the code is a misdemeanor. We still have counties around me with the same attitude as your friend's in Wisconsin, though.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    96. Re:How Tragic by war4peace · · Score: 1

      See? Not an EASY way.
      If I want poison in my food, I can easily add it. If I disagree with an additive already in my food, I can't do squat about it. "Don't drink tap water" is a retarded argument. How about not enrich it with crap?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    97. Re:How Tragic by Sique · · Score: 1

      Partial facts don't conflict. Hypotheses based on partial facts might conflict. Predictions based on those hypotheses might conflict. But the facts themselves don't. They are just different sets of data points.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    98. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Flourine in drinking water is absolutely nothing
      > compared to HF acid.

      maybe that's why hog was mocking it?

    99. Re:How Tragic by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure you realize what you said is rubbish. Lets take a news example: Interviewer asks Sheriff "Who did it?" and Sheriff states "We don't know, could be accidental or a criminal". You read the report in a Newspaper where they show the quote "Could be criminal". Another source quotes "Could be accidental". Both are correct. The statement was conflicting. This same scenario was presented similarly yesterday with media quoting a Sheriff in Boston.

      Now before you claim it's only these scenarios, use your head. Almost all heated discussions are subject to this scenario. Very little boils down to concise mathematical expressions. With math I'd agree with you but with politics, ethics, morality, etc.. is all subject to conflicting statements.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    100. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to protect our precious bodily fluids!!!

    101. Re:How Tragic by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Nice!!! Was wondering if anyone would mention Dr Strangelove.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Strangelove

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    102. Re:How Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very common method of city growth in Texas. Build something annoying/dangerous way out of city limits. People build close to it for jobs,cheap land, and since it's not incorporated, easier building rules. This happened around our local airport, now the people who knowingly built by the airport are bitching that airport wants to expand because 'it will be to noisy'. WTF people.

      People would NOT build anywhere around or near this type of facility IF THE DAMN STATE OF TEXASS WOULD PUT INTO PLAY BUILDING CODES.

      But then that would just be "Big Gob'ment' getting in our business."

      There's just no bottom in the Pool of Stupid that is the good State of Texas.

  3. Detected by seismic network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was detected by seismic networks. Note that the most common reason for "earthquakes" at zero depth is a quarry explosion, so that's how they initially labeled it. They've since changed it to read simply "Explosion". Click the "did you feel it link" and you can see that some people felt it as if it were an earthquake. Strangely, they are north of the event. Either the waves propogated that way, or people south of the event saw the cloud and realized it was an explosion not a quake.

    1. Re:Detected by seismic network by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Well, North of Waco is many many times more populous than south of Waco, so that doesn't really surprise me.

      Still, interesting that it was picked up that far away. I still cant grasp how big the bang must have been.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    2. Re:Detected by seismic network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid, near Philadelphia, a ship exploded (I forget all of the details), but small in comparison
      to what happened with this plants explosion. About 15 miles away, I saw what I thought was a flash of
      lightning, then about 5 seconds later. what felt like the hand of God punching the ground. Imaging hitting
      your open palm with you fist - very sudden and sharp, only 10x stronger. What happened there was (probably)
      2-3 magnitudes stronger than what I felt --- very, very scary.

    3. Re:Detected by seismic network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a town 40 miles south of Waco, and we felt it there. Still unsure if it was the shockwave or the earthquake-esque blast.

    4. Re:Detected by seismic network by torsmo · · Score: 1

      I checked the site for other recent events, and there have a surprisingly large number of high-intensity quakes/tremors in the past week or so. Or maybe since I'm not a seismologist, this might be normal? Any thoughts?

    5. Re:Detected by seismic network by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Still, interesting that it was picked up that far away. I still cant grasp how big the bang must have been.

      your typical terrorist bomb (like Mcveigh, or the trade center bomber) is going to be on the order of several hundred pounds of explosives. Maybe 500 to 1000 pounds.

      These idiots had 54,000 Lbs of the stuff on site, and managed to let it catch fire, and then explode. To help put that in perspective, the myth busters used 800 Lbs of high explosive and vaporized a cement truck. This explosion was at least an order of magnitude more powerful.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
  4. Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I noticed that every time there's an explosion somewhere, /. has to have an article about it but yet it has nothing to do with tech. Can someone care to elaborate on why that is? More importantly, why does it just take a few hours for /. to have these kinds of news posts but yet tech related articles could be weeks behind?

    1. Re: Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo hoo

    2. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't blow a fuse; the answer was just in the news! Flaaaming hypocriiiites...

      (To the tune of "Reading Rainbow.")

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't blow a fuse; the answer was just in the news!

      True, but a serious disaster is an event of national interest. Even special interest websites like this one are, in addition to being news sources, are also community gathering locations. Which means, we gather here to talk about what's going on in the world. Is there profit to be made? Sure. But there's also a discussion to be had. And our view into this news event may differ from that of the popular media; For example, there are chemical engineers who read this site. They may have something to say about how this happened. Maybe the fire suppression system failed -- maybe it was even due to a computer glitch. Whether it did or didn't, I can't really say. But the point is, we have a different perspective.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      /. has to have an article about it but yet it has nothing to do with tech. Can someone care to elaborate on why that is?

      /. is "news for nerds, stuff that matters". People who make this complaint always seem to forget that, this isn't just a tech website. Besides, on other sites this has sparked a lot of debate about the chemistry of what exactly caused the explosion and whether or not it was clever planning to plonk a prone-to-exploding chemical plant beside a school. If chemistry and town planning aren't nerdy topics I don't know what are.

       

      More importantly, why does it just take a few hours for /. to have these kinds of news posts but yet tech related articles could be weeks behind?

      That, I have no idea about.

    5. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by inasity_rules · · Score: 2

      In this case, it has everything to do with tech. What failed on the plant's systems to cause this? Fertalizer plants are dangerous places, by nature, and (at least in my part of the world) have some hectic safety procedures and equipment up to shutting down if it looks like there is lightning anywhere near....

      Was it human error? Equipment failure? We don't know, but everyone came here to speculate. So, yeah it belongs here.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    6. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Valid—and normally I'd defend that point myself; the irony of such a recent story condemning other sites for doing the same thing, however, was just too tempting. (And many do have communities themselves, though obviously not as well-developed.)

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    7. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Validâ"and normally I'd defend that point myself; the irony of such a recent story condemning other sites for doing the same thing, however, was just too tempting. (And many do have communities themselves, though obviously not as well-developed.)

      Nobody ever said the new management doesn't regularly open their mouth and insert their foot.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    8. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by lxs · · Score: 2

      I haven't noticed that.
      In Baghdad and other parts of central Asia huge bombs are set off on a weekly basis with scores of victims but Slashdot doesn't mention it. The odd bomb in the US will get a mention. Attacks in Europe or Russia only get mentioned if they are big. So it's just the spillover of regular news you'd expect from a US based site.

    9. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since when were tech and computers synonyms?

      Chemical engineering is tech, moron.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably, but Slashdot is a worldwide site.

      Not really. This was on their FAQ for a very long time.

      Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?

      Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.
      It is worth noting that there is a Japanese Slashdot run by VA Japan. While we helped them a little in their early days, they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji! There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites.


      Answered by: CmdrTaco
      Last Modified: 10/3/04

    11. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can make snarky comments like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rWWq_EHxPg

    12. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by raymansean · · Score: 2

      News for Nerds! There are other nerds than those who sling lines of code all day or design computers. Explosions are of interest to Chemical, Mechanical, Civil engineers, etc. EE's may also be interested depending on what was the ignition source.

      --
      insert inflammatory comment here!
    13. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I noticed that every time there's an explosion somewhere, /. has to have an article about it but yet it has nothing to do with tech. Can someone care to elaborate on why that is?"

      It's pretty simple actually. Each time one of these stories you hate is posted, you click on it and then post a comment. Both of those actions raise counters in a database that is then interpreted as "people like this and want to see more"

      So put another way, they are posted here because you told them you want more, and it's all your fault :P

    14. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The BBC has been talking about it all morning. I doubt there has been a similar level of coverage of the paper mill fire in Birmingham this morning on US TV. In fact it took a bit of time to find it on the BBC website even.

    15. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am more interested in what Slashdotters have to say on the subject than anyone else. Typically a story like this plays out as follows:
      NPR/BBC - here are the unbiased details of the story
      BS news - OMG Explosion! Think of the children/town/nation! The government should do something/nothing!
      Slashdot - here are similar stories (ammonia nitrate-related disasters), chemical discussion, physics of the matter.

    16. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When there's a massive explosion involved, yes I do mind. US news -does- cover such things around the globe.

    17. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I am always interesting in hearing the details of the latest French surrender :-P

    18. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, unimportant people who aren't directly related to my day-to-day life died, blah blah humanity and sorrow whatever, WHERE'S MY GODDAMNED NEWS ABOUT THE LATEST SHINY PHONE GADGETS, YOU SIMPLETONS?!? Come on, come on, a bunch of dead Texans aren't getting ME the next iPhone any quicker, you know!

      FTFY. And nerds wonder how they can shake the stigma of being a bunch of detached human beings...

    19. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      This is what news organizations have been doing long before social media.

      The evening of the bombing, CNN was already analyzing Obama's speech w.r.t. whether he did a good job or not. Meta-analysis.

      That's fine for a politics class, but a news show?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    20. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Do you really mind what happens in the world outside of US ?

      Sometimes I do, and sometimes I don't. In the times that I don't, I have the option, and free will, to not click the link if I don't care.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    21. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      I'd be pretty interested in a GIGANTIC explosion in France, and I'm from Texas. Also it does have a science angle, because it's a chemical plant, and I've been interested in the discussions of how to deal with chemical fires in this thread.

      So.

      Fuck off, and have a nice day!

    22. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by geoskd · · Score: 1

      News for Nerds! There are other nerds than those who sling lines of code all day or design computers. Explosions are of interest to Chemical, Mechanical, Civil engineers, etc. EE's may also be interested depending on what was the ignition source.

      Not to mention, techies always have the best video links. I have found links to some behemoth explosions, not related to this event, just by reading the comments of other posters. Try getting that from CNN or the BBC.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    23. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      so, what you're saying is that his posting "why is this here" is creating a minor Streisand Effect?

    24. Re:Why are these stories on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since hogwashxious and moron were.

  5. Re:Bah by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

    I'm not reading here for the news (that is everywhere) either - I'm reading /. for the moderated comments that are certainly not everywhere.. (except yours)

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  6. Coincidence? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    or is it related to the Boston bomb attack..?

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:Coincidence? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. Factory fires (This started off as a fire) happen all the time. This one was just unfortunate enough to happen where a metric shit tonne of amonium nitrate happened to be.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My comprehensive and exhaustive in-depth analysis to your stupid question says: "No."

    3. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing, everything is connected... Why not blow up a random factory in the middle of nowhere to leave an impression..?

    4. Re:Coincidence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      How much is that in imperial fuckloads?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Coincidence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      leave an impression

      I see what you did there.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Coincidence? by Paperweight · · Score: 1

      Well, since West, TX is 20 miles from Waco, and it's almost the 20th anniversary of the Waco siege of April 19th 1993, I assume that's where the antichrist will be making his appearance tomorrow.

    7. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      42

    8. Re:Coincidence? by Hentes · · Score: 2

      It did cause more losses, and would make it harder to catch the attacker afterwards. If terrorists wre smart they would do sabotage instead of bombings.

    9. Re:Coincidence? by behrooz0az · · Score: 0

      Did You actually use some math or am I missing the joke?

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
    10. Re:Coincidence? by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Henceforth you are missing your geek card at least, it has now been revoked. (hint)

    11. Re:Coincidence? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      The relevant metric is not only "people killed", but also "people scared" and "amount of disruption due to people being scared". The last two are massively higher with bombings in cities or of civilian infrastructure. Places that you can sabotage is also better protected than the average intersection.

    12. Re:Coincidence? by The+Pea! · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_the_Galaxy

    13. Re:Coincidence? by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [Coincidence] or is it related to the Boston bomb attack..?

      Yes. Timing was Coincidental and it was related to the Boston bomb attack: While the terrorist attack in Boston will likely result in less rights for civilians, the West, TX explosion won't cause corporations to be beholden to even basic zoning restrictions; The Boston explosions were committed by a small group of terrorists with the intent to kill, and strike fear into hearts of citizens, but the West explosion were caused by a large corporation on accident, and we should be terrified of their general recklessness, but we aren't. The Boston attack, like most terrorist threats, would have been exceedingly hard to prevent (esp. without stripping away the rights of all citizens), yet most all of the West, TX explosion injuries and casualties could have been easily avoidable by requiring such plants spend the money to relocate further from the towns they cause to spring up as they get filthy fucking rich. The perpetrator(s) of the Boston explosions may be found and put to justice for their crimes, but the rich bastards who are responsible for the West, TX explosion will get a sympathetic pat on the back, and at least a tax break in losses from Uncle Sam. The terrorists wounded many in their Boston attack, but the West, TX explosion was far more lethal and devastating. People will get right fucking pissed off about the terrorist attack in Boston, but they'll exhibit a disproportionate response of only remorse for the victims of the TX explosion.

      So, you see, they are inversely related.

    14. Re:Coincidence? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unlikely. Factory fires (This started off as a fire) happen all the time. This one was just unfortunate enough to happen where a metric shit tonne of amonium nitrate happened to be.

      This wasn't an "unfortunate" accident. This was the result pure unabashed incompetence and greed. It's not like we don't know how far to space apart caches of volatile stuff having a high energy density in order to prevent massive explosions like this. For fuck's sake, do you think even the morons who sign up for the military would put ammo reserves all in one giant pile for safe keeping? No, that's fucking stupid. Stupid and a bit less expensive, but mostly stupid. The fire was an accident, but the explosion was caused by Corporate Negligence.

    15. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or is it related to the Boston bomb attack..?

      That's right. Texas felt compelled to prove that they do everything bigger.

    16. Re: Coincidence? by CGordy · · Score: 2

      Relocate a plant because houses were built nearby? It would be far cheaper to relocate all the houses.

    17. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TX explosion won't cause corporations to be beholden to even basic zoning restrictions

      The constitution does NOT permit government to medal like that. Those individual's who are affected may sue through the courts and this will cause the company to loose money and so eventually market forces will cause company's to pay attention to safety. If you lived under communism like I did you'd know what you were talking about like I do and you wouldn't suggest bureacratic state intervention as the solution to everything.

      --
      roman_mir, karma in the basement again. Bastard liberal mod's

    18. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It saddens me that Zooey Dechanel's tireless efforts to keep Douglas Adams in the hearts of geeks have come to naught.

    19. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the basic purpose of terrorism: It uses people's fear against them, to the point where anything and everything, no matter how coincidental, must be suspected to be connected to an attack. The terrorists only needed to detonate a few bombs and injure a tiny number of people compared to, eg, daily traffic accidents - but the fear of being randomly maimed or killed lasts forever.

    20. Re:Coincidence? by ta_gueule · · Score: 1

      If the terrorists were even smarter, they could act lazy, just wait for an accident to happen and claim responsibility. It's even harder to catch them, and they don't have to leave their couch. Then they can make threats, wait a little more and claim the next one.

    21. Re: Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an even cheaper solution: don't allow the houses to be built so close to the plant in the first place, or vice-versa. They're called zoning laws. But the developers think "Duh, that looks like cheap property to build on, right next to that industrial site", and slip a little money to the municipality to look the other way, or the municipality is stupid in the first place and only cares about the jobs and tax revenue that will result from building either residences or the factory.

      We all know it would be a lot cheaper and more profitable to have the employee residences close to the factory, right? So we'll just suspend any kind of rational thinking in the name of limiting government interference in the economy and preserving both jobs and profits. After all, everybody knows that ammonium nitrate is pretty safe stuff when properly managed, and it's not like Texas, in particular, has any history of problems with it.

    22. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAMPANT SPECULATION WITH NO FACTS TO SUPPORT IT. You might end up being correct but shouldn't you wait for an investigation before jumping to conclusions?

    23. Re: Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be far cheaper to enforce simple zoning restrictions to keep the houses from being built there in the first place. But in our system, some developer just needs to grease a few palms and now they can profit from that big empty patch of land next to the (whatever) factory.

    24. Re: Coincidence? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Not to metion that the plant's probably part of the raison d' etre for the town and the very houses we're talking about.

      Zoning restrictions are something the City typically does, not Unions, etc.- and the Town probably didn't think anything OF it.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    25. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not blame the greedy developers for wanting to build houses near an industrial plant? And then selling such property to prospective homeowners?

      Or the city council who approved of the zoning? Or the environmental impact survey that said it would be ok to develop houses nearby?

      I find your statement extremely troubling because you spout them as facts.

      In other words, citation needed.

    26. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did Waco relocate to West Texas?

      Check out a map. It's quite central - a little north, but much more central than west or even north.

    27. Re:Coincidence? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence + I hate daddy syndrome.

      With a straight face, people bitch about capitalism using their iPhones, then drive to McDonald's to shove Big Macs down their 250- lb. gullets.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    28. Re:Coincidence? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      When trashcans with pressure cookers in them explode during a public event, that's an attack.

      When a fertilizer plant explodes, that's just an entry in the actuarial tables.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    29. Re:Coincidence? by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      But they promised it was perfectly safe! Thanks to corporate self-reporting (since we can't spend money on pesky government inspectors for health and safety risks), this same plant had filed a report with the EPA saying they had no fire and explosion risks, in response to a slap-on-the-wrist fine for not filing a risk-management plan in 2006. What sort of commie would refuse to trust corporations to properly self-report environmental and safety issues?

    30. Re:Coincidence? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No, it may just be incompetence. Although subject to revision, a reasonable scenario is fire -> fire department -> water on fire -> Ooops, shouldn't have done that - very rapid exothermic reaction AKA explosion.

      Apparently there are a number of volunteer fire firefighters missing. I'm tentatively putting this together as bad training / bad luck / fog of war mistake. Some officer in the VFD should have pulled people back until they were damned sure of what they were spraying. Even underfunded, undermanned departments would do occasional walkthroughs of major problem areas in the district, would talk to the engineers, owners, foremen and come up with plans.

      Of course, in the middle of an evolving incident, it's easy to ignore all that. It's the primary killer of fireman - storming in when they should have been held back. Of course, hindisight is often more accurate than forsight.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    31. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most ignorant and prejudiced post I've seen in a while.

    32. Re:Coincidence? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Those individual's who are affected may sue through the courts and this will cause the company to loose money and so eventually market forces will cause company's to pay attention to safety.

      Unless the rich and powerful companies in question have bribed their legislators to provide immunity to lawsuits under the guise of "tort reform". Or in jurisdictions where judges are elected, they may have heavily funded the campaigns of judges who they know value corporate profits over human life. Even if the victims of corporate crimes prevail in court the damages are going to be a small fraction of what the company earned by cutting corners, which provides no incentive at all to behave better.

      It's always "tough on crime" for the poor, and "tort reform" for the rich.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    33. Re: Coincidence? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0

      I have an even cheaper solution! Don't rely on mommy gov't to make all of your decisions for you.

      I'm aware that's not an acceptable answer here. You people love being told how to live.

    34. Re:Coincidence? by geoskd · · Score: 1

      How much is that in imperial fuckloads?

      That would be 5.4 IFL.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    35. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet most all of the West, TX explosion injuries and casualties could have been easily avoidable by requiring such plants spend the money to relocate further from the towns they cause to spring up as they get filthy fucking rich.

      Thank you for an interesting example of blaming the wrong party. The plant was almost certainly built quite far away from anyone. Then people likely relocated closer to the plant in order to be near their source of income. The business tried to be well away from everyone, but then people came closer. You think the business owners should be forced to pay additional money to move yet further away from anyone, at which point people will almost certainly chase the plant again?

    36. Re:Coincidence? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      There should have been other safeties making this impossible, such as insurance companies refusing to insure and fire department applying pressure to have permits not issued or revoked. Still, if what you say is true, there's at the very least criminal negligence here.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    37. Re:Coincidence? by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      They didn't need to move it, from what i understand they lacked essential safety and preventative requisite requirements. Some one will get charged with wanton reckless endangerment and manslaughter.

    38. Re:Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two white guys were seriously injured in a bomb explosion in Oregon the day before Boston. The police found bomb making materials and instructions at their home. Was it treated as terrorism? No sir, just good 'ole boys larkin' around.

  7. nuclear or terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if its not nuclear or terrorist nobody cares.

    1. Re:nuclear or terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pronounced "nucular" and "terrist", you anti-american commie!

      Also, "foillage".

    2. Re:nuclear or terrorist by StupidSlashDotJavaSc · · Score: 1

      Also "walla"...

  8. Impressive video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That video is impressive. Watch the video, show it to your kids, and tell them to bear it in mind next time you see someone successfully outrunning an explosion in a Hollywood film.

  9. Re:Bah by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    (except yours)

    I can see it now, in the CNN comments section: "wtf, what's up with all of these non-tech stories on slashdot"

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  10. That was one big freakin explosion. The cameraman must have been at least a couple of hundred meters away and flaming debris was zipping past him almost instantly. Still it's a fertiliser plant, explosive by its very nature, no reason to think there's any connection between this and Boston. Yet.

    1. Re:Wew by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of this explosion.

    2. Re:Wew by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everything's bigger in Texas.

    3. Re: Wew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including the dick in your mouth.

    4. Re:Wew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except safety regulation.

    5. Re:Wew by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      That he was far to close was clear from the first frame. Surely everyone knows that some types of fertilizer make for great bombs - there have been pretty famous real world examples and it's used in every tv/movie about terrorists (well aside from the ones that pretend nukes are easy to get and use).

      The Oklahoma City bombing obliterated about a third of a reinforced concrete building. With fertilizer that fit into a 20ft rental truck. I would assume a fertilizer factory has significantly more fertilizer in it, though not arranged to optimize an explosion or primed with detonators/etc one would hope...

    6. Re:Wew by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I felt bad for the young kid in the car: scared sh!tless AND apparently lost his hearing. I imagine that is just temporary, or at least would hope.

      I felt so bad for the kid, that I almost want to bite my tongue about complaining about vertical-orientation shots like that. Oh well: seriously people, take your videos in land-scape mode... learn to turn your phone 90-degrees.

    7. Re:Wew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you didn't know about the potential for an explosion, you'd still have to be some kind of retard. "Hey kids, let's go and watch the toxic chemical fire." Who could think that was a good idea?

    8. Re:Wew by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he would have wound up the windows if the air smelt funny...

    9. Re:Wew by tqk · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he would have wound up the windows if the air smelt funny.

      Slowly choking to death from noxious fumes, or slowly bleeding to death from shards of flying glass. Pass.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:Wew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      including egos and skull walls

    11. Re:Wew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're waco too.

  11. And an Exxon refinery caught fire by thegarbz · · Score: 2

    Not quite on the same scale and completely lost in the news of this explosion there was a fire at Exxon in Beaumont with 12 people injured. Not a good day for Texas industry.

    1. Re: And an Exxon refinery caught fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Right-to-Work states.

      2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion

      Hate filled little POS.

    2. Re: And an Exxon refinery caught fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if a Union situation would've changed the "dangerous working conditions"... IDIOT. And don't tell me that not being able to fire the person would've made them actually do anything- not to mention that it probably wasn't something were there was a problem that'd have triggered OSHA attention, etc.

      Simply put, SHUT THE FUCK UP. That's right. SHUT THE FUCK UP.

      Your bullshit wouldn't have done a damned thing different and you're adding to the problem, not fixing it.

    3. Re: And an Exxon refinery caught fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the ultimate in "Union" stories where things fucked up like this anyhow...I present for your nose rubbing...

      Chernobyl

      No "right to work". The ultimate in Unions, the State. Dangerous working conditions. And a mess that still isn't cleaned up fully...that happened in spite of all the bullshit you're flogging. Keep your tripe to yourself, k?

    4. Re: And an Exxon refinery caught fire by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Because clearly no Unionized facilities have every had anything unsafe happen. Nope.

      Nice straw man.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:And an Exxon refinery caught fire by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      Not a good day for Texas industry.

      Is it ever? I mean, that would imply that anything in Lesser Texas (i.e., anything outside the confines of Austin, San Antonio, or a few other relatively small and obscure geographic pockets within the state) was good. Which generally doesn't occur.

      --
      That is all.
    6. Re: And an Exxon refinery caught fire by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The concepts of "at-will employment" and "right-to-work" are different, and in practice neither implies the other.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  12. Is this nerd news? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interesting that just the other day we were discussing here about "exploitation" of social media sites etc. to drive traffic to "tech" sites after the Boston bombs.
    Here we have links to BBC, CNN & even Youtube?
    I assume like many /;ers I already get my "mainstream" news from the BBC etc. Do we need this?

    1. Re:Is this nerd news? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I think it's probably seen as "stuff that matters" because of heightened paranoia following the Boston Marathon bombings, even though there is no apparent evidence that this was deliberate.

      People have also mentioned the Waco "connection" here too. I think the US psyche is in a bit of a frazzled state at the moment.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Is this nerd news? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      For the discussion of what could have caused it by people who know about fertilizer plants?

    3. Re: Is this nerd news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are chemical engineers who post on /., so that's not actually as ridiculous as you'd think.

      That said, although I've had a few people call me today to ask my opinion of what happened (I've designed ammonium nitrate plants), but I've had to tell them that I'm as much in the dark as anyone.

      I do think its unlikely to be an attack though - there are plenty of ways that fertiliser facilities can explode through ignorance or maloperation.

    4. Re:Is this nerd news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To make this nerd news, I guess that it should be pointed out that the guy who filmed the explosion was holding his camera wrong (vertically). He must be an iPhone user!

    5. Re:Is this nerd news? by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      For the discussion of what could have caused it by people who know about fertilizer plants?

      A rapid and uncontrolled oxidation reaction.

  13. Fertilizer hazard underrated by ta_gueule · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fertilizers are extremely dangerous and should be handled with more care. A similar thing happened in my town 12 years ago. If was on 21/9/2001, so 10 days after 11/9/2001 and therefore nobody heard about it but it left some 30 people dead and a city in ruins. Look up AZF in Toulouse on the web to see what I'm talking about. They first blamed it on the terrorists and later admitted it was an industrial accident. Like in Texas, the AZF factory was build out of the town but the town grown and it found itself in the middle of it. Poor urban planning.

    1. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I believe in this scenario there should be a plan to abandon the site and let it burn or blow up. And obviously there should be a buffer zone around the plant, as there are around airports. No residential, just commercial land.

    2. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by ta_gueule · · Score: 2

      Well, the explosion propagates at the speed of sound, so abandoning the site is not an option. In Toulouse, the explosion occurred when 2 chemical products entered in contact (ammonium and nitrate if I'm not mistaken) It left a crater 200 meters wide. Although the biggest damage occurred near the factory, Steel girders were found 3km away, windows blown up 20 km away and the seismic activity was recorded in Paris (800 km away)

    3. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In this instance a fire preceded the explosion, so the plant could have been abandoned when the fire was discovered, if there had been no immediate threat to public safety. I agree that the idea doesn't work for all cases.

    4. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are.

      Once, when helping out, a truck load of fertilizer got dumped on me and a lot of it went down my mouth.

      Off to the hospital where I was told that I was full of shit.

      Ahhh - Thank you!

    5. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And obviously there should be a buffer zone around the plant, as there are around airports.

      You've never been to Heathrow, have you[1]? I used to live so close to the runway I could see what colour undies the stewardesses were wearing.

      [1] You should. I'm sure you have some mates in Shepherd's Bush ;)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toulouse - Paris don't lay 800 km apart.

    7. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by Khyber · · Score: 1

      " And obviously there should be a buffer zone around the plant, as there are around airports."

      Most airports I've been around or in are within rifle distance of a house. That's a shitty buffer zone.

      In Memphis I could take a slingshot and peg every FedEx plane on the tarmac, from my porch.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Fertilizer hazard underrated by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Former workmates I suppose. The southern hemisphere part of the company is not doing so well due to the high dollar, so I am currently a free agent.

  14. Eerie recollection of AZF, France by Jesrad · · Score: 2

    This explosion appears very similar to that of the AZF chemical plant near Toulouse in France, though (thankfully) smaller in damage and victims.

    Fire and ammonium nitrate deposits... like match and dynamite.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:Eerie recollection of AZF, France by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And there's a similarity to the Pepcon explosion too.

      It was rocket fuel manufactured there but the chemical composition of it was similar. Ammonium perchlorate compared to Ammonium nitrate for the fertilizer.

      Is it that we are going to see a fertilizer blowup happen every decade or so from now on because people aren't smart enough to provide sufficient safety measures?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Eerie recollection of AZF, France by tqk · · Score: 1

      ... like match and dynamite.

      Not unless you're Walter Brennan ("Rio Bravo"). Dynamite sans detonator burns like wood.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Eerie recollection of AZF, France by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Dynamite consists of nitroglycerine mixed with stuff that makes it less sensitive to shock. As it ages, the nitroglycerine can seep out and degrade to compounds even more sensitive to shock. Depending on dynamite without a detonator to be safe is ... unwise.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  15. Aint it weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bomb in boston.. Kills a couple ppl. Injures a bunch.
    Country loses its fucking mind and we'll get some new 'security' laws in place etc...

    Industrial explosion kills 100+ from the last i was reading.
    And not one single thing will change. At all. No more industrial controls than we have now. The last time this company got fined for safety violations they paid $3,000. Nothing really.

    I don't get it... If we really have a problem with the whole 'people dying' thing.. Why don't we spend some money on the things that kill the most people..

    But no... We go all nuts over some gun deaths or a bombing.. Ignore the stuff mostly that kills way more.
    When on the larger scale of things... At it's worst only 20,000 a year died from guns back in the 90's... It's gone WAY down since then.

    And yet every year... ~40,000 people will die from aspirin overdose...

    40k is alot more than 20k... Have we ever seen one bit of info or warnings about aspirin? Nope.

    Drunk drivers kill ~10,000 people a year...
    Hell, ~30,000 people a year die on the roads... Have we worked very hard to fix that yet?

    I just don't get it... Our sense of scale is completely fucked up.

    We spend TRILLIONS and take away peoples rights because 'terrorisim'. And yet in a single year more people die from aspirin than have EVER died from terrorisim in the usa....

    It makes no sense.

    1. Re:Aint it weird... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And yet every year... ~40,000 people will die from aspirin overdose...

      The only cure for that is to make suicide (or extreme stupidity) illegal.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Aint it weird... by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 1

      Industrial explosion kills 100+ from the last i was reading.

      You need to start thinking critically about where you get your information. At this point, there are only two confirmed dead and six missing firefighters (probably also dead, but you never know)

    3. Re:Aint it weird... by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Accidents can be designed out of industrial processes, try looking up Poka-Yoke.

      Defense spending is largely dick waving and vote gathering, I'm not impressed by the utter failure of the war in Afghanistan - the place where the bad guys who took out the twin towers came from.

      The illegal war on Iraq at least bought you some cheap oil which has little to do with any deliberate response to violence.

      I think you need to look a bit closer at what all that "defense" is actually doing before making claims about it.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    4. Re:Aint it weird... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Yeh, it's 5-15 now and it sounds like a good chunk are emergency service personnel.

      Though one source says it's still early and those numbers might spike to 60-70. But that's just guessing a this point and guesses sometimes do more harm than good during a disaster

    5. Re:Aint it weird... by Khyber · · Score: 2

      You should speak for yourself. More than 10 are dead and almost 200 wounded.

      Including one of my friends, whose family called to tell me he died in that explosion, as he was one of the volunteer firefighters.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Aint it weird... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm very sorry for the loss of your friend. :(

    7. Re:Aint it weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. You started off saying 100+ killed.
      Someone called you on that number.
      Your reply was to to say "more than 10 are dead" -- that's not quite the same as "100+", so I think he was right in calling you on it.

      The fact that you are emotionally invested in this doesn't give your numbers more authority.

    8. Re:Aint it weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should take a look at just how much oil we get from Iraq before telling other people to look a bit closer at their claims.

    9. Re:Aint it weird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accidents can be designed out of industrial processes, try looking up Poka-Yoke.

      You show me a Japanese term related to safety or preventing mistakes and I'll show you a Japanese beach full of melted reactor cores.

      what all that "defense" is actually doing

      Your whinging about the (mis)use our military in Iraq etc. is actually orthogonal to my `claims.' It's possible for neocons to abuse military power while you are simultaneously a doe-eyed malcontent, unable to distinguish between `dick waving' and the reason you aren't someone's thrall, as were all but the most recent of your ancestors back to the dawn of civilization.

    10. Re:Aint it weird... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Uh, *I* never said 100+ killed. You'd better learn how to read user names and which post is attached to them.

      Oh, wait, Anonymous Coward. Probably still in middle school.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Aint it weird... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      ~30,000 people a year die on the roads... Have we worked very hard to fix that yet?

      That statement is just ignorant. Do some reading about automobile design, road design, driver training and licensing, etc.. There are people who spend their whole working lives on nothing but this stuff.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:Aint it weird... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The risk of accidents can be reduced, it can never be eliminated.

      You need to do more detailed research into the nature of defense. During the cold war, USSR aircraft challenging US borders was a DAILY occurrence. Failing to respond would have eventually led to a shooting war. North Korea figuratively dances on land mines regularly, trying to find a weak place to exploit. Multiple bombs daily is routine for countries around Israel.

      This is not a game. The US has made some bad decisions about where to fight and worse decisions about how to fight, but the failure to fight when necessary is catastrophic.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  16. In the aftermath of Boston by mnt · · Score: 0

    every Explosion seems to be IT News.

  17. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possible comment from CNN.com: "WTF is it with all these tech related stories. CNN has completely gone down the shitter since Ted handed the reigns over. Fucking rounded corners, who gives a fuck when fertilizer plants are exploding and ricin is sent to US pols and we're supposed to give a fuck about Whobuntu or whatever the fuck. Fuck."

  18. Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disasters by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here, listing 24 previous disasters, the largest of which was also in Texas. You'd think they, of all places, would know to keep large quantities of ammonium nitrate away from population centers (or vice versa).

    Scarily, some of those disasters were from when a large quantity of ammonium nitrate powder had solidified and people tried to break it up with explosives.

    The news reports I'm seeing don't actually say it was an ammonium nitrate explosion in this case, although it seems a reasonable supposition.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  19. Re:Bah by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Me neither, but this one is about an explosion.

  20. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm kind of surprised this one hasn't been blamed on muslims as well.

  21. crisis mapping by richlv · · Score: 1

    this event was about mismanaging a facility (most likely), so there is a technical angle.
    also, openstreetmap volunteers are mapping that region already - give a hand :)
    http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=31.80806&lon=-97.09316&zoom=16&layers=M

    --
    Rich
  22. Ya, happens all too often by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quite often when you see something, even something not particularly dangerous but more annoying like an airport, that is in a populated area and say "Why the hell didn't they build it out in the middle of nowhere?" the answer is often that they did. When they built it, there was nothing around, but things grew up around it, or grew nearer and nearer to it.

    You watch an area over a couple decades and it can go from "a whole lot of nothing" to "very developed".

    1. Re:Ya, happens all too often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet, still to happen in the US Congress.

    2. Re:Ya, happens all too often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Comment heard on a tourist plane from New York approaching Heathrow, London:

      "Hey, honey, look down there. It's Windsor Castle!"
      " Sure is. Gee, I wonder why they built it so close to the airport....."

    3. Re:Ya, happens all too often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days, when quite a bit of science fiction from 2 decades ago is available on everyone's desk - just use Google Earth to look at historical imagery to see for yourself. On a flatscreen straight from Star Trek ;)

    4. Re:Ya, happens all too often by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Quite often when you see something, even something not particularly dangerous but more annoying like an airport, that is in a populated area and say "Why the hell didn't they build it out in the middle of nowhere?" the answer is often that they did. When they built it, there was nothing around, but things grew up around it, or grew nearer and nearer to it.

      Yet, still to happen in the US Congress.

      That wouldn't happen naturally, so they planned a city (D.C.) to be built for that purpose.

    5. Re:Ya, happens all too often by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is zoning: Zone the area around the airport, fertilizer factory, etc. to be agricultural. Never allow anything but farm fields to be there.

    6. Re:Ya, happens all too often by yabos · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then you have the idiots that move close to the airport or whatever and complain about the noise. Well don't bloody well move somewhere near an airport if you don't want to hear the jets!!!

  23. This is nerd-worthy news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get this type of news from the mainstream outlets already.

    1. Re:This is nerd-worthy news? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I get this type of news from the mainstream outlets already.

      Slashdot will sometimes post big disaster-level news. The tagline USED to read: news for nerds and stuff that matters. Large explosions like this matter, added to that being so near a supposed terrorist attack in Boston.

      During 9/11 Slashdot was one of the few news sites able to handle the strain of panicked masses trying to find out info. CNN and the others went down but Slashdot was able to stay up and post news updates they were able to get about w t f was going on.

      Besides: if you want to whine... it is nerd-worthy news. You're talking about chemical reactions between Fertilizer and whatever else caused it. Which intrigues the chemistry nerds and informs others since somehow some people still don't realize how volatile fertilizer is. You have the whole safety/technology issue if it turns out this was an accident, with people chiming in about the cause one its known. Etc.

  24. Huge explosion in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up to 25 cents of damage may have been caused!

  25. Re:Bah by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    (except yours)

    I can see it now, in the CNN comments section: "wtf, what's up with all of these non-tech stories on slashdot"

    And the conversation might evolve something like this:
    CNN Commenter A: "Wtf, what's up with all of these non-tech stories on slashdot"
    CNN Commenter B: "Wtf, is Slashdot?"
    CNN Commenter A: "It's a gossip forum where cellar-dwelling nerds go to whine about things when they get tired of adding to the summit of 'Tissue Mountain'."

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  26. Fertilizer Plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the real news that it was one located OUTSIDE Washington, D.C.?

  27. Yay by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    A fertilizer plant is being built in my little burg right now.

    In the middle of one of the poorest and not exactly lilly white neighborhoods, of course.

    1. Re:Yay by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      My family descends from a family farm, where they have received notice that a flour mill is being built nearby. My question for my father was "when that thing explodes, is the farm going to get a nice insurance settlement?"

      Not if... when.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:Yay by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest you petition that a 15-20' high dirt berm be built around the facility. That way if an disaster happens that causes an explosion it will be directed above mostly above the area around it.

  28. I know it's old but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can we finally say "that shit has hit the fan" in Texas ?

  29. Re:Bah by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Informative

    People will never agree about what constitutes news for nerds, but the following should be pretty much common ground:

    * Things that go beep.
    * Things that go boom.

  30. Phone Video Up on Youtube Already by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was detected by seismic networks. Note that the most common reason for "earthquakes" at zero depth is a quarry explosion, so that's how they initially labeled it. They've since changed it to read simply "Explosion". Click the "did you feel it link" and you can see that some people felt it as if it were an earthquake. Strangely, they are north of the event. Either the waves propogated that way, or people south of the event saw the cloud and realized it was an explosion not a quake.

    Here is how it looked dangerously close (warning, the people taking this video were way too close so if you can't stomach listening to young girl in complete fear, don't watch that video all the way through) I'm guessing and hoping those people are okay being that the video is on YouTube.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Phone Video Up on Youtube Already by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Here is how it looked dangerously close (warning, the people taking this video were way too close so if you can't stomach listening to young girl in complete fear, don't watch that video all the way through) I'm guessing and hoping those people are okay being that the video is on YouTube.

      They were mostly OK. One of them got a flash burn, one got some broken ribs, otherwise they had some cuts and bruises, but survived the experience.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    2. Re:Phone Video Up on Youtube Already by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      YouTube won't work, but if it's a little girl asking her dad to get them out of there, they are alive. Though, people shouldn't get near a burning fertilizer plant, especially with a kid. Several people thought they knew better and they have the.bits of shrapnel and many minor facial lacerations to show otherwise.

  31. Re:Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disast by arielCo · · Score: 1

    Scarily, some of those disasters were from when a large quantity of ammonium nitrate powder had solidified and people tried to break it up with explosives.

    WHAT??!! Isn't it a bit like "DUH I OVERFILLED THE TANK AGAIN - I'LL JUST BURN OFF A BIT WITH A MATCH" ?

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  32. and this is news for nerds how? by Kildjean · · Score: 1

    I live in Texas, and while tragic and all that, why is this news in slashdot? Why is it news for nerds? Was a computer security issue that caused the explosion? If I want world news i go to CNN or huffington Post, when I come to slashdot is to read news for nerds, stuff that matters.

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:and this is news for nerds how? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Explosions are a traditional nerd interest.

      When I was about 12 I used to make small amounts of explosives in my basement. Of course nowadays that would be grounds for internment, but back then we had a more reasonable society.

    2. Re:and this is news for nerds how? by StormyWeather · · Score: 2

      Chemicals, Reactions, Explosions, Response to those, Causes, Effects, new technologies to stop these problems in the future being discussed?

      What about this is NOT science, technology, and stuff that matters?

  33. Immediately before the explosion ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... there was some flame visible on the left edge of the image. I would not call this a reflection since the main fire (as seen in that video) had not exploded, yet. Some kind of trigger?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  34. Re:Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disast by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    The problem with economic growth, is that something like a $500M fertilizer plant brings lots of jobs. The people that work those jobs don't like driving 30 miles each way to get to work, so the town that used to be at a safe distance from the half-billion dollar industrial site grows towards it. Then the thing blows up and everyone asks "Why wasn't it in the middle of nowhere?"

    It probably was when it was built 20 years ago.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  35. Thank God it Is in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a liberal East Coast Elite, I whole hartedly approve of this senseless loss of life. All Texans are prejudiced and therefore have no human rights. A loss of life only means something if it happens on the East (the best) Coast.

    Seriously though we do need to get a hand on this fertilizer situation. I propose that we ban the sale of matches, fertilizer, and hammers to all people living outside the state of NY. See people outside my great state are not truly human, and definately can not be trusted with anything potentially dangerous (to New Yorkers).

    -

  36. Was this a SCADA infrastructure attack? by tbonefrog · · Score: 1

    Granted, it COULD be an accident or a non-cyber insider attack.

    If it was not, would there be any evidence left? Could someone out there start looking?

    Are we still checking the parts for cargo containers from N. Korea, which may be radioactive and/or ticking?

    Or did we get distracted by the pressure cooker bomb?

    Or were we distracted by the argument over whether they could put a nuke on a missile?

  37. wait a minute by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Fertilizer by itself doesn't tend to explode. If you have a nitrate-heavy fertilizer that's the oxygen source but if you want to make it explosive, you typically add carbon (charcoal or coal) and sulfur. I'm preeeeetty sure OSHA or whatever doesn't let those 2 be stored next to each other. So I'm really wondering how this would blow up. The last 2 major explosions I can think of were a propane storage facility and a rocket fuel manufacturing plant so those made sense. Fertilizer, not so much. They must have epically mixed up what was stored where or something.

    1. Re:wait a minute by DCFusor · · Score: 1
      Ammonium nitrate can detonate all by itself. Look at the chemical formula. NH3NO3. When the nitrate breaks up, you get nitrogen (which becomes N2 with release of energy), oxygen. Ammonia is flammable, and when it breaks up, you get H - which burns with the O, and N, which becomes N2 again, also with a release of energy.
      .

      Sure, it's easier to make ammonium nitrate into a bomb if you add a fuel or sensitizer (see tannerite, or ANFO) but it's not required if you hit the stuff hard enough.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  38. Insurance by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    My father in law was an insurance inspector for Lloyds.

    He inspected ships carrying guano from Chile to Europe. Guano of course is what was used prior to the Haber process being commercialized.

    The need for an inspector became pretty obvious after some of these ships disappeared en route. No warning. One day everything was fine, the next no contact.

    The insurance company was more worried about the ships going up in port - much more liability.

    The largest industrial accident in US history was a nitrate ship explosion killing 581 people.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Disaster

  39. Easy way to fix this (sortof) by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    What you do is jigger the tables the insurance companies use so that "within Blast Zone of Industrial Building" is something they can charge a Rider for. Within a few years the problem will solve itself.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  40. The Wit and Wisdom of the Texas Governor by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    "We need to stop apologizing for celebrating life."
    "We need to stop apologizing for wanting to protect an individual's right to build a business."

  41. Distill it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a toxin. Most vegetables contain ~ .1% fluoride normally. Also, dental caries are so much of a pandemic that people think it's normal to have them. This is wrong beyond description.

    The idea of having tap water be free of "contaminants" is just delusional. It's not distilled or deionized, and it's not ever going to be. You're probably skipping some necessary trace minerals that way too.

    Lastly, if you're going to label trace quantities of fluoride as "contaminants", be prepared to show that it is harmful. I can't guarantee a Nobel for that trick, but it will be a career-making discovery. I personally look forward to reading your paper.

    1. Re:Distill it yourself by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      It's not a toxin. Most vegetables contain ~ .1% fluoride normally.

      You mean I get it in my food anyways? So why add it to water, again?

      Perhaps I should ask it this way; would you like it if the government simply required you to eat your vegetables daily "for your health?" Why not do that instead of putting it into the water?

      I'm not advocating one of those "precious bodily fluids" conspiracies at all. I just think it's ridiculous. We'd be very upset if the government required us to take fluoride capsules or something, but we're okay with them just putting in the water (which most people in the city are more or less required to use, you can't just dig a well in your apartment's common area... yes, you could buy bottled water, but that's economically and environmentally pretty stupid, isn't it?)

  42. Elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been a lot of accusations against federal authorities performing inside false flag attacks. If anything like this or any of the shootings happen again, then all federal authorities need to be considdered suspects, and excluded from the investigation, and prevented from being on the site.

    If anybody gets a chance to ask local government or local investigators, ask them why they continue to allow federal authorities to access the data and crime sceens.

  43. The difference is... by iceaxe · · Score: 1

    Nobody is making money off of terrorism and mass murder (except perhaps "news" outlets and businesses selling unnecessary things to frightened people?) so we can't accept that, but if someone is in business, a few corpses are just the price of getting rich. Welcome to the plutocracy.

    (Note to the sarcastically challenged: I agree with the anonymous parent poster's sentiments.)

    --
    WALSTIB!
  44. FERTILIZER!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

    The shit just hit the wall!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  45. Unknown Cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The cause of the explosion is not precisely known, but *the plant was on fire beforehand.*

    I'll bet it was a cruise missile.

  46. Finally! The world will know your true identity! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    If one were to remove first two and the last three letters from the first word in your nick, and last two and first three from the other, your nick would show that you are actually a "man g".

    A G-MAN!

    And when we jumble those letters around we get SHARIAH and the international symbol for frowning/sadness - TwT.

    Ha! Your days as a government/Taliban double agent provocateur/griever are coming to their well deserved end!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  47. What's a single letter among friends? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Osama... Obama...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  48. It was probably a chemical reaction by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    From what I've read of reports (caveat emptor), the fire started near an anhydrous ammonia tank. OK, bad, but from early reports it seems to have been worse.

    Reportedly, there was a rail-car tanker full of fuming nitric acid nearby. A clear safety violation, but anyways...

    Anhydrous ammonia is a strong base. It also, like any water-soluble chemical, has a certain heat of solution, in this case generating heat. So, spraying water on a fire that involves leaking anhydrous ammonia will generate more heat. Not good, but it gets worse. Apparently, from preliminary reports, there was a rail-car tanker full of fuming nitric acid nearby. That is a no-no, because fuming nitric is a strong acid. Aside from the heat of solution, strong acids react strongly with strong bases, often generating lost of heat, and gaseous byproducts such as hydrogen gas. And, oh, furthermore, fuming nitric acid is also a strong oxidizer.

    To sum up this early-reported scenario, which may or may not be the full story: Anhydrous ammonia (NH3) was stored in close proximity with fuming nitric acid (HNO3). There was a fire of some sort. First-responders sprayed water onto this fire. What may have happened next was that the fire got the ammonia hot enough to possibly dissociate and produce H2, or perhaps the vessel just leaked. The heat of the fire eventually ruptured the nearby tanker car of fuming nitric acid, thus releasing it. Aside from the heat of solution, the ammonia and nitric acid could have come into contact. Strong base + strong acid = heat, hydrogen gas, and unhappy things. Add to that the strong oxidizing capability of fuming nitric acid, and you have: fuel + oxidizer + heat = BOOM.

    That's just one possible chemical scenario that could have led to this tragedy.

    The plant should have had very firm procedures for dealing with fires, separating reactive pairs of chemicals, and for dealing with leaks of the various chemicals that they stored in large containers. It seems, from these early reports, that they did not.

  49. Re:Finally! The world will know your true identity by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    So many competing interests! Tiiiime to chooooose...

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  50. Did they find a.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saudi national near the plant? Then they probably should take him for interrogation.

  51. Re:Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a thing called urban planning which helps you avoid that.

  52. Nice reference. by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I'm speechless.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Nice reference. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I would've dug up a more subtle one if I wasn't behind on a paper today. Alas.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  53. Well... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    behind on a paper today.

    You're clearly not wasting enough time on Slashdot for something like that. You're barely in the "dishes need washing" category.

    Wasting time on Slashdot instead of pursuing academic achievements requires a proper argument with several participants, neither side willing to yield or compromise.
    With lengthy explanations and quotes and links to external sources.

    Anyone can merely wait until the time runs out.
    On Slashdot we weave our precious time and intellectual resources into elaborate sculptures of words which we then proudly present to the entire world.
    "See this? THIS is what I actually did when I was supposed to be doing that other thing! Behold its terrible glory!"

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Well... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, I haven't gotten into one of those... since Monday.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  54. Segue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next, on Mythbusters...

  55. :3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :3

  56. I am going to go out on a limb here by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    And suggest that the explosion was likely caused by this aforementioned fire.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  57. The rich bastards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no rich bastard here to blame. There is one old guy who has lived there all his life and happens to own one of the businesses in town. It's not a giant mega-corporation here, it's simply a family business and an industrial accident. EPA profile of the site in question:

    http://iaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_detail.disp_program_facility?p_registry_id=110038267452

  58. Re:Wikipedia has a page of ammonium nitrate disast by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Except that most "urban planners" are too busy spending money to try and get people out of their cars, instead of actually planning anything urban.

    Streetcars and bioswales don't prevent this.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.