In Canada, a Government-Backed Electronic Currency
An anonymous reader writes "Secure chips have already made it into our credit and debit cards. Next up, they could replace pocket change.The Royal Canadian Mint has been pushing forward with its "MintChip" prototype, a digital cash replacement aimed at transactions under $10, since it surfaced a year ago. The Crown corporation is factoring in developer feedback, hiring a product manager and consulting with the financial sector."
My credit card works fine on transactions below $10.
Where exactly is the need for this?
Wait do you guys have anything to do with the Mintchip or something? Or does it have something to do with Linux? I'm a bit confused as to what you're asking of us.
It looks like a linuxgerian scam...
This is a copypasta troll.
He spams this shit in many stories everyday.
Not sure why.
Let me fast forward this a bit because MintChip was discussed on the bitcoin forums months ago. It's bullshit. It's set up completely wrong. It's horribly insecure. It's like a spy-on-you version of bitcoin. Even the encryption style was massively flawed from what I heard. It's absolute, utter crap.
Sounds a lot like the now pretty much dead "ChipKnip" scheme we had in the Netherlands. It wasn't practical; it died.
credit cards have been digital currency for decades, wallstreet doesnt trade in physical bonds or stocks anymore, theives steal credit cards more than cash, and the concept of a 'processing fee' in an era of such ubiquitous computing is absurd. the easiest way to digital currency is to use the system in place and be gone with visa and mastercard endorsed 'debit' cards.
Good people go to bed earlier.
Function PrintMoney(Currency money) As Currency
SendMoneyToCheatch(money)
PrintMoney = money
End Function
the end game will be cashless society so banks and the government in their pockets get a piece of any action. If government labels you a "terrorist", your ability to buy, hold money and sell gets instantly revoked. convenient way to make everyone in an area come in for "questioning" just to get their "privileges" back
A technique for delivering an already established currency is what I'm reading. Still pretty cool nonetheless.
Commence the subcutaneous microchipping!
You have to have a cash register, clerk, physical visit to bank, tabulation, possibly armoured service.
Would the servers that handle transactions run Linux Mint? Okay, I'm sorry; it had to be done sooner or later.
We already have electronic money, it's called a debit card
And they require a bank account, require the receiver to have a merchant account of some kind, and often have high transaction fees for small payments.
we have the Octopus card in Hong Kong which works for convenience stores, subway and other transportation fees, and some retailers like Starbucks or our local supermarkets. it can only be topped up to 500HKD($64.43USD) at any convenience store or subway station and is anonymous. it uses an RFID chip, so it doesn't need swiping, just place close to the machine will charge the card. same goes for Japan's Suica card, which was only for Tokyo before but has just gone national. having an electronic currency card is wonderful, instead of having to pocket so much change for those times u need to use the payphone or pay for a one time bus ticket or buy something from a vending machine. and it's not attached to my credit or debit card, so i can hand it to a relative or friend when they visit me in Hong Kong, or i can buy a Suica card in Japan and use it just for the duration of the trip without worrying about daily exchange rates.
After trying to get them to support Linux and even offering to do the development to get it to work with Linux they informed me that the hardware requires a binary blob and that Linux would never be supported.
Some other developer also found an easy way to pull money off the chip without permission using a bit javascript and I wasn't too impressed with the design and security.
There's a hard limit (1000?) transactions per chip so once you go over you need a new chip. I found that quite odd but maybe that's the limit to the amount of transactions this "anonymous" cash system can hold.
Listen to my music.
He who controls the databases, controls everything .
âoeToday, people obviously use coins. They use bits of metal and bits of paper. "
Really? I doubt it. I for one hardly ever even carry cash. I always just use my debit card.
I honestly dont see the difference between this and a debit card as this system still uses a "broker" in the middle that knows the value of your account. other than this is more limited in its use (to $10).
Only If they came up with a way to eliminate the need for an account with the man in the middle then it would be a replacement for cash.
A government run, patented, closed source electronic currency = do not want.
Mondex was released before that, and was more sophisticated in that it allowed card to card transactions. This too was trialled in multiple locations.
Both have disappeared pretty much without a trace, usurped by credit/debit card payments - either contactless, or pin-free transactions - or other mobile based payment schemes. I still have the full visa cash specifications somewhere (runs to 5 very fat a4 binders), and the MasterCard Chip Vendor Services program award is used as a paperweight on my in tray...
Nice idea, shame about the implementation reality.
Not hardly, this site even had a story with the title "Smartphone Used To Scan Data From Chip-Enabled Credit Cards". There is also the Cambridge chip and PIN attack from 2010. It's all just a matter of time before getting your Credit Card defunded becomes widespread. It never ceases to amaze me at the amount of people so ignorant as to put their entire trust and own life in the hands of Technology; when Technology has proven to us it's unreliable nature.
If it's government controlled or directly backed by USD, what's the advantage vs. a debit card?
If it was run by a private entity and backed by PMs, how would it avoid the same sort of government crackdown that we saw with e-gold or the liberty dollar?
The banker government is very jealous of its debt-based money monopoly. They won't hesitate to use violence against anyone who might provide an alternative. If Bitcoin operated under centralized control, they would have sent in the armed goons and shut it down already.
You trust the US Dollar? You are dumber than I thought. Gold on the other hand is way better. Perhaps you are not quite so stupid.... I am feeling conflicted now. Shit.
Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
I'm fed up with banks, Paypal, Interac, and other middlemen taking a cut of every transaction. My governments have a legal right and a need to tax us but I didn't sign up for a 3% premium on all goods just to benefit the banks. I don't particularly trust my government but I don't distrust them as much as banks and other commercial enterprises.
Shoes, tyres, etc already have them. Walmart love them for stock control - which means one in each carton at least, and then one each on high ticket items. They've experimented with pickup loops on the shelf, tracking stock in real-time. They've run commercials showing a man billed for all the items in his pockets via RFID - not showing their hand much...
In a same way that a bank employee can spend your cash anonymously I imagine.
My grocery store does not take credit cards.
There is no reason for money to be based on anything tangible, and if you are going to do it, gold is a damnfool thing to use.
Climate Progress - Hell and High Water
Many have mentioned, good reasons already. Such as the fees that are changed, the percentage that VISA/MC/etc... all charge, which is all passed on to customer, peer-to-peer transactions, etc...
The real reason is of course control, or lack of it. Pretty much all "electronic" currency right now is handled in 2 forms. Debit, which is governed by "Interact", and Credit Cards, which for all intents and purposes are VISA/MC. That is a lot of power consolidated into 3 groups, that are not "national" or at least not "national Canada". Given their recent actions against Wikileaks, one might argue they are "national US". Who at the whim of a national government decided to eliminate their services from an individual, who not only isn't, of that nation, but also wasn't physically in that nation, nor actually changed by anyone associated with that.
Anyway, one could argue that Mint is a POS, and given that the Canadian Mint is behind it maybe it is. However I think there is a very easy reason for it. Also the other electronic transactions, are exactly that, transactions, whereby various currencies may be used and exchanged (at high fees), where as the idea behind mint is that it is an actual currency... perhaps, I haven't really looked into it all that much to be honest.
Horrible idea.
I'd rather be killed than use this.
It's my understanding that the only reason that the Canadian government ever started dealing with the private banks at all for their finances instead of the Bank of Canada, as they did before 1975 or so, is because when the government switched its fiscal policies to operate on a large annual deficit that they weren't ever really going to pay back, the Bank of Canada told them that wasn't acceptable, so the government started dealing with private banks instead.
So by my understanding, we need the government to return to its old fiscal policies of actually paying back the money that it borrows. If they did that, the BoC could lend them the money to pay back the private banks at a nominal interest rate (far below what the private banks charge), and the government could then pay back the BoC over a period of time, where the money is reinvested into our economy.
The real trick, of course, is convincing the Canadian government that they should actually try operating on a budget that doesn't involve borrowing more money than they can actually pay back in a manageable period of time.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Digital "change" was introduced in Sweden about 14 years ago. It didn't take off, mostly (as far as I understand - and this includes personal experience) because it was cumbersome to work out how much change you had.
Without a display on the card it meant either finding your personal reader (I still have mine somewhere), or a store where you could check. This lack of convenience was the deciding factor. Sure, it didn't have the wave-or-tap ability (it was good old-fashioned swipe), and card-to-card wasn't available, but those I never had a need for. Quickly checking whether I had enough "change" to go and grab a quick snack, I most definitely had. Unless this new system solves the display issue, I don't see this going very far. TFA doesn't seem to mention this aspect at all, so I'm going to guess they haven't addressed it.
Do I trust the USD to be as useful next week and next month as it is today, plus or minus a margin of acceptable error? In other words, can I expect to use the dollar I receive today to buy groceries next week and pay the electricity bill next month without the value eroding a lot? Except for filling my gas tank and a few other high-price-swing purchases I routinely make, pretty much.
Do I trust it to be useful within an acceptable "99.9% confidence" upper bound on how much it will lose to inflation 1, 5, or 10 years from now? Yes.
Now, do I trust it to be around for my great-grandchildren, or to survive an "economy-ending event" like a revolution, war against an ally capable of defeating us, or natural disaster like the could-happen-any-time-in-the-next-million-years Yellowstone Supervolcano eruption? My confidence is much lower here.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Well, unlike unopened packages of cigarettes, gold doesn't lose its value in the rain.
On the other hand, you can't smoke gold. Cigarettes and (for the anti-USD cynics out there) USD$100 bills, on the other hand ...
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
France has Moneo. Is this the same kind of beast?
The Netherlands has had a similar scheme ('Chipknip', or chip wallet) since 1996, and is now in the middle of phasing it out. Reasons to cancel it include insufficient popularity (people use their debit card instead) and high costs to convert the current (NL-only) system to European standards. Its popularity wasn't helped by a botched introduction of two competing systems in 1996, which was later followed by a merger.
I've used it mainly to pay for parking (parking ticket machines included Chipknip but no debit card facilities). It's convenient, but very insecure (no authentication via PIN or somesuch), so it was only suitable for storing small amounts of money. Still, it virtually eliminated the need to carry cash.