Slashdot Mirror


Florida Teen Expelled and Arrested For Science Experiment

First time accepted submitter ruhri writes "A 16 year-old girl in Florida not only has been expelled from her high school but also is being charged as an adult with a felony after replicating the classic toilet-bowl cleaner and aluminum foil experiment. This has quite a number of scientists and science educators up in arms. The fact that she's African American and that the same assistant state attorney has decided not to charge a white teenager who accidentally killed his brother with a BB gun has some thinking whether this is a case of doing science while black."

185 of 1,078 comments (clear)

  1. Playing the race card again by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There we go, playing the race card. Sigh. What does a kid with a BB gun have to do with this? Nothing, but it "creates the narrative". We all know what the narrative is, race race race. It's always first on the list and it always gets shoehorned in even if it doesn't belong. Everyone sees it but due to the mainstream media's gatekeeper role nobody can talk back. This is why Americans distrust the media, with 60% saying they have little or no trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Playing the race card again by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could have responded without turning this into race rant yourself.

    2. Re:Playing the race card again by martas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does a kid with a BB gun have to do with this? Nothing, but it "creates the narrative".

      Funny, if you drop the quotes, instead of "creating a narrative", the BB gun story actually creates a narrative. Namely a narrative where an ADA is out for blood in one instance of possibly reckless behavior from a child that didn't cause anybody any harm, but ignored another instance of possibly reckless behavior from a child that resulted in the loss of life. Whether this has anything to do with race is of secondary importance. The primary issue is the apparent lack of consistency in the severity of prosecution from this ADA.

    3. Re:Playing the race card again by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There we go, playing the race card.

      Um yeah? That's the whole fucking point.

      If you look at any of the myriad statistics linked from the articles the system is incredibly, systematically racist.

      What does a kid with a BB gun have to do with this?

      Because the DA was the same. Apparently that was a tragic accident but this is a serious felony.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:Playing the race card again by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Proportionality. That's what the kid with a BB gun has to do with this. An accidental death caused by a white boy gets no punishment. An accidental chemical hazard that kills no one, but is caused by a black girl gets charged with felonies. That's disproportionate. What exactly is the non-racist explanation for that lack of proportionality?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Playing the race card again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you look at any of the myriad statistics linked from the articles the system is incredibly, systematically racist.

      Or African-Americans have a shared culture that glorifies violence and celebrates street crime/being a thug, causing them to commit more violent crimes. Most human beings of any color have difficulty resisting the influence of a poisonous culture. The silly, stupid, moronic War on Some Drugs is where nearly all of the arrests of non-violent people are coming from.

      Because the DA was the same. Apparently that was a tragic accident but this is a serious felony.

      This should go nowhere because there was no criminal intent. This student did not intend to damage anything or hurt anyone. Far as I know, nothing was damaged and no one was hurt. If we are going to have Prohibition against "unauthorized chemical reactions" just like we do against "altering your consciousness in unauthorized ways" then let's call it what it is.

    6. Re:Playing the race card again by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I used to dismiss things like "driving while black" until, after a fracas about one such incident in New Jersey, several NJ state troopers came forward and said that it was "unofficial" policy. It's also been statistically documented. If I knew I was more likely to get pulled over because of the color of my skin, I'd be damn resentful for the rest of my life. Want an ever better example? Check out the racial stats on Mayor-for-life "Bill of Rights No Longer Applies" Bloomberg's stop and frisk police state program. Also, given how absurd the government's reaction is, I don't blame anyone for playing the race card or using any other trick to do something about this. I thought it was a temporary suspension, which is no big deal, but apparently she "will be forced to complete her diploma through an expulsion program". WTF? Given the absurdity of "zero tolerance" (aka "zero brains") policies, the principal may have little choice. He did say she meant no harm. But being charged with a felony? WTF? Nobody was hurt. Nobody was likely to be hurt. Schoolyard fights have bigger physical consequences. Since the state has prosecutorial discretion, forget any nonsense about them not having any choice. If I'd been prosecuted this way for some of the "experiments" my brothers and I did as teenagers, I'd be doing life.

    7. Re:Playing the race card again by thewolfkin · · Score: 2

      Or African-Americans have a shared culture that glorifies violence and celebrates street crime/being a thug, causing them to commit more violent crimes. Most human beings of any color have difficulty resisting the influence of a poisonous culture.

      While we appear to be on the same side regarding the instance cited in the article, and since this doesn't appear to have been posted facetiously, I know a lot of people who would disagree with this statement. In the first place where you see a shared culture of violence others would see a shared culture of persecution.

      --
      Just another second banana
    8. Re:Playing the race card again by CaseCrash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Proportionality. That's what the kid with a BB gun has to do with this. An accidental death caused by a white boy gets no punishment. An accidental chemical hazard that kills no one, but is caused by a black girl gets charged with felonies. That's disproportionate. What exactly is the non-racist explanation for that lack of proportionality?

      Maybe they're just sexist?

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
    9. Re:Playing the race card again by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could have responded without turning this into race rant yourself.

      If it's one thing that I've noticed about the US, especially the left and democrats is that they're hung up on race, all race related stuff all the time. And the more racist it is, the better. Because that means ratings! Then again, you guys have groups dedicated to nothing but race, and creating new race issues where someone with an ounce of commonsense would throw up their hands in disgust at an issue.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would say one could easily lead to the other.

      Much like a troubled child does not fear suspension/detention/principals office visits, once you incarcerate enough people a society is no longer going to see that as being outside the norm.

      Via the War on (some) Drugs we have made sure that prison is merely a fact of life for many subcultures and no longer out of the norm or to be feared. The War on these drugs is one of the most racist policies we have, NYCs stop and frisk statistics show this as do prosecution rates. A nice middle class kid in college busted for possession is going to get a stern talking too and maybe a visit from the police, a poor kid relaxing after work is going to jail.

    11. Re:Playing the race card again by DudeTheMath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thirty years ago, my high school chemistry teacher taught our (A.P.) class how to make some explosives. What better way to effectively demonstrate exothermic reactions?

      The fact that this nonsense is also occurring in what (IIRC) is the Florida county with the highest teen pregnancy rate is further reinforcement of my belief that, despite all the "STEM! STEM! STEM!" cries, corporate-owned America really wants to keep most people sick and stupid. They've taken a girl who showed some interest and aptitude in real lab science and effectively put her on a welfare track.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    12. Re:Playing the race card again by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      What exactly is the non-racist explanation for that lack of proportionality?

      The BB gun kid was excercising his American right to hold arms; The science student was engaged in an act of Godless, materialist alchemy.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    13. Re:Playing the race card again by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 2

      As usual TFS doesn't really do this justice.

      This wasn't an official science project, she was mixing chemicals outside in the schoolyard. Not in a science fair, not in controlled classroom setting.

      Is it still a gross overreaction, I have to say yes, but lets face it after the last week, anytime something goes boom around a populated area, the person who causes the boom is going to be found guilty until they prove they are innocent. I feel like she should be punished, not expelled, and sure as shouldn't have a felony, but she's under 18, so her record will be sealed, and it won't affect her chances in life. Plus since she has no former history, she'll probably be allowed to plea to a lesser charge and get off with a fine.

    14. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The democrats are a center right party, we have no left party. The US has huge institutionalized race problems. You can simply compare punishments for the same crime meted out by our justice system to prove that.

    15. Re:Playing the race card again by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I'd been prosecuted this way for some of the "experiments" my brothers and I did as teenagers, I'd be doing life.

      No kidding. We'd be under the jail. There used to be a time in this great land of ours when kids could play with things like black powder, acetylene, and sodium and all we'd get is a finger wag by the authorities and maybe have to pay for a trash can we would turn inside out.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    16. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      She is being charged as an adult, so I don't think the records will be sealed. We are thus talking about seriously impairing someones life over mixing a couple cleaning agents in a plastic bottle.

    17. Re:Playing the race card again by martas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The way I interpreted the summary is as follows: "Case A wasn't prosecuted, case B was. Case B was less deserving of prosecution than case A. One difference between the two cases is attribute R, which should not have any bearing on the decision to prosecute, but in practice often does (as is quite well documented). Hence, it is worth questioning whether this is one of the instances where attribute R is incorrectly used to decide matters regarding criminal justice".

      That seems quite reasonable to me.

    18. Re:Playing the race card again by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's only an apparent lack of consistency if you use the two items to create the context in which to judge the responses. Here's the more likely scenario:

      * There was no punishment forthcoming in the accidental shooting case because, after determining that there was no intent involved, and that it was, in fact, accidental, no punishment was deserved. Since there was no possibility of the parents suing themselves for damages, or that affecting the greater population, it got left at that.

      * The incident on school property was punished because A) There was clearly an intent to make the explosion and B) it was on school property. That means lots of children who could potentially have been harmed, and that means lots of parents who could potentially sue the school system. Even if no one got injured, the potential for injury might be enough to have a jury in a civil suit feel that the plaintiff is "entitled" to "damages."

      In that second case, everyone suffers. If the school has to pay out money to one set of irate parents, other suits will likely follow as everyone thinks they need to "get theirs," too. But guess who is on the hook? The school district, funded by property taxes or whatever they use in Florida. Thus, the community is the ones putting up the money to pay out to some jack-ass members of the community who want to take advantage of the situation. Being able to say "Look, no one got hurt but we have dealt with the perpetrator to the fullest extent of the law" goes a long way in staving off civil complaints, or having them be validated by a jury if someone thinks of doing it anyway.

      It's all a CYA move. Does it suck? Yes. is it fair? No. Is life fair? Hell no. But unfortunately, we live in a chicken-shit, overly litigious society where these things happen. My mother is a public school teacher and the district where she teaches has had to deal with things like this in the past. "Science" wasn't involved, but the schools have been sued in the past, and in one incident $5,000,000 was awarded for "negligence" by the administration because two guys were fighting over a girl and one went through a plate glass window. Public schools are strapped enough for cash as it is, and losing $5,000,000 when you're already in budget shortfalls due to declining real estate values (and thus property tax revenue) is tough.

      I would wager anything that was what they were concerned with above anything else.

    19. Re:Playing the race card again by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What does a kid with a BB gun have to do with this? Nothing, but it "creates the narrative".

      Funny, if you drop the quotes, instead of "creating a narrative", the BB gun story actually creates a narrative. Namely a narrative where an ADA is out for blood in one instance of possibly reckless behavior from a child that didn't cause anybody any harm, but ignored another instance of possibly reckless behavior from a child that resulted in the loss of life. Whether this has anything to do with race is of secondary importance. The primary issue is the apparent lack of consistency in the severity of prosecution from this ADA.

      I have an older sister, and she would of gladly shot me in the head with a BB gun growing up. It would of gone well with the other crap she did to her little brother growing up.

      Not saying this girl did it on purpose, but I'm sure I'm not the only person who had a cruel older sibling.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    20. Re:Playing the race card again by mmcxii · · Score: 2

      What exactly is the non-racist explanation for that lack of proportionality?

      Oh, you mean like firearms that count for less than 1% of all firearms deaths being the targets of an aggressive firearm ban? Or a 100% natural drug with a great track record on safe use in the long and short term being prohibited while another drug that is a thousand times more lethal is sold to anyone who can flash an ID to prove that they're over 21? Or being able to watch the real life death of another human on TV while scenes of nudity are strictly forbidden?

      You're seriously looking for logic in our social norms on "proportionality"?

      It's hard to take all the facts from this not being a first party participant and while I wouldn't be surprised to find that race played a role I also would be even less surprised that this has to do with bomb making. Oddly the peanut gallery around here likes to scream and moan when we talk about the lack of real chemistry sets today but now that this same metric is brought into the class room with the potential or a race element it's just racism and nothing else?

      This is the exact type of knee-jerk reaction that is keeping us from solving real social problems.

    21. Re:Playing the race card again by martas · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I buy that as a more likely explanation than racism. In fact, my guess would be that the CYA in this instance is an ADA trying to avoid "you don't care about the safety of our children" allegations, more so than them being worried about a school's budget (though I guess it's possible that they got the directive from higher ups).

    22. Re:Playing the race card again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's even funnier is how you seem to conveniently ignore the fact that one incident was admittedly intentional, while the other was an obvious accident. Intentional acts get prosecuted, especially those that involve dangerous, explosive devices detonated on school grounds. If you take off the blinders, you might actually see the facts.

    23. Re:Playing the race card again by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As much as I want the post to be funny, I'm slowly thinking it might be truth. You just need to look at the esteemed leaders of the House Committee on Science.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    24. Re:Playing the race card again by JWW · · Score: 2

      I would be willing to be that if the BB gun happened at a school, the zero tolerance policies would have pushed the prosecution of that to 11 as well.

      In cases like this the school systems actively encourage overreaction by other authorities to back up their assertions about why these policies are right and necessary.

    25. Re:Playing the race card again by moeinvt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "What exactly is the non-racist explanation"

      1. The incidents have nothing to do with each other
      2. The circumstances are not even remotely similar
      3. One was on school property, the other not
      4. One was apparently an accident while the other was deliberate
      5. People are absolutely paranoid about improvised explosives after the Boston thing

      I completely agree that the kid is getting shafted, but put the damned race cards away.

    26. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right wing dictators the world over and throughout history disagree with you.

    27. Re:Playing the race card again by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The democrats are a center right party, we have no left party.

      Depends on your ideological POV, doesn't it? Consider...

      * From the Limbaugh standpoint, the DNC is a frothing group of neo-marxists out to take down the USA by any means possible.
      * From the MSNBC fan's standpoint, the DNC is a fair-minded champion of tolerance and diversity whose policy set sits far to the right of that found in the EU.

      * From my standpoint, both the DNC and the RNC are a bunch of posturing hypocritical leeches on society who don't give a shit about anything but gaining power, money and control. Their only real difference is in how they each want these things exerted, and on whom, but their goals are the same so long as they are the ones in charge when the dust settles.

      Ideology? Pfft! That's simply the truncheon they use to keep their respective troops in line.

      A pox on both your frickin' houses.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    28. Re:Playing the race card again by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're talking about the school's reaction. The far more egregious issue is charging her with a felony, which is something the school has no say in. This is more about police overreaction and DA's whose only interest is self-aggrandizement. Law, justice, or even sanity be damned. What do you think happened to Aaron Swartz?

    29. Re:Playing the race card again by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      The democrats are a center right party, we have no left party. ... You can simply compare punishments for the same crime meted out by our justice system to prove that.

      Great joke, no really. The democrats in the US are about on par with the liberals here in Canada these days. The liberals are centre-left. Oh and the punishments? You can be left-wing and be a strong authoritarian, just a useful tip.

      As for your other post:

      Right wing dictators the world over and throughout history disagree with you.

      You may want to look up the socialist, revolutionary dictators around the world and throughout history who's main ideas revolve around: Socialism, marxism, and communism.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:Playing the race card again by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The way I interpreted the summary is as follows: "Case A wasn't prosecuted, case B was. Case B was less deserving of prosecution than case A. One difference between the two cases is attribute R [...]

      (Emphasis mine)

      Therein lies the problem: "One" difference. Thing is, there are likely a whole host of differences in the two cases. I'm not saying that either case should or should not be prosecuted, but I am saying that if the two are going to be compared, then how about including more pertinent contrasts than the blindingly obvious subtext of 'he's white and she's black'? You know, contrasts like circumstance, motive, intent...?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    31. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Canadian liberals have slid right over the last few years.

      But yes, you can be left or right wing and authoritarian or not. Think of them as two axis on a chart.

      I am not familiar with any dictators who actually practiced any of those first two. Do you think the DPRK is a democratic nation?

    32. Re:Playing the race card again by ildon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might as well try to argue that because one child was a boy and the other a girl, that this story is evidence of sexism.

      The more pertinent differences are:
      1. One was an accident and one was intentional.
      2. One will be perceived by the public as involving a bomb and one will be perceived by the public as involving a gun or possibly even a "toy."
      3. There was a recent very public bombing. To fail to prosecute in what could be perceived by the public as a "bombing" case could cause negative political pressure against the DA. Despite the recent public shootings, there are many with a lot of political clout who would see prosecution of a BB gun incident as a move toward stricter gun control and act against it.

      I'd say these factors likely weighed a lot more heavily than either child's race. I may not agree that they should be considered factors, and I find it likely that this case will be thrown out, but I have a feeling that if the children's races were reversed (or the same), the situation would remain identical, except we wouldn't have to listen to idiotic stories about how the DA is "racist."

    33. Re:Playing the race card again by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Troll

      Or it could just be a case of two different prosecutors having different standards, one happening to preside over a white person, one over a black one.

      I've had similar shit happen to me before, and race didn't have anything to do with it. I remember recently hearing about some black dude not being allowed to seat in first class on an airline because he was wearing a hoodie and their dress code forbids that. It just so happened that a white guy came in there wearing a hoodie and he was able to be seated.

      I already know from personal experience that this is the result of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing. I always wear regular clothes to the airport, and usually I save money by buying standby tickets. One of the benefits of standby is that if they run out of coach seats, they put you in first class. On the way there that happened to me, and I just wore regular t-shirt and shorts. On the way back, the same thing happened again, only they said that if I wanted to sit in first class, I had to wear slacks. So I had to go shop around the airport until I could find a pair of slacks. When I was seated, somebody else on the plane was wearing shorts. Yay me.

      Same airline both ways.

      It's just one of those things where sometimes it doesn't end up getting enforced. But one of those times it happens that a black man was enforced and a white man was not? STOP THE PRESSES!

      http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/index.php?topic=33733.50

      Have read at least the first few paragraphs of that, then go to the first page and read some of that. Then recall not long ago that incident where that couple were beaten severely after just passing through a black neighborhood, and the newspaper they worked for chose to not even report it.

      Personally, I don't mind that the media isn't interested in it. If anything, it's a mark against the anti-racist crowd who is willing to look the other way when reverse racism happens, and they know they're asshole fucks for doing so, but it's ok because we already knew they were asshole fucks and nothing has changed.

      But what does piss me off is when they pull the race card needlessly, such as the scenario I described above. It pisses me off when they go out of their way to try to make me feel guilty for being born white. I'm looking at the unfair campaign.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBqWMblu_Ss

      Fuck them. I hope they all go die in a fire and get hit by a bus at the same time.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    34. Re:Playing the race card again by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Canadian liberals have slid right over the last few years.

      Hardly. They've slid more left because of the NDP stealing their voting base.

      I am not familiar with any dictators who actually practiced any of those first two. Do you think the DPRK is a democratic nation?

      You're not familiar with any dictators who've practiced either socialism or marxism? Venezuela doesn't ring any bells I take it, and China pre-1960 either.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    35. Re:Playing the race card again by Stuarticus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever studied the chemistry? The whole point is making explosions on school property.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    36. Re:Playing the race card again by Stuarticus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was it your grammar made her despise you so?

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    37. Re:Playing the race card again by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm probably going to be crucified for this, but I think he has a good point. There's nothing anywhere to indicate that blacks are genetically more prone to violence on any level. There is nothing anywhere to indicate that they are inherently inferior. However one thing that does stand out is black culture in the US. Note how different it is in the US compared to everywhere else in the world.

      First generation or recent generation black Americans tend to be some of the most dignified people I know, and that includes blacks who have served in the military. But the ones who have been here for numerous generations, especially the inner city ones, are more often than not a bunch of douchebags. Many among them literally call having good grades "acting white" and look down upon it.

      Again, the mere fact that they're black doesn't predicate them into being that way. However they themselves are equally guilty of establishing the stereotype that they behold. To blame everything on white people doesn't do anything to fix the problem, not to mention is just an asshole thing to do.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    38. Re:Playing the race card again by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are close. The (D) and (R) parties are working in cahoots to increase tyranny upon the people. They pit group against group, color against color, sex against sex etc. They present you with a false dichotomy of choice and work together to the enslavement of the people.

      Obama isn't worse than Bush, he isn't better either, he is the same, pushing the same agenda. All you have to do is watch what he does, and pay no attention to what he says. This makes it worse than GWB, because the Press/Media is largely in his pocket with a tingling down their legs.

      There are a few (D) and (R) types that are starting to see through the charade being played and are ridiculed for going off the reservation. I just wish people would wake up, but I am afraid it is too late.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    39. Re:Playing the race card again by blueturffan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about interpreting it this way. "Case A wasn't prosecuted, Case B was. At first glance, Case B appears to be less deserving of prosecution than Case A, but Case B took place on school property. In Case B there was clearly intent to create an explosion and given recent high-visibility events involving 1) kids being murdered at a school, and 2) innocent bystanders being killed/maimed by an explosion it is predictable that any explosion at a school will be highly scrutinized. Furthermore, in Case B, the so-called experiment appears to have been done without supervision, permission or any safeguards making the "experiment" excuse seem unlikely. Additionally, schools have published weapons policies and zero-tolerance policies, with mandatory consequences for violation. Had Case B taken place away from school property and/or under controlled conditions, it is extremely unlikely that Case B would have been prosecuted."

      Note the complete absence of Attribute R. Also note that there was no judgment on the merits of the school's policies. As the parent of a student that was suspended for a zero-tolerance policy violation that even the principal thought was ridiculous, I have strong feelings about zero-thought policies, but that's a rant for another day.

    40. Re:Playing the race card again by tmosley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right-left spectrum is a bit one dimensional, don't you think?

      Fact is that both parties in the US are FASCIST, not right wing. There is a very large difference, as at least the right wing allows significant economic freedom.

    41. Re:Playing the race card again by losfromla · · Score: 2

      Chavez was no dictator. A worthless shitbag he was, but that is not what a dictator is.

      He might have been a worthless shitbag from your (USian) perspective but from the perspective of the formerly disenfranchised in his country (the indigenous mainly) and the perspective of his allies, he was honorable and as stand-up guy.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    42. Re:Playing the race card again by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fascism may look like communism and even have similar attributes but they are fundamentally different.

      Calling them the same is ignorance.

      Communism requires that the people own the means of production. Corporatism is essentially the means of production owning the people.

    43. Re:Playing the race card again by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The reason that the US is hung up on race, is because of the appalling history of racism in the US. The only possible argument is about how much of a change for the better there has been.

      To pretend that racism has completely faded away is to ignore reality, however uncomfortable it may make some people feel.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    44. Re:Playing the race card again by losfromla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Embezzling their oil wealth? By taking multinationals mostly out of the trough and using what would have been corporate profit on social programs? I think that you are confusing embezzling the native population with removing predatory companies from taking their customary lion's share of the national wealth. The people elected him and loved him dearly right to the very end. For the most part those who disliked Chavez wanted to go back to the status quo of the rich always getting richer at the expense of both the environment and the poor.
      There are systems that can work well which are not heavily capitalistic. I'm not a huge fan of Castro but, read about their vermicomposting program. I am jealous of them because it sounds like they are building a quite sustainable economy on their island, and probably eat better than the average USA consumer (that is what we are called now, right?). One of the main reasons they are able (forced) to do this is that they aren't "helped" by the agrichemicals that US corporations would love to be able provide them with.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    45. Re:Playing the race card again by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Castro yes, Chavez no.

      Chavez I don't think goes to the level of dictator. He was elected and using elections no worse than many precincts in America stayed in power. He was definitely authoritarian though.

      Yes, I think you're a pretty pathetic dictator if you rely on the democratic will of the people.

      Castro and Cuba are an odd example, because they were basically forced to become paranoid thanks to the US's economic embargo and earlier attempst to overthrow Castro. They are in a similar position to Israel, i.e. with implacable enemies at very close range.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:Playing the race card again by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how about including more pertinent contrasts than the blindingly obvious subtext of 'he's white and she's black'? You know, contrasts like circumstance, motive, intent...?

      So you think that the black girl had deeply sinister motives/intents in highly dubious circumstances, whereas the white kid was self-evidently just involved in some light-hearted play that went wrong?

      There's a word for those sort of assumptions.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    47. Re:Playing the race card again by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or it could just be a case of two different prosecutors having different standards

      RTFA. Same prosecutor in both cases.

    48. Re:Playing the race card again by hondo77 · · Score: 2

      If you mean this story, the "victim" shot the unarmed robber once in the head, eliminating the threat. He then went and got a second gun and pumped five more bullets into the robber while he was on the ground. An Oklahoma jury recommended the life sentence.

      Do you get all your news from soundbites found on conservative blogs or what?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    49. Re:Playing the race card again by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hitler really was a socialist during his rise to power. It wasn't just the party name. As has often been said, had he been killed in a car accident halfway through his reign, he would have been remembered as a great statesman. He led the way in Europe on thinks like minimum wage, social security, universal health care, the whole progressive agenda. He gave the people what they wanted, for as long as there was money to give them.

      You seem to have confused "authoritarian" with "right wing". They're separate axes.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    50. Re:Playing the race card again by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is standard practice. Charge as much as you can possibly get away with and plea bargain down from there.

      In that case, why wasn't the "standard practice" applied to the boy?

    51. Re:Playing the race card again by scot4875 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but your saying the "war on drugs" is "racist" is telling me that drugs usage has a racial component, and that people of that race have a predisposition to using said drugs, based upon their race

      No, that's not what he's saying. He's saying that the *prosecution* of "some" drugs has a predisposition for targeting certain demographics. You've got to be willfully ignorant at this point to not know this fact by now, and to top it off you add a nice little lie on top by constructing a strawman to attack. "nuh uh! ur the racist!" Nicely done.

      Here's a hint: acknowledging statistical facts about a demographic is not the same thing as discrimination against that demographic. Creating policies that target a certain demographic's behavior while ignoring another demographic's similar (but distinct) behavior *is* discriminatory. Going after the reefer while ignoring the tobacco is purely discriminatory.

      And this has fuck all to do with a race's supposed "predisposition" for using a certain drug. That's a bald-faced strawman and you know it.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    52. Re:Playing the race card again by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Thing is, there are likely a whole host of differences in the two cases."

      OK. How about she was a straight A student and he wasn't?

      "You know, contrasts like circumstance, motive, intent...?"

      I'm pretty sure those were covered. For example, she was exploring science and he wasn't. Her motive was to learn; his wasn't. She intended to be better at science; he didn't. As you can clearly see all those other differences point more strongly at a bias, and exploring those things makes it more likely that "she was black and he wasn't" is the big difference that the DA actually cares about.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    53. Re:Playing the race card again by TFAFalcon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can what she did even be classified as an explosion? The reactions seem to be pretty slow and the 'explosion' happens because they are trapped in a small space. So are we also going to charge people who leave bottles of water in freezers with felonies when those bottles 'explode'? What about kids stomping on closed, air filled milk cartons? Just imagine the damage the cap from one of those cartons could do.

    54. Re:Playing the race card again by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Obvious" in what way? The girl said she was expecting some smoke from her chemical reaction, not a (very small) explosion. The boy said he thought the gun wasn't loaded, but admitted to puposely aiming at the other kid's head and pulling the trigger. So what exactly, besides the skin color difference, makes one more "obvious" than the other?

    55. Re:Playing the race card again by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The boy had no intent. It was an ACCIDENTAL shooting.

      And you're not mentioning that the mother and the boyfriend aren't being charged with endangering the life of a child by letting a 10 y.o. and a 13 y.o. shoot BB guns at each other.

      In the real world you need permission to do things that will explode

      But you don't need permission to shoot someone in the head?

    56. Re:Playing the race card again by ppanon · · Score: 2

      Actually, it is Florida so chances are good that the ADA is Republican. If so it's quite possible the ADA decided not to prosecute the boy with the rifle to avoid annoying the NRA by providing a case regarding gun control at a time when the NRA are particularly touchy (gun-shy?) on the subject. The NRA (and their gun manufacturer donors) likes kids being indoctrinated young and doesn't like the risks publicized to its "responsible gun owner" members and the public at large.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  2. Lets not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lets not attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.

    And in this case, I hardly believe its about one being black,although it could play a part, it beingthe us,it seems more a thing about one being gun related and the other science related.

    We all know what many americans hate most.

    1. Re:Lets not by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to believe that too. I really would.

      So explain to me how a white teenager who shoots and kills his brother doesn't deserve to be charged with anything, while the same prosecutor decides that a black teenager who didn't injure anyone needs an adult felony conviction to show her that "there are consequences to actions.".

      Perhaps they aren't being racist on purpose, but that's hardly a consolation to the student. Sufficently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

    2. Re:Lets not by SirGarlon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking of double standards, I think it's rather unfair to jump to the conclusion that the DA charged her because she's black. You'd need to show a history of bias to make an insinuation like that less than libelous. The Huffington Post op-ed makes loud protestations that it's not accusing anyone of anything, which might be enough to avert a libel charge. It does fall far short of decency, though. Mr. Lava makes no attempt to consider other possible differences between the cases of the white boy and the black girl, like the age difference between the kids or the fact that the BB gun accident happened at home and the chemistry accident happened at school.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:Lets not by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Informative

      This girl essentially made an IED.

      If you think mixing toilet cleaner and aluminum foil is essentially making an IED, then you'd be perfect for a modern school's zero-tolerance enforcement officer. Personally I'd go for the potassium permanganate and glycerine experiment, or dropping metallic sodium into water. I suppose they qualify as WMD's.

    4. Re:Lets not by thewolfkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lets not attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity.

      And in this case, I hardly believe its about one being black,although it could play a part, it beingthe us,it seems more a thing about one being gun related and the other science related.

      We all know what many americans hate most.

      While there is a theory for that, it doesn't line up with the statements released. They're specifically citing the dangerous nature of the girls activities and the hallowed ground aspects of a school along with actions need consequences. I'm all for punishing the girl. Having actually read a few of the articles she did something stupid. Detention would be light. A suspension for a few days should be the most she gets in my opinion. Expulsion and charges are extremely overboard and charging her as an adult comes out of nowhere, considering both the lack of malice, the lack of injury, and uprightness of the accused. She didn't run away she was there when they came for her and owned up for her actions. She had support from students, teachers, and the principal directly. If this isn't a case for SOME sort of leniency what is?

      --
      Just another second banana
    5. Re:Lets not by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      She's a kid 'screwing around', same as my friends and I would do as teenagers. Everything's a crime nowadays, and this YouTube video shows what she propably did...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUudTpSvudg

      Makes a "Bang!" noise, that's all. Give her detention for doing it on school grounds, don't let her get a record that'll keep her from getting a future education. She's a smart and curious young person, that's all.

    6. Re:Lets not by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You still aren't explaining, without using race, how one kid who broke the law needs to have the most extreme charges possible filed agasint her, while another who broke a much more serious law (manslaughter) gets nothing.

      The thing I find particularly telling is that nobody involved is arguing that this is just. The argument is that a law was technically broken, so they have no choice but to charge her. So why doesn't that argument apply to both people?

    7. Re:Lets not by BonThomme · · Score: 2

      apparently we need a Constitutional amendment to perform science experiments

    8. Re:Lets not by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also wonder how it is even possible to charge a 16yo as an adult. Those age limits are put in place for a reason - arbitrarily lifting them because some kid did something "exceptionally stupid" makes them worthless.

      And this is really not something that should be punished at all. Other than for doing it on school grounds, presumably without proper supervision and safety measures.

    9. Re:Lets not by martas · · Score: 2

      I'd go for an over-inflated plastic bag and a firm strike from the palm of your hand. If nail clippers can land you in jail, this is Gitmo worthy shit right there.

    10. Re:Lets not by SirGarlon · · Score: 2

      I think there is abundant evidence that the American justice system is biased against blacks. That does not make it OK to say "that individual is biased against blacks" based on two anecdotes.

      Really, the journalists missed an opportunity to discuss what's really important when the spectre of racial bias comes up: what the state (Florida in this case) is doing or failing to do to address bias within its criminal justice system.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    11. Re:Lets not by Nyder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Speaking of double standards, I think it's rather unfair to jump to the conclusion that the DA charged her because she's black. You'd need to show a history of bias to make an insinuation like that less than libelous. The Huffington Post op-ed makes loud protestations that it's not accusing anyone of anything, which might be enough to avert a libel charge. It does fall far short of decency, though. Mr. Lava makes no attempt to consider other possible differences between the cases of the white boy and the black girl, like the age difference between the kids or the fact that the BB gun accident happened at home and the chemistry accident happened at school.

      Actually, I think you are wrong.

      The girl who killed her brother was 13 and she held a gun 6 inches from her brothers head and fire it. Even if it was just an accident, she purposely put a gun (bb gun, but still a gun) to the head of her brother and pulled the trigger. She knew it was a bb gun, she knew it shot bb's. And yet, she still put it to the head of her brother and pulled the trigger.

      You grasp that yet? That girl is not being charged. At 13, she is more then old enough to know better then to put a gun to anyone's head and pull the trigger. I knew better then that when i was 13, shit, I knew better then that when I was 7 (first time i got to play with a bb gun).

      So, we have a case, where a girl purposely put a gun to someones head and killed them, and is not being charged. Then we have this case where a girl does an science experiment on school grounds, made a very small explosion, and she is getting charged as an adult. No one was hurt. She wasn't trying to hurt anyone, she was just repeating a science experiment. Did she do wrong? yes, she should of been supervised, or at least, not on school grounds when she did that.

      So, what is the difference between these 2 stories? 2 young girls, one is 13, and the other is 16. While there is a difference in age, it's not really that much. And it doesn't matter, as both should of known better then to do what they did. So what is the difference? One girl is white and the other is black. And the white girl did a far worse thing, far worse. Even thinking the bb gun was unloaded is no excuse for pointing it at the head of someone, at close range and pulling the trigger.

      So you keep saying there isn't any proof that the charges are racial motivated and those of us who can grasp the obvious will keep discussing them.

      For the record, I am white, and if I was the DA, that white girl would of faced charges (as a kid, not as an adult) and the black girl wouldn't of.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    12. Re:Lets not by tmosley · · Score: 3, Funny

      What odd and medieval country do you live in where murder can only be prosecuted if there is someone to complain about it?

  3. I don't think that this is race related by jessecurry · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't think that this is race related, I think that the punishment is so harsh because everyone is scared of improvised explosive devices after Boston. When I first heard the story it was reported as "An Acid Bomb was Set Off At a Local High School".

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  4. Public schools have morphed into by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jails for the mind. NCLB has ruined education, by far GWB worst piece of policy. That coupled with "zero tolerance" which equates to "no thinking by staff" we are ruining a generation of kids. Teaching to tests, which NCLB does prohibits this kind of "thinking" to experiment.

    I'd have a rap sheet a mile long if I was in school and I only graduated 14y ago. And I didn't even do anything bad!

    1. Re:Public schools have morphed into by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That coupled with "zero tolerance" which equates to "no thinking by staff" we are ruining a generation of kids.

      At least we are teaching them that those with authority and political power are not to be trusted.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Public schools have morphed into by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2

      "Teaching to test"

      It has been the norm of most East Asian countries. I have been there. GWB thinks we need to learn from them, so he just carbon-copy the policy over to here.

    3. Re:Public schools have morphed into by sycodon · · Score: 2

      "Teaching to the test" is a lazy response to standardized curriculum guidelines.

      I was in educational software market for 12 years and probably talked to over 300 schools across my state several times. Schools that simply taught the curriculum never had a problem with the tests. Schools that focused on the tests usually had problems.

      If the test covers Algebra, then teach Algebra and they'll do fine on the tests.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    4. Re:Public schools have morphed into by 1s44c · · Score: 2

      At least we are teaching them that those with authority and political power are not to be trusted.

      You are also teaching that power granted by authority is absolute and beyond question and that using that power to crush people is fine.

  5. Knee Jerk Yoyo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    School authorities in Florida have always been on the retarded side of the coin. Suspending or expelling kids for this kind of thing is really disgusting. God it is depressing. I went to school in Florida and was lucky that most of my teachers were good at their jobs. But those above teachers in the school food chain are some of the worst creeps you could ever imagine.

  6. America has become pussy nation by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 5, Insightful

    America is a bunch of pussies now. Had something like this happened in the 50s-80s..maybe even the 90s, the result would have been a stern reprimand and at most a couple days suspension. This "Daddy" syndrome needs to end. I doubt even the French would freak out the way the school and DA have.

    1. Re:America has become pussy nation by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I suspect if this had happened 20 to 30 years ago, there would not even have been a reprimand for performing the experiment, rather using said experiment (if it was considered a failure), as a learning experience to figure out where the student went wrong.

      At most, I would have been yelled at for not using a fume closet...

      Hell, I went to school in South Africa in the late 80's early 90's.... our science labs had green and black marks all over the ceiling from various "failed" but awesome experiments :)

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    2. Re:America has become pussy nation by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3

      There are props that I made for Video productions I did in high school (87-91) what would have gotten me thrown in jail today.

      I spray painted a plastic water gun black for one production. That in itself would have gotten me expelled, thrown in jail, or worse, but then it didn't even get me in trouble. We ran around the grounds taking video for another production, and who knows what that would have caused.

      In those days I didn't usually feel that school admin. was all that enlightened... but they were wise and patient by today's standards.

    3. Re:America has become pussy nation by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By today's standards: what a waste of time and money. How is that going to help at standardized test time.

      Really... just about every institution needs to be wiped and started again.

    4. Re:America has become pussy nation by JBMcB · · Score: 2

      I went to high school in the 90's and we used to build low-order explosives as class-prescribed experiments. In one class the teacher showed us how to make thermite, and used it to burn through a lump of iron. The last day of class he filled a large balloon with perfect mix of pentane (IIRC) and oxygen. The explosion knocked the light covers off and rattled windows two floors down.

      High school teachers today are wimps.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    5. Re:America has become pussy nation by gstovall · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Shoot. When I was in high school (in the very early 1980s), we made nitroglycerin and nitrogen triiodide as part of chemistry class.

      The instructions for making nitroglycerin were in the high school chemistry text book, and it even helpfully explained how to improve the rate of the reaction for faster production.

      The guys making nitrogen triiodide were doing so in the enclosed vent chamber, and they sternly warned the instructor not to throw open the door. He failed to heed their warnings, and it exploded and burned off his hair and eyebrows. There were no lectures or discipline -- he acknowledged that they had carefully warned him not to be careless.

      What they did with the liquid suspension was rather creative. :) It's basically inert while in suspension, but very unstable when dry. So they took eye droppers and wandered the halls of the school, randomly dropping drops of it on the floor. It dried in time for classes to swich. Lots of little firecracker bangs as people walked down the hallway and activated the dried samples on the floor. :)

      As a junior high student (and high school student), I used to go around the school demonstrating potassium permanganate and glycerin for various classes. It was a great way to get young minds interested in the sciences and fascinated with chemistry.

      Now, all 4 of my children have had high school chemistry (youngest is just now finishing it up). There is NO experimentation or lab work -- they are not allowed to touch any chemicals. The teacher is not even allowed to do the potassium permanganate experiment -- it is deemed too likely to cause students to become terrorists. I'm thoroughly disgusted by what has happened to the educational process in this country.

      My oldest is graduating college in 2 days. Over the last 4 years, he has brought home horror stories about the rigid mindset that he has experienced in the classroom. Nearly all the college instructors (and this is at a large public university) absolutely insist that their perspective be parroted back -- there is zero tolerance for discussion and debate. People with differing beliefs and perceptions are publicly ridiculed and humiliated.

      When I was in college at Texas A&M, my philosophy prof was the faculty advisor for the Gay and Lesbian student association. Despite the fact that he and I shared very few common positions on the topics discussed and written about in class, we got along well. He commended me at the end of the class, saying that I had presented my positions with clarity and precision, and I achieved a high A in his class. Apparently, that experience would be rare now.

  7. Weapon by SJHillman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So now anything that blows up is automatically a weapon? I hope their school buses don't run on gas or diesel engines, then they would have to charge all the bus drivers with bringing weapons to school every day.

    This is almost as stupid as suspending a 7 year old for having a pastry that's vaguely gun-shaped.
    http://www.loweringthebar.net/2013/03/pastry-gun.html

    1. Re:Weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh sure, let the kid have his pastry, then the next thing you know, he's lunging at you with a banana.

  8. Every boy used to do this by yog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was in school, it was basically a full time job for many of us boys to figure out ways to make ever larger and more dramatic explosions happen. We used to fill trash bags full of methane from the lab, seal them with tape, then release them with a lit fuse and watch this huge fireball in the sky (I stopped before the principal took notice, so I didn't get caught:). I mean, kids just do stuff like that.

    The difference today is the zero-tolerance rules in many public schools where even a little 6-year-old boy making a shape of a gun with his hand and going "bang!" at another kid is grounds for suspension.

    As usual, bureaucracy gets it wrong. That girl should be reinstated and an apology should be issued, otherwise she'll be barred for life from many professions (albeit, as a minor theoretically her record is sealed, but in reality she's screwed).

    And racism? That was just an extra little tidbit the OP added to spice things up. Ridiculous.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    1. Re:Every boy used to do this by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She is being tried as an adult, as such, the records will not be sealed. She is unfortunately fucked for life if she is found guilty...

      And I really hope that whatever judge gets this case, tosses it out for stupidity reasons, and bitch slaps the educational establishment for this travesty.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    2. Re:Every boy used to do this by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't count on it...

    3. Re:Every boy used to do this by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2

      She is also in trouble if found not guilty. Good luck getting a job when a background check turns up arrests/charges.

      Hopefully she never needs to get a job with a security clearance. The wording for some of the questions has changed to 'have you ever' rather than 'in the last 7 years, have you ever'.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  9. What science? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was this really a science experiment? She was mixing household chemicals in a plastic bottle on school property. It had nothing to do with her science class. It's more likely she got this stuff out of the janitor's closet or something like that. It sounds more like a kid being stupid rather than one experimenting.

    Not that I agree with the penalty in any way. Detention or suspension would be ok here since no real harm came from it. It doesn't merit police involvement, or comparison to an accidental shooting.

    1. Re:What science? by ozydingo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the one hand, you're right, and calling it a "science project" and a s"science fair experiment" is playing with language.

      On the other hand, since when should science encompass things only inside science class? Whether the experiment was "does the explosion really happen?" (as claimed), or "how will people react to this awesome explosion" (also likely), it's still no stretch to call it science. So the one thing I disagree with you on is this apparent dismissal.

      But, I think overall you and I are in agreement. In my view there is are appropriate and inappropriate place to do such an experiment where you have an idea that the result might be something like an explosion. Maybe doing this type on one's own on school grounds is inappropriate -- though I'm sure there are arguments to be made on both sides for that statement. But does it deserve zero-tolerance, expulsion, and a criminal charge of a 15-year-old as an adult? I can't imagine anyone would think so (though, apparently, some do...)

    2. Re:What science? by LateArthurDent · · Score: 2

      It sounds more like a kid being stupid rather than one experimenting.

      When you're a kid, they're often one and the same.

      I long for the days when chemistry sets contained chemicals that you could actually make explosives from, and kids would compete to see who could make the most powerful explosions. Those who didn't lose a limb are now successful in their science careers, because that's how they were motivated to go that route. We've decided to take all the fun out of science in order to try to make everyone safer, and then we're surprised that kids don't have any interest in going into the science fields.

      Science experiments are supposed to be fun. If she's doing this on her own time, she's one of the good ones with enough interest in science to have a successful career in it. Somebody give her a college scholarship and limit her punishment to a suspension and some community service. If she's allowed to, she'll contribute far more than enough to our economy in the future to justify the cost of the minor damage she caused while being a stupid teenager.

  10. More likely "Zero Tolerance" gone insane, again. by RevDisk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Zero Tolerance means zero intelligence. Circumstances are always different. Thanks to our wonderful school and legal systems, there's less discretion. The bad and good part of discretion is bias. A straight-A good kid will be given the benefit of a doubt over a kid that has a reputation for being a troublemaker. On one hand, it's possibly a good rule of thumb... but it can lead to folks getting railroaded unfairly.

    The "solution" then is to treat EVERYONE badly. I'm not that old, and my school had a policy of "both kids in a fight get punished." Didn't matter if you got jumped for being a geek with pacifist philosophy. OTOH, it was a learning experience about bureaucracy, government and pacifism. I dumped the pacifism, and the next kid that jumped me, I earned every ounce of my administrative punishment because I had no incentive NOT to do so. Zero tolerance and "everyone involved is equally guilty" is bunk, and a bad idea.

  11. a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok? by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I clicked the link already angry at what I expected to find - a story about an ignorant, probably racist bureaucrat ruining a smart kid's life for no good reason.

    But as someone who (as a kid) did more than my share of disruptive, loud, messy things, I can tell you that even before 9/11 and IEDs and "zero tolerance" doing this in a school bathroom would have resulted in punishment. This wasn't a classroom experiment - no teachers were aware of it - and, like it or not, Drano (or an equivalent toilet cleaner) is a pretty harsh chemical.

    This won't be a popular post, but I don't think the story lives up to the headline.

  12. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but schools are run by bed wetting morons all over the country.

    But you keep going with that shit because I believe we should clearly know who all the stupid fucking morons are.

  13. Not about race or science by MikeRT · · Score: 2

    The BB gun incident seems to have happened off of school property. If she did this at home the charges applied (explosives, dangerous toys, blah blah blah at school) would not have been applicable. The government's standard response with stuff involving schools and "danger" is "kill it with fire" to appease the parents who might freak out if something HAD happened and the few squeaky wheels who are such bed-wetters that they'll call into question the integrity, intelligence, etc. of people who "let this happen."

  14. Oh no an energetic reaction at a science fair by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

    What next baking soda and vinegar gets a 6 months in juvie. Hydrogen filled balloons at least a year. Sodium your going down for life man. Please fire whatever school staff made this decision they are obviously incapable of rational thought, they claim it's a zero tolerance bs when the zero tolerance has a specific exception for scientific experiments.

    I do really hope the judge dismisses the case with cause and send a nasty gram to the state bar.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  15. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by jbmartin6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not many are saying that punishment isn't warranted. The problem is that the police were involved at all, that's the ridiculous part. Frankly if the police and DA have time to get involved in this sort of thing layoffs are long past due in this district.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  16. Three Minutes on Youtube... by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...tells me that it is massively unlikely this was intellectual curiosity. Some kid thought it would be funny to make a huge bang at a place where huge bangs are known to cause massive administrative overreaction.

    When I first read this, I thought it was horrible. One of the articles linked in the story here called it a botched experiment. What kind of loony racist throws the book so hard at a kid who messed up a project? Then I went looking for the "experiment" and learned there was pretty much definitely nothing botched about this. Youtube is full of works bombs, which is apparently what these are called. A popular chemistry blog I stumbled into explains these are actually illegal to make. And I really don't see what else you could do with these components.

    Now, this kid certainly doesn't deserve to be tried as an adult for multiple felonies just because they made a total dipshit choice that hurt nobody. But what's going on here is just usual-business prosecutorial excess, not racism. Ruining dumb high school kids' lives is practically what these fuckers live for lately, regardless of skin tone.

    1. Re:Three Minutes on Youtube... by rasmusbr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...tells me that it is massively unlikely this was intellectual curiosity. Some kid thought it would be funny to make a huge bang at a place where huge bangs are known to cause massive administrative overreaction.

      I don't understand, isn't that what intellectual curiosity is, at least if you're a teenager? This is how most scientists and engineers started out, by doing stupid experiments or building stupid things. That's how people learn.

      Imagine where the economy would be today if every kid who tried to DDOS their school system had been tried for using a cyber weapon on school property.

  17. what makes it fun by SkunkPussy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its exactly that kind of stuff that got me into chemistry in the first place

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
    1. Re:what makes it fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This, completely. As I've remarked elsewhere, if this kind of logic had been applied when I was a kid I'd have been in prison. A LOT. I'd have also not got a master's degree in chemistry from a damn good Uni. One of my friends would have not ended up getting a PhD in the physical properties of high explosives and working someplace where he can't tell us a lot about what he does (it's either nukes or defeating armour, I just don't know which.)

      AC - I don't want to end up on a no-fly list!

  18. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one is saying it's OK. We're saying it's not a felony. Make the kid clean up the mess and suspend her for a week. Problem solved.

    Excessive criminalization is a much bigger threat to us all than kids with drano bombs.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  19. How can I contribute... by HagraBiscuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How and where can I contribute to the legal costs for the family of this student? I want them to hire the best advocates money can provide, I want to see that judge humiliated for attempting to destroy the future of a curious student who made a mistake leading to an incident where no harm was either done or intended.

  20. Re:this is sad, just sad... by sycodon · · Score: 2

    As a rule...mostly no.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  21. Re:this is sad, just sad... by xclr8r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you have zero tolerance policies then rightly or wrongly administrators and educators think they have no agency in the matter. Also educators don't have control of the police force they have welcomed into their own school. *DA's and AGs are political animals in "some" cases and this is just a stepping stone to bigger things so riding rough trod over people's lives will not be swayed.

    --
    Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
  22. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by sanosuke001 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I see no mention in the article about a bathroom; it was outside near a gazebo and she stated that she was doing a science fair experiment.

    --
    -SaNo
  23. Soda Bottle Explosive Device by twmcneil · · Score: 2

    Once again, proof as to why Florida is the only state that has it's own Fark tag or needs it.

    My kid was showing me last night how to squeeze an empty water bottle hard enough to make the cap pop off. It made a good pop and sent the cap across the kitchen. If he does that at his school will he be arrested and charged with detonating an explosive device? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  24. Was it really a felony? by transporter_ii · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. Apparently they have charged rape suspects as Juveniles in that area, but a good student who hurt nobody will be tried as an adult??? It will never drop off her record. Freaking insane.

    There is a petition to get the charges dropped and it has well over 10k signatures already:

    http://www.change.org/petitions/the-bartow-police-and-bartow-high-school-drop-charges-against-kiera-wilmot?share_id=dFwlXuyxHk&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  25. Re:this is sad, just sad... by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    I thought people involved in educational process are better than this...

    The teachers often are. The administrators, no. Most teachers care about the kids, while the administrators tend to be risk-averse bureaucrats who find it easier to hide behind a rule book than to make tough decisions.

  26. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least it wasn't "your an idiot".

  27. Gateway drugs by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What exactly is the non-racist explanation for that lack of proportionality?

    Think "war on drugs" logic. This chemistry experiment ended up producing what is technically an improvised explosive device, and IEDs like this are a "gateway drug" of sorts to IEDs that terrorists have used within the past month to kill or maim dozens of people.

    1. Re:Gateway drugs by Lazere · · Score: 2

      Yes, but this is America we're talking about. Guns are sacred here.

  28. Re:Florida by drakaan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm thinking it has more to do with a heightened public sensitivity to bomb-making in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing...

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  29. Re:What the hell... by moeinvt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They needed a "racist" slant on the article, so they found a completely unrelated incident where a white person did something "bad" and was not charged. The "obvious" conclusion therefore is that this teen's expulsion and arrest is CLEARLY motivated by racism, regardless of the details.

  30. I'm glad I was a teen 20 years ago by hairykrishna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was far from a bad teenager. I loved science though and if it went bang that was all the better. Draino and aluminium foil? Jesus. I made fertiliser bombs. I synthesised Nitrogen triiodide and all manner of other fun compounds.

    One bonfire night I once had a visit from the police due to my homemade titanium salutes. They were amused and told me not to blow my hands off. These days I'd go to jail for a million years.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  31. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey now, we disowned Florida a long time ago.

    You stop holding the rest of the South accountable for Florida, and we'll forgive you for New Jersey.

  32. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of Florida is not "The South." Anyone here who lives in an urban or suburban area is more likely a transplant from New York than a "Southerner."

  33. Why isn't it science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I once mixed ammonia and bleach on school property as an undergrad, just to see what would happen. That's called curiosity.

    To say it wasn't a science experiment because it "had nothing to do with my science class" is to undercut what education is all about - making you curious enough to try stuff on your own.

  34. Re:Florida by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you may be missing the point of condemning racism if you find it acceptable to casually condemn an entire region as being of similar mind. That said, the south wouldn't have as much trouble with racism as it does, if it weren't for the pervasive denial of racist things as racist. So don't take my post as defending that.

  35. It's an experiment now? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen this news elsewhere and Slashdot was the first place to call it a science experiment. I guess it could be, in the same sense as a Diet Coke & Mentos experiment or an "effects of flour on your best friend's head" experiment.

    What's being done to her is completely ridiculous and she deserves nothing more than maybe a nasty look and a mild talking-to, but let's not stoop to yellow geek journalism

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:It's an experiment now? by The+Rizz · · Score: 2

      I've seen this news elsewhere and Slashdot was the first place to call it a science experiment

      Obligatory XKCD link.

    2. Re:It's an experiment now? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could say the same of popping a paper bag between your hands, where do you draw the line between "bomb" and "harmless fun thing that goes pop?"

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:It's an experiment now? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2
      From the Miami New Times article linked to in the summary:

      "Kiera Wilmot got good grades and had a perfect behavior record. She wasn't the kind of kid you'd expect to find hauled away in handcuffs and expelled from school, but that's exactly what happened after an attempt at a science project went horribly wrong."

      It's the first friggin' paragraph, in fact.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re:It's an experiment now? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      I draw the line where someone put it together in order to destroy things and/or kill people. Of course, if they put it together in order to destroy things, if those things which are their property and there is no reason to think that harm could have come to others (or the property of others) in the detonation of the bomb, it still falls under the heading of harmless fun in my book.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:It's an experiment now? by twistofsin · · Score: 2

      I've seen this news elsewhere and Slashdot was the first place to call it a science experiment. I guess it could be, in the same sense as a Diet Coke & Mentos experiment or an "effects of flour on your best friend's head" experiment.

      What's being done to her is completely ridiculous and she deserves nothing more than maybe a nasty look and a mild talking-to, but let's not stoop to yellow geek journalism

      She mixed compounds together to observe the reaction. What about that doesn't sound like a science experiment?

    6. Re:It's an experiment now? by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Or she shakes up a pepsi can, it vents and sprays liquid everywhere, and her friend slips on it and falls striking her head and is put into a coma...

      Although to be fair, drano and the like is not something you want to spray about randomly. It won't kill you that way but it will cause scarring easily as well as a non trivial chance of blinding if people didn't have their safety glasses on.

      So what the girl did was wrong. Not criminally wrong, not expelled from school with no recourse wrong, but it was a big mistake. The sort of big mistakes that just about every single child will do a couple of times before reaching adulthood.

  36. My son was expelled for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My now 17 year old Son was expelled from high school two years ago for... get this... popping a regular old helium balloon. He was charged with Disorderly Conduct (the catch-all "when we want to charge you with something" summary crime in Pennsylvania) but we managed to get that dismissed at the Magisterial District Court after about $15,000 in legal fees, most of which was spent trying to obtain school surveillance video showing that the balloon popped when he leaned up against a wall, pinching the balloon between his backpack and the wall, causing it to pop.

    We've home-schooled him since then. It's truly amazing how absolutely brain-dead our government has become. It really does destroy everything it touches, including the education system.

    As the saying goes, "zero tolerance = zero common sense"

  37. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Florida's as much of the South as New York

  38. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with religion. This is the fault of so-called "educators." They have become thoughtless, lazy, and self centered. Don't think so? They pass these so-called zero tolerance policies and blindly enforce them. It lets them discipline anyone for the slightest infraction so that they don't have to deal with the real issue of discipline within their own classrooms. It's far easier, from a teacher's perspective, to get a kid suspended or expelled rather than having to deal with discipline and the child's parents. In my school district, these zero tolerance policies are used in to go after the really bad kids instead of instead of going after them for the real issues. The attitude of most teachers and administrators is that so what if an innocent kid gets caught up in the rules, rules are rules. It's just easier to follow the rules than it is to enforce the spirit of them. It's amazing that educators just aren't thinking.

    I think it's great that some teachers spoke up for this kid, but the union and the board should do this as well.

    I also blame parents, but the parents of this kid are the problem. IT's the problem kids that have the loudest screaming parents only because if their kid gets suspended they have to take vacations days to watch them.

    Honestly, I can't stand the way we treat kids today. We say they're important and then do everything we can to show them they aren't.

           

  39. Re:this is sad, just sad... by Skapare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had several cases where I needed to deal with public school administrators in a few places around the country. Usually it was computer security issues such as kids doing bad things from the school, or things like school machines infected and sending out spam. Similar kinds of things happen from businesses and universities a lot more because there are more of those around. But I can tell you that a much much higher percentage of the public school administrators are just plain totally incompetent, not just about computers and networks, but just about everything they do, including communicating in English. These people are so stupid in general (a few exceptions exist) I have to call them a totally separate breed. That's how bad it is. I would characterize half of them as wanna-be-politicians who just could not cut the rough and tumble world of dealing with adults who can fight back.

    When I actually was in school, I noticed a few administrators were actually good people. Most went on to other jobs elsewhere (probably because they could not deal with the stupidity above them). One later got elected to Congress. The stupid ones stayed where they were.

    The teachers, however, were almost all very good people. One friend I met in college who went through teach education graduating at the top of his class and earning other awards, ended up quitting from education after 5 years simply because he could not stand the bureaucratic BS from stupid people.

    I thought people involved in educational process are better than this...

    A few are. Gotta look hard to find them.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  40. Re:this is sad, just sad... by 1s44c · · Score: 2

    As a rule...mostly no.

    You went to a better school than I did if you can honestly say 'mostly no'. In my UK school race was the overriding consideration in just about everything and all it did was fuel more racism.

    Racism is still alive and well but it's a far more complex issue than simply white people believing they have to make up for past crimes to black people. It's become a self-perpetuating cluster-fuck of resentment on all sides.

  41. Re:Florida by Toonol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you may be missing the point of condemning racism if you find it acceptable to casually condemn an entire region as being of similar mind.

    Exactly, and that goes on a lot, even among otherwise intelligent people. "That *large diverse group* is so bigoted!"

    Not only are comments like that repulsive because of their innate stupidity, they're harmful because they are recasting the basic elements of racism and bigotry in a more socially tolerable guise, against a group that the poster feels it's OK to condemn based on stereotypes.

    And I'm not from the south, so this isn't defensiveness. It's irritation. Just think about what you say.

  42. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's sodium hydroxide which is basic, not acidic. Yes, it turns the fats in your body to soap, and is a very effective way to melt down a body, but the process is very slow.

    As someone who has had an experiment of this very nature go haywire in my face I know from first hand experience that it's very unpleasant. But...please don't try to make out that the solution will melt someone's skin off in front of their eyes, the victim will have plenty and plenty of time to get water on the burn to dilute and remove the hydroxide. In the eyes won't be some easy, but I would be highly surprised if someone lost their vision provided they reacted in any kind of normal way: "holy shit, my eyes sting like living hell, I'd better wash them out with water *immediately*!!!"

    Yes, an explosion in the face won't be good, but again, for a hydrogen explosion like this to do any real damage to life or property it has to be in a confined space and produce a lot of gas. In the open air you would have to make a monsterous amount of gas, and even then we'd be talking about a mild concussion and possibly ear-drum damage.

    Anyway, the point of my response is to try and provide some rational perspective of the true *danger* and *risk* involved here.

  43. Re:Florida by OakDragon · · Score: 2

    Hey now, we disowned Florida a long time ago.

    Florida?! But that's America's wang!

  44. Re:Florida by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gallagher said in one of his specials:

    "I like the shape of Florida. It looks like we're pissing on Cuba."

    Perhaps it was the only time Gallagher has ever been funny.

  45. Re:Racist a little? by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's worse than that, they disqualified 50,000 black people from voting by using an intentionally broad filter do disqualify ex-felons (who can't vote in Florida and a few other Southern states). They had a list of ex-felons that listed little information about them, but did list their race. If a black guy named John Smith once committed a felony in Florida and you were a black guy named John Smith you'd likely be disqualified from voting (with no advance notice that would let you challenge it). Never mind checking for little details, like the two John Smith's being born thirty years apart. The company doing the work warned about this lacking of checking, but the State of Florida told them not to refine it.

  46. Re:Florida by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However I can see the same thing happening in up where "All dose Yankees live" It is part of the dumbing down of our system of discipline.

    Our system has been so intent of getting the bad guys that they are willing to let hundreds of innocent people go to jail vs letting one real criminal go free.

    We spend more time trying to find ways to get kids kicked out of school and or locked up in prison. Then we do trying to keep kids in school and out of prison. We are all humans and we make mistakes. If we don't make mistakes, we don't learn from them. Does that mean that there are no consequences, no. They are consequences but they don't mean permanent marks on your life for getting caught for making a simple mistake.

    For this teen, It probably should have lead to Detention, or perhaps up to a week suspension, because setting off unsupervised explosions (even small ones) is wrong. But being that didn't cause any damage, or was meant to the punishment should face that fact.

    Her biggest mistake was that she wasn't a big football player, if that was the case she would have gone off with a kids will be kids and ignored.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  47. Re:Florida by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is no evidence this has anything to do with religion, and you know it. Your vile attempt to inject your pet cause into this important issue is disrespectful to the student and doesn't serve anyone except yourself.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  48. Re:Florida by jitterman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a non-anonymous Southerner, and I can agree that while it's probably not quite as bad as people elsewhere believe it is, we've still not quite escaped our past. Things are getting better generally (look back at the 1960s and 1970s and you will see that is factual), but yes, things like this at the very least give the appearance of a socially backwards society. A friend of mine from NYC once told me, "I thought I had seen racism. Then I came to college here."

    If you abhor racism, the very fact that it is stronger here than in many places is a reason to STAY - I can be an active voice against it.

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  49. Re:Florida by JWW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your last line is spot on.

    Zero tolerance policies are for zero brained educators.

  50. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the incident report, "Mr. Durham advised Kiera told him she was conducting a science fair experiment... Wilmot advised she did not know what would happen when she mixed the ingredients. Wilmot advised she thought it would just cause some smoke." There were no injuries, no damage, not even clear intent. Where is the felony crime here? It's only in the mind of Assistant State Attorney Tammy Glotfelty.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  51. Re:Not a science experiment by BLKMGK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No it wasn't, this experiment was done outside. The police report clearly states this if you had bothered to read. When I was a kid I did the same thing with dry ice and water as well as vinegar and baking soda. Water and baking powder were also interesting but pretty weak. Friends did all sorts of stuff with powdered iodine. All of us turned out just fine, we didn't have our lives ruined or curiosity killed. My teachers wouldn't have allowed me to do this but they might have demonstrated the reaction to our class as they did many other things. We're destroying our kids...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  52. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had dinner with a H.S. teacher recently and I was amazed at how things have changed. For example, it's now SOP for them to call the police when two kids get into a FIGHT. Even a basic fistfight with no weapons and no serious injuries. "Ridiculous" is right.

    How does a kid being bullied not count as assault? Certainly when I was at school there was a lot of bullying going on and the school simply didn't care (even when people inevitably ended up injured). Whilst I'll agree that the first port of call should be for it to be handled internally in the school, if that doesn't work shouldn't the police be involved if only for the protection of the kids on the receiving end?

  53. Re:Florida by neonKow · · Score: 4, Informative

    I agree completely.
    Polk County School's justification for expullsion was (from TFA)

    Anytime a student makes a bad choice it is disappointing to us. We urge our parents to join us in conveying the message that there are consequences to actions.

    Yes, Polk County School, I think the 16-year-old understands what the general concept of punishment is and that actions have consequences. I don't see how they're going to be able to explain why a small explosion that produced as much force as any other gas reaction in a sealed bottle deserves expulsion, a felony charge, and being tried as an adult.

    This one comment on TFA also seems appropriate:

    User: [ideasrule]

    Guys and girls, we should be engaging in activism instead of just posting comments! I've collected the sites and emails offered by other users into one place:

    Change.org petition: http://www.change.org/petitions/the-bartow-police-and-bartow-high-school-drop-charges-against-kiera-wilmot

    Police department complaint form: http://www.cityofbartow.net/index.aspx?recordid=103&page=18
    School superintendent: john.stewart@polk-fl.net
    School principal: Ronald.Pritchard@polk-fl.net

    The other email someone offered, lbryan.pd@cityofbartow.net, is of "Crime Prevention Practioner" Lyn Bryan and it doesn't work (my email was blocked).
    Remember that the school principal is a reasonable person who rightly thinks the girl didn't intend any harm, so we should be supportive of him.

  54. Re:Florida by jodido · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As Malcolm X said, "Don't talk to me about the South. The South starts at the Canadian border." Google "stop and frisk New York City" for further evidence. Any other attitude is liberal smugness.

  55. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by Hatta · · Score: 2

    Lets suppose for the sake of argument that I would blame the teachers if this child had blown herself up. Does it follow from that that the only reasonable response is to charge this child with felonies?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  56. Science for Dummies by Lodlaiden · · Score: 2

    They really have toned down science in schools if this sort of thing gets you in trouble. My Chemistry teacher sent me home with a soda bottle of liquid nitrogen. Granted, none of it made it home, because he knew how far I had to walk and how fast it would evaporate, but the point remains.

    --
    Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
  57. Re:A "science fair experiment"? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it wasn't a science fair project, it was teenagers playing around in the bathroom at 7 am before school starts making a big bang for kicks and youtube. It was as much science as it was racism.

    --
    I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  58. Re:Florida by neonKow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but the school is supposed to be the a source of wisdom and knowledge for developing adults. Instead of being the voice of reason that acknowledges and points out the heightened sensitivity to the child (and yes, a 16-year-old is still very much a child when it comes to making non-malicious mistakes like this), and teaches her to exercise better judgement, the school system is teaching her that if her curiosity leads her to accidentally crossing the line on what will freak out parents, the who system will come down on her and try to throw the book at her.

    Although, after reading what I just wrote, that's probably a pretty accurate and depressing lesson of our current paranoid state. Still, I don't think kids should be subjected to such treatment.

  59. Re:Florida by jahudabudy · · Score: 2

    I think it depends on whether you are characterizing Southerners as racist or The South. To my mind, one is a large swath of people that have a wide variety of opinions and beliefs. The other is a historical political/social culture that still has an influence on modern institutions in regions where it was most pervasive at its height. And that political/social culture undeniably has some roots that were planted in racism. Which makes it tricky to distinguish, in modern institutions, what occurs because of the normal stupidity that everywhere is subject to, and what occurs because of the influence of those historical roots.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  60. Re:What the hell... by Nyder · · Score: 2

    ...does someone accidentally killing someone with a BB gun, and someone dissolving Al in TBC have to do with each other? I haven't read the article, and I won't read the article, but come on. I don't even care about the merits of each case. Slashdot, you're treading on thin ice.

    Actually they aren't. If you had bothered to read all the articles, you'd know.

    The DA decided not to charge a white girl (age 13) who put a bb gun 6 inches from her brothers head and pulled the trigger. It ended up killing her brother.
    The same DA decided to charge a black girl (age 16) who did a 'science' experiment on school grounds, which caused a very minor explosion. No one was hurt.

    So, being white and purposely putting a BB gun to the head of your brother, then pulling the trigger and ending the life of your brother is not worth charging with a crime. But if you are black and you do a science experiment on school grounds that does a small explosion (and you are outside) it's worth charging the black girl with adult felony charges.

    Nope, not racism at all.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  61. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am fed up with people who do not know basic statistics and who want falsely "protect" groups.

    It is ok to condemn groups. Speaking of groups or stereotypes is equivalent to stating group statistics.

    Stereotypes is what makes us reason about groups.

    A stereotype is a bad name given to group statistics. There is nothing bad about stereotypes.

    What is wrong is to assume an individual represents a group. Thus assuming that group statistics apply to the individual.

    This is discrimination. That's what you should be looking out for.

    All statements regarding groups are statistical in nature.

  62. Re:Florida by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    Hey now, we disowned Florida a long time ago.You stop holding the rest of the South accountable for Florida, and we'll forgive you for New Jersey.

    "Forgiving" New Jersey isn't charitable, it's insane.

  63. Re:Florida by supercrisp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could agree with you if you replaced most instances of "educators" with "administrators"; teachers generally aren't the ones setting these policies. It's school boards and, more often, politicians. As you note, and as the article says: it's teachers who are sticking up for this kid. And the only people who stand to benefit from this are politicians making hay with the baser elements of their base.

  64. Re:Florida by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

    And I'm not from the south, so this isn't defensiveness. It's irritation. Just think about what you say.

    I spent five years living in Montgomery, Ala., before I finally escaped. That "large diverse group"? Not so diverse, actually.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  65. Profits !! by boorack · · Score: 2

    There are more and more stories like this one. It seems that US overgrown prison system has run out of suspects to jail, so they're now after anyone. Lots of Americans deny it but reality seems to be more cruel than beurocracy/stupidity/paranoia of those in power. This is for-profit cruelty instigated on US citizens by US corporations (as opposed to opressing 3-rd world citizen for profits in the past). You're being harvested by corporate prison complex installed by Bush senior in Reagan years. Sadly, this process seems to be advancing: people are being jailed for more and more trivial things and corporations operating this scheme are now profiteering on prisoners' work - which effectively converts US prisons into US prison camps and makes even more incentives to lobby/bribe officials to jail even more souls. In its way, US corporate economy found a way to compete with China prison camps or Burma prison camps - I'm sorry for if it looks cynic but it is what it is.

  66. Re:Florida by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

    South of the Mason-Dixon line. Need we know more?

    Actually, yes. You need to know that there are really three Floridas. The Panhandle is part of the Deep South, but South Florida is basically part of the Caribbean. In-between is Disney World and the lost 13th Canadian colony.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  67. Re:Florida by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've personally encountered a lot of bigotry in the south. Am I not allowed to say so, or to notice?
    I've encountered bigotry in the north and in the south. I know it can be hard for anyone not a white male to get a job at a small business. It is also difficult for anyone who IS a white male to get a job at a large company. It works both ways. As long as we enforce quotas and give preference to a group, no matter who the group is, that is racism.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  68. Re:Florida by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You forgot the worst part of zero tolerance: that the lesson schools are teaching to kids is that heavy-handed, inflexible rules and imposing authority is normal. The next generation isn't going to overturn the patriot act or roll back arbitrary and secret no fly lists, or demand that the government abide by the constitution because they will be used to having absolutely no rights, save what the authority lets them have.

    I don't know if it will actually turn out that way, I had it drilled into me up through high school that marijuana was basically heroin, that condoms didn't work, that premarital sex would destroy my life, that God hates both of those things and that homosexuality is evil. Granted, I hate being high, was unsuccessful in most attempts to get laid, and am not gay, but none of that was due to what they told me in classes. Moreover I'm agnostic now. So hopefully zero tolerance will have an opposite effect and get kids to realize from an early age that they MUST fight for their rights. Still, I'd rather us not run that experiment. If when I'm an old man, I have to submit to a prostate check every time I get on a hoverbus because these youngsters were trained with zero tolerance not to question authority, I'm gonna be pissed.

  69. Unintended discovery by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The girl wanted to find out what happens if she mixes aluminum and drain cleaner. Her findings: under the experimental conditions (unsupervised, on school property, post-9/11), there is a fizz and a bang, a bunch of adults overreact, and you get charged with a felony. :-(

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  70. Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2

    But as someone who (as a kid) did more than my share of disruptive, loud, messy things, I can tell you that even before 9/11 and IEDs and "zero tolerance" doing this in a school bathroom would have resulted in punishment.

    This isn't about whether or not she should have been punished. Making a Drano bomb was wrong, and making it on school property was even wronger. Her actions definitely merited disciplinary action.

    The issue here is the proportionality of it all. Did the punishment fit the crime? Personally, I believe that the punishment was insanely excessive. Beyond all common sense. If it were my call to make, I would have given her a 1 week school suspension, required her to write a written apology to the classmates who were in the area for putting them in danger, and required her to write a report on the safe handling of household chemicals.

    Do you really think that you should today still have to answer for all of the stupid shit that you did when you were a teenager? I wouldn't want to live in such a world, either. But that's what's being done to this kid. I don't give a shit what sex she was, what color she was, or about any of the other distractions in the summary. Wrong is wrong, and that transcends everything. What's being done to this kid is wrong.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  71. Re:Florida by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    Which of course is why I suspect that racism is behind this. In my experience, New Yorkers are more likely to be racist than Southerners.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  72. She's a Model Student by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My immediate response to this item was to wonder whether the student in question was a constant annoyance to the teachers and administrators. The original article makes it clear that she is a model student: "Kiera Wilmot got good grades and had a perfect behavior record. She wasn't the kind of kid you'd expect to find hauled away in handcuffs and expelled from school, but that's exactly what happened after an attempt at a science project went horribly wrong."

    That additional information (which really should have been in Slashdot's summary, as it was properly used in the reporter's lede) makes it clear that the student is being wronged. Whether she is being wronged as a result of racism or as a result of the inherent stupidity of zero-tolerance policies (policies from which exceptions are often made for the children of the wealthy and/or powerful) remains to be determined. Perhaps both are involved.

    This is a teachable moment for the school. It is an opportunity for students and faculty together to examine the nature of fairness and the nature of bureaucracy. I hope there are some tenured faculty members at the school who are interested in making good use of the opportunity.

    My own suspicion is that the administrators should be fired, but I think that way about a great many administrators.

  73. Forget the Race Issue Here by smack.addict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do think the race issue is worth discussing. As well as the gender issue.

    But there's something more fundamental and less likely to stoke passions at play here:

    DOING SCIENCE IS ABOUT MAKING MISTAKES. Her "punishment" should be to write a paper on what she was trying to do and why the results were not what she expected. Simple, end of story.

    There should be no real punishment of any kind, much less the over the top expulsion and arrest.

    The simple fact is that she should be encouraged to make mistakes, not punished for them. And the most basic problem we are dealing with is that our school systems don't understand this fact.

  74. Re:Florida by LateArthurDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh, please. I have brown skin living in South Carolina, and have never encountered any racism.

    That's nice for you. In other news, the US has a black President, and recently had a female Secretary of State, so obviously there's neither racism nor sexism anywhere in the country.

    Truly, America is a land of wonders.

    Pretty much, yes.

    I'm not saying racism and sexism doesn't exist. But if it's possible for people of all races and genders to live their lives without discrimination, then we, as a society, don't have a racism problem. Not having a racism problem doesn't mean that you're never going to encounter discrimination every once in a while. It means those cases of discrimination are due to individual fuckwads. In the same way that there will always be morons who think killing people watching a marathon is a good idea, or shooting up an elementary school fool of kids is a good idea. Individual fuckwads will always exist, but as long as their actions isn't met with acceptance and encouragement from our society, it's not a problem with our society.

  75. Re: Florida by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    seems everyone needs to RTFA: "The assistant principal called police after talking to Wilmot's science teacher and determining he didn't know about the experiment."

    assistant principal hears explosion, sees smoke, runs over and student claims "bomb" is science experiment. Seems reasonable, but teacher knows nothing about it. Of course expell student and possibly charge with crime, after all the things that have been going on recently at schools the school would be neglectful if they didn't expell student and call the police. Would a student be expelled and police notified for bringing a "harmless" BB gun to school or firecrackers? Of course, so should this student. But I'm a little perplexed why skin color was brought into this, or why a story of an accidental death has anything to do with this. People die all the time accidentally and it is not always a crime. Seems submitter is focused on racism rather than just looking at what happened and determining if punishment fit the crime.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  76. So would it be all right if... by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Suppose that she had been a he, had been white, had been the star quarterback and was expelled and charged as an adult for exactly the same act.

    No one would say it was about race or anything else of that sort. Would that make it any less outrageous?

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  77. America, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    America, the land of no more freedom.

  78. Re:Florida by Sigmon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here here! In Arkansas -most- folks generally get along pretty well. Instances of racism are encountered occasionally... but rarely in my experience (I'm pretty pale-skinned). In any event, although pockets of racism may be found in a wide-spread geographic distribution, one doesn't generally find institutional-type discrimination anymore here in the 'South'... You'll run into an occasional crack-pot (of any color) here or there... but I've personally encountered a seemingly - alarmingly - high incidence of racist white folks up north. Once on a business trip with a black co-worker of mine, we even encountered somebody who, apparently, had never met a black person face-to-face before. So, I'm quite disappointed when I hear people - who likely live in the North - make disparaging remarks of how racist white people in the south are.

    It's also important to note - there are many geographic regions here in the South where a white person is the minority... I've been to many of those places in my travels. Some of them are the most welcoming environments I've ever visited... Other places, I'll walk into a gas station, restaurant, or what have you... and all of the black folks just stare at me. So, it goes both ways... Your mileage may vary, however, depending on where you go. :-)

  79. Re:Florida by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm calling *BULLSHIT* on you. I was born in South Carolina and maybe 90% of my family still lives there. For you to say you've *never* seen racism makes you a statistical anomaly far on the tail end of the curve (unless you just stepped off a bus from the North to blog). Even if you're White, you're going to hear comments from people in "safe" company. Racism just doesn't *exist* in the South, it's institutional. It's baked into the culture like apple pie and Memorial Day sales. Even the way people get hired and promoted in small towns like my home town has a racially-motivated undercurrent that favors some.

    And, for you to go further to say the US doesn't have much of a problem with racism has to mean you're trying to make a point for an agenda. Just because you've never seen a banana thrown on a NBA court means nothing. Google for some articles about the crap Black pro athletes in the US hear on a regular basis during games. Just because their aren't collective chants doesn't mean there aren't just as many a-holes in the crowds. I've lived in Europe for 7 years. Their flavor of racism is different; it's almost nationalism-based but I agree that they have their problems as well.

    I wonder what you mean by "brown skin." Are you Italian? Indian?

    I do agree that this story is more about anti-terrorism and overreaction. That you *do* have right.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  80. Re:Florida by amiga3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm from rural Georgia and during a trip to Birmingham, Alabama I felt like I had traveled back in time over 30 years. It reminded me a lot of the attitudes I saw in my youth. There are still a lot of people who were raised in a prejudiced environment but things have improved much. I was recently talking with a very country friend of mine who said something that would be labeled racist by most here although he probably didn't intend it as such, he called a guy a "black asshole." He stopped and kind of looked down for a second and said "I really shouldn't say it was because he was black, it ain't got nothing to do with that, he's just an asshole." I was kind of surprised that he made the distinction because for him identifying people by color is just natural.

  81. Re: Florida by tbannist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok. I looked at the what happened and determined that the punishment does not fit the "crime". What she needs is a lecture on responsible chemical use, to have her parents called down to the school in the middle of the day and to be sent hom with a one or two day suspension (for her relatively minor recklessness). The goal is make sure she learns the lesson that she is not allowed to mix chemicals without supervision. Expulsion, on the other hand, certainly looks like behaviour of a cowardly administrator who looking to cover their ass.

    The criminal charges are just stupid.

    --
    Fanatically anti-fanatical
  82. Re:Florida by spleck · · Score: 2

    were --> where
    then --> than
    their --> they're
    payed --> paid
    its --> it's
    (I skipped the regular typos and sentence structure issues.)

    How is the grammar education in that low class school district that's only 10 miles away?

  83. Re: Florida by flayzernax · · Score: 2

    The student is not a terrorist. At most the kid is acting out because of issues going on in the world or at home. Shoving them in the fascist meat reactor of the criminal system and ending their education is not the answer to making one more productive member of society.

  84. Prosecutor not judge by Bruce66423 · · Score: 2

    But yes, the prosecutor should be shredded. The challenge is to get the jury to do it if the judge won't; a verdict of contempt of court for the prosecutor for wasting the court's time would be a great outcome but probably too much to hope for.

  85. Re:Florida by PhxBlue · · Score: 2

    The only difference between "Science" and "Recklessly mixing chemicals" is whether or not you take notes and share your results after you're done.

    I'm fairly sure that assembling a controlled environment, measuring the amount of reagents and ensuring the results won't potentially injure someone are also part of the difference between "science" and "recklessly mixing chemicals."

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  86. Re:"science experiment" by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

    The kid made a soda bottle pop in a field somewhat nearby a government building.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  87. Re:Florida by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

    But if it's possible for people of all races and genders to live their lives without discrimination, then we, as a society, don't have a racism problem.

    This is not true in any sense in which it is relevant to the real world. Certainly, there are senses of "possible" for which I would agree with that statement, but they aren't senses of "possible" for which the premise of the hypothetical presented is true in the real world.

    As long as the real world experience of a significant subset of the population involves experiencing race-based discrimination, we have a racism problem. (Gender is irrelevant, of course, to racism, but replace "race" with "gender" and "racism" with "sexism" and the same is true.)

  88. Re:Florida by FuzzNugget · · Score: 2

    This isn't just a problem with educators. It's a problem with western society in general: "rules are rules, I have to enforce them" (along the same lines of, "hey, I was just doing my job when I slaughtered those Jews..."). No, you cantakerous nitpicking fucks, it is with extreme rarity that rules should be enforced to the letter, hard and fast.

    We have a systems of extremely strict rulesets -- too strict. In order for society to function, to breathe, there must be a social contract where the enforcers use equally extreme discretion and consideration, where actions are weighed against all of the circumstances and it's not just assumed that every act is one of malice. Either that, or we operate on the honour system. Society will collapse if neither one of those principles are upheld.

    Rules are often designed with the edge-cases in mind; the few bad apple that spoil the bunch. But you don't carpet bomb the whole damn orchard because of a one bad apple.

  89. Re:Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having travelled all over the US (and living outside of it), I can say with some certainty that the racial *undertones* of the southern culture are extaordinarily stronger than they are anywhere else I've been in the English speaking world.

    While racism is always somewhat present, even in a place like Ontario, Canada, where natives are still often treated with scorn, even if it's not endorsed publicly, it happens on the street constantly.

    I'd never heard the word "nigger" used in a derogatory sense in my life (outside of television and movies) until I was in a small town in Virginia about 10 years ago, and I overheard it during a conversation in a gas station parking lot.

    I've since heard it a dozen times or so, always in Albama, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisiana, Texas.... Never heard it, except in a joking context in Canada or Oregon or Massachusetts or Minnesota.

    Bear in mind I was usually in small towns and I'm a big bald white guy who was driving a (rented) pickup truck. I'm fairly certain that those guys wouldn't have talked so freely if they didn't think I was "one of them".

  90. Re: Florida by Jessified · · Score: 2

    You're absolutely right. There is no statistical quantitative or qualitative difference between the punishments meted out to white students vs the rest, neither within the school system nor with the larger criminal justice system. How could anyone even suggest that?

    Surely if there were someone would have kept track of it and brought it up by now. Oh wait. But forget the numbers. I like my privilege and we can't have the other colours getting uppity, best be keeping them in check.

  91. Re: Florida by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    Sorry, that's how things were handled in the 50s. Beaver accidently left his 6" pocketknife in his book bag? Silly beav, go take it home and I'm calling your mom. Things have changed. Kids even drawing PICTURES of guns are being suspended. Crazy? Maybe, but so is kids killing a dozen students. Zero tolerance is zero tolerance, if they gave her a pass for setting off an explosion at school and then lying to cover it up what do they do to the next kid that brings a BB gun or firecrackers? The police charges may go a little too far, but charging and being found guilty are two different things. She'll likely plead and get probation, she's not serving time in federal pound me prison

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  92. Re: Florida by jsrjsr · · Score: 2

    If she pleads and gets probation, she's still a convicted felon with all that goes with that. Try thinking about what that means.

  93. Re: Florida by chrismcb · · Score: 2

    Of course expell student and possibly charge with crime, after all the things that have been going on recently at schools the school would be neglectful if they didn't expell student and call the police.

    I personally believe the school is being neglectful BY expelling the student, and refusing her a right to an education.
    Lets examine what this student did. She mixed some cleaning ingredients with a plastic bottle of water.... Lets look at that again, she had a bottle of water. she had some cleaning materials. She mixed them. And she was expelled and will be charged as an adult (charged for what? dropping a mentos into a bottle of diet coke?)
    So what was the result? The bottles top popped off, and caused some smoke. No one was hurt, and no property was damaged. She was expelled because the TOP of the bottle popped off. And YOU think this is ok?
    Oh, she should be expelled because she was working on an experiment that her teacher didn't know about? Are you saying students shouldn't show initiative, students shouldn't think for themselves? Shouldn't do extra work? Students should only learn what they are taught? Perhaps they should be seen and not heard too?
    This whole thing is asinine. Everyone responsible for charging this student, and expelling her, should be charged with child endangerment. They should be prosecuted for destroying this students life.