Slashdot Mirror


Sleep Deprivation Lowers School Achievement In Children

New submitter josedu writes:"Sleep deprivation is a great, hidden problem that afflicts a great percentage of children in affluent countries. About 73% of 9- and 10-year-old children in the U.S. are sleep deprived, as are 80% of 13- and 14-year-olds. The new study thinks this is linked to the increased access to devices such as mobile phones and laptops late at night. One of the researchers put it very simply: 'Our data show that across countries internationally, on average, children who have more sleep achieve higher in maths, science and reading.' This disruption is also causing schools to dumb-down their instruction to accomodate the reduced capacity of these kids. Thus, even the kids who are getting enough sleep will suffer. The long-term impact of sleep deprivation on nationwide education levels is enormous."

272 comments

  1. Let me be the first to say... by chinton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Duh!

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except they blame devices instead of the schools for having to start classes at 8am on the dot. Why not start them later at like 930 or 10. I hated waking up for school so freakin early.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by foobsr · · Score: 1

      TFS probably was done by a sleep deprived individuum.
      The point is the alarmingly high percentage of children affected in some countries, especially the US, combined with reasons and large scale effects.
      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by chinton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then go to sleep earlier...

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure circadian rhythms don't work like that.

      here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Biological_clock_human.svg

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_sleep_phase_disorder

      I tried my best to go to bed earlier. I just ended up tossing and turning in bed until midnight for weeks on end. Only thing that helped me is melatonin.

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by chinton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently my son has a /. account and just modded me 'Troll'.

    7. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Go to sleep earlier"

      And... Look at that, zero sleep-deprived children helped by your shitty judgmental non-advice.

      God forbid the overgrown children pretending to be authority figures do anything to actually help the actual children in their care who are trying to learn.

      Learn to deal with problems by dwalin

    8. Re:Let me be the first to say... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Because we need to prepare them for a life of sleep deprivation caused by having to start work at 8am on the dot.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:Let me be the first to say... by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      It's not "duh" though, adults grossly underestimate the amount of sleep kids need, starting at about age 1 all way through age 25. I tell people my 2 year old goes to be at 7:30PM and wakes up at 7:00AM, then has a 2 hours nap. I've gotten everything from incredulous stares to accusations that I'm somehow a bad parent for letting my kid sleep that much. Very, very rarely do people say anything positive about it. Never mind the fact that all the research points to kids 1-3 years old needing 12-14 hours of sleep per day. That number starts to gradually drop at age 3 until it hits about 8-9 hours, then puberty hits and the recommended sleep goes back up (and the circadian rhythm shifts to a sleep late wake up late schedule that our schools ignore).

      The take away shouldn't be kids that sleep more do better, it should be that sleep is fucking important and as parents it's up to you to make sure your kid gets it.

    10. Re:Let me be the first to say... by suutar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to mention the natural wake/sleep cycle changes as you age. Adolescence tends to shift the natural wake-up time back by a couple of hours. Yes, teenagers wanting to sleep in later than preadolescents (and stay up later) seems to have a biological basis. http://kidshealth.org/teen/your_body/take_care/how_much_sleep.html

    11. Re:Let me be the first to say... by naff89 · · Score: 1

      I know it's tough to read the accompanying articles to things, but that image represents "someone who rises early in morning, eats lunch around noon, and sleeps at night (10 p.m.)".

      If you sleep between 2am and 10am, your pattern will be different.

    12. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      If you're from NYC and you travel to L.A., you'll be getting up earlier and going to be earlier than L.A. people. If you 'stay' on NYC time you'll in effect become an L.A. morning person.

    13. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting on for three years and counting.

    14. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      I tell people my 2 year old goes to be at 7:30PM and wakes up at 7:00AM, then has a 2 hours nap. I've gotten everything from incredulous stares to accusations that I'm somehow a bad parent for letting my kid sleep that much

      Same here - Lights out at 7:30 and a big nap in the afternoon, Although my 2 year old boy seems to be ready to get up at 6am most mornings.

      I think the reason you (we) get stares is parents have to adjust their lifestyles if they want their kids to get enough sleep, and they're not keen on that. I see people hauling their exhausted kids around at 9pm and I'm like "What the hell?"

    15. Re:Let me be the first to say... by WillgasM · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's so parents have time to drop off their kids at school on the way to work.

    16. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem is devices. The light emitted by phones, laptops, tablets, etc., cause the body's circadian rhythm to go out of whack. The body begins to think that daylight lasts longer than it does, and that it should be awake longer than it should. This doesn't reduce the amount of sleep that the body needs, but since it believes that daylight lasts longer, it doesn't get 'sleepy' as early as it should.

    17. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wanted to vouch for the 6am wake cycle. I did that between 2 and 4, then again around the 4th grade to 6th grade. Then whenever puberty hit it slowly became harder to handle. (Mind you there were also social aspects which made me more inclined to stay up late and not get up early if I didn't have to.)

    18. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Never mind the fact that all the research points to kids 1-3 years old needing 12-14 hours of sleep per day.

      That's nice. How about if your kid just won't sleep that long, no matter when you put them to bed? Given the handful that a two year old can be, most parents pray for their kids to sleep a lot. Never worked with my daughter. Given my flexible schedule and that my wife was able to be a stay-at-home mom then, we could and did try any schedule. The bottom line is that people differ, which simplistic recommendations often don't take into account.

    19. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But if they performed better, they'd be able to get jobs where they're not slaves to the rhythm.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Except your body won't stay on NYC time. It'll align itself with the sunlight hours you're now experiencing in LA. If you're a night owl in NYC, you'll be a night owl in LA, after that period of adjustment known as "jet lag". That's what jet lag is, you know, when your body's rhythms are trying to cope with having daytime suddenly shifted several hours on it.

    21. Re: Let me be the first to say... by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Sorry boss, I like to stay up late"?

      It's not a problem for you, so it's not a problem? This may come as an amazing shock to you but not everyone can sleep at will. Not everyone can choose when to sleep. Going to be earlier for you lets you go to sleep earlier? Great for you. Not everyone is exactly like you.

      Quite a few people are at the mercy of their circadian rhythms, and nothing short of addictive sleep aids will cause them to fall asleep earlier. Youcan, of course, always set the alarm earlier. Thus a big problem with sleep deprivation.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 0

      Except your body won't stay on NYC time. It'll align itself with the sunlight hours you're now experiencing in LA. If you're a night owl in NYC, you'll be a night owl in LA, after that period

      Only because you keep staying up late.

      I travel a lot for business, and, if the schedule allows it, I'll often stay on my 'old' time zone, sometimes for 4 or 5 nights. It's not hard because it's what you're used to.

    23. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people get home from their jobs at 7:30pm you insensitive clod! Sometimes you don't have any choice in the hours you and your kids need to keep. The world doesn't revolve around you or your two year old.

    24. Re:Let me be the first to say... by lgw · · Score: 1

      When America was brimming with manufacturing jobs, and manufacturing jobs were among the best jobs available, that was a great plan for a school system.

      But the world has changed, and manufacturing jobs are history, and narrowly fixed work schedules across a team make less sense every decade.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Didn't work back then, still doesn't work for me, not at all.

      During a few weeks of holidays I did some self experimentation with my "natural" sleep cycle. I shut off any kind of outside information concerning time (i.e. no light from outside, no clocks, no contact), wrote an app where I'd press buttons depending on when I wake up and when I go to bed (without telling me what time it actually is) and set an alarm for the morning of the last Sunday (so I won't miss having to go to work again).

      The result was interesting. After a few days my rhythm stabilized at surprisingly exact 27 hours (give or take only about 15 minutes per day). I went to bed tired and woke up relaxed and fresh, and interestingly I needed less sleep too. Which was probably more sleep in the end, since I spend a good deal of my usual "sleeping hours" rolling around in bed in a vain attempt to find some sleep.

      For me that meant I have to reorganize my daily schedules, and given the flexible work time I enjoy I can actually shift the hours about enough to fit my work hours into my "awake" hours. That means that at days I go to work just after getting up and at others I get home from work just before going to bed, and a "normal" work rhythm feels to me a lot like doing shift work, but at least I can now fit my work into my natural rhythm.

      It's not perfect, but I guess it's as good as it's gonna get.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Let me be the first to say... by edumacator · · Score: 1

      You are blaming schools, when most of the time these decisions are made by school boards, which are comprised of elected officials. The blame is with us all.

    27. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about putting your kids to bed at a reasonable hour in the evening instead of 9 or 10 or 11.

    28. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently my son has a /. account and just modded me 'Troll'.

      Of course, that must be what happened. The fact that you smugly oversimplified a complex, nuanced issue in order to dismiss it and those adversely affected by it has absolutely nothing to do with it.

      You remind me of certain extreme right-wingers who think the poor should just "get off their lazy asses", as if poverty was that simple.

      Not everyone is "wired" to be a morning person. They are not naturally that way, but they find themselves in a world run by those who are. They go against their own nature trying to adapt to the world. It should surprise no one that this has a cost. The people surprised by this are people like you who think everybody is either just like themselves, or somehow defective. Expecting everybody to naturally be a morning person is like expecting every person on the Internet to be a telecommunications expert. It's inconsistent with observable reality.

      What you are doing is like trying to force-fit a square peg into a round hole. When it doesn't work as well as you hoped, you are then telling the peg it's doing something wrong. That's why you are being smug or if you like, self-centered - I am not trying to name-call or hurl insults, it's just that what you are doing has a name. It's this black-and-white view of yours that was correctly recognized as "Troll". No one is accusing you of intentionally trolling, it's just the closest moderation fitting your post.

      Unfortunatley you are now considered "insightful" by the more numerous small-minded mods who share your black-and-white view of how everyone else should be.

    29. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Everything you said is true, and potentially useful.

      That does not change the fact that many people will read your post and imagine grumpy cat making a face. It means you have crossed the line into geezerhood. Welcome! Don't forget to pick up your complementary sock suspenders.

    30. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tried my best to go to bed earlier.

      Same here. My pet peeve is how morning people are often so sanctimonious about their preferred schedules, as though working at 7AM is somehow more virtuous than working at 7PM. Personally I think we should put all the morning people on the other side of the planet so they stop bothering us (bonus points if you force them to attend conference calls in the middle of their night).

    31. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people get home from their jobs at 7:30pm you insensitive clod! Sometimes you don't have any choice in the hours you and your kids need to keep. The world doesn't revolve around you or your two year old.

      Your problem is, you have no sense of irony. Let me demonstrate:

      You call him an "insensitive clod". The true insensitive clod is someone who values their own convenience more than what is good for their children.
      And the last time I checked, the world revolves around the sun.

    32. Re: Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The greatest fun is finding some way to force self-righteous morning people to have to work at night. If they have trouble, they'll saying that being on a late schedule is "unnatural".

    33. Re:Let me be the first to say... by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      No, blame the schools because they let out the kids out at 4 PM.

      If schools let them out at 1 PM instead of 4 PM, then cartoon time and prime time can be moved forward 3 hours, and then little school children everywhere could go to bed at 8 PM instead of 11 PM, and nobody would be having this problem of not enough sleep.

    34. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Or how about putting your kids to bed at a reasonable hour in the evening instead of 9 or 10 or 11.

      Been there, done that. I can make my 9 y.o. daughter go to bed, ensure she has no electronic distractions, and that the lights are out and stay out. If she's not ready to sleep, an hour or two can go by and she'll still be awake. She has been like that for years.

    35. Re:Let me be the first to say... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      narrowly fixed work schedules across a team make less sense every decade.

      So we should only expect them to persist for the next century or so.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    36. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Veery good. From now on I expect you to come in no earlier than 12:00 noon, take lunch ah 4:00Pm, and leave no earlier than 9:00pm.

      If you hypothesis is correct you can trivially address this by going to be later and getting up later.

    37. Re:Let me be the first to say... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you don't have any choice in the hours you and your kids need to keep.

      If you want to hang out at The Olive Garden at 9pm get a sitter, or don't have kids. Forcing some poor exhausted toddler to sit in a high chair because your work hours means you can't enjoy unlimited breadsticks until after their bedtime is child abuse.

    38. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Damn lazy kids these days.
      I had to walk a mile and a quarter each way. In the winter I got to take the bus. 10c each way was too expensive for my family to support year round.
      People wonder why there are so many obese kids.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    39. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Some people get home from their jobs at 7:30pm you insensitive clod!

      The true insensitive clod is someone who values their own convenience more than what is good for their children.

      The selfishness of some parents, who insist on keeping these "job" things for their own amusement. Of course they make excuses about needing the money to feed, clothe and house their children, and will complain that they don't have infinite flexibility in their work schedules, but I never believe them.

    40. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that describes "the job you like". You can find a way to work different hours. It just won't be a job you like. That is very .. inconvenient.

    41. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      No, that describes "the job you like". You can find a way to work different hours. It just won't be a job you like. That is very .. inconvenient.

      Of course, jobs are so abundant these days that you can just pick one that has the hours most convenient for your child. Certainly there's gotta be a burger flipping job like that. With food stamps you can probably feed the kid, and housing w/ roaches builds character. Forget about medical care though.

      P.S. I assume you speak from experience, and had to change jobs so that you could put your kid(s) to bed by 7PM.

    42. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      It's not hard because it's what you're used to.

      No, it is not hard because you are you. People that are not you, or even you later in your life, may have great difficulty doing it. When I was in my twenties, I would be asleep in five minutes, and would nearly always sleep soundly through the night. I am decades older now, and usually wake several times during the night, and often take an hour or more to get back to sleep. Don't assume everyone is like you. Different people have vastly different sleep patterns, and even the same person can have vastly different patterns during different phases of their life.

    43. Re:Let me be the first to say... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      Obligatory XKCD. By dividing it into 28 hours it makes a perfect 6 "day" week.

      When I had a 100% flexible work schedule with no reporting location, I tried this a few times, but I never had the discipline to see it through an entire week. It's quite interesting to see something like that actually work!

    44. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the problem is not devices. Many of us are old enough to remember The World Before Smartphones, and even in those dark days, there were insomniacs and morning people and late risers, and the blithely unaware who'd just say "oh your rhythm's out of wack, try counting sheep".

      It just doesn't work that way. The reality is that there is no biological mechanism that would, when functioning correctly, coordinate a whole population's circadian rhythms to particular times of day, like a 7am wake-up and an 11pm bed-time.

      If you put night-owls to bed later, they just get to stay awake longer and feel shittier the next morning. If you don't understand what that's like, try going to bed at 3pm and staying there until 11pm, and then stay up all night to work a night shift. Doesn't sound like fun, does it? Now imagine that society (including your employers and family) expects you to do that every day (except weekends, if you're lucky) for the next 15-30 years. And now imagine someone says "the problem is books. Stop reading books".

    45. Re:Let me be the first to say... by AdamThor · · Score: 2

      Try This:
      http://stereopsis.com/flux/

      Super cool app to change the color temp of your computer screen automatically toward red in the evening so that you can go to sleep. I run it and I normally don't even notice it in action. As it gets dark outside the colors still look correct. But I don't feel like my eyes get burned by the computer at night.

      It's way cool.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    46. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Skrapion · · Score: 2

      Seriously?

      Okay, here's what you were thinking:

      "Duh! Obviously sleep deprivation is bad for children!"

      But here's the full implication of your response:

      "Duh! Anybody who doesn't know that 73% of 9-10 year olds and 80% of 13-14 year olds in the US are sleep deprived is a moron."

      Measurements are important. That's what science is all about.

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    47. Re:Let me be the first to say... by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Although I do find the transition quite obvious - unlike my daylight alarm clock which goes from dark to bright over half an hour, Flux does it in about five seconds. Once it's changed you don't notice the difference though, and it's definitely less glaring.

    48. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But people on slashdot always seem to be proud that they do all-nighters at school/college/work and need minimal sleep to still function as brilliant engineers, so presumably they'd say that depriving kids of sleep was good preparation for the real world.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    49. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have massive problems with not falling asleep until late at night only to suffer in the morning. Then I discovered melatonin (or to be precise, my physician told me about it) and it has practically changed my life. I can fall asleep when I decide that I need to and if I have had any lack of sleep, sleeping as long as I have to is not a problem (I don't wake up when the effect wears off). I also travel a lot and I recommend it to everyone as an aid in adjusting to an entirely different time zone (I can adjust 7+ hours in one night). Now, obviously being dependent on any kind of medication is bad but melatonin should be quite harmless since it's natural for your body anyway.

    50. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Then go to sleep earlier...

      There's no fascist like an early-rising fascist.

      Some people do better work at 5pm than 5 am, that is just how different people are made. Not everyone can go to bed at 9 and sleep solidly for 8 hours so they're fresh for the dawn chorus.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    51. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What you are doing is like trying to force-fit a square peg into a round hole.

      It's called fascism. The inability to acknowledge differences between people is the basis for all evil everywhere.

      Everyone is not like you.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    52. Re: Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      For kids particularly it's not a question of "I like to stay up late". If you pack them off to bed at 8 pm, they won't necessarily sleep for 10 straight hours and wake refreshed at 6 am.

      Your inability to appreciate this point means that you are part of the problem.

      Adults going to work have at least some notional say in when they choose to get up, children have none at all.

      I personally would never take a job where I had to do shifts and start work at 4am or whatever. Even if I went to bed at 6pm I wouldn't get enough sleep, and I would be tired all day. Obviously, in extremity I could function, the same way that soldiers in combat learn to function with minimal sleep for days at a time, but I would certainly never choose to.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    53. Re: Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      It's not a problem for you, so it's not a problem?

      That's pretty much the unofficial motto of slashdot isn't it?

      "I've got a really well paid job, nice big house, a couple of cars, a great family, wonderful friends and a cock like a rolling pin. If you're poor, uneducated and unhappy, it's because you're a big fat loser".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    54. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure it's so parents have time to drop off their kids at school on the way to work.

      Parents should not be taking their kids to school after the age of about 4 or 5.

      It is one of the most ridiculous things to have happened during my lifetime. Kids should walk, cycle or get a bus (depending on distance). There is absolutely no advantage whatsoever in parents driving their kids to school. It makes the kids physically lazy and infantilises them. They have no freedom to play with friends on the way to school, or hang around afterwards talking, or explore on their own.

      It's all part of society's destruction of childhood. Children go from toddler straight to whining entitled adolescent.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    55. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The problem is devices. The light emitted by phones, laptops, tablets, etc., cause the body's circadian rhythm to go out of whack. The body begins to think that daylight lasts longer than it does, and that it should be awake longer than it should. This doesn't reduce the amount of sleep that the body needs, but since it believes that daylight lasts longer, it doesn't get 'sleepy' as early as it should.

      What are you talking about? If you're stupid enough to leave lights on while you're trying to go to sleep it probably won't help, but it's not the reason why you can't sleep.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    56. Re:Let me be the first to say... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No, blame the schools because they let out the kids out at 4 PM.

      If schools let them out at 1 PM instead of 4 PM, then cartoon time and prime time can be moved forward 3 hours, and then little school children everywhere could go to bed at 8 PM instead of 11 PM, and nobody would be having this problem of not enough sleep.

      So you'd start school at 6am or something?

      Clearly there are no down sides to that at all.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    57. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure every school district in America still has buses.

    58. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Also, poor people should, in fact, get off their asses.

    59. Re:Let me be the first to say... by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

      agreed ... not like we know this already for decades ...

    60. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. I regularly rose at 4 or 5 AM as a kid, and this did not change at all when I was a teen. Now, as a 30 something, I still prefer to wake before 6 AM; I consider sleeping until 6 AM to be sleeping in, and any later than that is wasting the day.

    61. Re:Let me be the first to say... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Not everyone can go to bed at 9 and sleep solidly for 8 hours so they're fresh for the dawn chorus.

      But for some reason only the early risers believe they have the moral high ground.

      Sure, not all early risers do, but have you ever heard of a late riser taking the moral highground?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    62. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like trying to drag you lazy noon snoozers out of bed during the proper morning!

    63. Re:Let me be the first to say... by hammyhew · · Score: 1

      No need to change the starting time of school, school is already too long as it is. 4 hours is an insane amount of time to put kids through on a daily basis, let alone 6 or 7 hours. I'm surprised kids even put up with it without revolting against the people who make them throw their lives away on such garbage.

    64. Re:Let me be the first to say... by WillgasM · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was a good reason, just a reason.

    65. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'd be surprised about morning-people's resiliency at waking up in the middle of the night. morning people seem to wake quickly and maintain good awareness at any time. Late risers are the ones who have trouble staying awake.

    66. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      That's almost exactly the schedule my daughter is on, and she's turning 2. Nobody gives us funny looks about it, though. It is true we don't get out much in the evenings anymore (each of us parents usually does something on our own once a week, but honestly we're pretty tired a lot of the time anyway so quiet time is good). It's one of the best things we did for her happiness and our sanity to get on a consistent and extensive sleep schedule.

      She's a good sport if we have to push her a little now and then, but we've noticed a direct correlation between her going to bed later and then sleeping worse, waking up more often, waking up earlier (unintuitive, but true) and being worse at nap time, plus being crankier when awake of course.

    67. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since invalids make up a surprisingly small percentage of "poor" people. Even handicapped people can do some work.

    68. Re:Let me be the first to say... by lgw · · Score: 1

      And thus the challenge to change the school system in less than a century!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    69. Re: Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being dependent on any kind of medication is bad but melatonin should be quite harmless since it's natural for your body anyway.

      I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. You do realize that your body will stop naturally producing normal levels of melatonin until you go through a long readjustment period right?

    70. Re: Let me be the first to say... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I have to say, that's really funny, and also a bit true.

    71. Re:Let me be the first to say... by ejasons · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a definite night person, I have no trouble at all staying awake, even for a couple of days. I do, however, have trouble getting awake after having gone to sleep. My whole family is that way...

      And my experience with morning people, is that they very definitely do fade toward the end of the day, whereas the most awake that I am all day is right before I go to bed.

      I definitely wouldn't want to be in a car driven at night by a morning person. My experience is that they are much more prone to falling asleep...

    72. Re:Let me be the first to say... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Bad parenting, totaly.
      Child abuse? Nah.

    73. Re:Let me be the first to say... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, we have to put up with the guys who think they deserve all kinds of recognition and praise heaped on them for "staying late" and still being in the office at 7PM when in fact they came wandering in a noon. So it all evens out.

    74. Re:Let me be the first to say... by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, mine has a an option for transition speed, fast is 20 seconds, slow is 60 min.

      Light up alarm clocks are the bomb.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    75. Re:Let me be the first to say... by spiralx · · Score: 1

      Ah, so it does... doh. 20s versus 60m is quite a difference though!

      The best thing about my alarm clock is waking up about ten minutes before it goes off. Never fails to amaze me :)

    76. Re:Let me be the first to say... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      So you'd start school at 6am or something?
      Clearly there are no down sides to that at all.

      Clearly, I wasn't being sarcastic at all.

    77. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn fools assigning blame to just one thing. Bitch bitch moan fucking moan. Society is different. Go live in a shack in the wops and shoot at anybody coming near you.

  2. And.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water is wet, news at 11.

    1. Re:And.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is water really wet, or does it it make other objects wet?

  3. Weird... by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

    So at some point before graduate school it turns the other way around...

  4. Ambient noise by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd wager ambient urban noise levels have increased tremendously over the last while as well. Given increasingly shoddy construction, antisocial behaviour from the party set and general vehicular activity you'd have to be living in a rural area to get a decent night's sleep in most places. It's a very serious business with major health implications for children and adults.

    1. Re:Ambient noise by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's a problem. I was raised in a city, and now that I moved I have trouble getting asleep without the noise. Ambient noise is relatively easy to get used to.

    2. Re:Ambient noise by cstec · · Score: 1

      ...antisocial behaviour from the party set...

      Wait, what? How many geeks have been harped on to get out, go to parties and see real people? Now the truth -- seeing other people is anti-social!

      Guess it's back to playing violent video games with a million other people, the last vestige of polite society.

    3. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you'd have to be living in a rural area to get a decent night's sleep in most places.

      Until the roosters start crowing at 3:00AM

    4. Re:Ambient noise by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Construction has gotten much better, especially windows which now transmit far less sound. Vehicles have gotten quieter and the party set is not going to risk arrest by being that loud.

    5. Re:Ambient noise by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if i lived on a farm I would have had to kill myself long ago.

    6. Re:Ambient noise by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      It seems you've never been annoyed by loud thumping music that you can hear from ten blocks away.

    7. Re:Ambient noise by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So if it doesn't apply to YOU, then it must be wrong.
      I agree habit plays a large role, but think of it like this: if you were to be raised in a more natural environment, maybe your today's performance would have been 150% of what it is now. Truth is, you wouldn't know. It's one of the things you can't prove unless you go back to birth and start off on a different path, and then a Godlike power would compare the two :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    8. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vehicles have gotten quieter

      LOL

      risk arrest

      LOL

      You say a lot of stupid things.

    9. Re:Ambient noise by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Ambient noises are not a problem. Far from it, given the fact that there's an entire industry geared around providing ambient sounds as a sleep aid for people who don't have enough of them. While sirens and the like may be annoying, most people don't have to deal with those most nights, and the rest of the ambient sounds are no more difficult to get used to than anything else. When I was a kid living in the suburbs, I remember leaving my bedroom window open at night so that I could fall asleep to the sound of the neighbor's A/C unit. Now that I'm a few decades older, I find that having something like an air filter running works great for me, but I've also had good results with just leaving a looping track of crickets or rainfall on my stereo in order to get a good night's sleep.

      Suggesting that ambient sounds are the problem flies in the face of what I'd imagine most people believe about the nature of ambient sounds and how they affect sleep.

    10. Re:Ambient noise by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Some of today's vehicles have five thousand watts subwoofers. You think those are quieter, really?

    11. Re:Ambient noise by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Nature doesn't have cars with subwoofers, harley-davidson bikes and idiots using streets as racing tracks.

    12. Re:Ambient noise by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I'd agree. However, you're failing to draw a distinction between ambient noise and just plain old noise. All of those are noise, certainly, but none of those would typically be classified as ambient, which is what the OP was talking about and I was responding to.

    13. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theory: ambient noise does not disturb truly sound sleep.

      Its not like the night hours are silent in nature, what with animals, wind, weather, rivers etc.

      Only rural places where humans have wiped out native animals and shelter themselves from the elements are really quiet at night, and plenty of people think the lack of noise is disturbing.

    14. Re:Ambient noise by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      This is why we all must campaign for electric cars to come *without* the artificial engine noise. Yes, we MAY save a few lives here and there (or maybe not, as people will just have to look both ways), but the insidious effects that noise pollution has on all our health is very much underrated.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    15. Re:Ambient noise by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      He's not talking about the sound system. Engine noise and road noise from modern cars is considerably less than what it used to be.

    16. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only problem is there are considerably more cars than there used to be.

    17. Re:Ambient noise by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      The artificial engine noise is only useful up to 5 or 10 mph. After that tire and wind noise are greater than engine noise.

    18. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's the stupid one????

      Every word he said was true. Up to you to disprove it.

    19. Re:Ambient noise by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      I had a college roommate for about two months who was from the country. He couldn't sleep:
      1 - with the window open, because of the street noise... 12 stories below
      2 - with the curtains open, because of the lights from the rest of the campus... 9 stories below

      Other than the dorm's twin 1200 feet away and the campus far below there was nothing but mountains and fields out that window. Maybe all that natural environment piece and quiet he experienced growing up would have resulted in better performance, but we wouldn't know because he dropped out and moved back home; he simply could never get sleep (we both agreed the window and curtains had to be open due to no A/C). The flaw in the logic that those raised in a natural environment will perform better is that most people spend most of their lives in an unnatural environment. Being raised without being adapted to noise/light pollution is actually a disadvantage for our current society.

    20. Re:Ambient noise by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Wow. He was smart enought to go to college but not smart enough to use earplugs and an eye mask?

    21. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trouble with a "more natural environment" is all the damned sabre-toothed tigers waking you up in the middle of the night when they try to invade you cave.

    22. Re:Ambient noise by war4peace · · Score: 1

      ...Or you could just perform at the countryside; I see nothing wrong in starting a business there.
      Sounds like your roommate wanted all the perks of the city but couldn't stand any of its disadvantages. Life doesn't agree with such a wish.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    23. Re:Ambient noise by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It seems you've never been annoyed by loud thumping music that you can hear from ten blocks away.

      There is quite a simple solution to the problem of inner city noise: don't live in an inner city.

      Complaining about background noise in a city makes about as much sense as complaining about the smell of cow shit in the countryside.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    24. Re:Ambient noise by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Nature doesn't have cars with subwoofers, harley-davidson bikes and idiots using streets as racing tracks.

      But it does have cocks crowing at dawn, pigeons fucking outside your window at the same time, blood-curdling screams and cries from animals being hunted by predators at 2am and so on.

      The general background level of quiet actually makes these sound worse than they are in the countryside.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    25. Re:Ambient noise by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I am speaking about road noise and mufflers.

      Those subwoofers are something you can call the cops about.

      In my nice middle class suburb they respond and it works!

    26. Re:Ambient noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you haven't lived near chickens before.

      Roosters crow. All the time. It doesn't matter if it's dawn or mid-afternoon.

  5. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone truly care about performance in public schools when public schools are obviously pure garbage? They're rote memorization paradises and little more than that.

    Agreed, they're the worst way to systematically educate every single person.*

    *Except for all the other ways we've tried.

  6. And this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to match a bunch of kids' sleep schedules to that of adults, who need less sleep, is a really dumb idea. Having a nap time in school or shortening the school day would do wonders.

  7. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did you even read the summary? Kids are getting dumber because of social/cultural/technological/material reasons. The schools are getting dumber to accommodate the kids who are getting dumber, and the problem is a downward self-propagating spiral.

  8. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This will prepare them for a future of diminished expectations, round-the-clock micromanagement by their employers and reflexive consumerism.

  9. Wow, I'm impressed. by seebs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They managed to reproduce results fifteen or twenty years, and offer a stupid interpretation. Not bad!

    The sleep-deprivation thing is well known, and not new. However, there's nothing tying it to "mobile devices". Rather, there's strong evidence that teenagers tend to have a circadian rhythm which favors being up later and not getting up that early. Schools have historically shoved their schedules extra-early so that extracurricular events like sports can occur before the sun goes down, but after school. Last time I heard about this, a school district had tried simply moving the high school day an hour later, and gotten a very noticable improvement in basically every measure of achievement available to them.

    Now that I'm an adult, I sleep until I feel like getting up, and if I'm up a bit late, fine. I pretty much wake up between 11 and noon, and I work "late" most nights... But I get a heck of a lot more done, and a lot better, than I did when I was trying to work 9-5.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on the person and their work environment. I work better in the mornings rather than later in the day and my work schedule reflects such a preference.

      As a manager I allow my employees to come and go as they wish (unless projects dictate otherwise) so we can have better coverage and work output.

    2. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Schools have historically shoved their schedules extra-early so that extracurricular events like sports can occur before the sun goes down, but after school.

      Solution, abolish sports. You go to school to learn. You can play with your balls on your own time.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what Al Bundy will do without his High School athletic accomplishments to look back on.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    4. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Schools have historically shoved their schedules extra-early so that extracurricular events like sports can occur before the sun goes down, but after school.

      Solution, abolish sports. You go to school to learn. You can play with your balls on your own time.

      You also get a LOT of pushback from the students themselves - while they like the late start, the don't like the evening endings because it means less dollars for their pockets to buy stuff with (i.e., part time jobs, babysitting, chores, etc). Turns out more than a few teens earn a few bucks doing a couple of hours of babysitting on the side before the parents come home. (It's generally a good time for homework and study as well, so ... multitask and make money).

      Parents generally hate it as well because it means two trips to school - one to drop off the preteens, then to drop off the teen, then pick up the preteen, and then the teen. Which generally screws up the schedule of the teen who has to wake up early anyways. (Schools do like it though - it means you can stagger lunch hours a bit and have a lot less conflict and congestion).

    5. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time a teenager is old enough to do that kind of casual work, they're probably old enough to be trusted to choose what time of day they start school, given a few options like 8am, 9am and 10am, as long as they put in at least 30 hours a week.

      Skip phys-ed and start at 10am on Tuesdays, for example. Stay for the 4pm CS class on Wednesdays. Attend the 2pm math class with Mr. Jones instead of the 8am math class with Ms. Smith.

      When I was in high school, we had unsupervised 'study periods' (at times determined by the school, but by the luck of the draw from the students' POV) that allowed us that flexibility if our study periods landed at the start or end of the school day.

      A more intelligent scheduling system (perhaps assisted by one of those new-fangled com-puter machines) would let high-school students shuffle their own classes around, within reason, to let them start late or sleep early as required. There is no good reason to have the whole school start and finish at the same fixed times.

    6. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by seebs · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Being allowed to adapt to when your body likes to be awake is a huge benefit.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    7. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, there's nothing tying it to "mobile devices".

      That works for patent office, though.

    8. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Schools have historically shoved their schedules extra-early so that extracurricular events like sports can occur before the sun goes down, but after school.

      Solution, abolish sports. You go to school to learn. You can play with your balls on your own time.

      Yes, because modern kids have so much physical exercise already that a few hours of sports at school wmakes little difference anyway. I mean, most kids are out from 3 til 6 or so just running around the fields, climbing trees and playing impromptu games of football in the street.

      Oh, wait, no that was when I was young. Nowadays, they're driven home from school by their parents and plonked in front of a laptop/TV until bed time, with occasional pauses for processed food snacks and sugar-laden fizzy drinks.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Wow, I'm impressed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When I was a teen* I made my own way to and from school. Why should parents have to make an extra trip for the teenagers?

      * Actually I was 11 when I started.

  10. Citation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Given increasingly shoddy construction

    I'd wager you don't work in construction nor have you ever studied recent materials science in sound dampening.

    "I wish I had a much older house." - said no one ever

    1. Re:Citation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wish I had a much older house." - said no one ever

      Someone hasn't watched It's a Wonderful Life.

    2. Re:Citation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've said that plenty of times.

    3. Re:Citation Needed by Wolvey · · Score: 2

      Many of the houses which were cheaply tossed up during the housing boom have incredibly poor sound dampening. The house I am in now was built in 2009 and doesn't even come close to my old 1971 block construction home. "I wish I had a house that wasn't built as quickly and cheaply as possible." - said the millions of buyers who realized that newer != better. Would you rather have antique solid wood furniture or a brand new!!! set from Ikea?

    4. Re:Citation Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Said no one ever" is remarkably lame.

      My wife and I are buying a 100 year old house next month. We *wanted* an old house. Old houses have charm and style. Proper architecture. Beautiful hardwood floors, molding and trim, et cetera.

      People don't want to buy a crappy house if they can help it -- but old houses have all sorts of things plenty of people like that simply don't exist in newer homes.

    5. Re:Citation Needed by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Given increasingly shoddy construction

      I'd wager you don't work in construction nor have you ever studied recent materials science in sound dampening. "I wish I had a much older house." - said no one ever

      I know it's different in America where you build houses out of plywood and anything built before the Korean war is practically an historic monument, but here in the UK, older houses are much, much nicer. Bigger, better construction, bigger gardens, you name it. Yes they may require updating for insulation, but that's about it.

      They generally cost more on upkeep just because of the size, but within reason the older the house the better. If I was rich, I would love a mansion from the Eighteenth century rather than some new-built plastic pile of shite with 10 bedrooms 10 by 6 feet and 5 bathrooms 20 by 16.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Citation Needed by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      "I wish I had a much older house." - said no one ever

      You might want to actually check property prices. "Period features" often command a premium.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  11. duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    while it might be "duh", government agencies, et al, won't respond to anecdotal stories about the effects of sleep deprivation. They need data to back it.

    There are many other "duh" topics, but no one ever bothers to actually study it. And for the ones who do, regular folks aren't surprised at the answer and wonder why the govt. is funding such "obvious" research.

    Well, analyzing "duh" data is tedious. And hard to do without preconceived bias.

    1. Re:duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many other "duh" topics, but no one ever bothers to actually study it. And for the ones who do, regular folks aren't surprised at the answer and wonder why the govt. is funding such "obvious" research.

      What *I* wonder is why the gov't doesn't err on the side of "duh, this probably is true, let's account for that in our planning".

      If you want to actually fix this situation, wrest control away from the morning-people who set the school schedules. Not everyone actually wants to get up shortly after dawn, for many people this is simply unnatural and goes against their own sleep rhythm, but everyone is forced to do this by various schools and employers.

      When you are not naturally a morning person, you have great difficulty going to bed early enough to get adequate sleep because you simply don't feel tired at all early in the evening. It would be like asking an early riser to be awake and alert at 2 in the morning. They could make themselves do that, but it will predictably hurt their performance. Speaking of "duh", I got one for you: when you force people by authority to do something that is quite unnatural for them, they won't perform as well as when you work *with* their nature instead of against it.

      You could address the problem from the other end of the candle by taking a hard look at the amount of homework assigned to students, which is sometimes hours a day, and eliminating any of it that is not strictly necessary. The default standpoint should be that a lot of homework means the teachers failed to transmit the information during the 7-8 hours per day the students were with them, unless there is good reason to believe otherwise.

    2. Re:duh research by sycodon · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm sorry, what Government Agency needs to pay attention to this and what should they do about it?

      Answer: None.

      The only reason 9 and 10 year old children are sleep deprived is because of dumb shit parents who don't give a fuck about their kids.

      And the only people who can do anything about it is the dumb shit parents.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:duh research by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, what Government Agency needs to pay attention to this and what should they do about it?

      Answer: None.

      The only reason 9 and 10 year old children are sleep deprived is because of dumb shit parents who don't give a fuck about their kids.

      And the only people who can do anything about it is the dumb shit parents.

      The only reason 9 and 10 year old children are sleep deprived is because of dumb shit parents who don't give a fuck about their kids.

      And the only people who can do anything about it is the dumb shit parents.

      Thank GOD we have someone here who knows the answer and no doubt or exceptions!

      I'm intrigued that you know everything - do you have a newsletter I can subscribe to?

      So first, Every sleep child is apparently allowed to stay up as late as he or she wants because those parents don't "give a fuck"?

      Not a single school aged child has ever had to staye up late because a parent was out working and they had to baby sit. I babysat my little sister while my parents were working late. Making ends meet. Not because they didn't "give a fuck". Lot's of children get to do this. Not everything is as it was in the Brady Bunch.

      Even my son while in high school was a part of the generation that got homework dumped on them. sometimes he'd be up until 11 or 12 at night doing it. In your world we made him do that homework because4 we didn't "give a fuck".

      Kind sir, you are a person who only knows one answer and spouts it as if it is from God's lips to your ears, You are not anywhere near as smart as you think you are, you have a very narrow, and I suspect politically influnced viewpoint - although I doubt that you "give a fuck".

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:duh research by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      while it might be "duh", government agencies, et al, won't respond to anecdotal stories about the effects of sleep deprivation. They need data to back it.

      There is plenty of data. This not even close to the first study that has reached the same conclusion. More sleep means more learning. Kids' sleep patterns are determined by daylight, so "going to bed early" doesn't work. What does work is shifting the school hours later in the day. The kids go to bed at the same time, but sleep extra in the morning. Schools that have done this not only have better test scores, but also have fewer pregnancies, less drug use, and fewer accidents. Kids are most likely to smoke pot and screw right after school, while their parents are still at work and the house is empty. When the school day is shifted later in the day, they don't have as much time for that. Citation (sorry about the pdf): Sleep, Safety, Drugs, Teen Pregnancy and other reasons to change school times

    5. Re:duh research by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Citation (sorry about the pdf)

      Here is the same citation, but html: Early Morning Classes, Sleepy Students, and Risky Behavior.

      More citations are listed at the bottom of the article.

      Quick summary: Starting and ending the school day early is really dumb.

    6. Re:duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      So 80% of school age children are babysitting or has so much home work they can't fit it in between 3PM and midnight?

      Yeah...sorry not buying it. Not even for you.

      And yes, your parents didn't really give a fuck because they vomited you out before they were in a position to take care of you it seems.

      You apparently let your children stay up until all hours of the night because you are being pretty defensive here. I guess the idea that parents should enforce bedtimes or otherwise make sure their kids loves are balanced is offensive to you eh?

      And what the fuck is political about making sure your kids get enough rest? I know. Anything that smacks of you having to be responsible and make sacrifices is an evil Republican plot to oppress you.

      Fuck you and your kids.

    7. Re:duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Kind sir, you are a person who only knows one answer and spouts it as if it is from God's lips to your ears, You are not anywhere near as smart as you think you are, you have a very narrow,... "

      Sorry for that, but I have seen too many times parents letting their children go too late to bed, just because the parents did not care, or did not know that children must sleep a lot. If if I let my three children do what they want, they would stay awake very late, playing, reading, watching a film, or whatever.

      "I suspect politically influnced viewpoint"

      Yes, we see what you mean. Anyone who disagrees with you is a "political suspect".

    8. Re:duh research by nine-times · · Score: 2

      Even my son while in high school was a part of the generation that got homework dumped on them. sometimes he'd be up until 11 or 12 at night doing it. In your world we made him do that homework because4 we didn't "give a fuck".

      One of many things I've never understood about highschool: Make teenagers wake up at 6am to get to school on time. Keep them in school until 3pm. Encourage them to go to football practice after school. Give them 5 hours of homework. Wonder why they fall asleep in class.

    9. Re:duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      @ShangaiBill...

      This makes total sense... unfortunately, it's doomed because it's sensible.

    10. Re:duh research by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Where do you get politics from this? Just because he mentions a government agency? That's silly.

    11. Re:duh research by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      So 80% of school age children are babysitting or has so much home work they can't fit it in between 3PM and midnight?

      Yeah...sorry not buying it. Not even for you.

      And yes, your parents didn't really give a fuck because they vomited you out before they were in a position to take care of you it seems.

      I'd take my parents a thousand times over than to be ruled by a hateful jerk like yourself . I truly feel pity for you.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:duh research by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "Yes, we see what you mean. Anyone who disagrees with you is a "political suspect".

      Sure, just as if I said "it takes a village to raise a child", that would be politically influenced. so if someone writes:

      I'm sorry, what Government Agency needs to pay attention to this and what should they do about it?

      Answer: None.

      Seems pretty obvious to me. If not to you, well, we all have different levels of comprehension.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:duh research by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Where do you get politics from this? Just because he mentions a government agency? That's silly.

      Let's take a different approach. Someone says "It takes a village to raise a child." Nothing political there?

      I would say that given that Hillary Clinton wrote a book on that, most people here would consider that a liberal expression. Disagree? It might be considered obtuse in some groups. To say that no government agency has any business paying attention to some children's sleep habits is exceptionally easy to attribute to a Libertarian political outlook. Disagree? fine, but know you could ask a hundred people to analyze both statements, and probably 98 would assign what I just wrote. The other two are posting on slashdot.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:duh research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone actually wants to get up shortly after dawn, for many people this is simply unnatural and goes against their own sleep rhythm

      Your sleep rhythm is more flexible than you think. Aside from sunlight, there is not much in our external world that drives it. Usually the problem is too much stimulation in the hours shortly leading up to when you go to bed, especially those involving staring at bright light like a TV or computer screen. Bright light has a direct impact on your circadian rhythm. If everyone get's up later and is in school later, they will just end up staying up even later yet if habits are not modified. Try winding down your activity to not involve TV or computers in the hour before you go to bed for a week or two and see the difference.

      The default standpoint should be that a lot of homework means the teachers failed to transmit the information during the 7-8 hours per day the students were with them, unless there is good reason to believe otherwise.

      Do teachers even get that much time anymore? I see kids walking home around 1:30 these days. I'm willing to bet that they don't start at 5:45.

    15. Re:duh research by nobodie · · Score: 1

      say "duh" as much as you like, but most kids in my son's class go to bed at 11. My son has to take a shower at 8, then read until 9 and then its lights out.

      So, he gets awards, straight A's, invites to gifted and talented programs and magnet schools, wins the math bowl, the reading contests, score a level higher in standardized tests, etc.

      No, he isn't really a genius, he just gets plenty of sleep and wakes up without an alarm clock because he is ready to wake up. It's 9:50 right now ans in ten minutes I'll go take my shower and go to bed and read myself. By 11, unless the wife and i feel frisky i'm asleep. I wake up about 6 in the morning and decide whether i want more sleep or not and then do what is needed. There are no alarm clocks in the house. We just go to bed at a reasonable time and get up when we are rested.

      It's not just me and the son though. I am known at work for being able to focus and get my work done at work: that is to say I don't take any work home, ever.

      Those of you who "have to work 12 hours a day" are cheating yourself. Either get a new job or learn to sleep more so that you can focus and get your work done in a reasonable span of time.

      Last thing I discovered: come to work before everyone else and work hard the first two hours of the day. Then, when the rest of the office drags in make sure you have new stuff to give people that you did in the morning. Make it clear that you did a buttload of work while they were asleep. Then, when 5 comes pack your stuff and walk out the door. No one will say anything, you will have whatever they need on their desk the next morning. Works for me anyway.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  12. Start school later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Start school at 9:30am and go until 4:30, just like the stock market. Have a 8-9:15 'social' class or work on your own class for those students that have to get there early for whatever reason.

    1. Re:Start School Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the last paragraph, and do you know what I got out of it? You were staying up too late playing with your computer. What you should have done was gone to bed. Then you wouldn't have been falling asleep in your Geometry class. A loss of free time is merely the natural progression into adulthood, when you have practically none. Teenagers want to have the privileges of adulthood, but none of the responsibilities. Your parents didn't want to nag. Nagging is merely the name that you give to commands from those in authority over you, which you don't want to obey.

    2. Re:Start school later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that mean almost every child was there in the 8-9:15 slot? Otherwise you're going to have children home alone in the morning.

    3. Re:Start School Later by PPH · · Score: 1

      Sports practice: 7AM. Problem solved.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Start School Later by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Prioritizing learning over sports would thus lead to improved learning.

      "Heh, heh, heh. Oh, wait; you were serious! Let me laugh even louder. HEH, HEH, HEH."

    5. Re:Start School Later by boristdog · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of one of the mantras at my school back in the 70's and 80's: "Kids who are in sports don't do drugs!"

      And..our athletes always had the best drugs.

    6. Re:Start School Later by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I recall Junior year of high school. Biology and Geometry were my first two classes, and I would fall asleep during the latter due to late nights exploring the nascent Interweb.

      AKA "masturbating furiously into a sock".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Start School Later by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Prioritizing learning over sports would thus lead to improved learning.

      Not in US public schools it wouldn't. There is little learning to be had, but plenty of rote memorization.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    8. Re:Start School Later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A loss of free time

      Why are you losing it? So you can sleep more and apparently perform better in a school that most likely offers to give you an awful education. Not worth it, in my opinion.

      is merely the natural progression into adulthood, when you have practically none.

      Only if you make certain choices, and I certainly didn't. And just because that is sometimes how it is, that doesn't mean you should waste all your time with a horrible education system to fulfill arbitrary responsibilities.

  13. Fuddy-duddy by primebase · · Score: 2

    I may seem like a fuddy-duddy to some other parents with the ~somewhat~ early (or at least not late) bedtimes we have established for our grade school aged kids during the week, but the further I go, the more I believe we're doing the right thing. I may not be able to control whether they get sick or not, or if they always eat all their veggies, but the one thing I CAN make sure of is that they always get a good night's sleep. And the older they get, the more important the benefits of being well rested are, considering the increasing academic rigor that comes with the higher grades. Considering how sleep deprived most kids are, they'll be Well Rested Supermen by the time they arrive at high school.

    And I've already tried to instill in them that all-nighters to cram for an exam are, without a doubt, absolutely counter-productive. Been there, done that - fell asleep during a Physics final. Staying up all night to try and learn a semester's worth of material simply doesn't work. If you haven't done the work all along and don't know the material before the final arrives, adding a serious level of fatigue won't help.

    1. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I may seem like a fuddy-duddy to some other parents with the ~somewhat~ early (or at least not late) bedtimes we have established for our grade school aged kids during the week, but the further I go, the more I believe we're doing the right thing. I may not be able to control whether they get sick or not, or if they always eat all their veggies, but the one thing I CAN make sure of is that they always get a good night's sleep.

      You could also make sure they eat a healthy nutritious breakfast. However, in many school districts, the failures of the parents to feed their children properly has resulted in free breakfast and lunch for every student. The rationale is that they don't learn if they are hungry, and you cannot single out the poor kids to feed for free because that would hurt their self-esteem.

      This free lunch even extends, in some places, to the SUMMER, when they aren't in school and the excuse that they won't be able to learn as well is absent. At this point, it's a "think of the children" emotional argument. TANSTAAFL be damned.

      So, with that said, and now this sleep deprivation data, the path forward seems clear. All children must report for school at 9PM the previous night so they can be put into taxpayer provided beds and get the right amount of sleep, prior to being fed a healthy nutritious breakfast and then going to class. But since some parents will not be available to drive their children to school at that time of day, the schools must make services available to house students from the close of one school day (3-4PM) until their appointed return time (9PM), and so dinner and a movie must be provided for free, as well.

    2. Re:Fuddy-duddy by nblender · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. It was sometimes a drag having to leave a social function early because our son needed to be in bed by 8:30... We even suffered the ribbing of friends who let their young (gr 3) children stay up until 10 or 11 so they could stay at social functions...

      Our son is 11 now, is in bed by 8:45, and is woken up by me at 6:45. He complains that most of his friends at school get to stay up until 10 and why can't he, etc ... On very rare occasions, does he get to stay up late and it sure shows in his ability to concentrate/focus the next day. Invariably, the next day will be one with lots of behavioral issues and defiance... He's basically a pain in the ass...

      If you go to a restaurant these days, it's not uncommon to see toddlers at the table with their parents at 9PM or later... People are eager to get their kids sleeping through the night and then they're eager to get them on an 8 hour sleep schedule...

    3. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can only make sure your kids get a good night's sleep if they're already naturally inclined to sleep and wake at times that suit you.

      If you're lucky that way... or rather if they are lucky that way, then great - congratulations.

      But what would you do if your kids couldn't naturally fall asleep until after midnight? I was one of those kids. I honestly didn't know what 'sleepy' felt like for other people, until I started taking melatonin as an adult. For me it was just exhaustion that got me to sleep, because I wasn't naturally producing melatonin at 'bed time' at all. Every weekday morning was miserable. I didn't really start learning anything until after midday, and after I got home I wanted to keep reading etc. until well after 'bed time'. Having a schedule forced on me did not work. I now take melatonin regularly and choose my own working hours, and it suits me perfectly.

      So when you say "the one thing I CAN make sure of is that they always get a good night's sleep", it sounds a little like "the one thing I CAN make sure of is that they grow up [heterosexual / christian / right-handed / curly-haired]". No, you can't make sure of it. Their natural state might suit you now, but it's out of your control. Their sleep patterns will probably change when they hit puberty, and you'll have to get used to that.

    4. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Zynder · · Score: 1

      What a hateful troll you are! It would be a shame if you somehow lost your job, filed for bankruptcy, and had to get food stamps and free school lunch. But I guess you're too awesome to ever have bad times fall upon you because you are a super prepper right? Got 22 years of savings squirrelled away and enough food to feed Cambodia for 15 years stored in your bomb proof shelter right? RIGHT?

      BACK UNDER YOUR BRIDGE!

    5. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your sarcasm is noted, this program would probably stand a decent chance of paying for itself over time, given the increased earning power of its actually-educated graduates.

    6. Re:Fuddy-duddy by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      We even suffered the ribbing of friends who let their young (gr 3) children stay up until 10 or 11 so they could stay at social functions...

      Well, good for you for not giving in to societal pressure. But then you say:

      Our son is 11 now, is in bed by 8:45, and is woken up by me at 6:45.

      Why on earth do you do that? If you haver to wake himup at 6:45 then either he needs more sleep than 10 hours (not unusual) or isn't actually falling asleep until much later and so isn't getting enough sleep.

      Either way it is not good.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    7. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The three years old already go to school? If he is awake at late, at worst he is going to be cranky the next day. Provided that his parents do not allow him to sleep long in the morning of course.

      Cause it is quite possible that while he is going to sleep later then your kids, he is waking up later too. That would give him the same amount of sleep.

    8. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This free lunch even extends, in some places, to the SUMMER, when they aren't in school and the excuse that they won't be able to learn as well is absent. At this point, it's a "think of the children" emotional argument. TANSTAAFL be damned.

      Are you seriously complaining about food assitance for needy kids? Really? And then using it as a slippery slope argument to your ridiculous scenario? Holy hell, that is disgusting. Seriously, what is wrong with some people?

    9. Re:Fuddy-duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in high school, my mom was working 2 jobs to take care of my brother and me, as well as two grandparents in their 80s. Getting a discounted lunch saved us a few hundred dollars which was put towards college.

      So fuck you.

    10. Re:Fuddy-duddy by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      considering the increasing academic rigor that comes with the higher grades.

      Those are some amazing letters you have there! Too bad they're useless.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    11. Re:Fuddy-duddy by nblender · · Score: 1

      I can't make him fall asleep; I can only make him be in bed with the lights out... It's his choice to stay awake or fall asleep. I can't control when he needs to get up for school.

      We've deployed various strategies like 'no screen time after 8', or 'reading only after 8' or what have you...

  14. Slashdot Theorem by jazman_777 · · Score: 2

    It's a Slashdot theorem that Technology Cannot Be The Problem. You may proceed, that is all.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Slashdot Theorem by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Technology can be the problem. But if it is, then it must also be the solution.

    2. Re:Slashdot Theorem by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the problem predates the technology (or at least the wide adoption of the technology), it's pretty unlikely that the technology is the primary problem. It may be aggravating things, but the root cause is somewhere else.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:Slashdot Theorem by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      Obviously it must be the parents' fault.

      I think I would have been sleep deprived as well if I had had a portable computer or game console as a child. Without those to pass the time when I wasn't ready to sleep, I used to read books, but somehow reading a book doesn't make you less sleepy. I mean, if you're really into the story you can stay awake for just one more chapter, but it takes some effort. With computers, it's very easy to lose track of time. Maybe it's the light coming from the monitor or maybe it's the increased interaction, but there is a difference in my experience.

    4. Re:Slashdot Theorem by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Technology can be the problem. But if it is, then it must also be the solution.

      You must be thinking of alcohol.

    5. Re:Slashdot Theorem by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Alcohol is no solution, don't be ridiculous.

      Pay some attention in chemistry class, it's a distillate.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Slashdot Theorem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Distilling in vacuum, eh?

    7. Re:Slashdot Theorem by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Without those to pass the time when I wasn't ready to sleep, I used to read books, but somehow reading a book doesn't make you less sleepy. I mean, if you're really into the story you can stay awake for just one more chapter, but it takes some effort. With computers, it's very easy to lose track of time.

      Personally, I find it much easier to lose track of time reading a book. I agree that if you're really tired, a book is better for helping you nod off though, because it simply has less to distract you. With a computer, you can flick between different games, conversations or whatever which is the mental equivalent of a quick splash of cold water on your face..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Slashdot Theorem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give him a break. Chemistry was at 8:30 am.

  15. My observations with my neighbors and friends with by Assmasher · · Score: 2

    ...kids, is that many parents don't put their kids to sleep the same way they did when I was a child (70's/80's.)

    My kids go to sleep between 7:30PM and 8:30PM depending upon their ages (ranging from 5-9.)

    At 9PM at night during the week I'll hear quite a lot of our neighbors' kids still playing outside, much less getting ready for bed.

    School starts VERY early here as well (kids have to be at school by 7:30AM.)

    Now, some of these kids who are staying up later are doing quite well in school, so who knows. It's just different from when I was a kid and it seemed to be a pervasive adult conspiracy to put all children to bed early...

    --
    Loading...
  16. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The beauty of it is that they will grow up to have kids of their own and will do an even sorrier job of raising them than their parents did with them. It's like watching water flow down a drain. Thank God for immigration. Without it the US would be doomed. In particular the oriental immigrants seem to do well due no doubt to actually having a solid family oriented culture. Here in the US most kids seemed to be raised by electronic devices.

  17. Less Homework by captjc · · Score: 2

    It's easy to blame computers and cell phones, how about not giving out 5+ hours of homework a night? To make it worse most of it was busy work in addition to the nightly reading assignments. When you have 6+ classes per day with reading and assignments, that stuff adds up pretty quickly. In high school, I was lucky to get 4 hours a night.

    Even my heaviest college semesters weren't anywhere near as busy as my average high school week.

    --
    Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    1. Re:Less Homework by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

      Judging by your archaic User ID, it's probably been a good 30 years since you were in high school. I just watched my niece graduate from a suburban US High school in a relatively affluent neighborhood - graduating in the top quintile of students. The homework load you suggest is greatly exaggerated - I would say most high school students are given an hour, tops, of *active* homework assignments, along with a half-hour to an hour of reading. I graduated nearly 15 years ago, from a Jesuit high school known for one of the most demanding after-hours academic requirements in Ohio. I had three hours routinely, and that was far more than anybody I went to middle school with who went to other schools. Tell me - if home work is a problem, why are so many students likely to drop out of college due to the increased work load? 16 hour semesters should be assumed to be 50 hours a week, including reading, coursework, and various projects. High school kids can't handle it today, and so college is becoming less demanding.

    2. Re:Less Homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about someone more recent then? Graduated high school in 2009. I did far more work in high school than I do in college. In high school I was doing 2-3 hours of work every single night of the week. In college I do a few hours of homework a week. College for me has mostly been projects where I'm given far more time than is necessary to complete them. I just finished up a project for a CS class that was assigned the first day of class to be due at the end of the semster. I think I maybe put 10 hours total into the thing.

    3. Re:Less Homework by captjc · · Score: 2

      Actually, I graduated in 2005 and my workload was not exaggerated. I was in all AP and College Prep classes and, ironically, I had a lighter workload than most of the general placement students who did nothing but repetitive worksheets that ask the same questions 50 times with slightly different phrasing.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    4. Re:Less Homework by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      it's probably been a good 30 years since you were in high school. I just watched my niece graduate from a suburban US High school in a relatively affluent neighborhood - graduating in the top quintile of students. The homework load you suggest is greatly exaggerated

      You can't generalize that way. Schools vary enormously from place to place. I did graduate from high school more than 30 years ago, in the same basic area, and I can tell you that my daughter in the 4th grade has a lot more homework than when I was that age. The idea seems to be "more work is better, regardless of whether is ridiculously redundant busy work". My wife and I make sure my daughter always does it, but it's a pain. She constantly complains about it nonsensical busywork. What my wife and I can't do is admit that we agree with her.

    5. Re:Less Homework by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

      You can't generalize that way.

      DID I MENTIONED I WAS AMERICAN????

      Another argument won.

    6. Re:Less Homework by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Did I mention that I'm also an American, or do I have to put it in all caps?

    7. Re:Less Homework by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

      Really doesn't matter. It's more about who can play the 'Merican card first, rather than whose caps are biggest.

    8. Re:Less Homework by Legion303 · · Score: 2

      "Judging by your archaic User ID,"

      An ID in the half-million range is "archaic" now? Shit!

    9. Re:Less Homework by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      My wife and I make sure my daughter always does it, but it's a pain. She constantly complains about it nonsensical busywork. What my wife and I can't do is admit that we agree with her.

      Why on earth not? Is there some problem with telling your kids the truth?

      Think about how you'd feel if you were in her position.

      And vast amounts of nonsensical busy work does not prepare you in any war for a good career. Nor does it help academic improvement in any way. A bit of drilling is good, but vast amounts of crap are simply depressing.

      She would be far, far better off doing something productive with that time.

      As a kid I basically did no homework. What little I did was usually done on the bus in the morning usually to a rather piss-poor standard. The only exception is that I stayed late a huge amount to hack on stuff in the school workshop because they had good tools. And I learned how to program in my copious spare time at home.

      Those are in fact two sets of skills which I have made considerable use of.

      I got a slightly nasty shock at uni, to put it mildly. However I did do the work then because it wasn't busy work, was important and was much more interesting. So apparently my complete lack of mindless drudgery after school did me no harm.

      By the way: your daughter already knows that it is pointless busy work. She is bright enough that is blindingly obvious. If you deny that, then she will know you're lying and will not respect you for it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Less Homework by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say that was my experience as well, although I graduated 16 years earlier. As best I could tell, the major difference between "advanced" and "average" classes in my high school was the amount of homework, busy work, and repetition. Unfortunately, more and more schools seem to be dropping this distinction.

    11. Re:Less Homework by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're just upset because you're super archaic, unlike us normal archaics.

  18. Isn't this just a special case of... by DdJ · · Score: 2

    ..."sleep deprivation lowers all achievement in everyone"?

    Who's surprised?

    (Mind you, I'm all for conducting experiments to test things we all "know". I just don't usually expect to see those experiments classified as newsworthy.)

    1. Re:Isn't this just a special case of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it is newsworthy knowing what can be classified as common sense and what can be classified as confirmed knowledge.

  19. Obvious solution by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

    A simple solution would be to start school a few hours later...

  20. Not electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experiance it was never getting distracted by flashy objects (which is the new thing to blame everything on these days) It was simply that the school schedule was crappy for me. When you are younger you sleep more than you do as an adult. The closer you get to adulthood the less sleep you need. if school started 2 hours later that would have made a huge difference. I naturaly want to go to sleep around midnight to 1, and they want to force me awake before 6am to get ready in time for school? I don't have to be at work till 9

    1. Re:Not electronics by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I have to be at work... when I'm bloody well there.

      One of the job perks I insist in is a lot of leeway when it comes to my working hours. In return you get top level work at a very affordable price, I don't need much money, but I need my sleep. Also, I think my employer has the right to get me at full potential for every hours he has to pay me for, which is not the case if I'm still asleep and running on automatic.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. What really lowers achievement... by Azure+Flash · · Score: 1

    School lowers school achievement in children.

  22. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by Nyder · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...kids, is that many parents don't put their kids to sleep the same way they did when I was a child (70's/80's.)

    My kids go to sleep between 7:30PM and 8:30PM depending upon their ages (ranging from 5-9.)

    At 9PM at night during the week I'll hear quite a lot of our neighbors' kids still playing outside, much less getting ready for bed.

    School starts VERY early here as well (kids have to be at school by 7:30AM.)

    Now, some of these kids who are staying up later are doing quite well in school, so who knows. It's just different from when I was a kid and it seemed to be a pervasive adult conspiracy to put all children to bed early...

    My parents made me go to bed at 7:30 till I was in middle school. It was evil. I didn't need that much sleep, and the sun was still shining most the time. It would take me hours to fall asleep. If that help my grades, I don't know. I was the kid who always had the "can't pay attention" in class. But later, in middle school and beyond, when I wasn't going to bed at 7:30 (it was then more 9-10ish) I got B+ grades without trying.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  23. For the Teens. Make sure to let them play.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For teens you might want to make sure they have privacy for a full release massage at night. The lack of privacy growing up made this difficult. I literately slept in the living room of a one bedroom apartment. with parents to worked a midday shift. Just a thought. Other adults, I've talk to had trouble getting the release they craved as teens due to parents checking on them every couple of minutes after they where supposed to be asleep. And yes they felt it affected their GPAs too.

  24. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    Damn, that sounds rough. I think when I was 10 I could stay up to 9PM.

    --
    Loading...
  25. My good sir, you couldn't be more wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "increasingly shoddy construction"

    Care to back that with something? Last I knew, building standards keep rising, not falling.

    1. Re:My good sir, you couldn't be more wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buildings may be more structurally sound than in the past, able to withstand quakes, fires, floods, hurricanes perhaps... but the fact is that modern construction doesn't hold a candle to the past in terms of craftsmanship and attention to detail.

      Used to be interior doors were solid slabs of wood, now they are hollow boxes. Used to be furnishings were made of wood, now they are composites or particle board with veneer. Used to be floors were made of solid and appealing materials like hardwood, stone or tile, now they are fake wood, fiberglass-simulated tile, or just plywood covered with cheap carpeting. Used to be moulding was carved wood, now it's injection molded foam. Used to be exteriors were crafted from real materials, now they are foam, sprayed onto steel beams, shaped as desired to mimic carved stone or something else, with a thin veneer of stucco and paint sprayed over.

      Tons of similar examples. Worse, go to Home Depot or Lowes and you will see mostly home improvement goods made in China.

  26. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just different from when I was a kid and it seemed to be a pervasive adult conspiracy to put all children to bed early...

    This attitude was probably a vestige of the days before TV, when awake children were children who required attention and supervision.

  27. Start School Later by mentil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The book 'the end of homework' explained this pretty well. Research has found that school starts an hour before children are typically awake. School starts so early so that there can be long afternoons of sports practice. Prioritizing learning over sports would thus lead to improved learning.

    I recall Junior year of high school. Biology and Geometry were my first two classes, and I would fall asleep during the latter due to late nights exploring the nascent Interweb. Late at night there are no parents nagging you, you can go to sleep whenever you want, it's quiet and you can think or do whatever you want. And, ya know, less sleep means more free time, of which high schoolers feel quickly slipping away as their homework load increases.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  28. Science by Murdoch5 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually I read once that teenagers are better "profiled" to perform during the mid day and hence they should really be sleeping much later at night and into the early morning, class for teenagers should be starting at noon not 9am. Well I'm not going to argue a good night sleep is important, it is very important, we need to be setting class times that revolve more around the natural clock of the body and not what works best for the adults. If science can show that 12 - 7pm works better for teenagers then I think we should move class times to work in that area. It would also be worth figuring out when the best natural class time is children, I have a problem when we base sleep patterns for the teachers rather then the students.

    This link from the BBC talks about it: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7932950.stm

    So I think the solution, at least for teenagers is to move the class time back so they can best perform when biologically they're ready to.

    1. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      9 AM? What lazy teenagers start class at 9 AM? Mine always started at 7:35 AM.

    2. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is that that would have a large economic impact on people who use schools as a means of looking after their children. I could see it justified for older kids though (such as high school level).

    3. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with natural class time for children is that parents work.

    4. Re:Science by PPH · · Score: 1

      12-7pm school? What about the poor teenagers that have to stay up until 4AM? They'll be lucky to squeeze in a decent 8 hours of sleep. Do you really expect every child to get up at the crack of noon?
      </sarcasm>

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I read once that teenagers are better "profiled" to perform during the mid day and hence they should really be sleeping much later at night and into the early morning, class for teenagers should be starting at noon not 9am. Well I'm not going to argue a good night sleep is important, it is very important, we need to be setting class times that revolve more around the natural clock of the body and not what works best for the adults. If science can show that 12 - 7pm works better for teenagers then I think we should move class times to work in that area. It would also be worth figuring out when the best natural class time is children, I have a problem when we base sleep patterns for the teachers rather then the students.

      This link from the BBC talks about it: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7932950.stm

      So I think the solution, at least for teenagers is to move the class time back so they can best perform when biologically they're ready to.

      Although I agree with your reasoning, there are other factors that play a role. At 7 pm it is dark in the winter - not exactly an environment I want my kids to bike home in. For parents with young kids, 12-19 makes combining work and having kids very hard (I know, you're talking about teenagers, but syncing with parents is also an important factor) and of course, teachers also have their limits. Lastly, the debate should also consider the distance to schools - if most kids have to bike for 20 minutes to get to the school, perhaps moving back the school times a little helps too.

      Changing school and work (!) schedules to more closely match biological clocks of children/teenagers and their parents is tricky, but I think there's a better trade-off than starting everything between 7.45 and 8.30. Times in the 8.30-9.30 range would probably make more sense.

    6. Re:Science by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      9 AM? What lazy teenagers start class at 9 AM? Mine always started at 7:35 AM.

      I think it's telling that you can remember the time so precisely. I assume that it's in the way people can account for every permanent scar on their body.

      I seem to remember starting at about 9, but I really couldn't care less (or remember) if it was actually 8.50 or 9.05

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    7. Re:Science by nine-times · · Score: 1

      class for teenagers should be starting at noon not 9am.

      Where you live, it starts at 9am? When I was in high school, you had to be there by 7:15am. 9am would have been amazing.

    8. Re:Science by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

      I think it actually started at 8:15 but in either case according to research that is to early for the normal teenager.

  29. It's a cultural thing by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    I lived in Rome for two years. We often saw young kids (4-8 or so) on the streets with family around midnight. Our 4-year-old was tucked up and snoring. Heck, I should have been tucked up and snoring...

    Rule for life: Don't impose your viewpoints on others. This also applies to wanting the schools to start later to suit the kids who go to bed late. (Maybe start a different class with the same stuff, staggered by two hours... hey, there's in money in this... I hold the copyright, remember).

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:It's a cultural thing by PPH · · Score: 1

      Italy. Ah yes. The cradle of Europe's industrial might.

      Don't impose your viewpoints on others. This also applies to wanting the schools to start later to suit the kids who go to bed late.

      Think of it as a lesson for later in life. When the boss says to get your ass in to work by starting time, you do it. Or lose your job.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:It's a cultural thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it as a lesson for later in life. When the boss says to get your ass in to work by starting time, you do it. Or lose your job.

      Anyone who spoke to me like that as an adult would be an ex-boss with a bloody nose.

      You macho management-types love to dish it out when you think the worker can't fight back, but here's a hint: we always fucking can.

    3. Re:It's a cultural thing by PPH · · Score: 1

      You'd slug a female boss?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:It's a cultural thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viewpoint? It is an article about a scientific study. No viewpoints are being imposed here, just facts. You don't like the facts, well tough shit.

      And just because keeping kids up late was the cultural norm in Rome, that does not mean it was a good thing. Maybe Italians have different genes so they can cope with it, maybe the kids were able to sleep in so they weren't sleep deprived, or maybe the kids were actually suffering because of it.

    5. Re:It's a cultural thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, i'm not sexist.

    6. Re:It's a cultural thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait, you just said you'd punch someone for demanding something of you, then you complain about THEM being macho?

  30. Blame The parents by grantspassalan · · Score: 2

    Common sense would tell anyone that it is parents fault for allowing their children to stay up all hours of the night. Simply confiscate all electronic devices at bedtime. It is the parents responsibility to raise their children, not the state.

    --
    A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
  31. Uh by Tolkienfanatic · · Score: 1

    Would love to see the sleep deprivation stats on college students...

    1. Re:Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would love to see the sleep deprivation stats on college students...

      And medical students and residents.

    2. Re:Uh by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      Would love to see the sleep deprivation stats on college students...

      And medical students and residents.

      No, medical residents are super-human creatures. As such it's perfectly reasonable to have them perform surgery after not having slept for two days, while mere humans should get at least 8 hours of sleep before attending math class.

  32. Daaaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No kidding. Lack of sleep makes you dumber. Big revelation.

  33. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the summary? Kids are getting dumber because of social/cultural/technological/material reasons.

    Actually I read the article, but had to go back to the summary to find the inaccurate characterization of the article that you cite. Perhaps sleep deprivation adversely affected the submitter's reading comprehension.

    The schools are getting dumber to accommodate the kids who are getting dumber, and the problem is a downward self-propagating spiral.

    That's not even in the summary - it's purely your invention. Maybe you need a good night's sleep.

  34. Radio by WillgasM · · Score: 1

    When I was a teen I stayed up listening to Loveline every night until 2am. I'm pretty sure I would have stayed up listening to a fan blow if it weren't for that radio. I think my point is that smartphones aren't inherently to blame, but I'm sure they don't help.

    1. Re:Radio by PPH · · Score: 1

      I recorded it and listened to it at work the next day. I'm sure many of my cow-orkers were wondering about what it was that I was LMAO.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Sleep tips by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    Obligatory post to inform those who may not otherwise know. Apart from the usual about not using the computer for an hour or two before going to sleep (which I often ignore), the following may help:

    1: Install F.lux - a popular utility to reduce the colour temperature of your PC's screen at night.

    2: Get a cooling fan to provide pink noise. This helps drown out any random noises. Also helps during the summer to have it cool your face as you sleep. During the winter, I have a heater right next to it, so warm air is wafted at me.

    3: Get blackout curtains to prevent light pollution.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  36. Lack of parenting skills leads to deprivation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame electronic devices? How is it a devices fault a kid is sleep deprived? Oh wait, it isn't because it is just an inanimate object that has no effect on anyone.

    Want to blame something for the kids sleep deprivation? Blame the parents who don't have their kids in bed earlier, pay more attention to their sleep habits, their school performance and so on. So here is a tip. If your kid is sleep deprived because he is up late playing a game or using a tablet, then tell them to stop, failing that you take it away.

    In fact most of kids problems today stem from bad parenting. Granted parenting isn't always fun but it really isn't very hard for most cases as long as you pay attention to your child, talk to them, correct them when they do wrong, teach them and well, be a parent. Problem is though most parents are lazy and stupid.

    1. Re:Lack of parenting skills leads to deprivation. by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      So here is a tip. If your kid is sleep deprived because he is up late playing a game or using a tablet, then tell them to stop, failing that you take it away.

      Great tip - why didn't I think of that? I've also made sure the lights are out and stay out. My daughter still won't fall asleep until her body is good and ready. After a couple of years we just decided having her lie in bed staring at the ceiling every night was silly.

      I'll bet you're a morning person, aren't you? Typical of an AC. Typical morning person sanctimony. Did you know that Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and Genghis Khan were all morning people? Figures, doesn't it. Of course Euclid, Archimedes, Newton, Einstein, Gandhi and MLK were all night owls.

    2. Re:Lack of parenting skills leads to deprivation. by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      After a couple of years we just decided having her lie in bed staring at the ceiling every night was silly.

      In fact, it's not just silly but counterproductive. Proper sleep hygiene includes getting out of bed if unable to fall asleep in a reasonable length of time. Otherwise it can make insomnia worse.

  37. Be Prepared Son by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    Water is wet, news at 11.

    ...the sky is blue, and women have secrets.... and old Satan Claus, Jimmy, he's out there, and he's just getting stronger.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  38. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    The beauty of it is that they will grow up to have kids of their own and will do an even sorrier job of raising them than their parents did with them. It's like watching water flow down a drain.

    So each generation has been getting worse, and this has been going on since at least the days of Ancient Greece.

    I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless beyond words... When I was young, we were taught to be discreet and respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly disrespectful and impatient of restraint.

    -- Hesiod, 8th century BC

    Thank God for immigration. Without it the US would be doomed. In particular the oriental immigrants seem to do well due no doubt to actually having a solid family oriented culture.

    "Oriental"? Is this the 19th century?

    More pointedly, you have to love those positive stereotypes. Presumably you realize that every positive stereotype is just a counterpoint to a negative stereotype. Forget the stereotyping of native born Americans. People who would cringe at the mere hint of a negative stereotype of any other nation will happily embrace the most negative stereotypes of Americans, and parrot that the only virtuous people left in America are immigrants (which kind of makes you wonder why virtuous family oriented immigrants stay here). So, given that native born Americans are trash, what about the non-"Oriental" immigrants? Do Hispanic immigrants, for example, not have a solid family oriented culture?

  39. Here's another insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, if you sleep less, you get less sleep.

  40. One-size-fits-all Education in the US by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    I was the kid who always had the "can't pay attention" in class. But later, in middle school and beyond, when I wasn't going to bed at 7:30 (it was then more 9-10ish) I got B+ grades without trying.

    How much of that "can't pay attention" is due to the one-size-fits-all education levels by age/grade in American education? We have programs for slower students very early on, but gifted students are expected to stay behind and be bored to tears doing lessons and homework for concepts they already grasp. The first time many students are really challenged are high school honors classes.

    1. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Society will always be a "one-sized-fits-most" proposition.

      As far as someone being bored to tears because coursework is too easy, that is just proof that an above-average mind can still be a lazy mind.

    2. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      How much of that "can't pay attention" is due to the one-size-fits-all education levels by age/grade in American education? We have programs for slower students very early on, but gifted students are expected to stay behind and be bored to tears doing lessons and homework for concepts they already grasp. The first time many students are really challenged are high school honors classes.

      This is the perennial whine of the slashdot self-diagnosed genius, but it's just nonsense. If you're that special, your teachers will notice and do something about it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This is the perennial whine of the slashdot self-diagnosed genius, but it's just nonsense. If you're that special, your teachers will notice and do something about it.

      Somehow you have been through life and the school system without actually managing to notice it at all.

      *some* teachers will notice the brighter kids and help. Other teachers seem to barely manage crowd control.

      Yeah, I found school boring as all hell, with the exception of a few lessons where the teacher actually seemed to like teaching.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was the kid who always had the "can't pay attention" in class. But later, in middle school and beyond, when I wasn't going to bed at 7:30 (it was then more 9-10ish) I got B+ grades without trying.

      How much of that "can't pay attention" is due to the one-size-fits-all education levels by age/grade in American education? We have programs for slower students very early on, but gifted students are expected to stay behind and be bored to tears doing lessons and homework for concepts they already grasp. The first time many students are really challenged are high school honors classes.

      It could always be due to the ridiculous level of pushing they do now days. We had Alegbra or Pre-algebra in 9th grade back in my day, even then many kids failed to grasp it in any way. My child's district does Alegbra in 6th grade. In 5th grade she started coming home with math homework consisting of one, single story problem. Sometimes it was simple, but many of them were essentially difficult geometry problems, a couple were linear algebra problems that they'd already effectively row reduced in the text of the story problem. Others consisted of other complex math subjects. I had to teach my 5th grader how to multiply fractions, even though they hadn't actually taught that, it was the easiest way for her to solve several weeks' worth of homework.

      I'm not saying these are bad things to be teaching kids, but they're teaching them aggressively and often without a good foundation which simply sets up many of the kids (and their parents, let's be honest) for failure.

    5. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by Nyder · · Score: 1

      How much of that "can't pay attention" is due to the one-size-fits-all education levels by age/grade in American education? We have programs for slower students very early on, but gifted students are expected to stay behind and be bored to tears doing lessons and homework for concepts they already grasp. The first time many students are really challenged are high school honors classes.

      This is the perennial whine of the slashdot self-diagnosed genius, but it's just nonsense. If you're that special, your teachers will notice and do something about it.

      Yes, the same teachers and adults that didn't notice I had ADHD, Dyslexia & a Depression problem. It wasn't till my mid 30's before it was discovered. Please, Teachers don't notice shit. And like most people, being a teacher is a job, not a calling.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    6. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Society will always be a "one-sized-fits-most" proposition.

      And I think this sort of nonsense is probably one reason why our education system is as terrible as it is.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:One-size-fits-all Education in the US by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      As far as someone being bored to tears because coursework is too easy, that is just proof that an above-average mind can still be a lazy mind.

      If you ask someone to do useless things, of course they're likely going to be bored. Call them "lazy" or what have you, but forcing someone to do useless things and not even giving them anything in return sometimes doesn't work out.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  41. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    To be fair, most kids have been raised by the state for several generations. We have long been an orphanage culture. So, biological parents being children's actual parent has been a rare thing for some time.

  42. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by c0lo · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the summary? Kids are getting dumber because of social/cultural/technological/material reasons.

    R you sure it's technological? I'd rather think it is the "social" part of it that is the cause, no matter the other factors that trigger it.
    Let me put it in other words: maybe it's not "No kids let behind" but "Not kid gets ahead".

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  43. Salad with ranch and tuna melt on rye, peese. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Insufficient sleep may also affect belly fat deposition, obesity, heart disease, and type II diabetes.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. The Big Dumb Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly dumbing down is dumb. The reality of education is that it is designed to push students out of the educational system when they reach a failure point. That is why we all are not wandering about with a fist full of Ph.D. diplomas.
              Unhappily some students present a failure point a bit earlier than others. That does not imply that we should not assist them in exiting the world of school. We simply might consider greasing the exit ramps for them. That way we don't have to dumb down the system over and over again until the few young scholars who actually want to learn get so disgusted that they leave the school system.
                Behind all of this are lousy parents with a "me to" attitude that indicates that their kid should get great grades no matter what. The second plunge of the dagger is the "G.E.D." . Ever try to keep a kid in school when the surf is up and his hot as heck girl friend has her bikini on and some pot and wants your boy to go to the beach every day because he can always get that G.E.D. later and it is easier anyway.
                  The simple fact is that about one third of the kids will never be anything more than a plague that destroys society. School drop outs and failures should appear before a court and be sentenced to menial service, the mines, or the front lines in time of war. You can bet that we would need far less drug rehabs, far less prisons, far less alcohol related diseases, far less unwanted pregnancies and unwise births, far less welfare expenses and a host of other good things if we make schools difficult and the price of failure a serious and life long pain.

    1. Re:The Big Dumb Down by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      I think fascists should go fuck themselves in the fucking face =)

    2. Re:The Big Dumb Down by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      P.S. your school system sucks, there's plenty of brighter then you kids that reach that failure point because your system is broken. Yet people like you will point to charts and science data and what everyone should be charts and say... Johnny Mick Different must be burned at the stake because they disagree with their teacher about the mass of electrons.

      No, STFU. Electrons have mass bro. Its negligible but they do. There's plenty of dumbass issues with education. Its not about offering up knowledge. It's about brainwashing and cramming it down everyones throats until they loose it.

  45. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We get home from work about 5:30. Without pausing for breath, one of us cooks dinner while the other plays with the kid. Then we eat dinner. That takes us to about 7:00.

    Then it's bath time. Again, one of us bathes the kid, while the other cleans up. That takes us to 7:30 or later, depending how much cleaning up needs to be done.

    Then we start the process of settling him down. No stimulation, subdued lighting, no play more exciting than a jigsaw puzzle. After about an hour of this treatment he's ready for bed.

    So even at the most optimistic assumptions, there's no realistic way he's going to be in bed before 8:30. Usually it's after 9.

    Where, exactly, can we cut time out of that schedule? I'm genuinely asking, because I hear other parents get their offspring to bed by 7:30 and I'd love to do that, but I really don't see how it's possible. Ye cannae change the laws o' physics, as a wise man once said.

  46. One size does not fit all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...kids, is that many parents don't put their kids to sleep the same way they did when I was a child (70's/80's.)

    My kids go to sleep between 7:30PM and 8:30PM depending upon their ages (ranging from 5-9.)

    At 9PM at night during the week I'll hear quite a lot of our neighbors' kids still playing outside, much less getting ready for bed.

    School starts VERY early here as well (kids have to be at school by 7:30AM.)

    Now, some of these kids who are staying up later are doing quite well in school, so who knows. It's just different from when I was a kid and it seemed to be a pervasive adult conspiracy to put all children to bed early...

    Not every child needs the same amount of sleep. Put our children to bed at 7:30pm and you'll be up for the day somewhere between 3am and 4am, guaranteed. And they're 2 and 4. My wife didn't believe that kids from my family don't require much sleep....until she ended up sleep deprived and messed up trying to do things as per recommendation.

    By the way I went to bed at 12pm as a kid, and I was dux of my school in yr 10 and came equal 3rd in the grade in yr 12. I have a bachelor's degree and master's degree. And to put another spanner in the works I did most of my homework in front of the TV. Put a soapie on and it bored me so much I found the work much more stimulating.

  47. Insert Concpiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About Martian tied sleep cycles...

    I don't know what you humans are talking about...

  48. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relax. These things are cyclical. There are good things that come from people hating their parents.

  49. Oh there's a reason by Zynder · · Score: 1

    So you want high school to run like a college. Ok, I'm good with that. A very logical argument.

    However when you say there is no good reason I have to disagree. You will disagree with this assement but it is founded out here in the real world and not from ideological texts. Baby sitters. The way our economy has developed since the Brady Bunch years of the 1950's, a family really can't afford to have a stay at home mom. So both parents have to work. In case you haven't noticed school really is a glorified babysitter who happens to also teach kids a few things. Allowing the students to have flexibility directly effects the adults abilities to have order. Parents bring home the money, they keep the kids fed. So yeah, their schedule takes priority over the child's no matter how much sense it may make. I think we as a society have forgotten one of the key lessons of life. Life is a cold hearted bitch. The very worst thing a parent can do is try to make thier kids worldproof. I gotta get my ass up at 0530 to go to work then dammit you are gonna get your ass up at 0530 to go to school. I don't like it, you don't like it, but it's just what you have to do to survive in the real world. When I go to this job, I am gonna work, make some money, and not get fired. When you go to school, you are gonna work, make passing grades, and not get expelled. If you can't because you are too tired from gaming or whatever then I am gonna take those phones/xboxen/whatever and back over them with a truck. You will hate me now, but thank me later. You don't cater the world to fit the kids, you make the kids fit the world. THAT ensures survivabilty.

    And yeah I know you said by the time they are old enough. You neglect that some parents just don't ever trust thier kids. Ever. I got great stories about about people in thier 30s and 40s who still get told by thier parents where they will go and when they'll go to bed. But that's for another thread.

  50. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by PPH · · Score: 1

    And thus the prophecy is fulfilled.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  51. Breaking News!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smoking is bad!!!

  52. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Stereotype. Heh. Whatever dude. It's an average, you do know about averaging things don't you? Simple math you can do at home with pencil and paper. On average Asian immigrants do better in school. Not a stereotype just a fact. Exceptions abound no doubt, it's just on average you know. I personally think it is because they seem to be more likely to have a home environment that encourages this to happen but I readily admit that is just conjecture on my part and I have no facts to back it up. As for the rest, the destruction of the American family unit is a post WWII phenomenon. The last couple of decades it has been a runaway train.

  53. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if they actually knew them well enough to hate them.

  54. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    Give the kid a bath whilst dinner is being cooked. You could shave off half an hour that way.

  55. How about we let them FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets let the kids fail... then the parents will have to do something about their kids.

    I make sure my son gets 10-1 hours sleep EVERY night and guess what he gets A's and is bored in his classes because they are so dumbed down.

  56. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    Does anyone truly care about performance in public schools when public schools are obviously pure garbage? They're rote memorization paradises and little more than that.

    So? they're still better than nothing.

    Or home schooling. * shudders *

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  57. The day has 24 hours no matter what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, reading this discussion, teenagers (and apparently also elementary school children lately) are genetically predisposed to go to sleep after midnight, cause they cardiac rhyme would not adjust if they would start to go to sleep at ten regularly. Not even in winter, when there is dark outside at freaking six. The sun is still not allowing them to get that regular sleep, never mind it disappeared hours ago.

    Btw, I'm not morning person. But if you go to sleep regularly and have those 8 hours available, you will wake up without alarm in around 8 hours. The key is regularly so your rhytmes actually have time to adapt.

    The homework arguments are even more funny. The day has 24 hours regardless of when the school starts. Moving school start to later on will not magically make the homework disappear. It will not reduce sport practice time, music practice time or whatever you are into. If 24 - (homework + school classes + extracurricular activities + movies + facebook + shower + eating) is less then 9, you are going to be sleep deprived no matter how much you move those activities around.

  58. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    School starts VERY early here as well (kids have to be at school by 7:30AM.)

    This happens in hot Mediterranean countries, but the kids get a proper siesta and finish early too.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  59. to be detailed about this by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    a kid that
    does not have
    1 a pair of guardians that give a flip
    2 a decent bedroom and bed
    3 Food at MRE grade or better
    4 a decent number of seasonal outfits

    WILL NOT DO WELL IN SCHOOL

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  60. Cause VS Causality by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Is it the fact that the children are missing sleep effecting their scholastic work? Premise seems to make sense.

    However maybe it has more to do with the fact that those that have effective parenting (i.e. not letting your kids stay up to all hours of the night), also do a better job ensuring their children have all the things they need to excel, like parental help with homework, tutors, diet, exercise, etc...

  61. Re:My observations with my neighbors and friends w by Quirkz · · Score: 1

    Is there some cleanup that can be done after bedtime? Also, I know all kids are different, but ours doesn't seem to need that much of a cooldown period. Ten or fifteen minutes of reading right at the end sets the tone for bedtime. We can even have tickle fights after the bath, and by the time we're done with books she's okay. If yours doesn't work that way, I realize that won't help, but you might try condensing it a little and see if you get anything out of it?

  62. What part of "obvious" don't you understand? by tripwire45 · · Score: 1

    Who commissioned this study and how much did it cost to tell us something every parent and teacher knows?

  63. It HAS to be the digital devices... by centre21 · · Score: 1

    Because it couldn't be the need to tailor the school day to fit Mom and Dad's work schedules -
    Or the mountains of un-necessary homework that the kids (even in grade school) get -
    Or the constant barrage from teachers and coaches that the kids need to have at least one if not two extra curricular activities -
    Or the insane concept that kids have to attend a minimum of seven classes every day -

    Research has shown that the average child between the ages of 10 and 20 require more sleep than previously thought to accommodate for their physical and mental changes. But instead of tailoring the school day to account for that, we'll blame laptops, smartphones, tablets and console gaming.

    Here's some ideas:
    1. Just like in college, have some classes offered MWF and some offered TR. That way, there's more time in the day for a kid to work on homework, and find their teacher if they have a question.
    2. Let's put more money towards buses, and allow kids to go to school from 9 am to 4 pm, instead of forcing them to get up at 5am to get ready for school.
    3. How about some teachers (I'm looking at you, math teachers) stick with assigning homework that teaches the basics and offers the more advanced concepts as extra credit. If I'm new to Calculus, it's better that you make sure I understand the basics of Calculus before "challenging" me with advanced topics before I'm ready.
    4. With less classes per day, extracurricular activities could be pursued during the school day, rather than forcing kids to do them after school and delaying when they can get to their homework.

    The problem isn't the distractions, it's the organization of the school day itself.

  64. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    He was talking about carpets, obviously. They do well in family settings.

  65. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On average Asian immigrants do better in school.

    Considering the rote memorization over there, how is that meaningful? It's not. They don't understand why or how many things work; they just memorize facts and spew them all back on a test, much like we do in the US. Asian students just happen to be particularly good at memorization, apparently.

  66. Re:So? Public schools are garbage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So? they're still better than nothing.

    And yet they're garbage. How does the fact that they're better than nothing help?

    Or home schooling. * shudders *

    Just an anecdote, but the home schooled kids I've seen were far more educated than just about any product of the public education system. I hear all sorts of lies ranging from "Without professional teachers, you can't get an education!" to "Kids who home school won't ever learn to socialize," but they're just that: lies and misinformation.