Slashdot Mirror


Bolivian President's Plane 'Rerouted Over Snowden Suspicions'

niftydude writes with the latest news on the Edward Snowden saga. It appears that the Bolivian President's plane was denied access to French and Spanish airspace due to suspicions that Snowden was on board. Quoting a few pieces from the Guardian: "In an extraordinary move, France and Portugal revoked flight clearances for the Bolivian President's plane on Tuesday after representations were reportedly made by the U.S. State Department. Mr Morales was flying home from an energy conference in Moscow and his aircraft was hastily rerouted to Vienna, Austria. Bolivian Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca angrily denied that Mr Snowden was on the President's aircraft, a fact later confirmed by Austrian authorities, and said France and Portugal would have to explain why they abruptly canceled authorization for the flight. AP reports that Venezuela's foreign minister Elias Jaua has condemned the decision by France and Portugal to block the plane from its airspace. He claimed that changing a flight's route without checking on how much fuel was left in the plane, put Morales' life at risk." Spain claims they only agreed to allow the plane to refuel there if it were subject to search, and France did end up authorizing use of their air space today. In related news, Julian Assange and the general secretary of Reporters Without Borders Christophe Deloire published an Op-Ed today why Europe must protect Snowden. And: dryriver sends news that Ecuador discovered that their embassy in London was bugged, describing the incident as "another instance of a loss of ethics at the international level in relations between governments."

146 of 621 comments (clear)

  1. God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Funny

    My country's dick is so fucking big that we can have entire continents close off their airspace! Jesus, I want to snort a mountain of coke and fuck my wife's sister!!!

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    1. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Home of the brave, land of calling for the assassination of anyone who pulls back the veneer hiding the relentless authoritarianism" just didn't have the same ring, I guess.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Informative
      Worth pointing out that some of those same EU countries trying to impede and/or deny Snowdens asylum requests ("a centuries-old right in international law") are also responsible for allowing CIA extraordinary rendition of unknown prisoners via their air space without any due process, airplane checks (yes Spain, that includes you).

      As usual, US officials and their acolytes who invoke "the law" to demand severe punishment for powerless individuals (Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning) instantly exploit the same concept to protect US political officials, their owners and their allies from the worst crimes: torture, warrantless eavesdropping, rendition, systemic financial fraud, deceiving Congress and the US public about their surveillance behavior. If you're spending your time calling for Ed Snowden's head but not James Clapper's, or if you're obsessed with Snowden's fabricated personality attributes (narcissist!) but apathetic about rampant, out-of-control NSA surveillance, it's probably worth spending a few moments thinking about what this priority scheme reveals.

    3. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      What you gonna do when we bug you!

      NSA?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Weapons of Mass Destruction?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Obama's Drones?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Mission Accomplished?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Fox News?! - Fuck Yeah!!
      Hollywood?! Fuck Yeah!!
      Stuxnet?! - Fuck Yeah!!

    4. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      land of the free, home of the "shit, that guy must be snuffed out, he told the world how dirty we really are. an example must be made so that others think twice about being a whistleblower".

      happy fourth of july, fellow americans ;( can't say I'm very proud to be american right now. in fact, I'm ashamed of what my country is looking like, to the rest of the world.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by auric_dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Team America to police the World but who will police America?

    6. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It'll be fun when we slaughter a political dissenter who was forced to flee to a south American country on July 4. So much freedom!

      Maybe we should use an axe to kill him. That won't, in any way, draw parallels to anything else that happened in history.

    7. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I like this quote: "Index on Censorship said to EU states this morning: "Members of the EU have a duty to protect freedom of expression and should not interfere in an individual's attempts to seek asylum. Edward Snowden is a whistleblower whose free speech rights should be protected not criminalised.""

    8. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      lets also blame our fellow geeks who have ENABLED this spying via their tech efforts.

      do you work for a networking company and have you worked on any sniffer or DPI code or hardware? you are to blame - you are part of the problem!

      do you work for anything having to do with calea? you are to blame!

      do you look the other way when you go into work each day? how do you justify the harm you are doing? oh right, you're helping to 'catch bad guys'. yeah, keep telling yourselves that.

      fellow geeks who enable the evil governments that spy are FULLY TO BLAME just as much as the politicians and folks in power who ordered the equipment and software to do this.

      seriously - if we, as a group, said NO to such jobs, they would not get done. but we are whores and will work for spying companies and not even think twice about it.

      its fucked up beyond belief. and we are part of the problem.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is the THIRD story today, where commenting with the following quote appears both appropriate and relevant to topic:

      "The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth
      and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought"

      -- George Orwell, 1984

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    10. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the movie Cube was about this. You don't know you're part of the problem because you're working on just a tiny piece of it.

    11. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Informative

      A'int no "home of the free". The US has more people incarcerated - per capita and in raw number - than any nation on Earth, or even in all of human history!

      While accounting for a mere 5% of the global population, the US has an aggregated 25% of the world's prisoners, and is growing this at a consistent, exponential rate.

      You have states, like Louisiana, where one out of every 55 people in the state is a prisoner for the duration of a year or more.

      We make China look like amateur hour. Stalin? a blip.

      Now. How can anyone argue that there's no such thing as "brainwashing", or that it only works on stupid or ignorant people?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    12. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It must be nice to be the Index on Censorship and not really have to give a shit about your own foreign relations. Or about the fact that the rest of Europe does the exact same shit as the US, only they just haven't been ratted out yet.

      Why do you think that they are helping the US? They want to show their own prospective leakers that they had better not get any ideas.

      Europe's current "moral high ground" is based solely on the fact that they currently have two fewer leakers than we do, and their governments are painfully aware of this.

    13. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, "moreso" over the top. I voted for him twice, but I'm dismayed at how far overboard he's gone with the "pragmatic" view that killing U.S. citizens without judicial review and continuing the indiscriminate spying is necessary for the national interest. Better than Willard, but it's still creepy.

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      If you believe that US citizens are worth more than any other human beings and should have rights others shouldn't have because of the circumstance of their birth, you're part of the problem.

    14. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, for the record, there were and are a large number of us who bitched about Bush's criminal behavior just as much as we bitch about Obama's. Problem is, the shills and sheeple bray so fucking loudly with their partisan nonsense, we end up being drowned out.

      Well, plus the partisan nonsense itself - when I complained that Bush was fucking us all over and defiling the Constitution, the 'liberals' cheered while the 'conservatives' called me a traitor. Now that it's a Democrat pulling the exact same shit, when I complain the 'conservatives' are right there with me, while the 'liberals' claim the only reason I don't agree with Obama is because he's (half) black. WTF?

      the 2-party system, combined with the general and willful ignorance of the population at large, are the reason we appear to be fucked.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    15. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free, but I don't think Stalin is a good comparison. I doubt we really know how many people disappeared in the night, how many were actually incarcerated, how many were sent to Siberia, how many were just killed outright.

    16. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by radiumsoup · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stalin? Really?

      So we've sent 4 million political dissidents to their deaths and left another 8-10 million to starve to death, then?

      Idiot.

    17. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      From Wikipedia: (emphasis mine)

      On 20 August 1940, Trotsky was attacked in his home in Mexico with an ice axe by undercover NKVD agent Ramón Mercader.[108] The blow to Trotsky's head was poorly delivered and failed to kill Trotsky instantly, as Mercader had intended. Witnesses stated that Trotsky spat on Mercader and began struggling fiercely with him. Hearing the commotion, Trotsky's bodyguards burst into the room and nearly killed Mercader, but Trotsky stopped them, laboriously stating that the assassin should be made to answer questions.[109] Trotsky was taken to a hospital, operated on, and survived for more than a day, dying at the age of 60 on 21 August 1940 as a result of blood loss and shock.[110][111]

    18. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How's it going?

      I'm a military contractor. The stuff I work on is designed to kill people. Well, mostly communication systems and power distribution, but a few of the systems, and the whole giant thing, is there to provide weaponry, humanitarian aid, and search/rescue operations.

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet. Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain. These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force. If you can figure out a way to get them to the table, fuck man, I'll buy the bagels with my last paycheque.

      Now, as for this warrantless wiretapping, or the use of military force without judicial permission and gratuitious amounts of oversight? That's something for which someone should be facing jail time -- because WE ARE the kinds of people who will sit down and discuss our problems over a croissant.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    19. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by starless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free,.

      Just wondering when the US was supposed to be the "land of the free"?
      Even after the era of forcefully removing the previous population from their land coming to an end, and slavery ending, there has still been apartheid
      (including anti-miscegenation laws) and anti-communist drives until rather recently.
      Despite the multitude of current problems, it may well be that the US is the most free it has ever been.

    20. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you were living in a different country than I was. When Bush was president people were taking to the streets over every little perceived offense. Remember all the demonstrations over the war, the Patriot Act, the G8 and UN summits? Remember how vocal MoveOn.org and others were?

      Go on to MoveOn.org today and there isn't a peep about Snowden or the NSA's domestic spy program. I thought these guys were supposed to be defenders of democracy. I guess they only care when a Republican is president.

      A while back Al Jazeera ran a story about supporters going to absurd lengths to defend Obama even when it violates their supposed principles. It was almost comical to see the people they interviewed criticize something like drone strikes only to do a full 180 and defend the program when they learned that Obama was behind it.

    21. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by mordejai · · Score: 2

      I want to snort a mountain of coke and fuck my wife's sister!!!

      Yeah, well, you won't be getting any more coke until you apologize to the President of Bolivia. You should have thought that through.

    22. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      US government, just like any other, is primarily responsible to its citizens who elected it to look after their interests. It is not a matter of whose life is more important. If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    23. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by SirGarlon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      Perhaps simply because it's an easier case to make, when arguing with other Americans. There are a scary number of my countrymen who are willing to agree with statements like "[anyone accused as] a terrorist doesn't have any rights." Even the most ignorant American is aware that US citizens have certain, specific rights. Persuading him that those rights need to be respected is, in my opinion, a prerequisite to subsequently selling him on the idea of natural and universal human rights.

      So I think framing the discussion as "killing US citizens" does reflect a certain chauvinism, but not as bad as it probably appears to a foreigner. :-(

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    24. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, an assassination is unlikely.... now. Snowden played it smart, got a lot of media involved, and got his face and his story spread all over the world. That is the only thing that has kept him alive.

    25. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by RivenAleem · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's time ... *puts on glasses*... to bury the hatchet.

    26. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For the record, there are a significant percentage of liberals who complain about Obama's behavior as much as we did Bush's.

      I in fact see that as a quick test of which political figures and organizations have principles: If their opinions remain consistent (e.g. ACLU and Glenn Greenwald and the EFF), they're legit. If their opinions change based on who's committing the crime (e.g. MSNBC and Fox News), they're partisan hacks.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    27. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      If you created a GUI so the NSA would be able to check the box to track US mobile phones, YOU ARE TO BLAME!

      This would never have happened in a command line only country.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    28. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hair splitting. So instead of sending them to their deaths, they get sent to their prison rapes. Sure they don't die per se, but they don't often get a trial either. May not be political dissidents, but most of them never actually hurt anyone either, they just happened to be brown people who chose to smoke a joint like the white kids do.

      So yah, these distinctions are not really that important to me. I definitely put them in the same general category of evil.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    29. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 2

      They are totally comparable. Stalin's government was more authoritarian and ruthless, but if we start adding up all of the political injustice, Obama's administration may just take the cake. In 2011, more than quarter million prisoners in US were doing time for drug offenses. Most of them -- pot, all of them political. In many cases, the actual crime was having brown skin, which makes them even more political. Give this machine 30 years of Stalin's term, and you arrive at similar numbers. This time, though, the turkeys are killed humanely :)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_Keller!_The_Musical

    30. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      People like you make me fucking sick. Go to the grocery store. Tell me, how many different types and brands of sodas are on the shelf. Now, try telling me we don't got freedom, you fucking godless commie.

    31. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by timmyf2371 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apologies if you were trying to be ironic, but that sounds like a perfect comparison.

      How many people disappeared in the night, only to be rendered to random countries around the world to be tortured?
      How many were sent to Guantanamo?
      How many were just killed by extra-judicial drone attacks?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    32. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Cigarra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      It's funny that you mention that, on the 25th anniversary of yet another senseless massacre by your beloved US Navy:

      "On 3 July 1988 (...) the aircraft serving the [Iran Air 655] flight, an Airbus A300B2-203, was shot down by U.S. missiles fired by the United States Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes as it flew over the Strait of Hormuz. The aircraft, which had been flying in Iranian airspace over Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf on its usual flight path, was destroyed. All 290 onboard, including 66 children and 16 crew, perished".

      I hope it's not too late for you to reconsider the choices you've made in life. Otherwise, I'll settle for you dying a horrible, slow death.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    33. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right now, there are people who will throw acid on girls for going to school or kill their sisters for dancing in the rain

      There are also people who will fabricate grounds for a war that kills half a million people (iraq). Those who will overthrow democratically elected regimes in favor of friendly dictators (iran). Those who will ally with the worst of the wahabists (saudi arabia) while overthrowing a much more progressive secular government.

      These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant. They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force

      You could say the same about the hawks in the US government.

      WE ARE the kinds of people who will sit down and discuss our problems over a croissant.

      Apparently we're not. It's been, what, 50 years now and Kissinger has never as much been indicted for war crimes? Can we expect Bush to be?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    34. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet.

      What about the people who just happen to be nearby the people the Navy is aiming at? Do they deserve to be killed too? How many of the approximately 500,000 people in Iraq who were killed qualify as the bad guys that aren't a big loss to humanity?

      These are not people who will sit down at the breakfast table and discuss their problems calmly over a croissant.

      Really? How many have you asked? I'm reminded of the point where we were planning to attack Iraq, and Dan Rather went over to Iraq and sat down with Saddam Hussein for a perfectly calm interview, which suggests that they might in fact be willing to talk. For what it's worth, the people of Iran just elected a guy who was pushing for just that approach to dealing with the US (assuming the croissant is halal).

      They're going to kill people for what we consider no reason at all, and the only thing they can understand is force.

      I strongly suspect that those who engage in terrorism think the same about us. For example, we have 86 Yemenis locked up in Gitmo right now that we have determined have committed no crime against us. We have killed more than a few Yemenis with drone strikes, despite no (publicly known) terrorist attacks from Yemen on the United States and an alliance with the Yemeni government.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    35. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Seumas · · Score: 2

      And just think about all those baristas who are culpable for our current surveillance state, because they made sweet expensive coffee-based drinks for people in the government and tech geeks during their commute to these jobs! The horror!

    36. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Why did you write "killing U.S. citizens"? Why not "killing humans"?

      Because everyone expects the POTUS to [sanction] kill[ing] humans, but killing citizens without due process is a violation of his oath to uphold the constitution. Remember, the constitution does not recognize a right to life, but it does recognize a right to due process. And unfortunately most people consider the rights guaranteed in the constitution to be both exhaustively enumerative and to be for citizens only. This is odd, because our government occasionally declares them to be human rights. For example, freedom of speech (obviously not all speech, but good old traditional political dissidence is what I'm talking about right now) is a human right in the USA, when it's a citizen's right in the UK. You can't (allegedly) try a citizen of the UK for seditious speech in the UK, but you can try a visitor for the same.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by austinhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow! According to radiumsoup we only have to stay better than Stalin before we start to worry about our freedoms eroding. I have heard about setting an impossibly high bar to surmount. Only due to lack of imagination have I never dreamed that setting an almost impossibly low bar to crawl under could be just as difficult.

    38. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by anagama · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should add a <sarcasm> tags.

      There's a large portion of the American population who would mod you "insightful" thinking you actually believe what you wrote.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    39. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

      Funny that this doesn't mean what people think it means.

      The words were taken from the Gettysburg Address, where Lincoln asked his listeners to resolve that "this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom." Except that in the Gettysburg Address, "under God" didn't modify "this nation" but the following phrase, "have a new birth of freedom." In Lincoln's time, "under God" was a common idiom that meant "with God's help" or "the Lord willing." -- NPR

      So yeah, it means: "One nation, hopefully." See how stupid the whole thing is?

    40. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do you think that they are helping the US? They want to show their own prospective leakers that they had better not get any ideas.

      They might think they are intimidating prospective leakers, but what they are really doing is encouraging them. Snowden saw what the US did to people like Bradley Manning and the NSA leakers who came before him and he STILL decided to go ahead.

      It was apparent from the first mention of his name that he was motivated by patriotism and idealogy - all this bootlicking by EU members is only going to push their own leakers that much closer to a similar breaking point as Obama's 180 on warrantless wiretaps pushed Snowden.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    41. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by arth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Other people have responded with the correct answer, but I will too - armies engaged with enemies on foreign soil do not require judicial review to kill them. This is true for every country in the world which has engaged in conflicts.

      According to US laws, it does require a declaration of war.
      And according to the UN charter, the Chapter VII only allows that for self defence or as a UN sanctioned intervention.

      So no, you cannot kill foreign nationals anywhere without judicial review, lest you commit a war crime.

    42. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you don't like it, move to a planet where there are no countries.

      Where do I sign up?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    43. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that we in the US have long ago since stopped being the land of the free, but I don't think Stalin is a good comparison. I doubt we really know how many people disappeared in the night, how many were actually incarcerated, how many were sent to Siberia, how many were just killed outright.

      At the rate the United States Government is going, I expect people that speak out to start disappearing...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    44. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And when you send the brown folks to jail, they don't vote.

      Then - by making 1 in 10 of them ineligible at anytime and demoralize the others - you eliminate the threat of a progressive force in the electorate, which appeared on the threshold of revolution, 35 years ago.

      The illusion of a representative republic is maintained by such soft suppression.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    45. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be honest, I'm kind of shocked at how far they've let that veil fly open, and for how long. If there's one thing politicians are good at, it's PR and vague, meaningless statements. But they're being really specific. "These programs are legal! Full oversight! Bipartisan support! That dude's a traitor!"

      It's incredibly (or intentionally?) botched PR. Why is the NSA still in the spotlight (or at least light) instead of slipping back into the shadows?

      Usually, it would go something like:

      1) Whistlerblower: "They doin' the snoops!"
      2) Republicans: "Saint Bush never intended this! It must be a secret Muslim plot by Obama to install Sharia law!"
      3) Dems: "No way, it was the Cincinnati branch of the NSA!"
      4) Senate hearings: "Mr. Snowden, thank you for your service to your country."
      5) Snowden: "No prob. I'll go rot in obscurity now."
      6) NSA: "Ow. My wrist. From the slapping." (Goes right back to biz as usual)

      Instead we've got international relations breakdowns, furious Internet rage that might actually result in demonstrations (for what that's worth).

      What the hell is going on?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    46. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by amRadioHed · · Score: 2

      There are partisan hacks on MSNBC, but not everyone. Rachael Maddow has been critical of the administration the past few times I've seen her.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    47. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Life's about choices, and if you've made the kind of choices where the navy is firing at you, it's probably not a big loss to humanity if we have to kick you off the planet."

      It must be nice knowing that whoever Navy happens to kill is an evil-doer.I am sure it helps you sleep at night too. Obviously Navy does not make mistakes about life it kicks off the planet as you eloquently put.

      Now, before we get into the politics and boring reality of what is currently happening, the people that you already write off as those who would not want to eat a bagel with you, typically don't want to eat a bagel with you because you either stole or shat on their entire breakfast at one point or another. It is a little hard to get over social faux pas of such magnitude.

      But there I go being pro-terrorist, right?

    48. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember that incident you are referring to. If you remember it as well, or if you read the Wikipedia article, you'll see that the Vincennes attempted to identify the Iranian airliner, failed, and in the tense environment, overlooked a series of cues that could have distinguished it from a hostile fighter. So when the airliner did not respond to radio contact, the captain ordered a missile fired at it.

      Consensus is that it was a horrible mistake.

      So consider this. When and where the US Navy deploys is up to politicians. There are *way* too many hawks in the US government right now, but that's not the Navy's fault. Future tragedies can be averted by giving the Navy better technology. Consider for example better radar that can tell the operator clearly whether the aircraft is ascending or descending, or better communications so the cruiser can get a video feed from a friendly aircraft or drone to visually identify the target before they decide to shoot. This would make the Navy deadlier toward people the Navy is trying to kill, but potentially a lot less deadly toward people it is *not* trying to kill.

      If you want to prevent the next Iran Air 655, there are two approaches. You can stop the US sending its military all over the world (good luck!). Or you can provide them with the best sensors and information systems money can buy so when they have to decide whether to pull the trigger, they make that decision with the best possible information.

      And yes, I've done Navy work myself. You may wish me a slow, horrible death, too, but I would prefer to discuss your objections over a croissant.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    49. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Znork · · Score: 2

      I assume there's no taxation without representation, so at least they don't have to pay any more taxes then, right?

      Right?

    50. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wondering when the US was supposed to be the "land of the free"?
      Even after the era of forcefully removing the previous population from their land coming to an end, and slavery ending, there has still been apartheid
      (including anti-miscegenation laws) and anti-communist drives until rather recently.
      Despite the multitude of current problems, it may well be that the US is the most free it has ever been.

      Yes, but we didn't care about those people. The government has started spying on me now.

      There's a quote about that, somewhere. First they came for...

    51. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well it was really only ever truly free for people who were not of African descent. If your ancestors were from Africa (in the recent past) then the US had no freedom at all. But since I am of European descent, if I had been born in say 1805 I wouuld have lived in what may have been the freest society that human beings have ever known. It wasn't really until the early 20th century that the US really stopped being free for white people. That's when the US really started to develop a taste for tyranny.

      If you are trying to figure out why such an unfree country is full of people who like to talk about freedom that is why. It's because we have a very unusual history. The only other country I know of that had a similar experiment in freedom is France, but their experiment died a lot faster.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    52. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by melikamp · · Score: 3

      People get killed in prisons. People get killed outside, because prisons force them to become a part of the criminal world (talk about rehabilitation). People die by ODing on street drugs (a problem created solely by enforcement). People can't ever hope to get a good job, and so die from health issues. They commit suicides. These deaths may be hard to quantify, but they are a direct consequence of the political incarceration. But you seem to be too taken with "humanely".

      You are also quick to dismiss the comparison only because of death rate, as if killing is the worst thing you can do to a person. Dooming them to a life of unpaid slave labor in prison, wage slavery outside, and taking away political rights is just as damaging as killing, as long as you do it to enough people and with enough prejudice.

    53. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stalin? Really?

      So we've sent 4 million political dissidents to their deaths and left another 8-10 million to starve to death, then?

      Idiot.

      The USA has killed that many civilians and dropped bombs on a quarter of the world's countries, since the end of WWII.

      Perhaps you need to remove the blinkers and learn a little about you own country's history?

    54. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if you want to get into raw numbers, the United States is responsible for at least a few million deaths worldwide since the end of WWII. If you count our proxy wars and the wars we helped arrange, such as the Iran-Iraq War, the Soviet-Afghan conflict, various central American death squads, etc, then it is upwards of 20-30 million dead in the last sixty years or so.

      (Here's a weak source, but discussing our empire isn't exactly acceptable conversation in regular media outlets. The basic facts are undeniable, even if you'd like to discount our role in arranging, funding, and supplying arms for war that are in our own interest.)

      We're not above watching people die of starvation either:

      As many as 576,000 Iraqi children may have died since the end of the Persian Gulf war because of economic sanctions imposed by the Security Council. ...
      The sanctions were imposed by the Security Council after Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Led by the United States, the Council has rejected many Iraqi appeals to lift the restrictions, which have crippled the economy, until Iraq accounts for all its weapons of mass destruction and United Nations inspectors can certify that they have been destroyed in accordance with several Council resolutions.

      I think we all remember how many WMDs were found after we spilled the blood of our own and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, along with emptying our treasury of five trillion dollars.

      In any case, what is undeniable is that the United States of today and the Stalinist era of the USSR both share one common feature: the respective governments of both nations are hiding their decisions to have people killed and imprisoned from a transparent judicial process. Our government has now openly declared that the political elite are above the law.

      But instead of talking about those hard realities, you have backpedaled to the position that we are not as bad as Stalin.

      Well, that's a load off my mind! I hope Obama spends the 4th helping military doctors force feed hunger striking prisoners at Guantanamo while they celebrate spending the rest of their lives without the right to a trial. I even have an idea of what we can write on the cake:

      "NOT AS BAD AS STALIN!"
      "USA! USA! USA!"

    55. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I may not like the caffeinated beverage you drink, sir, but I will defend to the death your right to do the Dew.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    56. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Omestes · · Score: 2

      Well it was really only ever truly free for people who were not of African descent.

      Tell that to my ancestors of Irish decent.

      Or many people of Japanese descent during WWII.

      Or to all the non-Blacks to languished in debtors prisons.

      Or the American Indians.

      Or...

      Yes, no nation is perfect, but that isn't an excuse to gloss over our flaws. Many do, I'm not pointing that finger at you. Americans love the tautology "We're number one. We're number one because we are America, and America is number one!" Oddly this includes my dad, who is generally against most of our Governments recent actions, I told him I was thinking of emigrating before starting a family, and he got very disappointed, telling me that America is the best country on earth, but couldn't actually say best at what. Not education. Not health. Not freedom/privacy. Not civil rights. Not freedom of the press. Not peace. Not mean happiness.

      Sorry, I'm being a bit negative. I just looked a a full page of news headlines, and got stuck with the feeling that we really are the bad guys again. I haven't felt that way since Bush II. We're the Skeletor of the international stage (or more likely Boss Hog, from Duke's of Hazard).

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    57. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by anyanka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In terms of numbers, Stalin's atrocities are off the chart; Bush/Cheney/Obama are peanuts in comparison.

      However, saying that the other guy was 1000x worse shouldn't be valid defense when it comes to war crimes, atrocities, tyranny and oppression(*). And – saying that it was the other guy who did it, I just let him get away with it, shouldn't be a defense either.

      (*) Though, it is interesting to note that several Germans had their sentences commuted during the Nüremberg trials for crimes that had also been committed by the allies.

    58. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by ph1ll · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, siree, Jim Bob! The captain who gave the order to fire on a civilian aircraft was awarded a medal!

      "The president of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the Legion of Merit to Capt. Will C. Rogers III, U.S. Navy, for service as set forth in the following citation:

      "For exceptionally . . . outstanding service as commanding officer, USS Vincennes from April 1987 to May 1989"

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    59. Re:God it feels good to be an American!!!!!!! by Carewolf · · Score: 2

      if I had been born in say 1805 I wouuld have lived in what may have been the freest society that human beings have ever known. It wasn't really until the early 20th century that the US really stopped being free for white people. That's when the US really started to develop a taste for tyranny.

      No, you were colonized by crazy people with really silly and stupid ideas of religion they liked to force on other people which wwas why they were thrown out of Europe.,somewhere in the last the 20th century these crazy people realized they held an effective political majority they could use to force the US away from freedom and towards craziness.

  2. Reasonable punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A harsh, but reasonable punishment would be to re-route Airforce One to Austria every time Obama wants to visit some country in Europe.

    1. Re:Reasonable punishment by anagama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's time to go beyond petty shit like that.

      Patriotic Americans should descend on DC with pitchforks, tar and feathers, and enhanced voting techniques.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:Reasonable punishment by DougOtto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not try a holiday in Sweden this year?

      See the lovely lakes, the wonderful telephone system, and many interesting furry animals, including the majestic moose.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    3. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

    4. Re:Reasonable punishment by arth1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True. He might be hiding people like Luis Posada Carriles, which is wanted by multiple countries for terrorism, or Victor Bout, a convicted russian arms trafficker.

      The double standards, where USA wants special treatment because it is USA, and refuses reciprocity, is becoming quite tiresome. How can anyone take us seriously?

    5. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Christ, sarcasm dude. I... what? How do you honestly think that anyone is in favor of arresting dissenters?

    6. Re:Reasonable punishment by morcego · · Score: 4, Funny

      including the majestic moose.

      A møøse bit my sister once....

      --
      morcego
    7. Re:Reasonable punishment by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      you don't think the guard, army (etc) won't shoot on fellow american citizens?

      think again.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Reasonable punishment by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Oh, I see, you want to go to Guantanamo for vacation too? I hear they offer free unlimited stays. And some kind of surf boarding class called "water boarding". Should be fun.

      Reminds me of the wisest thing I ever heard a hippie say:

      "Hey, man, they can't, like, arrest us all, right?"

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    9. Re:Reasonable punishment by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Funny

      We apologise for the fault in the comments. Those responsible have been sent to Gitmo.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    10. Re:Reasonable punishment by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly, in America there does seem to be a growing number of people who have no issue with arresting protesters, dissenters and other people who speak against the status quo. You only have to look at major recent protests over the past ten years (OWS, G8, anti-Iraq War, etc) to see how often people are detained under the most frivolous of charges. Dare to step outside the designated "free speech zones" they outline for you, be they literal or figurative and thereby attract the attention of the Powers That Be and you are ever more likely to rue your actions. I had a colleague who went to one OWS protest, was arrested but never charged and /still/ he had to go to court three times. He wasn't imprisoned but just the inconvenience of having all these court dates has made him reconsider participating in future protests.

      The grandparent poster wasn't suggesting that /you/ believe in arresting dissenters, or even that most Americans do. But increasingly there is an awareness that if you /do/ go to one of these protests, you are likely to face detainment despite the fact you are doing nothing more than expressing your right to free speech and assembly. Are they arresting everybody? Of course not, but it is far more likely to happen than it was even fifteen years ago. It is a legitimate fear.

      And America is less free because of it.

    11. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Seeing as they're doing exactly that at my state capital quite regularly: yeah, they can.

    12. Re:Reasonable punishment by cellocgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you don't think the guard, army (etc) won't shoot on fellow american citizens?

      think again.

      They have before, many times, including the 1970 Viet Nam and Equal Rights incidents, and several union/strike - breaking attempts.

      Try as I have over the last 45 years to believe the military and paramilitary (police, etc) has become more enlightened, I see absolutely no evidence of that -- and rather a lot of evidence to the contrary.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    13. Re:Reasonable punishment by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What they don't seem to realize is that if becomes the norm, there won't be any reason to limit one's protest to the ostensibly legal kind.

    14. Re:Reasonable punishment by cellocgw · · Score: 2

      You relieve your officer of his command because he has violated his sworn oath.
      At least that's the way the Pentagon claims it's supposed to work.

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  3. Complete asshat move by the White House by haruchai · · Score: 5, Informative

    No matter what you think of Snowden, at this point he's just a whistleblower or spy.

    If the US wants to search plane, they can fucking do it themselves - they still have an Air Force, after all.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Jawnn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter what you think of Snowden, at this point he's just a whistleblower or spy.

      Just a whistle blower? He's God damn American hero, even if most American's can't understand that. Where are the yellow ribbons reading "Support Our Whistle Blowers"?

    3. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simple. The hunt for him is a threat against any other would be whistleblower.

    4. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah "I'm not going to scramble fighter jets for this guy", he'll just get other countries to do that for him... Hey but what is one more tiny human rights violation when you've already done so many.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He certainly knows much more about classified materials than what he has released. Considering that he didn't accept Russia's terms to stay, it is likely he plans to release more information. If you're being mugged you don't calm down until the threat is dealt with -- you don't relax because they promise they only want your wallet.

    6. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did. While we can argue back and forth over whether he'll get a fair trial, he is entitled to his day in court. From what I've read of it, the information gathering being done is against the US constitution, and he should be exonerated.

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court? And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange? These are the questions people need to be asking about this situation...

      BTW, you don't have to be a spook (or former spook) to guess that the US was spying on everybody they could. You'd have to be pretty naive to think they weren't, given the political climate over the last 12 years.

    7. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's a man with principles. There's nothing more dangerous to illegitimate authority. They are sending a message to every individual who cares about liberty and the rule of law: "If you stick your neck out, we will stomp on your face".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because he knows there's no chance of a fair trial. Those whose crimes he exposed won't see a courtroom, why should he?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the highest rule one can follow is to Do The Right Thing. we each should have some idea as to what that is.

      this is higher than any loyalty to a government or country. higher than loyalty to a religion. higher than what your employer wants you to do.

      I include manning and snowden as true heros and patriots. when a country or government goes bad (ours has, in case there was any doubt) then its your DUTY to Do The Right Thing and inform on them.

      the notion of checks and balances is near and dear to my heart. those who keep the people informed of wrongdoings are at the highest level of hero.

      its sad that our modern heros are being treated like criminals. isn't that a laugh, the criminals are punishing the good guys. I'm not sure when things got so backwards, but they clearly are, now.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 4, Insightful

      illegitimate authority

      Ha! You wish it was illegitimate authority. Unfortunately, those are your elected representatives. Totally legitimate.
      Oh, right, that is sad, not funny :(

      --
      morcego
    11. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by morcego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did. While we can argue back and forth over whether he'll get a fair trial, he is entitled to his day in court. From what I've read of it, the information gathering being done is against the US constitution, and he should be exonerated.

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court? And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange? These are the questions people need to be asking about this situation...

      I'm sorry, but your arguments sounds a lot like the ones we hear against anonymity, and in favor or letting the government spy on its people.

      The reason he went into exile is simple: he doesn't trust the government. And rightly so.
      Maybe he doesn't want to be a martyr?

      --
      morcego
    12. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it's not specifically authorized in the Constitution, it's not legitimate authority. Generalized surveillance is prohibited by the 4th amendment, no matter how many representatives or judges have oversight. Congressional oversight of an unconstitutional law does not make that law legitimate, it makes those congress people traitors to their oath to defend the Constitution. The only way to make this legal is to amend the Constitution.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple. The hunt for him is a threat against any other would be whistleblower.

      Were that the case, one would think the persecution of Bradley Manning would have sufficed.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    14. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's laws (in theory at least) in the US to protect whistle blowers, even those who release information the way he did.

      Citation? Examples?

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because, as someone who only just turned 30 he is not prepared for his life to end either through execution (USC 18, section 2381; http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381) or just life in prison. It is true that no good deed goes unpunished, but I think Snowden would still like his choice of punishments. Like most people he prefers exile over death.

      When he released classified documents he did in fact break US law. He publicly admitted to doing it. Short of a sympathetic jury who believes in jury nullification he has zero chance of being found not guilty of leaking classified documents. So, like everyone else, he has no illusions about living free ever again in the country of his birth.

      It always annoys me when people claim that by not choosing to spend the rest of his life in prison he is not facing the consequences of his actions. The dramatic events we are all watching unfold are the consequences. Exile is simply the only option he has that is preferable to suicide. I highly doubt you or any of the others claiming he is avoiding the consequences of his actions would act any differently. Remember that he and many other people all over the world do not believe he did anything wrong. On the contrary, many believe he is a hero.

      And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange?

      I'm not sure if you are following the news, but at no point has he been to London. He is still in the Moscow airport. So I'm not sure what you mean by "going" to Assange. He accepted help from one of Assange's associates, which is precisely what you would have done in his situation. Any other questions?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    15. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Legitimacy is given by the people

      Right, and you know who ratified the Constitution? The People. If the authority isn't specifically listed in the Constitution, the people have not consented, and the authority is not legitimate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

      He must be something much more dangerous to somebody. I don't understand how everything he revealed can be so trivialized, and yet he be this sought after.

      I understand it perfectly: The government's every word on this topic is a pack of lies.

      --
      Who did what now?
    17. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      Because he knows that the consequences involve being tortured (by the standards of the UN and Amnesty International) for years before his first day in court? If you're wondering how he knows this, it's because that's what the US did when it got its hands on Bradley Manning.

      And what did he think he had to gain by going to Julian Assange?

      A possible ally? An organization that's dedicated to spreading leaked information to the world, and has an infrastructure for doing so?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    18. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by jkflying · · Score: 2

      So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

      You mean like Bradley Manning did?

      Does that answer your question?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    19. Re:Complete asshat move by the White House by melikamp · · Score: 2

      Their attempts at plugging leaks are as earnest as they are pitiful, IMHO. People like Manning, Drake, and Snowden came forward because they grew up believing in the right to freedom of expression. If the administration keeps reacting this violently, though, then the next stream of leaks will be by anons. And it will be wider, bigger, deeper stream, if only because there's more to leak as the time passes, and the copying friction keeps approaching zero. I'd bet 1:1 the next big leak will be anonymous, thanks in large to Snowden's widely publicized treatment.

      In the age of the Net, the only way to stop leaks is by reducing organization size. Systematic lawbreakers will have to become very small (may be hundreds of people, more likely dozens), just so that they can be kept secret. Which is great for all of us.

  4. Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and I'll bet France and Portugal have business interests associated with Bolivia's lithium deposits. Morales could spank both of them by levying an access fee amounting to a few hundred million Euros. Gotta make it more expensive to be a USA poodle if we want this bad behavior to stop.

  5. Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

    It's not supposed to be legal to interfere with the travel of diplomats or search them.

    If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance. If this was done by someone trying to keep the Americans happy, they crossed well over the line.

    But America seems to believe the rest of the world should be subservient to their wishes -- and the rest of the world is waking up to a big "Fuck You".

    Keep braying about how you're the defenders of Truth and Freedom, while lying your faces off and becoming an authoritarian state. What Snowden has done is demonstrate that the US only gives a shit about themselves, and will break any law that stands in their way.

    1. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by mcvos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was done to Air Force One, there would be outrage and calls for war.

      Of course. But it wasn't Air Force One, it was merely the plane of the president of some unimportant country that's not the US. So who cares, right? Only the US really matters. Only the people in charge of the US really matter, I mean. If there's one thing abundantly clear now, it's that.

    2. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by zlives · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i assume some blame must also reside with the ball-less wonders of Europe?

    3. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this was done at the request of the Americans, they've well overestimated their own importance

      I take great offense at that statement. the corrupticians in power run bartertown. the american people have no say in things anymore.

      please do not assume that We The People have any control over our lawless government officials. that boat sailed a long time ago and it isn't coming back any time soon.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      America can either realize her own problems and fix them, or continue to act like arrogant douchebags.

      Ignore this at your own peril, because the rest of the world is getting tired of putting up with the shit your leaders do.

      But you've already found America guilty when there is no indication that: 1. it happened. 2. the U.S. was involved.

      Really? A presidential plane was diverted to search for a person of pressing interest to the US and you are going to claim there was no US involvement? These countries just decided on a whim to violate international law, redirect this plane and demand to search it?

      Are you going to pretend that 'rendition' never happened either?

    5. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 2

      But America seems to believe

      Please be a bit more precise. We're talking about the American government, not the country. Most ordinary Americans would be appalled if they fully understood the extent of their government's crimes.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by jcr · · Score: 2

      Right now all we have are the accusations of one man who, by the way, has his own agenda.

      Nice try, spinbot, but we don't just have his accusations, we have a vast amount of DATA that he delivered to news organizations.

      Now fuck off and polish that bullshit off your jackboots.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Yahma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The american people are complicit in the thuggish behavior of their own government in the same way the German populace was complicit with the thuggery of the Nazi government of the 1930's and 40's.

    8. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right now all we have are the accusations of one man who, by the way, has his own agenda.

      President Morales was not the only one on that plane. It is the accusations of everyone on that plane. And his agenda was just to fly home.

      He's riled up sentiment among the Latin American countries against the U.S.

      No. We and our French and Portuguese lapdogs (who cannot seem to get enough of our cum down their throats) have riled up sentiment. And rightfully so. If we are willing to essentially ground the plane of a foreign president for just the slightest of rumors can you imagine what we would do if there were some real evidence that Snowden were on the plane. Would we simply shoot the plane down? Maybe. I've never heard of anything like this before. It sounds like the US government wants Snowden more than they have ever wanted anyone. I shudder to think what the government has done that makes them so afraid of this guy.

      Maybe what he is saying is true, but the countries involved deny it.

      Have you got any evidence for that? They haven't denied it. Even if France and Portugal do deny it no one with any sense is going to believe them because it is by far the most likely sequence of events that could lead to President Morales' plane changing course and landing in Austria.

      I'm beginning to suspect that Snowden is dead no matter what he does. If the US governemnt feels he is so dangerous that they have to ground a president's plane like this over the most insubstantial of rumors then he is well and truly fucked. They will simply assasinate him and try to make it look like an accident or extraordinary rendition him to gitmo and torture and murder him there. It is sad because he truly is a brave hero. Obama's protest that this issue is not worthy of his attention is starting to sound more and more like the opposite of the truth. It is becoming clear that they are terrified of what he might reveal. It's sickening to speculate about, but maybe it is something that makes Abu Ghraib seem tame in comparison.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    9. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by einar2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, I take offense on this. It is always you the people! There is nobody else you can hand over the responsibility to. This is your government, this is your country. And you profit from its actions. You are in for it.

    10. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

      I don't know that he really has any further evidence that's more damning than he's already released. I don't think they're afraid of what else he has. I think the sheer arrogance of the US has just gotten THAT out of control. He scuffed their shoe, therefore he must die. I've seen enough of that behavior in very very little people who don't control nuclear weapons that I don't find it difficult to believe that people who get followed around by a military officer carrying a nuclear "football" will have that same reaction.

      But you're right, if he sticks his head up just a little too far, they'll kill him. Snowden's choice of where to run makes a great deal of sense, really. Black helicopters fly across Pakistan on a regular basis, and with impunity. Black helicopters do NOT fly across Russia, unless they're Russian. Russia controls its airspace. It doesn't just watch it. It backs up its radars with fighters and SAMs and assorted other pieces of unfriendly hardware, and Moscow more than anywhere else. Nobody is going to fly a black helicopter full of Navy Seals into Moscow. Not if they want to avoid being turned into a fireball, at least.

    11. Re:Bullies and thugs ... by PRMan · · Score: 2

      Most Americans live very cushy, comfortable lives. Until they start to lose their way of life personally, they most likely won't lift a finger.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  6. Re:So what was it? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't matter. Seems that all of them bend over gracefully and at once to the one that they know spy on all of them. Maybe the place that matter is Stockolm, they all have the syndrome.

  7. Dear leaders: by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Snowden didn't make you look bad by revealing your little games both at home and abroad. You made us look bad by pulling this shit in the first place.

    Cut it out and give Snowden the hero's welcome home he deserves.

  8. What hasn't he revealed? by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What concerns me the most is just how aggressively the entire world seems to be against him, when all he's basically revealed is the existence of a high-level domestic spy program. Yeah, that's horrible and shit, but that alone wouldn't have the US government moving political mounts pressuring other countries not to harbor him.

    What did he potentially have access to that's so damning to the government that it's strong-arming the entire world over the possibility that he could release it?

    1. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by xstonedogx · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't it obvious?!

      He has evidence:

      1. The moon landing was faked.
      2. The U.S. is complicit in the alien abduction of its citizens.
      3. The U.S. is reverse engineering alien technology at area 51.
      4. Bigfoot is real and a consultant for the DEA.
      5. JFK was killed by Jimmy Hoffa and Elvis.
      6. The U.S. is run by lizard people of which George W. Bush is one. (Also Morena Baccarin.)
      7. Jimi Hendrix, Buddy Holly, and other supposedly dead musicians are alive, well, and immortal prisoners in an underwater city in the Atlantic for the rich and powerful.
      8. (The truth about eight is too awful to print.)
      9. Tater Tots are PEOPLE.

    2. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > What concerns me the most is just how aggressively the entire world seems to be against him

      Nope. The world is not against him. The world is against the possible [economic] retaliation from the US. That's kind of funny: during the cold war, a time people were worrying about possible armed conflicts, Snowden would have been granted asylum from many countries, including USSR. Nowadays, it seems the economic threat has more impact than nukes.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    3. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His problem is he's a geek and doesn't understand how social relations work between people, much less countries. For example everyone spies on everyone-else's diplomatic missions, but everyone also pretends that no such thing ever happens. In a lot of ways these spy-missions-between-allies are actually in everyone's best interest because if French spies tell the the French government the UK really is serious about issue #47, the French know that pressing the Brits too hard on Issue #47 is likely to lead to big problems in other areas. But it's considered rude to talk about this stuff openly because the voters don't understand this, and the Brits will have to do something if anyone ever points out to those voters that the French spies got all Britain's documents on Issue #47.

      Snowden and co. just did that to the US. Instead of doing whatever they were actually planning on doing today, the Foreign ministers of multiple countries have to be self-righteous hypocrites for the next three months. They know they are being hypocrites, they do not like it, and they blame Snowden/Wikileaks for forcing their hands. Therefore they are sending a message to Evo Morales. Helping Snowden is going to have repercussions with his relationships with them. I'm not sure whether Morales cares one way or the other about that, but now he knows.

      If Snowden had stayed in Hong Kong, and avoided Assange religiously he'd be a lot better off. Since he's with Wikileaks he's burned his entire stock of moral authority with all people who have legal authority, he's also guaranteed that his information is worthless to those people because Wikileaks always tells everyone everything eventually. But he fled to Russia with Wikileaks help, now the Russians don't know what to do with him, and the Latin American countries that might shield him as a FU to the US are finding out that they'd be telling a lot of other countries FU2.

    4. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by jovius · · Score: 2

      The releases can't be contained. The freedom seeking individuals are the problem. It's impossible to have a total control anybody, so the measures taken can only go to the infinity, unless the facades themselves are deconstructed. That's not going to happen, because so many are dependent on the illusionary constructions.

      What Snowden possesses is what's inside all of us - the desire to be free. It's being chained by semantic structures like nationalism, top-down hierarchy, late primordial version of the democracy and the glorified and commercialized needs and desires.

      The admission that absolute control is impossible is not going to be heard, and to avoid the uneasy feelings snowdens need to be removed from the stage.

    5. Re:What hasn't he revealed? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What did he potentially have access to that's so damning to the government that it's strong-arming the entire world over the possibility that he could release it?

      A conscience.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  9. Grow a pair, Europe by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On the heels of revelations about US spying on its European Allies, why are you people putting up with this crap?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by arth1 · · Score: 2

      People don't just put up with it, they revel in it. It's panem et circenses for today's plebs.

      As long as something does not appear to affect an American's ability to buy cheap cheeseburgers and petrol, it's only entertainment.

    2. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      Probably because they don't give a shit about their diplomatic missions being spied on by the US. They're our allies. They need to know what we think is important, not just what we say we think is important when the cameras are rolling, therefore they almost certainly spy on us at every opportunity. Which means they can't really blame us for doing the same damn thing to them.

      Look at it this way: if you were Estonia would you rather know the US Ambassador to Estonia's official instructions were "defend Estonian sovereignty from the Russians by any means necessary," because your spies read those instructions, or would you prefer to trust him when he told you that?

      But voters don't understand that because voters think like you, so now instead of spending the next few months negotiating a free trade agreement, or pressuring Netanyahu/Abbas to fucking talk to each-other, Europe's diplomats will be forced to spend them in self-righteous hypocritic outrage.

    3. Re:Grow a pair, Europe by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      The news is not that we were caught spying on our enemies, but that we were caught spying on countries we like to claim are our friends. Friends don't spy on friends. Hence the problem. And then there's the whole part about the US and UK treating 1984 as if it were an instruction manual. People of the world are not too happy about that either.

      If it's not news that there's no reason to be grounding planes to try to catch the guy who released the non-news that no one cares about. If it's not news then it is pretty hard to claim that Snowden has caused any harm to US interests.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  10. Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by 3seas · · Score: 2

    ... isn't that supposed to be a given in todays spy vs. spy MAD comic?

    1. Re:Discovered the Embasy was bugged????? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bugs were invented for the purpose of spying on embassies, which were from time immemorial used as a good place to headquarter your espionage operations in foreign countries.

      I remember a story from the '80s where a new US embassy in Moscow was so infested with bugs that it had to be abandoned. The very concrete rebar served as antennae for the bugs.

      http://articles.latimes.com/1991-07-29/news/mn-177_1_embassy-building

      So it should be no surprise at all that any embassy is buggier than an ant hill.

      My favorite story was the the bugged version of the Great Seal Seal given to the US Ambassador, which hung in his residence. Dr Theremin got an order Stalin award for that one.

      It's one thing to be bugging private citizens, and another altogether to be bugging embassies.

  11. Re:They still can get out of Europe with some risk by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

    Afaict Morales was flying in a business jet that didn't have enough fuel to go Russia-Bolivia nonstop, so the original plan was to refuel in Western Europe before continuing on. So that complicates the possibility of just overflying without permission and daring them to shoot him down, because he'd actually have to land and refuel at their airports, not just overfly.

  12. Re:So what was it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

  13. Conflicting stances...double standards? by Bearhouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the BBC article...

    Meanwhile, France has urged EU-US trade talks be delayed amid the fallout from secrets leaked by Mr Snowden.

    The talks are due to begin on Monday but claims that the US bugged EU diplomatic offices in the US, and spied on internal computer networks, have upset transatlantic relations.

    French government spokeswoman Najat Vallaud-Berkacem said the talks should be suspended for 15 days to enable mutual trust to be restored.

    Yet at the same time it is claimed that the French potentially violated the diplomatic priviledges of the President of an interntionally-recognised, non "axis-of-evil", democratic nation-state in order to please the USA?

    Looks like genuine 'realpolitik' at its cynical best; we're pissed that you're spying on us, but we'll still help you collect your "bad guy" in case we need you to return the favour in the future. Just like what happened when NZ gave back the Rainbow Warrior killers so fast...

    Bottom line: Why is this spying stuff so persistent and pervasive? Because everybody in power wants it...

    1. Re:Conflicting stances...double standards? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      it is unlikely the flight stop request went through the political leaders in France.. thus the announcements later that the airspace is open, once they heard about it. You can request a plane to be grounded on terrorist suspicions etc nowadays. Well, you used to be anyways, until today(because the system got abused).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  14. Whats the threat we are issuing to these people? by Marrow · · Score: 2

    Do what we say or we'll declare bankruptcy and trash the world economy?

  15. spy novel by noh8rz9 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love all this Snowden stuff... it's like a real life John LeCarre novel! Let me go get the popcorn...

    --
    let's have a conversation! let me know what you think.
    1. Re: spy novel by Mabhatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Realistically, show of hands who thought the USA ever shut down spying on other countries from during the Cold War? These Europeans are so silly and naive they thought the USA closed up spy shop just cause the Comminist countries fell? I mean that's so naive as to be dangerous for politics and military. These guys are too content coasting on NATO treaties for security arrangements in the area that the USA does the lion's share of the operations on.

      But to think for a minute the USA isn't spying on you is just silly.

      That said, back in the 1970's if the USA thought you were openly harboring a spy, we'd have just "accidented" you mr from Bolivia. I'm sure Ecuador is starting to feel the "coup de Tate" pressure from tge CIA right about now too.

    2. Re: spy novel by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't understand ANY of this. We have known, since the 90s, that Echelon existed and monitored everything everywhere for keywords. The only new information is "now we can do it in real time and we also archive everything". We even knew this went for the NSA and CIA spying (illegally, by obligation of the agencies) on our own people. We have also known that we still spy on other nations. And other nations spy on us. And we all spy on each other. It is actually astonishing to me that the general consensus seems to be that it's horrible that we are spying on other countries, because I thought everyone knew we were doing this the whole time. Spying is just something every nation does and, frankly, it seems to be almost an obligation for their own protection. How does the Central Intelligence Agency gather Intelligence without spies and spying?

      And, of course, when it comes to spying on our own citizens, we have known about this for the last couple of decades and we've tried making a big deal about it and nobody has given two shits. It wasn't even until a few years ago that the general media started to even reference Echelon and most people who had any concern about the government spying on its own citizens were dismissed as being paranoid.

      Now, it is suddenly trendy, and people who didn't give two shits six months ago or two decades ago are all getting major boners over on Reddit as they all pretend to be revolutionaries fighting for freedom and against surveillance etc etc and now that all these little kids give two fucks, the rest of us are supposed to tag along and act like they're the first to acknowledge this and want to do something about it. Sort of like when you keep posing an idea to your boss and he keeps ignoring you, until he finally brings the idea up and claims it was his.

      Fortunately, I think most of us on Slashdot are halfway through our life (or more -- some of you guys are real old bastards), so I think we can pragmatically say "have fun with things, kids - we're going to be dead soon". And so, I can't be assed to give much of a fuck anymore. I exhausted all my giving a fucks over the last two decades. I say, bring on the surveillance state. Bring on the dystopian future. Bring on Mother America and government involvement in everything. Big monolithic buildings being erectic. Futuristic all encompassing surveillance systems. The whole boat load. It'll be fun to watch. And by the time it really crushes the absolute spirit of man, we old timers will be ashes in the dirt.

    3. Re: spy novel by anagama · · Score: 5, Informative

      What is different, is that we have direct information (not statements, not conjecture, not foil hattery) about the surveillance. It is the difference between suspecting (or even having a well grounded belief), and KNOWING. It is the difference between knowing that AT&T set up splitters, and wondering what happens after that, and knowing what happens after that.

      More to the point though, if we do nothing after these revelations, the DC pukes will take it as a mandate to do more and worse.

      So instead of wasting your time and everyone else's lamenting how long it has taken to get to the point where real pushback can occur, get on board and start pushing the fuck back. Hard.

      Demand prosecutions, impeachment proceedings. Start with the obvious, like Clapper's felonious perjury, and then keep plowing the bastards. Don't sit back and whine about people not acting in the past -- that is a useless waste of time and just plays into the enemy's hands. So stand up and fight, or if you won't do that, go back to your cotton row and shut the fuck up.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re: spy novel by xQx · · Score: 2

      Seumas: I couldn't agree more with your position. In fact I have stated the same position a number of times previously. To clarify your point on "spying on our own citizens" it's an open secret that one of the benefits of having bilateral spying alliances, is when the NSA wants to know something about a US citizen, ASIO or MI5 do the spying then share the information (and vice versa). That way none of the agencies have to break their legal obligations but neatly avoid this getting in the way of them spying on whomever they like.

      I wish I could find the quote, but recently a USA military leader said that Obama wouldn't pressure china too much about their cyber-espionage programse, because 'we wouldn't ask them to do something that we would never agree to ourselves'. It's also old news that this surveillance is used to advance US commercial interests. There have been previous statements that this is clearly inside the NSA's published goals "to gain a decision advantage for the Nation and our allies under all circumstances."

      Basically, everybody is spying on everybody these days, and have been for some time. Nobody who is spying wants to stop spying, and we have about as much chance of de-armament as we do with nuclear weaponry - we may as well get the f*ck over it, and get on with our lives.

      The recent issue is that it's becoming apparent that this information is no longer confined to the spy agencies, for two reasons: 1. It's only a matter of time (and a very short time at that) before other law enforcement agencies get access to that information because if we all agree someone has broken the law, and the law is just, why should they NOT have access to all the evidence to convict criminals? and 2. Unsurprisingly, when you have spy agencies that employ thousands of people, you get leaks. It's only a matter of time before these massive databases of information get compromised, and the public gets access to information about their neighbors.

      So it's public now, and to take a quote from a crappy 1995 Steven Segal film:

      " We know this. The Chinese know that we know. But we make-believe that we don't know and the Chinese make-believe that they believe that we don't know, but know that we know. Everybody knows. "

      So, what do we do about it?

    5. Re: spy novel by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      There once were times ( under the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, but I grant that is a bit far away from your armchair ) when people actually cared about leaving the world as a place palatable to the next generation, and about uncovering wrongdoings. We are speaking about such moral giants as Demosthenes, Cleisthenes, Thucydides, Cincinnatus, Cato, Scipio.

      It is exactly because I am statistically a bit more than halfway through my life, and because of such examples, that I actually care. I happen to have a grandfather who was in the resistance against the Nazis, in WWII. Having such examples and such ancestors may protect one from becoming a cynic.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  16. War by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    By now US is at war against the world, by their own definition, the ones that act as allies in things like this are targets too, even if they keep covering they ears and eyes to not see the evidence. Even if international law and rights used to have some meaning, is not anymore.

    Ok, maybe they have to act like this even if they don't want to. The biggest benefit of massive, worldwide snooping on everything digital is not stopping terrorist, is just have a really big database for blackmailing, to force anyone to do what they want, from the top governors to the last shoeshiner.

  17. Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by photonic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dear opposition parties of all involved countries (France, Spain, Austria, ...), please drag the responsible ministers to parliament and have them explain every detail of the closure of the airspace as soon as possible. I don't know how it is organized exactly in those countries, but in the political system I know (Netherlands), all ministers are forced to respond to any question posed by members of parliament. The sillier questions can be answered by mail within a few weeks deadline, but I guess that for more important issues like this one, they can have any minister get his ass in parliament with a few days notice. Willfully giving wrong answers is political suicide via a 'motion of no confidence'. In the more likely case that the relevant ministers are supported by the leading majority, they can still be forced to make some embarrassing statements (yes, Obama did call us to close the airspace ...), which could lead to ridicule in the press and losses in the polls.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    1. Re:Call responsible ministers to parlement ASAP by Arkh89 · · Score: 2

      Hahahaha, forget that for France...
      It's not a free country anymore, and there is no political "opposition" party right now : we have a "Nazi" party (Front National), we have a zombie-party (UMP), rulling while the country was involved in selling weapons and DPI technologies to previous Arab dictatorships (just before their revolutions) and also receiving money for their campaigns from these same countries. And a Flanby-party, rulling right now (the name comes from a jelly-like desert, I think that you get the image).
      As for the citizens : French are morons, they're angry at the government for the same-sex mariage but you won't see them for these (irony)high level things(/irony) such as privacy concerns or human rights.
      In the 60s, General De Gaulle, got the country out of Otan to emphasize its sovereignty (vs US-UK and USSR). Now all of this has been wiped out as it re-integrated the organization and we are back following US desires... ("yeah, let's buy some more M$ licenses!")

  18. Snakes on a Plane 2? by jasper160 · · Score: 2

    "Enough is enough! I have had it with this motherfucking Snowden on this motherfucking plane!"

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished.
  19. Re:So what was it? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. The submitter also neglected to mention that these countries deny the accusations.

    Citation? I'm not sure that Spain and Italy were accused, but I know that at least so far Portugal and France have not denied the accusations. They refuse to comment on the matter. Are you gullible enough to believe that the Bolivian president just made up the whole thing and chose to have his plane diverted to Austria and then searched?

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  20. Snowden's self-exile actually makes sense by jdev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So why, then, did he choose to go into exile rather than accept the consequences and justify his actions in court?

    Have you seen what due process has been for Bradley Manning? During his nine-month stay in Fort Quantico, he was reportedly held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, forced to sleep naked without pillows and sheets on his bed, and restricted from physical recreation or access to television. A military judge ruled that his treatment was excessive and credited him with some time served against any future punishment.

    The government has demonstrated that it will crush whistleblowers who try to defy it. Who in their right mind would allow this to happen to them? Extreme measures for Snowden to protect himself just mirror the extreme measures our government has taken to punish those who oppose it.

  21. Shame on you. by Fuzzums · · Score: 2

    Shame on you France.
    Shame on you Spain.
    Shame on you Portugal.
    Shame on you Italy.

    Now bend over and have Uncle Ben have it's way with you some more.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
    1. Re:Shame on you. by vikingpower · · Score: 2

      Some political commentator today vocally despised the attitude of Spain, Portugal, France and Italy, qualifying such an attitude as "crouching self-humiliatingly low while even running ahead of obeying the American bully once more". Well said. Nuff said.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  22. I am proud by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...to live in Austria, where Mrs. Miki-Leitner, the Minister of Interior Affairs, said ( after the dust had settled somewhat, this afternoon ):

    "This was a missed chance for Mr. Snowden. Austria has shown not to let itself be intimidated by the US. If Mr. Snowden had come here, he would have gotten a serious examination of his request for political asylum, as well as an investigation into recognizing him as a political refugee."

    I would say: Edward, life in Vienna is more than bearable. Plenty of high-tech firms in case you ever need a job again ( which I doubt ), and the border to Switzerland is only a few train hours away, in case you need to run. Come over here, man !!!

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  23. What a bunch of crooks ... by boorack · · Score: 2

    It seems US govt propaganda department aparatchiks never stop. They'll repeat their shit over and over again, conveniently hiding behind AC. I'm sick seeing taxpayer money thrown into this. Fuck you.

  24. Re:Lay Odds by Seumas · · Score: 2

    It seems one of these happens every six to eight weeks. Have to keep the population frightened, after all.

    Of course, this won't do for very long. We're already at the point that people who are of voting age don't remember anything about 9/11 and certainly don't have any concept of a pre-war/pre-terrorism America. To just about anyone who is wasting away on Reddit, 9/11 is just this thing their parents and the government talk about. This means that something big will have to really happen (not just supposedly be about to happen and then stopped by the FBI at the last second). Something to rattle them and keep them subservient at least as much as most of society has been the last dozen years.

  25. good for the goose, good for the chief of staff by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Capricious application of the law is a prime sign of corruption.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  26. Re:Bolivia has a big fraction of the world's lithi by Issarlk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    France also had Morales' visit earlier this year, he planed to buy helicopters and Airbus planes... Good job president Hollande !