Slashdot Mirror


City-Sized Ice Shelf Breaks Free Of Antarctica

LeadSongDog writes "Germany's TerraSAR-X satellite is showing that the Antarctic's Pine Island ice shelf has calved a 'berg of 720 square kilometres, 'the size of Hamburg.' Angelika Humbert says 'The Western Antarctic land ice is on land which is deeper than sea level. Its "bed" tends towards the land. The danger therefore exists that these large ice masses will become unstable and will start to slide.' The article extrapolates that 'If the entire West Antarctic ice shield were to flow into the Ocean, this would lead to a global rise in sea level of around 3.3 meters.' Goodbye Florida.

51 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. FINALLY! by Sparticus789 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I knew those 569 acres of land on the Arizona/California border would gain some value. Just didn't think it would happen so soon. Anyone want to buy my new ocean-front property?

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:FINALLY! by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      Wait, the drunk guy doesn't like the meth guys?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:FINALLY! by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Nope I'm holding out for the land I own at 100' above sea level in Florida to become ocean front.

      You own land on Space Mountain???

  2. Dooomed by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dooomed we are all doooom.
    Dooooooomed!

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Dooomed by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Puny humans do not yet know the meaning of the word "doomed".

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Dooomed by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      Dooooooomed!

      Yes, in general, however those living in coastal regions will dooooom first. The rest of us will need to acclimate to some intense heat and drought before the welcome relief of doooom sets in.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    3. Re:Dooomed by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dooomed we are all doooom.

      Pretty much, yeah. Even if this iceberg doesn't get us, and even if climate change won't, the by-now ingrained habbit of putting fingers in your ears and shitposting to drown out unpleasant facts effectively nullifies your intelligence, thus making it impossible to consider or react efficiently to any situation. Since intelligence is our sole evolutionary advantage, and since climate chance denial has made pretending stupidity fashionable, we're pretty much doomed.

      Still, at least it provides a fascinating case study about self-delusion.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:Dooomed by tbannist · · Score: 2

      And constantly blathering on about how evil we are as a whole and that we are destroying the planet and that we are causing the climate to no longer be in stasis...

      Actually, the scientists and virtually all of the major groups that recognize that climate change is occurring are very much aware that the climate would be changing at a very slow rate even if humans didn't exist. In fact, they're the ones who discovered that in the first place.

      That means the assumption is that the climate would never change if it weren't for the evil humans.

      No it doesn't. That's a strawman argument, I've literally never seen that argument made by anyone who isn't actively denying the climate change is an issue.

      That requires accepting that the climate has never changed.

      No it doesn't. As previously mentioned, there are no major groups that claim that the climate has never changed.

      And that requires ignoring a vast amount of physical evidence as well as written and oral history.

      No it doesn't, because the only one making an argument that the climate has never changed in the imaginary opponent in your mind.

      And I am in denial?!? wtf

      Yes, you are. It's kind of like you are trying to argue your way out of a speeding ticket by claimin the police officer doesn't believe in continental drift and therefore couldn't accurate get a measure of your cars speed because he didn't account for it, and therefore your foot on the gas pedal shouldn't actually matter. What you are writing appears to be pretty much insane.

      The natural temperature change is around -0.02 degrees per century. Our green house gas emissions have overwhelmed the negative trend and turned it into about +2.00 degrees per century (and still accelerating). It's 100 times faster in the opposite direction. That's actually a significant change attributable entirely to human acitvity.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  3. Re:what? by Entropius · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the point is that the boundary between the ice and the rock is below sea level.

  4. The poet Smash Mouth said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Judging by the hole in the satellite picture
    The ice we skate is getting pretty thin
    The water's getting warm so you might as well swim
    My world's on fire how about yours
    That's the way I like it and I never get bored

    1. Re:The poet Smash Mouth said it best by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Judging by the hole in the satellite picture
      The ice we skate is getting pretty thin
      The water's getting warm so you might as well swim
      My world's on fire how about yours
      That's the way I like it and I never get bored

      Burma Shave

      --
      Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  5. How's that? by tchdab1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could somebody translate that into Chicago-units? Here in the US we're having trouble visualizing this.

    1. Re:How's that? by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Funny

      My guess is it is probably equal to about 1 Chicago proper but with fewer random shooting.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re: How's that? by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      apparently you aren't aware of how much penguin on penguin violence goes on in Antarctica. Much of it the result of arguments over which Linux distro is best.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    3. Re:How's that? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2

      Hamburg is about the surface area of 7,648,706,558.13 Chicago style pizzas. Or 4,598,807,355.66 New York style pizzas (which is better :-p).

  6. Re:what? by Microlith · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wait what?

    Umm.. isn't it impossible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level?

    By definition, that is land. My guess is that you meant to ask if it is impossible to have land below sea level, and the answer is no. Much of New Orleans and Death Valley in the US are below sea level, they just happen to be surrounded by natural (and some artificial) barriers that keep the water out.

    My understanding of the point is that the ice in question is standing on solid land below the ocean's surface, which means that its volume is not currently reflected by the height of the oceans today. In addition, the land is sloped towards the rest of the ocean so, should the ice in question calve off it will enter the ocean rather than simply cracking but staying put.

  7. The size of Hamburg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Darn metric system! How many Libraries of Congress is that equivalent to?

    1. Re:The size of Hamburg? by Zynder · · Score: 2

      He said Olympic SWIMMING pools, not cess pools. The units don't convert.

  8. New Unit! by WillgasM · · Score: 2, Funny

    I propose we swiftly adopt the "Hamburg" as a new unit of measurement.

    1. Re:New Unit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course subdivided in smaller units, Hamburgers, of about 1/1.500.000 that size.

  9. Re:what? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wait what?

    Umm.. isn't it impossible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level?

    By definition, that is land. My guess is that you meant to ask if it is impossible to have land below sea level, and the answer is no. Much of New Orleans and Death Valley in the US are below sea level, they just happen to be surrounded by natural (and some artificial) barriers that keep the water out.

    My understanding of the point is that the ice in question is standing on solid land below the ocean's surface, which means that its volume is not currently reflected by the height of the oceans today. In addition, the land is sloped towards the rest of the ocean so, should the ice in question calve off it will enter the ocean rather than simply cracking but staying put.

    An added issue, which has been seen in the past couple of decades in Greenland, is that if the ice calves and slides into the ocean, not only will mass previously perched on land enter the ocean, but the mass removed from the antarctic plate will cause the plate to rise significantly... causing less volume for the ocean in that area, and REALLY messing with plate tectonics.

    Some people think there's a correlation between the rising landmass in Greenland and some of the recent quakes in the Pacific.

  10. Re:what? by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

    Based on the context (the 'danger' part) I think it means that it's resting on the ground with is sloping away from shore. So that if it slips it will slip into the ocean causing sea level rise since there more ice above water than would be if it was floating.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
  11. Re:what? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> The Western Antarctic land ice is on land which is deeper than sea level.

    Umm.. isn't it impossible to have land that isn't deeper than sea level?

    If it's possible anywhere on Earth, it's surely possible on a continent that can have a "western" part despite covering all geographic longitudes.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  12. Sea Level Map by WillgasM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A 3m rise in sea level is significant, but will hardly wipe out Florida or California. Check your map before you start building that new condo.

    1. Re:Sea Level Map by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like we really need to install a drain in the ocean now.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:Sea Level Map by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like we really need to install a drain in the ocean now.

      I for one welcome our new Netherland masters.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    3. Re:Sea Level Map by emho24 · · Score: 2

      I keep trying to submerge New York with that map but it takes 60m until I'm really happy with the results.

      --
      You must gather your party before venturing forth.
  13. In Soviet Russia... by BreakBad · · Score: 2

    the land ice's land water is deeper than....wait...above or not as deep....fuck.

  14. Sigh... Again? by scsirob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Every year we get at least one or two pieces of ice breaking from the main shield. Happens at both poles. It's normal.

    And every year the article ends with some kind of fatalistic "IF blah blah blah we are DOOOMED!"
    Puhlease... We have worse things to worry about than fantasy threats.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Sigh... Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Every year we get at least one or two pieces of ice breaking from the main shield. Happens at both poles. It's normal.

      True. What's not normal is the amount of ice breaking away. Pine Island and Thwates glacier are speeding up. They're calving more ice into the ocean than before. Sure they calved before, but not as much or as often.

  15. Time to drain the oceans! by RKThoadan · · Score: 3

    Thankfully the fine folks over at xkcd pointed the way to the solution yesterday: http://what-if.xkcd.com/53/

    All we need is a portal to... anywhere not in Earths gravitational influence I guess, and we'll be set!

    1. Re:Time to drain the oceans! by sanosuke001 · · Score: 2

      The regolith on the moon will accept portals; we can shoot it from the surface!

      --
      -SaNo
  16. West ??? by feufeu · · Score: 2

    Where the hell is the *west* antarctic ??? Well, west of east antarctic obviously. Stil...

    1. Re:West ??? by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 2

      My guess would be the part in the Western hemisphere.

      --
      horror vacui
  17. Re:Goodbye Florida... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...hello beach front property in Alabama!

    Ever hear about Mobile, Alabama?

    Hint: Alabama already has a Gulf Coast....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  18. let us celebrate instead by 1800maxim · · Score: 4, Funny

    The oppressive regime of Antarctica has long been opressing its constituents.

    The world celebrates the ice shelf's newly found freedom, and hopes this will pave the way to democracy in the entire region. When asked about what the ice shelf plans to do with its newly found freedom, it humbly replied "just going to drift a few kms that way, hopefully leading the way for many others to follow."

    When asked for comment, the visibly agitated Penguin Brotherhood declined to comment beyond blaming the west-sponsored Carbon Revolution.

  19. Oh no! by 0123456 · · Score: 2

    A tiny chunk of ice (relative to the size of the world) breaks off Antarctica and we're all doomed!

    It's not as though tiny chunks of ice have been breaking off Antarctica ever since it first froze, or that most of Antarctica is cooling.

    1. Re:Oh no! by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His analysis is spot on. The "article extrapolates" [to absurdity] isn't unusual when it comes to these things, because absurd extrapolation generates grant funding from government.

  20. Re:Goodbye Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wouldn't worry. You're already in Alabama, so it can't get much worse.

  21. Re:No such thing as 'man made global warming' by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At this point, telling everyone to use a bike to go to work and acting like some smug green idealist saying "I told you so" isn't going to fix anything so shut the hell up and learn to surf.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  22. Re:Oh well by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

    Why are you making fun of NASA?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  23. Re:No such thing as 'man made global warming' by RenderSeven · · Score: 2, Informative

    FTFA (which you should have read before posting): Are ice breaks caused by climate change? Angelika Humbert does not so far see any direct connection: "The creation of cracks in the shelf ice and the development of new icebergs are natural processes", says the glaciologist. Not arguing one way or the other, but the FTFA says its not related.

  24. Here's my plan for Florida by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Tell everyone in Florida that 3.3 meters of water is coming

    2. Allow the person who understands what 3.3 meters of water means to move to wherever they want

    3. Celebrate

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  25. Re:Why would the sea level increase?? by spitzak · · Score: 2

    This is probably a troll, but if you are genuinely being ignorant:

    The water rises when the piece of ice breaks off and enters the ocean, not when it later melts.

    Before it was sitting on land and displacing less than 90% of it's volume of water (it would be displacing 0% if the land was above the ocean surface, but it is non-zero in this case because the land is below the surface). When floating it is displacing 90% of it's volume. The difference means the extra displaced water has to go somewhere.

  26. Re:what? by H0p313ss · · Score: 4, Informative

    I also wonder if a big piece (like say a few cubic km) of ice slides in the water at few km/h. a really big tsunami ?

    Yes, if that were to happen the result would be quite dramatic. But the chunk we're talking about is the leading tongue of an ice shelf that is already floating at sea level and the crack that caused this calving has been tracked since 2011 so it's not exactly a dramatic change as the media would like you to believe.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  27. Re:Bloop? by Bardez · · Score: 2

    The what and the what and the what?

    --
    Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
  28. Re:Oh well by coinreturn · · Score: 2

    Nothing of value would be lost if Florida suddenly was underwater permanetly. Other then a bunch of old folks who were probably near death anyway, brain dead party people aka animals, and just a bunch of ignorant and stupid people that make the rednecks in the southern usa look like einstein's in comparison.

    My irony meter pegged at 11 with "einstein's."

  29. Re:Goodbye Florida... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mobile Alabama is already adjacent to the sea.

    Plus it's mobile, so it can just move inland if the sea rises.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  30. Douglas Adams, meet Anonymous... by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Either Jesus will come back and end everything before climate change makes a difference, or God will never let us hose His perfect creation.

    The trouble is, there are folks in Congress who believe this and set policy based on it...

    Maybe it's just time to build Noah's Ark II.

    Also known as the /b/ Ark.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  31. Smell that? by tmosley · · Score: 2

    Smells like fearmongering.

  32. Re:Weird physics at play. by MindCrusher · · Score: 2

    Ice has a density of only 9/10 of the water. That is why ice floats on water. You might know the expression: "only the tip if the iceberg". It means that there is 9 times more iceberg under the water level than above. When ice becomes water its volume increases by 10%. Hence the sea level rises.