Slashdot Mirror


Edward Snowden Still Stuck At Airport, May Be Permitted Entry Into Russia Soon

sl4shd0rk writes "Edward Snowden, the enlightening NSA Whistleblower, may have been granted refuge in Russia as reported by Interfax News. He has apparently been given papers (and a change of clothes) by the Russian government to allow him to soon leave the Sheremetyevo airport. The delay in exodus, cited by a Russian official, is apparently due to the 'uniqueness' of the situation being cause for thorough review of Snowden's Asylum request." Reports are conflicting; WaPo and Reuters say Snowden's Asylum application is still in limbo, whereas other sources are claiming only minor details are blocking his exit and he may be allowed to leave as early as tomorrow. What is certain is that he's not leaving today despite early reports claiming he could.

124 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. and a change of clothes by slashmydots · · Score: 2

    Whoa. It's been what, like 3 weeks and I've never seen a laundromat in an airport, especially one that lets you stand there naked. So he's been in the same clothes the whole time. Ugh!
    They do have a hotel or something like that in there though, right?

    1. Re:and a change of clothes by turp182 · · Score: 4, Informative

      CNN has had a couple of corespondents try and find Snowden at the airport. There's actually a hotel has a floor that isn't considered Russian territory (having not passed through customs) that they will bus you off airport property to. There's room service, and probably laundry as well.

      http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/europe/russia-snowden-goodman-transit/index.html?iref=allsearch

      Interesting read actually. And of course they didn't see him...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    2. Re:and a change of clothes by slashmydots · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was wondering about some sort of offsite hotel arrangement like that. If he took the bus (though Russian territory) then obviously that was kept on the down low. Then just order some new clothes on ebay, ship to the hotel, and kill some time. If I had one guess, he's just playing Neverwinter on a laptop all day and probably is level 60 already, lol. I've seen like 8 players named Snowden so far so who knows.

    3. Re:and a change of clothes by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      If he took the bus (though Russian territory) then obviously that was kept on the down low.

      If an airport terminal in a country can be considered "not in a country" and that works, and a hotel can also be considered "not really in a country", why not a bus?

      For that matter, the whole idea of countries is purely artificial anyway. The US isn't respecting agreed upon international law anyway. They're only not pulling him out of the airport, bus, hotel, or whatever because that would create more headaches than not taking revenge on him. And because they probably expect to get him anyway.

    4. Re:and a change of clothes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      And because they probably expect to get him anyway.

      Or because they want him to get away. Of course they have to put on a show of trying to get him, but do they really want to? The "Snowden Affair" is quietly fading away, with all the NSA spying intact. Bringing him back to the USA for a trial would put the issue back on the front page. The government prefers that we all focus on Will and Kate's new baby instead.

    5. Re:and a change of clothes by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      If an airport terminal in a country can be considered "not in a country" and that works, and a hotel can also be considered "not really in a country", why not a bus?

      Quite right. As long as he's continuously under the control of the immigration authority, he's still "in transit".
      Not uncommon to bus international passengers between airplanes and customs/immigration, especially if the airport has construction going on.

    6. Re:and a change of clothes by loufoque · · Score: 1

      It's out?
      Why didn't anyone tell me?

    7. Re:and a change of clothes by colin_faber · · Score: 1

      Seems like a nice airport, maybe he's bathing in the fountains near the strip club.

    8. Re:and a change of clothes by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Or because they want him to get away. Of course they have to put on a show of trying to get him, but do they really want to? The "Snowden Affair" is quietly fading away, with all the NSA spying intact. Bringing him back to the USA for a trial would put the issue back on the front page. The government prefers that we all focus on Will and Kate's new baby instead.

      They also seem to needlessly be trying to keep the Travyon/George thing going, another thing to help distract from Federal govt spying and persecution on the US public...something I think is more important that some state level case that a jury has already decided.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Carousel by A10Mechanic · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's just waiting for his luggage to pop out on the carousel

    1. Re:Carousel by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 2

      I can't see this word and not think to myself, "Renew! Renew!"

    2. Re:Carousel by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      waiting for his luggage to pop out

      How many CIA operatives can fit in a suitcase anyhow?

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    3. Re:Carousel by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      The slight delay is caused by the need to reroute his laptops through a Russian code breaking facility.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    4. Re:Carousel by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      He's just waiting for his luggage to pop out on the carousel

      Of course he is. In (post) Soviet Russia, luggage containing secret filled laptops carries you (to asylum).

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    5. Re:Carousel by oxdas · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it would take the Russians to break the NSA's best encryption?

    6. Re:Carousel by Master+Moose · · Score: 1

      There is no sanctuary

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
  3. Exclusivity by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This probably means Snowden has agreed to turn over everything he's got to Russia. That way it can be quietly assimilated at a government level and just kind of go away at the public level. That gives Russia secrets they certainly want, and saves face for America publicly.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Exclusivity by PraiseBob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because causing their greatest geo-political competitor massive embarrasment in front of the whole world isn't enough incentive for Russia to let him stay? What does Russia have to gain by throwing him out? Many of their top allies all support giving Snowden asylum. They get to paint America as the bad guys, and themselves as pro-freedom. Why on earth would they need extra incentives above and beyond that? Any intelligence Snowden could offer has less value than his presence.

    2. Re:Exclusivity by Baloroth · · Score: 1

      This probably means Snowden has agreed to turn over everything he's got to Russia. That way it can be quietly assimilated at a government level and just kind of go away at the public level. That gives Russia secrets they certainly want, and saves face for America publicly.

      And make him an actual, valid in every sense of the word, traitor (as opposed to before, where he was a traitor only if you stretch the term a bit, and even then only in a very limited technical sense).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    3. Re:Exclusivity by runeghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Former KGB General Oleg Kalugin, who is an American citizen and critic of Putin, stated in an interview that he doesn't believe that Snowden has much if anything Russian intelligence didn't already know. http://ianmasters.com/content/july-2-julian-assange-now-speaking-edward-snowden-kgb-general-standoff-moscow-could-deadly-n

    4. Re:Exclusivity by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2

      Of course they aren't pro-freedom, but they get to paint themselves as such, like the US does constantly.

    5. Re:Exclusivity by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Russia is playing a game with the US and is granting Snowden asylum just so they can thumb their collective nose at the US.

      "We know you want to arrest Snowden and parade him around as a traitor in front of the press SO badly *BUT* guess what, we will let him stay here just so you can't get him. HAHA bitches!"

    6. Re:Exclusivity by evilviper · · Score: 1

      What does Russia have to gain by throwing him out?

      Not DESTROYING their recently repaired relationship with the US? You know, one of their big allies, who gives them truck-loads of cash?

      That might be something...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re: Exclusivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      people are naive. if snowden can walk away with this data easily as one of hundreds of thousands of people who had access to it then the russians likely already know it via espionage. the administration wants to look muscular on punishing leakers but the current system is very leaky by design

    8. Re:Exclusivity by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Russians are playing it very diplomatically. They already stated he can only stay if he stops with the comments hurting the US. Not everything another country does outside of our interests is "thumbing their nose." They definitely want that next defector with some juicy intel looking their way for an escape route.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    9. Re:Exclusivity by westlake · · Score: 1

      What does Russia have to gain by throwing him out?

      Someone just might suffer from the delusion that Putin would tolerate leaks of Russian documents. That males Snowden high maintenance, while his entertainment value --- and political capital ----diminishes with time.

    10. Re:Exclusivity by Livius · · Score: 1

      Russia doesn't even pretend to be pro-freedom. The US paints itself as the bad guy without any help.

      It could be as simple as Snowden being a legitimate refugee from political persecution.

    11. Re:Exclusivity by MushMouth · · Score: 1

      which if you look at the fact that Snowden (and PFC Manning) really didn't have all that much with respect to credentials, it makes sense that a world class intelligence agency most likely already has many assets with higher access than an IT guy with a GED.

  4. He should just go to America and face the music by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am sorry.
    I gave him points for what he did, but they were loss by how he is just hiding across borders, because he doesn't want to face the consequences for his action.

    Good job man on following your morals. However you are dumb ass, for not standing up and realizing your actions have consequences. A real hero would gladly go to jail to prove his point. A politically radicalized scumbag would just run away.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TWiTfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What good is disappearing into a hole forever, with no further contact with the world, going to do for his cause? People will just forget about him. At least this way, he and Assange can blog and publicly comment. That's way more than Bradley Manning will ever be able to do again.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He probably would've stayed in US. However, he saw how US government was torturing Mannings, and he saw how easily US government assassinated their own citizens. I don't blame him at all for escaping. I hope he exposes our corrupt government more once he gets to the safety of Venezuela.

    3. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yes because Good is Dumb. Or maybe not.

    4. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The consequences of his actions are not going to be in proportion. You agree that what he did is a good thing, then you really should agree that the most likely consequences of his actions will not be deserved.

      He isn't just going to jail, he is going to get royaly fucked when he goes to prison. You aren't talking about a few years of jail here, you are talking about quite possibly being imprisoned forever. What good are you with a hero that is imprisoned? If you agree that his revealing of what the NSA is doing is a good thing, you should stand up for him not getting any bad consequences at all.

      How can you rationalize that he did the right thing and in the same breath condem him for not having bad things happen to him for doing the right thing?

    5. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by intermodal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every time I hear that argument, I have to laugh. If we had any reason to believe Snowden's constitutional rights would be upheld and he'd be given what he has a right to (a fair, speedy, and public trial) I might agree with you. The problem is, Snowden exposed the government in their violations of the basic rights theoretically protected by our Constitution, and it's not as if the government is acknowledging the other rights therein outlined. That's what is at hand here.

      Snowden has been in an airport terminal for several weeks precisely because he is aware that his actions have consequences. Neither you nor the US government gets to micromanage what those consequences are, no matter how much Uncle Sam wants to pretend they do.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    6. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      He is facing the consequences. Pure economics. No man should sacrifice his freedom..period. If you are sentenced to or facing jail it is in your best interests to flea if at all possible. Any sane person would do the same.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Dan+East · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'll tell you when I lost respect for him. When I learned he wasn't just some innocent IT guy that happened to see information that he, with good conscience, could not just ignore. That's called whistle blowing, but that's not what happened here.

      Snowden stated that he tried to get that position for the specific purpose of digging up whatever he could to use against his country. That's called espionage. That makes him a traitor in my book, regardless of what he ended up finding out.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    8. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Indeed, he has been awarded the Whitleblower Award in Germany (whatever that is) and at least one person has nominated him for a Peace Prize on top of other notable citizens speaking out in support. He is doing the right thing and his actions have spurred a much needed debate in our country. The longer this goes on the less spin control Washington has and the more they look like the bad guy for trying.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by InlawBiker · · Score: 2

      He has an opportunity to come home and strike while the iron is hot. There's enough publicity now for him to get the very best legal representation for free. Running away at this point is silly, he needs to finish what he started or it'll all be for nothing.

    10. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I gave him points for what he did, but they were loss by how he is just hiding across borders, because he doesn't want to face the consequences for his action.

      This isn't like Martin Luther King Jr spending a few days in jail in Birmingham. The United States government has made it clear its intentions towards Snowden: They've already caused at least one major diplomatic incident involving violating the rights of a foreign head of state to try to get to him. I have every reason to believe Snowden is on the short list for getting the Anwar Al-Awlaki treatment if he goes to somewhere that the US can get a drone to, and the Bradley Manning treatment if he otherwise ends up in US hands.

      I'd be on the run too.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    11. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That makes him a traitor in my book, regardless of what he ended up finding out.

      So investigative reporters who specifically try to dig up all the bad things they can about their own country are traitors. You have some seriously skewed priorities if you believe that someone trying to expose government malfeasence is the wrongdoer.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Informative

      A traitor to whom? The only people he betrayed are the ones who betrayed the people by spying on them. He did nothing but expose traitors.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    13. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Remember the scene from The Matrix: "what good is a telephone call when you have no mouth?" or whatever it was...
      Best legal representation will be next to useless in the US, as most of the details they'd need to talk about to prop up his defense will be gagged under "National Security" orders or classifications. His lawyers would be free to blab to the press about next to nothing.

      The US is full of people who seem like they're living in a giant dysfunctional family. We're happy to bitch about how lousy our family is, but when specifics are brought to bear by The Government [sic] against one of them, we circle the wagons and defend the family, wanting to shoot the messenger to try and make the message go away.

    14. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by PraiseBob · · Score: 2

      He lost his cushy 6 figure job, and life in Hawaii with his girlfriend and gets to spend his life on the run. Explain to me again how he isn't facing consequences for his actions? Even though you support his actions, you think it's morally appropriate to lock him in a cage forever?

    15. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To paraphrase George C. Scott paraphrasing George S. Patton, "You don't win wars by dying for your country, you win wars by making the other poor bastard die for his."

      Also, have you noticed what's happened to the prison system in the past twenty years? Not that it was a peachy keen hotel before, but, yeah, this ain't like spending 30 days in the county jail with a window, a bunkbed and a harmonica. He'd be in solitary, in conditions the U.N. considers torture, and unable to communicate his message to the rest of the world.

      Jail is one thing. Torture is something else entirely.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by vux984 · · Score: 1

      A real hero would gladly go to jail to prove his point.

      What point would that prove exactly?

      A politically radicalized scumbag would just run away.

      No. The politically radicalized scumbag are the ones who are willing to be martyred to make a point.

      Normal people value their lives and their freedom, and aren't willing to throw it away just to make a point to other people who apparently just want to throw them in prison.

    17. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by zlives · · Score: 1

      Active resistance is better than passive!?

    18. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by jcr · · Score: 1

      What did he do, steal your girlfriend?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He did that because he already was aware of wrong-doing, but he didn't have proof.

    20. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by jcr · · Score: 2

      A real hero would gladly go to jail to prove his point.

      Bullshit. He's up against a government that refuses to admit any legal limitations to what it can do, and you say he should just submit? Fuck that.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    21. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by jkflying · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you talking about the guy who was charged with rape by a 'witness' who refused to sign the testimony, for which all charges were initially dropped, then reopened once he leaked the US diplomatic cables?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    22. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by firewrought · · Score: 2

      Snowden stated that he tried to get that position for the specific purpose of digging up whatever he could to use against his country... That makes him a traitor in my book.

      Pretty sure he dug it up for his country, and against the real traitors (his employers) who are usurping the autonomy of the people of the United States.

      At any rate, he undoubtedly sought the Booz Allen gig because he suspected agency wrongdoing based on his prior experiences with the NSA/CIA. I don't think you could ask for a better whistleblower than this: someone willing to get the full story, obtain and screen evidence, and responsibly disclose the matter to public attention (while giving up a $200,000/year Hawaiian lifestyle).

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    23. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I'm a former ELINT drone - when I started working for various secret 3 letter agencies I told the psych I wanted to find out if UFO's actually exist, and that I daydream almost constantly - except on work time. I kid you not. (Now it'll be someones job to actually dig through the records and check this :-) I held a TS positive vetted clearance with pretty much every brief that exists within that domain for more than a decade. Some interesting crap goes on in the world for sure, though eventually I quit and moved to Asia. Is there an analogy here? You can pick one if you want, whatever makes you feel good, but I will respectfully say you should dig your head out of the sand and use some logic - what's the difference between whistle blowing with a good conscience about something illegal and whistle blowing with the moral guidance unit turned off? I don't see one myself. Illegal is still illegal if that's what your constitution and laws say.

      I have no idea what my point is though. Just thought I'd share that.

    24. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Hatta · · Score: 1

      he doesn't want to face the consequences for his action.

      When Obama faces consequences for his actions, this argument will have some merit.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    25. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by ethanms · · Score: 2

      Ghandi, Mother Theresa, etc...

      You die for your principals--

      As in I love this country (USA) so much, and believe what has been done is so bad, that I am willing to leak this information to world, but of course I will keep the true secrets out of anyone's hands that could harm the US and it's citizens.

      I think that is the OP's point and I don't think it's "Flamebait" at all.

    26. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You die for your principals

      As the great General Patton once said, you don't win by dying for your principles.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    27. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      What good is disappearing into a hole forever, with no further contact with the world, going to do for his cause?

      His "cause?" As one comedian put it, he's probably just trying to get out of his engagement to his girlfriend. "No honey, I really *do* want to get married, I just have to lay low until this whole 'stolen security secrets' thing blows over..."

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    28. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And how exactly am I supposed to put Obama in jail?

      And what makes you think there's any "suddenly" about it? Every president who authorizes unconstitutional behavior deserves to go to jail. That has always been my position, will always be my position, and is the position of any decent human being.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    29. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      Manning was a member of the armed forces, and so subject to a ifferent judicial process. This is no secret.

    30. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by intermodal · · Score: 1

      I think it's morally appropriate to let a fair and speedy trial determine what appropriate consequences he should face.

      don't forget public. Public trials are also constitutionally guaranteed, regardless of what FISA may want you to believe.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    31. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Its espionage to expose crime to the citizenry? In what universe? Every US citizen has a moral duty to expose crime where they see it, its part of being a citizen. The NSA is engaged in absolute criminal behavior, and you are worried about Snowden's motivations??? It doesnt matter WHY he did it, the point is the NSA is acting unbounded and needs to be checked. There should be nothing illegal about exposing this type of deep corruption.

      --
      Good-bye
    32. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Jesus did.
      Of course, he came back shortly thereafter.

    33. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by intermodal · · Score: 1

      And therein lies the problem for the government. Notice how their focus in argument has been on their phone record collection, trying to distract people with that ridiculous "it's only metadata" argument?

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    34. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What part of 'WE DONT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT TO CONDUCT A FAIR TRIAL' do you not get. They have PROVEN they are quite happy to ignore the law, torture people and hold them for very long periods of time without trial or representation. Your suggestion is like letting a rape victim be judged by the rapist.

      --
      Good-bye
    35. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The United States government has made it clear its intentions towards Snowden: They've already caused at least one major diplomatic incident involving violating the rights of a foreign head of state to try to get to him.

      Please offer ANY evidence the US had ANY involvement in that incident.

      I have every reason to believe Snowden is on the short list for getting the Anwar Al-Awlaki treatment if he goes to somewhere that the US can get a drone to,

      Tin-foil hat on too tight? Al-awlaki was promoting terrorism, and associated with Al Qaeda. Snowden isn't suspected of anything remotely as serious. It's pure baseless paranoia.

      and the Bradley Manning treatment if he otherwise ends up in US hands.

      When you sign-up for the Military, you sign over your habeas corpus and lots of other rights. Snowden was never in the military, so it can't get that kind of treatment. He'll be held in a federal prison, by federal guards, and under the authority of federal judges. There is zero similarity to Bradly Manning's situation.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    36. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      Jesus did. Of course, he came back shortly thereafter.

      Yeah, but nobody has seen him since.

    37. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      No, I mean "bravely" sacrificing your freedom is stupid.

      Perhaps I should say, "You don't bring rule of law by going to jail for your government, you bring rule of law by making the rich and powerful bastards go to jail for their country."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    38. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      A traitor to whom? The only people he betrayed are the ones who betrayed the people by spying on them. He did nothing but expose traitors.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but where did he reveal anything illegal going on? Everything was authorized by the Patriot Act (section 215 and others) and FISA. And really, what is so shocking about the agencies using the powers that Congress explicitly gave them? Traitors? Seems harsh, but if you are going to throw that around, maybe toss it towards the congresscritters that created those laws and the administrations that keep signing off on it.

    39. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by bheading · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking - if you are referring to Assange, the charges were not "reopened". He is wanted in Sweden for questioning - perhaps because the alleged victim changed her testimony - but he has not been charged.

    40. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I do, but, I never believed in that sort of buck passing. When someone authorizes it, that doesn't make him responsible and the minion carrying it out not responsible, it makes them BOTH responsible.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    41. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by chihowa · · Score: 2

      Mother Theresa didn't die for her principles. She got old and sick and received better treatment than she ever delivered to the patients under her care. If anything, she compromised her principles in the end by seeking so much expensive treatment to ease her suffering and prolong her life.

      Gandhi did die for his principles, but it made sense for him to do so because he was the leader of a movement. The movement that he built outlived him and he continued to give it power after death as a martyr. The same can be said for Martin Luther King, Jr. Their deaths cemented the will of their followers.

      Snowden isn't the leader of a movement. He doesn't have throngs of followers that are following his guidance. He is a whistle blower, a messenger. His death won't make him a martyr and cement any particular movement, because there is no movement. It makes more sense for him to remain alive and continue the discussion at this point, even if the US government does paint him as an Emmanuel Goldstein of sorts.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    42. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You're part of the problem.

    43. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by jkflying · · Score: 2

      No, they weren't reopened. They were, however, assigned to a prosecutor and an extradition was filed to bring him into the country for 'questioning' (like they can't send someone to question him where he is now).

      Also, I might add, this happened (prosecutor assigned) 2 days after he leaked the US diplomatic cables, after having lain discarded for months. Odd how the timing of these things works out, isn't it?

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    44. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by oxdas · · Score: 2

      How about Jose Padilla? He spent nearly five years in a military prison without being charged with a crime, just because the President labeled him an "enemy combatant."

    45. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by oxdas · · Score: 1

      He is doing a very good job of upholding his oath. It appears to me like he is defending "the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic," just as he swore to do.

    46. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      By mere coincidence the countries which denied the landing were all NATO countries. Austria, where he did land, does not belong to NATO.

    47. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by evilviper · · Score: 1

      By mere coincidence the countries which denied the landing were all NATO countries. Austria, where he did land, does not belong to NATO.

      Most countries in Western Europe are NATO countries, so that's just the odds.

      In addition, I believe the only country that admitted to denying flyover was Portugal, while the other two have contradicted the claim.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    48. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Al-awlaki was promoting terrorism, and associated with Al Qaeda

      So if, hypothetically the government pronounces "evilviper" a terrorist associated with Al Qaeda, you'd be ok dodging drone strikes for the rest of your probably short life?

      See, the problem with Al-awlaki is fundamentally that there was no trial. No defense. You and Obama even I might all be pretty convinced of his doubt, but that's beside the point. I don't care if the police catch a guy committing a crime red handed having witnessed the criminal act from start to finish. You don't skip due process and jump straight over to sentencing without a trial.

      Snowden was never in the military, so it can't get that kind of treatment.

      Sorry, you don't get to tell us to put our faith in the integrity of a system that's just been exposed demonstrating it has no integrity.

      Assange, Snowden, whether we approve of what they did or not, they are right to attempt to refuse to be subject to a trial in America. America by its actions now lacks the credibility that it would conduct a fair trial for these people, and there is no moral reason any one should willingly participate in an unfair trial.

    49. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by vux984 · · Score: 1

      erm "convinced of his doubt" --> convinced of his guilt.

    50. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm not defending any of the US' actions. I'm just pointing out that Snowden isn't Al-awlaki, nor Manning, and it's pure paranoid psychotic ramblings to claim he'd be treated like either one.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    51. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You die for your principals

      As the great General Patton once said, you don't win by dying for your principles.

      You forgot the second part of that quote: "You win by getting the other son-of-a-bitch to die for his", or something to to that effect.

    52. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      A real hero would gladly go to jail to prove his point.

      Why? There's literally no point. Your version of a "real hero" just sounds like an imbecile.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    53. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      If he really didn't believe in it, he was perfectly free to walk away into obscurity without selling out for fame

      I'm glad he didn't.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    54. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I'm just pointing out that Snowden isn't Al-awlaki, nor Manning

      While that's tautologically true, in the eyes of the law they are equal... or should be, until proven otherwise.

      and it's pure paranoid psychotic ramblings to claim he'd be treated like either one.

      Right. I'm sure they'd find some new way to be miserable douchebags to Snowden. That seems to be the trend so far.

    55. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Ammendment IV of the constitution:
      "Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions."

      Blanket storage of metadata easily falls under this by any honest interpretation of its meaning. Therefore cannot be authorized by anything, not even an act of congress. These people have betrayed us, along with everyone who follows their illegal commands.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    56. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      Ammendment IV of the constitution: "Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions."

      Blanket storage of metadata easily falls under this by any honest interpretation of its meaning. Therefore cannot be authorized by anything, not even an act of congress. These people have betrayed us, along with everyone who follows their illegal commands.

      Then it should be challenged in court (the Patriot Act). Another commenter posted that the ACLU is challenging the NSA over its interpretation of the Patriot Act, but no one is challenging the activity on constitutional grounds (largely because of a 1989 Supreme Court "finding that a minimal intrusion on privacy was justified by the government’s need to combat an overriding public danger.")
      http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/us/in-secret-court-vastly-broadens-powers-of-nsa.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1374778966-Bwk6gp9wV17MNPc2hI6YXg
      Devils advocate for the NSA: Actually, this is from Gen. Alexander of the NSA directly when he spoke at an AFCEA conference I was attending: They are only collecting the data. In order to access or search it, they require a FISA court approval. (but which they almost always get)

    57. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      What investigation is the data collection relevant to? The government admits they are collecting the data to search through it in the hopes of finding something to investigate.

      Regardless, the constitution is the supreme law of the land. Any law or action that violates the constitution is itself illegal. The government's actions clearly violate the fourth amendment.

      I hope the ACLU suit succeeds or that Congress decides to fine tune the law (lol). But from the NSA's perspective, (or so I've heard from a talk by Gen. Alexander) they believe they are authorized to collect the data, but they "have a system in place" to protect access to the data. They require some sort of FISA court approval to actually search and use the data (which as I understand, the FISA court is basically a rubber stamp). He also referenced a specific number of times it had been accessed and how many terrorist events it provided information on (51 or so I think, don't remember the other numbers).
      The fourth amendment isn't even being considered seriously because in 1989 the Supreme Court already ruled that a minimal invasion of privacy was justified in the government's need to combat an overriding public danger (the case was about drug testing of railway workers), but it has been interpreted, well.. broadly. The FISA judges have ruled that the NSA's collection and examination of communications data to track potential terrorists doesn't run afoul of the fourth amendment.
      I don't see a clear path would put this in front of the Supreme Court to challenge it on constitutional grounds. Nobody can claim they have standing unless they know their information was accessed and no one knows that because the info is classified. catch-22 of sorts.

    58. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yes and I am well aware of why the courts will not rule this way at all. Simple fact is, 250+ years has been more than enough time to find technical trick after technical trick to violate the spirit of the constitution without actually violating it. The entire foundation of this government has been entirely subverted and has long since ceased to sit upon any legitimate foundation, as it has already undermined that foundation.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    59. Re:He should just go to America and face the music by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      You need to read more. The French President said he granted Morales permission but it was only after the facts became public. They apologized for the 'delay' in granting permission. As for the Spanish they said they had granted permission to land after he had landed in Austria and mentioned they had 'concerns' that Snowden could be on board.

  5. Bah ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

    Once he's out, I'm sure the CIA or someone will send in a team to black bag him in the middle of the night.

    It's not like they've never done that before.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Bah ... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Or the Russians will kill him and blame the CIA. They score a black eye against the US (who would NOT believe the CIA did it) and they avoid any consequences for harboring him. Win-win! Well, unless you're Snowden.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  6. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unreported: how much contact Snowden has had personally with the Russian authorities, just like we have no idea how much contact he had with Hong Kong's.

    Is he trading info for asylum?

    Let me rephrase this unfounded speculation with the purpose of impugning his character:

    Is Edward Snowden selling US secrets because he hates freedom?. We don't know. We're just asking the question. Next on Fox News, why don't we know if Snowden has terrorist connections? Is the mainstream media covering this up? We report, you decide.

  7. Re:Give up now! by TWiTfan · · Score: 2, Funny

    If he agrees to wear a muzzle and gag, they may even let him talk to his lawyer at Christmas.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  8. Amazing how he became the narrative.. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He is the story now. What the governement is doing in terms of spying on its own people is now largely forgotten in the news cycles.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      That's because you falsely presume that the majority of people are against what the government is doing. Most of the people rationalize it as okay and then condemn Snowden as a traitor. You need to get out of your nerd bubble to see this, though.

    2. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh really?

      Top Civil Rights Groups Join Challenge to NSA Spying

      New York, NY Today, the NAACP and five other leading civil rights organizations joined the growing challenge to the Administrations illegal National Security Agency spying program.

      Due you want your crow hot or cold?

    3. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      LOL I'm dumb. Wrong Snowden. Mod me down please.

    4. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by mockchoi · · Score: 1

      2006?

    5. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      its not going away no matter how much the govt and media try to get it to go away.

      History tells us you're wrong. The US Government wants nothing more than for people to forget this so that they can continue raping the American public. They have had very good success with manipulating our short attention spans by getting involved in other shit that they have no business getting involved with.

    6. Re:Amazing how he became the narrative.. by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I think once you're done with it, he'll just see if there is any left.

  9. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by Shajenko42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're in jail or dead.

  10. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by zlives · · Score: 1

    they were preemptively "liberated" because jailing them just made them into heroes.

  11. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bradley Manning's treatment got to them. Going to jail for your beliefs is one thing. Spending a year in solitary confinement with guards refusing to let you sleep for *months* and making you strip naked at random times...before you're even *charged*, is quite another. Indepenent of Manning's guilt/innocence, his treatement before his trial was shameful.

  12. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Snowden and Assange are going to be in a new reality show produced in Russia

  13. What Happens When We Actually Catch Snowden? by auric_dude · · Score: 4, Interesting
  14. Re:Too bad .... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The government astroturfers are out in full force today.

  15. I see what happens now... by sageres · · Score: 1

    Snowden probably does not know yet, but Russians are very much interested in American government secrets. He just might find himself on a fourth floor of Lyubyanka, in a padded room without windows (Lyubyanka is former KGB headquaters, now FSB, did not have a basement jail).

    1. Re:I see what happens now... by oxdas · · Score: 1

      What would the Russians hope to achieve with that? He probably didn't memorize much and all the data he has is heavily encrypted and he doesn't have, nor know, the keys. I doubt torturing him is really worth their time and the spectacle is far more valuable.

  16. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Indepenent of Manning's guilt/innocence, his treatement before his trial was shameful.

    Not just shameful, it was criminal. Cruel and unusual punishments are prohibited by the constitution.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  17. Re:Too bad .... by jcr · · Score: 2

    he should be stuck in a US prison,

    For what?

    He informed us of billions of counts of illegal wiretapping. Whistleblowing isn't a crime.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  18. Where's Snoden by Petron · · Score: 3, Funny

    He should wear a red & white striped shirt and hat on the next interview.

    --
    if (it != oneThing) it = another;
  19. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That poll is bullshit. If a third of people don't know who he was, then the number was larger when the propaganda campaign started. All that this poll shows is that most people are ignorant and influenced by propaganda.

    And as far as his lawyer, your claims are ridiculous. In his case he needed to hire a lawyer with connections. In Russia than means that he would likely have contacts with the FSB. If he hired someone unconnected, he would be fucked. But that does not mean that Snowden is giving information to the FSB.

    All that you are doing is trying to smear Snowden by association, comparison to a spy, and by misleading polls. Your post is nothing but a smear piece. I have to wonder if your fingers felt greasy before clicking 'submit'. Looking through your comment history reads like the posts of a neo-con. You justify the Iraq invasion, you talk about how Afghanistan is better now, you discount the idea of proportionality, and you unequivocally support spying on US citizens. And that is only in the past couple of days. You are a zealot who has no connection to reality, which explains your above post.

  20. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

    It's not an unfounded speculation. We know he revealed information about US spying on China to the Chinese authorities. In any case, putting himself in Russian custody and begging them for favors (asylum) while in possession of tons of classified information is not a good idea if you actually intend to keep that information secret.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  21. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    newer polls are much more positive although broken down by age group a majority of every cohort but the younger ages still thinks he should be prosecuted. still after it became clear that there was far more than phone metadata collection occuring public opinion has shifted more in his favor and probably will continue to when the revelations are tied back to bush administration era attempts to unlawfully expand executive power

  22. Re:Too bad .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I rarely read replies, so don't assume you won your argument just because I don't respond....

    I rarely respond, so don't assume your argument wasn't stupid just because I didn't take the time to deconstruct it.

  23. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To return your ad hominem attack with another based on your own postings:

    "They hate us for our freedom" post
    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2867991&cid=40084835
    Iraq is better off because we invaded post
    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2867991&cid=40084745
    The Iraq invasion was worth it post including the quote:

    "By historical standards the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan have been cheap in terms of American lives lost. For dealing with Saddam and al Qaidas state within a state and training base turning out thousands of trained terrorists per year in Afghanistan, it was worth it."

    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3981499&cid=44305701
    America's fucking with everyone in the world and starting wars, arming contras, etc., was justified because of communism post
    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2725743&cid=39362143
    Gitmo prisoners are well treated post
    http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3749765&cid=43727743
    Waterboarding isn't torture post
    http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3749765&cid=43730807

    I found all of this in just a 5 minute search. Holy fuck. I now understand why you don't like Snowden. Your moral alignment is 180 degrees off.

  24. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by Kingofearth · · Score: 2

    I don't understand this mentality. I would say that him releasing the information he did means that he is willing to go to jail or be killed for what he believes in. If he wasn't willing to have that be an option, then he would have kept the info to himself.

    Soldiers are, in theory, willing to die for their country. That certainly doesn't mean they purposely go run into the line of fire, and anyone who would suggest that a soldier need to do so in order to prove they're "willing to die for their country" would be ridiculed.

    Being willing to suffer the extreme consequences of your actions in no way precludes attempting to avoid those consequences. Unless your cause has something significant to gain by making yourself a martyr, odds are you're of more use alive and free.

    Also, would you rather people not expose crime, corruption, and abuse of power if they aren't willing to go full martyr right after their "one-hit-wonder"? If you had the info Snowden did, you probably wouldn't even be brave enough to release it to the public, much less hand yourself right over to the government whose corruption your just exposed.

  25. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

    If you had the info Snowden did, you probably wouldn't even be brave enough to release it to the public, much less hand yourself right over to the government whose corruption your just exposed.

    A thousand times this ^ . When you deal with the NSA the first thing they do is let you know that they'll be climbing up inside your ass before you get your clearance, and that they will continue to monitor and track you for the rest of your life "just in case" you decide to do what Snowden did.

    If your ethics dictate that you'll keep an immoral secret, you have no ethics. Snowden should be lauded, not lampooned.

  26. Re:What happened to the real freedom fighters? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Spending a year in solitary confinement with guards refusing to let you sleep for *months* and making you strip naked at random times...before you're even *charged*,

    Manning probably regrets making a gratuitous suicide threat, don't you think?

    " Manning told a guard that if he wanted to kill himself, he could hang himself with the waistband of his underwear." -- more

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  27. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by oxdas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Snowden has been planning this for years. Do you think he hadn't though about that possibility? The Guardian reporter was quite clear that Snowden doesn't want the information falling into the wrong hands. To that end, according to the reporter, the information he is carrying is heavily encrypted and he doesn't have the keys. He spread copies of the encrypted data and copies of the keys to trusted associates around the world. If something happens to him, then they can share their keys and reveal the information. While the Russians could break it in time, by then the information will have considerably less value.

  28. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    It's not an unfounded speculation. We know he revealed information about US spying on China to the Chinese authorities. In any case, putting himself in Russian custody and begging them for favors (asylum) while in possession of tons of classified information is not a good idea if you actually intend to keep that information secret.

    Is this true? I haven't been following the case that close but if Snowden did do this then yes he is a traitor.

  29. Why the change of clothes... by nbritton · · Score: 1

    1. The CIA has taken everything but the clothes on his back at the airport. Too many eyes are looking for extraordinary rendition, but that doesn't mean they haven't take all of his luggage in the middle of the night.
    2. The government has locked all of his assets.

    He has no secrets to sell Russia, the USA wouldn't let him sit in an airport for a month if he, still, had anything of value. Do you see him on youtube? He doesn't have a computer, he doesn't have anything but the clothes on his back. I doubt he's still in the airport, but if he is I want the Daily Show or Colbert to go interview him.

  30. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by MushMouth · · Score: 1

    Like Manning before him, Snowden was a pretty low level guy (you know a GED), it's unlikely that the Chinese, Russian, Israeli, British, etc, governments don't already have assets at a higher level than either of these guys.

  31. Re:We still don't know much of the situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are a fucking neo-con and you call my ideas from the fringe? How many wars started, people killed, and rights crushed will it take for your to realize that history has rejected your bullshit?

    It is not Snowden's fault that the government created a surveillance program that violated the 4th Amendment. He bravely exposed that. And working at the CIA and NSA, if his goal was to give information to the Russians for asylum, he could have collected far more valuable information on foreign intelligence than domestic spying. He is a whistleblower, not a spy. And as anyone who has taken an official oath in the US knows, all oaths go to the US Constitution first. You claim that he has violated trust and lied, while it is clear that he has upheld a trust that even high levels of our government can't. And unlike them, he has never lied under oath. So screw your broken philosophy where there is no government accountability over spying programs and when somebody points this out they get thrown into an oubliette. And screw all of your other philosophies where you believe the ends justifies the means. The US Constitution was based on principle, not your Machiavellian bullshit.

  32. US does NOT have extradition treaties by NewYork · · Score: 1

    The United States maintains diplomatic relations, but according to the above-mentioned list, does NOT have extradition treaties with the following countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central African Republic, Chad, China (except Hong Kong), Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican, Vietnam, Yemen, and the countries formerly part of Yugoslavia: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Kosovo.

    The United States is negotiating an extradition treaty with Taiwan
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition_law_in_the_United_States#International_extradition