Slashdot Mirror


Obama Praises Amazon At One of Its Controversial Warehouses

theodp writes "In his first term, President Obama was a big booster of indie bookstores. But on Tuesday, the President chose to deliver his speech on Jobs for the Middle Class at one of Amazon's controversial fulfillment centers in Chattanooga, TN. 'Amazon is a great example of what's possible,' said Obama, who also toured the 'amazing facility' where workers can make $10.50-$11.50 an hour as an employee of Integrity Staffing Group, 'may also be eligible for medical and dental benefits', and 'must be able to stand/walk for up to 10-12 hours' in temperatures that 'will occasionally exceed 90 degrees.' So, are '21st century migrant workers' the new middle class?"

55 of 435 comments (clear)

  1. "Be content to be slaves" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    -Obama, overlord of Earth.

    1. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The claims of socialist look dumber by the day.

      Obama is just more pro-corporate than Bush, Sr... just a tad less than Bush, Jr.

    2. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think it is simpler than that. He knows that Amazon is popular. He also knows most of the people that support him will not research anything he says and just take what he says at face value.

      It's like the Travon thing. He mentions that Travon could have been him when he was younger. He makes these types of racial comments often. Most of the people that I know that support him honestly assume that he struggled and grew up in the deep south (instead of Hawaii) like them.

      This appearance makes him look like he is pro-corporate and pro-middle class without actually doing anything but make a speech. And, judging by your post and people I know, he will fool most people.

    3. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The claims of socialist look dumber by the day.

      Obama is just more pro-corporate than Bush, Sr... just a tad less than Bush, Jr.

      That's what the Democratic Party has become, "not quite as bad as the Republicans." The difference between the two is that when a Republican gives government money to a business it's to encourage growth; when a Democrat does it, it's for jobs. Neither end up happening.

      There isn't a party out there that represents the working class.

    4. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Most of the people that I know that support him honestly assume that he struggled and grew up in the deep south (instead of Hawaii) like them.

      What rock have you been hiding under? Blacks aren't restricted to the deep south. Neither are bigots that think they aren't bigots despite an eagerness to assume some goofy kid is a dangerous criminal.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is America. The word "socialist" here means "Anything the government does that I don't like." GM bailout? Banksters bailout? Socialism.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:"Be content to be slaves" by uniquename72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obama is, in almost every policy area, a Reagan Republican. This is part of why Republicans hate him (the other part is that he doesn't have an R after his name).

  2. Misleading summary by schneidafunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So he likes to shop at indie book stores with his daughter, and somehow this makes him a hypocrite by giving a speech at an amazon warehouse? The speech itself wasn't really about books anyway:

    In his speech, Obama outlines the areas he believes the country needs to focus on "if we want to create good jobs that pay good wages in durable industries." Among these priorities, listed in order of mention, are: manufacturing and high-tech jobs, infrastructure jobs, and clean energy jobs

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Misleading summary by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The thing about indie bookstores is largely irrelevant. Choosing to give a speech about 'good jobs that pay good wages in durable industries' in a fulfillment sweatshop that will continue to use expendable temps only so long as robots can't economically handle irregularly shaped packages is... perhaps a bad sign...

    2. Re:Misleading summary by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Clean energy" jobs require subsidy. 3 other people need jobs elsewhere to pay the taxes for them.

    3. Re:Misleading summary by stewsters · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You cant easily track who buys what books at an indie bookstore if they use cash. Amazon purchases are way easier to add to the NSA data.

    4. Re:Misleading summary by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think oil, gas and coal are subsidised, no. Taxing something less is not the same as subsidising it. Unless you're starting out from the basic assumption that the State owns 100% of production and is benevolent enough to let us keep some of it. Which if you ask me, is not a very Libertarian world view.

    5. Re:Misleading summary by JWW · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, its not. It may have the same effect as a subsidy, but its not a subsidy.

      Oh and calling tax write-offs that oil companies take over employee benefits and such a "subsidy", when every other type of company can use those same write-offs is being disingenuous.

    6. Re:Misleading summary by tbannist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, its not. It may have the same effect as a subsidy, but its not a subsidy.

      The Wikipedia article on Subsidy paraphrases the Collins Dictionary of Economics:

      Subsidies can be direct – cash grants, interest-free loans – or indirect – tax breaks, insurance, low-interest loans, depreciation write-offs, rent rebates.

      Which explicitly says a tax break is an indirect subsidy.

      Oh and calling tax write-offs that oil companies take over employee benefits and such a "subsidy", when every other type of company can use those same write-offs is being disingenuous.

      That's a strawman argument, he clearly wrote "tax break to a specific industry or individual". Clearly if everyone other type of company can use the same write-off it's not for a specific industry or individual. Calling your opponent disingenuous for making an argument they clearly haven't made only makes you look foolish.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    7. Re:Misleading summary by raehl · · Score: 4, Informative

      It may have the same effect as a subsidy

      If it looks like a duck....

      If the government agreed to send oil companies a check for $10 for every barrel of oil produced, we'd all agree that that's a subsidy, right?

      If the government instead says, "We'll credit your tax bill $10 for every barrel of oil you produce, reducing the amount on the tax check you send us", it's THE SAME DAMNED THING.

      Oh and calling tax write-offs that oil companies take over employee benefits and such a "subsidy", when every other type of company can use those same write-offs is being disingenuous.

      No one is calling those tax write-offs available to all businesses subsidies. The subsidies are the tax write-offs available ONLY to oil production companies. One example is the ability to write off the "declining value" of oil wells.

      So, if you're an oil company, you spend $20 billion looking for oil reserves, and deduct those expenses. Then, you find a reserve, worth say, $100 billion. Then, you spend $20 billion getting that oil out of the ground, and deduct those expenses, and then you sell the oil for $100 billion. This is all the normal way a business would run. For example, someone might spend $20 million researching a new product, $20 million making the products, and then sell the products for $100 million, making $60 million in profits they are taxed on.

      But on top of the normal deductions for ACTUAL COSTS, the oil companies ALSO deduct the "declining value of the wells". You know, since the oil in the ground was worth $100 billion, as they pump the oil out of the ground and the "value" of the oil in the ground declines, THEY DEDUCT THE DECLINING VALUE OF THE WELLS TOO!

      And that's a subsidy. It's a tax deduction no normal business gets.

  3. Keep up the selfishness.. by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keep up the selfishness... Keep buying the cheapest crap from the cheapest place possible, without regard for where you're spending your money, and this is what you get. After all, there's "free shipping", right?

    Welcome to the another manifestation of the culture of "I've got mine. Fuck you."

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Keep up the selfishness.. by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll buy the same book more cheaply at Amazon if I can, thank you. I value my pay cheque.

    2. Re:Keep up the selfishness.. by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.

      "I've got mine. Fuck you."

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Keep up the selfishness.. by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think there's something fundamental you're missing here.

    4. Re:Keep up the selfishness.. by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Careful you don't fall off that high horse.

      I'm a frequent and long-term Amazon customer (their first year, I even got some swag from them for being an early adopter). I rarely buy something on Amazon because it's cheaper, and when price is the deciding factor, it's between Amazon and another online retailer, not between Amazon and a local retailer.

      I'm picky about what I buy, and I do not miss at all the days of walking into a retail establishment with the goal of buying a specific (shoe, gadget, book, whatever), being told that they don't have it in stock, and then either having to settle for something less than I wanted, deal with being upsold by some sales rat, or wait for them to order it and deal with another trip to the location. I don't miss at all the days of the $5 trip on the subway to buy an $8 book, assuming there was something at the bookstore that appealed to me when I got there.

      Governments that think that levying sales taxes on online companies will magically cure retailer woes are morons, because for the people that are buying the stuff, it's selection, convenience, and then price. Physical stores are always going to lose the first, quite often the second, and at best tie on the third. And I bet the guys stocking the local supermarket would be happier with a full-time with benefits job at an Amazon warehouse than where they are now.

      Retailers are middle-men. Good ones offer services and experiences beyond the mere exchange of cash for goods, but they're still middle-men, and if the internet has taught us anything, it's that it eats middle-men. Record stores, game stores, drug stores, book stores...

    5. Re:Keep up the selfishness.. by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words "Your brick and mortar was shit, fuck you".

  4. Re:"Controversial?" by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 5, Informative

    They're not middle class though, are they? I think that's the point.

  5. Re:America the beautiful by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thank God for that. Imagine having a society have to pay for one of these disposable workers to recover from a sick day!

  6. Temperatures that 'will occasionally exceed 90 deg by korbulon · · Score: 5, Funny

    well it is the Amazon duh

  7. Middle Class by tdp252 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Middle-Class is being redefined as people who can afford basic necessities like food, shelter, clothing and medicine. Want money to enjoy life beyond that? Tough luck!

    1. Re:Middle Class by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not so much a re-definition of "middle class", it's more a perpetuation of the very pervasive myth that most Americans are middle class, when in fact most are really working class.

      First, an accurate definition of "middle class": At a minimum, middle class family is one that can accumulate wealth if they manage their finances reasonably well. That wealth may be in the form of pensions, retirement accounts, investments, home equity, vehicles owned free and clear, bank accounts, or just about anything else, but there has to be a clear upwards trajectory. For example, a middle class family is in a position to save a significant pile of cash that will allow them to send their child to college without their child taking out large loans. By contrast, a working class family is at best capable of paying their bills on time and putting food on the table.

      The key facts are:
      (1) The average American family has negative net worth, which means not only are they not accumulating wealth, they're losing wealth.
      (2) The average American family has, over the last 15 years, cut spending dramatically on entertainment, travel, food, clothing, and almost all other discretionary categories. That means the "out-of-control spending" hypothesis is incorrect.
      (3) Personal bankruptcies have been increasing steadily since 1995, and then skyrocketed since 2008. Most involved: extended unemployment, medical bills (even for insured patients), and adjustable rate mortgages bumping upwards.
      (4) The average American family does not have the ability to pay their bills if they miss a single paycheck.

      Also worth mentioning: If you're a typical /.er with a job in the IT sector, you very likely pull in about 3-5 times what the average American worker makes.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  8. Woah, wait a minute... by Svenia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When did ~$24k gross a year become middle class? Did I miss a memo or have I been living in fantasy land? (11.50 per hour * 40 hours per week * 52 weeks)

  9. Obama isn't a Democrat by TWiTfan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He's like all politicians, just a Corporatist who happens to have either a "D" or "R" after his name.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  10. Wow - how did this one get approved at /. ??? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It must be a cold day in Hades.

    Relentless war which the globalist elites are waging against any possible middle class opposition - CHECK.

    Utter hypocrisy of moving employees off-book, into sub-contractor scams, where hours are guaranteed to be less than 30-per-week so as not to qualify for Obamacare - CHECK.

    Big-$$$ campaign contributions and other goodies being laundered from Bezos through Gorelick and into the Chicago Machine - CHECK.

    Hypocrisy of Martha's Vineyard vacationing politician, who otherwise would love him some indie bookstores, heading to the mother of all vertical bidnesses for a little facetime on the evening newz - CHECK.

    What's next, an honest discussion of why Fuckerberg and Ballzmer and L-Word-ison really want all those H1B aliens?

    Might be a good day to go long on some snowball contracts in Hell.

    1. Re:Wow - how did this one get approved at /. ??? by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Utter hypocrisy of moving employees off-book, into sub-contractor scams, where hours are guaranteed to be less than 30-per-week so as not to qualify for Obamacare - CHECK.

      Err, this isn't something just with Amazon.

      This is becoming a pretty widespread result of Obamacare...lots of places are reducing hours to keep from having to pay the new fees/taxes.

      It isn't even doing it through subcontractors. I know of other businesses that are reducing hours to under 30. My Mom got caught up on this....and I know of others in the retail (national department stores) that are getting hit the same way.

      Also, there's lots of small businesses that are hanging at the 49 employee number to avoid the Obamacare mandates.

      Whether you agree with Obamacare in full, in part or not at all....I think most everyone can see that these two reactions in particular apparently weren't anticipated as side effects as widespread as they seem to be at this point.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  11. Re:People Need to Get Over Themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sold dew worms to fishermen for a year to buy my first computer

    And now you can't even buy a cup of coffee with what you'd get from doing that.

    Everybody wants it all but doesn't want to work for it. Guess what? It doesn't work that way

    You're right, the people who have it all don't work for it, they've already got it and now they spend their days on the golf course making the hard decisions of which division to amputate in order to make this quarter's numbers look good enough for a bonus.

  12. Re:What's your boggle, citizen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're temp workers without benefits, working 12 hour days, and get fired if they make any mistakes or say the wrong thing. Length of employment and available work is not guaranteed, but when there's work you're working overtime. Workers are searched off clock when entering the building, during break, and when they leave. You can't bring anything with you as the shipping center ships everything so how do they know if you're stealing it?

    These are shitty, high stress jobs for people near the end of their ropes.

  13. Re:What's your boggle, citizen? by ATMAvatar · · Score: 5, Informative

    $10.50-$11.50 per hour works out to be around $21k-$24k a year on average, given a full 40-hour work-week. That's hardly middle class. It's actually much closer to the Census Bureau's defined poverty threshold. If the worker is the head of a traditional 4-person family, it actually puts him/her at or below the poverty line.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  14. $11.50 an hour... by __Paul__ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is not middle fucking class.

    --
    worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
  15. Re:What's your boggle, citizen? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These are shitty, high stress jobs for people near the end of their ropes.

    Ah, so these are the new middle class American jobs!

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  16. Re:Temperatures that 'will occasionally exceed 90 by telchine · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as temperatures don't exceed 451 degrees, they should be fine

  17. Re:America the beautiful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Too bad they're not Amazon warehouse jobs, they're Integrity Staffing jobs.

  18. Do you know what a middle class job is? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you talking about?

    They're decent, honest jobs that pay a fair wage.

    That's about as middle class as it gets.

    Ummm, no. Physical working conditions are certainly great, but Amazon fulfillment warehouses are notoriously known for driving workers into a state of constant terror due to managerial abuse. A middle class job used to imply a sort of shielding from such things (not totally but certainly more than what you would see and still see at a minimum wage fast food joint.)

    Middle class doesn't imply that anymore. And $10-$12 an hour is $24K. That is not below what is typically considered a low-end middle class salary. $24K was middle class twenty years ago. Not anymore. They are just above the limit that forces people to use social services.

    I'm not saying these jobs are decent or honest (and thank God they are not Walmart salaries.) Any job with salaries above the poverty line is better than no job or poverty-line job, anytime, any day. And I'm not saying that for the type of job being performed, these are not fair wages. They are.

    But let us not call them middle class wages. They are not. The rising cost of living, education and health care, and the continuous shift towards replacing full-time workers with part-time workers (or contractors) have pretty much made sure a $12/h job is not a middle class job anymore.

  19. How is this controversial? by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see anything controversial about the warehouse. It's hot (or cold) unskilled manual labor. It pays above minimum wage, but like most jobs with unskilled labor, pays no benefits. They do not do so because it would not provide them with any competitive advantage vs. other fulfillment companies.

    Breaking the "race to the bottom" to make sure you won't starve to death and have access to things like basic medical care when you are a productive member of society (fulfilling your end of the "social contract") is arguably a useful thing for government to do.

  20. Re:Obama hates America by ebno-10db · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plain and simple: Obama is turning America into a third world nation.

    Don't give him too much credit - he has plenty of help.

  21. No, it's not, and it's a shame. by sirwired · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are correct; $11.50 an hour is not middle-class. However, that no-benefit salary is usually enough to make you ineligible for things like Medicaid (even though you aren't buying jack-$hit in medical care on that paycheck) or a Public Defender if you are accused of a crime.

    It's a tragedy that a productive member of society that is fulfilling his/her end of the "social contract" still cannot obtain the things we would expect every civilized nation to make sure it's citizens have access to.

  22. Funny but the guy doesn't remember his own schtick by Virtucon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In late August 2008, Then Senator Obama gave a little speech in a airline maintenance hanger in Kansas City. He complained about the Republicans and how much ground the middle class had lost, about healthcare. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xauuo1CvexE Listening to it now it still echos of somebody who didn't have ideas then and certainly has no ideas now. What's ironic about his middle class speech there is that American Airlines closed down that maintenance facility in 2010.. http://www.dallasnews.com/business/headlines/20100924-American-Airlines-closes-former-TWA-base-878.ece

    Sounds like the same schtick over and over again.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  23. crap job better than no job doesn't make it good by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this, right here.

    Amazon is contracting these jobs out so they are distanced from the managerial abuses, lack of benefits, instability, and poor working conditions.
    AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HOLDS THIS UP AS A PARAGON TO BE EMULATED.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Re:doctors & lawyers, you're next... by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a useful baseline as the term middle class has been distorted to the point where it has no meaning whatsoever anymore.

    If you are working for all of your money, you simply aren't middle class and weren't ever really. That's just a lie that people in power like to tell to keep the huddling masses from getting discontent.

    If people realized they were really part of the underclass they might be more inclined to act out or just differently.

    A lot of higher paid wage slaves have themselves convinced that they are something different than people that fill Amazon orders and that's not really the case.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  25. Re:What's your boggle, citizen? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These are shitty, high stress jobs for people near the end of their ropes.

    Ah, so these are the new middle class American jobs!

    Exactly. This is the new reality. What we used to call "working class" is being re-defined as "middle class", and the new American Dream is "just getting by."

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  26. Re:Hope and change the Obummer way! by jdmuskrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i guess he is really just another fucking republican after all. corporations are people and people are nothing.

  27. Wal-Mart Effect by rullywowr · · Score: 3, Informative

    The issue with Amazon is while they offer great service and the lowest prices, they are forcing not only other businesses to go under but also dictating the prices of goods in the market. Many companies have a Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) policy in order to keep an even playing field for their resellers. Amazon is so large, and buys so much, that do not obey to MAP policies - they do what they please. If the manufacturer doesn't like this, they can choose not sell to Amazon and subsequently lose sales in the millions of dollars.

    In the wake of low prices and convenience, we are seeing the extinction of a free-enterprise market and the transition of skilled laborers to box-stuffers....all run by the efficiency of a computer system.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart Effect by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      MAP is nothing more than collusion.
      I think they should be flatly illegal. In a totally free market no one would ever obey them.

      You don't want a free market you want a market that is ruled the way you like.

      The correct solution to amazon paying this little is just to raise the minimum wage for this job. If you don't want to do that, then you think this wage is fine.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart Effect by rullywowr · · Score: 3, Informative

      MAP is nothing more than collusion. I think they should be flatly illegal. In a totally free market no one would ever obey them.

      You don't want a free market you want a market that is ruled the way you like.

      The correct solution to amazon paying this little is just to raise the minimum wage for this job. If you don't want to do that, then you think this wage is fine.

      MAP is not collusion, it is the currently best (and affirmatively deemed legal by courts) way to create a fair playing field for all the resellers of a particular product. I know most people feel MAP is a bad thing because as end users we all pay the same MAP price, just like trying to buy an Apple product - price is same everywhere. With this being said, when a company as large as Amazon or Wal-Mart does not abide by MAP, it is simply a race to the bottom with who has the lowest price. Because these large companies get a huge quantity discount, without MAP they could afford to sell for pennies on the dollar for an extended period of time. This action has the very real potential put all the other resellers out of business. When the other competition is gone, Amazon (et. al.) are free to raise the prices as high as they want as they retain complete market control. The manufacturer of the good is forced to sell to Amazon at whatever price Amazon determines. Amazon is so large that they can make or break a company simply by not choosing to sell a product...and you can bet your ass it is on Amazon's terms because they know the power they hold.

      A marketplace without MAP, as you suggest, is simply a setup for monopolistic control by companies who can afford to do it. Look what happened to all the Mom and Pop shops in the US with the introduction of Wal-Mart: gone. Without some kind of level price structure, the reseller with the deepest pockets will prevail.

  28. Divide and Conquer by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There was a time in the US when the "working class" actually banded together for higher wages and benefits. There was a time when Americans cared enough about the future of their children to take the necessary steps to guarantee them a better future, whether they were garbage collectors or brain surgeons. The lessons learned from the affects of Robber Baron Capitalism and The Great Depression have been utterly lost. Utterly Lost.

    What has happened is(for lack of a better term, and a nod to Queensryche's 1988 masterwork, "Operation Mindcrime") that the 1% that rule America discovered how to "divide and conquer", as if that tactic hasn't been used countless times through history with the same results. Since the 1980s(yea, you've heard this before) the 1% have successfully rolled back the social safety nets, which in the past were mainly affecting the poor. Now the middle class is sliding down into poverty.

    This is no "market adjustment" or "realignment of labor forces". This is nothing less that a concerted and tightly executed plan to turn the US into a third world country, where the vast majority of the population is poor, marginalized and has little or no political or economic power, where a small elite controls all facets of society.

    The lessons learned from the affects of Robber Baron Capitalism and The Great Depression have been utterly lost. Utterly Lost...

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  29. Re:doctors & lawyers, you're next... by Zalbik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you are working for all of your money, you simply aren't middle class and weren't ever really. That's just a lie that people in power like to tell to keep the huddling masses from getting discontent.

    This is a very good definition, but unfortunately (at least where I live), many people simply make the choice not to be middle class in favor of lifestyle.

    Now, I'm in a reasonably well off "economic bubble" city, so take what I have to say with a grain of salt, but....

    Many of the people I work around have 2400+ sq foot houses, 2 expensive (40K+) cars, re-modelled kitchens, multiple cell phone plans (at $80+ a pop), gadgets galore, all brand-name clothing, take 1-2 out of country vacations per year, and some even own vacation property.

    Yet they live in debt.

    They allow their money to actively work against them, which astonishes me.

    Why are people constantly lined up a starbucks to pay $5+ for a cup of coffee? Are name-brand clothes so much better than Wal-Mart that they are worth 3-4x the price? Do they really need a data plan on your cell phone for $80 a month? etc. etc. etc.

    As much as we like to blame: the president, the government, big banks, wall street, global economy, immigration policies, etc for the current financial situation, at least where I am, I see the biggest issue being: people themselves.

  30. An absolute must-read on the subject by sootman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I Was a Warehouse Wage Slave: My brief, backbreaking, rage-inducing, low-paying, dildo-packing time inside the online-shipping machine.

    "... when you're late or sick you miss the opportunity to maximize your overtime pay. And working more than eight hours is mandatory. Stretching is also mandatory, since you will either be standing still at a conveyor line for most of your minimum 10-hour shift or walking on concrete or metal stairs."

    "The gal conducting our training reminds us again that we cannot miss any days our first week. There are NO exceptions to this policy. She says to take Brian, for example, who's here with us in training today. Brian already went through this training, but then during his first week his lady had a baby, so he missed a day and he had to be fired."

    It's 4 pages. Take the time to read it. It's depressing as fuck. I buy very little from Amazon anymore, and when I do, it's usually from individual sellers, not "Amazon" itself.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  31. Be constructive by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about instead of criticizing a company for creating all these jobs, innovating an entire new industry, producing incredible value for customers, and instead praise them for doing so?

    Working for low wages sucks. I know plenty of people who do this. Often they are recent immigrants or children of recent immigrants. Both parents may need to work. Grandmother may need to live with them and do child care. Their kids might not have their own bedrooms.

    But having wages of this level means they can have a (used) car, refrigerator, microwave, TV, running water and a flush toilet - things they may not have had if they were unable to come to the US. So they are happy about that. But life is still challenging, though they get by and have a life as enjoyable as anyone else (I know unhappy rich people and happy poor people).

    Low wages are an important price signal. It says perhaps you should finish high school, or go to college like 66% of high school graduates, or go to a trade school, or become an entrepreneur and start your own business (I know a Central American immigrant who started as a maid, saved up money, and now owns a chain of restaurants). Or perhaps you should move to areas with higher wages, like the Bakken or Eagle Shale areas.

    Don't be like Washington DC and destroy thousands of potential jobs by saying Walmart should pay higher wages than the minimum wage. Don't force people to be unemployed.

    If you really want to help these people, first let them have jobs (i.e. at the market wage) rather than try to manipulate their wages and making them unemployed. Give them a chance to make some money now. Then they may figure out they need to save to get more skills, move, stay in place and learn how to move into management, etc.

    Then ask yourself why our unionized socialized government monopoly schools might not be preparing everyone for high-skill, high-productivity jobs.

  32. Re:What's your boggle, citizen? by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it fair? No. Life isn't fair.

    That was my attitude until the last few years. After '08 financial crisis, read about the top 1%, the ecnomy improving yet hiring was stagnant, the board members of investment firms getting off scott free & blaming lower level execs for breaking the law, increadible mis-management and wheel sleeping morons at the SEC, the American prison population quadrupling over the last 10 years, the whole-sale gutting of the right of habeas corpus, and the complete lack of caring or understanding of the removal of the many fundamental constitutional rights here, I am of a mind that its beyond "not fair", but the game is rigged and not rigged for me or you. And you'd be a fool to think otherwise.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  33. Koch Brothers by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a useful baseline as the term middle class has been distorted to the point where it has no meaning whatsoever anymore.

    In my benighted Red 19th-century state, the Kochs are running TV ads refuting the 1% / 99% argument, reassuring the working poor that they indeed are well-off and middle class. Pay no mind to your paycheck-to-paycheck, one middling medical issue away from oblivion, dear serfs!

    Exerable assholes highly deserving of dying in a fire.