Slashdot Mirror


Former NSA Chief Warns Hackers Will Attack US If Snowden Is Captured

Okian Warrior writes "The Guardian is reporting Michael Hayden speculating that hackers and transparency groups are likely to respond with cyber-terror attacks if the United States government apprehends whistleblower Edward Snowden. Hayden called the potential attackers 'Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'"

77 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Old Married people? by ka9dgx · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do old married persons (people who haven't talked to the opposite sex in years), have to do with this?

    1. Re:Old Married people? by Galaga88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wife: My husband hasn't spoken to me in years.
      Husband: I know you don't like me to interrupt you.

    2. Re:Old Married people? by Notabadguy · · Score: 5, Funny

      The joke is on Mr. Hayden. Calling upstairs for your mom to bring you dinner totally counts as talking to members of the opposite sex.

    3. Re:Old Married people? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to give him credit: it's a brilliant play. Insult script kiddies who see themselves as cyber activists, to get them to do their worst if and when the US arrests snowden for the crime of defending the constitution. When they finally do get him, they'll be able to shift the news story to the "cyberattacks" rather than "We've heard screams coming from the holding cell where Snowden is being held. Can you tell us you are not torturing him for exposing your crimes?"

      That the "cyberattacks" will be the equivalent of someone spraying "Fuck U!" on a billboard for the NSA won't matter. Citizens will get the message that the NSA is your first and only defense against an unholy cabal of virgin"cyberterrorists" who would hack your toaster to murder your spouse and are probably gay or something, child pornography rapists who will come for your kids, and Edward Snowden who evidently murdered US troops or something.

      In order to keep defending you against such evil people, they're going to need you to install a camera in your living room, and you'll need a license to go on the internet on your state-approved computer.

      (I'll admit I got carried away with this hyperbole...)

  2. Nihilists? by Galaga88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nihilists! Fuck me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.

    1. Re:Nihilists? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      at least they don't work on Shabbas.

      (and, shut the fuck up, donnie)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Nihilists? by CodeHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, the rug ties the room together.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    3. Re:Nihilists? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      at least they don't work on Shabbas.

      (and, shut the fuck up, donnie)

      beating a dead horse, they don't bowl on shabbas. this isn't nam! there are rules!

  3. Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This claim was made by a fossilised old fart who hasn't managed to get a rise out of his dick for thirty years and has decided to take it out on everyone else who isn't having a problem satisfying themselves and their partners sexually.

    If Hayden hadn't been spending the last 20 years trying to fuck over the entire country en-masse, he'd still be able to get a hard-on for normal sexual thoughts about individual people.

    1. Re:Meanwhile by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can we get a +1 BURN?

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    2. Re:Meanwhile by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd rather we didn't stoop to his level, but if insults about sexuality are what will win or lose the fight against government surveillance, sure. I've heard things about certain NSA chiefs who torture dogs while masturbating. I don't believe those rumors personally, but I'm just saying, Hayden has yet to say publically he DOESN'T fuck puppies to death.

    3. Re:Meanwhile by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      The above post was a lie. I was lying. I'm going to spend the next few years vacationing now in some place that doesn't have the internet, so you probably won't hear from me.

      All praise the NSA, benevolent defenders of freedom.

      Sincerely,
      Little Girl

  4. Out of touch with reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news: crotchety old man demands kids get off his damn lawn.

    1. Re:Out of touch with reality by Grey+Geezer · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a crotchety old man I resent that! It is quite possible to be concerned about threats to the 4th admendment and still want kids to stay off of the lawn.

      --
      The USA is only 4X older than me...perspective
  5. Hours of ad hominem fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mod Hayden -1 Troll.

    1. Re:Hours of ad hominem fun. by niftydude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The NSA narrative has always been the same: give us more money so that we can protect you against a large unspecified threat.

      As a former NSA chief this is ingrained behavior for him, and so Hayden will keep spouting that line long after he's past the point of senility.

      --
      You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
  6. In other words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people who give a greater damn about the Constitution than the current government.

    1. Re:In other words, by Mitreya · · Score: 2

      the mighty United States of America has been reduced to feeling "terror" from "twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years."

      At least twentysomethings are a lot scarier than (possible) 3oz+ bottles. Just observed two very serious TSA agents gather around a non-standard bottle with foreign lettering and discussing in detail whether it does or does not exceed the 3oz allowance. They may have been looking for a translator, as I left security.

    2. Re:In other words, by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Smug nerds who give a greater damn about the fashionable parts of the Constitution, such as the second amendment, and look at you like you are crazy when you mention the others

      FTFY

      This just in: different people tend to care more about the stuff that they feel is important. Film at eleven.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:In other words, by runeghost · · Score: 2

      Oh, we still have one, we're just not bothering to put any effort into following it. (Although lots of effort gets put into avoiding the bits of it that people in power dislike.) The Constitution, for all the nigh-divine reverence it gets, it just a piece of paper with a set of rules on what the people who wrote it thought was a good way to run a government. When the people running the country are no longer interested in good government, then the Constitution is irrelevant, no matter whether it is ignored or twisted into a semantic pretzel.

    4. Re:In other words, by intermodal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the constitution is the only authorization those people have, it is entirely relevant when they lose interest in following it. It's not merely advice or rules. It's the documentation of what was ratified by the states authorizing their authority. When that falls by the wayside, so does the legitimacy of their authority.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:In other words, by hazah · · Score: 2

      It's been my experience, sitting in my mother's basement, pounding my fists on the table and muttering to myself about teh eevil lib'ruls and teh eevil gummint, that those who defend the second amendment ...uh, what was I talking about again?

      FTFY.

      You paint everyone with the same brush... My mother's basement happens to be a fully developed apartment complete with a whole back yard. Perfect for my wife and son to live in. And I only sound like that after about 8 beers... you know when the chance of me being taken seriously is nil. On the other hand, I do concider the constitution, as a whole, to be far more valuable than your government. And I'm not even american. Your attitude betrays you. You use the freedom you have to undermine those who wish you to have it in the first place. You're a douchebag.

    6. Re:In other words, by VortexCortex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't picking and choosing which parts of the constitution to support the reason we dislike the NSA so much in the first place?

      No, it's the opposite. Picking and choosing which parts of the constitution to ignore is the reason the NSA is disliked. Additionally: I have limited resources as an individual, so I put my limited time and money into advocating the things I think are important. If many do so, then all bases are covered. Requiring me to "support" all views equally would spread me so thin as to be ineffective at any advocacy.

      Note that even though I do not rally in support of the 2nd amendment, I do not ignore it and think it is important. I think the 2nd needs to be reformed to become "The right to bear technology" such that our freedoms extend to 3D printers and all other technology including encryption systems (which are nearly considered munitions anyway). That means a new amendment... That new amendment would expand the 2nd, it's the one I would support.

      Perhaps with such a right to bear technology uncorrupted would have prevented the government from removing mandatory encryption from IPv6... Thus PRISM would be moot, making less likely the need to exercise our 2nd amendment rights to uphold the constitution.

      The point is: You've got it all wrong, mate.

  7. Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'

    Well, at least that excludes Slashdot. Slashdot is filled with thirtysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in fifteen or sixteen years.

    1. Re:Slashdot by Svenia · · Score: 2

      You can assume all day, for all you know I'm a cat on my owner's keyboard typing severely lucky random chains of key-presses.

  8. In advance of possible cyber attacks, by Howitzer86 · · Score: 5, Funny

    US citizens are advised to flee the planet.

    1. Re:In advance of possible cyber attacks, by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      US citizens are advised to flee the planet.

      In other news, US citizens will be punished either by the government for the actions of other citizens, or by other countries' citizens for the actions of the government. However, in no way and at no time, should this reflect that the government is in any way wrong. Meanwhile, police everywhere would like to remind women that if they were raped, it must be because of how they were dressed. "Lady Liberty was asking for it! She was showing leg."

      -_- My point is that if the government is concerned that its actions may be inviting wide-spread reprisals, they ought to be asking whether or not those actions have public support. Afterall, isn't this supposed to be a democracy? When most of your citizens are saying "Dude, you fucked up," it might be time to, I don't know... hold a meeting at least?

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:In advance of possible cyber attacks, by runeghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the U.S. is damn well not a democracy any more. Democracy doesn't mean, "going to vote every 2 or 4 years", although the so-called, "Republican" and "Democratic" branches of the Establishment Party would certainly like you to think that it does. Democracy requires (among other things) an informed electorate, a free press, and a government that is both accountable and responsive to its citizens. The U.S. does not have these things. It is not the public that panics in response to "political winds", it is the establishment that uses major events as excuses to do what they wanted to accomplish anyway.

    3. Re:In advance of possible cyber attacks, by chihowa · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US was NEVER a democracy... The US was initially established as a Representative Republic...

      This is such a lame argument and it needs to stop being made. Democracy just means, "rule by the people". A representative republic is a form of democracy, as is a direct democracy. Saying that a country is a democracy is making the distinction that the government represents the will of the people, as opposed to an aristocracy (represents the will of a small ruling class), monarchy (represents the will of one person), a plutocracy (represents the will of the wealthy), etc.

      The entire basis of the United States is that the government must represent the will of the people, so the US is a democracy (in theory).

      I mean, read the dictionary before calling other people idiots:

      democracy (d-mkr-s)
      n. Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives.
      n. A political or social unit that has such a government.
      n. The common people, considered as the primary source of political power.

      Can we please never see this argument again?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  9. Kettle, pot by qbast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's from guy who instead of talking to person of opposite sex would tap her phone, read her journal and search her underwear drawer?

  10. In other words, by orlanz · · Score: 5, Funny

    In this day and age, the mighty United States of America has been reduced to feeling "terror" from "twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years."

    Wasn't that a standup joke 20 years ago?

  11. Twentysomethings who haven't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This country is terribly plagued with such a reprehrensible menace. The only solution is to mandate a free girlfriend to every twentysomething, to avoid their fall into tyranny and hackery. It will be a burden for us all, but I think we on Slashdot can manage.

  12. As opposed to what Hayden and his ilk are by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which are fascist, traitorous, nationalistic power-fetishists who only view the opposite sex as tools or sex toys. Power in D.C. attracts a lot of arm-candy and those people get used to that very quickly.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  13. Same Brush Syndrome by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like how he lumps "activists" in together with Lulzsec and Anonymous.

    Within a couple of years, the US media will be using "activist" as a synonym for "terrorist".

    Sadly, most Americans will go right along with this.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:Same Brush Syndrome by Kurast · · Score: 5, Informative

      I like how he lumps "activists" in together with Lulzsec and Anonymous.

      Within a couple of years, the US media will be using "activist" as a synonym for "terrorist".

      Sadly, most Americans will go right along with this.

      Fox News does that already.

    2. Re:Same Brush Syndrome by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Within a couple of years, the US media will be using "activist" as a synonym for "terrorist".

      I am hoping and praying that it gets revealed that the NSA was feeding the FBI information as part of the nationwide crackdown on Occupy protesters. It's bad enough the FBI was involved but if the NSA can be proven to have directly fucked with a political movement like that, then the all pretense of defending against terrorism will be gone.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Same Brush Syndrome by odigity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here in New Hampshire, home of the Free State Project (http://freestateproject.org), that's already happening. We're about to go have a protest next week in Concord against the city PD requesting what is essentially a tank. In the reasons stated on the form they filled out to apply for the DHS grant, they specifically reference "Free Staters" and "Occupy" as potential threats they're worried about -- as justification for getting a fucking TANK.

      http://freekeene.com/2013/07/29/concord-pd-requests-a-bearcat-to-deal-with-sovereign-citizens-free-staters-and-occupy-new-hampshire/

    4. Re:Same Brush Syndrome by HeckRuler · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Forget the old boogymen of terrorists and nihilists. Those are classic punching bags. The sort that everyone hates and everyone can get on board with hating. Don't like them? They're a terrorist! That's how it goes. Lumping activists in there is only a slight deviation from the typical script. It's effective when talking to republicans while democrats have a kinder view of the label. (Although, hell, the teapartiers have started to turn those tables)

      And forget the low-brow insult to twenty-somethings. Sure, it's uncouth and he's punching below the belt. He's specifically doing it to antagonize. He WANTS it to happen. He wants to poke that bear so he can have a raging bear to justify his bear-repellant.

      Forget all that. No, this is worse. Catch this part:

      "But certainly Mr Snowden has created quite a stir among those folks who are very committed to transparency and global transparency and the global web, kind of ungoverned and free. And I don't know that there's a logic between trying to [punish] America or American institutions for his arrest, but I hold out the possibility. I can sit here and imagine circumstances and scenarios, but they're nothing more than imaginative."

      He's specifically calling out TRANSPARENCY GROUPS. And he's kinda sorta maybe suggesting the possibility that they'll go "punish America". He can't actually tell us why that would happen but oh he's imagining it. It's like a wet dream where all of his illegal deeds throughout his life become justified and he's worshipped as a hero for stopping "those evil transparency groups". It's one where he doesn't go to sleep at night worrying that he'll be fired, tried, and thrown in prison for violating the law.

      That's what you have to focus on here. The man is in FEAR of transparency. This is a sign of a bad man.

  14. Chilling effect by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A government official advising against a course of action because he fears a terrorist response is proof that terrorism works.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    1. Re:Chilling effect by sociocapitalist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A government official advising against a course of action because he fears a terrorist response is proof that terrorism works.

      Where do you see that he recommended against a course of action?

      This is a government official trying to get more budget than he already has, nothing more.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  15. Wait what?!? by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When did hacking turn into "Cyber-terrorism"? Has the world gone stupid?

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    1. Re:Wait what?!? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

      No, the world has always been stupid.
      It is just became more obvious after internet v2. or whatever they called it.

    2. Re:Wait what?!? by intermodal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Terrorism as defined by the government is not what terrifies the people, but what terrifies people with cushy jobs in the government. Right now, they're terrified that people will find out what they're doing and call them out for it.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Wait what?!? by Burntgerbil · · Score: 2

      At this point, I'm becoming more scared of the misguided, (presumably) well-meaning and ill-educated elected officials than I am of any tur-rur-rists. When does the Patriot Act start to apply to them ?

    4. Re:Wait what?!? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      The world has always been stupid. It's just gotten worse recently.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Wait what?!? by Inanna-qui-baille · · Score: 2

      We are just getting wiser as we age and having a more critical view of things. There was no golden age before, people always have been very stupid in general.

  16. Re:Fighting words by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

    He's trying to provoke an attack, isn't he?

    It would be a win-win. That is to say a "win" for whoever does the attacking, and a "win" for the national security/defense/spying establishment. Maybe not as profitable for everyone as 9/11, but still not bad for a day's work.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  17. Michael Hayden, like internet trolls everywhere... by Notabadguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many times have you seen someone respond to IRC, forum post, thread, etc with something along the following lines:

    "The person disagreeing with me is 15 year old acne-crusted, coke-glasses-wearing, living in his mother's basement loser with no social life and blah blah blah....."

    Reading Michael Hayden feels like reading an internet troll. I don't know if he's doing it because he's dumb troll, or because he used to be one of those 15 year old acne crusted, coke-glasses-wearing, living in his mother's basement loser with no social life before getting into the NSA so he could change venue to live in a government basement.

  18. Such shame by lapm · · Score: 2

    Lol, maybe government should not be doing things they are shamed afterwords. Like spying its own citizens that have done nothing wrong. All this under fear of terrorist. I wonder how long until they realize terrorist won the war. They changed how certain superpower lives its lives. So much for land of the free... I all pro information freedom. And i don't fit any of those categories.. 'Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.' Im 38 yeras old, i quess thats twentysomething.... Im married and talk my wife every day...

  19. Scare tactics for tax dollars by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    This whole scare tactic on Hayden's part, especially since it was a speech at the "Bipartisan Policy Center" sounds like a grab for political support and funding to further broaden what the NSA, FBI, DEA and every other shitty acronym involved is already doing. People like Hayden are the types who create places like Gitmo, fund operations like Haliburton, and see nothing wrong with getting what they want by any means necessary. No wonder he's so scared.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  20. calling people gay by 6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'"
    Really? Is calling people it doesn't like gay really the governments new tactic?

  21. Stick, Meet Hornet Nest by denmarkw00t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years

    It's great to see people putting down others, I'm sure statements like that won't at all cause people who otherwise probably wouldn't have wanted to be involved in any such thing to change their minds. It's like saying "we have information suggesting an attack is imminent on US interests abroad - keep an eye out for young men who have unsightly beards, sand in their butt cracks, and a strange fascination with goats" and not expecting more people to be violent towards you than before you made the statement.

  22. They won't attack the US by godless+dave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They won't attack the US, they'll attack the US government. Completely different. These guys remind me of mafiosi who try to claim prosecutors going after the Mafia are going after all Italian-Americans.

    --
    "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
  23. Self Loathing Much? by Bob9113 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'"

    Really? "Hah hah, little nerd, you don't get any pussy!" The former NSA chief is using sophomoric name-calling to make himself feel better about having become one of the most crafty and subversive enemies our nation has ever faced. Just like high school, when the jocks would do the same to feel better about their abusive relationships with their fathers.

  24. grain of truth? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, the guy's being a DB, but you have to admit there's a grain of truth:
    nihilists: that could be one way to describe groups like lulzsec, who aren't into transparency as a cause but would rather watch the world burn for the lulz.
    anarchists: I don't see this one per se, but the govt described bradley manning as an anarchist so that's why they think that.
    activists: for sure, groups like anonymous are activists. manning too. snowden too. they are motivated by effecting change in the system.
    Lulzsec: I'm not sure to what degree Lulzsec would participate themselves based on the FBI busts, but I'm sure there would be some offshoot phoenix "rise from the ashes" that would throw their hats in the ring.
    anonymous: i think this one is a given.
    neckbeards: kind of a stereotype, not suprised he through that out.

    tldr: I think he's more right than wrong, both to expect attempts at reprisals and in describing many of the groups that will attempt it. I would add foreign nations / hostile groups (not activists, but interested in harming USA interests). It's the perfect time to attack under the guise of these other groups.

    1. Re:grain of truth? by runeghost · · Score: 5, Informative

      Certainly there's a grain of truth - anyone who values freedom is likely to be unhappy with the Fed's nascent police state, and some of them will act out violently against their corrupt and unaccountable rulers. When that starts to happen more and more frequently, it's important not to see it not as justification for repression, but as a sign of just how hated and undemocratic the U.S. government has become.

      As John F. Kennedy once said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

    2. Re:grain of truth? by Capt.Albatross · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The entire speech is spun from speculation: "I can sit here and imagine circumstances and scenarios, but they're nothing more than imaginative." (his words).

      Much like the Iraqi WMD thing.

    3. Re:grain of truth? by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Funny

      yeah so everyone and anyone might attack USA if Snowden is captured and might attack if Snowden is not captured?

      soo? more surveillance a cure?!? what the fuck is he making this statement for "we're acting kinda like dicks so we're likely to be attacked by dicks".

      in other news AQAP has figured out a new way to terrorize american interests - all they need to do is write messages to each other that "we'll attack with 100 militants sometime next month, RIGHT?!". so the surveillance that is based on just electronics is geared up for a big fail, they can spin up an entire fantasy terrorism empire that they'll be monitoring using massive resources... just by sending skype messages to each other they can shutdown embassy activities in multiple countries for far longer than a bomb would have.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:grain of truth? by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Kinda brings the whole Golden Rule thing into focus doesn't it. Maybe if the NSA and by extension our nation does want to be attacked, terrorized, and treated so much; we should consider attacking, threatening, and terrorizing others less often.

           

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:grain of truth? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's called terrorism. He is trying to terrify you into changing your behaviour and beliefs with threats.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  25. "The more you tighten your grip" by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers" Seems fitting here.

    Let's ignore that some of what he leaked was about the US more or less illegally spying on their own citizens and people in other countries. Let's ignore that not everyone feels they should be spied on by the US. Let's pretend that some of this spying wasn't getting into the unconstitutional domestically and illegal where it happened. Let's completely ignore than political asylum has been around for centuries and America has certainly granted it to Russians over the years who were equally damaging. While we're at it, let's pretend that this 'apprehending' is essentially illegal in the countries where it happens.

    Instead, let's put the focus on how a bunch of nihilists and anarchists might decide to stage a little retribution and how God himself told America they're allowed to do these things and fuck everyone else.

    Because it couldn't possibly be because people disagree with what the NSA and other agencies do, or that everyone else in the world is tired of them thinking that what everyone else's rights don't matter. There's no way that the rest of the world doesn't feel like the US has overstepped its authority in other countries. It's inconceivable that we don't think you can have Liberty if we have to give up all of our privacy in order to make you safe. People couldn't possibly be protesting because the US is rapidly becoming a surveillance state which will happily trample on people's rights while telling other countries they should be more open and free.

    Fuck you Mr. Hayden, we're not buying the misdirection to a bunch of nerds in their basement. You may not be able to understand why people are venting their displeasure, but that doesn't mean your stated reasons are the right ones.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  26. Re:Fearmongering by TheCarp · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of an old Bill Hicks rant:

    "Frightening people man. Bush tried to buy votes towards the end of the election. Goes around, you know, selling weapons to everyone, getting that military industrial complex vote happening for him. Sold 160 fighter jets to Korea and then 240 tanks to Kuwait and then goes around making speeches why he should be Commander-in-Chief because, "We still live in a dangerous world."...Thanks to you, you fucker!"

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  27. Bullcrap! by lasermike026 · · Score: 2

    Get this bullcrap off the front page. Complete nonsense.

    1. Re:Bullcrap! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

      He has no credibility in our eyes. That doesn't mean that he doesn't have credibility in the eyes of a lot of other people and most of the news media.

  28. It's resignation time. by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting Michael Hayden feels free to hold forth as an authority on the presumably private lives of his fellow American citizen's, specifically their sex lives.

    Does anyone seriously doubt that this is Hayden accidentally -and very publicly- accessing and referencing the very thing he denies the NSA is doing- watching, cataloging , storing (and sniggering at) the most deeply personal and intimate details of people's everyday affairs, in this case their masturbation habits and likely frequency of sexual intercourse?

    It's hard to keep clear the boundaries between what you know and can talk about and what you know and aren't supposed to talk about, isn't it Michael? It requires constant vigilance, doesn't it? You never know when you're going to let something slip.

    I am asking the president of the United States to relieve General Hayden of his responsibilities for conduct unbecoming, gross negligence in his public utterances, and failure to uphold the high standards of the US military.

  29. Cyber-terror attacks? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

    Oh, give me a break.

    Not every attack is "terrorism". Not every crime is terrorism.

    IF this materializes, which who knows, it might, it will most likely be cyber-annoyance. You'll try to buy something on amazon and it'll be slow, so you'll do it later. Some web sites may be DDOSed off the net for a day or three. Life will go on.

  30. Hedley Lamarr? by Blackmjck · · Score: 2

    "Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years."

    ...rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ass-kickers, shit-kickers

    ...and Methodists!

  31. Michael Hayden by fredrated · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is the kind of person that pulled the levers for the Third Reich.

    1. Re:Michael Hayden by hyperfl0w · · Score: 2

      It is true, most of the population went along with the Third Reich, Michael Hayden is in the class of "Doers" who turned idea into project plan.

  32. So what? by T.E.D. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, and arresting terrorists makes other terrorists mad at us too. So what? Either its the right thing to do, and we do it, or it isn't, and we don't.

    The real conversation nobody seems to be having is wether its worth the tremendous black eye we are giving ourselves by ineffecitvely chasing this guy around the world. The guy broke the law, so he should be arrested. But that doesn't mean we have to publicly rail like impotent babies every time this dweeb sneaks into another country that doesn't like us much. For generations people have fled places like Russia and China after saying or doing things there that the government doesn't like (but are perfectly legal here), and we've rightly used each as an oppertunity to lecture them about freedom and human rights. Well guess what? Telling what you know about the NSA's operations is a form of speech that is not illegal in China or Russia. So now they can smugly do the same back to us. So what does our government do? Why, they make a big public stink about it, so that the damage to our reputation when China and Russia throw our own rhetoric back at us is a large as possible. This whole situation has been so perfect for Russia and China that they might start believeing in God again.

  33. Not to mention... by Shark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The most important rule of propaganda: If you can't discredit the message, discredit the messenger.

    --
    Mind the frickin' laser...
  34. Re:two tales that have nothing to do with the pare by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 2

    If we could trust the NSA it would be one thing , but they shown us we can't .

    This is where I see most people get tripped up. You're wrong. The fact that they want to spy on us at ALL proves that you're wrong. No Government can be trusted, and that includes the "good" one. Our Constitution was drafted specifically with this in mind...I really wish they'd teach this in public school, but that's probably asking too much.

    They are supposed to be there to help us being safe , right now it's them we don't feel safe with.

    You're assuming that the Government wants to keep you safe. This is false. The Government wants you to pay them to think that they're keeping you safe, but the reality is that they couldn't give a shit as long as they're getting paid.

  35. Odd stereotype .... by PPH · · Score: 2
    twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years

    .... seeing as how Snowden was dating a stripper. Indeed, I can think of no better role model.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  36. Re:OT: Dehydration Question by Webs+101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, I know this is kind of OT for this thread and has little to do with Snowden, but I was flipping through channels last night and ran across this movie where everyone was in a life raft. I don't know what movie it was, but it went on for a while with people in a life raft, and they were fighting off sun poisoning, sharks, and dehydration. They tried to create an evaporation still with some saran wrap and a cup and lick the condensed drops off, the bottom of the plastic, but it didn't work. Here's the thing- so they were completely dehydrated, but the two women with larger boobs seemed OK. Why do they never talk about drinking boob milk when they're out there on a life raft or in the desert with no water or whatever? Big boobs have to carry at least a few quarts of liquid.

    I think we just found someone who hasn't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.

    --

    "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

  37. Married with children by chthon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am married for fifteen years, and have a daughter of nine, but I sympathise with Snowden, not with the likes of NSA, CIA or FBI, or other likewise organisations.

    As a middle class engineer who has to comply with all kinds of regulations and laws and has to pay taxes, I want that the organisations which are created by the lawmakers also obey the law.

    Also, whistle blowers should be by default protected by the judiciary.

  38. Re:OT: Dehydration Question by DeuceDaily · · Score: 2

    From a quick google, I found some countering arguments on this.
    I would rather address this point though:
    If you are found dead on a life raft, do you want it to be with or without a tube shoved up your arse? I'll take without thank you.

  39. TO,IH - Too Old, Ignored Him by doggo · · Score: 3

    Lest you think I'm some young, age-ist punk, he's only a decade & a half older than me. But most people who were born before personal computers were common in peoples' homes don't understand 'net culture. Or computers, for that matter.

    I'll give General Hayden some cred, in that's he served in the Air Force, and has worked in intelligence for most of his career. So he'll have some passing acquaintance with computers. But like many people his age, and from his background, he's probably clueless about "Nihilists, anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years."

    The fact that he's using "Nihilists & anarchists" in the same grouping makes me think of those fogies who say things like, "on the drugs", "hippy-hop", and "all gooped up on gop". It's a spew of things they might have heard, but aren't really familiar with. All they know is it's different... and it scares them.

    I'm sure Fox News'll give him lots of air time. You know, 'cause: Boo! Scary!