Slashdot Mirror


Excess Coffee May Be Linked To Early Death

Mr.Intel writes "Should we believe it? Those of us under 55 who drink a lot of coffee – more than four cups per day – may be at greater risk of an early death. And not just death from heart problems, but death from all causes. The study, published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings (abstract), followed people for almost two decades, and found that in both sexes, younger people were more likely to die of anything than people who drank less."

220 comments

  1. Juan Valdez by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Must be spinning in his grave ... oh wait...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Juan Valdez by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

      People who drink more coffee also have more sex.

      It's the sex that kills 'em off. But what a way to go! Buzzed and polished.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Juan Valdez by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I should be dead, because I've been drinking a whole pot every day for over 40 years. But then, I'm in the middle of few Bell curves.

      Perhaps there's no causation behind this correlation? Perhaps what kills you isn't the coffee (like you said humorously) but substituting coffee for sleep? If a and b or correlated, sometimes the causative factor is c which triggers both a and b.

      I drink a lot of coffee, but I also sleep 7 to 9 hours a night. This needs further study.

    3. Re:Juan Valdez by temcat · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I heard that coffee was bad for testosterone level? No idea if that's even remotely correct though.

    4. Re:Juan Valdez by WaywardGeek · · Score: 2

      Yes, more study needed. Here's a correlation I bet they could prove: companies where employees go through company provided aspirin bottles rapidly have employees who die younger. We used to joke that the effort and often results from employees could be measured by the aspirin bottle, sort of like measuring coffee consumption.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    5. Re:Juan Valdez by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Or chronic worry about finding the required money for the next pot of coffee?

    6. Re:Juan Valdez by 32771 · · Score: 1

      I heard your employer gives them away for free.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    7. Re:Juan Valdez by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The cost of a pot of coffee is less than about any other beverage except water if you brew it yourself.

    8. Re:Juan Valdez by Vreejack · · Score: 2

      In other news: doing something to excess might not be good for your health. Actually, that's not news; it's a tautology.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
  2. eh by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good thing they invented Redbull

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  3. RIP Mr. Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He died suddenly shortly after submitting this article.

    In lieu of flowers, contributions can be sent directly to the EFF.

  4. causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you are the kind of person who drinks that much coffee...

    anyway it's not clear that coffee is the problem

    1. Re:causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative

      if you are the kind of person who drinks that much coffee...

      anyway it's not clear that coffee is the problem

      Doesn't matter in the market, though, expect Starbucks stock to dip on the news. Wait for it to go to a sufficient low and buy, because caffeine addicts will rationalize their fear away (the way smokers are real pros at) and be back in two shakes of a lamb's tail.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Totally agree.

      I drink a lot of coffee, but it's probably the whole 75 hour work weeks that lead me to do so that are the problem (and the associated lack of sleep and terrible diet).

    3. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Starbucks stock didnt move on the news. Any other advice?

    4. Re:causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Starbucks stock didnt move on the news. Any other advice?

      Either coffee drinkers are more bound to their daily dose or quicker on the uptake of rationalization than Krispy Kreme fans, when the word got out that donuts can make you fat.

      Or people are more conscious of how they appear than how they feel about early onset of bucket kickin'

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:causation versus correlation by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most shocking thing to me is that 4 cups of coffee a day is considered "a lot of coffee". Of course I live in Seattle so my view may be a bit skewed.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    6. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stock market does not work that way.

      Stock prices are affected by emotion more than logic.

      The big people who buy/sell enough to actually affect the stock price are not necessarily the majority of people who drink caffeine in the Venn diagram here.

      No justification is required or needed.

    7. Re:causation versus correlation by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Actually, it appears SBUX peaked around 11am (about when the Forbes article went up if I'm right about the timezones), then dropped until about an hour ago, and is now going back up.

      Probably just a coincidence though.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Most shocking thing to me is that 4 cups of coffee a day is considered "a lot of coffee". Of course I live in Seattle so my view may be a bit skewed.

      There are Cups and there are Cups. Starbucks coffee, even just the straight stuff I baffle people with (when I endeavour to slum) is far more potent than the stuff I make when at the office or camping. I thin it out pretty good (you can actually see through it) and sip it, rather than wrap my mouth around the cup and tilt my head back with a sound like a toilet bowl draining.

      Perhaps there's something like a Caffeine Molarity to be considered.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:causation versus correlation by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why would you ever want to thin it that far?

      I find Starbucks coffee already too weak. I want a fork to stand up in the coffee, ideally.

    10. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. Bought some Herbal tea in a common grocery store. The real stuff. Yeah, the last two days have been hell, but I'm thinking it's a detox process so it should go over pretty soon (I'm otherwise from drinking a lot more coffee the last two years, living a pretty healthy lifestyle).

      When I say hell, I mean it: Not just headaches, but hypertension and dizzyness. Calling in sick (I didn't need one sick leave in two years, so it's up by quite alot of % here ;-).

      I need to go out more for walks, but that's about it. Oh yeah, and the Herbal tea, it was really good.

      Let's face it: What I need is hydration, not coffeine giving a false stimuli causing me to overdo things and cramp up trying to finish everything. Hydration will do many more wonders in the long run, while coffee, like smoke, just seem to give a buzz the first couple of cups. It's not even a buzz anymore, just a bit sickening in the stomach.

      It's my choice. After reading so many studies stating coffee is good for you, and having tried it alot the last two years, I'm ready to go all Herbal (the REAL stuff).
      Your choice may be different, and I fully respect that.

    11. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink therefore I... damn

    12. Re:causation versus correlation by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop considering taking stock tips from random slashdotters. Not even as a joke.

      That's almost worse than trolling "Ask Slashdot" for career advice.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    13. Re: causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      We keep the 16 M coffee under the hood. Be sure to wear gloves and goggles when handling.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    14. Re: causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Could also be pesticides. Gotta keep those Peruvian Coffee Weevils at bay.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    15. Re:causation versus correlation by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I like the commercials where they say cigarettes have urea which is found in cat pee. All I can think is, you mean they use the same fertilizer they put on all those vegetables you eat?

      {don't get me wrong there is no smoking in my house but those commercials are silly}

    16. Re: causation versus correlation by chihowa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Add DMSO and apply directly to the skin. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    17. Re:causation versus correlation by pepty · · Score: 2

      Could be stress, but then you would expect the extra deaths would be mostly due to heart problems, which they didn't see. I'll hazard a guess that it has to do with liver function. It could just be if your liver is constantly busy breaking down caffeine it neglects some of its other duties. It could be that constantly breaking down caffeine changes the expression level of the enzymes that break down caffeine (like CYP1A2), and that is what causes problems. Or it could just be that caffeine is revealing a pre-existing problem: People who can't metabolize caffeine very quickly generally don't drink 28+ cups of coffee per week. They also tend to have different versions of CYP1A2 compared to people who metabolize caffeine quickly. So maybe the CYP1A2 alleles that are efficient at processing caffeine are lousy at some other more important task.

    18. Re: causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer my coffee with DHMO.

    19. Re:causation versus correlation by MrL0G1C · · Score: 3, Informative

      Absolutely, the mortality risk from accidents, heart attack, stroke high blood pressure related deaths etc doubles for people who's sleep is lessened by 2 hours from 7 to 5hours. Excessive coffee drinkers group is highly likely to have a big overlap with the sleep deprived group.

      (sleep deprivation causes your blood pressure to rise).

      So, sort your life out! - I mean that in a nice way.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    20. Re:causation versus correlation by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I want a fork to stand up in the coffee, ideally.

      No, the fork should dissolve.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    21. Re:causation versus correlation by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop considering taking stock tips from random slashdotters. Not even as a joke.

      That's almost worse than trolling "Ask Slashdot" for career advice.

      Yeah, us random slashdotters haven't learned a thing about the stock market over the years.

      sent by my butler's assistant's lackey's peon

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    22. Re:causation versus correlation by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the fork should bend out of the way to avoid entering the coffee at all.

    23. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If most stock tips from random slashdotters are wrong then the opposite.... would have to be right

    24. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i drink therefore i... damn

    25. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drink therefore I... damn ~Rene Decaf

    26. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no fork.

    27. Re:causation versus correlation by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      There's some good research that suggest coffee consumption is linked to protection from cirrhosis of the liver (important for those who like their alcohol as well as their coffee!)

      ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 166, JUNE 12, 2006 WWW.ARCHINTERNMED.COM

      Posted from a laptop with a dying battery, excuse the poor link.

    28. Re: causation versus correlation by morganjayp · · Score: 1

      Cool, I just read that as: 'put more kahlÃa in my coffee and I'll live forever.'

    29. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the fork should bend out of the way to avoid entering the coffee at all.

      There is no spoon

    30. Re:causation versus correlation by leftie · · Score: 2

      Maybe you should consider just eating roasted coffee beans.

    31. Re:causation versus correlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there is no fork Neo.

    32. Re: causation versus correlation by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      Once we had a hot drink machine with coffee put in the chocolate compartment, without changing the dosage. About 15 times as strong as it should be. That was a real coffee!

    33. Re:causation versus correlation by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 0

      I like the commercials where they say cigarettes have urea which is found in cat pee.

      Cat pee also contains dihydrogen monoxide. Pretty noxious substance.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    34. Re:causation versus correlation by kermidge · · Score: 1

      It works. I've even seen chocolate-covered roasted beans. Not that I recommend this.

      I have a 10-cup machine, I'm guessing at the now-standard 5oz/cup. Normal fill is just over 8, so call it 42oz. per pot. I make one or two pots a day; if two, there's sometimes carry over to the next day. (I like good coffee, but am no purist; a cup of cold coffee in the morning is just as effective for drug delivery - WD-40 for the brain.)

      Mid-price dark roast, a finer-than-average drip grind, filtered water. Works. Been doing this, or close to it, for nigh twenty years so I guess I'm hosed. Have to see how it plays out.

    35. Re:causation versus correlation by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      dihydrogen monoxide is in all the food you eat and if you inhale any you could die. The oceans are full of the stuff... scary.

  5. Life without coffee? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would you even want that?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Life without coffee? by RobinH · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always love the "for the price of a coffee a day" arguments about how little it costs to start saving. What are my savings goals, though? I guess to retire, so I can go down to the local coffee shop every morning and enjoy a coffee. Oh wait...

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Life without coffee? by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      I don't believe in life before coffee.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    3. Re:Life without coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how do you save when you cant afford the coffee?

    4. Re:Life without coffee? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why I just make my coffee at home. Even if you use really good beans, Even if you buy really expensive beans (fresh roasted and all that) you can still make a cup of coffee at home for under 50 cents. If you buy cheaper coffee it can be made for under a quarter. When they say "for the price of a coffee a day" they are usually referring to a coffee you buy from a coffee shop. Somewhere around $2. So if you make it at home, you can have your cake and eat it too. Save the money, and still drink your coffee.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Life without coffee? by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      Why would you even want that?

      Well good news: Cofee May Reduce Risk of Suicide

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    6. Re:Life without coffee? by santiagoanders · · Score: 2

      Buy coffee now AND later. When you have no retirement savings, someone ELSE will pay for it, guaranteed!

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    7. Re:Life without coffee? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Obamacoffee FTW!

    8. Re:Life without coffee? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Because coffee tastes and smells awful?
      I don't get how people even drink that stuff. But then again, I am puzzled the same way about all the sugar water people tend to drink.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    9. Re:Life without coffee? by AlternativeIdeas · · Score: 0

      For the price of a cake a day ...

    10. Re:Life without coffee? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      It's even better if you roast your own coffee. You don't need an expensive roaster. Go on over to some place like sweetmarias.com and learn all about it. Roasting is easy and usually takes about 15 minutes +/-.

      My favorite coffees are from Sumatra, and I guarantee you I can roast, grind and brew a cup of coffee better than anything Charbucks can sell you.

      Right now I'm drinking a nice coffee from Brazil that I roasted just the other day to a nice Full City roast. But I'm 60 years old and I'm not going to die from it. :)

      Bottoms up!

    11. Re:Life without coffee? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Why would you even want that?"

      Not I!

      "The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Life without coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, how big of a cup? Is that a standard 8oz cup or the more relevant coffee cup of 6oz(Cuisinart machine says 5oz) ?

      Secondly, this is ok as it takes it off the end of your life. Having seen a lot f grandparents get to 90, I am not sure that I want to live past 80, 85 at the most.

    13. Re:Life without coffee? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      It's definitely an acquired taste. I didn't start drinking coffee as part of daily routine until, oh, 35 or 40. Now it's unthinkable to go without. The smell? The taste? Mighty fine.

    14. Re:Life without coffee? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Another article I read said the study used 6oz as the standard size. Which is a lot of ristrettos, so I think I'm safe.

  6. Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Possible correlation to people who drink a lot of coffee and people who work crazy hours/lots of stress/not much sleep/eat poorly/etc..

    My excessive coffee drinking is a symptom of my shitty lifestyle.

    1. Re:Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Combine that with a steady supply of a hot, tasty vasoconstrictor and perpetually, artificially elevated heart rate and yeah, you're setting yourself up for a rough time.

    2. Re:Correlation not cause by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Possible correlation to people who drink a lot of coffee and people who work crazy hours/lots of stress/not much sleep/eat poorly/etc..

      My excessive coffee drinking is a symptom of my shitty lifestyle.

      I was a serious caffeine addict for the better part of a year, while putting in 14-16 hour days - yeah, I think the lack of sleep alone, plus the spice of stress, was doing quite a bit of damage. Now I only have a little now and then, preferring tea. Life is better.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Not a statistician or researcher, so I may be using the term wrong, but..]

      I think it might be called "selection bias"--you make seemingly arbitrary distinction between two groups (coffee vs non-coffee), and you find a statistically significant difference between the two. The distinction is real, but the underlying cause may not be directly related to your initial cut.

      Possible correlation to people who drink a lot of coffee and people who work crazy hours/lots of stress/not much sleep/eat poorly/etc..

      It would make more sense to think the shitty lifestyle leads to drinking more coffee, as you say. But, there are lots of coffee drinkers out there, so the headline is sure to pull in eyeballs for advertisers...

    4. Re:Correlation not cause by Sique · · Score: 2
      And? No one ever said there was a causal connection between the two. Just a link - a co-relation, as you called it.

      And yes, there are many possible root causes for the link. One you already cited: Living excessive is connected to both early death without a dominant cause, and excessive consumation of certain products.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re:Correlation not cause by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      My excessive coffee drinking is a symptom of my shitty lifestyle.

      My excessive coffee drinking is the cause of my awesome lifestyle. You're doing something wrong.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    6. Re:Correlation not cause by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I think that's at least partly causative. The coffee enables people to work the crazy hours.

    7. Re:Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess: Coffeine doesn't affect your brilliant mind and body at all?

      Then why do you use it?

    8. Re:Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I'm a heavy drinker (certainly well over 4 cups), yet my resting heart rate is in the 40's. Rule #1: Cardio.

    9. Re:Correlation not cause by cciechad · · Score: 1

      It depends on your genes. There are different caffeine metabolization genes depending on which you have caffeine may be significantly worse for you. https://www.23andme.com/health/Caffeine-Metabolism/

      --
      https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom
    10. Re:Correlation not cause by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You can drink a lot of coffee and work regular forty hour weeks and have a fifteen minute or less commute too. (I know half a dozen people like that.)

    11. Re:Correlation not cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly I drank the most coffee when I was working the worst "do nothing" job of my career. It was a public sector position where budget and work load were basically fixed. I'd get my stuff wrapped up quickly, then have to hunt for stuff to do.

      I used to go on several coffee breaks a day just to get out of the damn office and kill a few minutes. I used to go to different ones because I always felt weird going to the same one multiple times within a day.

      So happy when I got outa there. The benifits and pay and all that were good, but damn, I would have gone insane within a year.

    12. Re:Correlation not cause by mtpaley · · Score: 1

      I agree. This looks like of the the standard news scare stories where correlation is implicitly connected to whatever correlation is trendy at the time. Drinking coffee is correlated with so many things that it is almost impossible to correlate with any health effects. The same goes for green tea, water from expensive purifiers, beer, high income, low income, .....

  7. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only started drinking coffee about 4-5 years ago because there was a great Saeco machine at work. Now I have my own machine at home and I easily drink 5-6 espressos a day. It has no effect on me I can drink them all in a row and go to bed. Sometimes I wonder if there isn't something wrong with the machine.

    1. Re: Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When puke up you rotten burned out kidneys and drop dead, you'll see the effects.

  8. I'm worried! by skade88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Death from all causes is the leading causes of death for people under 55.

    1. Re:I'm worried! by localman57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Agreed. And fully half of those people die younger than the median mortality age in that group.

    2. Re:I'm worried! by sgage · · Score: 2

      Thank the godz I'm over 55!

    3. Re:I'm worried! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death never killed anybody. Stopping breathing did though

    4. Re:I'm worried! by CannonballHead · · Score: 2

      Congratulations; leading causes of death no longer cause death for you, I guess. Watch out for the runners-up. ;)

    5. Re:I'm worried! by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Time

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:I'm worried! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to fix this. Every person has a right to an above-average income and an above-average lifespan.

  9. Not always... by gnushell · · Score: 1

    I turn 55 next month and drink insanely strong coffee and have been doing so since I was 15. Just sayin'.

    --
    home != /dev/null
    1. Re:Not always... by localman57 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh. You know how you can take your social security earlier in exchange for a smaller monthly payout? Take a good look at that.

  10. Well, I am 53... by Skiron · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and doubt I ever have drunk 53 cups of coffee as I am English, and TEA is the way. So bring on 55 - (forget the fags I smoke and Beer I drink ;) )

    1. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, Slashdot really is for old people, two 50 year olds in a row and I'm 30...where do all the young nerds chill at? REddit? oh fuck no not gonna do it.

    2. Re:Well, I am 53... by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Funny

      In American English your comment is very funny. You mention forgetting homosexuals, but you drink tea. I know what you meant, but man you are a bunch of Nancies.

    3. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the nation whose beer is famous for being for pussies

    4. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We import Boddingtons for a reason!

    5. Re:Well, I am 53... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Says the guy who has not tried out modern beer.

    6. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're all on MySpace or something.

    7. Re:Well, I am 53... by Skiron · · Score: 1

      When I was in Montreal on a business conference, my female boos told two Yanks from West Virigania "Whatever you Do, don't try to keep up with {my name} drinking. Well, we went out, and they did try to keep up drinking with me (started off with two flagons each, piss water type stuff). The next day both Yanks had hangovers and failed to get up, let alone come to work. I was up at 6. haha, my boss new too!

    8. Re:Well, I am 53... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      If they are from West Virginia they are not Yanks to us. They are southerners. They are likely religious and don't drink at home.

    9. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kill gay people?

    10. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. West Virginia was a northern state. It broke away from Virginia which was confederate.

      Oddly enough, I have been called a yank in the south, and I live in the capital of the confederacy (Richmond, VA). Not religious, though.

    11. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so you girly men got micro brewery beer , you dont think us brits have strong beers either or cant just hop on a plane to go to beer festivals in Germany, Belgium and the rest of europe to.

    12. Re:Well, I am 53... by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      Had a friend who told me a story about a time he was at a restaurant with some guests from somewhere in the UK. The jist of it was that after dinner his guests were looking for some cigarettes which my friend didn't have so they approached some burly looking marines at the bar and asked where they could find a couple of fags. In a flash moment of terror in envisioning where that exchange might lead my friend sprung up and as quickly as he could explained: "cigarettes!, they are looking for cigarettes!"

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    13. Re:Well, I am 53... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be all the Newcastle Brown you merkins import. Oh wait thats not very strong is it anymore.

    14. Re:Well, I am 53... by leftie · · Score: 1

      I got raised in VA in 70's and 80's. After Deliverance "squealed" into the mass consciousness, we thought of W Va as banjo people.

      Guess what music the kids are playing now I hate right now, by the way...

  11. is this really a correlation? by intermodal · · Score: 1

    This seems like it might be a single element that has little to do with the coffee itself. Despite the study's findings, this is far from a guarantee that the coffee itself was the cause. It could well be that dying and coffee are both attributable to somethign else they had in common. Perhaps it would be better to look at what the common thread between the coffee drinkers studied. especially the ones who died.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:is this really a correlation? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A correlation was shown, but with a 6 digit UID you've been here long enough to know that correlation does not necessarily mean causation. The possibilities:

      Coffee causes early death (doubtful)
      Early death causes coffee (impossible)
      Something else causes both (most likely)
      Coincidence (possible but unlikely)

    2. Re:is this really a correlation? by intermodal · · Score: 1

      You're right, I meant causation. I didn't proofread, so I will gladly take the ridicule for it.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:is this really a correlation? by InfiniteLoopCounter · · Score: 2

      The possibilities:

      Coffee causes early death (doubtful)
      Early death causes coffee (impossible)
      Something else causes both (most likely)
      Coincidence (possible but unlikely)

      OR

      Author of study has some terrible disease that means he can't drink coffee and has it in for the rest of us coffee drinkers (obvious answer).

  12. Where did those studies go .. by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    .. of a lower incidence of prostrate cancer in anyone drinking more of anything, including coffee? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702886

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
    1. Re:Where did those studies go .. by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Prostrate cancer? What is that, like a benign tumor or something?

    2. Re:Where did those studies go .. by ilguido · · Score: 1

      Man doth not die by prostate cancer only etc. etc.

    3. Re:Where did those studies go .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The great thing about quoting 'studies' is that you can almost always find one that shows exactly the opposite of what the new one says.

      This is because so many of them are bogus make-work for otherwise unemployable science grads.

  13. Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just because the coffee drinkers are living life faster than you "normals."

  14. Did they look at other habits too? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    I only scanned TFA, and didn't see it. My guess is it's probably because people who drink 4+ cups of coffee also have other habits that are bad for their health. I typically drink 3 cups a day, but it wasn't unusual for me to drink a whole pot a day when I was younger. I also ate lots of junk food, was overweight and didn't exercise on a regular basis, and would get maybe 4 hours of sleep a night. I'm still overweight, but I've greatly reduced my junk food consumption & exercise on a regular basis now and get 6-7 hours of sleep a night, so I need less caffeine to make it through the day.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Did they look at other habits too? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      They looked at smoking. When they controlled for smoking the risk went down some.

    2. Re:Did they look at other habits too? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      "However, after stratification based on age, younger (28 cups per week) and all-cause mortality after adjusting for potential confounders and fitness level (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.30-1.87 for men; and HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.26-3.59 for women)."

      I believe the standard next step is to assert that they couldn't have possibly checked for all possible correlated variables, and hence all studies are meaningless. If you're into that sort of thing.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    3. Re:Did they look at other habits too? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      As should be expected, smoking nicotine increase the rate at which the body eliminates caffiene, actually cuts the average plasma half life in half. This means smokers, who have a higher than average likelihood of early death, who drink coffee, can be heavier coffee drinkers easily.... leading to a bit of a selection bias if they didn't controll for it.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    4. Re:Did they look at other habits too? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also, smokers smoke more heavily when drinking coffee (just like alcohol).

    5. Re:Did they look at other habits too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite that bad. Most psychology studies, however, are just pseudoscience that haven't even been repeated to see if the results of the initial experiment were accurate.

  15. Make up your mind, dammit! by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sometimes they say coffee is beneficial and helpful.
    Or even sometimes they say it actually lowers the risk of death.

    Other times they say it's horrible and should be avoided.
    Can you please make up your minds already? |:

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by GLMDesigns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the inane hyperbole of science reporters that make the situation worse. Reporting and sensationalizing science news without taking things into context creates this yo-you effect. (As with most /.ers I did not RTFA so I'm assuming basic competence in the original study.)

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    2. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, correlation does not necessitate causation. Even if it did, it could have some positive benefits while being negative overall. For instance, of course you're less likely to get Alzheimer's if you're going to die earlier.

    3. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      It's complicated. Different studies will factor different things depending on what they had in mind when they made the study. Sometimes you're trying to look at the direct impact of something, whereas other times you want to include things which are strongly correlated too In this instance, you could decide to correct for stress, for example, which would target coffee more specifically (ie. if there is a correlation between stress and coffee, then not correcting for it could mean the actual reason might be stress but you'd still just link it to coffee; on the flip side, you might want not to correct for it if you want to highlight that relationship in your study).

      Then you have statistical analysis, sometimes there's a bit of a bias (researchers have a hypothesis they want to test and consciously or subconsciously select data that supports the result they're looking for), errors, missing factors, etc. Studies are useful in practice because they can link together often disparate elements, but they're also very empirical; they won't give proof about anything, at best you'll have a statistical result which could mean something very different depending on how you interpret it.

    4. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by infinitelink · · Score: 1

      Can't. The average idiot--in fact, the average scientist--is pretty simpleminded: it's like the news which has to present stark dichotomized positions on complex issues to get people to listen and follow and shout at one another and drive-up ratings (aka political speech). Grants would be threatened, careers (that only work by duping millions), nutritional "research" (poorly conducted correlational studies). Putting it another way: Mary Jane may make you really high or think "what's the deal"; coffee may make your heart jitter or not at all (depending on your genetics and the factors around you growing-up); [something] may or may not [something] to some extent [same stuff in parenthesis after coffee comment for almost any given substance normally consider food or drug, here]. ^^^^ Real research...would find the various combinations of values for these factors. Don't expect it soon: more of the holisticy "OMG DON'T EAT WHEAT!!!!!! Like, it's got GLUTEN and WE DIDN'T EVOLVE TO EAT THAT STUFF TILL 10,000 YEARS AGO (we have no proper understanding of evolutionary theory or punctuated equilibrium but biologists'll give us pass because we're trying to--and failing--to tie our crap into evolution)" types go into "nutrition" than hard-nosed assholes who think too much and criticize too much for peoples' liking (the kind who tend to...figure stuff out).

      --
      Intelligent idiots are we. | Evil men do not understand justice.
    5. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of decades ago when I was poor and they decided butter was bad for you. The price of butter plummeted and the price of margarine shot up, which was a GOOD thing, as I love butter but couldn't afford it when it wasn't bad for you and I had to settle for (yech) margarine.

      Like the studies you point out, then it was margarine that was bad for you, but by then I was no longer poor and could afford butter.

      As to coffee, perhaps this will bring the price of coffee down, it's doubled in price in the last decade. I hope so, anyway. I can't believe people pay Starbucks prices when a whole can of Maxwell House or Folger's costs less and lasts a month (and I drink a pot every day).

    6. Re:Make up your mind, dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, about 3/4 of this site is simpleminded.

  16. may be? by ionymous · · Score: 1

    That was true before the study.

  17. Correlation equals Causality by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every good junk scientist knows that correlation always equals causality. I am a member of the junk scientists world club. We meet every year. Everyone flys to the west to get to our meeting so that no one will end up flying off the end of the earth. Correlation equals causality is thesis of every speach. So it can't be that people addicted to coffee might be more likely to be addicted to something else as well. If coffee is correlated to death then coffee must cause death!

    1. Re:Correlation equals Causality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the other way around. Impending early death causes you to drink coffee.

  18. Oh Shit by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    As a guy who can drink 2L of coffee a day that is scary.

    1. Re:Oh Shit by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      As a guy who can drink 2L of coffee a day that is scary.

      Like the Bruce Willis movie (spoiler alert), you're already dead!

  19. I Drink Three Cups Daily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, they are all four-shot latte's, so I'm safe.

  20. How big are the cups? by Traciatim · · Score: 1

    Did they mean 4 cups as in 4 250ml units of coffee... or 4 cups as in 4 actual sized coffees available at retailers that are generally 3 measured cups for the large or extra large sizes that seem so popular?

    1. Re:How big are the cups? by sgage · · Score: 2

      That is a good question. In the US, most coffemakers are graduated such that a cup is 6 US ounces (an official cup being 8 ounces). I drink 2 good-sized mugs of coffee every morning, which is about 4 coffeemaker cups, so about 3 official cups.

      But I am over 55, so I have nothing to worry about. :-)

    2. Re:How big are the cups? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      But I am over 55, so I have nothing to worry about.

      Yes you do, just not death. I'm 61 and for the last year or so if I drink too much coffee I get the shakes. I've cut my consumption down... a little. When I get the shakes I have to pour out the rest of the cup.

      Not a good thing. I love coffee.

    3. Re:How big are the cups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 27 and I get a headache/the shakes at about 6 cups*.

      *cup = a large (20oz) at tim hortons (think starbucks with less hipsters)

    4. Re:How big are the cups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just happened to me (I'm 44). I've always gotten the shakes if I drink too much, but that amount was getting to be less-and-less (kind of like the amount of alcohol it takes to give me a hangover). Then one day, I got massive heart palpitations after drinking two cups of coffee and went to the ER thinking I was having a heart attack. I'm (mostly) caffeine-free now, but it sucks because I'm a coffee lover. I drink decaf, but it's not the same.

      My husband on the other hand can drink 5 espresso shots and barely notice. He doesn't get addicted either....can drink a bunch one day and go without the next.

      I think it's an individual thing as to whether or not it's harmful/beneficial to you.

    5. Re:How big are the cups? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I'm also 61. I used to drink about (translation: over) a dozen cups of coffee a day via our work coffee maker machine about 10 years ago. Potent cups. Except after a while I found they no longer affected me. I was not exercising enough, getting overweight, ridiculous working hours, stress ... and the coffee didn't work anymore. Eventually cut down, but still all those risk factors caused a bit of damage. Much better now but only occasionally touch coffee, my body simply rejects it.

      However, I think the parent was just exercising his sarcasm rights.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
  21. Thinly disguised non-story by melonman · · Score: 1

    They make this claim in the first paragraph and then spend the next four pages pointing out that they didn't check lifestyle, didn't distinguish caffeinated and decaff and that half a dozen other studies have shown health benefits of drinking coffee, and conclude by saying that health experts are not putting coffee on any lists for lack of hard evidence.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
  22. Should we believe it? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    After so many studies lately that talk about the benefits of drinking at least two cups of coffee a day, it's nice to see a study come out that not only seems to refute this but assaults common sense. Drink a lot of coffee? Then you're more likely to die in an industrial accident. Then you're more likely to die in a shooting. Then you're more likely to did in an airplane crash! Drink a lot of coffee and your odor will apparently provoke more deadly shark attacks. Drink a lot of coffee and you're more likely to die in your sleep. Drink a lot of coffee and you're more likely to die of old age. Of course you should believe it, this was a study done by professionals and you know how honest and reputable such research always is.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Should we believe it? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Is "Trust me, I'm an expert!" as reputable as "Trust me, I'm a banker!" ? ? ?

  23. Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It tastes like fucking shit, so it isn't surprising. Mother Nature tries to warn you. The fact that it tastes like a dead fetus dredged through elephant shit and then drenched in donkey semen should be a sign we shouldn't drink it.

    1. Re:Not surprising by mdenham · · Score: 1

      I assume you take your dead fetus dredged through elephant shit drenched in horse semen instead, then.

    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It tastes like fucking shit, so it isn't surprising. Mother Nature tries to warn you. The fact that it tastes like a dead fetus dredged through elephant shit and then drenched in donkey semen should be a sign we shouldn't drink it.

      Don't matter if it gives the buzz, I guess...

  24. Bloody Confounded Epidemialogical Studies! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    This study tells you nothing useful. How much more confounded can you be than with the lifestyle choices that associate with coffee drinking?

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  25. Blown up coffee shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How frequently do Coffee Shops blow up? That might correlate more random deaths with heavy coffee drinkers

  26. Dup comment by tool462 · · Score: 2
    I may have to repost my old comment in every coffee story that makes it to the front page. It always seems to apply. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2899159&cid=40234945

    It's not that caffeine causes us to die early, caffeine dilates time itself. We live a lifetime of productive bliss in only a few moments. Why else do non-coffee drinkers never appear to age? In what feels like 60 years for us, only a short time passes for them. They look younger because they are younger. But, they also live long enough to get Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, cancer. In a twist of irony our lives are shorter but our years are longer. We looked to the internet for the Singularity, but we should have looked inside. The Singularity is us.

  27. those who don't drink coffee by OglinTatas · · Score: 2

    Those who don't drink coffee are more likely to die in their sleep.

  28. In other news... by rwven · · Score: 1

    Excess leads to death. As if, yakknow, we all didn't know this already.

  29. Dying young but also crawling out of the casket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The future dead will be crawling out of their casket seeking for more coffee as it's a natural bodily instinct for them so their bodies can still function without their brain.

  30. It didn't take long to figure this out by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    TFA says, "...may be at greater risk of an early death. And not just death from heart problems, but death from all causes..."

    This is obviously because people who drink more than four cups of coffee a day are awake and actually doing things. People who don't are sleeping their lives away, all safe and tucked away in bed. And except for that poor bastard in Florida who got eaten by the sink hole, remarkably few healthy people die while they're peacefully snoring away in their own bed.

    QE-frickin'-D.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  31. The candle which burns twice as bright... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Fuck that - life without coffee isn't really life, amiright?

    May as well ask me to give up bacon.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  32. Where's the breakup of causes of death? by gwstuff · · Score: 1

    It's really weird that there is no breakup of the causes of death. The study (linked in the article) says 32% of the deaths were from heart disease. In the study, the graph measuring the correlation between coffee drinking and incidence of heart disease cannot be accessed.

    This makes it really hard to derive any meaning out of the study. Does drinking excessive coffee make it more likely that you'll walk into a manhole, or to have car accidents?

  33. Fits the data by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

    Possible correlation to people who drink a lot of coffee and people who work crazy hours/lots of stress/not much sleep/eat poorly/etc..

    My excessive coffee drinking is a symptom of my shitty lifestyle.

    There probably is a strong correlation between younger people who drink a lot of coffee and have an unhealthy lifestyle. Supposedly the researcher corrected for smoking but not for things like too little sleep, too much stress, etc. (Been there. Done that.) If that describes you and you survive into your 50s, chances are that your lifestyle gets healthier but you still have the coffee habit and then the health benefits of coffee consumption kick in. (There now. Doing that.)

    I'm down to only about 5 mugs a day which is better than when I was an undergrad (mid 1970s) and drinking 10 to 15 mugs a day.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  34. The irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody here having the trait being studied (i.e. drinking more than four cups of coffee a day) will actually read TFA. So those making the usual uninformed rants about the study methodology will all be on the same side of the debate :)

  35. Running out of hearbeats by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Two decades or so ago, I read an article in Scientific American that bascially said biological organs have a maximum "cycle duty". In other words, humming-bird hearts and human hearts get pretty much same number of beats before they wear out, but since their hearts beat 1260 times a minute instead of 70, they only live 5 years instead of 90.

    Now, this is clearly a simplistic view of anatomy. However, if he's onto something, then you'd expect people who regularly raise their heart rates (eg: with large daily caffine intakes), to live a bit shorter lives than everyone else on average.

    1. Re: Running out of hearbeats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that also apply to people that exercise regularly?

    2. Re: Running out of hearbeats by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      No, because if you exercise regularly your resting heart rate will be lower, which presumably will compensate for the higher rate during exercise (I exercise a lot, and my resting heart rate is 49 bpm - a real athlete's rate will be even lower).

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
    3. Re: Running out of hearbeats by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd like to see numbers on this, but presumably even professional athletes spend much more time at rest than they do exerting themselves. Thus they'd put out a lower number of heart beats a day than a couch potato. However, when a heart gets closer to the end of its duty cycle, perhaps the extra strain from a good workout might induce a failure early...

    4. Re:Running out of hearbeats by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      However, if he's onto something, then you'd expect people who regularly raise their heart rates (eg: with large daily caffine intakes), to live a bit shorter lives than everyone else on average.

      If that's the case than people who get a lot of exercise should die young. Note that this study said more folks died "of all causes". That suggests to me that it's the lack of sleep that does it; someone who gets 4 hours of sleep and drinks that coffee on the way to work is in some deadly danger (as are all the people on the same highway). And face it, people who get little sleep usually drink LOTS of coffee to compensate.

  36. I know I'm pissing into the wind, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Correlation does not imply causation."

    But, it seems our whole "scientific" (and I am using that term very loosely at this point) process revolves around that easy-to-fall-for fallacy.

    Show me the causal relationship between "excess coffee" and "early death," and I'll give a shit about your study.

  37. Contradicting studies by LateArthurDent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As soon as I read the headline, I was reminded of an earlier slashdot article from last year.

    In the linked NIH study, drinking 3 or more cups of coffee a day was associated with a lower risk of death. From all causes. This study is probably a follow up to the earlier study, and they came to the opposite conclusion.

    Conclusion: not enough studies to change your daily habits one way or another. Obligatory xkcd

  38. Large cup size? by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Since there is no legal "standard" coffee cup does the study define a cup? Could be anywhere from 5 ounces to 8 oz.

    1. Re:Large cup size? by cusco · · Score: 1

      And anything from my sister's coffee, which is only slightly darker than weak tea, to Turkish coffee or espresso. Caffeine content ranging from crappy Colombian to hyperactive Ethiopian. Light barely-roasted to almost-burned. French press, percolator, espresso, drip, Andean steeped, etc. Coffee would be a really hard thing to generate a standard definition for.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  39. Obvious conclusion: by Hartree · · Score: 2

    Bad for those under 55 years old, huh?

    So, you're saying I only have to survive 4 more years until it starts being good for me?

  40. That's why it's called EXCESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excess of anything can kill you, cause early death, generally do bad things.

  41. This just in... by new+death+barbie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Coffee drinkers studied by Mayo Clinic scientists have a greater chance of dying than NIH coffee drinkers.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  42. Excess coffee causes early death?! by mistaryte · · Score: 1

    The hell you ... ACK GURGLE

  43. I'm in denial by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    (sip) It must be (sip) bad science (sip) or something (sip).

  44. Excess Posting Of Comments To Slashdot by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    "has been linked to an early d....ACK, GAG" (thud).

    1. Re:Excess Posting Of Comments To Slashdot by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Finally, a REAL scientific study (I recall the time some douchebagger at this site downgraded me 'cause I had the temerity to quesiton Corporate Pseudo-science --- ya know, that vaccines are only as reliable and efficacious as their manufacturing process.)

  45. What does this phrase mean? by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    "younger people were more likely to die of anything than people who drank less." ???

    1. Re:What does this phrase mean? by Ferrofluid · · Score: 0

      It means that young people had higher rates of death from all causes compared to people who drank less coffee.

  46. Mea Culpa by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If a and b or correlated"

    *facepalm* Someone slap me, I must need more coffee!

    1. Re:Mea Culpa by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      "If a and b or correlated"

      *facepalm* Someone slap me, I must need more coffee!

      And, there will be outliers that don't fit the pattern (or correlation) either, possibly you in this case. That doesn't mean that everyone or even a majority of cases will be like you! If there's one thing I learned during my chemotherapy for Hodgkin's is that everyone's body chemistry is different. Everyone! Just because a majority happen to die given the same dosage of the same drug doesn't mean everyone will, and just because one outlier doesn't die from the same dosage also doesn't mean everyone won't die. This is a single study from a credible source (The Mayo Clinic for cryinoutloud!). It is just a single study and more will have to be done to further substantiate the results. But, to anecdotally say something like, "Well, I drink fifty cups of caffeinated coffee daily and I'm not dead!" is about as silly as someone saying they drink [insert harmful chemical here] and I'm not dead. Hell, look at Keith Richards! That guy should have been dead long ago with all the chemicals he's put in his body, even with regular transfusions. YMMV

    2. Re:Mea Culpa by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Hell, look at Keith Richards! That guy should have been dead long ago with all the chemicals he's put in his body, even with regular transfusions. YMMV

      Who says he's not? Perhaps the first known zombie.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Mea Culpa by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I think you got the wrong guy.

  47. When I was in university by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in university they had this environmental thing: buy a plastic 'enviro-mug' for about $5, and they donate it to the environment, and then you can get that 22 ounce thing filled for the entire year for the price of a medium. I said "sign me up!" I would make one before class at home, then have another at university, then make another when I got home. If it was early enough, I would switch to coca-cola (mid afternoon to 6:00 pm depending on the semester). So 66 ounces per day, followed by coke. Is that an issue? Does that count as 'just 3 cups per day?'

  48. And in 30 years... by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    When Global Cooling seems imminent, they will determine that coffee reduces the incidences of heart attacks, cancer and stupid posts on Slashdot.

  49. I don't believe it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's been so freaking many "studies" over the decades announed on the tv, radio, and in newspapers as well as magazines saying coffee is good for you, then entirely bad, then good again and bad again. It's like scientists can't make up their minds as to whether it's finally good for you or not. Must be the coffee growers paying off the scientists just like big tobacco made them off for years to deny that smoking cigarettes was bad for you.

  50. BSD drinks too much coffee! by plover · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is drinking more than four cups of coffee per day.

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD coffee consumption has risen yet again, now over more than 4 cups a day. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has drunk more coffee, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is drinking pots of coffee every day.

    You don't need to be a Juan Valdez to predict *BSD's future. The kettle is on the stove: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is drinking too much coffee. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to drink coffee. Coffee flows like a river of coffee.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having drunk more than a pot a day for years. The unwashed cups on the desks of long time FreeBSD developers only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is drinking coffee.

    Fact: *BSD drinks excessive amounts of coffee.

    --
    John
  51. countries average life span vs. coffee consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just look at it.

  52. Leave Your Young Women For Us Older Guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over 55 who can drink all the coffee we want! Har, har!

    Drink up, mofos! Yer next swig may be your last! Aaaargh!

  53. Maybe you didn't realize this but... by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Maybe you didn't realize it; but you've given us a rather succinct re-telling of the Mexican fisherman story

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Maybe you didn't realize this but... by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I was definitely thinking of that story when I was writing it. :)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  54. Amateurs by Lord+Grey · · Score: 1

    Those of us under 55 who drink a lot of coffee – more than four cups per day ...

    I'm a 48-year old card-carrying member of the Serious Coffee Drinkers of America. I drink my first four cups of coffee before I leave for work in the morning. My coffee cup at work is actually a travel mug, and it's never empty or contain cold coffee. I drink a full pot of coffee between dinner and bedtime. Most workdays, I drink 20-30 cups of coffee, easily. I cut back to only 10 cups or so per day on the weekends.

    I just had a full health checkup. I have no -- zero, none, nada -- health problems. Sure, my knees are starting to ache and I now wear glasses to read, but as far cholesterol, glucose levels, triglycerides, etc. goes, I'm well within the normal range. My blood pressure was 106/70 and my resting pulse was 54.

    Maybe I'll be one of those old guys that eats and drinks whatever he wants and lives to 110. Maybe coffee is the reason.

    Mayo Clinic Proceedings, I laugh in your general direction.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
  55. *ALL* causes of death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really surprised I haven't seen someone call them out on this...
    Are people who drink "excess" (whatever that means...) coffee more likely to die of suffocation? drowning? car accidents? knife fights?
    I mean really...

  56. Sooner or later by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Life is gonna kill you.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  57. Re:Looks like Mormons were right about everything by cusco · · Score: 1

    Fresh fruits & veggies, whole grains, no smoking or chewing tobacco, eating meat sparingly

    That actually sounds like the lifestyle of most of the Third World.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  58. This is why I hate academia by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

    Ok first, even though as about 20 people have posted "correlation does not equal causation", the authors are also aware of this and therefore control for many other things. So whenever you doubt the causual relationship claimed by a study, it's always good to actually read the paper.

    However in this case, the "correlation does not equal causation" crowd were right, and the authors even admit it

    Fourth, residual confounding may still exist even though we adjusted for all the potential confounders available in the present study. Smoking is likely to be one of the most important factors to cause residual confounding in this investigation. We therefore stratified the analysis by smoking status and the results are shown in Supplemental Figures 1 and 2, available online at http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org./ We did not [my emphasis] observe the significant association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality both in current smokers and non-current smokers.

    Not only do they find that the relationship goes away once you look at just smokers, or just non-smokers, but they hide this fact in a single sentence, and don't even comment on this result.

    1. Re:This is why I hate academia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why does the article say

      Even controlling for cigarette smoking, which is generally the big confounder in coffee studies, did not totally eliminate the link.

      ? Did not totally eliminate, just pushed it below significance?

    2. Re:This is why I hate academia by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      Yes that seems to be the case.

  59. Obviously by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Excess [anything] May Be Linked To [something bad]

    That's why they call it "excess".

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  60. Meh by gander666 · · Score: 1

    Meh. My coronary artery disease will likely be the cause of my demise

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  61. And in other news... by DigiWood · · Score: 1

    And in other news a new disease called "Life" was discovered. It has proven to be fatal in 100% of those infected. Scientists are searching for a cure.

    --


    Nothing is impossible. It just hasn't been figured out yet.
    1. Re:And in other news... by aristofanes · · Score: 1

      The BBC published (july 9 2011) a graph showing the mortality rates for 1961 and 2009:

      BBC News - Heart medicine advances help patients enjoy active life.html

      In 1961 CVD was 51% of all deaths and cancer was 18%

      In 2009 CVD was 32% and cancer was 29%
       

  62. Can't say no by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    Coffee has been shown to help in many diseases and increase longevity but seeing that caffeine is addictive I suspect that people with addictive personality problems will be the ones that drink way way too much. People with that problem no doubt indulge in all kinds of behaviors that put them in the grave earlier than is normal.

    Assuming that even if the study were to eliminate those with other terrible addictions such as cocaine the people that I have met who drank too much coffee also tended to be serial daters, drove too fast, drank too much pop, gambled, drank too much during social settings (even if they weren't alcoholics) and generally led lives that were a mess. I'm not sure that eliminating coffee would have added a day to their lives.

  63. News Flash by kdogg73 · · Score: 1

    Excess living leads to early death.

    My grandparents drank coffee every day and lived to be in their late eighties and nineties.

    --
    Let's face it, most of us are scoffers. But moments before zero hour, it does not pay to take chances.
  64. summary misses the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coffee is a complex mix of compounds. Coffee consumption was NOT associated with increased hazard ratio (HR) of death from cardiovascular disease. Anybody else see the correlation smoker prevalence and coffee consumption? You can "covary that out" to your hearts content, but dollars to donuts that parametric statistics can't quite get that right so I would doubt any subtle HR changes measured by the model.

  65. If that is a real question .. by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    It affects the male "valve" for peeing and can be benign although it is getting in the way after some years.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB
  66. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A study was published about why scientists feel the need to contradict themselves on the benefits/disadvantages of coffee every six months.

  67. Younger people vs people who drink less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that younger people are more likely to die than people who drink less: Younger people have a greater probability of being alive. People who are alive die with a probability of 1. On the other hand, dead people drink nothing. There are more dead people than alive people, and people who drink less have a good chance of being dead. Dead people don't die (except in rare cases when they were actually undead in the first place).

  68. If this were the case... by GarethIwanFairclough · · Score: 0

    then Janeway wouldn't have made it past season 3.

  69. Very befitting interstitial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forbes Thought Of The Day

    “ Statistics are no substitute for judgment. ”

    — Henry Clay

  70. Re:Looks like Mormons were right about everything by albacrankie · · Score: 1

    "Fresh fruits & veggies, whole grains, no smoking or chewing tobacco, eating meat sparingly"

    Me: Will that make me live longer?
    Doc: Perhaps not, but it'll sure feel like it.

  71. Go away health wowsers. by ncmathsadist · · Score: 1

    Every god-damned week yet another contradictory finding comes out about health or nutrition by yet some other tiresome wowser. Here is my message wowsers: BUZZ OFF.

  72. 2 cups, period. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No study I know of says that drinking lots of coffee is beneficial. 2 cups a day and you are fine. Go over, and you risk problems. It's not complicated.

  73. Heard that one before! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to even bother to read this abstract as I've read far too many similar studies over the decades, always invalidated and retracted due to not sampling and delineating between coffee AND tobacco, plus other drugs and alcohol. There are simply too many positives associated with coffee as an antioxidant, stomach cancer inhibitor, etc.

  74. things that cause death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    things that cause death touted to be a likely cause of many deaths.

  75. I don't understand ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... the combination of 'excess' and 'coffee' used in the same sentence.

    http://images.esellerpro.com/2486/I/473/9/lrgscalecoffee-shaking-magnet.jpg

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  76. Exact information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, drinking less than four cups of coffee a day kills you sooner and drinking more than four cups of coffee kills you sooner. By the power of mathematics, I declare four cups of coffee the right amount per day.

  77. After a career of coding... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    According to this article, I died sometime in 1986. So this is what Heaven is like? I thought it was just northern Arizona.

  78. Stupid simple reason... low oxygen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fact: The human body is capable of processing less oxygen when the blood is on the more acidic range that it swings at.

    Lower oxygen levels over long periods of time will reduce your life span. Period.

    Weird that they didn't grok on that during the study.

    Whatever

  79. Re:Looks like Mormons were right about everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fresh fruits & veggies, whole grains, no smoking or chewing tobacco, eating meat sparingly

    That actually sounds like the lifestyle of most of the Third World.

    Enjoy your miserable life.

  80. Excess of water causes early death too by woodengod · · Score: 0

    In general excess of anything is deadly.

  81. Coffee's good for you - coffee's bad for you ... by ccanucs · · Score: 1

    And then it's good for you again - and then it's bad for you again...

    Like brown bread or chocolate or any number of other things.

    A recent study also showed it was good for being an anti-oxidant and was good for you.

    Researchers really ought to talk to one another...

  82. Dear researchers of this study: by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    Fuck you.

    Love,
    Everybody

  83. On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Slashdot last year(http://science.slashdot.org/story/12/05/17/1625203/nih-study-finds-that-coffee-drinkers-have-lower-risk-of-death):
    "They also found that the association between coffee and reduction in risk of death increased with the amount of coffee consumed. Relative to men and women who did not drink coffee, those who consumed three or more cups of coffee per day had approximately a 10 percent lower risk of death."

    So, one says that three or more reduces risk of death and the other says more than four increases the risk of death.

    I'll drink exactly FOUR cups a day from now on.

  84. Excess coffee has always bothered me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never understood why some people leave a few sips at the bottom of their cup. Well now we know that excess coffee is dangerous, so finish your coffee people!

  85. on the other hand by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    People over 55 who drink less than 28 cups a week are at greater risk of feeling like they are dead.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  86. maybe different populations by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    I suspect there is a 'finding' that 3 cups/day or less is better and 4 cups/day or more is worse.
    But that may just be an indication of some other correlation such as the activities or general health/well-being of people who prefer lots of coffee vs those who don't.
    If that is true, then the amount of coffee you drink is irrelevant; it is the population you are in that is your main risk factor.
    For example, people who don't drink coffee probably tend to eat better. Period.
    Not always (most folks don't understand statistics and think that if it didn't occur for one single person, then the study is flawed. Not true. The person whining is flawed in his or her understanding of statistics of _populations_ )
    Check out other 'normal' associations of coffee use and other behavior such as exercising.

  87. needs more data by bitterblackale · · Score: 1

    ... yet it has also been shown that there is a correlation of lower rates of colon cancer as well as lower occurrences of Alzheimer's in people who drink around 6 cups/day. I think they need more data including a quantitative analyses of the results of the 6-cup study as backdrop for this (4-cup study). My guess: it evens out and doesn't matter.