Slashdot Mirror


Delta Replacing Flight Manuals with Surface Tablets

Frosty Piss writes "Delta Air Lines plans to buy 11,000 Microsoft Surface 2 tablets for its pilots to replace the heavy bundles of books and maps they haul around now. Delta says the Surface tablets will save it $13 million per year in fuel and other costs. Right now, each pilot carries a 38-pound flight bag with manuals and maps. Other airlines, including American and United, have been buying Apple's iPad for that purpose. One reason Delta picked a Microsoft device was that it's easier to give pilots separate sections for company and personal use, said Steve Dickson, Delta's senior vice president for flight operations. Another reason for picking the Surface tablet is that Delta's training software also runs on the same Windows operating system as the tablets, reducing the need to redo that software for another device, Dickson said."

244 comments

  1. My experience.... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in AMC (Air Mobility Command, USAF) we use the iPad with an OtterBox case. Hope there is a tough case for the Surface, because even is a nice jet like the C-17, these things take a beating.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:My experience.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Surface doesn't even have a BSOD. How will they know when they're going to die?

    2. Re:My experience.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      my experience on the b-1 immediately lets me hate you

    3. Re:My experience.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I always thought being a crew chief on 130s was a dirty job......until I deployed to a base with B-1s.

    4. Re:My experience.... by Cryacin · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're being given a Microsoft Surface instead of an iPad. They're already dead inside.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    5. Re:My experience.... by Fubari · · Score: 1

      that was pretty clever; thanks for the link

    6. Re:My experience.... by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      Ha! I was watching that at a friends house on her iPad sitting in a case at a 15-ish degree angle in an aftermarket case that had a keyboard. It was pretty high up on the unintentional irony scale. Good for a chuckle. There really is no USB port, though. No floppy drive, either.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:My experience.... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I always thought being a crew chief on 130s was a dirty job......until I deployed to a base with B-1s.

      What makes the B-1 such an unpleasant plane to fly? I know it usually flies low, where there is a lot of turbulence. I have flown on C-130s many times, but as a grunt, I wasn't crew, I was cargo.

       

    8. Re:My experience.... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Surfaces don't need nice cases. Have you every handled one? They're weapons.

    9. Re:My experience.... by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet another example how people think they can get by with a tablet but just end up rebuilding the laptop.

    10. Re:My experience.... by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Dad was a KC135 (SAC) and later KC10 (NJ-ANG) guy. I don't recall a stack of books or even 1 book. Not that I consider a tablet inferior to a thigh mounted paper notepad. Maybe they made the navigator carry them.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    11. Re:My experience.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I think MS is close to having just the right combination of both with Surface. Tablet touch only mode for viewing, but a nice keyboard/stand when you decide you want to write a comment or email. Lighter than a laptop and more portable.

      If they could just sort a few other aspects out like wireless charging, and then get the price right down to Nexus 7 levels I think they could be on to a winner. It's too expensive to complete with the Nexus and similarly priced tablets, not cool enough to command Apple premium level pricing. The concept itself is good though, and I'd buy one if it was competitively priced.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:My experience.... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why do we need to make everything into a competition? These are all just computers in various form factors - shades of gray. Adding a touchscreen to a laptop makes it more like a tablet in exactly the same way as adding a keyboard makes a tablet more like a laptop. Excepting Chromebooks (or if you can still find a netbook), most devices branded "laptop" in the price range of the iPad are big, heavy, and have comparatively poor battery life. If we use my friend as an example, she is a doctor and just needs to make patient notes. She wants a battery that will make it through the day and a keyboard that isn't too painful to type on. Most laptops would not be the optimal fit.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:My experience.... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Tablet touch only mode for viewing, but a nice keyboard/stand when you decide you want to write a comment or email.

      Isn't that just an Asus Transformer running a less popular OS? Why will it set fire to the world when the Transformer hasn't?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:My experience.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You can get the same thing with a lot of android tablets. Some even have keyboard docks with their own batteries.

    15. Re:My experience.... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      That was essentially what Surface RT proved by failing. The key advantage of tablets over laptops for many uses is that they are lighter, cheaper, smaller, and simpler. Apple understood this from the beginning, with their separation of iOS from mainstream OSX.
      Android did not attempt to be a mainstream Linux, and marketed accordingly. Microsoft, on the other hand, seems to have forgotten the KISS principle and tried to give us the kitchen sink when the market asked for a glass of water.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    16. Re:My experience.... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The C-17 requires around 75 pounds of paper, mostly airfield info. The loadmasters carry 5 or 6 binders of Tech Orders.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  2. "personal use" on flight-critical device by smash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Hey, Angry Birds, ya know.

    2. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that different than the pilots doing it themselves on the ipad?

    3. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Karganeth · · Score: 1

      They aren't flight-critical devices.

    4. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by bondsbw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Separating personal use from professional use is better than mixing them.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    5. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Bolting it to the plane is even better.

    6. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, we've seen what angry birds can do...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Old-Claimjumper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, Wrong!

      The FAA requires up-to-date charts appropriate for the routes being flown. The FAA has approved these as legal substitutes for printed charts as long as they are current (at Least IPads are, I assume Delta will be getting approval for these things).

      So unless they are also carrying the "38 pounds" of paper charts, these things ARE flight critical devices by definition.

    8. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Not what flight critical means...

    9. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by skiflyer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was confused as to why they wouldn't just do that, or at least just have a pool of them at each airport. Drop it off when you finish your flight and it will be updated, charged, cleaned, etc.

      I guess you're saving even more weight if your pilot isn't also carrying a personal laptop for when he gets to the destination, and people do tend to take better care of devices if they're theirs... maybe that's the logic, or maybe the logic is in the article I didn't read.

    10. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't flight-critical devices.

      Sure, as long as knowing how the plane works, or where it's going doesn't matter all that much to you. If you don't mind a monkey flying a plane, enjoy. As for me, I don't "fly", and after hearing this, I will be reinforcing the rough of my house to make it more resistant to plane-crashes, since they'll be falling out of the sky now.

      Gives the whole Blue Screen Of Death!

    11. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not what flight critical means...

      perhaps not to the FAA's definitions section, but to muggles it sure seems critical to have maps and operations guides always available.

      These people are absolutely insane if they allow the devices to make a network connection to anything but a controlled updates server. Windows zero-days are real and common.

      I sure hope the Delta security folks got their recommendations in writing.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I don't know how the airlines work, but I could picture a pilot making several flights in a day, on different planes, instead of there-and-back-again journeys. Instead of doing New York to Chicago, then turning around and doing Chicago to New York, a pilot could do New York to Chicago, Chicago to Salt Lake, Salt Lake to Los Angeles, to Dallas, to Atlanta, to New York; sometimes doing training flights as a co-pilot, sometimes as the main pilot.

      In such a case it would be helpful if the pilot had a personal device so that she could maintain an itinerary, study up on the planes she's going to be flying during her layovers, etc, rather than one that had to be turned in at the end of the flight. Mind you, the update/charge/clean concept has much merit as well.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by smash · · Score: 2

      Compare the amount of malware available for the Windows platform to the amount of malware available for the iOS platform.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    14. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by tftp · · Score: 1

      Not what flight critical means...

      I guess you live pretty far from San Francisco airport. The latest crash there, just a month ago, illustrated pretty well why it is worth knowing stuff about the place where you are about to land.

    15. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by smash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pretty much my line of thinking. Whilst in theory, iOS devices are also breakable, the comparison for instances of malware for the two platforms is night and day.

      Also, by default, on iOS, all applications are sandboxed. Whilst this may be true for metro apps on Windows 8, it most certainly is NOT true for non-metro applications.

      But in any case, I'd seriously suggest not running personal software on a device such as this irrespective of that. For a device in this role, I'd be locking it down tighter than fish's arse-hole - to the point where "personal use" beyond access to the corporate e-mail system would be pretty much impossible anyway.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    16. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by segin · · Score: 1

      And then compare the amount of architecture or ARM-capable Windows malware with that which only operates on the Intel IA-32 and/or IA-32e architecture(s).

    17. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by segin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TFA says they're buying Surface 2 tablets, not Surface Pro 2. Which use ARM processors. Which cannot run malware designed for x86. Which mostly invalidates your argument.

    18. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      You needn't worry - these are Surface tablets.

      The flight crews have no interest in using them for anything personal.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    19. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I understand it, normal practice is that the pilot stays with the same plane throughout their shift, unless technical issues require the airline to substitute another plane. Most pilots are only allowed to fly one type of plane. (They can retrain for a different model, but this takes a month or two. It isn't something you study up on a lay-over.) So they aren't going to fly a 737 in the morning and a 767 in the afternoon. (There are exceptions. The 757/767 pair and the A330/A340 pair were designed to have nearly identical cockpits so that pilots could swap between those types at will. Also, a few pilots are current on more than one type.)

      It makes sense - the pilots need as about as much downtime between flights as the planes do. If your schedule involved swapping pilots between planes, you'd get even more disruption by delayed flights than currently.

      "Co-pilot" is a misleading term. They are both pilots, one is captain and the other is first officer. Both are trained to do anything that needs to be done. 50% of take-offs and landings are performed by first officers rather than captains. (The non-flying pilot will be talking to ATC, troubleshooting technical issues and assisting the flying pilot in other ways.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    20. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by rioki · · Score: 1

      Flight crews, that is pilots and flight attendants do that, except on one plane. I know for example that Lufthansa (use to?) operates a plane that did Frakfurt, Paris, Munich, Fankfurt (or something like that). I get the idea that the device is bound to the pilot, it creates a certain respect for the device, since if it breaks, it is your device that breaks not any random one.

      On the other hand I don't get the personal use aspect. What is so bad about restricting the device to professional related matters only. It is not like a doctor is told he can use the X-Ray machine in the off hours...

    21. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They also say that their training software already runs on windows, its highly unlikely their current training software would run exclusively in windows rt and far more likely that it currently runs on x86 windows, therefore they would be buying x86 based tablets.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen fishs arsehole? They are not particulary tight.

    23. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Molochi · · Score: 1

      So are Surface2 running Atom instead of ARM? That'd be the big news.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    24. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Molochi · · Score: 1

      SOP is you train for your first plane as an "engineer" and if you're good you choose between first officer and then captaining the plane or upgrading with more training on a different plane. Though the constant divestiture of senior talent on corporate airlines I sometime feel like the baggage handler got promoted to captain.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    25. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Co-pilot" is a misleading term. They are both pilots, one is captain and the other is first officer.

      Co-pilot means "also pilot". The term first officer makes them sound like they're more different.

    26. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty much my line of thinking. Whilst in theory, iOS devices are also breakable, the comparison for instances of malware for the two platforms is night and day.

      Your statement is technically correct, but with the opposite meaning of what you think. This is the ARM-based non-Windows compatible Surface we are talking about here. I follow security and haven't seen any reports about malware for this platform yet. And it has significant protection in the new app/API model, it does run all apps in sandbox, and only running signed code.

      Not saying it is malware proof, and if people here have links to in-the-wild malware for ARM Surface I'd be truly interested to be corrected. But since there definitely are malware out there for iOS, this is currently the platform of these two on the negative side of your "night and day comparison" regarding malware.

    27. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Alioth · · Score: 2

      The crash wasn't caused by a lack of a chart. The sort of information the crew had they'd know from their briefing, even if every handheld device failed in the flight deck. The crash was caused by basic airmanship (stick and rudder) skill problems.

    28. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      It is possible that their software was written using .NET, which could run on both full Windows and the ARM-based Windows RT.

    29. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Separating personal use from professional use is better than mixing them.

      Better still is not permitting personal use in the first place. I don't think Delta is doing their pilots any favors by allowing them some personal use on a Surface. (I would say the same about the iPad - it's a company-provided tool for a specific work-related task. Don't muddy the waters by also trying to make it the pilot's personal app-purchasing, media-consuming, time-killing companion.)

      Delta certainly isn't doing Delta any favors in allowing personal use, either.

    30. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Windows RT devices can only run Metro stuff anyway. You can't install random x86 based malware.

      Of course the lack of malware for RT might just be that no-one has bothered to target either of it's users, but on the surface (lol) it does seem to be quite secure. Don't forget that at one point you could jailbreak iOS just by visiting a web site, so I don't think there is any reason to assume it is somehow inherently more secure.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Do you mean flight engineer a.k.a. second officer? Are there even any airliners still flying that have a flight engineer? I think they stopped building them in the 80s.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    32. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Amtrak · · Score: 1

      They are M$ $urfaces running Windows RT. They are incapable of running anything that isn't signed by Microsoft and why would Microsoft sign any malware besides there products. Consiquently this is why I will never buy a computer running Windows RT.

    33. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Amtrak · · Score: 1

      Since they wrote there software and have all the source how hard do you think it would be for them to recompile it from x86 to ARM? If it was written in .NET it's a switch at the top of VisualStudio. The real issue is getting it signed by M$ so that it can run on the crippled OS that is WinRT. But since they are buying a ton of tablets from M$ I'm sure they will work that out.

    34. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they have to put it in "airplane mode". Thanks folks, I'll be here all night.

    35. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delta is a bit of a dumpster diver of the airlines. They have so many variants the pilots are certified on many planes. Be that as it may, the pilots are unionized, and there are strict fences in place for certain (high paying) plane types. 747s and A330s are all going to be flown by former Northwest Airlines pilots since they are the most senior. 777s and 767s are going to be flown by legacy Delta Pilots. The narrow body fleet has a lot of certification cross over. There's just too many types of aircraft to have someone just be a MD90 pilot. Flight attendants are certified for all plane types.

    36. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They bought the Surface 2(not the pro) which doesn't run x86 apps, or "non-metro" apps, so your argument is invalid.

    37. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Surface 2 tablets can't run non-metro applications.

    38. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by smash · · Score: 1

      My bad. IN any case - my comments regarding personal use stand. Whether it's Surface RT OR IOS.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    39. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      "Co-pilot" is a misleading term. They are both pilots....

      Um, that is the literal meaning of prefixing "co" to a word. In reality, if there is a hierarchy then "co" is incorrect. So, no, "co-pilot" isn't misleading - it's correct.

    40. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Angry Birds"?

      No, no, no! This is an alias of a very specialized software called "Optimal Parabolic Orbits Planner and Simulator"!

    41. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it also says that they run traditional x86 training software...so which one is right?

    42. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    43. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible that their malware was written using .NET, which could run on both full Windows and the ARM-based Windows RT.

    44. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are exceptions. The 757/767 pair and the A330/A340 pair were designed to have nearly identical cockpits so that pilots could swap between those types at will.

      i'm sure everything is scheduled by a central computer, so the pilots can't switch flights at will. they're at the mercy of the schedule-bot just like everybody else.

    45. Re:"personal use" on flight-critical device by segin · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that it is possible to write meaningful exploits purely in a .NET language. Even if shellcode is an inline string...

  3. A third reason is they gave it to us free by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I can't imagine them doing this any other wise. As pointed out else where, this is going to take 2 more years. $5.5 mil for iPads, or $13 mil in fuel savings per year. Hmm... Someone help me with the math here.

    And in two years, once the Surface 2 gets certified, what happens? Delta is now flying with 2 year old technology... whoopie.

    1. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by icebike · · Score: 2

      Buying 11,000 Microsoft Surface 2 tablets is not "gave it to us free".

      Surface 2 release date is set for October 22, not two years, and these don't have to be certified.
      Something that can show your flight maps and NOTAMS today will show the same in two years.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can tell you, I hate Microsoft for both rational and irrational reasons. But there is one area that Microsoft beats out the competition, and that is backwards compatibility. If you want to write software that will still run in 10 years, then choosing carefully among Microsoft technologies is a decent way to do that. So if I were Delta, and were deciding whether to do this on iPads or Window Tablets, I would also choose the Windows Tablet, because Apple has demonstrated they have no longterm (or medium term) commitment to backwards compatibility. That is especially true since they already have a codebase set up to run on Windows. Remember that the tablets themselves are likely the cheapest part of this whole operation.

      The best would be Linux tablets, because then you can own the whole software stack. The only drawback is the UI situation on Linux........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      $5.5m for iPads + $xx.xm for re-writing and testing software that already works on Windows.

      Perhaps they have a long term agreement for continued supply of Surface 2's
      Good luck getting that from Apple. iPad 2 came out 2 1/2 years ago, can I get a replacement now or do I have to upgrade and re-test and re-certify it?

    4. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Then Android. Are you talking about the hot and heavy, clunky Surface Pro, or the yet-to-be-released-or-tested Surface 2?

      I'm curious how anyone would go for a yet-to-be-released hardware, versus hardware that's been battle tested.

    5. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      They are still seeking FAA approval. By the expected time for approval, this tablet will be battle tested. Plus, it'll be relatively recent tech compared with the original.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    6. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If that's true, they why doesn't my old Windows software work under Vista or Win7 or Win8? Why do I have to use WINE to run my applications? I mean there's a zillion "compatibility" options and none of them work. But WINE, that works everywhere.

      Why do my windows applications work better on a Mac with WINE from MacPorts than Windows 7 or 8?

      People who say Microsoft has backwards compatibility have never tried it! You've just read the sales literature... Oh, and by the way, the word gullible is written on your ceiling.

    7. Re: A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, windows software migration is not guaranteed. Check with any major corporation the effort to migrate from 95, to 2000, xp, to vista oh sorry Vista had to be skipped and to 7.

    8. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once upon a time that would have been true. But the reality is, now Microsoft dumped a lot of backwards compatibility with Windows Vista, 7, and 8, Windows Mobile (obsoleted), WIndows Phone 7 (obsoleted) and Apple is the one known for supporting it's mobile devices the longest.

    9. Re: A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Wrong, windows software migration is not guaranteed. Check with any major corporation the effort to migrate from 95, to 2000, xp, to vista oh sorry Vista had to be skipped and to 7.

      This is the point, right? Migrating from 95 to Windows 7 might be difficult on Windows.

      However, look at what we're comparing it against, Apple. Remember that no software sold before 2005 runs on the latest version of OSX. The Microsoft view is, "try to maintain backwards compatibility if we can." The Apple view seems to be, "maintain backwards compatibility when it's convenient."

      There are things compiled for DOS that still run on Windows today. There's nothing similar in the Apple world. Apple makes appliances, for better or worse.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      You complain about the lack of backwards compatibility for very old applications. Others complain about bloat. Microsoft has done very well in keeping backwards compatibility, but there are limits even for them.

      You have a solution, use it.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    11. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5.5m only gets you the ipad device, add an extra 10+million for software rewrites and certification and testing of the content and then you still end up with a device that doesn't even meet the stated reason they went with surface which was seperation of official and personal use in one device.

    12. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Hardware is a small problem compared to the software problem. My post was addressing the software problem, and you neatly sidestepped it.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Informative

      And in two years, once the Surface 2 gets certified, what happens? Delta is now flying with 2 year old technology... whoopie.

      If two years scares you, I pray you NEVER look at the age of some of the flight electronics in the cockpit. Some of those designs and products are over two decades old!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    14. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to write software that will still run in 10 years, then choosing carefully among Microsoft technologies is a decent way to do that.

      Better hope those apps aren't written in a language that depends on the .NET runtime or you will end up having numerous versions installed, each of which must be patched independently for security updates. Windows isn't really a bloated OS until you start piling on all the runtime libraries it takes to support legacy applications, IMHO.

    15. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by geekboybt · · Score: 1

      The iPad 2 is still available. You can go and buy one right now if you wish: http://store.apple.com/go/ipad2

    16. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Decker-Mage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I support a lot of businesses that have little to no interest in the latest hardware or ripping out and replacing their software. That came about due to them putting all their (financial) eggs in a DOS/Windows/... basket and a total commitment that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." I have no idea why you are using WINE when Dosbox does a pretty damn wonderful job of running the legacy (antique) software, especially games and productivity software. I just spent the day here segregating software by category and one of the major ones is legacy Microsoft.

      I'm running Windows 3.11 over DOS 6.22 here with no problems on a latest and greatest Z77 motherboard which I selected precisely due to the fact that it seems to be last machine with both floppy disk and IDE drive plugs on the motherboard. It's a weird job, but someone's got to be able to do it. Oh, and Turbo C++ runs on all versions of Windows to date here. Real handy for a quick filter/translate hack.

      --
      "[I]t is a wise man who admits the limits of his knowledge or skill, and that pretending either causes harm." --Terry Go
    17. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only drawback is the UI situation on Linux...

      You say that like the problem doesn't exist on Windows. *cough*Metro*cough*

    18. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "But there is one area that Microsoft beats out the competition, and that is backwards compatibility."

      Can I install my Microsoft Office 2007 on Windows RT?

    19. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the solution is the open source OS model where you officially "own" the whole software stack. Where can I buy a copy of Windows 95 since it's not "free" software it is only legal to purchase right? And so if you can't get the OS and middleware with proprietary software things like virtual machines are useless too. Add to that the registration stuff Microsoft adds to enable installations...

      The solution to long term software and ESPECIALLY with these one-offs like Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Metro, etc Delta has just cost themselves way more than porting their software to open source platform. And there's a good history of Microsoft doing lots of changes and dropping compatibility when they have very little market share. The poor fools who followed Windows CE rings a bell here.

    20. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by DDK+8.1 · · Score: 1

      You still get the traditional desktop layout on Win8...that's never going away.

    21. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Nice how you neatly dismissed it. If hardware is such a small problem, why didn't previous generations of CE-based Microsoft tablets work? If hardware is such a small problem, why not laptops, after all, it even has a keyboard for precise data entry.

    22. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by narcc · · Score: 1

      People who say Microsoft has backwards compatibility have never tried it!

      Or they've had nothing but success.

      A company I occasionally do work for dropped an old dos program that was in use since 1990 a couple years back. It was running just fine in Windows 7.

      I've yet to see an old Windows program that wouldn't run. I've heard anecdotes, sure, but it's never been something I've actually encountered. The most I've ever had to do was check the "Run this program in compatibility mode for" box and pick an old version of Windows. That happens so infrequently I can't even recall the name of any of those programs.

      What are these mysterious applications that run just fine under WINE on your Mac that don't run in Windows 7?

    23. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Windows CE isn't compatible with Windows.

      The previous generation of Windows XP tablets probably would have worked fine, I don't know why they didn't do this back then. Possibly they just didn't think of it, you'll have to ask them.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    24. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by binsamp · · Score: 1
      "I'm running Windows 3.11 over DOS 6.22 here with no problems on a latest and greatest Z77 motherboard"

      Can you tell me which motherboard? I just lost a bundle on an Asus P8H77 and an Asrock Z77 Pro due to problems with the UEFI bios even though it was turned off. I'd like to know what motherboard actually reverts to the old non-UEFI bios and allows you to run DOS 6.22! Thanks, Mike

    25. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Fishchip · · Score: 2

      Can you install Yellow Dog on your latest Mac Pro?

    26. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by jd2112 · · Score: 0

      Buying 11,000 Microsoft Surface 2 tablets is not "gave it to us free".

      Surface 2 release date is set for October 22, not two years, and these don't have to be certified. Something that can show your flight maps and NOTAMS today will show the same in two years.

      I'm sure they got a good deal on them, since nobody else seems to be buying them.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    27. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then Android.

      Are you kidding? Android has worse long-term support than iOS does, the majority of Android devices get no OS upgrades after release, even if you take the official nexus devices (like the Nexus 7) the latest OS runs like crap on it and the UI is just not responsive enough even with their "project butter".

    28. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by sribe · · Score: 1

      Surface 2 release date is set for October 22, not two years, and these don't have to be certified.

      1) Delta says it will be 2 years from now when they get this fully implemented.

      2) Yes, they do have to be certified by the FAA for this use, and Delta states they expect that certification to be received next year.

    29. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by tftp · · Score: 1

      Delta is probably confused. The name "Surface 2" does not mean that the tablet will be still in production 2 years down the road.

      As matter of fact, it'd be mightily insane to expect any given tablet to remain in production for two years. Whole chipsets get invented, sold and obsoleted in this time frame. Even if MS has the best intentions in the world (which they rarely do,) they may not be physically able to buy the parts.

      Besides, once the device is approved, it will stay in use for a few years before the next one is approved and deployed. During all this time the tablets need to be serviced. In case of glued-shut devices this means "replacements." Those replacements must be available, say, seven years from now - in the year 2020. You cannot do a lifetime buy of tablets with Li-Ion batteries inside. So how is that supposed to work? A batch of 10K devices is not that large on the tablet market.

    30. Re: A third reason is they gave it to us free by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft view is, "try to maintain backwards compatibility if we can." The Apple view seems to be, "maintain backwards compatibility when it's convenient."

      The Microsoft view has traditionally been, "maintain backwards compatibility at almost all costs." The real reason old software doesn't run well on Vista and Win 7 is MS stopped supporting the hacks the software was using. That and actually enforcing security restrictions. Seriously, it seems like every piece of old software needs to be run as Admin.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    31. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If you want a printed chart to work in ten years, wait what, it'll work in a hundred years, even a thousand years. Why tablets shouldn't be used, if you have a severe enough electrical failure to knock out the built in charts and manuals in the airplane's computer system with the large screen LCD displays, relying on a toy content distribution tablets seems pretty silly. Sometimes the manual system makes a lot more sense to stick with and the savings wont pay for a plane load of dead customers.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    32. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by icebike · · Score: 1

      Give the same OS, approving a follow on device would only require an fcc certification. Since its a commercial device that will be taken care of.

      By that time actual on line use of the device in aircraft willbe allowed. That is already about to be approved for any fcc certified devices.

      If fragile ipad can get approved it can't be that big of a deal.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    33. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't do that, because in case of an urgency or emergency, you don't want to find your reference manual on a 'installing 167 updates, 2% complete.' or some other kind of 'Do not turn off computer, its doing something important' screen. Because, you know, those updates are important and the best moment to let the user wait for them is right after they turn their machine on, or when they want to turn it off to secure it or take it somewhere else.

      Now when Delta decided on the tablet, they probably didn't know that it has the same behaviour...

    34. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by citizenr · · Score: 0

      Buying 11,000 Microsoft Surface 2 tablets is not "gave it to us free".

      11000 tablets and 19000 Lumias, Im sure they did it after researching the marked and concluding those are best devices out there, not because they got them at a HEAVY discount.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    35. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by sribe · · Score: 1

      By that time actual on line use of the device in aircraft willbe allowed. That is already about to be approved for any fcc certified devices.

      I don't think you understand. Allowing a device to be used inside an aircraft during flight is not the same as allowing it to be used by cabin crew as a replacement for their "flight bags". In one case the FAA doesn't give a flying fuck if the device crashes every 10 minutes, or has crappy touch input that ignores every other tap, or any other aspect of quality as long as it doesn't interfere with aircraft control; in the other case they care very much that it works well and reliably, and they do require certification on a per-model basis, and the Surface has not been certified, at least not yet.

    36. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by icebike · · Score: 1

      You buy 30000 devices on one order and you will get discount as well.
      Regardless of who makes the devices.
      Throw in an advertising deal, "Delta Flys High on the Surface", and you will get an even better price.

      What was your point?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    37. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the fuck is this shit modded 'informative'? There is no information there, it is barely an anecdote! What is this software? What errors does it throw up? Anybody can see that this just a bullshit post except a rabid imbecile that just wants to up-mod anything anti-Windows.

    38. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If you want a printed chart to work in ten years, wait what, it'll work in a hundred years, even a thousand years.

      No they won't they get outdated too quickly. RTFA. Also it's not mission-critical, so if it fails, no one will die because their tablet failed.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    39. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by citizenr · · Score: 0

      Throw in an advertising deal, "Delta Flys High on the Surface", and you will get an even better price.

      What was your point?

      Its usually the other way around. M$ bribes resellers with free advertising money/funds/inclusion into already running campaign.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    40. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by segin · · Score: 1

      Surface 2 release date is set for October 22, not two years, and these don't have to be certified. Something that can show your flight maps and NOTAMS today will show the same in two years.

      From TFA:

      Delta plans to test the tablets on its Boeing 757s and 767s, which are flown by the same group of pilots. The airline is hoping for Federal Aviation Administration approval next year to use the tablets throughout a flight, and it hopes to be using the devices on all of its other planes by the end of next year.

      If certification is not required, then why are they waiting for FAA approval? Yes, they don't expect it to take two years (more like six to nine months), but regardless, what does the release date on the device matter if you still have to wait for approval? Or is TFA just plain wrong on the whole requiring approval thing?

    41. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by tftp · · Score: 1

      Give the same OS,

      The same OS??? You mean no service packs, no hotfixes, no nothing? That would be a radical departure from Microsoft's practice of releasing a Beta onto the customer and then gradually fixing the most glaring bugs online.

      The OS never stays the same. You actually would be better off with an old Blackberry devices - it is guaranteed to remain the same :-) It's so easy to update software that those updates occur on weekly basis - sometimes just for marketing purposes.

      The same OS on a different hardware is just as bad as a different OS on the same hardware. Things change; but not every change is beneficial. Since tablets are heavily consumer devices, nobody cares about a weird 10K batch that some airline wanted to buy. This is what they move per week. Apple sold 750K iPads per day in one specific case. Do they care about a 10K order that comes with a mile of strings attached? What retailer needs that headache?

      This is why professional hardware costs as much as it costs. Not only servers, but laptops and everything else. It takes real money to have a product available for ten years, even if the demand for the product is small. An example: Panasonic Toughbook. It costs like a luxury item, but it's not all that pleasant to use.

      Since changes in software can easily render the product unusable (see the long history of bad patches from MS,) the certification will be definitely invalidated if you update the OS. Nobody is going to do that. And as a pilot you don't want to find yourself above clouds, having nothing but a GPS location but no faintest idea where you are, and what airspace is around, and what is the landing approach (this one is also interesting.) Try to land there without knowing the route :-)

    42. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by segin · · Score: 1

      Delta is a commercial end-user, not a reseller.

    43. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by segin · · Score: 1

      OS updates aren't so much a concern here (assuming that these devices will never be on "untrusted" networks - yes, a stretch), but Android has excellent backwards-compatibility. Applications designed for Android 1.0 will generally run on Android 4.3 without issue, within reason (given there are certain things you can do with an application on any OS that'll hinder backwards-compatibility, such as relying on certain system behaviors.)

    44. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by segin · · Score: 1

      There are always things that an application can do to limit it's ability to run on future operating system releases. Relying on undocumented, poorly documented, or implementation-specific behavior will generally cause your application to require (a) specific OS release(s).

    45. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by segin · · Score: 1

      This generally boils down to games or other consumer-specific software that use undocumented or release-specific functionality or behavior (or third party middleware that does such), or invent their own way of handling certain things prior to such behavior being "standardized" in the OS. Software written before widespread consumer adoption of NT-derived Windows releases that stores configuration data in it's install directory, for example. (While there is file system virtualization for such applications in some recent releases of Windows, it's not foolproof.)

    46. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Probably should have checked that first.

      It's the iPhone's are now only available for 12 months.

    47. Re: A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't there many people who can't upgrade to Windows 7 because it won't run their very important software? I wouldn't count on the Surface having that level of backwards compatibility anyway because Microsoft have shown repeatedly that outside their core business they can and will drop products like a hot rock at any time or to change them in significantly incompatible ways. It would be sheer foolishness to trust them not to do this with Windows tablets and Windows RT.

    48. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who has never used Win8.

      I bought a laptop because it was too cheap to pass up (under $300 for a 14" display model). It has Win8 on it, so I'm giving it a shot. After a few weeks, I'm almost ready to pay an extra $100 to get Win7 (you can only downgrade from Win8 pro for free). Why? Because you really can't use the damn thing without it forcing you to interact with Metro, and everything I do takes 2-3 mouse clicks more because of Metro. It's complete bullshit.

      For example, hit the windows button and type "windows update". Now find the one that's not the stupid metro UI wrapper around the Win7 UI that lets you choose which updates you want. I'll wait while you figure it out. On Win7 it's "[start] Windows Update [enter]".

      Now try to shut down your PC. Good luck doing that without interacting with more Metro bullshit. Again, I'll wait. On Win7, it's "[start] (click shutdown)", or "[ctrl-alt-delete] (click shutdown)".

    49. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS updates aren't so much a concern here (assuming that these devices will never be on "untrusted" networks - yes, a stretch),

      Given that they've said they'll be usable as personal devices too, that's more than a stretch, it's just false.

      Applications designed for Android 1.0 will generally run on Android 4.3 without issue

      Similarly, iOS 3 apps will generally run on iOS 7. You would in general have had to have stood on a private API to managed to build an app that doesn't.

    50. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that slogan, you might not get the customers you want.

    51. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by afgam28 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft used to be all about preserving backwards compatibility, even resorting to crazy hacks in Windows 95 to make sure games like Sim City would run despite bugs in the game. But that Microsoft doesn't exist anymore.

      It started with VB.net not being compatible with VB6, and continued with other products too. Microsoft obviously doesn't care about making sure IE10 works with old web apps targeted to IE6, Vista broke the old crappy XP apps that didn't understand non-admin users, and Office often has problems getting the formatting right for documents created in older versions. Those are the obvious examples, but there are many more smaller and more obscure ones.

      http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/APIWar.html

      Not saying I disagree with all of the decisions - e.g. the old insecure XP apps were broken anyway. But Sim City was also undeniably broken, and yet the old Microsoft took ownership of the issue and fixed it anyway.

      And in Apple's defence, they did bring out Rosetta when they started making Intel Macs, and supported it for about 5 or 6 years. Microsoft did no such thing with Windows RT.

    52. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      True, when it comes to backwards compatibility, no one beats IBM, who still supports punch cards and OS/360 (albeit through emulation). You do pay for it, however.

      But between Apple and Microsoft, Microsoft has more commitment to backwards compatibility. The Linux kernel developers have a stronger commitment to backwards compatibility, but the userland libraries are not always so considerate........

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    53. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by narcc · · Score: 1

      Install IObit's Start Menu 8.

      I'll describe it with a car analogy. Have you ever had some obscure problem with your car that makes it stall, overheat, or otherwise perform in such a way that driving it becomes a huge pain. You know that feeling of relief you get when you drive that car home from the garage? That's what it feels like when you install that program. Like everything is back to normal.

    54. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

      That was the case, but Microsoft has been making those awesome management decisions ....

      Obviously the first one was the Surface RT - ARM based and though it could be backwards-compatible with a recompile for the most part, MS won't allow you to run your old stuff on it, they want you to rewrite as Modern app using the new APIs and sell it only via their 30%-cut store.... In other areas they are dropping support for technologies they don't really want to support - Silverlight anyone?

      The UI situation on Linux is good, its just that the geek media is full of bull and hype - Ubuntu makes a good UI but the geeks will jump up and down shouting how its different and how Canonical has sold out, etc etc. Its still a decent UI that works well, even if not to your rabid geek's taste.

    55. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      Can I install my Microsoft Office 2007 on Windows RT?

      That's like asking 'can I power my TV by rubbing a balloon on my sweatshirt'.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    56. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ubuntu makes a good UI

      Dude, pass the bong already.

    57. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by UneducatedSixpack · · Score: 0

      Nice how you neatly dismissed it. If hardware is such a small problem, why didn't previous generations of CE-based Microsoft tablets work? If hardware is such a small problem, why not laptops, after all, it even has a keyboard for precise data entry.

      Battery life.

    58. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Typically, when iPhone version N is introduced, N-1 is available for about $100 off, and N-2 is available for about $200 off (normally "free with contract" in the US). This iteration, they replaced the 5 with the easier-to-produce 5c in the rotation. That means any iPhone is typically available for three years.

      Last I checked the Apple store, they were selling 5s (although they won't deliver it immediately), 5c, and 4s.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    59. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Can't buy an iPhone 5 anymore. Only the 5S or the new plastic version, the 5C.

    60. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is yellow dog?

    61. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running Windows 3.11 over DOS 6.22 here with no problems on a latest and greatest Z77 motherboard which I selected precisely due to the fact that it seems to be last machine with both floppy disk and IDE drive plugs on the motherboard. It's a weird job, but someone's got to be able to do it. Oh, and Turbo C++ runs on all versions of Windows to date here. Real handy for a quick filter/translate hack.

      Are you talking about the Sabretooth Z77? I checked the specs online, and it doesn't appear to have IDE and floppy connectors?!

    62. Re:A third reason is they gave it to us free by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's the first time they did this, and what they changed from the 5 was the outer case. The 4S is still available. There's no basis for the statement that they're only available for 12 months.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Re:Paper works better by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    I love the smell of burning paper. Or paper flying all around in a depressurized cabin...

    Can you please come up with better arguments next time?

  5. And let's not forget by kiriath · · Score: 1

    Someone from Microsoft probably performed a few 'favors' for someone from Delta...

    Just sayin'

    1. Re:And let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the day, Microsoft could get their way through bullying, lying and good ol' FUD.

      You're saying now they've resorted to blowjobs?

      I guess we all knew this day would come. Microsoft has already proved they have no morals, so the means by which they land a sale is just a matter of insignificant details.

  6. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least someone is buying any. I'd almost feel bad for Microsoft. Almost.

  7. Delta pilots don't want Surface. by GrBear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Considering the pilots fought to keep the iPads and didn't want Surface, there's more going on behind the scene here.

    http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/09/30/delta-pilots-fought-against-deal-to-replace-ipad-flight-bags-with-microsoft-surface

    1. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by MatthiasF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fanboy site takes one person's opinion and stretches it across entire group of people, fills rest of article with cherry-picked fluff from other sites.

      News at 11.

    2. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I'm sure those pilots were crawling over each other to get Surface tablets.

    3. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right,

      The delta flight ops podcast (http://www.dalpilot.com/podcast/) had the head of IT talking about using the Surface because M$ has always partnered with Delta.

      The guy doing the interview (a Delta employee) had an iPad.
       

    4. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fanboy site takes one person's opinion and stretches it across entire group of people, fills rest of article with cherry-picked fluff from other sites.

      While I applaud efforts to modernize aircraft guides, etc., I have to wonder if these will perform as well as regular print would in certain emergencies. Violent vibration is often a precursor to engine failure, for example, and anyone can tell you that trying to view an LCD that is on a vibrating surface is nearly impossible; Have they tested how well pilots can use this device in such an emergency?

      I'd like to know more about the testing that has gone into how well these devices integrate into crew functions during an emergency -- is it as fast? Faster? Will it function well during, say, an explosive decompression (or will the display shatter)? Can it be read in direct sunlight, or when heavy smoke is in the cabin? What procedures are in place to deal with sudden device failure -- do they have backups, one per pilot, one per crew?

      So far all I've heard is the benefits to Delta, the corporation: Reduced fuel costs. What I haven't heard of is how this affects flight safety. And to be clear, Delta doesn't have a great record when it comes to this -- AirTran and Southwest Airlines routinely beat them out, and these are budget airlines. Delta aspires to be the go-to for frequent business fliers, and those tickets are at a premium. Delta has routinely shown it is more profit than safety oriented, to the point that airlines with much smaller budgets routinely beat them on maintenance, training, and flight safety.

      Well, Delta... did you already prepare a press release for when it's discovered that an inability to access critical checklists during an emergency because of device failure or lack of training wasn't your fault? Or have you done the responsible thing and made sure there's redundancy and adequate training? I know which one costs more... the question is, which one did you pick.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      viewing anything on a vibrating surface is near difficult.

      Also, I think the more likely situation is darkness, not viewing in sunlight

    6. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      Most pilots want this. Plus, the checklists are still paper.

      Seriously, it's even in the summary. Pilots are currently carrying around 40lbs worth of charts. Not checklists, just old fashioned paper maps. That's one bag with just paper. Then you add a suitcase for two weeks, and a backpack on top of that. So, not only are pilots carting around a ridiculous amount of paper that doesn't get used, but they can't fly with just carry on.

      Believe it or not, airlines book commercial tickets to get there pilots to the plane they're going to be flying. With a huge bag full of paper those pilots have to go through baggage claim every single time. Plus hauling 70lbs worth of gear isn't the healthiest thing for them to be doing. Then there's dragging it to the hotel and back. Not fun.

      The big problem with testing is the pilots have to haul around the bag and the tablet. Plus some airlines don't provide a mount in the planes, so they have to carry around this big, bulky, heavy mount as well. Yeah, I know quite a few pilots. They just don't have space for that.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    7. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by naff89 · · Score: 1

      Well, reading that article, it sounds an awful lot like ONE Delta pilot didn't want a Surface. Though I'm sure we can trust Apple Insider to remain impartial...

    8. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another troll already said that, asshat.

    9. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's highly unlikely that the checklists -- the things you use in an emergency -- do not have paper counterparts. The kit bags these replace are going to be things like sectionals, logbooks, and other non-criticial supplies.

      Believe it or not, the few hundred spent printing and laminating checklists for an aircraft is a tiny fraction of the TCO.

    10. Re:Delta pilots don't want Surface. by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      The pilot quoted merely says "We fought hard for iPad". Neither the pilot nor the article expand on this, other than to allude to the timeframe it will take to roll out the Surface tablets.

      When my work laptop was replaced recently, I asked if I could get a MacBook and ended up with a Dell. This is generally what happens; IT decisions are made by specialists with the bigger picture (often financial) in mind and it is for the employees to use the tools provided.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
  8. Surface no longer minor player by Marqis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now MS has sold 11,023 tablets!

    1. Re:Surface no longer minor player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like 11,003

    2. Re:Surface no longer minor player by AdamStarks · · Score: 1

      Only 628,977 left to go!

  9. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft tablets, huh? So what happens when the tablet succumbs to the inevitable blue screen of death?

    1. Re:Uh oh by linear+a · · Score: 1

      I dunno, maybe use the copilot's one or the spare? Or not take off is something zaps them all at once.

    2. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each tablet should come with a lucky rabbit's foot and a Micky-d child's meal compass toy, just in-case.

    3. Re:Uh oh by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      From the classic dual engine failure to new dual tablet failure?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  10. Re:Paper works better by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    What happens if the aircraft depressurizes?

    They attach Charlton Heston to a cable and drop him in from a helicopter.

    He wouldn't need any maps or manuals to land that bird.

  11. Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surface you said ? They aren't simply replacing the manuals with electronic tablets but with Surfaces ? Dear god.

  12. BSOD by GrBear · · Score: 1

    Blue Sky of Death

    1. Re:BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, will it be able to be towed back to port?

      [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Yorktown_(CG-48)]

    2. Re:BSOD by slash.jit · · Score: 1

      What would you like for dinner Sir? Oh wait I just got a BSOD on my iPad, Please wait while I do a Control+Alt+Delete. I will get back to you shortly.

  13. Re:Paper works better by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Same as all the other electronics in the plane. Nothing.
    The skin is a Faraday cage. That is why you've never heard of passengers complaining of that problem and why fly by wire planes don't fall out of the sky.

  14. Not flight critical by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Informative

    My understanding* is that many airlines are doing this, and the flight critical standard and emergency check-lists are still kept in hard copy. The material no longer on paper will be things like approach maps for a few hundred airports, and manuals for seldom-adjusted aircraft systems. Should such documents be required but unavailable due to misfunctioning tablets, air traffic controllers and the airline's dispatch centre would be able to assist by radio.

    If there is a real pilot in the house, perhaps they could comment further.

    * I am a non-pilot with an interest in aviation, so I try to follow such developments via internet news sites.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Not flight critical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is a real pilot in the house, perhaps they could comment further.

      I really hope there is no pilot checking Slashdot while at work...

    2. Re:Not flight critical by kybur · · Score: 2
      I flew for the airlines up until 2005, well before the tablets in the cockpit.

      None of the airlines are replacing critical paper copies with an electronic version. Historically, there would be three copies of all the manuals and charts, one for the captain, one for the first officer, and one for the airplane.

      The iPads replace the 40 pounds of paper that each pilot used to be required to carry.

      The aviaion industry is probably the most cautious and slow moving industry out there (in response to the poster who brought up decades-old technology in the cockpit). Pilots welcome the new technology -- it usually makes their jobs easier, but it must pass an unbelievable amount of scrutiny (over the course of many many years) before it can actually completely replace an older, but proven tech.

    3. Re:Not flight critical by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      I flew for the airlines up until 2005, well before the tablets in the cockpit.
      None of the airlines are replacing critical paper copies with an electronic version. Historically, there would be three copies of all the manuals and charts, one for the captain, one for the first officer, and one for the airplane.

      The iPads replace the 40 pounds of paper that each pilot used to be required to carry.

      The aviaion industry is probably the most cautious and slow moving industry out there (in response to the poster who brought up decades-old technology in the cockpit). Pilots welcome the new technology -- it usually makes their jobs easier, but it must pass an unbelievable amount of scrutiny (over the course of many many years) before it can actually completely replace an older, but proven tech.

      Actually, the impetus came from the pilots themselves. When Apple released the iPad in 2010, many pilots immediately saw the possibilities - there are many, many, MANY aviation apps for iOS. And these aren't dinky calculator apps meant to help you with your flight planning, either. They included maps, moving maps with geo-referenced plates (granted, the GA cockpits were having geo-referenced plates for years before the iPad), etc.

      And the big reason was - it's CHEAP. An iPad for $500, plus a GPS add on (another $500) was all you needed. Which for the pilot flying VFR, saved $25K worth of avionics upgrades and still got them what they'd use those avionics for.

      Hell, these days there are GPS and ADS-B add-ins for $900, and it's still cheaper than getting ADS-B in your avionics, even if you buy an iPad solely for it.

      Android's getting there, too.

      Windows probably had the first EFB apps (there were people selling preconfigured tablets for $5000 (still cheap) with full EFB capabilities. This was Windows XP tablet edition, though. Of course, you had to have ship power for it as tablets rarely lased much beyond 2 hours. An iPad or Android tablet can last far longer. Even then, newer planes have USB ports for power.

      The non-GA industry is being forced because a lot of commercial pilots fly recreationally, and the equipment in their GA aircraft are often a lot better than what they have in their bread and butter jets (even the latest ones). Heck, old hat things like having a plate on the MFD for reference usually doesn't exist (nevermind geo-referenced ones).

    4. Re:Not flight critical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is interesting is that the hard copies are only required for a certain period, after that you are not required to have them.

  15. They're saving only 38 pounds.. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Why don't they connect the thing directly to the autopilot and save about 350 pounds? And on top of that, they could save even more money on the pilot's salary.

    They could also replace the stewardesses with motorized food carts, or even better, just put the tiny bags of peanuts (all three of them) in the seat pockets in front of you.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the way you think. I haven't seen an attractive stewardess since 1999. I'm guessing they all quit after 2001.

    2. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by iggymanz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      fly an asian airline sometime, they're still sexist. and, in this case, that's a good thing.

    3. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you don't understand. on an american airline, the stewardess sells $2 bags of peanuts, $2 soda, $5 beer and $6 wine (was july a vintage month?)

    4. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The flight attendent (lets be at least a little recent here) isn't their for the food or booze. They're there because the regulators (e.g. FAA) say they have to be. Its about passenger safety, not pretzels.

    5. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by Gogo0 · · Score: 2

      a (western airline) stewardess once told me that on long-haul or flights that have interesting destinations, the flight attendants with seniority get the assignment. thats why you see so many oldies on european/asian flights.

      as the other reply to your message stated, asians dont play that game. they only hire young cute girls (and the occasional young guy for some reason -maybe to lift things) to staff the aisles and ticket counters, sometimes also the security gate. makes the occasional pat-down far more pleasant, and flying overall much more bearable.

    6. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      you don't understand. on an american airline, the stewardess sells $2 bags of peanuts, $2 soda, $5 beer and $6 wine (was july a vintage month?)

      Are things really that bad?

      Most stewards and stewardesses will have advanced levels of first aid training. I know a few on Asian and Australian airlines and basic first aid is mandatory before setting foot on a commercial flight as cabin staff. If you have any problems mid-flight, you'll be relying on them to save your life.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:They're saving only 38 pounds.. by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      I heard from one of my pilot friends. The Asian airlines don't just do that with the flight attendants. They also do it with the pilots.

      See also Asian Flight 214

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
  16. Re:Paper works better by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re What happens if the aircraft depressurizes?
    In the old days with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airways_Flight_5390 and your guided down.
    http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/1-1992%20G-BJRT%20Append.pdf
    So the loss of tablet computer or charts is understood. The other aspect is keeping the tablet up to date eg. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossair_Flight_3597#Final_report.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. please turn off all electronic devices by jasontheking · · Score: 2

    hey, can't you see I'm RTFMing ?

  18. At least Microsoft can now say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That they've sold more than 10K of them. If they get really lucky, maybe they'll sell 20K - over half way there.

  19. They were free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Posting as AC for obvious reasons but I work for a major airline and Microsoft tried to do this exact thing to us. They offered to give them to us for free too but the backlash was too much. It's true the $0 up front makes the ROI reasonable (remember the ROI still includes project cost). The internal push back was enough that MSFT dropped it because they didn't want to impact there $2m++ enterprise agreement when they found out our exec's only wanted iPad's.

    The only people pushing these shitty Surfaces is the out of touch internal IT management and Microsoft. Pilots, Exec's, internal customers and guests do NOT want these. It's iPad or "Samsung tablets" or nothing.

    1. Re:They were free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You story smells of BS. firstly a 2m enterprise agreement puts you as a tiny enterprise, if you could even call it that. secondsly how is this the same thing, these are for pilots not for fashion conscious execs that care more about looks than function.

  20. Re:Paper works better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, the same thing would happen to the tablet as what happens to the rest of the aircraft. Oh! What about the HF radios? What about the VHF radios? What about the radar and ident systems? What about the GPS, and the flight control computers? Oh? The lightning strike hits the metal skin of the aircraft, and continues on through the air. The lightning strike doesn't kill anyone onboard either, and none of their phones. Clearly you never studied Electronics Engineering. Perhaps you think when lightning hits your car, you are safe because of the rubber tires. And in is similar vein, your tablet (or any other electronic device) will magically burn up when the skin of the aircraft gets hit by lightning. Oh Noes. Now there are reasons why any microsoft product is brainlessly stupid for this, but that's another matter.

  21. Re:Paper works better by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    What happens when a stack of paper is struck my lightning? It burns. A tablet won't survive that either though.
    What happens to you when the plane is struck by lightning and you're inside? Nothing. No ones laptop gets fried, none of the cargo gets fried, none of the passengers and none of the planes systems.

    de-pressurising? The pressure is only going to go from 77kpa to ~35kpa, depending on the altitude. It's not like a plane is pressurised to sea level.
    It's not like that crate of tablets in the cargo hold is going to explode because if it, with no moving parts, what is going to change if the device is powered on? Nothing.

  22. Bye bye Delta by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

    I'd rather not have my plane controlled by anything Microsoft. If you want to save weight, prohibit fatties from flying or charge them more. I'm sorry navigating a multi-ton airplane at 500+mph is hard... but it is. It's just science.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Bye bye Delta by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Well, breathe easy dude. The tablets aren't controlling anything.

      They're electronic manuals. No more, no less.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Bye bye Delta by Fishchip · · Score: 1

      But let's not allow that to get in the way of a good old circle jerk of Microsoft hate.

    3. Re:Bye bye Delta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1995 called, M$ crashing jokes are a little old...

  23. The only problem with the Surface tablets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pilots have complained that the displays are covered by a fine layer of Arizona desert sand that is virtually impossible to scrub off.

  24. Possible reasons? by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft would have offered a very sweetheart deal pricewise for this.

    From Delta's standpoint it would also have the advantage in that almost nothing runs on it, meaning that people aren't going to muck with it install crap software and malware on the Surface RT is all but unheard of. They also almost certainly would have offered some type of enterprise management tools for the tablets from MS.

    Enterprise support for the Ipad is a royal pain at best and tools are quite limited. The app store is oblivious to the concept that a computer could be owned my a company instead of a person. Support issues go far beyond these and their IT department doubtless didn't want to deal with it.

    I'm not endorsing the Surface RT and I've certainly gone on the record here about how it's a terrible tablet. I'm just explaining the logic behind the order. They certainly could have made a much better choice than the Surface RT.

    1. Re:Possible reasons? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      They also almost certainly would have offered some type of enterprise management tools for the tablets from MS.

      I know System Center and Intune can manage RT devices.

    2. Re:Possible reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The airlines using iPads are using Airwatch MDM to deal with their own app stores and walled gardens.

    3. Re:Possible reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "sweetheart" you mean effectively negative pricing, you are probably in the ballpark.

    4. Re:Possible reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mention in some articles that Delta's IT department is heavily invested in MS seems a bigger deal. If they deal with desktop Windows and MS phone devices, then support might be extended to Surface tablets at low cost, whereas iPad isn't so friendly to corporate control.

  25. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My iPad has only locked-up once in three years. The Surface I use for work locks-up several times a week. Do we really want something so unreliable in the cockpit?

  26. Turbulence ahead by Solandri · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another reason for picking the Surface tablet is that Delta's training software also runs on the same Windows operating system as the tablets, reducing the need to redo that software for another device, Dickson said."

    Considering they bought the ARM version of the tablet, someone's going to be very disappointed (and probably in a lot of trouble) when they discover that it does not run the same operating system as their training software. At least not unless their training software only runs on an extremely limited number of low-power computers.

    Good news is, Microsoft's deception campaign to trick people expecting to run Windows apps into buying their ARM OS is working.

    1. Re:Turbulence ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they're aware of the differences and are tweaking the software to account for necessary changes. Delta, or any airline or major corporation for that matter, doesn't employ idiots.

    2. Re:Turbulence ahead by citizenr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they're aware of the differences and are tweaking the software to account for necessary changes. Delta, or any airline or major corporation for that matter, doesn't employ idiots.

      AHAHAHAHaha, you got me till the last ascertainment

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    3. Re:Turbulence ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they're aware of the differences and are tweaking the software to account for necessary changes. Delta, or any airline or major corporation for that matter, doesn't employ idiots.

      AHAHAHAHaha, you got me till the last ascertainment

      Ditto.

      After working in the corporate world, the only thing I *AM* sure of is that all corporations employ many idiots. They may have been excluded from this decision, but they are there, wandering the halls, desperately looking for help to do the most simple of tasks.

  27. Re:Paper works better by cdl · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Ahh - well, the plane is a sealed metal tube, right? And the pad is in the sealed metal tube right? What else can we call a sealed metal container.... wait for it.... A Faraday cage. That's right kiddies, If a plane gets hit with lightening, it will charge the skin of the plane, but not induce a current inside of the plane - this is why existing electronics in planes aren't fried. Yes, they are flight qualified, but all the laptops that the punters have in the plane don't get fried, the entertainment system doesn't get fried - basically, lightning isn't a big worry. I'm much more worried about other lightening effects (surface damage, fuel ignition - pretty sorted by now, etc) Now let's talk about depressurization. A computer with rotational media (a hard drive, where air pressure helps float the heads off of the platter) would probably not be too happy about having the air pressure radically change, especially in the downward direction - something about heads plowing little furrows in the disk surface. Similarly, devices that move air to cool their electronics might get a bit warm with the fans blowing a lot less N2 molecules over the heat exchangers. Which of these systems does a pad have? Microsoft may be less than brilliant when it comes to many of their business activities, but I don't even think that Monkey Boy would sign off on a tablet that had either a hard drive or a fan for cooling. So, what's going to be killed by depressurization? If you say the LCD, I'll slap you (lightly) so you'll look up and see the glass cockpit staring you in the face. Better arguments, please.

  28. I'm sure the pilots will not want to see this... by rmadhuram · · Score: 1

    while trying to find information on the airport just about to land.

    Error reading flash drive
    Abort, Retry, Ignore?_

  29. WinRT training software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they training software provider had already ported their product to RT. Does the .Net ARM desktop route work with enterprise side-loading keys?

  30. two decades? Active military planes 60 yrs old by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Never mind two decades, the friggin air force has bombers in active service that were built in the 1950s.

    An airplane doesn't need to play the newest version of angry birds, it needs to avoid injesting large birds.

    It's not like they run Windows, so they're overrun with viruses if they aren't updated weekly. Oh shit.

    1. Re:two decades? Active military planes 60 yrs old by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      the friggin air force has bombers in active service that were built in the 1950s.

      But much like some famous women of the same era, they've had a lot of work done up front to keep them serviceable.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  31. Now I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do I find these? Local landfill?

  32. Don't hire Steve Dickson by tooyoung · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other words, think long and hard about having Steve Dickson make purchasing decisions for your company in the future....

  33. Good luck by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    I hope these work out a lot better than the Microsoft mobile scanners that we use on the ramp and in cargo to track bags/cargo. I'm 30 yards from the damn wireless transmitter and I lose signal at least once a day. Inside a giant warehouse. But yeah, I imagine they went with Microsoft tablets because most of the other computer systems Delta uses is Microsoft, so it streamlines things. However, over the past 6 months or so they have started to give out iPhones as company issued phones to managers and supervisors in the headquarters, but the ones on the ramp and other areas still use Blackberries.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  34. We've just enabled terrorists in hacker versions.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pilot keeps his personal stuff on his tablet running windows, eh? Now there's a nice pathway for a virus... one that modifies the electronic manuals to display wrong flight paths or instructions for necessary maintenance.

    Why hijack a plane when Mr. terrorist can sit back in his chair and hijack the tablet, causing the same damage?

    These things should never be on a public network, and never have personal information or applications place on them.

  35. Re:Paper works better by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    nothing, nothing at all would happen cause its not hitting the freaking tablet and there are entire systems on board to take care of such an event

  36. Re:Oh, hell no. by linear+a · · Score: 1

    You prefer maybe an Apple device built with a totally-compelling user interface?

  37. Oh fuck, not this argument again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Dick Wet 2013 RT vs. Microsoft Vista vs. Microsoft Blow Job .NET 2003

  38. Re:I'm sure the pilots will not want to see this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siri: I didnt understand that....

  39. Re:That comparison lacks context. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Here's another lacking just as much, leading to a different conclusion. In 2006 Mac OS X 10.4 was the most recent version of OS X and it would run magnificently on an iMac from 1999 meanwhile Windows Vista was the most recent version of Windows and it would barely run on the hardware of 2005.

    You're talking about forward compatibility of the hardware, which is a different topic altogether.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  40. but winRT is not Win8 by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    so they can't just buy the el-cheapo $800 surface, they need the $1400 surface pro. may as well buy a laptop at that pricepoint.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  41. 2015: Top Delta pilot software download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As part of the deal, a new port of Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator will be released for Surface 2

    "Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. Sorry about the rough ride, and the attendants will assist you back into your seats, but I had Adolf Galland on my tail and couldn't shake him..."

  42. A Pit of Cock by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Sir, the plane is not responding!
    What does the flight manual say to do?
    Nothing! But, the Autopilot said to "Sit on the damn tablet and rotate" before it stopped talking to me!

  43. Nothing to see here folks by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    So in case of flight emergency the flight crew will have the speed of windows search to find the correct procedures. I feel safer already...

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  44. training software also runs on same sys as tablets by citizenr · · Score: 1

    Wow. I didnt know Delta was using Windows RT internally for all those years .......

    Looks like M$ is in panic mode and giving surfaces away for free just to get some PR and traction.

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  45. Re:I'm sure the pilots will not want to see this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solution: carry 3 or 4 for extra redundency?

  46. mmhmmm by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    That's about equal really because my map and books run out of batteries all the time. Don't even get me started on how often the flash memory in them fails or that I drop it and it shatters.

  47. About time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this fairly common at this point? As I recall, both SAS and Norwegian have already been on the "digital flight documents" system for some time and they are hardly alone.

    So what's new?

  48. It is required to REPLACE the books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now, they have to fly with both the tablet and the physical books until the device is approved.

    In case of emergency, they have to use the OFFICIAL books and not software version.

  49. Just needs a recompile and retarget! by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Luckily, all they have to do is retarget their VB apps for the Windows RT runtime...right? RIght? Isn't that what the rep said?

    Anyone? Anyone?

    1. Re:Just needs a recompile and retarget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's more or less how I interpreted it. That they were talking about "redoing" the software, implies they have the source code, and tweaking it for Windows RT is a lot less work that tweaking it to run on Android or iOS.

    2. Re:Just needs a recompile and retarget! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programs written in .NET will run without a recompile. But why ruin your FUD?

  50. Looks like a Surface Pro. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    As the main advantage cited is compatibility with existing training software, we can probably rule out Windows RT. The Pros I can understand, they are basically just conventional PCs in tablet form factor.

    No-one wants a windows RT machien though. If you gave me one, I'd ebay it - and when it didn't sell, strip it down for parts.

    1. Re:Looks like a Surface Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't say their software would run without alteration, just that it "reduces the need to redo the software". And when they are buying that many of them it is probably cheaper to get their Windows training software running on a RT tablet than paying the difference in cost for the Pros.

  51. Scada / Ada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey the pilots could get supervisory control over the planes Ada and/or Scada systems giving them technology at their fingertips that is above and beyond what the aircraft normally offers and avoiding an expensive systems upgrade. Security would be a major concern though.

  52. pun warning by Forget4it · · Score: 1

    Sure they'll work fine on the surface, it's when they get in the air I'd begin to worry.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is the study of how to make real computers act like the ones in the movies.
  53. So they will have two tablets? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Because most Delta pilots already have an ipad with all the other things they need. I have two friends that fly for delta and have been using the ipad in the cockpit for over 2 years now.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  54. The reason is very simple by Begemot · · Score: 1

    The Windows store is almost empty - less distractions for the users (pilots!).

    They might also get a special custom tailored version of Windows that doesn't allow installing apps.

    OTOH, it's quite dangerous as well, pilots may fall asleep of boredom ;)

  55. Re:training software also runs on same sys as tabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows RT is Windows 8 compiled for ARM, more or less. It will be a lot less effort to port it to RT than it would be for iOS.

  56. Hello to 1993 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1993, I was working on a NASA project to make electronic documents the norm for flight operations - space, airplanes, mechanics, flight controllers, everyone. Our $3M project paid for itself after a few shuttle flights - just in the lack of paper to be carried into orbit.

    Boeing was interested in using this for their manuals.

    There are issues with not having paper and it takes a little effort and belief to make the switch-over. Flight controllers rejected the solution and were using paper again in about 2 yrs. I think the space station and shuttle used it for many years - they probably still do. In a cockpit, things are tight and having access to seldom-used documents on a pad, is probably find, but replacing daily use documents probably is NOT the best use.

    I switched to ePub, html, and PDF documents about 15 yrs ago. I always strip any DRM, but honor the intent of the license. My tablet (Android) has 200+ books and reference items on it. I am not thrilled with the viewing programs available. Each seems more interesting in tracking my reading than anything else.
    HTML is the best format - cross-platform, enough layout control, but not too much. Handles images nicely. Allows font scaling easily - text wraps automatically.
    Epub a close 2nd - PDF is the worst.

    The purpose of the documents matters. Occassional reference and I'm happy for pilots to have - critical checklists .. not so much.

  57. anyone else feel safer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that the pilot's flight manuals run on batteries? Can be destroyed by dropping it? Is vulnerable to coffee spills?

  58. Maybe Paul Allen made it part of the deal by iccaros · · Score: 1

    The Sounder and Seahawks just Signed Delta as their flight provider, Paul Allen has been known to use one deal to strike another... http://news.delta.com/index.php?s=43&item=2109 maybe that is why they went Surface..

  59. BSOD by mythix · · Score: 2

    New meaning for Blue screen of death in 3...2...1...

  60. Microsoft incompatibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Microsoft drop support for 16-bit apps under Win7? Or was it earlier?

    As in, your actual old 32-bit application will run fine. But the 16-bit installer won't work anymore so you have to install it on another older (WinXP) machine and try to copy everything over, files and registry entries included. Classic Microsoft "compatibility".

    Anyone ever heard of the pallet bug where all the colors are off? Try running StarCraft on Win7! There are workarounds, manual registry hacks, third party open-source kludges to fix Microsoft's bugs. But this compatibility is a joke.

  61. Takeoff and landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So...do they have to turn these things off for takeoffs and landings?

    Kinda defeats the purpose...

  62. What? No comments on safety? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    "Please make sure your electronic devices are powered off during take off and landing."

    I mean, they're dangerous (!), so pilots can't use them during critical flight time. Right?
    I know, we're about to have this restriction reset thanks to hindsight and sanity.

  63. Sure by The+Cat · · Score: 1

    What could go wrong?

  64. Great... by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    That brings the grand total of Surface tablets sold to 11,001.

  65. Corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're obviously corrupt, buying the cheaper and better device... Sounds like the Apple police need to teach them a lesson about the dangers of ignoring the cartel...

  66. Re:I'm sure the pilots will not want to see this.. by UneducatedSixpack · · Score: 0

    MS DOS 6.22 tablet? Cool!

  67. Not surprised by terrywirth5 · · Score: 1

    As a lifelong Microsoft hater, I have to admit that I love Windows 8, especially on a tablet for too many reasons to list. Yes, I have mastered virtually every OS since PC-DOS and have extensive experience with both iOS and Android tablets. Bottom line is that Win 8 works with damn near anything and MS deserves credit. I invite you to flame on.

  68. Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pilots usually know pretty well where they are going to be flying ahead of time. I know that I would always have backup paper with me for the usual trips. Don't worry about the 38 lbs. It is on wheels.

  69. And the #1 reason is... by gstrickler · · Score: 1

    ...they don't have to worry about anyone stealing them, since there is almost no market for them.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false