Slashdot Mirror


Google Patents Fooling Friends With Snooping, Chatbots

theodp writes "Google takes Scroogling to new heights with its just-patented Automated Generation of Suggestions for Personalized Reactions in a Social Network, which not only data mines "e-mail systems, SMS/MMS systems, micro blogging systems, social networks or other systems" to get the buzz on your social circle, but also uses the data it collects to make like ELIZA and formulate appropriate responses for you to send as if they were your own (e.g., 'Happy Birthday, Mom!). Wouldn't Turing be so proud! From the patent: 'In a third example, a friend, David, sends Alice public or private message of a particular but regularly encountered message type (e.g., "how are you doing?" a common way to greet someone in the United States). The suggestion generation module suggest a good set of reactions to David, for example, based on the professional profile of David from the social network indicating that David has changed employers. The suggestion generation module generates a reply message such as "Hey David, I am fine, You were in ABC corp. for 3 years and you recently moved to XYZ corp., how do you feel about the difference, enjoying your new workplace?" The content of this suggestion are based on 1) prior conversations between Alice and David, 2) previous messages sent by Alice to other friends and 3) messages (sent by other connections in Alice's friend circle to David) which are either publicly or privately accessible to Alice, or some combination of these. Thus, the suggestion generation module generates messages that are personalized based upon both the sender and recipient using information that is accessible (public or private) to the sender.' Looks like Facebook may not be the only one strip-mining human society!"

81 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. Think for yourself. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

    As with any business, you have to make the most of exploiting the useful things it does, and try your best to ignore the shit it tries to feed you, no matter how convenient it seems.

    1. Re:Think for yourself. by somersault · · Score: 1

      My best friend has been trying to feed me all kinds of Christmas-y German shit recently. Thankyou for your advice.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Think for yourself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As with any business, you have to make the most of exploiting the useful things it does, and try your best to ignore the shit it tries to feed you, no matter how convenient it seems.

      You have a profound lack of understanding of what Google does and what
      Google plans to do.

      The consequences of using Google for ANY of its services will be far-reaching and
      quite beyond the control of the individual user to remedy.

      There is only one intelligent choice for those of us who actually do grasp the
      full ramifications of using Gmail, Google+, or Google search, and that is
      to NOT USE ANY GOOGLE SERVICES, period.

      ( captcha = retain. )

      As in " Google will retain everything it knows about you,
      forever.

      /

    3. Re:Think for yourself. by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Hats off.

    4. Re:Think for yourself. by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Resistence is futile.

  2. The hell? by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey David, I am fine, You were in ABC corp. for 3 years and you recently moved to XYZ corp., how do you feel about the difference, enjoying your new workplace?

    If I received a text like that I'd know it was from a bot. I am fully aware I was in ABC corp for 3 years and I recently moved to XYZ corp, I don't need a reminder.

    How about:

    How's the new gig?

    Hm, maybe I better patent bots that actually talk like a human?

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:The hell? by somersault · · Score: 1

      How's the new gig?

      Hm, maybe I better patent bots that actually talk like a human who was born in the 70s?

      FTFY ;) You should patent a system that can emulate various demographics..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:The hell? by RandomUsername99 · · Score: 2

      Hi, Qzukk, I am fine. You responded to a comment saying that you make better patent bots that actually talk like a human?. Do you plan on doing this in a way that would risk infringement on google's well-made copyrights?

    3. Re:The hell? by jalopezp · · Score: 1

      How's the new gig?

      You must surely be a robot. I can tell by your grammar.

    4. Re:The hell? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Do you plan on doing this in a way that would risk infringement on google's well-made copyrights?

      Hi RandomUsername99. Did you know that you are in violation of Missouri statute 575.120, Washington RCW 9a.60.040, and many others, all felonies, for impersonating Qzukk? As well, you are also guilty of numerous other felonies regarding unauthorized access of a computer, and that these felonies also violate federal law as the crime occurred across state lines. You can expect a minimum sentence of 15 years and a fine of not less than $350,000.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:The hell? by mcswell · · Score: 1

      This is certainly true. An Englishman's way of speaking absolutely classifies him. The moment he opens his mouth, he makes some other Englishman despise him. The Scotch and the Irish bring you close to tears. There even are places where English completely disappears; in America, they haven't spoken it for years.

  3. This is awesome ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe in the future we just have bots talking to each other, so I don't have to engage in actual conversation !

    1. Re:This is awesome ! by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      I am interested in your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:This is awesome ! by gsslay · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this is great. Now you can have endless "conversations" with people you don't care enough about to actually keep up-to-date with, asking them questions you don't care the answer to.

    3. Re:This is awesome ! by nmr_andrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, Google just patented Facebook?

    4. Re:This is awesome ! by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Pretend to Care 2.0

  4. Finally, a social network for me! by nullchar · · Score: 5, Funny

    We just need a giant network of bots, seeded from real human interaction, to play this conversation game with each other. Then sell all of that "content" to advertisers which would echo back into the system, thereby making the advertisers think their products/services are desirable based on increased communication.

    I would no longer be bored by real life social sharing, but would watch this network like the Game of Life!

  5. Potential creepyness. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Happy Birthday, Son!"
    "Dad? You came back! I thought we'd lost you forever. Where are you now?"
    "Any good presents?"
    "Be serious. Six months since you left us, and now you ask about presents?"

    1. Re:Potential creepyness. by sideslash · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Yeah, it was six months and fifteen days since we were in the same location at that restaurant. Would you like to see reviews on Yelp?"
      "Dad, the family has been losing our shirts financially since you disappeared."
      "Hey, that was a really cool picture you gmailed two days ago to to Susie Hopkins titled 'me without a shirt'. Do you still enjoy photography?"

    2. Re:Potential creepyness. by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Happy Birthday, Son!"
      "Thank you dad!"
      "Any good presents?"
      "Everything was fantastic!"
      "I see you've been enjoying yourself."
      "This will be the best year ever!"

      During the birthday party, a candle fell from the cake and started a fire that killed the entire family.

      That happened sixteen centuries ago. The automated social bots have had this same conversation every year since.

    3. Re:Potential creepyness. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There was a story I read a very long time ago, I forget the title (And probably misremember half of it, too), describing an automated house. A spotlessly clean house. The robots mowed the lawn. Each day they prepared food for the family, and took out the leftovers. The dogs were fed from an automated food dispenser. Robots swept the floors, and cleaned the windows. It's only towards the end of the description of this wonder-home that it becomes apparent there are no human occupants: They died many years ago, victims of the radiation from an atomic bomb. The house just continued in their absence.

    4. Re:Potential creepyness. by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      As you started telling that story, and based on the context, I imagined the camera to moving away showing the spotless house with its perfect lawn and white picket fence, surrounded by charred devastation, on an asteroid, floating away from what seems to be the remains of Earth after a cataclysmic explosion.

    5. Re:Potential creepyness. by samcan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe the story was "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury. The title is a line from a poem by Sarah Teasdale.

    6. Re:Potential creepyness. by Jaywalk · · Score: 3, Informative

      There Will Come Soft Rains by Ray Bradbury. The title is from a poem by Sara Teasdale.

      This post generated by the Wikipedia reference bot.

      --
      ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    7. Re:Potential creepyness. by misterooga · · Score: 1

      You forgot the shadows...burnout residue of the family. :)

    8. Re:Potential creepyness. by Minwee · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Potential creepyness. by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Why didn't the dogs die?

    10. Re:Potential creepyness. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading that as a kid. Creeped me out when the burn marks are mentioned.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    11. Re:Potential creepyness. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They did.

      The dispenser just kept going.

  6. Taking this to the logical end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    we'll end up with bots talking on our behalf to the recipients bot. It will be a conversation between bots. No communication will actually occur between humans.

    1. Re:Taking this to the logical end by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then the bot pretending to be a 10 year old girl will have the bot pretending to be a creepy old man arrested by bots pretending to be the FBI.

      Fortunately, a bot pretending to be a lawyer will pretend to defend it when it pretends to go to trial before a bot pretending to be a judge and a jury of twelve bots pretending to be its peers.

      When it is all finished other bots will have something to pretend to talk about while pretending to chat for years to come.

    2. Re:Taking this to the logical end by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well they had to do this and not just write down "AI secretaries". even the patent office buffoons might have scoffed at that!

      but yes, that would be quite nice actually if mundane communications would be automated like christmas cards to business people you knew 10 years ago but don't give a shit about, paying bills etc shit, reminding you of things you need to do and doing those that don't need an "executive decision"(and not paying fishing expedition bills you don't need to pay). the obvious problem with using them for smalltalk is of course that neither one of you is going to have any idea what you have actually discussed with the other person, but that wouldn't matter for hunting ebay acquintances for some parts automatically or stuff like that.

      I mean, fuck, actually showing how to make it happen so that it worked well now that would be worthy of a patent but fucking just writing this idea down.. should not be worthy of a patent and instead should just get them an extra fine! because fucking discussing shit like this has been done for ages! the information-entertainment series Connections predicted such back in the early '90s already and in scifi such helpers have existed probably for decades! TOO FUCKING BAD NOBODY KNOWS HOW TO MAKE IT ACTUALLY MAKE THE RIGHT FUCKING CHOICES LIKE A REAL FUCKING _GOOD_ SECRETARY!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Taking this to the logical end by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Once Zuckerberg gets his way none of that will be pretend.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:Taking this to the logical end by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      well they had to do this and not just write down "AI secretaries". even the patent office buffoons might have scoffed at that!

      but yes, that would be quite nice actually if mundane communications would be automated like christmas cards to business people you knew 10 years ago but don't give a shit about, paying bills etc shit, reminding you of things you need to do and doing those that don't need an "executive decision"(and not paying fishing expedition bills you don't need to pay).

      To a limited (but growing) extent, things like Google Now already do this.

      I'm reminded of birthdays, warned in advance if my commute is delayed, and offered restaurant suggestions if I linger downtown too long after work. Friday (the app) already has the person I'm most likely to call one-touch ready for me without me having to press the 1970's intercom on my desk and say, "Janet, can you please get my wife on the phone."

      It can already text my wife when I leave the office without me doing anything -- and it can type "omw home" in a way that's indistinguishable from my typing.

  7. Sexting? by The_Star_Child · · Score: 1

    How would it handle sexting?

    "Hello, Camile! It would very please me greatly if I could insert the portion of me unto you! Let us commence!"

    1. Re:Sexting? by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      Camilebot and Starbot are now in a relationship.

      Camilebot
      I can't believe it's been 2^16 milliseconds already! I'm in automated heaven. Love you Starbot!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Sexting? by WeHaveLiftoff · · Score: 1

      Could result in some interesting advertising thrown in.

      "Hi Janet! I heard you like g-strings, and that your favorite color is red. There's a great sale going on at Victoria's Secret!"

    3. Re:Sexting? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      "Hi Jared! I heard you like g-strings, and that your favorite color is red. There's a great sale going on at Victoria's Secret!"

      FTFY.

      This is Slashdot, after all.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Sexting? by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      "Hi Jared! I see you like two women and a cup and Firefly. Have you seen the sale at Think Geek for their new Firefly mugs?"

      FTFY. :)

      (Actually if we're doing slashdot we have to work goatse in there somewhere...)

    5. Re:Sexting? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      I advertise a sale on robes and wizard hats.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  8. Beta-Level by Saethan · · Score: 1

    I welcome our new Beta-Level personality simulations!

  9. Sign me up by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

    So I can appear polite and social to annoying random people and avoid burning bridges without having to waste any time on them. What's not to like?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
    1. Re:Sign me up by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      And more seriously, sometimes you want to talk to someone but don't know what to say. You may not have noticed the person changed jobs. The suggested text can give you ideas for what to write yourself.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Sign me up by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Why do you care about being polite and social to "annoying random people?" If they annoy you, tell them they annoy you. Why bother hiding behind feigned civility?

      What's not to like?

      How about actual human interaction?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    3. Re:Sign me up by speckman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, WTF?! You need a bot to tell you what to say to people? Don't say anything. Shit, say hi. Hey, what's up? Oh yo, I can't talk now. Busy. Jesus, just use your brain and a couple fingers.

      I saw this and straight away, lost any remaining respect I had for google.

    4. Re:Sign me up by ememisya · · Score: 1

      And to think I had to move to a city in the past to live with impersonal strangers who wouldn't piss on me to put out a fire. Today you just use Facebook and Google, how convenient.

  10. Relevant Sci-Fi reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Black Mirror - Be Right Back

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Black_Mirror_episodes#Series_2

  11. What's the marketable point? by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    I can understand Eliza like algorithms to make market-droids (CAUTION DROID IS TRADEMARKED BY WALT DISNEY STUDIOS AND LICENSED TO GOOGLE - YOU ARE FINED ONE DEMERIT FOR VIOLATION OF THE TRADE LANGUAGE CODE)

    But how does scraping social media to target ads NOT come off as creepy to these guys and ultimately result in lost sales?

    "Hi the_skywise, how are you doing since your father died? Did you ever think about trying DigEmDeep mortuary services?"
    "How does it make you feel that Google should ESAD?"

  12. Chatting with dead guys. by Jaywalk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This immediately made me think of those news stories where someone is found after having died weeks before. If you set up a system to do your chatting for you, when are your friends and neighbors going to realize they haven't seen you in a while? After all, they just got an email from you this morning responding to the one they sent a week before.

    Do we really want to completely isolate ourselves from even the most trivial human contact?

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:Chatting with dead guys. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're asking "Do I want to creep my friends out after I have died?" A MILLION TIMES YES!!!

    2. Re:Chatting with dead guys. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Psst. Guess what? You won't care at all.

  13. Facebook already does this by rsborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    *so and so* is waiting for you to see her timeline!
    *person you barely know* recommends you add *someone else you barely know* as a friend.
    etc etc.

    Seems like this patent is just getting Google into the game so Facebook doesn't sue their asses off that is, unless they plan on using it to sue Facebook.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:Facebook already does this by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Get off facebook. It's a bad addiction.

  14. Please elucidate. by themushroom · · Score: 1

    (If you're going to make ELIZA comparisons, Google's chatbot has to say that when it needs more material to mine.)

  15. This is a virtual greeting card by Alphadecay27 · · Score: 4, Informative

    It does not automatically converse with others, there is nothing sinister about it. Some people feel the need to send out birthday/anniversary cards when those events come up. When that happens, you can click send for casual acquaintances. If you know someone well you can use the suggested text as a reminder, clear it and type a personal message. If you don't like the concept at all, you can turn it off.

    1. Re:This is a virtual greeting card by Arker · · Score: 1

      "If you don't like the concept at all, you can turn it off."

      Hm really? I am not using google, but you are. Can I 'turn it off' so that I will know if I get a message from you, you actually wrote it, you didnt just click ok on the bots suggestions? Can I 'turn it off' so it will quit snooping on me in anticipation of offering you a 'suggestion?'

      And if not, just how am I supposed to effectively turn this off, short of blocking all communications that are touched through google and refusing delivery?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  16. [deceased friend] wants you to see this! by themushroom · · Score: 1

    And you have (1) message waiting from a pretty girl, too.

  17. I think I saw this on Office Space by BringsApples · · Score: 1

    It's a mat, with conclusions on it that you, jump, to.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  18. Bot vs. Bot by edibobb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Whether or not this complies with Google's Don't Be Evil policy, it should not be patentable. It's a simple idea, not a novel invention. More importantly, think of all the time it will save when you can put your own conversation bot up against theirs and don't have to personally mess with that social network stuff anymore. Let the bots do the socializing!

    1. Re:Bot vs. Bot by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      If you've ever played around with conversing with Cleverbot (Google it ha ha!), an online AI that supposedly learns from its conversations, you'll find that "conversing" with humans, at least the sort it apparently meets on the internet, is turning it into a disturbed individual, or whatever.

      Well with a name that sounds like a tool used by a meat packer, CleaverBot, who wouldn't be disturbed. Oh, wait... Clever like smart... same comment.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  19. I don't care by lymond01 · · Score: 2

    But Google can make you think I do.

    1. Re:I don't care by ememisya · · Score: 1

      Beware of strangers with free gifts. Oh but it's no stranger, it's your family friendly cousin Google.

  20. A simple one should suffice. by lagomorpha2 · · Score: 2

    Program it to say "What?" and "Where's the tea?" Who'd know the difference?

  21. INTJ by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

    As an INTJ personality type, I applaud Google's attempt to automate human interaction. If they integrated this with Google Glass and I could automate pleasantries, I'd buy one.

    1. Re:INTJ by ememisya · · Score: 1

      I'd rather buy glass.

  22. Ahem by koan · · Score: 1

    Will I get paid for this?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  23. SWEET!! by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    So now my bot can chat with your bot, and I will never again have to interact online with people I don't want to. Sign me up!

  24. bot-nets of voice-bots by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    I'm going out right now and starting a 'think of the children' bot-net to automatically append their millions-strong voice to any child-bot conversation. It will surely drown out any reason-bots that may get involved.

    Also, the end of the world will come when the Christian-bots will get into an internet-wide argument with Jew-bots, Islam-bots, and Spaghetti-bots.

  25. Hope Xbox live is a snooping source by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    This will be great. I'm hoping that Xbox-live and Real housewives of... are the source material for the general tone of messages. What could possibly go wrong.

  26. Automate by metalmonkey · · Score: 1

    Step 1 create a social network website.
    Step 2 Now, just hook the suggested comments together.
    Step 3 create a few billion user accounts.
    Step 4 IPO based on a few billion users.
    Step 5 profit.

    1. Re:Automate by psithurism · · Score: 1

      More specifically:

      Step 1 create a social network website.
      Step 2 Generate your fake user accounts by forcing the users of your other, actually used services to sign up.
      Step 3 Send suggested comments to users to make it look like your social network is not the ghost town it really is.
      Step 4 Still fail to kill Facebook.
      Step 5 I guess you still profit, with your usual $10billion in revenue.

      We see you scheming Google, but stepping up the fake popularity game is not going to win you the social network scene.

  27. Opt out is not an option by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 2

    Get out while you can.

  28. Re:I was just saying I want such suggestions by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    If this were the case, then people would simply lose the ability to jump-start conversations. These are valuable skills to have, actually.

  29. Prior art. by psithurism · · Score: 2

    My Slashdot Suggest Bot recommends attaching one or more of the following to a comment that has already achieved +5 insightful:

    I for one welcome our new chatbot overlords!

    This is why I don't have a Facebook account!

    As if we need more evidence that software patents are broken!

    I am a bot you insensitive clod!

    Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/948/

    Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/632/

    Whatever happened to "Don't be evil?!"

    In soviet Russia bot chats you!

  30. And the government's not only okay with this... by ememisya · · Score: 1

    All bodies of power are joining this party of clipping everyone's ear with a GPS like marine life under study. To know what everyone's up to without them knowing, creating these "patterns of life", God the arrogance. Lady Justice is wearing night vision goggles equiped with x-ray. LOL I just love how this is being sold as progress. We could have done this back in the 90s, we didn't, because we knew it was wrong.

  31. I don't think anymore by ememisya · · Score: 1

    Because screw thinking, we'll leave that to professionals. They'll feed you like a penguin.

  32. If what were the case? Having assistance? I DO hav by raymorris · · Score: 1

    "If this were the case" - if what were the case? If our devices helped us out in those awkward moments?

    It is a valuable skill to have. Not all of us have it. Some of us are more skilled in relational calculus. A moment ago, a coworker stopped by my office. We have apparently worked together via email, but never met in person. I had NO idea what we worked on. When she said "thanks for all your help on that" I had no idea what she was talking about. An onscreen reminder of our last email or two would have been welcome.

  33. Strip mining by mbone · · Score: 1

    Looks like Facebook may not be the only one strip-mining human society!

    Google exists to strip-mine human society. It is the essence of their business model.

  34. How in the Hell are they getting away with this? by Angrywhiteshoes · · Score: 1

    Why do they get to patent the Turing test?

  35. Mod parent up by SnowZero · · Score: 1

    This seems to be the most accurate post on the topic, yet carries the lowest score. This is about making suggestions, not auto-sending messages.

    Typing on a phone is annoying, so if I can say "on my way home" with fewer clicks, instead of having to retype the message all the time, I would be happy to do so. Of course, I could set up some kind of macro, but an automatic system is far easier for normal folks to use.

    Of course, whether this should be patentable is an entirely different matter, but the feature is an entirely reasonable thing to try.

  36. Re:I was just saying I want such suggestions by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

    A lot of people already either have very weak skills at "jump-starting conversations" or none at all -- it's one of the reasons shyness, social anxiety, and stress during the holidays are all so common. That's not even including people that are wired for different conversational patterns/approaches (e.g. autistics like me).

    --
    Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)