Slashdot Mirror


Thieves Who Stole Cobalt-60 Will Soon Be Dead

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "The Washington Post reports that the carjackers who set off international alarm bells by absconding with a truckload of highly radioactive cobalt-60, used in hospital radiotherapy machines, most likely had no idea what they were stealing and will die soon from exposure. The robbery occurred as the cobalt-60 was being driven from a public hospital in the border town of Tijuana to a storage facility in central Mexico. While waiting for daybreak at a gas station in the state of Hidalgo the drivers were jumped by two gunmen who beat them and stole the truck. "I believe, definitely, that the thieves did not know what they had; they were interested in the crane, in the vehicle," says Mardonio Jimenez, a physicist with Mexico's nuclear safety commission. The prospect that material that could be used in a radioactive dirty bomb had gone missing sparked an urgent two-day hunt that concluded when the material, cobalt-60, used in hospital radiotherapy machines, was found along with the stolen Volkswagen truck. The cobalt-60 was found, removed from its casing, in a rural area near the town of Hueypoxtla about 25 miles from where the truck was stolen. Jimenez suspects that curiosity got the better of the thieves and they opened the box. So far the carjackers have not been arrested, but authorities expect they will not live long. "The people who handled it will have severe problems with radiation. They will, without a doubt, die.""

147 of 923 comments (clear)

  1. They will, without a doubt, die... by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    or gain superpowers.

    1. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

    2. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that is a fate worse than death

    3. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably not. Radioactive is a necessary but not sufficient cause for superpowers.

      You are going to need to combine that with spiders, toxic chemicals, a DNA X-factor, experimental drugs, or something else to kick off the process.

    4. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

      But it worked for Radioactive Man!

      .

    5. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by rossdee · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think it (gamma rays) was all that was needed to turn Bruce Banner green (when angry)
      There was also an 'Invisible Man' series where it was caused by radiation. (starring David (UNCLE) Macallum)

    6. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On a side note, Radioactive Man is the only man on the planet who's immune to Google Glass.

    7. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Nope. In the film continuity, he received a super serum, a la Captain America.

      The Hulk is the result when you add expose a super serum recipient to gamma radiation rather than Vita rays.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's already happened. This was rural Mexico for crying out loud. The odds that they weren't bit by a snake, spider, or donkey are miniscule at best. I'm betting on them being pricked by an Agave cactus. I want to see a superhero (or supervillain, I'm not picky) who attacks by peeing a stream of radioactive tequila and dresses like the Frito Bandito.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    9. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 5, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

      Unlikely. Syfy prefers animals as the villains of its Saturday-night original movies, not people.

      Now, if it turns out that a shark or octopus (or, even better, both) stole the cobalt-60, then you'l have the network's attention. Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now.

    10. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by zarthrag · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    11. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by RCGodward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, don't make him mad.

    12. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by jason.sweet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Film continuity doesn't apply to the real continuity.

      Do you mean the real continuity described in the excellent historical references published by Marvel Comics?

    13. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      Good, we need more hispanic superheroes. When I was a kid, all we had was El Dorado, and he was pretty lame.

      Of course, they were thieves, so they would probably end up being supervillians.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    14. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good, we need more hispanic superheroes.

      What about Speedy Gonzales?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by forkazoo · · Score: 2

      A Mexican desert shark that robs trucks? That seems like a syfy movie of the week even before it gets ahold of the radioactive cobalt!

    16. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 3, Funny

      I saw "Sharknado" on SyFy. That isn't just jumping the shark on SyFy the shark jumps you!

      So once you are hit by a tornado with teeth, a mere hybrid Sharktopus is kind of tame in comparison.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    17. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

      Unlikely. Syfy prefers animals as the villains of its Saturday-night original movies, not people.

      Now, if it turns out that a shark or octopus (or, even better, both) stole the cobalt-60, then you'l have the network's attention. Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now.

      "Atomic Sharktopusnado" Anyone?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    18. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now

      The second and third Sharktopus movies are already in the works, so this one would be Sharktopus IV: A Nuclear Hope.

    19. Re: They will, without a doubt, die... by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

      A Chupacabra and/or Jackelope offed the original robbers and is feeding this to its babies!!!

      Machete will save us!

    20. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always preferred "El Kabong!"

    21. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cobaltacabra!

    22. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well if you consider projectile vomiting and diarhea a superpower.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    23. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Hulk begs to differ

      The Hulk doesn't beg. "Hulk smash"

    24. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by bondsbw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, death implies an end. Syfy shows rarely have a proper ending.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    25. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      or Plot

    26. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by dpiven · · Score: 2

      You are going to need to combine that with ... something else to kick off the process.

      Tequila?

  2. Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instant Karma is gonna get ya...

    1. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

    2. Re:Tough luck.. by casings · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I completely and utterly disagree.

      You clearly haven't been the victim of any robberies at gunpoint. It is terrifying and life-changing and most victims usually end up with some sort of PTSD. It takes a sick and depraved mind to commit such acts, and those responsible fully deserve death. There are far too many people in this world to allow people who are willing to kill to continue to breathe the same air as the rest of the population.

    3. Re:Tough luck.. by hubie · · Score: 2

      How badly would the drivers have had to been beaten for it to be more proportional?

    4. Re:Tough luck.. by kirkb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welcome to Mexico, where the highs and lows in life are disproportionately higher/lower than what first-world countries are used to.

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    5. Re:Tough luck.. by KenFury · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget Karma, this is natural repercussions of actions.

    6. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know a lot of people don't agree with us, but this isn't a case of stealing to feed your starving family; anyone willing to so wantonly disregard the rights of others for personal gain does not belong in our society.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Tough luck.. by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      I don't agree. I think the karma is spot on. The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it.

      That would only make sense if they knew what they were stealing, and they knew the implications of stealing it, and they stole it anyway.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Tough luck.. by chilvence · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which is defined as Karma, for your convenience.

    9. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having been jumped and beating unconscious, I still do not wish a painful horrible death on the people who did it.

    10. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best guess right now is that they stole the truck for the crane it was carrying.

    11. Re:Tough luck.. by tibit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, you see, but you're being rational about it. Others seem ready to be driven by unabated hate.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    12. Re:Tough luck.. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How badly would the drivers have had to been beaten for it to be more proportional?

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Didn't Jesus say:

        'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      So in other words even though there are shitty people in the world then anyone who considers themselves a christian should strive to not seek revenge against such people by killing them or wishing them to be killed. Instead they should forgive and leave any judgment for the lord. Wishing an agonising death upon them would then surely never be proportional, no matter how harshly they beat their victims.

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    13. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy). Even the Old Testament said "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"- that is, the punishment should match the crime. If someone takes your eye out, you're entitled to take up to one eye- not the whole head.

      And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...

    14. Re:Tough luck.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you ever wonder what motivates people to take such extreme and risky actions? It isn't because they are evil or "bad guys".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Tough luck.. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Informative

      They could have been intending to use it to make dirty bomb what could have exposed hundreds, if not thousands to such an ugly death.

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth. Disperse the radioactive material far enough to affect a large number of people, and you disperse the radiation as well. The concentration of radioactive material decreases as the square of the radius of the area of dispersal.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    16. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      anyone willing to so wantonly disregard the rights of others for personal gain does not belong in our society.

      And yet, this seems to be the very premise of America these days.

    17. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really no. Caught and punished yes. killed? No.

    18. Re:Tough luck.. by rwise2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe in karma, which is why, when I do something bad to people, I assume they deserve it.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    19. Re:Tough luck.. by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being the one beaten is one thing.

      Being a friend or relative of the one attacked usually is far worse. Stuff like having a friend's son whom you grew up with tasered to death (the thieves wanted to know "where the valuables were", and kept pulling the trigger until the victim's heart gave out) makes one not really empathetic with violent criminals who do this sort of stuff.

    20. Re: Tough luck.. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is no way Jesus said that, my gardener can barely speak two words of English.

    21. Re: Tough luck.. by CrypticLokiOmega · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whoa! Hold on a second, dude. First, you must realize the majority of Christians in the US are only Christians on Sundays or when the dogma serves to back their beliefs. Second, a belief in a religion doesn't equal the existence of morality or empathy. Clearly. Thirdly, and I mean this most sincerely above all other points, though Christianity is the most popular religion in the US, please don't lump all of us under the same religious umbrella. It makes you look like a right wing Christian from the US, and you don't want that, do you? Guns and Love, An atheist stuck in the southern US.

    22. Re:Tough luck.. by Ravaldy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think this one was karma but rather Darwinism. I'm sure the containers had plenty of warnings. They were crooked and DUMB.

    23. Re:Tough luck.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't always because they are evil or "bad guys".

      FTFY.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    24. Re:Tough luck.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      Yeah, and it did not end well for him.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    25. Re:Tough luck.. by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a difference between wanting them killed and finding them dead as a result of their crime a convenient outcome.

      Every time a would-be-criminal ends up killing themselves because of their own stupidity, I smile.

    26. Re:Tough luck.. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you ever wonder what motivates people to take such extreme and risky actions? It isn't because they are evil or "bad guys".

      Really? You're saying that the single best course of action they had available to them was to beat those guys and steal the truck? That, in addition, any rational person put in their situation would choose the exact same course of action?

      Sort of makes you wonder why they chose to beat the two guys instead of just force them at gunpoint to be tied up. They must have had literally no other choice.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    27. Re:Tough luck.. by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it.

      Good point. And your mom should be charged with prostitution, because she could do it.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    28. Re:Tough luck.. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      It wasn't just theft though. It was aggravated robbery and assault.

      the drivers were jumped by two gunmen who beat them and stole the truck

    29. Re:Tough luck.. by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      I don't think this one was karma but rather Darwinism. I'm sure the containers had plenty of warnings. They were crooked and DUMB.

      The thieves probably assumed the warnings were fake, meant to deter... well, people like them. I know people will ship containers labeled things like "bull semen" and the like so that shippers will handle it carefully. The thieves probably (wrongly, of course) assumed this was something similar: drugs, money, or something else valuable labeled with radioactive symbols to discourage theft.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    30. Re:Tough luck.. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Please recognize the difference between wishing something upon someone and believing someone deserved it. I've never wished death on anyone, but there are people I believe deserved it when it found them.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    31. Re:Tough luck.. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but this isn't a case of stealing to feed your starving family;

      Just curious - how do you know the motives of the thieves? Don't believe I've seen any interviews with them where motive was discussed...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    32. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth.

      Absolutely correct, however a dirty bomb isn't really a weapon of mass destruction, it's a weapon of terror. Given the fear economy that has been driving the US for the last decade or so, I imagine it would be a highly effective weapon too.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    33. Re:Tough luck.. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      It's a float. In case you've ever wondered what happened to yours: Rounding error.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    34. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      You are likely far smarter and more well educated than them.

      Why yes, this is why we should pity them instead of revile them. They were obviously too stupid to know that repeatedly striking another human being with their fists and kicking them with their booted feet would cause harm to that other person. And they were obviously too stupid to know that taking the truck away from those two other human beings was wrong. Why, this truck was just sitting there, and how dare those two people stand in the way of them taking what was rightfully theirs because of the universal "finders keepers losers weepers" law. It's the truck driver's fault for existing, not the poor criminal's fault for being too stupid to know better.

      All it would take to solve this problem is to give everyone a free college education so they will all be educated enough to know that beating someone up is wrong and taking their stuff is bad, n'kay?

      Sheesh.

    35. Re:Tough luck.. by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This, right here.

      There is no call for capital punishment on a carjacker. However, if a couple of them die painfully after giving a couple of innocent folks a severe beating, doing so at gunpoint, and all because they were too dumbassed to ignore the warnings splayed all over the container?

      I really cannot bring myself to feel bad about the outcome.

      For those who feel otherwise, look at it this way: When you use a lethal weapon to commit a crime, you state to the world that you are willing to kill innocent people in order to get what you want, no matter what. From the moment when you point that gun at someone, your life is automatically forfeit should you die as a result of committing that crime. It doesn't matter if you died instantly because the victim shot back, or because every orifice you have is slowly bleeding out of your swollen body due to radiation exposure... you got what was coming to you.

      Oh, you're dying a painful death from the stuff you stole and some bleeding-heart type on Slashdot says I should show you some sympathy? Okay: you'll find sympathy in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis".

      On the plus side, maybe the next person contemplating violent acts to get what they want will think twice because of these two Darwin Award winners?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    36. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sheesh? All I was suggesting is that asking why they choose one method of theft over another is, well.... because they are likely dumb and it didn't even occur to them.

      It might be worth considering that just because a person is wrong doesn't mean that is the end of the story. Criminals are generally a symptom of larger social issues. Morality is nice and all, but, just stopping at the morality of it and deciding they were wrong; is simultaneously correct and useless. You may as well be pointing out that water is wet.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    37. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      I not only agree with you, but need to shake my head every time some apologist changes words like "beat" into "hit." They didn't just "hit" the drivers, the drivers were "beaten." I don't wish death on the perpetrators because they stole a truck, but because they beat someone, and that was just completely unnecessarily to commit the theft. Some of these people take pleasure in it, they have demonstrated a complete, selfish lack of regard for others. They simply do not deserve to exist with the rest of us.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    38. Re:Tough luck.. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

      That's the beauty of the situation. We don't know who did it, and we don't need to; the problem will take care of itself.

      And I don't buy the argument that anyone ever has to steal. My income in 2010 was a nice round $0, and I didn't steal anything.

    39. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      Interesting then that the cobalt 60 machines used in medical therapy don't put the patient in direct contact with the stuff. It must be magic. Cancers can detect the boogeyman at the door and die from fright, never getting actually touched by this magical medical miracle.

    40. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Death for Stealing a truck.
      that's not poetic justice, or poetic, or justice.

      Poetic justice would have been if the truck they stole had been stolen and they got pulled over because of the first theft.

      I"m more worried about the scum that thing Justice for stealing a truck is death then I am about people who steal trucks.

      Please learn to apply critical thinking skills to you're current mode of what I will generously call thinking.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    41. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Caught, yes.

      Punished, yes.

      Death, if warranted, yes. The problem is that our judicial system is flawed, and thus we are often not 100% sure it is warranted. WHICH is why I support the concept of the Death Penalty, while opposing it 100% in practice. We (mankind) can rationalize doing all sorts of evil, in the name of good.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    42. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My mother was a drunkard and crazy. I was 12 and had to feed her and my two brothers.
      Yeah, I stole. Robbed bread trucks, soda trucks, I would go into busy pizza places and just grab a pie off the counter and walk out.
      It was always a last resort, it was always about basic survival.
      And if I had to do it again, I would.

      You clearly had other avenues to get food and shelter.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    43. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OTOH, a Mexican Cartel might have threatened to kill their families if they didn't get a lot of money.
      Like what was said 'Motives unknown' at this time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah but dude your stance in favor of EXECUTION as punishment for MUGGING is not justifiable to anyone with a shred of human decency. get a grip.

      This wasn't a simple mugging and it's disingenuous for you to frame it as such. This was a violent hijacking by two sadistic individuals whose actions will have lasting effects on their unfortunate victims. Gfxguy's comment above captures our concerns perfectly - they are dysfunctional, dangerous members of society and statistically speaking these people do not change.

      How do you rehabilitate someone who gets great pleasure in (effectively) torturing innocent people?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    45. Re:Tough luck.. by xtracto · · Score: 2

      Except that it may be the case that other innocent people may be affected by these people's acts.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    46. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw a couple of pictures of the container, I was surprised they didn't have the yellow and black radiation warning.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    47. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but this is the same Jesus that made a Scourge (whip with metal bits at the ends) and forcibly evicted money changers in the Temple. He wasn't opposed to violence, he was opposed to revenge violence. Specifically, there is a strong opinion that this has more to do with being a Servant (to G-D) than anything, for a bondservant has no right to revenge, only his master has that right. By giving up that right, you declare yourself the proper bondservant Jesus wanted. This would mean the person "turning the other cheek" was casting a much harsher punishment (hell) on those that perpetrated it, while also allowing for the redemption of the criminal should they repent of their sins.

      Lastly, the eye for eye, tooth for tooth, was about equity of outcome (in the Old Testament). A person harmed by a criminal act, had the right to equity of results upon the perpetrator. This means, that the perpetrator would have to live under the same conditions, for the rest of his life, that he cause upon another. This same provisions also require full restitution for the harm caused (money).

      In truth, it isn't as barbaric as it seems at first glance. And from their (ancient) perspective, our current judicial system seems completely useless, providing little or no justice to victims.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    48. Re:Tough luck.. by smpoole7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      You need to throw away that datasheet and get a better one. :)

      http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/cobalt.asp

      Cobalt 60 emits gamma radiation, fairly energetic, which means you only need to be in proximity to it to suffer ill effects. I saw a chart on another site a while ago that said standing within 1 meter of the Co-60 for longer than a few minutes would result in a serious exposure. Being that close to it, without touching it, for more than 30 minutes to an hour would almost certainly be fatal.

      The sad thing is, the guys probably didn't know what they were handling and are almost certainly dead by now. I'm frankly surprised that they didn't find the bodies near the site, because after about 15-20 minutes of direct exposure to that much Co-60, they would have already begun feeling the effects -- severe headaches, nausea and diarrhea.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    49. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      uh huh... and the Mexican Cartel said "oh, and, by the way, beat the drivers when you steal the truck?" That's why it doesn't even matter in this case.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    50. Re:Tough luck.. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excuse me Euroweenie. The death penalty is about as direct eye for an eye and you are likely to see. This punishment is reserved for the worst of the worst.

      Do you not remember John 7:53-8:11, the story of the adultress to be stoned? Jesus was not in favor of capital punishment ("Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."), and was in favor of forgiveness as a general principle.

      At that, it's is almost totally unused in the states, with the exception of a few states. An in the cases where it is applied, this is always after numerous expensive appeals.

      The death penalty is still in effect in 32 out of 50 states and at the federal level. 3 of the states which banned it recently have not done so retroactively, leaving prisoners still awaiting their execution. While Texas is an extreme outlier for executions, 10 states have had an average of 1 execution per year or more since the penalty was reestablished in 1976. The South as a whole has executed over 1100 people since then.

      So we may disagree on this, but to characterize the US as a bunch of death penalty fiends is completely absurd.

      And yet we're the only Western country that still has the death penalty; most of the civilized world has given it up. We're also the Western country with (by far) the highest rate of incarceration and the longest prison sentences. We're also one of the few that allows the use of plea bargaining to compel guilty pleas, and many of our states disenfranchise felons, which is also rare in Western democracies. Gallup polls show that 57% of Americans still support the death penalty (down from a peak of around 80% in 1994.)

      Over all, we're a very harsh regime when it comes to law enforcement, and the death penalty is just part and parcel of a nation that believes on some level that criminals aren't human and don't deserve to be treated as such. Punishment is part of our culture, not rehabilitation, and certainly not Christian forgiveness.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    51. Re:Tough luck.. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      We all die, some from old age, some while attempting hijack, others as a result of successful hijack...

    52. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

      This is a Sophists' phrase, and it is an unnecessary constraint. Why would a man who failed to pray on $holy_day be prevented from punishing a rapist? Both men are sinners.

      I, personally, do not worry if the judge is a sinner. The only requirement is that he judges fairly and by the law. I do not care if he has plans on the wife of his neighbor, or that he stole a cookie when he was 5 years old. Some say that it's hard to be honest from 9 to 5 and not so honest from 5 to 9. It may be so. However if a person can do the job, that's the only thing that matters.

    53. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The usual response to this is that your situation, as described, is mostly caused by the breakdown of "community" that occurs in large cities. In smaller towns, there's enough sense of community that people will actually provide other avenues and help each other. These people are acquaintances, if not friends, with their neighbors. They keep an eye on each other. They have family, usually, and those families live relatively close and help each other. You end up being a part of a large social network that's generally populated with helpful people that care about you. You also have a social drive to be a provider rather than a leech on this system, so you only tend to use it in dire need and then you get back on your feet and figure things out. It all works out pretty well. The big city phenomenon is the opposite: neighbors are strangers, family members visit on Christmas Day at best, nobody really cares about anyone. It's easy to see how people "fall through the cracks" in such a sub-society, which is how we end up with large homeless populations, and yes, children having to steal food to care for themselves while the rest of society ignores them and their broken parents. In the other situation, a family member, neighbor, or other community member would've seen the problem with your mother and taken over for her and raised and fed you.

    54. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that explains many of your posts.

    55. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many cranes did you steal to feed your family?

      Usually about one each week, which is how long the meat would last before going bad.

      They're slender birds so you'd might not think that one could last a family of four (myself, my mother, and my two sisters) that long, but in desperate situations people learn to make do.

    56. Re:Tough luck.. by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mother was a drunkard and crazy. I was 12 and had to feed her and my two brothers.
      Yeah, I stole. Robbed bread trucks, soda trucks, I would go into busy pizza places and just grab a pie off the counter and walk out.
      It was always a last resort, it was always about basic survival.
      And if I had to do it again, I would.

      You clearly had other avenues to get food and shelter.

      You know if you sold one of your brothers you would of made enough money to live off for awhile, till you sold the remaining brother.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    57. Re:Tough luck.. by mjwx · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between wanting them killed and finding them dead as a result of their crime a convenient outcome.

      In countries as corrupt as Mexico, this difference can be as cheap as a few hundred dollars.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Evolution in action.... by chalsall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Title says it all.

  4. radioactive markings by Danathar · · Score: 5, Funny

    On my lunch bag when I put it in the fridge at work I put

    "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE" on one side

    The other I put

    "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

    1. Re:radioactive markings by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you had Hot Pockets for lunch?

    2. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Way to make sure all your colleagues know what a dork you are...

    3. Re:radioactive markings by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE"

      "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

      The hell kind of deli do you shop at?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:radioactive markings by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      Nice experiment. Which side of the bag is stolen the least often?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    5. Re:radioactive markings by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both sides would have been stolen equally, since they would have been attached to each other.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  5. Darwin by ableeker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I nominate these guys for the Darwin award!

    1. Re:Darwin by Anon,+Not+Coward+D · · Score: 2

      we need to know if they already have children

      --
      Sometimes it's better not having signature
    2. Re:Darwin by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Have you read the Darwin awards? They seem to be a flimsy excuse to laugh at other people's tragedies, with a little bit of superiority thrown in for good measure. There's quite a bit of questionable entries in there. For example.... And that's even if you accept the idea that only people who are stupid because of heritable characteristics ever do dangerous, dumb things. Plus you kind of have to ignore a bunch of more recent evolutionary theory which suggests that individuals within a species dying or living comes down more to chance and doesn't really drive evolution gradually.

    3. Re:Darwin by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I nominate these guys for the Darwin award!

      These guys are amateurs compared to the Mexican scrappers who sold hospital equipment containing 6,000 pellets of cobalt-60 for scrap. The machinery was then processed into rebar which was in turn was used in god knows how many homes in Mexico and the USA as well as metal furniture that ended ups as far away as Canada. The Mexicans even found pellets of cobalt-60 embedded into the asphalt surface of roads in Sinaloa and 109 houses had to be torn down and disposed of as radioactive waste. All in all some 5000 metric tons of steel were contaminated ... as far as is known. According to a documentary I watched about this incident there is a good possibility that there are still contaminated houses and furniture out there. The incident only came to light when a truck with a load of contaminated rebar drove past a Los Alamos laboratories radiation checkpoint and set of a whole bunch of alarms. One person died of bone cancer, another 4 were injured and least 10 individuals received significant exposures and some scrapyard workers became sterile. There is also a good chance that many more people either will, or already have, developed cancer since it took about a year to discover this snafu and even longer to track down all the contaminated material already in use. This story made me think about how US Homeland security worries about 'dirty bombs'. The only thing that still amazes me about that particular contingency is that it hasn't happened yet because highly radioactive material is apparently very easy to come by. The Juarez incident caused radiation sensors to be installed at all major border crossings but one wonders if this has been extended to every single crossing along the US/Mexican border. Either way, I'd be worried.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    4. Re:Darwin by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Dying because you smoked a cigarette after gulping down some gasoline sounds like it fits the Darwin awards criteria pretty well: removing yourself from the gene pool due to your own stupidity.

      You misunderstand evolution by natural selection, just like many other people. Nobody who knows what they're talking about, from Darwin to now, ever proposed that only organisms who are not fit die. Natural selection requires only that organisms that successful reproduction be correlated with certain heritable features. Of course most survival or death is random. But not all of it. The second part is the magic.

  6. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You've been watching too much tv

  7. I am reminded of the final scene in by mark_reh · · Score: 2

    "Kiss Me Deadly".

    1. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by swb · · Score: 2

      ...or several of the scenes in Repo Man!

    2. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by swb · · Score: 2

      It MUST have been the "goddamn, dipshit, gypsy-dildo" Rodriguez brothers!

  8. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Pinhedd · · Score: 2

    In some cases yes. The L3 band used by the GPS satellite system is used to detect and report nuclear detonations, but I do not know if a small amount of cobalt-60 would be detected by a satellite 26,000 kilometres away.

  9. What was the make and model of the get away car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    By any chance was it a 1964 Chevy Malibu?

  10. OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    I am going to stencil "Cobalt-60" on every thing that I own that could be of interest to the thieves.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      You will be a hit with the TSA.

    2. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      And stencil your Cobalt-60 canister "Delicious cupcakes." You know, all this stenciling is making me hungry. I could sure go for some delicious cupcakes.... Uh oh.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  11. Re:Could Be Worse by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

    That's not really a transaction that you set up on one day's notice.

    "Hey. I heard that you were a terrorist and I just wanted to give you a call and offer you some radioactive material that I happened to get my hands on. So is that something you would be interested in?"

  12. "They will, without a doubt, die." by bob_super · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The difference with about 100 Americans on the road today, is that at least they know it in advance.

  13. Re:Too much TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We can identify radiation sources in the sky with pinpoint accuracy.

    Yeah, multiple times what the sun will put out in its lifetime against the vast vacuum of cold space. Aside from that you mostly get infrared, radio and visible light. All three useless in this case given the background of where you're looking for it. So, this is a little different. And even at that there are forms of radiation we have a very hard time detecting the origins of with any real accuracy. If you want to dispute this I'll leave it to you to provide the proof.

  14. Re: isn't it possible to detect by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Geiger-Mueller detectors work on the photoelectric effect. Point source radiation is an inverse square law. You wouldn't detect this stuff even a few miles away. Reactors hardly release any isotopes. It's the thermals that show up on satellites

  15. Re:hmmm... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here you go: The Goiânia accident.

    It wasn't an X-ray machine though, but a device for radiotherapy.
    Fortunately, X-ray machines are harmless when powered down.

  16. Re:hmmm... by Xylaan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, it's happened enough that it's sadly hard to narrow down. Though if I had to guess, you were originally referring to this one.

  17. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's too bad they found that cobalt. If not, they would have lived forever!

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  18. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    Right, because it's not like there's a plethora of criminal organizations in Mexico already, that they could have walked the material to. No drug cartels, no corrupt local officials, nope, none, nada.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  19. We could market this... by DeTech · · Score: 2

    The all new 2015 Toyota Camry with nuclear anti-theft aka pandora's box protection (pbp).

  20. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    ISO 21482 is pretty universal. Doesn't solve any of the nastier issues of cross-cultural-communication-without-shared-assumptions; but either that symbol, the old trefoil, or both, are about as iconic as warning labels get.

    Now, as for this 'cobalt 60 in those drug shipments' concept, it might expose the mules (who tend to be low level and treated as expendable anyway) to enough radiation to kill them, slowly; but the major effect would be on the customers: ie. the coke-snorting Americans whining about them. You wouldn't be the first to suggest this... particular approach, the winning the war on drugs; but I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up.

  21. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by Quila · · Score: 4, Informative

    They probably don't. They felt nausea after first handling it, then after that passed they felt fine. They will continue to feel fine for maybe one to three days during what is called the "walking ghost" phase, after which their bodies will start shutting down and they die a very messy and painful death.

  22. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Pinhedd · · Score: 2

    The L3 band is the transmission band used to communicate with the base stations on the ground. The disturbances themselves are detected using the satellite's onboard instruments.

    The GPS satellites are incredibly sensitive to atmospheric disturbances and can detect anything that causes interference with radio transmissions, such as electron emission from a subterranean nuclear test. It is not necessary to detect the emission source itself, just the effects of the emission.

  23. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up.

    Indeed, there have been cops, judges, and prosecuters in the news in Illinois in the last year who were busted for cocaine. There are the mayor of that Canadian city and the ex-mayor of DC. Look at Rush Limbaugh.

    I look at "war on drugs" politicians like I look at right wing politicians who constantly decry homosexuality, how many of them have been kicked out of the closet?

    I don't know if the GP is an idiot, a troll, or a government shill. He advocates a painful death for drug users? I smoke pot and advocate HIS death. Alcohol, tobacco, and coffee are all addictive drugs. Marijuana is not.

    All of society's problems that are attributed to drugs are really problems that stem from the laws against them.

  24. it doesn't have to be painful and horrible... by schlachter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they have guns right? It's up to them how painful and horrible it is.
    it can be quick and painless if they like.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  25. Re:isn't it possible to detect by thunderclap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Um thats all fiction. No, radioactive metal looks like normal metal, feels like normal metal and smells like normal metal. It simply kills you in 48 hrs. Violently with lots of hair loss and vomiting blood.

  26. Re: Good to see Justice Prevails by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shhhhh, here have a bowl.

  27. They will, without a doubt, die... by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They will, without a doubt, die...

    ...eventually. Like everyone else on the planet.

    Or at least 93% of us, since 7% of all humans who have ever existed are alive today.

  28. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by hAckz0r · · Score: 3, Funny
    No, I think it was a DeLorean DMC-12. No idea why they needed all that radioactive stuff.

    Seen leaving the scene of the crime here: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bI0WbLHBXyY/Tix4ZFMCZ_I/AAAAAAABoSM/1YqK064jHsY/s640/back+to+the+future+whitewalls.jpg
    and I think they need to get their engine checked.

  29. And the Darwin Award goes to... by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    Those two idiots.

  30. Theiving Rule #341 by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the loot starts to glow, just say "No"

  31. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The US does the same thing. When nuclear material gets shipped across the US it is in unmarked, locked trucks (although I am sure the shipment itself if liberaly marked). Of course, these are government shipments and have heavily armed escorts, in unmarked vehicles as well. You don't want to advertise the fact you are carrying radioactive cargo, both for security and NIMBY reasons. At least, this is what I have been told by my father's cousin, who did security for both nuclear shipments and nuclear sites for the DOE for a number of years (and was even a rangemaster for them at one time-yes, even the DOE has their own firing ranges)

    In this particular case, and especially given the amount of crime in Mexico, it does not surprise me that the truck would be unmarked. And it doesn't really matter if the cargo is marked: carjackers aren't going to rob you at gunpoint and beat you up then take the time to look at the cargo and see if it is worth stealing. They are just going to drive off. I am surprised that the hospital didn't at least hire a security service to escort the shipment; I would assume even(maybe even especially) in Mexico contractable security services are common. Maybe they just aren't trustworthy or capabale enough?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  32. Re:Or mutate into Chupacabra! by plopez · · Score: 2
    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  33. Serves them right by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They stole a truck with no idea of the cargo's value or importance, and probably didn't even care if someone else could die if they stole it. It might have been medical supplies, vaccines, food rations, anything. And if they'd gotten involved in a high speed pursuit they could have killed someone just running away. Not to mention their willingness to threaten deadly force in the act, which would have given the driver grounds to use the same in self defense, even without the cargo being lethal.

    Which would itself only increase any self defense fatality in being justified if the thieves had gotten shot.

    They jacked a rig, had no concern for the value of human life, and it bit them in the ass. To be blunt, they had it coming.

    The fact that the authorities aren't even going to be responsible for punishing them means they have nobody to blame but themselves.

    1. Re:Serves them right by ddt · · Score: 2

      If they had no concern for human life, they would have killed the drivers instead of beating them up. And it is safe to assume that one or more of thieves was doing it because of peer pressure, which can be intense amoung criminals, where your buddy can suddenly turn judge and executioner if you say or do the wrong thing.

      While we're on the subject, let's talk about what white collar criminals "deserve" for the crimes they do that can hurt millions instead of just a handful.

    2. Re:Serves them right by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're going to die a horrific, slow, and painful death. While I agree they brought it upon themselves, the picture of what they're likely to go through brings me no pleasure or satisfaction.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Serves them right by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Wow, so there are intelligent, compassionate humans alive today. Good comment, hey!. I sure don't mourn criminals who die because of their follies, but I take no joy in their deaths.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  34. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Informative

    "ie. the coke-snorting Americans whining about them. You wouldn't be the first to suggest this... particular approach, the winning the war on drugs; but I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up."
    Yes, a lot of Americans and Europeans would die. And I bet a lot of Canadians would as well.

    I guess you're too lazy to read up on the subject and instead jump straight to bashing Americans. I know its easy and makes you feel better about yourself. But please try to at least make an effort to sound like a smug, smart ass. Here, I have done the work for you, since you appear to be incapable of doing it yourself:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War#Effects_internationally
    Improved cooperation of Mexico with the U.S. led to the recent arrests of 755 Sinaloa cartel suspects in U.S. cities and towns, but the U.S. market is being eclipsed by booming demand for cocaine in Europe, where users now pay twice the going U.S. rate.

    OOPS! Bet you didn't see that one coming ... did you?
    http://newamericamedia.org/2013/02/mexican-drug-cartels-eye-spain-as-their-new-home.php
    http://www.mexicogulfreporter.com/2013/04/mexican-drug-cartels-have-strong.html
    http://www.irishexaminer.com/analysis/mexican-drug-cartels-eye-europe-238202.html

    Sorry to be a dick but as an American I am tired of ignorant people outside of the USA painting every American as an ignorant slob.

  35. If the material is mobilized in dust, by Marrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesnt the danger remain? The total rads you get is not as important is not as important as how you get those rads. If you inhale a particle, your body cannot dispel it and it will mutate your genes and kill you with cancer. Even minimal radiation, if constantly directed at you by an internalized particle will still kill you.

  36. Re:isn't it possible to detect by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Short answer: No. Long answer: What do you mean "big doses"? There are many sources of gamma rays in the atmosphere (when stuff like cosmic rays hit it, you get a nice shower of gamma rays and other neat thingies). Maybe if you have a gamma spectrograph you can filter out just the cobalt-60 gamma rays, assuming they're unique? In that case you just need to worry about the fact that the surface is huge and gamma detectors are non-directional. That means that to scan a point on the surface you need to point straight at it. Unless you have a massive constillation of sats that means each "square" you scan will need to have a pretty high CPM for there to be a statistically significant number of counts during the scan. Due to the inverse square law, your satellite in LEO will only see a few CPS if somebody within 1KM of the source is getting several MILLION CPM. That translates into radiation sickness within a few days. For being 1KM away. Don't even ask about being in the same room as it! And of course the area you're scanning in 1 second is pretty huge so this detector wouldn't be much help locating things. And that's assuming no background radiation on the same order (or higher) CPS.

    This would change if you have a gamma ray vector spectrograph that lets you measure the exact frequency and vector of each gamma ray it detects. But right now I think the filters are pretty fuzzy AND the techniques used are all non-directional. Even assuming perfect filters and vector detectors, the counts have to be huge before they show up in space right when you're looking. And I think the assumption you even can filter so you won't see any background ticks is incorrect, but I have no idea what kind of spectral distribution the Earth's gamma background has.

    The reason you can have satellites that detect and locate the gamma bursts of underground nuclear tests is because of the B word. If it's a burst then you can triangulate between satellites even though their detectors are scalar not vector. That's because the sudden uptick that each satellite sees is tied to the same physical event. If you're looking at decay emissions then the counts are not synchronized so you can't triangulate. Oh, and also the gamma ray burst from an explosion is pretty big compared to the decay from a few kg of cobalt-60.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  37. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

    No, it becomes half as dangerous in about six years. That's still pretty dangerous.

  38. Re:hmmm... by jafac · · Score: 5, Informative

    Goiana was Cesium-137.

    There have been several incidents with Cobalt-60 sources, including one in 2010 in Dehli, India, and another in 2000, in Thailand. And in some cases, the radioactive material has ended up being recycled into new products; for example - incidents which actually happened: water-dishes for pets, and belt-buckles sold from discount websites. In these cases, the radioactivity was detected by random spot-checks. There are probably products out there that have incorporated recycled radioactive substances, which made it through spot-checks and are sitting in people's homes, making them sick - and there is no way for us to know.

    With regard to the cobalt 60 source: Wikipedia says it was 111 Tbq.
    "Example: a 60Co source with an activity of 2.8 GBq, which is equivalent to 60 g of pure 60Co, generates a dose of 1 mSv at one meter distance within one hour."

    A 1 Sv dose in 1 hour, is lethal.

    Extrapolating 111 TBq to 2.8 GBq; (111,000/2.8 = 39,642 ...); so multiply 1 mSv by that, and you get 39.6 Sv per hour.

    If they took it out of it's casing, they'd receive a lethal dose of radiation in less than 2 minutes. (depending on how close they stayed, and how long they stayed near it). Staying at least 400 cm away, would mitigate much of the beta particles, but not the gamma rays. Gamma rays are attenuated by the inverse square law, like any radiant energy. So distance is also your friend, but better still, an inch or so of lead.

    They would not start feeling symptoms, until an hour or two later. Dizzyness, headache, nausea, vomiting. Later - worse symptoms appear. It will probably take a few days for them to die, and they may seek medical treatment, which may save them, depending on how long they were in close proximity to the unshielded source.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  39. If I'm gonna die of Cobalt poisoning... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

    I'm at least going to want to do it... On the Beach.

  40. Exposure by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    I am no nuclear scientist, but I thought radiation sickness and death was a factor of emission of the source and well as time exposed and distance.
    The exact details of the source can be found here(111 TBq):
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt-60#Safety

    However all they did was find the material, unshielded. They don't know how long the thieves had been exposed to it. Unless the level was high enough that any unshielded exposure would lead to insta-death (which I find hard to believe). It could be that their exposure was reduced to opening it, discarding it, and leaving, so on the magnitude of minutes. Anyway they seem to be missing 2 or 3 variables to make such a assured claim.

    I don't know how to calculate a lethal dose from the indicated source strength to figure out the amount of time needed. Looking into it, calculating TBq (or Curie) into Gy/h (or rads/h) looks pretty complicated. Found an online tool, but it doesn't seem to work.

    Anyway far from "They will, without a doubt, die.", unless it is of that insta-gib variety.

    Here is a mortality chart:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_radiation_syndrome#Signs_and_symptoms

    2-6 Gy seems bad but possibly treatable, while 6+ means you are probably going to die regardless of what you do.

    1. Re:Exposure by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
      Anyway far from "They will, without a doubt, die.", unless it is of that insta-gib variety.

      Cobalt-60 sources are like that, kinda. Look for some "radiological accident" reports on the IAEA webpage. It's stuff like people entering industrial sterilizers with the radiation source in the active position ... deadly exposure in 30 seconds or so.

  41. Re:Look in the mirror: you are the problem by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    What the fuck is wrong with you?

    With that user id? It's a troll account.

  42. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > better still, an inch or so of lead.

    depends. An old friend worked with medical radio-iodine, which emits high energy gammas. Part of her job was introducing new medical staff to the procedures. She would bring in the standard lead drapes and a Geiger counter and ask them all if they understood radiation precautions. They would of course say yes; she was just a little old lady (her own description), after all, and they were Doctors and Nurses.

    She'd hold up the Geiger counter near the patient who had taken the radio-iodine dose, and the Geiger counter would click away steadily.

    Then she'd put the lead drape in between patient and Geiger counter -- and the counter would roar.

    Then she'd smile and say:

    "... I know you all understand secondary radiation, and how gamma rays mostly go straight through tissue like you and me without interacting, but if they hit a really dense material like these lead drapes, they knock off a huge number of electrons that become charged particles that will interact far more readily with tissue, that's one of the reasons we call it ionizing radiation.

    "So who wants a drape?"

  43. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    I'm fairly certain legalizing things like meth and cocaine wouldn't do much to aid the addicted.

    It's better than sending them to prison, AKA Criminal University. If their drugs were cheaper they wouldn't be stealing from me. I never knew a cigarette smoker or alcoholic stealing to support their addictions.

    Legalization would end the drug violence, just as Prohibition's end ended the violence of the illegal liquor trade. All the arguments for Prohibition as well as against it still apply in today's prohibitions, and history shouldn't be ignored.

  44. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

    You rebutted his "coke snorting Americans" with an article that says most of the Mexican coke is snorted by Americans but the Europeans are catching up? Hm....

  45. Who found it? by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    The cobalt source is said to have been found in a rural area. What about the exposure of the people who found it?

  46. Reminds me of the movie PU-239 by Demonantis · · Score: 2

    Where they snort the isotope thinking its coke. You are dead and there is fuck all they can do about it. Tylenol overdose does the same thing too though if its not treated in time. You get mildly ill first. Then you get better and suddenly deteriorate since your liver is cooked. Very freaky shit.

  47. Wrongful death by johnpc831 · · Score: 2

    Good thing this didn't happen in the U.S.A. Otherwise the families of the robbers would be suing the hospitals for wrongful death.