Slashdot Mirror


NSA Says It Foiled Plot To Destroy US Economy Through Malware

mrspoonsi writes "Business Insider Reports: The National Security Agency described for the first time a cataclysmic cyber threat it claims to have stopped On Sunday's '60 Minutes.' Called a BIOS attack, the exploit would have ruined, or 'bricked,' computers across the country, causing untold damage to the national and even global economy. Even more shocking, CBS goes as far as to point a finger directly at China for the plot — 'While the NSA would not name the country behind it, cyber security experts briefed on the operation told us it was China.' The NSA says it closed this vulnerability by working with computer manufacturers. Debora Plunkett, director of cyber defense for the NSA: One of our analysts actually saw that the nation state had the intention to develop and to deliver — to actually use this capability — to destroy computers."

113 of 698 comments (clear)

  1. NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by fractoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and subprime lending really DID destroy the U.S. economy.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    1. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Iraq had WMDs. And the NSA never lied to congress or the people... how stupid do they think we are?

    2. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by mellon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The attack being described probably would have been worse. And if the NSA stopped it, that's great—they should get credit and appreciation for that. This is exactly what the NSA _should_ be doing. It's too bad that they have spent so much focus on stuff _other_ than this. People forget that the NSA has actually done a _lot_ over the past century that has been of extreme benefit, because they have done so many inappropriate things recently. It would be really great if we could get back to the old NSA.

    3. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by afxgrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a fucking propaganda piece. It's quite easy to see right through the bullshit.

      If a BIOS exploiting malware was a real threat where's the CVE for it? Where's the advisory?? A BIOS crippling virus released into the wild has no need for secrecy unless the NSA themselves released it. It's quite convenient they mention they thwarted a "major cyber attack" without releasing the name of the virus nor when this supposedly happened.

      What a fucking joke that entire interview was....

    4. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Cenan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is exactly what the NSA _should_ be doing. It's too bad that they have spent so much focus on stuff _other_ than this.

      Which begs the question, how come this was not among the first things touted as their reason for being? How come this was not mentioned before Congress? Or to the media? How come this whole thing sounds utterly made up?

      --
      ... whatever ...
    5. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Desler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Recently? The intelligence agencies were doing all manner of inappropriate things throughout the 50s, 60s and in the 70s until the Church Committee was created to investigate. Their gross abuses of power during those decades was the entire point of why the FISA legislation was passed. And it was not to create the rubber-stamp court that we have now.

      It's amazing how 9/11 has made so many people forget the rampant abuse of power in the NSA's and CIA's history.

    6. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by mellon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because there's a shit-ton of money in pervasive surveillance, and a lot less of it in doing what the NSA should be doing.

    7. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by mellon · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying the NSA never did anything wrong prior to 9/11, but their remit was a lot more restrained. This is not to say that they wouldn't have done more if they'd had the resources, but really Moore's law is what's turned them into the juggernaut they are today.

    8. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by LVSlushdat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... how stupid do they think we are?

      You don't want to know just how stupid *they* think we are.. And the really sad part?? *They* are absolutely right on a large percentage of the American people.. The ones who drink the koolaide that comes from BOTH parties.. Its becoming apparent that none of the media, better known now as the defacto US Department of Propaganda, is telling the truth.. oh sure, they tell *their* "version" of the "truth", but not the TRUTH.. We are well and truly screwed...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    9. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The attack being described is nonsense, especially if China was supposed to be the perpetrator. Undermining the US economy is really the LAST thing the Chinese would want to do. It makes no sense from a business perspective.

      North Korea would have made a much better scapegoat.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by number6x · · Score: 5, Funny

      The NSA probably commissioned some vendor to write a key-logger that would install in a computer's BIOS. They probably paid billions of dollars for development and research.

      Then they tested it on a few computers and the NSA malware bricked them all.

      So the NSA canceled the project, saving America from a malware threat that would have tanked the economy. See how diligently they work to save Americans from cyber threats?

      Next week they'll stimulate the economy by breaking everyone's windows (pun intended).

    11. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Posting AC, although I wish for an "Advocatus Diaboli" button:

      If the US had a propaganda department, it sure isn't working. Look at the morale of the population. Look at the government mistrust, and the pushback against the ACA.

      Other countries have far better effect on the US people. Take China for example. It is common for people in the US believe that China has risen to the point where they have far better technology, and the peasant in the rice paddy has been replaced by the 1950s American middle class person.

      Regardless of the truth, the NSA will not get credit. If they did stop a malware attack, most Americans won't believe it. If they didn't, I'm sure they wouldn't bother trying to appeal to a dubious populace.

      Plus, the evidence is in their favor. All and all, most operating systems have had some hardening done by them to reduce attack surface, be it BSDs, Linux's SELinux, or the multiple access contexts in Windows. A malware attack against a soft infrastructure would do a lot of damage, so someone, somewhere probably has done work to keep things working.

      But what do I know... I'm just a dumb AC, emphasis on the "C" part of the abbreviation.

    12. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      People forget that the NSA has actually done a _lot_ over the past century that has been of extreme benefit

      Pray tell, remind us of some of these many incredible accomplishments, please. Or all they all SECRET?

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    13. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More accurately, Iraq had a lot of chemical weapons in the 1980's, and we stood idly by while Saddam expended them. When I say "we", I mean that very literally, and very personally. I was there, along with my shipmates, to see it happening. We helped to document it. We stood idly by while Saddam expended huge quantities of chemical weapons.

      By 2002, when we decided that Sadman was so very sad that we had to do something about him, he had very little to nothing left.

      Our governments (US and UK) knew very well what Saddam had, and what Saddam was capable of. Our governments exaggerated everything by orders of magnitude, and bald faced LIED TO US. Those truckloads of stuff that went to Syria? Probably some bad stuff. Most of it was far more likely to have been plundered treasures, destined to ensure a life of security, if not ease, for certain select people dear to Sadman.

      But, you go on believing the propaganda.

      You will note, I hope, that I've said nothing in Saddam Hussein's defense. I have ONLY pointed out how dishonest our own governments are.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re: NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Next up NSA saves companies from being "slashdotted"

      Now I wonder what the NSA will save us from after that? If we are lucky maybe fake entertainment stories posted by fox and msnbc that pose as news

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    15. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Phreakiture · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is entirely possible that they did, indeed, halt a plot, just as they said they did. It is also possible they did not. It's very difficult to tell at this point, because the one thing of which I am sure of, and I speculate most Americans are as well, is that they lie and they do it without hesitation. My confidence in anything they say is near enough to zero that the difference can be written off as rounding error.

      As a consequence, it really does not matter what they say.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    16. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      You want to know how? I'll tell you how. They overheard me talking with this genius I know, and they came to my house to ask me about his virus. I told them all I knew when they threatened me with a five dollar wrench. Their next stop was at my buddy's house, where they recruited him to work for the NSA. Me? All I got was the liberty to keep using my knees. Bastards didn't even buy me a beer. And, my buddy has forgotten my name. So, yeah, I guess it's good for all of you that the NSA monitors people like me and my buddy.

      To bad I didn't understand how the virus worked - they might have offered me a job too!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    17. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

      Assuming (and it's a big assumption) that it is true, there are several reasons it might not have come up until now:

      (1) The judicial review of the constitutionality of the programs means they will have to disclose some serious stuff they've prevented or else they're out of a job.

      (2) If the "report" is accurate, which seems unlikely (because it would be a really STUPID thing for China to do unless there is a war), you're talking about an act of war committed by one nuclear power on another. That's not something you dick around with by sharing it with the public, especially not without vetting and appropriate spin from the Chain of Command, all the way up to POTUS.

    18. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what you get for outsourcing your propaganda to the private sector.

    19. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Oh, don't be silly. Don't you remember that other infamous virus that the NSA thwarted? The one which caused your hard drive to melt down, and your monitor to assplode? THAT one was North Korean!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    20. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      you don't understand - they secretly patched everyone's machines, so now we're all safe. It's all good!

    21. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Regardless of the truth, the NSA will not get credit. If they did stop a malware attack, most Americans won't believe it. If they didn't, I'm sure they wouldn't bother trying to appeal to a dubious populace.

      I'll happily believe the NSA stopped the malware attack in question, and I'll happily give them credit for it.

      However, it does not give them even a single tiny shred of excuse for all the unconstitutional totalitarian treason, for which I will continue to call for their prosecution.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 2

      Weapons of Mass Destruction != Nukes. WMD *includes* nukes, as well as chemical and biological weapons and probably other stuff I'm not aware of. The fact that people conflate the terms changes nothing.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    23. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by rourin_bushi · · Score: 2

      I think more to the point... it sounds like what they did was find the vulnerability that they'd detected some folks working really hard on an exploit to, and worked with industry to close it. While good for the country (and probably me individually), I'd hardly call it "foiling a plot".

      Frankly, I have a hard time believing that China was really just about to try to destroy the economy of such a large trading partner.

    24. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Learn to READ before comment!

      His point was that he never installed a BIOS update, because it isn't delivered through regular OS update channels.

      As probably everyone here hasn't installed a BIOS update if your system is running without problems.

      But he (and no one here) suffered from no mystery-chinese BIOS attack. So how could the NSA have done that mystery feat? Protecting a nation from BIOS attacks withiout making sure that BIOSes are updated?

      Makes this whole story sound quite unbelievable. More like "Wag the dog"-like spin-doctoring.

      --
      bickerdyke
    25. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Typical+Slashdotter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Per Article 3, Section 3 of the US Constitution,

      Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

      Let's not dilute the word by using it for other bad things.

    26. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by budgenator · · Score: 2

      Prosecution will never happen, everybody is prohibited by law from testifying to whether the documents Snowden stole are authentic or not, i.e. the infamous "I can neither confirm nor deny", and Snowden is unlikely to respond to a sumons to testify.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    27. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ones who drink the koolaide that comes from BOTH parties.. Its becoming apparent that none of the media, better known now as the defacto US Department of Propaganda, is telling the truth.. oh sure, they tell *their* "version" of the "truth", but not the TRUTH..

      What qualifications do you have that allow you to reliably discern the TRUTH from the lies?

      Are you 100% sure you aren't drinking someone else's brand of koolaid?

      What makes your sources of information more reliable than other peoples'?

      Often when someone is pushing a story about a vast conspiracy, the conspiracy is fictional, or at least highly exaggerated, and the people pushing the conspiracy narrative have their own political reasons for pushing it.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    28. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Shoten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a fucking propaganda piece. It's quite easy to see right through the bullshit.

      If a BIOS exploiting malware was a real threat where's the CVE for it? Where's the advisory?? A BIOS crippling virus released into the wild has no need for secrecy unless the NSA themselves released it. It's quite convenient they mention they thwarted a "major cyber attack" without releasing the name of the virus nor when this supposedly happened.

      What a fucking joke that entire interview was....

      One, there's no CVE for malware. The "V" in "CVE" stands for "Vulnerability."

      But I think you're right otherwise, and this is total propaganda. So, let me get this straight, 60 Minutes: our largest trading partner, who manufactures more of our goods than any other country, and on razor-thin profit margins while your own economy wobbles, would for no particular reason go out and mess up the economy of their largest customer.

      I CALL UNBELIEVABLE FUCKING ASS-FUCK SHENANIGANS.

      It makes absolutely no sense. Not only does China have nothing to gain by disrupting our economy that way, they have a lot to lose. It would also be considered an act of war, and one that would be sure to align pretty much the whole planet against them.

      So, maybe it was someone else...I can think of very few countries that have any reason to do something so much like poking a sleeping lion with a stick, but they are out there. As you said...why not provide more details?

      I'd be willing to bet that what they actually stopped was a very small targeted attack like Shamoon, and that attribution is classified. Unless they're completely making it up entirely, which is less likely in my opinion.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    29. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by dAzED1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. It is not possible they did this. Doing this would require fixing the vulnerability - did they hack into the bios programming tools at all the motherboard manufacturers and secretly fix this problem? Did they hack everyone's computer and install the firmware update? An OS patch is one thing, but a firmware patch? This particular problem can not have been fixed with just a handwaving. It's one thing to say they intercepted a phone call and foiled a terrorist plot. It's another thing to claim they updated all current and future disparate BIOS firmware to protect against an undisclosed vulnerability. That is impossible, and makes them even more ridiculous.

    30. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is entirely possible that they did, indeed, halt a plot, just as they said they did.

      Not it fucking isn't.

      The NSA says it closed this vulnerability by working with computer manufacturers.

      Where are motherboards and BIOS shit is fucking manufactured / written? (Hint: China and Taiwan)

      Do you really think it's possible that a BIOS update was created by those manufacturers that:
      1: Applied to all the vulnerable systems, many of which are 10+ years old and manufactured by a now defunct-company
      2: Worked
      3: Got deployed
      4: Had all of the above happen with no one knowing about it outside of the NSA, the manufacturers, and the one guy in the world who writes BIOS patch notes
      ?

      Hell, I'll GIVE you the fucking BIOS patch notes.

      BIOS Version 2.3.5

      1 - Updated tables to half-support new Intel processors. Buy a new motherboard with new socket if you want it to actually work, though.
      2 - Updated Intel Option ROM. Just kidding, we're not updating that anymore, this motherboard has been out for 2 months already.
      3 - Various menu items have been slightly changed, and some of your settings will be wiped, we won't document which or why, though.

      At least this shit is believable.

    31. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by AK+Marc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So they are not levying war against the people? Given the government's use of "war" (on drugs, cold, etc.), I would say yes.

    32. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by crtreece · · Score: 4, Informative

      We stood idly by while Saddam expended huge quantities of chemical weapons.

      Personally that may be true. On a bigger scale, we (the United States) provided helped them deploy the chemical weapons.

      Our governments (US and UK) knew very well what Saddam had, and what Saddam was capable of.

      We certainly should have known what Saddam had and was capable of. First, we helped put the Ba'ath party in to power. During the Iran / Iraq war, we helped them financially and with intelligence information. Then, we sold the precursors of chemical weapons to them and provided reconnaissance intelligence that was used in their deployment. Why else would Donald Rumsfeld be smiling as he shook Saddams hand in 1983?

      You will note, I hope, that I've said nothing in Saddam Hussein's defense. I have ONLY pointed out how dishonest our own governments are.

      And here is more evidence supporting that supposition.

      --
      file: .signature not found
    33. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by iksbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In all seriousness, I was thinking the exact same thing.
      As others here have pointed out, the premise of a BIOS-flashing piece of malware seems tenuous, and even laughable to those familiar with the subject. So why would the NSA make such a claim? One strong possibility in my mind is that they really have produced such a piece of malware (keylogger, packet sniffer, whatever) and are afraid of the public backlash and/or damage claims (my motherboard failed! it must be the NSA!) that would arise when its existence is made clear by a Snowden release. As such, they are desperately trying to spin it off on China before said release can be made.

    34. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Re: the media... yup - sad, but mostly true.

      I find that I usually have to look up at least two different sources, plus at least one non-US source (my faves: RT, BBC, Deutsche Welle) and at least one alt-media source (*not* an ideologically-driven one) to get a semi-coherent picture of the truth behind a given story I find interesting.

      There is one bit, though: I don't think the US media is doing it for a given propaganda track per se (though it is rapidly approaching that), but instead I think it's an organic result of the $media_corporation drive for eyeballs, thus advertising dollars. This is why a typical cable show's primetime slots are packed with crap that feeds off of the drama and controversy, instead of trying to get at the actual facts and heart of a given story. It's why you have the likes of, say, Nancy Grace on CNN making her paycheck off the corpses of dead kids, MSNBC sneering at anyone who dares to besmirch their idol in the White House, and FOX shouting full-throttle that that same White House occupant is a combination of Stalin and the Antichrist (albeit wearing a better suit). Each channel is shaping their chosen demographic, and stoking them up so they can jack up the rates for advertisers.

      But then, I suspect it's part of the grand civilizational cycle - rise, peak, fall. We (the world, mind, since we're a lot more global than most folks realize) are somewhere near the peak IMHO, though I'll be damned if I can say for certain which side of that peak we're on.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    35. Re:NSA failed to halt subprime lending, though. by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2

      No, it's not possible. The idea that China would want to tank the U.S. economy is absurd. We buy all their stuff. And all the treasury debt they own would be worthless, where's the logic in that?

  2. We have all the evidence! by NIK282000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But we cant show it to you, its a privet.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:We have all the evidence! by Desler · · Score: 2

      They will just simply claim that happened because they didn't have enough spying powers.

    2. Re:We have all the evidence! by phrostie · · Score: 5, Informative

      and this lame vague shit is the best they can do.

      100% of the NSA budget needs to be given to NASA.

    3. Re:We have all the evidence! by u38cg · · Score: 2

      That makes sense. A hedge is not really good evidence for anything, except possibly gardening.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  3. Is this why we have UEFI all of a sudden? by danudwary · · Score: 2

    I don't know the history of this, and the linked article is vague on timelines, but it always did seem like UEFI came out of nowhere...

    1. Re:Is this why we have UEFI all of a sudden? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2

      UEFI is the attack capable of not allowing you to boot anything they do not ordain as acceptable.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  4. Expect these claims to be walked back by the_scoots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once those pesky real journalists that insist on facts and sources start digging into this, I'd expect the cataclysmic claims will be slowly walked back to something much less sinister, like almost all other claims of thwarted plots.

    1. Re:Expect these claims to be walked back by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't matter. You have the resounding shout into the ears of the masses, followed by the trickling in of facts. The big emotional movement comes from the resounding shout; unless you're torn down in a huge uproar from an angered populous, the facts will be ignored and shrugged at.

  5. Not buying this by Akratist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China holds a huge amount of our debt. They want us to buy their stuff and to borrow money from them. Why cripple our economy? Or, even worse, why do something like this that will point a finger back to them and stir up the pot against them? (and possibly lad to embargos, and so on)

    1. Re:Not buying this by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Informative

      China holds a huge amount of our debt.

      Our debt is around 17 trillion dollars. Of that 17 trillion, China owns around 1.2 trillion. A large number for sure, but not something I'd say is a rather small percentage of the total debt. The debt owned by the public equates to 12 trillion which is something I'd call huge.

      National debt of the United States

    2. Re:Not buying this by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Informative

      China holds a huge amount of our debt. They want us to buy their stuff and to borrow money from them. Why cripple our economy? Or, even worse, why do something like this that will point a finger back to them and stir up the pot against them? (and possibly lad to embargos, and so on)

      Ya, it makes no sense. Like if I pulled up to the Starbucks drive-thru to order a venti double-skinny mocha latteachio with no foam and instead they went all Goldfinger on my car. You don't try to kill your best customer.

      Likewise if this was some freelance/rogue/criminal/terrorist operation inside China, I'd think they (the Chinese) would be motivated to foil it themselves for the same reasons.

      The NSA should have cooked up a more plausible bogus plot to foil, but instead they don't even respect us enough to make up a believable lie.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Not buying this by usuallylost · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't forget the other 3 or 4 trillion in US dollars they are holding as cash reserves. If China did something to bring down our economy their exposure would be far worse than the debt that they hold. It would impact their hard currency reserves and an unknown amount of additional US currency held by various Chinese companies and individuals.

      If this was a governmental effort in China my guess is it would be more along the lines of something that would be held back in case there was a confrontation between the US and China. Rather than something that would just be randomly used. If it was some private individual or crime group who knows what their intentions would be. Unless they sell new computers how would they monetize this? Whole thing sounds kind of suspect to me.

  6. What a load of bollocks by dido · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If these attackers the NSA supposedly thwarted (the Chinese it is speculated), managed to gain control over large numbers of computers with access enough to damage their firmware, it would make far better sense to keep those machines alive and working for them instead. You could cause far more damage to the US economy by keeping those machines alive and pwn3d than if you simply bricked them. A bricked machine will cost a few hundred dollars to fix. A pwn3d machine is a gift that keeps on giving!

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  7. house of cards? by AntEater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does this strike anyone else as being utterly ridiculous? "Cataclysmic"?? I mean, if a bunch of bricked computers could bring down our economy (and possibly the global economy) then isn't the whole thing in need of some serious attention? Maybe we've built an unreasonable amount of dependence on something that is entirely too frail to warrant such trust? - both the computer systems and our current economic system.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    1. Re:house of cards? by supremebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If anything, bricking a few million old PC's might actually have a stimulating impact on the economy. When the users toss out their 5 year old system that is probably still running Windows XP, they will likely go out and buy a shiny new laptop from Dell or HP that comes with a copy of Windows 8.1 and Office 2012. It will probably come with a "free" trial subscription of McAfee or Symantec virus protection as well. Lots of profit to be had by all in the IT industry.

      When you think about it that way, it makes you wonder who paid the Chinese programmers to write this malware.

    2. Re:house of cards? by Kielistic · · Score: 2

      All those broken Windows machines would definitely stimulate the economy. Sound economic theory at its finest.

  8. Re:Suuure by techsimian · · Score: 2

    Mine's a flowerpot...with a wilted daisy

  9. Prove it by bradley13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right, sure they did. A BIOS attack of the sort hinted at in this interview is difficult to believe.

    If they worked with computer manufacturers to close some such massive security hole, then they can easily point to the historical vulnerability. The technical community can verify their claims. Failing that, no, I do not believe such an attack ever existed outside the overheated imagination of some technically illiterate NSA bureaucrat.

    In other news, I have a bridge I'd like to sell you.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Prove it by rmdingler · · Score: 2

      Another TLA that seems appropriate at this juncture is FUD. It's not tough to believe the security game might be painted as another necessary sacrifice of freedoms in exchange for security. Will citizens pick necessary evil we know >malevolent threat from abroad?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Prove it by sunderland56 · · Score: 2

      If they worked with computer manufacturers to close some such massive security hole, then they can easily point to the historical vulnerability.

      Except, there is none. The BIOS is not connected to the internet; the computer's operating system is. Any vulnerability that would allow remote updating of the BIOS is a vulnerability in Windows/MacOS/Linux/etc., and not in the BIOS or hardware; so working with computer manufacturers is pointless.

      Many BIOSes have a setting to allow/prevent the updating of the BIOS from the OS; if your machine has that, and it is set to block updates, then there IS no vulnerabilty at all. If your machine does not have that, then the fix would be to update your BIOS.... over the internet....

    3. Re:Prove it by sandytaru · · Score: 2

      Probably this story was accepted by the same guy that approved monitoring for terrorists in World of Warcraft.

      --
      Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    4. Re:Prove it by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Perhaps more importantly, even if their claims are 100% true, they are basically irrelevant to the 'read absolutely everybody's email on the entire planet' side of the NSA, and instead support the 'do tedious work on making sure computer security sucks less' side of the NSA.

      Building a dystopian panopticon surveillance apparatus is of limited use for preventing such an attack (best case, maybe the attackers will be dumb enough to chat about it over insecure channels months or years before it's finished); but provides a dangerous incentive to tolerate, or even encourage, vulnerabilities in systems and infrastructure.

      Fixing vulnerabilities is something you can do with nothing more than access to samples of potentially vulnerable things, along with a supply of suitably skilled people paid to poke at them; along with a basic research type group that explores techniques for building future systems more securely.

      If the NSA were known for doing that sort of stuff, nobody would have anything unpleasant to say about them, aside from a few possible grumblings about whether software companies were slacking off because they expected the NSA to clean up after them.

  10. It's obviously false. by QilessQi · · Score: 5, Funny

    the exploit would have ruined, or 'bricked,' computers across the country, causing untold damage to the national and even global economy

    Sorry, I'm not buying it. Despite the NSA's best efforts, Microsoft did release Vista.

  11. BIOS Attacks by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have been known for years. The problem is you have to gain admin access to the machine first, so basically you are bricking your own botnet.

    LOL.

    1. Re:BIOS Attacks by swb · · Score: 2

      I guess it depends on what your goals are.

      Arguably, organized crime could make money by just killing shopkeepers and taking the till. But at some point they realized they could make MORE money by threatening them with death or violence and getting regular payments for "protection". It's recurring money versus one-time money and has a lot less blowback than dead bodies.

      Botnets and remote control of PCs are of more value for crime and intelligence gathering than bricking, so if your goal is long-term value is money or intelligence, then remote-control viruses that let you harvest information are more valuable.

      PC viruses seemed to have evolved in the same way -- a lot of the early ones were stupid and malicious, deleting files, corrupting the OS and rendering it unusable. The more contemporary ones mostly strive for stealth and keeping the computer running so that information of value can be continuously harvested.

      But it's certainly not hard to imagine a scenario where the group responsible has a different goal and bricking PCs is the desired outcome. And maybe it was meant to be a sleeper virus that was only activated under specific circumstances.

      I'm not defending the NSA, either, the story seems implausible because it seems to me that if mass-bricking BIOSes was achievable, someone would have done it by now, either state-sponsored (Israel, Iran, etc) or on a rogue basis. I think there have been some BIOS bricking viruses, but they haven't gotten very far for whatever the reason.

  12. make believe by Korruptionen · · Score: 2

    The NSA is keeping us about as safe as the Mars rovers do from martian attacks.... which really is the reason we all know they are there. amiright?

  13. We've been there, done that; CIH virus by freax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIH_(computer_virus)

    ps. It didn't destroy the US economy.

  14. Which is really irrelevant to the debate by davidannis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    because I can't imagine the scenario in which they uncovered that plot by looking at the metadata from American cellphones.

  15. They did their job is a news story? by BisuDagger · · Score: 2

    NSA needs to stop back pedaling and trying to prove they are a legitimate organization. It's their job to protect us from all types of stuff the general public has never heard of. Maybe they should watch some more Hollywood action films because those actors in the movie are more concerned about OPSEC then the NSA.

  16. The NSA says it closed this vulnerability by by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

    The NSA says it closed this vulnerability by working with computer manufacturers.

    Ah the Chinese are so helpful ... oh wait!

  17. vulnerability is closed? by wkk2 · · Score: 2

    I'm sure, due to their hard work, all new computer have hardware jumpers to write protect the BIOS....

  18. A bricked computer isn't the biggest threat by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Informative

    A more dangerous cyber threat would be malware that collects all the users personal information and stores it until the malware writer is ready to use it against the victim.

    Oops!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  19. Re:Guys seriously please dont hate us! by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 2

    I found this part of that odd: The NSA says it closed this vulnerability by working with computer manufacturers.

    Did they work with a time machine to take care of machines built with this vulnerability? Includes those that are set not to automatically upgrade BIOS, of course.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  20. Stated more accurately by xednieht · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China has discovered NSA's backdoor into computers, and worked with computer manufacturers to build a much more better and newer back door for NSA.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  21. Yeah, right, NSA, we believe you soooo much (not) by tekrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please. I saw this on 60 Minutes and that entire pandering two-parter on Sunday night was a such a load of bullshit, I could smell it through the TV.

    And this segment of it was the worst, because it made no sense. I mean, they dumbed the story down for Ma and Pa in Pigsknuckle Arkansas, but for anyone with even a hint of technical acumen, it came off as complete tripe.

    Why *exactly* would China want to destroy the global economy? Such a move would hurt them more than us, because they are in a period of crazy growth, and their entire stability *depends* upon that growth or they'd have rioting.

    Secondly, if a nation wanted to destroy us, why use "malware"? A better way would be to use lobbyists to force more deregulation and let us cut our own throats as we've already seen. Our own greedy bastards will happily destroy the global economy if it means 6 more dollars in *their* pockets.

    The whole thing is fishy and smells of NSA desperation to look good to the average american, and paint the Chinese and Edward Snowden as bad guys we need to be afraid of so that the NSA can "protect" us, by of course, stripping us of all our rights.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  22. Prove it by gman003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This doesn't pass the sniff test. What would China gain by *destroying* our economy?

    Sure, China planting surveillance software on every computer, I can believe that. But bricking all the computers in the US doesn't make sense as an espionage move, it doesn't make sense as an economic move (do you think anyone would trust Chinese-made computers when rebuilding?), it doesn't make sense as a propaganda move. It might make sense as a military move as a prelude to invasion, but a) China doesn't want that, b) China probably couldn't do it if they wanted to, and c) even if not fired, the risks of such a weapon being uncovered outweighs any benefit.

    So it doesn't seem like something China would do. So who could it be? Even the NSA is explicitly calling it a nation-state, so it's not a terrorist group like al-Qaeda. If it's a nation-state, it has to be one that thinks (correctly or not) that they can beat the US when it is inevitably discovered (either before or after the attack). Russia's on that list, but I don't see how they would benefit except, again, as a pre-invasion attack, and our relations aren't that bad yet. North Korea might be dumb enough to think they can get away with it, but for the same reasons they probably don't have the capabilities of developing an attack like this. Iran is probably smart enough not to provoke the US with a direct attack, but maybe I'm wrong, or maybe they thought framing China would work.

    Honestly, if someone in the Chinese government got on TV and said "yeah, we made that as a training exercise for defense drills, how the hell did you guys find it in the wild?", I'd believe them more than I'm believing CBS/NSA right now, because that at least makes sense with all the other information.

    Especially since it's REAL FUCKING CONVENIENT for the NSA to suddenly have a major "victory" when they're being revealed as basically a bunch of puppy-kicking freedom-hating fascists.

  23. Unlikey! China would lose as much as the USA by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
    If the american economy bombs, who will repay all the debt the chinese hold? If there was such a "cataclysmic" financial crash and the USA defaulted on its loans, then the trillions and trillions of dollars owed by the USA becomes junk. How would that help China?

    Further, with their biggest customer deep in the mire, who would they sell their goods to? The same goods they depend on for revenue to keep their own growth moving forward?

    This has got to be the dumbest scare story, no: xenophobic, boogy-man, fiction to come out this year (and it has lots of competition). Although the american debt is a big drag on its economy, it's also so large that it's a problem for the debt holders, too. They are in just as much trouble if the value of that debt drops and therefore have an interest in making sure the USA does not crash and burn - despite what some scared, bigoted and ill-informed media commentators might think.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  24. cf. "Vietnam" by DdJ · · Score: 2

    "We had to destroy the village in order to save it."

  25. And if you believe any of this by calarndt · · Score: 2

    And if you believe any of this I've got a bridge over troubled waters I'll sell you! But the real problem is there are way too many Americans out there who will fall for this lame tactic.

  26. Re:in other news by multisync · · Score: 2

    NSA wrote the malware and implicated China

    That was my thought. The only countries who have attempted something on the scale of what the NSA is alleging are (allegedely) the United States and Isreal, who (allegedely) unleashed Stuxnet on the world.

    And I agree with the poster above - why would China wish to cripple the economy of one of the largest customers of its goods.

    This isn't passing the smell test.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  27. Re:Guys seriously please dont hate us! by danceswithtrees · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Includes those that are set not to automatically upgrade BIOS, of course

    Two words: BIOS backdoor!

    More importantly, they need to show that the massive dragnet of surveillance of all Americans was essential to find out about this.

    Another thing, ironic that the US worries about other people doing things that it has already done. For example, the US created Stuxnet and is worried someone else will follow our lead. The US dropped a nuclear bomb on civilians and we are worried someone else will follow our lead.

  28. You can't prove I didn't! by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I routinely stop alien invasions. Their lazors are no match for my hands (and let's not mention my other weapon... in my pants).

    Your move NSA - what have you done lately?

  29. Re:Guys seriously please dont hate us! by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought it was odd too untli I read the article and realised they were not talking about a real threat, they were talking about an analysts scenario. To quote:

    "One of our analysts actually saw that the nation state had the intention to develop and to deliver — to actually use this capability — to destroy computers."

    So basically this is a fear-mongering story since if the country in question had had the intention and capability to deploy such an attack, it would have been SUCCESSFUL. Only a small proportion on PCs would have been "fixed" if they had "worked with computer manufacturers".

    They really do think everyone is stupid don't they?

  30. Bullshit! by Sven-Erik · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just bullshit! If they stopped this attack by "closed this vulnerability by working with computer manufacturers", this would only fix the vulnerability on new computers built after the fix was created, but not on machines already produced and sold.

    This sounds more like a PR campaign to garner positive support after all the negative impact of the releases of the documents Edward Snowden leaked.

    --
    - "Every demand is a prison, and wisdom is only free when it asks nothing." Sir Betrand Russell
  31. I repeat by wcrowe · · Score: 2

    The NSA has become the Ministry of Truth.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:I repeat by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      The media has become the Ministry of Truth.

      FTFY.

      In other news, scientists discovered that two plus two actually equals five!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  32. From the lab horse's mouth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > Called a BIOS attack, the exploit would have ruined, or 'bricked,' computers across the country, causing untold damage to the national and even global economy.

    This is stupid. Malware writers learned a long-long time ago not to kill computers, because virus code cannot run on paper or thin air. They need living but ill computers, whose processing and communication capabilities can be exploited by the infection, to spread spam or mine Bitcoins, etc.

    The black plague killed some 33-40% of medieval european population within weeks. It did that trick 3-4 times during history. Where is yersinia pestis nowadays? It is a Level-4 biohazard lab curiosity, displayed in vials. In contrast, common cold is still with us and successfully exploits your nose to produce green soya, year after year.

    Furthermore, it is not possible to destroy computers by overwriting the BIOS. There is a unwritiable "brain stem" part of the BIOS, which knows only one thing: if the main BIOS mass fails to boot, read first file from floppy disk and overwrite BIOS with it. Even if the BIOS chip is soldered onto the motherboard (say laptop) and cannot be removed for re-writing in an external EEPROM programmer, this trick will save the computer.

    Honestly, NSA is making a Rigoletto of itself, in public. Or maybe it's Yorick, with NSA threatrically proclaming "To be or not to be..."

    1. Re:From the lab horse's mouth. by tibit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a unwritiable "brain stem" part of the BIOS, which knows only one thing: if the main BIOS mass fails to boot, read first file from floppy disk and overwrite BIOS with it.

      I'd like some thing tangible to back it up, since I think it's bullshit. There may have been some bioses like that, maybe even popular ones, but this is not the case anymore since at the minimum such a thing would need at least a minimal USB stack with it - it wouldn't be anywhere near "small" anymore.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  33. Re:Piss-poor reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From your link:

    Matt Blaze, a computer and information sciences professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said that BIOS could be overwritten by malware, bricking an unsuspecting computer. But the vagueness of the description of the “BIOS Plot” made him suspicious.

    “It would take significant resources – and an extraordinary bit of co-ordination and luck – to actually deploy malware that could do this at scale,” Blaze said.

    “And it's not clear how you'd ‘thwart’ such a scheme if you found out about it if you were NSA, since it's basically a combination of a large number of vulnerabilities spread among a zillion computers rather than one big problem that can be fixed with a single patch.”

    The lack of specificity made cybersecurity expert Robert David Graham dubious that the plot NSA claimed to discover matched the one it described on TV. “All they are doing is repeating what Wikipedia says about BIOS,” Graham blogged, “acting as techie talk layered onto the discussion to make it believable, much like how Star Trek episodes talk about warp cores and Jeffries Tubes.”

  34. Re:in other news by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe one part of the NSA wrote the malware and another part found out about it and stopped them.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  35. Re:Guys seriously please dont hate us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes.they do. And they're mostly right. there's only a majority of 535 people they need to convince though.

  36. Re:funny by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Like all caught criminals....

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  37. Foil this plot by ClassicASP · · Score: 2

    I hear there is a tribe of super-weathy elites running the U.S. behind the scenes who have effectively succeeded in making it rain-bullshit on the American people. Foil that one for me.

  38. We have had BIOS virus attacks before. by seeker_1us · · Score: 3, Funny

    There have been BIOS destroying viruses before. Now the NSA is in the antivirus business? And by doing so, they save the U.S. economy? Even Norton and McAfee don't make this claim.

  39. Somebody is playing stupid so hard... by tibit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's this moment when you're acting out when you cross from plausible belief to total, in-your-face disbelief. Does NSA seriously imply that such an attack would have lasting consequences? Do they really think that there wouldn't be many BIOS recovery solutions popping up left, right and center literally within hours? My bet is that within a week there'd be a thriving BIOS recovery business going on all around us, and the damage would be well contained in spite of whatever bullshit the clueless media would be spewing around.

    --
    A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  40. Fear? by DaWhilly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that they have committed themselves to the role of protecting the country, can they track down the people who wish to bring down our country by exploiting our fears?

  41. Hi, I'm with the NSA and... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hi [insert computer bios maker here], I'm with the NSA - we've detected a BIOS damaging malware and we would like to you implement these changes to prevent it - No, we totally aren't actually just making shit up to get you to install a backdoor for us, okthxbie"-

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  42. Are we entirely sure ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 2

    ... this wasn't a Microsoft plot to advance UEFI Secure Boot, while implicating Chine?

  43. And how would the virus spread? by Marrow · · Score: 2

    Maybe it could use one of the backdoors or zero-day exploits that NSA keeps under its belt. They don't tell computer manufacturers about those threats because they want to use them themselves. Yeah, you guys are real heroes.

  44. Act of War by wjcofkc · · Score: 2
    Oh my. Consider the scale and scope of the attack the NSA is reporting. If China had done this and pulled it off, they would have know in advance that not only would we figure out it was them, they would also know it would be act an of war that we would respond to with military might. In other words: they are not that stupid.

    BIOS attack? Beyond not likely on a scale where you would have to target such a multitude of vendors running at different patch levels. This was aimed at the technically less inclined (most people).

    As a lot of people have already pointed out, our economies are intimately intertwined. Such an attack on us would equal the same level of damage on them. Further, if this would have thrown the entire world into economic chaos, it would have been a double whammy against China. Triple since we would attack. Again: the Chinese are not so short sighted or stupid.

    Fact: The NSA lied to the government about what they are up to. Lying to the American people is a cake walk compared to that.

    'While the NSA would not name the country behind it, cyber security experts briefed on the operation told us it was China.'

    Two things here:

    1. My sig becomes more relevant with every passing day.

    2. Yes the NSA effectively did say it was China - through "cyber security experts" instructed to say so and that are likely NSA contractors if they could have known that in the first place. The NSA accusing China of nearly pulling of an attack of military escalation proportions is so extraordinary reckless it scares me that they would do it at all.

    This is so fucked up. If you don't have a passport get one now and plan where you're going to escape to while there is still time.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  45. Way to "save" the economy by cortcomp · · Score: 2

    1) China supposedly destroys most pc's (and servers), we have our pants down. Insurance companies probably say not paying over terrorism clause but government stops that with "executive order" 2) i go on a hiring spree and sell more PC's than i can make, as does everyone else 3) service sector goes nuts installing and re-updating infrastructure 4) even homeless drunks with no skills can unwrap keyboards and set out system units for more skilled people 5) people get short-lived (1-2 years) but paying jobs and training 6) I make tons of money and blow it on strippers, houses, cars, and whatever i can think of, putting it back into the economy 7 most every small and medium business makes out on this deal. Sure, some insurance companies go bankrupt, but it would trigger some much needed liquidity oversight in that industry. THANK GOD YOU STOPPED ALL THAT!

  46. Re:Bios threat not the worst by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    If we really cared about viruses destroying the US economy, we wouldn't be still running windows in the business world.

    FTFY

  47. see this for analysis of these claims by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't always agree with Techdirt, I think they exaggerate, omit and sometimes distort for effect. That being said, they do good stuff also. They have a pretty good take down of the whole 60 Minutes puff piece, including the interviewer (hint- when you've never seen that interviewer before, you might be interested to know more about him) and also claims about the whole BIOS attack thing.

    http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131216/12580425582/cbs-airs-nsa-propaganda-informercial-masquerading-as-hard-hitting-60-minutes-journalism-reporter-with-massive-conflict-interest.shtml

    I am sure there's more out there that's even more damning. This is the problem with the people running this organization. They've somehow enabled themselves to lie lie lie and think they're doing everyone a favor so it's OK.

    That's just not how a democracy is run. If you've given up on democracy, like say Peter Thiel apparently has

    http://techcrunch.com/2013/11/22/geeks-for-monarchy/

    then that's cool. But you don't need to be running the organs of that democracy in that case. Have a nice retirement. It's on us.

  48. Snowden claims... by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Edward Snowden claims to have uncovered a plot to subvert our constitutional rights by a super secret organization. Both claims are far fetched... which do we have more proof of?

  49. Wait...it all makes sense now... by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Computers, manufactured in China. Had a defect that led large number of machines to crash and brick. These were sold to the NSA. Who pointed the flaw out to the manufacturer. And received an update, and a scathing email addressing the NSA sysadmin for having updated all the machines with the wrong BIOS firmware.

  50. stopping an attempt should not be the goal by dAzED1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a better response than my previous...

    If such a virus was found that affected a large portion of the computers out there. If that is so, stopping a single virus deployment attempt is worthless; the virus still exists, and more importantly the vulnerability still exists. If they are being truthful in any way, then they have done absolutely nothing useful. As you say, where's the CVE? Where's the details? Without details this is useless.

    With a terrorist attack or something, "trust us, it happened!" can sortof work...I guess. For this though - it's useless without details. More, without details - we're forced to believe that the NSA is just making crap up. Did they think about getting a person with any sort of compsci background to help the marketing/PR at NSA person come up with a valid "threat" that was being stopped? In theory there should be one or two there....

  51. Saddam pretended to have WMD to trick Iran by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lies! Iraq had WMDs! Didn't you see the 3D renderings of the mobile port-potties that Saddam had?!?

    How does the fact that the US government lied tell us whether Saddam had or did not have WMD? It doesn't. It merely shows that the US gov't did not know but wanted to sell the war to the public. The truth is Saddam worked to maintain the IMPRESSION that he had WMD, he was scared of Iran and thought the fear of WMD could keep them at bay. He was afraid to admit he no longer had any. He explained it all to his FBI interrogator. It was a proper humane interrogation where the interrogator builds confidence and trust and uses psychology to persuade. A documentary was made. Its often cited as an example that "enhanced" interrogations are not needed.

    1. Re:Saddam pretended to have WMD to trick Iran by drnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How does the fact that the US government lied tell us whether Saddam had or did not have WMD?

      Simple: various intelligence agencies warned that Chalabi was lying and the Bush Administration propagated the lie. That's how we know that the lies meant Saddam didn't have WMDs. Or did you not hear the memo that he fabricated his supposed evidence?

      You need to seriously reexamine your logic. The fact that the US lied or was lied to does *not* indicate that Saddam was WMD free. There were people lying and guessing on both the pro and anti WMD sides, none of this lying or guesswork is evidence of anything. Only boots on the ground by outsiders could prove things one way or the other. Ideally that would have been UN weapons inspectors receiving full cooperation from the Iraqi government. Regrettably Saddam didn't like that plan.

      "After several months, Saddam started to talk. There were no longer weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, he said, although the capability to build them remained. But Saddam said he kept up the ruse that those weapons still existed to preserve his power and protect Iraq against Iran, which Saddam viewed as his country’s biggest threat. Not even senior leaders within his government knew that there weren’t any weapons, Piro said."
      http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/the_intelligencer_news/fbi-agent-saddam-interrogation-was-unique-historic-opportunity/article_6306f1c9-b9c0-5fc7-b4ff-398cf04ad103.html

    2. Re:Saddam pretended to have WMD to trick Iran by Desler · · Score: 2

      You keep arguing with me but you also point out that everyone claiming Iraq had WMDs was lying. So, if everyone making the claim of something's existence is lying the intelligent person comes to only one conclusion which is that they didn't exist. Only someone using tortured logic or had some agenda could come to any other conclusion.

    3. Re:Saddam pretended to have WMD to trick Iran by drnb · · Score: 2

      You keep arguing with me but you also point out that everyone claiming Iraq had WMDs was lying. So, if everyone making the claim of something's existence is lying the intelligent person comes to only one conclusion which is that they didn't exist. Only someone using tortured logic or had some agenda could come to any other conclusion.

      Your logic is terribly flawed. Condition X may have three states: true, false or unknown. If a person lies about X being true you still do not know whether the actual state is false or unknown.

      If you re-read my posts you will find that I said that both sides lied, those claiming true lied, those claiming false lied, the true factual state was unknown.

      The US gov't lied about WMD. If WMD had been found, it the US gov't was accidentally correct, would that have made their original statements any less of a lie? Well that is why happened with the "no WMD" side, they were accidentally correct.

      Now add to this the fact that many against the war were at the time saying there is "no evidence of WMD" (the unknown state), not that there was "no WMD" (the false state). To claim there was a large body of people claiming the false state prior to invasion is a lie. In truth there was a large body claiming the unknown state and saying the inspectors should have more time.

  52. Me too! by readin · · Score: 2

    NSA Says It Foiled Plot To Destroy US Economy Through Malware

    What a coincidence. So did I!

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  53. Why are the feds still buying chinese-made goods? by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, they should be working hard to bring back manufacturing to America. Obama is, but the DOD should insist on all of their communications, including phones and networks, being made in the west. Just as China blocks goods from the west based on defense needs, we should be doing the same. This should include our telcos, utilities, etc. Ideally, we should push other western nations to do the same.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  54. Re:Only boots on the ground answer the WMD questio by Alomex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our governments certainly lied but they did not know what Saddam had. Not until there were US/UK boots on the ground did we really know one way or the other.

    Sorry, but no. Many other foreign countries had a look at the evidence and they voted "no WMD". Only US lapdogs went along (coalition of the willing), everyone else took a pass. So people were able to tell "one way or another".

  55. Damn straight, that. by HBI · · Score: 2

    Operation McCall on CNN
    IAEA Al-Tuwaitha site report

    A little bit of critical reading of the two sources in conjunction with each other will show some discrepancies. I have a nice award from the OSD hung up in my basement that says I was at Al-Tuwaitha. My time in Iraq with dosimeter badges and looking at the abandoned fortifications atop the depicted berms (in the IAEA report) convince me that there was every appearance of a WMD program in Iraq. There may have been no nuclear weapon produced, but the theater was excellent.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  56. How to watch the 60 Minutes NSA Segment by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Arguably this goes for anything on TV; but I found myself keeping it particularly in mind while watching the NSA segment. You have to watch it thinking, "How much of this will later be revealed as a lie?".

    I bet a lot of people took that approach. It's called "credibility" and the NSA has lost it. They can't get it back with one dog and pony show. At least... you shouldn't let them get it back that easily.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  57. Re: URL: #badBIOS by dirkmitt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have suggested we look at the hash-tag #badBIOS , to see the system in action, that deploys PC firmware updates via Windows. This is one of the several articles written on the Web about this, all from the same guy, who goes by the name "Ruiu": Suggested Link What I find the most dubious about all this, is the ability "to transmit small amounts of network data with other infected machines even when their power cords and Ethernet cables were unplugged and their Wi-Fi and Bluetooth cards were removed." Also note, "(badBIOS) has the ability to use high-frequency transmissions passed between computer speakers and microphones to bridge airgaps." Can I be forgiven for not taking such claims seriously? To the best of my own knowledge, (1) Actual BIOS updates are infrequent, not a part of any routine workflow. (2) Even though virus-writers can use them to cripple computers - via a running O/S - SysAdmins can't use them unless they shut down the computer first, precisely because they do not work as described in this article. (3) Attempts are frequently made to bypass Protected Memory on the O/S, to result in viruses gaining access to all the hardware. But this cannot - presently - be used to produce a changed BIOS which works normally. (4) Instead of using floppy disks, we use USB sticks today. We put a file onto that USB drive, which has the filename extension .ROM . It stands for 'a ROM Image'. And because some advanced File Systems require than special drivers be loaded, even in this day and age we format those USB sticks with FAT32, just in case. (5) It's considered gauche, if there is even more than one .ROM File on the stick, even though technically, the BIOS itself, booted into admin mode, displays the .ROM Files in a list, for the user to choose from.