Office Space: TV Documentary Looks At the Dreadful Open Office
sandbagger writes "The CBC (it's like PBS only without the begging) is broadcasting a documentary about the open plan office this evening. You can hear a radio interview about the documentary here. In this documentary, the history of the open office is looked at, how it has evolved, and how the justifications for it being best for everyone else are used by those with offices. Advocates say fewer doors and walls means more collaboration. Critics say it's all driven by bottom line economics--crowding more people into smaller spaces saves money. Is it just me or do the people who want you to work in open offices sound like the nobility in Downton Abbey?"
> Is it just me or do the people who want you to work in open offices sound like the nobility in Downton Abbey?
It's just you...here's my anecdote from which you can synthesize data.
I've had an office. It was lonely and I got sleepy. Give me an open plan any day, where I'm more productive and learn more about what's going on.
(And for what it's worth, in the last few places I've worked, the multimillionaire bosses have always sat right in the middle of the open plan with everybody else).
After reading the headline I seriously expected to see a documentary about Apache OpenOffice. That would've been a justified rant!
There is a case study in the book Lean Thinking where the CEO liked it so much that he also sits in the open office.
Switch to LibreOffice. It's much less dreadful.
Forcing someone to work in the same space as someone else is psychologically stressful no matter how fine you are with it.
Cubeville is bad enough. I'm having to overhear folks politics the next row over right now (not my politics...). For real design work you need to be able to shut out enough outside noise and distraction to really immerse yourself for a couple hours at a shot, and a door would be awesome right now...
are in the office. Then I am all for that. Exspecifically naked parachuting ladies.
open spaces mean management can keep better eye on the peons... can peek at desks and computer screens at will and with ease and make sure that people are productive and not slacking.
So long as you give people enough desk space and drawers to store stuff I think it works well for agile and paired programming. When it doesn't work is when some bean counter decides "Let's throw all the contractors into a meeting room". Things get cramped and stuffy. It also doesn't work when you have resource that take a lot of phone calls. They just end up disturbing everyone else.
To me the reasons for the open office space are partially explained by this Dilbert strip.
All hope abandon ye who enter here.
The bureaucracy of the organization was blocking many necessary bug fixes. That is one of many reasons why OpenOffice was forked into LibreOffice.
Oh wait, that's not what they are talking about.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Things really went downhill when Oracle took it over.
The problem with open office floor plans is that every other office accommodation is also affected, but in a negative way - at least at the companies I've seen or worked in. Conference rooms are downsized as well and are given uncomfortable chairs (such as bar tools). Quiet places or "phone booths" are moved to reservation systems. Kitchens, cafes, and cafeterias are no longer respites from work, but just another area to hold meetings. Any office implementing an open floor plan should also set aside traditional offices, cubicles, or booths that can be rented out, ad-hoc, when a serious conference call or task comes up that requires undivided attention. Moreover, these workspaces should be equipped with all of the necessary amenities (laptop dock, second monitor, etc.) so that workers can truly come and go at a whim. Having to pack up my desk and wander the halls for half an hour just so I can hear myself think over the lady having the daily conversation with her college-aged daughter or the guy slurping his coffee is not productive at all.
"It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
Am I the only programmer in America who still has his own office (with four walls, and a door, and everything)? To me, the idea of working in a cubicle (or, god forbid, one of these weird open offices) sounds like a fucking nightmare. Shit, I hate it when the person in the office next to mine turns her goddamn music up too loud. I can't imagine working in an office where my co-workers were literally looking over my shoulder all day too.
The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
The only place I've ever worked that had an "open office plan" was because the boss was a penny-pincher who had deemed cubicle walls to be an unnecessary expense. Our "desks" were mostly mismatched folding tables that he'd picked up from various places and all desks faced the wall so he could watch what you were doing. (Think "panopticon.")
Fortunately, I got out of there quick.
That's not to say *all* open office plans are a result of that, of course. But it has soured my opinion of the concept.
I'm someone with a hearing loss (mildly hard of hearing, good enough for one-on-one conversation, adequate in group situations, bad in loud environments) and open office plans drive me crazy. My brain spends half the time trying to catch what people are saying, even as I'm consciously trying to block it out, and then I can't hear when someone actually needs to get my attention.
It's worse when the folks who are used to talking at a low volume, to their computer screens, and can still be heard by the other person then have to talk to me, and can't figure out why I can't understand what they're saying. If they had to physically get up and walk over to me, instead of just talking across the open office, it would be far easier to work with.
Bah, it's also an oblique reference to Iron Man 3 -- try to pay attention next time, this will be on the final exam. ;-)
Lost at C:>. Found at C.
Probably participation in an open office design should be optional so that all the extraverts can follow their desires and get together in one ginormous noisy collaborative hive and all the introverts can follow their desires and perform deep contemplative naval gazing in their alone-cave.
All your attention are belong to my old internet meme.
The article title made me think that the documentary was on bad alternatives for Microsoft Office.
Be careful, open office can be confused with openoffice.org but has nothing to do with it. In fact, the article you refer to doesn't even use the term "open office".
It's just you, since I don't watch Downton Abbey
Neither does the submitter, since there's no way Lord Grantham would talk that way about "commoners".
#DeleteChrome
You do get more collaboration, and people are more in tune with what everybody else is doing. The problem is that the additional cost is mostly in the form of stress, which is borne by the office workers. So yes, it has its ups and downs, but the downs are the workers' problem, the ups are the capitalists benefit.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currency/2014/01/the-open-office-trap.html
I want a cubical that is bigger on the inside.
http://msn.foxsports.com/conte...
It means the teams get sick together, you can't have any personal calls if you need to make them (within reason), and conference rooms are needlessly booked up for what could have been handled in a cube. If you want an employee to always be looking elsewhere take away their emotional attachment to where they work. If you need to have teams that collaborate, but don't require constant communication give them plenty of open spaces, but give them their privacy when they need it. Happy employees are more productive and come up with ways to make your company more money for less overhead. Too much efficiency ruins long term effectiveness, just look at IBM. Focused too much on saving money and cutting waste and it's basically gutted their company. Same thing with Microsoft. Short term gain, long term pain. I can say I have personally saved the company multiple times my yearly salary because I was given time and space to play when I needed to. I think the actual thinking is rote tasks are okay for this type of set up, but creative/thinking tasks require space to breathe.
ok, maybe they sound like the Cybermen.
We have an 'open' office space. There is a scene in the movie where the hero finally gets fed up with his cubicle's stupidity and disassembles his cubicle wall. You see the bosses situated the hero's cubicle next to a window but with the cube wall BLOCKING the window. I used to have a nice cubicle with a great window behind me so I could look outside. But they recently moved me to a worse cubicle. But I can't really complain. The guy behind me has a cubicle next to the window. Guess how they put his cubicle.... No, it is not load bearing - he has three walls around him, one blocking a window for no reason except the total stupidity and bureaucratic rules. If I were him I would go to our boss and tell them "Look, I like my job, and I hope you like my work. But I need to know: 1) Is this a joke? Because it's in bad taste. 2) Am I being punished? If so, what can I do to fix the situation. 3) Did no one comment on the situation before I did? Am I really the first person to notice this? 4) Is there any possibility of taking down that temporary wall in the next oh say, week? I don't know whether to feel sorry for him or laugh.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
>> it's all driven by bottom line economics--crowding more people into smaller spaces saves money. ...and massively decreases productivity. Its amazing how most managers can never see the obvious unless it has a directly quantifiable $ value.
Take a look at some nice modern office layouts for more relaxed and creative offices.
Lord Grantham (Robert) and his family regretted having to change with the times to become more efficiency-focused in their dealings with their renters and workers. These people are gleeful by comparison.
I've also found in my travels between individual offices and open bays of a few acres in size: The people that seem to love to continuous shoulder to shoulder contact with fellow workers are social creatures. They tend to come to work to make friends (no social life outside) rather than be productive. And they get upset if some people don't participate in their sports pools or go out drinking with them at lunch time. Closed offices drive them nuts. They either quit or start bothering people with closed doors and get canned. Either way, good for the company.
Have gnu, will travel.
Why not both? I prefer the semi-open office plan where you have multiple cubicles in a group where 4 people share the square space and their cubicles have only two walls. Basically a large 4 person cubicle. It promotes communication between the people there but can be private and quiet enough so that you can focus and get things done.
The last place I worked had open office plan and I hated it. Noisy, no sense of my area to feel comforatable in. Just rows of tables not eveb desks. The owner and managers were a big part of making it feel so uptight, they discouraaged conversation, that SCRUM or meetings were time to exchange ideas. Development and SysAdmin involves sharing of problems, solutions, and communication is the key.
I like having cubes and co-workers would come by to disuss work, or there would be group talks outside of the cubes. What would appear to some as people just hanging out was a very creative enviromnet.
What I could see working is a mixed open area and then cubes for people that want to get away to think. Options are good.
It's not bad, as long as you can manage to claim a spot on the periphery (as I have). If I had to work in the middle of the floor, I think I'd have a problem. I've done this, but as soon as I was offered an opportunity to move, I chose a place out of the mainstream. I'm an electrical engineer, I do circuit, firmware and programmable logic design. When I'm head-down, the office plan makes no difference at all. When I'm less busy, it's not really any more distracting than a cube farm. I am glad, however, for the carpeted floor and acoustic tile ceiling. Downstairs, it's a bare metal high-bay type ceiling and the noise reflected off it is so bad I couldn't stand it (I spent a short time desk-hopping as an experiment).
I've worked with an industrial psychologist for quite a while now - they focus on things like pre-employment screening, improving employee efficiency, hiring (both from the company and candidate viewpoints) and so on.
One of the things they'll point out is that not every employee has the same motivations or same 'best' work environment. You're going to get some that thrive in an open environment, and others that don't. You'll get some that spend more time chatting, and others that use collaboration to become more productive. Unfortunately, there's no silver bullet to say which is best, and office layout is only a small part of that anyway.
However, you can do an employee survey (by which I mean an actual scientific survey with statistical analysis, not just a slopped together 'do you want open seating yes/no' form), and determine which environments work best for your best workers and average workers. This gives you the information you need to make a good decision. For example:
- Does it make sense to change the environment to make the average workers more efficient?
- Alternatively, should you change the environment to make your star workers most efficient and expect that the environment will help turn your average workers into stars (and weed out the underperformers)?
- Are your tasks inherently better suited to solo efforts or team efforts?
- Are your employees good communicators?
Of course, most of this is moot.
There are only a few cases where an immediate manager has the ability to radically restructure the work environment - those decisions are made higher up. At the same time, those higher up are making decisions primarily on immediate financial costs - so cubes and open offices are much more cost effective.
Personally, I'd rather have a small office with complete control of the light and temp, and don't have a chance that someone's looking over my shoulder.
I'm in an office and honestly, I'm not sure it's very productive (particularly not right now, heh). At a former employer we were five people in a fairly large room - IT&Ops. At yet another employer I know at least one sprint team that was placed in their own corner of the open office because they chatted so much with each other, they were annoying everyone else but they were very effective. I'm really not an extrovert and yet the office is lonely. Unless someone explictly tells me, I don't gleam into what anyone else is doing. I can never hear two people discuss and put in a "I have a solution for that" or "No, don't do it that way". And you are really starved for social interaction, I guess you could hover at the coffee machine or water cooler or use Lync but exchanging a little banter is so much more natural.
However, make sure there's enough quiet rooms for people to go to - particular one man rooms for people on the phone or something as it 's often off-topic and loud. Or as a big "Do Not Disturb" sign. Or to just grab when two or three people need to discuss something on a whiteboard. Those that are extremely tight fisted with space and only look at rent per square meter is missing the point, it's like skimping on office supplies which are ultimately petty change when you spend five minutes chasing down a paperclip. Meaningful communication is extremely valuable to the company, noise is just annoying. The point is to get the signal-to-noise ratio up, neither blasting everyone with everything nor to cut it off entirely.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Veal pens
I worked for a big corporate overlord for a long time, and for some reason every 3 years or so our cubicle walls got shorter. They started out at 6 feet high, which was great and quiet and semi-private. They got short enough so if you sat up straight and leaned forward, you could barely peak over... which was a little distracting.
The breaking point was when they got lower than the average person's stupid mouth. Then EVERY phone call was basically broadcast across the entire warehouse of an office complex. Seriously, god help you if you are within shouting distance of sales, because you are never ever ever going to get any work done.
As a final insult they shrunk our desks from U shape to L shape, then lowered the cube walls to desk height... so if something rolled off your desk, it could roll down the hall too. It was insanely stupid...
Eventually they just sent all the tech people to work from home... since they had sabotaged our work so much at the office, we might as well take the initial hit on telecommute.
I am all for ruining the office so badly that we no longer regard meat based presence as mandatory, but I wish it could happen faster, rather than the phased "lets ruin everything every 3 years" approach.
I work in an office that is extremely poorly designed as an open office. There are still two cubes for mid level managers, and offices along the wall for the high level managers. The rest is all a mix of half height cube walls or no walls at all. There's an "island" counter near our area where people tend to put snacks and treats. It is IMPOSSIBLE to concentrate or get any work done 90% of the time. It drives me insane, and after 5 years I am to the point of telling management I am going to leave if at least our area (IT) is not changed soon. People are constantly talking/shouting nonsense and completely non work related shit across the entire office. Technically, this is still possible with cube walls as its not like they have any sound deadening but this atmosphere completely encourages people to talk to their neighbors and even their neighbor's neighbors. People don't even use phones a lot of the time and just yell across the office. The worst part is our area, with the island of snacks makes people show up like it's a water cooler and have little inter-office meetings and cell conversations there (again rarely work related). They also try to prod me and my co-worker into conversations with them from the island. I am a Network Administrator and my co-worker who is a programmer are distracted the majority of the day by these drive by visits and shouts across the office (whether involving us or not). When you're trying to solve a critical server issue, multi-task multiple issues, or just concentrate on reading tech whitepapers it is impossible most of the time to effectively do it in this environment. I can't even imagine how bad it is for him as well being that writing code rarely goes well with constant interruptions. This type of environment on paper might look good for "communication," but in reality it just breeds the wrong kind of communication. People are not getting their work done effectively because they are distracted which leads to them joining in on the distraction. If I had my own office or we had a normal cube setup around here, our IT team alone would be like 400% more efficient and effective. Don't get me wrong I am not against taking breaks and the occasional distraction can be helpful, it's the constant nature of it in this office; and the way that it affects everyone at the same time that is an issue.
I have worked in nothing but open office environments over the years, and I hate them. I know all the usual BS arguments for them, such as "fostering collaboration" and other buzzword crap, but if that works so well, why does everyone grab a meeting room in order to work on something? Instead of having a quiet space to focus on a problem, I get to hear my coworkers going on about how they're sick, the sports game I don't care about, and a hundred other things that I have no interest in, none of which are conducive to a good programming environment. Wherever I'm at, I'll find the "quiet corner" of the building I can go work in, be it a lab, or an unused conference room, or some other place that the voices of meaningless don't penetrate.
goyims
The correct plural is goyim; the singular is goy. If you're going to use Yiddish, at least be a mensch and do it right.
It's just you, since I don't watch Downton Abbey
Neither does the submitter, since there's no way Lord Grantham would talk that way about "commoners".
Oh, I don't know. The aristocratic class on Downton Abbey often seem to express confusion when those "below them" even talk about concepts of concern to the ordinary worker. Witness, for example, Dame Maggie Smith (the Dowage Countess) completely befuddled when someone talks about having time off from work on the weekend to attend to other things in his life: "What is a week-end?"
I think there are plenty of workers in office environments who also believe that their bosses have no concept of what a "weekend" is supposed to be.
Example of a bad open office: "Let's make the cubicles smaller and shorten the walls!" (seen at Intel)
Example of a good open office: "Let's put everyone on this small team in the same walled-off space" (seen at a lot of local startups)
There have already been extensive studies done on this subject. The studies concluded that companies can expect a 33% gain in productivity by moving engineers into individual offices.
But corporations are loathe to do this for various reasons, cost and vanity included. Although there are a few exceptions.
At my work we have a mostly open office area, with several openly available office rooms around the main work area. Most of us work out in the open, no cubicles. We have developers, customer support, etc all in an open area. We do tend to collect, of course, with developers typically sitting around one or two large tables (depending on how many of us are in the office that day, or working from home) while the customer support people are on the other side of the office (where the phones are...).
We have a stand up office room.
We have a room with some couches.
Etc.
You work where you feel you need to. If a developer is intensely into something, he might go into an office and close the door.
Collaboration is easy, and we encourage open and frequent communication between all the groups in the company.
Recently the owner/CEO/whatever declared he doesnt think we should even have titles per se, although clearly some of us are "developers" or "data support" or "customer support" etc. He's eschewed his own title and his private office, and now uses it only for meetings when needed.
We have a flat organization, there are no bosses and no hierarchy. There's no bureaucracy. No politics. At least thats the goal. Of course we're human and sometimes stupid human things get in the way.
It works extremely well. It is assumed that every employee is of equal value and is intelligent and motivated to do his/her job without needing to be managed. We're all treated like family, and as if we are permanent members of the team.
No, we're not a bunch of hipster, holier-than-thou types either.
Completely different than any other company I've ever worked at.
Yes they upstairs lot in Downtown Abby are old school patrician one nation torys' - the ones that push open plan working are the doggy barrow boy tendency that infested the Tory party after Maggie came to power.
I had a programming job in a startup where not only was it open plan but the sales team was in the same space (so you could hear in real time the lies about the product you hadn't finished building yet, and the laughter, oh god the vacuous fake forced jocular hilarity!!!! shudder) , and also, the CEO would come to ask a question about 5 times a day, and would redirect the each programmer's work at least twice a day. Hint ADHD and programming are not a productive mix.
Needless to say, I was more productive hacking in 30 minute blocks in the back seat of the crowded bus on the way to and from work. It's too bad for the company that that hacking was for my own different product. We were underpaid and no equity so there was no way I was going to hack on the bus for the company.
Bad scene altogether. Happens when anti-programmers try to lead programmers.
Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
"He didn't fit in."
It's just you, since I don't watch Downton Abbey. Make a reference to Doctor Who and I might get it, though.
The Open Office building is actually smaller on the inside.
It all starts at 0
The company I work for has been migrating to the open-office concept over the past year or so, first with a new building, and then by doing floor-by-floor conversions of existing buildings on the campus. Some of the people are being migrated from offices to desks, some from cubicles to desks. Almost everyone has been very good about going along with the plan and giving it a shot. The results are a mixed bag, overall, but as time goes on, it's proving to be more a liability than an improvement.
Pros:
Everyone gets new furniture, and the worse shape their old furniture was in, the better the first impression.
The lighting is MUCH better - even in areas that don't have direct sunlight; the large number of smaller light sources on the ceiling with little obstruction works well.
There's more people in the same area
- makes more efficient use of space
- don't have to walk as far to get to someone
Cons:
There's more people are in the same area
- in the older buildings, this means that the number of toilets is no longer proportional to the demand
- its noisy; sometimes a little, sometimes a lot
- people sneeze and it hits their neighbors
- you can't make a phone call without annoying everyone, so now nobody uses the phone unless in a conference room; phone communication in general has dropped precipitously and now takes a back-seat to e-mail
- folks are increasingly annoyed with their neighbors and it increases stress and some talk less
There's visual distraction (things always coming in and out of your field of view)
The clever storage ideas don't make up for the overall lack of storage volume or shelf space
You can't have a conversation without annoying everyone, so you have to spend time hunting for a "huddle room" or chat in a stairwell or utility closet
Older employees (>40) especially have a hard time with the din (and the white-noise generators don't help).
It's super difficult to work on certain types of things - anything that has personnel info, or HIPPA protected info that you're not supposed to let your neighbors
Anything that really takes focus (reading a complex scientific paper, for example), is really out of the question
Lots of people try and drown out the din with headphones (which produces noises that annoy those without), and effectively the employees are being trained to tune each other out
There's lots of "unplanned interactions"
I think everyone agrees that we: are less productive, are not collaborating any more than before, and are collaborating less with the outside. HR is already noticing that people are using more sick days. However, I presume that the loss in productivity and decreasing office morale are offset by gains in energy and space efficiency (lower cost facilities).
For me, it means that my work space has shrunk by 50% and I no longer have shelf space that I used to put reference materials and manuals on (all that's not sitting in boxes in my attic). I also just walk away from my desk when the din gets to a certain level where I can't concentrate on what I'm supposed to be working on. If you call my phone extension, it automatically forwards you to a voicemail instructing the caller to e-mail me (there's not even a phone at my new desk, none of have them). I don't read papers in the office anymore, and sometimes take what the office calls "productivity days" where I work from home (no, they don't give anyone money for home office stuff or to pay for Internet service). All of our experienced job candidates that have rejected offers have cited the open-office plan as a contributing factor in their decision not to accept the offer (we lead in compensation, so it's not like they wouldn't be well compensated).
I have been called a scrum-bag before!
I worked for a Japanese company in the 90s.
The white-collar workers all worked in a single large room. Desks all facing the top-level boss, and the bosses desk faced them, almost like an American elementary school classroom.
We mostly worked like we were in a library: quietly.
Zero privacy.
It did seem to keep people from being chatty or goofing off in the office, if I remember correctly.
Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
I telecommute 4 days out of 5 currently.
So now, my dept only meets in person on Mondays.
For my current job, an open office floor plan would be terrible, as the jobs of our dept requires lots of phone use, and I would find the constant voices of others destracting as I tried to concentrate on my work.
Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
I wouldn't say that, even though I have switched to LibreOffice, thats more because I don't trust Oracle...
If I'm doing programming I prefer to be in an office with a door that I can close if I need to concentrate. If I find myself in a cube then I'll just use headphones for such occasions. Like when an impromptu meeting starts right beside your desk while you're trying to work on something that requires focus.
If I'm doing management tasks I also prefer an office to a cube. Why? It gives me a place that I can conduct confidential conversations. Also, your computer screen is more visible in a cube than an office and it might be showing something that not everyone is supposed to see.
Sadly, to many an office is just seen as another management perk. Like the reserved parking spot and the conferences. It's the same reason that "the bosses" tend to get the best computers and the biggest screens. Not because they need them to do their jobs more effectively but because they are "the boss" and they control the budget that pays for that stuff. And the best chairs. Despite the fact that they spend most of the day sitting in other chairs - at various meetings - leaving their expensive office chair unused for most of the day while the staff sit all day on a chair with the comfort equivalent of an orange crate.
It's the "tax man" mentality (that's one for you, nineteen for me). Many of the management people I have worked with see this kind of entitlement behavior as a reward for their hard work. They deserve a better chair than you because they worked hard to get to where they are. Ego, in other words.
It's just you, since I don't watch Downton Abbey
Neither does the submitter, since there's no way Lord Grantham would talk that way about "commoners".
Oh, I don't know. The aristocratic class on Downton Abbey often seem to express confusion when those "below them" even talk about concepts of concern to the ordinary worker. Witness, for example, Dame Maggie Smith (the Dowage Countess) completely befuddled when someone talks about having time off from work on the weekend to attend to other things in his life: "What is a week-end?"
I think there are plenty of workers in office environments who also believe that their bosses have no concept of what a "weekend" is supposed to be.
Or, as one former employer liked to call it: "72-hour Friday".
The key is that we are all a bunch of monkeys. In an open area with lots of other monkeys we will play our monkey games such as watching for predators, seeing who is grooming whom, etc. This is all very distracting. So we try to raise the walls of the cubicles higher which helps a bit. The best open concept that I have been in were when small teams(5-7) were grouped in large walled offices. The worst was in a long office that was open all the way down to a dead end with the bosses all having the best window offices. So you had not too many places with a view but people walking by you all day. It sucked. Headphones didn't change people moving in the corner of your eye.
In cubeville I have noticed that many workers hunch right over their desks with headphones on trying to shut out the useless distractions around. The best is when the bosses themselves walk around being the distraction (because they are lonely in their offices) and then ban headphones because it makes it harder for them to interrupt their drones.
My kingdom for a standing-capable desk!
Is it just me or do the people who want you to work in open offices sound like the nobility in Downton Abbey?
No, the nobility in Downton Abbey seem to genuinely care about their help. I think some of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn books more sucinctly capture how management views and treats employees.
Cheers,
Dave
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
Ben
I just want the Tardis.
Decent headphones make open plan offices bearable.
Unless you hate wearing headphones and find music/talk distracting. Personally having to wear headphones all day would drive me insane in short order. I like a relatively quiet office with minimal visual or auditory distractions when I'm trying to get serious work done.
This show has been brought to you by Microsoft, makers of Microsoft Office.
When you take down walls, you also lose storage space. This is important more often than you might think. You also lose privacy; while it may seem like reducing privacy could be good for keeping peoples' noses clean, it can make for a generally uncomfortable environment for occasional important necessities like calling your doctor to schedule an appointment.
Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
Could it be that difficult to provide choices for one's preference to allow respective offices/cubes or the open office spaces?
They *do* think they're the new nobility.
Back in '87-'88, I worked in what's now called an open plan office. Five of us in one room, no dividers at all - desk, desk, desk on one side, and desk, desk on the other. Two of the people were on the phone at *least* 40% of the time to in-house people. After listening to some training tapes one week, I brought in music for my player (and I had to bring my own player). A day or so later, my manager, the VP, asked me if I was done the tapes. I told him I was, but that I had music, so I could concentrate better and improve my productivity.
He told me to take off the headphones and improve my productivity.
He had an office with a door he could shut, with real walls, not like my manager now, where the walls stop about 8" under the ceiling....
First thing they told us, when I first went to college, in an orientation, was to study, or do homework, etc, to ->find a quiet place where you wouldn't be distracted-
Open office is a lot cheaper. Managers can show that they've lowered costs, and so increased ROI, and so they should get more money....
And if you *really* think you do better work in an open office plan, then I predict that you also tend to work 50 and 60 hour weeks and up, and think this is "normal".
mark "I was never that young and stupid"
If you don't like it, try Microsoft Office. It's great as long as Microsoft Bob's dog doesn't drag the fire from the fire-place onto the desk again.
Table-ized A.I.
In my experience, given the proper environment, cubes aren't as restricting as a lot of people feel them to be.
Where I work we're set up with 10x10 cubes with the 'doors' facing an aisle with more cubes across it, and the walls are just short enough that an average-sized dude can stand on his toes and rest his chin on the edge. We don't have an oppressive 'no talking, sub-human' atmosphere, so neighbors can chat if they want, cubes come with a second chair for visitors, you're not totally walled off, and the desks can be arranged to face however you want if seeing the hall is distracting. If you need to knuckle down and get some stuff done with zero interruptions, it's easy enough to just put on some headphones or look like you're concentrating, then people leave you alone unless it's important.
Of course all this kind of depends on how your managers and coworkers behave. If your manager regards any social interaction no matter how small as the death of all productivity, or you're next door to somebody who just can't shut up then it'll be a problem.
You fucking giant retard.
Is it just me or do the people who want you to work in open offices sound like the nobility in Downton Abbey?"
It's just you, since I don't watch Downton Abbey. Make a reference to Doctor Who and I might get it, though.
Let me try:
Is it just me or do the people who want you to work in open offices sound like the Daleks in Dr. Who ?"
Actually, after reading this, that's probably the better analogy anyway.
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/100000/20000/3000/800/123838/123838.strip.print.gif
I describe Downon Abbey nobility in terms of office metaphors.
what is old is new again.
It's clearly the direction we're going. Herd the lumpenproletariat into open spaces so they can be survielled and managed more efficiently.
Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
Open office can work just fine, maybe better in many cases when you have many people working on same project. But do it right, make it comfortable, not just the coffee room but actual work area, enough deskspace, enough room to move etc. And if someone insists on cluttering work are with some crap, enforce some cleanliness, if you havent needed something for a month, it probably shouldnt be on your desk. For many people, computer is really only thing you need on your desk, maybe some temporary note papers, but not piles of crap. Clean up and you'll feel better working in an area with some air in it.
Sounds like they know how to boil a frog.
The CBC is almost like PBS without the begging. That's because (a) it gets a certain amount of money from government and (b) it actually runs commercials.
...ank
Its funding base was never as secure as that of the BBC (which used to be entirely funded from Television licenses) but once upon a time Canada used to practice "Universality" (not socialism, just good-neighbourliness) and living in a town in the 60s where the only available media was CBC (the then-equivalent of Radio 1 and CBC TV), we were thankful that their funding was stable and that they weren't an outright organ of any government.
As I said, it used to get a lot more money from the government than it does now, but thanks to Reagan-Thatcher-Murdoch and their local toad-in-Canada (Brian Mulroney) these moneys have shrunk, not quite to insignificance but substantially. Our current RTM-toad, Stephen Harper, has been cutting this cash still further -- along with his near Koch-like commitment to small government, this is also thought to be in revenge for the voice the CBC gave to folks from Ontario who were scared of him. (as his behaviour in office shows that they were right to be)
But other than a tendency to idolize Barbara Frum (skewer question) and Peter Gzowski (friendly to the point of deferential) too much, it still produces stuff like this.
Peace, Order and Good Governance forever!
Still hoping for Gentle Treatment...
The New Yorker published an article named The Open-Office Trap a couple weeks ago about open offices as well, and included research data that showed open offices are a net negative to productivity. Feeling good about doing something didn't actually make that thing good. :)
I would like my bread and circus office space please with a window view....
If you want the office plan to encourage people to work together, you have to provide those with shared spaces that attract them. It's not like you can collaborate with someone effectively over a divider or squeeze a ten person team into a 10x10 cubicle for a working meeting.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Looking for justification for your latest cost cutting, employee inconveniencing measure? Just subscribe to Management Weekly, where we take the latest trends in cost cutting and spin them positively so that they look like they are good for morale and productivity, while in fact they are demoralizing, dehumanizing and even your lowest paid, least educated employee will see right through the ruse. Of course, like any good manager, you consider all of your employees to be dumber than rocks, and you figure that the fact they don't immediately quit is proof positive that you have once again successfully pulled the wool over their eyes.
Here are some highlights from upcoming issues:
Have your Christmas party in January. It is much cheaper, but you can tell your employees it is because you respect their busy holiday schedules!
Convert your employee's vacation and sick leave plans into one Paid Time Off plan. You can effectively reduce the amount of potential paid time off by up to an infinite amount, and if you start them off with three weeks vacation, they will think you are doing them a FAVOR!
Convert the employees offices and cubes into an open plan. This reduces the cost of furniture and walls, while only greatly decreasing productivity and employee privacy. Your higher-ups will grant you a huge bonus in cost savings long before all of the employees quit in disgust and besides, you will have moved on to the next high paying gig where you can ruin them too, and if you get fired, hey, there is always your golden parachute which insures you will never have to work again in your life.
If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
Very reminiscent of the sad story of Frederick Taylor and "Scientific Management." Taylor meant to be a good guy, and believed he researches on the best ways to organize industrial work would be a good-for-everything win-win. He advocated good pay, good treatment, frequent breaks, etc.
He actually believed that scientific management would put an end to labor-management conflict: "The great revolution that takes place in the mental attitude of the two parties under scientific management is that both sides take their eyes off the division of the surplus as the all-important matter, and together turn their attention toward increasing the size of the surplus until this surplus becomes so large that it is unnecessary to quarrel over how it shall be divided."
Labor unions opposed "scientific management" as just a kind of speed-up, a way of squeezing workers, and that essentially is how it was applied. In his later years Taylor regretted what he said was the misapplication of his methodology, but the damage was done.
And so it is with the open office. What might originally have become a well-intentioned effort at innovating on office architecture quickly became just a way of squeezing workers--almost literally, into smaller and smaller spaces, with facile "proof by repeated assertion" that it was an actual improvement on what had gone before.
The best that can be said about it is that cubicles are at least better than the arrangements of some office in the 1960s and 1970s, which looked just like classrooms but with bigger desks.
"How to Do Nothing," kids activities, back in print!
In the day, construction management wanted to move an entire academic department into "open offices." An uproar ensued, faculty wanted both quiet for work and space to talk with students privately. A high-level meeting was called, with the department management, provost, and head of construction on campus.
Finally, someone asked about the cost differential between cubicles and offices. The construction head pulled out a calculator, punched in some numbers, and said, "It's a wash." The provost rolled his eyes--"Why am I here?"--and whoever advocated cubicles was defeated.
Can't stand it.
The guy next to me is a noisy clod.
I've seriously been tempted to drop other people's cell phone, left abandoned on their desk and ringing loudly, into their coffee.
The problems are noise and interrupts. For simple problems less communication is better because minutes lost by an engineer using Google instead of his friend make a smaller impact than the fifteen minutes of context switch overhead which can result for the person interrupted. When more communication is needed people can always grab a conference room.
IIRC IBM's Santa Tersa Laboratory - Architectural design for program development lists a 40% throughput delta for engineers in quiet spaces provided by enclosed offices or with partitions at least six feet high.
With fully burdened per-engineer costs that can break $200K per annum open offices can waste at least $58K (I don't recall if the comparison was stated as 140% for the good performers implying you get $142.9K of work for $200K from slow ones or slow movers loose 40% of their throughput and don't do $80K worth of work) per engineer per year and cost more than closed offices.
_Peopleware Productive Projects and Teams_ by Demarco and Lister provides some anecdotes and hard numbers in chapters 8 "You never get anything done around here between 9 and 5" and 9 "Saving money on space."
Comparing coding wargames participants who performed in the first and fourth quartiles
57% versus 29% have "acceptably quiet" space
62% versus 19% have "acceptably private" space
38% versus 76% do not have "people often interrupt them needlessly"
Median time to complete the programming tasks was 2.1 times the best and bottom half as a whole 1.9 times the top half.
Participants with acceptably quiet spaces were also one third more likely
to produce zero defect work.
in Taylor's theory: "until this surplus becomes so large that it is unnecessary to quarrel over how it shall be divided."
Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
As some other people have mentioned - in my current company everyone is in the same open office. It's an open office of over 100 people, and no matter the level of the team member or visiting 'executive' everyone shares the same big desk spaces with no specific assigned (but sometimes habitually claimed :D) seating. There are tons of offices for people to use, but nobody uses them for long and often only for noise-reduced client conversations.
I can, however, see why people can lean towards the critics *or* the advocates point of view, because every office is different and every company has different levels of trust and transparency, if I worked in an office with execs in private offices and everyone else forced into an open space, I'd be critical too.
I feel like I am working at UPS. The walls are painted a dark brown and we have multiple shades of brown speckled carpet.
The air exchange is poor to middling. No windows. Can be quite boring but I have a job.
The cubes are high enough when you sit and when you stand you can look over the top. We are side by side with a aisle in between. I face away from my co-worker. Not too bad for noise as it is a small office. Occasionally you can hear someone getting louder and louder and louder... during a call. You just know they are frustrated. The last place I was at was a call center that had 300+ people in one large room with desks lined up in rows and low enough walls that you could look over them with a minor stretch. Very loud all the time. Did not miss it when I left. I would love walls with a door but can only draw a line with yellow tape and ask my co-workers to knock on an imaginary door (Les from WKRP..)
I too have co-workers who will not talk but will IM you from the desk next to you.
... maybe it's time we all move to Office 360?
A French company I know about has different spaces for different functions.
People doing clerical repetitive work sit in an open office area, but in small clusters of 2-3 seats so you don't feel like participating in a dystopian future.
People that require to concentrate for long stretches of time have offices, shared between 2 people at most. In the middle of that area there are standing up long desks were these people can congregate with colleagues to discuss technical matters.
There are lots of offices since most people are not doing repetitive work.
They also have several meeting rooms of different sizes, tables of differing sizes where quick improvised meetings can be held, and the canteen is communal, airy with striking views of town centre.
This is not a tech firm, it is an old school utilities company (oil, gas, that kind of stuff).
A company that is not going to great lengths to understand the kind of working space its workforce needs is not helping itself.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
So the great benefactor can watch out for you and keep you safe. You can always apply for a certificate to lower your shade for several minutes. Do you have anything to hide citizen?
That's BBC. CBC is American TV without the content.