Slashdot Mirror


Wozniak To Apple: Consider Building an Android Phone

snydeq writes "Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has some advice for Apple CEO Tim Cook: consider offering a phone based on the rival Google Android platform. Speaking at the Apps World conference in San Francisco, Wozniak made the suggestion of an Apple Android device when responding to a question about the fate of the faltering BlackBerry platform, saying that BlackBerry should have built an Android phone, and that Apple could do so, too. 'BlackBerry's very sad for me,' Wozniak lamented. 'I think it's probably too late now' for an Android-based BlackBerry phone. Apple, Woz said, has had some lucky victories in the marketplace in the past decade, and BlackBerry's demise may provide a cautionary tale: 'There's nothing to keep Apple out of the Android market as a secondary phone market.'"

143 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdot readership to Dice by gumpish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Consider scrapping beta.

    1. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

      ... didn't you just begin a sentence on the subject line and finish it in the body?

    2. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by ElementOfDestruction · · Score: 1

      .... and then change your sig from "I automatically downmod all posts which begin in the subject line and finish in the body?"

    3. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by gumpish · · Score: 1

      Well, I could make the case that "X to Y" is more like a mail header. "Consider Z" does stand as a sentence on its own...

    4. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by globaljustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Consider scrapping beta.

      agree...i hate that we have to hijack threads to say this but they need to stop

      plz Dice...stop...just stop

      slashdot's 'look and feel' is fine how it is...ok, some could say its dated...but the is **not** to hack the content down to a big 'feed' that buries content under graphics

      leave the main layout the same! tinker with logos/colors/menu types etc. but **don't remove whole sidebars** and put giant squares of color where informative text used to be

      this is the worst trend in "U/X" right now....the idea that less information is somehow better and that users somehow prefer all content from one giant feed pipe

      please...just stop...

      if you want to make it look snappy, fine, but dont reduce the complexity & information level

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    5. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by Velex · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      I would be happy with [FUCK] BETA if it weren't for the superfluous sidebar that continues down the page to infinity and beyond, limiting space for comments and the various other layout issues. The font size is too big for another thing. Now I know I can hit ctrl+- a few times, but I mean, come on! I want comments to be the full width of my window, and I want to choose whether I want to see all comments when I'm moderating and whether I just want to browse at +1 or +2 depending on my attention span any particular day. In fact, I don't give a FUCK BETA whether a comment was modded up because it was funny, insightful, or interesting or whatever. All I care about is how many moderators thought the comment was noteworthy when I don't care to browse at 0 or -1.

      FUCK BETA is like everything I hate about the mobile site brought to a desktop site. I even do "request desktop site" on my phone when browsing Slashdot because the mobile site is worthless. I once tried modding on the mobile site, and not a single mod ever took place! (Still had my mod points when I got home!)

      We can argue about whether or not it's too AJAXy or whether JQuery is too onerous. All I want is the Slashdot I know and love for its threaded comment system and moderation/meta-moderation system. More power to Dice if they can realize a functional AJAXy vision of that in my opinion as long as it degrades gracefully for browsers such as elinks (yes, I actually do use elinks on occasion!) and screen readers, but FUCK BETA is not that.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    6. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

      FUCK BETA is like everything I hate about the mobile site brought to a desktop site.

      You think the current mobile site is bad? Try the beta on your phone. Sweet raptor jesus, after the third nesting level or so the text is squeezed in a narrow little space and ends up being one or two words per line.

      And there's no way to get it to show the "normal" layout on a mobile device, it seems to be based on window width somehow. For instance, if you take the beta site and shrink the window you can see it changing the layout to "suit" the smaller space, eventually ending up with this weird single column view that ends up being all you get on a phone. No, using "request desktop site" does nothing.

      I suppose at the very least if they fixed the spacing issues the beta would be a worthwhile replacement for the current mobile site, which is, quite frankly, complete shit. I'll grant you that no matter what they do slashdotters are going to bitch, but the current outcry is far worse than for the current site, when it was a shitty beta.

      --
      Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
    7. Re:Slashdot readership to Dice by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Did you ever think that maybe that's why it is a beta?

  2. Re:first by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Indeed, fuck the beta site.

    This could have been a good flame war, fun for all the family. Instead we have the beta site hanging over us, preventing half the fanbois from participating. Fuck the whole thing.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's nothing to keep Apple out of the Android market as a secondary phone market.

    Of course there is. Apple isn't allowed to distribute copies of Android to the public except under license from Linus Torvalds, Google, and other contributors to Android. If Apple accepts the license of Android (mostly Apache v2 and GPLv2), it has to give the public an implicit or explicit license to patents that Apple holds that Android allegedly infringes. So unless Apple wants to end up dropping lawsuits against Samsung, it has to refrain from making an iDroid.

    1. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by TWX · · Score: 1

      You'd need to read up on SCO vs Novell et al, I don't think that the argument by Novell and company that SCO had implicitly granted permissions for the code that they were suing about by continuing to distribute the successor to Caldera OpenLinux, which contained a GPL license with the theoretically offending code, was recognized. If it had been then the suit would not have lasted for as long as it did.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is funny, of course they'll use Android. They don't make anything themselves. Haven't you noticed how Mac OSX is a blatant rip off of Red Star OS? Glorious Leader spent several hours creating an operating system from scratch only to have it stolen by these capitalist lapdogs.

       

    3. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by TWX · · Score: 2, Informative

      They (BMW) already have a lower-end model, it's called the Mini Cooper.

      And Mercedes has Smart, and even had Smart in North America for a time.

      And the analogy falls apart when one considers that Apple isn't really a premium brand anyway. Unfortunately the premium brands are essentially gone now. SGI, Sun, hell, even HP and IBM had their high, high end workstations. Apple doesn't make high-end, they make commodity. They make some things that are better than others, but for every Cadillac they have plenty of Buicks and Chevrolets.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 2

      I base this on section "3. Grant of Patent License" in the license of Android.

    5. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Under the Apache license, Android phone makers are required to license their patents that cover Android itself to other Android phone makers.

    6. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 2

      The kernel is GPLv2. Modules specific to Android are under Apache v2, which has a patent clause. These modules implement things like overscroll bounce, pinch zoom, data tapping, and other user interface features on which Apple claims to hold patents.

    7. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to keep Apple out of the Android market as a secondary phone market.

      Of course there is. Apple isn't allowed to distribute copies of Android to the public except under license from Linus Torvalds, Google, and other contributors to Android. If Apple accepts the license of Android (mostly Apache v2 and GPLv2), it has to give the public an implicit or explicit license to patents that Apple holds that Android allegedly infringes. So unless Apple wants to end up dropping lawsuits against Samsung, it has to refrain from making an iDroid.

      That would only be true if Apple incorporate those patents into their version of Android. If Apple left Apple stuff out of the Android operating system, they wouldn't have to give up anything.

    8. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to keep Apple out of the Android market as a secondary phone market.

      Of course there is. Apple isn't allowed to distribute copies of Android to the public except under license from Linus Torvalds, Google, and other contributors to Android. If Apple accepts the license of Android (mostly Apache v2 and GPLv2), it has to give the public an implicit or explicit license to patents that Apple holds that Android allegedly infringes. So unless Apple wants to end up dropping lawsuits against Samsung, it has to refrain from making an iDroid.

      Apple making an Android phone is about as likely as Vladimir Putin coming out of the closet as a gay.

    9. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by narcc · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Indeed. Apple would be foolish to make an Android phone, just as Blackberry would have been foolish to do so. In BB's case, you don't drop a superior OS in favor of a dramatically inferior one. That's not a recipe for success! Whatever Blackberry's problems were, it wasn't the technology.

      If Woz wants Apple to produce Android phone, that can mean only one thing: He wants to see Apple die.

    10. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by mjwx · · Score: 1

      They (BMW) already have a lower-end model, it's called the Mini Cooper.

      At the low end, BMW have the 1 series, which I don't think are available in the US.

      Mini is a completely different badge altogether. Same with Smart (the cheap Merc's are the A class).

      And the analogy falls apart when one considers that Apple isn't really a premium brand anyway.

      This.

      Apple is a luxury brand in the same way that VW is a luxury brand, it isn't. However this does not stop lot of people who buy a Golf GTI from pretending they have a European luxury car.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    11. Re: Alleged Apple patents on Android by shiruba3094 · · Score: 1

      Well, they wouldn't have to load android on it. They could just explain the specs well enough that people could make drivers for it, and then make it ready to load an alternative os. You know, like boot camp.

    12. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by ChaseTec · · Score: 1

      I don't even think licensing is the main issue. Content (and making money off of it) is the big issue. iTunes could probably be modified to support additional phone types so music and movies aren't that big an issue but the real issue is the app store. Apple makes money on all apps sold (and in-app purchases) and none of those apps would work on an android device (without a WINE type API compatibility) so your talking about Apple creating a second Apple app store with zero existing apps. They'd have to encourage android developers to submit their apps to the google play store and the apple android store. That should sound familiar because that is basically what Amazon does. And you know what, their app selection sucks. No way would Apple ever release a phone that supports the google play store.

      Maybe Apple should have pushed web apps a little more... If JavaScript was a "native" development language with true phone hardware APIs then we'd have apps that could enable them to swap the underlying platform without making their app store irrelevant.

      --
      My Hello World is 512 bytes. But it's also a valid Fat12 boot sector, Fat12 file reader, and Pmode routine.
    13. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I'm having trouble parsing your comment. Could you please rephrase why it is that you dislike the beta so that we can understand you better?

    14. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Of course there is. Apple isn't allowed to distribute copies of Android to the public except under license from Linus Torvalds, Google, and other contributors to Android. If Apple accepts the license of Android (mostly Apache v2 and GPLv2), it has to give the public an implicit or explicit license to patents that Apple holds that Android allegedly infringes. So unless Apple wants to end up dropping lawsuits against Samsung, it has to refrain from making an iDroid.

      Is what you said true, though? Does the APL and GPL require granting the public a license to all of Apple's patents, or does it only require granting a license to users of the software when they use the software (i.e. you can't distribute some GPL software and then sue the people that got it from you)?

      I haven't read the licenses lately, and I don't care enough to go read them right now, so that is a genuine question.

    15. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 2

      Does the APL and GPL require granting the public a license to all of Apple's patents, or does it only require granting a license to users of the software when they use the software

      The Apache license (read it now) requires each "Contributor" to a covered program (those who modify it, as Apple would when porting Android to its device) to grant a license to its "patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed" by the program.

    16. Re: Alleged Apple patents on Android by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It looks like the patent license only applies to their contrbutions, though ("where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work"). So if they don't submit any changes, maybe other than device drivers, they could still use their patents against other Android manufacturers.

    17. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by dido · · Score: 1

      In what way was BlackBerryOS superior to Android? Perhaps it is superior in many technical ways, but we all know that isn't what makes or breaks a platform. BBOS is, however, woefully deficient in the one thing that truly matters: DEVELOPER MINDSHARE. We all remember Steve Ballmer famously dancing around like a monkey shouting "Developers, Developers, Developers" but for all how ridiculous he looked, he was absolutely right. Without developers making applications for a platform, a platform has no users, and without users, a platform dies. Microsoft is seeing that right now with Windows Phone, and Blackberry never managed to attract much of a developer base. Like it or not, iOS and Android were the platforms that attracted a lot of mindshare, and even Microsoft with all its resources is having a hard time muscling themselves in.

      Well, I've been on Slashdot since 1996 or thereabouts, and soon enough it would have been twenty years since I first registered. I'd hate to leave, but if the beta is shoved down my throat with no way to go back to something reasonably approximating classic, well, I'm outta here too. From what I've seen of it, it totally destroys the comments section, and that's really what I've found most valuable about Slashdot which has kept me coming back nearly every day for the past eighteen years!

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    18. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by unity · · Score: 1

      I had to make a blackberry app for a customer and It was a total pain in the ass for too many reasons to list. I say good riddance to it. I wouldn't count windows phone out, its easy to develop for and I happen to really like the interface. They did take too long to get into all the carriers. My big complaint with MS was their total lack of support for corporate apps on the WP. They have recently rectified that FINALLY, but still its a pita and takes a fair number of steps to enable. oh, and i'm with you on the beta bullshit.

    19. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Good analogy: BMW's are actually pretty unreliable and overpriced. There are much better deals out there if you want a good car, sports car or otherwise. The "quality" you pay for with BMW is all in the brand name and the styling.

    20. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      I base this on section "3. Grant of Patent License" in the license of Android [apache.org].

      So what you're saying is that if Nokia release their Normandy Android phone next month, it'll indemnify Android from both Nokia and Microsoft's patent extortion?

      Does that include the FAT patents that they've been getting so much cash from?

      If so, you've uncovered a far bigger story than Woz's opinion piece...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    21. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 1

      Not if Nokisoft strips out FAT support from the version of Android on the phone. Besides, FAT is part of Linux, which is licensed separately (GPLv2) from the userland of Android (Apache v2).

    22. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Apple's rich enough to duke it out with the other Big Boys over patents. But they don't want to dilute their high end hardware brand.

      It would do more than just dilute the brand. It would be an entirely incompatible ecosystem that they'd have to somehow graft in support for, which would mean huge engineering overhead. It isn't like BMW building a copy of a Ford. It's more like living in a world in which there's a network of overhead tracks that run above all the roads, and BMW deciding to build a second version of their cars that hangs from those tracks and has to be driven by pushbuttons and a trackball instead of a steering wheel, so drivers have to relearn how to drive. And they would somehow have to modify all of their existing cars to add brake lights near the roof so that drivers of the new hanging cars could see them and wouldn't crash into people's rear windshields.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    23. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by Vintermann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a reason why you can't just strip out FAT support, a reason those patents are so obscene. It's a de-facto standard, and you need it for compatibility with lots and lots of stuff.

      The actual technical worth of the FAT filesystems is zero. They are dumb, slow, they fragment, and lacks essential features. You can have strictly superior systems for free. But due to network effects, it's very hard to get rid of as the lowest-common-denominator filesystem, that can be read on every Windows and OSX and dumb little flashcard-reading gadget.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    24. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by swilver · · Score: 1

      Maybe that was the case a few years ago. Now it is just the phone that only comes in size 6. Don't have size 6? Too bad.

      Apple is "special" alright, just not in the way you think.

    25. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be that surprised if he was. I know its a cliche but I still suspect that the most anti-gay are really grappling with their own hidden feelings and (unjustified) self loathing. Otherwise why would they care so much?

    26. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It would have made a lot of sense for BB to switch to Android. Their big thing was the services they provided to business and end users (mainly BBM, which is now on Android too) and the fact that their hardware had a real keyboard. They could have saved a lot of money spent on OS development and focused on those services, while bringing their hardware to a wider audience of people who want an Android device.

      For Apple I'm not so sure... It really depends how long they can keep iOS a viable platform.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      If this were true, then the source for TouchWiz would also have to be released. You are allowed to make proprietary hardware and software without making it part of Android. If they don't alter the OS to include their patents, then it wouldn't release their patents. The point and definition of that clause is so that you can't patent encumber an open source project by contributing code that uses something you have a patent to without promising you won't go after anyone for using your contribution.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    28. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 1

      f this were true, then the source for TouchWiz would also have to be released. You are allowed to make proprietary hardware and software without making it part of Android.

      Do most of the patents in suit in Apple v. Samsung cover TouchWiz, or do they cover features that are actually "part of Android"?

      If they don't alter the OS to include their patents

      Apple might claim that Apple wouldn't have to "alter the OS" because it already "include[s] their patents".

    29. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 1

      Citation: Section 3 of the Apache license version 2

    30. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      The point is that participating with an open source project doesn't make it so things that aren't part of that contribution are covered by the license. You can't modify the code without giving out a patent license for your contributions, but just because someone else decides to contribute something that violates your patent and you happen to make unrelated contributions doesn't mean that you authorized someone else's abuse.

      --
      AJ Henderson
    31. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Apple has been happy to use software under GPLv2, and apparently doesn't touch anything with GPLv3. I don't think there's anything GPLv3 in Android (there isn't in Linux), so it's not a matter of licensing. It's just that making Android iPhones would be a stupid thing to do. The Woz has done some marvelous things, but I don't think he's got comparable business savvy.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    32. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Except that Apple is a premium brand. They don't make things for the low end. They put a heck of a lot of finish on what they do. Their user and support satisfaction numbers are generally the best.

      Thing is, /. caters to a crowd that generally doesn't care that much about the little things Apple puts into their systems, but tends to rate systems on raw power, which Apple doesn't usually compete on. There's nothing wrong with that, but the /. crowd also seems to come up short on empathy, so people here tend not to understand why other people are often willing to pay extra for Apple gear.

      Consider the iPhone. It didn't have more capabilities than other smart phones of the time, but it was much more usable. iPhones still generate disproportionate amounts of web traffic, for example. That sort of thing is less important to somebody who likes the Unix/Linux command line than somebody who can't remember any of the options on the "find" command and doesn't want to learn.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    33. Re:Alleged Apple patents on Android by tepples · · Score: 1

      Has Apple been happy to use software under Apache v2, the license of Android's userland?

  4. Re:first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are a lot of snarky comments in the “fuck beta” threads right now, and reading what little has been posted by soulskill, the admins actually think that they are being unfairly targeted by a mob mentality. This is a problem because the issues here will likely get managerial attention at Dice soon and if the executives see what looks like a bunch of juvenile shite in the comments, they are likely to buy into that false world view. If that happens, then Beta will be pushed through and Dice will think of themselves as victims of Anonymous or whatever.

    For this reason, I wish to lead a call for all users to spend the time from now until the boycott on the 10th to repost this as soon as a new story is posted.

    ----------------------

    Dice: Frankly, many of us want a new design, Classic is broken in so many ways. But beta is terrible, and this is what is wrong:

        * The value that Slashdot brings to its users is not in its articles. Frankly, the articles are terrible. The value that Slashdot provides is a discussion forum for self-selected nerds.

    * As such, it is vital that you remember that the community is not just an audience, it is also your primary content creator.

        * Your new redesign does not allow the community to create (or even consume) content because:
                        - It makes it impossible to follow discussions in the comments sections. This is largely because of the max-width on window and the fact that of the space left over is taken up by a useless sidebar. The vertical spacing is also overdone.
                            - Slashdot has a fragile but effective moderation system. Your changes make it impossible for readers to leverage that system to read a high quality discussion and ignore the trolls.
                        - It disregards conventions of the community. UIDs matter. We’re nerds. We understand that you need to attract a younger audience, but for a lot of us (including the younguns) it is thrilling to see a post from somebody who has been there from the beginning.

        * In the last 24 hours Soulskill has bitterly commented that the community has been involved since October and that they also get emails supporting the new design; only the comments are an echo chamber. This comment demonstrates a deep incompetence in your development team. Soulskill should have been citing A-B testing numbers. A-B testing is cheap, easy and effective but instead you are taking stabs in the dark.

        * Your ability to attain user acceptance is dismal. A number of years ago, when Taco needed to modernize the site, he solicited the community for designs, and awarded the best designer and used that design. That is how you leverage a community and gain their acceptance: incorporate them in the design process. As a bonus, you won’t have utterly useless redesigns that will either ruin your website or have to be scrapped.

  5. Writing on the wall..... by sfm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out some of the predictions that came out when /. went to Dice. It is amazing how well some people can predict the future.

    http://news.slashdot.org/story...

  6. Wacky Wozzy by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what caused him to start smoking crack?

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    1. Re:Wacky Wozzy by aitmanga · · Score: 2

      The slashdot beta, of course.

      --
      He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious.
    2. Re:Wacky Wozzy by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Well, he hung around with Jobs for awhile.

    3. Re:Wacky Wozzy by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Woz had a plane crash in 1981, and suffered head injuries. He hasn't said much rational since then. Nor created anything of note.

  7. Beta Sucks by tekpagan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Beta Sucks
    Join the boycott Feb 10-17.
    If Beta is still here on the 18th I will not return.
    Do not fix what is not broken.

    --
    And This Too Shall Pass
    1. Re:Beta Sucks by Princeofcups · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beta Sucks
      Join the boycott Feb 10-17.
      If Beta is still here on the 18th I will not return.
      Do not fix what is not broken.

      Please stop with this boycott nonsense. It accomplishes nothing except letting you "think" that you are doing something when you are powerless to do anything.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    2. Re:Beta Sucks by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      Please stop with this boycott nonsense. It accomplishes nothing except letting you "think" that you are doing something when you are powerless to do anything.

      Actually, it will just be a test to myself more likely. I won't go on Slashdot for a week in boycott. At the end of the week I'll come back to see if beta is 'live'. If it is the boycott will still end, and Slashdot will be a website that I used to go to.

      Side note to all you longtime users/posters: I just want to thank you for all of the great commentary over the years, some comments have changed me and some had tears streaming down my cheeks with laughter.

      The nerds are dead. Long live the nerds!

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:Beta Sucks by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      It accomplishes nothing except letting you "think" that you are doing something when you are powerless to do anything.

      That bit of reality really made my day... Sigh...

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    4. Re:Beta Sucks by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      Strange. I'd say you're trolling, but you have a low count six-digit user ID. I'll choose to treat you as misinformed.

      You say that we are powerless. I disagree. I intend to boycott. Should that fail, I'll leave for another site... which is already in the making. (I might frequent both if both can survive. There are other IT sites after all.) That is the power of my choice.

      As for power the of Slashdot, it comes from the community -- people like you and me. If enough people boycott, the quality of Slashdot will be seriously affected for a week. It will be interesting to see the results.

      -- Common Joe

      Valentines Day Slashcott: Boycott Slashdot because "Fuck Beta!": February 10 - 17

      Support Okian Warrior's alternate slashdot idea! Information can be found here: www.altslashdot.org.

    5. Re:Beta Sucks by karmawarrior · · Score: 1

      Any chance you could start that boycott a little earlier? KTHXBYE.

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  8. So that we won't forget the Woz... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    It's that time of year again! Wozniak needs to remain visible and he delivers his usual controversial quotes to internet to feed the link baits.

    Beta sucks btw.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  9. Fuck Beta! by Striek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That is all.

    --
    "Government is like fire; a handy servant, but a dangerous master." -- George Washington
  10. WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are very good reasons.

    1. profit - Apple already earns most of the profits to be made http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/08/22/apple-samsung-dediu-profits/
    2. Control - unless they fork it, Google is in control , and if you are going to fork it why not just stick with IOS
    3. Good taste - Apple does NOT want to be associated with all the low end crap
    4. No eco-system - Apple will NOT want to support iTunes etc etc on a platform they don't control, particularly if people try to run the Apps on 3rd party phones

    So if Apple were to make a high quality Android phone , it would probably cost the same money as the iPhone , so they may as well stick to IOS because its working for them.

    1. Re: WRONG by Scowler · · Score: 2

      Apple should take this in the opposite direction... Provide tools to migrate Android data to iOS. For example, allow an Android user iCloud access, and be able to load that data (including app-specific data) from iPad/iPhone. Make the bar to convert to iOS as low as possible.

    2. Re: WRONG by xlsior · · Score: 1

      Provide tools to migrate Android data to iOS. For example, allow an Android user iCloud access, and be able to load that data (including app-specific data) from iPad/iPhone. Make the bar to convert to iOS as low as possible.

      Except doing so also lowers the bar leaving the Apple ecosystem behind... Given that Apple has a significantly smaller market share than Android does in most countries these days, it seems like it would be a losing strategy for them.

  11. Wozniak To Apple: Consider Fucking Beta by Thanosius · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Account abandoned. I can't fucking spell for shit and Slashdot doesn't even allow time-limited edits of posts. Plus you'
  12. Slashdot sucks, why make it suck more? by rdelsambuco · · Score: 2

    I logged in just to say that. I NEVER login.

    --
    I comment occasionally so that I can mod others -1 overrated or -1 offtopic.
  13. Yes, quite the cautionary tale indeed. by sootman · · Score: 1

    The moral of BlackBerry's demise is, "Don't make be a show-moving turd and make crappy decisions when you're not the the world's most valuable and profitable company at the same time." I think Apple has a bit of a cushion before Mr. Cook is commiserating with Messrs. Lazaridis and Balsillie.

    Seeing as how Apple managed to survive without ever shipping a Mac running Windows, I doubt we'll ever see Apple-made hardware leaving the factory with Android installed. That said, it's a neat idea, but it's about as pointless as wishing Ford would ship a Mustang with a Corvette engine.

    In other news, slashdot beta still sucks.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Yes, quite the cautionary tale indeed. by larkost · · Score: 1

      While your statement about Windows never shipping on a Mac is technically true, the "PC Compatibility Cards for Power Macintosh" cards came really close. They were basically most of a PC on a PCI card using a Pentium processor, so you could have a Windows machine running inside your PowerMac:

      http://www.mug.jhmi.edu/mirrors/infoalley/0496/25/pc.html

      They came with DOS installed, so you had to instal your own copy of Windows.

    2. Re:Yes, quite the cautionary tale indeed. by slew · · Score: 1

      Apple managed to survive without ever shipping a Mac running Windows...

      Yet they did switch to shipping Macs that could run Windows (boot camp, parallels).

      In fact it wasn't just that Macs could run windows, the Apple folks that speced the HW for the Macs were always interested in how well the windows benchmarks performed on all the Mac HW they shipped because inevitably someone would use this as a basis to compare the value proposition of the machines and they knew many folks bought Macs because they could still get PC compatibility if necessary for their job/work.

      Right now the world is on Apple's side, but when it hasn't they haven't been historically too proud to make their products useful if necessary (e.g., office on Mac, etc)... Of course the Apple fanbois don't tend to see things that way...

      Running a hot android app under iOS might actually be a desired thing someday, you never know..

  14. Re:first by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    Commenters are doing such things, but it is foolish to think that management is going to throw good money after bad to redesign the site again when they've had a bad year with Slashdot Media financially. Their best bet is to simply turn it into another buzzfeed-like linkfarm and hope it generates revenue somehow (maybe sell it). So ... yeah. Let's just take her out back and put her out of her misery. Maybe some angel investor will come in and buy up the property and allow us to like support the site's maintenance via paypal. Maybe I'll grow another dick. :3

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  15. Re:first by s.petry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a hopefully coherent thread written here which could be a point of discussion assuming enough people want it on the front page as a stand alone article.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  16. The Woz..... by Dega704 · · Score: 1

    Always a heretic in the church of Apple. That's why we love him.

  17. would make Android into Apple's slave by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Wozniak needs to remain visible and he delivers his usual controversial quotes

    maybe Woz does this...idk...but on the merits this is an awesome idea. this is what actual "innovation" in business looks like

    the iphone running Android would make Google into Apple's bitch...

    strategically, you get them on your hardware with the option of using Android software...fine...if Google gets testy, **users can switch to iOS easily**

    Android users on iPhone would always be *one click* away from iOS...that would let Apple dictate development terms to Android

    fanboi disclaimer: I use devices with both Android and iOS so im not pimping one over the other..

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re: would make Android into Apple's slave by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      maybe Woz does this...idk...but on the merits this is an awesome idea. this is what actual "innovation" in business looks like the iphone running Android would make Google into Apple's bitch...

      strategically, you get them on your hardware with the option of using Android software...fine...if Google gets testy, **users can switch to iOS easily**
      Android users on iPhone would always be *one click* away from iOS...that would let Apple dictate development terms to Android

      fanboi disclaimer: I use devices with both Android and iOS so im not pimping one over the other..

      .
      Today users can switch to an IOS device. Does that make Google Apple's bitch? No. Why would make you think that Apple using Android for their iDevices would take away any power from Google? It wouldn't.
      .
      Woz is being silly anyway. Apple isn't going to give up their walled garden app store, they make too much money off of it.

    2. Re:would make Android into Apple's slave by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      the iphone running Android would make Google into Apple's bitch...

      Just like Google is currently Samsung's bitch?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  18. Wozniak has ruffled feathers before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wozniak has ruffled feathers before, in fact many times. This post concerns merely one issue though.

    That is why, even as a longtime apple 2 -> Mac - OS X -> iOS pro developer I admire him for his candor when he slams Apple.

    Usually he is right, even if he attacks his own investments, both financial or intellectual.

    The best time he attacked apple was back around 1991 or 1992, when in a little publicized shaming of Apple, he complained about Apple's near retarded renaming of names and macros in the header files so that everything you compiled year to year would continually break. Including... THE ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE interface headers!

    I had 500 kilobytes of hand crafted assembler and I got so sick of apple ruining my life with capricious and continual spelling changes (they foolishly use way too many abbreviations, and then gradually add more letters over time, like microsoft)... that I made my own headers for assembly language based off frozen header forks.

    That way my stuff can always assemble and compile for many many years. This was for a variety of products with over 500,000 paid for licensed copies.

    When wozniak bitched about the header utter disrespect at apple, I was so happy to have him in my corner.

    Truthfully, Apple source code headers have always been 4 times more logical and better than microsofts, but in OS X they at least have various mechanisms to allow older code to compile with newer headers, with over 5 year overlap, if not 7. Also in OS X there are tools that can extract headers from apps or from the entombed headers in ".framework" files. So the header horror years are long over, except when bridging legacy mac, legacy windows, and Cocoa all into one huge namespace. ... i am digressing...

    Breaking it year to year was foolish and wozniak called apple on it, for apple hiring morons.

    Wozniak was always semi approachable, and I also like the fact that one of two of wozniaks non personal phone lines was always listed and publicly accessible in his den his whole career, for the polish joke on the tape he left. Many I know called it up in the late 70s early 80s. I was thrilled to see the thing in the recent movie "Jobs". Truthfully, Steve Jobs too, except in person on the sidewalk, was also very very openly approachable, primarily via beth or his other secretaries as intermediaries. And steve was far more humble than biographers give credit. In mid 2000s he drove his own kid to school every day on the way to work, not too many fathers did that.

    1. Re:Wozniak has ruffled feathers before by Xest · · Score: 1

      "In mid 2000s he drove his own kid to school every day on the way to work, not too many fathers did that."

      They did if they've not long found out they possibly have terminal cancer and wanted to optimise the amount of time they spend with their kid as a result.

  19. Re:first by steveg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Let me endorse this. It's a very well thought out opening post for a discussion, and both Slashdot staff and users could benefit from reading it.

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  20. Re:I'm getting desperate. by TWX · · Score: 1

    *sigh* This.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  21. A serious attempt to get some increased RPMs from by gnujohn · · Score: 1

    A remarkable tale. Not only is Woz reported as having farted at the Church service, we are to believe that he expected applause for his flatulence? But no, this must be a '/. beta bug', coming out of the closet.

  22. Re:Any way to disable beta? by QuantumLeaper · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 at least until they switch completely over. I don't know I what I did but currently I never see the Beta.

  23. Damn, this could have been an interesting topic by excelsior_gr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was very interesting in reading what the slashdot crowd would have to say on this topic and on the opinion of Woz. However:
    1. The slashdot crowd is too pissed of with Beta, so all they do is keep complaining about it, and,
    2. If they didn't complain and Beta was rolled out in silence then I would still not be able to read what the slashdot crowd had to say on the comment of Woz, because the discussion section of Beta sucks.

    So, pretty please, with sugar on top, take back the fucking Beta.

    1. Re:Damn, this could have been an interesting topic by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      Normally a topic on Apple and Android would be filled with snide remarks and anti-Apple/Android comments, but most people are complaining about the slashdot beta instead, which kinda shows how much people hate it.

  24. We have spoken... by Nightbrood · · Score: 1

    DICE, the community is trying to tell you something. We hope you are listening. This Slash Beta idea you all got obsessed with rolling out is a REALLY bad idea. You obviously tried pencil whip the user feedback portion of your launch plan otherwise the comment system wouldn't have devolved into an outright revolt against the Beta in EVERY. SINGLE. STORY. you have posted today.

    Additionally, you should keep in mind that while we love Slashdot, we recognize all good things must come to and end. If this is what you want to do, then do it. However, don't expect a large portion of the community to follow you down that path. I know this because they have told you ALL DAY. I know this because I this community, unlike many others, is made up of the people who have the skills and abilities to REPLACE you. I know they will replace you because you've made them passionate about the cause. Even I, a 4 digit UID and pro-lurker, am fired up enough to post! Fix this guys or the community will fix it for you.

  25. I wonder if beta fixes things that are actually br by thevirtualcat · · Score: 1

    ---
        .
    ---

    This previous line was supposed to read "Like UTF-8 Support." in Unicode look-alike characters.

    Incidentally, I don't think they need to throw out the new layout entirely. Just fix the things about it that are horribly broken. Like the huge swaths of empty space at the sides of the screen. Especially the right. Also the comment system.

    Alas, I fear that it's only marginally less likely that Apple would build an Android phone than Slashdot is to address any of the community concerns about the layout.

  26. Re:first by Velex · · Score: 1

    Just voted it up.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  27. What a perfect example of why beta is bad... by Daneurysm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This is absolutely astounding. This is one of the most absurd articles I have seen posted to /. in years...the amount of fanboy rage, absurd theories, wild conjecture, fallible prophesying....so much. This is such a juicy article. We have practically been waiting for this since the beginning of the iOS vs Android wars...

    ...and instead we have focused our efforts on drawing attention to the horrid design that is threatening our digital homestead.

    If that doesn't drive home the point that beta = bad, well, I just don't know what will.

    Flawless karma be damned, fuck beta.

    After over 15 years of this site being my home page I will simply walk away and never look back if the concerns of the user community are not taken into serious consideration. Slashdot is the community.

  28. A real shame. by simonwalton · · Score: 1

    I really hope that someone with the skill and resources is creating an alternative for us all to flock to with a similarly functioning moderation system.

  29. Re:Dude, there is plenty of fat to be trimmed by Velex · · Score: 1

    It may not be Slashdot Media employees per se. I think we have to look higher up the food chain.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  30. Re:first by ImdatS · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess it will be time to move on when beta becomes standard and/or the only option.

    Sad that I will lose my "Karma: Excellent", but beta is really bad - actually, horrible.

    Dice: Please go back to the drawing board and just make the classic/current design slightly nicer/better - that's all we need. No new fancy UI which I can't really use.

    It will be a sad day when I ask for deletion of my account - all those times I spent trying to write really informative comments - lost in time like tears in rain...

  31. Re:first by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Is it time to brush up on our Japanese?

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  32. It would be amazing if Apple... by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

    ... ah forget about it. FUCK SLASHDOT BETA. The coments aren't even working here, all I've got is a stupid message "Shazbot! We ran into some trouble getting the comments. Try again... na-nu, na-nu!".
    Fuck you Dice Holdings.

  33. Re:first by DocHoncho · · Score: 2

    Has anyone seen this?

    Took the tour, laughed at gems like "A redesign 16 years in the making ... you know it's going to be good." LOL.

    "Intuitive menus" that feature prominently the desolate ghettos that are the new "Channels," SlashBI, SlashCloud, etc. The rest is just a randomly sorted list of "popular topics."

    "Social media integration" Oh, they've got Facebook spy bugs now! Too bad those dumb little buttons are probably blocked by a fairly large contingent of the userbase has those sad little abominations blocked (bonus points for IPTables or HOSTS based solutions!) they seem to exist solely to provide free advertising for cheap, lazy entities and to vigorously ejaculate banal content around the internet, like a giant mug of frothy, steaming semen. For god's sake, the stopwatch on my phone has a share feature, so you can litter your facebook with "My time is 00:01:22."

    To top it all off, the tour ends with the text "The New Slashdot. Newsier. Nerdier." What the hell is so nerdy about a rotten abortion of an update that, so far as I can tell, the community nearly unilaterally despises? Hey advertisers! Come pay to advertise on a site that just alienated it's user base!

    --
    Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
  34. Re:Any way to disable beta? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Any way to disable beta?

    go to the bottom of the page and hit classic mode.

  35. Re:Any way to disable beta? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Try http://slashdot.org/?nobeta=1 at least until they switch completely over. I don't know I what I did but currently I never see the Beta.

    Evidently it remembers your last use. If you are in beta and click the classic mode link, then the next time you come back you will still be in classic mode. At least for now.

  36. Re:first by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Commenters are doing such things, but it is foolish to think that management is going to throw good money after bad to redesign the site again when they've had a bad year with Slashdot Media financially.

    Their best bet is to simply turn it into another buzzfeed-like linkfarm and hope it generates revenue somehow (maybe sell it). So ... yeah. Let's just take her out back and put her out of her misery.

    Maybe some angel investor will come in and buy up the property and allow us to like support the site's maintenance via paypal.

    Maybe I'll grow another dick. :3

    It's even more foolish to think that Dice is going to respond to a bunch of "Fuck Beta" comments.

  37. Re:Dude, there is plenty of fat to be trimmed by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

    Slashdot media has 35 employees. Can you believe the insanity of that? 35 fucking employees to run this site and a bunch of shit spin-offs. There is plenty of fat to trim there that will make Slashdot profitable for _years_, all they have to do is scrap this shitty beta and fire these incompetent assholes.

    I don't work for Slashdot media, but I'm sure they appreciate an anonymous coward saying to fire them. After all, usually it is not the decision maker that gets fired, but the rank and file employee. Since slashdot lost money this year, it would be cheaper for Dice to fire all 35 employees and just shut down the site. That would also end the beta.

  38. Re:first by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    I don't really care if they go back to classic or keep beta, I would like the numerous bugs in classic fixed, however, regardless of which interface is used.

  39. Re:Beta Sucks! by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    Why would you ever mod up somebody hiding behind an anonymous coward? If they aren't willing to sign their name, why should they be listened to?

  40. Um Y by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    es

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  41. Just Unlock the iPhone by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Funny

    They don't need to port Android to the iPhone. They simply need to unlock the iPhone. It has essentially the same hardware as an Android phone, and I bet cynaogenmod would be running on the iPhone in short order if Apple simply unlocked the bootloader.

    One can currently buy a Mac laptop and entirely wipe the MacOS on it and install Windows. This would be the same thing for the iPhone. Let people decide what OS they want to run on their iDevices.

  42. Re:first by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    Barrapunto.com if you speak Spanish.

  43. Re:An example of why Beta is bad by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    All these people upset with digg v4 are just a vocal minority trying to ruin the experience for everyone else.

  44. Wouldn't pass testing by tepples · · Score: 1

    If Apple left Apple stuff out of the iDroid, then it more than likely wouldn't pass the Android compatibility tests. This would block applications that rely on things in the CDD over which Apple claims a patent. It would also block a lot of applications that rely on Google Play Services, which are available only on devices whose manufacturer demonstrates conformance to the CDD.

    1. Re:Wouldn't pass testing by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      If Apple left Apple stuff out of the iDroid, then it more than likely wouldn't pass the Android compatibility tests. This would block applications that rely on things in the CDD over which Apple claims a patent. It would also block a lot of applications that rely on Google Play Services, which are available only on devices whose manufacturer demonstrates conformance to the CDD.

      What are you talking about. There is nothing stopping Apple creating an Android phone. It could be 100% pure android, just like HTC, Samsung, Motorola and others. Are you thinking that an Apple Android phone would need to be able to run iOS apps? That would be sweet, but that's not a requirement for Apple to sell an Android phone.

      Look at it this way, say Apple licenses the Samsung Galaxy 4 to use as it's phone and they slap an Apple logo on it. There is now an Apple Android phone and it hasn't cost Apple one iota of intellectual property or anything else. Granted they probably wouldn't do that, but even if they ported Android to run on the iPhone, they aren't required to release their drivers open source. Even Android has closed source parts.

    2. Re:Wouldn't pass testing by tepples · · Score: 1
      Apple holds patents that it claims cover specific features of Android (the "claimed features"). If Apple were to make and sell an Android device, it could either include the claimed features or remove the claimed features. Were you suggesting that Apple keep or remove the claimed features in its hypothetical Android device?

      It could be 100% pure android, just like HTC, Samsung, Motorola and others. Are you thinking that an Apple Android phone would need to be able to run iOS apps?

      No. But Android without the claimed features probably wouldn't be able to run Android apps either. A device must pass the Compatibility Test Suite, which tests conformance to the Android Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) published by Google, or it won't get Google Play Services and Google Play Store, which are the closed-source parts of Android. Apple could remove claimed features from its version of Android, but the resulting version of Android would likely fail this test suite.

      There is now an Apple Android phone and it hasn't cost Apple one iota of intellectual property or anything else.

      Android Open Source Project is distributed to the public under the Apache License 2.0, which states that anybody who redistributes a covered computer program and holds a patent on a feature of the program is required to license these patents at no charge to other users of the same program. If Apple were to distribute Android with the claimed features, Apple would end up licensing its patents on claimed features to the public. This means Apple wouldn't be able to use its patents on claimed features against other device makers anymore because these device makers would be licensees of Apple's patents under the Apache License.

  45. Re:Fuck Android by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Funny

    >> Android works, but iOS is superior

    Not at all. My girlfriend has always been a hardcore apple fan/iPhone user. I've tried using her iphone 5 just to do some relatively simple stuff several times now and always ended up giving up and giving it back to her to get done whatever I needed to do. I think the iPhone user interface is highly unintuitive and a fundamentally terrible design. The screen is also tiny and poky. Since she has seen and tried using my (now relatively old) Samsung S3 even she, the diehard apple fan, can't wait to buy an android phone next.

    I've been a mostly C/C++ embedded software dev. for 30 years and recently wrote my first Android phone app. Most of my career has been doing embedded programming on many different platforms and I have to say that eclipse + ADT is probably the slickest/best embedded development environment I've ever seen/used. Java is pretty easy too.

    The reason I wrote the phone app was for a startup I'm helping with. We also need to do an iPhone app. To get our iPhone app on iTunes' App Store will be an absolute frickin nightmare compared to the ease of getting our Android version on the Play Store and all the early signs are that the Objective-C/iOS API will be much more of a pain in the ass than the Android API.

  46. Don't waste time on Android. by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I like open source and Linux and all that but Google can't design a worthwhile UI to save their life. I started out with an Android phone and was totally disgusted with it. Switched to an iOS phone and you couldn't pay me enough to go back to Android. I'm normally not an Apple fanboi but for a mobile UI, Android is simply the worst.

  47. mystifying... why? by jinchoung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    android provides two things:

    - free, ready to go OS
    - app ecosystem

    apple already has both. using their existing OS incurs no additional cost. and it is a framework that they already know how to work around.

    even if they wanted to make a dirt cheap phone based off of an iphone 3gs, it would be a matter of making hardware that would fit the bill as secondary market product. they ALREADY HAVE the os and ecosystem.

    so WHY... in the WORLD... would apple do that? why in the world would woz say that?

    and i come at this as a pc user with an android phone... this is truly mystifying.

  48. Re:first by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Too bad those dumb little buttons are probably blocked by a fairly large contingent of the userbase has those sad little abominations blocked (bonus points for IPTables or HOSTS based solutions!)

    HUSH! You'll get apk the HOSTS guy going. Bad enough that we have Beta Slashcott going on!
    http://slashdot.org/comments.p...

  49. Re:first by akh · · Score: 1

    That site has to be a parody.

    --
    Accept Eris as your Fnord and personally sate her
  50. Re:first by DocHoncho · · Score: 1

    The sad truth is that it probably isn't.

    --
    Celebrity worship is a poor substitute for Deity worship and costs more to boot.
  51. Re:Any way to disable beta? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    A boycott is not necessary... if the experience that slashdot presents is unusable, people who are bothered by it won't use it.

    Simple.

    Some will continue to use slashdot even after beta goes live and becomes the standard slashdot site.

    I probably won't be one of them, once it becomes mandatory, unless some rather significant changes are made between now and then.

    But that won't be because I'll be doing anything as formal as "boycotting", it will simply be because using slashdot won't be enjoyable anymore.

  52. Re:Fuck Android by maccodemonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To get our iPhone app on iTunes' App Store will be an absolute frickin nightmare compared to the ease of getting our Android version on the Play Store and all the early signs are that the Objective-C/iOS API will be much more of a pain in the ass than the Android API.

    I know both the Android and iOS APIs.

    There are some things each API does better than the other. And one is written in Obj-C and one is written in Java. HOWEVER...

    The iOS API is much more consistent than the Android API. Sure, it's Obj-C. And you have to learn Obj-C. And you might complain that Obj-C is new and different and not Java (which does NOT make it a bad language. Different != bad.) But if you know Obj-C, and if you know Java, the iOS API is just generally more sensible and easy to use. I would not define the iOS API as a pain in the ass. You'd call it a pain in the ass, but then again, I know it, and you don't.

    The Android API has several advantages. The Activities concept is a nice thing the iOS 6 and later APIs are just starting to play with. But they also make several boneheaded decisions. Rotating the device creates a new activity? WTF? Fragments? Fragments are nice but they're window dressing on a broken concept that iOS at least got right the first time. And native code support on Android is... lacking. Yes, you can technically do it, but not without jumping through a lot of development hoops you don't have to with the iOS tools. It would be nice if Android at least shipped with some Neon optimization code paths. And low latency audio on Android? Nope, still not there. Great if you're playing back or recording an audio file. Not great for much else. And don't get me started on all the bizarre OpenGL issues that iOS doesn't have.

    I don't mean to trash on Android too much. What I'm basically saying is I'm having trouble taking this seriously as a level headed comparison when it's basically "I spend a lot of time with Android, I know it, and I like it. I don't know iOS, and it seems totally crazy to me!" The iOS APIs are basically child APIs of what shipped in OS X, and from there what shipped in NeXTStep. A lot of developers have spent a lot of time with the APIs over the last 20 years. It's not like these are bizzaro APIs that came out of nowhere that have never been peer reviewed, iterated on and improved, or worked with for long periods of time. Which is more than I can say for the Android APIs.

  53. Very true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess he's a brillant engineer, but often engineers need a businessman at their side for success (and vice versa).

  54. Me to Apple: by drolli · · Score: 2

    License iOS to the competitors, and let them do their own app markets. Other hardware and iOS with a less-cencored market than the app store could brinf mroe money to apple (with less risk and investment) than trying to compete in the Hardware business.

  55. that makes about as much sense as Eric Schmidt tea by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    People should stick to what they know. Eric should pursue being an asshole, and Steve should work on his role as perpetual victim.

  56. I think several of the users did a study between t by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    whatever this puke color is called and determined that slashdot would make 200,000,000 dollars if they switched to a blue theme.

  57. He should take all that apple money and start a co by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    I hear it's going to be big.

  58. To have wasted such a large base of completely del by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    who were pathologically loyal, and utterly confused as to their actual level of tech savvy, should be criminal. In the future, corporate courts will prosecute this type of behavior.

  59. My friend had to return his iphone because he said by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    Normally, I would laugh on the inside, but it turns out he was totally ahead everyone on the whole gluten craze, so basically...you might be on to something.

  60. 1995: "Unbundle The OS, 2014: "Unbundle The H/w" by cmholm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The margins on Android phones are razor thin. Apple has complete control over the iPhone, giving them a plausible rationale for marketing a premium phone. If they release an Android phone, that rationale evaporates.

    How well has Nokia made out since dumping Symbion and MeeGo for someone else's OS? Yeah, that bad.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  61. The hardest skill is knowing when to leave the par by vancedecker · · Score: 1

    Steve became the change. "Oh wow, Oh wow, Oh wow" While your false messiah is working all his 'miracles' through his foundation, such as, the miracle of the H1B visa increase, and the miracle of the blocky user interface from ten years ago, ours has long since ascended. ...and through his sacrifice allowed others to rise and grow, unlike that old carcass.

  62. That's why it's good that Woz isn't CEO of Apple. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's why it's good (for Apple) that Woz isn't and never was CEO of Apple. He obviously has absolutely not the faintest idea what he is talking about marketing and business-wise. I use Android for my phone and tablet, just recently backed off of buying an iPad Mini for development because it was to expensive ... and even *I* get the value-add that the sophisticated iOS devices bring along.

    Apple should stick right where they are, perhaps move in closer with the opinion leaders a little again. Like XCode for free and without registration, direct access to iOS devices and filesystem, direct deployment of apps to iOS devices and some other stuff that's pissing of the top 0.2 % expertlayer of computer users, i.e. us, with Apple. That would be about all the changes I would make if I were in charge.

    The rest is going absolutely perfect for Apple, a fashion mindshare Google, Samsung, MS and others would kill for and bizar gros margins of 30%+ on post-PC devices included. Thinking of bringing Android into that picture makes me cringe - and I'm not even an Apple Fanboy.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  63. Re:Fuck Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    whooooosh.

    and BTW, beta sucks. join the slashcott, everybody.

  64. What a n00b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You do realize that you can actually filter out based on +1, +2 etc. don't you? The cog wheel on the right by the insightful,funny tabs, have you clicked it?

    All the people condemning the beta should be shot for being so darn set in yesterday mode that they cannot see the benefits of the new sight. This is a classic case of update blues .... seen this time and again when no training is provided with new software.

    Grow up you lot and remember that the guys a /. are trying there best here to provide something of better value.

    1. Re:What a n00b by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Too bad you posted as an AC, I would have modded you up. I have a policy, though, to only mod up people who are not ACs.

  65. Best of both worlds by allo · · Score: 1

    Superior Software combined with superior hardware.

  66. Re:Fuck Android by BigZee · · Score: 1
    This sounds an awful lot like the arguments I heard in the early 90s on open systems vs proprietary. Your points are all valid but do they make the iOS platform sufficiently better for it to carry on? Given that Android is actively developed, just how long are the advantages you describe going to be an issue?

    For now I see Android competing with iOS but I do think it's just a matter of time before there will be no advantage for Apple to continue developing their own OS. Woz is right, Apple could easily find themselves in the same situation as Blackberry and they need to be ready to deal with it.

  67. BlackBerry 10 Android by acoustix · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And BB 10 > iOS.

    Seriously. Give BB 10 a try. It's clean, responsive and secure. Plus with the latest 10.2.1 OS you can load Android APK files directly on the device. It really is a solid platform.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  68. Re: Dude, there is plenty of fat to be trimmed by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    I think that was his point... That they should fire some of those 35 employees to save money.

    It would seem to be prudent to first figure out what those employees bring to the bottom line. Slashing the workforce only saves money if the the same output can be achieved with fewer people. Maybe 34 of those 35 employees market slashdot to various entities for advertising. If they are covering their cost then cutting them cuts revenues, unless there is enough slack to be picked up by others. Of course, if the others do pick up the slack for those cut, then they don't have the time to go after new clients.

    The labor force of a company is rarely the problem. They don't make managerial decisions. If change is needed, it needs to start at the top. The same is true with cost savings. With the pay disparity between rank and file workers and management, cutting one manager position is the equivalent of cutting several rank and file workers. And, is more just as the managers are the ones who made the decision that screwed things up.

  69. Sig by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    I like you sig, however, I would be remiss to say that PL/1 helped put my kids through school, so I question whether it was a total loss.

  70. Re:That's why it's good that Woz isn't CEO of Appl by twocows · · Score: 1

    He didn't say they should stop selling iOS devices, he said they should start selling Android devices as well. Your post seems to be predicated on the idea that Woz thinks they should stop selling iOS devices, which he never said. But maybe I misunderstood you.

  71. Re:Fuck Android by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    you guys are wierd.
    I appreciate the mod points, but where did you get "funny" from?

  72. They can't give up control by AJH16 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that an Android phone made by Apple would be a radical success in the market, but it is unlikely to be successful enough to make up for the vertical integration control that Apple has over iOS. The point of the iPhone and iPad has nothing to do with selling iPhones or iPads. The point of selling them is to get an Apple controlled system in the hands of users which they can then leverage to get money for everything someone does with their device.

    They get a major cut of music, books, videos, apps, etc that you get through your phone or tablet, even for ad revenue from free apps. This and access to the information the devices provide is what makes them as successful as they are. This is why Microsoft released Windows 8 on the world (to try and copy the vertical integration through Metro.) And this is why Apple can not afford to release an Android phone, because it would actually harm their bottom line more than the sales would help.

    --
    AJ Henderson
    1. Re:They can't give up control by beefoot · · Score: 2

      Never say never. Their market share (iphone and various sizes of its cousin) are down and there is no way it will ever go back up. The next thing we know, iphone market share will be down to single digit. Of course the company will continue doing well for the years to come. Look at blackberry, their major break through was with RIM 950. It took them 12-15 years to collapse. The market is more competitive now. I'm betting Apple has at least 7-8 years of time left if they don't do anything -- i.e. we will continue seeing record profits year after year until the end its sudden death.

    2. Re:They can't give up control by AJH16 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but until they can no longer get content to sell to their customer base at ridiculous margins, it will still be more profitable to keep whatever % of the market they have on their platform than to risk losing some to their own Android platform. By the time it breaks down significantly enough, the market share won't be big enough to matter particularly much as they will have lost relevance.

      Not that they couldn't surprise me and do that now that Jobs isn't behind the wheel any more and so there isn't a trend to look at for them, but until a lot of factors change, it isn't in their best interest to make an Android device (which demonstrates yet again why Woz is not a business guy.) It still amazes me he managed to stay around Apple as long as he did given how juxtaposed Jobs desire to control was to Woz's desire to make technology work.

      --
      AJ Henderson
  73. SD cards, USB flash drives, and cameras by tepples · · Score: 1

    You need FAT support if you want to be able to mount an SD card that the user has inserted (which likely was already formatted as FAT), mount a USB flash drive that the user has connected (which likely was already formatted as FAT), or mount the storage of a digital camera that the user has connected (which likely was already formatted as FAT).

  74. Steve Jobs ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... would be aghast at such heresy. This calls for a public stoning! Anyone know where to get some Orange Sunshine?

  75. OS != device by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Today users can switch to an IOS device.

    and here we have it...you've shown us the source of 10^10 fanboi message board arguments...

    iOS & Android are **operating systems**

    iPhone, etc. are **devices**

    if Apple let users run Android on their Apple devices, they would indeed be **one click** away from switching

    they wouldn't **have to buy a new phone** because they are already using an Apple **device**

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:OS != device by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Today users can switch to an IOS device.

      and here we have it...you've shown us the source of 10^10 fanboi message board arguments...

      iOS & Android are **operating systems**

      iPhone, etc. are **devices**

      if Apple let users run Android on their Apple devices, they would indeed be **one click** away from switching

      they wouldn't **have to buy a new phone** because they are already using an Apple **device**

      And the same argument would let people switch to any other android device just as easily.

      Besides, the reason that Apple delivers a premium experience is that they're neither a hardware vendor, nor an OS vendor, nor a software company. They're a Solutions Provider, and it shows. They offer - or attempt to offer - a tightly integrated experience between the hardware, OS, and userland software. Changing that experience would be corporate suicide.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  76. we make websites by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    you know this is /. right?

    someone on here probably *invented* the term 'beta' for tech usage...

    alot of us are web coders...we know these problems because we deal with them every day...the problems in current web site design I mentioned are legit problems that hurt our industry & make people stupider for having visited a website (at times yes this happens)

    we've done redesigns...we've had clients listen to us & clients who want the worst...now we see what is essentially our worst nightmare played out before our very eyes and commenting is the only way we can possibly stop it

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  77. Re:Fuck Android by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Android and iOS are both being developed, and Apple can throw an awful lot of resources into iOS. I'm really hoping that both stay as viable alternatives for a long time. That keeps each side working hard on making things better for me.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  78. Re:Fuck Android by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

    This sounds an awful lot like the arguments I heard in the early 90s on open systems vs proprietary. Your points are all valid but do they make the iOS platform sufficiently better for it to carry on? Given that Android is actively developed, just how long are the advantages you describe going to be an issue?

    Maybe?

    Large chunks of iOS are open source, so I don't know if I buy the "iOS will die because Android has more momentum." Android up until 4.4 was still using iOS's web renderer and JavaScript runtime, and finally in 4.4 they forked it.
    http://opensource.apple.com/
    (A lot of iOS stuff is in the Mac section.)

    The private components of iOS are still being actively developed, and share a lot of foundation with the Mac, which is also being actively developed.

    I think, like any platform, continued development of iOS will be reliant on it's market share. If market share dips below 15%, you'll see interest wane. But in the US, majority share is still going back and forth between iOS and Android. Worldwide, we typically see iOS more around the 30% mark, but iOS active usage share and app store activity is far higher. So I think we're looking at years before we settle whether or not Android or iOS will become the only OS worth someone's development time, if that ever gets settled at all. I don't think a Windows style OS monopoly in the OS industry would be good at all. And as Google has taken more share, we've seen them becoming more abusive of their power (such as clamping down on source availability and certification for Android.)

    For now I see Android competing with iOS but I do think it's just a matter of time before there will be no advantage for Apple to continue developing their own OS. Woz is right, Apple could easily find themselves in the same situation as Blackberry and they need to be ready to deal with it.

    And that is a possibility. But it's also a possibility that Google could stop working on Android. Google gives Android away, makes no money from it, and puts a lot of support into it. I know, similar arguments have been made against Linux, but hear me out... If you're Google, and Android is only being done to keep people on Google services and ads, the best course of action is to hand over Android to Samsung (which, to be frank, is the only Android manufacturer seeing significant adoption), make a services agreement with Samsung, and then re-build their services agreement with Apple. That gives Google %100 share of the market, excluding the insignificant Microsoft bits, and no cost of developing Android.

    If you're Apple, that possibility looks ugly enough to keep you developing on iOS. Plus Apple gets the advantage that if they want to build a new device category like a watch or something akin to a new class like a tablet, they have enough expertise and resources in house to rearrange all the OS bits in a way they see fit.

    There is also the Mac. Even if Apple dropped iOS in favor of Android, they can't stop developing iOS. iOS is Mac OS X, and Apple still sells Macs. So even if this all plays out the way it all seems to in Woz's head, Apple can't even stop iOS development.

    Woz should have understood that, which makes me wonder about him. He's spent enough time at Apple, he understands Apple values knowing and controlling both the software and hardware, and he should understand that iOS and Mac share source and their fates are intertwined. I'm not sure if he realized that advocating for Apple to spin down iOS development isn't possible with the Mac existing. I've previously had a high opinion of Woz, but he's not thinking like an engineer or innovator here, which worries me. Apple adopting Android would make them a lot like Nokia, Dell, or HP. And look where those companies are now. I'm not even sure Woz is correct. If Blackberry had adopted Android would they have survived? Or would they have been run off the market by Samsung like every other company that put their lot in with Android (except for Samsung?)

  79. Re:Fuck Android by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    I also observe Google progressively closing off more and more of Android's API's, making iOS comparatively less of a walled garden over time. In that respect, Android's comparative advantage is decreasing steadily.

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  80. marketing horseshit by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    they're neither a hardware vendor, nor an OS vendor, nor a software company. They're a Solutions Provider, and it shows

    'Solutions Provider'

    the term offends me...it's stupid marketing-style bullshit

    do they sell hardware? then they're a damn hardware vendor

    do they write software? then the're an OS vendor

    do you make stupid distinctions with marketing words that make no sense to the conversation? yes

    please, i know i'm spouting vitriol here but you must consider what i'm saying....you need to adjust your view of how the tech industry works

    hype is always bullshit...always...

    people like Steve Jobs talk alot of hype & that's what they're known for, but its not what made them successful

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:marketing horseshit by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. No single component of the hardware, OS, or software on the iPhone was particularly revolutionary. Putting them together into a single, coherent, supported package was the step that made all the difference. Taking ownership of everything throughout the interaction chain is what allows Apple (and others, but this example is about Apple) to deliver a single high-quality experience, and their adoption rates show it.

      You can have great hardware, a great OS, and great software that don't quite jibe together and you end up with great specs on paper but devices that feel unnatural and eventually get left in a drawer. Its a very real problem in the industry. Fixing those continuity errors and adding reasonable sales and support services (for the price) was a game-changer.

      BTW, I've been in the tech industry for close on 25 years from peon to CTO - pretty sure I'm okay with my views on it. You don't have to share them, of course.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!