Slashdot Mirror


20 Freescale Semiconductor Employees On Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight

NeverVotedBush writes with news reported by CNN that a passenger manifest for the flight that went missing on its way from Malaysia to China indicates that "Twenty of the passengers aboard the flight work with Freescale Semiconductor, a company based in Austin, Texas. The company said that 12 of the employees are from Malaysia and eight are from China," and writes "Apparently, at least two passengers used stolen passports to board."

107 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Cargo by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The plane was carrying a cargo of 400 million dollars in Bitcoin. nuff said.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Cargo by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And we learned that you can board a plane with passport that was stolen and REPORTED stolen on an airplane, as long as you leave your shampoo at home an remove your shoes before boarding.

    2. Re:Cargo by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Malaysia.

    3. Re:Cargo by Kjella · · Score: 1

      On domestic flights here in Norway they don't check IDs anymore, they used to but basically nobody really looked twice at it and you could go anywhere by car or train or bus or whatever anyway. The security control is supposed to pick up on anything dangerous you bring along. That you can travel on a stolen passport is more a customs and immigration problem, if it turns out these people were able to bring explosives or something to bring the plane down that's the problem whether they were travelling under their real name or not.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Cargo by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      A few years ago my mother was coming to visit us, in Mexico. Someone working for Continental put her on a Continental flight to Oklahoma (instead of Veracruz), not even checking her ticket, not even wondering why "her" seat was already taken. Continental couldn't even be bothered to call us at Veracruz, and an employee of continental treated us like shit when we finally figured out that my mother was not on the plane, blaming her.

    5. Re:Cargo by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      Not just domestic, but inside Schengen. I've flown to Switzerland (once, and I've flown that route MANY times) without showing any ID ever - checkin was automatic, bagdrop was automatic, and from then on I just had to show the bording card (which no-one actually looked at except to beep the barcode). I could have checked in in your name without any issues.

      Basically the airlines are the only ones checking any ID as long as you're flying inside Schengen.

  2. Was there any ACARS data? by stoploss · · Score: 5, Informative

    I watched a documentary about Flight 447 (the Airbus flight that was lost off Brazil) and they mentioned that modern planes send tons of position and other data per flight. Seems the current system is called ACARS.

    Anyway, from a probability perspective it seems highly unlikely that a plane would disappear from radar precisely at the time that a data transponder stopped sending position fixes, unless, you know, the plane crashed right there.

    I mean, the media makes it sound like the search radius is "flight speed * remaining potential flight time at current fuel burn rate".

    1. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      So far there is no debris at all. Thats pretty amazing considered where it was last seen. It either didn't crash, or didn't crash where the search is.

    2. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It could be more complicated then that.

      Suppose an electrical fault cause the loss of coordinate transmission while it also lost navigation and the pilots were forces to fly manually and blindly for a while before they lost all control and the plane crashed. A jets under ideal conditions can glide around 70 or so miles from 35000 feet in the air.

      So if the jet lost portions of the planes controls in stages, it could be quite a large search radius from the last known position and it could be close to the limit of the fuel range if they could still control the engines (doubtful as most everything is fly by wire and a catastrophic electronics failure likely would consume that too).

    3. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by invictusvoyd · · Score: 1

      Apparently, at least two passengers used stolen passports to board.

      Sudden catastrophic decompression could lead to structural collapse of the entire fuselage destroying an aircraft almost instantly. Lack of any distress signal possibly indicates that the pilots did not have enough time to do so . IMHO Investigators should have a careful look at the airport where the boarding took place.

      Having said that , The possibility of pilot error or mechanical faliure cannot be completely ruled out at this point.

    4. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Funny

      So far there is no debris at all. Thats pretty amazing considered where it was last seen. It either didn't crash, or didn't crash where the search is.

      Not "amazing" at all if the jet was VAPPORIZED by a small thermonuclear device placed on the jet by the same NSA operatives that brought down the Twin Towers.

      CO-INKY-DINK?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aren't they the same guys who make Steve Guttenberg a star?

    6. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IMHO Investigators should have a careful look at the airport where the boarding took place

      As I live and travel a lot within Asia, I can tell you that many airports in Asia, particularly those in Indonesia and in Malaysia (and also in Thailand) are so lack in any security procedure that any suicide bomber can board a plane easily.

      And in Malaysia as well as in Brunei and in Indonesia, I have seen with my own eyes that they let women who cover up their faces passing through checkpoint and boarding planes.

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    7. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      placed on the jet by the same NSA operatives

      lol I love it; used to be everyone thought the CIA was doing things, now it's the NSA. The conspiracy theory has evolved.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by QQBoss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only problem with the thought of losing portions of the planes controls in stages, the first two or three would have had to have quickly knocked out the transponders, the pilots radio (separate from the transponders) and the backup radio (separate from the transponders and the primary radio) before affecting anything else on the plane that would have caused the pilots to message someone on the ground that bad things were happening. Transponders disappearing usually gets a call from someone on the ground, which the pilots would respond to if they could. Needing to switch to a backup radio will have the pilots letting someone on the ground know in short order. If you assume they lost electrical system power due to total engine failure (which would merit a fairly rapid SOS call as a result), that still wouldn't prevent the ram air turbine from generating the power needed to send a distress call.

      It isn't unreasonable to start from an assumption of catastrophic failure of the airframe and start your search on that basis while investigating other possibilities in parallel. It could also be due to a pilot or co-pilot deciding they wanted to take the plane down, however, since the transponder can be disabled from the cockpit (Think Egypt Air MS990, though that was never declared officially to be a pilot suicide), but then the plane would have quickly shown up as a transponder-less blip on multiple radar systems, since that air space is quite well covered along the flight path and to both the south and west. To the north east, it should have been picked up at Con Son, unless it really was under control to head back south east towards Riau Islands. Chances are good, whatever direction it went, including straight down, either the Malaysian or Vietnamese govts. will eventually announce the radar tracks they watched it on, given that the last transponder point had the flight only ~250 km from the closest Malaysian airport (not to mention Malaysian Navy ships out on normal patrols) and about 1/2 of that from a Vietnamese naval base which it would have flown directly over if it had continued on path.

      Hmm, just checked Google News for an update. Reported in the last 30 minutes, the Malaysian military is saying the plane appeared to turn back south according to radar.

    9. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does becoming vappor hurt more than becoming vapor? I'm pretty sure it's painless if it happens quick enough, though it's difficult to determine since vappor hasn't been studied.

    10. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      An electrical fault would not cause the main systems, the backups, the transponders and the emergency beacons to all simultaneously fail. In fact, in the event of a power failure, a ram air electrical turbine generator drops out of the belly of the plane to provide electrical and hydraulic power. Something catastrophic or something deliberate happened to that plane.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The stolen passports are of course something to look at but for all we know, it could be quite common in that part of the world and what people seem to forget is that a stolen passport is not an explosive. Heck, if you're a suicide bomber there, you could just as well use your own passport when they don't have TSA type no-fly lists. The fact that no organization has yet claimed responsibility is another reason why i have a hard time suspecting foul play. Many times a bunch of (incompetent) terrorist groups claim responsibility for what is clearly an accident. And then there's the question of what entity wants to target Malaysia or the Malaysian government - it's their flag carrier so that's whom any attack would be considered to be against. Or possibly China considering the substantial number of Chinese passengers and the fact that it was a code share flight with China Southern.

      Pilot error is the most common cause so any time when nothing is known about a crash (like now) that's what I would put my money on unless I considered betting on the cause to be in terribly bad taste. Or pilots terribly mishandling a large or small problem - like AF447...

      Based on slightly more qualified speculation on pilot forums, a suspect is Boeing's ADIRU since in 2005 a Qantas 777 made a rapid nose dive when the unit "went nuts" due to a software glitch but that has of course been patched long ago. Another suspect is the thrust reversers since the system in the 777 bears some resemblance to the one in the 767, which caused a Lauda Air 767 to completely disintegrate suddenly when the left engine thrust reverser suddenly deployed in the air. But that too was fixed long ago. In the 767 too. Finally, this particular aircraft was involved in a ground collision a few years ago - its wingtip hit the rear of a parked A340 - but based on the pictures of the event, even if the wingtip were to suddenly break off again, it would not make the aircraft completely unflyable. At least not to the vicinity of an airport to attempt an emergency landing. And of course plenty of time to talk to ATC.

      Another possibility is of course another Egyptair 990 (pilot suicide) but we already know more about this particular aircrew since Richard Quest flew in the jumpseat with them when making a business travel program for CNN just a week ago and both seemed very, very satisfied with their lives. The captain was an experienced training captain and the copilot in the process of transitioning to the 777 from another Boeing (767 IIRC but I could be wrong).

      However, the good thing is that we're likely to get the black boxes a lot sooner than from AF447 since the water is much shallower. Parts of the search area are even "shallow" enough to be within the maximum depth for professional divers (100m).

    12. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Bugamn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what the CIA wants the commoners to think.

    13. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Hand moving above head from front to back.
      Whosh

    14. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ACARS doesn't send position data, ADS-B does. The area where this plane went down doesn't have good ADS-B coverage. www.flightradar24 is a good site to learn more.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    15. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      ADS/CPDLC runs over ACARS and definitely sends position data. Believe me, I used to code this stuff for a living.

    16. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by drkim · · Score: 2

      So far there is no debris at all. Thats pretty amazing considered where it was last seen. It either didn't crash, or didn't crash where the search is.

      Latest I've heard was that Vietnamese boats found two large oil slicks - but no debris yet...

    17. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by JustOK · · Score: 2

      What do you mean, "runs over ACARS"? ADS-B is similar but not the same as ACARS. ACARS is on 131.55 MHz, ADS-B is 1090 MHz, for one.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    18. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      Doubtful, they didn't even manage to hold back the Electric Car, and I'm not going to call "Rigged!" on the Oscars just yet...

    19. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      "d) shot down by North Korea, China, someone else"

      Since it was nowhere near North Korea I think that can be ruled out. Of course Vietnam or China could have shot it down, but the latter seems unlikely.

      I am sure they have boats out analysing the oil slicks that were found tto see if they could be from the plane.

    20. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Anyway, from a probability perspective it seems highly unlikely that a plane would disappear from radar precisely at the time that a data transponder stopped sending position fixes, unless, you know, the plane crashed right there. I mean, the media makes it sound like the search radius is "flight speed * remaining potential flight time at current fuel burn rate".

      My reading is that ACARS updates position only few minutes whereas radar update times is faster. As for search area, the initial search area is where the plane disappeared off the coast of Vietnam. The max search area is based on remaining fuel. It is theoretically possible as the plane may have changed courses. Not probable, but possible.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The last known position was over the ocean.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    22. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

      Agreed

    23. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by antifoidulus · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind that the Air France 447 flight was intact when it hit the ocean(in fact aside from the blocked pitot tubes the airplane was almost certainly completely functional). The events that led to the crash unfolded over several minutes, giving plenty of time for ACARS data to be transmitted. A sudden breakup of the plane would preclude any ACARS data indicating distress from being sent from the plane.

    24. Re: Was there any ACARS data? by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      The reports are now that the two stolen passports were used at the same time and location to buy consecutive tickets but with different destinations though the same origin. While it doesn't prove a terrorist link, that two passports were stolen from two different people but then used together in this way is pretty suspicious.

      Not that suspicious. Could be low-level or mid-level organized crime, or just illegal immigrants to a location, or people with a felony history that would keep them out of a country, or a victim of human trafficking escorted by a trafficker, or dissidents kept on a no-fly list, or anyone with an interest in being off the grid.

      It does, however, point out the limited usefulness of the move along the US border to require passports rather than birth certificates for entry after 9/11. I'm sure it makes entry slightly harder, which is what security is about, but it's not something that would have prevented 9/11.

    25. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      ACARS is on 131.55 MHz, ADS-B is 1090 MHz, for one.

      Don't confuse a coder with fancy hardware talk.

    26. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was wrong. Thank you. I did find, 'tho: 'the ratio of ACARS messages which contain position reports, to those which don't, is very small' So that's probably why I wasn't aware of that. Also, I wasn't completely correct with the freqs for either, there may be other freqs depending on location etc

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    27. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by stoploss · · Score: 1

      A sudden breakup of the plane would preclude any ACARS data indicating distress from being sent from the plane.

      Yes, that was my point. ACARS isn't a distress signal, as far as I understand it. Receiving a constant log of position fixes via ACARS that ceases at approximately the same time and position that all ground-based radar systems lose track of the aircraft tends to strongly circumscribe the likely search radius. Bayesian statistics and all that.

    28. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      ACARS is a network service. ADS is an application.

    29. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Like a bomb? Oh that Islamic fanatics are at it again. Missing passports my ass.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    30. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by zummit · · Score: 1

      No debris? Must have been taken by Space Aliens/UFO.

    31. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Leonardo Di Caprio still hasn't won one. Are you sure they aren't rigged?

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    32. Re: Was there any ACARS data? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      If those passports were stolen by terrorists, their affiliated organization would have piped up by now to claim responsibility for it.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    33. Re:Was there any ACARS data? by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      I'm sure a bunch of guys with nothing better to do are sadly exclaiming "We do!".

  3. And this means...? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1
    Do we know who these employees were? Do we know what this means for Freescale? For all we know these were accountants and advertising execs, and have no real long-term effect on the company.

    Now don't get me wrong, that's not to say that the loss of these people is any less bad, but I have to wonder if we're overestimating the importance of the fact that there were Freescale employees on the flight.

    --
    Rawr
    1. Re:And this means...? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The entire company could be killed next year by a disease transmitted by a dirty telephone.

    2. Re:And this means...? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Well, we keep bitching about "why is this non-tech news on /.?", so they had to find a tech angle in order to get the story on here.

    3. Re:And this means...? by afidel · · Score: 1

      In theory that's correct, for instance our company has a policy that a manager and no more than two of his direct reports can be on a flight together, but the number of times that policy is violated when a bunch of the bigwigs are taking the chartered jet to a meeting far away makes it a bit toothless in reality. Who's going to fire the CEO and a bunch of EVP's?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:And this means...? by petsounds · · Score: 1

      According to Freescale's statement, eight of the individuals were Chinese employees and twelve were Malaysian. My guess is that they were probably management and Process Engineers traveling to a factory in China to oversee production of a new product.

    5. Re:And this means...? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      The entire company could be killed next year by a disease transmitted by a dirty telephone.

      And no wouild have noticed...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    6. Re:And this means...? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      God fires them from the job of "living humans" when the plan crashes?

    7. Re:And this means...? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      He's got 1 whole digit more than you. You've 2 more than someone else I know.

      You can put the e-peen away now.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    8. Re:And this means...? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Some of us have been around here on Slashdot to remember that in the original Slashdot culture, there was sort of a dislike of the 'ranking by number' kind of stuff. Before the whole 'Fake Bruce Perens' shit happened, UID numbers weren't even visible on comments. It's a sad fact that they should remove them again. Oh, wait! That's one of the things that is gone in the Beta. Is that the basis for some of the carping and whining about Beta? Do we only have left the kind of 'old timers' for whom that kind of crap really, really matters?

    9. Re:And this means...? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Aren't you happy to know that you're not flaming some fake Zontar?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  4. Re:Thank goodness that we know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except of course you are conflating "fear of or the risk of terrorism are overstated" with "there is no such thing as terrorism." I could get shot by some nut in public tomorrow, but I'm not going to structure my life or society around the fear of that possibility.

  5. Re:Two people with stolen passports? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I think it was the second Flying High! (Airplane) movie where an old lady gets grilled while dudes with guns walk through the scanners.

  6. Re:Thank goodness that we know ... by Sun · · Score: 1

    No, that is not what everyone on slashdot are saying.

    What we are saying is:

    • Terrorism is extremely rare.
    • People who brings a water bottle on board because they want to drink it are extremely common

    So, to falsify the common slashdot knowledge, you'd have to show all of the following:

    1. The plane was downed by a terrorist attack
    2. The terrorists were not the passengers boarding with false passport (else traditional airport security was supposed to locate them),
    3. and..

    4. The terrorist were using some sophisticated water based bomb assembled on board, or smuggled stuff in their underwear.

    Assuming 1 is true and the rest is false, pre-9/11 airport security was all it was supposed to take to prevent this plane from going down.

    Shachar

  7. Summary needs a slight rewrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Freescale Semiconductor did not write that blurb about the stolen passports and the way it is displayed here makes it seem that there is a connection between the passports and the company's employees.

    1. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      per Fox news not only is this connected, but Freescale execs KNEW about it and encouraged it, even to the point of making sure everyone on the plane was wearing the company-required "highly explosive" jackets, that have an 80% chance of combustion if more than three of them come within 30 feet of each other.

    2. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The stolen passports likely have nothing to do with Freescale, but in regards to those passports, they've already determined that the two tickets purchased for those two identities where purchased at the same time - they have consecutive ticket numbers. Further, and oddly, the two had different final destinations.

      A conceivable theory is that they were terrorists with explosives in their checked in baggage. The plan was for the explosives to detonate later than they did (but something caused one to detonate prematurely), thus taking down two flights and not just one. Further, they may have intended to disembark or not board those final flights while intending their luggage to continue on (perhaps they did a test run and found that luggage was not properly removed from the plane if a passenger did not board a connecting flight at the destination Chinese airport). There was a Chinese terrorist attack in the last couple weeks (the mass killings with knives) and this plane was carrying almost all Chinese citizens, and it was headed for China. If that speculation is correct, two planes would have been destroyed, doubling the amount of Chinese that were killed, and the destruction would have happened over China, thus potentially causing collateral damage.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    3. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by malvcr · · Score: 1
      This is material for many new books and movies, even without knowing what really happened. Your description is a possibility (better knowing, as another reader point to, that Malaysia security control are very lax ... until now at least).

      Other options:
      • These are flying by wire devices. You don't need to go to the cabin to destroy the plane, you only need to disturb the plane network to make it useless.
      • It is supposed the plane was turning to south before loosing contact. Could be possible it was hijacked instead of destroyed?
      • There are ways to disturb the satellite and GPS systems so the device believe they are in one place while they are really in a another one... but the lack of communication makes this a not so good option.
      • Static in te cabin .... what about our atmosphere, that is presenting many changes lately, is developing some type of unknown new, for us, electro magnetic disturbance that could destroy the electronics in a plane? ... I expect this not to be real, because many other planes could be in trouble very soon.
      • Errant and/or out of control Drone?
      • A meteorite?

      In fact, I just realised that the Drones have a very nice possible future usage. Many planes with troubles are alone in their space. What about if we "always" send a small recognisance Drone with each plane? It is "outside" the plane, so if the plane explode or lost control, the Drone can be a first class witness. Also, if there is a strange air flow or some atmospheric disturbance and the Drone is flying in front of the plane, it will be affected first. Some seconds are the difference between life and death. And, they could give a hand if the pilots have very serious situations inside the plane.

    4. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea about the drone however most drones can only fly slowly so it would be hard to match the speed of a airliner.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    5. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by 32771 · · Score: 1

      First the ~5000 pages of i.mx53 documentation and now this! This is pure and unadulterated terrorism I tell you.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    6. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      How do we get a bunch of those jackets positioned for sale in the convenience stores in the vicinity of Moffat Field? Preferably with some sort of wifi widget on them that would make them seem cool to geek wannas. They could call them 'Jacket.'

    7. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by malvcr · · Score: 1

      What about "something" can fly for a little landing from the plane and returning to depart again? ... this is not for 2014, but could be in the future, with a different design of what a plane is.

    8. Re:Summary needs a slight rewrite by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      Drag it on a string

      --
      Nullius in verba
  8. Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by QQBoss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Granted, it has been a while since I worked for the part of Motorola that became Freescale, but I am fairly certain there were rules against the maximum number of employees that could take any one flight. I think it was 2 for executives and 6 or 8 for regular employees. Situations like this, rare as they are, was the reason. I wonder if Freescale still has those rules and ignored them, or didn't copy them over. Any current employees have insight?

    I hope the families receive meaningful information as to what and why this happened, and don't have to spend a year or longer wondering (at least for the what, why usually takes a lot longer with airline crashes).

    The 777 is one of the safest commercial planes in the aviation history, with only one accident with fatalities prior to this. Having just flown on a 777 (Cathay Pacific) out of Kuala Lumpur less than 30 days ago, however, I will say that their airport security was very lax. When I set off the metal detector and was wanded, the security person stopped at the first thing that might have set it off (I had left a metal-bodied pen in my shirt pocket) and didn't go on to find I also forgot to take out my cell phone and earphones from a different pocket (cargo pants). That was just for entry to the main concourse, though. To actually get on the plane, Cathay Pacific required a secondary screening that was much more rigorous from what I observed of how they dealt with other people (I remembered to put away my pen and phone that time). Malaysia Air did not do a secondary screening for a domestic flight when I boarded in Sandakan a few days earlier, but the concourse screening was also more intensive.

    1. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2

      Pffff. I flew into KL a few weeks ago and I gotta say security was ridiculous. My plane had to stop to refuel and about five times before landing they warn you over the air that if you have any drugs on you when they land you'll be executed (the plane WAS from Amsterdam). Everyone had to disembark (and we weren't allowed to take any baggage). Then through metal detector + xray + pat down for everyone. Seemed a tad overkill for a plane refueling. I mean, I get security before entering a plane, but landing midlfight and asking everyone to disembark for another security screening?!?!?!?

      On another note (and what I thought was interesting), I had one of the worst landings ever there. They didn't slow down to land and wheels down felt like the bottom of a loop-de-loop on a roller coaster. I wondered if this was due to the fact that we flew in for landing over mountains and they needed to cut a few thousand meters quickly.

    2. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by mpfife · · Score: 2

      I think there is good reason to believe if something tragic has happened - that it was an accident. Usually when terrorists destroy something - they immediately give notice and announce how and what they've done. We haven't seen that so far.

    3. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      "how they dealt with other people" via throwing them into an operating jet turbine intake!

    4. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Granted, it has been a while since I worked for the part of Motorola that became Freescale, but I am fairly certain there were rules against the maximum number of employees that could take any one flight. I think it was 2 for executives and 6 or 8 for regular employees. Situations like this, rare as they are, was the reason. I wonder if Freescale still has those rules and ignored them, or didn't copy them over.

      Most likely it was scrapped - plane crashes being rare things, it's easier and cheaper to book a single flight for everyone. I mean, that could mean booking easily 4-5 flights for something that probably only happens once a year or less, and the chances of that flight being "the one" is so low that the added expense isn't worth the cost.

      Planes are highly reliable pieces of equipment, much more so than even just 30+ years ago. We understand risks much better, and airspace is generally well controlled and monitored. So that policy might've been necessary back in the days, but these days, it's so unlikely that the company would rather save the money.

      Just this time, unfortunately, they lost the bet.

      Pffff. I flew into KL a few weeks ago and I gotta say security was ridiculous. My plane had to stop to refuel and about five times before landing they warn you over the air that if you have any drugs on you when they land you'll be executed (the plane WAS from Amsterdam). Everyone had to disembark (and we weren't allowed to take any baggage). Then through metal detector + xray + pat down for everyone. Seemed a tad overkill for a plane refueling. I mean, I get security before entering a plane, but landing midlfight and asking everyone to disembark for another security screening?!?!?!?

      Well, technically, the plane is in Malaysia and they'll treat even a fuel stopover as entering the country.

      And Singapore and Malaysia are pretty much drug free - they execute anyone carrying any drugs. Zero tolerance - get caught and it's to the firing squad. Very quick, swift justice. You might get a few extra days with some consular assistance.

      They treat drug smuggling very seriously. Every vehicle passing through gets inspected.

    5. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2

      That may be so but that's not what they said in the cabin.

      They announced five times in slightly different ways "drug traffiking gets the death penalty, capital punishment in malaysia for drug traffiking, etc."

      And on the boarding cards, getting off at the arrival gate, etc., there were signs saying the same thing in BIG RED LETTERS.

    6. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by quietbob · · Score: 1

      I just flew out of KL last night on a Malaysia Airlines flight (another 777), less than 24 hours after MH370.

      I think they've tightened things up a little - forgot a couple of coins in my pocket at the first screening and set off the detector, got the full pat down. Then at the gate they were screening again immediately before boarding and doing it thoroughly. First time in this part of the world I've seen them making people take off watches & belts.

      Seemed to be a few more uniformed guards around than usual, even a few between the gate screening and the airbridge which I don't recall seeing before.

      Other than that everything seemed to be business as usual.

    7. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by QQBoss · · Score: 1

      A) The point under discussion was security on the way out, not on the way in. Since you were just passing through, perhaps airport security was given a heads up to look for something specific to your flight? You did say you were coming from Amsterdam, after all. Arriving into KL from Hong Kong, my flight had no additional screening, and immigration procedures into and out of Malaysia are the easiest I have ever dealt with in any country (you don't fill in any paperwork, they take it all off of your passport matched up with flight manifests). For reference, I am at about 1.8M air miles (not including all the free trips I took) and in the process of filling up my 4th extended passport (where they add an additional 24 pages). Regardless, concourse security at KLIA was the laxest I have ever experienced post-9/11 anywhere in the world I have traveled.

      B) You must not have flown into KL International airport, there are zero mountains within 30 kilometers of the airport (and those are big hills, more than mountains) and zero mountains on any approach path that doesn't try to land at 90 degrees from the airport (typically an unhealthy approach to any runway). Or maybe you have a different concept of what is a mountain from me.

      C) Those hard landings are not uncommon when pilots allow the ALS to land the plane with even mild wind shear present. Or poor pilots blame the ALS, at least.

      D) Drug trafficking means possession with the intent to sell. Mere possession of small quantities of heroin or marijuana is rarely considered trafficking, even in Malaysia.

      Since you can't do it anymore in reality, find a flight simulator that models the old Hong Kong airport runway approaches, or find YouTube videos that show airplanes passing at close to the same levels as high rise building while performing 40-60 degree turns to line up with the runway (there used to be a rooftop restaurant famous for plane watchers) on the top of mountains, then having to dive down rapidly to not overshoot the runway (a low fuel, passenger loaded 747 at 225 tonnes needs roughly 1675 meters of runway to land by the book IIRC, and the longest runway at Kai Tak was 1664 meters and those 747s were landing all day long), frequently while crabbing heavily to deal with heavy cross-winds. I can say I miss that experience... now. Ex-Navy pilots said it was the closest thing to trying to land a 747 on an aircraft carrier with a cross wind that they could imagine. Wikipedia has a good explanation of various approaches.

    8. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      They didn't slow down to land

      What was the windspeed and direction at the time of landing? What did ATC indicate was the minimum landing speed for wind conditions at the airport? What did the aircraft / company manual indicate what minimum approach speeds were for the conditions provided by ATC?

    9. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You fly into a Malaysian airport with dope--that's trafficking. Better hope you can bribe the hangman well enough that he actually makes the rope long enough to break your neck.

      But don't take my word for it--try it yourself with a small amount and let us know how that works out for you.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    10. Re:Motorola used to have rules against that, IIRC by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

      They didn't slow down to land

      What was the windspeed and direction at the time of landing? What did ATC indicate was the minimum landing speed for wind conditions at the airport? What did the aircraft / company manual indicate what minimum approach speeds were for the conditions provided by ATC?

      There's so much wrong with this statement that it makes my head hurt. Who the hell thinks ATC dictates landing speeds? Those are determined by the pilots. If you asked ATC what your approach speed should be, they'd laugh you out of their airspace.

  9. My guess is bomb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reason why it would be a bomb is that the plane disappeared from radar without sending message to controllers. Thus the breakup of the plane is so quick that pilots couldnt send message. Only thing that can cause quick breakup of whole plane is a bomb or missile. And bomb is more likely.

    Also they think there is two unknown persons on board with false passports. Maybe they never boarded the plane or left too early, and werent in the plane when it crashed. False passports sounds exactly like what is needed to get bomb on board.

    1. Re:My guess is bomb... by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      Every time a plane goes down suddenly a terrorist bomb is always the first thing suspected. That's despite the fact that only one bomb has ever brought down a commercial plane

  10. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Informative

    As there is no American aboard that plane, move along, there is nothing to see here ...

    Not so. There were three Americans in the group of 239 that died on that flight.

    The premise of your comment is ignorant.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  11. You gotta understand ... by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... from a probability perspective it seems highly unlikely that a plane would disappear from radar precisely at the time that a data transponder stopped sending position fixes, unless, you know, the plane crashed right there ...

    You are talking from a perspective of a Western folk who has no idea what is going on in other parts of the world.

    The airplane belongs to the Malaysian Airline System (MAS). The plane took off from the KLIA airport, again, of Malaysia. That radar which did the tracking (actually there were 4 radars doing the tracking) were all operated by ... Malaysians.

    Furthermore, the pilot and first officer of that plane were from Malaysia.

    Everything points to the same thing - Malaysia - a country whereby RACE means everything.

    That pilot is a Malay. The first officer is also a Malay. Both of them graduated from MARA college, a college which has produced the kind of graduates that the private sectors of Malaysia do not want to hire.

    The reason is simple:

    Graduates from the MARA college (now promoted to become a "university") are all from the Malay race (you need to be a Malay before you can enroll into that college, btw) - which essentially means ... MARA takes in people who are NOT qualified to go to college any where else, and award them college degrees even if they can't do anything right.

    In such context - your "probability perspective" will never work as the whole thing is so skewed out of whack.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:You gotta understand ... by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

      the MARA college which produces graduates that the Malaysian private sector itself has steadfastly refuse to employ.

      The private sector may refuse to employ people out of sheer dumb prejudice too. Historically it has and many businesses still do, even in liberal nations.

  12. No problem taking liquid on board by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    In Indonesia as well as in Malaysia I myself have carried out "experiments" when I board a plane.

    I put plastic bottles (some time one, some time more than one) and filled them up with liquids, and then put them into my luggage and also carry on luggage.

    They let me pass. No problem.

    And as I have mentioned in another comment - I have seen with my own eyes that the airport security officers let people (supposedly female) who cover up their face to pass the security checkpoint (without having to reveal their true face) and board the planes (all the while with their face covered).

    That is why I say, in Malaysia and in several other Asian countries, it will be very easy for any terrorist to board the plane.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:No problem taking liquid on board by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Did you also include the large mixing pump system necessary for binary explosives?

      Either a large mixing pump is not actually necessary, or the TSA has been banning the wrong things from all passenger flights for the last ten years.

      Either or both of those things is quite plausible, actually.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  13. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hold on a sec we don't know if they're dead yet. I mean they could have been abducted by aliens you know.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  14. Tech news, much? by jargonburn · · Score: 1
    I dunno. I realize things around here have somewhat changed; hell, I'm pretty new here, anyway. I would rather not be the "is this really news for nerds?" guy. Actually I haven't noticed that slogan printed on this site since certain changes were implemented.
    But while this is newsworthy, hoping that the discourse will evolve into a meritorious discussion of the technologies in use during such flights, the tech and techniques intended to prevent this specific kind of situation, and/or interesting details about the methods/tech used to aid in the resulting search seems a bit optimistic.

    As far as the article goes, there's a lot to be suspicious of...it's certainly not normal to have this happen with everything that goes into making, controlling, and tracking those planes. Still, mistakes and failures occur. I am interested to know what they eventually find.

    1. Re:Tech news, much? by stoploss · · Score: 2

      I dunno. I realize things around here have somewhat changed; hell, I'm pretty new here, anyway. I would rather not be the "is this really news for nerds?" guy. Actually I haven't noticed that slogan printed on this site since certain changes were implemented.

      Actually, the mandatory on-topicness for tech news on Slashdot died on 11 Sep 2001. That topic got thousands of posts from "the audience" (*cough*), and tech relevance forever after took a back seat to potential ad impressions for proposed content.

      I know, I know, people always point to the "...stuff that matters" part of the slogan. However, that's a retcon construction, as proven by the fact that the content was on-topic for years before they chose to digress. It's like how the U.S. Constitution is basically now encompassed by the "General welfare means the federal government has an unlimited mandate to do whatever they want" and "everything is interstate commerce" retcons while practically everything else in the document is considered optional.

      I guess it's refreshing that Dice ditched the slogan, since it hasn't been applicable in years.

      Fuck Beta.

  15. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, alien abductions only seem to happen to the most stupid people you ever meet. There were way too many smart people on the plane to have the alien encounter (cause aliens are scared of smart people).

  16. Re:Uh, doesn't every company? by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

    OK Try IBM. Worked for them in the 90's, some of us got flown out from the UK to a recognition event in San Diego. There must have been 30 of us on the same flight. They tried to get the other 20 making up the same party on the same flight but it was full.

  17. Re:Uh, doesn't every company? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    OK Try IBM. Worked for them in the 90's [...] There must have been 30 of us on the same flight. They tried to get the other 20 making up the same party on the same flight but it was full.

    Was IBM doing one of their so-called "Resource Actions" at the time . . . ?

    Did your manager look surprised when you returned from the event . . . ?

    Bond Villain Voice: "Ah, Mr. IBMer! . . . I wasn't expecting you . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  18. Re:Stolen passports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's a big deal for a struggling semiconductor company like Freescale to lose that much talent in one go.

    It has been suggested on al-Jazeera that the two in question were Iranian terrorists and that this was a terror attack to retaliate against US sponsorship if Israel's program of assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists.

    That's the link to be explored here.

  19. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, alien abductions only seem to happen to the most stupid people you ever meet. There were way too many smart people on the plane to have the alien encounter (cause aliens are scared of smart people).

    Also, all alien encounters seems to be limited to what US government can cover up, the aliens doesn't seem to be interested in the rest of the world.

  20. Re:Uh, doesn't every company? by _merlin · · Score: 1

    Really? A trading company I worked for would routinely have 20-50 employees on the same flight for company-sponsored weekends away.

  21. Re:Stolen passports? by Megane · · Score: 1

    It's up to four or five now, which is certainly enough to hijack a plane. However, I have also heard that the pax with stolen passports were flying onward to Amsterdam, and supposedly drug smugglers like to go in packs, so it's also possible that these were just drug smugglers.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  22. Re:Stolen passports? by Megane · · Score: 1

    That sounds rather farfetched. Terrorists blowing up a Malaysian plane traveling to China because the US and/or Israel are killing Iranian scientists? Seriously? In case you haven't heard, China has been having a bit of a terrorism problem of its own lately, which makes a lot more sense.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  23. Re:Uh, doesn't every company? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    I haven't heard of a single company that doesn't have limits on how many employees can travel with the same aircraft/bus/hovercraft/whatever. It's simple, quite cheap risk management.

    A previous company I worked with put 180 of the 250 employees on the same flight to a company gathering - the other 70 came by another plane. Even at say a max limit of 40 you'd need seven planes instead of two and when each route has one plane/day either you need to fly them in stages or fly to other nearby cities and have them shuttled in, it would be a huge logistics nightmare. And I don't know any company I've worked for that wouldn't load up a rented bus full of employees. I think the alternative would be to never, ever go offsite with your employees for any meeting, never arrange any social gathering with organized transport and I think such a company would quickly die because people don't want to work there. YMMV.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  24. Have you check all other International Airlines ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1, Informative

    That maybe true but they operated internationally

    Tell you what ...

    You go try checking with other International Airlines ... and here is a short list of International Airlines that you can call up or write to ...
     
    Singapore Airline, or Cathay Pacific, or Dragon Air, or United Airways, or British Airways, or American Airline, or Quantas

    Go check with them exactly how many of their Pilots and/or First Officers were graduates of the MARA college.

    Go check now, and then come back and tell us how "international" the MARA graduates are.

    The truth is, out of the hundreds of airlines all over the world, only TWO airlines employ graduates from MARA as pilots / first officers.

    One is MAS, and its subsidiaries.

    The other is AirAsia, and its subsidiaries.

    Only these two airlines are reckless enough to employ graduates from MARA as pilots / first officers.

    As for the others ... why are they not hiring MARA graduates ? Why ???

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  25. Sepang F1 GP... by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Malaysia - a country whereby RACE means everything."

    Thats in 3 weeks time, and since everything in Formula 1 is different this year who knows whats going to happen

  26. Re:Previous /. story by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    Nice try, but the captain has been flying commercial jets since the early 1980s, according to the BBC.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  27. Yay slashdot! by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    Hey, look! Slashdot mods as informative racist rants against Malaysians!

    I know we're a bit of a groupthink crowd, but seriously. Stop. Just stop.

    1. Re:Yay slashdot! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Informative

      I see we have never been to Malaysia.

      I remember the first time I was in Kuala Lumpur, I was shocked to see newspaper ads for apartments that openly declared "Chinese only" or "Malay Muslim woman only, 18-25" or some such. The racism is all out in the open and codified in law. Every citizen's mandatory ID card has a field for race and religion. Race is there because different people's votes count differently come election time, and religion is there so that when you're eating during the day on Ramadan, when the religious police come into the restaurants you show them and you don't get arrested.

      Did we learn something today? Much better than just ignorantly shouting "RACISM!" at a culture with which we are unfamiliar.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  28. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    ...they could have been abducted by aliens you know.

    Reporter: There's a rumor that your son was abducted by aliens.
    Nathan Arizona: Son, don't print that. If the wife reads it, she'll lose all hope.

  29. Re:Uh, doesn't every company? by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

    Don't think so...would have cost them a fortune as part of benefits package was 9x annual salary payout for death while travelling on company business. Much cheaper just to sell us off to another company and have them do the nasty layoff stuff about 6 years later. Which is what they did.

  30. Re:airplane tracking by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Thanks for this.

    Can I ask some additional questions?

    How it it different with ships? A ship can be in the middle of the pacific and you can track its location, speed and heading online. What technology are they using?

    When you view an aircraft's track on a site like FlightAware, where is the data coming from? Is it guesstimating based on ATC data?

    Why wouldn't an EPIRB work post-crash? Why does a Cessna have an EPIRB but not a 777?

  31. Re:Is called scientific sampling by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    If you guys are so smart, how come you still have PhD's?

    And grad students. Really. Get with the program.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  32. Re:Previous /. story by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Right, because you were in the cabin with him all that time.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  33. Re:Stolen passports? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    That sounds rather farfetched. Terrorists blowing up a Malaysian plane traveling to China because the US and/or Israel are killing Iranian scientists? Seriously? In case you haven't heard, China has been having a bit of a terrorism problem of its own lately, which makes a lot more sense.

    Given the current political climate, I'd be more inclined to believe something along the lines of:

    US Governmental Secret Agencies Destroy Malaysian Flight attempting to show that NOWHERE IN THE WORLD is safe from Terrorist Homosexual Paedophile Cannabis-users who hoard Files Released by Snowden.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  34. Re:airplane tracking by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    FlightAware is coalescing a range of data. In the US they can use a time-delayed FAA radar feeds, feeds from ADS-B receivers, possibly other aircraft originated data (ADS-A/C), and fore-knowledge of the expected location based on filed plans and aircraft speed to date. In Australia there's little radar coverage over the interior or outer sea approaches: ground-based ADS systems are useful but there are significant blind spots and ATC relies on aircraft reports over voice (VHF, HF, sometimes satellite) and projections based on filed airspeed etc.

    Commercial ships can routinely report a GPS location once an hour and it would be useful if the ship suddenly disappeared. They can do that by satellite or HF radio although I don't know the specific system. Ships rarely disintegrate in too short a time to issue a mayday or deploy an ELT. In any case they will be within, say, 20 nautical miles of its last reported location.

    Emergency Locator Transmitters are the aviation device. They use a 406Mhz digital signal uplink to a satellite: the data carries a unique ID registered to the device/aircraft. Most emit a local homing signal on 121 and 243 Mhz that's not useful in a global sense. All have to survive the initial catastrophic event, and subsequent fall to Earth, to be useful. Some are automatically activated/ejected from the the aircraft after severe jolt, some are not. Some are activated by immersion, some are not. All should float if free of other wreckage. None work if submerged (either to receive GPS to get a location, or to transmit it). While certainly useful they are not an infallible system.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  35. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by Kubla+Kahhhn! · · Score: 1

    You have apparently never been to California, where some of the world's brightest minds believe the most irrational nonsense. That goes double for Silicon Valley, where the unfortunate phrase "drank the Kool-Aid" was coined.

  36. Racism still racist by Etherwalk · · Score: 1

    I see we have never been to Malaysia.

    I remember the first time I was in Kuala Lumpur, I was shocked to see newspaper ads for apartments that openly declared "Chinese only" or "Malay Muslim woman only, 18-25" or some such. The racism is all out in the open and codified in law. Every citizen's mandatory ID card has a field for race and religion. Race is there because different people's votes count differently come election time, and religion is there so that when you're eating during the day on Ramadan, when the religious police come into the restaurants you show them and you don't get arrested.

    Did we learn something today? Much better than just ignorantly shouting "RACISM!" at a culture with which we are unfamiliar.

    Actually, racism is still racism even when and if it is openly endorsed by society.

  37. Re:No American aboard ... move along, folks ! by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Silicon Valley, where the unfortunate phrase "drank the Kool-Aid" was coined.

    Strange, I thought that it originated in the Jonestown mass murder-suicide of several hundreds (thousands) of Christian idiots in Venezuela somewhere, in the late 1970s. The group members were given their self-administered poison dissolved in "Kool-Aid", partly to hide it's nature from the many children murdered by their religious parents.

    As the old saying goes - religion poisons EVERYTHING it touches.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"